Hard Talk
Posted on June 21st, 2010

By Charles.S.Perera

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The man Stephen Sackur, talks loud. He asks a question and before the question is answered he cuts in to ask another question. Thus he leaves the effect of his question in the mind of the listener who has no time to hear the answer.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Watching this comedy of hard talk it becomes quite evident that Sackur does not want to elucidate facts, but impose his prejudiced judgment in the minds of the listener. In such circumstances it becomes a one sided talk show meant to fluster and destabilise the questioned projecting his image as a man who has no answer to the wise white mans questions.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Stephen Sucker had come to Sri Lanka and visited the IDP Camps in the North and finally when he came to question the Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse he had nothing new to ask him from what he had gathered in his meetings with the people in the north and the small talk shows he had with the people and the students and their teachers.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Hard talk programme is said to be of ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- world wide fame due to its global reach ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-.. But unfortunate it grapples important subjects about which some of the listeners in the west may be prejudiced, and the talk show which high lights these controversial questions leave out what is important for the prejudiced listeners to clear their doubts.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Hard Talker Sacker, does not look at the positive aspects of the subject, but emphasis on negative side of the subject. After all the time Sacker lost in interviewing the people who had been affected by the terrorism, he comes back to the Defence Secretary to ask him the same old questions which had been repeatedly asked and answered. They will ask this self same questions until the cows come home.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Sackers questions do not interest the people of Sri Lanka except those who oppose the President Mr.Mahinda Rajapakse and his Government. Sacker asks the Defence Secretary that in the North there is a large presence of the Military . This question he asked from a IDP Tamil man about to leave the camp to settle down in his former village, he again asked the same question from Tamil man who had been with the terrorists, then he asked the same question from the Students and their teachers.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ But Sacker has no intelligence, to understand that it is necessary to have a military presence as the people have still to be protected. It also helps the people and the children who had come out of the horror of terrorists, who had been brain washed to think of the Government Army is their enemy, know the Soldiers are in fact their friends..

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ With the constant presence of the Government Army now reverting to civilian non-military tasks, would be an effective means to remove from the brain washed minds of former terrorist child soldiers and terrorist sympathising Tamil people the notion that the Government Army Soldiers are their enemies.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ And what the Western interviewer forgets is that the Government Armed Forces were not engaged in a conventional war, but an armed struggled against a group of terrorists who sprang from the people, and utilised by the Indian government to make terrorists of them.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Fighting terrorism is different from fighting against an enemy state or an invading army. Therefore, it is foolish to point to Geneva Conventions of 1949 which was long before terrorism raised its head, to point out that the Government Forces may have acted against the Geneva Convention.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Sacker asks the Defence Secretary, whether he does not think that having the Military Soldiers walking the village paths and streets of their towns a scary concept for the Tamil people.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Sacker cannot imagine with his western mentality that the presence of the Military Soldiers is not a scary experience to the Tamil people as the Sri Lanka Soldiers, are not after all foreigners but there own people, who had in fact rescued them from a more scary experience with the terrorists walking in their villages and towns looking out for children to be forcibly taken away to be trained as child soldiers.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Sacker had not been in the same situation that those Tamil people had been for 30 years, and therefore, he cannot and will not understand their mind set however much he tries. It is only one year after the elimination of terrorism in Sri Lanka. We cannot yet be sure there would not be attempt by a stray terrorist still living some where carry out a suicide bomb attack.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The Hindu of 21 June,2010 carried a very relevant report which may perhaps open the eyes of Sacker to the necessity of the continued monitoring of the North and East by the Armed Forces. The report states; ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦Three cadre of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were arrested by the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”Q’ Branch police in the city on Sunday. Large quantities of ordinary and electric detonators were seized from themƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦.ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Will the West and the Hard Talking man understand why a military presence is necessary in the North ?

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ I may follow this later to cover SackerƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s rest of the questions to the Defence Secretary.

3 Responses to “Hard Talk”

  1. SonOflanka Says:

    GOTA is correct. Give a damn about the international community if they oppose the hard earned peace. Sri Lankan‘s have given mandate for GOTA not to UN or any body else to get the job done and he did it. Every Sri Lankan is happy about that. Keeping international community happy sending own country men in to a hell is the former governments have done after getting mandate from there fellow citizens.

    Respect is a joke to one whom no nothing about the respect. “Yes Sir “is the word white man is looking from us. GOTA is an exceptional in that sense.

    Get it form me, truth is some times painful but that is the only hard truth you have anyway. Talking peace cost us already 100,000 lives that’s the achievement we made with the peace talking international community past 30 years. Think about Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan how many people yet to die for taking peace, no one knows. Be happy with what we achieved last year. There are no killings under the pretext of terror any more in Sri Lanka. If our leaders have had courage like today to say go to hell international community and clean up 10 – 20 LTTE heads 30 years ago, we could have saved more than 100,000 lives in Sri Lanka today instead of letting them die in vain. Don’t be afraid to say any phony peace talkers who don’t understand this fact, go and jump in to Nantikadal lagoon with the terror loving Pelam Diaspora

  2. De Costa Says:

    Charles,
    Listen to this program from the beginning. Every word is carefully manipulated to prove how innocent boys sent to front line by LTTE were killed ruthlessly by Army.
    To Sackur,” inocent people” are only “Tamil people”. He learned this from his Guru Anjem Chaudary.

    http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/transcript-anjem-choudary-hardtalk-interview-77-london-bombings/#transcript

    Stephen Sackur, Interviewer: [interrupts] All right, I think we’ve established you will not condemn it. I just wonder why you won’t condemn it when your own leader Omar Bakri said quite simply, “I condemn the killing of innocent people” on the 20th of July. Why won’t you say what he says?

    Anjem Choudary: Look, at the end of the day innocent people, when we say “innocent people” we mean Muslims. As far as non-muslims are concerned they have er … they have not accepted Islam and as far as we are concerned that is a crime against God.

    Stephen Sackur, Interviewer: I want to be clear about what you’re saying. This is very important. You’re saying only Muslims count as innocent people.

    What a hypocrite ? He has no heart to acknowledge enormous suffering undergone by Sinhalese people due to Tamil tiger Terrorist war. He had no time to interview a single mother from Sinhala community.

  3. jay-ran Says:

    Our Def Sec has quite correctly defended Sri Lankan Security Forces but Sackur’s intentions were PRE MEDITATED, to ACCUSE SRI LANKA AT EVERY DROP OF AN ALLEGATION.As Charles mentioned, this SWOLLEN HEADED WHITE SKINNED PUNDIT WAS VERY AGGRESSIVE RIGHT FROM THE BEGINING as this BANDIT NEVER ALLOWED THE INTERVIVEE TO COMPLETE HIS ANSWER.This I have noted when Ambassoder Jaliya was intervieved by a woman of ALJASEERA I suppose, SHE TOO PUT FORWARDED QUESTIONS BEFORE Jaliya replied.

    Therefor in my opinion, EVERY INTERVIVEE SHOULD DEMAND THE INTERVIVER TO SHUT UP UNTILL THE COMPLETE ANSWER IS GIVEN.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress