Why the British said no to Europe
Posted on June 27th, 2016

John Pilger Courtesy John Pilger.com

The majority vote by Britons to leave the European Union was an act of raw democracy. Millions of ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated and dismissed with open contempt by their presumed betters in the major parties, the leaders of the business and banking oligarchy and the media.

This was, in great part, a vote by those angered and demoralised by the sheer arrogance of the apologists for the “remain” campaign and the dismemberment of a socially just civil life in Britain. The last bastion of the historic reforms of 1945, the National Health Service, has been so subverted by Tory and Labour-supported privateers it is fighting for its life.

A forewarning came when the Treasurer, George Osborne, the embodiment of both Britain’s ancient regime and the banking mafia in Europe, threatened to cut £30 billion from public services if people voted the wrong way; it was blackmail on a shocking scale.

Immigration was exploited in the campaign with consummate cynicism, not only by populist politicians from the lunar right, but by Labour politicians drawing on their own venerable tradition of promoting and nurturing racism, a symptom of corruption not at the bottom but at the top. The reason millions of refugees have fled the Middle East – irst Iraq, now Syria – are the invasions and imperial mayhem of Britain, the United States, France, the European Union and Nato. Before that, there was the wilful destruction of Yugoslavia. Before that, there was the theft of Palestine and the imposition of Israel.

The pith helmets may have long gone, but the blood has never dried. A nineteenth century contempt for countries and peoples, depending on their degree of colonial usefulness, remains a centrepiece of modern “globalisation”, with its perverse socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor: its freedom for capital and denial of freedom to labour; its perfidious politicians and politicised civil servants.

All this has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of Tony Blair and impoverishing and disempowering millions. On 23 June, the British said no more.

The most effective propagandists of the “European ideal” have not been the far right, but an insufferably patrician class for whom metropolitan London is the United Kingdom. Its leading members see themselves as liberal, enlightened, cultivated tribunes of the 21st century zeitgeist, even “cool”. What they really are is a bourgeoisie with insatiable consumerist tastes and ancient instincts of their own superiority. In their house paper, the Guardian, they have gloated, day after day, at those who would even consider the EU profoundly undemocratic, a source of social injustice and a virulent extremism known as “neoliberalism”.

The aim of this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist theocracy that ensures a two-thirds society, with the majority divided and indebted, managed by a corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In Britain today, 63 per cent of poor children grow up in families where one member is working. For them, the trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of Britain’s second city, Greater Manchester, are, reports a study, “experiencing the effects of extreme poverty” and 1.6 million are slipping into penury.

Little of this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the bourgeois controlled media, notably the Oxbridge dominated BBC. During the referendum campaign, almost no insightful analysis was allowed to intrude upon the clichéd hysteria about “leaving Europe”, as if Britain was about to be towed in hostile currents somewhere north of Iceland.

On the morning after the vote, a BBC radio reporter welcomed politicians to his studio as old chums. “Well,” he said to “Lord” Peter Mandelson, the disgraced architect of Blairism, “why do these people want it so badly?” The “these people” are the majority of Britons.

The wealthy war criminal Tony Blair remains a hero of the Mandelson “European” class, though few will say so these days. The Guardian once described Blair as “mystical” and has been true to his “project” of rapacious war.  The day after the vote, the columnist Martin Kettle offered a Brechtian solution to the misuse of democracy by the masses. “Now surely we can agree referendums are bad for Britain”, said the headline over his full-page piece. The “we” was unexplained but understood – just as “these people” is understood. “The referendum has conferred less legitimacy on politics, not more,” wrote Kettle. ” … the verdict on referendums should be a ruthless one. Never again.”

The kind of ruthlessness Kettle longs for is found in Greece, a country now airbrushed. There, they had a referendum and the result was ignored.  Like the Labour Party in Britain, the leaders of the Syriza government in Athens are the products of an affluent, highly privileged, educated middle class, groomed in the fakery and political treachery of post-modernism. The Greek people courageously used the referendum to demand their government sought “better terms” with a venal status quo in Brussels that was crushing the life out of their country. They were betrayed, as the British would have been betrayed.

On Friday, the Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was asked by the BBC if he would pay tribute to the departed Cameron, his comrade in the “remain” campaign. Corbyn fulsomely praised Cameron’s “dignity” and noted his backing for gay marriage and his apology to the Irish families of the dead of Bloody Sunday. He said nothing about Cameron’s divisiveness, his brutal austerity policies, his lies about “protecting” the Health Service. Neither did he remind people of the war mongering of the Cameron government: the dispatch of British special forces to Libya and British bomb aimers to Saudi Arabia and, above all, the beckoning of world war three.

In the week of the referendum vote, no British politician and, to my knowledge, no journalist referred to Vladimir Putin’s speech in St. Petersburg commemorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of Nazi Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June, 1941. The Soviet victory – at a cost of 27 million Soviet lives and the majority of all German forces – won the Second World War.

Putin likened the current frenzied build up of Nato troops and war material on Russia’s western borders to the Third Reich’s Operation Barbarossa. Nato’s exercises in Poland were the biggest since the Nazi invasion; Operation Anaconda had simulated an attack on Russia, presumably with nuclear weapons. On the eve of the referendum, the quisling secretary-general of Nato, Jens Stoltenberg, warned Britons they would be endangering “peace and security” if they voted to leave the EU. The millions who ignored him and Cameron, Osborne, Corbyn, Obama and the man who runs the Bank of England may, just may, have struck a blow for real peace and democracy in Europe.

Follow John Pilger on twitter @johnpilger and on Facebook

9 Responses to “Why the British said no to Europe”

  1. Dilrook Says:

    Strategically, Russia should take all measures possible to worsen the European migrant crisis. This is what split the EU and cow down Europe without falling into US war mongering. Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Turkey and even Egypt and Algeria should cause a larger influx of migrants to Europe. They avoid Russia as it is in economic crisis.

    NATO war build up around the Baltic Sea will ease as more and more countries will start to act independently economically and militarily. Turkey (a NATO country) apologised yesterday to Russia for downing a jet. This is a clear sign of Turkey accepting defeat from Russia and taking back all the lies it and USA propagated on the Russian jet. Russian support for Kurdistan did the trick. Ukraine is in dire economic crisis. EU trying to salvage it will sink the EU. So is Greece.

    It makes sense for the EU to say no to USA now that the strongest US ally – UK is out of the EU. Sanctions on Russia must be removed and militarisation of Europe by USA must be stopped. EU can gain much more by dropping sanctions against Russia and stopping the arms race.

    If the EU is still not up for it, Russia must worsen its migrant crisis and put pressure on EU to accept Russia or suffer dismemberment. Ultimately Europe’s future lies not across the Atlantic Ocean but within Europe itself. USA has no business in Asia or Europe.

  2. Ananda-USA Says:

    Dilrook,

    I beg to differ with you that the USA has no vested interest in Europe.

    It has, and his toric ally has had such an interest.

    Don’t forget that it is US soldiers, US weapons and US wealth that rescued Western Europe in two World Wars and protected the world from the communist rampage in the post World-War 2 period.

  3. Dilrook Says:

    Ananda,

    That is true (agree with both rescues), however, today USA is only worsening the plight of Europe (and Asia).

  4. Christie Says:

    John Pilger on the distant voices and desperate lives of the Tamils.

    He sucks Indian imperialists. Indians less than three percent of UK population controls almost 8% of the GDP. Time to kick the Indian colonists from UK Mr. Pilger.

  5. NAK Says:

    Ananda, Does the US demanding its pound of flesh!

  6. Christie Says:

    It is the Russians who defatted the Germans in the European front.

  7. Dilrook Says:

    Now the Russians are eyeing China as a weapons purchaser since Western sanctions bite and India (Russia’s largest traditional weapons buyer) turns to the West more and more. This will dramatically change the East China Sea and South China Sea scenarios as China gets Russian weapons. It is impossible to match China in East Asia. Already ASEAN is cracking under pressure. Only Vietnam and the Philippines are strong US allies. Others value trade with China more than confrontation. A mini Brexit there.

    Russia must hedge India by selling offensive weapons to Pakistan and China. The rise and rise of India is a grave threat to Sri Lanka.

  8. Geeth Says:

    Please watch this video. It gives a good insight into current global politics behind Brexit.

    http://thesaker.is/the-meaning-of-brexit-the-bigger-picture-crosstalk/

  9. Christie Says:

    Rise of India is a threat to Ceylon as well as other countries in the Indian Ocean Rim including Indian colonies in Africa and Australia.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress