|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
LOS ANGELES JUDGE WITHDRAWS HER OWN JUDGEMENT FAVORING PKK AND TAMIL TIGERS IN A 16 PAGE VERDICTBy Walter JayawardhanaA federal judge in Los Angeles has withdrawn her own judgment favoring
Sri Lankas Tamil Tigers and the PKK terrorist group in Turkey
delivered last November. The ruling highly criticized by section of the press and legal quarters
and US justice department was withdrawn by the judge on Friday may
4 in a 16 page order, Last November, the federal judge said President Bush acted unconstitutionally
when he designated 27 groups and individuals including the Tamil Tigers
as terrorists in 2001. The judge reconsidered the issue at the governments
request. Judge Audrey Collins of Los Angeles in her new ruling said, that
American supporters of Kurdish and Tamil separatist groups lack standing
to challenge the terrorist designations, which applied toOsama bin
Laden and Al Qaeda, and others linked to militant Islam. "Plaintiffs have pointed to no instance of their being issued
a specific threat or warning that
they would be designated,"
the judge wrote in a 16-page order Friday. "Plaintiffs' fear
of designation is ultimately based on speculation. Accordingly, plaintiffs
cannot establish a genuine and immediate threat that they will be
designated by the President," the judge further wrote. In November, Judge Collins ruled that Mr. Bush's designations were
"unconstitutionally vague" because he set forth no criteria
for inclusion on the list and established no mechanism to get off
of it. A terrorist designation typically freezes all assets in America
belonging to a group or individual. Americans are also barred from
doing business with or providing aid to those on such lists. The judge's about-face was quickly seized upon by the Justice Department,
which filed a copy of the decision Monday with a Texas judge handling
a case against leaders of an alleged Hamas front, the Holy Land Foundation
for Relief and Development. Judge Collins left open the possibility that groups or individuals
with close ties to the 27 entities on the September 2001 list could
mount a new challenge to the designations. Legal experts said her
new ruling could lead to many more cases of litigation in the form
of appeals. She has not said, I've determined it's constitutional,'"
a lawyer for the plaintiffs, David Cole said. An appeal is planned,
The New York Sun quoted him as saying Judge Collins also ruled that the government successfully cured a
constitutional problem stemming from language in Mr. Bush's order
that permitted freezing the assets of those "otherwise associated
with" designated terrorist entities. In January, the Treasury
Department issued regulations that define that relationship to mean
owning or controlling a terrorist entity, or providing "financial,
material or technological support, or financial or other services"
to such a group. The plaintiffs claim the definitions are still too vague, particularly
catchall terms such as "other services." However, Judge
Collins said the new definition made what was prohibited clear enough. Mr. Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University, said the statute
invoked by the president's order, the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act of 1977, gives him t too much authority. "It's very
much like the blacklists of the McCarthy period. The president can
designate anybody he wants for any reason, or no reason at all,"
Mr. Cole said. In her new ruling, the judge lifted earlier injunctions against applying
parts of Mr. Bush's order to the parties that brought the lawsuit.
Despite the sweeping implications of her previous decision, she never
blocked the executive order's application to Al Qaeda and others not
directly involved in the litigation. The New York Sun said, Judge Collins, an appointee of President Clinton, has issued a series of decisions curtailing the federal government's authority in terrorism cases. In 1999, she ruled that a criminal law banning the provision of "personnel" or "training" to terrorist groups was unconstitutionally vague. In 2003, she ruled that a ban on "expert advice and assistance" to terrorist groups contained in the USA Patriot Act was also void for vagueness. |
||||||||||||
|
Copyright
© 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com
Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved. |