The United Nations : A Christian Western Agenda to rule the World
Posted on March 9th, 2014

Shenali D Waduge

The United Nations was formed by 51 states in 1945 following World War 2 that led to 55million deaths. UN comprises 193 member states, 45,000 employees and 35 associated organizations. However, this so called ‘peacekeeping’ body has failed miserably in keeping peace around the world. 83 different conflicts around the world proves this and the root of these conflicts all lead to some involvement (direct /indirect) to the US and its Allies bringing us to ask what has the UN done against the violations being community with impunity by the US? It has reached such a laughable stage that instead of US being taken to task for violations, the US is bringing Resolutions against countries and the UN is assisting the military interventions with UN heads even calling for the arrests of elected leaders whom the US is targeting. Unless and until the rest of the world members of the UN General Assembly unite and stop the charade, the US through the UN will totally ruin the world and its people while based on a notion of ‘anti-Christ’ a new world order is taking shape to deny national governments rule over their nation and people.

The dominance of Christianity is seen in the inscription outside the UN office in New York taken from Isaih.

The domination of Christian beliefs is paving the way for a world government ruled by the UN clearly understood in tying the quotations of various prominent and key organizations together.

The UN is well on its way to establishing a one world government

1.     GLOBAL ONE WORLD COURT – It has already created a global one world court ” plans are afoot to take the rule of law under the UN and away from sovereign governments

2.     GLOBAL EDUCATION SYSTEM – Education ” teaching global citizenship. Attempts to change education system to deny parents to teach patriotic sentiments about their country’s history/civilization etc. Under Julian Huxley’s guidance, the UN prepared a guidebook for teachers. This guidebook was aimed at ‘destruction of a child’s love of country and patriotism is the first step in educating that child for world citizenship. ” A UNESCO study has concluded that patriotism in children occur as a result of home influence and to address this the strategy to be adopted and promoted amongst schools globally is “history and geography should be taught at this age as universal history and geography. The study of history raises problems of values which are better postponed until the pupil is free from the national prejudices which at present surround the teaching of history’. We can now understand how UN has influenced national education systems to omit the country’s history from text books so that children are not made aware of the past wrongs that the Christian colonial nations committed and the historical civilization that individual countries should be proud of. If leaders of nations claim to be national, it behoves them to immediately address this issue. For in taking away nationalist sentiment it is the leaders who will invariably lose out and they will discover sooner than later that the days of reigning power of its subject will soon be over when everything comes under UN jurisprudence.

3.   GLOBAL ECONOMIC ORDER ” A one government order needs power to monopolize the money and food distribution. This will bring governments to their knees. Thus the UN plans through its international conferences and special sessions to call for a new international economic order. The new economic order has to control the food supply systems for which the FAO, WHO, UNDP, UNICEF, World Bank are all working on. They are trying to control the food supply chain under the pretext of helping bridge world hunger. The New Economic International Order was established in 1974 at a special session of the UN General Assembly. Member nations would have been clueless to understand the real gameplan when they agreed ‘we the members of the United Nations..solemnly proclaim our united determination to work urgently for the establishment of a new economic international order”.

4.   GLOBAL ONE RELIGION ” UN is promoting a new spiritual order, a new cosmic Christ. Religions converging into one is being promoted on the argument that all religions want one thing. However, why should Christianity and its doctrines be the basis of the new global religion especially for religions that do not believe in a God? However in 1995 an Interfaith Conference was held to unite the world’s religions (United Religions Organization). URO is mandated to cooperate closely with UN, its organizations and to complement the UN’s political, diplomatic, social mandates and influence UN policy and support its programs.

Philip Jessup, Council of Foreign Relations member says “national sovereignty is the root of all evil”. Thus, we can see how the UN is using its power to undermine the national sovereignty of nations accusing it of not being able to run its people.

The University of Kent findings reveal that 70% of the NGOs lobbying governments at the UN were Christian/Catholic. Moreover, the Vatican is regarded as a State and becomes the ONLY religion to be given the rights of a State.

The full report: ‘Religious NGOs and the United Nations’, is available by emailing: [email protected].

NGOs can register to have consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Over 3,000 NGOs have consultative status with the UN, enabling them to attend most UN meetings to monitor the negotiations, share information, and advocate their positions with ambassadors and government delegations. NGOs have been very influential at the UN, and have often been at the forefront of encouraging the UN to initiate or move forward on efforts to address the world’s problems. NGOs were instrumental in getting the UN to establish the office of the UN High Commission on Human Rights in 1994, in advancing the concept of the International Criminal Court to try war crimes, and in getting the UN to address women’s advancement and global racism through world conferences. UN conferences and human rights treaties bring international pressure to bear on governments and are used by human rights activists worldwide to affect change. Another sign of the growing influence of NGOs is the fact that they are often invited to serve in an advisory capacity on government delegations at UN meetings. US is pushing its Christian Right agenda at every opportunity throughout the UN system while claiming to be a secular ‘multicultural’ state.

The amounts that the US Government allocates to Christian NGOs via USAID is evidence of this too. 50 out of the 55 men who framed the US Constitution were professing Christians. 11 of the 13 States required faith in Jesus Christ and the Bible as a qualification to hold public office. The Constitutions of the 50 States acknowledges and calls upon the Providence of God for the blessings of freedom.

The path to a new one world order becomes relevant in the UN Agenda 21 excerpts reveal:

Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.” ….. 

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.” 

This UN Agenda was signed in 1992 by 172 member nations in Rio de Janeiro and was prepared by the UN Environmental Program.

We may think that this program is to create ‘sustainable societies’ but it is far from so. Under the banner of saving the earth, Agenda 21 seeks to control governments, control the way we eat, learn, communicate and live. Through this agenda, they can limit water, electricity, transportation, even deny access to parks and wildlife. The plan is to have all lands and people come under the UN.

Plans are afoot to control the air and sea and once that is controlled the ground war is easy. Agenda 21 attempts to regulate everything under the UN

Aligned to this goal are various programs cunningly being set up and obtaining the approvals of Governments and officials who are clueless about what they are signing.

Agenda 21 seeks to create a one-world government under false charade of a man-made global warming crisis, while the Earth Charter is working on a one-world religion.

The Earth Charter was launched in 2000 by Mikhail Gorbachev and Steven Rockefeller. The plan is to disseminate the Earth Charter across schools and religious communities.

Mikhail Gorbachev, Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1997:
“Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own environment… My hope is that this Charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a ‘Sermon on the Mount’, that provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century.”

No nation state can exist any longer as a separate island capable of providing in isolation opportunity and security for its people. Local and global security can only be founded on the principles of global partnership and the sharing of sovereignty, leading to the creation of new systems of global governance.” Steven Rockefeller, Ecology, Religion, and Global Governance. Steven C. Rockefeller. Prepared for A Symposium on Religion and World Order, Sponsored by Global Education Associates, Maryknoll Center for Mission Research and Study, and Fordham University Institute on Religion and Culture. May 3-7, 1997

UN to Propose Planetary Regulations of Water and Food (March 2012)

Earth Day wrongly emphasizes idolatry

The UN Plan For Running The World: Global Carbon Taxes, Global Safety Nets And A One World Green Economy (May 2012)

io20: Why Africans (and the world) Should Fear European Elite’s Green Agenda (April 2012)

UN Seeks New Powers to Remake World at Rio Sustainability Summit (April 2012)

Obama’s Plan to Control and Regulate the Oceans (April 2012)

A close look at the UN functioning and the dominating presence of various and varied Christian movements goes to show some innate belief in an anti-Christ ” whatever reasons or beliefs they may have such should not be absorbed into a global framework of nations and people who do not all believe in Jesus or even a God and countries and people who have long civilizational histories which UN has no right to annihilate through bogus education programs as we see happening. We now realize that the current insistence and the projection of the lack of rule of law is in order to deny Governments the right to run their nations and to cunningly bring that under UN jurisprudence.

A closer look at the UN Agenda 21 should make people realize that elected Third World Governments need to wake up to the ground realities. Their corrupt behaviors which the First World allows and encourages are with the hidden agenda to be used against these countries to say that countries do not have proper rule of law and their economic systems are crumbling because of corruptions.

Therefore, a summit of Third World nations need to be immediately set up to review these agenda items and together these nations must withdraw from them. Third World nations are also encouraged to look at a new economic order that will be controlled by them in an equitable way so that the current globalist tendency for a handful to run off with the loot does not occur. There are many ways that the Third World can respond to the UN and its indomitable plan and the time has come to start the ball rolling before they realize too late that their nations have been taken over and unknowing to them they have signed UN programs that have given approval for the UN to rule over their nations.

19 Responses to “The United Nations : A Christian Western Agenda to rule the World”

  1. Senevirath Says:

    very few Sri Lankans are keen on learning and reading these things. Others like this govt and Mahinda only because they are now safe without bombs. — not interested on other things. It is pathetic
    I know some scholars are trying re write and re teach the distorted history of sri lanka by british..LIKE. MAHA SINHALE WANSA KATHAWA IN SWARNA VAHINI. IT IS FANTASTIC EVERY BODY SHOULD LISTEN TO THAT . But unfortunately
    most of the people are not keen on these subjects they don’t know what happened in the past and what is happening now.
    western new science , school education . economy etc etc are all based on Christian ;;;;CHINTHANAYA””

  2. Marco Says:

    Senevirath you are probably right but then again we Sri Lankans in Sri Lanka are getting accustomed to the re-re-re written history of supposedly experts that future generations are getting rather confused especially with the shenanigans of BBS and the like.

  3. aloy Says:

    I think the Sinhalese people made the fundamental mistake of not knowing who our enemies are; perhaps they are within as from the time of JR.

  4. Lorenzo Says:

    The problem is Tamils have NO history in SL beyond TOBACCO era.

    So they want to TWIST history to lay claim for their FAKE HOMELANDS.

    Mahavamsa is the ONLY real history book. There is NONE other left. Yarlpana Vai- Poi Malai is NOT existing!! So it is OUT.

    The enemies of SL are Tamilians.

  5. AnuD Says:

    Since Roman time, they did it and they are doing it. but, they failed. Why western people have classified them religious – those who believe in Almighty), agonists – those believe in some super power but not in the almighty, Athiests – those who do not believe in any gods, Spiritual – they don’t believe almighty or GOd crap, Instead they believe in spirituality.

    Both Agonists and spiritualists are closer to buddhism.

    Even English Language is mostly Christian. Can we explain Buddhism in English very well and exactly as it is. We can not. As soon as we try to explain it we introduce words that is used to explain Christianity but not the Buddhism.

    On the other hand, Christians leave their marks every where, in the architecture, language, laws and but people are leaving Christianity.

    If you investigate, even United Nations has some buddhist values inserted. Those things came from India as Values of Hinduism (buddhism is part of Hinduism in Hindia).

    Anyway, Lord Buddha did not go behind Kings to spread the buddhism. Instead, Buddha send monks to explain it to lay people where ever they meet. That is how multi faith (far many religions than toda) Maha bharatha and near by Asia became a buddhist Strong hold.

  6. Christie Says:

    It may be but our problem comes from Hinduthwa.

  7. Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha Says:

    The post world war 20th century takes its roots from the Colonial era when Christian nations of Europe created empires which reshaped the world. Out of them the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, French and British Empires stand out. Each in its own way pushed Christian values upon the nations they subjugated. When the Portuguese set out to create a Colonial Empire their nation was in the throes of the Inquisition which was a group of institutions within the judicial system of the Roman Catholic Church whose aim was to combat heresy.

    This fire brand version of the Catholic church went to extreme levels of intolerance towards the lands they conquered and brought with them the Inquisition. India faced the full brunt of it in the area of Goa where every single holy structure that was not Catholic was destroyed and non Christians were subjected to the terrors of that system.

    The Dutch and French were not that better. Under Hollands rule the level of intolerance of pure brutality in Indonesia led to to the mass suicide of members of the Royal families where 600 members first engaged in a final dance and then commited suicide while the Dutch soldiers watched with fascination. It was emblematic of the general treatment of the native Indonesians by the Dutch rulers. France and Spain being of the Catholic faith showed an extreme level of intolerance. When many of these nations finally achieved independence France in particular was merciless, as seen in Algeria, Vietnam, and Morocco.

    But the defining empire was the British Empire whose holdings were a quarter of the world. Its Empire contained both Egypt and India, two of the greatest ancient civilizations. Before the European Colonial Empires India’s GDP was 25% of the worlds economy. When the British left the Indian sub continent India’s GDP hovered around 1% of the world’s economy for many decades.

    During the British Empire the thriving textile industry of India was systematically destroyed and shipped to England, particularly to Manchester. India dropped from being a nation that exported finished textiles to exporting the raw materials of cotton, silk and wool to the mills of Manchester who then sole them back to India. During this time the British also engaged in a reckless movement of peoples. Sri Lanka became victim as the British imported Indian Tamils to work the tea estates they created in Sri Lanka and going by their “divide and rule” concept gave the most lucrative government jobs to the Sri Lankan Tamils which then led to ethnic rivalry after the British gave Sri Lanka her independence. It was even worse for India where the British deliberately used the “Muslim card” as an excuse to divide a nation known for her diversity which by and large coexisted till the exit of the British. Pakistan was not a concept of Ali Jinnah but a concept brought up by the British.

    When the British finally gave India her independence Great Britain made sure that a Muslim state torn out of India, be formed. This alone has pegged India down since her independence as a mini cold war continues in the sub continent. Most of the wars of Africa to Asia have roots to the British Empire. But the most destruction the British did was that she had the power to rewrite history. It is through the British historians that the Western world gets their opinions of the former colonial nations. Biased and racist the British version of history of Asia and Africa continues to define the world organizations created by the (Christian) European nations. From the UN to the UNHRC to the Geneva conference to even the IMF the old bias has shaped the policies of the West.

    But this is changing in the 21st century where the shift of power from the West now allows the former Colonial nations to revise the history written by the British and echoed across the Western world. Now with the rise of China, Japan, India, to the Middle East old twisted concepts are being revised and the organizations set up by the Western world are dying due to a severe case of moral turpitude. No nation will honor any organization whose policies are biased, racist and down right ignorant. That is the problem with the league of nations which ultimately failed and now is the same problem with the UN.

  8. jay-ran Says:

    Senevirath !
    U R wrong my friend!!!
    Every citizen EXCEPT DIRTY SAKKILI TAMILS do not want peace in SL,but V ALL NEED PEACE!!!

  9. Sunil Mahattaya Says:

    Glad Senerath has made a point!- “most of the people are not keen on these subjects they don’t know what happened in the past and what is happening now. Western new science , school education . economy etc etc are all based on Christian ;;;;CHINTHANAYA””
    Shenali’s documentations despite their high content quality are not impartial and some of the percentages involving christians are not that kosher either. The UN comprises of a very cosmopolitan count of various religions and it’s unfair to generalise on the theme.Was there a single Buddhist who went to cleanse and care for the lepers at the Leprosy mission or teach an incredible variety of disciplines to poor children at many Catholic convents often free of charge or carry bedpans in hospitals ~Nooooo ! Never!!our Sinhalese wouldn’t hear of these! So lets forget castigating Christians and Christianity and stop sounding like a never ending echo of lament and take the good with the bad as far as Christianity is concerened remembering that all religious teachings attest to goodness and the truth with the exception of Fundamentalist Islam which believes the one goes to heaven if Jihad is maintained through killing in its name’s sake.The UN would probably welcome an inscription similar to the one depicted, of Lord Buddha’s noble teachings inscribed on a wall outside the UN building.Probably a good assignment for the Administration to move on as it would surely get a very positive response including one from Ban Ki moon and Navi Pillai who just might be inspired towards upholding the salient truth rather than unsubstantiable lies!

  10. Nanda Says:

    Please withdraw the statement,
    “Was there a single Buddhist who went to cleanse and care for the lepers at the Leprosy mission or teach an incredible variety of disciplines to poor children at many Catholic convents often free of charge or carry bedpans in hospitals ~Nooooo ! Never!!”.
    This statement is mere speculation based on personal knowledge than facts.
    Besides few unknown Buddhist monks, many non Lankan Buddhist have done such work.
    I agree Shenali’s may not be 100% accurate but your is worse.

    Are you aware of so many Buddhist monks donated kidneys to various needy people regardless of race or religion ?
    I know a few and at least one monk donated to a Catholic lady, who still remains Catholic.

    Your statement is deplorable.

  11. Sunil Mahattaya Says:

    how can speculation be offset against personal knowledge.You should have used the word conjecture onstead of sounding confused!.
    There is no contestation of the good and evil of Buddhists or Buddhist priests here as a majority of them are meritorious and follow the teachings of Lord Buddha but you truly amaze me by your reference to non Lankan Buddhist monks where your interpretation of the good they have done seems to have a strange leaning towards the fact that they are non Lankan.I know what Im talking about when I say that the Catholic nuns did menial work and carried out duties others would not dream of doing and the manner in which they embellished the education system by the work they did selflessly yet were thrown out by indiscriminate regimes.Your objections seem to even suggest that Mother Teresa’s work in Calcutta might have been equitably done by others around her which was simply not true. Is this a shamefaced attempt to justify what was not done but should have been done where a degree of guilt remains?You seem to have taken the gist of what I was implying out of context and are attempting to make this a Buddhist Christian issue which is not what I was implying at all regardless of how you may interperet it.And you seem to have conveniently avoided my cross reference to tolerance and had the audacity to suggest that my opinion which is what it was based on fact and first hand experience as deplorable.
    Where are you coming from?

  12. Nanda Says:

    I made no reference to “non Lankan Buddhist monks “, I said non-Lankan Buddhist, there are a lot doing various deeds in Africa, India and many places. I do not deny mother Tersa’s work and a lot of other non-Buddhist’s work although there are a lot of controversies around Mother Teresa too.
    I am singling out part of your comment , which obviously is not true and it hints and belittles a lot of good work done by Buddhists all over the world , thus it is deplorable.

  13. Nanda Says:

    You said ,
    “Was there a SINGLE BUDDHIST ……………….or teach an incredible variety of disciplines to poor children at many Catholic convents often free of charge or carry bedpans in hospitals ~Nooooo ! Never!!”.”

    I am simply telling you that many good deeds which you mentioned in that statement were done and being done by various Buddhist in various parts of the world. Your that statement is an insult to those good people. Up to you to accept or reject. I have no more arguments here.

  14. Sunil Mahattaya Says:

    No more arguments Nanda I respect your sensitivities and Im sure you are someone who practises what you preach.This is not a wrestling match to establish the credibilities of Buddhists and Christians buit simply an objection to the core issue at hand that the UN according to Shenali W is a Christian Western Agenda to rule the world which is her opinion and not a general consensus towards denigrating Christianity.This was what I took offence over as it is a very irresponsible statement to make.I stated quite emphatically that the UN is a very cosmopolitan organization of a compendium of religions which unfortunately has the sponsorship of the USA where if the argumnt spills over further there wiill be conclusions that the USA being a non Buddhist Country seeks Christian domination over the world.This is of course an entirely different issue with so many variables that we could argue till the cows come home yet never reach conclusive closure.I think we should let it go and let the powers that be resolve related issues.You might also want to ponder upon Senevirath’s comments which prompted my initial response as they seem to make a lot of sense logically, rationally as well as historically.
    Thank you.

  15. Lorenzo Says:

    This is NO personal attack.

    There are MANY Buddhist monks who work with drug addicts, criminals, prisoners, poor villagers, the suicidal, etc. trying to better their lives. I have heard of many.

    But I agree there are some Catholic sister groups that SPECIALISE in looking after the VERY SICK. Their service MUST be commended. Hope they do it for HUMANITY and NOT to spread the faith.

    UN is a disgrace to that verse. SL police should not be an insult to its great motto.

  16. Fran Diaz Says:

    Sri Lanka is being exploited through a LABOR PROBLEM. Labor is an important component of the creation of Wealth, the Money Market & Profits (basic Economics). It is all about Money & Power as an added bonus.

    Here are the facts :

    * Sri Lanka has been FORCED to absorb huge numbers of FOREIGN LABOR (Tamil) FROM THE TIME OF COLONIAL RULE.

    * Colonists brought in FOREIGN LABOR (Tamil) to man their coffee, tea, tobacco plantations.

    * Colonists found obedient Caste bound Tamil FOREIGN LABOR from Tamil Nadu. to be far cheaper and more amenable than local indigenous labor.

    * Ex-Colonists will always side with the IMPORTED FOREIGN LABOR (Tamil).

    To stabilise Lanka :

    * Stop importing FOREIGN LABOR. Deport all ILLEGAL MIGRANTS from anywhere.


    * If Lanka is to IMPORT Labor, then do so as other Democracies do. Make the whole issue Public. Have proper Laws in place for Import of Labor. Have Labor Laws to govern imported Labor. They must pass a test of knowledge of the Language of the Land, have some knowledge of the proper History of Lanka, come with some funds, etc., as done in other Democracies.

    If needed, the Government of Sri Lanka must import LABOR, and not done through some secretive and loose arrangements via various Churches as in the past.

  17. Fran Diaz Says:

    Govern Lanka as done in Singapore. Rule of Law must prevail.

    Or be prepared to play high prices in constant destabilization and constant losses in life and wealth, culture and wellbeing for the indigenous People of the Land.

  18. Fran Diaz Says:

    Also, can someone explain to us what this is about ? Is there any SE Asian country where a Sinhala/Buddhist can walk in and claim Asylum due to some sort of trouble in Lanka ?

    ” Pakistani Christians seek asylum in Sri Lanka
Tue, Jan 7, 2014, 01:22 pm SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.

    Jan 07 (SBS) In recent years, Sri Lanka has been one of the main sources of asylum seekers arriving in Australia. But mainly Buddhist Sri Lanka has its own asylum seeker issue – with an increasing number of Pakistani Christians arriving to claim refugee status.

    Catholic Church leaders say Sri Lanka is now hosting more than 600 asylum seekers claiming to be victims of persecution of the minority Christian community in Muslim-majority Pakistan.
    The Pakistanis are not eligible to work, and are relying on support from Sri Lankan Christians.
    Catholic Church spokesman in Colombo, Father Xystus Kurukulasuriya, spoke to Zara Zaher.

    Read More:: SBS (Source)”

  19. Fran Diaz Says:

    The Northern part of the Catholic church appears to be promoting Tamil illegal migrants into Lanka through Mannar, whilst the Southern counterparts of the same church is currently helping Pakistani Catholic Asylum seekers !

    I am surmising that a lot of such Tamil people came in illegally during the LTTE rule of the North, whilst the Pakistani folk have come in using the ‘visa on entry’ facility of the SAARC countries. Can we afford such hospitality when our own people are in want ?

    The converts to Catholicism in Tamil Nadu are treated as low caste folk, whilst those converted in Pakistan are persecuted. Is Sri Lanka the catchment area to nurture all the converted Catholic folk of the region ? What laws govern Sri Lanka in this respect ?

    It reads like : ‘how to drown Sri Lanka in permanent destabilization by bringing in all the regional SE Asian dissidents who convert to Catholicism’ ? Why do I get the feeling that to some folk Sri Lanka is some sort of FREE board & lodging place to dump all sorts of unwanted folk in the world ? Is it because we are a Buddhist country ? If so, Buddhism & State must be quite separate. Granted that the predominant religion of the land is Buddhism, but Buddhism is not the Law of the Land.

    I am sorry that people are persecuted in various SE Asian countries, but please ! Sri Lanka has enough problems without dumping their unwanted folk on Lanka.

    Why not take these Catholic folk to Italy ?


    Also, can someone explain to us what this is about ? Is there any SE Asian country where hundreds of Sinhala/Buddhist can walk in and claim Asylum due to some sort of trouble in Lanka ?

    ” Pakistani Christians seek asylum in Sri Lanka
Tue, Jan 7, 2014, 01:22 pm SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.

    Jan 07 (SBS) In recent years, Sri Lanka has been one of the main sources of asylum seekers arriving in Australia. But mainly Buddhist Sri Lanka has its own asylum seeker issue – with an increasing number of Pakistani Christians arriving to claim refugee status.

    Catholic Church leaders say Sri Lanka is now hosting more than 600 asylum seekers claiming to be victims of persecution of the minority Christian community in Muslim-majority Pakistan.
    The Pakistanis are not eligible to work, and are relying on support from Sri Lankan Christians.
    Catholic Church spokesman in Colombo, Father Xystus Kurukulasuriya, spoke to Zara Zaher.

    Read More:: SBS (Source)”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2019 All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress