by Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D. PhD
The rich tapestry of Sri Lanka’s cultural heritage is intricately woven with mythology and legends, which serve as a profound reflection of the island’s history and identity. These narratives, passed down through generations, encompass a diverse array of tales that highlight the values, beliefs, and traditions of the Sri Lankan people. The mythological tale of Sinhabahu serves as a foundational narrative for the Sinhala nation, intricately weaving together themes of identity, heritage, and cultural pride.
Prof. Gananath Obeyesekere argues that the myth of Sinhabahu serves as a quintessential representation of the Sri Lankan Oedipus narrative. In his notable work, “The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in Psychoanalysis and Anthropology,” Prof. Obeyesekere highlights a particularly striking aspect of the Sinhabahu myth: the complete absence of any expressions of remorse or ethical dilemmas regarding the act of patricide. This lack of moral conflict sets the myth apart, suggesting a cultural framework in which such actions are not only accepted but perhaps even normalized, thereby inviting deeper exploration into the implications of familial relationships and societal values within the context of Sri Lankan folklore.
Sinhabahu Narrative
The myth of Sinhabahu narrates the legendary beginnings of the Sinhala people, an ethnic group indigenous to Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese communicate in Sinhala, an Indo-Aryan language (Lewis, 2009), and the term “Sinhala” itself translates to “lion people.” Central to this mythology is the tale of Princess Suppadevi from the Vanga Kingdom, situated in the eastern region of the Indian Subcontinent, who was abducted by a fierce lion and taken into the wilderness. During her time in captivity, she gave birth to twins: a son named Sinhabahu, which means “hands like a lion’s paws,” and a daughter named Sinha Seevali. The lion confined the family in a cave, sealing the entrance with a massive rock.
At the age of sixteen, Sinhabahu managed to lift the stone and escape with his mother and sister to the Lala Kingdom, evading their captor. Upon discovering their flight, the enraged lion rampaged through nearby villages in search of the princess and her children, prompting the terrified villagers to implore their king for assistance. The king then tasked Sinhabahu with confronting the lion, leading the young hero to track down and slay the beast with a lethal arrow. This act of bravery earned Sinhabahu the admiration of the people, who hailed him as a hero.
Prince Sinhabahu established a city known as Sinhapura, which translates to “The Lion City.” In a significant familial union, he married his sister, Sinha Seevali, and together they welcomed a son named Vijaya. The chronicles of the Mahawansa, a revered historical text, identify Prince Vijaya as the first documented monarch of Sri Lanka, reigning from 543 BC to 505 BC. His ascension marked a pivotal moment in the island’s history, laying the foundation for a lineage that would shape the cultural and political landscape of Sri Lanka for centuries to come. The legacy of Sinhapura and its royal inhabitants continues to resonate in the annals of Sri Lankan heritage, symbolizing the intertwining of myth and history in the formation of a nation.
The tale of Sinhabahu has been passed down through generations, embodying the essence of oral tradition. These narratives often depict the evolution of their heroes through a recurring motif of exile and return, which places them in circumstances that continually test their strength and determination (Scot, 1990). Within these stories, archetypes emerge in various forms, including typical characters, plotlines, imagery, and overarching themes, creating a rich tapestry for analysis. One of the most prevalent archetypes found across cultures is that of the hero and the hero’s journey, a narrative framework that resonates universally. This journey not only highlights the trials faced by the hero but also reflects the values and beliefs of the culture from which the story originates, making it a vital component of storytelling across different societies.
Mythical Stories and Culture
Obeysekara probes into the rich tapestry of traditional folk tales, myths, and narratives that characterize the cultural heritage of Sri Lanka, revealing a world imbued with both myth and enigma. As an anthropologist, he meticulously examines the stories that have been transmitted through generations, recognizing their significance not only as entertainment but also as vessels of cultural identity and collective memory. His analysis reveals underlying sociological and psychological themes, suggesting that these folk narratives reflect societal values, beliefs, and human experiences. Through this lens, Obeysekara highlights the intricate connections between folklore and the social fabric of Sri Lankan life, illustrating how these tales encapsulate the complexities of human nature and community dynamics.
The tale of Sinhabahu is often regarded as a work of mythology, steeped in the rich traditions and cultural narratives of its origins. A mythical story is a traditional narrative that often carries deep symbolic meaning, serving to illuminate the beliefs, historical events, and cultural practices of a particular society. These tales frequently delve into the origins of the world, the exploits of legendary heroes, and the actions of deities, providing insight into the values and moral lessons that shape a community’s identity. Through rich imagery and allegorical elements, mythical stories not only entertain but also educate, preserving the collective memory and wisdom of a culture for generations. They act as a bridge between the past and present, allowing individuals to connect with their heritage while exploring universal themes of existence, morality, and the human experience.
Obeysekara investigates the intricate essence of traditional folk tales, offering a comprehensive examination of their underlying themes and motifs. In his analysis, he not only unravels the narrative structures and cultural significance of these stories but also contextualizes them within their historical and sociological frameworks. By doing so, he provides readers with a deeper understanding of how these tales reflect the values, beliefs, and social dynamics of the communities from which they originate. This multifaceted approach allows for a richer appreciation of the folk tales, highlighting their role as both artistic expressions and vital components of cultural heritage.
Mythical Narratives and the Collective Unconscious
Mythical narratives are deeply connected to the collective unconscious and act as expressions of inherited, universal archetypes that form a shared layer of human experience across cultures and history. These mythical narratives posit a profound, universal aspect of the human psyche that is shared among all individuals. This collective unconscious houses archetypes—fundamental symbols and themes, such as the hero or the nurturing mother—that recur in myths, dreams, and symbols across various cultures. The presence of these archetypes elucidates the striking similarities found in mythological themes and motifs across diverse societies, suggesting a common psychological heritage.
Carl Jung’s exploration revealed that these universal patterns transcend cultural and historical boundaries, leading him to propose that a segment of the human mind contains a collective unconscious, akin to a shared, primal memory that connects all members of the human race. Numerous mythological tales, such as Sinhabahu, exemplify this phenomenon, illustrating how ancient cultures have woven similar narratives that resonate with the collective human experience. It’s unclear if Carl Jung was familiar with the Sinhabahu legend itself; though there is no direct evidence that he wrote about it, his theories are applied to it by later Sri Lankan scholars like Obeysekara.
Mythical narratives play a significant role in shaping the collective unconscious by serving as reflections and manifestations of universal archetypes and patterns inherent within it. Carl Jung posited that these myths unveil the common psychological frameworks that are passed down through generations, highlighting the shared mental structures that define humanity. Archetypes such as the hero, the mother, and the trickster emerge consistently across diverse cultures, illustrating fundamental themes that resonate deeply within the human experience. These motifs not only influence our perceptions and emotions but also guide our behaviors, providing a vital framework for comprehending and integrating the more profound dimensions of the human psyche. Through the exploration of these archetypal stories, individuals can gain insights into their own lives and the collective human experience, fostering a deeper understanding of the psychological forces that shape our existence.
The Lion as a Totem Animal
The lion has emerged as a significant totem animal for the people of Sri Lanka, especially among the Sinhalese community, largely due to the legendary tale of Sinhabahu. A totem is a natural entity, often an object or an animal, that holds profound spiritual significance for a specific community or society. This belief system imbues the totem with a sense of identity and connection, leading the group to adopt it as a symbol or emblem that represents their values, heritage, and collective spirit. The totem serves not only as a marker of cultural identity but also as a source of guidance and inspiration, reflecting the community’s connection to nature and the spiritual realm. Through rituals, storytelling, and artistic expressions, the totem becomes a vital part of the society’s traditions, reinforcing bonds among its members and fostering a sense of belonging and continuity across generations.
The lion, often referred to as a beast, serves as the father of Prince Sinhabahu, who famously abducted his mother from her clan. This lion can be interpreted as a metaphor for a man of extraordinary strength or even as a figure with a lion-like visage, particularly relevant in the context of Hansen’s disease, where individuals may exhibit a leonine appearance.
The lion has emerged as a powerful totem for the Sinhala nation. The lion represents not only the physical prowess associated with the animal but also embodies the cultural identity and heritage of the Sinhalese. This legendary figure, believed to be the progenitor of the Sinhalese people, has established the lion as a significant emblem of both the Sinhalese identity and the monarchy since ancient times. The intertwining of history and mythology has reinforced the lion’s status as a quintessential symbol of strength, courage, and resilience. Over the centuries, this association has culminated in the lion’s prominent depiction on the national flag of Sri Lanka.
The lion, revered as a totem animal, embodies the qualities of leadership, strength, courage, and protection, serving as a powerful source of inspiration for individuals to embrace boldness, resilience, and self-assurance. This majestic creature symbolizes an inner strength that empowers one to confront and surmount obstacles, fostering a spirit of self-expression and active participation within the community. When the lion appears as a spirit guide, it often heralds a significant phase of spiritual development, emerging at pivotal moments when an individual must assert their authority, safeguard their domain, or lead with compassion and integrity. This connection to the Lion encourages a deeper understanding of one’s capabilities and the importance of standing firm in one’s beliefs while nurturing the bonds that unite us with others.
The lineage of Prince Sinhabahu, traced back to a lion, symbolizes the embodiment of masculine power and vigor. Such symbolic representations are deeply rooted in social, ideological, and political constructs, as noted by Miller (2011), which is why the lion has come to represent the ‘Sinhala’ race. Across various cultures, lions are revered for their innate qualities of strength, nobility, and bravery, traits that resonate universally. Their status as apex predators positions them as protectors against malevolence, while their majestic presence conveys dignity, authority, and leadership. This widespread admiration has led to their incorporation into religious practices, mythological narratives, heraldic traditions, and use as guardians in both ancient and contemporary societies.
Carl Jung posited that animals often symbolize instinctual drives, with the lion serving as an archetype for the Sinhalese people. At the core of any symbol lies a vital energy, whether instinctual or archetypal, often referred to as libido or anima, as discussed by Jutta von Buchholtz (2000). Furthermore, Obeyesekere explores the concept of “symbolic remove,” which describes the cultural evolution of symbolic forms. These symbols, although regressive due to their origins in individual psychological development and unconscious processes, also possess a progressive aspect, as they enable the transformation of primitive motivations from early experiences into a more profound understanding of the sacred, as articulated by Nuckolls (1997).
The Lion—the Emblem of Sinhalese Identity
The lion has emerged as a powerful symbol of Sinhalese identity, deeply rooted in ancient folklore and its association with the island’s inaugural monarch, Prince Vijaya. This connection is primarily derived from the Sinhabahu legend, which narrates the tale of Sinhabahu, a lion-man who is said to be the progenitor of the Sinhalese people. According to this legend, Sinhabahu, born of a lion and a human princess, embodies strength, courage, and nobility, traits that resonate with the Sinhalese culture. As Prince Vijaya, a descendant of Sinhabahu, established his reign in Sri Lanka, the lion became an enduring emblem of the Sinhalese heritage, representing not only royal lineage but also the resilience and identity of the Sinhalese people throughout history. This rich tapestry of myth and history has solidified the lion’s status as a national symbol, reflecting the pride and unity of the Sinhalese community.
The lion has long served as a powerful emblem of Sinhalese identity, much like the peacock represented the Mauryas, the fish symbolized the Pandyas, and the tiger stood for the Cholas. This majestic creature is deeply woven into the historical narrative of Sri Lanka, with King Dutugemunu famously carrying a lion flag during his legendary battle against Elara, a moment immortalized in a painting at the Dambulla temple from the Kandyan period. Furthermore, the Sinhalese kings of Anuradhapura minted coins adorned with the lion, reinforcing its significance in their reign. Additionally, King Kashyapa’s creation of a colossal lion statue at Sigiriya exemplifies the lion’s enduring status as a national symbol, reflecting the pride and cultural heritage of the Sinhalese people throughout the ages.
Bestiality Narrated in the Sinhabahu Story
The Sinhabahu legend contains elements that can be interpreted as bestiality, particularly in its portrayal of the protagonist’s origins and the relationships he forms. Bestiality, defined as sexual intercourse between humans and animals, raises significant ethical, legal, and moral concerns across various societies. This practice is often viewed as taboo.
The myth of Sinhabahu delves into complex themes, including the controversial subject of bestiality. This ancient narrative, rooted in the cultural and historical context of its origin, presents a tale that intertwines human and animal characteristics, ultimately exploring the boundaries of morality and nature. Sinhabahu, a character born from a union between a lion and a human, symbolizes the intersection of the primal instincts of the animal kingdom with the rationality of humanity. The story raises profound questions about identity, lineage, and the consequences of transgressing natural laws.
The Mahavamsa recounts the tale of a king from Vanga, an ancient region corresponding to modern-day Bengal, who took as his wife the daughter of the Kalinga monarch, now part of Odisha. This union produced a daughter named Suppadevi, who was foretold to engage with the king of beasts. As she matured, Princess Suppadevi sought to carve out her own destiny and departed from Vanga, joining a caravan that was en route to Magadha. However, their journey was abruptly interrupted when they were ambushed by a creature referred to as Sinha, meaning “lion,” in a forest located in the Lala region, which has been variously identified with either Rarh, an area within the Vanga-Kalinga territory, or Lata, a region in present-day Gujarat. During the chaos of the attack, Suppadevi managed to escape but soon found herself face-to-face with Sinha once more. Captivated by her presence, Sinha was drawn to her, and in a moment of recognition of the prophecy, she reciprocated his affection. Subsequently, Sinha imprisoned Suppadevi in a cave, where they had two offspring: a son named Sinhabahu, which translates to “lion-armed,” and a daughter named Sinhasivali.
The cultural implications of bestiality differ significantly across various societies, encompassing a wide range of historical, mythological, and ritualistic contexts. In some cultures, it is intertwined with specific rites or considered a forbidden practice, while in others, it appears in modern media portrayals that often mirror societal fears or notions of moral transgression. Although bestiality is frequently regarded as a taboo subject in many parts of the world, there are historical instances where it has been recognized as a form of sexual expression. The ancient Egyptian religious customs included elements that could be interpreted as bestiality, illustrating its varied significance throughout history.
In mythology, the theme of bestiality carries profound cultural implications that extend beyond mere taboo. It serves to delineate the distinctions between human and divine realms, often reflecting societal anxieties surrounding sexuality and the institution of marriage. These narratives frequently delve into the complexities of desire, illustrating how the intertwining of human and animalistic traits can symbolize deeper connections to the natural world. Furthermore, bestiality in myth acts as a powerful metaphor for the primal forces of power and lust, revealing the underlying tensions between civilization and the wild. Through these stories, cultures grapple with their fears and fascinations, using the motif of bestiality to explore the boundaries of morality and the essence of human nature itself.
As Sinhabahu navigates his existence, the myth serves as a reflection on the darker aspects of desire and the societal implications of such unions, prompting audiences to confront their own perceptions of normalcy and taboo. Through its vivid imagery and allegorical depth, the myth invites a critical examination of the human condition and the often-blurred lines between civilization and the wild.
Sinhabahu and the Oedipus Complex
The Oedipus complex emerges during Freud’s phallic stage of development, which typically occurs between the ages of three and six. During this critical period, a young boy begins to experience unconscious feelings of attraction towards his mother, while simultaneously perceiving his father as a competitor for her affection. This internal conflict often leads to intense emotions such as jealousy and anger, as well as a profound fear of castration, which represents the boy’s anxiety regarding potential retribution from his father. According to psychoanalytic theory, resolving these complex feelings is essential for forming a robust psychological identity and developing the superego. This resolution is achieved when the child identifies with the father figure, thereby suppressing his desires for the mother and internalizing paternal values, which ultimately contributes to a healthier psychological framework as he matures.
The term “Sri Lankan Oedipus” refers to the legend of Sinhabahu, a mythical figure credited with founding the Sinhala people, and it draws intriguing parallels to the Greek myth of Oedipus. Both narratives revolve around a central character who unwittingly engages in patricide and incest, resulting in profound consequences that shape their respective cultures. In Sinhabahu’s story, this tragic fate is symbolized through a totemic relationship with a lion, which serves as a powerful emblem of national identity and heritage. Furthermore, the influence of Sophocles’ “Oedipus Rex” is evident in Sri Lanka, where adaptations and performances of the classic play have been integrated into the local cultural landscape. This connection not only highlights the shared themes of fate and familial conflict but also underscores the enduring impact of these myths on the formation of national narratives and theatrical traditions in Sri Lanka.
Dr. Wijaya Dissanayaka, a distinguished consultant psychiatrist and respected lecturer, posits that many narratives center around the theme of a hero vanquishing a formidable beast or dragon. This recurring motif, he argues, serves as a profound representation of the Oedipal conflict, a concept rooted in psychoanalytic theory. The act of slaying the dragon can be interpreted as a symbolic confrontation with paternal authority, where the hero’s triumph signifies a resolution of inner turmoil and the quest for identity. Through this lens, these stories not only entertain but also delve into the complexities of human psychology, reflecting the struggles individuals face in reconciling their desires and familial relationships.
In the narrative of Sinhabahu, parallels can be drawn to the classic tale of Oedipus, particularly in the tragic act of patricide, as Sinhabahu also kills his father. However, a significant divergence exists in their respective stories; unlike Oedipus, who unwittingly marries his mother, Sinhabahu chooses to marry his sister instead. This crucial difference highlights the unique aspects of the Sinhabahu tale, positioning it as a semi-Oedipal narrative. While both stories explore themes of fate, familial conflict, and the consequences of one’s actions, the resolution in Sinhabahu’s story diverges from the archetypal tragedy of Oedipus, offering a distinct interpretation of similar motifs within the realm of mythological storytelling.
Buddhist philosophy, particularly as illustrated in the narrative of Prince Ajatasatru, encompasses profound themes that parallel the Oedipus complex, including elements such as parental abandonment, the act of patricide, and the intense rivalry for parental affection. In this tale, Prince Ajatasatru grapples with the psychological turmoil stemming from his relationship with his father, King Bimbisara, and the subsequent actions that lead to a tragic confrontation. The prince’s journey is marked by a deep-seated conflict, as he seeks to assert his identity and claim his rightful place in the royal lineage, often at the expense of his father’s life. This struggle not only highlights the complexities of familial bonds but also reflects the broader existential questions of desire, power, and the consequences of one’s actions. The interplay of these themes within the context of Buddhist teachings invites a deeper exploration of the human psyche, revealing how ancient narratives continue to resonate with contemporary understandings of familial dynamics and psychological conflict.
Moreover, the Thayo Darma Jātakaya can be viewed as a rich metaphorical tale that encapsulates themes reminiscent of the Oedipus complex, particularly highlighting a son’s tumultuous quest to overthrow his father and ascend to the throne. In this narrative, the father-king embodies a figure who actively stifles the growth of his male heirs, preventing them from reaching maturity and posing a challenge to his authority. However, one son manages to evade this oppressive fate, fueled by a burgeoning animosity towards his father, which is secretly nurtured by his mother’s support. This complex relationship culminates in the son’s violent act of patricide, as he seeks to seize not only the throne but also the companionship of women associated with his father. The story intricately weaves together the fundamental aspects of the Oedipus complex, including the intense conflict between father and son, the rivalry for maternal affection, and the son’s relentless pursuit of power, thereby offering a profound exploration of familial dynamics and the darker facets of ambition.
Patricide in the Sinhabahu Story
Prince Sinhabahu, a figure of both valor and tragedy, found himself in a harrowing situation that would forever alter the course of his life. Sinhabahu confronted his father. The confrontation culminated in a dramatic and fateful encounter, where the prince, fueled by a mix of courage and sorrow, ultimately took the life of Sinha. Finally, he had to kill his own father. He killed the totem animal.
The act of Sinhabahu killing his father carries profound significance within the narrative, symbolizing a complex interplay of destiny, power, and familial conflict. The act itself can be interpreted as a tragic assertion of autonomy, where Sinhabahu, in a desperate bid to escape the shadow of paternal authority, commits an irreversible act that alters the course of his life and the lives of those around him.
Freud defines patricide as the act of killing one’s father, which he interprets as a manifestation of the unconscious desire to remove the paternal rival within the framework of the Oedipus complex. He further theorizes that this concept extends beyond individual psychology to encompass a collective phenomenon, wherein a group of brothers collectively murders the “primal father” of a primitive horde. This act, according to Freud, serves as a foundational moment in the development of civilization, morality, religion, and social structures. The repercussions of such a primal act lead to feelings of collective guilt among the brothers, which in turn fosters the creation of the totem—a symbolic representation of the slain father that embodies both reverence and remorse. This intricate interplay of familial dynamics and societal evolution underscores Freud’s belief in the profound psychological underpinnings of human culture and social organization.
Patricide, defined as the act of killing one’s father, transcends mere literal interpretation and instead serves as a profound symbolic archetype within the collective unconscious. This concept, introduced by Carl Jung, refers to a deep-seated psychological framework that is universally shared among humanity, encompassing archetypes that reflect common human experiences and conflicts. In this context, patricide symbolizes the struggle against paternal authority, the rejection of established traditions, and the dynamic tension between generations, where the younger generation seeks to challenge and ultimately supplant the older one. This archetype is vividly illustrated in various myths and narratives across different cultures, highlighting a fundamental human conflict that resonates through time and space, revealing the complexities of familial relationships and societal evolution.
Freud proposed a theory centered around the concept of a primitive horde, characterized by an all-powerful father figure. This dynamic culminates in the fratricidal act of the brothers who conspire to kill their father, an event that subsequently paves the way for the emergence of the totemic clan. This theoretical framework explores the psychological conditions that allow such thoughts to manifest.
In the context of the Sinhala Nation, the legend of Sinhabahu plays a pivotal role in establishing totemism, a belief system that fosters a mystical connection between the Sinhala people and the lion, a spirit being. This relationship has evolved into a profound symbol of identity and continuity for the Sinhala Nation, representing not only their cultural heritage but also their enduring spirit.
Patricide Described in the Mahabharata and in the Other Ancient Mythical Stories
The ancient Indian epic Mahabharata and the Sri Lankan myth of Sinhabahu exhibit no recorded parallels in their narratives or themes. The Mahabharata is a monumental text that chronicles the intense dynastic struggle between two factions, the Pandavas and the Kauravas, ultimately leading to the climactic and devastating Battle of Kurukshetra. This epic not only explores the complexities of duty, righteousness, and moral dilemmas faced by its characters but also delves into the broader implications of war and its consequences on society.
In contrast, the Sinhabahu myth serves as a foundational story for the Sinhala people, detailing the legendary origins of their nation through the tale of a princess who unites with a lion, resulting in the birth of twin sons. This narrative emphasizes themes of identity, lineage, and the intertwining of human and animal realms, reflecting the cultural and historical significance of the Sinhala heritage. Thus, while both texts are rich in their respective cultural contexts, they remain distinct in their storytelling and thematic focus.
The narratives found in both the Mahabharata and the Sinhabahu tales prominently feature the theme of parricide, a grave act that carries profound moral and ethical implications. In the Mahabharata, the complex relationships among family members, particularly the conflict between the Pandavas and Kauravas, culminate in tragic events that often involve the betrayal of familial bonds, leading to the ultimate act of killing one’s own father. Similarly, the Sinhabahu story explores the consequences of such actions, where the protagonist’s struggle against his lineage and the resulting violence against his father highlight the tragic dimensions of duty, honor, and the quest for power. These narratives not only serve as cautionary tales but also delve into the psychological turmoil faced by characters who grapple with their identities and the weight of their actions, ultimately reflecting on the broader themes of fate, justice, and the moral dilemmas inherent in human relationships.
In the epic narrative of the Mahabharata, one of the most poignant instances of patricide unfolds when Babruvahana, unaware of his true lineage, fatally wounds his father, Arjuna, with an arrow. This tragic event occurs during the Ashwamedha Yagna, a significant ritual that symbolizes royal authority and sovereignty. The backdrop of this act is steeped in a curse laid upon Arjuna by the river goddess Ganga, who sought retribution for the death of her son, Bhishma, at the hands of Arjuna. Ganga’s curse foretold that Arjuna would meet his end at the hands of his own offspring, a fate that Babruvahana unwittingly fulfills in a moment of conflict. The encounter serves as a profound exploration of destiny and the intricate web of cause and effect that permeates the Mahabharata. However, the narrative does not conclude with this tragic act; Babruvahana, upon realizing the gravity of his actions and the bond he shares with Arjuna, utilizes a magical gem to restore his father to life, thus intertwining themes of loss, redemption, and the complexities of familial relationships within the epic’s broader tapestry.
Patricide emerges as a prominent motif in ancient epics, particularly within the realm of Greek mythology, where it is vividly illustrated through the acts of Cronus, who castrated his father Uranus, and the tragic tale of Oedipus, who unwittingly killed his own father. These narratives delve into the theme of the overthrow of established orders by the younger generation, often fueled by a relentless quest for power or an inescapable fate. Additionally, the Babylonian epic Enûma Elish presents a parallel instance with the god Ea slaying his father Apsu, while in Hurrian mythology, Teshub defeats Kumarbi, both of which signify a recurring divine cycle of conflict and the generational struggle for supremacy. Such stories not only reflect the complexities of familial relationships but also serve as allegories for the broader societal transitions and the inevitable clash between the old and the new.
Parricides Recorded in Ancient Sri Lankan History
The influence of Sinhabahu on the theme of parricide is profound and multifaceted, reflecting deep cultural and psychological undercurrents within the narrative. The earliest documented case of parricide in ancient Sri Lankan history involves King Kashyapa (also known as Kassapa), who infamously killed his father, King Dathusena, in a bid to usurp the throne during the 5th century CE. Historical narratives, including the accounts from Portuguese sources such as De Queros, suggest that King Seethawaka Rajasinghe may have murdered his father, King Mayadunne. This claim, however, remains a subject of considerable debate among historians. The allegation of patricide is often associated with a broader conflict involving Buddhist monks, which subsequently led to Rajasinghe’s notable conversion to Hinduism. This shift in religious allegiance is seen as a significant turning point in his reign, reflecting the complex interplay of power, faith, and familial loyalty during a tumultuous period in Sri Lankan history. The implications of these events continue to resonate in discussions about the political and religious dynamics of the time.
Sinhabahu and the Laius Syndrome
The Laius Syndrome is a conceptual framework primarily derived from Silke-Maria Weineck’s (Professor of German and comparative literature at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor) analysis in “The Laius Syndrome, or the Ends of Political Fatherhood.” This term encapsulates the intricate and often detrimental dynamics between a father and his son, drawing inspiration from the mythological narrative of King Laius within the Oedipus mythos. In this context, the father figure is emblematic of various themes, including the exertion of political authority, the propensity for violence, the obsessive desire to dictate one’s lineage, and the tragic inevitability of fate. These elements converge to illustrate a poignant narrative where the father’s attempts to control his destiny ultimately culminate in his own downfall at the hands of his son. Notably, Laius Syndrome shares thematic parallels with the Sinhabahu myth, further enriching the discourse on paternal relationships and the tragic consequences of power and control.
Killing of the Totem Animal
Sinhabahu made a fateful decision to eliminate the totem animal that held significant cultural and spiritual importance to his community. This totem, revered for its symbolic representation of strength and protection, was not merely an animal but a vital part of the tribe’s identity and heritage.
In a courageous quest to rid his village of a menacing lion that had terrorized the inhabitants, Sinhabahu embarked on a perilous journey into the heart of the wilderness. Armed with a finely crafted bow and a quiver full of deadly arrows, he tracked the beast through dense underbrush and treacherous terrain, driven by the cries of his fellow villagers who lived in constant fear. After a tense and arduous pursuit, Sinhabahu finally confronted the formidable creature, his heart pounding with determination. With a steady hand and unwavering focus, he released a well-aimed arrow that struck true, bringing the ferocious lion to a swift end. The villagers, witnessing this act of bravery, erupted in cheers and expressions of gratitude, hailing Sinhabahu as their savior and protector, forever grateful for his valor in liberating them from the clutches of the evil beast that had plagued their lives.
The clan totems hold a significant place within the community, treated with the same reverence as human members of the group. This deep-seated respect extends to the belief that any act of eating, killing, or otherwise harming these totems is not merely a physical act but a profound violation of the clan’s values. Such an offense is thought to have dire consequences, particularly in the form of a decline in the clan’s population. The community believes that breaching taboos associated with the totems can lead to a corresponding reduction in clan size, reflecting a direct connection between the spiritual and physical realms. This belief underscores the importance of maintaining harmony with the totems, as they are seen as integral to the clan’s identity and survival.
Killing a totem animal is considered a profound violation of a sacred taboo, which can result in dire spiritual repercussions for both the individual responsible and their community. Such actions may invite misfortune, illness, or a disconnection from spiritual realms, as the totem is not merely an animal but a symbol of the group’s ancestral lineage, protective spirit, and their bond with the natural world. This act is perceived as an affront to the totem, which embodies the spiritual essence that connects the clan to its heritage and the environment. While the majority of cultures strictly prohibit the killing of a totem animal, some traditions permit this act under specific circumstances or during particular rituals. However, even in these cases, it is imperative that the act is performed with the utmost reverence and respect for the spirit of the animal, acknowledging its significance and the potential consequences of such a grave decision.
Dr. Vamik Volkan, Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia, luminously writes on the killing of the totem animal, or the patricide, thus.
Long ago, primitive people lived in small tribes led by despotic leaders. With his unlimited power, the leader or father considered all the women of the tribe his exclusive property. If the young men of the tribe, or sons, expressed jealousy, they were killed, castrated, or excommunicated. Their fate unbearable, the young men joined forces, killed the father, and ate him. But the father’s influence would not disappear. In death he became more powerful. Haunted by the ghost of their father, the sons replaced him with a horrible and strong animal, a totem. It absorbed the sons’ ambivalence—the simultaneous hate and love they were experiencing for their dead father. Since the ghost of their father lived in the totem, however, the sons were still not free of his influence, and their hate for him, as well as their love for him, continued. Totemism is thus both a religious and a social system.” (Hence, the totem animal was used to maintain two useful prohibitions—one against killing the totem animal (patricide) and the other against having sexual relations with women of the same totem or clan (incest).(Totem and Taboo in Romania: A Psychopolitical Diagnosis—Dr. Vamik Volkan)
However, the concept of “killing one’s spirit animal” has emerged in contemporary discourse as a metaphor for personal transformation, suggesting that such an act, whether literal or figurative, can serve as a powerful catalyst for addressing and confronting deeper spiritual or personal challenges. This duality highlights the complexity of the relationship between individuals and their totem animals, where the act of killing can simultaneously represent a violation of sacred bonds and an opportunity for profound self-reflection and growth.
Incest in the Sinhabahu Story
The concept of incest is notably illustrated in ancient Sri Lankan folklore through the tale of Sinhabahu, a significant legend that recounts the origins of the Sinhala people. According to this narrative, Prince Sinhabahu, who is credited with establishing the Sinhala lineage, entered into a union with his sister, Sinha Seewali. This controversial marriage resulted in the birth of their son, Prince Vijaya, who would go on to become the first king of Sri Lanka. The legend not only highlights the complexities of familial relationships in the context of royal lineage but also serves as a foundational myth that shapes the cultural identity of the Sinhala people. Through this story, themes of power, destiny, and the intertwining of familial bonds are explored, reflecting the intricate tapestry of Sri Lankan history and mythology.
The legend of Sinhabahu narrates the tale of a prince who, in a controversial act, wed his own sister, Sinha Seewali, thereby engaging in incestuous relations. This narrative raises intriguing questions about the social norms and familial structures of ancient societies. Sontakke (2017) suggests that in prehistoric times, there were likely no prohibitions against mating among close relatives, indicating a vastly different understanding of kinship and marriage compared to contemporary standards. Such practices may have been influenced by various factors, including the need to preserve lineage, consolidate power, or ensure the continuation of certain bloodlines. This historical context invites further exploration into the evolution of societal norms surrounding incest and the implications these legends have on our understanding of ancient cultures.
Greek mythology often explores the origins of various cultural deities, including those associated with music and dance, through narratives of incestuous relationships among divine figures. For instance, the siblings Shu and Tefnut gave rise to Geb and Nut, who themselves were a brother-sister duo that eventually entered into marriage. This pattern of familial unions continues with their grandson Horus, who, in a strikingly complex twist of mythology, chose his mother, Isis, as his consort. This relationship not only highlights the intricate web of connections among the gods but also symbolizes the intertwining of maternal and romantic bonds within the divine narrative, reflecting the multifaceted nature of love and power in ancient Greek culture.
For over three millennia, incestuous unions among siblings and other closely related individuals were a prevalent cultural norm among the ancient Egyptian pharaohs, primarily aimed at safeguarding the purity of the royal bloodline and reinforcing the divine status attributed to the king. This practice ensured that power and wealth remained concentrated within the royal family, thereby maintaining a sense of continuity and stability in governance. However, the implications of such marriages were dire, as they significantly increased the risk of genetic disorders, resulting in various health complications and physical deformities among the offspring of these unions. A notable example of this is Pharaoh Tutankhamun, whose remains exhibited several signs of genetic abnormalities, underscoring the detrimental effects of these incestuous practices on the health of the royal lineage.
The incest taboo represents a nearly universal cultural norm that forbids sexual relationships among close blood relatives, although its interpretation and enforcement can differ significantly from one society to another. While the majority of cultures uphold this prohibition, the specific relationships deemed unacceptable can vary widely; for instance, some societies may allow marriages between certain cousins, while others strictly prohibit such unions. Additionally, various cultural myths, such as those depicting ancestral siblings who survive cataclysmic events like floods and subsequently repopulate the earth, illustrate the intricate and often contradictory nature of incest within different cultural frameworks. These narratives not only reflect the complexities surrounding familial relationships but also reveal how cultural beliefs shape the understanding and acceptance of incestuous relationships in diverse contexts.
Sinhabahu- the Archetypal Hero
The figure of Sinhabahu exemplifies the archetypal hero, a character type that transcends cultural boundaries and appears in narratives worldwide. This hero embarks on a transformative journey, confronting various challenges that ultimately lead to personal growth and the achievement of significant goals, which often resonate deeply within their society. Central to this archetype is the Hero’s Journey, or monomyth, a narrative framework that encompasses a departure from the familiar world, a series of trials and initiatory experiences, and a return enriched with newfound wisdom or gifts intended for the community. Essential traits of this archetypal hero include unwavering courage, selflessness, a strong moral compass, and a readiness to make sacrifices for the greater good. Through these qualities, Sinhabahu not only navigates his own path but also leaves a lasting impact on those around him, embodying the timeless essence of heroism that inspires and uplifts.
His triumph over the lion firmly established him as the quintessential hero, a notion thoroughly examined by Joseph Campbell in his seminal work, “The Hero with a Thousand Faces” (1968). In this influential text, Campbell articulates the essence of a hero as someone who ventures beyond the confines of the mundane world to undertake a profound and transformative journey. Throughout this odyssey, the hero confronts various challenges and personal fears, ultimately striving to fulfill a quest that not only tests their mettle but also serves to uplift and benefit their community. This archetypal narrative underscores the hero’s role as a catalyst for change, illustrating how their extraordinary experiences resonate with universal themes of courage, sacrifice, and the pursuit of a greater good.
The archetypal hero holds profound significance within a culture, serving as a universal template for both individual and societal advancement. This figure inspires people to confront and surmount obstacles through acts of bravery and selflessness, while simultaneously embodying the fundamental values and aspirations of the culture from which it originates. Narratives such as the Hero’s Journey encapsulate these themes, providing a structured approach to understanding personal transformation, ethical growth, and the victory of human consciousness over various internal and external challenges. Through these compelling stories, cultures foster a sense of collective identity and shared ambition that resonates across generations, reinforcing the importance of resilience and moral integrity in the face of adversity.
Sinhabahu is revered as a quintessential hero within Sri Lankan culture, symbolizing the archetypal journey of triumph over adversity and representing the mythological roots of the Sinhala people. His narrative encapsulates the essence of resilience and the struggle for identity, making him a pivotal figure in the cultural consciousness. In contrast, Madduma Bandara epitomizes the child hero, showcasing remarkable courage in the face of imminent execution, thus highlighting the theme of innocence confronting grave challenges. Additionally, other notable figures such as King Dutugamunu, Keppetipola Disawe and Puran Appu emerge as significant heroes, each embodying distinct archetypes of national resistance, cultural revival, and military strength. These warriors not only reflect the valor and determination of their time but also serve as enduring symbols of the collective spirit and heritage of the Sri Lankan people, reinforcing the narrative of heroism that is deeply woven into the fabric of the nation’s history.
Transformative Journey of Sinhabahu
The transformative journey of Sinhabahu is a profound narrative that encapsulates themes of identity, redemption, and the quest for belonging. Sinhabahu’s early life is marked by a struggle to reconcile his dual heritage, which sets the stage for his eventual metamorphosis. As he navigates the complexities of his existence, he faces numerous challenges that test his strength and resolve. His journey is not merely a physical one; it is also an emotional and spiritual odyssey that leads him to confront his fears and embrace his true self. Through trials and tribulations, Sinhabahu evolves from a being caught between two worlds into a figure of strength and leadership, ultimately finding his place within the societal fabric. This transformation is not only significant for him personally but also catalyzes change within his community, illustrating the power of self-discovery and the importance of embracing one’s roots.
The Connection Between Sinhabahu and Hindu Mythology
The narrative of Sinhabahu, a prominent figure in Sri Lankan folklore, exhibits intriguing parallels with elements of Hindu mythology, particularly in its themes of heroism, divine lineage, and the interplay between human and supernatural realms. Sinhabahu is often depicted as a superhuman with enormous strength and nobility. This dual heritage resonates with the Hindu concept of avatars, where divine beings take on various forms to fulfill cosmic duties. Furthermore, the tale of Sinhabahu’s journey to establish a kingdom in Sri Lanka mirrors the epic quests found in Hindu epics, such as the Ramayana and Mahabharata, where protagonists face formidable challenges and engage in battles that determine the fate of their realms. The lion, a symbol of power and courage in both traditions, further cements the connection, as it appears in various forms across Hindu texts, representing divine protection and royal authority. Thus, the story of Sinhabahu not only enriches the cultural tapestry of Sri Lanka but also reflects the broader themes present in Hindu mythology, illustrating the shared narrative motifs that transcend geographical boundaries.
Beowulf and Sinhabahu
The ancient English epic poem Beowulf shares notable similarities with the tale of Sinhabahu. Beowulf, recognized as the oldest surviving epic in the English language, dates back to around 700 AD and has undergone numerous retellings before being transcribed. This narrative follows the heroic journey of a prince who confronts and defeats the fearsome monster Grendel, ultimately liberating his people from terror. Both Beowulf and Sinhabahu, along with contemporary narratives such as Star Wars, particularly the conflict between Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader, illustrate a recurring theme of paternal conflict. In these stories, the son often rises against the father’s authority, embodying a primal animosity that culminates in acts of patricide. This motif underscores a deep-seated struggle for identity and power, reflecting the complexities of familial relationships across different cultures and eras.
Although Beowulf and the Sri Lankan myth of Sinhabahu originate from different cultural backgrounds and possess unique storylines, they share several notable similarities. Both narratives feature heroic protagonists who are of noble descent, embodying the ideals of bravery and valor. Central to their tales is the confrontation with formidable, monstrous adversaries that threaten their realms, highlighting the theme of the hero’s struggle against chaos and evil. Furthermore, the legacies of these characters are deeply intertwined with their extraordinary feats and the strength they exhibit, which ultimately shape the destinies of their people and kingdoms. Each story serves as a foundational myth within its respective culture, symbolizing a significant era marked by heroic endeavors and the establishment of societal values, thus reinforcing the importance of these figures in the collective memory and identity of their cultures.
Symbols and Cultural Meanings in the Legend of Sinhabahu
In the legend of Sinhabahu, the lion, or Sinha, serves as a pivotal symbol, embodying the origins of the Sinhala ethnic group and representing a powerful male archetype that resonates deeply with the identity of the Sri Lankan people. Within this rich narrative, Sinhabahu himself emerges as a significant figure, symbolizing the collective history and cultural heritage shared by the community. The story also introduces the theme of incest, which not only transgresses established social norms but also signifies a rupture in familial ties, thereby reflecting the totemic roots of the Sinhala nation. This complex interplay of symbols highlights the intricate relationship between identity, history, and cultural values in the context of Sri Lanka’s past.
Cultural symbols encompass a range of objects, words, and actions that embody the shared meanings, values, and beliefs prevalent within a particular society, thereby facilitating communication and reinforcing a sense of group identity. These symbols can take various forms, including tangible items, specific behaviors, and linguistic expressions, all of which offer a window into the collective consciousness of a culture and act as vital tools for both individual expression and communal solidarity. It is important to recognize that the significance attributed to a symbol is not universal; rather, it is shaped by cultural context and can differ markedly between societies or even evolve within the same culture over time. This dynamic nature of symbols underscores their role in reflecting and shaping the identities and experiences of individuals within a cultural framework.
Obeyesekere offers a deep exploration of how symbols, cultural meanings, and individual concepts undergo transformation, adaptation, and redefinition over time, significantly impacting Sri Lankan society. This evolution can manifest on a societal scale, leading to shifts in cultural norms and collective identities, or on a psychological level, where it fosters personal development and the integration of previously unrecognized aspects of consciousness. Such changes are not merely superficial; they reflect a dynamic interplay between tradition and modernity, revealing how individuals and communities navigate the complexities of their cultural landscapes. Through this lens, one can appreciate the intricate processes that shape human experience, highlighting the fluidity of meaning and the ongoing dialogue between the past and the present.
The Application of Psychoanalytic Concepts to the Sinhabahu Myth
The application of psychoanalytic concepts to the Sinhabahu myth is explored through the lens of ethnopsychoanalysis, which interprets the narrative as a profound psychological drama that encapsulates the archetypal conflicts inherent in the human psyche. This approach delves into the myth’s characters and their interactions, revealing the underlying emotional and psychological struggles that resonate with universal human experiences. By examining the myth in this context, one can uncover the symbolic representations of internal conflicts, such as the battle between primal instincts and societal expectations, as well as the quest for identity and belonging. The rich tapestry of the Sinhabahu story thus serves as a mirror reflecting the complexities of human nature, illustrating how these timeless themes continue to shape our understanding of self and society.
Integrating psychoanalytic theories into the field of anthropology enriches the analysis of cultures by delving into the unconscious motivations that shape human behavior. This exploration allows for a deeper understanding of subjective experiences, illuminating how cultural expressions such as myths and rituals are often grounded in universal psychological frameworks. By adopting this interdisciplinary perspective, researchers can uncover the intricate power dynamics and processes of socialization that exist beneath the surface of cultural variances. Such insights enhance ethnographic studies by revealing the often-overlooked dimensions of life, thereby refining our comprehension of why certain experiences resonate with social significance while others remain on the periphery. This approach not only broadens the scope of cultural analysis but also fosters a more nuanced appreciation of shared human experiences across diverse societies.
Symbolic Transformation in the Sinhabahu Myth
Symbolic transformation encompasses the dynamic processes through which symbols, meanings, and cultural elements undergo change and development across various contexts and over time. This phenomenon significantly impacts societal norms, shapes personal identity, and influences our comprehension of the world around us. It manifests in cultural evolution, where symbols adapt to reflect new social realities and dynamics, as well as in individual psychological growth, exemplified by Carl Jung’s exploration of how symbols facilitate the transformation of the individual psyche. Additionally, symbolic transformation is evident in the realms of art and design, where creators skillfully manipulate existing images to forge new symbolic interpretations and convey complex ideas. Furthermore, this concept extends into more technical domains, such as the transformation of mathematical objects within symbolic languages, illustrating the versatility and breadth of symbolic transformation across diverse fields of human endeavor.
Obeyesekere explores the intricate ways in which cultures create and utilize symbolic frameworks, such as myths and rituals, to address and reinterpret fundamental psychological challenges that are universally experienced. His analysis delves into the mechanisms through which these cultural constructs serve not only as coping strategies but also as means of understanding and giving meaning to the human experience. By examining various cultural contexts, Obeyesekere highlights how these symbolic systems reflect the collective psyche and provide individuals with a sense of identity and belonging. This investigation reveals the profound relationship between cultural expressions and psychological phenomena, illustrating how societies navigate existential questions and emotional struggles through the lens of their unique traditions and narratives.
Anthropological Interpretation of the Sinhabahu Myth
Anthropological interpretation involves deciphering the complexities of cultures and human behaviors by exploring the intricate “web of significance” or “webs of meaning” that individuals construct and navigate, rather than attempting to identify overarching universal principles. This approach emphasizes the importance of context and the subjective experiences of people within their cultural frameworks. In this light, Obesekara provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sinhabahu myth, illustrating how this narrative serves as a reflection of the values, beliefs, and social structures inherent in the culture from which it originates. By examining the myth through an anthropological lens, one can uncover the deeper meanings and implications it holds for the community, revealing how such stories shape identity and influence social dynamics.
The Anthropological Interpretation of the Sinhabahu Myth delves into the cultural and social significance of this narrative within the context of Sri Lankan society. Sinhabahu becomes the progenitor of the Sinhalese people and serves as a foundational legend that encapsulates themes of identity and power. From an anthropological perspective, the myth can be seen as a reflection of the historical and social dynamics of the Sinhalese community, illustrating their quest for legitimacy and unity in a diverse cultural landscape. The lion, a symbol of strength and royalty, represents not only the valor of the Sinhalese but also their aspirations for sovereignty and cultural pride. By examining the myth through an anthropological lens, one can gain insights into how such stories function as vehicles for cultural transmission, reinforcing social norms and collective memory while also addressing existential questions about lineage, belonging, and the human condition.
Sinabahu – A Paradigmatic Myth
A paradigmatic myth serves as a crucial, archetypal narrative that lays the groundwork for understanding the origins, identity, and values of a culture. This foundational story acts as a narrative framework that not only shapes the beliefs and social structures of a society but also influences its worldview. By providing a culturally significant reference point, such myths are often invoked to elucidate contemporary issues and to offer guidance for future directions. A prime example of such a myth is the tale of Sinhabahu in Sri Lanka, which plays a pivotal role in forging a national identity through a shared origin narrative. This myth encapsulates the essence of the culture, reinforcing communal bonds and collective values that resonate through generations.
Cultures are characterized by foundational myths that serve to create and uphold a collective worldview, elucidate the origins and essence of the universe, and define humanity’s role within it. These narratives not only reinforce societal norms and values but also offer essential guidance for navigating life’s complexities. By legitimizing various customs, rituals, and aspects of identity, these myths provide a framework through which individuals can understand their place in the world. They encapsulate the symbolic interpretations of a community’s shared reality, acting as a navigational tool for successive generations as they confront the challenges of existence. Through these stories, cultures transmit wisdom and insights that shape the moral and ethical landscape of society, ensuring continuity and cohesion across time.
The tale of Sinhabahu serves as a quintessential example of an ideal myth, encapsulating the cultural heritage, origins, and identity of a nation. Such narratives are not unique to any single culture; rather, they resonate across various societies worldwide, each offering a unique lens through which to view human experience. These paradigmatic myths function as foundational stories that help individuals comprehend the complexities of existence and human behavior. For instance, the Greek myth of Sisyphus poignantly illustrates the concept of futile labor, while the Old Testament’s Exodus narrative stands as a cornerstone for the identity of Israel. Similarly, the myth of Romulus and Remus provides the legendary backdrop for the founding of Rome. Beyond these examples, myths often encompass creation stories, heroic journeys, and explanatory tales that seek to clarify the underlying reasons for existence and the nature of the world. Through these rich narratives, societies articulate their values, beliefs, and collective memories, thereby reinforcing their cultural identity and continuity.
Conclusion
Gananath Obeyesekere’s “The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in Psychoanalysis and Anthropology” delves into the intricate ways in which cultural symbolic systems in South Asia, with a particular focus on Sri Lanka, serve to navigate and reshape psychological challenges. The book critically examines the Oedipus complex through the lenses of Hindu and Buddhist traditions, juxtaposing these interpretations with Freudian theories to highlight their relevance within specific cultural practices. By investigating the dynamic relationship between psychoanalysis and anthropology, Obeyesekere seeks to illuminate the nuances of human symbolic expression and the deeper meanings embedded in cultural contexts. This exploration not only enriches our understanding of psychological dilemmas but also underscores the significance of cultural frameworks in shaping individual and collective identities.
He explores the notion of “symbolic remove,” a term he uses to describe the intricate process through which symbolic forms, deeply embedded in cultural frameworks, are both created and redefined through the lens of individual cognition. This concept highlights the interplay between personal and cultural symbols, illustrating how they collectively influence individual identity while simultaneously contributing to broader societal meanings. Obeyesekere’s analysis offers a sophisticated perspective on the ways in which cultural symbols evolve, emphasizing the dynamic relationship between individual experiences and the collective cultural narrative.
Obeyesekere highlights a notable aspect of the Sinhabahu myth: the absence of any indication of remorse or ethical concerns regarding the act of parricide, which is the killing of one’s father. This lack of emotional conflict within the narrative is particularly striking, as it raises questions about the moral implications of such a grave act. In many cultural stories, parricide is often accompanied by feelings of guilt or regret, serving as a reflection of the societal values surrounding familial bonds and the sanctity of life. However, in the case of Sinhabahu, the narrative seems to present the act as a straightforward event, devoid of any moral scrutiny or emotional fallout. This absence invites deeper analysis of the cultural context in which the myth was created, suggesting a different set of values or beliefs regarding authority, power, and familial relationships. The implications of this narrative choice are significant, as they challenge conventional understandings of morality and the human experience in relation to familial obligations.
References
Ahmed, S. (2012). Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory Oedipus complex: A critical study with reference to D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers. Internal Journal of English and Literature Vol. 3(3), pp. 60-70.
Campbell, Joseph, 1968 & 2004. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Fischer, M. J. and Dirsmith, M. W. (1995), “Strategy, technology, and social processes within professional cultures: A negotiated order, ethnographic perspective”, Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 381-412.
Jutta von Buchholtz. (2000). Animals and the Psyche.Quarterly News.
Lewis, M. P. (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Texas.
Loewald, H.W. (2000). The Waning of the Oedipus Complex.J Psychother Pract Res. 9(4): 239–249.
Millar, K. (2011). The Power of Cultural Symbolism. Retrieved from http://www.societyandself.com/the-power-of-cultural-symbolism.html
Nuckolls, C.W. (1997).Review of the work of culture: Symbolic transformation in psychoanalysis and anthropology. Psychoanalytic Psychology, Vol 14.133-134.
Obeyesekere, G. (1990). The Work of Culture: Symbolic Transformation in Psychoanalysis and Anthropology. University of Chicago Press.
Perelberg, R.J. (2009). Murdered father; dead father: revisiting the Oedipus complex.Int J Psychoanal. 90(4):713-32.
Phelan. J.E. (2005). Consequences of the Unresolved Oedipal Paradigm: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 3-4.
Scott, A. (1990).The ethics of heroism in medieval and American Indian tales. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 3(3):37-58.
Stenudd, S. (2006). Psychoanalysis of Myth. Retrieved from http://www.stenudd.com/myth/freudjung/
Volkan, V.D. (1995.) Totem and Taboo in Romania: A Psychopolitical Diagnosis. Mind and Human Interaction, 2: 66-83.
