The achievement of Kumar Sangakkara becoming the best batsman in Test Match Cricket.
Posted on August 11th, 2010

By Dr Muralidaran Ramesh Somasunderam.

Dear Sir,

As a fellow Sri Lankan, it is both a privilege and an honour that Kumar Sangakkara is presently ranked the best batsman in Test Match cricket.

I believe Sangakkara has all the strokes both on the front and on the back foot, including the vertical and horizontal bat strokes. He is an eye player who embodies his inner mind, temperament, application and concentration, including determination, which are essential necessities and requirements, with quality technique, and hard work to be the best batsman, especially in Test Match cricket, which is the litmus test of the game.

Sangakkara is like great left hand batsmen before and during his time, such as Sir Garfield Sobers, Brain Lara, David Gower and Neil Harvey, which is positive and aggressive batting, and being able to be a match winner when required or needed. Nevertheless Sangakkara has also the ability and temperament to negate his aggression, and play within himself, if the team requires that, based on the circumstances and situation of a game. This I believe makes him special and a rare commodity at the pivotal position of number three, where a batsman of quality should be able to meet both aspects and requirements, depending on the circumstance and situation of a game. In this regard, Sangakkara is different than Sir Garfield Sobers, who was the greatest aggressive left handed batsman in world cricket, along with Brian Lara in the modern day game. Even though in my view, Sir Garfield Sobers was greatest cricketer in the history of the game, as a genuine all-rounder of true class and repute in regard to all facets of cricket, not just batting.

The best number three batsmen in world cricket based on the modern day game that can attack and defend depending on the circumstances and situation in a match was Dilip Vensakar of India, who had this unique ability to be aggressive and to defend when needed, depending on the circumstance and situation of a game. He also was elegant and a stylish right handed batsman, which was pleasing and enjoyable to the eye. ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

In my view, Sangakkara is a great player, especially in regard to the square / cover drive, and his nature to dominate a bowling attack from start to finish, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ which is an assert to any team whom he plays for or represents. The late Sir Everton Weeks and Ritchie Richardson were also great exponents of the square / cover drive, including the late Sir Frank Worrall of the West Indies, who sat on one knee, and produced a picture perfect square / cover drive against Alan Davidson in the 1960 ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” 1961 Test Match series against the Australians at the Sydney Cricket Ground, which was an absolutely perfect stoke technically speaking.

Sangakkara is the best Test Match batsman in the world at the moment, because no bowler in world cricket can curtail him, especially in regard to his stroke play all-around the wicket. But to me, his square of the wicket play between cover point and extra cover is the best I have seen from a left hander in modern day cricket, because he waits for the ball to come to him, and his timing and placement are a feature, especially at the point of contact, with the square drive, where ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ a batsman has to open the face of the bat at the point of contact, and control the stroke by keeping the ball down, even though a player of the calibre such as Sanath Jayasuriya opened the face of the bat and lofted the ball, and on many occasions for six runs, which is extremely rare indeed. This not only highlighted his uniqueness, but his class as a batsman of quality, who was a genuine match winner on his day in both Test Match cricket and One Day cricket.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

I was brought up in the generation where I admired players such as Sidath Wettimuny, Ranjan Madugalle, and Roy Dias and Aravinda d Silva.

The greatest innings in terms of technical perfection was the 190 odd runs Sidath Wettimuny scored in the 1984 Test Match at Lords, when he played every stoke for its exact requirement, technically correctly, and he also built his innings based on total concentration, dedication, and application, but like Sangakkara, the square of the wicket stokes were a feature during his innings, with his driving and square cutting being exemplary. Nevertheless to me the player who showed that as a Sri Lankan he had ability to be a true match winner on his day, and in the process to be prepared to attack a bowler from start to finish was Aravinda de Silva, who was a delight to watch, as he did not curtail himself, but was a champion, who dominated bowlers in both Test Match, and One Day cricket. Aravinda also played the vertical and horizontal bat strokes regularly with great success, especially the pull stroke in front of square, and was a strong driver of the ball down the ground, including the drive and cut stroke. Therefore he was a complete player, with fine onside flicks off his toes and glances, and this made it very difficult to curtail him from scoring runs quickly in a dominate manner and fashion. He also charged at fast bowlers, and the lofted drive, which he played against Craig McDermott at the Melbourne Cricket Ground in the One Day International in 1984, is a very good example of this rare class and ability. This was an extraordinary stroke by a very special player indeed. To me, he was the advocate for players of the calibre, such as Kumar Sangakkara, and Mahela Jayawardene who do not allow opposition bowlers to curtail them or dictate terms to them, when they are at the crease batting. But, they set the pattern of play in terms of the pace, and momentum, which is great for the game and to visually watch for spectators at the ground, and for television audiences, who get full entertainment and enjoyment, which is what the game of cricket is about, like any sport, at the end of the day.

Kumar Sangakkara is also very eloquent in the English language when he gives press conferences, and interviews, and is a fine captain, who will get better both tactically, and astutely, with more experience and exposure, by captaining the Sri Lankan national cricket team in both Test Match and One Day cricket.

I wish to conclude by mentioning that Sangakkara is a source of inspiration to many young batsmen in world cricket, especially up and coming batsmen in Sri Lanka in first class cricket, and in international cricket, and to young players to have a positive mindset, based on purpose, drive, dedication, application and determination.

I wish Sangakkara personally and the Sri Lankan team the very best in their future endeavours, especially in Test Match cricket, which is the pinnacle of the game, and congratulate his magnificent effort of becoming the number one batsman in Test Match cricket at present.

In my view, you are a true source of inspiration to the nation, and a genuine champion whom I hope, and wish, will continue to bring joy to many cricket enthusiasts around the world, including all Sri Lankans in years to come.

4 Responses to “The achievement of Kumar Sangakkara becoming the best batsman in Test Match Cricket.”

  1. mario_perera Says:

    I share your enthusiasm for Sri lanka cricket and for Kumar as well. Yet while individual performances count, what matters in the end is that the TEAM WINS. The third test with India left fans very disappointed. Our team plucked defeat from the jaws of a win or atleast an easy draw. As for Kumar, he must be advised to learn from his errors. His principal batting error, repeated without end, is pulling longhops directly into the wating hands of fielders on the ON side, purposely placed there to get him.
    As regards his captaincy, comentators point out time and again his tendency to FOLLOW THE BALL in his field setting. This is like closing the gate after the horse has bolted.
    As for his English, it is refreshing listening to Kumar, especially after having listened to Ssnath Jayasuriya. Yet cricket captains tend to be like politicians. So the ‘gift of the gab’ in itself is not a blessing.
    Finally, when all is said and done, what matters is that the TEAM WINS. The third test was a disaster. Our last five batsmen, after Prasanna, went down like the fall of dominos in the first innings, in contrast to the Indians. Catches were dropped lilke hot potatoes. Those who were given lives, were not just any other batsmen but Sachin, Sehwag Raina and Luxman. In the second innings, the top order fell like nine-pins, Kumar included.
    Yes what matters in the end, is that the TEAM as a whole comes out on top. The rest is for personal statistics and personal glory.

  2. Dr Muralidaran Ramesh Somasunderam Says:

    Dear Mario,
    It was good to read your views and comments, which was much appreciated.
    I understand that cricket is a team sport and that individual performances do not precede the achievements of team, but it is most important to understand that cricket like rugby union for example is made up of gentlemen, who make up the team, both in terms of its numbers, and thereby its performers. Based on this, I must confess that spectators went to cricket matches to watch players such as Dr W. G. Grace, Sir Len Hutton, Sir Walter Hammond, and Sir Alec Bedser to name a few examples of cricketers of quality, from yesteryear.
    Therefore if cricket enthusiasts mention that I went to watch Kumar Sangakkar play, because he is presently the number one batsman in world cricket, and he is a player of quality and substance, it does not mean that the individual concern is looking upon individual players ahead of the team, but admires and cherishes the talent of individual players, who brings a great deal of joy and pride to the person concerned. I believe this is most important to understand.
    Therefore I realise that Sangakkara may have weakness in certain areas of his batting, as even the great late Sir Donnald Bradman did not feel comfortable in regard to the short pitched delivery, which caused the late D. Jardine to advocate and promote the bodyline theory, with the late Sir Harold Larwood being the main architect to carry out this theory extremely successfully, by curtailing Bradman’s brilliance in scoring runs during the 1932 – 1933 Ashes Series, which was played in Australia.
    I am not advocating Sangakkara to be in the class or league of the late Sir Donald Bradman, but he is a very fine player, with a great deal of flair and ability, who I believe will end his international career as one of the greatest left handed batsman in Test Match cricket.
    I understand and realise that Sangakkara does have to mature and develop as a quality captain of Sri Lanka, especially in regard to being more creative and more astute tactically, but this will hopefully take place with more opportunity to captain the national team, in both Test Match and One Day cricket.
    Yours Sincerely,
    Dr M. R. Somasunderam.

  3. mario_perera Says:

    Dear Dr.Somasunderam,
    I do appreciate the content and the tone of your letter. Needless to say I, and surely all our cricket lovers are admirers of Kumar.
    Thank you,
    Mario
    Mario Perera, Kadawata

  4. Sri Rohana Says:

    Kumar is a good batsman and a good cricketer no doubt and we are proud of his achievements. He is well talented and technically sound cricketer.
    But I cannot agree with him in three decisions.
    1)Why he is not considering Chaminda Vas to SL team. Vas is world’s most accurate bowler. Excellent fielder and All-rounder. Best bowling figures in one-day as well as test. Why can’t Kumar allow him to play his last world cup in 2011?
    2)Dilhara Fernando is always selected to SL team. His bowling is more like an under 19 cricketers and batting and fielding is still under 12 standard. Why Dilhara is Kumar’s favorite. Is he better than Vas? Is he more influencial than Vas?

    3)Why Kumar’s stepmother treatment to our best cricketer Sanath Jayasooriya. Though Sanath fails in 20/20 batting for a short time he is still a good bowler and a fielder. He is an asset to SL cricket and why can’t Kumar allow Sanath to play his last world cup in 2011. Take India as an example their best player Sachin never get such a mal treatment.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress