{"id":78121,"date":"2018-06-06T16:00:54","date_gmt":"2018-06-06T23:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/?p=78121"},"modified":"2018-06-06T16:01:13","modified_gmt":"2018-06-06T23:01:13","slug":"in-this-interregnum-thinking-sri-lankas-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/2018\/06\/06\/in-this-interregnum-thinking-sri-lankas-future\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018IN THIS INTERREGNUM\u2019 THINKING SRI LANKA\u2019S FUTURE"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em>By Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka\u00a0Courtesy The Daily Mirror<\/em><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This is a sign of just how managerial and technocratic we have become; so much so that mediocre utilitarianism confuses itself with professionalism. And all of this is in place of what could be called humanism.\u201d\u2014 John Ralston Saul, \u2018Voltaire\u2019s Bastards\u2019<\/p>\n<p>From President Sirisena\u2019s whistle-blowing \u2018State bank privatization plot\u2019 speech to the surrounding social anomie, we are living through a great variety of morbid symptoms\u201d which appear in this interregnum\u201d as described in Antonio Gramsci\u2019s classic passage with the opening definition the crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.dailymirror.lk\/media\/images\/image_1528221533-f4c9aafccc.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Is the post-2019 future to be a rightwing Authoritarian Populism\u201d as Stuart Hall named the Thatcher (or more broadly the Thatcher-Reagan) phenomenon? Or is it to be a left-of-centre, progressive and democratic populism in which nationalism is part of the protean mix? Is the patriotic populist vision of a strong State and strong leadership, to be of the centrist Putin-Erdogan variety or the rightist Trump-Netanyahu variety?<\/p>\n<p>Any design for a new vision for Sri Lanka should centrally and explicitly address the mounting social crisis. A front page lead of an English language newspaper (May 27) disclosed that 40% of Colombo\u2019s children are malnourished. The overall malnutrition figure for most provinces is a shocking 25%-30% i.e. 2 or 3 out of every 10 persons! The report was based on a presentation on May 24 to a Parliamentary Sectoral Oversight Committee on Women and Gender and the Children\u2019s caucus, by Dr. Thusitha Wijemanna.<\/p>\n<p>The same newspaper reported on May 30 that the Global Nutrition Report (GNR) 2017, a World Health Organisation (WHO) publication, documented that in Sri Lanka \u2018Anaemia among women of reproductive age\u2019 i.e. ages 15-49, had risen to 33 per cent as at 2016, when compared to lower figures of 25.7 per cent as at 2011.<br \/>\nEarly in 2015, when the Yahapalana Government took office, a noteworthy economic conference was held in Colombo. Nobel Prize winner in Economics, Prof. Joseph Stiglitz, sat next to Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and urged that the key to optimal economic development in Sri Lanka should be regarded as the question of equity. By January 2016, Prof. Stiglitz had written a key article containing his recommendations. He has proved prophetic:<\/p>\n<p>Some suggest that Sri Lanka turn to the International Monetary Fund, promising belt tightening. That would be hugely-unpopular. Too many countries have lost their economic sovereignty in IMF programmes. Besides, the IMF would almost surely tell Sri Lankan officials not that they\u2019re spending too much, but that they\u2019re taxing too little.\u201d (https:\/\/www.project-syndicate.org\/commentary\/sri-lanka-development-growth-by-joseph-e&#8211;stiglitz-2016-01)<\/p>\n<p>So far, Stiglitz\u2019 recommendations have been ignored by the UNP and its Alt-Right challengers. The vision for Sri Lanka articulated by Joe Stiglitz, the world\u2019s most renowned economic policy intellectual, pays particular and repeated emphasis to precisely the public\u201d rather than the corporate\/private: public goods,\u201d public investments,\u201d public infrastructure,\u201d public services,\u201d public transport\u201d etc. His recommendations for Sri\u00a0 Lanka stress the public factors and dimension rather than the private sector, the market realities\u201d or public-private partnerships:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Any design for a new vision for Sri Lanka should centrally and explicitly address the mounting social crisis<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u2026Likewise, another frequently proposed strategy, public-private partnerships, may not be as beneficial as advertised. Such partnerships usually entail the government bearing the risk, while the private sector takes the profits. Typically, the implicit cost of capital obtained in this way is very high. And while the private sector can, and frequently does, renege on its contractual obligations (through bankruptcy) \u2013 or force a renegotiation under the threat of reneging \u2013 the government cannot, especially when an international investment agreement is in place.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2026Heavy public investment in infrastructure, education, technology, and much else. Indeed, such investments are needed for the entire country\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2026This gives the country the opportunity to create model cities, based on the adequate provision of public services and sound public transport and attuned to the cost of carbon and climate change.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sri Lanka, beautiful and ideally located in the Indian Ocean, is in a position to become an economic hub for the entire region \u2013 a financial centre and a safe haven for investment in a geopolitically-turbulent part of the world. But this won\u2019t happen by relying excessively on markets or under-investing in public goods.\u201d (Stiglitz, Ibid)<br \/>\nGodfrey Gunatilleke is the most distinguished Sri Lankan development thinker-practitioner alive. Volume 1 of his selected essays \u2018Towards a Sri Lankan Model of Development\u2019 (May 2017), contains a final chapter entitled \u2018A Vision of Sri Lanka 2025 and 2035: from High Human Development to Very High Human Development.\u2019 Anybody who attempts a vision for this country should study it.<\/p>\n<p>The latest vision statement for Sri Lanka rolled out at the Viyathmaga event at the Shangri-La by Gotabaya Rajapaksa is one which does not mention, one single time, any of the following keywords and core concepts: \u2018citizens\u2019\/\u2018citizenry,\u2019 \u2018social,\u2019 \u2018public,\u2019 \u2018poor\u2019 (except for \u2018poor returns\u2019), \u2018poverty,\u2019 \u2018inequity,\u2019 \u2018unemployment,\u2019 \u2018rural,\u2019 \u2018peasantry,\u2019 \u2018agrarian.\u2019 This is by no means a centre-left, moderate or middle path policy paradigm.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.dailymirror.lk\/media\/images\/image_1528221550-aedf362178.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/>What Sri Lanka needs is not to mimic, adopt or adapt a model from the US, India, China or anywhere else. What it needs, firstly, is a deep study of its own realities and development experience, and a balance sheet of the positives and negatives of each development episode\/phase, with a view to combining the best practices adopted by all Sri Lankan governments hitherto. Secondly, this study must be informed by a creative application of the best development practices in other parts of the world, insofar as they are relevant.<\/p>\n<p>Development is not a spectator sport, where the majority of citizens watches and cheers while corporate profits and high-rise buildings ascend, as their own quality of life declines or stagnates. The foreign policy component of the Viyathmaga sessions completely-omitted the main challenges: how do we successfully combat \u2013 not merely decry and denounce \u2013 the threat of universal jurisdiction and unilateral sanctions? How do we reverse the diminution of our soft power\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>Sri Lanka\u2019s international relations cannot be insulated from Sri\u00a0 Lanka\u2019s nationalities question. The Tamil question was globalised decades ago and is now more globalised than ever. No serious discussion on Sri Lanka\u2019s foreign policy can ignore this problem and omit the political solution we propose, which is vital in managing our relations with India &#8212; without which we lose international space and are strategically-vulnerable.<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, Sri Lanka broke with the settled traditions of its democracy and brought Right and Centre together in a coalition government with ghastly results: we inhabit a decadent, fraught, \u2018Weimar moment.\u2019 Will Sri Lanka return to the successful democratic conventions and traditions that have prevailed since 1947 (including over the JVP and LTTE): the competitive alternation of centre-right and centre-left that propelled our high social welfare and sustained our pluralist democratic freedoms? Or will we see post-2019, roughly the same pattern, that we did post-1977\u2014an euphoric \u2018new beginning,\u2019 a great economic upswing initially, a harsh authoritarian interlude justified by calls for stability in the cause of rapid economic advancement, and a culmination in multiple conflicts, internal and external, with foreign troops on our soil?<\/p>\n<p>The most effective political struggle against the rightist-dominated government has been waged post-2015 by a progressive, broadly centre-left opposition. Which ideological tendency, progressive centre-left, moderate\u2013centrist or neo-nationalist right, prevails in the broad oppositional space and as the opposition\u2019s option, will depend considerably on the SLFP\u2019s new course.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka\u00a0Courtesy The Daily Mirror This is a sign of just how managerial and technocratic we have become; so much so that mediocre utilitarianism confuses itself with professionalism. And all of this is in place of what could be called humanism.\u201d\u2014 John Ralston Saul, \u2018Voltaire\u2019s Bastards\u2019 From President Sirisena\u2019s whistle-blowing \u2018State bank privatization [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78121","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78121"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78121\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78121"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78121"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lankaweb.com\/news\/items\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78121"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}