NATIONAL SECURITY, POLITICS AND THE YAHAPALANAYA IN SRI LANKA
Posted on April 23rd, 2019

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

National security is the priority in any country and Sri Lanka has been facing for this issue clearly since 1983 and even before it was, but after 1983 security forces identified the significance of national security than any other activity of the country.  Before Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa elected as president of the country, the national security was negotiated with foreigners without knowing importance of national security and no country negotiate with overseas people on national security.  Many people supported to such negotiation due to ignorance and members of the current government supported to such an attempt to neglecting of national security for greedy and selfish motives of money offered by foreign organizations.

After the election of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as the president of the country in 2005, the scenario has been entirely changed and he determined to eliminate terrorism in the country and governed the country with a successful plan to overcome security threats. The result of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa’s strict and authoritative administration was successfully controlled LTTE terrorism and so-called yahapalana advocates, NGOs and failed Marxist political parties united against the Rajapaksa regime in 2015 as they were provided with foreign assistance to defeat the administration of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa and to establish an environment where it is a fertile ground to grow terrorism in the country. After the yahapala victory in 2015, good intelligence officers and successful leaders of armed forces were prosecuted and put to jail based on fabrication of yahapalana advocates. These examples clearly indicate that neither Mr. Maithripala Sirisena nor yahapalana advocates had good understanding of the national security and politics involved in it.

The environment created under the yahapalana administration was a free ground for growing other potential terrorist groups and many abeyance personnel who secretly associated with international or domestic terrorist movements gained opportunities to enter administrative positions, diplomatic and armed forces in Sri Lanka. Recently experienced that certain foreign diplomats appointed by the government of Sri Lanka were making decisions without listening to the government of Sri Lanka.  These yahapalana advocates attempted to make decisions disregarding the national security of the country. There were several racist conflicts after 2009 and in such conflicts, several members of the current government attempted to blame Sinhala Buddhists without properly investigating the problems and attempted to gain political advantages.   

The nature of all countries in the world is that national security is a not negotiable task and it is free from the politics and nobody can gain political advantages out of national security.  People have seen that after the terrorist crimes in the Easter Sunday in Catholic Churches, Hotels and other places, Mr Mangala Samaraweera attempted to push the responsibility of terrorism to the Rajapaksa family and when the culprit was disclosed to the world, Mr Samaraweera is hiding and looking for safe places to stay. Another minister of the government issued public statements that his father knew about the terrorist activities and he did not attend the church service in the Easter Sunday.  These two misters must resign and beg the pardon of people.  They could have avoided the killing of local and overseas people.

 The most of people suffered from the terrorist attack was poor people, who have no opportunity to go overseas or to have breakfast from the Shangri-La hotel.  One foreign national stated that his family contributed a large sum of money to build a hospital in Rathnapura and his family arrived to see the good work.  Unfortunately, his wife was killed by the bomb blast and a child was injured.

Now, ninety per cent of people in Sri Lanka clearly believe that the current government has no ability to govern the country, where needs an authoritative leader who can give priority for national security and make decisions to secure people.

As a responsible person, the president of Sri Lanka needs resigning from his position and allow to elect suitable person who respect national security and protect people.   

4 Responses to “NATIONAL SECURITY, POLITICS AND THE YAHAPALANAYA IN SRI LANKA”

  1. Randeniyage Says:

    Within 5 years, 4 defense secreteries ! – Howe true ? This is a joker’s government

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRGlvktWMg8

  2. aloy Says:

    ” Many people supported to such negotiation due to ignorance and members of the current government supported to such an attempt”

    Security of any country is a non-negotiable thing that should not be a subject for discussions with foreigners as they all have their own agendas. Many foreign leaders from the countries where this barbaric ideology originated visited this country in the recent past on one pretext or another.

    The defence secy should be arrested and questioned why he did not pass the info to prez as he claims. And if it turns out to be otherwise, then in my opinion both PM and prez should be asked to resign.

  3. Ancient Sinhalaya Says:

    Ban the religion of violence aka fastest breeding religion in non-believers countries to have peace. Wherever this
    menace goes, they breed, breed and breed to wrestle control. Once the numbers are high enough, the menace
    starts to kill the natives. It worked in the olden days since natives didn’t know until the menace came to their
    doorstep. But today’s tv, phone, internet age the dirty, disgusting, sub human trick doesn’t work since natives
    fight back to save their countries.

    iGoogle
    iran
    afganisthan
    pakesthan
    bangladesh
    maldives
    malaysia
    indonesia etc etc see old Buddhist heritages before these fastest breeding religion arrived.

    We all seen the menace tried it in Buddhist Myanmar and failed recently thanks to their patriotic leader. But in Sri
    Lanka we have a bunch of traitors who lick mussies backsides for their votes, this was not entirely unexpected.

  4. Ancient Sinhalaya Says:

    Saudi arabia: not even a Buddha statue allowed in the country.
    Iran (a former Buddhist country): possession of a Buddha statue is a punishable offence
    Former Buddhist countries afganisthan, pakesthan: Buddhism not allowed
    Former Buddhist bangladesh, malaysia, maldives, indonesia Buddhism and Buddhists are being systematically destroyed.
    Sri Lanka: Do anything you like mussies. Eye sore mosques every corner, burkas the fashion in hell for ghosts,
    goni billa dress, again high fashion in hell for ghosts, eye sore mosque bigger than Sri Dalada Maligawa next to
    it etc. etc.

    Traitor puppet vairapala sorry sena, traitor chief die hard catholic token Buddhist bay gal karaya mega thief
    mega thakkadiya walking crime bomb (against Sinhalese Buddhists, Sri Lanka and Buddhism only) Batalande
    wa(n)dakaya Pol Pot [email protected]_leech wickrama Sinhala killer, kunu datha kunu kata, tailor mongol pongol etc. etc.
    all licking mussie backsides for the fast multilplying mussie votes. This is the result.

    If saudi arabia, iran, afganisthan, pakesthan, bangladesh, malaysia, maldives, indonesia don’t need Buddhism
    why we need this barbaric fast breeding religion of violence? Ban it now! That’s how Spain was saved from fast
    breeding mussies in 1478 by Ferdinand II.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2019 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress