Call for autonomous unit in North-East renewed GTF seeks talks on proposal though not being included in Wijenayake Report
Posted on November 7th, 2016

The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) on behalf of the Sri Lankan Tamils resident overseas has called for the creation of an ‘Autonomous Tamil Region’ (ATR) in a re-merged Northern and Eastern Province to address their grievances. The two provinces comprise eight administrative districts.

The GTF has acknowledged that a consensus among Tamil and Muslim leaders is a prerequisite for creating an autonomous unit. The proposal has been included in four separate proposals dealing with contentious issue of power sharing. In addition to them, the GTF has made ten specific recommendations regarding administrative autonomy exercised by what it called ATR

government, division of powers between the Centre and ATR government, responsibility for land and ports in re-merged Provinces, generating domestic and foreign investments, responsibility in respect of law and order, financial sector, future change of governance structures subjected to ATR government’s approval.

The UK-headquartered GTF has submitted its proposals to the 19-member Public Representations Committee (PRC) on Constitutional Reforms headed by attorney-at-law Lal Wijenayake. The GTF has also made available a copy of its proposals to the four-party Tamil National Alliance (TNA) for its consideration. The influential grouping with access to both British and US administrations underscored the pivotal importance of ‘rearrangement of governance structures’ to achieve primary objectives of the proposed new Constitution.

The proposals have been made on the basis of 13th Amendment to the Constitution is ‘too weak and fragile’ hence far reaching constitutional reforms are required.

The GTF represents influential Tamil Diaspora groups in Europe, Australia, the US etc. The GTF works closely with the Illankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi led TNA, the main Opposition in parliament though the Joint Opposition (JO) comprises 50 members in parliament.

GTF spokesperson Suren Surendiran told The Island that the grouping was confident that its proposals would be taken into consideration by political parties though the Report on PRC on Constitutional Reforms didn’t contain them. Recollecting talks between the GTF and the government at the highest level over a period of time, Surendiran asserted that their proposals needed to be discussed and an understanding reached.

Asked whether the GTF’s proposals were in line with those of the TNA, Surendiran said: “TNA has its manifesto commitments which is on what the people elected them. There will be many points where both GTF’s and TNA’s proposals converge.”

The GTF has warned the government that the failure on its part to address their just grievances will certainly strengthen extremist elements within the Tamil community.


GTF proposals for a New Constitution

Context

1. The authoritarian trajectory and the sharpening of the national conflict in Sri Lanka during the last four decades can be traced to a high degree to the inadequacies of the 1972 and 1978 republican constitutions, which concentrated power in a single institution without effective checks and balances, and entrenched, rather than countered, majoritarianism, in particular the Sinhala-Buddhist character and dominance of the state.

2. The removal of the specific minority protection clause existed in the Soulbury constitution (Section 29, which was then thought of as unalterable), and the outright rejection of the Tamil demand for regional power sharing in the 1972 and 1978 constitutions and consequent non-participation of the elected Tamil representatives in the constitution making process, effectively excluded Tamils as a people from the foundations of the state.

3. The denial of the Tamil aspiration to meaningfully exercise self-rule within Sri Lanka (including by unilateral abrogation of the power-sharing agreements signed with the elected Tamil representatives); the programs implemented to weaken the national existence of Tamils through a policy of colonisation and systematic discrimination (particularly in the areas of language, higher education and employment); the violent suppression of the peaceful protests and civil disobedience campaigns; and the killings of hundreds to thousands of innocent Tamils in periodic, communal riots at times carried out with state complicity, eventually led to the call for the creation of a separate Tamil state and an armed struggle.

4. Though the civil war that afflicted all communities ended in 2009, the Tamil aspiration for meaningful self-rule in the North-East of the island (an area Tamils consider as their traditional homeland over several centuries), and to be treated as equals throughout the country, remain as strong as ever. A strong affiliation and consistent demand by the Tamil people for power sharing based on the idea of federal autonomy in the North-East Sri Lanka, a proposition repeatedly mandated in elections, is sought as a means to preserve and prosper as a distinct people in their areas of historic habitation, with full recognition and respect of the uniqueness and aspirations of all other communities living there, in particular the Tamil speaking Muslims.

5. The absence of war and the lessons learnt from it, and the virulent experiences of the society from the authoritarian policies of the recent past have created conditions favourable for political renaissance in Sri Lanka. The political changes of January 2015 and the present coalition government of traditionally antagonistic political parties are a reflection of this reality, and the attempt to write a new constitution to reflect the wishes and aspirations of all peoples, is an important development consistent with the new thinking. This opens up the opportunity to bring the Tamil people into the constitutional fold, a historic first for the republic.

6. All aspects that are being considered in the constitutional deliberations – abolishing the executive presidency, reforming the electoral system, incorporating Bill of Rights of international standards, ensuring independence of judiciary and other legal institutions, and resolving the national question – are critical to produce a constitution that is vital for good governance, protection of human rights and national reconciliation. However, addressing the Tamil national question through a policy of credible power sharing that promotes Tamil self-governance within united Sri Lanka is the primary focus of this submission.

7. From a Tamil perspective, the new constitution is viewed as the primary means through which the long standing Tamil national question could be addressed. In searching for a political solution, we (GTF) express our solidarity with the political aspirations of the Tamil-speaking Muslims and the upcountry Tamils, and our willingness to work in partnership with the Sinhalese community. Any long-term political solution, in our view, has to significantly rearrange the governance structures of the country to affirm the distinctiveness and empowerment of the different peoples, to affirm their physical safety, and to forge a truly meaningful unity, within a plural, multinational state, where the political majority cannot transpire into an instrument of oppression.

8. The current state structure of Sri Lanka entrenches discrimination and subjugation of the Tamil people through a unitary constitution, the centralisation of power and governance, and majoritarian decision-making. The 13th amendment to the Sri Lankan constitution, enacted as a part of the Indo-Lanka Accord, is the present constitutional arrangement to mitigate this problem, by providing a mechanism to limited empowerment of the people in the regions. It has been proved without doubt during the last 28 years that the 13th amendment is too weak and fragile to be easily undermined by the centre and does not provide a sufficiently comprehensive framework to arrive at a lasting solution to the Tamil national question.

9. It is vital that following the end of the civil war the root causes of the conflict are addressed, and power sharing and genuine devolution of power are important components of such a response. It is equally important to recognize that the Tamil people voted for moderation and engagement at the Presidential and Parliamentary elections in 2015, rejecting strongly antagonistic politics, and also played a decisive role in the 2015 political transformations. Failure to respond adequately to the reasonable demands for decentralisation of power to the regions and equality will only strengthen the emergence of forces of extremism within the Tamil community. Whereas effectively addressing these issues is the best guarantee for peace and against threats to the unity and territorial integrity of the country.

10. GTF calls for genuine and open-minded negotiations and eventual consensus among all the major political parties representing various communities to arrive at a political solution that will be incorporated into the new constitution. On our part, we are committed to provide all necessary assistance to support the lead role expected to be played by the elected representatives of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka.

Territorial Decentralisation

11. Political decentralization along territorial lines is emerging as a key element in contemporary civil war settlements. Territorial decentralization recognizes the political and spatial realities on the ground, granting each group a region within a state, mitigates fears of political exploitation and inter group violence and, at least, in part satisfies local demands for greater autonomy. At the same time, decentralization maintains existing external borders, and thus does not challenge the principle of territorial integrity. In effect, territorial decentralization addresses the political insecurities and desire for self-determination that lead to conflict, without dismantling the overall state structure.

12. We believe that territorial decentralization is the only valuable tool in the transition to peace in Sri Lanka. It is a signal of moderation and accommodation by the political majority that can allay minority fears about its likely treatment in the future, and should benefit both the political majority, who gain from sustained territorial integrity and a united country, and the political minority that aims for greater autonomy and local control over cultural, economic, internal security and social policies.

13. The Sri Lankan government that negotiated the Indo Lanka Accord of July 1987, recognised the Northern and Eastern provinces as the areas of historical habitation of the Tamil speaking peoples, who have at all times hitherto lived together in this territory with other community groups, and agreed to permit the adjoining provinces to join to form one administrative unit, requiring a referendum later to decide whether the merger should be permanent.

14. The nine provinces and their present boundaries have colonial origin and are somewhat arbitrary in their construct. Regrouping the provinces and/or revisiting their boundaries should be seriously considered as an option if that would create more meaningful political and administrative units compatible with the current needs of the society.

15. Several countries around the world have generated political systems that bind a distinct, territorially-concentrated people into a larger, non-centralized state while allowing them to maintain their own political identities. Certain characteristics and principles are common to all such successful power sharing arrangements: a written constitution or basic law stipulating the distribution of powers; diffusion of power among the constituent elements, which are substantially self-sustaining; territorial divisions to ensure neutrality and proportionality in the representation of various groups, interests and government entitlements; and changes requiring the consent of those affected. Such successful systems tend to have a sense of common nationality and promote direct lines of communication between the citizens and their governments.

16. We believe that a precondition for reconciliation and development is the creation of a just and fair society to all, which will in turn provide the necessary environment for economic, social, and cultural rights to flourish alongside state stability. Sri Lanka will not achieve stability and prosperity unless these basic essentials are addressed by the new constitution.

Basic Principles underlying a New Constitution

General Principles

17. The Republic of Sri Lanka is one, free, sovereign and independent state consisting of the institutions of the centre and of the regions, and the institutions shall reflect the pluralist character of the society and exercise power as laid down in the constitution.

18. The multi-ethnic, multi-lingual and multi-religious character of Sri Lankan society as well as the identities and aspirations of its constituent peoples shall be constitutionally recognised.

19. Constitution should recognise the different identified peoples as constituting the country and having an equal stake, a proposition that needs to be included in the preamble which can also state that we are making a new beginning, acknowledging the past.

20. The right of every constituent people to develop its own identity, language, to develop and promote its culture, and to preserve its history, and the right to its due share of state power including the right to due representation in institutions of governance (legislative, administrative, judicial and armed forces) shall be recognized, while also strengthening and promoting the common Sri Lankan identity and peaceful coexistence.

21. The constitution shall be based on the basic constitutional principles and values including sovereignty of the people, participatory democracy and supremacy of the constitution which shall form an unalterable basic structure.

a) Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law

b) Representative and participatory democracy

c) Human dignity, social justice, advancement of fundamental rights and freedom, including abolition of death penalty

d) Racial, religious and gender equality

e) Non-discrimination

f) Minimum 1/3rd representation of women at all levels of representative bodies

22. The form of government shall be Parliamentary, with the executive powers exercised by the Cabinet of Ministers.

23. A strong and enforceable Bill of Rights consistent with universally accepted norms and standards shall be incorporated.

24. There shall be separation of powers and an independent judiciary which shall also include a Constitutional Court, and the separation of the judiciary and executive must be ensured.

25. Important institutions shall be independent and accountable. Appointments to these and other High Posts shall be through a transparent mechanism that provides for a national consensus, for example the Constitutional Council.

26. Sinhala, Tamil and English shall remain the official languages.

27. The Republic of Sri Lanka shall be a secular state.

28. The repeal of all politically repressive, anti-democratic or discriminatory legislation and regulations which have been enacted by successive governments since 1947.

Power Sharing

29. Power sharing shall be on the basis of self-rule and shared-rule within an undivided Sri Lanka.

A. Self-Rule: Based on subsidiarity and maximum devolution to regions/provinces consistent with the unity of the state.

B. Shared Rule: Institutions of power sharing at the centre (e.g., regional/provincial representation in a second chamber).

30. The new constitution should generate national and regional institutions which would ensure mutual respect for the basic rights and legitimate aspirations of all the people of Sri Lanka and also bring about active and mutually beneficial cooperation towards the realization of social and economic prosperity for all.

31. Tamil demand for autonomy is not aimed at any form of isolation, but on the contrary for empowerment and to be in a better position to contribute to the collective wellbeing of all.

This calls for the correct balance between autonomy and interdependence – first to clearly demarcate the division of responsibilities between regional and central governments, and then provide avenues for consultation and mutually beneficial cooperation.

32. As geographic entities, the Northern and Eastern provinces, which have historically evolved as the traditional homeland of the Tamils and the Tamil speaking Muslims, to be incorporated as a single regional unit, “Autonomous Tamil Region” or ATR (‘Tamil’ referring to the language). (The Tamil and Muslim leaders should work out consensus for this arrangement). The organising of the non-ATR part of the country into relevant regional entities is left open in these proposals.

33. Key recommendations regarding the power sharing arrangements between the ATR with its regional assembly and government, and the central government (of Sri Lanka) are:

=ATR government will exercise administrative autonomy, be vested with appropriate legislative power, and the executive powers exercised by the Cabinet of Ministers.

=A proper division of powers between the central and the ATR governments, which allows to maximise the opportunities for independent and complimentary development, is central to the success of this arrangement. A supplementary charter of principles of economic cooperation, mutual assistance and resource allocation to be developed.

=The unity and commitment that the recent hardships have generated among the Tamil people will spur economic growth and development. Economic development and planning, social and cultural growth, education and health care are areas that can immensely benefit from autonomous powers. A genuine land reform favouring those who farm will unleash great potential for agriculture modernization and raising production. To this end, the ATR government shall have the authority and primary responsibility for the land and ports in its region.

=The ATR government must be given the widest possible powers to restructure the economy in respect of both the public and private sectors, and to generate public and private investment both internally and internationally. Provision must be made for sharing national revenue between the central and the ATR governments, in addition to the regional generation of revenue by ATR. The ATR must be free to raise funds in international financial markets and from foreign governments and to enter into economic protocols, with the support of the centre.

=The responsibility for the maintenance of law and order should be distributed between the central and the ATR governments and each provided with the appropriate instruments for this purpose. The primary responsibility to maintain law and order should be placed in the hands of the ATR government.

= The ATR must be able to play an active role in major decisions of the centre, which because of its pervasive character will have impact on all citizens including those within ATR. These include such matters as currency and central banking, fiscal policy and foreign aid, as well as the formulation of overall national policies and objectives.

= The central government will exercise ultimate powers in respect of foreign affairs and national defence.

? The constitutionally guaranteed structure and functions of the regions and the centre cannot be altered without the consent of the ATR body.

= The ATR government, when promulgating its basic laws, has to assure that social, religious, ethnic and political minorities in the region are not hindered in the exercise of their fundamental rights and in achieving their full potential. The Bill of Rights to be incorporated in the new constitution must be supplemented by adequate provisions to ensure that minorities in any of the regions of the country are not discriminated or impeded in their development.

=Another area of central government control is human or fundamental rights. The central government must be allowed to spell out the fundamental rights of all of its citizens in accordance with international covenants and treaties, and the regional governments must respect those basic rights. However, the regional governments are free to expand (not remove) those rights as long as they respect the declared rights by the central government as the basic rights of the country.

3 Responses to “Call for autonomous unit in North-East renewed GTF seeks talks on proposal though not being included in Wijenayake Report”

  1. plumblossom Says:

    There is no Tamil Homeland! It is a completely bogus invention. The writer has got the history slightly wrong. Even the most recent Pandyan invasion just prior to the arrival of the Portuguese in the 16th century by Aryachakravarthi only invaded the Jaffna peninsula only and the settlement of the Jaffna peninsula was very sparse. All earlier invasions by the Cholas etc. they invaded Anuradhapura and Pollonnaruwa and these was for short periods of time and there were no settlements whatsoever at all as a result. Most Tamils were brought over by the Portugese and the Dutch to work on Tobacco and Indigo plantations set up by the Portugese and the Dutch after the 16th century.

    There were from around 600BC over 43 attempted invasions of the island by the Chola, Kalinga, Pandya, Vijayanagar and other South and Indian Kingdoms etc. However only six succeeded. There was one invasion by a Malayan kingdom too. These were during Sinhala Kings Walagamba, Dhutugemunu, Dhathusena, Vijayabahu I, Parakramabahu II, Buvanekabahu V and Parakramabahu VI times. However invaders invaded Anuradhapura, Pollonnaruwa and stayed only for a short period of time and left the island once they were overwhelmed. There were no settlements due to these invasions except the very last invasion by Aryachakravarthi of the Jaffna Peninsula.

    When looking at Sri Lanka’s history, it is extremely obvious that from 600BC to around 1400AD there were three kingdoms, all Sinhala Buddhist, Ruhuna, Pihiti or Rajarata and Maya or Malayarata. Rajarata encompassed today’s North Central, North Western, Northern and even the Central Province. Ruhunu rata encompassed today’s Uva, Eastern and Southern Provinces. The Kandyan Kingdom from 1400AD encompassed most of the island inclusive of today’s Northern and the Eastern Provinces except for the Jaffna Peninsula. Even the Jaffna Peninsula was invaded and occupied by force by Aryachakravarthi (Pandyan) and actually did belong to Rajarata earlier and later the Kandyan Kingdom.

    Today’s provincial boundaries were drawn up by the British colonialists as per their divide and rule policy and the Sinhala people were not consulted when drawing up these provincial boundaries. In the meantime, most Sri Lankan Tamils of today were actually brought over during Dutch and British times to the Jaffna Peninsula and elsewhere to work on tobacco and indigo plantations which were planted extensively in all the colonies since they were much sought after and made a lot of money for the colonialists. Therefore they are recent arrivals and cannot claim homelands or separate states whatsoever.

    The usual practice when a colonial power hands over their former colonies is to hand it over to its original owners. Therefore the British colonialists should hand over the Kandyan Kingdom to the Kandyan Sinhalese from whom they took it by force. Since the Kandyan Kingdom encompassed the North and the East, these provinces too should be handed over to the Kandyan Sinhalese who are its rightful owners. Even the Jaffna Peninsula should be handed over to the Kandyan Sinhalese since it was part of Rajarata and was forcefully occupied by Aryachakravarthi (Pandyan).

    Since this has now been done already, the TNA, other separatists or the US, UK EU, Canada, Norway, Sweden and India cannot demand that present day Northern or even the Eastern provinces be provided any more powers or be made into federal states since this is totally going against the history and archaeology of the island and totally going against the rights of the Sinhala people who also have fundamental rights to claim the entire island inclusive of the North and the East as their homeland first and foremost.

    History which was dropped as a subject should be taught at school since Sri Lanka has a very long history and it is very beneficial for the next generation to learn the history and archaeology of the island based on actual archaeological findings, archaeological ruins, artefacts, stone inscriptions, ola leaf writings and so on. Otherwise people will believe any bogus history invented by interested parties to their benefit, not based on facts but invented for their own nefarious purposes. Today these settlers such as the Sri Lankan Tamils are inventing history for their own purposes without any archaeological evidence whatsoever to back up such bogus claims. Therefore it is imperative that history is taught as a subject in school as soon as possible.

  2. plumblossom Says:

    The writer has asked for further historical facts and figures. Apart from many Buddhist ruins, the writer has missed a very important part of the Sinhala Buddhist civilization which is the extensive hydraulic system that still prevails in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. The Sinhala kings built over 10,000 (please check this figure in research papers for accuracy) large, medium and small scale irrigation reservoirs in Rajarata and Ruhuna encompassing today’s, North Central, North, Eastern, North Western provinces. For example Yodha Wewa Reservoir in today’s Mannar in the North was built by the Sinhala King Dathusena or Mahasen. The Pavatkulam Reservoir in Vavuniya in the North was built by the Sinhala King Dathusena or Mahasen. The Kanthale Reservoir in the East was built by Sinhala King Agbo II. All of the irrigation reservoirs present in the North Central, North, North Western and East were built by Sinhala Kings.

    In fact, to get the water to flow out of the reservoirs in a smooth manner, the Sinhala Engineers invented the biso kotuwa or the besi kotuwa (as in wathura besi kotuwa), a type of valve pit, or a type of water outlet out falling from the reservoir where water pressure can be managed so as not to damage the tank bund. Another use of the Sinhala irrigation Engineer was the anicut where a river’s water was diverted using a dam type structure built across the river partially blocking the river flow and diverting the water into open flow canals.

    The amazing and extensive irrigation system in Sri Lanka’s dry zone encompassing today’s North Central, North, East and North Western Provinces encompassing over 10,000 (please check this figure for accuracy) large, medium and small scale reservoirs, open flow canals etc. was built by the Sinhala Kings.

    Therefore there is no doubt whatsoever that there was a Sinhala Buddhist civilization encompassing today’s North Central, North, East and North Western Provinces, even just by considering this extensive irrigation reservoir system. R.L. Brohier , H.C.P. Bell, D.LO. Mendis, Henry Parker and many archaeologists, irrigation engineers and surveyors have written many books and research papers on this subject. In fact even the British Governor at the time Sir Henry Ward marvelled at the ingenious of the Sinhala irrigation engineer and wrote on the subject and Even Sir Emerson Tennent, another British Governor marvelled at the ingenious Sinhala irrigation engineer and wrote on the subject. In fact, the Sinhala irrigation engineer was a master of hydraulics. Not only that extensive data on rainfall patterns would have had to be collected to figure out the capacity of the irrigation reservoirs and their placing. Very accurate surveying of the lay of the land would have had to be carried out to come up with very accurate contour maps in order to figure out the trace of the open channel flow canals.

  3. plumblossom Says:

    The Sri Lankan Tamils demanding a ‘Tamil homeland’ is a bogus demand as per the history and archaeology of the country. Even a few months back, a discovery was made of an archaeological site in Anuradhapura dating back to 800BC and included beads, pottery etc. Anuradhapura was a large village by 900BC and there was an expansion into a city by 600BC. There is plenty of evidence of pre-historic cave discoveries such a the Fa Hien caves, the Bellanbendi pellessa and other cave discoveries especially in the wet zone of pre-historic sites or iron age and stone age discoveries (due to the clay in the wet zone preserving such sites well). The oldest skeleton found on the island is 37,000 years old. We know there were four tribes Yaksha, Naga, Raksha and Deva and around 600BC there was an influx of people from India, possibly Bengal or Orissa. These people together with the four tribes Yaksha, Naga, Raksha and Deva together then formed the Sinhala nation. This is why Anuradhapura which was a village by 900BC expanded into a city by 600BC.

    Does all this archaeological evidence not prove that the Sinhala people are the descendants of the indigenous people of the island i.e. the yakshas, Nagas, Rakshas and Devas? Much later by around the 16th century due to the Aryachakravarthi invasion of the Jaffna Peninsula the Sri Lanka Tamils migrated but into the Jaffna peninsula only. Later during the Portuguese, Dutch and British colonial times, there were further migrations of Sri Lankan Tamils (called Malabars meaning those from the Malabar coast of India) for purposes of planting tobacco and indigo brought in by the colonialists.

    Of course other people such as the Arab traders, Malays, then the Burgers (descendants of colonisers) also migrated to the island too.

    Does this not then prove that this island inclusive of the North and the East is the homeland of all its people? So is this demand for a separate state by the Sri Lankan Tamils (called Malabars meaning those from the Malabar coast of India), descendants of recent migrations to the island, not absurd and unacceptable?

    Let us state in the constitution that this island is the homeland of all its people, for the sake of justice and fairplay, by everyone concerned.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress