Battle with the dead
Posted on October 10th, 2011

Dr.Tilak Fernando

A Will or Testament in general is a lawful declaration by which a person or testator names a person or persons to manage oneƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s assets, property or fortune that provides for the transfer of such wealth at death.

In the strictest sense, a ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”WillƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ has historically been limited to real property while ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”testamentƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ applies only to dispositions of personal property (thus giving rise to the popular title of the document as ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-Last Will and TestamentƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚, though this distinction is seldom observed today. A Will, therefore, may also create a Testimony Trust that becomes effective only after the death of the person who testifies.

The Last Will and Testament of Adolf Hitler were dictated by Hitler to his Secretary Traudl Junge in his Berlin Fuhrerbunker on April 29, 1945, the day Hitler and Eva Braun married. They committed suicide the next day (April 30), three days before the surrender of Berlin to the Soviets on May 2, and just over a week before the end of World War II in Europe on May 8. HitlerƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s Last Will was a short document signed on April 29 at 4.00 am which consisted of two separate documents, a Will and a political testament.

Foreign supporters

It acknowledged his marriage – but did not name Eva Braun – and they chose death over disgrace of deposition or capitulation; and their bodies were to be cremated.

Prabhakaran either did not want or have time to think of a Last Will or a political testament. May be he did not expect a sudden capture the way things happened and was rather confident of being rescued by his foreign supporters. Even if he had one such Will or a political testament confided in his wife or son Charles, they too perished simultaneously. Perhaps, considering the multimillion LTTE activities that operated from foreign shores he may have had confided in close LTTE lieutenants in the diaspora who are unable to execute it now under the present circumstances.

Coming back to everyday life and activities, just imagine what happens if a grand old dear lady takes a liking to you (which has happened to a few Sri Lankans working in London, Paris and Italy for that matter) and leaves a generous Will – say a few hundred thousand Pounds or millions of Euros with a mansion in England or a villa in Italy, on condition that you donƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢t step out of your line according to her wishes – say never to look at a beautiful woman for the rest of your life!

Would you start practising transcendental meditation and try to burn out all your animalistic desires and feelings with the power of concentration? Or can you lay your hands on the fortune in any other way?

Expensive business

According to the Law Society in England anyone leaving a Will with strict conditions attached to it can be contested. ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ…-It is up to the courts to weigh out and see whether the wishes of the dead person are unreasonableƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚. But the final Will of the dead person is normally completely binding unless there are exceptional circumstancesƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”š‚.

There are some canny examples of the Western eccentricity involving fortunes virtually put into ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”storageƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ as a result of extra ordinary Wills.

My next door neighbour in London hailed from an affluent family but at the age of 40 he is compelled to confine to a rented room having a fortune in a Trust Fund under his name tied down as per his parentsƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ wishes that he should not get more than X amount of money per week or month! Naturally he did not have to work for a living but he became somewhat of a prisoner of his own fortune due to such conditions in the Will.

Spare a thought for the relatives of a teacher who died at 52 ruling out that no one should land on his sterling pound 500,000 estate before training as airline pilots!

Taking a case to courts is an expensive business in England (Sri Lanka is not second in that respect with procrastination as a symbol) .The prospect of a massive bill and the small amount left when everyone has had a slice of the action is usually enough to put anyone off a court battle.

One advantage in the British welfare society is that one could always seek legal aid (if one qualifies to receive such assistance) while contesting their Will, but would probably end up having to pay legal costs if the lawsuit is won. Dangers of having to contest a will are enormous. If it involves more than one party then it could turn nasty, sometimes depending on oneƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s patience and temperament and especially if it happens between two women!

Court decision

Once an English mistress, a shapely young blonde of a deceased Sri Lankan hung her head low before the magistrate while the legal Sri Lankan wife was contesting her husbandƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s Will. English dollƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢s guilt was clear. Indeed the Sri Lankan had been naughty and regretted not a moment of it. Being such a ƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ”¹…”fair mindedƒÆ’‚¢ƒ¢-¡‚¬ƒ¢-¾‚¢ person, wishes of the dead had been obviously to distribute his assets equally between his wife and mistress.

During the hearing, legal wife (Sri Lankan) bottled up all her anger more than she could possibly cope with, to keep her hand to herself. After the court decision public at large stood astounded as the Sri Lankan woman followed the frame of the shapely mistress along the high street pavement.

With unerring accuracy an umbrella was stabbed into the mobile buttocks of the pursued. The buttock, like two rabbits in a sack, bustle along, as an asp in pursuit – greater the haste, more the indignity. To an ever more frantic and rhythmic beat bottom rolled and the umbrella stabbed.

It all boils down to one thing. Unless someone is really in the money, it may not be worth beyond the grave to battle with the dead.

tilakfernando@yahoo.couk

One Response to “Battle with the dead”

  1. radha Says:

    An amusing write up about a serious subject! I quite like it. From what you have written, I gather that even the British courts are scared of the ghosts of the dead, hence they dare not change the terms of their will, except under very exceptional circumstances.

    You certainly solved a puzzle that I carried in my head for several years now. It goes like this. “The mother of a friend of mine who is a fairly well known Buddhist monk in my social circle, died a few years ago. She left a will transferring all her assets to this monk and his brother, who split up the proceedings between them. There was another adopted son of the family, whom I knew the mother adored but he died before the mother. Strangely the mother did not leave anything in her will to the wife and children of this late adopted son, on the grounds that the wife did not even visit her while she (the mother) was in her terminal illness phase.

    After the proceedings were split, and aware of the family circumstances, I casually queried the monk why he and his brother did not share some of the benefits with the adopted brother’s family as, after all they were so close to one another, so it was just fair if the dead brother’s family also got a share. I was quite shocked by the Buddhist monk’s very rapid response to my query, “Oh no, we dare not do it. Mother would be very angry if she finds out” as if the dead woman’s spirit might be lurking round the corner.

    Actually, at the bottom of my heart, I was thinking that the monk could have had some sort of sympathy and generosity towards his adopted brother’s family, but I could not see any in his reply. It had been puzzling me all these years since that incident, but now Dr Fernando, you enlightened me to understand that even British courts have such a great respect to a dead person’s will, no matter how much pain and sorrow is generated by them for the living. So the monk was right all along. I will change my mind about his heart. Thank you for that.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2024 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress