Sri Lanka needs to stand up against external meddling in the Maldives
Posted on February 12th, 2012

Ajit Randeniya

 The Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs has rightly warned against external meddling or intervention in the Maldives following the peaceful transition of government that took place on 7 February.

 Such a warning was warranted in view of the flurry of activity that began within the first 24 hours of change of government in the Maldives, with India, Robert O. Blake (not necessarily the US government or people), the UK and the United Nations trying to get involved.

 Also, Sri Lankan ‘friends of friends’ of the ousted Mohamed Nasheed, such as Gamini Weerakoon of The Sunday Leader and other agents of the British and US embassies in Colombo have pleaded for international intervention. Sri Lanka needs to represent resistence against any such moves in its own backyard.

 One needs to look at Nasheed’s bio-data in order to fully understand Robert O Blake’s interest in keeping Nasheed in power if at all possible: Mohamed Nasheed is the ‘ultimate’ in terms of the misguided third world lackey Blake and others of his ilk are aiming to exploit as cats’ paws to achieve their weird aim of manipulating geopolitical events for the benefit of Israel.

 Gamini Weerakoon gloats on Nasheed’s personality and his ‘achievements’; Weerakoon does not do much for his own credibility though, when he describes Nasheed as a ‘freedom fighter of repute’, elevating him to the same league as Nelson Mandela!

 Weerakoon tells us that in 2010, Nasheed was named one of the ‘Ten Top Global Thinkers’ by Foreign Policy journal; in 2011 British Premier David Cameron has declared Nasheed his ‘new best friend’ and said that he would be on his guest list for the exclusive stag weekend which would have only Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Nicholas Sarkozy and John Key. Weerakoon, in his boot licking, servile mindset may see this as a great honour. However, looking at the list of warmongers and nonentities Cameron keeps company with, he probably had a hard time finding any other takers!

 Such meaningless plaudits and perks are thrown at people like Mohamed Nasheed because he is the archetype of the ‘global’ agent conspirators like Blake are seeking to nurture for the implementation of their privatised US foreign policy: such agents are usually men and women from the developing world who have grown up under lengthy political regimes (benevolent or otherwise), on a make-believe US propaganda diet that drums-in the belief that solutions to all their problems (arising from poverty, and government ineptitude in some cases) lie in the made in US’’ contraptions of ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’ etc. Many such individuals may have received a UK or US sponsored tertiary education in these countries and have returned home, aspiring to gain political power by using the formula handed down by the masters: it is a strategy based on the cynical exploitation of human nature (of ambition or greed), misguided belief systems, and limited knowledge, by conspirators like Blake.

 Sri Lanka is witnessing such agents in operators like Milinda Moragoda, Kumar Rupesinghe and Pakiasothy Saravanamuttu, to name a few, who join the gravy train for the millionaire life style it affords, fully knowing that they will not be able to make an iota of difference to national politics.

 In Nasheed’s case, it is significant that Nasheed met with Weerakoon (an agent of foreign embassies for a very long time) on the way back from Liverpool in fact, seeking assistance to launch his political challenge to the then President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. Interestly, Weerakoon, forever the brave guardian of everything wholesome, has advised Nasheed against his plans, on the grounds that he was ‘qualifying for exile in a remote island’. Nasheed went home and formed the Maldivian Democratic Alliance and won the elections in 2008.

 The honeymoon of the Nasheed regime ended early due to public resentment against the political and economic direction of his government, with progressive forces in the Maldives intervening last week to gain control of their country.

 Ironically, what brought the matters to a head was his arrest last month of the nation’s top criminal court judge for ‘freeing a government critic’; Blake has obviously taught him during his frequent visits to the Maldives within the last couple of years that concepts like the rule of law, democracy and human rights are quite malleable, depending on whose interests they serve! About 200 policemen mutinied and seized control of the state TV station. Nasheed announced his resignation and within hours retracted, claiming that he lost power in a coup.

 The former president’s attempt for a ‘people power’ coup by gathering outside a mosque failed due to only a couple of hundred of his supporters turning up. He demanded that the new government step down and hold early elections, and more importantly, adding: “I’m really hoping there is some kind of intervention. It’s hopeless”.

 This is when his friend Blake sprung in to action; having earlier ‘recognised’ the new government of Mohammed Waheed Hassan, he got the State Department also to retract and to announce that they want to ‘investigate’ the power transfer. Blake was in the region, on another of his uninvited visits to Colombo to terrorise the government with demands of accountability in fact, and flew to Male to ánalyse’ the situation.

 Also arriving in Male on 10 February was Óscar Fernández-Taranco, the United Nations assistant secretary general for political affairs. His visit signified the west’s attempt to transform the UN (under the ineffective leadership of Ban ki Moon) in to a global police force that seeks to intervene in domestic affairs of member countries, against the UN Charter. In a statement that merely represented waste of breath, Fernandez-Taranco told reporters that he requested “all political actors to remain calm and prevent any type of violence!”

 As it usually happens, ‘regime change propaganda’ of the western corporate media began their usual supply of opinion and lies dressed as news. Allegations of ‘widespread abuse of civilians’ by the armed forces and police, based on ‘sources that cannot be identified’, are presented to tarnish the image of the new leader as a dictator. A clear example of this shameless practice was the CNN reference to ‘a teacher’ who mourned that the clashes reminded him of the 30 years of single-party rule. “Brutality is returning, and that brings out bad memories,” the teacher is alleged to have said. Report also referred to ‘some users of Twitter’ who reported ‘knowing’ people who were treated similarly.

 The Rupert Murdoch owned Wall Street Journal invoked the ‘Islamic extremists’ card, (naming the new Home Minister Mohamed Jameel as one such extremist) and expressed concerns about the ‘stability’ of the Maldives, located on a strategically important sea route. Needless to say, such lies are necessary to justify possible future international intervention and also to unsettle Indian policy makers concerns that the Maldives could be used as a potential base for Islamist militants.

 The Maldives, as is common knowledge in Sri Lanka, is a predominantly Islamic country and some Muslims have taken justifiable umbrage against some of Nasheed’s domestic and foreign policies. In the domestic policy arena, his government’s decision to extend permission to operate spas and massage parlours in the main island Male and other inhabited islands, previously confined to atolls where luxury resorts operate, attracted opposition. Though the ‘enlightened’, American trained minds may not be able to understand, such religious (Jewish, Christian or Islamic) and cultural sensitivities do exist and they need to be respected!

 On the foreign policy front, due to his friendships with people like Cameron perhaps, Nasheed became the first Maldivian leader to send his foreign minister to Israel. Also, his decision to allow an Israeli airline to land in the Maldives prompted the Islamist Adhaalath Party to leave the coalition government in protest.

 In December Islamic political parties held rallies against him and his government, accusing of defiling Islam, their national religion – hardly an extremist activity. The problem appears that Nasheed seems to have clearly judged the mood of his country looking through the veil Blake and others have provided him with!

 India, Sri lanka and Pakistan would be the only countries with a justifiable interest on Maldivian affairs. India should not be moved by Blake’s false propaganda that Islamist extremists have taken control in the Maldives. As Sri Lanka has provided the lead, these three countries together with SAARC need to keep events local and regional, barring intervention from afar.

 Regime change is a universal human right after all!

5 Responses to “Sri Lanka needs to stand up against external meddling in the Maldives”

  1. Lorenzo Says:

    SL cannot do that. China must do it instead without allowing US and India to get involved.

    Islamic fundamentalism will attract US and Indian military response. It may be a plan. The new president Waheed is a bigger pro-US bootlicker than Nasheed.

  2. radha Says:

    May be this is part of US’ way of balancing power in the Indian Ocean. No doubt they will ask for the use of Gan as a base for their aircraft, and a secure, deep water harbour for their warships. Strange coincidence, the timing of the coup and Blake’s visit to Maldives nearest neighbour, just very convenient to drop in to see what the trouble is.

  3. nandimitra Says:

    i am sorry Maldives is no different than Sri Lanka . Unfortunately our people are blind to our predicament. Deficiet Budgets and debt have led us to this situation where officials from India, USA, West at large make frequent trips to SL and make demands from the government that are unjust and which disenfranchises its citizenry. The IMFs demands are gradually being adhered to. The trojen horses the Tamils, christians and probably the Muslims in the future is eating into the sovereign rights of the majority. The majority is subjugated by violence. This is the position of SL. My advise would be Physician heal thy self. Be fore thinking of the Maldives think of the predicament of SL.

  4. Fran Diaz Says:

    As much as we sympathise with the problems of the Maldivians, we do hope Maldivians will not land in Lanka as ‘refugees’. GoSL must take a firm stand and have laws in place re any ‘refugee’/illegal migrant intake. Illegal migrants from anywhere must be deported.
    The Law of the land must prevail. Be prepared, Sri Lankans.

  5. desh Says:

    Why should we? Those buggers are destroying Buddha statues there. Their azure beaches are killing our tourist industry. They are already rabid, militant Muslims, so shouldn’t that country sink and go forever?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2017 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress