WHY RESTRICT TELEPHONE CALLS OF ALOYSIUS TO COPE MEMBERS ONLY? IF RAVI K HAD HUNDREDS OF CALLS, TO WHOM RAVI SPOKE IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH CALL TO GET ORDERS?
Posted on November 18th, 2017
By M D P DISSANAYAKE
The biggest financial scandal in Sri Lanka now known as Bond Scandal” is continuing to expose politicians who were supposed to be guardians of the rule of law. However, few names so far published are not enough? What is the reason to restrict the relationships between Aloysius and his partners in Business” only to 6 names consisting Cope Members who refused to endorse the contents of the Report?
As all those who refused to endorse the Report were members of the UNP, was there any person in the UNP hierarchy who influenced the UNP members sitting in the Cope Committee not to endorse the report, but to provide dissenting FOOT NOTES? If so, who is that Person?
- Does this mean Aloysius had not phoned other influential VVIPs, seeking help, including such people as: President Maithreepala Sirisena, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya, (Clayton) Opposition Leader Sambandan, Laksman Kiriella, Other Cabinet Ministers other than Ravi Karunanayake ( more particularly Rajitha Senaratne, ) etc. during the intervening period when the illegal financial transactions took place. Opposition Leader Sambandan was in Batticaloa when the debate took place in Parliament???
- If POOR RAVI K ( appears to be a scapegoat) had received hundreds of calls from Aloysius, did Ravi K contact his superiors or political God Fathers immediately after calls from Aloysius, to get approval from HIS BOSS, if so to whom did he call almost each time after incoming calls from Aloysius?
- Did Ravi K return the calls to Aloysius after he called HIS BOSS to disseminate information or decision? This will establish a link, if any, with the those who played the game behind the scenes. It is impossible to believe that Ravi K acted alone, especially considering the Central Bank was not under his purview.
The statement made by former Minister of Justice Mr Wijedasa Rajapakse that I was removed in an attempt to sweep the bond scam under the carpet” will have far reaching consequences
November 18th, 2017 at 10:33 pm
We are a capitalist democracy. The only way we could progress is by following basic principles of any sort of social group. Mahendran was an independent employee and was responsible for his actions alone. What he did was to use his position to gain a benefit that he is not entitled. Even if the people who benefited from his actions are his associates it is considered that it is he who benefited from his actions.
November 18th, 2017 at 10:40 pm
So if it was any other country the person who is responsible and is obliged to be responsible is Arjuna Mahendran. Any one else is not primarily responsible.
The people should first ask for prosecution of Mahendran. Anything else is just a circus.