{"id":150026,"date":"2025-06-03T15:48:53","date_gmt":"2025-06-03T22:48:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/?p=150026"},"modified":"2025-06-03T15:48:53","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T22:48:53","slug":"buddhism-law-and-governance-in-sri-lanka-ethics-must-guide-the-state-continue-penal-code-365-365a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/2025\/06\/03\/buddhism-law-and-governance-in-sri-lanka-ethics-must-guide-the-state-continue-penal-code-365-365a\/","title":{"rendered":"Buddhism, Law, and Governance in Sri Lanka: Ethics Must Guide the State: Continue Penal Code 365\/365A"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em><strong>Shenali Waduge<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"570\" src=\"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-150027\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1-300x167.png 300w, https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-1-768x428.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Sri Lanka, is a nation morally anchored in the teachings of the&nbsp;Buddha. From the&nbsp;Constitution&nbsp;to the&nbsp;Penal Code though the latter is colonial, Sri Lanka\u2019s legal foundations echo Buddhist ethical values such as&nbsp;non-harming,&nbsp;truth,&nbsp;justice, and&nbsp;restraint. These Buddhist values shape&nbsp;law, governance, and public accountability. How this applies to the present attempts to repeal&nbsp;Sections 365 and 365A of the Penal Code&nbsp;\u2014 colonial laws used to criminalize same-sex relations which were amended &amp; strengthened in 1995 &amp; 2006 making 365\/365A a modernized penal code which however, cannot shirk its links to Buddhist jurisprudence embedded in Article 9 &amp; Article 16 of Sri Lanka\u2019s Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buddha\u2019s Teachings: The Moral Blueprint for Governance<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buddhism, particularly in the Therav\u0101da tradition practiced in Sri Lanka, sets out clear ethical principles for personal and public life. For rulers and officials, the Buddha articulated the&nbsp;Dasa R\u0101ja Dharma&nbsp;\u2014 Ten Duties of a Righteous Ruler. These served as religious guidance &amp; a moral standard for politicians, public servants &amp; law makers. How many actually govern as per these duties today? Is it not the failure to follow these righteous duties that is reason for the decline in morals &amp; ethics at all levels today?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buddhist Ethics in the Law: Reflected in the Penal Code<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While Sri Lanka\u2019s&nbsp;Penal Code (1883)&nbsp;is based on British colonial law, it mirrors many Buddhist precepts, including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td>Buddhist Precept<\/td><td>Penal Code Equivalent<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>No killing<\/td><td>294\u2013298 (Murder, homicide)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>No stealing<\/td><td>366\u2013399 (Theft, robbery)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>No sexual misconduct<\/td><td>363\u2013365A,B (Rape, abuse, gross indecency, exploitation)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>No lying or defamation<\/td><td>190\u2013198, 500\u2013504<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>No intoxicants (social order)<\/td><td>Excise Ordinance, Motor Traffic Act, etc.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Moral living<\/td><td>365\/365A against unnatural offences &amp; gross indecency<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sections 365 and 365A<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>Against Unnatural Offences &amp; Gross Indecency<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buddhist Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The<strong>Third Precept<\/strong>\u00a0(K\u0101mesu micch\u0101c\u0101ra) urges abstinence from\u00a0<strong>sexual misconduct<\/strong>. This includes\u00a0<strong>unnatural sexual acts<\/strong>, which ancient Buddhist commentaries (like\u00a0<em>Visuddhimagga<\/em>) interpret to include same-sex acts, anal sex, and other forms of indulgent sexual behavior that defy nature.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penal Code Alignment:<\/strong>&nbsp;Sections 365 and 365A criminalize:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Carnal intercourse against the order of nature.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Acts of gross indecency, particularly same-sex acts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Moral Basis:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>These laws mirror the<strong>Buddhist view that sexuality should be restrained, natural, and directed toward moral purposes<\/strong>\u2014not craving or indulgence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Section 363<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>Rape<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buddhist Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Sexual exploitation or forced intercourse is considered a severe form of<strong>sexual misconduct<\/strong>. The Buddha emphasized\u00a0<strong>consensual and moral sexual relations<\/strong>, bound within ethical limits.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penal Code Alignment:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 363 criminalizes<strong>non-consensual sexual activity<\/strong>, which protects women and children and upholds\u00a0<em>saddhamma<\/em>\u00a0(righteous conduct).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sections 364 &amp; 364A<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>Statutory Rape and Incest<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buddhist Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Buddha severely condemned exploitation, particularly of the vulnerable (e.g., children, relatives). These acts violate<strong>both moral precepts and karmic laws<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penal Code Alignment:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>These sections protect family purity and prohibit immoral relations\u2014preserving social and familial<strong>order<\/strong>, which is a Buddhist value.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sections 291A &amp; 291B<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>Insult to Religion<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buddhist Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Buddhism promotes<strong>tolerance<\/strong>, but also\u00a0<strong>respect for religious sanctity<\/strong>. Promoting acts that undermine Buddhism or insult its doctrines (e.g., by mocking morality or sacred teachings) is a form of\u00a0<strong>adhamma<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penal Code Alignment:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>These sections prohibit deliberate insult or disturbance to religious feelings\u2014helping protect the<strong>Buddha S\u0101sana<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>from moral erosion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sections 365B &amp; 286<\/strong>&nbsp;\u2013&nbsp;<em>Grave Sexual Abuse &amp; Indecent Exposure<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buddhist Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Buddha upheld<strong>modesty<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>restraint<\/strong>, and\u00a0<strong>protection of others<\/strong>\u00a0from harm. Public indecency, sexual abuse, or moral corruption breaks the foundation of\u00a0<strong>right conduct (samm\u0101-kammanta)<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penal Code Alignment:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>These laws restrict public immorality and abuse, in line with Buddhist<strong>ethical restraint<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>These laws aim to\u00a0prevent harm, uphold\u00a0justice, and preserve\u00a0public decency\u2014 all key Buddhist principles.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The Controversy: Sections 365 &amp; 365A<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What do these laws say?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 365: Criminalizes carnal intercourse against the order of nature\u201d \u2014 a phrase historically used on same-sex relations (especially male-male anal sex).These committed on children constitute a crime.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 365A: Criminalizes acts of gross indecency\u201d between persons \u2014 in public or private.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Why is repeal being called for?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Human rights groups, handful of legal experts&nbsp;argue that these laws:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Violate\u00a0privacy and dignity of same-sex persons<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are used to\u00a0harass\u00a0and\u00a0blackmail\u00a0LGBTQ+ citizens<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are\u00a0inconsistent\u00a0with Sri Lanka\u2019s obligations under\u00a0international human rights law<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>What Does Buddhism Say About Same-Sex Relations?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For laypeople:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Buddhism teaches\u00a0restraint from sexual misconduct,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What matters is whether a relationship is\u00a0ethical, consensual, and respectful<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Strongest Therav\u0101da Argument Against Lay Same-Sex Relations<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1.&nbsp;The Third Precept: Sexual Misconduct<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Interpretation from the Commentaries:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;<em>Visuddhimagga<\/em>&nbsp;and other commentaries by Buddhaghosa classify&nbsp;sexual misconduct&nbsp;as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Adultery<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Coercive or deceitful sex<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sex with underage or protected persons (e.g. those under guardianship)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sex that leads to\u00a0social disorderor violates norms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Same-sex relations are micch\u0101c\u0101ra\u201d (misconduct) as they violate:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Violate\u00a0social norms<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are\u00a0non-procreative<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>often\u00a0frowned upon culturally\u00a0in ancient Buddhist societies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Sources:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Visuddhimagga<\/em>(Path of Purification) by Buddhaghosa<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>A\u1e45guttara Nik\u0101ya 5.87<\/em>\u2013 discusses five types of misconduct, including sexual, though not homosexual per se<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>J\u0101taka Tales and Cultural Attitudes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Several J\u0101taka tales (e.g.,&nbsp;<em>K\u0101ma J\u0101taka<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>Sama J\u0101taka<\/em>) refer to ideal lay conduct including heterosexual marriage, family duty, and procreation. This has been&nbsp;used traditionally&nbsp;to imply that&nbsp;same-sex unions are outside Buddhist lay ideals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reference:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>J\u0101taka Tales<\/em>\u2013 moral narratives shaping lay conduct<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cultural interpretations embedded in\u00a0Sinhalese and Buddhism<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Anum\u0101na from Monastic Discipline<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;strict prohibitions&nbsp;against same-sex acts in the Vinaya show that the Buddha viewed&nbsp;non-heteronormative conduct&nbsp;as spiritually regressive, and that such principles should&nbsp;also inspire lay morality since the final destination for both laypersons &amp; theros is Nirvana.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Traditional Therav\u0101da Societal Codes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Therav\u0101da-majority countries (Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Traditional\u00a0temple teachingsand\u00a0village ethics\u00a0have historically\u00a0condemned homosexuality\u00a0as misconduct.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Monks often advised against it from a\u00a0moral puritystandpoint<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Examples:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Writings by Myanmar\u2019s Sayadaws and Sri Lankan forest monks<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Local\u00a0<em>Bana<\/em>sermons transmitted through oral tradition<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For monks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the&nbsp;Therav\u0101da Vinaya,&nbsp;any form of sexual intercourse, whether with a woman, man, or non-binary individual, constitutes a&nbsp;P\u0101r\u0101jika&nbsp;offense (the gravest of monastic sins), leading to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Immediate\u00a0expulsion from the monastic Sangha<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Permanent\u00a0loss of monkhood<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No opportunity for reinstatement<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This applies&nbsp;regardless of gender, and is&nbsp;uniformly strict (Bhikkhus &amp; Bhikkhunis)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Citation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Vinaya Pi\u1e6daka \u2013 P\u0101r\u0101jika 1 (Sexual Intercourse)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Reference:\u00a0<em>Bhikkhu P\u0101timokkha Rules<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Rejection of Pa\u1e47\u1e0dakas&nbsp;from Ordination<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therav\u0101da texts also bar pa\u1e47\u1e0dakas\u201d (interpreted traditionally to include effeminate men, homosexuals, and other gender non-conforming individuals) from ordination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This reflects:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A concern that such individuals would disrupt celibacy and discipline.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A traditional belief that they are sexually deviant\u201d or unfit\u201d for monastic life.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Citation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Cullavagga V, Vinaya Pi\u1e6daka (Therav\u0101da Canon)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Contemporary Analysis: The Conversation, Traditional Buddhist teachings exclude LGBTQ people\u2026\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The Buddha\u2019s View of Marriage: A Moral Union Between Man and Woman<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Buddha acknowledged it as a natural institution within lay life, meant to uphold&nbsp;<strong>social stability, virtue, and mutual respect<\/strong>. His guidance, especially in the&nbsp;<em>Sigalovada Sutta<\/em>&nbsp;(DN 31), explicitly refers to&nbsp;<strong>the marriage bond between a man and a woman<\/strong>, outlining distinct&nbsp;<strong>duties<\/strong>&nbsp;for each. These are not arbitrary roles\u2014they reflect the natural order (<em>Dhammaniy\u0101ma<\/em>), essential to personal discipline and societal balance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Male-Female Complementarity in Marriage (Sigalovada Sutta):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;<strong>husband<\/strong>&nbsp;is expected to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Honor his wife<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Be faithful<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Provide for her<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Share authority<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Treat her with respect<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;<strong>wife<\/strong>&nbsp;is expected to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Be faithful<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Manage household duties<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Welcome relatives<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Protect family wealth<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Be industrious and wise<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This framework clearly assumes&nbsp;<strong>biological and moral complementarity<\/strong>\u2014a male and a female, fulfilling natural and ethical roles that support not only each other but the wider family and community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Why This Opposes Same-Sex Unions:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Moral Disruption:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Same-sex relations lack the&nbsp;<strong>complementary moral duties<\/strong>&nbsp;and natural alignment outlined by the Buddha. There is no Dhamma-based precedent for redefining marriage around desire, identity, or preference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Violation of S\u012bla (Moral Discipline):<\/strong><br>The&nbsp;<strong>Third Precept<\/strong>\u2014to abstain from sexual misconduct\u2014demands that sexuality be morally restrained, purposeful, and in harmony with Dhamma. Same-sex acts, driven by sensual craving (<em>k\u0101ma-ta\u1e47h\u0101<\/em>), are incompatible with this path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>No Procreative or Generational Role:<\/strong><br>Buddhist marriage supports&nbsp;<strong>stewardship of life<\/strong>\u2014protecting and nurturing future generations. Same-sex unions cannot fulfill this role and therefore depart from the moral utility of marriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Social Confusion:<\/strong><br>Promoting same-sex marriage\u201d undercuts the Buddha\u2019s clear roles for husband and wife and invites moral ambiguity, not the clarity the Dhamma offers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Buddha\u2019s teachings on marriage provide a&nbsp;<strong>moral, natural, and disciplined framework<\/strong>\u2014clearly designed for a union between man and woman. This sacred structure, rooted in duty and self-restraint, is incompatible with the promotion of same-sex relationships. Buddhist society must therefore&nbsp;<strong>defend the sanctity of this moral model<\/strong>&nbsp;and resist attempts to redefine it through ideologies alien to the Dhamma. To reach Nirvana, laypersons must cultivate&nbsp;<em>right conduct<\/em>\u2014not celebrate cravings disguised as rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therav\u0101da Buddhism upholds moral discipline (s\u012bla) as the essential foundation for any practitioner aspiring toward Nirvana. The Buddha emphasized the importance of right conduct, self-restraint, and ethical living\u2014not only to avoid karmic consequences but to purify the mind for higher spiritual progress. Therefore, under Therav\u0101da doctrine and cultural application, same-sex conduct is neither spiritually beneficial nor morally justifiable\u2014and should be discouraged for both laypersons and monastics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Constitution: A Legal Duty to Uphold Buddhism and Justice<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article 9:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This makes it a&nbsp;constitutional duty&nbsp;for the government to&nbsp;protect Buddhist values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Articles 27\u201328:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Require the State to establish a\u00a0just, moral, and equitable society<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Public servants must\u00a0respect human dignity\u00a0and\u00a0preserve public trust<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Government, Politicians, and Public Servants: Bound by Law and Morality<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Public officials are entrusted with both:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Legal power\u2014 under the Constitution and Penal Code<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Moral responsibility\u2014 under the values of the Dhamma<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>They must:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Act with\u00a0honesty and restraint(\u0100jjava, Tapa)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Avoid corruption and abuse (Paricc\u0101ga)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Promote\u00a0justice and tolerance(Avirodhana, Khanti)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Sri Lanka is a civilizational trust grounded in the Dhamma. The Buddha did not speak of rights divorced from duties, or liberty without restraint. He spoke of&nbsp;<strong>discipline, morality, and self-control<\/strong>&nbsp;as the foundation of personal freedom and national harmony.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To&nbsp;<strong>repeal Sections 365 and 365A<\/strong>&nbsp;in the name of rights\u201d is to&nbsp;<strong>violate the moral and legal duty of the State to protect the Buddha S\u0101sana<\/strong>, as mandated by Article 9 of the Constitution. It is to&nbsp;<strong>substitute discipline with desire, ethics with ideology<\/strong>, and Dhamma with imported dogma.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let us be clear:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is not about hatred \u2014 Buddhism teaches&nbsp;<em>karu\u1e47\u0101<\/em>&nbsp;(compassion) and&nbsp;<em>mett\u0101<\/em>&nbsp;(loving-kindness).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But&nbsp;<strong>true compassion does not celebrate craving<\/strong>&nbsp;(<em>ta\u1e47h\u0101<\/em>); it guides individuals away from it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>True tolerance is not silence in the face of adhamma (immorality)<\/strong>, but active defense of what is right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Same-sex acts and ideologies that normalize them&nbsp;<strong>contradict the Third Precept, disrupt natural family roles<\/strong>, and undermine the moral clarity provided in texts like the&nbsp;<em>Sigalovada Sutta<\/em>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<em>Vinaya Pi\u1e6daka<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Upholding 365\/365A is not about punishing people \u2014 it is about preserving the&nbsp;<strong>moral spine of a Buddhist nation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The State has a choice: It can&nbsp;<strong>stand with the Dhamma<\/strong>, uphold the Constitution, and protect the moral foundations of society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Or it can&nbsp;<strong>capitulate to foreign-funded agendas<\/strong>, strip the law of its ethical core, and plunge the next generation into confusion, hedonism, and social decay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let this be a call to every citizen, monk, official, and leader:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>To protect Sri Lanka is to protect its moral order.<\/strong><br><strong>To protect its moral order is to defend the Buddha S\u0101sana.<\/strong><br><strong>To defend the Buddha S\u0101sana is to defend all beings from suffering.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reject the repeal of Sections 365 and 365A.<br><strong>Not out of hate \u2014 but to uphold truth, dignity, and Dharma.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Shenali Waduge<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shenali Waduge Sri Lanka, is a nation morally anchored in the teachings of the&nbsp;Buddha. From the&nbsp;Constitution&nbsp;to the&nbsp;Penal Code though the latter is colonial, Sri Lanka\u2019s legal foundations echo Buddhist ethical values such as&nbsp;non-harming,&nbsp;truth,&nbsp;justice, and&nbsp;restraint. These Buddhist values shape&nbsp;law, governance, and public accountability. How this applies to the present attempts to repeal&nbsp;Sections 365 and 365A of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-shenali-waduge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}