Courtesy The Daily Mirror

I am writing to express my views on the recent news about Sri Lanka Tourism endorsing the LGBTQI travel initiative. While I understand the importance of promoting tourism and inclusivity, I believe this decision warrants careful consideration.  Dollar earnings by hook or by crook” are not everything.  I think export of Rilaw monkies for meat production is a better alternative to earn dollars than gay tourism. Or even special secluded beach hotels for nudist tourism will be a lesser evil.

Sri Lanka is a country with a rich cultural heritage and traditional values. The potential impact of this initiative on our society and cultural norms needs to be thoroughly assessed.

Economic Benefits vs. Social Costs must be considered. While tourism can bring significant economic benefits, it’s essential to weigh these against potential social costs. We must consider whether this initiative aligns with the values and expectations of the majority of Sri Lankans who are a multi religious community.

I propose that stakeholders, including Maha Sanga and all other  religious leaders, community leaders, cultural experts and tourism industry representatives, engage in an open and respectful public dialogue to discuss the implications of this initiative. This would help ensure that any decisions made are informed and considerate of the diverse perspectives within our society.

Already, most reverened Cardinal Ranjith spoke strongly against this proposal yesterday as shown on TV and advised the president who may be unaware of what govt. officials are doing to take a closer look at this decision.

He stressed that religion means living according to set standards and rules of a religion. 

Let’s work together to find a solution that balances the needs of all parties and communities involved.

Sumith de Silva