Somehow Channel 4 is recycling old footage as new evidence with compliant forensic pathologist called Prof Derrick Pounder to evaluate photographic evidence, but without a body.

This goes against all forensic science and he was caught before trying to assertion time of death in a criminal case so that his findings will fit the police report.

He was challenged by a reputable forensic expert in Scotland, Professor Busuttil. (Link below)

Fortunately for the accused, due to Professor Busuttil intervention man who was convicted due to Prof Derrick PounderƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s dark science walk free.

http://www.mojoscotland.com/steven_johnston/b_s_appeal.html

We have similar scenario here that good Prof Derrick Pounder creating something out of nothing without anybody to analyze and also creating false impression by innuendo and half truth regarding PrabakaranƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s death and also his son’s death.

No one knows how the son was killed knowing the killer and the coward father (remember Prabakaran did not have cyanide capsule with him) he may have ordered his criminal gang to shoot the boy. Unfortunately Prof Derrick Pounder did not say that but he just says things that his paymaster wants him say rather that any possibility that may have happen that fateful day.

Second part is how PrabakaranƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s met his deathƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦ Suddenly new theory from Prof Derrick Pounder saying that he may have been killed from back of the head and this kind of a wound is rare in a war situation. Who is he kidding? Does he have war related forensic expertise from different part of the world? Was he there to see what happened on that day?

Sri Lanka government need to ask from the University of Dundee, do they agree with Prof Derric Pounder one side bias comments and why he is not objective on his theories ( after all his pet theories). This should be taken up by Sri Lanka government forensic teams with proper rebuttal about Prof Derrick Pounder’s obvious one sided bias.

One strange thing about new video is all critical metadata are stripped off and only very few left. We all know why since Ch 4 does not open for critical analysis of their work and all they need is compliant lackey to do their dirty work.

Below is an extract from Ch 4 management regarding their work and see the final sentence, which says “We are expected to test boundaries and to draw attention to the matters of the day that we feel are important, and those are examples of creative risk-taking.”. Word is Creative risk-takingƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦.. Meaning creative risk taking on behalf of terrorist that fund them.

I am appauld that prestigious UK bodies are now moon lighting for terrorist causes and Ch 4 and a University Professor who is preaching dark science will not help UK’s reputation. The country that brought me up with fair play and justice is now moving towards anarchy and hope UK, academics in this field take a note and I will go and meet the Dundee Chancellor re. this episode and will get answers.

I am a fan of UK’s forensic show called ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-Silent Witness” This show got real heroes’ like Prof. Sam Ryan and Prof. Leo Dalton, both of whom have formidable reputation as fearsome scientist that go after the truth and most of the time fighting for justice and hope Prof Derrick Pounder learn from this show what is British reputation is all aboutƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦..

– Asian Tribune –