What is the Doctrine of Dependent Origination ? (paticca samuppada)
Posted on May 12th, 2012

R Chandrasoma

According to a leading expository work (Buddhist Dictionary edited by Ven. Nyanatiloka), the Doctrine of Dependent Origination (paticca samuppada) ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”is the doctrine of all physical and psychical phenomena ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” a doctrine which taken together with anatta forms the indispensable basis for the real understandingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and realization of the Teaching of the BuddhaƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢. This is a great exaggeration. In the first instance, the Buddha never attempted to give a final and comprehensive explanation of all physical and psychical phenomena. The religious truths he announced were narrowly focused on the existential issue of the release from suffering of beleaguered mankind. A brief glance at the wording of the paticca sauppada shows that it is a description of the plight of man and the reasons which bind him to a remorseless cycle of life and death. It is not an explanation of how the world works. It is good to remember that man (and, indeed, life in general) is an insignificant part of the world treated as a physical system. Any explanatory schema which places man at the centre is religiously oriented and cannot be full and final in any objective sense. These remarks are not intended to belittle the standing of the doctrine. No religion outside Buddhism has a cogently argued foundational thesis that can match the paticca samuppada. Let us look at the canonical formulation. It takes the form of a deductive chain starting from a universally accepted premise and ending in an inescapable conclusion. There are twelve stepsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  viz. ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…”

AvijiaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  SankharaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  VinnanaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Nama-rupaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  SalayatanaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  PhassaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  VedanaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  TanhaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  UpadanaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  BhavoƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  JatiƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Jaramarana.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  (IgnoranceƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Mental FormationsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ConsciousnessƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Six-Fold SensoriumƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ContactƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  FeelingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  CravingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  BecomingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  BirthƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Decay and Death.)

A literal rendering of this jargon-filled formalism would be as follows: Ignorance (avijia) is at the very root of the samsaric cycle that traps and defeats all karmic beings. Here the word ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”ignoranceƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ refers to the ignorance of the Four Noble Truths. Due to ignorance, oneƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s Mental Formations (Sankhara) or drives, proclivities and attitudes – are corrupted. This leads to the emergence of consciousness (vinnana) in a karmic successor. This connecting consciousness generates an organized being, a successor (Nama-Rupa).This being acquires a Six-Fold Sensorium (Salayatana) and makes Contact (or has transactions) with the external world.(Phassa).ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  (Note – the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”heartƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ is here taken as a sense organ- hence he ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”six-fold sensoriumƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢). Based on ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”contactƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ there is responsiveness or feeling (Vedana) that excites grasping or Craving (Tanha) that leads to Clinging (Upadana)ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  or love for life and its allurements. This creates the basis for continued becoming (Bhavo) and its sequel, the re-launching of life as a karmic being (Jati). Misery, decay and death (Jara-Marana) follow as they are inseparably connected with the dynamics of this cycle.

A great puzzle to an outsider is the linking of categorically different items ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” Ignorance and contact for example ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” are not of the same epistemic status. How they can be ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”linkedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ in direct causal sequence is puzzling. There is also the problem of generationally different events being chained together as components of a single process. Much is left out ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” how can volitions in the mind of X influence the ontogenetic process in Y that yield a distinctive nama-rupa?

A more ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”learner-friendlyƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ version of the Doctrine of Dependent Origination would be as follows : (1) life is an ever-present burden, sorrowful and unfulfilling (2) Birth is the cause of this doleful state ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” it traps the karmic being in a program that necessarily entails want, sorrow, disease, decay and death. (3) Ignorance leads to birth and all the misery that follows. (As noted above, ignorance is equated with the ignorance of the path of emancipation based on the Four Noble Truths.). These ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”declarationsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ are followed by statements on how a karmic being arises- (1) Karmic promptings from a predecessor (sankhara) induce a fresh lease of life and thereby causes birth. By its very nature, the carnal promptings of sankhara seek re-establishment in another life when its own decays and dies. (2) corporeality, personhood and sensory interaction with the external world follow as the necessary consequence of this re-establishment of a karmic life-form. (3) Craving and grasping arise due the essential nature of our karmic conditioning and there is no mitigation of our desire for the world except through true knowledge. (4) Sorrow, decay and death ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” far from extinguishing this misery ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” merely triggers a fresh round of the same in a karmic successor. (5) Radical extirpation of this ceaseless trans-generational misery is possible only if its root cause is removed ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” ignorance of the path of release. Notice that in this formulation, the primacy of the person as a free moral agent is not clearly acknowledged. Life is a disease that spreads from generation to generation by the contagion of desire and greed. There is a universal remedy and it is its fatal ignorance that is the real cause of this spreading misery.

A skeptic can argue that ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”ignoranceƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ as a state of the mind cannot be root of all evil. Many learned men ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…”BhikkhusƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  included – are well versed in the in the minutiae of the doctrine and are very far from being ignorant of the Four Noble Truths. Yet, they are sadly enmeshed in that round of activities that will see them re-born as harassed and perishable beings. What is missing is the conviction and the will to act that goes beyond mere knowledge and understanding. This pre-supposes an agent, an applier of knowledge ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” something ruled out by the foundational belief in anatta. In later developments in Buddhism this shortfall was partly addressed ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” it was recognized that the Awakened Being was more than merely knowledgeable or prescient ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢¢”š¬…” he was energized with the paramisƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  (or paramita) – such things as resolution, loving kindness, equanimity and most significantly, energy (viriya) to act and to achieve. This dimension is missing in the paticca-samuppada.

7 Responses to “What is the Doctrine of Dependent Origination ? (paticca samuppada)”

  1. herman Says:

    UNDERSTANDING and EXPLAINING PATICCA-SAMUPPADA (Dependent Origination) is best left to a BUDDHA or an Arahant even a Paccekabuddha, stream enterer (sotapatti), once-returner (sakadagami), non-returner (anagami) may understand but cannot explain fully the intricacies of DO.

    Also, most writers failed to understand without the DHAMMA wholly – DO cannot be understood.

  2. Sunil Vijayapala Says:

    To understand Buddhism one need not adorn robes. Most monks are ignorant especially the Sri Lankan monks who are in fact Poojakavaroos. Monks of the calibre of Narada, are no more. Renowned English monks have evidently mis-translated Pali text as no words with precise meanings could not be found and esentially they were driven by Christian ideology. Some translated Nirvana as Gnosis, absolute murder of a great concept.
    Foundation of Buddhism is based on 4 Noble Truths and Dependent Origination. May I correct one thing. Formations cover not only Mental but Speech and Body too. Simply Formations are Actions or Kamma. All 3 give rise to Re-birth Linking Consciousness, although I prefer to call New-birth linking consciousness as re-birth connotes a ‘being’ born and also a ‘continuation’ of a ‘being’, none of which is acceptable in Buddhism. One of the practical points for a being to break this cycle is controlling FEELINGs, which Buddha said ‘where there are feelings there is suffering’.
    Paticcha Sammupaadaayer is a complex cycle which in fact begins with Aasaaver which conditions Aviijaa. As Herman observes, this should be left for Enlighten beings to explain, rather than fools (relative term) like myself. Anyway discussions and analysis of the concept should not be discouraged, which even Buddha appreciated.
    Sunil Vijayapala

  3. Charles Says:

    Buddha has explained his teachings in different ways. The commentaries to the teachings were made by Arahants, and such highly qualified noble ones.

    A lay man cannot explain the teachings of PS better. It is better left for each one to understand PS his way without steppinbg into explin it to him

    I agree with Herman.

  4. Dham Says:

    “These remarks are not intended to belittle the standing of the doctrine. ” Looks like this fool worry of being unpopular.
    Then “A literal rendering of this jargon-filled formalism”
    “A skeptic can argue that ‘ignorance’ as a state of the mind cannot be root of all evil. ”

    This fool does not know any Buddhism, as he has displayed here, yet want to challange Buddha.
    Fool,
    “Ignorance is not the root of all evil” who sid so ? Give an example.
    Ignorance alos let you collect good kamma. Replace ” Evil” with “kamma”.

    Fool,
    Only those who get rid of Ignorance completely can get out of Samsara, not all people learn 4 Noble truth but people who fully understood the noble meaning of the 4 truths. Certainly not people like you.

    I too advice you to go and write somthing else rather than get destroyed drinking poison like Ben Silva.

  5. Naram Says:

    From my little understanding I can say Paticca Samuppada explains the functions of senses that bind together the whole concept of ‘myself’. It has to be understood and many will reject it and that is their right and priviledge. I have heard it said that the proportion of human beings who will undertand is proportiona to the dirt on one’s nails in comparison to earth.

    Each one has to have the will to pause and understand and swim against the tide upstream to shed the yearnings and defilements if he is to reach that high point.

  6. Dham Says:

    Naram,
    You seems to be having a much better understanding than the writer.

  7. Wickrama Says:

    As I have commented on a previous article, I think Gauthama Buddha decided to appear in this world TOO early. Imagine the scene if he was alive today, with all the modern technology, it would have been very easy for him to explain Dhamma at least to many scientists who excel in various fields such as Cosmology, Physics, Chemistry, Biology etc, etc. Imagine his sermons reaching billions of people all around the world via Radio, Television, Internet, in contrast to few hundreds or thousands of primitive people mainly in India ?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress