Some Questions regarding Sinhala & Tamil language
Posted on January 22nd, 2021

There is much ado about the claims that the 1956 Official Language Act was responsible for the present ‘ethnic conflict’. The advocate of this notion must explain how ITAK formed in 1949 sought to create a Tamil Nation as per translation of its name? They must also explain how grievance over Sinhala language could be solved by giving into a demand for ‘federalism’ as sought via Bandaranaike-Chelvanagayam Pact. What does Sinhala language have to do with federalism?

Let us simply ask some questions, find the answers and think about the false notions being spread

  • What was the language spoken during the rule of the Kings that ruled Sri Lanka?
  • Were the kinglets that the Kings established ‘independent’ and ‘sovereign’ or were they under one ruler who ruled the entire island?
  • Is there any evidence to show Tamil as an official language at any time in our island’s history?
  • What was the language of administration during colonial rule?
  • John D’Oyly learnt Sinhalese, did he also learn Tamil? Why didn’t’ he?
  • If Jaffna was a separate kingdom, why didn’t British sign a separate treaty with the Tamils similar to the Kandyan Convention signed in 1815?
  • The colonials set up the best of missionary schools in minority areas as part of divide and rule policy, giving the best of education to minorities and enabling them to secure the best jobs thereafter – didn’t Sinhalese suffer the greater discrimination during colonial rule as a majority? – their language rights, cultural rights, religious rights were all earmarked to be vanquished.
  • The ‘elite’ that the British nurtured through their education system in English language, converting to Christianity meant that Sinhalese & Tamils who converted only could obtain English education. Were these not the one’s who preferred to remain the chosen elite continuing to think and act like the British even after independence? Were these not the brown sahibs the British wanted to hand over powers to on their behalf?
  • Wasn’t the demand to reverse the discrimination to Sinhalese manipulated into showcasing a majority-minority rift, again part of colonial divide and rule policy?
  • The demand to reverse the discrimination suffered by the Sinhalese had nothing linked to Tamils nor did Sinhalese demand any rights to them denying anything to Tamils. But, the media campaign was tasked to show this simply to deny the rights that was due to the Sinhalese. 
  • The publicity was quickly directed to showcase that the demand for reversing the discrimination to Sinhalese was actually a demand to deny Tamils their rights which they were enjoying in excess of their population ratio. Statistics will reveal the jobs enjoyed by Tamils in state sector on account of Tamils being given better education opportunities. The Sinhalese demand was not to deny what the Tamils were given but for the Sinhalese to be also given with the same spoon. 
  • Did Tamil language enjoy official language status in any time of the islands’ history? 
  • Did Tamil language enjoy official language/administrative status during Portuguese, Dutch or British rule– if not, how can the 1956 Official Language Act making Sinhala the Official language and ‘reasonable use of Tamil’ become a grievance to Tamils? To claim that anything is purposefully denied, anyone has to be enjoying that right first. So the question returns to ask – was Tamil an official language at any time to claim a grievance?
  • It was only via a bogus and intrusive Indo-Lanka Accord in 1987 demanding passing of the 13thamendment that Tamil was made an official language. The same country does not even afford Tamils who have a virtual Tamil state (Tamil Nadu) official language status. Tamil is not a National Language even in India inspite of over 72million Tamils living in it. Tamil is spoken by around 6% of Indian population and barely outside Tamil Nadu.

Please share your thoughts on this discussion too.

For too long, false notions and lies have been spread in a campaign to divert people from thinking about true facts and asking rationale questions and seeking answers to them.

Shenali D Waduge

One Response to “Some Questions regarding Sinhala & Tamil language”

  1. Ratanapala Says:

    Thank you Shenali, for keeping the conversation alive. We should not let the Gobbels to occupy this space with any authority!

    The Tamils who now live in the North and East talk about their glorious past. However they have little to write home about in terms of what little they have left in the ground for the archaelogists to find out. There is little to show for Wigneswaran’s 5000 year old occupancy in Sri Lanka. Only thing that survives to this day of any antiquity is the Nallur Temple built by Sapumal Kumaraya of the Kotte Kingdom!

    The present day Tamil who now live in the North and East, at least for the 95%, their history begins with the coming of the western colonial intruders into Sri Lanka. There may have been a few left over from Chola invasions and Chola administrators who have been there since Magha et al – ie 13th Century! Even then most inhabitants were Sinhalese under Chola administrators. At one time in recent history, historians write that there were more foreigners in Jaffna than the local inhabitants – meaning the Sinhalese! This was the time both the Portuguese and thereafter the Dutch brought in ship loads of indented labour to work their tobacco plantations.

    It is the spineless gutter snipes the so called Black-White Sinhala most of them either Christian or Christian turned political Buddhist and a few running dog Buddhists who have sacrificed the hapless Sinhalese and their rights to this day. This is the reason Sri Lanka hasn’t prospered, the way other countries in the regions have done so far!

    Only way out is for the Sinhalese to begin asserting their position in the country. As long as the Sinhalese are forcibly kept down by the powers that be, it is difficult to forsee a worthy future. This is why Sri Lanka should look forward to an Assertive Sri Lanka and not a meek one bending over backwards to all and sundry!

    Admiral Sarath Weerasekara’s proposal for General Conscription is a good beginning!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress