CLASSIFIED | POLITICS | TERRORISM | OPINION | VIEWS





 .
 .

 .
 .
.
 

JVP Agitation against Corruption

Dilrook Kannangara

A wane but nevertheless a hot topic; we all know the cost of a huge cabinet of Ministers. But is it all? Was the country any better when a 35 member cabinet was in place? Surely the cost associated with the Ministers was lower. However, this issue is deeper than the large cabinet, perks of Ministers and the much howled transparency, etc. This is part of the bribery-corruption-waste (BCW) vicious trio. However, let me emphasise that, we got to find solutions for this in the new democratic/capitalist world order. Therefore, although the JVP, for instance, genuinely harps on socialist mechanisms to curb BCW (most of them are apparently follow it – a good thing in any ideology), it cannot achieve anything significant in the new world order.

Corruption equals approximately 20% of the total government revenue (BOI/PERC employees have overtaken politicians recently) according to a report published by a group headed by Hon Wijedasa Rajapakse. However, this doesn’t include other types of BCW that can be identified using a simple economic model; I suggest an economic model as a moral classification often gives a wrong impression. The fact that most politicians, etc. are corrupt makes no sense as it doesn’t show a way out. On the other hand, a particular politician or a group of them account for $2 million, for instance, makes perfect sense; it help quantify the damage and helps in comparison so that lesser corrupt ones may be elected, etc. A good example is the incident that involved an elephant and two temples; a politician (a cleaner one) was involved in settling the dispute and he was called ‘ali-hora’ by some media while the real jumbo-crook was called Mr. Clean/Bean!

In terms of economic consequences, BCW is anything that burdens the society in financial terms that doesn’t have a reciprocal contribution to the society. This includes welfare schemes as well as they have no corresponding return or a very meagre return overall.

Capitalism, the welfare state and BCW
The best remedy for BCW is capitalism. However, we need a phased move towards capitalism. There is enough scope for governments to engage in business activities contrary to what the promoters of ‘privatisation’ say. In fact many capitalist countries have very successful business undertakings owned by the government.

Most Corrupt (by value)
I charge that the biggest corruption in this country is its welfare schemes in terms of both the dollar value and the number of individuals involved. These schemes include (among others) janasaviya, samurdi or whatever it is named now, free education that doesn’t ensure societal benefits in return, tax amnesties awarded from time to time to defaulters.

Welfare
The number of welfare aid recipients run into a few millions and a large number of them do not deserve it. Most others intend to continue with it for the rest of their lives without any attempt to stand on their own feet. Then there is the enormous cost and BCWs of administering such schemes; the great robbery of the janasaviya retention money (Rs.25,000) is a classic example! A better way of doing this is to subsidise local industries, here you are subsidising industries than consumption! Almost all developed countries do this and apparently the daily earnings of a cow in the US (in terms of subsidies it gets) is much higher than the average daily earnings of a rural Indian.

The cost and effects of handouts is well known; how about our education system? Especially the universities?

Free Education
A significant number of graduates do not contribute anything in return and as the system of university admission is based on 1981 (26 years old and pre-war) population data, there is no equitable distribution of public money in educating the nation’s children across the 24 districts. This cross-subsidisation has spelt disaster for the nation as only around 2% could make it to the university, each of them consumes a colossal sum of money and some do not give anything in return. This got to change, come what may. University admissions should be based on the current number of candidates sitting the GCE A/L as a base; this ensures an equitable distribution of opportunities, which in turn will produce more graduates to give more in return for the society that educated them than financing the LTTE!

Benefits that can be reaped on this in terms of national development, general increase in the national education level and their ripple effects far more outweigh many other anti-BCW initiatives. Many developed countries have either a loan scheme or a community financing scheme that eliminates ‘cross-subsidisation’. It is ironical that a poor country like ours being so ‘generous’ when even the developed countries aren’t! Although it is morally good, we should count the economic costs and benefits as economic resources are scarce and must be used optimally.

Another requirement is the need to accommodate more students in disciplines with higher demand in the job market and to reduce the intake for other disciplines. We come across graduates whose area of specialisation has little relevance to the local and international job markets. Unrest and vandalism would die a natural death if such measures are taken.

Official Language
Then there is the essential requirement for improving English proficiency among children. The government should give its top priority to this over teaching Sinhala or Tamil as a second language. It is a fact that language differences has little to do with the present conflict as the call for Tamil Elam was made in 1924 and the ITAK (fancifully termed ‘federal party’ in English) was formed in 1949 to get the TE by any means! If language was the cause of the conflict, there would be hundreds if not thousands of similar conflicts around the world as almost every democratic country has only one national language. The socialist concepts of ‘one language two nations; two languages one nation’ is the exact opposite of what democracy/capitalism propagates. Therefore, whatever the OLC (official languages commission headed by a socialist) dictates, we should emphasise teaching English than teaching Tamil to Sinhalese and Sinhala to Tamils (a grand BCW initiative!). This is a nice little trap laid by India to divert the separatism cause from its territory to this country; therefore we should at least wait till Tamil becomes a national language of India before attempting OLC recommendations; Tamil Nadu deserves to be the Tamil Nation and not this country or part of it. After all what is good for India should be good for its little neighbour.

Lax Tax System
Our tax system needs an overhaul; not to mention that tax fraudsters, corrupt tax officials and their henchmen should be behind bars. Also it is not fair that when foreign companies are allowed tax concessions, our own companies got to pay tax. Corporation tax rate should be reduced drastically; this will amass financial capital that we need desperately. Retained earnings in the hands of investors is much more productive than it ending up elsewhere. Churning out government activities from funds that would otherwise generate more capital is a crime, in my view, especially at a time when we beg for FDIs.

Trains
Sri Lankan rail system is nothing but a disaster and a big BCW den. A proper rail network can turnaround economic stagnation in parts of the country. Many often blame the government for this. However, as long as running a kilometre results in financial loss, the best thing is to stop all trains! Innovative solutions are needed to make the SLR run at a profit. Only continued profits will lead to the expansion of the rail network.

Penalties and levies
Another BCW avenue is the ridiculously low penalties, etc. attached to most offences. These got to increase by many folds in line with today’s COL indices for the law to have a deterrent role. It will also help finance crime reduction, a burden at present the law abiding citizenry carries for the benefit of criminals!! What a joke?

Politicos
Then there comes politicos; apparently there are allegations against 114 politicos at the bribery commission in relation to past years. This is the post mortem and little can be done to reverse the damage; there is no point in terms of finance and economy in investigating them other than limited deterrence it may provide. What should be done is to prevent it in the first place. To use Japanese and South Korean judicial precedence in this regard is most appropriate, we also need some real fool-proof controls.
Barring businessmen from getting into politics; there should not be any businessman in any political party/group, etc.
Barring all forms of business activity for politicians; politicians shouldn’t involve in any business activity by themselves or by proxy
No member of the business community should concert with politicians for any adventure mutually beneficial or beneficial to either party or a third party
Politicians should not concert with the business community/an entity for any adventure mutually beneficial or beneficial to either party or a third party

These four means cover most avenues available for BCW for politicos, it will also end the war atmosphere during elections as the underworld, etc. would find politics financially unattractive. Is it the desire to serve the people that makes Ranil (and others) crave for power so much that they can’t wait till the next election? Definitely not; there is no sense in killing each other just to serve the public!! Money in terms of BCW is the real driving force.

Implementation of the above four controls will reduce the number of political parties from around 35 to a handful; only those who have a genuine craving for the wellbeing of the people will remain. It will also provide local businesses a level playing field which would in turn encourage entrepreneurship.

Then there is the case of stealing, etc. by politicos that should attract criminal procedures irrespective of rank. However, compared to pseudo business like acts of BCW, the value involved in direct stealing, etc. is insignificant. In turn, politicos should be handsomely compensated so that national decision makers can lead a decent lifestyle devoid of the risk of being bought over.

Overheads
Defunct provincial councils system, etc. should be abolished. Added with elections, maintenance, accommodation costs, these white elephants are such a burden on the country with no real output; a classic case of BCWs. Any devolution proposal that harbours similar administrative overheads would also be a BCW initiative. P-TOMS, CFA, transporting terror personnel and men at public expense are few more such BCW efforts.

Terrorism
Terrorism menace should be eliminated as it draws a lot of resources from the society without any return. War or surrender, as long as the terrorists continue to live, we will always be in dire straits! Complete extermination of terrorists and industrialisation of the North and the East should happen; wasting very large extents of arable land and other resources (water, fisheries, minerals) in the North and the East should stop soon.

Constitutional amendments are required to effectuate these and it needs to be done soon. As a measure of good governance, ministerial functions and their coverage should be standardised and the number of ministries should be defined in a policy which cannot be exceeded under any circumstances.

In the meantime, the least costly method to maintain political stability is to maintain this large Cabinet of minsters; going for multiple elections (at a cost of a few billion rupees each) to get a strong parliament elected is a never ending process under the PR system, especially when the JVP adopts a hardline approach on almost every issue and will eventually end up in a larger and a worse Cabinet (possibly with a few LTTE agents running the Finance ministry like Paskaralingam!). However, there are possibly many corrupt politicos in the government, especially among the UNP alternative group. If for reasons of political stability they are not punished, this gives a very bad signal. After all it was the corrupt elite of the PA that brought their government down in 2001. Therefore, protecting the corrupt has its grave repercussions on the government.

The need for immediate permanent solutions is grave. We have to get rid of this socialist style set-up allowing BCW and replace it with a capitalist structure where value for money rules.


Disclaimer: The comments contained within this website are personal reflection only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LankaWeb. LankaWeb.com offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither the LankaWeb nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site.
All views and opinions presented in this article are solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those of LankaWeb.com. .

BACK TO LATEST NEWS

DISCLAIMER

Copyright © 1997-2004 www.lankaweb.Com Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproduction In Whole Or In Part Without Express Permission is Prohibited.