Disgraced Navi Pillay, declared agent of West leaves UN Human Rights Council in shame
Posted on September 1st, 2014

Shenali D Waduge

Accolades will soon pour in from quarters that are fully satisfied with the role played by Navi Pillay in facilitating their agendas. It showcases how UN has been turned into a peace body flooded by puppets and agents of the West who are being used to legally redraw governance of sovereign nations and through UN legislation, remove the governing power held by sovereign nations. Third World, China, Russia and perhaps now India need to realize the gameplan and resolve to address this ground reality. Navi Pillay’s role on behalf of the West has been unprecedented creating precedents outside of the mandate afforded to her. These precedents have been created primarily as a result of sovereign nations sending incompetent representatives not passionate enough to defend their country’s integrity and sovereignty. It is not difficult to benchmark in whose interest the UNHRC has been used during the six years Navi Pillay has held office.

The UN Human Rights Council created by UN General Assembly resolution 60/251 on 15th March 2006 succeeded the UN Commission on Human Rights established in 1946. The position of UN High Commissioners has existed since December 1993. Navi Pillay took over from another disgraced UN High Commissioner Louise Arbor on 1st September 2008.

To add meat to the credentials of Navi Pillay, her function must be exemplary, unbiased and transparent. These were all lacking in her performance not just against Sri Lanka but all the non-Western nations she helped put down. A good look at all statements and actions by Navi Pillay and her office since 2008 will show no actions taken against US, UK or NATO countries. Is it not strange that from the time Navi Pillay took over as UN Human Rights Chief she has not made a single call to investigate US, UK or NATO for their crimes in Afghanistan, Iraq while she called for not only investigation but intervention upon Libya and Syria?

Can she then argue that she has honorably carried out her duties? It will be these countries that would soon shower praises and accolades at the wonderful work she has done and of course they can afford to do so, Navi Pillay has facilitated their agendas to perfection.

Agent for West against Libya

  • Navi Pillay abused office to demonize Gaddafi and son to lay groundwork to facilitate calls for an international intervention.
  • Navi Pillay stands accused of turning a nation without debt, a nation that had $150billion reserves to a nation in anarchy.
  • Navi Pillay used lies of NGO Bouchiguir to suspend Libya from UNHRC so that Libya would not be able to reply to the charges made against it. This meeting which she chaired, she called for the international community to ‘act without delay’ to protect Libyan civilians. After the US-mercenaries created anarchy in Libya she has failed to make any calls to ‘protect Libyan civilians’.
  • Navi Pillay prevented Libya from appointing a new ambassador to the UN and Libya had to use Rev. Miguel D’Escoto Brockman (former Nicaraguan Foreign Minister) but was blocked by US Susan Rice showing how UN and officials have shamed their roles.
  • Navi Pillay without basis referred Libya to the UN Security Council and called ICC to lead an international investigation against Gaddafi and son.
  • Navi Pillay’s lies include quoting casualty figures without verifying truth – She claimed that 250 people had been killed in Libya going on to say widespread and systematic attacks against the civilian population” which may amount to crimes against humanity.” – these were all lies prepared for the intervention by US and NATO.
  • Navi Pillay is morally responsible for destroying Libya. Navi Pillay / the US or Allies have NOTHING to show that Libya is better in ANY WAY after Gaddafi to how the country was under Gaddafi.

Agent for West against Rwanda

  • Rwanda’s civil war was in reality a stage managed conflict as part of US conglomerate foreign policy of gaining strategic and economic advantage in Africa (not for Americans but for the handful of corporate that run America).
  • Navi Pillay is accused of being party to the agenda of the West as she carried out role of President of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
  • Lawyer Justry Patrice Lumumba Nyaberi objected to Navi Pillay as President of ICTR in view of her bias.
  • Navi Pillay and Stephen Rapp prosccutor at ICTR were accused of covering US culpability.

Agent for West against Syria

  • When people congregate and commit money to fund ‘rebels and supply equipment’ there has to be a catch. The plan against Syria was set in early 2011 through ‘Friends of Syria’ initiated by Canada and represented by 70 countries with US committing to provide ‘communications equipment’, Saudi and Qatar pledging large sums o money for regime change and Canada committing $8.5m. Fast forward and when Navi Pillay issues statements on violations of human rights, calls for international intervention, Syria to be referred to the ICC we should all know what was in store for Syria.
  • That plan made sure President Assad who was repelling mercenaries funded by the West was faulted and accused of crimes against humanity and an arrest warrant was issued turning Assad into an international fugitive.
  • Navi Pillay took side of Western-backed rebels most of whom were non-Syrian nationals outsourced from other countries. She chose not to take the side of the legitimate Syrian Government trying to protect the country from rebels using lethal arms supplied by Western Governments. US have admitted sending lethal aid to Syrian rebels.
  • Navi Pillay’s role in Syria regime change alleges her guilt in violating Article 1 and 2 of the UN Charter that says regime change within a sovereign country is a war crime and no one can threaten regime change.
  • Navi Pillay quoted only from casualty figures supplied by foreign-backed Syrian opposition (just like she quoted from pro-LTTE sources against Sri Lanka)
  • Why has Navi Pillay not accused Al Qaeda / Al Nusra and Takfiris arriving from 40 states facilitated by Qatar and Turkey? Why has Navi Pillay not condemned Qatar for spending $3billion for the war in Syria?
  • Why does Navi Pillay not allow sovereign Syria the right to protect its country and its people especially when Syrian people have given overwhelming thumbs up for Assad?
  • The accusation that Navi Pillay functioned as an agent of the West was seen in predicting massacres to take place in Al Oseir 20 days before the events started.
  • When Navi Pillay does not have a mandate to refer countries to ICC why was she allowed to function outside her mandate just like she is functioning outside her mandate on Sri Lanka?
  • The words of the Syrian delegation at UNHRC aptly sums up the bias – ” My country’s delegation inspected the Commissioner’s report and wants to express their deep denunciation and regret at the obvious bias which Pillay practices in her dealing with the events in Syria’. (Faisal Al-Hamwi) / If the High Commissioner’s office isn’t qualified to give documented data, then it’s better for it to remain silent,” / from Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates: It is really strange that she used the UN human and financial resources against Syria, based on lies and calls outside her jurisdiction,” / The Commissioner has rejected to consider the acts of terrorist groups as crimes against humanity, although all standards of identifying crimes against humanity apply to them, and chose instead to level this accusation at the state which is doing its duty in protecting its own people,”

Sri Lanka’s issues with Navi Pillay.

Question of Conflict of Interest

  • Nemo iudex in causa sua implies no one should be a judge in their own cause. A principle of natural justice is that a person should not judge a case in which they have an interest as it would undermine confidence in the process as well as impair the individual’s ability to perform duties and responsibilities. Not only must Justice be done; Justice must be seen to be done. Thus the recusal of judges (required by law under Continental civil law systems and by the Rome Statute, organic law of the International Criminal Court) is imperative for true impartial justice and Navi Pillay should have chosen to judicially disqualify herself from taking part in affairs related to Sri Lanka.
  • Navi Pillay is of Tamil origin and born to a Tamil family who had migrated from Tamil Nadu to South Africa. Tamil Nadu is home to 72million Tamils and first launched a bid to separate from India in the early 1930s. The calls from Tamils for a separate land continue to come from Tamil Diaspora and Tamils all over the world. Therefore, being Tamil is it fair for her to sit in judgment in Sri Lanka’s conflict which revolves around an aspiration to create a separate Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka?  Does her emotional, genetic and ethnic ties being Tamil not stand in the way of unbiased, neutral and impartial judgment? Her lack of appearance of objectivity and neutrality is evident when looking through every statement issued by her in her official capacity against Sri Lanka especially when she quotes extensively from pro-LTTE/LTTE fronts sources. When she visits ‘victims’ who are spouses of former LTTE but does not pay a single visit to the Sinhalese and Muslim victims of LTTE terror this adds to her list of bias
  • Navi Pillay’s Indian Tamil community in South Africa was said to be aligned with LTTE, funding LTTE and secretly operating military camps to train LTTE – these camps were dismantled by President Mandela after consultations with former Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadiragamar.
  • Her February 2014 report calls for an international investigation against Sri Lanka but she has never called for international investigations against military interventions by US and Allies. The pattern of her behavior is not the same.
  • Navi Pillays conclusions on Sri Lanka are arbitrary and selective and she has cared not to provide a single piece of evidence to substantiate her allegations
  • She has never made a single reference to the violations committed by Indian Peace Keepers during their 3 ½ stint in Sri Lanka
  • She can listen with empathy to spouses of dead LTTE leaders but she has no time to travel to other parts of Sri Lanka where LTTE struck terror for 30 years.
  • Her calls for international investigations echoes similar calls against Libya and Syria at the behest of US and NATO and questions the framework that UNHRC is planning for Sri Lanka using the false reports likely to be compiled.
  • She is attempting to polarize communities by creating the image of discord out of isolated cases but not issuing a single statement despite 700 attacks on mosques in UK
  • Navi Pillay is accused of procedural bias for not circulating Sri Lanka’s response to her incriminating report.

There are many Uncle Toms and Aunt Sally’s amongst us. Their backgrounds and living styles are such that they cannot connect to the heritage of the country they have been born into to feel pride or passion to defend their nation. They feel they belong to other foreign cultures and will do whatever to feel belonged to that culture. These people will immediately take offence for accusations made against Navi Pillay because they belong to the same category which is why they would argue in favor of Navi Pillay by explaining why she demanded investigations against Libya and Syria but did not do the same for Iraq and Afghanistan against the US & NATO? Supporters of Navi Pillay must also explain why she lost sleep about 300,000 IDPs immediately following the end of conflict (all of whom are now out of refugee camps 5 years after the end of conflict) while she remains mum on 12MILLION people living as refugees for over 10 years?

Her supporters may also like to answer why she has not taken a single action to investigate international mercenaries who are being used by Western governments to destabilize nations. Her supporters need to also explain why she has not taken action against the West for using and supplying banned chemicals including white phosphorus and sarin gas which these governments have openly admitted. Her supporters may like to also let us know why she does not investigate NGOs and other religious institutes who are foot soldiers for Western regime change and why she has not made any statement on unethical conversions which are an issue for Asia including India. Her supporters need to also tell us why she has not initiate investigations or made calls for such on terrorists who function under charities and NGOs abusing tax-free status to transfer money across the world. Anyone defending Navi Pillay must supply reasons to showcase why the issues mentioned have not been included into the action plan of Navi Pillay during her 6 year term. When Canadian anti-war  activist Ken Stone accuses Pillay of abusing her power to facilitate western intervention and regime change it sums up the argument quite aptly.

The cases referred above are cause for alarm because no one expected Syria to face this calamity but now Syria is in a mess, no one expected a debtless Libya to have its leader publicly killed. No other thought that internal conflicts could be created inside nations to form the grounds for foreign presence/intervention – that’s what happened to Rwanda. Faked documentaries and films are media inducements to fool international public- Syria and Libya are victims and Sri Lanka too. No one thought Kosovo or South Sudan could happen but they did and these are all precedents. Sri Lanka’s international investigation is also a precedent. It is the FIRST time a country is being investigated for a concluded conflict but that investigation covers just 1/3 of the entire conflict. The officer chosen by Navi Pillay had been expelled by the Somali and South Sudan governments for doctoring reports so we can imagine how Sri Lanka’s report will be compiled when they have already declared that they have already compiled necessary details.

Sri Lanka’s leaders need to seriously wonder what is the urgency, time and effort behind 3 Resolutions and a UNHRC investigation and it has to be far more than simply regime change. We need to realize that the puppets are preparing to legitimatize a grievance and from that build up a legal argument for creating a separate state in Sri Lanka (for the moment it will take the form of Eelam but in reality it is not an Eelam for Tamils, at least not for the Hindus). It is good for India to start relooking at the entire scenario.

If it could happen to Syria, Kosovo, South Sudan, Libya, Rwanda and Sri Lanka it could happen to any other country so countries should not be lukewarm in their response. There is a serious flouting of international laws by public officials of the UN and Navi Pillay is just one of them.

Navi Pillay has not done anything for the Non-Western World to be proud of.

11 Responses to “Disgraced Navi Pillay, declared agent of West leaves UN Human Rights Council in shame”

  1. Lorenzo Says:

    During Pee-Illey’s term the world saw MOST brutal and outrageous human rights violations!.

    That is her legacy.

    She was ONLY interested in Tamils because she’s a Tamil.

    Palestinians, Ukrainians, Arabs, Libyans, Egyptians, etc. were ignored.

  2. Nalliah Thayabharan Says:

    Most of us believe that the United Nations is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security and international law. United Nations promotes itself as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the United Nations at the forefront of all international conflict and instability, since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of all the peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.

    U.N a tool of international war criminals was founded by the very financial military industrial elites such as Nelson Rockefeller who arranged for construction of U.N.headquarters in New York and the Rothschild family(famous for the saying ‘the time to buy is when their is blood in the streets and founders of the terrorist religious money laundering state of Israel)) who donated a house to the UN in London during WWII.

    The head of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navanethem Pillay,is a representative of fascist war criminals who invaded Iraq and Afghanistan murdering hundreds of thousands and allowing the U.S.and its allies to coverup and leave uninvestigated those crimes.She vhas never criticized Saudi Arabia, Israel the UK or the US. and the EU and NATO and the financial military industrial elite she represents that have murdered and looted and raped their way from Eastern Europe in the 1990’s to the Middle East since 9/11.She is part of the 9/11 coverup that killed 3,000 people on 9/11 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the Middle East since this time.

    The scumbag Secretary of the U.N. has had the nerve to reside in NY at the time the WTC was attacked by planes coming from Logan Airport Boston that were CLEARLY the responsibility and crime of Israeli goons Menachem Atmon, Ezra Harel and their ICTS International who conveniently never provided or had to provide video surveillance of these monsters boarding flights 11 and 175 under their ‘protection’ and even after this fact continued being employed by the fascist Zionist governments in Europe particularly in the UK and Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam where they were actually responsible for both Richard Reid ‘the shoe bomber’ as well as the 2009 Christmas Muatallab the ‘crotch bomber’ terrorism who was allowed to board flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit with his ‘crotch bomb.’

    Secretary Ban Ki Moon has lied along with ex U.S. U.N. Secretary Susan Rice about Libya’s Gaddaffi supplying his troops with Viagra to ‘rape’ Libyan citizens,something that he never did.The U.N. has in effect occupied U.S.soil and used it to subvert our own government and aid and abett the international financial military industrial complex.Ban Ki Moon sat silent in NY after 9/11 while knowing that W Bush and Dick Cheney regime was sending remains of WTC to Asia including to his own country of South Korea to be melted down to destroy crucial forensic evidence and has taunted doubting Americans without ever acknowledging his shameful role in 9/11 destruction of evidence and collusion with perpetrators.

    United Nations use mainstream media networks, like CNN. CNN is owned by Time Warner, which is owned by JP Morgan Chase and Company and Dodge & Cox Inc, to name a few . It also has a select group of direct holders, like Jeffrey L. Bewkes. Mr. Bewkes sits in the head office of Time Warner’s two towers built in 2001 -buildings purposely built to resemble the once standing World Trade Centers of New York City. Bewkes is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),which is headed and funded by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. In fact a large majority of mainstream media network owners are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), as well as the trilateral commission. Another example of this is Richard D. Parsons. who served as Time Warner’s Chairman of the Board from May 2003 to January 2009. Currently Mr. Parsons is a member of the Board of Trustees and is a Senior Advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation. Frank J. Caufield, another major direct holder of Time Warner Corp, who is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). CNN is owned by Time Warner Corp, which is owned by a number of individuals and corporations that are run by a few families. These families hide behind the corporations they run, using the employees and politicians they hire to do their dirty work. Why we continue to hand our perception of what is happening on the planet to a select few who show no regard for the human race is beyond me. How a human being could have such negative intentions, and create so much conflict through the use of trickery.

    JP Morgan (major institutional holder of Time Warner)/ Rockefeller connections, which also played a big role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1912. So what does all this have to do with the United Nations? Well, the same ones that own all of our mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. All of the same corporations are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, like General Electric. More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.

    The forerunner to the United Nations, was the league of Nations. It was created under the treaty of versailles in 1919 . Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation. At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families. It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.

    The Same Groups That Funded Nazi Germany Created The United Nations? Both Sides of the War Were Funded by the Same Group?

    A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies of planet Earth? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting War time, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.

    Paul M. Warburg, a German-born banker, who was an appointed member of the Federal Reserve System, on the board of governor. Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? He was heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, and his family was heavily involved with I.G Farben. I.G Farben was the largest chemical company in the world during its time, and one of the largest industrial booms next to the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, and General Motors. I.G Farben was responsible forsupplying the Hitler with weapons and even funding Hitler. Why would the federal reserve system and the Rockefeller’s be involved with I.G Farben? Isn’t the federal reserve an American entity? Did they not fund the United States as well? Paul Warburg and his family were involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Warburg family headed I.G Farben, a company that supported Hitler. So what is going on here? There is a lot of evidence to show that both sides of World War II were funded by the same people. The Federal Reserve is still in tight with the Warburg family, as they have transformed themselves into several multinational corporations and financial institutions, like Warburg Pincus.

    It’s no secret that the Bush family also heavily profited from the war. Did you know that the Bush family also had members connected to the federal reserve, and that the Bush family is also very close to the Rockefeller family?. It’s not a secret that the presidency has always been connected to the Federal Reserve. Prescott Bush even worked for Hitler, he worked with and profited from companies that were funding Hitler. With all of these connections, it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. So what makes you think it has stopped today? What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peace making body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the United Nation protect us against mining corporations for example, that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major mining corps, like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation.

    One aspect of the current consciousness shift is waking up to new facts and possibilities of what really happened in our recent human history. Many people take different paths to awakening, but in the end it all leads to one thing: we have to be the change we want to see. We’ve seen a lot of turmoil throughout the years on this planet, and in turn it’s created a very dense energetic state for planet Earth. More people are starting to find peace, they are experiencing more joy and desire change for all on planet Earth. Through awakening, we are changing the vibrational frequency of the planet. We’ve been blind to many things for thousands of years. We are living in the age of transparency, everything has presented itself for us to see from the “darkest” experiences to the “lightest”. Either way you look at it, everything that has and is playing out on planet Earth is all an experience for the human race. Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the federal reserve, the Illuminati, extraterrestrials, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people.

  3. Nalliah Thayabharan Says:

    Most of us believe that the United Nations is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security and international law. United Nations promotes itself as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the United Nations at the forefront of all international conflict and instability, since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of all the peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.

    U.N a tool of international war criminals was founded by the very financial military industrial elites such as Nelson Rockefeller who arranged for construction of U.N.headquarters in New York and the Rothschild family(famous for the saying ‘the time to buy is when their is blood in the streets and founders of the terrorist religious money laundering state of Israel)) who donated a house to the UN in London during WWII.

    The head of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navanethem Pillay,is a representative of fascist war criminals who invaded Iraq and Afghanistan murdering hundreds of thousands and allowing the U.S.and its allies to coverup and leave uninvestigated those crimes.She vhas never criticized Saudi Arabia, Israel the UK or the US. and the EU and NATO and the financial military industrial elite she represents that have murdered and looted and raped their way from Eastern Europe in the 1990’s to the Middle East since 9/11.She is part of the 9/11 coverup that killed 3,000 people on 9/11 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the Middle East since this time.

    The scumbag Secretary of the U.N. has had the nerve to reside in NY at the time the WTC was attacked by planes coming from Logan Airport Boston that were CLEARLY the responsibility and crime of Israeli goons Menachem Atmon, Ezra Harel and their ICTS International who conveniently never provided or had to provide video surveillance of these monsters boarding flights 11 and 175 under their ‘protection’ and even after this fact continued being employed by the fascist Zionist governments in Europe particularly in the UK and Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam where they were actually responsible for both Richard Reid ‘the shoe bomber’ as well as the 2009 Christmas Muatallab the ‘crotch bomber’ terrorism who was allowed to board flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit with his ‘crotch bomb.’

    Secretary Ban Ki Moon has lied along with ex U.S. U.N. Secretary Susan Rice about Libya’s Gaddaffi supplying his troops with Viagra to ‘rape’ Libyan citizens,something that he never did.The U.N. has in effect occupied U.S.soil and used it to subvert our own government and aid and abett the international financial military industrial complex.Ban Ki Moon sat silent in NY after 9/11 while knowing that W Bush and Dick Cheney regime was sending remains of WTC to Asia including to his own country of South Korea to be melted down to destroy crucial forensic evidence and has taunted doubting Americans without ever acknowledging his shameful role in 9/11 destruction of evidence and collusion with perpetrators.

    United Nations use mainstream media networks, like CNN. CNN is owned by Time Warner, which is owned by JP Morgan Chase and Company and Dodge & Cox Inc, to name a few . It also has a select group of direct holders, like Jeffrey L. Bewkes. Mr. Bewkes sits in the head office of Time Warner’s two towers built in 2001 -buildings purposely built to resemble the once standing World Trade Centers of New York City. Bewkes is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),which is headed and funded by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. In fact a large majority of mainstream media network owners are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), as well as the trilateral commission. Another example of this is Richard D. Parsons. who served as Time Warner’s Chairman of the Board from May 2003 to January 2009. Currently Mr. Parsons is a member of the Board of Trustees and is a Senior Advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation. Frank J. Caufield, another major direct holder of Time Warner Corp, who is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). CNN is owned by Time Warner Corp, which is owned by a number of individuals and corporations that are run by a few families. These families hide behind the corporations they run, using the employees and politicians they hire to do their dirty work. Why we continue to hand our perception of what is happening on the planet to a select few who show no regard for the human race is beyond me. How a human being could have such negative intentions, and create so much conflict through the use of trickery.

    JP Morgan (major institutional holder of Time Warner)/ Rockefeller connections, which also played a big role in the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1912. So what does all this have to do with the United Nations? Well, the same ones that own all of our mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. All of the same corporations are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, like General Electric. More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.

    The forerunner to the United Nations, was the league of Nations. It was created under the treaty of versailles in 1919 . Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation. At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families. It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.

    The Same Groups That Funded Nazi Germany Created The United Nations? Both Sides of the War Were Funded by the Same Group?

    A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies of planet Earth? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting War time, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.

    Paul M. Warburg, a German-born banker, who was an appointed member of the Federal Reserve System, on the board of governor. Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? He was heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, and his family was heavily involved with I.G Farben. I.G Farben was the largest chemical company in the world during its time, and one of the largest industrial booms next to the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, and General Motors. I.G Farben was responsible forsupplying the Hitler with weapons and even funding Hitler. Why would the Federal Reserve and the Rockefeller’s be involved with I.G Farben? Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? Did they not fund the United States as well? Paul Warburg and his family were involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Warburg family headed I.G Farben, a company that supported Hitler. There are lots of evidence to show that both sides of World War II were funded by the same people. The Federal Reserve is still in tight with the Warburg family, as they have transformed themselves into several multinational corporations and financial institutions, like Warburg Pincus.

    It’s no secret that the Bush family also heavily profited from the war. Did you know that the Bush family also had members connected to the federal reserve, and that the Bush family is also very close to the Rockefeller family?. It’s not a secret that the presidency has always been connected to the Federal Reserve. Prescott Bush even worked for Hitler, he worked with and profited from companies that were funding Hitler. With all of these connections, it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. So what makes you think it has stopped today? What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peace making body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the United Nation protect us against mining corporations for example, that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major mining corps, like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation.

    One aspect of the current consciousness shift is waking up to new facts and possibilities of what really happened in our recent human history. Many people take different paths to awakening, but in the end it all leads to one thing: we have to be the change we want to see. We’ve seen a lot of turmoil throughout the years on this planet, and in turn it’s created a very dense energetic state for planet Earth. More people are starting to find peace, they are experiencing more joy and desire change for all on planet Earth. Through awakening, we are changing the vibrational frequency of the planet. We’ve been blind to many things for thousands of years. We are living in the age of transparency, everything has presented itself for us to see from the “darkest” experiences to the “lightest”. Either way you look at it, everything that has and is playing out on planet Earth is all an experience for the human race. Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the federal reserve, the Illuminati, extraterrestrials, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people.

  4. Christie Says:

    ““Navi Pillay has not done anything for the Non-Western World to be proud of.”
    Navanathum Pillayan, an Indian colonial parasite from South Africa did a lot for a Non-Western World country: India. I am sure India is not a Western country in the Writer’s vocabulary. Navanathum Pillayan has done a lot for Indian Empire and other Indian colonial parasites. The so called Darusman Committee and report was mainly written by another Indian colonial parasite Yasmin Sooka from South Africa who was a member of the Darusman Committee as well as a member of the Truth Commission of South Africa. She was very nasty towards Zulus during the Truth Commission hearings.
    She has done a lot for India during her job in the UN for India, not only in relation to the Tamil terrorists trained, armed, financed managed and branded Tamil Tigers by India. She always managed to hide any issues relating to Kashmir.

  5. Lorenzo Says:

    Christie,

    She was the one who facilitated GHANDHI’s homosexual love letters with Kallenbach to be transferred from South Africa to UK and then to Endia.

    Yes. She very carefully hid the Kashmir, Andaman, Nicobar, Adhivasi issues of Endia and South Africa’s CONTINUING APARTHIED from UNHRC.

    She is also said to be behind multi billion dollar Endian investments in South African GOLD mines recently. As you know Endia is in a CRISIS because of massive gold imports. Not sure how true these are.

  6. Nalliah Thayabharan Says:

    United Nations – a tool of international war criminals – was founded by the very financial military industrial elites such as Nelson Rockefeller who arranged for construction of U.N.headquarters in New York and the Rothschild family who donated a house to the UN in London during WWII.
    The retiring head of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navanethem Pillay,is a representative of fascist war criminals who invaded Iraq and Afghanistan murdering hundreds of thousands and allowing the U.S.and its allies to coverup and leave without investigating those crimes.She has never criticized Saudi Arabia, Israel the UK or the US. and the EU and NATO and the financial military industrial elite she represents that have murdered and looted and raped their way from Eastern Europe in the 1990’s to the Middle East since 9/11.She is part of the 9/11 coverup that killed 3,000 people on 9/11 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the Middle East since 9/11.
    The scumbag Secretary of the U.N. has had the nerve to reside in NY at the time the WTC was attacked by planes coming from Logan Airport Boston that were CLEARLY the responsibility and crime of Israeli goons Menachem Atmon, Ezra Harel and their ICTS International who conveniently never provided or had to provide video surveillance of these monsters boarding flights 11 and 175 under their ‘protection’ and even after this fact continued being employed by the fascist Zionist governments in Europe particularly in the UK and Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam where they were actually responsible for both Richard Reid ‘the shoe bomber’ as well as the 2009 Christmas Muatallab the ‘crotch bomber’ terrorism who was allowed to board flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit with his ‘crotch bomb.’ Secretary Ban Ki Moon has lied along with ex U.S. U.N. Secretary Susan Rice about Libya’s Gaddaffi supplying his troops with Viagra to ‘rape’ Libyan citizens,something that he never did.The U.N. has in effect occupied U.S.soil and used it to subvert our own government and aid and abet the international financial military industrial complex.Ban Ki Moon sat silent in NY after 9/11 while knowing that W Bush and Dick Cheney regime was sending remains of WTC to Asia including to his own country South Korea to be melted down to destroy crucial forensic evidence and has taunted doubting Americans without ever acknowledging his shameful role in 9/11 destruction of evidence and collusion with perpetrators.

    We are told that the United Nations (UN) is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security and international law. They promote themselves, and are outwardly promoted as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the UN at the forefront of all international conflict and instability, since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of social progress, economic development, international security and international law. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.

    CNN is owned by Time Warner, which is owned by JP Morgan Chase and Company and Dodge & Cox Inc, to name a few. It also has a select group of direct holders, like Jeffrey L. Bewkes. Mr. Bewkes sits in the head office of Time Warner’s two towers built in 2001 -buildings purposely built to resemble the once standing World Trade Centers of New York City. Bewkes is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which is headed and funded by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. In fact a large majority of mainstream media network owners are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations – CFR, as well as the trilateral commission. Another example of this is Richard D. Parsons. who served as Time Warner’s Chairman of the Board from May 2003 to January 2009. Currently Mr. Parsons is a member of the Board of Trustees and is a Senior Advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation. Frank J. Caufield, another major direct holder of Time Warner Corp, who is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations – CFR. CNN is owned by Time Warner Corp, which is owned by a number of individuals and corporations that are run by a few families. These families hide behind the corporations they run, using the employees and politicians they hire to do their dirty work.

    JP Morgan (major institutional holder of Time Warner)/ Rockefeller connections, which also played a big role in the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1912. So what does all this have to do with the United Nations? Well, the same ones that own all of the mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. All of the same corporations like General Electric are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.

    The forerunner to the United Nations, was the league of Nations. It was created under the treaty of Versailles in 1919 . Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation. At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families. It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.

    A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies ? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting War time, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.

    Paul M. Warburg, a German-born banker, who was an appointed member of the Federal Reserve, on the board of governors. Isn’t the Federal Reserve a United States entity? He was heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, and his family was heavily involved with I.G Farben. I.G Farben was the largest chemical company in the world during its time, and one of the largest industrial booms next to the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, and General Motors. I.G Farben was responsible for supplying Hitler with weapons and even funding Hitler. Why would the Federal Reserve and the Rockefeller’s be involved with I.G Farben? Isn’t the Federal Reserve an American entity? Did they not fund the United States as well? Paul Warburg and his family were involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve, the Warburg family headed I.G Farben, a company that supported Hitler. So what is going on here? There is a lot of evidence to show that both sides of World War II were funded by the same people The Federal Reserve is still in tight with the Warburg family, as they have transformed themselves into several multinational corporations and financial institutions, like Warburg Pincus.

    It’s no secret that the Bush family also heavily profited from the war. Did you know that the Bush family also had members connected to the Federal Reserve, and that the Bush family is also very close to the Rockefeller family?. It’s not a secret that the presidency has always been connected to the Federal Reserve. Prescott Bush even worked for Hitler, he worked with and profited from companies that were funding Hitler. With all of these connections, it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peace making body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the UN protect us against corporations that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major corporations like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation.

    Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the Federal Reserve, the Illuminati, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people.

    Following Navanethem Pillay’s announcement of her 12 member Team for Sri lanka comprising investigators, forensics experts, a gender specialist, a legal analyst and other staff, complete with a coordinator, came her announcement of the “experts” Martti Artisaahri, Asma Jahangir and Dame Silvia Cartwright. The so-called “experts” are supposed to provide “advice and guidance” as well as independent verification through the investigation that is bound to be a monumental waste of resources on a vengeful exercise instituted by the neocons that will be inconsequential. The neocon forces who instituted the “Pillay inquiry” were so obviously thrilled by Pillay’s appointments of experts, the British Foreign Secretary William Hague enthusiastically welcomed the appointments – of course, without failing to “strongly urge” the government of Sri Lanka to cooperate fully with the scandalous inquiry.

    In order to gain an impression of Hague’s, and of the “international community” of neocons enthusiasm for Pillay’s panel of experts, one needs to view the “experts” and the roles played by them over the last two decades on the US neocon-led international agenda of “divide and rule”. Indeed, the selected experts have been an integral part of neocon projects designed to capture the globe since the orchestration of the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the NATO expansion project, assisted by the Colour Revolutions, Arab Springs and other conspiracies aimed at regime change in targeted countries, courtesy of the international hedge fund billionaire George Soros and his Open Societies Foundation. Soros deploys a network of pseudo-NGOs, think tanks and an army of operatives (Samantha Power, Rupert Colville, Virginia Nuland and others too numerous to mention who have infiltrated the US State Department) and the elaborate UN human rights protection infrastructure established over the preceding decades, to destabilise target countries with the resources he robs from poor national economies of the world through currency value speculation. A brief look at Pillay’s panel appointments reveal how loyally she is serving the neocon agenda by her attempt to handover the Sri Lankan“case” to Soros’ agents led by Martti Ahtisaari and Asma Jahangir, with inconsequential Sylvia Cartwright thrown in under “expert” pretensions, together with seasoned operators of the calibre of Rupert Colville and Sandra Beidas in the key support roles as the OHCHR spokesperson and the coordinator of the “inquiry” respectively.

    The public profile of Martti Oiva Kalevi Ahtisaari is typical of the neocon “elders” who operate through the UN special appointments process on designated “trouble spots” throughout the globe, serving the neocon aims. Others belonging to the club include Lakdas Brahimi, the well-known Trojan horse-salesman who was last deployed, unsuccessfully, to make friends with Syria’s President Assad. Martti Ahtisaari is presented to us as a former President of Finland (1994-2000), Nobel Peace Prize laureate and United Nations diplomat and mediator – the first thing to note is that Ahtisaari’s Finnish identity is only nominal, with him being essentially Norwegian; his ancestors emigrated to Finland from Southern Norway in 1872, and changed his surname from Adolfsen to Ahtisaari in 1937. Such relatively minor issues relating to the real identity of neocon operatives begin to assume significant proportions in the context of the composition of the conspiracy. In Finnish politics, Ahtisaari kept with the neocon globalist outlook by being a keen proponent of Finland joining NATO and the EU in order “to shrug off once and for all the burden of Finlandization” – a strange claim for a nation’s leader to be making against the nation he is supposed to be leading! During his term as president, he also sponsored a meeting between the vodka-filled Russian “tool” Boris Yeltsin and Bill Clinton in Helsinki.

    Ahtisaari’s first recorded involvement with high level UN diplomacy was during the signing of the Tripartite Accord when he was sent to Namibia in April 1989 as the UN “special representative” to head the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG). During that mission, Ahtisaari took advice from the then British Prime Minister, neocon leading light, Margaret Thatcher to allow the South Africans to deploy South African troops, leading to the killing of many hundreds of South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) independence fighters.

    In December 2000, Ahtisaari was awarded the J. William Fulbright Prize for International Understanding by the Fulbright Association in recognition of “his work as peacemaker in some of the world’s most troubled areas.”

    The proof of Ahtisaari’s major value to the neocon global project of divide and rule came when he was appointed, in November 2005, by the then UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan as Special Envoy for the Kosovo status process – the appointment followed the UN occupation of Kosovo in 1999 following the illegal US and NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, to achieve the creation of an independent enclave of Kosovo by bombing Slobodan Milosevic into submission.

    Ahtisaari was charged with determining whether Kosovo, being administered by the United Nations since 1999 should become independent, or remain a province of Serbia. By 2007, Ahtisaari proposed that Kosovo gain “supervised independence” with extensive minority rights.

    Ahtisaari’s proposal flew in the face of Point 8 of the UN Security Council-sanctioned agreement of June 2, 1999 between NATO and Yugoslavia (that ended the bombing of Yugoslavia and the withdrawal of Yugoslav forces from Kosovo) that enshrined the principle that Kosovo would remain an integral part of Serbia.

    Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica conveyed Serbia’s response in no uncertain terms by saying – “Ahtisaari is proposing to rob Serbia of 15 per cent of its territory”. He added that this would be “a gross violation of the integrity of the democratic European state of Serbia.” The US however, fully endorsed Ahtisaari’s plan as the “best solution possible”. Russia vehemently opposed the plan at the UN Security Council.

    The manner in which the US and many EU countries worked closely with the Kosovo separatist leaders to implement the Ahtisaari plan, overcoming Russian opposition to it, is a scandal that has been only matched by the neocon lying to the UN on Iraq and Libya in 2003 and 2011 respectively.

    In an elaborate strategy designed to lull the Russians and other opponents to the “separation by stealth” plan into a false sense of security, Ahtisaari announced, in July 2007, his mission over in the face of Russia’s persistent refusal to support independence for Kosovo.

    But he worked behind the scenes with the US and EU players to encourage the separatist leadership of Kosovo to unilaterally declare itself an independent and sovereign state, which they did on February 17, 2008. The US, the UK and France recognized Kosovo as an independent state the following day. A new Kosovo constitution came into force on June 15, with the rest becoming history.

    In October 2008, Ahtisaari’s contribution to the important first neocon project of pulverizing the Balkans was recognized with the award of the Nobel Peace Prize.

    Since leaving office, Ahtisaari has been working hard, like many international human rights operatives, to find lucrative UN postings and other “work” through public and private sector organizations and the international NGO circuit. Ahtisaari also founded the independent Crisis Management Initiative (CMI) – closely aligned with George Soros’ own International Crisis Group – with the contrived goal of “developing and sustaining peace in troubled areas”.

    Martti Ahtisaari’s current, extensive links to the octopus-like structures of George Soros removes any credibility from his appointment to Pillay’s much publicized inquiry under “expert” pretensions.

    Martti Ahtisaari serves on the board of The International Crisis Group (ICG), a scandalous INGO financed by George Soros, together with Soros himself. The Board of Trustees of the ICG is Co-chaired by the former neocon US diplomat Thomas R. Pickering and the former British neocon diplomat Mark Malloch-Brown. The anti-Sri Lankan bias of the ICG is reinforced by the Canadian Louise Arbour, Navi Pillay’s predecessor as Former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights serving as its chief executive.

    With Ahtisaari of ICG doubling as a UN “expert” on Pillay’s Kangaroo Court on Sri Lanka, any Sri Lankan participation at it would have given ICG resident Sri Lanka analyst ‘twits’ like Alan Keenen a field day to formalize their well-known biases against Sri Lanka and the “Sinhalese”in general.

    The other “expert” appointed by Pillay, the naïve Pakistani human rights “campaigner” Asma Jahangir, is also compromised by being associated with the NGO the “Open Society Foundations” founded by George Soros – in the all-important capacity of advisory board member.

    Founded in 1993 by George Soros, the Open Society Foundations’ claimed mission is “to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens”, and other wholesome pursuits such as “shaping public policies that assure greater fairness in political, legal, and economic systems and safeguard fundamental rights” and to work to build vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens.

    For an NGO named “Open Society” however, the Soros fraud is totally non-transparent with its Annual reports not providing the names of NGO grantees or amounts transferred to individual groups. Following the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, several Central Asian nations took action against the Open Society Institute as the underground network was known then – with Uzbekistan forcing the shutdown of the OSI regional offices, while Tajikistan accused OSI-Tajikistan of corruption and nepotism.

    Jahangir, a lawyer from Pakistan, is also a former President of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association and of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. She has served as UN Special Rapporteur twice, proving that she is a seasoned rider of the human rights gravy train.

    Asma Jahangir has threatened to use “sources on the ground” to obtain information on the war if it is not allowed to visit Sri Lanka. She warned the Sri Lankan government that any attempts to prevent people from testifying at the inquiry would only be “detrimental to them”.

    With dubious contacts to an underground operator like George Soros, Jahangir will do well to guard her mouth while she is engaged in “beating the air” with her role in the inquiry.

    The “experts” are not the only part of the OHCHR that is tainted by associations with the neocon global conspiracy – Rupert Colville, Pillay’s spokesperson was previously a spokesman for Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq.

    Rupert was certainly born with the silver spoon in his mouth, to the British civil servant Sir John Rupert “Jock” Colville, CB, CVO who with family connections to the Rothschilds, served as a Page of Honour to the queen and served as Private Secretary to the then Princess Elizabeth.

    He also served as Assistant Private Secretary to three Prime Ministers – Neville Chamberlain, 1939–40, Winston Churchill, 1940–41 and 1943–45, and was Joint Principal Private Secretary to Winston Churchill, 1951–55. No surprise Rupert carefully hides his background that could serve as a distraction to his current UN role!

    Rupert Colville, like Samantha Power, was working on the Kosovo project from the journalism front before they both secured high office with the UN. Colville then moved on to justify neocon intervention in Afghanistan by “shaming” the media in to action through a sensationalised article titled ‘One Massacre That Didn’t Grab the World’s Attention’, published in the International Herald Tribune, Paris, August 7, 1999.

    Since around 2011, Colville has taken upon himself the task of an effective witness protection program as crucial to ensuring justice and end impunity regarding human rights violations in general. Apparently what triggered Colville into action was the death – by suicide- of a man named Agim Zogaj, a key witness in the case against former Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) Commander Fatmir Limaj.

    The other member of the team is its coordinator Sandra Beidas, who was expelled by South Sudan for allegedly conducting an unethical probe into human rights violations in that country. Baidas is a long term associate of one of the key divide and rule lieutenants of the neocons, the Britisher Ian Martin.

    Rising to the position of the UN’s chief promoter of the divide and rule strategy from the humble beginnings of leading the NGO Amnesty International Ian Martin, has headed UN missions in Nepal, working to transform Nepal into a polyglot federal republic based on indigenous groups, nationalities, castes such as the Dalit, and Muslims.

    Martin has previously been involved in creating “federal” structures in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Libya where the eastern province of Cyrenaica, with its capital in Benghazi, proclaiming its autonomy from Tripoli. Martin also performed the magic of creating a voter register in East Timor that voted 90 per cent in favour of association with Portugal, contrary to on the ground evidence!

    The more we look at Navi Pillay’s fraud on Sri Lanka on behalf of the neocons, the more we are convinced that having nothing to do with the so-called inquiry is overwhelmingly the right decision the country could make. The “experts” convince us even more!

  7. Christie Says:

    Most of the Indians in South Africa live in gated communities and have minimum social contact with blacks. In 1984 I think Zulus attacked Gandhi’s house. Homosexuality is the is the toast of the day and no wonder this woman capitalized on this in the West. She or other Indians do not talk about the fact that Old Gandhi was a pedophile.

  8. Nimal Says:

    I think it is wrong to demonize Navi Pillay as I am sure she is doing what she can to expose and even help to prosecute or expose the violators of human rights every where in the world.Just read about her in the internet,where she was one of the first to accuse Israial of possible war crimes and openly berated the US and her allies for not putting pressure to stop the indiscriminate attacks on the Palestinians in Gaza.She may be Tamil,doesn’t mean that she will side with the murderous Tamil tigers,whom she wanted investigated too.
    US and other powerful countries never singed up to the UN treaties and their influence on us on violations should be ridiculed and ignored.US must put her own house in order before lecturing other nations.
    We must respect the conventions that are set to safeguard people of all nations,therefore I would urge GOSL to conduct a credible investigation using people like Desmond De Silva QC.
    GOSL must show the world that she will never condone stupidity,like displaying the dead as a trophy,which is unacceptable.We also can explain to the world that the tigers have used the sanctuary of hospital,civilian camps to conduct the war,irrespective of the consequence to it’s own people.Any right minded investigator will accept that there will be some reaction from the best trained military unit when under attack from a terrorist outfit that have broken the basic rule of engagement of the war.If the GOSL forces are hellbent in committing atrocities,they would not be escorting and giving shelter Tamil victims of that horrible war,perpetrated by a bunch of conniving diaspora living in the comforts of the Western countries.Perhaps this commission could ask for extradition of their leaders to face trial and ask for war reparation for the damage thus caused.Who knows M/s Pillay may even help us on this matter because we were all losers?

  9. Christie Says:

    Navanathum Pillayan never criticized the Indian terrorist outfit Tamil tigers. The Indian colonial parasites have been always behind India. Government of the island nation should ignore all requests and demands by the West which are initiated by India, Indian vermin and Indian colonial parasites. There is something more than a chance in this woman and Yasmin Sooka getting involved in Sri Lanka.

  10. Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha Says:

    Excellent article. The farce of the UNHRC is unfolding as they slap ISIS of crimes against humanity on the behalf of the US while that same charade of an organization never even attempted to deal with the 30 year long atrocities committed by LTTE except name them as a terrorist organization.

    What ISIS is doing is horrible and should be immediately condemned. If so then the UNHRC should have done the same when the LTTE repeatedly indulged in crimes against humanity.

    The UNHRC should have monitored their actions after they and many nations across the world labeled them a terrorist organization the UNHRC should have left a paper trail a mile long of each crime against humanity that the LTTE perpetrated including the genocide of Tamil Muslims and Christians, the slaughter of the Sinhalese, the abduction and forced slavery of tens of thousands of Tamil children, the use of hundreds of thousands of Tamil citizens as a human shield.

    Had they done that this mockery called Navi Pillay would not be able to dictate to Sri Lanka that the UNHRC will only consider the acts done at the end of the war as legitimate issues to investigate

    Sri Lanka should also look at how Russia is dealing with US, NATO and UN sanctions against her. She is dealing with those actions as a “state of war” and is treating it in exactly that manner. These days to use sanctions and embargoes on a nation is as effective as the old time “siege” of a city. To use commerce against a nation is an effective tool of war. Sri Lanka mus always keep that in mind if the despotic UN decides to use this tactic on Colombo to pressure her to do the will of the debouched United Nations and their joke called the UN human rights council.

  11. Samanthi Says:

    A news item appears in today’s Divaina:

    කොල්ලුපිටිය පොලිසිය ඉදිරිපිටදී
    ‘පිල්ලේ පල’ හමුදා විශ්‍රාමික ගිනි තබා ගනී

    හේමන්ත රන්දුණු – ප්‍රදීප් ප්‍රසන්න සමරකෝන්

    එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කොමිසමේ හිටපු මහ කොමසාරිස්‌ නවනීදන් පිල්ලේ විසින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ යුද අපරාධ විමර්ශනවලට විරෝධය පළකරමින් විශ්‍රාමික යුද හමුදා නිලධාරියෙක්‌ කොල්ලුපිටිය පොලිස්‌ ස්‌ථානය ඉදිරිපිටදී ඊයේ (02 වැනිදා) උදේ තම සිරුරට ගිනි තබා ගත්තේය.

    තම සිරුරට ගිනි තබාගැනීම නිසා බරපතළ පිළිස්‌සුම් තුවාල ලැබූ කලපලුවාව රාජගිරියේ පදිංචි 72 හැවිරිදි සෙල්මුර විතානගේ පියසේන මහතා කොළඹ ජාතික රෝහලට ඇතුළත් කර තිබේ.

    නවනීදන් පිල්ලේ මහත්මියගේ ක්‍රියාකලාපයට විරෝධය පළකරමින් තමන් ඇමරිකානු තානාපති කාර්යාලය ඉදිරිපිටදී සිරුරට ගිනි තබාගැනීමට සැලසුම් කළ බව පියසේන මහතා පොලිස්‌ ප්‍රශ්න කිරීම් හමුවේ පවසා ඇත.

    තානාපති කාර්යාලය ඉදිරිපිට සිටි පොලිස්‌ නිලධාරීන් පියසේන මහතා එම ස්‌ථානයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීම නිසා කොල්ලුපිටිය පොලිසිය ඉදිරිපිටට පැමිණ සිරුරට පෙට්‍රල් වත්කරගෙන ගිනි තබාගෙන ඇති බව ද පරීක්‍ෂණවලින් හෙළිවී තිබේ.

    සිරුරට ගිනි තබාගන්නා පුද්ගලයා දුටු පොලිස්‌ නිලධාරීන් පිරිසක්‌ වහාම ඉදිරිපත් වී එම පුද්ගලයාගේ සිරුරේ ඇවිළී තිබූ ගින්න නිවා දමා කොළඹ ජාතික රෝහල වෙත ඇතුළත් කර ඇත.

    ඔහු විසින් ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතාට ලියූ රහසිගත ලිපියක්‌ ද පොලිසිය සොයා ගත්තේය.

    සීල් තබා තිබූ එම ලිපිය ජනාධිපතිවරයා වෙත භාරදීම සඳහා ජනාධිපති ආරක්‍ෂක අංශය වෙත භාරදී තිබේ.

    පියසේන මහතාගේ සිරුරේ සෑහෙන ප්‍රමාණයක්‌ පිළිස්‌සී විනාශ වී ගොස්‌ තිබෙන බව රෝහල් ආරංචි මාර්ග කීය.

    පියසේන මහතා වසර 21 ක්‌ යුද හමුදාවේ සේවය කර ඉන් විශ්‍රාම ලැබූ නිලධාරියෙකි. එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කොමිසමේ හිටපු මහ කොමසාරිස්‌ නවනීදන් පිල්ලේ විසින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව ගෙන යන චෝදනාවලට සහ ඇගේ ක්‍රියාකලාපය පිළිබඳව පියසේන මහතා දැඩි වෛරයකින් පසු වී ඇති බව ද පරීක්‍ෂණවලින් හෙළි වී ඇත.

    කොල්ලුපිටිය පොලිසිය මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් වැඩිදුර පරීක්‍ෂණ පවත්වාගෙන යයි.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress