A. POLICY PAPER (CABINET / EDB Level ) Developing Sri Lanka as an Indian Ocean Marine & Offshore Services Hub
Posted on January 11th, 2026

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera 

Lessons from Hambantota and the Way Forward


1. Executive Summary

Sri Lanka’s strategic location along the East–West international shipping route presents a unique opportunity to develop a high-value marine and offshore industrial economy, rather than relying solely on port-based logistics and transshipment activities.

In 2015, a comprehensive proposal was submitted to develop a Hambantota Dockyard Project, aimed at ship repair, conversion, and offshore services. The proposal demonstrated strong technical, economic, and strategic merit. However, the absence of a national marine industrial policy and delays in institutional decision-making resulted in the opportunity not being realised in its intended form.

This paper outlines:

  • What the Hambantota Dockyard proposal achieved conceptually
  • Why marine industry–led development is superior to port-only models
  • How Sri Lanka can still recover this opportunity through a national, multi-location marine & offshore strategy

2. Strategic Importance of Marine & Offshore Industries

Ports generate value only when anchored to industry. Globally successful maritime hubs such as:

  • Dubai (Drydocks World)
  • Sohar (Oman)
  • Singapore

derive the majority of their economic value from:

  • Ship repair & conversion
  • Offshore engineering
  • Marine fabrication
  • Skilled technical services

These sectors generate:

  • Continuous foreign exchange earnings
  • High-skilled employment
  • Strong backward linkages (steel, welding, coatings, logistics)

3. The Hambantota Dockyard Proposal – What It Got Right (2015)

The Hambantota Dockyard Project proposed in 2015 was industry-led, not asset-driven.

Key strengths:

  • Location: ~10 nautical miles from the main East–West shipping lane
  • Natural deep water suitable for 300,000 DWT class vessels
  • Availability of ~50 hectares of contiguous industrial land
  • Integrated connectivity (port, airport, highway, rail)

Proposed facilities:

  • 300,000 DWT dry dock
  • Floating dock
  • 1.5 km quay length with four berths
  • Phased development:
    • Phase I: Ship repair & conversion
    • Phase II: Shipbuilding and offshore works

Economic impact:

  • Approx. USD 400 million FDI
  • ~3,000 direct skilled jobs
  • Technology transfer and managerial expertise
  • Development of a marine industrial cluster

4. Why Hambantota Could Have Competed with Dubai

Dubai’s maritime success was industry-first:

  • Drydocks preceded large-scale port expansion
  • Offshore conversion created continuous demand
  • Marine clusters followed naturally

Hambantota possessed:

  • Comparable geographic advantage
  • Superior natural depth
  • Lower operating costs
  • Immediate access to South Asian and Indian Ocean fleets

The key difference was policy sequencing, not feasibility.

5. Lessons Learned (Policy-Safe Analysis)

Without assigning blame, the following structural gaps are evident:

  • Absence of a unified National Marine & Offshore Industry Policy
  • Overemphasis on port asset utilisation rather than industrial value creation
  • Fragmented institutional responsibility across ministries
  • Slow investment facilitation mechanisms for complex marine projects

6. Why the Opportunity Still Exists (2026 Outlook)

  • Global fleet ageing → increased repair and conversion demand
  • Congestion and rising costs in traditional hubs
  • Growth in green retrofits, ballast water systems, scrubbers
  • Sri Lanka’s existing but underutilised marine skill base

7. Recommended National Strategy

A Tiered Marine Industry Development Model

Tier 1 – Trincomalee

  • Heavy ship repair
  • Offshore structures
  • Floating and semi-submersible docks

Tier 2 – Hambantota

  • Large-vessel repair & conversion
  • Offshore maintenance
  • Green ship retrofit hub

Tier 3 – Modera / Galle / Beruwala

  • Yacht and leisure craft MRO
  • Nautical tourism support services

8. Implementation Framework

  • PPP model with land lease (not port asset transfer)
  • Multiple international partners
  • EDB-led single-window facilitation
  • Vocational and engineering skill pipeline development

9. Conclusion

Sri Lanka’s future maritime competitiveness depends not on ports alone, but on industrial capability. The Hambantota Dockyard proposal offers a proven blueprint that can still be adapted and scaled nationally.


Prepared by:

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera 

Comments are closed.

 

 


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress