The drumbeats for war against Iran is a crime against world peace
Posted on March 11th, 2012
A columnist for the progressive Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Israel Harel recently made the point that the instinctive and uncontrolled ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œhatredÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amongst Israelis prevents a rational discussion of a possible military attack on Iran. The primary observation that Netanyahu is a ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œhatedÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ figure in Israel, made albeit in the context of HarelÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s support for NetanyahuÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s conduct during the recent US visit, is a valid one: people dislike him intensely due to his arrogant warmongering and his blatant disregard for human life; his belligerent ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œwar talkÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ during the US visit last week further contributed to such public opinion.
Netanyahu took his combative views on Iran to a White House meeting with Barack Obama and later delivered, in a speech crafted to induce fear, to the already converted audience at the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention; he invoked the Holocaust, asserted that sanctions against Iran have not worked, and declared: ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œAs prime minister of Israel, I will never let my people live in the shadow of annihilation.ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ He asked the US for ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œbunker-busterÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ bombs and refuelling planes that could improve his ability to attack Iran’s underground nuclear sites.
On the matter of invoking the memories of the Holocaust, Netanyahu carefully hid the obvious difference between the modern day Israel, a nation with its own army, and the defenceless European Jewry during time of the World War II: he is obviously milking the ancient Jewish feeling that ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œof the [other] people there was none with meÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢; ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œtherefore my own arm brought salvation unto me; and my fury, it upheld meÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢, to justify an attack on Iran.
The other Israeli saber-rattler, defence minister, Ehud Barak is telling the world that Iran is nearing what he calls a ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œzone of immunityÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢, a vaguely defined point beyond which Iran could potentially produce weapon fuel without fear of an air attack that could wipe out its facilities.
In consistence with the total subservience of the US political machine to Israeli demands, Obama and his surrogates have offered unprecedented military assistance and cooperation to Netanyahu, with the mild plea that Israel not attack Iran this (election) year. Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and US military commanders have claimed that they have drawn up contingency plans for a potential attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The BBC Diplomatic Correspondent Jonathan Marcus has gone as far as undertaking an analysis of ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œhow Iran might respond to an attackÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢!
It appears that the idea of an attack on Iran that once seemed far-off or dangerous has started to gather a sense of inevitability just as in the cases of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libyan invasions: the difference in opinion between the US and Israel appears to be merely a question of timing, with Washington advocating bit more patience.
Opposition to an attack on Iran amongst the more sensible sections of the US and Israeli bureaucracies and wider civic society is being ignored, just as in the case of Iraq and other past illegal invasions.
As an example, Intelligence analysts of AmericaÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s 16 intelligence agencies have affirmed the 2007 intelligence finding, and the 2010 National Intelligence Estimate, that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and there is no hard evidence that Iranian enrichment work includes a weapons program.
The CIA deserves credit here because it is clear that it has learnt from the faulty assessments in 2002 about IraqÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s purported weapons programs: new analytical procedures designed to avoid a repeat includes analysts having access to raw information about the credibility of ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œsourcesÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢, and the requirements that the ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œchain of logicÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ as well as contrary conclusions are featured prominently in classified reports.
ObamaÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s most senior national security officials including chairman of the joint chiefs of staff General Martin Dempsey, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Admiral William Fallon, former commander of US Central Command, and General James Cartwright immediate past vice-chairman of the joint chiefs of staff also have made it clear that they remain opposed to an attack on Iran by Israel.
Amongst leading Israelis who have expressed opposition to a war with Iran is the former Mossad chief Meir Dagan who retired in January 2011: he believes the Iranian regime including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œvery rational one,ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ and therefore regime change or getting the US to attack is a preferable option!
The leading Israeli novelist David Grossman, author of the war epic To the End of the Land, whose son was killed in the 2006 Lebanon War opposes an attack on Iran by Israel or the US, due to the likely consequences of such an attack would be more daunting even than that of Iran building nuclear weapons.
It is crucially important that the world at large reinforce such sensible opposition against this madness, due simply to the damage it can incur on global peace and stability, in addition to the massive economic sabotage of poor countries it will cause through inflated oil prices. Also, the war talk is illegal.
It is rarely mentioned in the corporate media that the ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œtalkÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ of an impending military attack on a sovereign country by a prime minister of another country, Benyamin Netanyahu in this case, is illegal as an ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œact of aggressionÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ under the international law as stipulated in the Un Charter, General Assembly Resolutions and other key instruments.
The Purposes of the UN as stipulated in Article 1 of the UN Charter are:
1.ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2.ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
Article 2, paragraph 4 prescribes that ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œAll Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ Netanyahu is clearly threatening Iran!
NetanyahuÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s talk is also a Crime against Peace defined in Principle VI(a) under the Nuremberg Tribunal, as:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
Obama in particular may do well to remember the words of the chief American prosecutor Robert H. Jackson who stated during the Nuremberg trial, that: ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œto initiate a war of aggression is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the wholeÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢.
In 1951, after long delays caused by the former colonisers, the International Law Commission provided a tentative definition of aggression as ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œ the use of force by a State or Government against another State or Government, in any manner, whatever the weapons used and whether openly or otherwise, for any reason or for any purpose other than individual or collective self-defence or in pursuance of a decision or recommendation by a competent organ of the United NationsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢: in effect, use of force is limited to self-defence and UN sanctioned operations. In 1974, the UN General Assembly, by Resolution 3314, declared that ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œwar of aggressionÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ constitutes a crime against peace and States would be held responsible for acts of aggression.
Needless to say, the 2001 criminal invasion of Afghanistan was dishonestly framed around the concept of self-defence, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq and 2011 Libyan invasions around the concept of deceptively obtained UN Security Council ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œapprovalsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ in order to qualify under the only exceptions provided under international law.
In further proof of the total disregard by top UN executives (US ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œlapdogsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢) of the founding principles of the UN and the international law, Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) appears to keep on providing ammunition to Netanyahu and the hawkish sections of the US system: recently he ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œrefused to rule outÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ that Iran may be trying to remove evidence of suspected research relevant to atomic bombs from a military site; it is no wonder that according to Wikileaks revelations, Amano was described by the US mission in Vienna as ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œDG of all states, but in agreement with usÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢.
The basis of the IAEA report was that for the first time, Iran had begun producing fuel inside the new facility known as Fordo, under 250 feet of granite in a mountain near the holy city of Qum: the existence of this facility was known at least since 2009! Also, Iran is charged of denying IAEA officials (not Inspectors) access to the Parchin military site near Tehran.
Examination of facts regarding AmanoÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s (and US) complaints against Iran and the Iranian responses (which go unreported) bear witness to the theory that the IAEA chief is doing all he can to ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œpick a fightÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ with Iran so that a pretext for Israeli and American bombing raids is put in place.
The long and the short of the story is that Iran is producing nuclear fuel enriched to 20 per cent purity because they require such fuel to replenish a nuclear reactor used to make medical isotopes: Iran has a legal, sovereign right (even though Israel or the US may not like it), to produce such fuel which is vastly different from that of 90 per cent purity needed for weapons.
For years, the Iranians have been denying IAEA allegations, raised at the prompting of the US and Israel, of ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œpossible military dimensionsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ of the Iranian program: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the countryÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s supreme leader himself has explicitly ruled out producing a nuclear weapon.
In any case, it defies common sense to fear that the Iranians could produce a nuclear weapon that is so precise in its impact that Israelis will be harmed, without injuring the Palestinians living in the West Bank and the Gaza and other Arabs or Muslims who live in this congested region!
IranÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢s refusal sometimes to allow IAEA ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œInspectorsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ access to their highly sensitive facilities such as Parchin is also well founded: inspectors have visited Parchin twice in 2005 and found nothing and Iran accuses the IAEA officials of leaking the names of its nuclear scientists who were assassinated by Mossad, the latest in January.
In view of these facts, it is clear as to why Iran is rejecting Israeli and Western accusations that it has nuclear ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œambitionsÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢ (an euphemism meaning a covert bid to develop atomic bombs), and is dismissing such suspicions as ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œridiculous ÃƒÆ’Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â and ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œchildishÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚Â¢.
The agenda of the UN and its agencies, and that of the highly paid UN executives such as Ban ÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚Â¬Ãƒâ€¹Ã…â€œKi moon, Navaneethan Pillai and Yukiya Amano these days appears to be almost exclusively dedicated to bringing to task the member countries and national leaders the US, UK France axis do not like. While the shameless corruption involved in this practice is abundantly clear, it causes further damage to the world due to the distraction of the UN from its core functions stipulated in the UN Charter.
Countries like Sri Lanka who are also at the receiving end of such corrupt conspiracies need to stand up alone and collectively with other developing countries at UN forums.