Freedom of the Press.
Posted on May 5th, 2010

By Charles.S.Perera

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ It is at least interesting to see how some Western Democracies , and their Agencies, select theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  winners forƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  awards for Press Freedom or Human right activities.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  It appears that the awards are notƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  given in appreciation of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  deeds themselves,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  butƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  according toƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the extent to which their actions had harmed the country which the awarding country or the AgencyƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  wants to dishonour.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The runner up for the ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ first annual Freedom DefenderƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s AwardƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  selected by the US Embassy in Sri Lanka wasƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Mano Ganesan.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Mano Ganeshan was well known for his close relationship with the terrorists, and whateverƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  part he was playing with the terrorists to set up a separate Eelam.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Robert Blake the US AmbassadorƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  for Sri Lanka at the timeƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  who selected Mano Ganeshan for theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  award was Robert Blake, who was also well known for his sympathies for the terrorists.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Then Tissainayagam who was arrested and convicted for a more serious offence and whose connection to the terrorists was proved in a court of law ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ wasƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  given an award for ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- courageousƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and ethical journalism ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ , by the Paris based Reporters Without Borders.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  He also won the International Press Freedom Award in 2009, awarded by theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Committee to Protect Journalists, andƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the British Press Award named him the 2010 Foreign Journalist of theYear.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ There was yet another anti Sri Lanka Government journalist Lasantha Wickramatunga who was awarded the UNESCO Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize. The Harvard Nieman Foundation for Journalism made him the award forƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Conscience and Integrity in Journalism.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  He also got the National Press Club Press Freedom award, James Cameron Award, and he also got Transparency International’sƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ very first Integrity Award.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ A wag says that if you have the courage to criticise a government of a developing country or a country which is not towing the Western ideology and write to the press , run a tabloid and cow-tow the west informing them of the weaknesses of the government, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ you are ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ likely to get all the awards given by Nations or their Agencies. The wag ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ says Boris Pasternack , andƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn may not have won the Noble Prize if they were not Russians, and critical of the regime.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ If Prabhakaran continued to live he may have perhaps been nominated ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ for the award of ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ the Nobel Peace Prize or ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ the Freedom DefenderƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s Prize of the US State Department , ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ or an award offered by the Amnesty International , UNESCO or UNHCHR.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ That is the way how the promoters of the freedom of the Press, manipulate the Journalists of Developing countries to take revenge from Government of Developing Countries forƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  not beingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  meek, andƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  toeing their line of ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-democracyƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚. They encourage dissidents by selecting them for grant of awards, honours, and being invited to their countries, or even givingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  asylum to some of them.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ There is evidence of this effort of the International Community to create dissention in developing countries by pampering , andƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  encouragingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  terrorists and dissidents to work againstƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  elected governments, in ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ the way how David Milliband, Bernard Kouchner, Hillary Clinton , Robert oƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢BlakeƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  acted, during the last phase of the government military operations against the terrorist of Sri Lanka, to save Prabhakaran and his terrorists from being completelyƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  annihilated.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ They did not stop at that even after the Sri Lanka Government Forces eliminated terrorism theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  International Community was all out to take revenge by attempting to accuse the Government of Sri Lanka for war crimes.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  They speak of Press Freedom, while Ban Ki Moon is seeking to appoint a commission to investigate whether the Government of Sri LankaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  committed war crimes.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Is nƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢t this utter hypocrisy of the International Community interposingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  their ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-yes manƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ Ban ki Moon the catƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s paw for their dirty work, and at the same timeƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  defendƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Press Freedom ?

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ One may say that this argument is besides the question of the Freedom of the Press.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  But it is, because it shows why the International Community and their Agencies, like the National Press Club,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the Nieman Foundation for Journalism and the Reporters Without Borders etc. seek out for their precious ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-awardsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ , journalists from developing countries who write against their ownƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  governments and by their writing create communal dissention, prevent communal unity, and keep away developing countries fromƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  becomingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  independent of the sacrosanct International Community-the British, American , the French etc. and pave a path of politically independent development.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ These protectors of the Press Freedom, think that by the mere fact of being Europeans, give them the privilege of judging journalists on their own without examining the back ground that necessitated a journalist to be convicted under the prevailing law of the land. Jean-Francois Julliard, secretary-general of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Paris based press rights group Reporters Without Borders said,

“J.S. Tissainayagam is one of those and should never have been imprisoned, Sri Lankans have the right to be informed about what is happening on their island. They have the right to read words written by men.ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Of course Sri Lanka does allow the journalists to write freely, but there is a limit beyond which they should not ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ go.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  That is because Sri Lanka is only a developing country, and it needs ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  coalitionƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and partnership of all communities for its development as a Nation. Therefore, the government cannot stand aside allowing the journalists to write what they want hampering the countryƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ progress towards development, by creating chaos among the communities and keep the country always dependent on the developed countries of the West.

Most of What the Foreign Press Clubs and such agencies say are with a view to condemn a developing country, to create dissention among the people, to keep them poor and dependent on the rich and the developed Nations, to take revengeƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  where Sri Lanka is concerned.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

As much as they refused to accept the Terrorists in Sri Lanka as ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- terrorists ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-, as they accepted the terrorists that attackedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  their own countries -America, UK, Germany etc. as ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-terroristsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚, they refuse to accept that some of the journalists in Sri Lanka writing ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ against the interest of their own country are a danger to its independence and development; apart from their bringing disrepute to the country of their birth.

Therefore it is no wonder that Rights watchdogs have named Sri Lanka as one of the most dangerous places in the world for journalists to work, after Iraq and Somalia.

Is it correct to speak ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ of the press ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ freedom without speaking about the necessity to control the press ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ when it oversteps the boundaries of decency , and ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ truth.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  In the West media has caused untold suffering to peopleƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  throughƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  paparazzi- the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- thieves of imagesƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ who would do any thing to photograph celebrities inƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  their intimacy.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The Late Princess Diana was ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ a victim of these photo journalists who chased the car in which Princess Diana was travellingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  with Dodi Al Fayed .ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The car had to be driven fast to avoid being caught up by the paparazzi, and when the accident happened the paparazzi were not considerate of the life of the Princess, but wanted to take photos of her mangled bodyƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  which would have brought them a tidy sum of money.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Is that Freedom of the Press or a shameless criminal intrusion into personal intimacy of persons ? ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Are not the journalists who complain of ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ state restriction to their freedom of writing , at times a danger to ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ the peoplesƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ freedom to live the way theyƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  want whether they are celebrities or not ?

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The News Agencies such as the Reuters, AFP, BBC often distort news, or useƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  adjectivesƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  which are injurious in introducing to the readers Political Leaders ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  developing countries.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  WhenƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Mr.Mahinda Rajapakse was elected the President of Sri Lanka, they calledƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  him the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-hawkish politicianƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ When they wanted toƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  contradict a developing countries effort to draw attention of the world to ruthlessness of itsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  enemies, they mollified the effect on theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  readers by usingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-softƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ adjectives to describe them. They called the terrorists in Sri Lanka ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-the rebelsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  They called Prabhakaran the terrorist leader,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the rebel leaderƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Some even called the terrorists the freedom fighters.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Is this part of the freedom of the press , to hide the truth,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  by using words to soften the effect ?

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ There are writers in the Guardian.co.uk Jonathan Steel, Malathi de Alwis, who do notƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  seem to understand that a sovereign state could do what it wants, and what it ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ thinks is best for ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ its people.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The memories of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ruthless terrorism of the past is best forgotten.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The people have had enough of it. A new page has to be turned and the country united to go forward with its projects of development.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Therefore, theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ruins of the past that brings terrorism to mind are beingƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  removed. And that is how it should be.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ It is no freedom of the press for journalists who know nothing of the suffering that the people went through to write condemning the action of the government.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  That is no freedom of the press but an interference in to the affairs of another country, which has to be condemned.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ What has the great defenders of the freedom of the press got to say about the journalists of the UK Channel four for accusing Sri Lanka for crimes on ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-doctoredƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ photographs ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Do they consider that the media- in the name of the freedom of the press, has the right to do what it pleases to accuse a developing country for war crimes simply because it succeeded in eliminating terrorism for good , where as the developed nations are stillƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  entrenched in seemingly never ending war against terrorism, violating human rights and killing innocent civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Freedom of the Press indeed is good where a country is developed and internal problems are less acute than those of developing countries.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  But in developing countries the journalists have a special duty by its country not to be critical of the government, but help it in its effort to develop the country.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ OnceƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  an elected government shows sign ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  following a well defined path for the development of the country, every one must put their shoulder to the wheel to make the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-machines of developmentƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ work.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Every thing said and done a good political leader is a rare phenomenon.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  We in Sri Lanka are fortunate to have such a leader who is willing to work and take SriƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Lanka away from the outmoded development programmes, looking only to the knownƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  west as our benefactors, depending on the ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-crumbsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ falling from their sumptuous tables to plan our development.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The President Mahinda Rajapakse has broken loose from those ancient shackles and has been able to lead the country to wards a different way of development.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  It is the duty of the journalists and media to help in his progressive projects by getting all communities togetherƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to engage wholly in the task of development.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  There may have been untoward happenings in the past but it is not the time to keep harping on them and deviate from the necessary effort of bringing all communities togetherƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to build a Nation.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  That is the duty of the free press of a developing country.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ I was in Sri Lanka after four years and I saw a tremendous lot of work that had been undertakenƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to change the country from what it was before. The roads, schools, hospitals, even towns and villages have benefitted from these vastƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  development programme.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Every thing may not be perfect, but we cannot deny that we have at last awakened to a new way of development a different strategy.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ There is one programme I saw from which poor villagers begin to profit. It is calledƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-VidathaƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ or taking technology to the village. It had been organised by the Ministry of Science and Technology.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  It trains both young and old villagers who are unemployedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to use whatever is availableƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to turn them into saleable items.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  It is good if the free press looks into it to promote it better, and make it known to the people. They do it well in Akurana.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ What is most important now ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ as I see is to bring the unity among the three main communities.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  That is also the duty of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Free Press.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Sri Lanka is divided, politically and communally.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The only way to jump from being a developing country, to be a developed country is to build thisƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Unity.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Everyone , principally the media should step into build this much needed unity.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ As it is each group of people is more absorbed about its ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ own welfare, without thinking of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Nation , the Country as a whole. Political parties are on their own vying against each other toƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  be popular among the people.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Journalists are critical of the Government for white van kidnappings, and the persecution of journalists.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The Trade Unions are active to getƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  salary increases, as that is the only way to bring down the cost of living.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The free press does not speak of achievedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  benefits, progress, and the governments ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ future plans for development.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The Tamils and Sinhala should come togetherƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  toƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  bring Sri Lanka into the new era that hasƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  commenced.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  There are those who ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ seem to be worried about a Rajapakse dynasty.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ We have had a Senanayake dynasty, then a Bandaranayake dynasty, and why not a Rajapakse dynasty.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Is it a matter that should stop us from going ahead with our development projects.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Rajapakses- Mahinda, Gotabhaya, and Basil have turned out to be indefatigableƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  workers bent on bringing progress to our country.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  That is what the people want.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Does it then matter that in doing so they are building a dynasty ?

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The President Mahinda Rajapakse has shown that he is a man who can change things for the good of the people. He has already done much though the Free Press of Sri Lanka prodded by the International Press gencuies refuse to accept it. The President has won the confidence of the ordinary people.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  It is now up to those who seek to criticise, find faults and cry over split milk so to say, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ to stop their preoccupations and join the Rajapakses to build a new Nation of Sri Lankans.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

5 Responses to “Freedom of the Press.”

  1. gunarat Says:

    As a retired professor of journalism and communication, let me both agree and disagree with the author of this piece.

    I AGREE that the freedom awards dished out by the West are questionable. They are solely based on the promotion of Western ideology based on individualism (atta), private enterprise/capitalism/greed (tanha), rights with no reciprocal responsibilities, neo-liberal democracy, cutthroat competition, secularized Christian values, and related factors.

    The truth is that there is no complete freedom of the press anywhere in the world. Freedom was/is/will always be relative. It is the outcome of the interaction of a number of interdependent and interconnected factors (nidanas) in a given society. This is the paticca samuppada principle in operation.

    The Eastern belief is that there are no rights without reciprocal responsibilities. Thus, there cannot be freedom of the press in the absence of reciprocal social responsibilities.

    Instead of meekly accepting the Western definition of “freedom of press,” we should define what it means to us through the perspective of the moral code (“Right Action,” “Right Speech,” “Right Livelihood”) in Buddha’s Noble Eightfold Path.

    Prof. Shelton Gunaratne

  2. dhane Says:

    Same as awarding Nobel Price for President Obama for continuing violating human rights and killing innocent civilians in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

  3. helaya Says:

    Charles,
    Well done. I agree with Gunarthna. There is no press freedom in well developed countries like US. Remember what happened to Dan Rather (CBS anchor) after he reported on Goerge Bushe’s draft dodging episode? NO pres reporting Dick Cheney’s kis-backs from Hiburton after the war. They call thsi free press.

  4. cassandra Says:

    You state, among other things, that “a sovereign state could do what it wants, and what it thinks is best for its people”. I can accept this statement in the sense that a sovereign state may have the capacity for doing these things, but I cannot accept it if you mean a sovereign can do “whatever” it wants or “whatever” it thinks is best for the people. Sovereignty does not provide a carte blanche for any sort of action. It necessarily implies that the authority it provides is to be used for the good of the people and not to engage in conduct that is harmful to its citizens, including a suppression of their legitimate rights.

    I cannot also accept that “in developing countries the journalists have a special duty by its country not to be critical of the government”. Sri Lanka’s Constitution declares at the outset that the country is a democracy. And a democracy by definition envisages freedom of expression and freedom of the media is part of that freedom. Sure, journalists should act in a responsible manner. That does not mean, however, that they should not refrain from fair and legitimate criticism of the government. Indeed, such criticism is necessary to ensure proper accountability on the part of the government.

    I see that Prof Gunaratne has observed that the Eastern belief is that there are no rights without reciprocal responsibilities. I do not think this belief is unique to the Eastern tradition but that it is a universally accepted proposition. The difficulty though is in ensuring that people conduct themselves accordingly.

    What constitutes freedom of the media is a matter of some debate. As with the case of sovereignty, there is the implication even with the freedom of the media that such freedom will be exercised in the interests of the common good, fairly and with due respect to the truth.

    You have referred to the abuses of the freedom of the media and cited the manner in which the media hounded the late Princess Diana. Certainly, the media did exceed acceptable norms in that case. But we need keep separate, the issues of abuses of the freedom of the media and the denial to the media of the freedom of expression. Merely because there are abuses does not mean that media freedom should be denied.

  5. M.S.MUdali Says:

    Awards and rewards from the west are sort of CATCHING people for their services of propaganda. Media Freedom is not hiding the truth or spreading untruths. Recently Canadian supreme court decided the source of the NEWS must be revealed and the journalists cannot have the right to hide the source.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress