A Sacred Geography
Posted on May 11th, 2017

C. RAJA MOHAN Courtesy Carnegie India

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s second visit to Sri Lanka in two years would hopefully launch a productive new phase in bilateral relations. In his first visit during March 2015, Modi promised to end India’s prolonged neglect of the very special relationship with Sri Lanka. Many reasons, including narrow domestic political considerations of previous governments, led to Delhi’s monumental errors in dealing with Colombo.

This had huge costs — in terms of generating a trust deficit and entrenched negative perceptions of India as a regional bully, insensitive to Lankan nationalism and sovereignty. Since the first visit, there has been an intensification of sustained high-level political engagement with Lanka. The Modi government also put new emphasis on expanding economic engagement with Sri Lanka.

Delhi’s new commercial possibilities in Lanka were highlighted by the expansive MoU on economic cooperation that was signed during Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s visit to Delhi last month. The MoU identified many major projects, including infrastructure projects relating to ports and the energy and transportation sectors. Delhi is trying to change the perception that India does not have the will or the capability to undertake and implement large projects in the neighbourhood.

To be sure, there is some political backlash in Lanka against India’s new economic activism. Delhi can only overcome this resistance, part-genuine and part-simulated, through patience and sustained engagement. Above all, Delhi must address the deep sense of nationalist hurt in Colombo that has arisen from India’s intervention in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs over recent decades. Delhi now appreciates the importance of being seen as a well-wisher helping to promote reconciliation after a brutal civil war in Lanka, and not an external demandeur on its internal political arrangements.

Modi has also sought to restore the deeper cultural connect between the two nations as part of his effort to go past the divisive discourse of the last few decades and rebuild mutual trust between Delhi and Colombo. That, precisely, is where an important dimension of Modi’s second visit to Colombo comes — the bonds of Buddhism that bind India and Lanka.

Although Buddhism was an important part of Indian diplomacy in the 1950s, it is only over the last decade that efforts have been made to revitalise it. What was started by the UPA government at the turn of this decade has been given an unprecedented personal push by Modi. During the last three years, Modi has pushed consistently for rebuilding India’s Buddhist bridge to the world.

Some have seen this as part of India’s competition with China for regional influence. That, however, is too narrow a construction. Modi had, in fact, put Buddhism at the centre of his initial outreach to China’s President Xi Jinping. Modi sees Buddhism as integral to India’s international engagement. That the PM has been invited as the chief guest at Sri Lanka’s special international celebration of the Vaishakhi Day underlines Colombo’s recognition of Modi’s special attachment to Buddhism. On his part, Modi is acknowledging that Buddhism is a defining element of Sri Lankan national identity and is eager to build on the long-neglected spiritual links between the two nations.

Vaishakhi Day is a very special date for Buddhists around the world, for it marks the birth, enlightenment and death of Gautama Buddha. Thanks to the efforts of the late foreign minister of Lanka, Lakshman Kadirgamar, the United Nations General Assembly in 1999 called for the international commemoration of Buddha Purnima to acknowledge the rich contributions of the ancient faith to human civilisation. Although it was a Lankan diplomatic initiative, this is the first time Vaishakhi Day is being celebrated in Lanka.

As he joins the celebrations, Modi has an opportunity to applaud Sri Lanka’s special role in preserving Buddhist heritage through the centuries and playing a leading role in its revival in the 20th century. The PM must acknowledge the special role of the Sri Lankan scholar, Gunapala Piyasena Malalasekera, who convened the World Fellowship of Buddhists in 1950 in Colombo. Malalasekera, then president of the All Ceylon Buddhist Congress, dreamt of promoting exchanges between different sects of Buddhism around the world and building a global Buddhist organisation.

Modi must also recall the special role of Sri Lanka in the evolution of contemporary Indian Buddhism. It was a Sri Lankan monk, Anagarika Dharmapala, who set up the Mahabodhi Society in 1891. Shocked by the sorry state of these sites during a visit to Bodh Gaya in 1891, Dharmapala led a life-long campaign to restore them. The Mahabodhi Society moved its offices to Calcutta in 1892 and worked to revive the Subcontinent’s Buddhist heritage. Dharmapala’s address to the 1983 World Parliament of Religions at Chicago contributed in a big way to the global interest in Buddhism in the modern era.

Modi’s second visit to Lanka, focused on the Buddha Purnima celebrations, can lay a very different basis for India’s engagement with Sri Lanka. For too long, Delhi has viewed Sri Lanka as a part of India’s problems — domestic or foreign. Colombo was seen either as an adjunct to Delhi’s management of Tamil Nadu politics or a location in the grand contestation with China — a pearl on a long string across the Indian Ocean. It is time we moved beyond that awful and constricting frame in bilateral relations.

In reclaiming the shared spiritual heritage with Lanka, recognising its special position in the sacred geography of Buddhism, and acknowledging Colombo’s leadership role in Asia and the Indian Ocean, Modi can help rebuild the special relationship with Lanka based on sovereign equality, mutual trust and common benefit. That could generate a more helpful environment for the resolution of long-standing problems and the expansion of all-round bilateral cooperation.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

4 Responses to “A Sacred Geography”

  1. Lorenzo Says:

    Endia is always a bully. Endia has NO friends in the region.

    IF Endia respects Lanka’s sovereignty, Endia should NOT object to China and Pakistan. Chinese economy is 4 times the Endian economy and Chinese deals are WIN-WIN.

  2. Christie Says:

    Namaste: Not A Sacred Geography. Ii is the Sacred Empire. Empire Build on non violent aggression and oppression. The Indian Empire after the dissolution of the British-Indian Empire. The Empire that the sun never set from Fiji to Guyana. An Empire that the colonists are high caste and the subjects are untouchables. Genocide of the subjects is caused by colonists breeding out the subjects. Like any colony of colonial parasites who arrive on the back of the carrier and wipe out the host.

    Modi the Emperor’s second visit to the Colony since the installation of the most recent Indian administration. First visit to meet the Indian terrorists armed, trained, managed, financed and branded Tamil Tigers by the Indian Empire in the coast of the island. Second one to meet them in the hills of the island.

    The Emperors visit will seal the Genocide of non Indians of the island nation whose birth rateis less thanone and that of Indians more than 3.

    Another Andaman

    Jai Hind. Jai Bharuch Samraj.

  3. Ananda-USA Says:

    Respect for Sri Lanka has to be earned and maintained through STRENGTH and POWERFUL ALLIANCES, not pitiful appeal to a Buddhist spirituality that has all but vanished in the land of its birth, India.

    Sri Lanka should NEVER FORGET that ALL of Sri Lanka’s PROBLEMS arose in India, and CONTINUES to be so today. This has been so historically, through times immemorial. Sri Lanka should NEVER FORGET that when PUSH COMES TO SHOVE, Tamil Nadu is the JEWEL IN THE CROWN of India, and PLACATING the RACIS Tamils of India will REMAIN it’s HIGHEST PRIORITY. Playing FAIR by Sri Lanka will be FAR DOWN the list of India’s PRIORITIES.

    As such, India will REMAIN the PRIMARY ENEMY THREAT to Sri Lanka’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, and the well being of Sri Lanka’s Sinhala Buddhist majority community.

    Therefore, it be hooves Sri Lanka to KEEP India at an arms length, and to prevent India from acquiring a dominant economic, diplomatic, political, and military position in, and control of, Sri Lanka.

    To implement such a POLICY of CONTAINING and HOLDING India at Bay, we need a PATRIOTIC GOVERNMENT to be in power in our country. Therefore, the current PARA-GATHI DESHA-DROHI Yamapalanaya that is acyivrly delivering Sri Lanka bound hand and foot to its enemies, has to be OUSTED and REPLACED by a DESHA-PREMI GOVERNMENT without delay.

  4. RohanJay Says:

    It would be very beneficial to both India and Sri Lanka. If India genuinely helps Sri Lanka. By first respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka. But also to work towards both South Asian nations mutually beneficial goals. What is good for Sri Lanka is also good for India. India and Sri Lanka are almost culturally identical, genetically identical and its people have similar views on many issues. It is mutally beneficial to both these South Asian nations and peoples if they genuinely work together. India should abandon its past policies of undermining and destabilising Sri Lanka for its own benefit. Question is what benefit has India gained in the last 40 years by undermining its geographically close South Asian neighbour? Practically nothing. The whole South Asian region gets destabilised because of India’s past foreign policy follies not to mention the west US,UK, EU etc interfering in the region let alone India. It is time for India and Sri Lanka to find what is mutually beneficial to each other as countries in the South Asian region since the war in May 2009 ended. Two more similar almost identical countries you won’t find anywhere in the world. Yet India’s policy has been to interfere and undermine Sri lanka in the past to the detriment of both India and Sri Lanka and the whole South Asian region. India being the largest and makes up almost 90 percent of South Asia has a responsibility to help its fellow South Asian neighbours responsibly and to the mutual benefit of India and Sri Lanka. Indeed India should have a more balanced and responsibly attitude towards South India in its own country too. Since South India and Sri Lanka share close links geographically and between it peoples.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress