{"id":53328,"date":"2016-03-28T13:42:30","date_gmt":"2016-03-28T20:42:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/?p=53328"},"modified":"2016-03-28T13:42:30","modified_gmt":"2016-03-28T20:42:30","slug":"whither-sri-lanka-vis-a-vis-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/2016\/03\/28\/whither-sri-lanka-vis-a-vis-india\/","title":{"rendered":"WHITHER SRI LANKA vis-a-vis\u00a0INDIA?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By India-Watcher<\/em><\/span><\/h2>\n

The recent unheralded entry of the Indian High Commissioner into the raucous and increasingly heated political\u00a0debate raging now in Sri Lanka about the benefits of the ETCA to our country, and also his simultaneous and\u00a0uncalled for outburst in a public forum, replete with derogatory\u00a0personal remarks against the respected\u00a0former Foreign Minister, who has ably represented Sri Lanka over the last two decades, demands explanations as to its genesis,\u00a0timing,\u00a0need for it, as well his and India’s\u00a0motivation; especially since it does not appear from the public record that our government deemed it appropriate to call for the High Commissioner’s explanation a la\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0President Premadasa in the Chilicot affaire<\/em>, when we had a more united and self-confident regime which spoke with one strong voice\u00a0and retaliated swiftly at the first whiff of British\u00a0political interference.<\/p>\n

It was reported on 16 March that the Joint Opposition claimed that the High Commissioner had “clearly lost sight of his official mandate in Sri Lanka…and questioned whether his public utterances were at all consistent with the proper role of a diplomat and the basics of protocol…being seen as a partisan political actor involving himself in public political debate on contentious domestic issues”.<\/p>\n

Also, a\u00a0large number of respected university academics have recently\u00a0 “registered\u00a0their vehement protest against the High Commissioner for overstepping the\u00a0limits of diplomatic propriety, and urged the Government to declare him persona non grata”. <\/em>They denounced his conduct as\u00a0preposterous. The issue arises whether India recently\u00a0extending short-term bridging finance of over $1 billion to fill our near\u00a0empty treasury has silenced the powers that be!\u00a0However, for some inexplicable reason the whole incident seems to have missed official attention, but the regional significance of the event should not be discounted.<\/p>\n

Since the current incident is fairly uncommon in the annals of our own or even global\u00a0diplomatic history, it is both\u00a0fitting and important\u00a0to probe the context in which such deviant and undiplomatic conduct can be expected from a very senior High Commissioner who obviously knew\u00a0the established rules of diplomatic conduct in the accredited country only too well. And in referring to the former Minister’s religious practices, the offensive\u00a0intrusion into his personal life\u00a0clearly descended beyond the pale!<\/p>\n

First, India-watchers will remember that whenever in our recent history, the local\u00a0milieu appeared divided or confused, India always took the low road and openly displayed its dominant position over this small island country. While there were many such instances during our armed conflict with terrorism, from the ”parippu”<\/em>\u00a0drop to openly consorting with the terrorists, the latest was the reported vetoing of Sri Lanka’s plans to purchase fighter planes from another neighbour, who was very helpful in our civil war effort. Did we then\u00a0instantly concede our sovereignty to India? Also,\u00a0SAARC becomes irrelevant\u00a0when Indian interests collide with those of any\u00a0other neighbouring\u00a0country!<\/p>\n

Second,\u00a0history shows that in times of some confusion here, Indian diplomats emerge who wield the full weight of a nuclear-armed sub-continent of 1.5 billion people, no longer non-aligned in its foreign policy, but kow-towing to\u00a0the West, mainly for security reasons. The mid-1980s\u00a0come to mind and the prophetic “Sri Lanka is our backyard to do what we like” Dixit\u00a0philosophy, which has just been demonstrated in full flight by another ‘Viceroy’ type, with at least\u00a0the implicit\u00a0authorization of New Delhi! Otherwise, this incident would not have happened.<\/p>\n

Third,\u00a0it is common knowledge that Indian diplomats (as well as their\u00a0top bureaucrats) are finely trained and groomed for overseas assignments, that their ingrained discipline will not certainly\u00a0allow this sort of conduct to occur vis-a-vis<\/em>\u00a0India’s closest neighbour or anywhere else, unless it is directed from or endorsed by their political superiors in New Delhi. Any similar unauthorized deviation from established policy would have been swiftly penalized – and that has also\u00a0not happened.<\/p>\n

Fourth,\u00a0it is of course now confirmed history that India has even done much worse to completely derail Sri Lanka’s development in the past thirty some years. The Indian publication India Today <\/em>itself\u00a0carried graphic photos taken in India\u00a0during the armed conflict with the LTTE\u00a0terrorists, which documented and\u00a0made abundantly clear the true story of financing, training, refuge and encouragement given by the\u00a0then Prime Minister of India herself, ably supported by RAW (Indian Intelligence), to convert a rag-tag band of a few troublemakers into a fully-fledged terrorist fighting force which conquered our territory, assassinated the country’s leaders and laid havoc to the country and its people during a three decade civil war. Unfortunately, all this scheming also led to her own son’s untimely death, and changed the course of India’s history!<\/p>\n

Only a few days ago, a perceptive contemporary analyst of the war scene referred in another newspaper to “India’s despicable role in sponsoring terrorism here”. He goes on to add that a very senior Indian diplomat then based here regularly consorted with the terrorist leader during the conflict, and turned around “in 2013 and called for an investigation into alleged atrocities committed by the Sri Lankan military during the final phase of the Vanni offensive….Having funded half a dozen terrorist groups, India finally established the TNA (now leading the Opposition!) to protect the then EPRLF provincial administration….India could never absolve itself of destabilizing a friendly country”.<\/p>\n

Despite giving invaluable assistance to the terrorists and sustaining the terrorist war, without making amends, India then collaborated with the West, the so-called vaunted\u00a0‘international community’, which also lacks ‘clean hands’,\u00a0in hauling up Sri Lanka before the UNHRC, where the civil\u00a0war’s victor is being now charged with human rights violations! The charge is so limited in time that the IPKF’s own destructive anti-civilian campaign in Sri Lanka’s north is exempt from inquiry! It is appropriate to mention here that India has itself\u00a0nursed a festering wound in Kashmir from it’s independence with numerous casualties, having reneged on an agreement to call a referendum; has been accused of tolerating the\u00a0mass massacre of Muslim nationals in Gujarat early in this century, and of\u00a0Naxalite terrorists for decades! Global morality dictates different norms for the elephant as compared with the mouse!<\/p>\n

So, the historical context was clearly not a bed of roses for the two neighbours to lie in! The terrorists returned India’s favours by assassinating her elected Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi! From about\u00a0that time, bilateral \u00a0relations have waxed and waned depending on who was in power in the two capitals, but sporadic and planned Indian interference in Sri Lanka’s business has always been par for the course.<\/p>\n

Every single open and public\u00a0incursion related above impinges\u00a0on Sri Lanka’s state sovereignty, and is very\u00a0significant since they collectively\u00a0set the stage for the most unequal relationship between a nuclear-armed sub-continent of over one billion people and a tiny island\u00a0democracy, which has at times been compelled\u00a0in the past\u00a0to survive as an “independent” country only\u00a0at India’s dispensation.<\/p>\n

In conclusion,\u00a0the High Commissioner’s recent speech, ongoing\u00a0trade and economic negotiations, the suspected infiltration of illegal Indian residents, the\u00a0large Indian business presence symbolized by IOC and now the ambulance service,\u00a0and the Mody proposal for a tunnel-bridge between the two countries, already publicly supported by ADB,\u00a0provokes this writer to venture a prediction after a prolonged association with India and\u00a0these bilateral\u00a0issues, that the very long-range perspective plan being relentlessly pursued in New Delhi, into which every single Indian move fits in,\u00a0may one day come to pass, to indeed geographically unite these two neighboring countries first, as a prelude to a\u00a0later permanent ‘arrangement’, (following the Sikkim and Bhutan precedents?)\u00a0since there does not seem to be any open outrage or violent opposition in our country to India’s past\u00a0and current moves in that direction. Throughout history, the strong have overwhelmed the weak, and we can only read the tea leaves, and wait for Sri Lanka to wake up before it is too late!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By India-Watcher The recent unheralded entry of the Indian High Commissioner into the raucous and increasingly heated political\u00a0debate raging now in Sri Lanka about the benefits of the ETCA to our country, and also his simultaneous and\u00a0uncalled for outburst in a public forum, replete with derogatory\u00a0personal remarks against the respected\u00a0former Foreign Minister, who has ably […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-forum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}