{"id":57351,"date":"2016-08-04T22:16:35","date_gmt":"2016-08-05T04:16:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/?p=57351"},"modified":"2016-08-04T15:09:31","modified_gmt":"2016-08-04T22:09:31","slug":"the-march-as-a-test-of-yahapaalanaya","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/2016\/08\/04\/the-march-as-a-test-of-yahapaalanaya\/","title":{"rendered":"The March as a test of \u2018Yahapaalanaya\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Malinda Seneviratne\u00a0Courtesy The Daily Mirror<\/em><\/span><\/h2>\n
\n

What did the Joint Opposition achieve by marching from Kandy to Colombo? What does it say about the strength of the joint Opposition? Does it say anything about the strength or otherwise of what is being called, tongue-in-cheek, the \u2018Official SLFP (Sri Lanka Freedom Party)\u2019? Has to solidified the alliance between the SLFP and the United National Party (UNP)? Was it an exercise poorly timed because the SLF and the UNP government have been in power only for a year and a half and as such there\u2019s little chance of this kind of agitation transforming into a mass upheaval resulting in regime-overthrow?<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nLet\u2019s consider the facts. . Yes, it was organized a mere year and a half after Maithripala Sirisena became President and less than a year after the UNP won the General Election. There are two ways of looking at it. Some might say \u2018too early\u2019. True. There\u2019s another way. If such numbers could be drawn to Colombo a mere year and a half after Maithripala Sirisena became President and less than a year after the UNP won the General Election it does indicate discontent of a significant nature. Putting it down to the ex President\u2019s charisma or the stupidity of his followers will not rob it of this significance. Loyalties of protestors, \u2018true objectives\u2019 of the organizers, the reasons that drew the crowds are relevant of course, but in a political sense it is the show of strength that counts. We are not talking any more, after all, about the merits and demerits of one regime over another here.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nThe march attracted massive numbers. Contrast it, for example, with the \u2018marches\u2019 that other Oppositions under different regimes organized at the tail-ends of terms. This has put all those to shame. Contrast it, also, with the rally that the United National Party (UNP) organized at Hyde Park a few months ago. On that occasion the organizers had to shift the venue to Lipton Circus fearing that Hyde Park might not be filled. This time Hyde Park was literally dug up by the Government, forcing the demonstrators to Lipton Circus. The five roads leading to Lipton Circus were \u2018peopled\u2019 to a considerable distance. If numbers matter, these do.
\nThat numbers matter is in fact confirmed by the response of the Government to the march. The United National Party started off with a bold statement, vowing to affirm the democratic right to protest. Good. It went downhill thereafter. The Government sought support of the courts on the flimsiest of pretexts, threw obstacles in the way of the march, issued dire threats of \u2018disciplinary action\u2019, threatened to expedite investigations (obviously against the big names of the Joint Opposition), found a sudden \u2018need\u2019 to dig up Hyde Park, indulged in endless rubbishing of the protest, abused state media especially Rupavahini; in short embarrassed itself at every turn. Hardly the behaviour one might expect of a confident and secure regime!
\nThe UNP, at least in secret, might say \u2018not us, but them,\u2019 with \u2018them\u2019 meaning sections of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) loyal to the President, but that excuse is no longer valid; after all the two parties, their leaders and the key supporters of the leaders, have reiterated marital vows and claimed conjugal bliss ad nausea. In fact, the response, in its entirety was reminiscent of the \u2018dirty tactics\u2019 used by the previous regime and indeed all regimes that came before. \u2018Change\u2019 (\u2018venasa\u2019) was not evident.
\nInterestingly, the bleeding-heart advocates of yahapaalanaya who shed buckets of tears over the abuse of state media by the Rajapaksas, the \u2018dirty tricks\u2019 in dealing with dissent\/protests etc., are silent. Instead we have people claiming that the march actually made the Government stronger.
\nFine. Now why should a \u2018strong alliance\u2019 fall over itself to rubbish a \u2018weak\u2019 protest which did not pose an immediate threat? Was it a case of old habits dying hard? Had they not been tutored enough in yahapalana-practice? Had they junked whatever notes were thrust into their hands when they got into the yahapalana bandwagon? Did someone whisper, \u2018scared out of their wits\u2019?
\nIt\u2019s not hard to understand why Mahinda Rajapaksa and his \u2018inner circle\u2019 of march-organizers want to re-capture power. It is not hard to understand why they have to paint things black. However, it must be acknowledged that things are not as rosy as the government wants people to believe. And it\u2019s not the Mahinda loyalists who are saying it. When someone like Dr Razeen Sally, a respected economist and academic who now heads the Institute of Policy Studies calls it \u2018an unwieldy unity government\u2019 and mentions bad appointments, messy decision-making, lack of coordination and above all faults the government for not having a credible economic plan, talking about political consolidation is downright silly.
\nLet\u2019s forget all that. If anyone thinks the march somehow consolidated the \u2018alliance\u2019, then one must talk of the constituents of that alliance and their relative strengths, never mind that the \u2018point of consolidation\u2019 is at best wishy-washy given the character certificate issued by Dr Sally. The UNP is intact but has embarrassed itself by the attacks on the media, foot-dragging on key election pledges and the about-turn and worse on Port City. Intact, nevertheless.
\nAnd the SLFP? Well, there\u2019s a party office that is shunned by the membership. There\u2019s an ex-leader who invites incessant booing by the mere mention of her name. There are ministers who\u2019ve been rejected at the polls issuing statements about political power, democracy and what not. And there\u2019s a leader who broke party lines, divided the party, was elected by default with the full support of his party\u2019s arch rival, the UNP, and who whiles about Mahinda Rajapaksa \u2018dividing the party\u2019. Is the section of the SLFP that he has some control a solid political force? If this is the case, then the march forcing it to strengthen ties with the UNP would amount to \u2018consolidation\u2019. But the march clearly showed where the rank and file of the SLFP stood. The louder they shout about conjugal bliss and solidity of marriage, the less convincing it all sounds.
\nAll this is good news, probably, for the Mahinda camp. It has to be bad news for those who truly believed the January 8 result would usher in a different way of doing things. The generous thing is to put down the silence of such people to a sense of shame or helplessness. The unpalatable truth, however, could be that they were never serious about \u2018change\u2019; they just wanted friends in power, never mind what they did and how they did it. The verbal contortions that yahapaalanists have been forced to take recourse to tell a tale.
\nThere\u2019s one positive though. The marchers did not get to undress the yahapaalanists. The yahapaalanists stripped of their own accord.
\nMalinda Seneviratne is a
\nfreelance writer.<\/p>\n

Email: malindasenevi@gmail.com.
\nTwitter: malindasene. Blog:malindawords.blogspot.com.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

– See more at: http:\/\/www.dailymirror.lk\/113568\/The-March-as-a-test-of-Yahapaalanaya-#sthash.ushJKzuC.dpuf<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Malinda Seneviratne\u00a0Courtesy The Daily Mirror What did the Joint Opposition achieve by marching from Kandy to Colombo? What does it say about the strength of the joint Opposition? Does it say anything about the strength or otherwise of what is being called, tongue-in-cheek, the \u2018Official SLFP (Sri Lanka Freedom Party)\u2019? Has to solidified the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57351"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57351\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}