At least minimum courtesies should be extended to a former president – Hakeem

August 22nd, 2025

Courtesy Adaderana

MP Rauff Hakeem says it is worrying that the arrest of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe was announced in advance by a ‘YouTuber’. 

Speaking in Parliament, the former minister referenced the arrest of Wickremesinghe by CID officers after recording a statement from the former president.  

A few days ago, there was a YouTuber who was showing his affection in a very inappropriate way, in my opinion. But then this particular YouTuber also went on record virtually announcing that the former President would be arrested.” 

So, it appears there’s an inspired leak. This worries us,” the MP stressed. 

The former minister explained that normally, when statements are recorded by the police, a ‘B report’ is filed before the magistrate. 

You have a basic courtesy. You give it to a former head of state. Then if the magistrate felt right, his attorneys could have made submissions and the magistrate could have decided whether to remand them or bail him out.” 

Everybody should be treated equally. But then, when it comes to a former president, at least some courtesies, minimum courtesies should be extended,” Hakeem declared.    

UNP files complaint with CID over YouTuber’s claim on Ranil’s arrest

August 22nd, 2025

Courtesy Adaderana

The United National Party (UNP) has filed a complaint with the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) today (22), requesting an investigation into a statement made by YouTuber Sudaththa Thilaksiri on his channel, claiming that former President Ranil Wickremesinghe would be arrested today and remanded for 14 days.

On August 21, Thilaksiri had stated on his YouTube channel that the former President would definitely be arrested today and remanded for 14 days.

Accordingly, a group of attorneys representing the UNP filed a complaint with the CID, requesting an investigation into the issuance of such a statement before any official action had been taken.

Meanwhile, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa says that a YouTuber predicting the arrest of a former President before it even happens cannot be a coincidence. 

A YouTuber predicting the arrest of a former President before it even happens? That can’t be a coincidence, could it be planned? If true, it’s a sad day when something as sacred as law and order is reduced to cheap theatrics,” he said, in a post on ‘X’ (formerly Twitter).

Former President Ranil admitted to Prison Hospital

August 22nd, 2025

Courtesy Adaderana

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, who was arrested and remanded in custody on Friday over allegations he misused state funds while in office, has been admitted to the Prisons Hospital on the advice of doctors, according to the Prisons Spokesman. 

Wickremesinghe became the most senior opposition figure to be hauled up in an anti-corruption crackdown by the new government as he was ordered remanded until August 26 by the Fort Magistrate’s Court.

The suspect (Wickremesinghe) will be held in custody till Tuesday, but considering his medical condition he could be admitted to the prison hospital or another hospital,” Magistrate Nilupuli Lankapura said ordering his remand.

Wickremesinghe, whose lawyers said was suffering from heart disease and diabetes, was charged under the Public Property Act and two counts of the penal code – dishonest misappropriation of property” and criminal breach of trust.”

Wickremesinghe, 76, was taken into custody after being questioned about a September 2023 visit to London to attend a ceremony for his wife at a British university.

Wickremesinghe had stopped in London in 2023 on his way back from Havana, where he attended a G77 summit, and the UN General Assembly in New York.

The brief UK visit was to participate in the conferring of an honorary professorship on his wife Maithree by the University of Wolverhampton.

His office had previously denied that he abused his position to visit Britain. Three of his then senior aides were questioned this month by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

Wickremesinghe had maintained that his wife’s travel expenses were met by her and that no state funds were used.

However, the CID alleged that Wickremesinghe used 16.6 million rupees of government money for his travel on a private visit with a delegation of 10 people, including bodyguards.

Wickremesinghe, who was ordered to be remanded in custody, was taken to the Welikada Prison. The former President was seen being brought to the Welikada Prison in a prison bus amid tight security.

–With Agencies Inputs

Urgent Appeal: Protect Non-Aligned Movement Sovereignty against UNHRC Mandate Overreach

August 21st, 2025

Shenali D Waduge Sri Lankan Analyst, and Advocate for National Sovereignty 

Your Excellencies,

I write to you as a concerned voice from Sri Lanka — the first nation to be made the testing ground of a dangerous precedent by the UNHRC, one that threatens every country in the Non-Aligned Movement.

The Non-Aligned Movement was founded to protect sovereignty and equality of nations.Today, despite NAM representing 74% of the world’s population and 82% of land together with China & Russia, just 20 nations are using Geneva to dictate to us all.

Regrettably, some non-governmental organizations with questionable funding have singled out Sri Lanka for relentless targeting. Their selective focus raises a simple question: why Sri Lanka, and who funds campaigns that name Sri Lankan leaders, military personnel & officials as accused without any judicial process, trial or verdict of guilt & without opportunity for defense? This is political targeting, not accountability. If allowed to continue, this pattern will transform the Council into a political kangaroo court & a forum of jungle law bypassing both the UN Charter and the authority of the General Assembly and Security Council.

A Dangerous Precedent

If the UNHRC is allowed to proceed with mandate overreach — violating the UN Charter with a handful of nations drafting and passing resolutions with the complicity of High Commissioners — the injustice inflicted on Sri Lanka will soon be inflicted on other Non-Aligned States.

The UNHRC was created in 2006 under Resolution 60/251. However, while not presenting any resolution against Sri Lanka’s non-state armed group LTTE — banned by 32 nations for its campaign of killings against Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims, and even an Indian Prime Minister — the Council has, after Sri Lanka ended the 30-year conflict in May 2009, passed successive intrusive, non–conflict-related resolutions and demands. 

1.    2009 (Special Session) — S-11/2 

2.    2012 — A/HRC/RES/19/2 (U.S.-led; accountability/reconciliation)

3.    2013 — A/HRC/RES/22/1 (U.S.-led; follow-up on 2012)

4.    2014 — A/HRC/RES/25/1 (U.S./UK-led; mandated OHCHR investigation OISL”)

5.    2015 — A/HRC/RES/30/1 (UK-led consensual roadmap/rollover”)

6.    2017 — A/HRC/RES/34/1 (UK-led rollover)

7.    2019 — A/HRC/RES/40/1 (UK/Canada/Montenegro/N. Macedonia—rollover)

8.    2021 — A/HRC/RES/46/1 (UK-led evidence preservation”/enhanced monitoring)

9.    2022 — A/HRC/RES/51/1 (UK-led; broadened OHCHR Sri Lanka Accountability Project”)

10. 2024 — **A/HRC/57/**L.1 (UK/Canada Core Group” rollover/updates)

11. 2025 — A/HRC/60/21 (Report of the High Commissioner – present dangerous precedent)

This pattern clearly showcases mandate overreach, UN Charter violations, and intrusion into Sri Lanka’s internal sovereignty. 

This is exactly the kind of precedent that could threaten all NAM nations if allowed to stand.

Within the UNHRC, just 20–25 nations can form a bloc and weaponize Geneva to name, shame, and sanction leaders of any NAM country that defends its sovereignty, fights terrorism, separatism, insurgency, or protects national security.

The Power of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)

We must remember who we are:

·      120-member states, NAM represents two-thirds of the United Nations membership.

·      With a combined population of 4.4 billion people — about 55% of humanity — NAM is the majority voice of the world.

·      NAM countries control 95 million km² of land — about 64% of Earth’s land area.

·      Our economies together contribute ~$23 trillion in GDP (nominal), or ~$65 trillion in PPP terms — a growing force in the global economy.

Contrast with the Resolution Sponsors

The initial resolutions against Sri Lanka were driven largely by the United States — a nation of immense economic weight, with a GDP of nearly $29 trillion. Yet even Washington has since withdrawn from the Human Rights Council, calling it a cesspool of political bias”, distancing itself from the very process it once championed.

What remains is a small circle of Western states — the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, and a handful of others in Europe and Oceania (including Australia and New Zealand).

Without the US/Canada/Australia, the Western bloc shrinks to:

·       1.4% of the world’s land

·       4–5% of the world’s population

·       15–18% of global GDP

With the US included, the Western bloc totals:

·       19% of landmass

·       9% of population

·       ~47% of world GDP

This bloc represents neither the majority of peoples nor the moral compass of our age. Collectively, they are a minority of nations — wealthy but isolated.

Global Balance of Power: NAM and its Strategic Partners

The imbalance is further exposed when one considers that, while the Western bloc relies on a handful of non-Western allies to inflate its voice, the Non-Aligned Movement is supported on principle by China and Russia — two permanent members of the UN Security Council who consistently resist Western unilateralism.

China and Russia combined:

·       Population: 1.56 billion

·       Landmass: 26.7 million km²

·       GDP: ~$23 trillion nominal (≈$43 trillion PPP)

NAM + China + Russia together:

·       Population: ~6.3 billion (≈74% of the world)

·       Landmass: ~122 million km² (≈82% of the world)

·       GDP: ~$46 trillion nominal (≈$100 trillion PPP)

This is the overwhelming global majority — in population, geography, and economic weight.

A Call to Unity

Your Excellencies,


The time has come to remember the founding principles of Bandung and Belgrade: non-alignment, sovereignty, equality, and resistance to neo-colonial interference.

·       If Sri Lanka’s precedent stands, tomorrow any NAM nation could be in the dock.

·       If NAM remains silent, the principle of presumption of innocence will be replaced by trial by resolution & kangaroo courts.

·       If NAM speaks with one voice, however, this experiment will end here.

Sri Lanka appeals not for sympathy, but for solidarity. 

What is at stake is not just my country, but the future of all Non-Aligned States.

Together, we represent the majority of the world’s population, the majority of the United Nations, and an ever-growing share of the global economy. Together, we can demand adherence to the UN Charter, the equality of sovereign nations, and a return to fairness and legality in multilateral processes. 

Let us unite & not allow UNHRC to weaponize human rights beyond its original mandate.

Today it is Sri Lanka. Tomorrow it may be your Nation. 

But united, no NAM country will ever stand alone.

Respectfully,
Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lankan Analyst, and Advocate for National Sovereignty  

An outline of a Proposed Master Plan of development for Meemure

August 21st, 2025

By Sudath Gunasekara BA (Hons) PhD. Sri Lanka (Peradeniya) (SLAS. Class 1)

This proposal covers the whole of original Meemure Vasama that includes the Meemure village and few other hamlets of Gandeka Korale of Uda Dumbara in the Kandy district. It comprises the entire area north of Koratuwemunduna (Corbets Gap) surrounded by the Dotalugala-Dumbanagala-Kehelpathdoruwegala-Telambugala ridge in the South and East, Dotalugala-Paskulupav (Knuckles)-Kalupahana on the West and Kalupahana-Katakitula-Lakegala-Demalagala range in the North covering an area of about approximately about 35 sq miles.

Steeped in legend and mystery, the history of Meemure goes far back in to antiquity, as far back as 5000 years BC, to the days of Ravana the Great. The legendary Lankanagara and Mahatissagaama of Mahawamsa and Lankapura of Ravana are also associated with it. Furthermore, it is synonymous with the resplendent and legendary giant Lakegala or Lanka pabbatha, rising up to heavens behind the Meemure village, a towering bare giant rock, unseen and unheard anywhere else is also located in its northern boundary. It is an exceptional world wonder that is acclaimed as the biggest bare rock outcrop in the world, nature has gifted to mother Sri Lanka.

The Geographical Setting

Geographically Meemure is a mountainous area with towering and precipitous mountaintops clad with wet montane type of vegetation and narrow valleys with very little flat lands, displaying climatic extremes from West to East as well as North to South. from Dry Zone, Intermediate to Wet Zone, a unique climatic variation one can see anywhere else in this Island. In terms of longitude and latitude it is roughly located between 80.48-80.53 E and 7.22-7.28 within a span of 10 miles from West to East and covers an area of approximately about thirty-five-40 square miles of which over 98 % is still under forest, mountains and rocks.

The landscape descends from 6112 feet Paskulupav (Knuckles) at the western end to almost 500 feet above mean sea level at Kahatagahawela in the northeast.  Meemure basin surrounded by the circular rim of high mountain ranges all round starting at Koratuwe Muduna(Corbet’s Gap 4000 ft) – Dumbanagala in the South, Dotalu gala-Kinihhirigala-Sudu valalle kanda, Paskulupavva (6211) (Knuckles) and Selvakanda plateau (West) Kalupaana (5341, Wamaarapugala (5110)- Lakegala the Queen among mountains  in Sri Lanka(4324) in the North and  Telambugala (4368), Kehelpath doruwegala (East), (5016) and Dumbaanagala (5389) range again merging with Koratuwe Muduna in the South (4000) is a deep basin surrounded by a rim of steep and lofty mountains. It measures approximately seven miles from South to North and six miles from West to East approximately covering an area of about 42 sq miles. The Maha Oya Heenganga valley traversing at the center in a SW-NE direction encircled by a mountain ring on the West, East, South, and the North, dominating the entire landscape of the area. It is drained by Karambaketiya Oya, Maha Oya, Heenganga, Meemure Oya and Ravana Ela on the left bank and Matinwatte Oya, Na Ela and Kekelewatta Oya on the right bank of Heenganga. Of all these only the three left bank tributaries of Karambaketiya, Maha Oya and Heenganga are perennial.

The landscape of this area exhibits a steep drop from west to east and displays a colossal Amphitheatre with four incised mini amphitheaters representing the Karambaketiya, Heenganga and Meemure Oya valleys on the left bank and St Martin-Na Ela saddle on the right bank is also noteworthy in this regard.

The area gets its rain from the northeast monsoon from October to March. The rest of the year is dry. A special feature of the dry period is the dry wind (mundusulang) that devastates this area from April to August. These wuthering winds sweep across the valley drying up everything that comes within its grip. The rainfall increases as we come to the South. Thus, the annual rainfall at St Martin estate is as 170” whereas at Meemure it is even less than 100”. Temperature ranges are equally impressive. When mean temperature at Meemure village is around 90-95 F, readings at Kalupana or the Corbett’s Gap are often around 60-65 F. The month of Ill (Oct. to end of Dec ) is the rainy months in this region.

Modern geographers like Elsy Cook have named this region as the Nitre Cave District after the famous Nitre Cave found on the western slopes of the eastern ranges. John Davy who visited this cave in 1821 has given a fascinating account of this cave. According to him it is the biggest Nitre cave in Sri Lanka.

A northward view from Koratuwe muduna (Corbet’s Gap)- named after surveyor Corbet who surveyed the Koratu kandu (Knuckles area) in the latter part of the 19th century. It is also called Attalamettuwa (not Attalawettuwa as some people call it) derived from the Tamil word Attaaleyi Medu-(a wooden platform to load logs to lorries, cut from the forest to feed the British owned Tea factories in the Ferndale- Rangala areas. On a clear day it affords a unique scenic splendor one may not see anywhere in the world. Lazarus calls these mountain ranges, Ceylon’s Elegant Mountains” Probably Corbet called the whole area Knuckles” after he was fascinated by the five peaks mountain he saw from Peradeniya-Kandy Road. Kandy. (I have renamed it as Panchakuuta Pabbatha or Paskulupav as it is seen with five conspicuous summits, thereby giving a local interpretation.

Administrative Divisions.

Prior to 1980s Meemure was one GS Division. But at present Meemure comprises of five Grama Sevaka Divisions. They are Meemure, Kaikawala, Pusse Ela, Kumbukgolla (also called Naela) and Karambaketiya. Total population in all five divisions is 1614, Meemure with the highest, 472. The approximate area of this region is about 42 sq miles of which only 473.3* acres come under paddy (1.5%). Paddy cultivation is the only noteworthy economic activity. Hena cultivation which occupied the second most important place in the village economy is no more there now due to banning by government. This decision by Colombo based persons who are utterly ignorant of the economy of this village has badly crippled the village economy and brought about many a hardship to these villagers. The paddy field, home garden and the hena supported by the forest around the village form the four pillars of its economy. Area presently under homesteads and sporadic Cardamom cultivations is negligible due to banning by the Government under the Knuckles Reserve. Incidentally small-scale Cardamom cultivation by the native villagers to Meemure and Kaikavala below 3500 ft was introduced by me in1967 against a move by some outsiders who tried to open up the main Knuckle watersheds like Garandithalawa and the whole Knuckle area, when I was DRO Uda Dumbara (1966 May -April 1971)

 This means 98.5 % of the area is still under forest. Leaving a margin for reserved forests, patan, steep mountains, stream reservations and rock outcrops, still there would be a very large extent of arable land available for agricultural pursuits, provided there is water.  This provides a rough clue to the development potentials of the region.

The three main constraints of development in this region are

1.Lack of proper roads (a motorable road was constructed in 2022, up to Meemure proper 9 miles from the Corbet’s Gap, as it was named after the British rule.)

2.Inadequate water and lack of all other infra structure facilities

3.Neglect and lack of commitment by all governments since Independence in 1948.

Proposed Master Development Plan for Meemure.

I give below an outline of an updated development plan proposed for the region, which I have conceived way back in late 1960s when I was working as the Divisional Revenue Officer of Udadumbara (2nd.June.1966 to 1st.April. 1971).

The Proposed Plan

  This is only an outline. Therefore, it needs to be studied in details as to its feasibility and cost   estimates etc by subject specialists before it is implemented.

1 Roads

The present road has to be improved beyond Dambada as priority no.1. The entire section has been haphazardly and unscientifically done in the past using the ancient footpath without an engineering survey done.. The repairs and successive constructions have only fattened the contractors. If someone can at least do the drains and repair the damaged sections immediately, the existing road could be made usable until a better one is constructed.

New Proposals Roads

1.Improve Rangala- Ferndale-Corbett’s Gap Road. This was constructed by the British planters in 1880s as an access road to their plantations in St Martin. Engineering wise it is the best access road to Meemure and also shorter than via Hunnasgiriya by 3 miles.

2.Attend to repairs of Hunnasgiriya-Loolwatta-Corbett’s Gap section as a supplementary to the present Uda Dumbra -Loolwatta road.

3 Re-do the present Corbett’s Gap Meemure Meegahamula road on the contour where necessary

4 Extend the present road from Karambaketiya via St Martin’s –Welgala, Kekalewatta to   Totillagasyaya Minipe stage 11 or Nugagolla through Hulugune, Minipe stage 111.

 5 A new deviation to the right from this road through Galamuduna-Pallegaladebokka-Udattawa to Udawela is also suggested.

  6 Link up the Meemure-Hettipola road with the St Martin-Totillagasyaya Road at Kekalewatta by a bridge across Heenganga at Kekalewatta.

7 Link up present Damboda Meemure road with the right bank road with a bridge across Mahaoya below Martinwatta.

8 Construct two new roads linking Meemure with Remanure in the north and Meemure with Hettipola Pallegama road through Dandeni Kumbura and Kivulevaadiya on the left Bank of Heen ganga.

9 Within the Meemure two roads are proposed

  1. A feeder road from Meehghamula through the village to Kamath godella without disrupting the traditional village set up
  2. The main road from Meemure to Naranagamuwa to be constructed starting at a point below the village from Kendagolla on the present road to link it up with the Meemure Narangamuwa Road at Kamathgodella. This is proposed to be linked with the Naranagmuwa road at Kamatahgodella by taking it over the propsed Wekade Reservoir on the Dalukgolla Wekade- Gorakaththawela LB Ela.

Improvements to the existing road from Karambaketoya to Meemure proper.

An engineering survey of the entire length from Damboda to Meemure village proper should be also done as a first step prior to undertaking any improvements to the existing road as a first step in order to guarantee the sustainability of the present road to Meemure. This could be done on a contour. using the present road as the base line.

Irrigation

b)  Construct the following new reservoirs

             1)  Maha Oya at or above 2500 ft msl (Karambaketiya as given in the Rangala 1 inch sheet)

             2) Karamabketiya oya 1700 ‘

Both these will augment the present Maha Oya-Heenganga supply going up to Bathalahena in Meemure proper.

(It is also proposed that all that area between the Corbet’s Gap and Karamaba ketiya Reservoir should be declared a strict reserved area of the Karambaketiya Reservoir.)

             3 Heenganga above Kaikawala-2000 ft msl. In addition to augmenting the Mahaoya -Heenganga ela supply, this reservoir is also expected to provide drinking water to Welangolla and Gedume settlements where the new administrative, cultural and the commercial centers are proposed to be located.

            4) On Meemure Oya at Dalukgolla 1500 ft msl. (priority one)

           5) Meemure at Wekade at 1400 ft msl and Wewatenna (Both                    

    these sites are ancient village tanks).

           6) Daagavilla Reservoire on Heenganga-Maha Oya confluence just below Kaikawala at   1200 ft msl. It is proposed to construct two Elas from Dagevilla rerservoir RB going up to Diyapihilla and LB linking with Wekade – Kekelewatta Ela . going up to Kekelewatt

           7) Na- Ela at 1700 ft msl south of Niter Cave.

           8) Martinwatta oya at 2000’ ft. Both 7 and 8 are expected to augment Dagevilla reservoir in addition to providing water for settlements and paddy field under their command.

All these are new reservoirs.

They will not only augment the present supplies but they will also bring large extents of new land under the plough as they will store all rain water from North East monsoon that flows in to the Indian Ocean at present down the Heenganga and Mahaweli. These new tanks will bring nearly 3000 acres, if not more, of new land under irrigation when completed. They will also increase the Yala extent appreciably, almost double the asweddumized area

Kalupahana- Meemure Trans-basin canal (This was first conceived by me in 1959 August when I was in my second year at Peradeniya on the day I climbed Kalupana peak and spent the night on its top. (5341)

Under this proposal it is proposed to build a trans basin canal to divert the waters of Naranatta Oya (A tributary of Kaluganga) to the Meemure Oya (Dimbigolle Oya). This is to be constructed at an elevation of 4000 ft msl, to take the waters of six other RB tributaries of Kaluganga to its destination Proposed Dalukgolla reservoir in Meemure. The approximate length of the canal is about 4 miles. This new supply will make Meemure Oya perennial and provide enough water to fill the proposed Dalukgolla reservoir on the Meemure Oya to enhance its irrigation and hydro-electricity generation potentialities. It could even enable the entire paddy acreage in Meemure to be cultivated for both seasons, which will revolutionize the present income levels of the villagers. Linking up Wekade with Dalukgolla reservoir also should be explored under this work.

(Since the Kuda Oya and Walpolamulla Oya (Both LB tributaries of Kaluganga) provide enough supplies, no threat is expected to the Kaluganga present supply. Further, constructing a reservoir just below Walpolamulla Oya –Kaluganga confluence, could increase the downstream Kaluganga supply. This will enhance the acreage cultivated in downstream areas like Batadanduwala, Rambukkoluwa and Gangahenwala. Therefore, diversion of part of head waters of Naranatta Oya to Meemure Oya will not create any water problems to the Kaluganga downstream area.)

At present Meemure village proper has a total of 70.57 ha of paddy of which only 13.7 ha are cultivated for yala season due to lack of water. The proposed Dalukgolla reservoir with the Kalupana augmentation could store sufficient water even to double the present total acreage for both seasons. New areas could be brought under the plough under the following canals.

It is proposed to construct two new Elas RB and LB from this reservoir. In addition, it will also be used to generation Hydro-electricity

a) Dalukgolla-Udakumbura-Bathala Hena RB Ela; approximately3 miles. To be linked up with the Mhaoya -Heenganga -Meemure oya Ela at Bathalahena

b) Dalukgolla-Moragolla-Bathalahenpitiya-Wekade LB Ela also to be linked up with the Maha Oya Heenganga- Meemure oya Ela at Bathalahena.;(about 2 1/2 miles) c)

In addition, these new reservoirs will also improve the water table and the microclimate of the entire region and provide water for the generation of hydro- electricity as well. I am confident that the construction of these 8 tanks will definitely make King Parakramabahus epic statement, that not a drop of water fallen from the heavens should be allowed to escape to the sea without being made use of for the benefit of man, a reality once again in our context. This proposed new irrigation network if constructed, will revolutionize the ecology, landscape and the economic prospects of the entire Meemure basin.

In addition to its irrigation potentials, the Wekade weva will also turn out to be a rare tourist attraction as it is expected to reflect the shadow of the mesmerizing, resplendent and the giant Lakegala, the biggest and the most enchanting largest bare rock in the whole world that was also supposed to be the abode of legendary Ravana the Great in the distant past.

The proposed network of reservoirs and irrigation canals will completely change the geographic landscape of the region.

Agriculture

 Paddy

 Increase the present acreage under paddy. This could be done in two ways; by increasing the existing Yala acreage and increasing the total area under paddy with additional water from the proposed new reservoirs. This project is expected to bring nearly 3000 new acres under paddy.

 Bring Cardamom under better management so that it will not be a danger to environmental destruction (I don’t agree with banning cardamom cultivation as it provides an important source of income for these villagers and also cardamom cultivation has been accepted as the best form of land use for this type of forests. Between 3500-4000).

    Introduce new cash crops such as pepper, coffee, cinnamon, cotton, citrus, Kaju, peanuts, ginger, lime and mango, jack, banana, papow and even grapes. etc. on a large scale as well as home garden basis.

    A programme of cultivating medicinal plants like Binkohomba, Nelli, Aralu and Bulu may also be tried out.

Large scale a programme of subsidiary food crops like onions, chilies, garlic, turmeric, yams, finger millet, corn, green gram, gram, peanuts and vegetable like drumsticks, pumpkin, watermelon etc. Some of these could be grown both on high lands and also in paddy fields where water is not adequate for paddy in yala.

    Livestock farming. A programme of water buffalo, need cattle, goats fowls,and even Sheep raring could be tried under this programme.

    Bee keeping. This could be very successful since there are sufficient forests around this area.

    Fruit cultivation like banana, mango, citrus, papaw, pine apple, grapes, oranges and grapes etc.

Education

There are three schools here at the moment, Meemure, Kaikawala and Na-Ela (Kumbukgolla). But facilities are depressing. Therefore, this has to be taken up as a priority. Two Primary and Junior Schols at Meemure village and Kmbukgolla and a Central School at Welangolla.

Industry

Agro-based cottage industries are recommended. Handicrafts like household items such as rattan and bamboo baskets and read mats etc also could be developed, as the talent needed is available here. Beekeeping is another industry where there is very big potentiality in this area. The cottages in the proposed cultural village (existing) could be used for this.

Environmental conservation

A comprehensive environmental conservation programme should constitute   a major component of this development project. All land above 4500 ft; over 60 % gradient, source areas and all other vulnerable areas should be strictly protected.

Urban development

A new town to accommodate this development thrust and cater to the increased socio-economic needs may have to be opened up in a central place where adequate facilities like land access and water are available. Two sites are proposed for this purpose. They are Geduma and Velangolla. Both are centrally located flat areas lying between the two villages of Meemure and Kaikawala. Enough land is available here. Water could be brought from the proposed Heenganga reservoir. Easy access is also available from the main road.

Velangolla.

I propose the Administrative Town to be sited at Velangolla, where the Central School, Hospital, Post office, Bank, VC office, and shopping complex serving both as a collection and service center and a sales point and other facilities needed for such a town-let are available. Present Kaikawala health center should be improved at least to a cottage hospital till such time.

Geduma

Located on a more scenic and elevated vantage location right at the center of Meemure is to be reserved for a cultural complex. I have a plan to construct a temple, to be named as Lankaramaya here depicting the ancient history of this village, taking it back to Ravana’s period, the Mahvamsa episode of Lankanagara of Kuweni and the famous narrative of Maliyadeva Mahaa Thera vs Sulugulu Upasaka referring to the Lankaa pabbatha and Mahaatissagaama coming in Pali Rasavaahini. Ven. Prof. Kumburugamuwe Vajira Thero Chancellor of Sabargamuwa Univesiity once told me that The Sacred Tooth Relict (Dalada vaahansei) also had been hidden here at Meemure Gallena, on the left bank of Meemure Oya during the tumultuous time of the Kandyan Kingdom. Considering all these episodes I also have a plan to Construct a Sthupa here on the Ruwanweli seya model

My ambition is to make it a traditional Sinhala cultural and religious complex like no other in this country, in order to tell the whole world, the hidden secrets of this ancient and pristine story of this historic village Meemure.

  Mini-hydro projects

Mini- hydro projects are recommended for all the reservoirs proposed. The projects should be connected to the national grid. They will provide the required power for the local needs both domestic and industrial. There is also a 33 KV HT supply proposed by the CECB via Laggala-Pallegama under ADB assistance which I understand is abandoned at the moment. (CEB Ref. No. ADB3 KUDDB 105: File No: UD 105). It is suggested that this project be re-activated. I also suggest that they change the proposed KV line route and take it on the eastern side of Lakegala. It will not only reduce the distance and cost but also the damage that would have caused to the upper watersheds covered with primary forests.

Prospects of wind power should also be studied, as there is a long spell of windy season from April to October in this region.

Tourism

This is another area where there are enormous potentials. The captivating scenic beauty that is not found in any other region in Sri Lanka could attract thousands of tourists from world over. The fantasy that opens up at the Koratuwe muduna (Corbat’s Gap) coupled with the mesmerizing triangular profile of Lakegala alone will create a tourist boom. Lakegala (4329 ft), a vertical bare rock outcrop measuring over 2500 ft from the ground level is the highest bare rock outcrop I have seen in the whole world. Its unparalleled exposed height, enormous beauty and the panorama one could witness from its summit are destined to make it a number one tourist attraction in the whole world. Many a foreigner have already described this are as an area with a unique scenic beauty not seen in any other part of the world.

The following cable car services are also recommended.

a)   Corbet’s Gap –Dumbanagala and Corbets Gap-Dotalugala

b)   Geduma to Meeriyagolla from there to the summit of Lakegala            c) From Geduma to Nitre Cave (According to John Davy this is the biggest Nitre cave in Sri Lanka.)       

Rāvana Asapuwa An aesthetic project at Na Ela

It is proposed that an aesthetic center (A Kala Kendraya) be set up in Na Ela at the foothills of Kosgolla Hills overlooking the panoramic valley of Meemure and Lakegala. This should be called Ravana Asapuwa” in memory of Ravana the Great who, according to legend is supposed to have built his capital Lankapura in the vicinity of Lakegala.  It is also suggested that this center be modeled on the line of Santiniketan of Tagore, but of cause with Sri Lankan identity. This should be developed as the center for all performing Sri Lankan arts with facilities for research and development. It should also have theatres- both open and indoor and residential facilities. The RB Heenganga Road will provide access. There was a similar idea in early 1950 by a group of aesthetic minded people like proctor Meemanapalana but it was later abandoned. They, I understand, bought the land comprising 1000 acres, for this project. 

Foot Note

When implementing this programme of development precaution should be taken not to destroy the purana village between the historic Mee tree and the proposed Wekade weva. The Unique architectural and sociological characteristics of the buildings, stone fences, Bo-maluwa and the traditional cluster type of houses” that is usually found in an ancient Sinhala village demonstrating its unique socio-economic and cultural characteristics must be preserved for posterity as a national heritage. These houses could be used as venues of traditional cottage industries. This traditional village could be preserved and named as the Meemure Under the shadow of Lakegala” like the Shakespeare village by the side of river Avon in England as a tourist attraction displaying the life style of the ancient village. In addition to the items gazetted under the Antiquities Ordinance on 18.6 1999 in No 1085 as protected monuments the following items also should be gazette. Bomaluwa, Katupandure linda, the Meda walawwa site where the two-princess o Sri Wickrama Rajasingha stayed, Dambagahaella burial site of the two Princess and the Historic Meegaha at the entrance to the village.

1    The road,

2    The Naranatte-Meemure oya transbasin ela and

3    The Proposed Irrigation cum Hydroelectricity projects

are the three live wires of this whole proposal. This programme of development should definitely open new vistas of prosperity for this area and transform it to an entirely a different landscape beyond our comprehension. The new road network will link up the East with the West by a new road between Kandy, Trinco and Battticaloa and open up an area hitherto secluded from the outside world. With the new economic activities generated, employment opportunities should increase at an unprecedented scale. Thereby the income levels and the standard of life of the local people will go up. As a result, the new development thrust should be able to support at least ten times the present population (Present population 1614).

This will complete the process of opening up the doors of the 21st century world for this secluded ancient village with new economic, social and educational opportunities that will arrest the present trend of serious ru-urban migration that will obliterate this ancient villages from the map of Sri Lanka as it has already happened to many villages in the Laggala area.

The completion of this project will definitely open a new chapter in the history of this hither to secluded ancient village and usher in  an era of prosperity, dignity and unprecedented fame.

The cost of wrong strategies in internal conflicts

August 21st, 2025

Courtesy The Island

Prof. Roberts / Kadirgamar

In June 1991, the then Army Chief of Staff, Major General Cecil Waidyaratne, submitted to the government a document outlining an overall strategy to conclusively defeat the LTTE. One of the recommendations in the Major General’s proposal was that the Navy should be expanded more than the Army. His argument was that the terrorists were dependent on arms and supplies by sea and the cutting off of such supplies would enable the Army to successfully combat terrorism on land” (The Island, August 11, 2025).

Published below are extracts of a presentation titled ‘Three Questions on Conflict Resolution’ by Sir Adam Roberts, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at Balliol College, University of Oxford, to commemorate the 20th death anniversary of former Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar (Sunday Times, August 10, 2025). The three questions are:

1 ARE CEASEFIRE AGREEMENTS NECESSARILYTHE RIGHT APPROACH?

Quoting from the extract: Calls for ceasefire agreements (CFA) have become an almost standard response of the international community to ongoing armed conflicts …. However, there is a question about whether calls for ceasefires are always the right approach. Have they sometimes been adopted more out of habit than from a realistic appraisal of a particular situation? ….. Kadirgamar, who was on the opposition benches in Parliament…. gradually came to see it structurally flawed, as vulnerable to violations by the LTTE, and as failing to lead on to any broader measures of conflict resolution. His critique of the CFA in his speech in Parliament in Colombo on 8 May 2003 presents a uniquely coherent, even forensic criticism of this agreement. He did not spell out exactly what the alternatives to the CFA might be, but that was evident enough: it was a continuation of the war involving the application of relentless military, economic, and political pressure on the LTTE”.

2 ARE EXTERNAL ROLES IN INTERNAL CONFLICTS BOUND TO RUN INTO DIFFICULTIES?

Continuing, the extract states: In the Sri Lankan conflict, there were broadly speaking three types of external involvement and/or assisting the hard-pressed population of conflict areas. All three ran into difficulties”.

The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF)which was deployed under the terms of the 1987 Indo-Lanka Agreement to Establish Peace and Normalcy in Sri Lanka, sought to impose disarmament provisions of the agreement on the LTTE, which was not a party to the agreement. The Norwegian –led Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM)established within weeks of signing of the CFA on 22 February 2002, had a strictly defined monitoring role. After operating for six years, its activities were terminated on 16 January 2008, just two weeks after the Sri Lankan Government’s withdrawal from the CFA. Like the CFA to which it was inextricably linked, it was extensively criticised during its active years and subsequently. As a Norwegian report issued in November 2011 stated, some LTTE sympathisers blamed the Norwegians for being complicit in a process that weakened the rebel movement, while among Muslim and Sinhala constituencies there was perceived Norwegian appeasement of the LTTE. Within Sri Lanka a damning critique of the SLMM was included in the December 2011 report of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission”.

3 ARE SAFETY ZONES INHERENTLY PROBLEMATIC?

According to the extract: What went wrong in the no fire zone in Sri Lanka that had been unilaterally proclaimed by the Sri Lankan Army? They proved in the end to be a death trap for many who had fled there. Far from being safety zones, they turned out to be extraordinarily unsafe. Why was this so? From a variety of sources, we now have a picture of zones where there were repeated shelling including many on or in the area of hospitals. There is pervasive evidence that there was a strong LTTE presence and that the LTTE did not permit the civilians to leave”.

There are some structural reasons for these failures. A proclaimed safety zone is likely to contain, and even attract, large number of civilians, but also some belligerent forces, who may themselves seek safety there or may plan and conduct military operations from safe area, or may want to control movement of civilians in and out of it. They may even seek to practice ‘lawfare’, where belligerents by inducing or faking attacks on civilians try to present their adversaries as violating the laws of war. Unless there are significant and properly thought-out arrangements for defence management of a safety zone, it can become a magnet for military involvement and activities of all kinds”.

COMMENTS on the THREE QUESTIONS

CFAs and External Roles in conflicts between Sovereign States is vastly different to CFAs and External Roles in Internal Armed Conflicts. The primary reason being that in the case of the former, sovereign States can be held accountable for violations of International Law relating to Armed Conflicts, while in the case of the latter, where non-state actors and sovereign States are involved in internal Armed Conflicts, rules of war are not enforceable to equal degrees between parties to the conflict because non-state actors such as the LTTE, in reality, cannot be held accountable to the same degree as the Sri Lankan State, despite being equal parties to the Armed Conflict as stated in the CFA.

This difference was exploited by the LTTE when they concealed their identities by shedding their distinctive uniforms and took the civilians in the safety zones hostage and used them as a human shield and resorted to ‘lawfare’ as described by Sir Roberts, thus making the safety zones Inherently Problematic”. In the context of how events unfolded, the fourth question that should be asked is whether the Sri Lankan State is more accountable for violations committed by adopting the strategy of safety zones” with the intention of ensuring the safety of the civilians or the LTTE who exploited the opportunity presented to their advantage, by merging with the civilians in complete disregard to their plight.

A fifth question is whether the adoption of the strategy of a CFA was entirely an initiative of the Sri Lankan State or did Sri Lanka capitulate under external pressure of the Norwegians considering the fact that it was the Norwegians who brokered the CFA to give legitimacy to the LTTE similar to current relentless pressures by the likes of Volker Turk for investigation and prosecution? Under the circumstances, should not the Norwegians also be a party to the accountability exercise?

In view of these serious questions to which there are no ready answers, the statement that is reported to be in the forthcoming Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, appears to be nothing but an exercise to look for a ready scape goat – the Sri Lankan State, in the absence of anyone to represent the LTTE when it states: While the primary responsibility for investigating and prosecuting crimes under international law and ensuring accountability lies with the Government of Sri Lanka, this can be complimented and supported by international means”(Daily FT, August 14, 2025) For the UNHRC to continue to recommend External Roles, notwithstanding the difficulties raised by Sir Roberts cited above, is not to have learnt any lessons from the past.

One lesson that should be learnt is to acknowledge the complexity of the issues involved with the Armed Conflict in Sri Lanka because the many players associated with it, make it next to impossible to hold one party or individual accountable. Is it the party that recommends a strategy or the one who implements it, despite its structural flaws and vulnerabilities”? Investigating and prosecuting as recommended by Volker Turk can only apply to individual penal responsibility. If Command responsibility also applies, it should apply to all who participate in pressuring the Government of Sri Lanka without diligent appraisal and failing to take into account the demonstrated character of the LTTE was more out of habit than from a realistic appraisal of a particular situation”.as stated by Sir Roberts.

AN ALTERNATIVE

As stated in Sir Robert’s extracts, although Kadirgamar was critical of the CFA, He did not spell out exactly what the alternative to the CFA might be”. However, there was an alternative. In the course of the review of Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda’s The Turning Point”, C.A. Chandraprema states: Throughout the decade of the 1980s, as separatist terrorism developed into a full blown civil war, nobody had given much thought to a comprehensive strategy to defeat the LTTE. However, after the Indian involvement ended in 1990, and Sri Lanka was left to its own devices, the need for such a strategy became evident. In June 1991, the then Army Chief of Staff, Major General Cecil Waidyaratne, submitted to the government a document outlining an overall strategy to conclusively defeat the LTTE. One of the recommendations in the Major General’s proposal was that the Navy should be expanded more than the Army. His argument was that the terrorists were dependent on arms and supplies by sea and the cutting off of such supplies would enable the Army to successfully combat terrorism on land” (The Island, August 11, 2025).

I am personally aware of a similar proposal being sent to former President J.R. Jayewardene, who had it read out to him at his breakfast table. Apparently, it was presented to the Service Chiefs but was dismissed by them on grounds that the conflict in Sri Lanka was a Land war. Whatever the underlying reasons may have been, personal or strategic, the fact that the concept of denying supplies to the enemy is as old as warfare, and therefore cannot and should not have been discounted. The idea of the proposal was to build up the Navy to create a Cordon Sanitaire”, out at sea and away from civilians, instead of along the coast, to prevent arms and supplies from reaching the LTTE and thus gradually ending the conflict through attrition. Had former Governments considered this option seriously, considering that its merits far outweigh the cost of a Land war, Sri Lanka would not be facing the multiplicity of charges it is now being presented with.

CONCLUSION

Emeritus Professor of Balliol College, University of Oxford, Sir Adam Roberts, in his book Democracy, Sovereignty and Terror – Lakshman Kadirgamar on the Foundation of International Order”, presents three defining questions as challenges to Conflict Resolution. They are the Cease Fire Agreement, External Role in the Armed Conflict and Safety Zones. By raising these questions, Sir Roberts highlights the structural flaws and vulnerabilities” of the strategies deployed during Sri Lanka’s Armed Conflict making them a barrier to post-conflict reconciliation.

In such a context for Volker Turk to propose investigating and prosecuting crimes under international law”, reflects his inability to make a realistic appraisal of the challenges involved due to the fact that after 16 years in which the members of the LTTE who were responsible for individual violations and others for command and control of violations cannot be located and identified. Since they are not likely to volunteer, tracking them in various parts of the world would not only be a daunting undertaking but also time consuming not to mention the prohibitive cost. On the other hand, such challenges would be significantly less in the case of Sri Lankan Security Forces. The net effect is a seriously flawed and skewed outcome where investigations and prosecutions against the Security Forces would far outweigh those against former members of the LTTE. Such disparities would NOT facilitate a reconciled nation but instead, one that would be even more bitter and polarized. As for Volker Turk, should he not be held accountable for a failed outcome, as it was with the External Role of Norway.

The only hope for Sri Lanka is for it to be blessed with a Government that has the Chutzpah to make a realistic appraisal of the ground situation and acknowledge that, instead of adopting the strategy recommended by Volker Turk which is in keeping with external values of Retributive Justice followed by inevitable bitterness associated with it, to adopt a strategy that mirrors Sri Lanka’s heritage of Restorative Justice as being in its long term best interests. Such a strategy would be to grant a general amnesty to all associated with the Armed Conflict and focus on the present by attending to the physical wellbeing of the survivors of all communities in a tangible way. (https://island.lk/a-model-for-reconciliation/).

What Sri Lanka is witnessing today is the cost of choosing wrong strategies in the execution of Sri Lanka’s Armed Conflict. Having missed the opportunity to neutralize the capabilities of the LTTE by means of a Naval Cordon Sanitaire” out at sea to prevent arms and supplies reaching the LTTE; a strategy that was adopted only during the latter stages of the Armed Conflict. Even at this late stage, the government should, invest in building a strong Navy to defend the interests and security of Sri Lanka if Sri Lanka is to overcome persistent threats from drug smuggling, human trafficking, illegal poaching etc. and the destruction of maritime resources caused by bottom trawling. In addition, Sri Lanka has to acknowledge that there is a compelling need to equip itself with a strong Navy backed by Air surveillance to ensure its security independent of others, for its security and the protection of its resources in its territorial waters and beyond, in the Exclusive Economic Zone.

මහනුවර නගරයේ දෙශපාලන සහ කච්චපුට රැඟුම්

August 21st, 2025

ආචාර්ය සුදත් ගුණසේකර මහනුවර

මේ පාපකාරී විකාරයට මුල්වි ක්‍රියා කරණුයේ කවදත් මොණර නැටුමට කැමැති බලලෝභී මුග්ධ  දේශපාලකයින් සහ කහවණු වලට ගිජු හරසුන් මහනුවර නගරයේ   ධනලෝභී කච්චපුට ව්‍යාපාරකයින් පමණි. දේශපාලකයින්ට අවශ්‍ය චන්දය පමණි. ව්‍යාපාරකයින්ට අවශ්‍ය සල්ලි පමණි. ඒ දෙක ලැබෙනවානම් ඔවුන් තමන්ගේ අම්මා වුවද පාවා දෙනු ඇත.ඔවුන්ට කළනොහැකි පාපයක් හෝ වරදක් මිහිපිට නැත. ඔවුන්ට රට,ජාතිය, ආගම, සන්ස්කෘතිය, ශිෂ්ඨාචාරය හෝ හෝ සමාජ හරයන්ගෙන් ඇති වැඩක් නැත.

පූර්ණ රාජ්‍ය අනුග්‍රහය ඇතිව බලධාරීන් විසින් සිදුකරන  මෙවැනි ආගම්ද්‍රෝහි, දේශද්‍රෝහී, ජාතිද්‍රෝහී ඕනෑම අසමජ්ජාති ජරා වැඩකට වුවද, ජීවත්වීම සඳහා රජයෙන් වැටුප් ලබන රාජ්‍ය නිළධාරින්ටද, මෙවැනි වැඩ තම හිතට විරුද්ද වුවද, උපේක්ෂාවෙන් ඒ දෙස අසරණව බලා සිටිම හැර වෙන කිසිවක්ද කළ නොහැක.

මේ විකාරයන්ට නගරයේ බහුතරය විරුද්ධ වුවද දේශපාලන මැර බලය ඉදිරියේ අද ඔවුන්ද තටු කැපූ කුරුල්ලන් මෙන් අසරනව ඇත. ඔවුන් සියළු දෙනාම දේශපාලන මැරකම් ඉදිරියේ අසරණ ඇත. 

යථාර්ථ එය බැවින්, මෙවැනි ව්‍යශනයන්ගෙන් රට,ජාතිය.සාශනය මෙන්ම සිවුරද, එසේම මේ රටේ 2566 ක ඒ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨ ශිස්ඨාචාරයද බේරා ගැනීමේ පූර්ණ වගකීම පැවරී ඇත්තේ තුන්සින්හලය පුරා ගමක් ගමක් හා වනගත අසපුවක් අසපුවක් ගානේ වැඩසිටින වසර 2566 ක ඉතිහාශය පුරා මේ රට හා ජාතිය රැකගත් රජුන්ට උපදස්දෙමින්, පාලකයින් යහ මඟට ගත් එසේම ඇතැම් අවස්ථාවලදී ථෙර පුත්ථාභය මහතෙරුන්  මෙන් තාවකාලිකව උපැවිදිවද රට දැය සමය ආරක්ෂාකොට ගැනීම සඳහා  දිවි දෙවැනිකොට යුධ පෙරමුණට පවා වඩිමින්, මේ සින්හල රටේ හා ජාතියේ මුර දේවතාවන් වශයෙන් විරුදාවලත්,   ලක්දෙරණ සහ සින්හල ජාතිය මෙන්ම සම්බුද්ධ සාශනය ද රැකගත් ඒ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨ සඟ පරපුරකින් පැවත එන මල්වතු අස්ගිරි උභය නිකායික මහානායක හිමිවරුන්ද සහ   රාමඥ අමරපුර නිකායන්හි මහානායක හිමිවරුන් ඇතුළු 42,000 කට අධික බුද්ධ පුත්‍රයින් වහන්සේලාට මිස වෙනත් කිසිවෙකුට මේ දේශපාලකයින් සහ කච්චපුටයින් සිදු කරන මෙවැනි ජාතික අපරාධ නතරකළ නොහැක.

එබැවින් මේ තීරනාත්මක අවස්ථාවේදී සින්හල බෞද්ධයින්ගේ මුදුන්මල්කඩ වන ශ්‍රි දළදා හිමියන් වැඩසිටින ලොව පුරා  සිටින සින්හල බෞද්ධයිගේ පමණක් නොව සමස්ත ලෝකවාසි බෞද්ධයින්ගේම ඉමහත් ගෞරවාදරයට  හා වන්දනාවට භාජන වී ඇති වර්තමාන ලෝක බෞද්ධයින්ගේ අති පුජනීය වූද වන්දනීය වූද ආගමික හා සන්ස්කෘතික මුදුන්මල්කඩවූ ශ්‍රී දළදා මාලිගාව ඉදිරියේ සිදුකරණ මේ ජාතික,ආගමික හා සන්ස්කෘතික අපරාධය වහාම නතරකරන මෙන් මෙහි දේශපාලන සහ කච්චපුට සන්විධායකයින්ට නියෝගකරණමෙන්ද  තවදුරටත් මේ උතුම් නගරය සල්ලාල මානසික රෝගීන්ගෙන් බේරා ගන්නා මෙන්ද සමස්ථ ශ්‍රී ළන්කා වාසී බෞද්ධ ජනතාව මෙන්ම සමස්ත ලෝකවාසි බෞද්ධයින් වෙනුවෙන් මම ගෞරවයෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමි.

.එසේ කිරීමෙන් පසුව වුවද සන්විධායක මස් වැද්දන් මෙය නතර නොකළහොත්  ශ්‍රී ලන්කාවාසී මහාසන්ඝ රත්නය දහස්ගණනින් වැඩමකොට මේ කෝලම වහාම නතර කොට එහි ප්‍රධාන සන්විධායකයින්ට වහාම සිය රාජ්‍ය තනතුරුවලින් ඉල්ලා අස්වන මෙන් බලකරන මෙන්ද මම ලිල්ලා සිටිමි

ආචාර්ය සුදත් ගුණසේකර මහනුවර

Easter attacks mastermind known but untouchable: Sirisena claims

August 21st, 2025

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, August 20 (Daily Mirror) – Former President Maithripala Sirisena today claimed that the mastermind behind the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings is well known to intelligence services, the military, and governments, but remains beyond Sri Lanka’s reach.

Speaking at an event at the Sri Lanka Foundation Institute, Sirisena said that despite ongoing efforts to identify those responsible, the truth cannot be revealed to the public. Everyone knows who the mastermind is. People in every government, the military, and intelligence agencies know where the mastermind is. But we cannot fight him,” he said.

The former President further alleged that serious crimes had been deliberately orchestrated to tarnish his image, destroy his government, and weaken his party.

Turning to geopolitics, Sirisena warned that the recently signed Indo-Lanka defence agreements could lead to major issues in the future, similar to the Indo-Lanka Accord of the 1980s. He also highlighted that provincial councils have remained inactive for more than a decade, wasting millions of rupees annually.

On global affairs, Sirisena said world peace and sustainable development are at risk due to the war mindset” of certain world leaders. Citing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an example, he accused powerful nations of fuelling conflicts instead of addressing global poverty.

Appointments to high office: SJB slams NPP’s ‘nepotism’

August 21st, 2025

Courtesy The Morning

The main Opposition, the Samagi Jana Balwegaya (SJB) accused the Government of nepotism through appointing those linked to the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) to a number of high-ranking public service and diplomatic positions.

SJB Parliamentarian, attorney Chithral Fernando made these allegations while speaking at a press briefing held yesterday (21).

Before it came to power, the NPP stated that it will not give any person any government position based on friendships. However, a large number of individuals that supported the NPP’s victory have been given chairperson positions in Government institutions and secretary positions in ministries.”

Fernando alleged that an NPP member who contested in elections and lost and another individual who is a member of the NPP-run collective for retired military personnel have been given ambassador positions, which he said goes against President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s statement that only the qualified would be appointed to ambassador positions. Moreover, he claimed that a number of other members of various groups run by the NPP have been appointed to high-level positions in the public sector including those handling disaster management, telecommunication, ports, and excise.

Ranil summoned before FCID tomorrow

August 21st, 2025

Courtesy Daily Mirror

Colombo, August 21 (Daily Mirror) – Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe has been called before the FCID tomorrow for a statement to be recorded on his  tour to London. 

Wickremesinghe went on a tour to London to attend a convocation of his wife Professor Maithree Wickremesinghe during his tenure as President.

Scientists Discover New Way to Travel at Ten Times the Speed of Light!

August 20th, 2025

Why is pork consumption forbidden in Islam?

August 20th, 2025

Masood Ashraf, USA

Why is pork consumption forbidden in Islam?

The consumption of pork is unequivocally forbidden in Islam. This command is not merely an arbitrary dietary law but a direct instruction from God. In the Holy Quran, Allah declares: He has made unlawful to you only that which dies of itself, and blood and the flesh of swine, and that on which the name of any other than Allah has been invoked.” (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.174)

The term used for pork, lahm al-khinzir, is described as rijs, meaning impure or abominable. This prohibition is repeated across the Quran in several places, thus highlighting its moral gravity and spiritual significance. (See Surah al-Maidah, Ch.5: V.5, Surah al-An’am, Ch.6: V.147, and Surah an-Nahl, Ch.16: V.117)

Islam does not base the worth of a command on whether humans comprehend its wisdom fully. Instead, divine commandments are to be followed out of obedience and trust in God’s superior wisdom.

Interestingly, this view is not unique to Islam. The Bible also clearly prohibits the consumption of pork. In Leviticus 11:7-8, it states: And the pig, though it has a divided hoof, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you.” Similarly, Isaiah 66:17 strongly condemns those who eat pork, associating such behaviour with divine punishment.

These texts show a long-standing religious view of the pig as a spiritually impure animal. Jesusas, though believed by many to have lifted dietary restrictions, never permitted the consumption of pork. In fact, he used the swine metaphorically to denote spiritual ignorance and moral corruption. In Matthew 7:6, he warned, Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.” This powerful image underscores the perception of swine as unworthy of sacred things, affirming their association with impurity in religious thought.

From a medical and scientific perspective, modern research supports many of the concerns that Islamic teachings raise. Pigs are omnivorous scavengers that will consume waste, excrement, and decaying matter. Their digestive system is notably inefficient at filtering toxins, which can become embedded in their flesh.

Pork has long been associated with diseases such as trichinosis – a parasitic infection caused by Trichinella spiralis – as well as Salmonella, Taenia solium (pork tapeworm), and hepatitis E. Though some of these dangers have been reduced through modern hygiene and cooking methods, the potential risks remain real.

Studies have also linked high pork consumption to chronic illnesses such as colorectal cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity-related complications. The physiological harm of consuming pork continues to validate the divine prohibition, showing how religious laws often precede scientific discovery.

Beyond physical health, Islam strongly emphasises the spiritual impact of food. What we consume influences not just our bodies but our minds and souls. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, the Promised Messiah, elaborated beautifully on the symbolic and moral implications of pork consumption.

He wrote, In its prohibition of swine, the Torah has gone so far as to forbid even touching it, and it clearly says that the prohibition is for all times […]” (Four Questions by Mr. Sirajuddin, a Christian, and their Answers, pp. 56-57)

He also explained that the pig represents shamelessness, gluttony, and moral decay, and that consuming its flesh can gradually deaden a person’s sense of spiritual refinement. The prohibition, therefore, serves not just to protect the physical body but to cultivate purity of heart and character. (The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, pp. 38-39)

Some sceptics ask: if God created pigs, why would He forbid their consumption? This question misunderstands the role of creation and the function of divine commandments. Not everything that exists is created for human consumption. Poisonous plants, harmful substances, or venomous animals are part of the ecosystem but not meant for our direct use.

Pigs, in many ways, serve a vital ecological function. As scavengers, they help decompose waste and dead matter. Their existence benefits environmental cleanliness, but that does not mean their flesh is meant to nourish human beings. The Quran teaches that life is a test. The presence of harmful or forbidden things is a part of that test, to see whether humans can exercise moral restraint and obedience to divine guidance. Just as interest, alcohol, and drugs exist in society but are forbidden, so too pork is a test of whether one will choose divine command over personal desire.

Moreover, Islamic teachings acknowledge that certain forbidden things may have permissible uses in specific contexts. For instance, pig organs, such as hearts, are sometimes used in medical research and education due to their anatomical similarities to human organs. This utilisation is not for consumption but serves scientific and educational purposes, reflecting the nuanced understanding within Islamic jurisprudence that considers intent and necessity.

Islamic law is rooted in five higher objectives: the protection of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. Anything that poses a threat to these principles is discouraged or forbidden. Pork consumption, by its association with physical diseases, spiritual dullness, and moral desensitisation, can be seen as undermining multiple values at once.

Moreover, Islam’s dietary laws are structured to promote both physical well-being and moral discipline. In the same way that prayer trains the spirit and fasting develops willpower, abstaining from forbidden foods builds the habit of self-control. This is not merely about food but about the principle of submission.

The Quran states: And it behoves not a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, that there should be a choice for them in the matter concerning them.” (Surah al-Ahzab, Ch.33: V.37) Thus, the true believer finds beauty and liberation in obedience – even when the command challenges their understanding.

In Islamic teachings, moderation and purity are emphasised across all aspects of life. The Holy Prophet Muhammadsa advised that one should eat in three parts: one part for food, one part for water, and one part for air. (Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab al-atʿimah, Hadith 3349)

This promotes not only a healthy lifestyle but a consciousness of what one allows into their body. Food is more than just sustenance; it is part of a holistic spiritual lifestyle. Just as one would not allow immoral entertainment or impure thoughts to pollute the heart, one must be vigilant about what is consumed physically.

In a world increasingly driven by materialism, the Islamic stance on pork serves as a reminder that not all that is available is beneficial. The spiritual dignity of a human being demands that we rise above base desires. Choosing what to eat becomes a reflection of who we are and what values we uphold. The pig, an animal known for its shamelessness and filth, is not suited for those who wish to attain spiritual clarity and moral elevation.

Thus, the prohibition of pork is not an isolated rule but part of a broader moral and spiritual framework that defines the Islamic way of life. It combines divine wisdom, spiritual symbolism, health guidance, and moral training. Through its ban, Islam calls on believers to elevate themselves – to consume that which is pure, avoid that which is impure, and to constantly be mindful that every choice in life, even what we eat, has consequences beyond the surface. This divine law, echoed by previous prophets and confirmed through modern insights, remains as relevant today as it was 1,400 years ago.

උන් මාව පණපිටින් අල්ලා ගත්තා | කටිටපරිච්චාන් සටනේදී මියගිය කමාන්ඩෝ විරුවා නැවත ඉපදෙයි

August 20th, 2025

Non-Binding but Deadly: How UNHRC Resolution A/HRC/60/21 (2025) could destroy Sri Lanka’s Sovereignty

August 19th, 2025

Shenali D Waduge

Non-Binding but Deadly: How UNHRC Resolution A/HRC/60/21 (2025) could destroy Sri Lanka’s Sovereignty

UNHRC resolutions are technically non-binding. Yet for Sri Lanka, ending terrorism has been met with relentless scrutiny—a witch hunt targeting select war heroes and commanding officers. Every Resolution since 2009 has been a ticking time bomb, made worse by the 2015 co-sponsorship from the Ranil–Sirisena–Mangala yahapalana” government. While lacking formal legal force, the nations backing A/HRC/60/21 (2025)—notably the UK, Canada, and EU states—can enforce these recommendations through sanctions, aid conditionalities, visa bans, military restrictions, and economic pressure. If passed, these non-binding” recommendations will be weaponized politically, and the Sri Lankan government risks prioritizing their party survival over national sovereignty. This danger is amplified as Sri Lanka’s economic sovereignty is already constrained: the IMF controls key policy levers, the Central Bank operates independently of Sri Lanka’s legislature, and critical national assets remain in foreign hands. The only way forward is clear: Sri Lanka must reject these resolutions outright, realign with the Non-Aligned bloc, deepen ties with traditional friendly nations, and refuse to barter sovereignty for temporary political survival. To concede now is to risk becoming not a partner in the international community — but a protectorate.

Against this backdrop, UNHRC demands — from a Truth & Reconciliation Commission to full 13th Amendment implementation and external accountability — are Trojan horses designed to dismantle sovereignty from within, redraw governance structures, and keep Sri Lanka permanently under watch. 

This is colonialism re-defined & restructured.

Sri Lanka has already erred in the past by believing compromise would ease the pressure. Co-sponsoring resolutions, flirting with hybrid courts, and entertaining international assistance” only emboldened those determined to rewrite the country’s history and dictate its future. The lesson is clear: Surrender and appeasement, only means demands grow more dangerous.

Immediate Term (0–3 months): Sanctions & Diplomatic Pressure

·      UNHRC Resolution Passed – Though non-binding” Western blocs voting for resolution will consider it mandatory.

·      Visa bans / travel restrictions  against military & political figures named in OHCHR/ITJP reports – may even deny children travel, scholarships or admissions.

·      Foreign pressure increases on Sri Lanka to show good faith” – setting up Truth & Reconciliation mechanisms, or else face punitive measures.

·      Economic chokehold begins – IMF conditions tightened; loan tranches delayed unless Sri Lanka cooperates with Geneva.” Carrot.

·      Sovereignty hit: Central Bank already beyond elected government’s control, enforcing IMF austerity without people’s consent.

·      Who is impacted first: Military leadership, political elites, war heroes, and the poor (with fuel, electricity, and tax hikes).

Short Term (3–6 months): Appeasement Phase: Government Trapped

·      Pressure to implement 13A fully – devolution of police & land powers to Provincial Councils, weakening central governance. Even possibility of a UDI/separate state. Military removed from the North and East, Camps closed down.

·      TRC (Truth & Reconciliation Commission) set up under UN guidelines, opening door for foreign experts” to sit in judgment of Sri Lankans.

·      Targeted sanctions expand on businesses linked to military/political figures — banks and companies begin de-risking” Sri Lanka.

·      Asset transfers accelerate – national infrastructure (ports, energy, telecom, plantations) negotiated into foreign hands under debt restructuring.”

·      Sovereignty hit: Sri Lanka loses decision-making over its economy, while national security is compromised by loss of central powers.

·      Who is impacted first: Military families, public sector in North/East, workers in state enterprises facing privatization.

Medium Term (6–12 months): A Nation being disempowered

·      Hybrid accountability demands escalate – calls for international judges, prosecutors, and investigators to override domestic law.

·      UN monitors embedded in Sri Lankan institutions under guise of capacity building.”

·      IMF-driven austerity deepens – currency devaluation, tax hikes, welfare cuts, fuel/electricity privatization.

·      Central Bank, under IMF line, blocks domestic relief measures, widening public suffering.

·      Foreign corporates take control of key resources (energy grids, ports, agriculture, water supply).

·      Sovereignty hit: Government becomes a figurehead, with real decision-making power held by IMF, UN, and foreign investors.

·      Who is impacted first: General population (price hikes, job losses), farmers & fisherfolk (as land/water access shifts to corporates).

Long Term (12–24 months): National Disintegration

·      Permanent UN oversight – Sri Lanka placed under a special human rights monitoring mandate,” legitimizing foreign interference.

·      Provincial Councils emboldened – external actors exploit devolved powers to push federalism/separatism.

·      Economic colonization complete – Ports, airports, utilities, and natural resources are majority foreign-owned.

·      Debt-for-assets swaps finalised – Sri Lanka’s weak anti-national government will trade away sovereignty for survival.

·      Foreign security interests embedded – military bases / strategic access points” leased out under cover of foreign investment.

·      Sovereignty hit: Sri Lanka ceases to function as an independent state — reduced to a protectorate under foreign control. Sovereign in name only.

·      Who is impacted first: Entire population — loss of sovereignty means loss of future generations’ independence.

The danger is not Geneva alone, but Geneva + IMF + foreign corporate takeovers working in tandem. The non-binding” resolutions are the political battering ram; IMF dependency is the economic stranglehold; and asset privatization is the Trojan horse. Together, they dismantle sovereignty piece by piece until Sri Lanka is left independent in name only.

What can and should Sri Lankans do?

Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lankan Marxists have not been pro – Sinhala or pro – Buddhist

August 19th, 2025

Chanaka Bandarage

True Dr NM Perera was an old Anandian, but it is doubtful whether or not as an adult he had ever attended a Buddhist temple with the true sense of worshipping the Lord Buddha. The LSSP never fought for Sinhala, Buddhist rights. It’s other Marxist partner, the Communist Party was the same.

When DS Senanayake and Dudley Senanayake were busy establishing ‘colonies’ in the North, North Central Province (Rajarata) and the East, these Marxists strenuously opposed it. NM pleaded with the Southerners not to relocate to the North, Rajarata and the East. He fearmongered them stating they will contract Malaria. He stated that in the North and Rajarata there are mosquitos the size of crows.

We all know it is thanks to DS’s and later Dudley’s colonies that the country was saved from Prabhakaran’s terror. During the Elam wars, the agricultural settlements that DS and Dudley established – Padaviya, Sri Pura, Weli Oya, Gal Oya, Aranthalawa, Kanthale etc provided the much-needed buffer for big cities like Anuradhapura, Polonnaruwa and Ampara.

If not for these ‘ marginal villages’ Prabhakaran would have easily roamed into Anuradhapura, Polonnaruwa etc and killed most of its inhabitants.

NM and few others were briefly in jail during the World War 2. But, that was not for engaging in freedom struggle. They opposed the 1942 budget. As the country was at war, they were naturally sent to prison. NM and the clan escaped from the jail and fled to India. Upon their return, they were pardoned and allowed to resume their MP seats.

It is important to mention that like India, Sri Lanka never had a strong anti-imperialistic movement. Independence was served to us on a platter.

Anagarika Dharmapala conducted a lone battle against the British. For being anti-British, he was imprisoned in India for a long period of time. It was Dharmapala’s brother, a medical doctor, who fought with immense dedication to obtain his release.

DR Wijewardane’s Lake House attacked Dharmapala fiercely, even making the false allegation that Dharmapala was a rogue. DS, FR Senanayake, Sir DB Jayathillake et al did not acknowledge his service but ridiculed him secretly. These were the reasons why Dharmapala left Sri Lanka. At the massive ceremony to intern his ashes in Colombo, DS, FR and Sir DB played a major role. They ‘sang hosannas’ for him.

It is sad that when living, Dharmapala was not given high regard and dignity. The elite despised him. The common masses always loved him.

Without kneeling down to the British, young Edward Henry Pediris bravely gave his life. He was shot dead in the Colombo jail for a crime that he never committed.

In the early 70’s and late 80’s Rohana Wijeweera conducted two brutal insurrections in Sri Lanka. His name is written down in history as the man who introduced terrorism to modern Sri Lanka. Even Prabhakaran learned the trade from him.

Both JVP struggles were utter failures. As a result, many thousands of people lost lives and limbs. The damage caused to public and private property is unprecedented.

Both JVP struggles were not for the safeguarding of Sinhala, Buddhist rights.

Wijeweera’s were selfish and jealous insurrections. He had a hatred against the democratically elected governments of the time. He saw that the country’s security was weak; he decided to take advantage of that.

Through his superb organisational skill and mockery, he mobilised disadvantaged youth to take up arms to topple the governments.

He deceived them too. When hiding in the Ulapane estate, he lived like a ‘king’ in utmost luxury. Drinking whisky and playing chess was his pastime. While in hiding, he produced five children. At the time of capture, his wife was expecting the 6th.

The state looked after this whole family.

In 1987/88, Wijeweera was fond of Prabhakaran. Wijeweera knew that because of the latter’s war, the South was militarily weak. He took advantage of that to wage his terror campaign.

Wijeweera had an unwritten pact with Prabhakaran about fighting against the government – LTTE to attack from the North/East and the JVP to attack from the South.

This is not the thinking of a patriot but a traitor.

One may argue that during this time the IPKF was in Sri Lanka thus the Sri Lankan Army was not in full military combat. This is not fully true.

There was a major war being fought in the North and the East. The Army’s constant focus was on it. The Army was not having much faith on the IPKF.

They were always ready to save the country from the Tamil Tiger terror (that is why R Premadasa demanded the IPKF leave Sri Lanka within a matter of weeks).

The Army never wanted that focus to be broken.

The last thing the government wanted was another war to erupt in the South. That is exactly what Wijeweera wanted; and, he did it.

Basically both Prabhakaran and Wijeweera had the same mindset – destroy and annihilate Sri Lanka.

If Sri Lanka collapsed (came very close to that), Wijeweera and Prabhakaran would have divided Sri Lanka among themselves.

But what happened in Batalanda, Sooriyakanda etc cannot be condoned.

Wijeweera’s cadres (ඉල් මහ විරුවෝ) cannot be described as patriots.

A patriot would never kill government soldiers, the Police or destroy public property.

These terrorists detonated hundreds of CEB transformers, set fire to thousands of SLTB buses/public vehicles, attacked military targets; even the magnificent Health Ministry building in Colombo Fort (in 1987 Sunethra Ranasinghe was the minister) was set on fire by them.

Why did they kill such innocents like Rex De Costa, Vijaya Kumaranathunga, Professor Stanley Wijesundera, Premakeethi De Alwis, Dr Gladys Jayawardane, Sagarika Gomes, Ven Kotikawatte Saddhathissa Thero, Ranjith Wickramarathne et al?

People who have committed such heinous crimes, perhaps crimes against humanity – it is impossible to think that they will ever be good.

It is strange how some JVP veterans relate their crimes now like heroic acts. Some openly state how they attacked military posts and rob banks etc. Under the law, if they were not then prosecuted, they could be prosecuted now. Serious Criminal law acts have no statute of limitation. Those who had been in jail must make a candid disclosure as to why they were so jailed.

In any case, such people can never be patriots.

They may do improvements to stay in power, but they do not have the real ‘passion’ to build Sri Lanka.

When they were the proletariat (the downtrodden) they had a hatred against the bourgeoisie (the ‘upper class’). But, when they become the elite themselves (eg. after winning the 2025 elections), they seem to have forgotten the proletariat.

Marx failed to explain this frequently occurring anomaly.

Because the Marxist JVP leaders do not genuinely love Sri Lanka (otherwise the past JVP members could not have committed such atrocious acts), they can easily form the mind to split this country into pieces. Their inbuilt hatred towards the country that they were born and bred must still be there.

That is why they are ever willing to work with those who have separatist and other vengeful agendas.

Wijeweera was never a practising Buddhist. He married a Catholic woman, but there is no record that he was a practising Christian either.

Prima facie, the JVP is an atheist political party. Being Marxists, we must expect this from them.

The major difference between NM and Wijeweera is that the former was a gentleman par excellence. Though a Marxist, he believed in democracy. Unlike Wijeweera NM (and his cohorts) never possessed murderous intentions.

Wijeweera was cruel and had extreme/bizarre ideas. He believed that old people were a burden to the country. He once stated that tea must be removed from the upcountry estates and grass grown instead. He stated that in that way the country could become self-sufficient in milk.

Marxist Pol Pot killed almost all the elderly people of Cambodia. He even killed those who wore spectacles stating that they were intellectuals. A similar rhetoric prevailed in North Vietnam, thankfully not anymore.

Marxist Stalin shot dead or sent to labour camps almost of every Russian Orthodox clergy member and that faith’s believers.

Marxist Mao Tse Tung destroyed many Buddhist temples in China. It is believed that during the Cultural Revolution (1966 – 1976) about 6,000 Buddhist monasteries and temples were destroyed in Tibet.

Though he had a Christian education and upbringing, Marxist Castro worked to counter the Catholic Church’s influence in Cuba.

Prior to September 2025 election, the current NPP leaders advocated an anti-Sinhala, anti-Buddhist sentiment. Some of the things that they stated are as follows:

  • We must get rid of tradition. Tradition is not good as it inhibits economic progress.
  • The state must separate itself from religion. The state should not provide assistance/patronage to any religion.
  • They stated they were ashamed that for 76 years Sri Lanka was not able to produce a Tamil PM.

Tutsis comprised of about 9% of Rwanda’s population, more than 90% are Hutus. Since the current Tutsi Presidency, Rwanda’s top positions are stacked with Tutsis.

Rwanda is blamed for helping M23 Tutsi insurgents to mount a war against the Hutus in Eastern DR of Congo.

For any person, mental freedom, freedom of expression and freedom to live without fear from anyone including the state are far more important than economic freedom

The writer is not against having a Tamil PM, but we must be careful not to fall into a Rwanda type situation.

Tamil or Muslim President or PM for this country is most welcome as long as they get elected on merit. High positions must not be afforded based on quotas.

The current PM Harini did not come to that position because of being a woman; but because of her talent and skill.

  • Article 9 of the Constitution that gives preferential treatment to Buddhism must be abolished.

The NPP has been in power for over 10 months. Thankfully they have not caused major damage to Sinhala and Buddhism during this period. But the future is uncertain, no one knows what sort of outcomes are forthcoming.

The following incidents are reasons for concern:

  • They disbanded the Buddhasasana Ministry.
  • They removed Jaya Mangala Gatha from an important public event
  • They failed to appoint a Sinhalese as the Governor of the Northern Province
  • They are planning to hand the newly built Presidential Palace in Jaffna (KKS – 27 rooms, 200 acres) for some other purpose. Where would a future President reside safely when in Jaffna?
  • The NPP hierarchy shows an extraordinary keenness to establish close links with the Tamil Diaspora. We all know most of them have not given up on the idea of Tamil Eelam.
  • The government plans to give precious Northern land to Tamil Diaspora. Again, most of them believe in the Elam.
  • No roadmap has been created for all people to live in all parts of the country. In this regard, the Sinhalese who desire to live in most parts of the North and the East are receiving stepmotherly treatment from government bureaucrats.
  • Through education reforms, the NPP seems to have a plan to curtail the teaching of history in schools.
  • With the government’s decision to shut down schools that have less than 50 students, does this mean the recently established Sinhala schools (thanks to Ranil’s government) in Mannar and Vavuniya are destined to be shut down?
  • People who fake the proud Sinhala Buddhist history have been given prominence and undue recognition.
  • The NPP government’s Civil Aviation Department has been entrusted to locate Ravana’s alleged ‘aircraft’ (planes) at extraordinary cost. It is believed that carbon dating costs for this project alone would be in millions of US dollars. A notorious archelogy professor that is famous for producing fake history is alleged to have been involved in this project.
  • The NPP government seems continuing with Ranil’s policy of arming farmers to kill wild animals that cause crop damage. If this is true, this cruel policy must be stopped. It is these guns that are used to kill wild elephants.
  • No action has been taken to correct the fake history that is produced in our current school history books and other forums, especially in the internet. Eg – Nil or very limited attention given to:
  • Vijaya’s arrival from North India more than 2500 years ago. Instead an African Homo Sapiens is being promoted.
  • Ven Mahinda’s arrival made the entire country Buddhist (except for few Veddhas).
  • the Great Sinhala Buddhist civilization that commenced during King Devanam Piyathissa’s time. Instead a fake civilization that did not exist about 7,000 – 40,000 years ago is being promoted. This is done to dilute the Greatness of the Sinhala Buddhist civilization.
  • the Great Kings – Dutu Gamunu, Dhathusena, Vijaya Bahu etc (nothing is mentioned about their Greatness in the current books/history talks)
  • the Great Kings Pandukabhaya, Devanam Piyatissa (a suspicion has been created that they may be Tamil; also that Kuveni may be Tamil)
  • the Great King Parakrama Bahu who even exported rice to other countries
  • Sigiriya that was King Kashyapa’s creation
  • the original inhabitants of this land are Hela people not Tamil. The books discreetly state that they are Tamil. Hela people (eg. Balangoda Manawakaya) mixed with Vijaya’s Sinha clan (700) and formed the Sinhala race.

Furthermore;

  • Lies have been propagated that rice and iron were first discovered in Sri Lanka (no, in China).
  • Lies have been propagated that Barley and Oates were discovered in Sri Lanka (no, in Israel and the Middle East).
  • Lies have been propagated that Lions had roamed in Sri Lanka (this lie is to counter the Great Sinhabahu legend).
  • Lies have been propagated that the mythology King Ravana was a Tamil (if he existed, he was a Hela).
  • Tamil Kings in Jaffna are being promoted; did they really exist? Owing to some prominent historians/scholars No. Sankili, if existed, seems to have been a sub King of the King of Kotte.

As outlined before, historically, the JVP has shown no empathy for Sinhala and/or Buddhism. Let us hope that the NPP will be different.

The NPP is better bear in mind that Sri Lanka is a conservative society that places a high onus on tradition, values, discipline, custom, religion, culture and history. They ought not try to meddle with them.

Leaving aside the treatment of Sinhalese and Buddhism reasonably, let us hope that the NPP will at least not indulge in any discriminatory acts towards the Sinhalese and Buddhism.

Conclusion – the NPP may develop Sri Lanka’s economy. They are likely to do it (SJB too will do it). Given the IMF assistance, it is not much of a difficult task. Our location is crucial – Sri Lanka is sandwiched between the two fastest growing economies of the world – China and India. Also, tourism is booming. Trump, Xi, Modi, EU, Japan – all are supporting Sri Lanka fully. And, NPP must be praised for not indulging in bribery and corruption. This is a great thing that has happened to the country in 76 years. But, this is what is most important for the citizen – ‘Mental freedom, freedom of expression, and freedom to live without fear from anyone including the state. They are more important than economic freedom.’

මැ. කො. ඉංග්‍රීසි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ දෝෂයක් නිවැරදි කිරීමට ඉල්ලා ඇති හෙයින් තවදුරටත් ඉංග්‍රීසි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව යොදා ගැනීම වළක්වන ලෙස නීතිපතිගෙන් / නීතීඥ සංගම් සභාපතිගෙන් ඉල්ලයි….

August 19th, 2025

මාධ්‍ය අංශය, වෛද්‍ය තිලක පද්මා සුබසිංහ අනුස්මරණ නීති අධ්‍යාපන වැඩසටහන

ජනාධිපති ධූරයේ සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කාලය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 83 (ආ) වගන්තියේ ඇති කාරණයක් ඉංග්‍රීසි පරිවර්තනයේ (83 B) වැරදි ආකාරයට සටහන්වී ඇති හෙයින් ජනාධිපතිවරයා වහා දැනුවත් කර එම වරද නිවැරදි කරන ලෙස මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාවේ සභාපති ආනන්ද රත්නායක ජනාධිපති ලේකම්වරයාට ලිපියක් යවමින් දැනුම්දී ඇති බව” 2025.08.18 දින ලංකාදීප පුවත්පතේ මුල් පිටුව මගින් වාර්තා කර ඇති බව නීතීඥ අරුණ ලක්සිරි උණවටුන මහතා නීතිපතිවරයාට සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකා නීතීඥ සංගමයේ සභාපති වෙත අවධානයට යොමු කර ඇත.

ඉංග්‍රීසි භාෂාවෙන් ඇති ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ තවත් දෝෂ පවතින හෙයින් ඔවුන් යටතේ සිටින නීතීඥවරුන් සහ තැනැත්තන් තව දුරටත් දෝෂ සහිත ඉංග්‍රීසි භාෂාවෙන් ඇති ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළ නෛතික කටයුතු වලදී යොදා ගැනීමෙන් වළක්වන ලෙසත් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ හතරවන උපලේඛනය සහ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව ආරක්ෂා කොට අනුගමනය කිරීමේ යුතුකම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අවධානය යොමු කරන ලෙසත් නීතීඥ අරුණ ලක්සිරි උණවටුන මහතා නීතිපතිවරයාට සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකා නීතීඥ සංගමයේ සභාපති වෙතද දැනුම් දී ඇත.

http://neethiyalk.blogspot.com/2025/08/blog-post.html?m=1

මාධ්‍ය අංශය, වෛද්‍ය තිලක පද්මා සුබසිංහ අනුස්මරණ නීති අධ්‍යාපන වැඩසටහන දුරකථන 0712063394
(2025.08.20)


Problematic Alcohol and Substance Use among Conflict-Affected Populations in Sri Lanka

August 19th, 2025

 Dr. Umaharan Thamotharampillai and Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge 

The long-term accumulation of stressors in post-conflict regions is under-discussed. Experts believe that there is a close connection between war trauma and addiction disorders. People living in post-conflict settings are at high risk of developing addictions. The trauma of war can significantly increase the risk of developing alcohol and substance use disorders. Alcohol and substance use addiction has been identified as a war-related social problem.

Complex interaction between biological predispositions and psychological and social factors upsurges substance abuse (Coleman, 1993). There is a comorbidity between problematic alcohol and substance use and war trauma exposure. Victims of war trauma are deeply affected—emotionally, physically, politically, and spiritually. These individuals can be considered a vulnerable population. These individuals with trauma-related distress often use alcohol and drugs as a negative stress coping mechanism and in a problematic manner.

The 30-year armed conflict in Sri Lanka had a negative impact on the health and well-being of people. The aftermath of the Eelam War has triggered mental health problems, including addiction issues. War trauma has been identified as a key risk factor for the emergence of alcohol and substance use disorders. These addictions cause negative health and social outcomes, affecting individuals, families, and communities.

Substance use disorders are cumulative in conflict-affected areas in Sri Lanka. The prevalence of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, adjustment disorders, and other mental health issues has contributed to a rise in addiction-related behaviors. Moreover, weakened infrastructure, under-functioning healthcare systems, mass unemployment, poverty, and lack of social opportunities have created a breeding ground for addiction issues. Alcohol and substance abuse contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality in war-affected areas.

There is a strong, bidirectional link between substance abuse and traumatic experiences (Simmons & Suárez, 2016). McFall and colleagues (1992) were of the view that PTSD arousal symptoms are strongly related to the substance.

Mostly the people use drugs/alcohol to escape from their emotional and physical pain. Drug addiction may be regarded as a disease of the brain reward system (Vetulani, 2001). According to Baker and team (1986), drug cravings are organized within a memory network. Addictive substances enhance the functioning of the reward circuitry of the brain, producing the ‘high’ that the drug user seeks (Gardner, 2011). It causes hedonic dysregulation within brain circuits, and it leads to addiction. 

People who persistently abuse substances often experience an array of social, financial, and mental/physical health problems. As described by Liang et al. (2011), there is a strong relationship among alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug usage and mental disorders. These addictions negatively affect their quality of life. There is a high morbidity and mortality related to alcohol and substance abuse. Data indicate that conflict-affected populations are at risk, and effective psychosocial measures are needed to address these issues. The identification and management of alcohol and substance use disorders are essential in the war-affected areas. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to provide psychosocial support for the conflict-affected population. The affected individuals require intense monitoring and supportive therapy. The mental health authorities should implement programs on drug prevention and rehabilitation in affected areas.

Dr. Umaharan Thamotharampillai, MBBS MD, is a Consultant Psychiatrist at Jaffna Teaching Hospital

Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge, M.D., PhD, is a medical doctor and a clinical psychologist, and also a member of the American Psychological Association (APA). He is a guest lecturer at Sri Lankan and North American universities.     

References

Baker TB, Morse E, Sherman JE. The motivation to use drugs: a psychobiological analysis of urges. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1986;34:257-323. PMID: 3627296.

Coleman P. Overview of substance abuse. Prim Care. 1993 Mar;20(1):1-18. PMID: 8464932.

Gardner EL. Addiction and brain reward and antireward pathways. Adv Psychosom Med. 2011;30:22-60. doi: 10.1159/000324065. Epub 2011 Apr 19. PMID: 21508625; PMCID: PMC4549070.

McFall, M. E., Mackay, P. W., & Donovan, D. M. (1992). Combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder and severity of substance abuse in Vietnam veterans. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53(4), 357–363.

Simmons S, Suárez L. Substance Abuse and Trauma. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Oct;25(4):723-34. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Aug 2. PMID: 27613348.

Vetulani J. Drug addiction. Part II. Neurobiology of addiction. Pol J Pharmacol. 2001 Jul-Aug;53(4):303-17. PMID: 11990077.

Liang W, Lenton S, Allsop S, Chikritzhs T. Does availability of illicit drugs mediate the association between mental illness and substance use? Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(10):1304-8. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.574769. Epub 2011 May 25. PMID: 21612339.

“UK SECRET SERVICES PLOTTING MARITIME ECOLOGICAL DISASTER”. Russian Counterespionage SVR Accuses! After capture of British MI6 officers in Ukraine

August 19th, 2025

by Carlo Domenico Cristofori

(Are there Lessons to be learned in Sri Lanka when remembering the Express Pearl and MV Diamond maritime disasters off the West and East coasts, also given interest in Submarine Date Cables and the Cloud Under the Sea?” that is vital to keep the Global Internet running?)

The UK’s secret services are planning to enlist NATO allies in a large-scale operation targeting the shadow fleet,” which could lead to an environmental disaster in international waters, the press bureau of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) said in a statement obtained by TASS.

British secret services are planning ecological disaster in international waters. The press bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation informs that, according to the information coming to the SVR, the British secret services are planning to involve NATO allies in a massive roundup for the ‘shadow fleet’,” the statement said.

According to London’s plan, the impetus for such a campaign should be provided by a resonant incident involving one or more tankers.”

The plan involves organizing a major act of sabotage the losses of which would allow the transportation of Russian oil to be declared a threat to all international shipping. This would untie Western countries’ hands in choosing methods of counteraction,” the document said.

