Is America trying to “murder” UNO with the resolution against Sri Lanka, to facilitate interfering into internal affairs of Sovereign States ?
Posted on March 21st, 2012

By Charles.S.Perera

 What America tries to enact by its resolution  against Sri Lanka is virtually the elimination of the role of the UNO with its Security Council Sanctions, to enable for it to intervene along with its western allies to  interfere into the internal affairs of the Sovereign States of the Developing countries.

 Therefore the African countries still not decided about the vote on the 23rd March, in Geneva on the resolution of America have to wake up before it is too late to stop the manoeuvres of America to facilitate the implementation of  its new “doctrine” of regime change from within.

 If America passes its resolution against Sri Lanka at the UNHuman Rights Council in Geneva, it  will set up a mechanism inside Sri Lanka, which will enable  it without the need for the sanctions of the UNSecurity Council  to by pass Chinese and Russian intervention, to set in motion  their nefarious moves to strangle the progress and development of developing countries keeping them under their control  with free access to NATO Forces if necessary.

 If America with its allies set up a “controlling mechanism” within    a Sovereign State, the Government will not be allowed to thwart a rebellious movement against the government  without the assent of their “controlling mechanism”.  They on the other hand would be in a position to help any rebellious groups with arms and military advice to defeat the Armed Forces of the government.

Thus they have nullified the authority of the UN Security Council, making UNO a nonentity.

America is today the most unpopular country in the world .  Its aggressivity  has no limit.  It takes all non Western countries as led by “fools”, and therefore easy to be brought under its influence.

But today Iran which is said to have stepped up its  uranium enrichment and  “has totally mastered nuclear science”,  has reiterated its determination to go ahead with its nuclear programme.  Will Iran be America’s Waterloo ?  America is bound to learn lessons from someone , somewhere.

What is happening today in Sri Lanka should be an eye opener to America and its allies ?  In Sri Lanka today there are large manifestations with thousands and thousands of Sri Lankans of all Communities, the Tamil, the Sinhala , the Muslim and  other  rising up to condemn the American resolution against Sri Lanka presented at the UNHRCouncil in Geneva. 

In contrast to the manifestations against the governments in Egypt, Tunisia , and Yemen, the manifestation of masses of people in Sri Lanka is in support of the Government of Sri Lanka and against ceaseless foreign interference into Sri Lanka, which after 30 years of a terrorist war  wants to be left alone to profit from the newly regained post terrorist peace to develop the country and reconciles the people psychologically disturbed in a terrorism that seemed unlikely to end.

The most foul  UK Channel 4 document had an unprecedented publicity being presented at the UNHRCouncil. It would have been more civilised for the UNHRC not to have allowed a document of  “doubtful” authenticity to be present at its noble precincts.  The Channel four document is false from beginning to its end and there is no verifiable facts in it. It had been categorically condemned by the former “terrorists” like Dayamaster who had challenged the  voracity of the document.

The Channel 4 document may be accepted by those who are prejudiced  against Sri Lanka, but any one who could evaluate the document objectively will see through the falsity of the document. It is no doubt a money spinner for Channel 4 which has certainly been commissioned by the pro-terrorist expatriate Tamil Community living abroad, who have inherited the “blood money” of the terrorists.

It is surprising that none of the  countries specially those of  Africa and the Arab States, have questioned America, what right it has to move a resolution against Sri Lanka, when America is not free from violation of human rights  and of w          ar crimes of the worst nature.  In reality America has to do more accountability than Sri Lanka, for its war crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan  and Vietnam.

The resolution against Sri Lanka moved by America at the UNHRCouncil in Geneva tries to camouflage its sinister motives by farcically accepting the report of the LRRC and at the same time adding conditions that belies its motives. It is a sugar coated poisonous pill to dupe the Member States of the UNHRCouncil to accept it  blindly on the  face value of the “sugar coating”. While the  resolution against Sri Lanka  seems to accept the report of the LLRC it at the same time criticises it as inadequate.

It then demands a comprehensive action plan laying down the steps taken to implement it. That is the most absurd and  at the same  time the  sinister of the conditions.  Sri Lanka appointed  the LLRC on it own accord  and not because  America or any other country had asked it to do so. The Implementation of the recommendations of the LLRC is what the Government intends to do. 

Therefore what is the necessity to present a comprehensive  action plan to America or any other Country, which during the 30 years of the terrorism in Sri Lanka never came forward to stop the terrorists, or assist the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka to wipe out terrorism  Sri Lanka.

It is only now two and half years after elimination of  terrorism  America and its allies wake up to call for accountability and accuse the Sri Lanka Armed Forces for violation of human rights and war crimes.

What is it that  the Administration of President Barrack Obama wants to prove in accusing Sri Lanka and demanding accountability for the elimination of terrorists in its own country ?

The member States of the UNHRCouncil should take into account the absurdity of the resolution  of America against Sri Lanka, and understand its sinister motive putting into danger all developing Countries in the world, and its plan to over ride the authority of the  UNO, should vote against it as it is being wise and objective to do so.

10 Responses to “Is America trying to “murder” UNO with the resolution against Sri Lanka, to facilitate interfering into internal affairs of Sovereign States ?”

  1. Lorenzo Says:

    UNO is already dead.

    Might is right.

  2. stanley perera Says:

    Bankrupt USA has dumped $140 million to gain support of the UNHRC. GL Peiris says already South American countries are changing. When Peiris is fighting with Mahinda Samarasinghe for the leadership of the team anything can happen now. There does not seem to be the tem spiritit has evaporated with Peiris complaining to the President. Cross over champion must toe the line. Has he been bought over by the Americans. Newer know, knowing who Peiris is.

  3. Rohan8 Says:

    The British Imperialist Oligarchy in my opinion controls the United States and god knows how many other countries. Anyway here is a good discussion, for those who don’t believe me that the British Imperialist Oligarchy controls America. Makes sense since the British Oligarchy created the United States and India. (part 1) (part 2)

  4. love_lanka Says:

    Stanley. You are correct!

    G L Peiris has betrayed our mother Lanka. We should send a white van to pick him from the airport when he returns to here.

  5. stanley perera Says:

    If Peiris betrayed his master Stanley Jayasundera, the man is capable of repeating it over and over again. Check how much he owes the banks. Thousands of millions unpaid loans. Banks writes them of and call it “BOL NAYA” So that there is no need to take bribes. Nowadays the bribery is in the form of Bank Loans quite legal. The politicians don’t have to serve the people. Socialist politician driving the most expensive car in the country and built the largest house in the country.

  6. stanley perera Says:

    Now that the resolution is passed at the UNHRC to-morrow Milliband and Cousnar will open an American Sub Agency at Killinochchi and rule East and West with TNA and Jayalalitha. This is the result of the coup between Hillary and Jayalalitha. To-morrow Jayalalitha will station permenently her fleet of 4000 fishing trawlers at Trincomalee and Hambantota.MR, BR, GR and CR must use their brains now. Close down the Indian diplomatic missions in the country. Give Trincomalee to Russia, Hambantota to China and Colombo to Pakistan.

  7. helaya Says:

    First thing should do now is to abrogate the 13th ammendmend. As far as itis there India never give up the idia of dividing the country. I hope Mihinda will wake upnow.

  8. Lorenzo Says:


    GL didn’t betray anyone. He did his best. Its only pro-US countries voted against us. It should be expected. Getting 15 countries to vote for us and 8 to abstain is a great achievement. Libya voting with USA is hilarious.

    We should QUICKLY bring a class action against TNA AT LEAST NOW before things get out of hand.

  9. Lorenzo Says:

    Breaking news.

    This dumb resolution was not the only one at UNHRC. Another resolution was passed against Israel. 39 resolutions against Israel so far. But NOTHING HAPPENED!

    The United Nations’ Human Rights Council voted on Thursday to appoint a panel charged with evaluating the effects of Israeli settlement construction on Palestinian human rights in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted harshly to the decision, calling the body a “hypocritical council with an automatic majority against Israel.” He added that the council “should be ashamed of itself, and has nothing to do with human rights.

    Netanyahu added that out of 91 decisions made by the UN body to date, 39 dealt with Israel. “Only three of the decisions dealt with Syria, and only one with Iran. It was enough to hear the Syrian ambassador speaking today about human rights to understand the extent which the council is out of touch with reality.”

    Thirty-six states voted in favor of the decision, while ten states abstained, including the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Poland, Costa Rica, Italy and Spain. The United States was the only country to vote against it.

    Israel’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva Aharon Leshno-Yaar criticized the decision. “Despite the fact that this is my fourth year in Geneva, I am still stunned by the hypocrisy of the Human Rights Council,” he said in a speech.

  10. Lorenzo Says:

    Against SL

    24 countries FOR
    8 abstained
    15 AGAINST

    Against Israel

    36 countries FOR
    10 abstained

    On the same day!

    USA was bloody humiliated yesterday.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress