There is no Scientific Evidence that Herbicide Glyphosate Causing Chronic Kidney Disease of Multi-Factorial Origin (CKD-mfo) in Sri Lanka
Posted on July 6th, 2014


Glyphosate mol-1

Glyphosate molecule

In spite of the pressure to ban glyphosate from Sri Lanka, the Government firmly rejected it at the recommendation of the Pesticide Technical Advisory Committee.  There is an assumption that this broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate, (used to known as Roundup, but now sold under a variety of trade names) may cause chronic kidney disease of uncertain aetiology (CKDue/uo).

However, this consideration was promoted on a hypothesis written in an article, which lacks any evidence for such claims.  There are major criticisms of both, supporters and opponents of glyphosate story; being non-scientific and biased.  The author takes neither side and the comments below are based on scientific data available to-date.

It has been known for several years that glyphosate forms heavy metal-complexes, making it insoluble.  Similarly, the measurement of free glyphosate and its complexes in water has been performed in several countries for many years.  The maximum permissible levels of glyphosate in water within the European Union and United States are 0.2 and 0.7 ppm, respectively.

The article in question hypothesizes that glyphosate forms chemical bonds with heavy metals, forming compounds that persist in drinking water until they are broken down in the kidneys and that the “glyphosate metal complexes” in the water are the cause of CKDu.  However, authors have not provided any evidence or data to support it.  There is, hitherto, no published analytical data on the levels of glyphosate in water anywhere in Sri Lanka.  Therefore, until at least such data is available and some evidence that it is linked to renal failure in humans, this hypothesis must remain rejected.

Full chemical structure of glyphosate

Full chemical structure of glyphosate

What is glyphosate?

Worldwide, glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine is the most commonly used herbicide (a weed killer).  To date, no scientific data from any country indicates that, when used as prescribed by the manufacturers, it causes renal failure in human.  Glyphosate may have other toxic effects, but compared to many other commonly used pesticides and herbicides, it is a relatively safe compound.  There is no doubt that no agrochemical is totally safe.  In this regard, the wise words of the father of pharmacology, Professor Bombastus Paracelsus, come to mind: “all substances are poisons, there is none which is not a poison; it is the dosage and the exposure that differentiates a remedy form a poison.”

Glyphosate use:

Glyphosate, has been used successfully as a weed control agent worldwide, for the past several decades (please see:  Globally, it is perhaps the most extensively used herbicide.  It has been used in Sri Lanka since the 1980s, but in the North Central Province (NCP) only since early 2,000.  However, patients with Chronic Kidney Disease of multi-factorial origin (CKD-mfo) have been reported several years before the introduction of glyphosate to the region.  Despite the concerns of the potential adverse effects of agrochemicals on the environment, modern agriculture continues to dependent on these to meet the world’s increasing food demand. 

In addition to its use in agricultural fields, glyphosate has been approved for the use on grass pastures, in forestry and in sensitive habitats in many countries including the United States and the European Union.  It is even approved for clearing railway tracks and for use in surroundings areas of rivers and lakes in some countries.  Thus, glyphosate is used almost every.

In Sri Lanka, glyphosate is used most intensively in plantation crops (not necessarily in the paddy fields in NCP), especially in tea fields, where it is sprayed three or four times a year.  This is in comparison to the paddy cultivations, where it is sprayed approximately twice a year; once every cultivation season.  The high cost of manual weeding and acute labour shortages have made the tea industry, in particular, dependent on glyphosate for weed management.

The use of glyphosate to kill weeds

The use of glyphosate to kill weeds

Apart from it being a cheaper and a practical way of managing weed, its role in mitigating soil erosion is substantial.  In the past, before herbicides came into use in tea plantations, weeding was done manually by scraping weeds with mammoties or with scrapers (sorandiya), which loosened the soil causing significant erosion and loss of fertile top soil.  If for some reason glyphosate is banned, there are no equally effective and less toxic herbicides to replace it.  Moreover, any chemical substitution of glyphosate is likely to be worse.  Nevertheless, there is no question that the proper amount and correct use of all synthetic agrochemicals must be propagated and are essential to mitigate environmental pollution and health hazards.

Mechanism of action of glyphosate:

Glyphosate inhibits aromatic amino acid synthesis in plants.  Consequently, weeds die of “protein starvation,” because of their inability to synthesize essential aromatic amino acids and thus plant proteins.  This particular enzyme pathway and mechanism of action is not present in animals or humans (i.e., this effect is plant specific), making glyphosate relatively safe for other living beings.

Glyphosate molecules avidly bind to most cations in the soil such as calcium, magnesium, zinc, and ferric ions, and to clay particles.  Once bound, there glyphosate loses the “weedicidal” activity or toxicity.  The generated relatively large insoluble matrices containing inactive glyphosate complexes neither leach into the water nor are available for plants.  Glyphosate binds to these abundant soil cations like calcium with higher affinity than with arsenic and cadmium (heavy metals), making very little amounts of complexes with the latter two heavy ions.

After binding to soil particles, glyphosate complexes are broken down into three harmless components by microbes, making them nontoxic to the environment.  The reported median half-life of glyphosate in the soil is approximately 47 days.  In water, it varies from a few days to three months, depending on the water hardness and other environmental conditions.  Because it rapidly binds to cations such as calcium, and the half-life of free glyphosate in hard water is low, its availability to living beings is minimal.

Proposed ban on glyphosate:

By definition, no synthetic agrochemicals are 100% safe [ ].  Therefore, to safeguard farmers, the environment, and the public, and for cost-effective usage, only the necessary amounts of fertiliser should be released to farmers as recommended by the manufacturers and the agricultural research and extension institutions based on local soil testing data.

Banning glyphosate would badly affect agriculture, increase the cost of agricultural production, and decrease agricultural output and returns for the farmer, and a higher food costs for the consumer.  Most importantly, such a ban will not reduce the incidence of CKD-mfo in the country.

CKD causes and confusions:

A number of agents and toxins have been postulated as causes of CKD of multi-factorial origin (CKD-mfo; also known as CKDu, CKDuo, and CKDue/a, etc.).  The use of the term, CKD-mfo is appropriate, as multiple factors and toxins seem to come together to precipitate this deadly disease.  Identifying it with one component or for that matter even with agrochemicals (without scientific, causative data) may mislead and divert the attention and research from “true cause(s)” (open mindedness) of this deadly disease.

The proposed causative agents include heavy metals (cadmium, arsenic), fluoride, algal toxins, agrochemicals, hard water, and ionicity (solutes in the water), leptospirosis, some Ayurvedic drugs, locally grown tobacco and illicit liquor, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (pain killers), inadequate water intake (chronic dehydration), and others (for detail, please visit; ).  Nevertheless, evidence supporting any one of these agents as the cause of this CKD-epidemic is inadequate, as even the World Health Organization CKD-Group’s 2013, final report is non-conclusive.

Although the said article’s hypothesis states that glyphosate metal complexes in hard water are the cause of CKDu (for which there is no scientific data), these complexes are mostly insoluble, which makes them less available and less toxic to living beings.  Even after extensive use of this chemical worldwide for over four decades, there is no medical or scientific evidence that glyphosate causes CKD-mfo.  If glyphosate causes kidney failure in humans, many American and European farmers should have been affected by this kidney disease.  This is not the case.

In addition, the period in which glyphosate use was introduced in Central America, Southern Europe and other regions of the world from where CKD-mfo/CKDuo patients are reported, does not coincide with this epidemic in those areas: i.e., the CKDu epidemic has been present, even before the introduction of glyphosate, just as in the NCP in Sri Lanka.  This point alone makes it highly unlikely that glyphosate (or hard water for that matter, which has been present in the NCP area for centuries) is the cause of the current kidney failure epidemic occurring in dry zonal regions in certain equatorial countries, one of which is the CKD-mfo epidemic in NCP in Sri Lanka.

Glyphosate-metal complexes are less toxic and unlikely to cause kidney failure:

Scientists worldwide have reported the formation of glyphosate metal complexes for many years (this is not new information).  Several Sri Lankan scientists have written to The Island, disproving the conjecture that these metal complexes could cause CKD-mfo based on the simple chemistry principle that these heavy metal-chelates are insoluble or markedly less water-soluble.  Consequently, the absorption via the gastrointestinal track or the skin is “minimal,” especially in the presence of hard water (please see and

Because of nature of these large glyphosate-ion complexes, it increases the half-life of glyphosate by a few weeks in farm soils.  However, simultaneously, it inactivates glyphosate activity and decrease the likelihood of soluble (free) glyphosate contaminating water sources.  Therefore, in the presence of hard water, glyphosate becomes less available for contaminating water and less toxic than in soft water.  Ironically, the manufacturers of glyphosate are now using surfactants to keep this molecule in soluble (i.e., to prevent the formation of cations/ metal complexes) to increase its herbicidal activity.

No evidence to suggest glyphosate causing CKD-mfo: 

Because glyphosate is a phosphonic compound, oral absorption is remarkably poor in humans.  If a human ingests a small quantity of glyphosate, even under the best absorptive conditions, the gastrointestinal absorption is estimated to be less than 1.0% of the total oral dose.  Both glyphosate and its key breakdown product, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), avidly bind to divalent and trivalent cations in food.  These complexes have minimum or no gastrointestinal absorption.

Even if small quantity of glyphosate is absorbed, as happens with many other environmental toxins (i.e., xenobiotics), it will get detoxified during the first pass through the liver, via a evolutionary liver enzyme system (CYP450).  There is no known physiological way that glyphosate or its complexes can “bypass” the liver and directly damage the kidneys.  Thus, the idea that large glyphosate-metal complexes (need to get absorb first) bypass the liver and “go direct to the kidneys and cause damage” as proposed in the hypothesis is flawed.  On the contrary, under these protective physiological conditions, it is unlikely that the minuscule amount of glyphosate that may enter the human body via the gut, skin, or inhalation, would reach kidneys in sufficient amounts to cause kidney damage.

Distribution and the spread of CKD-mfo hard water in Sri Lanka (DoA) do not co-localize with the distribution of CKD-mfo.

Hard water is not the cause for CKD-mfo: 

The distribution pattern of patients and deaths attributed to CKD-mfo correlate with the rainfall and within certain geographical regions.  In fact, no patient with CKD-mfo has been documented  from the wet zone in Sri Lanka including NuwaraEliya region where farmers use even high quantities of fertiliser.

Moreover, farmers continue to use glyphosate in regions where the water hardness is much higher than that in the most areas within the NCP, such as in Jaffna, Puttalam, Monaragala, and other areas.  Yet, the prevalence of CKD-mfo is far less in these areas.  The distribution of (natural, ground) hard water in Sri Lanka does not coincide with the distribution of the numbers of patients (or clusters of patients) with CKD-mfo (see the attached figure).  Considering all available data to date, the proposed glyphosate-CKD (and hard water) connection is unlikely.

The need for a national science and technology advisory body:

We believe that the Government should not make a hasty decision about matters of national interest based on a mere hypotheses or opinions.  Rather than appointing biased scientists and politicians, the Government should consider appointing a team of reputed unbiased, senior scientists with expertise in these filed(s) scientifically investigate this hypothesis and other claims, and propose evidence-based firm decision and directions on this nationally important matter.

The tea industry in particular and the department of agriculture and the Pesticide Technical Advisory Committee should provide balanced scientific evidence to the above-committee for consideration.  Meanwhile the relevant scientific institutions and ministries, as well as the government have a fiduciary duty to protect the environment and educate the public based on the available scientific evidence, how to prevent this deadly disease, rather than be non-committal.

What is Needed:

Sri Lanka has the Central Environmental Authority and the Pesticide Technical Advisory Committee.  However, it may be time to think whether it would be proper either to (A) strengthen the responsibility, authority and the accountability of these two organisations, or (B) to created a new Authority to control all “Toxic Substances,” in Sri Lanka.  Such a department should focus on not only keeping records, creating right policies, and working as an advisory capacity, but primarily focus on testing all imported and locally produced toxic compounds, agrochemicals, and other hazardous material before these are released to the public, and to monitor their usage and distribution channels.   Accountability and the transparency should include, reporting the summary of findings and actions the new Authority has taken to the parliament on quarterly basis and releasing these data to the public.  The primary function of such an agency should be to proactively protect the public, just like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does in the United States and in Europe.

A National Crisis that Requires Presidential Intervention: 

It is critical that the Government establishes a “CKD-Alleviation Authority,” rather than relying on conflicting recommendations from various advisory bodies and avoid inherent conflicts of interests.  The country needs a firm actions to prevent and eradicate this deadly disease that kills farmers in significant numbers:

This action plan should includes but not limited to, (A) preventing environmental pollution, (B) large-scale public education on this disease and practical ways and means on preventing pollution,  (C) encouraging organic farming, and (D) provision of clean water to everyone in all affected regions at the earliest possible.

In the absence or delaying of such program, that must cover the entire NCP and other affected areas, the deaths due to CKD-mfo and the miseries of the affected families will continue.

9 Responses to “There is no Scientific Evidence that Herbicide Glyphosate Causing Chronic Kidney Disease of Multi-Factorial Origin (CKD-mfo) in Sri Lanka”

  1. Nanda Says:

    “In Sri Lanka, glyphosate is used most intensively in plantation crops (not necessarily in the paddy fields in NCP), especially in tea fields, where it is sprayed three or four times a year. ”

    If this is so, Mahaweli water washing down this poison flown into Kalavewa and then reached NCP since 1980.

    “Even if small quantity of glyphosate is absorbed, as happens with many other environmental toxins (i.e., xenobiotics), it will get detoxified during the first pass through the liver, via a evolutionary liver enzyme system (CYP450). There is no known physiological way that glyphosate or its complexes can bypass” the liver and directly damage the kidneys.”

    If this is true humans can take these poisons daily basis without any health issue appearing !

  2. AnuD Says:

    HEre pesticide use is banned in some municipalities except for pyrithoriods. govts uses integrated pest management extensively. PEsticide use is the last resort.

    Sri lankan use pesticides and make a list of things Sri lankan farmers have destroyed. It is long.

  3. hela puwath Says:

    It would be a great idea if more scientists, specially with opposing views, would contribute articles to Lankaweb about this calamity affecting our poor.

  4. aloy Says:

    The catch in your own words is:
    “After binding to soil particles, glyphosate complexes are broken down into three harmless components by microbes, making them nontoxic to the environment. The reported median half-life of glyphosate in the soil is approximately 47 days. In water, it varies from a few days to three months, depending on the water hardness and other environmental conditions. Because it rapidly binds to cations such as calcium, and the half-life of free glyphosate in hard water is low, its availability to living beings is minimal.”

    What if the microbes also have died due to excessive use of pesticides. These days people complain that the small fish they use to see in little streams have all disappeared. People may have died due to use of pesticides before glyphosate came to Sri Lanka. But now they die in large numbers and up to now nobody has done anything about it except coming out in conflicting views. I challenge those politicians who get elected from these innocent farmers votes continuously to state a single thing they have done up to now to stop people dying. Please Prof. advice GOSL to ban this substance until it is proven that it is safe to use the substance the way our farmers in NCP use it today.

  5. Lorenzo Says:

    So the bottom line is we still don’t have a way to SAVE millions in affected areas!

    Then the problem is HOW to relocate these people away from those BLCK (WORSE) areas. Instead of splitting hairs of this and that, govt. should RELOCATE people to safer areas. The clock is ticking.

    Imagine IF this was a problem in the NORTH! Then the govt., NGOs, IC, etc., would have done many things by now. Because the affected are ONLY SINHALESE no idiot in the govt. does anything.

  6. Nanda Says:

    Now we know Mahaweli Water is contaminated with poisons used in tea estates. All the poison washed away in the catchment of Mahaweli river ends up in Anuradhapura.

    Lorenzo might say send this water to Killinochchi. That is not right.

    Killinocchichi got a brand new Jaffna- Killinochchi Water Treatment Plant ( under construction ?). Tamils are safe.

    Sinhalas in Anuradhapura has town water only. All others drink Mahaweli Water contaminated well water.

    Nevertheless, why use Roundup at all ?

  7. aloy Says:

    I posted here sometime ago the summary of a comprehensive study done by four Sri Lankan medical doctors on CKDu which was published in Ceylon Medical Journal. According to the report they have found that the areas where affected people lived were always from the lower side of the irrigation channels (ie. they found that the affected people are those who got their drinking water from the channel). This means the contaminated water came from upcountry where they grow tea. Perhaps the Indian labourers have now become lazy and tea estate owners have to use Roundup to clear weeds and in the process our Rajarata farmers dying in large numbers.

  8. Prof.Oliver Ileperuma Says:

    Glyphosate came into use on paddy lands only in 1998 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) was detected even in 1994 and it is an unlikely cause of CKD. Glyphosate use increased only after about 2000 when it became cheaper owing to Monsanto losing its patent rights to manufacture glyphosate and other companies started producing this chemical and sold it at a cheaper price. Earlier cheaper paraquat was used to control weeds. Besides, this disease is widely spread over many parts of Sri Lanka and all over the world and no such effects are evident. Also, it has been shown that glyphosate binds to the first 6 inches of soil only and it is highly unlikely that they can find the way to dug wells. The hypothesis that calcium complexes of glyphosate complexes are responsible for CKD is a fairy tale which has no scientific foundation.

  9. NeelaMahaYoda Says:

    Dear Prof. Oliver Ileperuma
    The truth is that Monsanto developed and patented the glyphosate molecule in the 1970s, and has marketed it as Roundup since 1973. If Monsanto products were available in Sri Lanka since 1970, there is a strong possibility that glyphosate must have entered to Sri Lanka with hundreds of herbicides came into use in tea plantations and rice fields. So your argument has no value.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress