|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
PRESIDENT RAJAPAKSA SAYS GENUINE TAMIL GRIEVANCES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED WITHIN A UNITARY STATEBy Walter JayawardhanaPresident Mahinda Rajapaksa accepted that there were genuine Tamil
grievances and those have got to be addressed but refused what is called
a federal solution due to the mandate he has received from
the nation constrained him to be within a unitary state. I cannot change history or my own political circumstances overnight...
You must remember my political legacy and constraints. During my election
I received few Tamil votes because of the LTTE-enforced boycott. I was
elected primarily by a Sinhala constituency on an election manifesto
which made it clear that an ultimate solution to the ethnic crisis could
be evolved only on the basis of a unitary state, he told a New
Delhi based reporter Inderjit Badhwar when he met him at his official
residence, Temple Trees for an interview. 'Federalism is a negative word in Sri Lanka because people think
it (is) synonymous with dividing the country. Also, I prefer the phrase
'power sharing' to 'devolution, he further added. The interview
was published in the News Post India ,September 2. The news website said he accepted there were genuine Tamil grievances
and genuine Tamil aspirations which have got to be addressed
but he vowed to fight back Tamil Tigers terrorism. President Mahinda Rajapaksa said, 'I recognise the legitimate historic grievances of our Tamil people. They are Sri Lankans; proud Sri Lankans. And any organised repression of the rights of any Sri Lankan is a blot on all Sri Lankans. Rajapaksa said he had no hidden agenda. But he urged Tamil groups to
present a united agenda and concrete proposals for peace. Prabhakaran
does not speak for all Tamils. The vast majority of Tamil people want
peace above everything and to them Eelam is just an illusion. President Mahinda Rajapaksa charged the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE) for treating the Norway sponsored peace accord as a joke
and said LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran was the main obstacle to
peace. He added, With or without Prabhakaran, genuine Tamil grievances,
the compulsions of their ethnic honour and linguistic identity need
to be respected and addressed or the problems will not be solved. He completely denied the Mangala Samaraweera group and UNP allegations
that he had secretly funded the Tamil Tigers to boycott the 2005 elections
which Rajapaksa won narrowly which otherwise have been won by his opponent
Ranil Wickremesinghe who would have easily received more of the Tamil
votes. The President said: 'This is completely laughable as well as logically absurd. Is it possible in any country for a person who is not even in power to make a deal of this sort? And how does this allegation co-exist with the earlier description of me as a 'hawk' who seeks only a military victory? I can't be both things at the same time. If I'm a hawk, I cannot be making secret deals (with the LTTE) for a political solution. If I'm for a negotiated settlement, then I cannot possibly be accused of seeking a military solution! ... History shows that secret deals backfire. President (Ranasinghe) Premadasa made such a deal with (LTTE chief Velupillai) Prabhakaran and the LTTE assassinated him. If you really believe that we gave him (Prabhakaran) 700 million
(rupees) and got him to organise a boycott of Tamil votes at the presidential
election, then we invite you, please, to take the initiative on our
behalf and offer him even a much bigger sum of money in return for getting
him to the negotiating table so that we may have peace in our country
and save so many precious lives. Rajapaksa said he would bring democracy to the Eastern Province s and
was quoted having said, he hoped to hold elections by the end of 2007
in the eastern province, which the military has seized from the Tamil
Tigers. Attacking critics that he was not doing enough to further a political
solution the President called them text book analysts and
instant experts and said, those people were 'giving
their text book analyses and solutions for decades with the aim of influencing
donors ... to pressure my country into imposing their theoretical solutions
rather than letting us negotiate a settlement based on a Sri Lankan
consensus and Sri Lankan realities... He also added, 'I differ from my opponents who say peace at any price. I say peace, yes, but peace with honour and dignity. And the only question that is non-negotiable is a divided Sri Lanka. |
||||||||||||
|
Disclaimer: The comments contained
within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents
of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the
views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual
authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any
loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which
you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or
reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
Copyright
© 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com
Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved. |