Dilrook Kannangara

Reconciliation, harmony, inclusiveness, and coexistence are admirable ideals. However, they must not be used to distort historical facts. History should be interpreted within the context of the norms and conventions of its own time—not through modern lenses.

Valuable artefacts discovered around the Jetawanaramaya stupa include items of foreign origin from the Far West, China, and North and South India. Among them was a statue of a Hindu deity donated by a visiting trade group from Tamilakam (modern-day Tamil Nadu). This was simply one object among many collected artefacts. There is no evidence it was venerated. Gifts of religious symbols are often diplomatic or cultural gestures; they do not imply worship or doctrinal integration.

Foreign visitors have long been drawn to Jetawanaramaya. Even in modern times, much of its restoration has been funded by foreign tourists through ticket sales. Historical evidence suggests that such visits occurred for centuries. Foreign pilgrims and traders admired the shrine and contributed to its upkeep. This demonstrates long-standing patronage—not evidence of social inclusiveness or permanent settlement.

Similarly, Sinhalese Buddhists for centuries visited sacred Buddhist sites in India, Nepal, and across Asia, where they were received with hospitality. Visiting a religious site does not imply settlement or demographic change.

Ancient societies understood the balance between hospitality and sovereignty. They welcomed visitors while preserving their homeland and identity. Interpreting ancient history through modern political or ideological frameworks risks serious distortion.

History must remain grounded in evidence and context, not reshaped to fit contemporary reconciliation and political narratives.