MRS. CLINTON’S HOBNOBED WITH LTTE TERRORISTS; A SIMPLE CASE OF ONE MAN’S TRRORISTS IS ANOTHER WOMAN’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS!!! OR IS IT PURE OPPATUNISTIC STRAKE RUNNING THROUGH HER BACKBONE?
Posted on May 19th, 2016
By Mahinda Weerasinghe, the author of “Origin of Species According to the Buddha” And “Mission to Oslo”
When the Clinton-Lewinsky Saga at its hottest we hear this famous one liner concerning Mr. Clinton’s sexual antics;
’I never asked her to lie, but simply requested her to lie down’? Indeed he fought this battle alone and we never hear any opinion by Mrs. Clinton. As if she has vanished into thin air and never existed. She was never seen or heard of those dreadful days, but extraordinarily enough she is now ready and willing to aid all needy people; how gracious of her?
In fact so democratic she has never been, for curiously enough it seems Hillary Clinton has wanted to be president since she was a 17-year-old “Goldwater girl”. In the 1964 presidential election the young Mrs. Clinton backed the most conservative of candidate in the Republican Party ever nominated. Trounced by Democrat Lyndon Johnson, Barry Goldwater’s campaign has been described as a “glorious disaster”. They say “we live and learn” and being so young we can let her off the hook at the time! But people have to learn to let off such flamboyant dreams. Especially if they are as incapable as she is!
But the point is, would she stand by the democratic ideals as a nomine when she was missing from sight when her husband needed her most? I doubt very much!
As Russia Today (RT) ankerman, max kiser EXPLAINED in THE GOLD counter THE DOLLER ASSESSMENT; he informed without EXPLAINING THE whole gambit that, (FOR HIS BOSSES WOULD have warned him of the consequences) if USA’s economy faluters then chinese goventment proping up USA’s economy will also lose out?
Indeed he never went all out and explained to the public what shape the next revolution is going to take!
Under the circumstances, Hussain Obama’s PERSONAL pilligrimage to mekka, in order TO PUSUADE THE sOUDI rOYALS and disalude them from doing anything drastic was a necessary EVIL AS far as President of USA is concerned?
Now we know for a fact that; their is AN over hanging theat which would be impossible to sweep under the carpet! And the next president would need to take this bull by its horns for sure and before long?
In the meantime what amarican govenment is doing is simply priting money which is paper ink, but nothing to back up with gold?
Concrete question, in this connection is; would she be strong enough stand up to Saudi Arabia’s intimidating threat of cashing in 75 billion dollars worth of asserts which in such a way they would destroy the economic survival of the western civilization! Indeed they would’nt be satisfied simply by GETTING SOME printed $ papers; but demand “to have THEIR POUND of flesh”, TRANSLATED IT would mean they would WISH TO be paid in gold and in full!
I am afraid she is not up to it and will come back to elaborate later on in this essay as to why I think so!
Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in 2002 the United Nations agreed to allow it under the “Oil for food” program instituted following Desert Storm. One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq, and lynched Saddam Hussein, and placed Iraq’s oil back on the world market only to be sold for, and you guessed it; in US dollars.
Meanwhile over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar. Gaddafi announced that Libya’s oil was for sale, but only in Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas Sarcoxie reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world. So, the United States invaded Libya, and brutally murdered Qaddafi (the object lesson of Saddam’s lynching seems lost on him), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya’s oil output to be sold in dollars only. The boodle that was to have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for. Thus went to dogs the prosperous and well governed Libyan nation!
So what are the future prospect of $ contra Gold situation? Any time soon the bubble will burst; and if USA cannot pay in Gold for the papers they have printed the world go into a tail spin? Luckily the world is full of suckers without any historical sense! The story of how it all came about is fascinating. And behind every such story there is an English brain which, being a part of “a nation of shop keepers” with their special mental agility?
one year after Mayer Amsteel Rothschild had uttered his infamous “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws”, the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild’s chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton. Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the nation’s economy, while enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the charter and signalled their intention to go back to a state issued value based currency on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild against the US Government, “Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.” Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!” The British Prime Minister at the time, Spencer Perceval was adamantly opposed to war with the United States, primarily because the majority of England’s military might was occupied with the ongoing Napoleonic wars. Spencer Perceval was concerned that Britain might not prevail in a new American war, a concern shared by many in the British government. Then, Spencer Perceval was assassinated (the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated in office) and replaced by Robert Banks Jenkinson, the 2nd Earl of Liverpool, who was fully supportive of a war to recapture the (American) colonies.
Financed at virtually no interest by the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Britain then provoked the war of 1812 to reach debt they would be forced to accept a new private central bank. And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank issuing the public currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United States. Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation’s money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many British and American soldiers had to die for it.
Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President to actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second Bank of the United States, there was an attempted assassination which failed when both pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire. Lawrence later said that with Jackson dead, “Money would be more plenty.”
President Zachary Taylor opposed the creation of a new Private Central Bank, owing to the historical abuses of the First and Second Banks of the United States.
The idea of a national bank is dead, and will not be revived in my time.” — Zachary Taylor died on July 9, 1850 after eating a bowl of cherries and milk rumoured to have been poisoned. The symptoms displayed are consistent with acute arsenic poisoning.
President James Buchanan also opposed a private central bank. During the panic of 1857 he attempted to set limits on banks issuing more loans than they had actual funds, and to require all issued bank notes to be backed by Federal Government assets. He was poisoned with arsenic and survived, although 38 other people at the dinner died.
When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln’s efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at 30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers in England, who quickly responded.
“If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become educated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” — The London Times responding to Lincoln’s decision to issue government Greenbacks to finance the Civil War,
Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on. Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war, and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing greenback. Following Lincoln’s assassination, the Greenbacks were pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at interest from the private bankers. Tsar Alexander II, who authorized Russian military assistance to Lincoln, was subsequently the victim of multiple attempts on his life in 1866, 1879, and 1880, until his assassination in 1881.
James A. Garfield was elected President in 1880 on a platform of government control of the money supply.
“He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation. — James Garfield
Garfield was shot on July 2, 1881 and died of his wounds several weeks later. Chester A. Arthur succeeded Garfield as President.
In 1896, William McKinley was elected President in the middle of a depression-driven debate over gold-backed government currency versus bank notes borrowed at interest from private banks. McKinley favoured gold-backed currencies and a balanced government budget which would free the public from accumulating debt.
McKinley was shot by an out-of-work anarchist on September 14, 1901, in Buffalo, NY, succumbing to his wounds a few days later. He was succeeded in office by Theodore Roosevelt.
Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply once again under the control of private bankers. Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to “The Federal Reserve” system in order to grant the new bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more “Federal” than Federal Express. Indeed, in 2012, the Federal Reserve attempted to rebuff a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom of Information Act did not apply to the “trade secret” operations of the Federal Reserve.
“When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check; but when the Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money.” — From the Boston Federal Reserve Bank pamphlet, “Putting it simply.”
“Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a ‘dollar’ bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries.” — “Modern Money Mechanics Workbook”? Federal Reserve of Chicago, 1975
“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of the people.” — Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924
“States, most especially the large hegemonic ones, such as the United States and Great Britain, are controlled by the international central banking system, working through secret agreements at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and operating through national central banks (such as the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve)… The same international banking cartel that controls the United States today previously controlled Great Britain and held it up as the international hegemony. When the British order faded, and was replaced by the United States, the US ran the global economy. However, the same interests are served. States will be used and discarded at will by the international banking cartel; they are simply tools.” — Andrew Gavin Marshall
World War One started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not unlike the present day United States). Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, it was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable levels. Under government control, investment was guaranteed to internal economic development, and Germany was seen as a major power. So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the prime opponent of World War One, and not just defeated, but its industrial base flattened. Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even though Germany had not actually started the war.
“Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain.” – Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)
“We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.” – Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)
“Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it.” – Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US – General Robert E. Wood)
Germany’s state-issued value based currency was also
“This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” – Winston Churchill (- autumn 1939 broadcast) a direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could break free of private central bankers!
As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany’s economic power looked for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse. Years later, in a spirit of candour, the real reasons for that war were made clear.
“The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.”- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fulton, USA March 1946)
“Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit anymore. …We butchered the wrong pig.” -Winston Churchill (The Second World War – Bern, 1960)
As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany. And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their business interests than Roosevelt’s “New Deal” which threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the working and middle class of America. So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead the overthrow of the US Government and install a “Secretary of General Affairs” who would be answerable to Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest and shut down all labour unions. General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act. When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still-fragile economy and blame Roosevelt for it. Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the Trading with the Enemy act. The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally released in 1967 and became the inspiration for the movie, “Seven Days in May” but with the true financial villains erased from the script.
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country’s most agile military force — the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of my time being a high–class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. “I suspected I was just a part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service. Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. I was rewarded with honours, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents.” — General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant, 1935
As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.
Kennedy’s United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do. All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.
As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three, we need to examine the financial dimensions behind the wars.
Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance. The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world’s “go-to” currency, Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946. The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency, obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so, on two conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax. That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold at $35 per ounce.
But as America’s manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other than real estate) anyone wanted to buy. Europe’s cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy US food exports. Israel’s constant belligerence against its neighbours caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep their end of the petrodollar arrangement.
Saddam Hussein, and, Muammar Gaddafi paid with their life for an idea which time has not come? But be sure it’s fast approaching the year of consent.
As we speak the bankers’ gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever currency they choose. The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran’s oil to be sold only in dollars and to force them to accept a privately owned central bank. Malaysia, one of the new nations without a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force claimed to be “Al Qaeda”, and with the death of President Hugo Chavez, plans to impose a US and banker friendly regime on Venezuela are clearly being implemented.
We have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures us that the reasons for all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (is this a fact; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile’s democratically elected government of President Salvador Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as “crazed lone nuts” to obscure the real agenda.
The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation. That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with which to pay that debt. Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the Private Central Banks.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY.
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. Today however, the FED, which is a privately owned company, controls and profits by printing money through the Treasury, and regulating its value.
The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners (stockholders purchasing stock at $100 per share – the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison (Reference 1, 14). The FED banking system collects billions of dollars (Reference 8, 17) in interest annually and distributes the profits to its shareholders. The Congress illegally gave the FED the right to print money (through the Treasury) at no interest to the FED. The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press nod charges U.S. taxpayer’s interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud.
Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed:
|Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
|Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
These bankers are connected to London Banking Houses which ultimately control the FED. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America (our forefathers were fighting their own government), they planned to control us by controlling our banking system, the printing of our money, and our debt
Adam Smith declared that Britain was ‘a nation that is governed by shopkeepers’, in the first edition of his classic Wealth of Nations (1776).
The influence ˜This nation of shop keeper extended in the west to the American continent, in the east to the ends of Asia, and in the south to the Australian continent, mainly places in which spices, cotton, tobacco and opium were either produced or sold
Indeed they control the Opium, oil, banks and nations.
|British used to boast that sun never set on the British Empire, and we know why, God wouldn’t trust an Englishman in the dark.
In fact this Nation of shop keepers was getting rich and powerful by the day by exporting indentured slave labour. People could not see the big picture. Indian slaves could not protest and everything was hunky-dory in the British empire. And if any insurrection was to raise its head, it was quelled importing external forces.
Until there came on the scene a Unique personality.
He was one man who understood what taking place. But he needed a plan which could not be discussed or explained to anyone.
Mohandas Gandhi was born in the western part of British-ruled India on October 2, 1869. Queen Victoria crowing as empress of India was just 8 years away!
None violence was the corner stone. Of Gandhi’s plan!
And why? There should not be violent resistance to British rule. They should avoid giving any excuse to the British empire to bring external forces he noticed that they not under any violent threat!
At the inception he should act so naive, no violence and obedient to the British colonial outfit that they feel that he is one of us!
In fact at the start probably British did not see Gandhi as a threat. How can this half naked fakir be a challenge to the mighty British empires? Gandhi realized before going on to implement his other plans he should get popular in UK itself that use the British democratic system to break there on backs!
The British officials felt that there was no threat by him. They could take him out of the equitation at any time; Above all his popularity should reach the heart of the British empire. He should abide by the laws and rules. In fact if a judge said put him in jail for violation for some offence, he was readily went to prison and the English poorer classes felt sorry for the poor man! In fact he became so popular in UK that if something happened to him they found that they were unable to control the India proper. But above all never initiate them to bring in troops from outside. At the end weakened by WW II they had to let INDIA go free.
Keeping in mind above said we can clearly recognize his strategy. With a campaign to win rights for Indians in South Africa behind him, Mohandas Gandhi returns to his native India in 1915 to find a country growing increasingly restless under the century-long colonial rule called the “raj.” While the British do not resort to the brutality used by most occupying forces, they limit basic liberties wherever the power of the raj was threatened. And, although Britain has granted self-rule to Canada and Australia, it drags its heels on self-rule for India. British viceroy Lord Irwin ignores most of the demands of the Indian National Congress.
By 1930, Gandhi decides that the time is right for civil disobedience directed at the heart of British interests. Recognizing the need for a unifying issue that speaks to all Indians, he finds one in the colony’s Salt Act, which forbids citizens from collecting or selling the vital mineral. The colonizers, he argues, are stealing a dietary staple from the people and then making them pay to get it back. By processing their own salt, millions of Indians can readily flout British rule.
In a shrewd pre-emptive move, Gandhi sends a public letter to Lord Irwin announcing his intent to break the British salt monopoly at the conclusion of a long people’s march to the sea where ordinary citizens will collect salt. At the same time, he implores Indian local officials to resign their posts, to drive a wedge between the raj and one of its key supports. He further advocates a boycott of imported British cloth in favour of homespun cotton a strategy that is of added significance for Indians who have been thrown out of work by Britain’s machine-manufactured textile industry.
These actions invite brutal reprisals. A mass of demonstrators approaching a salt depot in Dharasana was viciously beaten; thousands are arrested, the number of participant’s swells and resistance stiffens. Overcrowding the country’s jails is part of Gandhi’s strategy to put a strain on British civil services, and the barbarism at Dharasana elicits worldwide support for the Indian cause. With India’s infrastructure under strain, and world opinion turning against the Crown, Lord Irwin agrees to one-on-one negotiations with Gandhi by February 1931. While the social and legal concessions that he grants (i.e., withdrawal of repressive laws and promises not to prosecute resisters) are more symbolic than concrete, the great Indian resistance of 1930-31 mobilizes the nation as never before to pursue independence, which it finally achieves in 1947.
How English managed to cheat the world for the past 200 years show the world that the English in the Dark is more perilous. Yet the dream of giving Sri Lanka to Jaffna Tamil Catholics is impossibility now. My findings go to show how many nations lost their identity and suzerainty because they passively sat by. Earlier British controlled the League of Nations and divided up Palestine; Now people of Sri Lanka is claver than Jaffna Catholic and their helpers English together; and they never can control UN now. I say get rid of Catholic agents controlling news media in Lanka and we can SAFLY SAIL THROUGH ANY CRISIS.
Getting back to Madame Clinton it seems;
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton through her Office in Washington D C announced that they have already rejected the election campaign funds sent by the Tamil Rehabilitation Organization (TRO) proscribed as an arm of the banned Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. A New Jersey resident in U S A, allegedly connected to TRO had sent in the funds. This was revealed to Sri Lanka’s Foreign Secretary Dr. Palitha Kohona and Bernard Goonatilake, Sri Lanka’s Ambassador in Washington? Unlike the good old days a few thousand $ wouldn’t do any good to appease Hillary, she must be gifted with a few million $!
In fact Hilary recognized two type of terrorist; the really bad terrorist was the Islamic ones? And the decent terrorists are the Jaffna Tamil catholic terrorist?
Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton?
“There are two Democratic visions for regulating Wall Street,” Sanders opens in his new 30-second ad airing in Iowa and New Hampshire. “One says it’s okay to take millions from big banks and then tell them what to do. My plan: break up the big banks, close the tax loopholes, and make them pay their fair share.” This is not pleasant news to banker so wall steet flooded Mrs.C election cofferers.
“Today there is no more doubts that Assad is the main target and not ISIL.
But how in the world DID Assad ascended to become such a big bad wolf in the western nexuses?
After angle Sadam Hussein wanted to sell oil not in dollars but in Euros! And that is an unacceptable as anything they knew?
Ditto Kaddafi who became such an unwavering enemy USA’s Oil for printed $ that he could not see whets in front of his face and just pressed on sell his oil for gold diners?
But what has Assad comparison to offer in comparison Sadam a g Kaddafi to get such atrocious treatment
In fact Syrian Civil War has been described as an “intensely sectarian conflict”. The focus of the conflict has been identified as a ruling minority Alawite government (with Alawites being a largely synergetic Shiite Muslim offshoot from which President Assad’s most senior political and military associates are drawn) and allied governments such as Iran, and pitted against the country’s Sunni Muslim majority who are aligned with the Syrian opposition and their Sunni Turkish and Persian Gulf State backers! The conflict had drawn in other ethno-religious minorities in the subcontinent including Armenians,Assyrians, Druze, Palestinians, Kurds, Yazidi, Mhallami, Arab Christians, Mandaeans, Turkmens and Greeks.
Alawites were mostly tolerant and hardly discriminates females. Having historically kept their beliefs secret from outsiders and non-initiated Alawites, so buzz and innuendo about them have cropped up.
Most people don’t know what this sect stands for and they care less!
So why should Osama be such a blatantly anti Assad and would wish to get rid of him at any price? Or is he a Sunni at heart? The answer is staring in ones face!
Let us assess the information provided in this essay earlier; and we can easily isolate some basic fact that I tried to hammer in with such lucidity? So what are vital points which must be considered in this connection?
- We recognize the fact that; Saudi royals are no longer are speaking of the 75billion they would wish to chip in?
- Undoubtedly there must be some sort of secret deals they must have hit upon!
- USA is currently printing notes like the devil so important exactly now and why so?
- And why such a zing sag policy concerning Assad!
- Why has a Silence descended in the Saudis camp!
And now one considers the above outlined points logically then one is bound to get a clearer prospective! US Administration took the easy way out thus hoodwinking the world and gave into Saudi demands! Not only Osama manipulated the world but deceived the American citizens as well. The reason why this left-right turn which is puzzling most everyone. Obama would have requested the Saudi wahabis to lie low and he would attend to Assad?
Why is Assad such a torn in USA’s butt? Obama must have agreed that Assad is practicing another religion and not the one what prophet Mahmud preached as Islam? So he need to taken off the equation and weighted against 750 billons is a ransom just cannot be ignored? In that sense just his toe nails must be costing a few billions!
If Mrs. C is the president would have the tenacity and the guts to take a decision against such chauvinistic bunch? I doubt very much!
Just saw in the internet the breaking news? This is unbelievable news the last thing I expected!! According to a press release:
Families of victims killed in the 2001 September 11 terror attacks may soon be able to sue Saudi Arabia’s government for damages after the US Senate passed legislation on Tuesday.
His would mean the next president will have to run through mine fields of terror supporting Islamic states! And strong blackmailing Saudis with 750 Billion $ WILLL BE AT THE FORFRANT?
This might be the last nail in the house of sound and perhaps the fall of the mighty Dollar AS WELL?
Above all Assad will survive the onslaught and threat hanging over his head for so long! The fall of the royal hose of said will be vicious!
Buddhist massacres along the Silk Road should be taken up! If Assad is wise he should propose and build a Buddhist temple in Damascus to show his tolerance to a creed which never took revenge for centuries and century’s mindless destruction done to them!
Sad to say if Mrs. Linton come to power in the white house then it would be business as usual, and would be worse than Osama years. They would shun that power mad woman and go for the intellectual; Bernie Sanders I believe that’s the only alternative left for Americans?
By Mahinda Weerasinghe