The sensational denunciation after the Arrest of British MI 6 Officers in Ukraine 

The sensational denunciation by Russian counterintelligence comes just 48 hours after the arrest of three senior British Secret Intelligence Service officers in Ukraine during the SKAT-12 raid conducted by Spetsnaz special forces and the FSB (Federal Service for Internal Security of the Russian Federation).

It is not possible to know whether evidence of the sabotage plot was discovered at the very moment the British spies were captured, who were operating for military purposes on foreign soil in violation of international law, as Moscow has not yet officially confirmed the raid.

But suspicions that today’s formal complaint and the capture of colonels from the British military counterespionage unit MI6 are related are very high at this point.

We also recall that the United Kingdom is also suspected of having played a significant role in planning the disastrous COVID pandemic caused by the laboratory-generated SARS-CoV-2 virus.

In fact, some British research centers collaborated with the Pentagon’s military agency, DARPA, which is the main suspect in manipulating the SARS virus together with the European Union, exploiting the collaboration on biological weapons with China, and then leaving the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the smoking gun” for the virus’s escape from the laboratory.

Two scenarios and actors

According to the SVR, the British are working on two potential casus belli.”

The first scenario implicates setting up an ‘unwanted’ tanker accident in one of bottlenecks of sea communications (for example, in straits). As it is believed in London, oil spills and fairway blocking would provide NATO countries with ‘sufficient’ grounds for establishing a precedent of ‘extraordinary’ vessel inspection under the guise of maritime safety and environmental regulations compliance,”

the statement noted.

The second one involves setting fire to a tanker at loading in a port of a state friendly to Russia. It is expected that the fire would cause significant damage to the port infrastructure and spread to other vessels, which would require an international investigation,” the SVR emphasized.

London is going to entrust Ukrainian security forces with the implementation of both terrorist attacks. Their expectedly dirty work and inability to ‘cover up’ their tracks are considered by the British as a guarantee of impunity for themselves. The international investigation would hold either Russia or at worst Ukraine responsible for the accident, similar to the situation with the Nord Stream gas pipeline explosion,” the press bureau stressed.

Already at the beginning of this year, in January, there were three disturbing explosions on as many oil tankers circulating in the Mediterranean Sea and already then Gospa News indicated the terrorist lead of the pro-Nazi regime in Kiev as also accredited by various international media.

Eying sanctions

The SVR pointed out that the timing of the UK attack is intended to be chosen so as to use the media effect from it to put pressure on the administration of US President Donald Trump.

The aim is to force Washington, in defiance of its national interests, to impose the most severe secondary sanctions against Russian energy resources buyers, making them seen as ‘indirect culprits of the tragedy’,”the statement said.

It seems like nostalgia for the lost dominance at sea and for authorized by the Crown pirate lawlessness have completely deprived the British Intelligence of the remnants of common sense. It’s high time for our British colleagues to understand that their increasingly bold attempts not only ‘to get back at’ their rivals, but also to cause damage to the global energy security and ecology are capable to make even their most loyal allies run out of patience,” the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service concluded.

Are there Lessons to be learned in remembering the Express Pearl and MV Diamond maritime disasters off the West and East coasts of Sri Lanka also given interest in Submarine Date Cables and the Cloud Under the Sea?” that is vital to keep the Global Internet running.


SOURCE: https://gospanews.net/en/2025/08/07/uk-secret-services-plotting-maritime-ecological-disaster-russian-counterespionage-svr-states-after-capture-of-british-mi6-officers-in-ukraine/

UNHRC Report on Sri Lanka (A/HRC/60/21.2025) – Mandate abuse & High Commissioners Overreach Exposed

August 19th, 2025

Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lanka’s position should stand firm: The 2025 UNHRC report systematically alleges state misconduct while bypassing its original mandate, due process, impartiality, and sovereignty. Despite pages and pages of reports or statements, condemnations or allegations, that the UNHRC churns annually, it is dangerously diverting from its original mandate given in Resolution 60/251. The UNHRC/OHCHR must be continuously challenged for this overreach. The 2025 UNHRC Report on Sri Lanka (A/HRC/60/21.2025) once again demonstrates how successive High Commissioners have stretched, distorted, and exceeded their mandates under GA Resolution 60/251. UNHRC was created as a subsidiary body to promote cooperation, impartiality & universality of human rights – not to be weaponized into a political tool. Anyone reading the current report on Sri Lanka will understand this overreach. UN internal oversight mechanisms must awaken to stop subsidiary bodies below UNGA/UNSC, acting through a handful of Member States to assume quasi- judicial powers and forming kangaroo courts that threaten all Member Nations. No Member State has faced this level of harassment by UNHRC & its High Commissioners since 2009.

The following highlights key areas of overreach and selective targeting against Sri Lanka in UNHRC’s 2025 report to showcase the bias & overreach.

1. Due Process & Presumption of Innocence

·      UNHRC demand: Calls for removal of alleged perpetrators from office (Para. 63(d)) prior to charge or conviction.

·      Legal Principle: Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat — the burden of proof lies on the accuser.

·      UNHRC Overreach: UNHRC is treating allegations as proof, ignoring UDHR Art. 11(1) and ICCPR Art. 14(2) which guarantee presumption of innocence and trial by a competent court.

·      Sri Lanka Asks: On what legal basis can punitive measures be imposed solely on unproven allegations?

UNHRC Scattergun Targeting

Resolutions on Sri Lanka began about the last phase of the civil conflict in 2009, however over the years UNHRC Resolutions & its 2025 report spans on a plethora of topics, nit picking incidents unrelated to the conflict. 

HR violations can easily be taken up at UPR sessions

·      Emblematic cases: Thajudeen (2012), Lasantha Wickramatunga (2009), Prageeth Eknaligoda (2010), Trincomalee 11, Weliweriya (2013) — criticized as stalled or reversed under public pressure (Paras 40–41).

·      Conflict-related sexual violence: Only one conviction (Krishanthi Kumaraswamy, 1996); OHCHR blames administrative and linguistic obstacles (Paras 42–43).

·      Easter Sunday attacks 2019: Over 300 cases filed; OHCHR demands independent inquiry despite ongoing investigations (Paras 45–47).

Implication: UNHRC cherry-picks incidents across years, creating selective, overreaching accountability, undermining proportionality and due process and it is clear these incidents are being used to justify its kangaroo court design.

2. Ultra Vires Actions of UNHRC

·      UNHRC Allegation: Paras. 62–64 urge international accountability,” cooperation for foreign prosecutions, and targeted sanctions.

·      Legal Principle: Delegata potestas non potest delegari — delegated powers cannot be further delegated.

·      UNHRC Overreach: UNHRC has no mandate to act as a quasi-judicial authority or surrogate ICC/UNSC.

·      Sri Lanka Asks: 

By what authority does the HRC promote quasi-prosecutorial pathways and sanctions? 

Why is the UN internal oversight silent? 

Can UN subsidiary bodies function as they wish?

UNHRC Demands:

·      Paras 44, 63(h–i): Reform AG Department, create independent Public Prosecutor, special counsel for war crimes.

·      Paras 63(f, j): Amend Online Safety Act, Amend ICCPR Act, Amend NGO Registration Act, Amend PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act), and Muslim Marriage & Divorce Act.

·      Paras 64(b–d):  Member States urged to prosecute Sri Lankans abroad, use international legal options, impose asset freezes and travel bans – this is a serious overreach by UNHRC & High Commissioner and must be stopped.

UNHRC Overreach: 

·      Interfering in Sri Lanka’s internal jurisdiction,

·      attempting to dictate domestic legal reforms 

·      press for extraterritorial prosecutions. Under the UN Charter (Art. 2(7)), the UN has no authority to intervene in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction” of a member state. 

This represents a serious encroachment on sovereignty and a politicization of human rights, effectively turning a subsidiary body into a quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial entity.

3. Equality Before the Law & Selectivity

·      UNHRC Allegation: Bias & hypocrisy seen in its continuous scrutiny of Sri Lanka even 16 years after the conflict has ended; while other conflicts with graver harms are ignored.

·      Legal Principle: Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet — what affects all must be approved by all.

·      UNHRC Overreach: By dictating constitutional reforms, military vetting, prosecutions, devolution, and even economic policies, the UNHRC far exceeds its human rights mandate. 

GA Res. 60/251 forbids such selective targeting, yet Sri Lanka is made a test case.”

·      Sri Lanka Asks: Is Sri Lanka a laboratory case” for intervention? 

Why are ongoing conflicts being ignored and not shown the same scrutiny levelled against Sri Lanka?

Relevant Allegations:

·      Paras 57–62: Calls for transformative reforms (truth-telling, reparations, military vetting, independent prosecution, devolution, security reforms, austerity impacts).

·      Paras 48–55: OHCHR Sri Lanka Accountability Project” preserves evidence and assists foreign prosecutions; victim consultations framed as survivors abandoned.” – an unlawful parallel justice mechanism that prejudges Sri Lanka’s legal system and undermines its judiciary.

 

4. Victors’ Justice vs. Terror Accountability

·      UNHRC Allegation: Emphasis on state culpability; LTTE crimes, accomplices (local & international) and international networks ignored.

·      Legal Principle: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio — no action arises from a dishonorable cause.

·      UNHRC Overreach: Downplaying terrorist crimes while elevating unproven state allegations, UNHRC is committing a double standard. 

UNHRC is seeking retributive justice for Sri Lanka’s National Army & restorative justice for terrorists being mooted. 

The UNHRC’s hypocrisy is further shown in the omission of the Armed Forces Commander but including a list of select ground commanders only.

·      Sri Lanka Asks: Why is UNHRC not investigating or prosecuting or even bothered to collect evidence against LTTE financiers, arms suppliers, human traffickers, child soldier recruiters, and overseas propaganda hubs that still continue goal of separatism?

5. Sovereignty & Non-Intervention

·      UNHRC Allegation: Paras. 63(k–m) of the OHCHR/UNHRC reports go far beyond human rights review and intrude directly into Sri Lanka’s sovereign governance — demanding constitutional devolution, land allocation to civilians, release of detainees held under anti-terror law, and restructuring of the security sector.

·      UNHRC Overreach: These prescriptions are political, not legal. They violate UN Charter Article 2(7), which prohibits the UN from intervening in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.” 

For example, whether to accede to the Rome Statute, how to design devolution arrangements, or how to regulate land ownership are sovereign decisions — not matters for international imposition.

·      Sri Lanka Asks: Why is Sri Lanka’s internal governance being subjected to external diktat, while powerful states invoke sovereignty to shield themselves from similar interventions?

Relevant Demands Highlighting Overreach:

Paras 63(a, m):

·       Accede to the Rome Statute (Sri Lanka has consistently and lawfully chosen not to).

·       Release military-held lands (ignores legitimate security considerations).

·       Release PTA detainees (disregards judicial process).

·       Reform the Office on Missing Persons under international oversight (imposing external control on domestic institutions).

·       Implement provincial devolution (a political choice, not a human rights violation).

Paras 63(b, c):

·       Publish all commission reports (ignores confidentiality and national security concerns).

·       Recognize the Committee on Enforced Disappearances jurisdiction (requires voluntary state consent).

Explanation: These demands illustrate that the UNHRC is no longer limiting itself to monitoring human rights but is dictating constitutional, judicial, and security policy — functions belonging solely to the sovereign state. 

If accepted, it sets a dangerous precedent where a handful of states in the Council can rewrite another nation’s constitution, security structure, and laws under the guise of accountability.”

6. Lack of Legal Standing & Evidence Integrity

·       UNHRC Allegation: Para. 62 relies extensively on NGO reports (often funded by individuals & entities with duplicitous goals), advocacy submissions, and unverifiable secondary sources.

·       Legal Principle: Nemo judex in causa sua — no one should be judge in their own cause; audi alteram partem — the other side must be heard.

·       UNHRC Overreach: The HRC admits material that would not meet even the minimum evidentiary threshold in a court of law. Testimonies are anonymous, hearsay is admitted, and NGOs with declared political agendas act as both complainants and evidence-suppliers. This bypasses adversarial testing, cross-examination, and disclosure of sources, violating principles of natural justice.

·       Sri Lanka Asks: Can the HRC justify treating NGO submissions as probative” without applying the judicial safeguards of authenticity, reliability, and impartiality? Will it disclose methodology, allow independent verification, and admit counter-evidence — or continue to weaponize untested advocacy claims as binding truth?

7. Weaponization of Human Rights

·       UNHRC Allegation: Paras. 64(b–d) propose sanctions, asset freezes, travel bans, and universal jurisdiction prosecutions against Sri Lankan officials.

·       Legal Principle: Fiat justitia ruat caelum — justice must be done, but punishment must follow verifiedwrongdoing, not unproven allegations. International law recognizes due process, proportionality, and the presumption of innocence.

·       UNHRC Overreach: The HRC seeks to transform human-rights protection into an enforcement arm for political punishment. Coercive measures — imposed absent judicial determinations — punish not only targeted officials but also the Sri Lankan population through economic, diplomatic, and reputational harm. This creates a chilling effect on State cooperation with the UN system, undermines reconciliation, and effectively weaponizes human rights as a geopolitical tool.

·       Sri Lanka Asks: How can sanctions, asset seizures, and external prosecutions be squared with the principles of fairness, sovereignty, and non-discrimination when no court of law has adjudicated guilt? Will the HRC admit that bypassing judicial processes to impose penalties politicizes its mandate and violates the very human-rights framework it claims to uphold?

Sri Lanka’s response defends not only national interests but the integrity of the UN Charter system. If a non-judicial council can prescribe punitive templates, constitutional outcomes, and quasi-prosecutorial measures, no small state is safe tomorrow. The report demonstrates selective targeting, evidentiary weakness, and overreach that threatens sovereignty, due process, and the universality of human rights.

Shenali D Waduge

Thailand turns to Sri Lankan workers to cope with Cambodian exodus in the wake of border conflict

August 19th, 2025

Courtesy The Straits Times

BANGKOK – Thailand’s Cabinet has approved the hiring of 10,000 Sri Lankan workers as it tries to address a labour shortage caused by Cambodian workers returning home in the wake of a deadly border conflict between the two countries, a Thai senior official said on Aug 19.

Thailand’s ageing population and shrinking workforce has forced it to rely on at least three million registered foreign labourers across the agriculture, construction, and manufacturing sectors, data from the International Labour Organisation showed.

More than 30,000 workers from Sri Lanka have already registered and 10,000 will be sent to Thailand in the first stage, Thai Labour Minister Pongkawin Jungrungruangkit told reporters, adding that it would also allow workers from Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines to apply.

A long border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia in July 

boiled over into the worst fighting in decades, with at least 43 people killed and over 300,000 displaced on both sides of the border. The two South-east Asian nations now have a fragile ceasefire agreement.

Before the conflict began, more than 520,000 Cambodians worked in Thailand, accounting for 12 per cent of the country’s foreign workforce, according to official data.

About 400,000 Cambodians working in Thailand have left the country during the fighting, according to the Cambodian government.

ජනාධිපති අනුර රට ගිහිල්ලා ඉද්දි වියදම් කරපු මුදලාලිට දැවැන්ත බදු සහනයක් දුන්නා, දැන් රටට ලාබ කරලද

August 19th, 2025

Two more petitions filed challenging bill to revoke privileges of former Presidents

August 18th, 2025

Courtesy Adaderana

Two more petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the bill presented in Parliament by the government to revoke the privileges of former Presidents, according to Ada Derana reporter.

The petitions were filed by two individuals from Veyangoda and Pannipitiya. The Attorney General has been named as the respondent in both cases.

The petitioners argue that Clauses 1 to 4 of the proposed bill violate the doctrine of separation of powers, which is guaranteed by the Constitution of Sri Lanka. They also claim that several provisions of the bill undermine the sovereignty of the people and the independence guaranteed under the Constitution.

They further state that, taken as a whole, the bill infringes upon fundamental constitutional principles, and violates Articles 1, 3, 4, and 12(1) of the Constitution, including the fundamental rights of individuals.

Accordingly, the petitioners request that the Supreme Court issue an order stating that the relevant clauses of the bill cannot be passed in Parliament unless it is approved by a two-thirds majority in Parliament and subsequently endorsed by the people through a referendum.

Earlier, Renuka Perera, the Administrative Secretary of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), also filed a petition challenging the same bill.

The Presidents’ Entitlements (Repeal) Bill, which seeks to repeal the Presidents’ Entitlements Act, was presented to Parliament by the Minister of Justice Harshana Nanayakkara on August 7.

On July 31, the Presidents’ Entitlements (Repeal) Bill was gazetted. The bill was drafted to revoke special privileges extended to former Presidents and their widows.

Earlier in July, the Cabinet of Minister also granted approval to the proposal to gazette and present in Parliament the draft bill formulated to amend the Presidents Entitlements Act (No. 4 of 1986).

Manusha, Vadivel Suresh and Sagala Ratnayaka summoned for questioning by Illegal Assets Investigation Unit

August 18th, 2025

Courtesy The Island

The Illegal Assets Investigation Unit has summoned former Ministers Manusha Nanayakkara, Vadivel Suresh and Sagala Ratnayaka for questioning over allegations of amassing wealth through unlawful means.

Officials said the trio would appear before the unit in the coming days as part of a sweeping probe into 26 politicians, including a former top defence official, accused of enriching themselves during past administrations.

The unit has been conducting inquiries for nearly a month and has already recorded statements from several ex-Ministers. Assets for which no legitimate source of income can be proven will be vested in the State and legal action filed against their owners, investigators said.

කණට ග😮හල හිරේ දාලා ජෙපි රැග් එක නවත්තපු හැටි ?

August 18th, 2025

Iraj Show

බැසිල්ගේ හොරණ ඩොලර් බිලියන 3 නේ සුපිරි මාළිගාව !

August 18th, 2025

Iraj Show

උතුරු නැගෙනහිර හර්තාලය අසාර්ථකයි: මඩකලපුව නගරාධිපතිගෙන් වෙළඳුන්ට තර්ජන

August 18th, 2025

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

මුලතිව්, මුත්තියාන්කට්ටු හි යුද හමුදා කඳවුරකට ඇතුළු වූ පුද්ගලයෙකු මරණයට පත්වීම ඇතුළු කරුණු කිහිපයක් මුල් කරගනිමින් උතුරු – නැගෙනහිර පළාත්වල අද හර්තාලයක් ක්‍රියාත්මක වුණා.

කෙසේ වෙතත් එම ප්‍රදේශවල දෛනික කටයුතු සාමාන්‍ය පරිදි සිදුවූු බවයි අප වාර්තාකරුවන් සඳහන් කළේ.

ඒ අනුව බොහෝ ප්‍රදේශවල පාසල් කටයුතු සාමාන්‍ය පරිදි සිදු වූ අතර, කඩ සාප්පු ද විවෘත කර තිබුණා.

මුත්තියාන්කට්ටු හි පිහිටි, යුද හමුදා 12 වැනි සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තු කඳවුරට අනවසරයෙන් ඇතුළු වූ පිරිසක් පළවා හැරීමට හමුදා සාමාජිකයින් පියවර ගෙන තිබූ අතර එහිදී පළා ගිය අයෙකු වැවේ ගිලී මියගොස් ඇති බවටයි පසුව අනාවරණය වුණේ.

කෙසේ වෙතත් මෙම මරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් මියගිය පුද්ගලයාගේ ඥාතීන් සහ ඇතැම් දේශපාලන පක්ෂ යුද හමුදාවට චෝදනා එල්ල කළා.

කෙසේ වෙතත් අද ක්‍රියාත්මක වූ හර්තාල් ව්‍යාපාරය අතරතුර විවෘත කර තිබූ වෙළෙඳසැල් වසා දමන ලෙසට මඩකලපුව නගරාධිපතිවරයා වෙළදුන්ට දැනුම් දී තිබුණා.

වෙළෙඳුන් සඳහන් කළේ, විවෘත කර ඇති වෙළඳසැල්වල බලපත්‍ර අවලංගු කරන බවට එහිදී නගරාධිපතිවරයා තර්ජනය කළ බවයි.

එහිදී වෙළඳුන්ගෙන් එල්ල වූ දැඩි විරෝධය හේතුවෙන් නගරාධිපතිවරයා එම ස්ථානයෙන් පිටව ගිය බවයි අප වාර්තාකරු සඳහන් කළේ.

How Does the US Embassy Bribe Media in Sri Lanka?

August 17th, 2025

e-Con e-News

blog: eesrilanka.wordpress.com

Before you study the economics, study the economists!

e-Con e-News 10-16 August 2025

*

In virtually every colonial territory

a certain number had to be killed

before the survivors would accept

the new prospects. This might even

be said to introduce a new concept

into the study of political economy

– the indispensable minimum of murder.’

– SBD de Silva, The Political Economy of Underdevelopment

*

‘The White House letter to Colombo ended

with the clear threat that future tariff levels

would be decided by the general US-SL

bilateral relations. With no reference to

trade or economic factors, Washington is

indicating expectation of a much wider

geopolitical conformity by Colombo.

– Lakshman Gunasekera (see ee Quotes)

*

I remember the World Bank representative saying to me:

‘That’s the norm, that’s how it’s done everywhere.

We write programs for countries.’ I replied,

‘I’m capable of writing my country’s program…’

Multinationals are involved in all development programs.

– Eritrea President Isaias Afwerki (see ee Quotes)

*

‘The Moving Finger writes;

&, having writ, Moves on…’

– The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam

*

How the US embassy in Colombo bribes the media (to move the fingers that write) in Sri Lanka has been a subject of speculation for decades. How Wall Street & the US Treasury run Sri Lanka’s economy (through their World Bank & IMF) is now no secret, though the merchant media here keep trying hard to deflect blame for our woes onto China (see ee Random Notes, Waduge, who names names).

     It is also no secret, what kind of ‘geopolitical conformity’ the USA’s latest ‘bilateral relations’ seek to impose. What is the latest ‘indispensable minimum of murder’ – the brilliant 4 words by SBD summing up his painstaking vast classic on our world’s political economy – that the USA is demanding Sri Lankans must endure, before we accept these ‘new prospects’? What are the ‘new prospects?’ They are yet to be fully divulged. Indeed, there has been no media inquiry into the role the current US Envoy has played in the overthrow of other nations’ leaders before she arrived here to thus also accomplish. Ju Chung however is a mere US State Department coolie, obeying the dicat of her white bosses.

     This week saw the always-leaving-yet-never-departing US envoy’eur Ju Chung have her tired photo taken with: the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce Chairman (& Keells’ casino king) Krishan Balendra, Vice Chairman (& England’s local Standard Chartered Bank CEO) Bingumal Thewarathanthri, Deputy Vice Chair (& Hirdaramani Group Chair) Vinod Hirdaramani, Secretary General & CEO (& on boards of Sierra, Cargills, etc) Buwanekabahu Perera, and others. These ‘executives’ are all beneficiaries of the US’ supposed largesse (60% of the swindle called the ‘garment industry’, ‘which does not make a pin’, destined for the US market). As one reader suggests (see ee Comments), information about the imported tools & machinery & other industrial inputs involved in this ‘garment trade’ is not easily accessible at all (Transparency International, where are you hiding?), and clearly not part of the calculations. Then again, these ‘tariffs’ are not about making trade equitable, but a prelude to another world war, led by the US & their EU satraps, to target China, to preserve white dominance over the world.

     The stashing by these ‘executives’ of their ‘apparel’ revenues in foreign tax hideouts is also well known to the USA. The same goes for the tea business (see below). Our Bribery Commissions are somehow prevented from hauling up these CEOs, let alone interrogating the multinationals they actually represent. Nor will they haul Chung in for questioning, perhaps due to diplomatic protocols, even as the US envoy has clearly overstepped her diplomatic boundaries, confident the US has the dirt on anyone who dares do so. Add this, then, to the 1,000s of photo-ops that have spread her jaded visage throughout the media. Yet with all this radiance, no media has ever dared ask her about her nefarious involvements in the overthrow (& murder, in at least one case) of several American leaders – in Bolivia, Peru, Haiti, etc – before she was installed as US Ambassador to Sri Lanka, on 2022 February 25, just in time to lubricate the aragalaya & almost-murder of a popularly elected President (see ee Random Notes, also see ee Quotes on Nigeria and the US role in promoting the terroristic Boko Haram).

*

‘A Financial Times front-page headline, ‘Bombshell on BOI investors’, titles a seemingly hurried news item, blaming government officials who listen to trade unions. The unsigned article claims to represent ‘the investor community’ (see ee Economists). Who exactly is this ‘community’? There was a much-promoted ‘Investors’ Forum’ this week in Singapore, in that refuge of Convicted Central Banker Arjuna Mahendran, organized by the Securities Exchange Commission & Colombo Stock Exchange. The forum included Asia Frontier Capital FundLynear Wealth ManagementBloomberg TV and Farringdon Asset Management. The question as usual is ’investment for what and in what and for whom’?  Investment in modern production, or importing cars, etc.?

*

Wages for estate workers are low. This is an industry.

We saw in the recent past that taxed businesses had obtained profits.”

– Bimal Rathnayake, Minister of Transport

(see ee Workers, Increasing plantation workers’ wages a challenge)

*

• This somewhat cryptic news item appears to be missing some detail. The Minister, who’s not the Minister of Plantations, also reports the government is working ‘to resolve estate workers’ wage issue within the next few months’. First, he should be aware that the tea fraud is no ‘industry’ at all. It was rumoured that the JVP once planned to uproot the tea bushes and throw them into the sea. But we are sure they have no such imminent plans. This ee Focus concludes Dhanusha Pathirana’s incisive examination, using SBD de Silva’s analyses, of the fraud by the ‘licensed export firms’ that prevents reinvestment of abundant plantation sector surpluses in technological advance. He also notes how fancy accounting practices are employed to suppress and deny the workers’ demand to raise the daily wage up to Rs 1,000 (no, that’s not a typo…). Pathirana also suggests certain steps that need to be taken: eg, on estate superintendents’ control of their National Identity Card applications; also ‘the main political demand of the workers therefore should be to revoke the ‘exclusive’ legal rights of the licensed export firms to purchase from tea auctions’:

‘70% of the profits of the sector are appropriated

by licensed export firms. Both licensed export firms

& RPCs are mainly owned by large conglomerates,

including Aitken Spence PLC, MJF Holdings, Vallibel

Plantation Management, Richard Pieris & Co, James

Finlay Plantation Holdings, Hayleys PLC, among others.’

(see ee Focus)

*

We do find it curious, however, that Pathirana has left out the overweening control by Unilever in the tea business, worldwide, let alone omitted the reparations required for those Sinhala people evicted from the highlands. Pathirana notes that this ‘branding’ of ‘Ceylon Tea’, has enabled Lankan tea’s special ‘monopolistic’ niche in the markets, which has no interest in changing a backward colonial status quo of plucking tea by hand on stolen lands. Unilever is now threatening to undermine the ‘Ceylon Tea’ brand by ‘blending’ it with other substances, but not to modernize the sector.

     In 2024, the then-Ministry of Agriculture & Plantation Industries signed an MoU with Unilever to ‘develop the country’s first national and globally accepted standard for sustainable tea production,’ and a more ‘ethical future’ along with the Sri Lanka Tea Board (SLTB), ‘and other tea industry dignitaries’. Unilever Sri Lanka’s ‘Ceytea’ factory in Agarapathana is the largest supplier of black tea extract to the Global Pepsi-Lipton JV, and its Iced Tea brands ‘Lipton’ and ‘Brisk’. This MoU claimed it would ‘drive sustainable sourcing of agricultural raw materials under the Unilever Climate Action Transition Plan’ (see ee Agriculture, Unilever…). What is the link between these ‘export firms’ and Unilever? The role played by multinationals such as Unilever – an offshoot of the 19th century privatization of England’s East India Company, and the subsequent private English opium trade from India to China – in undermining the state and the economy, is a tale yet to be fully told.

*

‘The underdeveloped countries before coming into contact

with Western society were not technologically static…

In the manufacture of consumer articles, especially cotton

& silk textiles, some of the non-European countries

until comparatively recently held a technological lead.’

(SBD de Silva, ee Focus)

*

Indeed, for a deeper understanding of how the colonial import-export plantation system has monopolized Sri Lanka’s resources of land & labor, we need to refer to SBD de Silva’s classic The Political Economy of Underdevelopment. This ee Focus begins reproducing his first chapter, after last week concluding his ‘Introduction’, which called for navigating back and forth between our history and the world, to seek clues. Those interested in the state of the economies of Sri Lanka along with the rest of Asia & Africa prior to colonialism – as well as the ‘great divergence’ between Europe, its settler colonies and the rest of the world – will find this Chapter 1 of SBD’s book, most magnetic, with each sentence a product of hours of contemplationDe Silva summarizes whole swathes of history to show how modern imperialism acquired an ‘automaticity’ through political changes favourable to capital accumulation & investment in modern technology. Despite their daily propaganda against state intervention, and the incessant promotion of ‘free trade’, their practices in Sri Lanka have been the exact opposite – just ask British American Tobacco (BAT)’s Ceylon Tobacco Co (CTC) about their monopoly, and the politicians and thinktanks they run. Indeed, the US government’s latest moves very much recall the English system of ‘imperial preference

*

• With all this current media chatter about the ascension of a ‘reform’ candidate in New York City, ee Focus also continues Gustavus Myers’ 1917 History of Tammany HallMyers tracked the emergence of several oppositions to the ‘Big Bosses’ of the status quo, ‘Young Democracy’ etc, that ‘furnish the appearance of a contest’, fronts for the oligarchy that has run the USA’s main metropolis, where gangs control the political process of representation & elections, alternating between thuggery & charity… Particularly interesting is how the corporations place politicians and civic officials, judges and police, on their payroll… We are to be held captive between a rock & a hard place, between the world’s self-proclaimed ‘oldest democracy’ (USA? Really?) & the world’s ‘largest democracy’(India?)… So, we keep being told (but… see ee QuotesSunday Times‘ Red Eyebrows).

*

Contents:

New government prints Rs. 1,225.9 Billion (1.22 Trillion) Debt rises by Rs. 905B

August 17th, 2025

Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon Former Governor of Uva, Southern and Central Provinces Former Executive Director of Campaign for Free and Fair Elections (CaFFE) and Center for Human Rights and Research – CHR Sri Lanka

Money printing, declining foreign reserves, and rising domestic debt could pose a significant challenge to achieving the year’s economic development targets, the Center for Human Rights and Research (CHR) Sri Lanka said in a statement.

From October 2024 to June 2025, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka printed Rs. 1,225.9 billion (or Rs. 1.2 trillion). The printing of money in violation of agreements with the International Monetary Fund could be the beginning of the country heading towards an economic crisis once again, according to the statement issued by the Executive Director of the Center for Human Rights and Research (CHR) Sri Lanka, Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon.

The amount of money printed as Broad money (M2b) each month since the current government came to power is shown below.

 Rs. Billion
2024 October58.70
November78.30
December234.80
2025 January117.40
February104.70
March233.90
April154.20
May33.60
June210.30
Printed Money (M2b)  1,225.9

Contrary to the guidelines of the International Monetary Fund, the Central Bank printed Rs. 210.3 billion (10.4% expansion) in June 2025 alone. Rs. 233.90 billion was printed in March 2025, the highest amount printed in the first six months. During the Gotabaya regime, the economy was devastated by excessive money printing (e.g., the April-May 2022 expansion of 17 -20%). It is the joint responsibility of Parliament and the Central Bank to take appropriate steps to prevent the country from experiencing another financial crisis.

Increasing debt burden

The country’s debt has been increasing rapidly since the Presidential Election last September. Following the formation of the new government, Sri Lanka’s domestic debt, which stood at Rs. 17,595.05 billion as of April 2025, has increased to Rs. 18,629.86 billion, representing an additional Rs. 1,034.81 billion.

Under the new government, the country’s total domestic and foreign debt has increased from Rs. 28,574.65 billion to Rs. 29,480.39 billion, representing an increase of Rs. 905.74 billion. Although the amount of foreign debt has declined, this is mainly due to continued domestic borrowing through the issuance of treasury bonds and bills.

The Rs. 65 billion bond issue presented by the Central Bank on August 12 was not entirely sold. There was not a single bid for the 2032 bond (8% interest). This is a clear red light for the domestic borrowing policy. 

Foreign reserves decline

The foreign reserves, which were $6.531 billion in June, fell to $6,080 million by the end of June. The foreign reserves in July were $ 6.114 billion. The ‘reserves’ are also announced, including derivative contracts through swaps.

However, when the swap exchange value is removed, the country’s net reserves, which were $2,799 million in March, have decreased to $2,210 million as of June, as follows.

Of the total reserves in December 2024, $6,122 million, Swap was $3,548 million, and net reserves were $2,574 million.

As of June 2025, the total reserves stood at $6,080 million, comprising $3,870 million in Chinese and other swaps and $ 2,210 million in net reserves. Accordingly, the decrease in net foreign reserves from December 2024 to June 2025 is $ 364M.

When the early signs of the economic collapse of 2021 – 2022 emerged, people with quantitative knowledge warned about money printing, unlimited borrowing, and a decline in foreign reserves. Despite those warnings, hiding facts and criticizing critics, the 2022 ‘financial collapse’ developed into a massive economic crisis. It is the responsibility of the Central Bank, the Treasury, the Ministry of Finance, and the Parliament to identify the leading signs of a similar financial collapse sooner and take measures.

The printing of money by Rs. 1,225.9 billion, a decline in net foreign reserves, and an increase in the country’s debt by Rs. 905.74 billion will inevitably lead to a decrease in the country’s economic growth rate. It is a situation that will have long-term adverse effects.

[The End]

Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon Former Governor of Uva, Southern and Central Provinces Former Executive Director of Campaign for Free and Fair Elections (CaFFE) and Center for Human Rights and Research – CHR Sri Lanka

අලුත් ආණ්ඩුව රු. බිලියන 1,225.9 ක් (ට්‍රිලියන 1.22) අච්චු ගහලා රටේ ණය බර රු. බි. 905 කින් ඉහළ නගී’

August 17th, 2025

රජිත් කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන් විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ/ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය

මුදල් අච්චු ගැසීම, විදේශ සංචිත පහත වැටීම හා දේශීය ණය ප්‍රමාණය ඉහළ යාම වසරේ ආර්ථික සංවර්ධන ඉලක්ක සපුරා ගැනීමට බලවත් අභියෝගයක් විය හැකි බව ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් පවසයි.    

2024 ඔක්තෝබර් සිට 2025 ජූනි දක්වා ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව විසින් රුපියල් බිලියන 1225.9 ක් (හෙවත් රු. ට්‍රිලියන 1.2) ක් අච්චු ගසා ඇත. ජාත්‍යන්තර මුල්‍ය අරමුදල සමඟ වන එකඟතා කඩකරමින් මුදල් අච්චු ගැසීම නැවත වරක් ආර්ථික අර්බුදයක් කරා රට යොමු වීමේ ආරම්භය විය හැකි බව එහි මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රයේ විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ රජිත් කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන් විසින් නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනයේ දැක්වේ.

වත්මන් රජය බලයට පත්වීමෙන් පසුව, මේ දක්වා කාලය තුල එක් එක් මාසයේ දී අච්චු ගසා ඇති මුදල්  (money printing Broad money (M2b) ප්‍රමාණය පහත දැක්වේ.

 රු.බිලියන
2024 ඔක්තෝබර්58.70
නොවැම්බර්78.30
දෙසැම්බර්234.80
2025 ජනවාරි117.40
පෙබරවාරි104.70
මාර්තු233.90
අප්‍රේල්154.20
මැයි33.60
ජූනි210.30
අච්චු ගැසූ (M2b)  මුළු මුදල රු. බිලියන1,225.9

ජාත්‍යන්තර මුල්‍ය අරමුදලේ මාර්ගෝපදේශයන්ට පටහැනිව මහ බැංකුව 2025 ජූනි මස පමණක් රු. බිලියන 210.3 (පුළුල්වීම 10.4%)  ක් අච්චු ගසා ඇත.  2025 මාර්තු මස රු. බිලියන 233.90 ක් අච්චු ගසා (M2b) ඇති අතර පළමු මාස හය තුල මසක දී අච්චු ගැසූ වැඩිම මුදලයි.  ගෝඨාභය පාලන සමයේ දී, අසීමිත මුදල් අච්චු ගැසීම හේතුවෙන් (උදා. 2022 අප්‍රේල් – මැයි පුළුල්වීම 17% -20%) ආර්ථිකයට මහත් විනාශයක් සිදු විය.  2001, රටේ මුල්‍ය අර්බුදයක් ඇති නොවීමට සුදුසු පියවර ගැනීම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ හා මහ බැංකුවේ ඒකාබද්ධ වගකීමකි.

ණය බර වැඩිවීම

පසුගිය සැප්තෑම්බර් ජනාධිපතිවරණ‍යෙන් පසුව නැවත රටේ ණය ක්‍රමිකව නමුත් වේගයෙන් වැඩි වෙමින් ඇත. නව රජය බිහිවන විට රු. බිලියන 17,595.05 ක් වූ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ දේශීය ණය ප්‍රමාණය, 2025 අප්‍රේල් වන විට රු. බිලියන 18,629.86 දක්වා එනම්, රු. බි. 1034.81 කින් ඉහළ නැග ඇත.

නව රජයේ පාලනය යටතේ රටේ සමස්ත දේශීය හා විදේශීය ණය එකතුව  රු. බිලියන 28,574.65 සිට රු.බි. 29,480. 39 දක්වා රු. බිලියන 905.74 ඉහළ ගොස් ඇත. විදේශ ණය ප්‍රමාණය පහත වැටී ඇති නමුත්, දිගින් දිගටම බැඳුම්කර හරහා දේශීය ණය ලබා ගැනීම මෙයට හේතුවයි. 

පසුගිය අගොස්තු 12 දින මහ බැංකුව ඉදිරිපත් කළ රු. බිලියන 65 ක බැඳුම්කර නිකුතුව අලෙවි වූයේ නැත. 2032 කල් පිරෙන (8% පොලිය) බැඳුම්කරයට එකම ලංසුවක් හෝ නොවීය. දේශීය ණය ලබා ගැනීමේ ප්‍රතිපත්තියට මෙය පැහැදිලි රතු එළියකි. 

විදේශ සංචිත පහත වැටීම

මහ බැංකුවේ නිල දත්ත අනුව, 2025 මාර්තු මස ඩො. මි. 6,531 ක් වූ සංචිත ජූනි මස ඩො.මි. 6,080 ට පහත වැටුණි.  ජූලි මස විදේශ සංචිත ඩො.මි. 6,114 කි. Swap (හුවමාරු) හරහා සිදුවන ව්‍යුත්පන්න කොන්ත්‍රාත්තු (derivative contracts) ද ඇතුලත් කරමින් ‘සංචිත’ ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කෙරේ.

කෙසේ වුවත්, Swap හුවමාරු අගය ඉවත් කළ විට, 2025 මාර්තු ඩො.මි. 2,799 ක් වූ රටේ ශුද්ධ විදේශ සංචිත ප්‍රමාණය ජූනි මස වන විට ඩො.මි. 2,210 දක්වා අඩුවී ඇත.

2024 දෙසැම්බර් මුළු සංචිත ඩො.මි. 6,122 න්,  Swap ඩො.මි. 3,548 ක් වූ අතර, ශුද්ධ සංචිත 2,574 කි.

2025 ජූනි මුළු සංචිත ප්‍රමාණය ඩො.මි. 6,080 න්, චීන සහ වෙනත් Swap ඩො.මි. 3,870 ක් වු අතර, ශුද්ධ සංචිත ඩො.මි. 2,210 කි.  ඒ අනුව, 2024 දෙසැම්බර් සිට 2025 ජූනි දක්වා ශුද්ධ විදේශ සංචිත අඩුවීම ඩො.මි.  364 කි.

2021 – 2022 ආර්ථිකය බිඳවැටීමේ පූර්ව ලක්ෂණ මතුවන විට ප්‍රමාණික විෂය දැනුමක් සහිත පිරිස් මුදල් අච්චු ගැසීම, අසීමිත ණය ගැනීම හා විදේශ සංචිත පහත වැටීම ගැන අනතුරු හඟවනු ලැබීය. එම අනතුරු හැඟවීම් නොතකා කරුණු සැඟවීම හා විචාරකයින්ට අවලාද නැගීම 2022 ‘මූල්‍ය බිඳ වැටීම’,  දැවැන්ත ආර්ථික බිඳවැටීමක් දක්වා වර්ධනය වූවේය. වසර හතරකට පසු නැවත එවැනිම මුල්‍ය බිඳවැටීමක පෙරමඟ ලකුණු හඳුණාගෙන පිළියම් යෙදීම මහ බැංකුව, භාණ්ඩාගාරය, මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශය හා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ වගකීමකි.

රුපියල් බිලියන 1225.9 මුදල් අච්චු ගැසීම, ඩො.මි. 364 කින් විදේශ සංචිත පහත වැටීම හා රු. බිලියන 905.74 කින් රටේ  ණය ප්‍රමාණය ඉහළ යාම හේතුවෙන් රටේ ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය පහත වැටීම අනිවාර්ය වනු ඇත.   එය දිගු කාලීන අහිතකර බලපෑම් ඇති කරන තත්වයකි.

රජිත් කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්
විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ/ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය

Sri Lanka vs. UNHRC: How High Commissioners abused mandates, exceeded authority, and politicized Human Rights

August 17th, 2025

Shenali D Waduge

We are concerned about the consistent manner that successive UN High Commissioners for Human Rights have been involved or caved into pressure by a handful of bloc nations using the UNHRC to exert political pressure over nations. Not only have resolutions been intrusive, and beyond the Human Rights Councils advisory mandate as per UNGA Resolution 60/251 (2006) the Council is now venturing into acting as quasi-prosecutors, prejudging Sri Lanka’s armed forces as war criminals based on well-funded smear campaigns. The latest and last attempt is a creation of an external judicial mechanism bypassing the authority of the UN General Assembly & even UN Security Council while entirely violating the UN Charter. Is the UNSC & UNGA asleep & watching this over reach take place. As public officials, the citizens of the world have every right to scrutinize the high commissioners working for the UN. We now look at the pattern of mandate overreach, institutional bias against Sri Lanka & leave the judgement to the readers. This analysis also highlights explicit actions where High Commissioners named Sri Lankan armed forces and senior officials, called for sanctions and travel bans, and ignored due process — reinforcing the pattern of systemic political bias.

The most alarming trend is the consistent interference in Sri Lanka’s domestic affairs — ranging from pressuring constitutional reforms, repeal of national security laws (PTA), imposing the 13th Amendment, and even demanding recognition of same-sex marriage — all of which have no place in the UNHRC’s mandate

This exposes not only systematic bias but also the abuse of UN mechanisms by a handful of bloc nations and politically motivated lobby groups.

Below we examine, Commissioner by Commissioner, how this bias has been institutionalized.

Navi Pillay (2008–2014)

Actions Beyond Mandate:

·      As a Tamil ethnic herself, conflict of interest required her recusal in judging Sri Lanka’s conflict which was not done.

·      Consistently referred to Sri Lanka’s armed forces as perpetrators of war crimes despite no international tribunal verdict or UN Security Council referral.

·      Called for independent international investigations into Sri Lanka, which the UNHRC is not empowered to initiate.

·      Publicly demanded Sri Lanka to implement the 13th Amendment to devolve political power — a domestic constitutional matter outside OHCHR’s remit.

·      Pressured for the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) without acknowledging Sri Lanka’s ongoing security concerns.

·      Repeatedly used emotive, accusatory language against Sri Lanka, ignoring LTTE terrorism.

·      Upon leaving her role as High Commissioner, she was also seen expressing condolence messages for the Mullaivaikkal commemorations – an event annually held to commemorate LTTE dead.

 

Procedural Overreach:

·      Functioned in a quasi-judicial role, making determinations of guilt and recommending punitive measures, which exceeds advisory functions.

·      Ignored due process by accepting unverified testimonies from LTTE-linked diaspora groups while dismissing official government submissions.

Pillay repeatedly accused Sri Lanka’s armed forces of ‘credible war crimes,’ pressed for international investigations targeting senior political and military leaders.

Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein (2014–2018)

Actions Beyond Mandate:

·      Pressed for the establishment of a hybrid court with foreign judges to try Sri Lanka’s armed forces — bypassing the UNGA & UNSC authority.

·      Recommended Sri Lanka amend its Constitution to entrench devolution and remove presidential powers — a clear breach of sovereignty.

·      Repeated calls for the repeal of the PTA, disregarding Sri Lanka’s sovereign right to maintain national security laws.

·      Openly endorsed UNHRC Resolutions demanding structural changes to Sri Lanka’s judiciary and security sector, far outside the OHCHR’s mandate.

 

Procedural Overreach:

·      Acted as a prosecutor rather than neutral advisor, producing country reports that accused Sri Lanka of systemic crimes without judicial validation.

·      Failed to recognize Sri Lanka’s domestic mechanisms (Paranagama Commission), dismissing them as inadequate without substantive review.

Zeid directly referred to the Sri Lankan military as systematically responsible for violations and pushed for a hybrid court with jurisdiction over senior commanders and officers

Michelle Bachelet (2018–2022)

Actions Beyond Mandate:

·      Called for the creation of an international evidence-gathering mechanism” (the OHCHR Sri Lanka Accountability Project”), acting as if OHCHR is a tribunal.

·      Recommended that Sri Lanka repeal the PTA and draft a new constitution reflecting external models — exceeding advisory limits.

·      Persistently demanded full implementation of the 13th Amendment, effectively endorsing federalization of Sri Lanka.

·      Issued statements on Sri Lanka’s judiciary, police, and governance reforms — intruding into internal governance.

Procedural Overreach:

·      Operated as a parallel judicial authority, collecting and preserving” evidence to be used in hypothetical future prosecutions.

·      Made one-sided assessments that consistently downplayed LTTE atrocities while amplifying unverified claims against the state.

·      Encouraged UN member states to use universal jurisdiction against Sri Lankan officials — again, outside UNHRC’s authority.

Notable Interference & sanctions call

·      Sanctions & Travel Bans Advocacy (2021): Bachelet called on Member States to consider targeted sanctions such as asset freezes and travel bans against those “credibly alleged perpetrators” of grave rights violations — a punitive step outside the OHCHR’s advisory role 

Bachelet explicitly named General Shavendra Silva, endorsed U.S. sanctions against him, and called upon UN member states to impose targeted sanctions and travel bans on Sri Lankan military officials.

Volker Türk (2022–Present)

Actions Beyond Mandate:

·      Continued pressure for the repeal of the PTA and replacement with new security laws, disregarding Sri Lanka’s legislative independence.

·      Demanded comprehensive constitutional reforms, including greater devolution of power — interfering directly in domestic affairs.

·      Remarkably, went beyond human rights to advocate for the legalization of same-sex marriage in Sri Lanka, a matter wholly unrelated to UNHRC’s mandate and contrary to Sri Lanka’s constitutional, cultural, and religious context during the recent visit to Sri Lanka.

·      Endorsed the ongoing external evidence mechanism created under Bachelet, which violates the principle that only the UNSC/UNGA can create tribunals.

·      Also during the recent visit to Sri Lanka, made a flying visit to a 1990 grave site & an emotive speech falsely giving impression to the ignorant international community that this was a grave site of killings by Sri Lanka Armed Forces while not including a visit to a grave site & torture chamber run by LTTE that had killed over 3000 Tamils which families claim documentation of proof was available.

 

Procedural Overreach:

·      Encouraged member states to impose sanctions on Sri Lankan officials — a function reserved for the Security Council, not OHCHR.

·      Continued the practice of naming and shaming, treating OHCHR reports as verdicts rather than advisory observations.

While more indirect, Türk has continued the trend by framing Sri Lanka’s military presence in the North and East as an obstacle to reconciliation, urging structural reforms that weaken the armed forces’ domestic role

Examples of Systematic Interference in Domestic Affairs of Sri Lanka

All Commissioners, followed a common pattern:

1.     Constitutional Interference – Repeated calls to implement the 13th Amendment and change Sri Lanka’s Constitution.

2.     National Security Undermined – Demands to repeal the PTA without offering alternatives to tackle terrorism.

3.     Judicial Substitution – Attempts to set up foreign or hybrid courts to bypass Sri Lanka’s judiciary.

4.     Cultural & Religious Insensitivity – Volker Türk’s call to legalize same-sex marriage ignores Sri Lanka’s religious and cultural framework.

5.     Selective Accountability – Silence on LTTE atrocities and external complicity, while prejudging the Sri Lankan armed forces as guilty. Explicit naming of armed forces and senior commanders for alleged violations and advocacy for sanctions or travel bans without judicial process.

6.     Institutional Bias – Reliance on funded NGO and diaspora allegations, while dismissing local commissions and state-provided data  

UN High Commissioners — notably Navi Pillay, Zeid Al-Hussein, Michelle Bachelet and Volker Turk — have all functioned beyond their mandates by explicitly naming Sri Lanka’s armed forces and, in some instances, individual commanders and even calling for sanctions & travel bans as well as asset freezes.

They have turned UNHRC into a parallel political tribunal against Sri Lanka on behalf of a handful of nations now manipulating the UNHRC for their political goals and behind are pro-LTTE funding groups. The same could happen to other nations if UNHRC overreach is not stopped.

Their actions amount to prejudgment, violate the presumption of innocence, and exceed the advisory role of the OHCHR under the UN Charter.

This breach of due process seriously undermines the credibility of the UNHRC. It also exposes the UNGA and UNSC’s inaction, allowing a handful of nations to manipulate the Council and attempt to grant it extra-judicial powers reserved for the General Assembly and Security Council.

Our question is – what is the UNSG, the UNGA (President & Members) as well as UNSC going to do about what is unfolding?

Over 15 years (2010–2025), the OHCHR and UNHRC dedicated disproportionate attention and resources to Sri Lanka, relying heavily on funded diaspora groups and NGO reports while dismissing domestic inquiries and ignoring LTTE atrocities. This demonstrates selective accountability, institutional bias, and misuse of UN funds.

Financial Cost of Bias

Over the past 15 years (2010–2025), the UNHRC and OHCHR have devoted an estimated $45–50million of UN funds to monitoring Sri Lanka—relying heavily on diaspora-funded NGOs and ignoring domestic investigations—while the country has been at peace since 2009. These resources could have been used for more constructive global human rights initiatives, but instead, they funded a politically motivated, selective witch-hunt against a sovereign state.

Hidden Funding and Influence

While the UNHRC and OHCHR spent an estimated $45–50 million from UN funds targeting Sri Lanka over 15 years (2010–2025), the campaigns against the country were heavily amplified and funded by the LTTE diaspora and international NGOs with destabilizing agendas. Preliminary assessments suggest these external contributions may equal or even double the UN expenditure, creating a massive, politically motivated machinery against a nation that has been at peace since 2009.

Shenali D Waduge


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress