|
|
 |
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, May 11th, 2016.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress
May 11th, 2016 at 5:42 pm
The Yahapalanaya has developed very sophisticated ways to rob the country. It is possible previous politicians took a few commissions here and there which is what has been done historically by all politicians. This time it has be elevated to a very high level of sophistication by the Yahapalanaya.
As soon as My3 was elected as President he appointed RW as Prime Minister which he had no mandate to do since there was an existing Parliament and a Cabinet. The only excuse this traitor gave the country was that the West want him to do so. These actions were unconstitutional.
RW in turn appointed a Catholic Cabinet and a well known Govt servant who had amassed an immense amount of wealth under a previous President and had gone abroad, as head of the Treasury, and a Singaporean as the Governor of the Central Bank. The Governor in turn issued CB bond to the value of X at an interest rate of Y and at the time of auction made the value of bonds 2X and the interest rate 2Y for his nephew’s company Capital Ventures. I do not have all the details but I am sure D.E.W. Gunasekera would have all the facts since he was head of COPE and produced a report to the Parliament. On the day before it was going to be presented to the Parliament along with a no confidence motion on RW, My3 at the request of RW dissolved the Parliament and called for elections. The same exercise is going to be repeated soon as I understand. Not sure if it already happened.
My3 the traitor allowed permission to President Mahinda Rajapaksa to run as head of UPFA for the Parliamentary elections. He then got information that UPFA was going to get 113 seats and to foil MR, two days before elections he announced that he will not appoint MR as Prime Minister even if UPFA wins, In addition removed the Secretaries of UPFA and the SLFP who had been gazetted and appointed his own henchmen. These actions confused our people so much that UPFA got only 95 seats. All these actions were unconstitutional. My3 formed a so called “National Govt between SLFP and UNP which was illegal since the SLFP did not run as a part at the General Election. They ran as a part of UPFA.
Ever since RW got into power he created an illegal entity called the FCID to enact revenge on previous politicians including MR and family. They keep harassing this great person and keep people distracted while like a magician with the other hand robs the country blind.
As far as I can see, the plan is to bankrupt the country, cause all kinds of hardships to people deliberately, then when the masses riot clamp down martial law and run a fascist dictatorship with RW at the head. My3 and CBK will sail off into the sunset and it will be Batalanda all over again everywhere in the country. RW may break up the country into as many pieces as India and Britain want and hand it over to them to Govern. It will be another new Colony of India and Britain.
May 11th, 2016 at 6:55 pm
I forgot to add that in addition to above in order to cover his trail CB Governor transferred 115 officers of the Central Bank. How did this Yahapalanaya Govt get away with so much. Is it because the West and India are covering for them since they are doing their bidding? Can someone inform me if I am being simply ignorant.
May 11th, 2016 at 10:56 pm
Why India’s Big Push for Economic Cooperation in Lanka May Backfire
Wed, May 11, 2016, 09:53 am SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.
May 11 (Wire) New Delhi’s policy of hustling its smaller neighbour comes at a time when the Wickremesinghe government’s mismanagement of the economy is apparent and will end up helping the xenophobic political forces in the country.
New Delhi’s relations with Colombo may appear to be at a high point but ironically, anti-India sentiments are on the rise in Sri Lanka. This divergence in sentiments between the Sri Lankan government and its population is largely a consequence of moves to liberalise trade in services and investment between the two countries.
It is no secret that there was a major sigh of relief in India and the United States following the regime change in Colombo in January 2015. China’s inroads into the country with the Rajapaksa regime had polarised the region and raised the geopolitical stakes. However, Sri Lanka’s relationship China was built on an economic foundation of large investments in infrastructure. It also has a historical basis from the rubber rice deal during the Korean War to the massive Bandaranaike Memorial International Conference Hall in Colombo, gifted by the Chinese in the early 1970s. Nevertheless, in India’s efforts to ensure its regional dominance and counter China’s influence, there has been a singular focus on trying to lock Sri Lanka into the Indian economic orbit.
Expanding trade and financial agreements
The India-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement of 1998 was followed by efforts towards a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) to liberalise trade in services and investment starting in the mid-2000s.
However, the CEPA negotiations dragged on for nearly a decade in the face of increasing opposition within Sri Lanka, particularly by the business community and certain interest groups such as the medical lobby. With the new momentum in closer bilateral ties last year, India is pushing for a new trade pact called the Economic and Technological Cooperation Agreement (ETCA). The pro-liberalisation government of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has been actively championing the proposed trade pact.
Meanwhile, the deterioration of the Sri Lankan economy in recent months – including a major balance of payments problem – has forced Colombo to seek support from external actors. India has boosted Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves by US$ 1.1 billion with a Reserve Bank of India credit swap for six months drawn last September, followed by a further emergency credit swap in March to wade over the tough financial tide.
The credit swap is a temporary measure to increase Sri Lanka’s forex reserves, until the country receives an IMF loan. The IMF’s extended fund facility of US$ 1.5 billion coupled with US$ 650 million in multilateral and bilateral loans are to take effect in June this year. The government believes these loans will create momentum for further global financial flows into the country.
The ETCA, widely perceived by the Sri Lankan public to be advantageous to India, is likely to become a trade-off for economic and political support from India to the Wickremesinghe government. However, Wickremesinghe’s visit to Beijing last month has strengthened relations with China – a shift from the soured relations which followed the defeat of the Rajapaksa regime last year. The possibility of equity swaps, where Sri Lankan debt to China is traded for financial stakes in Sri Lankan enterprises, is now being considered. Sri Lanka has also initiated negotiations with China and the US on new free trade agreements. Seizing this opportunity, the IMF and the World Bank are also pushing to liberalise trade as part of a larger strategy of liberalising the Sri Lankan economy – from encouraging the privatisation of state owned enterprises to labour reforms.
Reactions to ETCA
Many of the Colombo-based neoliberal think tanks see the Wickremesinghe government in power and the crisis facing the economy as an opportunity to accelerate liberalisation, including in trade. However, the ETCA is coming under considerable fire from a range of interest groups and political parties – from the chauvinistic remnants of the Rajapaksa regime to the ‘left’ opposition Janatha Vimukthi Perumana.
So what fuels this tremendous reaction to the ETCA? After all, the agreement is only one part of this liberalisation push. To start with, the trade picture is not pretty. According to the Central Bank, Indian exports to Sri Lanka were US$ 4,268 million while Lankan exports to India stood at just US$ 643 million in 2015 – reflecting a massive trade deficit between the countries.
There have been various explanations put forward by Indian officials and pro-liberalisation advocates in Colombo on what has been gained with the previous free trade agreement, including claims that the high Indian exports to Sri Lanka are mostly independent of the free trade agreement. However, India’s eagerness for the trade pact and the stark trade deficit is difficult to miss.
In this context, the current economic crisis and the neoliberal economic policy trajectory have become the political ground for the mobilisation of forces opposed to the government. And this campaign has zeroes in on the ETCA as the catch-all word to describe any and all impending economic woes. Political forces and middle class interest groups such as doctors and IT professionals are opposing the agreement and mobilising broader sections of society. Furthermore, these forces have assumed a xenophobic character, propagating anti-Indian sentiments.
Recent economic crisis
Much of the current economic woes in Sri Lanka have been inherited from the Rajapaksa government’s economic development policies of construction-led growth on high interest debt. In addition, the deterioration in global economic conditions over the past year have created difficult financial conditions for Sri Lanka to roll over such debt. However, the Wickremesinghe government needs to take part of the blame for mismanagement and certainly for its flawed economic vision.
Having come to power over a year ago, and having crossed the milestone of the parliamentary election in August 2015, it nevertheless chose to continue on the path of further exposing the economy to international debt in its November 2015 budget. It ignored the warning bells about the increasing import bill and falling revenues, which have made the country far more susceptible to the current crisis conditions of capital flight from the emerging markets and increasing cost of capital in the global financial markets.
At the core of the Wickremesinghe government’s economic programme is the liberalisation of trade and capital flows; the trade agreements and the IMF facility reflect this economic vision. In other words, it is counting on enticing inward capital flows despite the winds of global capital blowing in the opposite direction. Worryingly, even trade agreements in services and investment are known to lead to further speculative investment flows into finance, insurance and real estate, rather than traditional forms of foreign direct investment leading to the building of factories for production and exports. However, the Sri Lankan establishment has been satisfied with such fickle policies that also lead to considerable rent-seeking by the financial elite.
Opposing xenophobia and liberalisation
Trade liberalisation is always contentious for its impact on society, but it is all the more so now in the context of the global downturn and a national economic crisis. It is likely to aggravate the rising inequalities and jobless growth in Sri Lanka – by pushing for lower wages to compete in international markets – and the inflow of cheaper commodities, wiping out local production.
With the ETCA debate polarised between the free trade elite and the anti-Indian forces, there has been little informed debate including critical analysis of trade liberalisation, broader neoliberal reforms and the deteriorating global economic situation. For those bothered by xenophobia and economic marginalisation, the challenge is to oppose both the reflexive anti-Indian campaign of the nationalists and the neoliberal policies of the liberalisers.
In this context, New Delhi’s policy of hustling its smaller neighbour cannot be more ill-timed and is likely to generate a political backlash. The hubris of the Indian and Sri Lankan establishments in pushing through this trade pact may well result in losing the great opportunity that emerged last year of rebuilding Indo-Lanka relations on a broader footing.
Ahilan Kadirgamar is a political economist and a member of the Collective for Economic Democratisation in Sri Lanka
Read More:: Wire (Source)
May 12th, 2016 at 4:27 am
Questions to Ask :
*. Can/will China ever trust any Ranil govt after the fiasco with Norway (CBK/RW govt time) – you know, mini-subs & LTTE suicide cadre and all that ??
*. Will INDIA ever trust an Ultra pro-West Ranil govt ?
So far, INDIA goes berserk every time any ultra-pro West UNP govt comes into power. We saw that the LTTE was trained in Tamil Nadu plus the 13-A illegally imposed under Duress on the JRJ govt.
Of course, now the Cold War is supposedly over and the ‘Contain China’ program is on. But China & Russia now co-operate re Economic matters, and INDIA may be looked at as a third force to counter and balance all that ? Thus the forcing of Lanka to ‘co-operate with INDIA’.
There appears to be a strong ‘Co-operate with INDIA Program on right now’ ?
May 12th, 2016 at 8:48 am
This time around with Ranil’s UNP led Yahap, INDIA seems to have delivered some sort of Economic ‘extreme unction’ to Lanka in the form of :
*. ECTA
* sea tunnel to Tamil Nadu (with over 15 Million categorised as Tamil Dalits)
* 5,000 acre lots on 99 yr leases to foreigners (Brit Tamils ?)
*.New Constitution (what might that bring re unitary status of Lanka ?)
The difference this time is that INDIA is doing things with western approval ?
The west may also maximise leverage with Lanka re Ports, Trade, Industry, etc. using the Made in INDIA Formula …?
In the meantime, Yahap. is causing maximum distraction by harrassing the Rajapakse Family. Every time MR speaks out some truth, Yahap squeezes.
Lanka need ALL her leaders to survive. ALL Lankans must work together to bring Peace to an undivided Lanka.
Message to JVP & Tamil folk, and Others who divide Lanka : There is no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody has to pay, even if Lanka is a Socialist country.