Jungle Law to Politically Blackmail India
Posted on March 10th, 2016

By Afshain Afzal

New Delhi behaved courteously by merely confining to refusal of Indian visa to the members of United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). In the same regard, Indian Foreign Office has played diplomatically and did not offend Washington for its misdeed as New Delhi could have announced sending reciprocal fact-finding team to Washington to access grave violations of religious rights of American citizens and immigrants. It is on record that US has past history of grave violation of religious and human rights, not only against its own citizens but the people around the world including orthodox Christians, Davidians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Sikhs. Reportedly, USCIRF team was tasked to investigate, negotiate and access the condition of religious freedom under the ruling government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a statement, Indian Foreign Office representative said that it does not see the need for allowing a foreign entity to pass judgment on the state of religious freedom in India. One wonders under which authority a commission of another country can be graded as fact-finding mission and without the approval of that country can be sent to that country on the grounds that discrimination of religious minorities have been reported.

If we recall, on account of 2002 riots in the Indian state of Gujarat that killed more than 200 people, mostly Muslims, Washington denied visa to then Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi to enter US. His visa of B-1/B-2 categories granted to him, were revoked on the grounds of foreign government official violating religious freedom. Ironically, Mr. Modi, who was banned to travel to US under Section 212 (a) (2) (g) of Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) was invited to visit US as state guest in September 2014. In is pertinent to mention here that the charges against Mr. Modi, Indian Supreme Court appointed a Special Investigation Team, which found no evidence and cleared him from all charges. One wonders for mere hidden self-interests Washington issued a waiver to a so called terrorist. In the past, US violated all rules and previous announcements and did not honour public opinion of American tax payers and pressure groups like US-based Collation Against Genocide (CAG), which drew attention to the Gujarat riots and pledged to continue ban of Mr. Modi irrespective of his victory  in the elections and becoming Prime Minister of India. The fact cannot be denied that when diplomatic and non-diplomatic interferences and pressures from Washington failed to defeat Mr. Modi in Indian election, US President Mr. Barack Hussain Obama personally telephoned Mr. Modi to congratulate and extent invitation to visit White House as a state guest.

As a matter of fact, all the countries of the world have to abide by the International Law, the Statutes and the Conventions that prevent them from interfering in the internal affairs of other sovereign countries. As far as the religious rights in India are concerned, an Indian constitution guarantees religious freedom to its entire citizen. The United Nations Organization (UNO) Charter clearly bans all countries and organizations from interference in the internal affairs of the other countries. Thus, Article 2 (7) states that the UNO has no authority to interfere in matters which are within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. Again, Article 2 (4) of the Charter prohibits the threat or use of force and calls on all members to respect sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of other states. It is a matter of concern that how can Washington interfere in others internal religious affairs when the First Amendment in US Constitution states, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In the latest development, US’ State Department spokesman John Kirby, while expressing disappointment over New Delhi’s refusal to grant visa to United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) said, “We are supportive of the commission and the important role they play in reviewing facts and circumstances of violations of religious freedom around the world.” He said, “Every person has the right to practice their faith how they choose, or to practice no faith at all and to do so free of persecution and fear of discrimination.” One would ask worthy so called seculars if such is the case which Muslims are graded as extremists and their families hunted like wild rabbits. It is now a high time to stop Washington and other countries from interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and allow democratic process to take its own course. The UNO must play its due role to ensure implementation of UNO Charter and International Laws. [email protected]

One Response to “Jungle Law to Politically Blackmail India”

  1. Christie Says:

    In 2002 Republicans were in power. In 2014 Obama the Democrat is in power. Indians in the US and India provided massive funds to Obama for his election to the US throne.

    The writer who might be living in the West may have been affected by the current situation in the US and in the West.

    But the life of Aadhiwaasis, Muslims and other religions in India is not easy. Reclaiming Hinduhthwa!

    India is butchering Muslims in Kashmir as we read and write.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress