We have a problem – Can the same ethnic group demand Homeland/Self-determination in 2 different countries?
Posted on October 7th, 2016

Shenali D Waduge

 There are 72million Tamils living in Tamil Nadu, India. There are less than 2million Tamils living in Sri Lanka. Self-determination for Tamils started first in Tamil Nadu demanding a separate homeland and secession when the British were about to give independence to British created India and then the pillow of secessionism was passed on to Sri Lanka. Those demanding separatism using all types of words in circulation have been the Tamil political parties, LTTE, LTTE Diaspora in Sri Lanka while in India it originally started as a Dravidian movement then went on to We Tamil Movement for secession until it was passed on to Sri Lanka by the Indira Gandhi government. The question is can the same ethnic group using virtually the same demands claim 2 Homelands in two different countries? Isnt this creating an ugly precedence and likely to create chaos when the same ethnic groups in other parts of the world start demanding homelands citing they have been historically living in an area?

Let’s first look at the definition

Homeland

  • Cambridge dictionary  – the country you were born in
  • Oxford dictionary : A person or a people’s native land.
  • Wikipedia :  country of origin, native land, country in which a particular national identity began.

In short we shall connote Homeland to mean the country of one’s birth and from where one originates.

Self-determination

Self-determination originated during decolonization. Let us not forget that people and territories were divided or created by former colonial invaders/occupiers who with a pen created new territories and divided people as they deemed fit. If people were divided by tribes, culture, religion and ethnicity it was by the Western Christian colonials and it is these same nations who are now politically using the term to further carve out nations. Today the word has become a battering ram for political correctness and phony liberal experiments riding on people’s sentiments for geopolitical profits and political mileage. The plethora of opinions and notions have thrown the word into an open

Starting initially with demands for a Dravidian Federation by T M Parthasarathy combining Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, the quest for self-determination became Tamil Nadu for Tamils in 1939 after the other states chose not to separate. Yet in 1940 Dravida Nadu Independence Movement was launched with a resolution and a map of the proposed Dravida Nadu. DM Dravidar Kazhagam was launched in 1944 promising to fight for a separate Tamil Nadu for which both Jinnah and Gandhi disagreed in 1947.

It was in 1949 December that the ITAK was formed in Ceylon calling for separate Tamil Nation in Sri Lanka.

In 1962 DMK went from house to house calling for a separate Tamil Homeland. However, separatism in Tamil Nadu was quelled with the 16th amendment in 1963. That did not stop the Tamil Nadu Liberation Army forming in the 1980s. It was in the late 1970s that the Indira Gandhi Government trained Sri Lankan Tamil youth clandestinely in Tamil Nadu and sent them under tutelage of Indian intelligence to carry out a guerilla warfare on ethnic lines against the Sri Lankan government. Prabakaran formed Tamil New Tigers in 1972 the same year that the Vaddukoddai Resolution calling for separatism in Sri Lanka. In 1975 Prabakaran killed a Tamil Mayor Alfred Duraiappah and then in 1976 May 5 Prabakaran re-named TNT as the LTTE.

Take a good look at the demands of the Tamil political parties, the LTTE, the other LTTE militant groups, the LTTE fronts operating from overseas and their demands are identical calling for separatism. The same separatism that Tamil Nadu was calling for – but in two different countries.

The similarities in the separatist chants by Tamil Nadu Tamils against Hindi India and Sri Lankan Tamils against Sinhalese in Sri Lanka is also noteworthy.

While Tamils opposed post-independent Hindi rule and Hindi domination, Ceylon Tamils opposed Sinhala rule as it reversed all the preferential treatment Tamils had been enjoying pre-independence as part of British divide and rule strategy.

While Tamil Nadu opposed the 16th amendment prohibiting separatism by the Indian Government the Tamil political parties also objected to the 6th amendment introduced by the Sri Lankan Government. Racist parties in both India and Sri Lanka won with landslide victories with the Sri Lankan Tamil party even becoming the Main Opposition Party.

The main difference in the two separatist calls is that Tamil Nadu separatism stems from the fact that there was no India until the British cobbled together independent territories and princely kingdoms to make one administrative unit called British occupied India and this is the basis of Tamil Nadu demand for separatism. In Sri Lanka’s case we are an island nation and it was under Sinhale kings until the advent of colonial invasion and occupation.

Tamil leaders in both countries claim they wish to look after ‘their people’ – however Dalits in Tamil Nadu are treated worse than slaves while the Tamil Northern province does not even spend the money they request to look after their province and instead enjoys going round the world complaining.

The other difference is that pre-independence Tamils were the bulk of indentured labor transported to all corners of the world to work on the plantations and were treated like shit by the British, however the minority Tamils in Sri Lanka later known as Ceylon Tamils since 1911 were given preferential treatment as part of British divide and rule policy.

Now we come to the problem

  • How can the same ethnic group use the same slogans to demand self-determination in two countries?
  • Tamil language, Tamil heritage, Tamil culture, Tamil traditions, Tamil physical appearance etc are COMMON to Tamils in both Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu.
  • How can the SAME ETHNIC GROUP claim to EVOLVE in TWO COUNTRIES to use criteria of language, culture, native land to demand for a separate state (or any of the other terms now being used)?
  • If Sri Lankan Tamils instead of referring to themselves as Tamils claimed self-determination in view of living in the north for a long period, that argument could have been at least debated, however when Tamils in Tamil Nadu and Tamils in Sri Lanka are demanding homelands using the same criteria – we are a bit confused.
  • Tamils cannot have evolved in two different countries. A race evolves in one country and then by migration spreads. This is why we continue to say that Tamils in Sri Lanka came from South India and that is why South India has over 70million Tamils and Sri Lanka less than 2million Tamils.
  • The Sinhalese evolved in Sri Lanka – there are no Sinhalese anywhere else in the world except those who migrated from Sri Lanka. Sinhalese language is spoken only in Sri Lanka. There are enough of proof to show a civilization existed in North Sri Lanka and despite 17 invasions from South India who destroyed most of the Buddhist architecture, when Cyril Mathew compiled the report to UNESCE in 1983 there were significant remains still – all these highlights that the Sinhalese have every right to claim self-determination themselves using the same criteria that is being used afterall Sri Lanka was also colonized, the majority were marginalized and divide and rule policies affected the majority Sinhalese which demands reverse discrimination.

The crux of the problem is this – the same ethnic group cannot use terminologies in vogue and in the UN system to claim homeland for the same reason in two different countries. We are not saying that Tamils cannot demand a homeland what we are saying is that a Tamil homeland is where the original Tamils were born and it is certainly not in Sri Lanka’s North. The original quest for a Tamil Homeland began in Tamil Nadu, using the same demands it began later in Sri Lanka.

This will be the first time the same ethnic group is calling for homelands in two different countries for the same reasons. We wait to see the theories the UN and other local lackeys will come up with to get away with this lie. The same ethnic group cannot evolve in two different countries. This is no laughing matter. If allowed it will only create a precedence where the same ethnic groups will start demanding homelands in all parts of the world as well. The same ethnic group cannot have homelands in all parts of the world citing the same reasons!

Therefore, the Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka quest does not have historical basis in Sri Lanka it has no real argument either. To overcome this we now see the demands of a Greater Eelam comprising entire Tamil Nadu and North and Eastern parts of Sri Lanka. Is this the gameplan riding on lies?

shenali07101601

 

Shenali D Waduge

Demand for Dravida Nadu – http://tamilnation.co/heritage/aryan_dravidian/dravidanadu.htm

22 Responses to “We have a problem – Can the same ethnic group demand Homeland/Self-determination in 2 different countries?”

  1. S.Gonsal Says:

    No! Not at all. Excellent explanation and no need of reading the map shows the fraud !
    There could be few possibilities of homelands for this Evil Race call Tamils.

    1. Both the island and the part sub-continent could have been evil home land originally and some very POWERFUL price Vijaya conquered the island , committed genocide and later became the Dhammadeepa, a heaven of earth. EVen now it is a heaven compared to Evil Nadu.
    (In that case it should remain that way because hell is worse than heaven)

    2. Both island and the part sub-continent belonged to Sinhalese, and Evil Tamils came from hell and committed genocide in the upper part and became hell thereafter.
    (In that case there is no Homeland of evil in Dhamma Deepa). Bogus claim.

    3. The above (2.) happened in Northern part of Dhammadeepa and the North of the island became parasitic to Dahmmadeepa, stopping the countries progress.
    (In this case, which is the obvious TRUTH ( logically speaking), STOP THESE STUPID BOGUS claims and LEARN to live like human beings)

  2. S.Gonsal Says:

    With the exception of a very small minority ( who could have been mixed with some other race), Tamil Race is naturally evil. This is why when the 90% of Subcontinent was ( some time ago) Buddhist, Hinduism including the rituals of sacrificing of thousands of animals remained in Tamil Nadu and later spread to whole of subcontinent.
    1. They are born liars, lying is in their blood. They make use of every part of the brains to make false claims and allegations.
    2. They cheat wheresoever possible
    3. They are cruel. They kill each other mercilessly and even invented suicide jacket.

  3. Dilrook Says:

    The key is Sinhalas evolved in Sri Lanka from pre-historic humans that came to the island. They had no language or culture. They were Homo Sapiens. If we came from Bengal, Orissa, Gujarat, Kerala or Tamil Nadu we should be speaking their language, following their religion and having their culture. But we don’t. We have a unique language, culture and religion. That proves Sinhalas are the sons of the soil of the island of Sri Lanka. Ideally, this fact must be constitutionally recognised.

    Tamils on the other hand follow South Indian language, religion and culture. Clearly proving they are South Indians, not Sri Lankans.

  4. Fran Diaz Says:

    The real Tamil Problem originates in Tamil Nadu.
    The Real Problem is the 3,000 yr old Caste System.
    Birth Certificates issued in INDIA (including Tamil Nadu, a part of INDIA), carries each persons Caste identity.
    There are over 20 Million Tamils of Dalit origin in Tamil Nadu.
    In INDIA, there are over 200 Million people of Dalit origin.
    INDIA does her Census on Caste base.

    Sri Lanka does NOT state Caste on birth certificates.
    Sri Lanka has the Tamil language in place, Tamil as a National Language – Special Prov – (SWRD) in 1958.
    The ILLEGAL 13-A from INDIA, forced the Tamil language as an Official Language in 1987.
    FREE Education, health care, subsidised food, etc. are given to ALL in Lanka.

    The British colonists brought in Tamil people form Tamil Nadu area for the Tea industry in particular.
    Over one and a half Million Tamil people were brought by the British & the Dutch to work the tea, tobacco etc plantations.
    Many thousands of ILLEGAL Tamil migrants have come into Lanka, particularly during the period of the LTTE rule in the North of Lanka.
    P’karan said that about a third of the LTTE army in the North consisted of Indian Tamils. They have to be illegal migrants.

    The Tamil leaders brought in the Vadukoddai Resolution in 1976 (Eelam through Violence)
    The LTTE formed AFTER the V’koddai Resolution was brought in. INDIA trained the LTTE in Tamil Nadu in the 1980s, AFTER the V’koddai Resoln.
    The 1983 trumped up Riots happened AFTER the V’koddai Resolution of 1976. These Riots enabled Tamils to go west as “Refugees”. There was no other way for nearly a million Tamils to go abroad to the west.

    Even though so many Tamil folks went west as ‘Refugees’, the numbers of Tamils in Lanka are the same. Most of the people in Lanka who are Tamils could be illegal migrants.

    So, how can there be ‘Genocide of Tamils in Lanka’ ?
    Why come in as ILLEGAL migrants to a country that “has Genocide of Tamils” going on ??
    Why claim about one third of Lanka and 2/3 of the coast line as Tamil Eelam if ‘Genocide of Tamils’ is going on in Lanka ?

    Also, how can Tamil people claim Tamil Eelam homeland in Lanka when they already have a Homeland in Tamil Nadu, INDIA ?

    We would like the Tamil leaders of Lanka to answer these questions.

  5. Cerberus Says:

    Thank you Shenali, This is a brilliant expose of the Tamil fraud that has been perpetrated ever since we got independence. It has been sustained because of support from India and the West for their own strategic geopolitical reasons. Ever since the first Colonists (Portuguese) came in 1505 the Sinhala Buddhist culture which had been sustained for 2600 years began to decline. It was the worst under the British who brought 1.5 million Tamil Dalits to Sri Lanka changing the ethnic mix permanently. It is the British who even today support the unjust Tamil cause for separatism. We the Sinhala Buddhists are the minority in an ocean of Tamil Dalits 12 miles away across the Palk straits. Please see: http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2015/12/24/it-is-the-sinhalese-who-need-protection-under-the-r2p-of-the-un-from-77-million-tamils-across-the-palk-straits/

  6. S.Gonsal Says:

    If any Homo Sapien looks at that simple map will understand that the ONLY WAY TO SOLVE THE EXISTING KOLAVERI is to wipe out the slightly shaded green infestation and make it white , back to Homo Sapien stage.

    Problem is we have the current politicians who are sub Home Sapiens, greedy with saliva dropping from mouths all the time.

  7. plumblossom Says:

    There is no Tamil Homeland! It is a completely bogus invention. The writer has got the history slightly wrong. Even the most recent Pandyan invasion just prior to the arrival of the Portuguese in the 16th century by Aryachakravarthi only invaded the Jaffna peninsula only and the settlement of the Jaffna peninsula was very sparse. All earlier invasions by the Cholas etc. they invaded Anuradhapura and Pollonnaruwa and these was for short periods of time and there were no settlements whatsoever at all as a result. Most Tamils were brought over by the Portugese and the Dutch to work on Tobacco and Indigo plantations set up by the Portugese and the Dutch after the 16th century.

    There were from around 600BC over 43 attempted invasions of the island by the Chola, Kalinga, Pandya, Vijayanagar and other South and Indian Kingdoms etc. However only six succeeded. There was one invasion by a Malayan kingdom too. These were during Sinhala Kings Walagamba, Dhutugemunu, Dhathusena, Vijayabahu I, Parakramabahu II, Buvanekabahu V and Parakramabahu VI times. However invaders invaded Anuradhapura, Pollonnaruwa and stayed only for a short period of time and left the island once they were overwhelmed. There were no settlements due to these invasions except the very last invasion by Aryachakravarthi of the Jaffna Peninsula.

    When looking at Sri Lanka’s history, it is extremely obvious that from 600BC to around 1400AD there were three kingdoms, all Sinhala Buddhist, Ruhuna, Pihiti or Rajarata and Maya or Malayarata. Rajarata encompassed today’s North Central, North Western, Northern and even the Central Province. Ruhunu rata encompassed today’s Uva, Eastern and Southern Provinces. The Kandyan Kingdom from 1400AD encompassed most of the island inclusive of today’s Northern and the Eastern Provinces except for the Jaffna Peninsula. Even the Jaffna Peninsula was invaded and occupied by force by Aryachakravarthi (Pandyan) and actually did belong to Rajarata earlier and later the Kandyan Kingdom.

    Today’s provincial boundaries were drawn up by the British colonialists as per their divide and rule policy and the Sinhala people were not consulted when drawing up these provincial boundaries. In the meantime, most Sri Lankan Tamils of today were actually brought over during Dutch and British times to the Jaffna Peninsula and elsewhere to work on tobacco and indigo plantations which were planted extensively in all the colonies since they were much sought after and made a lot of money for the colonialists. Therefore they are recent arrivals and cannot claim homelands or separate states whatsoever.

    The usual practice when a colonial power hands over their former colonies is to hand it over to its original owners. Therefore the British colonialists should hand over the Kandyan Kingdom to the Kandyan Sinhalese from whom they took it by force. Since the Kandyan Kingdom encompassed the North and the East, these provinces too should be handed over to the Kandyan Sinhalese who are its rightful owners. Even the Jaffna Peninsula should be handed over to the Kandyan Sinhalese since it was part of Rajarata and was forcefully occupied by Aryachakravarthi (Pandyan).

    Since this has now been done already, the TNA, other separatists or the US, UK EU, Canada, Norway, Sweden and India cannot demand that present day Northern or even the Eastern provinces be provided any more powers or be made into federal states since this is totally going against the history and archaeology of the island and totally going against the rights of the Sinhala people who also have fundamental rights to claim the entire island inclusive of the North and the East as their homeland first and foremost.

    History which was dropped as a subject should be taught at school since Sri Lanka has a very long history and it is very beneficial for the next generation to learn the history and archaeology of the island based on actual archaeological findings, archaeological ruins, artefacts, stone inscriptions, ola leaf writings and so on. Otherwise people will believe any bogus history invented by interested parties to their benefit, not based on facts but invented for their own nefarious purposes. Today these settlers such as the Sri Lankan Tamils are inventing history for their own purposes without any archaeological evidence whatsoever to back up such bogus claims. Therefore it is imperative that history is taught as a subject in school as soon as possible.

  8. plumblossom Says:

    The writer has asked for further historical facts and figures. Apart from many Buddhist ruins, the writer has missed a very important part of the Sinhala Buddhist civilization which is the extensive hydraulic system that still prevails in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. The Sinhala kings built over 10,000 (please check this figure in research papers for accuracy) large, medium and small scale irrigation reservoirs in Rajarata and Ruhuna encompassing today’s, North Central, North, Eastern, North Western provinces. For example Yodha Wewa Reservoir in today’s Mannar in the North was built by the Sinhala King Dathusena or Mahasen. The Pavatkulam Reservoir in Vavuniya in the North was built by the Sinhala King Dathusena or Mahasen. The Kanthale Reservoir in the East was built by Sinhala King Agbo II. All of the irrigation reservoirs present in the North Central, North, North Western and East were built by Sinhala Kings.

    In fact, to get the water to flow out of the reservoirs in a smooth manner, the Sinhala Engineers invented the biso kotuwa or the besi kotuwa (as in wathura besi kotuwa), a type of valve pit, or a type of water outlet out falling from the reservoir where water pressure can be managed so as not to damage the tank bund. Another use of the Sinhala irrigation Engineer was the anicut where a river’s water was diverted using a dam type structure built across the river partially blocking the river flow and diverting the water into open flow canals.

    The amazing and extensive irrigation system in Sri Lanka’s dry zone encompassing today’s North Central, North, East and North Western Provinces encompassing over 10,000 (please check this figure for accuracy) large, medium and small scale reservoirs, open flow canals etc. was built by the Sinhala Kings.

    Therefore there is no doubt whatsoever that there was a Sinhala Buddhist civilization encompassing today’s North Central, North, East and North Western Provinces, even just by considering this extensive irrigation reservoir system. R.L. Brohier , H.C.P. Bell, D.LO. Mendis, Henry Parker and many archaeologists, irrigation engineers and surveyors have written many books and research papers on this subject. In fact even the British Governor at the time Sir Henry Ward marvelled at the ingenious of the Sinhala irrigation engineer and wrote on the subject and Even Sir Emerson Tennent, another British Governor marvelled at the ingenious Sinhala irrigation engineer and wrote on the subject. In fact, the Sinhala irrigation engineer was a master of hydraulics. Not only that extensive data on rainfall patterns would have had to be collected to figure out the capacity of the irrigation reservoirs and their placing. Very accurate surveying of the lay of the land would have had to be carried out to come up with very accurate contour maps in order to figure out the trace of the open channel flow canals.

  9. Ancient Sinhalaya Says:

    It is different in Sri Lanka of course. Why? Sri Lanka is easy meat now. Traitor UNPatriotic yama pallan will let
    anybody do anything as long as they can fill their pockets. Sri Lanka, Sinhalese and Buddhism are nothing to
    the traitor YAMA PALLAN. Traitor chief die hard catholic token Buddhist Batalande Wadakaya pol pot ponil
    wickrama Sinhalakiller is ruling Sri Lanka today. So all the tamils, mussies and catholics know they can dismember
    Sri Lanka.

    When MR was running the country, catholic west, traitor two faced india along with the traitor tamils, mussies
    and catholics all behaved. Why? Because MR was not a puppet. He didn’t take any notice of these traitors
    and developed the country, not just south the whole country. Sri Lanka was booming. If he had carried on like
    that people would have reconciled in a few years since people will be working hard and enjoying life in a booming
    economy. Now bunch of traitors ruling Sri Lanka. So tamils, mussies, west and india know anything is possible.
    They know this is the best time to dismember Sri Lanka.

    Tamils’ bogus claims for a motherland is laughable. Look at a few facts. They are mainly in 3 areas in Sri Lanka.
    North, east – dutch brought them to work in tobacco plantations
    Up country – british brought them to work in tea plantations
    coastal belt – 60s kallathonis who came/swam/crossed from tn to save their lives from severe famine there.

    Then their ancient kingdoms without an ancient tamil brick to show. They exist only in books and www. That’s how
    ridiculous their claims are. Everyone, including them, knows they were mythical kingdoms. As Sinhalese are divided
    thanks to traitor UNPatriotic party plus almost all Sinhalese deshapaluwan are there just to lining their pockets
    they make these ridiculous claims knowing they are making progress. Sinhalaya famous for being modayas are
    mara ninde. No wonder Sinhalaya called modayas. Thanks to UNPatriotic party they have become dhrohiyas
    as well.

  10. anura seneviratna Says:

    Great expose’, many thanks Shenali.

    “homeland” can also be meant where one or a community set up home in a country having come from a country of national origin elsewhere.

    But ” indigenous national motherland” refers more to the original country of a nation of people.

    The theory of humankind originated in ONE place on earth sounds mythical and god based. What can be so special in one area of earth for a humanoid to spring and not elsewhere? Possibility that humans originated from different parts of the earth with differing physical and mental characteristics is rational.

  11. Susantha Wijesinghe Says:

    SA K !! KALLATHONIS ARE PEOPLE WHO COME ON THE SLY. YOU MAY BE A KALLATHONI EH ?

    Dear Editor,

    I would appreciate if you would PLEASE delete, above comment by SA K, insulting LORD BUDDHA, repeatedly. Thanks.

  12. aravinda Says:

    Problem and answer lies in India. India was united by British for purpose of adminstration. India is a loosely amalgamated area consist of number of nations. Sooner or later it will break up. west will see to that. Tamil Nadu will spring up as a independent nation for Tamil people. It will take time, but it is definite. 72 million is bigger than 2 million. 72 million wins. We will see a independent Tamil nation in south India. Wish them well.

    Sri Lankans should never allow FEDERALISM. If they do, north east Federal part will join in with Republic of Tamil Nadu.

  13. Christie Says:

    They come within who are called Persons of Indian Origin and Non Resident Indians. After the ETCA NRIs will skyrocket.

  14. Christie Says:

    Shenali, Editor and others:

    Indian colonial parasites and vermin are all over the world. Please do not delete any comments even if they are offensive to some.

    Buddha I believe was born in the island and Asoka took the teachings and processed and packed and send back to the island.

  15. Ancient Sinhalaya Says:

    Susantha W is right. Sak insulted Lord Buddha. Moderator should delete his comment and throw the real
    kallathoniya out of this website. What can you expect from a Sak…. ? The traitor lot are never grateful, never
    loyal, never Sri Lankan, can never have enough, never happy. They won’t be happy until they get their drealam!
    Traitors to the core!

  16. SA Kumar Says:

    All MY Sinhala Sakodayas I have more respect Lord Bhudda & Mother Lanka than You All or at least same as you .
    it is not my intention to insult Lord Bhudda or even not you all what my concern is why We both can not understand basic thing what happieng in Mother Lanka that We both are kaput now !!!!

    Why Indian flag is flying in Jaffana sky ???? for how long ???

  17. SA Kumar Says:

    They won’t be happy until they get their drealam!- Correct , Ape Mother Lanka !!!!

  18. SA Kumar Says:

    YOU MAY BE A KALLATHONI EH ? Yes , I am (meaning my Ancient Eela Raja (Elra)).

  19. S.Gonsal Says:

    SAK(allathoni),
    Buddha did not settle down in Sri Lanka forever as your forefathers did. He came, gave a sermon and left. He passed away in India. So we respect him. If your mother and father also went back to India voluntarily and passed away there we will respect them than calling them Kallathoni.

  20. Lorenzo Says:

    Good one Gonsal.

    But there is more. Look at these INDISPUTABLE proof how GODS avoided TN and those people.

    1. Buddha lived in Nepal, Madya Pradesh and Orissa. He visited SL 3 times. But he NEVER EVER visited TAMIL MADU, ANDRA or KERALA that are along the way! He avoided these horror cesspits. It would have been very difficult as SOUTH ENDIA is between where Buddha lived and SL. But he DELEIBERATELY avoided these dirt. It should teach us.

    What a fantastic HINT made peacefully but LOUDLY.

    2. The MOST POPULAR god among Tamils is MURUGAN but he too AVOIDED living among Tamils and opted to live in a SINGHALA ONLY area called KATARAGAMA. Even MURUGAN avoids Tamils.

    These are NOT flukes. They are deliberate decisions made by gods to give a HINT to people.

  21. SA Kumar Says:

    S.Gonsal
    Buddha did not settle down in Sri Lanka forever as your forefathers did- At last Lord Bhuddha from Indian & Prince Vijeya & his 400 friends & their wife from India & Me & my ancient apart from you & your ancient , now you know why we-Demila Sakkiliyar call you Sinhala Modaya machang !!!!

    Live & let’s live machan , why this kolaveri ????

  22. Fran Diaz Says:

    Buddhist countries must learn how to properly protect themselves in a globalised world with globalised systems in place.

    The ECONOMY must be turned around first, to primarily benefit the citizens of Lanka.
    Clean Air, Water & Food for ALL should be the goal.

    (See Shenali’s article on the Economy).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress