UK Channel 4, fools a naive home audience with low grade TV Programmes with faked films, and Discredits a Sovereign States for a « fistful of Dollars ».
Posted on June 12th, 2011

By Charles.S.Perera

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ UK ChannelƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  takes up controversial issues and projects them to suit their pre-planed object and in doing so itƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  does not stop short ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  showing the factual information, but goes beyondƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to falsify the information to fit into their planned intention.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ It was what they did with the documentary it presented in its TV ChannelƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  on ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  jihadist preachers in mosquesƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚» called the Undercover Mosque.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The West Midland Police in UKƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  reported the Channel 4 to industry regulator Ofcom over the way an undercover programme was edited.

West Midlands Police carried out an investigation into three speakers in the programme- Undercover Mosque.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The Crown Prosecution Service, speaking about the programme said, it ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-completely distorted ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  what the speakers said.

Of courseƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the spokesman for the Channel 4 Gavin Dawson said, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  We believe the offensive views expressed by the people revealed in the programme speak for themselves.
We didn’t put these words into people’s mouths and all extracts were carefully contextualisedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦..ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚» ( But this is what they are completely capable of doing.)

Another Mosque presented in the programmeƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  wasƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the Green Lane Mosque in Small Heath, Birmingham.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The spokesman speaking for the UKChannel 4 saidƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  that, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ It investigated mosques run by organisations claiming to be dedicated to moderation and dialogue with other faiths .ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚»

After the programme was presented by the Channel 4,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the spokesman for the Green Lane Mosque said , that, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦.he had been shocked by the programme and was thankful the mosque’s name had been clearedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚».

Abu Usamah, one of the preachers featured in the programme, said he was shocked when he saw himself depicted. He added,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  that, ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ It was the fact that Green Lane Mosque has a 33-year-old tradition of preaching and teaching the moderate version of Islam. To try and demonise the efforts of these people by taking their comments out of context was shocking. ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The Channel 4 Dispatches website, in a piece about the programme, said the reporter had attended talks at mosques and found preachers “condemning the idea of integration into British society, condemning British democracy as unIslamic and praising the Taliban for killing British soldiers”.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚»

IsnƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢t this typical of what the Channel 4 is doing now with the video footage ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  summary execution ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  naked men with their handsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  bound,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  being propped upright to be shot by a man wearing clothes similar to those of a soldierƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ?

The West Midlands Police later said that,ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦.. itƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  acknowledges some parts of the programme may have been considered offensiveƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦butƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  there was not enough evidence to bring charges.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  But damage was already done .

When Channel 4 was accused ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-IslamophobiaƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚, the Channel 4 deputy head of news and current affairs, Kevin Sutcliffe, dismissed accusations of IslamophobiaƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦, stating that it would remain “fearless” in its coverage.

It was later reported that, Mr. Sutcliffe, one of five panelists involved at a sometimes heated session at the MediaGuardian Edinburgh international television festival about the portrayal of Islam in the media, said , “ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦We have a rounded view and approach to this issue … we are quite fearless about what we want to say and when we want to say it,” he added.

Fearless indeedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚¦..In short that is UKChannel 4, with its pants down.

Then there was theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  UK Channel 4, programme ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The Great Global Warming SwindleƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚».ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The documentary was welcomed by the ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  global warming scepticsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚»ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  But the document was later criticised by the Scientific OrganisationsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and a Scientist who wasƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  interviewed in the film, whoseƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  research had been used to support the filmƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s claim.

After viewing the programme in Channel 4, they ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ said the film presented by the Channel 4 had misused and fabricated data, relying on out-of-date research, employing misleading arguments and misrepresentedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the position of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

It is a habit with UK Channel 4 to fabricate, and put words in to mouths ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  persons alreadyƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  filmed.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  And this isƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the Video footage prepared byƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  a ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-proven fabricators of false dataƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ and doctoring films , that theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  new UN Rapporteur, Prof. Christof Heyns said ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ appears to be authenticƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚», after having same tested by three USƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ forensic expertsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ at the Geneva sessions of the UNHRC in June 2011

This is how UK Channel 4 fabricates documents, and how the UN OfficialsƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  for some unknown ulterior reasons said, ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- appears to be authenticƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The US forensic experts seem to have beenƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  easily fooled by the technicians of the Channel 4 adept inƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  fabricating false documents.

A CriticƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and a TV Reviewer James Walton speaking about Channel 4 had said, “one of the things that gets me angry is Channel 4’s use of the mentally ill for entertainment – in shows like How Clean is Your House, where plainly some of the people have mental problems, or Fat Pets or Wife Swap. I get this recurring image of Channel 4 programme makers sitting round the Groucho saying, ‘We’ve found this marvellous working class fat person for the show!’.”

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ There are many more instances of the Channel 4, presenting false, doctored documents for a gullible BritishƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  TV Viewers.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The Channel 4 now has the expertise to make any false documentary video footage look true, and make any true video footage look false.

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The video footage of the Channel 4 of the alleged summary killing of the naked men with their hands bound by a man wearing a dress like a soldiers uniform, should not have been allowed to be presented at the Geneva UNHRC Sessions held in June, 2011.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  The Sri Lanka delegation to the session had gone unprepared and raised no objection to the presentation of this video footage which is without any doubt a completely a faked video.

It was a pity that we did not have Dr.Dayan Jayatiklleke at least as a member of that Sri Lanka Delegation toƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the UNHRC.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  He would have certainly not allowedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the video footage to have been presented.

Even after its presentation the Sri Lanka Delegation did not even attempt to show the apparentƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  falsity of the Video, despite the assertion of theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  US experts who seem to lack real expertise in ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-Video fabricationƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

A soldier who shoots a civilian would have knocked him off with the but of his gun and shot point blank to kill without getting some other soldier to keep the man seated up right for him to shoot !!!.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

There were two of these documents in whichƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the persons shooting were speaking in Tamil in one and in the other which is the same in which the words spoken in inaudible SinhalaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  had been ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-fedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ in to the Video.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Why did not the Sri Lanka Delegation make investigations before attending the UNHRC Sessions and got the two copies and presented them at the Session, to prove that what had been presented by Navineetham ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ Pillai was a fake ?

A document presented at a high level forum like that of the UNHCR Session, to accuse a Sovereign State for War Crimes, should have been properly introducedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  giving the names of the persons who filmed the scene, the names of the persons who had been killed by shooting,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  where it was taken , ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ whether there were other witnesses to the incident,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  and the circumstances under which the UK TV Channel 4 came into possession of them.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

Without such information the presentation of the video footage should have been rejected by the Sri Lanka Delegation.

Now the damage has been done, and the UK Channel 4 ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ will be presenting on the 14th June,2011 another ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…- fakedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ longer film on the infamous incidentƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-hatched by the Channel 4ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ to fool the ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ apparently naƒÆ’†’ƒ”š‚¯ve UK viewers.

The Channel 4 should be challenged and the presentation ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the video footage at the UNHRC SessionƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  should be ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ made an occasion to pass a vote of no confidence on Navineetham Pillai the Commissioner of the UNHRC.

But we should at least at thisƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  stage question why this continued vendetta against Sri LankaƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  by theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  UKChannel 4 ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ adducing mean, lowly, crude, and most unethical methods to discredit, the government and the armed forces of Sri Lanka ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Is it ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ to satisfy a clientƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  who is ready to payƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to bring the Government of Sri Lanka before a tribunal accused for War Crimes ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

Of course money may be one consideration, as the TV Channel4ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  pays for itself in much the same way as most privately run commercial stations. ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ The Channel has its financial problems .

ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚«ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ In 2007 due to severe funding difficulties, the channel sought government help and was granted a payment of ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚£14 million over a six-year period. The money would have come from the television licence fee and would have been the first time that money from the licence fee had been given to any broadcaster other than the BBC. The plan was scrapped by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, Andy Burnham, ahead of “broader decisions about the future framework of public service broadcasting”.The broadcasting regulator Ofcom released their review in January 2009 in which they suggested that Channel 4 would preferably be funded by “partnerships, joint ventures or mergersƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚»

Therefore, this vendetta against the Government and Armed ForcesƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  cannot be put ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ as a normal media tacticƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to increase the number of viewers by which a TV ChannelƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s popularity is measured, and whichƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  would help it to get more business enterprises to use the ChannelƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  to diffuse publicity for their products and services, thus increasing its income.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

But it is more likely that ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-popularityƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ seeking is not the object in UK Channel 4ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s vendetta against Sri Lanka, ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ perhaps there is ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ another source to getƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-an easy buckƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ from a client who is ready to pay for discrediting Sri Lanka and its Government.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

In this respect ,ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the client behind all the Channel 4 activities against Sri Lanka, is undoubtedly the pro-terrorist Tamil diaspora living in large numbers in UK with a Bank account full of ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-blood moneyƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ to pay any one who is prepared to carry any destabilizing media publicity against Sri Lanka.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  There is a waiting queue to receive theƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-blood moneyƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚- the Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, andƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  many more.

The UNHRC Navineetham Pillai too appears to be a partner in the pro terrorist Tamil, diaspora and UK Channel 4 conspiracy against Sri Lanka.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Navineetham PillaiƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s hands are not very clean in the matter.

Why did Navaneethan Pillai drop accusations of human rights violations against BharainƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

In Sri Lanka there was a ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-warƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ against ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ ruthless terrorists who would stop at nothing in its terrorist campaign in Sri Lanka, which at the last phase of its stand against the brave Sri Lanka Armed Forces was holding civilian Tamils as a human shield and the Sri Lanka Army while facing a barrage ofƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  artillery fire by the terrorists braved the way to rescue the 300ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 000 civilians from the clutches of the terrorists, but yet the UNHRC Navineetham PillaiƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  accused the Government of Sri Lanka and its armed forces for human rights violation at that last phase of the military operations against the terrorists.

But Navineretham Pillai conveniently droppedƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  the accusations against Bharain which had no terrorist problem but yet was accused for torture of civilians.ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Why ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚  Was it because the man involved in the torture and the first accused is a British Citizen ?ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

It ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ has bee reported that, ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-Officer Ian Henderson, British, Head of Bahraini Security and Intelligence Bureau (1966-2000) tortured citizens horribly. He also exiled dissidents and human rights activists out of country for long years. He caused the detention of many young people for merely opposing state polices during his era. He also killed dozens of young activists during clashes between security forces and citizens calling for human rights,ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚ƒÆ’-¡ƒ”š‚ 

(Bahraini victim of torture said. http://mail.google.com/mail/?source=navclient-ff&shva=1#inbox)

14 Responses to “UK Channel 4, fools a naive home audience with low grade TV Programmes with faked films, and Discredits a Sovereign States for a « fistful of Dollars ».”

  1. AnuD Says:

    Channel 4 is private channel. they need this kind of contraversial things. Besides, Tamils are happy to pay and watch cheap bollywood movies.

  2. Cyril D Says:

    Channel 4 is the broadcaster who commissioned the film. Channel 4 News, based at The Independent Television News (ITN) did the research, production and presentation.

    Channel 4 is based at 124 Horseferry Road , London SW1P 2TX.

    Channel 4 News is based at the ITN building – 200 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8XZ.

  3. Kit Athul Says:

    Under the current UK law a private individual living in UK can file a case against this team who did the research, production and the presentation of this flim. Upsala univisity in Sweden, doctored the film so that technologists will be confused, but in a court of law the falsefication of the technology used can be proved. IS there any Sinhala living in UK willing to file this case? I do not think so!

  4. Rohan8 Says:

    Man made global warming is a fraud. There upto 30,000 scientists who dispute Al Gore’s version of Global Warming. Also UK Channel 4 these days nothing more than a tabloid newspaper in TV form. They are now trying to appeal to the less intelligent in the UK population. The agenda is quite is quite obvious tabloid newspapers and Channel 4 are trying to stoke a clash of civilisations (Christian vs Islam) scenario. Only the least intelligent would fall for it. No one with any intelligence in the UK pays any attention to what Channel 4 says anymore.

  5. Sri Rohana Says:

    Charles you are exactly correct to said that “Sri Lanka Delegation did not even attempt to show the apparent falsity of the Video……..” We all knew that Siri Hewawitharana proved that above video a fake, well ahead of the UNHR session.

    Totally agreed. “It was a pity that we did not have Dr.Dayan Jayatiklleke at least as a member of that Sri Lanka Delegation to the UNHRC. He would have certainly not allowed the video footage to have been presented”.

    Tamil tigress Navinathan Pillai did the stage setting. In December Ban Ki Moon will bring the other episodes.

  6. andylingam Says:

    Sri Rohana/ Other Sinhala brothers & Sisters
    Ref:this video footage which is without any doubt a completely a faked video.
    Are You realy beleive this video is faked ????

  7. nilwala Says:

    TAKE CHANNEL-4 TO COURT…ONLY A REALLY MASSIVE LEGAL SUIT WILL STOP CHANNEL-4’S FABRICATED NONSENSICAL AND IRRESPONSIBLE SENSATION-SEEKING FOOTAGE BEING RELEASED WITH INTENT TO BRING INTERNATIONAL DISREPUTE TO SRI LANKA.

  8. Chintha Says:

    Andy,
    Anybody know any Sinhalese will know the original would not have been done in Sinhalese and Sinhalese words have been dubt. The Sinhalese words here has nothing to do with the vedio. Clearly a doctored piece without doubt. I saw what was supposed to be the original in the internet site. The words spoken are in Tamil and it look authenticate. As usual the LTTE killed thier own people or SL soldiers and vedio tape and released as SL army doing it. The same way they kill sinhalese civilians and fool Tamils outside SL ,SL army is killing Tamils to collect funds.

  9. andylingam Says:

    Chintha
    Please do not take me wrong what you are saying all these vedios are all faked no SL forces involed at all .
    I’ve watched most of them including Ramesh’s (LTTE Batticalo commodo) & back groud word in Tamil & Sinhala( I know dik dika Sinhala) it look authenticate .

    Whole world is waiting for tuesday 11.05 (BST- GMT) C4 brodcast ! I hope VP’s last day surrenter will be there?

  10. AnuD Says:

    As long as Sri Lanka will not make India insecure we don’t have problems. 13th amendment and tamil issue is important for NGO supperters because if Tamils don’t gain they will lose. Their plans will buckle. I remind here again the late pope’s declraration that Asia is the new millinium’s battle ground.

    TNA is the most important to handle. Only way to do that, govt should reach to Tamils and TNA should be side lined.

    We also should be careful when we make new friends or fulfilling the needs of existing frineds as we can mae the west insecure.

    It looks like now, Jayalalitha takes over what ever Karunanidhi did.

  11. Fran Diaz Says:

    Rohan 8: You say : “Manmade global warming is a fraud”. This is incorrect. Most of the scientists in this world (about 92%) now agree that Climate Change is due to global warming, and use of fossil fuel and other activities by people have definitely contributed to global warming.
    The hot areas on earth are getting warmer and the cold areas are getting colder, with more storms (tornadoes, cyclones, typhoons etc.) and polar & mountain ice cap melting, resulting in rise of sea levels. Some say that earthquakes can happen due to Fracking used to search for oil.

  12. Rohan8 Says:

    Fran Diaz : I am not disagreeing with you that climate change is real. I just don’t agree with the way it is presented in the maintream media. I have an open mind on these things, it is possible global warming is caused by the Sun going through its natural changes. This is another point of view. I am someone who is open minded and want to find out all the findings not just what the mainstream media tells me. You may be right Fran, but I want to hear all points view on the matter. Please look up Lord Monckton and global warming who presents a compelling case for the other side.
    Here is his website http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/
    I am not trying to alarm you just present you with a alternative point of view. I for a long time believed man made global warming until I read up on Lord Monkton. I am not a conservative or rightwing nut just someone who wants to hear all points of view. The internet is the only place where that occurs. Certainly doesn’t occur in mainstream media.

  13. Sri Rohana Says:

    Andy for your comment on 13th June! Chintha replied it very well thanks.
    We don’t know who filmed? when and where? Have you read media specialist Mr Siri Hewawitharana’s findings? He challenged to the entire tamil media world and proved that it was filmed with a digital camera with zoom and this is a fake film and edited in a lab. Now Channel 4 and tamil media has to prove it was filmed by a mobile phone. Can they prove it was not edited?

    Will you believe Channel 4 film as a true one? If so you have to believe prabakaran is still alive? Can’t you remember after 2009 May 18th tamil net and pro LTTE media, released a video clip of prabakaran, himself watching his dead body in the TV with sarcastic face.

  14. Fran Diaz Says:

    Rohan8: I do agree with you some media may be alarmists and exaggerating the effects of human contribution toward Climate Change. But, we all have to face the fact that there is such a high contribution made through use of fossil fuel in that carbon dioxide is produced when burning fossil fuels which in turn causes less heat escape from planet Earth (Glass House effect). As a result when the air warms up, water from the sea especially evaporates, and this causes too much rain plus winds (blowing of warm air to cool air areas) resulting in tornadoes, hurricanes, etc. Even small rises in temperatures here and there matter. The rise in sea levels will happen over many years, and it is predicted that about 12 feet will rise over some 50 – 100 yrs. (not sure of period here). Polar caps & mountain ice cap melt down is already happening, quite rapidly too.

    We can all see that too many weather related extreme conditions are happening. Check out NASA website http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/ for the latest information.

    At any rate, it will be far better to MAINLY use wind & solar and other natural and renewable resources rather than use fossil
    fuel which reason has caused a great deal of political unrest/some wars in the world. This will save valuable foreign exchange too.

    We agree that keeping an open mind is a good thing.

    On the Channel 4 matter, most of us have seen the YouTube presentation of the Royal Wedding set to baila music. See how easy it is to cook up films !

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2023 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress