IMF conditions violate human rights in Sri Lanka

January 11th, 2024

By Veeragathi Thanabalasingham Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, January 11: More than a week has passed since the dawn of the New Year. Although greetings were exchanged as per  tradition, it cannot be said that Sri Lankans greeted each other without a tinge of apprehension about what is in store for them in the new year.  

Newspapers carried New Year messages from political leaders and  religious dignitaries along with news about impending steep rise in prices.

Most people had already taken austerity measures to cope with the skyrocketing cost of living will were preparing to face further hardships to be piled on them by a new Value Added Tax (VAT) rate. The government increased VAT from 14 percent to 18 percent from January and has brought many already exempted goods and services under the ambit of VAT.  

The severe shortage of goods during the 2022 economic crisis was eased to an extent last year and the situation where goods were available though at unaffordable prices was editorially described by a Colombo English newspaper as an ‘Interval in Hell’.

But the interval was short. Again the cost of living has become unaffordable as a result of tax hikes in the New Year. .

The government cannot do without the IMF. It has no choice but to implement the IMF’s conditions to continue to receive its Extended Fund Facility.  Beggars cannot be choosers.

The government is implementing the conditions. As per the IMF’s conditions expenditure is being curtailed and government’s revenue has been enhanced, but without thinking about the potential effects on the people.

It has been announced that a team of IMF officials will be in  Colombo this week to assess Sri Lanka’s economic progress. The IMF, which has already given the first two tranches of the four-year bailout, may impose more stringent conditions if it is not satisfied with the measures taken by the government to boost revenue.

Although the national elections are looming on the horizon, one cannot expect sweet promises of economic relief from political parties as in the past. Even the main opposition parties, despite blaming the government for agreeing to the conditions of the IMF, will not be able to withdraw from the agreement with it.

Even if the leaders of those parties say they will renegotiate terms with the IMF, the key question whether they can bring about major changes.

The Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe recently said at a press conference that any government can renegotiate the programme with the IMF, but it would have no option but to follow the path chosen currently to get international support.

Foreign governments and other commercial entities are extending debt relief only with the understanding that this programme is moving forward. We need to go in this direction, during this period of 10 years of debt structuring. If that changes, they can also change their decision on debt relief. So, if this is broken, they can say we don’t support this any more. We will have to repay USD 6 billion per year in debt repayments” Dr.Weerasinghe stressed.

The governor’s explanation clearly shows the severity of the predicament Sri Lanka is in.

President Ranil Wickremesinghe has said several times in the past year that we will have to face serious challenges in the new year. He can pride himself on being a no-nonsense leader by saying that he does not want to lie to the people about economic recovery and will not hesitate to take decisions that are not popular with the people. But how long can the people bear the burden of the economic restructuring measures that are supposed to be carried out to recover from the state of bankruptcy caused by the misrule of the political class? Nor is the burden shared equitably among all sections of society.

The burden of indirect taxes presses the common man very hard. A report released by the Department of Census and Statistics two weeks ago and recent studies conducted by various organizations of the United Nations such as UNICEF, the World Food and Agriculture Organization, local civil society organizations and media organizations have exposed the misery of the people of Sri Lanka.

The monthly income of most of the employees is around LKR 40, 000.   If both husband and wife are working, the monthly income of the family is LKR 80, 000. Most families have an average of two or three children. A family of four members needs at least one lakh 20 thousand rupees to meet their basic needs especially food.

As for private sector employees, salaries have not been increased for after the COVID -19 pandemic. Thousands of workers lost their jobs as businesses closed down. Many of them are still unable to get decent regular jobs.

The average monthly income of 60.5% of households has declined sharply while the monthly expenditure level of 91% of households has increased significantly. As the economic crisis worsened, 22%  of the households were forced to borrow from banks or private individuals. 75.2% of the families have changed their food pattern.

97.2% of the households are forced to adopt various strategies to meet the expenses while 46.4% spend their savings on daily necessities. 

After 2019, the number of poor people increased from around 40 lakhs to 70 lakhs. An estimated 31% of the population is below the poverty line. A third of the population, or 33 % skip meals on a daily basis and 47% cut down on food intake, while 27% of adults restrict their diet significantly lest their children go to bed with an empty stomach.

In order to cope with the situation, families have not only reduced their food intake but have been forced to give up staple foods and turn to cheaper alternatives. Sri Lanka is second only to Afghanistan in South Asia in terms of malnutrition among children.

This being the case, the Minister of Trade, Commerce and Food Security said last week that the government will take measures to reduce the cost of living burden by 75% by the end of the first quarter of this year. An important question is how feasible it is to make such a large reduction in the present circumstances?

The government may not be able to do anything without the help of the International Monetary Fund. But stringent measures implemented by the government while meeting the strict conditions of the IMF may risk igniting social unrest.

It seems that the government is smugly thinking that it is no longer possible for people to take to the streets and revolt like the Aragalaya uprising.The government may be confident that if there are signs of such an uprising, it can be suppressed by force at the outset.

The government in keen on bringing  draconian  laws to curb the freedom of expression, democratic protests and trade union activities.

Our government has not learned lessons from the political and social upheavals in countries like Argentina as a result of the IMF’s strict lending conditions. Such uprisings also occurred in Latin American, Middle Eastern and North African countries. In our region  Pakistan is facing the same crisis now.

Many international human rights organizations have strongly  criticized   the IMF’s policies that  have increased inequality and led to unrest in many countries. 

The Human Rights Watch recently said in a report on IMF policies that austerity measures that reduce government spending on essential  services or significantly increase regressive taxes have a well-documented history of undermining rights.

The IMF is pushing policies that have a long track record of exacerbating poverty and inequality and undermining rights. The IMF’ s own internal research indicates that the Fund’s policies are generally not effective in reducing debt, which is their chief objective, HRW has said.

IMF’s World Economic Outlook published in April 2023 observes that fiscal consolidations — a term usually linked to austerity programmes — do not reduce  debt ratios , on an average. 

It is doubtful whether some of the IMF’s policies and conditions are consistent with the UN Human Rights Council’s guiding principles that require strict criteria to be met and human rights impact assessment  conducted by governments and the financial institutions when austerity measures are adopted.

By imposing stringent conditions the IMF, and by implementing  those conditions governments, violate human rights and devalue human dignity.

(Editors’ Note. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of NewsIn.Asia necessarily)

UN court hears South Africa genocide case against Israel

January 11th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

UN court hears South Africa genocide case against Israel

The UN’s International Court of Justice is hearing a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

The submission also calls on the court to order Israel to stop military operations there.

The ICJ will deliver only an opinion on the genocide allegation as the case is not a criminal trial, although it is being closely watched.

Israel has vehemently rejected the accusation as baseless”.

There were angry scenes outside the ICJ’s Peace Palace on Thursday as Dutch police struggled to keep groups of Palestinian and Israeli supporters apart.

Hundreds of people waving Palestinian flags gathered outside the ICJ, calling for a ceasefire. Israeli supporters set up a screen showing images of some of the hostages still being held in Gaza.

South Africa will present its case on Thursday and Israel its defence on Friday.

In its submission, South Africa says Israel’s actions are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group”.

It says Israel’s actions include killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting on them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction”.

It calls for provisional measures” to be implemented by the court as a matter of urgency, including that Israel cease all military activities in Gaza.

The ICJ is the UN’s top court, based in the Hague in the Netherlands. Its rulings are theoretically legally binding on parties to the ICJ – which include Israel and South Africa – but are not enforceable.

In 2022, the court ordered Russia to immediately suspend military operations” in Ukraine, an order that was ignored.

Under international law, genocide is defined as committing one or more acts with the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.

Unlike the International Criminal Court (ICC), the ICJ cannot prosecute individuals for crimes such as genocide, but its opinions carry weight with the UN and other international institutions.

On Wednesday, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said: Our opposition to the ongoing slaughter of the people of Gaza has driven us as a country to approach the ICJ.”

Israeli President Isaac Herzog called the accusations atrocious and preposterous”.

We will be in the International Court of Justice and we will present proudly our case of using self-defence… under humanitarian law,” he said.

He added that the Israeli army was doing its utmost under extremely complicated circumstances on the ground to make sure that there will be no unintended consequences and no civilian casualties”.

The ICJ could rule quickly on South Africa’s request for Israel to suspend its military campaign – but a final ruling on whether Israel is committing genocide could take years.

William Schabas, a professor of international law who chaired a UN committee investigating Israel’s conflict with Hamas in 2014, said there is a low bar for the court to issue an injunction against Israel.

He told the BBC that South Africa needs to demonstrate that there are elements that support its case”, for the court to issue an order, although this would not involve making a definite decision as to whether or not genocide is actually taking place”.

South Africa has been highly critical of Israel’s military operation in Gaza, and its governing African National Congress has a long history of solidarity with the Palestinian cause.

It sees parallels with its struggle against apartheid – a policy of racial segregation and discrimination enforced by the white-minority government in South Africa against the country’s black majority, until the first democratic elections, in 1994.

In Gaza, more than 23,350 people have been killed, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, since the war began in the aftermath of Hamas’s 7 October attacks on southern Israel. In those attacks some 1,300 people were killed – mainly civilians – and about 240 others taken hostage.


Source: BBC
-Agencies

Bottled water contains up to 100 times more plastic than previously estimated

January 11th, 2024

Courtesy Hiru News

Bottled water contains up to 100 times more tiny pieces of plastic than was previously estimated, scientists said.

The average liter of bottled water contains around 240,000 detectable plastic fragments, researchers wrote in a study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They were able to find microscopic bits of plastic, called nanoplastics, by probing samples with lasers that were tuned to make specific molecules resonate.

How much plastic is in bottled water?

Scientists have known for years that there’s plastic in water. A 2018 study detected an average of around 300 particles of plastic per liter of water.

At the time, they were measuring microplastics — small plastic pieces less than 5 millimeters long.

In the latest study, researchers examined nanoplastics, which are particles less than 1 micrometer. For reference, the diameter of a human hair is about 70 micrometers.

With the new capacities to study nanoplastics, scientists found that the amount of plastic fragments in bottled water is about 10 to 100 times more than was previously discovered.

How did the scientists find the plastic?

Researchers at Columbia University and Rutgers University tested three popular brands of bottled water sold in the U.S. They did not specify the brands tested in the study.

Study co-author Wei Min, a biophysicist at Columbia, was one of the inventors of the laser method used to test the samples. Researchers probed the samples for seven common types of plastics before using a data-driven algorithm to interpret the results.

“It is one thing to detect, but another to know what you are detecting,” Min said in a press release.

The researchers found 110,000 to 370,000 particles in each liter, according to the study. About 90% of the particles were nanoplastics, while the rest were microplastics.

In response to the study, the International Bottled Water Association noted that there “currently is both a lack of standardized (measuring) methods and no scientific consensus on the potential health impacts of nano- and microplastic particles. Therefore, media reports about these particles in drinking water do nothing more than unnecessarily scare consumers.”

What does this mean for your health?

People are exposed to microplastics when they breathe, drink and eat, according to health officials. The human body naturally flushes most microplastics, but some extremely small particles can remain in our systems.

The study’s researchers said that “nanoplastics are believed to be more toxic since their smaller size renders them much more amenable, compared to microplastics, to enter the human body.”

Researchers are unsure just how dangerous microscopic pieces of plastics are for people. The World Health Organization in 2019 said that the potential hazards associated with microplastics come in three forms: from the particles themselves, chemicals that make them up and “microorganisms that may attach and colonize on microplastics, known as biofilms.”

At the time, WHO technical officer Jennifer de France said the organization was not alarmed.

“With the data that we have, we can say that we believe the risk to be low, but at the same time, we can’t rule out conclusively that there might never be a risk in the future,” de France said in 2019.

Beizhan Yan, an environmental chemist at Columbia University, recently told CBS News he believes there is cause for concern.

“When they are getting into the nano size, they can potentially get into the blood and then they can be transported to the vital organs.”

Rutgers University’s Phoebe Stapleton said the particles then could “actually bypass the cells” of the gastrointestinal system.

Bottled water products in the U.S. are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. In general, the FDA does not comment on specific studies. A spokesperson explained that when studies come out, the FDA “evaluates them as part of the body of evidence to further our understanding about a particular issue and assist in our mission to protect public health.”

The agency said it is reviewing the findings of the nanoplastic study.

Current regulations require the water to go through filters that remove particles larger than one micron— .00004 inches in size

“From source to finished product, a multi-barrier approach helps prevent possible harmful contamination to the finished product as well as storage, production, and transportation equipment,” the International Bottled Water Association said in a statement. “Many of the steps in a multi-barrier system are effective in safeguarding bottled water from microbiological and other contamination.”

The association also noted there is “no scientific consensus on potential health impacts.”

සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම   

January 10th, 2024

චානක බණ්ඩාරගේ

මානසික විෂාධය (ඩිප්රෙෂන්) මේ සියවසේ මිනිස් වර්ගයා විනාශ කර දැමීමට තරම් වූ දරුණු රෝගයකි. මෙය ඉතා තදින් ලොව පුරා පැතිර යයි.

මෙය බොහෝ දෙනෙක් ගණන් නොගන්නා සහ කථා කිරීමට අකමැති රෝගී තත්ත්වයකි. මෙය නිසා මිනිස් ක්‍රියාකාරිත්වය හින වී සමහරු සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමට පවා පෙළඹේ.

මිනිස් මනසේ ඇති වන ව්‍යසනය, අධි ව්‍යාකුලභාවය, අධි තෙරපුම වැනි තත්ත්වයන් නිසා මේ රෝගය සෑදේ (හට ගනී).    

දීර්ඝ කාලයක් මේ රෝගයෙන් පෙලෙන්නන්ගේ මොලයේ හිපොකැම්පස් ප්‍රදේශය හීනවී ගොස්, මතක තබා ගැනීමේ හැකියාව සහ හැඟීම් (ඉමෝෂන්ස්) ප්‍රදර්ශනය කිරීමේ හැකියාව දුර්වල වේ.

කෑම අරුචිය හෝ වැඩිපුර කෑම, නින්ද නොයාම හෝ උවමනාවට වඩා නිදා ගැනීම, කටයුතුවලින් ඉවත්ව සිටීම, තනිවීමට ඇති ආශාව, මුළුවී සිටීමට බැලීම මේ රෝගයේ ලක්ෂණයි.

බලාපොරොත්තු සුන් වීම, කුඩා කාලයේදී  දෙමව්පිය ආදරය නොලැබීම – විශේෂයෙන්ම දෙමවිපිය ආදරය සෙසු සොයුරු/සොයුරියන්ට වැඩියෙන් ලැබීම, ස්ථානවලදී අඩු සැලකුම් ලැබීම, බාල වියේදී කාම අපරාධ වලට ලක්වීම, පවුලේ/සමාජයේ දරුණු ආසාධාරණයකට/වලට ලක් වීම, පොලිසි/සිර මැදිරි වලදී ගුටි කෑම, දරාගත නොහැකි ක්ෂණික සිදුවීමක් සිදුවීම (උදා: රැකියාවෙන් පහ කිරීම, දැඩි ලැජ්ජා සහගත දෙයක් සිදුවීම) ආදිය සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමට හේතු සාධක විය හැක.  

අඩු තරමින්  ලෝකයේ 7 දෙනෙක්ගෙන් එක් අයෙක්වත් මේ රෝගයෙන් පිඩා විඳිනවා ඇතැයි (බොහෝ විට නිහඬව) උපකල්පනය කෙරේ.

කොටින්ම, ජිවිතයේ කිසියම් අවස්ථාවක සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම තම දරුණු ප්‍රශ්ණයට විසඳුම යයි කල්පනා නොකළ කෙනෙක් මේ ලොව නොමැති තරම්ය.

ඔබ දන්නා කෙනෙක් මේ කාළකන්නි රෝගයෙන් පිඩාවිඳින්නේ නම්, ඒ අයට උදව්  අවශ්‍ය බව හැගේ නම් මානසික උපදේශකවරයෙකුට හෝ  සාමාන්‍ය වෛද්‍යවරයෙකුට ඒ අයව පෙන්වන්න. නැත්නම්, ඔබටම හැකි පමණින් හොඳ උවදෙස් ලබා දෙන්න.

 ‘මම සියදිවී නසා ගන්නවා’ කියා  කියන අය ගැන ඉතා  වැඩි අවධානයක් යොදන්න. ඒ අය එසේ කියන්නේ ඒ ගැන සිතන නිසයි. ඔවුන්ගේ ප්‍රකාශ සුළුවෙන් තැකීම අපේ මෝඩ කමයි. එවලේම නොකලත් කාලයක් ගියාට පසු හෝ සිය දිවි හානි කර ගැනීමට බොහෝ ඉඩ තිබේ. බරපතල තත්ත්වයක් ඉදිරියේ  දී මතු වීමට පුළුවන; නමුත්, එවිට සියල්ල ප්‍රමාද වැඩි විය හැකියි.

මේ අය තුල තිබෙන ‘සිය දිවි හානි කර ගැනීම තමා එකම විසඳුම’ යන වැරදි ආකල්පය වෙනස් කළ යුතුයි. ඒ සඳහා අපට දැඩි කැපවීම් කළ යුතු වුවහොත් එසේ කළ යුතුයි.

බොහෝ අය (දෙමව්පියන් පවා) මේ කැපවීම් නොකරත්. සමහරවිට ඔවුන්ගේ මෝඩ කම නිසා රෝගය අවබෝධ නොකර ගනී. ඒ නිසා වටිනා ජිවිතයක් විනාශ වේ. මැරුණු පසු දුක්වීමෙන් පළක් නැත.

සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමේ ක්‍රම වේදයට කෙනෙක් යොමු වන්නේ තනිවයි. ඒ අයට කිට්ටු අය  ඔහු/ඇයගේ ඩිප්රේෂන් තත්ත්වය හඳුනා ගැනීමට දක්ෂ විය යුතුයි.

මේ රෝගී තත්ත්වයේ සිටින අයට බොහෝ අවශ්‍ය ආදරය, කරුණාව සහ සැළකිලිවන්තභාවය පෙන්විය යුතුයි. මේවා කළ යුත්තේ නැවත කිසිත් බලාපොරොත්තු  නොවීය.  

ඒවා නොඅඩුව දෙන විට ඔවුන්  ‘එළියට’ එනු ඇත.

කළින් කීවාක් මෙන් ප්‍රධානම දෙය ඒ අයගේ රෝගී තත්ත්වය හඳුනා ගෙන, ඔවුන්ගේ ප්‍රශ්ණයට විසඳුම සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම නොවන බව පෙන්වා දීමයි. නිසි උවදෙස් නොමඳව ලබා දීමය කල යුතු වන්නේ.

සෑම සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමක්ම වැළක්විය හැකියි; ඒ අවට අය ඒ පිළිබඳව නිසි අවබෝධයක් රෝගී අයට ලබා දුන්නා නම්.

සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමට පෙළඹෙන තැනැත්තා තමා අවට සිටින අයට කිසියම්  ‘රතු එළියක්’ කළින් දල්වයි (සුනාමි ඒමට පෙර ස්වභාව ධර්මයා අපට අනතුරු අඟවනවා සේ – මුහුද ගොඩ කිරීම, දැඩි ශබ්ධයෙන් රළ බිඳුම වැනි).

අප එය ගණන් නොගැනීමයි වරද.

කිසි කෙනෙක් නොමැතිව සමහරු තනිව,සතුටින් ජීවත් වෙති. මේ අය අතර සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම අඩුය. තනිව ජීවත් වෙන කෙනා දැඩි මානසික ශක්තියක් වර්ධනය කර ගත් තැනැත්තෙකි.

නමුත්, මොවුන් අතරද සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම් නැතුවා නොවේ.  තනිව ජීවත්වෙන එවැනි අයට බාහිර කෙනෙක් මැදිහත්ව උපකාර කිරීම ඉතා අපහසුය.

සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම මුළු ලෝකයටම තියෙන ප්‍රධාන ප්‍රශ්නයකි. එය ඉදිරියේදී වැඩි වනු ඇත. ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ඇති තත්ත්වයන්/වාතාවරණය  අනුව මේ රට ලෝකයේ සිය දිවි නසා ගන්නන්ගේ ප්‍රමුඛතම රටක් වෙනු ඇත (දැනටද එසේ යයි කෙනෙකුට කිව හැක).

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම් ගැන මාධ්‍ය විසින් ප්‍රචාරණය කරන අයුරු වැරදිය. ඔවුන් වාර්ථා කරන්නේ සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම ප්‍රශ්ණයට පිළියමක් ලෙසිණි.  සිය දිවි නසා ගත් තැනැත්තාගේ (උදා: බෙල්ල වැල  දා ගත් හෝ දුම්රියට පැන්න කෙනා) සිද්ධියේ ඍජු පින්තූර පළ කිරීම වැරදිය.

බොහෝ විට මාධ්‍ය කරන වැඩ පණින රිලවුන්ට ඉනිමං තැනීමකි. මාධ්‍යය පුවත් බලා දරුවන්, තරුණයන් සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම ගැන තමන් තුල තිබෙන බිය නැති කර ගනිත්. අනුන් අණුකරනය් කිරීමට යත්.

උපරිම විව්ස් ලබා ගැනීමේ චේතනාවෙන් සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම් ආචාර්ය ධර්ම විරහිතව වාර්ථා කරන නරුම යු ටියුබ් මාධ්‍යවේදීන් ඇත.

බොහෝ සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීම් සාමාන්‍ය මරණ ලෙස හුවා දක්වන අවස්ථා තිබේ. ලෙඩවූ  වයෝව්රිධයෙක් චේතනාවෙන්ම කෑම/බීම නොගෙන සිටීම සිය දිවි නසා ගැනීමක්ද විය හැක.

 අද පාසැල් ළමුන් (වයස 13 -17) බහුල ලෙස සිය දිවි නසා ගනිති. මෙය, මේ රටේ ඉතාම කණගාටුදායක, නව ප්‍රවණතාවයකි. පාසැල් මට්ටමෙන් වහාම යොමු විය යුතු කරුණකි.

පුළුවන් සෑම විටම සතුටින්, ධනාත්මකව සිටීමට බලන්න; හිත දැඩි කරගන්න, ඩිප්රෙෂන් පරාද කරන්න.

ඇල්සය්මර්

ඇල්සයිමර් යනු අනාගතයේදී  මේ ලොවම ගොදුරු කරගන්නා මහා අවාසනාවන්ත ව්‍යසනකාරී, වැඩිමහල්ලන්ට හැදෙන ලෙඩකි.

බොහෝ  වැඩිහිටි දෙමවුපියන්ට යන්තමින් හෝ ඇල්සය්මර් තිබිය හැක – පසුව මේ රෝගී තත්ත්වය එන්න එන්නම වැඩිවේ.

අවසානයේදී පිඟනේ තිබෙන කෑම ටික කෑමටවත් ඔවුනට මතකය නැත.

දු දරුවන් ඇල්සය්මර් ගැන නොසිතත්. වයස 75/80ට වැඩි වැඩිමහල්ලන් දිහා ඉතා විමසිල්ලෙන් සහ පරීක්ෂාවෙන් සිටිය යුතුයි.

රෝගය වැළඳුනු විගස ප්‍රතිකාරවලට යොමු කරවීම යෙහෙකි.

ආදරනිය දරුවාට ඇල්සය්මර් හැදුනු මව හෝ පියා දෙසැරයක් මැරේ.

පළමුව, වයසක මවට හෝ පියාට තම දරුවාව පවා අඳුනා ගන්න බැරි වෙන අවස්ථාව.

උදා: දෙමව්පියන් අර්ථයක් නැතිව විකාර දොඩවීම.  සමහරු (දරුවන් පවා), මේ තත්ත්වය දැක සිනාසෙති. වැඩිමහල්ලාට සැබවින්ම ආදරය කරන කෙනා නම් එසේ සිනහ නොවේ, දුක් වේ.

ඇල්සයිමර් යනු ඉතාම ශෝචනීය තත්ත්වයක්. එය අවසානයට මාරයා ගෙන දේ.

මහළු පියා/මවගේ අවයවයක් නැති වුනත් කමක් නැත – සිහිය විකල් නොවී කියා විටෙක සිතේ.

වයසක පියාට/මවට හොඳ සිහිය නැති නම් හොඳ අවයව වලින් කිනම් පළ?

හොඳ සිහියක් නැති දෙමව්පියන්ව සෑම දෙනාම පාහේ අත් හැර යත්; සමහර විට දරුවන් පවා. මන්ද, එවැන්නෙක් සමඟ නැවත මොන අර්ථවත් කථා බහද කියා ඔවුහු සිතති.

රෝගී මව, පියා මේ ගැන දන්නවාද විය හැකියි.

 දෙවෙනුව, ඇත්තටම ඒ අය මැරෙන අවස්ථාව. 

පළමුවැන්න සහ දෙවැන්න දෙකම ඒ දරුවන්ගේ පැත්තෙන්, ඉතාම ශෝකදායි තත්ත්වයක්.

රෝගී දෙමව්පියනට සැබවින්ම උවැටන් කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය නමුත් ඒ සඳහා අවස්ථා නොලැබෙන දරුවන් සිටී. ඒ අයගේ තත්ත්වය ඉතා කණගාටුදායකය. මේ දරුවෝ තනිව දුක්වෙත්.

“ඉඩම් අයිතිය ඉල්ලා සිටින ජනතාවට එය ලබාදීමේ ක්‍රියාවලිය රජය ඉදිරි මාස 2 තුළ සාර්ථකව, වේගවත්ව ක්‍රියාත්මක කරනවා; ගොවිතැන කරන, පදිංචිව සිටින ජනතාව, අනවසරද අවසරද යන කාරණාව මත එලවා දමන්නේ නෑ” – අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා

January 10th, 2024

පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සභානායක කාර්යාලය

ඉඩම් අයිතිය ඉල්ලා සිටින ජනතාවට එය ලබාදීමේ ක්‍රියාවලිය රජය ඉදිරි මාස 2 තුළ සාර්ථකව, වේගවත්ව ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන බවත්, ගොවිතැන කරන, පදිංචිව සිටින ජනතාව, අනවසරද අවසරද යන කාරණාව මත එලවා නොදමන බවත්, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී 2024.01.10 දින අවධාරණය කළේය. ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගෙන් ප්‍රශ්න ඇසීමේ අවස්ථාව යටතේ දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ පා.ම. චාල්ස් නිර්මලනාදන් මහතා උතුරේ මුලතිව් දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ, කිසිදු ලියවිල්ලක් නොමැතිව මධ්‍යම පාන්තික ඉඩම්වල (MCC Land) ජීවත් වන බවත්, ඔවුන්ට ඒ සඳහා ඔප්පු ලබාදීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් මෙන්ම ඔවුන්ට රජයේ සුබසාධන දීමනා ලබාදීම පිළිබඳවත් අසා තිබූ ප්‍රශ්නයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමිනි.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා පැවසුවේ, මිනිස් ජිවිතයේ පැවැත්ම ගෙනයාමට නිත්‍යානුකූල වුවද එසේ නොවුනද, එම ඉඩම්වල දැනට ජීවිතය ගතකරන සෑම දෙනාට ම, ගොවිතැනට-ධීවර කටයුතුවලට, වෙනත් ආදායම් මාර්ගවලට පිවිසෙන සැම දෙනාට ම, අවශ්‍ය සුබ සාධනය, ආධාර ලබාදීමට රජය බැදී සිටින බවය. පදිංචිය සනාථ කිරීමේ තොරතුරු මත ඉඩම් අයිතිය සහතික කිරීමට ප්‍රමුඛතාව ලබාදෙන බවද අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා පැවසීය.

“ගරු නිර්මලනාදන් මන්ත්‍රීතුමා අහන ප්‍රශ්නය අපි ඉතාම අගය කරනවා. ඒවාගේම මේ ප්‍රශ්නයට සම්බන්ධව කරුණු රජයේ අවධානයට යොමුවී තිබෙනවා. විශේෂයෙන් මුලතිව් දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පළමුවෙන් මුලතිව් දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ යම් යම් ග්‍රාම නිලධාරී කොටඨාශවල දීර්ඝ කාලයක බිම් බෝම්බ වළලා තිබූ ප්‍රදේශ නිදහස් කර ගැනීමට පුළුවන් වුණේ අවුරුදු ගණනාවක ක්‍රියා මාර්ගයන් හරහා. ඒ නිසා සමහර ප්‍රදේශවලට තාවකාලිකව පදිංචි වුණු අය ස්ථීර පදිංචියට පරිවර්තනය කර ගැනීමට අවශ්‍ය වූ ආරක්ෂක සහතිකයන් සහ ඒ අයගේ ජීවිත පිළිබඳ සැපයිය යුතු විවිධ සේවාවල් ලබා දීමට අවශ්‍ය කටයුතු ප්‍රමුඛත්වයට ගෙනෙන්න ජනාධිපතිතුමා උතුරු ප්‍රදේශයට ගියපු හැම අවස්ථාවකම ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමාලා හා රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් සියලුදෙනා සමඟ සාකච්ඡා කොට අතිරේක මූල්‍ය ප්‍රතිපාදන වෙන් කර තිබෙනවා.

මේ අනුව ග්‍රාම නිලධාරී කොට්ඨාශ ඔබතුමා සඳහන් කළ විදිහට පවුල් 1600ක ලියවිල්ලක් නොමැති තත්වය මෙලෙස දැනට පුදුකුඩුඉරිප්පු ප්‍රාදේශිය ලේකම් කොට්ඨාශයේ පහත සඳහන් ග්‍රාම නිලධාරී කොට්ඨාශවල මධ්‍ය පාන්තික ඉඩම් පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු මෙසේ ඉදිරිපත් කරනවා. දැනට ලැබී තියෙන තත්වය නිවැරදි කිරීමට ඉදිරියේදී යටත්ව. ග්‍රාම නිලධාරී කොට්ඨශ දේවිපුරම් 140යි, මන්නකන්ඩාල් 66යි, ඉරනෛප්පලායි 10යි, සුදන්දිරපුරම් 23යි, උතුර උඩයාර්කඩ්ඩු 08යි. ඊට අතිරේකව ඉඩම්වල පදිංචි අනවසර පවුල් සංඛ්‍යාව සහ බලපත්‍ර පවුල් සංඛ්‍යාව පහත පරිදි ඉදිරිපත් කරනවා. ඒ විස්තර මම ඉදිරිපත් කරනවා. ඔබතුමාට ලැබෙන්න සලස්වන්නම්.

ඒ අනුව ඇතැම් ඉඩම් කට්ටි සංවර්ධනය නොවූ තත්වයෙන් පැවතීම මත මෙම ඉඩම් කට්ටිවල උතුරු, නැගෙනහිර පළාත්වල පැවති අවතැන් වුණු ජනතාව කොටස් වශයෙන් බෙදාගනෙ පදිංචි සංවර්ධනය කිරිම මත එම අනවසරකරුවන් නියමානුකූල කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය ලේඛන ලබා ගැනීම ගැටලු සහගත වුව ද දිසාපතිතුමා හා ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරු හරහා ප්‍රගතියක් ලබා තිබෙනවා. ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමත් ඒ පිළිබඳව දක්වන ලද සහයෝගය සංවර්ධන කොමිටියේ මේ අවස්ථාවේ සටහන් කරන්න කැමතියි.

මෙලෙස මධ්‍ය පන්තික පවුල් කුටුම්භ සඳහා ඉඩම් ලබා දීමේ වැඩසටහන යටතේ ලබා දී ඇති ඉඩම් සඳහා මූල්‍ය හිමිකරුවන්, උරුමක්කරුවන් විසින් විවිධ ලේඛන, හිම්කම් ඉල්ලා පැමිණීම මත හිමිකම් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නන්ගේ හා අනවසරයන් යම් එකඟතාවයන් යනු ඇතැම් අනවසරකරුවන් වෙත ලේඛන ලබා දීමට කටයුතු කර ඇතිමුත් ඇතැම් ඉඩම් සඳහා එකඟතාවයක් ඇතිකර ගැනීමට නොහැක‍ි වීම හා අනවසරයෙන් සංවර්ධනය කිරීම කරන ලද ඉඩම් සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම ලබා දීමට ඉඩම් හිමිකරුවන් විසින් එකඟ නොවිම මත ඉදිරි කටයුතු ප්‍රමාද වෙලා තිබෙනවා. ප්‍රධානතම ගැටලුව වී ඇත්තේ අවතැන් වූ හා තවමත් එම ඉඩම්වල පදිංචි වී සිටින බහුතර ජනතාවකට ඔවුනට දැනට ලබා ගෙන තිබෙන MCC ඉඩම් සඳහා නීත්‍යානුකූල ලියකියවිලි නොමැති වීමයි. මේ අයට වෙන කිසිම ප්‍රදේශයක වෙනත් ඉඩම් නොමැතිකම මත මේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසඳීමට අපි කටයුතු කරගෙන යනවා.

ඊළඟට යුධ සමයේ තිබුණු තත්ත්වය නිරවුද කර ගැනීමට පුළුවන් බව ඔබතුමාට අපි දැනුම් දීමට කැමතියි. ඒ වාගේම ජනාධිපතිතුමා  විසින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කරන ලද ඉඩම් ඔප්පු ලබාදීමේ ඉලක්කය මේ අයවැය ලේඛනයේ මේ ප්‍රදේශය ද සාර්ථක කර ගැනීමට අවශ්‍ය පියවර ප්‍රමුඛත්වයට ගෙනල්ලා තිබෙනවා.

ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමා අහන ඊළඟ වැදගත් කොටස තමයි මේ පදිංචිකරුවන් හැම දෙනාටම ලැබෙන සහනාධාර මේ අයිතිය තිබුණ ද නැද්ද සියලුදෙනාට ලබාදීම සඳහා වූ තත්ත්වයන් ඇති වී තිබෙනවා නම් ඒවාට මැදිහත් වෙන ලෙසයි. රජයේ ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් ලෙස එය පිළිගෙන තිබෙනවා. අපේ දිසාපතිතුමා කැඳවන සංවර්ධන කොමිටියේ දී හි අඩුපාඩුකම් තිබෙනවා නම්, ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමාට යළි ඉදිරිපත් කරන්න කියලා මම මේ අවස්ථාවේදී ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.

මොකද ඒ සැම දෙනාටම මිනිස් ජීවිතයේ පැවැත්ම ගෙන යාමට නීත්‍යානුකූල ද නොවන ද හෝ එය ඉඩම්වල දැනට ජීවිතය ගත කරන සැම දෙනාට ඒ අවශ්‍ය සුභසාධන හෝ ආධාර ගොවිතැනට, ධීවර කටයුතු සඳහා හෝ වෙනත් ආදායම් මාර්ගයකට පිවිසෙන හැමදෙනාටම ලබා දීමට අපි බැඳී සිටිනවා.”

 ……………….

“ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමා කියන කාරණයට ප්‍රමුඛත්වය දෙමින්, ජනාධිපතිතුමා උතුරු ප්‍රදේශයේ යළි සංචාරයක යෙදුණා ගිය සතියේ. සෑම ප්‍රදේශයකම පදිංචිකරුවන්ගේ පදිංචිය සනාථ කොට ඔවුනට ඉඩම් ඔප්පුවේ සනාථ කර ගැනීම සඳහා ලබාගත හැකි තොරතුරු ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම මත ප්‍රමුඛත්වයෙන් මේ ඉඩම් හා පදිංචිය පිළිබඳ සහතිකයන් ලබා දීම අපි ඉක්මන් කරගෙන යනවා. ඉදිරි මාස දෙක තුළ රජය මේ ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන්නට සාර්ථකව වේගවත් කරන්න කටයුතු කරන ආරම්භ කරලා තිබෙනවා මේ ඉඩම් අයිතිය ඉල්ලා සිටින ජනතාවට. ඒ අතරතුර කිසිම ගොවිතැනක් කරන ප්‍රදේශයක හෝ පදිංචියක සිටින ජනතාව අනවසර ද, අවසර ද කියන කාරණාවල් මත එලවා දමන්නේ නැති බවත් ප්‍රකාශ කරන්න කැමතියි.”

“බිල නොගෙවීම නිසා පළාත් පාලන ආයතනවල විදුලිය විසන්ධි කිරීම නොකළ යුතුයි; විකල්ප බලශක්තිය සම්බන්ධතා නොදෙන විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලයේ හිතුවක්කරිකමට දඩ ගැසිය යුත්තේ කාටද ?” — අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා අවධාරණය කරයි

January 10th, 2024

පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සභානායක කාර්යාලය

විදුලි බිල නොගෙවීම නිසා පළාත් පාලන ආයතනවලට අදාළ විදුලිය සම්බන්ධතා විසන්ධි කළ යුතුය යන ස්ථාවරයේ තමන් නොසිටින බව පැහැදිලිව ප්‍රකාශ කරන බවත්, එය විසඳා ගැනීමට මහා භාණ්ඩාගාරය සහ විදුලිබල අමාත්‍යංශය සමග සාකච්ඡා ආරම්භ කර ඇති බවත්, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය සහ රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන, ස්වදේශ කටයුතු, පළාත් සභා හා පළාත් පාලන අමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා අවධාරණය කළේය. ඇතැම් පළාත් පාලන ආයතන විකල්ප පුනර්ජනනීය විදුලි බලය සඳහා වහලවල උපකරණ සවිකර ඇතත්, විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය ඒවා සම්බන්ධ නොකර හිතුවක්කාරී ලෙස හැසිරෙන බවත් කී අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා, එම ක්‍රියාවට දඩ ගැසිය යුත්තේ කාටද යන්න ප්‍රශ්න කළේය.

ඔහු මෙම අදහස් පළ කළේ, පා.ම.දයාසිරි ජයසේකර මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී 2024.01.10 දින මතුකළ ප්‍රශ්නයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමිනි. මන්ත්‍රීවරයා විමසුවේ, පළාත් පාලන ආයතනවල විදී පහන් ආදිය සඳහා විදුලි බිල, අදාළ පළාත් පාලන ආයතන මගින් ගෙවිය යුතුය කියා ඇති නියමය අනුව එම ආයතනවලට රුපියල් ලක්ෂ 20, 50, 60 ආදී බිල්පත් ඒවා ඇති බවත්, මෙය විසඳන යුතු බවය.

“ගරු කතානායකතුමනි, පළාත් පාලන ආයතන හා පාරවල් හා විදුලිය ගැන කලින් මහා මාර්ග අමාත්‍යංශය යටතේ තිබුණු සියලු ගෙවීම් පළාත් පාලනයෙන් කළ යුතුයි කියලා තීරණයක් එළඹිලා ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කරලා තිබෙනවා. ඒ අනුව විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය සියලු ප්‍රදේශවල, මේ, අය කිරීම් කෙළින්ම පළාත් පාලන ආයතනයට පවරනවා. සමහර පළාත් පාලන ආයතනවලට, මම එකඟ වෙනවා ආදායම මදි ඒ ගෙවීම් කරන්න. ඒ  ප්‍රශ්නය අපි මහා භාණ්ඩාගාරය සමඟත් විදුලි බල අමාත්‍යංශය සමගත් සාකච්ඡා කරනවා.

එතකොට මේ  නිකුත් කරන නිවේදනය අනුව මුදල් ගෙවා නැත්නම් විසන්ධි කිරීම බොහොම පහසුවෙන් කරන්න පුළුවන් බව ඒ පනතේම තිබෙනවා. නමුත් එහෙම අසාධාරණයක් කරනන් එපැයි කියන පදනමේ තමයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමත්, ඒ වාගේම පළාත් පාලන අමාත්‍යතුමාලා හැටියට අපි ඉන්නේ.
එහෙම කරන්න එපා.  අපි මේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසඳා ගැනීමට සාකච්ඡා ආරම්භ කරලා තිබෙනවා. ඒ නිසා එය තවත් කාලයක් අත්හිටුවලා ආණ්ඩුකාරවරුත් කැඳවලා, පළාත් බඳ ඉංජිනේරුවන් සමග මෙය විසඳගන්න කටයුතු කරමු.

මේක රට පුරාම පටන් ගෙන තිබෙන ගැටලුවක්. ඉතින් මං පිළිගන්නවා, මම පිළිගන්නේ නෑ විදුලිය විසන්දි කළ යුතුයි කියලා. ඒ ස්ථාවරයේ මම නෑ. ඉතා පැහැදිලිව කියනවා. අපිට මේක විසඳාගත හැකි ප්‍රශ්නයක් ලෙස විසඳන්න ඕන.

සමහර තැන්වල ගරු කතානායකතුමනි,  ඔබතුමත් දන්නවා,  පුනර්ජීවන විදුලිබලය ඇති කර වහලවල්වල තිබෙනවා. නමුත් විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලය ඒක සම්බන්ධ කරලා නෑ, මම බොහොම වේදනාවෙන් කතා කරන්නේ. ඒක සම්බන්ධ කරන්න. සම්බන්ධ නොකිරීමට කාටද දඩ ගහන්න ඕන ?
ඒ හිතුවක්කාරකම කාගේ හිතුවක්කාර කමක්ද?  සම්බන්ධ කරා නම් පළාත් පාලන ආයතනවල, ඒ තැන්වල විදුලි බිලක් මතු වෙන්නේ නෑ. මොකක්ද මේ? හැසිරීම කියන එක, විසඳා ගැනීම සඳහා මේ අර්බුද කාලය තුළ බොහොම ප්‍රවේශමෙන් විදුලිය මිනිස් ජීවිතයට අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය වෙලා තියෙනවා.  
ඉස්සර වගේ නෙවෙයි, අපි විදුලිය දුන්නා අපේ ආණ්ඩුව විදුලිය දුන්නා හැම ගේකටම.

අපි දුන්නා පළාත් පාලනයට. පළාත් පාලන ඇමතිතුමා හිටයට මම කියන්න ඕන.   ඔබතුමාටත් මතකයි විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලයට තිබුණු වටිනාම ප්‍රදේශ LECO  ආයතනයට ගත්තා. ඔබතුමාට මතකයි මේ පනත ගේනකොට මහා ආන්දොලනයක් මේ පාරිලිමේන්තුවේ ඇතිවුණා ඒ කාලේ. නමුත් LECO  ආයතන ඒ ප්‍රදේශ භාරව කටයුතු කරමින් දියුණු කරලා තිබෙනවා. ඒකත් කියන්න ඕන. LECO ආයතනය සූදානම්, පළාත් පාලනයේ ඕනෑම විකල්ප විදුලිය සපයන මාර්ගවලට අවතීර්ණ වෙලා එවා සම්බන්ධ කරගන්න.  ඒවා සම්බන්ධ කරලා තියෙනවා. ඉතින් මේක බරපතල ප්‍රශ්නයක් ලෙස ගෙන දැනටමත් අපි සාකච්ඡා ආරම්භ කරලා තියෙනවා.  

මම හිතනවා තමුන්නාන්සේලාගේ සහයෝගය දෙයි විදුලිය අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය දෙයක් මහජනයාට. එහි මිල වැඩිවීම හා මිල අය කරන ක්‍රමවේදය ගැන තිබෙන ගැටළු තුළ අපි මුහුණ දෙන මහජනයා මුහුණ දෙන‍ෙ මේ කාරණය නිරාකරණය කර ගැනීමට පළාත් පාලන ආයතන හැටියට අපි මැදිහත් වෙනවා.”

“ආර්ථිකය පණ ගැන්වීමේ ඉදිරි ක්‍රියා මාර්ගය සඳහා, විදේශ ආයෝජන, පෞද්ගලිකව හෝ රාජ්‍ය ආයෝජන අවශ්‍යයි.-අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා

January 10th, 2024

පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සභානායක කාර්යාලය

“ආර්ථිකය පණ ගැන්වීමේ ඉදිරි ක්‍රියා මාර්ගය සඳහා, විදේශ ආයෝජන, පෞද්ගලිකව හෝ රාජ්‍ය ආයෝජන අවශ්‍යයි. ස්ථාවරව ඒ ප්‍රතිපත්තියට අපි සියලු දෙනා කැප වී තිබෙන බව, මා විශ්වාස කරනවා, මුළු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවම. එය සාර්ථක කරන්න සහයෝගය හා සක්‍රීය දායකත්වය පෞද්ගලික අංශයෙනුත් අපි බලාපොරොත්තු වෙනවා” – අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා

ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේ, අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගෙන් විමසන ප්‍රශ්න යටතේ  පා.ම. නාලක බණ්ඩාර කොට්ටෙගොඩ මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී 2024.01.10 දින…  විමසූ ප්‍රශ්නයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමිනි.

“ගරු කතානායකතුමනි නාලක බණ්ඩාර මන්ත්‍රීතුමා විසින් නගන ලද ප්‍රශ්නයට අපේ ගරු අමාත්‍යතුමා පිළිතුරු දීමට මත්තෙන් මම සඳහන් කරන්නට කැමැතියි, විදේශ ආයෝජනයන් පිළිබඳව අපට පසුගිය කාලය තුළ ප්‍රධාන ගැටලු රාශියක් ඇති වී තිබෙනවා. සෑම ආණ්ඩුවක්ම විදේශ ආයෝජනයන් වැඩි කර ගැනීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවය සදහා අයවැය ‍ලේඛනයද සහනයන් ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කරලා තිබෙනවා.

අතිගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමා විසින් මෙම වසරේ අයවැය ‍ලේඛනය ද ඒ සහන හා  ප්‍රතිකර්මයන් ගරු ඇමතිතුමා සඳහන් කරයි. විශේෂයෙන් BOI ආයතනය හා EDB ආයතන දෙක ඒකාබද්ධ කොට අපනයනයන් වැඩි දියුණු කිරීම හා ඒ හා සම්බන්ධවත් ආයෝජකයන්ට වඩාත් සහනයක් ලබාදීම සඳහා වැඩපිළිවෙළක් ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කර තිබෙනවා. මේ සතියේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසින් තවත් ඉදිරි පියවරක් ගත්තා, ජනාධිපතිතුමා විසින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කළා, යාපනයේදී උතුරු පළාතේ ආයෝජන කලාප පහක් ඇති කිරීම සඳහා විශේෂ භූමි භාගයන් සහ සහනයන් ත්‍රිකුණාමලයට අතිරේකව ඇති කරන්න. මෙහි බලාපොරොත්තුව පෞද්ගලික ආයෝජන විදේශීය ආකර්ෂණය කොට ආයෝජනය කිරීමට ස්ථානගත ආයෝජන කලාපයන් ඇති කිරීමයි.

ඒ නිසා පසුගිය කාලය තුළ විවිධ බාධාවන් තිබෙනවා. ගරු මන්ත්‍රීතුමා අහලපු ප්‍රධාන කාරණාව අපි පිළිගන්න ඕනේ. අපේ ආයතන රාශියකට ආයෝජකයන්ට ගමන් කිරීමට සිදුවන ප්‍රශ්නය ආණ්ඩු ගණනාවක අවධානයට යොමු කොට,  අද ඒ නිසා මේ ආයතනික හා නීතිමය අතරින් ඇති වී තිබෙන ප්‍රමාදයන් දුරු කිරීමට පියවර ගනිමින් තිබෙනවා. ඒ වගේම මම සභාගත කරන්න කැමැතියි අපේ ගරු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ද  ඔබතුමා කමිටියක් ඇති කළා. Doing Business Index එක සම්බන්ධව. ඒ පිළිබඳ පරීක්ෂණ කරලා තිබෙනවා. ඒ වාර්තාව මේ අවස්ථාවේදී එහි ඇත්ත දත්ත මූලාශ්‍ර ලෝක බැංකුව සමග සභාගත කරන්නට අදහස් කරනවා. ඒවගේම නීතිමය සංශෝධනයන් ගැන කලින් මං සඳහන් කළා. ගරු ඇමතිතුමා ඉතිරි කරුණු ගැන ප්‍රකාශ කරයි. අපි පිළිගන්නවා අපි ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කර තිබෙනවා, ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමා ඇතුළු රජයට විදේශ ආයෝජන පෞද්ගලිකව හෝ රාජ්‍ය ආයෝජන අවශ්‍යයි. ආර්ථිකය පණ ගැන්වීමේ ඉදිරි ක්‍රියා මාර්ගය සඳහා. ස්ථාවරව ඒ ප්‍රතිපත්තියට අපි සියලු දෙනා කැප වී තිබෙන බව, මා විශ්වාස කරනවා. මුළු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවම. එය සාර්ථක කරන්න සහයෝගය හා සක්‍රීය දායකත්වය පෞද්ගලික අංශයෙනුත් අපි බලාපොරොත්තු වෙනවා. ස්තූතියි.

සියලු හිඟ විශාමික පාරිතෝෂිත ගෙවීමට මුදල් ලැබුණා; එය විශ්‍රාමිකයන්ට විශාල ජයග්‍රහණයක් — අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා

January 10th, 2024

පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සභානායක කාර්යාලය

වසර ගණනාවක් තිස්සේ ප්‍රමාද වෙමින් පැවති සියලුම විශ්‍රාමික පාරිතෝෂිත ගෙවීමට අවශ්‍ය සියලු මුදල් ලැබීම නිසා, 2023 වර්ෂය වනවිට ගෙවීමට තිබූ සියලු හිඟ පර්තෝෂිත විශ්‍රාමිකයන් වෙත ගෙවා අවසන් කිරීමට හැකිවූ බවද එය මෙරට විශ්‍රාමිකයන් ලැබූ විශාල ජයග්‍රහණයක් බවද, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය සහ රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන, ස්වදේශ කටයුතු, පළාත් සභා හා පළාත් පාලන අමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී 2023.01.10 දින ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේ, අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගෙන් ප්‍රශ්න ඇසීමේ අවස්ථාවේදී, පා.ම. ජගත් කුමාර සුමිත්‍රාරච්චි මහතා ඉදිරිපත් කළ ප්‍රශ්නයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමිනි. 2021 වර්ෂයේ සිට මෙම විශ්‍රාමික පාර්තෝෂිත හිඟය පැවතිණි.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා මෙසේද කීය.

“ඉතා කාලෝචිත ප්‍රශ්නයක්. වසර ගණනාවක් තිස්සේ ප්‍රමාද වෙමින් පවතින විශ්‍රාම පාරිතෝෂිත ගෙවීම ගැන මූල්‍ය අර්බුදයකට අපි මුහුණ දුන්නා. එම අර්බුදය ලිහිල් කිරීම සඳහා මුදල් අමාත්‍යංශයත්, රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන අමාත්‍යංශයත්, දීර්ඝව පවත්වපු සාකච්ඡා අනුව, ක්‍රමානුකුලව ලිහිල් කර ගැනීමේ කාර්යයට අවතීරණ වීමට පුළුවන් වුනා. 2023 දෙසැම්බර් මාසයේ මුදල් අමාත්‍යංශය විසින් විශාල සහනයකට පරිවර්තනය කළ හැකි ලෙස මුල්‍ය ප්‍රතිපාදන නිකුත් කිරීම විශ්‍රාමිකයන්ට විශාල ජයග්‍රහණයක්. ඒ නිසා විශ්‍රාමිකයන් මුහුණ දුන් ගැටලුව තුරන් කිරීමට අපි දැන් එළඹිලා තියෙනවා.”

Foreign Ministry urged to advise govt. against Red Sea deployment

January 10th, 2024

Courtesy The Island

Former Sri Lankan Ambassador to Iran M. M. Zuhair yesterday (09) urged the government not to join US-led military alliance in Red Sea operation.

The former PA MP and Senior State Counsel issued the following statement: Those in Sri Lanka holding accountable office but recklessly aiding the US moves to widen the Western supported wars in the Middle East, must read the 85 page Complaint of genocide that South Africa had filed in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) arising from the ongoing mass murder of civilian men, women and children of Palestine and the close upon total destruction of their homeland, recklessly bombed by the ‘holocaust victims’.

The Foreign Ministry must advice the SLPP controlled President to be strictly non-aligned and save Sri Lanka from getting trapped in Joe Biden’s wars in third world countries. South Africa is due to seek interim orders on Israel to forthwith implement ceasefire on all Palestinian fronts. There is nothing to prevent South Africa at some appropriate stage in the ICJ proceedings to move to add the US, Britain and other States for complicity in the violations of international humanitarian laws by aiding and abetting Israel in committing genocide in Palestine.

There is no need for Sri Lanka to get implicated for aiding the wrong side in this war. The 1968 to 1973 massive US massacres in Cambodia and the 18 year American war in Vietnam pale into insignificance compared to the unimaginable process resorted to by the Israeli State terror mafia in its murderous onslaughts, bombings and the collective punishment of Palestinian men, women and children in the 2023 massacres in Gaza.

To quote the Israeli Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter, at whose request Sri Lanka had reportedly offered to provide 10,000 agricultural (or domestic) workers, We are now actually rolling out the Gaza Naqaba”, quoting the Arabic word ‘Naqaba’ used to refer to the pre 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestinians to create Israel. The Minister’s genocidal intent to wipe out Gaza is clear. Sri Lanka’s Foreign Employment Minister who has risked the lives of Sri Lankans by offering to send them to the Israeli war front, can also be considered by South Africa to be added to the ICJ list for aiding Israel in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

In this background, the Sri Lankan President’s offer to dispatch a Navy vessel to confront the Yemeni Houthis in the Red Sea is beyond any comprehension! The cost of the deployment of one Navy vessel is reportedly Rs 17.5 million every two weeks. This money can be used by the Foreign Employment Minister to prevent Sri Lankans being sent to the Israeli war zones. Sri Lanka can pay from the Rs 17.5 million (Rs 35 million per month) each of the 10,000 Sri Lankans Rs 105,000/= every month and save them from facing likely deaths in Israel and also the Navy Vessel and its personnel from getting destroyed by the Houthis! Whoever gave the President’s advisors the idea of blaming the Yemeni Houthis for Sri Lanka’s skyrocketing cost of living, thanks to the VAT, deserves a free ride to the Sun in India’s Aditya-L 1” or ‘L 2’

Israel itself has reacted to the South African move in the ICJ by deciding that the destructive bombings in Hamas controlled Northern Palestine would be scaled down even as it’s over stacked ground campaigns continue to meet stiff resistance from Palestinians. Unlike in other UN related inquiries, Israel, a signatory to the Geneva Convention, will appear before the ICJ and attempt to put up a defence for the mass murder of human animals” and the near total destruction of Gaza” relegating it, into an uninhabitable part of the globe.

The US move to enlist other nations in the Israeli war on Palestine must be seen as a dangerous step to widen Israel’s war into a broader ME war. The correct option for Sri Lanka will be, to press the US to demand Israel end this senseless war, carried out under the pretext of countering last year’s globally condemned Hamas attacks of 7th October, in Israeli occupied Palestinian territories. Israel’s pre- 7th October desecration of the historical Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem has been comfortably forgotten! 75 years of oppression of the Palestinians by Israel have also been effectively buried under the sand by the world media!

South Africa’s move in the ICJ ought to succeed, if the ever growing Hamas is to be restrained from recourse to acquiring nuclear weapons to defend its only homeland, as Israel continues to obliterate even the two State solution, which was dangled only as a carrot for consumption by the world at large but never seriously offered.

චමින්ද විජේසිරි මන්ත‍්‍රීකම කෝටි 09කට විකුණලා.. පාර්ලිමේන්තු එන්නේ ද්විත්ව පුරවැසියෙක්..

January 10th, 2024

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

සමගි ජන බලවේගග පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ධුරයෙන් චමින්ද විජේසිරි මහතා ඉල්ලා අස්වී ඇත්තේ රුපියල් ලක්‍ෂ නවසීයක් ලබාගෙන බවට පළවන මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා ගැන සොයා බලන්නයි පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී මහින්දානන්ද අලුත්ගමගේ ඉල්ලා සිටී.

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් සියලු දෙනාම චමින්ද විජේසිරි මහතාගේ ප්‍රකාශයන් නිසා හෑල්ලුවට දැක්වී ඇතැයි ද ඔහු කියා සිටියේය.

විජේසිරි මහතාගෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්වීමෙන් පුරප්පාඩු ධුරයට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට පිවිසීමට නියමිතව ඇති ද්විත්ව පුරවැසික් බවද ඔහු පෙන්වා දෙයි.

අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අමතමින් හෙතෙම මේ අදහස් පළ කරන ලදී.

මන්ත්‍රීවරයා එහිදී මෙසේද සඳහන් කළේය

‘ඊයේ ඉල්ලා අස්වුන මන්ත්‍රීවරයා කිව්වේ එතුමට ළමයි ඉස්කොලේ යවන්න බැහැ , එතුමට පාරේ යන්න බැහැ ඒ නිසා කළකිරිලා ඉල්ලා අස්වෙනවා කියලා.

මන්ත්‍රීවරු සියලු දෙනා හෑල්ලු කරමින් මාධ්‍ය ඒක හුවා දක්වලා තියෙනවා. නමුත් අපිත් පාරේ යනවා මින්ස්සු අතර ඉන්නවා අපිට එහෙම ප්‍රශ්නයක් නැහැ.

හැබැයි මේ මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ඉල්ලා අස්වීමේන් පසුව ඊලඟට පාර්ලිමේන්තු එන්නේ ද්විත්ව පුරවැසියෙක්. මේ මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ඉල්ලා අස්වුනේ ලක්ෂ 900 ක් අර‌ගෙන කියලා පත්තරේ තියෙනවා. මේ ප්‍රකාශය අපිට හොද නැහැ.

ද්විත්වපුරවැසියන්ට පාර්ලිමේන්තු එන්නත් ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාවේ පදිංචියට යන්නත් මේ කරන ප්‍රකාශ හොද නැහැ ඒගැන හොයා බලන්න කියා මම ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.’

Monetary deal behind Chaminda Wijesiri’s resignation?: Aluthgamage

January 10th, 2024

By Yohan Perera and Ajith Siriwardana Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, Jan 10 (Daily Mirror) –  SLPP MP Mahindananda Aluthgamage who questioned the alleged deal behind the resignation of SJB MP Chaminda Wijesiri, where it has been reported that the latter had accepted a sum of Rs. 90 million to vacate his seat for the person who is next in the SJB list in the Badulla District to come into Parliament, requested the Speaker to look into the matter.

It has been reported that Chaminda Wijesiri has accepted a sum of Rs. 90 million to vacate his seat for the next person in the list to come into Parliament. All MPs have been ridiculed by these reports. Therefore this drama has adversely affected all MPs,” MP Aluthgamage said.

Also, the MP said there is an issue in swearing in Nayana Wasalathilaka who is next in the SJB list as he is a duel citizen. 

There is an issue in swearing in the next person in the list as he is a dual citizen. The Speaker should look into all these matters as it adversely affects all MPs,” Aluthgamage added.

Sri Lanka hoping to strike debt deal with commercial creditors within 2 months

January 10th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

The governor of Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) says ‘good faith negotiations’ are in progress with commercial creditors to reach an in-principle agreement as soon as possible.

Addressing a special media briefing at the CBSL premises this morning (Jan.10), Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe said the agreement is expected to reach within the next two months.

Sri Lanka reached in-principle agreements with China’s Export-Import (Exim) Bank and the Official Creditor Committee (OCC) in late 2023 on the financial terms of debt treatment.

The OCC was formally formed on May 09 with 17 countries to respond to the Sri Lankan authorities’ request for debt treatment. It is co-chaired by India, Japan and France (as the chair of the Paris Club). It was established following the launch of a common platform in April 2023 for talks among bilateral creditors to coordinate restructuring of Sri Lanka’s debt.

Agreement with the Chinese Exim Bank was reached in October 2023, covering approximately USD 4.2 billion of outstanding debt. It was followed by the debt deal struck with the OCC which covers USD 5.9 billion of outstanding debt.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) later said the two agreements are consistent with the 48-month Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangement provided to Sri Lanka.

The global lender in March 2023 had approved a USD 2.9 billion bailout package for the island nation to ride out its adverse economic situation.

IMF’s Executive Board completed its first review of the EFF program for Sri Lanka, paving the way for the disbursement of the much-anticipated second tranche of the loan which amounted to USD 337 million. This brought the total IMF financial support disbursed thus far to USD 670 million.

The in-principle deals with the Chinese Exim Bank and the OCC had set the scene for the IMF’s Executive Board to consider clearing the first review.

Sri Lanka plunged into its worst financial crisis in seven decades last year after its foreign exchange reserves dwindled to record lows. But since locking down the IMF bailout of USD 2.9 billion in March 2023, the island nation has managed to partly stabilise its economy, bring down runaway inflation and rebuild currency reserves.

The EFF program supports Sri Lanka’s efforts to restore macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability, safeguard financial stability, and enhance growth-oriented structural reforms.

World Bank forecasts Sri Lankan economy to grow 1.7% in 2024

January 10th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

The World Bank forecasts the Sri Lankan economy to grow by 1.7 percent in 2024 and by 2.4 percent in 2025, according to its report on global economic prospects made available to the local press on Wednesday.

According to the World Bank, the country’s economy is estimated to have recorded a negative growth of 3.8 percent in 2023.

Although the output in Sri Lanka is also estimated to have declined in the 2022-2023 financial year, progress has been made in sovereign debt restructuring, said the World Bank.

However, it said the outlook for Sri Lanka remains uncertain amid debt restructuring negotiations, particularly with private creditors.

The growth in South Asia is estimated to have slowed slightly to 5.7 percent in 2023, yet it remains the fastest among emerging markets and developing economy regions, according to the World Bank.

Source: Xinhua

–Agencies

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට  පැමිණි ඈන් කුමරිය සම්ප්‍රදායික රැඟුම් මැදින් හරසරින් පිළිගත් අයුරු 

January 10th, 2024

Princess Anne calls on President Ranil Wickremesinghe

January 10th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

Princess Anne calls on President Ranil Wickremesinghe

Her Royal Highness Princess Anne, the Princess Royal of the United Kingdom accompanied by her spouse Vice Admiral Sir Timothy Laurence, who are on a three-day official visit to Sri Lanka, met with President Ranil Wickremesinghe at the President’s House a short while ago.

The Princess Royal and her spouse arrived in Sri Lanka this afternoon for a three-day visit. The visit comes as Sri Lanka and the UK mark 75 years of diplomatic relations. During the visit, The Princess Royal is scheduled to undertake engagements in Colombo, Kandy and Jaffna.

Earlier today, The Princess Royal toured the MAS Holdings Nirmaana facility and heard about their innovative excellence in product creation and development for strategic international partners, including British brands like Marks & Spencer.

As patron of Save the Children UK, The Princess Royal also met and thanked staff at the Save the Children offices in Colombo for the work they do to support humanitarian needs across Sri Lanka. She received a briefing on their work and celebrated their 50th year of operations in Sri Lanka.

Princess Anne last visited Sri Lanka nearly 30 years ago in 1995 as patron of Save the Children to see projects supported by the charity.

Princess Anne was welcomed to Sri Lanka today with a dazzling performance by traditional dancers as she walked down the plane’s steps at Bandaranaike International Airport in Katunayake. 

She’s been joined by her husband Vice Admiral Sir Timothy Laurence, 68, for the start of a three-day visit celebrating the UK’s ties with the South Asian Island. The trip is the royal family’s first overseas tour of 2024.

A large group of dancers and musicians performed for the couple with drummers playing a hypnotic beat in the hot and humid conditions.

The princess is visiting the country at the request of the Foreign Office and will begin a whistle-stop tour to mark the UK’s bilateral relations with the nation, including a meeting with President Ranil Wickremesinghe and First Lady Maithree Wickremesinghe.

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister, Ali Sabry and British High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, Andrew Patrick were among the dignitaries who formally welcomed the princess at the airport. 

–With agencies inputs

Stringent legal action against businesses exploiting consumers and unfairly profiting

January 10th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

Stringent legal action against businesses exploiting consumers and unfairly profiting

State Minister for Finance, Ranjith Siambalapitiya, emphasised the strict enforcement of laws to eradicate the trade mafia generating profits without registering with the Inland Revenue Department (IRD). 

He also outlined the government’s plan to expand the tax base, anticipating a rise in the direct tax percentage to 40%.

These remarks were made during his participation in a special VAT awareness conference at the Ministry of Finance yesterday (09 Jan.), organized by Saman Ratnapriya, the Director General of Presidential Trade Unions, for the benefit of civil society activists, government officials, political activists, trade union leaders, and journalists.

Expressing his views State Minister Ranjith Siyambalapitiya further said;

These challenging times affect everyone, regardless of their economic status, as incomes decrease and expenses rise. The government acknowledges these difficulties and recognizes the necessity of its ongoing program to address the country’s problems.

Increasing government revenue is crucial for economic development, and to achieve this, the government aims to expand the tax base. The direct tax percentage has already risen from 20% to 30%, with plans to further increase it to 40%. 

The government also enforces strict laws to combat the trade mafia, preventing them from making unfair profits through fake bills without proper registration with the Inland Revenue Department. Additionally, there is potential to reduce indirect taxes in the future.

Tax Consultant of the Finance Ministry’s Finance Department Tanuja Perera said;

Businesses are required to remit VAT to the Inland Revenue Department monthly, with the amount charged from the 1st to the 31st of January due by the 20th of February. Failure to do so may result in legal action under the VAT Act by the Ministry of Finance.

Displaying the Inland Revenue Department’s issued license is mandatory for shops eligible to charge VAT. Invoices, following a format set by the Commissioner General of Inland Revenue, must be issued to consumers after VAT is applied. Strict enforcement is in place against fraudulent businesses collecting money without proper VAT registration, with penalties and collected VAT funds pursued by the government.

Saman Ratnapriya, Director General of Trade Unions to the President expressing his views said;

The VAT amendment has sparked heated discussions in today’s society, particularly since President Ranil Wickremesinghe introduced it in the 2024 budget in his capacity as the Finance Minister. This budget serves as the economic blueprint for the current year, and without meaningful societal discussions, turning its proposals into reality becomes challenging. That’s why seminars on VAT are organized.

Numerous misconceptions surround this VAT amendment, notably the increase from 15% to 18%. While the tax has risen by 3% for existing goods, some items have gone from 0% to 18%. 

Additionally, due to tax adjustments, certain products experience a lower-than-expected VAT increase at 18%. To navigate these complexities, a thorough societal discourse on this VAT amendment is crucial.

K. K. I. Eranda from the government revenue unit of the President’s Office said;

Government inefficiencies in VAT collection have been identified, impacting the potential contribution to the economy. Proper VAT collection could add 6% to the gross domestic product, but currently, only 2% is realized. 

Three primary areas of tax leakage have been uncovered: businessmen not remitting collected taxes, irregularities by officials, and losses due to tax exemptions. Addressing these leakages is crucial for stabilizing the economy.

In the first half of 2019, VAT was at 15%, reduced to 8% in 2020, and maintained for the next three years. However, the economic downturn persisted, indicating that the VAT reduction alone did not stimulate growth. 

To revitalize the collapsed economy, a VAT increase to 18% is proposed.

Currently, around thirteen thousand businesses are registered for VAT collection, with the government aiming to increase this number to fifty thousand in the future.

How Sri Lanka is made to be the 29th State of India

January 9th, 2024

Dr. K M Wasantha Bandara

It can be very logically proven that six international agendas are being implemented together -at one and the same time-under the current Ranil Wickramasinghe rule. It can be clearly proven that the final goal is to weaken the government of Sri Lanka, break down the structure of society, and make it dependent politically and economically. A very potent space was created historically to initiate the entire agenda and lay it on Sri Lanka by the ’77 government change. Thereafter it can be seen that the journey which has systematically progressed, under different governments by now has reached its zenith under the direction of President Ranil Wickramasinghe.
Of these agendas, the first is the separatist agenda; President Ranil Wickramasinghe emboldened by a courage that none of the seven earlier Presidents had states that he would enforce fully the 13th Constitutional amendment. That is, the road will be laid for the Eelam State by creating a complete Federal state, constitutionally. An argument can be made that he gets such courage because of the support and guidance he gets from outside. The reason is that by now it has been proved with evidence that there had been a strong American and Indian mediation to overturn the Gotabhaya Rajapakse rule which had people’s mandate of 69 laks, and bring into power Ranil Wickramasinghe who had no mandate from the people.
It is now evident that the relevant people had known the final outcome of the drama – ‘Gota Go Home’, purportedly scripted by under the Second Secretary of USA, Victoria Nuland, set to music by the Indian Defence Advisor, Ajit Doval, directed by the American Ambassador Julie Liyon Chang- was ‘Ranil Come Back’. It is very clear that the majority of the simple honest youth who performed the role of actors and spectators had seen only ‘Gota-Go-Home’ on the cover, and not the last line in the copy – ‘Ranil-Come-Back’. Is it not on this reality that Mr. Anura Kumara Dissanayake -the leader of the JVP- expressing his ideas about the so-called Galle Face Drama, accept that he has supported the anti-revolution, thinking it was the revolution?
Now it has come to light that on the manuscript of the drama, one of the two conclusions could have been reached. Suppose it had been possible to assassinate President Gotabhaya Rajapakse and fuel public protests across the country, the situation to establish an interim government with international intervention would have arisen as had happened in Libya. That would have created the environment to implement the above agenda very quickly and by force. When the tragedy faced by the Libyan and Iraqi public is observed, it can be accepted that the same fate would have followed the people of Sri Lanka.
But with the failure to build up public protest as in Libya as mentioned above, it is very clear that Plan B relevant to the manuscript was put in force. That is the creation of the space necessary to continue the agenda by empowering Ranil Wickramasinghe as the most suitable alternative. Now it has been proved that Ranil Wickramasinghe had known the role given over to him according to Victoria Nuland’s script, and that he had been prepared for it. His advisor Prof Ashu Marasinghe and Minister Harin Fernando have acknowledged in public that they had been told to provide all support for the success of the protest. It can also be well argued that he accepts the posts in Parliament on a definite calendar on a specific road map.
Thus, there is no doubt that Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe is now under severe pressure from his masters who have put him into power. Especially considering the manner, he has been dealing with India during the recent past, shows that the Indian agenda which is the third of the six agendas handed over to him has been given priority. It is a historical fact that the Indian agenda is based on the Panikkar theory-tied up with the separatist agenda or the 1st agenda. It was in 1932 that the Mahabharath theory or the Panikkar theory was put forward and it became one of the principles on which the RAW, India’s external intelligence service bases its foreign policy. According to that, Maha Bharat must be created with the annexation of all smaller kingdoms associated with India through agreements as semi- independent states. At the recently conducted G20 summit Narendra Modi identified India as Bharatha. In addition, the map of Bharatha displayed at the Indian Parliament included Sri Lanka too.

The independent state of Sikkim was attached as the 22nd state-protectorate of India in 1975, according to the Panikkar theory. The Prime Minister of the country at the time Lhendup Dorji-the Indian agent like the prime minister of Sri Lanka-Ranil Wickramasinghe, lost ignominiously in 1974. Consequently, very much like the Galle Face protest, with the mediation of India, public agitation was pursued against the king that the relevant election was corrupt. The king accepting it, had to call for fresh elections. Then the Prime Minister who had suffered an ignominious defeat could secure a strong victory with Indian mediation. Finally on conforming with all agreements presented by India within a year, Lhendup Dorji was able to aspire to the governorship of the 22nd protectorate of India. When that situation is applied to Sri Lanka, the question can be raised whether the Indian agenda cannot be implemented within the Gotabhaya Rajapakse regime making use of Basil Rajapakse. It is a fact that Mr. Basil Rajapakse went to India in November 2021, and agreed to a number of serious strategic processes such as handing over the oil tank complex at Trincomalee to India, handing over the monopoly of power generating projects in the North and East to the Adani company, providing permission to establish the largest alcohol manufacturing plant in Asia under the pretext of purifying sugar, as well as a land of 20,000 acres belonging to the Kantalai Sugar Factory to another Indian company , finalizing matters regarding the handing over of the Western jetty of the Colombo Port to the Adani Company, and bringing the surveillance of the Sri Lanka maritime zone under the Indian navy .

However, it is not surprising that the RAW Intelligence Service admitted that it was not possible to achieve the Indian objectives on a short-term basis under the Gotabhaya regime due to two reasons. The first was that, however much Basil Rajapakse tried, it was very clear that their final target could not be achieved without breaking down the Sinhala Buddhist force that empowered the Gotabhaya regime. Accordingly, it had to be accepted that chasing away Gotabhaya and breaking the backbone of the majority Sinhala Buddhist forces must happen simultaneously. The second was to escalate the economic crisis further and subject the economy of Sri Lanka to the sympathetic affiliation of India. It was clear that for that to the happen the most appropriate was to bring down the economy further and become the saviour by helping and finally adapt the strategic approach of ‘Gota go home-Ranil come back’.

There can be no argument that prior to examining the length and breadth of the Sardar Panikkar agenda, a basic introduction to the rest of the agendas is called for. Accordingly, it must be admitted that the third agenda, that Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe has grasped firmly, is the agenda related to the geopolitical needs of America -or the Indo Pacific region. It is seen that some political novices seem to think that there is a contradiction between the Indian and the American agenda. But it becomes apparent, on a practical basis that there is no contradiction, when looking at the agreements reached by India and America through the NATO in Asia which is the QUAD organization. India and America have agreed on four war and defence agreements-BECA, GSOMIA, LEMOA, COMCASA. The areas of joint training, operations, unifying intelligence services, exchange of information and provision of war supplies are covered by these.
Additionally, India has shown no objection whatsoever to the ACSA and SOFA agreements signed between America and Sri Lanka based on accommodating the land and the harbors of Sri Lanka for the use of the American army. Nor has India shown any objection whatsoever to the MCC agreement that Sri Lanka is being compelled to sign, or the agreements reached recently by the government with the heads of the CIA and NATO who were here recently on unifying the intelligence services. Accordingly, what is left to complete the American agenda given over to President Ranil Wickramasinghe on their Indo-Pacific agenda is to agree on the ‘Annexure B’ that has been presented by now and sign the MCC agreement. It can be assumed that these will take place on winning the next Presidential election.

When the three agreements-ACSA, SOFA, and MCC related to the American or the Indo-Pacific agenda are implemented, it will be possible to make use of the entirety of the landmass of Sri Lanka according to the Indo-American unified war strategies. Accordingly, a soldier, an officer of the American army, or a contractor who provides services to those armies can enter the country by air or sea. It will not be necessary to obtain prior permission for such. In addition, they can, travel to any place within the country making use of air, sea or highways and camp in any place. They could go about in the country in or out of uniform, armed or unarmed, and their travelling bags and vehicles may not be examined on any occasion. The opportunity is created by the MCC to obtain the land necessary for supplies and to establish the supply center for the American armies in the vicinity of Trincomalee.

The network of new industries and the other required facilities will be established in proximity to Trincomalee according to the plan already drawn by Surbana Jurong -the Advisory Company of Singapore. Permission has been granted for such only to Indian, American, and Japanese companies. It is reported that Victoria Nuland who came to Sri Lanka and India recently, in discussions with Subramaniam Jaishankar, the Foreign Minister in India, had come to an agreement that an Indo -American united war supply centre be established in Sri Lanka in the vicinity of Trincomalee. Doesn’t all this clearly indicate that there is no discrepancy between the Indian agenda and the American in relation to Sri Lanka?

Now it becomes apparent, that the agenda Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe is implementing currently, very bravely and strongly is the fourth or the IMF agenda. It is based on the theory of Milton Freedman- ‘the economy must be governed by the market’. According to that, the private sector must perform the major role of the Economy, and the state’s role will be minimized by privatizing state-owned land and reducing responsibility. By facilitating free trade with no obstruction, the opportunity is created for global multi-national companies to appropriate the entire economy of Sri Lanka. Already under the guise of selling off loss making state institutes, the process of selling off even those that do make profits has been started. The selling of farms and other land that belong to the government also comes under that.
The destruction of the economy of the country as a whole can be taken as agenda five. This process was initiated with fanfare in 1977, and by now it is reaching its conclusion in the economic crisis. Within this the system of local manufacturing will break down and the security of power and food will be endangered. Under the tax policy, and the energy policy introduced by the Ranil Wickramasinghe government the local producer is exposed further to difficulties and it is reported that by now over 2000 industries have been
closed. Bringing about economic dependence, the IMF agenda as well as the Indo-American agenda are tied together. Indian companies have got the opportunity to acquire local companies at a pittance in the situation where they collapse due to the depreciation of the rupee.

The process of breaking down society, implemented from colonial times, which is proceeding fast under the government of Ranil Wickramasinghe can be identified as agenda six. The strategic approach related to colonial rule was the break-up of society through taking over the government. But within the current process, it can be clearly seen that the strategy of weakening the state and its subjugation is achieved through the breakdown of society. Then as now what was used to break down society was to break down strong social institutes. Three such social institutes can be recognized in Sri Lanka. The first is the sangha, the second the family and the third the individual. In a civilizational state” such as ours, the individual too becomes a social institute because the individual performs a strong role within society in maintaining the system of social values. There is evidence that various militant political parties are made use of to continue the process of breaking down society by making the individual violent and break down the individual by making society violent.

Meanwhile in the name of preventing domestic violence, providing justice to the LGBT community, and that by making the individual violent overall, the final objective is to break down the institute of the family. In addition, it can be clearly seen that the process launched from within and without to break down the sangha society has reached its climax. On considering the historical role played by the Sangha to balance power between the people and the king, it is very clear that by breaking down the power of the sangha society, not only will it bring about the fall of the power of the sangha society, but it will simultaneously bring about the fall of society, and weaken the power of the state by allowing it to go astray.

Out of the six agendas that are concurrently implemented, the Indian agenda is moving forwards rapidly. As per Mr. Milinda Moragoda – former ambassador to India and the unofficial American ambassador- and according to the researchers at the Jawaharlal Nehru University who provide intellectual
guidance to the Indian RAW intelligence organization, there is only one alternative for Sri Lanka to get over the economic crisis. That is for the Sri Lankan economy to be unified with the Indian economy. That six basic accessories will be made use of for this unification was made very clear in the joint statement made by Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe and Mr. Narendra Modi on 22nd last July. These six accessories will be made use of as an extension of the strategic assets and the processes launched so far and that it is the climax of the final objective. A long list can be identified related to it.

First, acquisition of the Oil Tank complex at Trincomalee and the Western jetty at the Colombo port. Meanwhile, there is pressure imposed to acquire the Eastern jetty and a new jetty at the Trincomalee harbour. Secondly, as an extension of the same, acquiring the significant business concerns and the land strategically significant in the Northern and Eastern provinces. As examples: acquiring the power projects at Pooneryn and Sampur and the islands off Jaffna ,obtaining priority for investment in the investment zone related to the Trincomalee harbour, 20,000 acres of land belonging to the sugar factory in Kantalai, space to obtain production rights for the production of alcohol on a massive scale as well as to acquire the market for sugar , acquiring the farms of the National Livestock Development Board, acquiring the local economy for milk by acquiring the Milco company, obtaining the right to explore mineral oils in the seas of Mannar, and Cauvery, converting the airports at Palaly and Batticaloa as civil airports and bringing them under an Indian monopoly, acquiring the authority for the transport of passengers and goods related to the harbour at Kankasanthurai, initiating the process of acquiring Sri Lankan Air Lines and the Mattala Airport belong to this list.

In addition, India has obtained a lot of strategic military advantages by getting the opportunity to enter the data system of the country through the project of digitally registering identity cards as well as the right to direct the intelligence service associated with the ocean zones of Sri Lanka. The climax of all this is the joint statement made as above on 22nd July 2023. It brings about facilities for these six accessories for economic unification. Already the Central Bank Act has been revised to provide room for such. The second is the unification of custom tariffs and the tax policies. The ETCA agreement provides facilities for this. With the ETCA the opportunity is created for Indian persons and services to enter Sri Lanka freely. An Indian will get to enjoy the rights enjoyed by a Sri Lankan within Sri Lanka. The fourth is the unification of power and energy, and the fifth is the unification of the harbour and the airport, in other words the unification of the logistics and supply system. The sixth is geographical unification trough highways and railways.

Thereby it is clear that the economy of Sri Lanka will in totality be joined with the economy of India. It has been revealed that to acquire all these, India is not only making use of the economic crisis faced by Sri Lanka but also using its influence to take relevant decisions to exacerbate the crisis faced by Sri Lanka. For example, the floating of the rupee, by bring about its value to a very low level, and announcing bankruptcy, a situation has been created where India alone must be depended on for financial support and loans.

It is seen that in creating and fostering this crisis, and for the launching of its objective India invests less than USD 5000 million. It is no secret that every dollar will go back to India and that a profit too is earned on every dollar. Accordingly, the process that began in July 2020, by providing the facility of a currency swap of 400 million dollars, has increased to a loan of 1500 million dollars in November 2021, for buying essentials and fuel from India. A further credit facility of 500 million dollars was provided in January 2022, a currency swap of 400 million and a further credit facility of 500 million dollars to purchase fuel. Later, in February and March 2022, a further 500 million dollars each month were provided for the purchase of fuel. It is no secret that the fuel purchased from Russia at very low cost is sold to Sri Lanka at a profit 0f 50%. On every occasion when exchange or credit was thus provided, six MOU s had been signed as surety of such acquisitions and six relevant agreements too have been signed.

As a result of all these, by having to depend on India for credit, by the time all the joint unifications are concluded, it is a question of time when Sri Lanka will be a principality of India, just as Sikkim was. Most probably if Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe wins the Presidential election, it will only take a year for Sri Lanka to be the 29th principality of India and for Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe to be a governor of India like Lendhup Dorji. But there is no doubt that the process will not stop with Sri Lanka being the 29th principality but will proceed forwards till Eelam the 30th principality is created. The reason is that though Sri Lanka has been invaded 17 times in history, it has not been feasible to make Sri Lanka a principality of India. Therefore, to keep Sri Lanka under subjugation for a long time a pre -condition is the separatist agenda. The creation of two states is a strategic move, that will ensure a prolonged and bloody struggle between the externally funded central government and the people of the newly created states, bringing about in perpetua vincere” a bloody combat which will achieve the necessary destruction of the socio-cultural ethos of 2500 years. It is on this precondition that the Indian State provides a strong influence to enforce the 13th amendment in full and holding the provincial council elections. Accordingly, most probably either Mr. Sumanthiran or Mr. Wigneswaran would get the post of Governor of the 30th principality. In addition, on the common Indo-American agenda, in other words Indo-Pacific war strategy, there is no doubt that the Eelam state would be the Israel of Asia. It must be recorded that, then the people identified as Sri Lankans especially those identified as Buddhists will face the fate faced by those in the Gaza today. Within a discussion of Indian expansionism, the earliest political analysis was put forward by Rohana Wijeweera.
Dr. K M Wasantha Bandara

Why the 13 th Amendment is inimical for our development and how it will create a separate State

January 9th, 2024

By Garvin Karunaratne

Posted on March 4th, 2021,republished in view of attempts to implement the 13 th Amendment

 I have in several of my Papers detailed as to  Why the 13 th Amendment should be abolished. I have detailed my experiences in my eighteen years’ service in the Administrative Service implementing development programmes islandwide. To state briefly if I were to work in either the agricultural marketing sector, the agrarian extension sector or the small industries sector I will not be able to achieve any target purely because the subjects are devolved(not decentralized) and the implementation of any policy determined by the Minister working at the Centre, on policies laid down by the Houses of Parliament  will depend on the whims and fancies of the Provincial Ministers. Officers in the provinces takes orders from him.

 The full effect of the 13 th Amendment even without devolving land and police powers has not yet been felt because the Provincial Ministers have not asserted their full rights.

 I am most thankful to Cecil Dharmasena of the Department of Agriculture, for his insightful article that appeared in The Island of 22/4/2013. Let me quote a few of his words, which fully support my above statement:

Referring to agricultural extension today he states:

The lack of an organized and coordinated extension and advisory system today as we had in the past(prior to the Provincial Administration System) where the Department of Agriculture through its comprehensive islandwide extension Division provided an efficient service appears to be the biggest drawback in agriculture at present.”

 The situation today he says is that all types of agencies of the Provincial Councils and private sector offer confusing services”.

 He details what happened to the Department of Agriculture after the implementation of the 13 th Amendment. The Department was broken up, the research division broken into independent institutes, the extension service given to the Provincial Councils and the seed farms sold to the private sector.

 Harking back to my days ”…” up to 1973, the Department of Agriculture had a full control over the technical side of Agriculture. At the divisional level there was an Agricultural Instructor, an officer who had two years’s study at the Agricultural School. Under him were several  Overseers- Krushi Vyapti Sevakas at the village level. They had an year’s training in agriculture. This was an effective service. In addition, after the Paddy Lands Act was enforced in came the Agrarian Services Department with cultivation committees at the grass roots level. This Department had Divisional Officers at the Divisional level and Overseers at the village level. The Overseers had an years’ training in agriculture. The Cultivation Committees took over grass roots level planning. Today the Paddy Lands Act is no more and the cultivation committees do not exist.

 Another important change that took place is that the  Overseers of the Agriculture Department- the Krushi Vyapti Sevakas were all promoted as Grama Sevakas( now Grama Niladharis) during the time of President Premadasa. No official trained in agriculture took their place.  After a few years’ lapse when the Agricultural Instructor at the Divisional Level did not have a single Overseer Assistant, during the days of President Kumaranatunge , O Level qualified youths were appointed as Niyamakas.

 This was the extension system that was bequeathed to the Provincial Councils. Cecil Dharmasena has stated that the efficiency of the extension system depended entirely in the hands of the Provincial Minister of Agriculture.

 My own experience with the agricultural extension system under the Provincial Council administration is detailed in my book: How the IMF Ruined Sri Lanka.& Alternate Programs of Success”.(Godages):

The entire  agriculture department has to get a bone shake which I hope can get done. In about 1997, running my small family farm I had the occasion to visit the extension centers at Kadawata and Delgoda. The officers there did not know the exact amount of fertilizer that I should use and when. At my insistence they raked their files and provided me with details. The circular advised the use of  ammonium sulphate and urea  at the basal stage  and no mention was made of the top dressing. ¦ About a year later I dropped into one of these Centers and to my amazement  I found that even then  the top dressing had not been incorporated into the advice. . In our inefficiency we are wasting fertilizer.”. This fully supports Cecil Dharmasena’s statement that the extension system is in shambles. My comments pertain to the late Nineties while Dharmasena speaks of the extension service of today.

 Sri Lanka is a small country which is smaller than a State in India and there is no necessity to devolve any subject in administration. Under the 13 th Amendment we have devolved many subjects and accordingly the extension sections of the Department of Agriculture and the Department oif Agrarian Services has been handed over to the Provincial Councils.

 In my days in the Agrarian Services, I was once in charge of fertilizer distribution and we sent out the first circular on fertilizer use for the entire island and this was immediately enforced through the cultivation committees. Not so any more. The futility of devolution is easily realized when one realizes that the Kegalla and Ratnapura Districts which come under the Sabaragamuwa Province is only some 25 miles away from the City of Colombo. It is inimical for Provinces situated in close proximity to have an extension service that is not coordinated. In my days if a circular left the main department signed by the Commissioner or his Deputy it had to be effective. Not so now because one will have to contact the Provincial Ministers and cajole them. In my days as a Senior Assistant Commissioner any communication from me was acted on in the entire island on the next day. Not so now my paper will sit on the Provincial Minister’s desk and mind you there are  a number of them. 

 It is also well known and not disputed by anyone that the 13 th Amendment was drafted by India and imposed on our country under duress by Rajiv Gandhi, the Prime Minister of India. Though President Jayawardena shivered in his boots and gave in and forced his Members of Parliament to vote for it. The fact remains that President Jayawardena held all his members of parliament incarcerated in a Five Star Hotel and they were all marched to parliament to vote. What Democracy! This fact is proved because the Finance Minister Ronnie de Mel shouted and stated that he was not among the incarcerated.   Though the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, also under duress (judges quarters were stoned),gave legitimacy to it, the 13 th Amendment remains a foreign appendage onto our Constitution.

 I am certain that if any Provincial Council asserts itself, the working of all Government Departments will totally cease from the Centre and the implementation of the policies laid down by Acts of Parliament can no longer be a reality.

 This will be the situation once a TNA which is pro Tamil Nadu and also following the LTTE agenda of separation is elected.  The Government will be faced with a crisis of severe dimension, a situation that will eventually lead to the formation of a separate State.

 All this is not surmise. As an experienced administrator with four decades’ experience, I can sense what will happen.

 The abolition of the 13 th Amendment is the only option if we are to remain a sovereign country.

 The International Community, India and the LTTE Diaspora whom we are trying to please by retaining the 13 th Amendment and implementing it are having their act cut and dry. Their one aim is to enable a separate State in the North and the East of Sri Lanka and it is hoped that our leaders will realize this fact before it is too late.

 It is upto our leaders to decide for our sovereignty.

Garvin Karunaratne, Ph.D

former GA Matara, International Consultant

4/3/2021

BUDDHIST VIHARAS AND EELAM Part 12E.

January 9th, 2024

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Tamil Separatist Movement used all sorts of tricks to try and stop Kurundi. Since there was strong evidence to show that Kurundi was indeed Kurundi, this was not easy and Tamil Separatist Movement found that they were making contradictory statements.

Tamil Separatist Movement asked whether Kurundi was Kurundi. Was it really the one built by Kallatanaga as mentioned in the Mahavamsa? No archaeological evidence has yet proven that the Kurundi vihara discussed in the literature is the mound at Kurundi, they said. Tamil Separatist Movement thought that the correct location for Kurundi was Karikattumulai in Vavuniya district, far away from Mullaitivu.

Historian Dewasiri suggests another approach. While archaeological evidence may suggest that the site was a Buddhist one, there is no evidence to prove that the worshippers were Sinhala..  We don’t know the ethnic identity of the people who were worshipping there, he said.

Tamil Separatist Movement stuck to the fiction of a kovil at Kurundi. Mullaitivu was Sinhala Buddhist only to end of Anuradhapura period, they said.  After Chola  rule, the place was full of Tamils who had got  left behind, said an observer, naming the Tamil kingdoms in the wrong order, Chola- Chera- Pandya -Pallava.” The north then became a Tamil majority region. This   change was a natural development and it must be accepted as such.  Kurundi was no longer in use as a vihara so it was turned into a kovil.  What is wrong with that.

Tamil Separatist Movement   then turned to land rights. The clash over Kurundi shows the difficulties of conserving archaeological sites while also ensuring people’s land rights, said an observer.  

International law  does not recognize an  absolute right to land ,  but at a popular level  a  historical  right to land ,  land that  people have lived on for generations, is r recognized. But this avenue is closed to the Tamils .Tamils are not    indigenous  to Sri Lanka .  They are recent arrivals. The  Sinhalese , on the other hand, can claim historical land rights in the north and east. They are the   nationals of Sri Lanka .

The Tamil Separatist Movement  then  tried to claim land through agricultural rights.  UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (UNDROP 2018) said people living in rural areas have a right to  their land. They cannot be displaced from it. ( Article 17) .

Tamil Separatist Movement  announced that 400 acres at  the Kurundi site had been cultivated by local Tamil farmers for centuries. If Kurundi site was developed as a place of worship, the Tamil farmers would  lose their paddy lands and livestock farms., they said.

President Ranil Wickremesinghe ordered that Kurundi land be released to the local farmers for cultivation. This took place at his well known meeting with the Department of Archaeology  in June 2023. But  he  withdrew the order following harsh criticism, reported analysts.

Tamil Separatist Movement also quickly deforested acres of Norochcholai forest reserve  and created an extent of paddy land near Kurundi, and  said  it was an ancient paddy field cultivated for centuries. But they did not dare   cultivate the land. The so called paddy field  was in an archaeological reserve.

The second land argument used by the Tamil Separatist Movement is the fiction of land  hunger.  Tamil Separatist Movement said that the threat to land is most acutely felt in Mullaitivu .That is false.  Mullaitivu is the least populated district in Sri Lanka.  It is grossly under populated and there cannot be land hunger in Mullaitivu.  In 2021, Mullaitivu had an  estimated 98,000 Population, in an area of 2617  sq. km².  Its Population Density was    0.66% . This is the lowest population density in    Sri Lanka  . https://lankastatistics.com/economic/districtwise-population-and-density.html

There were no  human settlements near Kurundi  stupa. The nearest Tamil village was 10 km away  at Kumalamunai and Mulliyavala. Ven. Santhabodhi  spoke well of the Tamil  villagers  living there.

Santhabodhi and his team  said that the villagers were not against the  Kurundi stupa. They have given Dane to the monk who had resided there some  years ago.  Santhabodhi  has gone for gilanpasa to their  homes.  They were  helpful and  cooperative. They had supplied milk  and kurumba to the Archaeology Department team working at Kurundi.  Santhabodhi and his group of donors had helped the villagers, specially the children. I have  provided school books for their children   and was planning to provide the computer  lessons they had asked for, Santhabodhi  said.

But it is clear that the Tamil Separatist Movement has got at these villagers,  and told them what to do and say. This is seen when you look at the statements the villagers made when they were interviewed.

 When interviewed, Tiruchelvam Divar said that Buddhist s were trying to claim the area. Kanagaraja Vijayakumar said that the Buddhist were building an unlawful temple at Kurundi, They were now prohibited from worshiping at Kurundi and he has been informed t is intended to settle Sinhalese there.  Baskaran Susila Devi (56 yrs) said that from the time she was small they  had worshipped at    Kurundi kovil.. Her son,  Baskaran  Divyaraja said they had deeds for the paddy fields at Kurundi.

 These    responses indicate that these  villagers are not the ‘ahinsaka  demela janatava” Santhabodhi  says they are. They are repeating what they were told to say. They have also been advised to obtain as much assistance as possible from the  Kurundi team for their  needs. They have been told to stay out of the demonstrations.

It will be a rude shock to Ven.  Santhabodhi and his team  when the villagers, after getting   everything they can from the sponsors of  Kurundi vihara,  turn against  them and    support the Tamil Separatist Movement . That will    happen soon.

Tamil Separatist Movement has turned to  the law courts  to  stop Kurundi. They had the advantage over the Buddhists, at Mullaitivu. The  court proceedings were in Tamil and the  Tamil judge, Saravanarajah  was  definitely for them. He permitted Hindus to conduct a Pongal  at the site on July  2023. The Tamil lawyers are also in this,  said Santhabodhi.

The  lawyers appearing for Santhabodhi and Kurundi  had many angry comments to make about the proceedings in Magistrate court, Mullaitivu. They complained that the hearing was one sided. The statements from the Department of Archaeology  were  not even recorded  . Magistrate only listened to  what the Tamil  protestors said and issued orders accordingly.

The  proceedings  were conducted in  Tamil and no provision was made for submissions in  Sinhala and English. The Sinhala lawyers, found that  at Mullaitivu the  court worked only in Tamil., They could not speak in Sinhala.  Translators were not  evadible to translate from    Sinhala  to Tamil. They could not speak in English either, as there were no translators for English to Tamil . Court orders  were only in Tamil..  Santhabodhi had to get them translated.

Three charges were made against the Kurundi restoration. One was  by the police  for  disturbing the peace, another for obstructing a Hindu Pongal,   the third was about constructing a new stupa at Kurundi under the guise of conserving  an old stupa.

When the  Tamil demonstrators disrupted the relic enshrining  ceremony, the police charged Santhabodhi with disturbing the peace. There was no charge against the Tamil protestors. When police brought in the charge of breaking the peace we pointed out that this was not due to monks or Department of  archaeology but due to the Tamil politicians, the Kurundi team said.   

Santhabodhi had made a complaint against Selvarasa  Gajendran,   S.Nogaradalingam , K Sarveshvaran and T Raviharan for  entering and disrupting the relic enshrining ceremony. The  demonstrators  were brought by MP  Raviharan Santhabodhi said.  These four should have been charged under the Penal Code,  Instead my complaint was ignored.. 

A case had been filed by a group of  Tamil  protestors, who alleged that in the guise of conserving an old  stupa, the archaeology team were  building a new stupa at Kurundi. The magistrate  believed them and ordered the removal of all new constructions at Kurundi. The Archaeology Department must refrain from any further  new construction.  

As the complaints continued, the Mullaitivu Magistrate held that the Archaeology Department had violated three court orders from 2022,.The Department can only protect ancient sites. It can’t do as it pleases,” the judge said..

The Department of Archaeology through its lawyers, the  Attorney Generals Department replied  that the work was done according to  approved policy as well as international  standards,  and to give permission to continue the work.

A group of Tamil  objectors then  petitioned  the Magistrate court, Mullaitivu saying that the court order issued in June 2022  which had prohibited  new structures at Kurundi had been violated. Army-sponsored new structures were coming up at Kurundi .

 State counsel representing the Archaeology department said no new constructions had been built .but the petitioners submitted proof such as photographs to show that new constructions had taken place and asked the magistrate to make an inspection. Magistrate  inspected the site on 04 July,2023  and decided that the complaint was correct. His competence to do so  was not questioned.( Continued)

Sri Lanka’s proposed Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC),

January 9th, 2024

By C. A. Chandraprema Courtesy The Island

South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission heard confessions from perpetrators of human rights abuses from 1996.

Whenever we hear the term Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), what comes to mind is the body by that name established in South Africa in 1995, headed by Archbishop Desmond Tutu. The South African TRC may not have been the first of its kind, but it was undoubtedly the one that gained the most public attention and the most accolades. Rightly so, because the South African TRC was a sincere effort at truth telling, healing and reconciliation and not an attempt to continue a war by other means.

South African TRC

The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission was set up under the provisions of South Africa’s Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act No. 34 of 1995. The purpose of this body was firstly the investigation and the establishment of as complete a picture as possible of the nature, causes and extent of gross violations of human rights committed during the period from 1 March 1960 to the end of the apartheid era. Secondly, the granting of amnesty to persons who make full disclosure of all the relevant facts relating to acts associated with a political objective committed in the course of the conflicts of the said period. And thirdly, affording victims an opportunity to relate the violations they suffered; the adoption of measures aimed at the granting of reparation to, and the rehabilitation and the restoration of the human and civil dignity of, victims of violations of human rights.

The South African TRC functioned through three Committees – the Committee on Human Rights Violations, the Committee on Amnesty and the Committee on Reparation and Rehabilitation. The provision for amnesty was the centrepiece of the TRC process. The Act of Parliament that set up this body stated that there is a need for understanding but not for vengeance, a need for reparation but not for retaliation, a need for Ubuntu (humanity towards others) but not for victimization”.  It was the task of the Committee on Amnesty to consider applications for amnesty. The Act in question had to be associated with a political objective committed in the course of the conflicts of the past and the applicant had to make a full disclosure of all relevant facts. The amnesty was available to both anti-government guerillas as well as members of the security forces for acts committed bona fide with the object of countering or resisting the armed liberation struggle.

The South African TRC did have an investigating unit headed by a Commissioner to support the Commission and the Committees of the Commission in carrying out inquiries and investigations. The Committee on Human Rights, for instance, did carry out investigations into human rights violations from 1960 to the end of the apartheid era. When the Human Rights Committee finds that a gross violation of human rights has been committed and that a person is a victim of such violation, it was required by law to refer the matter not to the Attorney General or the Courts but to the Committee on Reparation and Rehabilitation.

If any person is questioned by the Commission, any incriminating evidence directly or indirectly derived from such a questioning was not admissible as evidence against the person concerned in criminal proceedings in a court of law. Hence the South African TRC was not an inquisitorial or punitive body but an institution genuinely designed to promote truth telling, healing and reconciliation between rival sides in a long drawn out conflict.

Sri Lanka’s proposed TURC   

A Bill to establish a Truth, Unity and Reconciliation Commission (TURC) in Sri Lanka has now been gazetted. Despite the name, what has been proposed for Sri Lanka is completely different from the South African TRC. While the provision for amnesty for persons on both sides of the conflict was the centrepiece of the South African TRC, the proposed Sri Lankan TURC has no provision for amnesty at all. What the proposed Bill seeks to establish is an inquisitorial commission which will conduct investigations, and make recommendations. The findings of the Commission’s investigations can also be referred to the Attorney General for criminal prosecution.

Under Clauses 7(1) and 12(1) the purpose of the Commission will be to receive and collect information and material and investigate, inquire, and make recommendations in respect of complaints or allegations or reports relating to alleged violation of human rights anywhere in Sri Lanka, which were caused in the course of, or reasonably connected to, or consequent to the conflict which took place in the Northern and Eastern Provinces during the period 1983 to 2009, or its aftermath.

Under Clause 12 (2) the scope of the investigations to be carried out by the proposed body extends from killings, torture, sexual violence, abduction, unlawful arrests or detentions all the way to corruption and intentional misuse of equipment and financial resources in relation to the conflict which took place in the Northern and Eastern provinces. The proposed law also requires that the TURC inquire into whether any of the alleged violations and abuses were committed as part of ‘systemic crimes’. The TURC is also required to make findings in regard to those responsible for the commission of the alleged violations and abuses, including those who advised, planned, directed, commanded or ordered such atrocities;

Trial at Bar style investigative panels

Under Clause 7(2), investigations and inquiries will be conducted by panels consisting of not fewer than three members of the Commission. The Chairperson of the Commission will appoint the investigative panels the way the Chief Justice appoints judges to a Trial at Bar.

Sweeping powers to investigate

Under Clauses 13(s), 13(t), 13(z), 13(za), 14 and 45 the proposed Commission is to be accorded sweeping powers to conduct its investigations including the requisition of reports, records, documents or information from governmental authorities or any other source and to compel the production of such material. The Commission can summon any person residing in Sri Lanka to attend any hearing to provide information or produce any document or other thing in such person’s possession. The Commission can make an application to a Magistrate for the issuance of a search warrant to enable the Police to search any premises suspected to contain material relevant to an investigation being conducted by the Commission.

All persons including members of the Government and public officials are mandatorily required to co-operate with the Commission. If any person fails to appear before the Commission, refuses to answer any question or fails to produce any document or other thing, which is in his possession or control such person shall be guilty of contempt against the authority of the Commission which shall be punishable by the Court of Appeal as though it were an offence of contempt committed against the Court of Appeal.

Overriding powers of the Commission

Under Clauses 15(1) and (2) the Commission shall submit its final report to the President at the expiration of its term along with its recommendations. It is also required to submit interim reports to the President bi-annually with recommendations and such reports will be tabled in Parliament within three weeks of their receipt. Under Clause 39, within one month from the date of publication of the first interim report of the Commission the President shall establish a Monitoring Committee to implement the recommendations of the Commission.

According to Clause 12(f) the Commission is required to make recommendations with regard to institutional, administrative and legislative policy and resource allocation measures that should be taken to prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of damage to persons or property or violation of human rights and to promote reconciliation. Such recommendations could have wide ranging implications for the country and the people. Yet, these recommendations are to be implemented forthwith by a Monitoring Committee without being referred to Cabinet or debated in Parliament first.

Under Clause 40 the Monitoring Committee has to submit bi-annual reports to the President on the implementation of the recommendations of the Commission. Where the implementation of any recommendation has not been fully complied with, the reports of the Committee shall include the reasons for non-implementation. Such reports by the Monitoring Committee will be tabled in Parliament within two weeks of receipt. Thus, Parliament is kept informed of the actions of the Commission only after the fact, with the Cabinet and Parliament having no role in deciding whether the implementation of a particular recommendation of the Commission should be carried through or not.

Foreign funding and control

Under Clause 13(g) the Commission may enter into agreements with any person or entity necessary to achieve the objectives of the Commission. Under Clause 13(k) the Commission is empowered to seek technical assistance from any person or institution or organisation in the interest of advancement of the commission’s work. Under Clauses 13(h) and 35(1)(c) the Commission is empowered to raise funds by obtaining grants, gifts or endowments. All funds received from outside Sri Lanka have to be channelled through the External Resources Department. Though Clause 11 of the Bill states that the Commission shall be considered an autonomous institution and shall not be subject to the control or direction of any person or authority, we know through experience that the foreign parties that will fund this operation will control it.

Actively seeking questionable evidence

Clause 13(x) empowers the proposed Commission to receive information in confidence from any person, where in the opinion of the Commission, the disclosure of such information would pose a risk to life or security of any person. The Commission will thus end up making recommendations based on information that nobody else knows anything about and the veracity of which cannot be checked. The Commission cannot be compelled to disclose the identity of any person supplying information in confidence.

Clause 13(y) empowers the Commission to admit, notwithstanding any provision of the Evidence Ordinance, any information, whether written or oral, which might be inadmissible in civil or criminal proceedings in order to facilitate truth seeking. Thus, the Commission bases its recommendations on dodgy evidence that the normal justice system would not touch.

Clause 13(z) empowers the Commission to seek assistance from community leaders and organisations to facilitate its public sessions. In practice, this becomes an open invitation to ‘syndicates’ of informers, narrators and witnesses as has often transpired at trials before the International Criminal Court.

Referral to the AG for prosecution

Clause 48 says that no evidence of any statement made or given by any person to or before the Commission shall be admissible against that person in proceedings in any civil or criminal court. Clause 16(1) states that the Commission’s recommendations shall not be deemed to be a determination of civil or criminal liability of any person.

However, Clause 13(zd) empowers the Commission to refer matters to the relevant law enforcement or prosecuting authorities of Sri Lanka for further investigation and necessary action, where it appears to the Commission that an offence or offences punishable under the Penal Code or any other law of Sri Lanka has been committed. Clause 16(2) states that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, No. 15 of 1979 or any other law, it shall be lawful for the Attorney-General to institute criminal proceedings in a designated court of law in respect of any offence based on material collected in the course of an investigation or inquiry by the Commission established under this Act.

Thus, what is being proposed for Sri Lanka is not a truth and reconciliation commission at all but a body which will, with the backing of foreign and local sponsors, wage law-fare against those who won the war against terror and seek to make wide ranging changes in Sri Lanka without any need to have those proposed changes vetted and approved by Cabinet and Parliament first.

‘හිමාලයා ප්‍රකාශනය’ ගැන තම මතය සෘජුව නොකියන්නෝ ‘බියගුළු අවස්ථාවාදීන්’ – දේශපාලන පක්ෂ නායකයන්ට විමල්ගෙන් විවෘත සංදේශයක්

January 9th, 2024

විමල් වීරවංශ (පා. ම.)  නායක, ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ,

“හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” සහ ඒ මත පදනම්ව ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ගනු ලබන ඉදිරි ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග පිළිබඳව නිහඬව සිටීමට කිසිදු දේශපාලන බලවේගයකට සදාචාරාත්මක හැකියාවක් නැති බවත්, එම නිසා සියලු බලවේග “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” සහ ඒ මත පදනම්ව ආරම්භ වී ඇති “සත්‍ය සෙවීමේ කොමිසම” පිහිටුවීම ඇතුළු සෙසු ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග පිළිබඳ තම මතය විවෘතව රටට ප‍්‍රකාශ කිරීමට කටයුතු කළ යුතු බවත් ජානිපෙ නායක, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී විමල් වීරවංශ මහතා පවසයි.

මේ බව දන්වමින් විවෘත්ත සංදේශයක් ඒ මහතා නිකුත්කර ඇති අතර, අදාළ සංදේශය පහළින්…

සියලු මහජන නියෝජිතයින්,

දේශපාලන පක්ෂ නායකයින් හා පොදු මහජනතාව වෙත.

බෙදුම්වාදී මාර්ග සිතියමේ නව හැරවුමක් වනහිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශයපිළිබඳව (යුද ජයග‍්‍රහණය මෙන්ම රණවිරුවන් පාවාදෙන සහ රට දෙමළ බෙදුම්වාදයේ ගොදුරක් බවට පත් කරන එම ක‍්‍රියාන්විතය අවබෝධකර ගැනීමේ වැදගත්කම සහ සියලු පාර්ශ්ව ඊට අදාළව තම මතය ප‍්‍රකාශ කළ යුතු බව)

වසර 30ක් පැවති බෙදුම්වාදී යුද්ධය, රණවිරුවන් 30,000ක් ජීවිත පූජා කරමින් මෙන්ම ඊට සමාන පිරිසක් තුවාල ලබමින් සහ 14,000ක් ආබාධිතයින් බවට පත් කරමින් පරාජයට පත් කර වසර 14ක් ගත වී ඇත. එම ජයග‍්‍රහණය උදෙසා සෙසු රණවිරුවන්ගේ මෙන්ම ජීවිත පූජා කළ සහ ආබාධිත බවට පත් වූ රණවිරුවන්ගේ අඹුදරුවෝ මෙන්ම ඥාතීහු සහ සිංහල, දෙමළ, මුස්ලිම් පොදු මහජනයා ද බොහෝ කැප කිරීම් සිදු කළහ. එහෙත් ඉන්පසුව සමානාත්මතා පදනමින් ජාතික ගැටලුව විසඳීම සඳහා සහ බෙදුම්වාදී මතවාද දේශපාලන වශයෙන් පරාජය කිරීමට ජාතියක් ලෙස අප අසමත් වීම නිසා දෙමළ ඩයස්පෝරාව ප‍්‍රමුඛ දෙස් විදෙස් බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේගවලට උතුරේ ජනයා ප‍්‍රාණඇපයට ගනිමින් බෙදුම්වාදී ක‍්‍රියාන්විතය පවත්වාගෙන යාමට හැකි විය. 

එම ක‍්‍රියාවලිය තුළ බෙදුම්වාදී මාර්ග සිතියමට අනුව 13 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම බලාත්මක කිරීම සඳහා බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේග දිගින් දිගටම බලපෑම් සිදුකළ ද ඔවුන්ගේ අරමුණු ඉටු කර ගැනීමට නොහැකි විය. ඊට හේතු වූයේ මහා සංඝරත්නය ප‍්‍රමුඛ ජාතිකවාදී බලවේග ජාතියේ මුර දේවතාවුන් සේ ඊට එරෙහිව සිට ගැනීමය.  නමුත් රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා 2003 දී අගමැතිවරයා ලෙස බෙදුම්වාදීන්ට තාවකාලික ආණ්ඩුවක් ලබාදීමට උත්සාහ කිරීම මගින් ආරම්භ කළ බෙදුම්වාදයට පක්ෂපාතී ක‍්‍රියාන්විතය, දැන් ජනවරමක් නොමැති ජනාධිපතිවරයෙකු ලෙස නැවත ආරම්භ කර ඇත. ඔහු විසින් තමා 13 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය බලාත්මක කරන බවට බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේගවලට සහ තමාට බලයට එන්නට අවස්ථාව සැලසූ පාර්ශ්වවලට පොරොන්දු ලබා දෙන්නේ ඊට අනුව ය. ඊට සමගාමීව දෙස් විදෙස් බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේග නැවත වටයකින් දිරිමත් වී ඇති බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිව දැක ගත හැක. 

ඊට අමතරව බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේගවල දායකත්වය සහිතව ආර්ථික සහ දේශපාලන අර්බුදය උස්සන්න කිරීම සහ එම ක‍්‍රියාවලිය තුළ රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා බලයට පත් කිරීම තුළ තමාට වඩා වාසිදායක තත්වයක් නිර්මාණය වී ඇති බවට බෙදුම්වාදී බලවේග කල්පනා කරන බව පෙනේ. එම නව තත්ත්වය තුළ ඔවුන් විසින් තෝරා ඇති උපායමාර්ගික ප‍්‍රවේශය තුළ පැතිකඩ දෙකක් හඳුනාගත හැක. පළමුවැන්න සමස්ත ක‍්‍රියාන්විතයේ පූර්ව කොන්දේසියක් ලෙස මහා සංඝරත්නයෙන් යම් පාර්ශ්වයක් දිනා ගැනීම සහ මහා සංඝරත්නය මෙන්ම ජාතික බලවේග අතර බෙදීමක් ඇති කිරීම සහ මානසික බාධක පැනවීමය. භික්ෂූන්  හත්නමක් නේපාලයේ හෝටලයකට රැගෙන ගොස් සියලු සත්කාර ලබා දී “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” නමැති ලියවිල්ලකට අත්සන් ලබා ගන්නේ එම උපායමාර්ගයට අනුව බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිය. එම ක‍්‍රියාන්විතයේ දෙවන අරමුණ බෙදුම්වාදී යුද්ධය පරාජය කිරීමෙන් පසුව බෙදුම්වාදීන්ට අහිමි වූ කේවල් කිරීමේ බලය ලබා ගනිමින් සාකච්ඡා ක‍්‍රියාවලියකට අවතීර්ණ වීමය. 

ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ පාලනය තුළ පවා ජී. එල්. පීරිස් වැනි පැකේජ්වාදීන්ගේ උපදෙස් අනුව දෙමළ ඩයස්පෝරාව සමග එකඟතාවකට පැමිණ ජාත්‍යන්තර පීඩනය සමනය කරගත යුතු බවට මතයක් ගොඩනැගී තිබුණි. එවැනි තත්ත්වයක් තුළ ඊනියා හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය යනු ඩයස්පෝරාව සමග ගනුදෙනු  සාධාරණීකරණය කිරීම සදහා වත්මන් ජනාධිපති රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතාගේම අදහසක් අනුව කැඳවාගත් ලේඛනයක් බවට ගොඩනැගී ඇති මතය ප‍්‍රතික්ෂේප කිරීම දුෂ්කර වේ. ඊනියා හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය මේ වන විට ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් උත්සවශ‍්‍රීයෙන් පිළිගෙන ඇති අතර මහා නායක හිමිවරුන්ගේ අනුමැතිය ඊට ලැබුණු බවට එම ක‍්‍රියාන්විතයට ගොදුරු වූ භික්ෂූන් විසින් සමාජයේ මතයක් ගොඩනඟන බව ද දක්නට ඇත. අමරපුර මහා සංඝ සභාව විසින් “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” ප‍්‍රතික්ෂේප කරමින් මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කර ඇතත් සෙසු නිකායන් නිහඬව සිටීම තුළ මහා නායක හිමිවරුන්ට අගතියක් සිදුවේ. එම බොරු ප‍්‍රචාර පතුරුවන භික්ෂූන් හත්නම අතරින් එක් නමක් ව්‍යාජ ලෙස මහාචාර්ය පදවියක් දරන බව පෙන්වති. 

ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” භාරගෙන දින කීපයක් තුළ දෙමළ දේශපාලන පක්ෂ නායකයින් ජනාධිපති මන්දිරයට කැඳවා 2024 ජනවාරි මාසයේදී සත්‍ය සෙවීමේ සහ ප‍්‍රතිසන්ධාන කොමිසමක් පිහිටුවීම සඳහා නව නීතිමය රාමුවක් සම්මත කරන බවට පොරොන්දු විය. එම උපායමාර්ගික ප‍්‍රවේශය 2015 සිට ජාත්‍යන්තර මානව හිමිකම් කොමසාරිස් වාර්තාව මගින් සහ යෝජනා මගින් අවධාරණය කරනු ලැබූවකි. “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” ඉදිරිපත් කරන ගෝලීය දෙමළ සංසදය විසින් එය ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කරන ලෙස ජාත්‍යන්තර වේදිකාවල දිගින් දිගටම බලපෑම් එල්ල කරනු ලැබීය. ඒ අනුව දැන් ඔවුන්ගේ උත්සාහය මල්ඵල ගැන්වී ඇති බව පිළිගැනීමට සිදුවේ. 

සත්‍ය සෙවීමේ කොමිසම යන්නට ප‍්‍රතිසන්ධානය ද අයත් වන බැවින් ඒ මගින් රණවිරුවන්ට එරෙහිව යුද අපරාධ චෝදනා එල්ල කිරීමේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ක‍්‍රියාන්විතය තවදුරටත් ශක්තිමත් කළ හැක. “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” තුළ ‘වගවීම’ සඳහා වන බැඳීම අවධාරණය කරනු ලබන්නේ ඒ සඳහාය. ඊට අමතරව ඒ මගින් නැවත ගැටුම් ඇති වීම වැළැක්වීමේ නාමයෙන් 13 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය බලාත්මක කිරීම සඳහා බලපෑම් එල්ල කිරීමේ හැකියාව ද ලැබේ. එම යාන්ත‍්‍රණය තුළ ජාත්‍යන්තර මැදිහත්වීමට අවස්ථාව සැලසීම මගින් ජාත්‍යන්තර බලපෑම රට තුළදීම සිදුකිරීමේ හැකියාව ලැබේ. ඒ අනුව මෙම ක‍්‍රියාවලිය ඉතා පැහැදිලිව යුද ජයග‍්‍රහණය සහ රණවිරුවන් පාවාදෙමින් රට නැවත බෙදුම්වාදයේ ගොදුරක් බවට පත් කිරීමේ ආරම්භක පියවර බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිය. 

එම නිසා “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” සහ ඒ මත පදනම්ව ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ගනු ලබන ඉදිරි ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග පිළිබඳව නිහඬව සිටීමට කිසිදු දේශපාලන බලවේගයකට හෝ මහා නායක හිමිවරුන්ට සදාචාරාත්මක හැකියාවක් නැත. මහා නායක හිමිවරුන්ට තම ධුරය අතහැරීමට අයිතියක් ඇතත් ඓතිහාසිකව උන්වහන්සේලා වෙත පැවරී ඇති භූමිකාව සහ බලය අතහැරීමට නොහැක. එම නිසා සියලු බලවේග “හිමාලයා ප‍්‍රකාශය” සහ ඒ මත පදනම්ව ආරම්භ වී ඇති “සත්‍ය සෙවීමේ කොමිසම” පිහිටුවීම ඇතුළු සෙසු ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග පිළිබඳ තම මතය විවෘතව රටට ප‍්‍රකාශ කිරීමට කටයුතු කළ යුතු බව අපගේ ඉල්ලීම වේ. මහා පාවාදීමකට මුලපුරන “සත්‍ය සෙවීමේ කොමිසම පිහිටුවීමේ පනත් කෙටුම්පත” මේ වන විට ගැසට් පත‍්‍රයේ ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත්කර ඇත. එම පනතට අදාළව ද සියලුම දේශපාලන පක්ෂ විසින් තමාගේ මතය ඍජුව ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත්කළ යුතු බව අපි අවධාරණය කරමු. එසේම තම මතය සෘජුව ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත් නොකරන පිරිස්, නිහඬව ඊට එකඟතාව පළකරන බියගුළු අවස්ථාවාදීන් ලෙස ද නම් කිරීමට සිදුවේ. ස්තුතියි.
මෙයට විශ්වාසී, 
විමල් වීරවංශ (පා. ම.)
නායක, 
ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ,

WHY SRI LANKA IS ATTEMPTING TO HARM HER OWN NAVAL OFFICERS.

January 9th, 2024

RANJITH SOYSA

We refer to the news report that the Government of Sri Lanka is planning to send her naval ship or ships to the Red sea area arguably to protect the international ships from the Houthi rebels who have started attacking the ships which are operating to and from Israel.

According to the information such operations will cost the country more than Rs 250 million. How can any sensible person justify spending our limited foreign exchange on a such a wasteful exercise especially when more than 70% of the population is fighting hard to keep their heads above water,

Any informed person is aware that the Houthi rebels are in possession of drones which they have launched successfully destroying a few vessels. We know our naval vessels   have practically no technical capability of destroying drones. If so, we are on a suicide mission to keep up with the major powers and compel our navy officers to face an unenviable situation. At the end, the Government will realize that Sri Lanka has paid dearly for her whistle.

Milinda Moragoda Interacts with the office bearers and Executive Committee of the Jamiyyathul Ulama.

January 9th, 2024

Pathfinder Foundation

Founder of the Pathfinder Foundation and Urumayake Ulpatha Milinda Moragoda met with the office bearers and Executive Committee of the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama (ACJU) for an interactive discussion and exchange of ideas on a wide range of subjects and issues. On this occasion, Mr Moragoda also presented the Executive Committee members with copies of Asoka Vadana a compilation of articles written during his tenure as High Commissioner in India.

The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama has been in existence since 1924, and was incorporated by an Act of Parliament in 2009. The objectives of the ACJU include serving the Muslim Community and the nation. At present the ACJU has 163 branches in 24 districts and over 8000 scholars and subscribed members. The meeting was held at the ACJU Headquarters in Colombo under the Chairmanship of ACJU President MIM Rizwe Mufthi.

ඉහළ අස්වැන්නක් ලබා දෙන සහල් වගාවකට චීන විශේෂඥ දැනුම…

January 9th, 2024

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

 චීන අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලී කියෑං (Li Qiang) විසින් අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා වෙත චීනය වඩාත් ශුභ ලෙස සලකන ‘මකරාගේ වසර’ සඳහා  අලුත් අවුරුදු සුබපැතුම් පිරිනැමීය.
ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ චීන තානාපති කිව් ෂෙන්හොං (Qi Shenhong) මහතා අද (2024.01.09) කොළඹ අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ දී අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා හමුවී චීන අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගේ විශේෂ 

සුබපැතුම් පත්‍රය භාර දුන්නේය.


ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළ පවතින දුෂ්කරතා මඟහරවා ගැනීමට ඇති හැකියාව දැකීමට සතුටු වන බව පැවසූ තානාපතිවරයා අතර කෘෂිකර්මාන්තය නවීකරණය කිරීමට ශ්‍රී ලංකාව දරන ප්‍රයත්නයන්ට චීනයේ අඛණ්ඩ සහයෝගය ලබා දීමටද සහතික විය.

ඉහළ අස්වැන්නක් ලබා දෙන සහල් වගාව සංවර්ධනය කිරීම පිළිබඳ චීන විශේෂඥ දැනුම ශ්‍රී ලංකාව සමඟ බෙදා ගැනීමේ වැඩසටහනක් චීනය විසින් ආරම්භ කරන බවත් එය ඉදිරි යල කන්නයේදී දියත් කරන බවත් චීන තානාපතිවරයා පැවසීය.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම් අනුර දිසානායක මහතා සහ චීන ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රිකයින් පිරිසක් ද මෙම අවස්ථාවට එක්ව සිටියහ.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

Super ( Not so super ) markets 

January 9th, 2024

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

 A few weeks back jugglery committed by a supermarket with the slogan ගෙදර යන ගමන් was exposed 

 Supermarket was scrupulously charging higher prices at the cashier than the price marked on the product claiming that notices are placed everywhere that prices can be changed any time

 A few days back another supermarket along the same road owned by a Foreign entity that boasts that you can spar (e) money for something else did the same thing 

 Today they charged for four loaves of bread when the purchased quantity was two 

Of course, cashier makes mistakes according to management 🥱 

People should help local groceries by  buying locally and boycotting supermarkets

Regards

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Cameron has ‘no regrets’ over Chinese investment links

January 9th, 2024

By Arj Singh Courtesy inews.co.uk

The Foreign Secretary said he was supporting Sri Lanka over Beijing-funded development

Screen grab taken from Parliament TV of Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron speaking at the Foreign Affairs Committee at the Houses of Parliament, London. Picture date: Tuesday January 9, 2024. PA Photo. See PA story POLITICS Cameron. Photo credit should read: Parliament TV/PA Wire NOTE TO EDITORS: This handout photo may only be used in for editorial reporting purposes for the contemporaneous illustration of events, things or the people in the image or facts mentioned in the caption. Reuse of the picture may require further permission from the copyright holder.
Screen grab taken from Parliament TV of Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron speaking at the Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday (Photo: Parliament TV/PA Wire)

Lord Cameron has said he has no regrets about backing a Beijing-funded development last autumn and dismissed concerns about his role as a senior figure in a mooted UK-China investment fund.

The Foreign Secretary has faced criticism over his links to China since being appointed to the role by Rishi Sunak, given the UK now regards the Asian giant as an epoch-defining and systemic challenge” – a far cry from the golden era” of relations with Beijing pursued by Lord Cameron as prime minister in the 2010s.

The peer has faced questions in particular about speeches he gave as recently as October in the United Arab Emirates in praise of the £16bn Port City Colombo business hub project in Sri Lanka, which counts as its main developer the state-owned China Communications Construction Company.

https://buy.tinypass.com/checkout/template/cacheableShow?aid=Xi7fMnt7pu&templateId=OTDEKJMG2GFZ&templateVariantId=OTVSGYGZHKVWE&offerId=fakeOfferId&experienceId=EX94U7VN8UTD&iframeId=offer_f1872a81c8aaaba8bc76-0&displayMode=inline&pianoIdUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fid.tinypass.com%2Fid%2F&widget=template&url=https%3A%2F%2Finews.co.uk

Critics, including Conservative MPs, have said that the peer’s promotion of the project amounted to support of China’s controversial Belt and Road investment initiative, which China-sceptics see as a project Beijing uses to gain control in developing nations.

But appearing at the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday, Lord Cameron insisted he spoke only in support of Sri Lanka and that it was solely his decision – rather than that of the Chinese – to speak at the event.

Put to him that he was a friend of China until very recently”, the Foreign Secretary told MPs he did it [the speeches] as a friend of Sri Lanka” after being approached by the Washington Speakers’ Bureau, which offered the ex-PM’s services on the global VIP speaker circuit.

David Cameron’s Beijing dilemma: Inside the new Foreign Secretary’s links to China

Lord Cameron also said he was supporting Sri Lanka’s former president Ranil Wickremesinghe, who believed the project was a good idea and who the peer had met earlier in 2023 while on holiday” in Sri Lanka.

Asked if he had any regrets about the speech, Lord Cameron told MPs: No.”

Lord Cameron also dismissed concerns raised by Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) over his past role as vice-president of a new £1bn China-UK investment fund.

The ISC said last year it was possible” that Lord Cameron’s appointment had been in some part engineered by the Chinese state”.

Asked whether he agreed with the committee, which has access to highly classified information, Lord Cameron said: I might if it had ever happened but there was no fund – it never got going, it never started and it never happened.

So this is a bit like the blind man in the dark room looking for the black cat that isn’t there.”

Sri Lanka to join US-led naval operations against Houthi rebels in Red Sea

January 9th, 2024

Courtesy abc News

A Sri Lankan navy spokesman says the debt-ridden country’s navy is preparing to join a U.S.-led operation to protect merchant vessels in the Red Sea against attacks by Houthi rebels

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — Debt-ridden Sri Lanka ’s navy is preparing to join a U.S.-led operation to protect merchant vessels sailing in the Red Sea against attacks by Houthi rebels, a Sri Lankan navy spokesman said on Tuesday.

The attacks by Houthi rebels have targeted commercial shipping vessels transiting through the critical Bab el-Mandeb Strait that links markets in Asia and Europe following the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas and Israel’s subsequent war against the militant group in Gaza.

The U.S. and its allies launched Operation Prosperity Guardian to protect ship traffic, and warships from the U.S., France, and the U.K. are patrolling the area.

No date has been set for sending the Sri Lankan ships and the area they will patrol has not been finalized, said navy spokesman Capt. Gayan Wickramasuriya.

The decision to send the ships drew criticism from opposition lawmakers in the island nation. Opposition leader Sajith Premadasa blamed the government for spending LKR 250 million ($777,000) to send ships to fight Houthi rebels in the Red Sea when Sri Lankans are experiencing severe economic hardships at home.

State Minister of Defense Pramitha Tennakoon defended the move, saying the government wants to fulfill its global responsibilities” and noting that Sri Lanka is against any form of terrorism.”

He added that Sri Lanka would incur no additional costs by joining the operations, as the country’s ships are already patrolling its vast maritime area in the Indian Ocean.

Sri Lanka is struggling to get through the worst economic crisis in its history. The country declared bankruptcy in April 2022 with more than $83 billion in debt — more than half of it to foreign creditors. Its economy was plunged into crisis, with severe shortages of food, fuel and other necessities.

Strident public protests led to the ouster of former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The IMF agreed in March last year to a $2.9-billion bailout package.

Sri Lanka hopes to restructure $17 billion of its tens of billions of outstanding debt.

Over the past year, severe shortages of essentials like food, fuel and medicine have largely abated, and authorities have restored power supplies. But public dissatisfaction has grown over the government’s efforts to increase revenues by raising electricity bills and imposing heavy new income taxes on professionals and businesses.

Last week, the government increased the rate of the valued added tax and extended it to cover many essential items, including cooking gas, fuel, medicine and others.

Office for National Unity and Reconciliation Bill passed in parliament

January 9th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

The Office for National Unity and Reconciliation Bill debated in Parliament today (Jan. 09) has been passed by a majority vote.

The debate on the Second Reading of the Bill was held from 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at the end of the debate, MP G. G. Ponnambalam of Ahila Ilankai Thamil Congress (AITC) called for a division for the said Bill.

In the voting held, 48 votes had been cast in favour of the Bill while only 7 votes were cast against. Accordingly, the Second Reading of the Bill was passed by a majority of 41 votes.

Amendments were added to the Bill during the Committee and accordingly the Bill was passed with amendments.

Meanwhile, the National Hydrographic Bill, which was debated today, was also passed with amendments and without a vote.

New investment zones to be established in North, East and South

January 9th, 2024

Courtesy Adaderana

The Cabinet of Ministers has granted approval for the establishment of new investment zones with the necessary technical assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Since the need to develop a joint mechanism between the public and private sectors to build an export-oriented economy has been emphasized in the 2022 budget, the government says it has identified the appropriateness of developing new investment zones.

Accordingly, a proposal was submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers seeking approval to establish new Investment Zones in the Northern, Eastern, Northwestern and Southern Provinces; in Mankulam, Paranthan Chemicals Company Premises and Kankesanturai Cement Corporation Premises; and in Iranawila and Trincomalee areas, while expanding Bingiriya and Hambantota Investment Zones.

Thus, the Cabinet of Ministers has approved the proposal presented by President Ranil Wickremesinghe in his capacity as the Minister of Investment Promotion to develop those investment zones based on an appropriate public-private partnership model.

President Wickremesinghe to contest as an independent candidate (video)

January 9th, 2024

Courtesy Hiru News

According to internal political sources, President Ranil Wickremesinghe has made a decision to hold the Presidential Election in September 2024.

In a surprising move, he has also declared his intention to contest the election as an independent candidate.

Additionally, the President has outlined plans for Parliamentary elections scheduled for January 2025 and Provincial Council Elections in March 2025.

This strategic timeline is expected to shape the political landscape in the coming months.

Meanwhile,former minister Ravi Karunanayake, Colombo district leader of the United National Party, attending a press conference held today (09), stated that it has been decided to hold the presidential election in another 9 months and the president is going to contest as a non-partisan candidate


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress