Sri Lanka dismisses UN rights chief’s comments on 20A as unwarranted, pre-judgemental

September 16th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka says the comments of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet on the proposed 20th Amendment are unwarranted and pre-judgmental, based on presumption.

https://youtu.be/WTQckbsfPnI

This was highlighted in the statement delivered by Sri Lanka’s Acting Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, Dayani Mendis during the General Debate under Agenda Item 2 at the 45th Session of the UN Human Rights Council on Tuesday (15).

The High Commissioner on Monday (14) said the proposed 20th amendment to the Constitution may negatively impact on the independence of key institutions, including the National Human Rights Commission.

The draft 20th Amendment to the Constitution submitted through the Parliament will be discussed, debated, following a complete democratic process, where all stakeholders will have the opportunity to present their views, Sri Lanka noted in its statement.

Further, Sri Lanka stressed that the new government remains committed to the assurances given before this Council in February this year as the island nation withdrew from the co-sponsorship of Resolution 30/1. 

Sri Lanka also hit back at the references made to false and unsubstantiated allegations leveled against senior military officials being appointed to key positions of institutions. Bachelet had stated the pardon given in March to a former Army sergeant convicted of participating in unlawful killings; appointments to key civilian roles of senior military officials allegedly involved in war crimes and crimes against humanity; and moves within the police and judiciary to thwart the investigation of such crimes, set a very negative trend.”


The full statement made by Sri Lanka during the General Debate is produced below:

Madam President,

Sri Lanka wishes to respond to the references made by the High Commissioner for Human Rights to Sri Lanka in the ‘Global Human Rights Update’ on 14 September 2020.

As this Council is aware, since February/March this year, the entire world was challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, a health crisis of a global scale, which had impacted many aspects of governance in many countries, and Sri Lanka was no exception.

We hope that this Council would appreciate that Sri Lanka while successfully containing the spread of COVID-19 through a balanced, multi-sectoral approach, and despite this challenge, held its commitment to the democratic processes, and conducted Parliamentary elections successfully and peacefully, last month, which the EU has acknowledged.

Madam President,

Sri Lanka made it clear even as it withdrew from the co-sponsorship of Resolution 30/1, that it will remain committed to achieve reconciliation, accountability and human rights within the framework of the Sri Lankan Constitution, through a domestically designed and executed process in line with the Government’s policy framework. Sri Lanka would like to state further that the new Government which assumed office with the election of the new Parliament on 5 August remains committed to the assurances given before this Council in February this year.

The draft 20th Amendment to the Constitution submitted through the Parliament will be discussed, debated, following a complete democratic process, where all stakeholders will have the opportunity to present their views. Therefore, the GoSL is of the view that High Commissioner’s comments on the proposed 20th Amendment are unwarranted and pre-judgmental, based on presumption.

The GoSL wishes to state that the pardon to the former Army sergeant was granted in terms of the powers and provisions of the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

Madam President,

The Government rejects the references made to false and unsubstantiated allegations leveled against senior military officials being appointed to key positions of institutions. Sri Lanka has consistently refuted the credibility of these allegations and wishes to highlight that the domestic processes such as the LLRC and Paranagama Commissions that examined these allegations particularly with regard to the last stages of the conflict, have not found substantive evidence against any of the senior military officials referred to in this regard.

In the absence of any substantive proof, Sri Lanka considers that the continued arbitrary accusations on crimes or crimes against humanity made against these senior military officials are unacceptable and a violation of the principles of natural justice.

In conclusion, with regard to allegations of surveillance and intimidation, the Government has already publicly refuted these allegations, and is committed to protecting and promoting freedom of expression and civil society space, and ensure that complaints received on alleged attacks against journalists, human rights defenders and civil society are investigated and prosecuted.

The prime focus of this Government is to ensure national security, and to uphold the rule of law and order in the country for all its citizens, with the aim of creating an environment where any citizen can live freely without any fear for the safety of themselves and their families.”

In line with the above policy framework, the Government is committed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN, with a determination to uplift the lives of all its citizens and ensure that there is no threat to peace, reconciliation or development in Sri Lanka.

Thank you.

AG submits Rs 340 million interim claim to lawyers of ‘MT New Diamond’ owners

September 16th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Attorney General has submitted an interim claim of Rs 340 million to the lawyers representing the owners of the ‘MT New Diamond’ oil tanker, for the costs incurred by the Sri Lankan government in the assistance rendered to the ship and other related matters.

The AG’s Coordinating Officer State Counsel Nishara Jayaratne stated that the claim was presented today (16) in writing seeking compensation for the costs related to the assistance rendered by all parties including the Sri Lanka Navy (SLN), Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF), Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), Colombo Dockyard PLC (CDPLC), Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) and Department of Coast Conservation, to extinguish the fire onboard the oil tanker, and other related matters.

She stated that the claim was submitted to the owners of the oil tanker seeking a compensation of Rs 340 million and that this estimation of costs was prepared only for the costs incurred up until yesterday (15).

Meanwhile she added that an estimate regarding the threat to the marine environment as a result of the oil leakage related to the incident will be submitted within the next couple of days after the relevant reports are received from the Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA).

The AG’s Coordinating Officer further stated that compensation is expected to be sought for the total amount of the costs incurred by all parties based on a complete estimate and that this estimate cannot be submitted until the oil tanker exits Sri Lankan waters.  

තරුණ අරගලයේ අමිහිරි මතකය…

September 16th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම FB

1971 අප්‍රේල් කැරැල්ල ගැන සඳහන් කරන විට ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරි නාමය ද නිතැතින්ම කියැවෙන්නේ, ඇය හමුදා ප්‍රධානියෙකුගේ අණ පරිදි නිරුවත්කොට, මහමග ඇවිද්දවා ඉතාමත් කෲර අන්දමින් වෙඩි තබා ඝාතනය කිරීම නිසාය. 1970 වර්ෂයේ කතරගම අවුරුදු කුමරිය වශයෙන් අභිෂේක ලබා සිටි ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරි මෙනෙවිය ඝාතනය කර දැනට වසර 47 ක් ගතවී ඇතත් එම සිදුවීම අදත් ජනතාවගේ සිත්වලින් බැහැරව නැත.

කතරගම වන සත්ව දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ මුරකරුවකු වශයෙන් සේවය කළ හෙන්ද්‍රික් අප්පුහාමිගේ හා ලීලාවතී ඔබේසිංහ යන අයගේ වැඩිමහල් දියණිය වූ ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරි ඝාතනයට ලක්වන විට 22 වැනි වියේ පසුවූවාය. කතරගම විද්‍යාලයේ දීප්තිමත් සිසුවියක වූ ඇය, විද්‍යාලයේ එකල අ.පො.ස සාමාන්‍ය පෙළ විභාගයෙන් විෂයන් සියල්ල උසස් අන්දමින් සමත් වූ අතර කතරගම ප්‍රදේශයේ සිටි උගත් බුද්ධිමත් තරුණියක ලෙසට ද, ප්‍රදේශවාසීන් අතර පිළිගැනීමට ලක්ව සිටියාය.

ධර්මාචාර්ය විභාගයට මුහුණ දුන් අතර එයින්ද ඉහළින්ම සමත්ව කතරගම දහම් පාසලේ දහම් ආචාර්යවරියක ලෙස සේවය කරන්නට ද අවස්ථාව ලැබුවාය.කතරගම අවුරුදු කුමරිය වශයෙන් අභිෂේක ලබන්නට තරම් රූසපුවකින් යුක්තව සිටි ඈ කතරගම සිට තිස්සමහාරාමය දක්වා වූ මහා මාර්ගය අසල වූ නිවසක පදිංචි වී සිටියාය.

අවුරුදු කුමරිය ලෙස ඔටුණු පැලඳීමත් සමග බොහෝ පිරිමින්ගේ ඇස් ඇය දෙසට යොමුවීම නැවැත්විය නොහැකි විය. මේ අතර ප්‍රේමවතී දෙස ගිජු බැල්මෙන් බැලූ තවත් අයෙකු ද වූයේය. අවුරුදු උත්සවය දා ප්‍රේමවතීට වේදිකාවේ දී සුබ පැතූ එවකට කතරගම පොලීසියේ ස්ථානාධිපතියි.

ඒ උත්සවය අවසන් වී දින කිහිපයකට පසුව ස්ථානාධිපති ප්‍රේමවතී මුණ ගැසුණේය. ඇය කෙරෙහි තමාගේ මනාපයක් ඇති බවට ප්‍රකාශ කර සිටියේය. එසේ ඔහු දින කිහිපයක්ම බලපෑම් කරමින් ප්‍රේමවතී හමුවීමට පැමිණිය ද ඇය කතරගම ස්ථානාධිපතිව ගණන් නොගත්තාය. ස්ථානාධිපති සැරසෙන්නේ තමාගෙන් අයුතු ප්‍රයෝජන ගෙන තමාව වනසන්න යැයි ප්‍රේමවතී හොඳින්ම වටහාගෙන තිබුණාය. ඇයගෙන් පිළිතුරක් නොලද තැන හොඳයි මම බලාගන්නම් යයි ස්ථානාධිපති කේන්තියෙන් පවසා පිටත්ව ගියේය.

එකල රාජ්‍ය බලය හෙබවූ සිරිමා බණ්ඩාරනායක අගමැතිනිය බලයෙන් පහකර රටේ පාලන බලය සියතට ගැනීම රෝහණ විජේවීර ඇතුළු ජවිපෙ කැරලිකරුවන්ගේ ඒකායන අරමුණ වී තිබුණු අතර ඒ අනුව 1971 අප්‍රේල් මස ආයුධ සන්නද්ධ කැරැල්ලක් දියත් කරනු ලැබිණි. ඔවුහු ඒ සඳහා දිවයිනේ පිහිටි පොලිස් ස්ථාන කිහිපයකටම එකවර ප්‍රහාර එල්ල කළහ. ජවිපෙ විසින් එලෙස ප්‍රහාර එල්ල කරන ලද පොලිස් ස්ථාන අතර එක් පොලිස් ස්ථානයක් වී තිබුණේ කතරගම පොලිස් ස්ථානයයි.

කතරගම පොලිස් ස්ථානයට එල්ල කළ පළමු ප්‍රහාරය යම් තරමකට සාර්ථක වී තිබුණද, එය කැරලිකරුවන් බලාපොරොත්තු වූ තරමින්ම සාර්ථක ප්‍රතිඵල අත්කර දී නොතිබුණේය. 1971 අප්‍රේල් 05 වැනිදා සිට 15 වැනිදා දක්වා කතරගම තම පාලනයට යටත්කරගෙන තිබූ කැරලිකරුවෝ හමුදාව පැමිණීමත් සමග පසුබැස්සහ.

කතරගම හමුදා පාලනයට නතුවීමත් සමග යටපත්ව තිබූ කේන්තිය මතුවී ඒමෙන් පොලිස් ස්ථානාධිපති අර කැරලි නායිකාව අරගෙන යන්න ඕනෑ යයි පොලිස් භටයන්ට කීවේය.

දිනය අප්‍රේල් 16 වැනිදා වෙලාව පෙ.ව. 9 පමණ වී තිබුණි. ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරි සුපුරුදු පරිදි නිවසේ රැඳී සිටියාය. අම්මාද ඇය අසලින් සිටි අතර තම නිවස දෙසට පැමිණෙන වාහනයක හඬක් ඇසුණේය. පැමිණ තිබුණේ කතරගම පොලිස් ස්ථානයේ ජීප් රථයයි. නිලධාරීහු දෙදෙනෙක් වාහනයෙන් බැස ගොස් ප්‍රේමවතීව කොණ්ඩෙන් ඇදගෙන ජීප් රථය ඉදිරියට ගෙන ආහ.

ප්‍රේමවතීගේ අම්මා හිස අත්බැඳ කෑගැසුවාය. සහෝදර සහෝදරියන් හඬා වැටුණහ. නමුත් පොලිස් නිලධාරීහු ප්‍රේමවතීව අත්නොහැරියහ. ප්‍රේමවතී පටවාගත් පොලිස් රිය පැමිණ නතර වී තිබුණේ කතරගම ලංගම විශ්‍රාම ශාලාවේ හමුදා කඳවුර වෙතය.

කතරගම ප්‍රදේශයේ ජවිපෙ ප්‍රධානම පෙළේ කැරලිකාර නායිකාවක් බවට ප්‍රකාශ කරමින් ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරිව භාරදෙන ලද්දේ, කතරගම හමුදා කඳවුරේ ස්වේච්ඡා භටයකු හා ලුතිනන්වරයකු වන ඇල්ෆ්‍රඞ් විජේසූරිය නම් නිලධාරියාටය.

අප්‍රේල් කැරැල්ලේ කතරගම ප්‍රදේශයේ ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරීගේ දායකත්වය පිළිබඳව ඇය අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනීමෙන් පසු ලුතිනන් විජේසූරිය ඇයගෙන් දැඩි ලෙස ප්‍රශ්න කරන ලද නමුත් අඩු තරමින් පන්ති පහට සහභාගිවී තිබේදැයි යනුවෙන් කරන ලද ආරෝපණය පවා ඇය එකලෙසම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කළාය.

1971 අප්‍රේල් 17 වැනිදා කතරගම පූජා නගරයේදී ඇයව නිරුවත් කොට දෑත් ඔසවා මා පන්ති පහට සහභාගි වූවායි කියමින් මහ පාරේ ගමන් කරන ලෙසට කරන ලද අණ හමුවේ පවා ඇය කැරැල්ලට දායකත්වය දැක්වූ බවට කරන ලද ආරෝපණය පිළිගත්තේ නැත.

ඈ වීදිය මැද්දෙන් මිනිසුන් ඉදිරියේ ලැජ්ජාව නොඉවසිය හැකිව මහමග හඬමින් ගමන් කළාය. ඇයට පිටුපසින් ගිනි අවිය මානාගෙන ලුතිනන් හා තවත් සොල්දාදුවන් දෙදෙනෙකු අණ දෙමින් ගමන් ගත්හ.

අසල පිහිටි ගුණසිරි හෝටලයේ හුන් දෙතුන් දෙනෙක් ඇස් අදහාගත නොහැකි ඒ දර්ශනය දෙස කුතුහලයෙන් බලා කම්පාවී ඉවත බලාගත්හ. එක අතක් හෝ පහත් කොට විළි වසාගන්නට තැත් කළ හොත් වෙඩි තබන බවට කාමුක සෙබළා අනතුරු හඟවා තිබුණ ද, ප්‍රේමවතීගේ දකුණත මිනිසුන් ඉදිරියේ ලිහිල්ව පහත් වන්නට විය. ඇය එසේ කළේ ලැජ්ජාව නොඉවසිය හැකිව මහ හඬින් හඬමිනි.

තුවක්කුව පත්තු විය. ප්‍රේමවතී මදක් වැනෙමින් දෑතින්ම විළිවසා ගනිමින් මොහොතක් සිට ඇද වැටී ඇඹරුණාය. නිරායුධව, නිර්වස්ත්‍රව වෙඩි තබා බිම හෙළනු ලැබූ තරුණියට නැවත ද තුවක්කුව එල්ල විය.

වෙඩි හඬ දෙක තුනක් පිටවිය. ලේ ගලාගෙන ගියේය. මහ පොළවේ හතර රියන් වළක් කැපී අවසාන වනතෙක් ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරි නොසැලී උන්නාය. ඇයට ප්‍රාණය තිබෙන්නට ඉඩක් ඇතැයි කිසිවෙක් නොසිතූහ. එහෙත් තරුණියට පණ තිබෙන බවත්, ඇය හුස්ම ගන්නවා පමණක් නොව සිහින් හඬින් කෙඳිරි ගාන බවත්, ඇය වළදමනු සඳහා දෑතින් හා දෙපසින් එල්ලා ගෙන වළ සමීපයට ගෙන යද්දී තේරුම් ගත හැකි විය.

නැවතත් සාහසිකයන්ගේ රයිපලය ඇගේ හිසට එල්ල විය. ප්‍රේමවතීගේ සිරුරේ හිල් නොකළ එකම තැන වූ හිසද ඔවුන් හිල් කළ හෙයින් හිසින්ද ලේ ගලා ගියේය. ප්‍රේමවතීව එම ස්ථානයේදී වළ දැමිණි.

ඝාතනය සියැසින් දුටු ඩෙස්මන් වයිට් මහතාගේ තොරතුරු දැනුම්දීමෙන් පසුව මේ පිළිබඳව පරීක්ෂණ ඇරඹුණේය. 1971 මැයි 24 වනදා ප්‍රේමවතී මනම්පේරිගේ මිනිය ගොඩගෙන පරික්ෂණ පවත්වන ලදී.

පසුව මේ පිළිබඳ නඩුව හම්බන්තොට මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා විසින් ගාල්ලේ අපරාධ නඩු අධිකරණය වෙත යොමු කරන ලදී. ඒ අනුව මෙම නඩුව විභාග කරනු ලැබුවේ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරුවරයකු වූ ඩී. කිව්. ඇම්. සිරිමාන්න මහතා විසිනි. පැමිණිල්ල මෙහෙය වූයේ රජයේ නීතිඥ කෙනත් සෙනවිරත්න මහතාය.

නඩු විභාගය අවසානයේදී පළමු විත්තිකාර ලුතිනන් ඇල්ෆ්‍රඞ් විජේසූරිය හා දෙවන විත්තිකාර සැරයන් රත්නායක චෝදනාවන්ට වරදකරුවන් වූ අතර ඔවුන්ට වසර 16 ක සිරදඬුවමක් නියම විය.

පසුව ඔවුන් එම තීන්දුවට එරෙහිව අපරාධ අභියාචනාධිකරණය වෙත අභියාචනයක් ඉදිරිපත් කළෝය. ඒ. සී. අලස් (සභාපති) වී. තාමෝදරම් හා ඩී. විමලරත්න යන ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරුවන් හමුවේ එය විභාගයට ගනු ලැබූ අතර එහිදී කලින් තීන්දුවම අනුමත වූ අතර සිරදඬුවම්වල වෙනසක් නොවීය.

වසර 16 ක සිරදඬුවමක් විඳිමින් සිටි විජේසූරිය ඊට වසරකට පසු බන්ධනාගාරයේදී හෘදයාබාධයකින් මිය ගියේය. සිරදඬුවම් විඳ නිදහස් වී පැමිණි රත්නායක දෙවිනුවර සිය නිවසේ සිටිය දී 1988 – 89 භීෂණ සමයේදී ජවිපෙ සාමාජිකයන් විසින් පිහියෙන් ඇන ඝාතනය කළ බව වාර්තා විය..

මිනිසුන්ගේ පහත් ආශාවන් සපුරාලීමට අකමැති වූ අහිංසක තරුණියකට තම ජීවිතයෙන් වන්දි ගෙවීමට සිදුවුණේ එලෙසිනි.

ඇගේ චරිතය ඉතිහාසය පුරා සදාකල් පවතිනු ඇත. ඇයට හිමි ඒ තැන ලබාදීම යුක්තිගරුක පුරවැසියන් වශයෙන් අප සැමගේ යුතුකමයි.

එම්. තාරික්

Will Moragoda deliver a ‘Sri Lanka First’?

September 16th, 2020

With much thought and strategy Sri Lanka has appointed Moragoda as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner to Delhi iced with cabinet ranking, the first such fringe benefit afforded to a high commissioner. No doubt, Sri Lanka is thinking the Moragoda magic will provide much relief to Sri Lanka, given the appointment is being made against tremendous objections.

So what will Sri Lanka be expecting from Moragoda

·     Will Moragoda be able to subdue America’s bullying of Sri Lanka in Geneva and shut the trap of the UNHRC Head who is following her predecessors issuing statements on Sri Lanka’s internal affairs – complete violation of UN Charter and her mandate.

·     Will Moragoda be able to get America, his land of birth to withdraw UNHRC Resolutions and bring to nought all of the bogus allegations against Sri Lanka since 2012. 

·     Will Moragoda be able to tell America to keep its $480m ‘gift’ disbursed across 5 years as Sri Lanka’s housemaids remit more annually! 

·     Will Moragoda tell India to stay clear off Sri Lanka’s territorial waters and not damage the ocean bed and destroy marine life using internationally banned bottom trawlers?

·     Will Moragoda politely tell Delhi to inform its Colombo mission to stop trying to rope in locals to be their eyes and ears and this same applies to the US mission in Colombo. Both nations are flouting diplomatic protocols with impunity.

·     Will Moragoda get Delhi to link the Tamil Eelam quest to the Tamil Nadu self-determination quest

·     Will Moragoda get Delhi to stop illegal immigration by Tamil Nadu?

·     Will Moragoda get Delhi to stop Kerala ganja, illicit narcotics from being smuggled into Sri Lanka from North and Mannar coast?

·     Will Moragoda get Delhi to agree to annul Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987, not protest or object to repeal 13a and the PC system?

·     Will Moragoda tell Delhi that Sri Lanka does not wish to sign ECTA or CEPA and all former trade agreements require to be re-negotiated given the imbalance in trade and one-sided benefits. 

·     Will Moragoda also tell Delhi that it makes no sense for Sri Lanka to give ECT development to India when India is likely to shift 70% of India’s transshipment that Sri Lanka currently handles to India’s new port in Tamil Nadu.

·     Will Moragoda tell India & US that since both nations objected to China’s submarines entering Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka wishes they too follow same policy! 

·     Will Moragoda tell Delhi that Sri Lanka will follow a National Policy of ‘Sri Lanka First’ and an international policy of ‘Friends with all & Enemy with none’.

·     Can Moragoda tell both US & India that Sri Lanka does not wish to be a punching bag or a playground for quad battles and any such should be taken elsewhere as Sri Lanka agrees with Non-Aligned Movement Charter and Indian Ocean Rim countries that Indian Ocean should be a ‘Zone of Peace” not a ‘Zone ending up in Pieces’.

·     Will Moragoda deliver the Rajapakse Doctrine” that encompasses the expectations of the 69lakh voters that voted for the President in November 2019.

Let’s see what the Moragoda magic can achieve, given that the powers that be are 100% certain that he is Sri Lanka’s Man Friday to deliver Sri Lanka’s wish list and he would be functioning in Sri Lanka’s interest putting ‘Sri Lanka First’ above US or India.

The leadership has nominated him inspite of opposition in a strategic appointment claiming to be in Sri Lanka’s best interest. 

Only time will tell. But, Moragoda has to deliver. Deliver to no one else, but to Sri Lanka’s advantage & favor.

Moragoda has to deliver to the expectations of those that selected & appointed him but indirectly not forsaking the 69lakhs that appointed the leader who has nominated him. 

The people don’t want this Government or its President to fail and those that are now carrying his baton should not disappoint him or the Nation. 

Shenali D Waduge

A Reply to Harsha de Silva

September 15th, 2020

By Charles S.Perera

It is strange to see the present ragtags-the remnants of the former Yahapalanaya who ridiculed democracy, and devastated the country politically,economically, and socially for four and half years,  now thundering in the parliament and out side about a disappearing democracy they in fact seem to know nothing about.

Among the remnants  of the Yahapalanaya now in the opposition are some who are supposed to be educated. But the question is, are they wise.  Wisdom is not what you put inside as knowledge, but what comes out from that accumulated knowledge. But these yahapalanaya remnants lack that wisdom to think and evaluate circumstances from past experiences.  These are the ones who came to parliament in 2015 thanks to the traitorous midnight escape of Maithripala Sirisena from SLFP to the opposition to be their common Presidential Candidate.   If not for Maithripala Sirisena  none of them would have been in parliament  then or now. 

But they have no gratitude for that.  The yahapalanaya remnants are now seeking  their own salvation by throwing on to scaffold President Maithripala Sirisena who enabled them to become  parliamentarians,  as responsible for the massacre of  Easter Sunday. Aren’t they all init under the doctrine of  collective responsibility ?

These partners of the former Yahapalanaya little realise they as members of the Yahapalanaya  are all responsible for that massacre of the innocents, more Harin Fernando who now breys louder than ever, forgetting that he had failed in his duty to God and Country, by  having failed to inform the Archbishop what his father had warned him not to do that Easter Sunday.

There is Harsha de Silva with a doctorate to decorate his name, who talks without reflecting or trying to understand the real issue with the presentation of the  20th Amendment. He as an intelligent man should not be swayed by emotions. When he led the footnote group at the COPE he showed how much he is involved in all the degenerative political maneuvers of the RanilW led Yahapalanaya-the Bank robbery, mismanagement of the government, Easter massacre, involvement in the MCC, Singapore Trade Agreement,  selling of Hambantota Harbour,  negotiating to sell the Colombo Port East Terminal to India etc.

Lets see what Harsha de Silva  with a doctorate tells about 20A. He speaks about removing the National Procuration Commission and curtailing the powers of the Auditor General which he says is inviting corruption. If he would read the 20A alongside the Constitution he would see that removal of the 19th Amendment has put the Constitution to what it was before the introduction of the 19th Amendment. The functions of the Auditor general will continue as it had been before. In tender procedures new transparent methods with modern  technology could be adopted.

The difficulties arise also  from the fact that the opposition has not placed the same trust on the President Gotabaya Rajapaksa as the large majority of people have placed their trust on him, as evidently shown through the Presidential and then the Parliamentary Elections. The Opposition should respect the large majority of the people who voted to elect the President,  and then give a near two third majority at the parliamentary elections.. 

The Opposition led by Sajith Premadasa who is known to think differently takes his position as the leader of the Opposition on the belief that the  Parliament is a place to criticise the Government and to show the people that what the President is doing is not in the interest of the country and the people but to look after the interest and the benefits of the Rajapaksa family.

 If the members of the opposition have peanut sized  brains they will know that in the Parliament there is no family, but parliamentarians elected by the people. The people know this and they are no more concerned with this family talk” except those supporting the UNP, and the SJB.

Harsha de Silva and his former yahapalanaya colleagues  should get out of their box to understand that the democratic  role of the opposition in parliament is other than being aggressive and jumping to criticism. They should instead  follow Ranil’s Lichchavi approach which unfortunately he failed to put into practice. The Parliament should be a place where there is an intellectual approach to any problem giving place to a rich  dialogue , discussion, constructive criticism, suggesting different approaches to the problem under discussion. 

This approach even the JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayaka seems not to know.  He spent 28 minutes in the well of the parliament shouting at the speaker and those who raised objections  taking pride in the fact that he  is the person who has made many speeches and stood up long haranguing  accusing the members of the government. He seemed to be happy with his role which for an outsider is really foolish. He spoke nothing of value or interest.  These parliamentarians have to change their attitudes and become responsible members of the opposition. They should contribute memorable speeches, make workable suggestions  without talking like hooligans.

Harsha de Silva was not even sure of his facts.  He was speaking  in praise of the 19A and its procurement guidelines, conceding that there were issues regarding the Procurement Commission. If there are issues why not adopt a new transparent system outside Commissions.  Why always think in terms of corruption when the emphasis should be on using efficient foolproof methods that will eliminate corruption.

Harsha de Silva is not true to himself when he says that the public should not buy into the view  that the 19th Amendement was a barrier to effective governance and economic growth. Harsha de Silva in trying to defend 19A is displaying his inability to evaluate the circumstances that led to the failure of Yahapalanaya. With 19A Yayhapalanaya could neither continue to govern,  nor  go forward with the absurdity of the it. If Harsha de Silva is now singing hosannas to 19A as an effective efficient piece of legislature he is not worthy of the Doctorate he  adds before his name. It is here Harsha de Silva should show his intelligence. 19A was an obstacle and a  failure- the Commissions were not functioning as they should, Commissions made wrong appointments, there was an inefficient  parliament not functioning for the benefit of the people, taking wrong decisions, signing wrong contracts, and the President could not dissolve it. It had to continue on its path of destruction   for four and a half years. Was that democracy ? Has one heard of such a parliament anywhere else in the world ?  

And that is what Harsha de Silva supports and praises and tells the people not to buy into the view that the 19Amendment  was a barrier to effective government and economic growth.  Harsha de Silva where did you see effective governance  and economic growth during the past four and a half years from 8 January 2015 ?  You display your inability to see things as they were and try to fool the people, Harsha de Silva.

The 20A then he criticises without giving adequate reasons imaging things reading beyond the text. He imagines what the Parliamentary Committee to replace the Constitutional Council  proposed in the 20A would be like imagining how it would function and how the President would react to observations made by the committee.  Are these valid arguments against 20A ?

These are meaningless arguments. He could make suggestions which are more democratic. He says that SJB and the government differ on the need to have civil society persons. But have the civil society representatives been useful during the last four years ? They were  accused of being NGOs.

In jumping to criticise the 20A, Harsha de Silva  takes an aggressive path instead of making suggestions to change the Amendment . Why stand against it when the 20A is only a proposal and you expected to make suggestions to change it ?  The Opposition will stand against it , de Silva says, but  that is the wrong way of looking at it . Why stand against it ? Is it because you take the role of the  opposition,  as a role  to  stand against  proposals by the Government ? Harsha de Silva,   in democracy there should be constructive criticism, discussion and compromise ? That is how it should be with the 20th Amendment. 

But Harsha de Silva says that he is  against the 20th Amendment.  If one starts having already decided where one  stands on the  20th Amendment,  then democracy cannot function as it should. One should instead start with an open mind looking at the issue  objectively. That should be the quality of a good politician. 

The theoretical relationship between compromise and democratic regimes (is) that … of arriving through discussion at political agreement with one’s opponent …”

The Government had explained that the 20th Amendment removes the 19th Amendment, to make the constitution what it was before the 19th Amendment was introduced.  Therefore the Auditor General will function with all legal paraphernalia as he did before the introduction of the 19th Amendment. In that there is no weakening of the Auditor General’s functions.

Harsha de Silva is creating mental images of what would happen and jumping to conclusions. If he gives more thought to facts,  and figures out  issues intelligently he will see that nothing has changed after removal of 19A except that the constitution has gone back to what it had been before.  There is no rule that says a member of the opposition should be the heads of COPE and COPA. 

Harsha de Silva is merely criticising for the sake of criticism.  He as an experienced politician and with a Doctorate in addition should know that the opposition has to allow the Parliamentary Democracy to Function. The President and the Government have been elected for five years and they should be allowed to continue to rule the country for the scheduled period of time. The opposition is not to put barriers against the government, with the intention of toppling it. 

But an intelligent leader of the Opposition would  contribute for  a healthy political dialogue , discussion and compromise to come to political agreement. 

Harsha de Silva accuses the government is deploying 20A under a smokescreen to fool the people.  The people understand , but it is the opposition that seems to have not understood.

Harsha de Silva and Yahapalanaya  had tried in different ways from the day the President was sworn in,  to stop the President from taking up his duties to carry forward his proposals for the development of the country. Even today the role of the opposition has taken a different path from democracy,  to hinder the President from continuing to rule the country.

Now the latest gimmick to embarrass the government on 20A is demanding who is the author of the Amendment. as  it is on that, the validity of the Amendment depends.  These are normally prepared by the legal draftsman based on the instructions issued after Cabinet approval.  Therefore the cabinet as a whole helped in the preparation of the 20th Amendment.

Wigneswaran up against a wall of scholarly opposition

September 15th, 2020

By Rohana R. Wasala

It seems to me that the former NPC CM and present Jaffna District MP octagenarian C.V. Wigneswaran has taken to dispensing racist hatred in order to wipe out the Sinhalese race as a pest. It is funny, but regrettable that he indulges himself in this sort of thing. But since the Sinhalese are not what he pretends them to be, his blasts of unprovoked hate will only irk them a bit, but will certainly fail to cause them any harm if sense and sanity prevail. All his anti-Sinhalese Buddhist assertions that are made without any basis in fact are so silly and childish that I, a fellow Sri Lankan of his belonging to the Sinhalese majority, think that he should be causing much embarrassment to the sensible members of his own Tamil community. But we cannot ignore the fact that there certainly is method in Wigneswaran’s madness. Fraudulent and frivolous though his claims are,  in the interest of natural justice as well as authentic  knowledge about our true history, they should not be allowed to go unchallenged. 

That is why a prominent, internationally recognized Sri Lankan archaeologist, who has been conducting excavations for delving into our buried history and prehistory, over the past thirty years, promised, in the latest (September 7) episode of a series of NethFM Radio interviews (also subsequently broadcast on the You Tube) called ‘Unlimited History’ to disabuse Wigneswaran of his misconceptions in a proper scientific manner in the near future, despite the extreme pressure of work due to the project which the archaeology professor is currently engaged in. The scholar meant is Professor Raj Somadeva, who deems it his responsibility to give Wigneswaran an adequate answer. 

Wigneswaran told a Sunday Observer interviewer (September 6): ‘The genuine grievance of our people is the non-settlement of their political issues. Not the denial of economic sops! Economic sops would not solve the long term problems of our people. When we speak of the needs and aspirations of our people why do you Southerners view it as communal politics? When the Government wants to give priority to Sinhala and Buddhism why did you not identify that as communal or parochial politics?’ The pot calling the kettle black! I think Wigneswaran must be invited to confront his young co-ethnic Arun Siddharthan on a TV discussion for an answer. But he will not dare do that, not only because the young man who is the grandson of a toddy tapper by profession, as he proudly claims, but because he will have a hard time explaining to him why, he, as NPC Chief Minister he returned all the development funds the government sent for his province unutilized each year during the five years he held  that post, while the poor voters who elected him suffered without even the barest essential infrastructure and other needs after the devastation caused by the war.  I am not sure whether Wigneswaran deserves the honour of being challenged by a reputed archaeologist.

The following argument of the MP is from the same source: ‘If we do not have the right of which we are entitled to under the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Tamil speaking people of the North and the East would become Sinhalese within 15 or 20 years. Already the people from Negombo to Puttalam who were Tamil speaking when I was a child, have now become Sinhalese. The Tamils of Anuradhapura in the Old Town where I lived as a boy have become Sinhalese. Many people of recent Indian origin have become Sinhalese. The only way to preserve our individuality is to become entitled to the right of self-determination so that the people of the North and the East would look after themselves while being part of the Sri Lankan polity’. 

Could all the Tamil speaking people of the North and the East become Sinhalese within that short period if the few thousands of war-displaced Sinhalese are resettled in those areas (but there is still no talk of the issue being addressed)? Throughout history many Tamils who came from South India to Sri Lanka as traders, guests, invaders or mercenaries merged into the Sinhalese community; so did many Muslim men who arrived in Sri Lanka to do business. Many of the Tamils in Jaffna today are degraded descendants of the original Sinhalese who were living there when the first permanent Tamil settlements appeared in the north only in the 13th century, after the expulsion (in 1236) of the invaders led by Magha of Kalinga (not a Tamil), who, with his 24,000 strong army of Kerala and Tamil  mercenaries devastated (1215 CE) Polonnaruwa, the seat of the Sinhalas’ flourishing hydraulic civilization and ruled there for 21 years. Some of the fleeing soldiers settled down in the north without returning to India. What became of Magha is not known. There was no Tamil north before the Magha invasion which, though it was repulsed, permanently destabilized the island kingdom. 

Even during the recent thirty year separatist war there were Tamils who changed their identity to Sinhalese, while living among the Sinhalese in the South for work as well as for protection from Prabhakaran or equally likely for avoiding detection by security forces for involvement in terrorist activities.  If the reverse of this happened, it would be natural too. But Tamil supremacist Wigneswaran’s fears of immediate bastardization of Tamils through admixture with the Sinhalese are not well founded.

In any case, the Sinhalese account for nearly 75 % of the Lankan population. It is a historical fact that Sri Lanka is the unique homeland of the Sinhalese who gave the island its name ‘Sinhale’, just like Tamil Nadu is the homeland of the Tamils. The Sinhalese do not demand or enjoy any special rights that the minorities do not enjoy because they are non-Sinhalese. Well over 70% of Sri Lankans are Buddhists. It is the practice in secular democratic countries around the world including the USA, UK, Norway etc to give special recognition to the religion of the majority, while ensuring the same freedom of belief and worship for people of other religions without any discrimination. It is globally appreciated that no other religion is more tolerant towards other faiths than Buddhism. 

Wigneswaran falsely claims that Tamil is the oldest living language in the world. A glance at the Web is enough  for anyone to dispute this claim, because there are dozens of other candidates (than Tamil) for the title of ‘the oldest living language’ among the world’s over 7000 different languages. Whether Tamil is the world’s oldest language or not, it has no bearing on the fact the Sinhalese are descendants of the oldest humans who lived on this island. We have overwhelming written, epigraphical and archaeological evidence scattered across the length and breadth of the island to prove that Tamil speakers were definitely not the earliest inhabitants of the island. The first homo sapiens who lived there so many millennia ago were the ancestors of the Sinhalese. However, they could have been conquered by a north Indian prince as claimed by the Vijaya legend. But the main body of people were the indigenous tribes who in the course of time came to collectively constitute the Sivhela nation.  

Fresh archaeological evidence, unearthed, for example, at the Pahiyan Rock near Kalutara in the Western province, shows that the caves there provided shelter to humans who used bows and arrows tipped with polished bones to kill small arboreal mammals like monkeys for food some 48,000 years ago. The tribal people who lived there and in other parts of the island then and in the following millennia had to have communicated in their own indigenous language/s. These early forms of verbal communication, in the long course of unrecorded history, must have gradually evolved into Sinhala, ‘the language of ‘dipe danan’ ‘the islanders’ that the missionary Mahinda Thera used to address the courtiers and the commoners of Sinhaladweepa when he arrived from modern Sanchi in India in 236 BCE. This evolution had taken place only within the island, completely independent of Tamil or other foreign language. The system of vocal sounds in Sinhala is the most distinctive feature that separates it from Tamil and other Dravidian languages. For the Tripitaka of Theravada Buddhism to have been committed to writing on ola leaves in the 1st century BCE at Alu Vihara, Matale in central Sri Lanka, the Sinhala writing system had to have been advanced enough. 

Wigneswaran stated,a month or two ago, in a different context from the Sunday Observer interview referred to above, that there had existed a historical Tamil state in the north; he also stated that the Sinhalese language originated in the sixth or seventh century CE. That is, his opinion is that the Sinhalese language came into existence only after the birth of Christ. This only betrayed abysmal ignorance. Wigneswaran was immediately contradicted by archaeology professor Raj Somadeva alluded to at the beginning, an alumnus of Sweden’s top ranked Uppsala University (for research and education). Professor Raj Somadeva is the head of the Postgraduate Institute of Archaeology of the University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. He is a scholar who is engaged in archaeological excavation and exploration, devoting himself to efforts that even go beyond the demands of his profession, in order to divulge Sri Lanka’s ancient history. He has made many findings based on his own absolutely independent excavations and studies using his expert knowledge. Particularly, as a result of his research into a history that goes back far beyond the two thousand five hundred years of written history, the Ravana legend is being revealed to have an element of truth; it can no longer  be dismissed as mere fiction. Professor Somadeva who found the Sinhala antiquity of Sri Lanka has proved with evidence that the country was known as Sinhaladveepa in the past and that Tamils and other races arrived there for trade

This is how Professor Somadeva responded to Wigneswaran then, drawing upon his archaeological  explorations: Firstly, it must be said that his statement is a completely baseless fabrication. I say so based on my academic background. According to the oldest available literary sources with which we can interact, the language known as Sinhala or Sihala was in circulation in Sri Lanka even at the time of the arrival of Mahinda Thera. It is recorded in the sources that Mahinda Thera preached the Dhamma in the language of the ‘dipe danan’ (people of the island). We can understand what this language was from taking into account the fact that erudite monks compiled a series of books or atthakatas (commentaries) to elucidate abstruse points in the Dhamma. These commentaries were called ‘Sihalatthakata’s. In some instances, the Sihalatthakata tradition has been referred to as ‘porana atthakatas’ (ancient commentaries). These commentaries were called Sihalatthakata because they were written in Sinhala. It is easy to understand that books written to explain difficult matters in the Dhamma to the male and female lay Buddhists (upasaka upasikas) were composed in Sinhala, because it was the language of the islanders.

Wigneswaran has stated that Tamils have lived in this country from pre-Buddhist times. Here we must be clear about what is meant by the term ‘Dravida’. It is the same as what is meant by the term ‘Dravidian’ in English. It denotes a language family, not any racial identity. The Dravidian language family is an extensive one. It includes many languages. Tamil is only one of them. Professor Somadeva describes a gold foil document found in the Jaffna peninsula: What is shown here is the oldest metal foil with writing (found in Sri Lanka). It is a gold foil. It was discovered at Vallipuram in the Jaffna peninsula. This gold sheet record in Brahmi script was written during the reign of king Vasabha (69-111 CE). It was made to record (for posterity) that the minister Irshigiri who was in charge of Nagadeepa built a vihara named Piyagunkatissa there.”  Professor Somadeva authoritatively establishes with archaeological evidence that the history of ancient Sinhalese goes back to the era of Ravana. A social media comment about him runs as follows: Many who fought for Kuragala were inspired by a sense of nationalism. But it may be stated confidently that the most crucial attacker in the Kuragala controversy was Professor Somadeva. His Kuragala report is an academic contribution that no person or group could reject. It is not a figment of his imagination. It is a document written after deep study.  Savants of our time like Professor Raj Somadeva provide proper guidance for  the Sinhalese who strive to protect the country and the nation out of mere emotional impulse to launch into an intelligent and comprehensive struggle.”

Professor Somadeva made this remark about Wigneswaran’s ‘federal’ idea: Although any other matter may be changed or interpreted to suit (the whims of) an individual or group, subjecting history to the influence (of such distortions ) could generate unexpected long-term complications. Very recently, I read in a newspaper a statement made by a certain politician. I understand that the statements relevant to your questions to me are parts of the same agenda. Everyone has a right to hold and defend personal opinions. This applies in respect of the federal idea, as well. However, it is my view that intelligent politicians must understand that  history cannot be federalized”. (I found much of this information from internet sources.)

Postscript 

Professor Somadeva answered Wigneswaran from a program recorded at a rock surface in the wilderness close to Wattegama Viharaya about 20 km from the main Monaragala town in what was the ancient Ruhuna. The program was broadcast on NethFM Radio and on You Tube today (September 15). Some students from the Postgraduate Institute of Archaeology (University of Kelaniya) taking part in excavations in progress under the supervision of the professor in the area and some local villagers were among the audience. They were in the process of identifying and copying some ancient rock inscriptions in the place. The scenic rocky place is overlooking a vast plain covered with jungle surrounded by mountains. There are a large number of ancient ruins and inscriptions scattered in the locality, according to Dr Somadeva. In the vicinity of the place where they were sitting, there were ruins of what they thought was an ancient Buddhist monastery complex. 

About Wigneswaran’s assertion that Tamils were the earliest inhabitants of the island, Dr Somadeva refuted this claim by referring to the use in archaeology and anthropology of information found through modern genetic methods to analyse fossilized specimens such as human bones for tracing the routes along which human populations spread radiating from Africa. It has been established that Tamils had reached the region today known as Pakistan in prehistoric times, only to be gradually pushed downwards to south India, where they are today. This happened when white skinned peoples from the Caucasus region (including Turkey, Iran, etc)  overran northern India and established their power there. As Dr Shiran Deraniyagala has shown through his excavations at Pahiyangala caves, that place had been inhabited by early humans over 48,000 years ago! However, this does not mean that the indigenous population had remained pure free from admixture with tribes travelling from India, because 9000 years ago India and Lanka formed a continuous landmass.  Genetic hybridity of races was the norm.

To say that one language is older than another, one should be equipped with knowledge derived from various related disciplines such as philology and linguistics (which Wigneswaran did not possess). In the case of the relative histories of Sinhala and Tamil in Sri Lanka, although the early Sinhala language inscriptions written in the Brahmi script are found, there are no Tamil words in such inscriptions, which suggests that Sinhala has a longer history in the island than Tamil. Dr Shiran Deraniyagala developed the the idea for his Harvard University PhD thesis that the indigenous community divided into two branches as Veddah and Yaksha about 10,000 years ago. This means that the Veddas and Sinhalas share a common ancestor, and Tamils were not the earliest inhabitants of the island of Sinhale. 

The hour or so long three-part You Tube video (Unlimited History – Episode 24), is worth watching.

රජයේ දැඩි හා ක්සනික අවධානය යොමුවියයුතු කරුණු කීපයක්

September 15th, 2020

ආචාර්ය සුදත් ගුණසේකර

15.9.2020

1 පරාජිත මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් නිල නිවාසවලින් ඉවත්ව නොයාම

2 අපරාධකරුවන්ට මැතිසභයට එන්ට අවසර දීම

3 මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් ඇතුළු කිසිම කෙනෙකුට තීරුබදු රහිත වාහන ලබා දීමට අවසර නොදීම

1 පරාජිත මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් නිල නිවාසවලින් ඉවත්ව නොයාම

මෙම ප්‍රශ්නය ඉතා දිගුකලක් තිස්සේ ඇදෙන කරුණකි. මේ මිනිසු නේද රටේ නීති හදන්ට චන්දදායකයින් විසින් උත්තරීතරයයි කියන පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට යවල තියෙන්නේ.මොවුන් හැසිරෙන්නේ ඉන්ට හිටින්ට තැනක් නැති පාර්ලිමේතුවට එන්ත ඉස්සර පාරේ හිටපු හිගන්නෝ වගේ. ඉතින් මේ අය ඔය මහ සභාවේදී නීති හැදුවේ කාගේ යහපතටද කියලා දැන් අපට හිතාගන්ට පුලුවන්. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඉන්න කාලෙට නිල නිවාස දීම වෙනම කරුනක්. නමුත් පැරදුනාට පස්සේ මොන නිල නිවාසද.

අපට තෙරුම් ගන්ට බැරි මේ ර්ටේ නීතියක් නැද්ද මොවුන් මේ රජයේ ගෙවල් වලින් එලියට දාන්ට කියන එකයි.හරි විදියට නම් චන්දෙන් පැරදුනදාම අඩුම ගානේ පහුවදා හෝ  මොවුන් මේ ගෙවල් වලින් ඉවත් විය යුතුයි නේද?.රාජය පරිපාලනේ මොකද කරන්නේ මෙ තක්කඩින් මේවායින් අදලා දාන්නේ නැතිව. ඒකත් හරියෙට තීරුබදු රහිත බලපත් වසර පහකට අන්සතු කරන්ට බෑ කියලා චක්‍ර ලේඛන හදලා හමස්පෙට්ටියේ දාගෙන අදාල වාහනෙ රට තියෙද්දීම බලපත්තර්ය විකුනන්ට ඉඩ දීලා බකන් නිදාගෙන ඉන්නව වගේම නේද. කෝ මේ රටේ නීතිය. ඒක තියෙන්නේ අසරණ පොඩි මිනිසුන්ට විතරයි, මැති ඇමැතිවරුන්ට දේශපාලකයින්ට සහ ලොකු මිනිසුන්ට ඒ නීතිය නෑ. උන් මිනීමරුවත් .හිරේ හිටියත් , එල්ලුම්ගහට නියම උනත් විශේස  සැලකිළි. කෝ නීතිය කෝ නීතියේ දෙවගන. ඇය අමු හෙලුවෙන් මහදවල් මහ පාරේ ඇවිදිනවා.

මේ ව්හිළුවව ජනාධිපති වරයාටවත් නොපෙනෙන්නේ ඇයි? දෙවියන්ටනම් ඔවා පේන්නෙම නෑ දැන්. මොකද උනුත් පුද පූජා පඩුරු අරන් මේ තක්කඩින්ගේ පැත්තේ නිසා. දේවාලෙට ආධාර නොදෙයි කියල බයට.

2 අපරාධකරුවන්ට මැතිසභයට එන්ට අවසර දීම

මේක මහ පුදුම රටක්. හිරේ හිටියත් , එල්ලුම්ගහට නියම උනත් කුමන අපරාධයට සම්බන්ධ උනත් මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ට ඒ නීතිය නෑ..

උසාවියේ තීරණයත් උන්ගේම  වාසියට. මේ රටේ සින්හල මිනිසුන්ට තියෙන්නේ සුද්දගේ රෝම ලන්දේසි නීතිය මිසක් සින්හලයාගේ නීතිය නෙවේ නෙ.ඒ අනුව උසාවියේ තීරණ හරි මොකද මිනිහෙක් මරණ දඩුවමට නියම උනත් ඇපල් ගත්තොත් එකේ තිරණය එනතුරු නිවැරැදි කාරයාලු. ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම  සිදුවිය යුත්තේ එය නොවේ. අඩුගානේ නිවැරැදිකාරයා කියල ඉහල උසාවියෙන් තීරණය කෙරෙනතුරු හෝ ඔහු වැරැදිකාරයකු වසයෙන් සැළැකීම නොවේද වඩා සාධාරන ක්‍රමය. අවුරුදු 5 ක් හිරේ ඉන්න සිවනේසන්, චන්ද්‍රකාන්තනුත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට එනවා. මරණ දන්ඩනයට නියම කල රත්නපුරේ චොකා මල්ලිත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට එනවා. අපේ ප්‍රස්නය තියෙන්නේ මේ වගේ මිනිසු පාර්ලිමේතුවට ගිහින් හදන නීති හදන්නේ කාගේ යහපතටද කියන එකයි. ඉතින් මේ රටේ ජනතාවගේ අතේ පරමාධිපත්තිය තියෙනවා කියන්නේ මොන පචයක්ද

ධර්මිස්ට රජයක් හදනවා කිය බලයට ආපු  ජේ ආර්  ජයවර්ධනගේ  1977 පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සම්මතකරගත්ත අන්ක 1 පනත මොකක්ද. මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්ට අවුරුදු 5 න් විශ්‍රාම වැටුපක්පෙන්සිඔන් එකක් හදා ගැනීම නේද. ඒකෙන්ම තේරෙනවානේද මේ අය ඔය දේවාලේ නීති හදන්නේ කාගේ යහපතටද කියල.ඊට පස්සේ ඉදිරිපත්කරපු සශෝධන පනත් 17 න් ම කලේ මන්තීවරුන්ගේ බලතල සහ වරප්‍රසාද වැඩිකරගැනීම සහ ජේ ආර් ගේ රජයේ බලය ආරක්ශා කරගැනීම සහ වැඩිකර ගැනීම නොවේද. හැබැයි ඔවුන් කියන්නේ මේ රටේ තියෙන්නේ ප්‍රජාතනතරවාදය කියල. හැබැයි හොදට ඇස් ඇරලා බැලුවොත්  මේ රටේ තියෙන්නේ පරජා තන්තන්තරවාදයක් මිස  ඔය කියන ජාතියේ ප්‍රජාතන්තර වාදයක් නම් නොවේ කියන එකයි මම නම් හැමදාම කියන්නේ. 

3 මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ට තීරුබදු රහිත වාහ්බලපත්තර ලබා දීම

මේ සෙල්ලම ඉස්සරවෙලාම පටන්ගත්තේ ජේ ආර්ගෙ කාලයේ. ඒ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් සන්තෝසකරල තමන් කරන ඔනෑම දේකට ඔවුන්ගේ චන්දේ ලබාගන්ට.පසුව ඒ පහසුකම රජයේ උසස් නිලධාරින්ටත් දුන්නා. ඊට පස්සේ තමහිතවතුන්ට,  හාමුදුරුවරුන්ට ආදී අයටත් දුන්නා. මෙසේ කිරීමෙන් ඔහු බලාපොරුත්තු උන එකම දේ ඒ අයගේ චන්දේ ලබාගැනීම පමණයි. රටේ ආර්තිකයට  එයින් ඇතිවන පාඩුව ගැන හීනෙන්වත් හිතුවේ නෑ. මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ට සහ නිලධාරින්ට එවා දුන්නේ  මහජනයාට සේවය කරන්ට කියල.අවුරුදු පහක් යනතුරු ඒවා අන්සතු කරන්ට බෑ කියල චක්‍රලේකයකුත් නිකුත් කලා හැබැයි මැති ඇමැතිවරුන් පමණක් නොවේ නිලධාරිනුත් ඒ කොන්දේසිය අමුඅමුවේ උල්ලන්ගනය කරලා  ඒ බලපත්තර ඔක්කොම ලක්ස ගනන් වලට වික්කා. විකුනලා ලක්ස ගනන් සල්ලි හොයාගත්තා. හැබැයි ඒ කිසිවෙකුට දඩුවම් කලේ නෑ. ඒ කියන්නේ ඒ කිසිවෙක් මේ වාහන ජනතා  සේවයට යෙදුවේ න කියන එක නේද?. මට මතක හැටියට 1977 සිටම සෑමම් රජයක්ම මේ ජාතික අපරාධය කලා. එයින් රටට අහිමිවු විදේශ විනිමය කන්දරාව, පාරවල්වල ඇතිවූ වාහන තදබදය සහ ඊටත්වදා රටතුල වර්ධනය වූ  දූසනය සහ සමාජයේ පිරිහීම මෙතෙකැයි කිවහැක්කේ කාටද.  ඒ නිසා අදාල පුද්ගලයින්ට ඇතිවූ නිලගාය නැමැති භයානක රෝගය.  වසර 40 කට ආසන්න කාලයක් සිදුකල මේ ජාතික මහා අපරාධය නැවතත් කරන්ට යන්නේ ඇයි යන්නයි මගේ ප්‍රස්නය. මා පමණක් නොවේ මේ රටට ආදරය කරන සියලුදෙනාම මේ ප්‍රස්නය රජයෙන් අහනවාට මත කිසිම සැකයක් නෑ.

 එමනිසා මේ ජාතික අපරාධය දැන්වත් නතර කරන්නයි මම මේ රජයෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ.

මම අහන්නේ ඇයි 1977 ට පෙර මෙන් අදටත් තම රාජකාරිය කිරීම සන්දහා වාහනයක් අව්ස්ය පුද්ගලයින්ට ඒ සදහා රජයෙන් නයමුදලක් දෙන්ට බැරි  එහෙම කලාම රජයට සතයක්වත් මෙවැනි කෝලම් වලට වැයවෙනේ නෑ. ඒ වගේම නිලරත, රියදුරු ආදී  අවස්යතාවන් ඇති වෙන්නේද නෑ එතකොට ඒ සදහා වැයවෙන කෝටි ප්‍රකෝටි ගානක් මුදලුත් ඉතිරිවෙයි නේද

 එමනිසා මැති ඇමැති වරුන්ට පමණක් නොවේ කිසිම කෙනෙකුට තීරුබදු රහිත වාහන බලපත්තර නොදිය යුතුය යන්නයි මගේ යෝජනාව. රටේ ආර්තිකයට සහ මාර්ග පද්ධතියට දරාගත හැකි පරිදි සීමාවන්තුළ වාහන ආනයනය කලාට වරදක් නැත.   

හැබැයි  එසේ කළයුත්තේ රටේ ආර්තික සන්වර්ධනයට අවස්ය යාන වාහන, යන්තර සුත්තර යනාදිය පමණි. එවැනි ක්‍රමයක් වුවද කළයුත්තේ දැඩි මූල්ය පාලනයන්ට යටත්වය.

Ontario Bill 104 2019 for creation of “ Tamil Genocide Education Week” Leading Upto 18th May Annually

September 15th, 2020

Dr. Chula Rajapakse MNZM FRCP/FRACP Specialist Rheumatologist, Wellington , New Zealand. Spokesperson, United Sri Lanka Association Wellington New Zealand .

Dear Members of Ontario Parliament,

I write to you as a contributor to a webinar on 16/8/20 organised by the ” Ontario Centre for Policy Research” on the alleged Tamil Genocide in Sri Lanka and the  Mullivaikal Massacre, that has formed the basis of the above bill.  Mullivaikal  in Mulativu Sri Lanka , is where the final battles that laid to rest three decades of brutal terrorism in SL  were  fought in May 2019. In these the  Sri Lankan forces  defeated decisively  the Terrorist, The Tamil Tigers in battles acknowledged  widely as clean . The massacre that is being alleged is a Tamil civilian casualty figure of 40,000 or more in the last few weeks of the battles in Mullivaikali .

The real casualty figure assessed by the UN resident representative in SL at the time , Sir John Holmes was around 7000 or less, consistent with the collateral damage expected from the magnitude of the battle . These numbers have been confirmed in the documents tabled by Lord Naseby in the British House of Lords in October 2017 and by the census carried out by the Tamil University teachers , a few months after the end of the war. The absence of the expected two to three times that number of war wounded, lack of any traces of burial or disposing of that  number of war dead, the findings of the internationally supervised Paranagama commission into missing persons from the war,  and many other investigations have al led to the same conclusion

Far from being massacred by Sri Lankan forces, nearly 300,000 Tamil civilians who had been held captive by the Tigers  as human shields at gun point and often shot at to prevent escape,  for months to protect themselves   from the advancing Sri Lankan security forces, streamed into the hands of these very same security forces , as the pictures below show, the moment they were rescued from the Tigers at Mullivaikal . This is hardly the response one would expect if they had been  just subjected to a  Miullivaikal massacre, as the Tiger Diaspora allege, through the  Bill 104 .

These allegations therefore have no factual basis at all and are the construct of the international Tiger Diaspora,  that supported  Tiger terror ion Sri Lanka  for 3 decades with funds and propaganda . 150,000of them are based in Canada especially in the Ontario region and are behind the sponsoring  of this bill . Tamil Tigers used terror in Sri Lanka to create a monoethnic Tamil state of  Elam which would have  consisted of two thirds  of Sri Lankas coast line and one third of the land area of Sri Lanka, that would be the home to  just 8% of Sri Lanka’s present population. Having failed at war, now the Tiger Diaspora are resorting to  a complex web of deceit and deception, to garner western support to pressurise Sri Lanka to relent into giving them Elam.

The initial  genesis of  this demand lies in the fact that the Tamils were the privileged minority during one hundred and fifty years of Divide & Rule” British colonial administration . Following independence in 1948 , the consequent loss of these colonial privileges were seen  by some Tamils as discrimination and presented as such to fellow Tamils to induce them into violence and Terror. This misrepresentation also had a fertile  soil in the well meaning western  minds, prepared to accept allegations of minority discrimination” , without too much inquiry. These formed the basis of allegations of  Tamil discrimination” that has now been further exaggerated beyond  belief, to Tamil Genocide”, to justify the call for Elam.

Through this  bill  the  Tiger Diaspora aims to incorporate and reinforce, using Canadian state funds,  these baseless allegations into the Toronto school curriculum and other think tanks in Canada , to make it an unchallenged fact eventually.

Please read the attached transcript of my presentation at the webinar referred to  that explains further  why these  allegations are baseless and why the bill should be defeated out right . Presenting it is a clear misuse of sacred democratic freedoms of Canada and if ratified will seriously undermine ethnic reconciliation now going on in Sri Lanka.

Thank you very much for your support and cooperation in defeating this bill.

Yours Sincerely,

Dr. Chula Rajapakse MNZM FRCP/FRACP
Specialist Rheumatologist, Wellington , New Zealand.
Spokesperson, United Sri Lanka Association Wellington New Zealand .

14. 9.20

How the 290,000 victims waded into the hands of the Sri Lankan Troops at the end of the war in May 2009, straight after the alleged Mullivaikal   ( Mullativu) Massacre of Tamils by the Sri Lankan troops.

How credible is it that if they were the victims of a Massacre, they would stream back into the arms of those who were responsible for the massacre

.

What the Sri Lankan troops really did for these civilians : including  Tiger leader Prabakarans parents ,whom they looked after for several years thereafter, till they passed away from natural causes

How the Sri Lankan Troops Rehabilitated over 30,000 surrendered Tiger combatant cadres & Incorporated Them As Responsible  Citizens, Into Civil Society

The Power Game

September 15th, 2020

By Garvin Karunaratne 

The Power fiasco is not over yet. Listening to the utterances by State Ministers over the Television it is clear that they  have been outsmarted. 

Perhaps an old Paper of mine published sometime back will provide details for the State Ministers to arm themselves for the next bout.. 

HOW TO DETERMINE THE SECURITY THREAT TO INDIA?

September 15th, 2020

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

The security threat to India is a quite complicated archetype and many people confuse with the term the security threat to India. The major reason people get confused about the nature of the threat is specifically delineated and people have a feeling it like a groping in the dark.   Since Indian independence in 1947 Indian bureaucrats manipulated and accused any support to surrounding countries from China as a security threat to India which accused Chinese aided projects in  Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. There has not been logic in the manipulation. 

The term security treat could be defined and applied in many ways, during the cold war India played a police role on account of Russia, and when the economic power of Russia declined and the Soviet Union divided to different countries India had to change the police role, but the economic role has become more important. India has a severe economic challenge first many surrounding countries have determined import substitution and domestic production of agricultural produces. In this environment, India has no options but to manipulate the security threat against the economic policies of surrounding countries.   It seems that the term security threat is used to attract investment from outside to surrounding countries, to India rather than a military threat to India from China or any other country.

Generally, a security threat to a country could come in various ways such as political, economic, social, cultural, religious, and many other ways. Print media in Sri Lanka broadly discuss the appropriate policy guide to foreign relations and a famous legal advisor, Mr.Neville Ladduwahetty mentioned in his recent article published in Daily News that neutrality” is the appropriate policy guide to foreign relations.  The term neutrality is a complicated term and how the concept of neutrality should be practically applied in a complex environment is a problem to many.  The concept of neutrality is applied in respect of India only or with other countries in the region or the other countries of the world may be a problem. During the cold war era, certain foreign policy analysts delated view that no country can stick to Non-Alignment according to the developments of the modern world, and all countries need to follow NON-NEUTRAL POLICY”. Logically all countries in the world must align to a power bloc.

Academics I spoke to had a problem explaining the difference between the terms Neutrality” and Non-Align”, and some stated that the two terms have a similarity of meaning and in practice, there may be contrariety.  Sri Lanka has been a giant of Non-Align policy since the Bandung summit and India has also been active in the association of Non-Align nations. When there was a conflict between India and Pakistan creating a separate country, Bangladesh,  Sri Lanka faced obscurity handling foreign relations between India and Pakistan, both countries were members of the Non-Align movement. As a first-year university student after the JVP conflict in 1971, I observed that Prime Minister, Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike was handling the problem very successful way. Some people stated that Mrs.B used her relationship with the Nehru family to tackle the issue, and how did she ignore Mr.Yahiya Khan’s behavior was unknown to people of Sri Lanka.    I also heard that Mrs.Sirimavo Bandaranaike intervened to settle a conflict between India and China. Nobody explained to me the strategy used by Mrs.B.   What kind of policy guide was practiced by Mrs. Bandaranaike, Neutrality” or Non-Alignment”.

The idea of the SECURITY THREAT TO INDIA would have practically considered on both occasions, and how it was determined by the foreign policy-makers is hard to describe.

After the COVID 19 pandemic, the world has faced a different environment.  The truth is the military research, and invented weapons have failed to fight with the pandemic.  More people have died from the pandemic than any war recorded in history. Although India and China can treat any country by military means, both countries cannot threaten the pandemic. In this situation,  what is the use of military power, and what is important neutrality, or non-alignment? The security threat to India’s concept has failed to stop the pandemic in India.

My feeling is if India, China, and the surrounding countries work together the security threat from the pandemic could be challenged or stopped if they spend trillions of dollars to strengthen the immune system of people instead of military power.              

PAKISTAN: Blasphemy as Pretext

September 15th, 2020

Sanchita Bhattacharya Research Fellow, Institute for Conflict Management Courtesy SOUTH ASIA INTELLIGENCE REVIEW

On September 8, 2020, a Sessions Court in Lahore, Punjab, sentenced a Christian man, Asif Pervaiz, to death, after convicting him of sending text messages containing blasphemous content”. The court order issued by Additional Sessions Judge Mansoor Ahmad Qureshi said Pervaiz would first serve a three-year prison term for misusing” his phone to send the derogatory text message. Then he shall be hanged by his neck till his death.” He was also fined PKR 50,000. Asif Pervaiz has been in custody since 2013, fighting blasphemy charges that were levelled against him by the supervisor of the garment factory he once worked at. The supervisor had accused him of sending derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad to him in a text message. Following the sentence, Asif’s lawyer, Siaf-ul-Malook, however, stated, “He [Asif] denied the allegations and said that this man was trying to get him to convert to Islam.”

On August 23, 2020, several individuals lodged separate complaints for blasphemy” against journalist and human rights activist, Marvi Sirmed in different parts of the country, including Lahore (in Police Stations of Ravi Road, Faisal Town and Garden Town) and Jhang (Kotwali Police Station) in Punjab Province; Karachi, in Sindh Province; and Islamabad with the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA). According to the information received, on August 22, 2020, Sirmed allegedly posted a satirical Tweet from her personal account, referring to the many enforced disappearances of human rights defenders and government critics in Balochistan Province, Pakistan.

On August 13, 2020, Police filed a case against actor Saba Qamar and singer Bilal Saeed under Section 295 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), pertaining to blasphemy, for shooting a music video inside Wazir Khan Mosque in Lahore of Punjab Province. The case was registered at the Akbari Police Station of Lahore on the complaint of advocate Farhat Manzoor. Manzoor filed the complaint following the release of a clip of the video on August 8. Both Qamar and Saeed have published statements apologizing on their respective social media accounts.

On June 10, 2020, Sajjad Soomro, Assistant Professor of Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, was arrested by Police under blasphemy charges from his house in Ali Murad Mohalla, Khairpur city. He was arrested on a complaint by Ghulam Nabi, a Police officer who accused him of having spoken against Islam and against religious seminaries in the country.

According to varying media reports, at present there are more than 4,000 cases pertaining to blasphemy registered across Pakistan, since 1986.  As reported on September 2, 2020, at least 42 cases pertaining to blasphemy were registered across Pakistan in the month of August 2020 alone. Most of those facing blasphemy allegations are members of religious minorities.

Individuals who are prosecuted for blasphemy are routinely denied fair trial guarantees: blasphemy-related proceedings are excessively protracted; prior to trial accused persons are commonly denied bail and are held in custody for extended periods of time awaiting trial; and while detained, they are often held in solitary confinement for prolonged periods.

More worryingly, individuals accused of blasphemy continue to be vulnerable even after formally coming within the ambit of the criminal justice system, and are in constant danger of being attacked and killed by religious fanatics and terrorists. Unfortunately, as reported on December 24, 2019, there have been 75 such extrajudicial executions in Pakistan, since 1986.

Most recently, on July 29, 2020, Tahir Naseem, a US citizen and an Ahmadi, accused of blasphemy, was shot dead inside a District Court in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in the presence of security and the presiding judge. A video of the attacker, identified as Faisal Khan, in handcuffs, shouting angrily that his victim as an “enemy of Islam” was available in various social media platforms. Faisal Khan was taken into custody on the spot. Regrettably, a rally was organised in his favour in Peshawar on July 31. Thousands of Pakistanis rallied to show their support for Faisal. Those who rallied, carried signs praising Khan for the killing, calling for his immediate release from jail and saying he killed Naseem because the government was too slow in sentencing blasphemers to death. Though Pakistan is one of 13 countries where blasphemy is punishable by death, no one has been hanged so far.

Mashal Khan, a student, was lynched and killed by his own hostel mates at Abdul Wali Khan University in the Mardan District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in broad daylight on April 13, 2017, after being accused of blasphemy.

Renowned qawwal (Sufi singer) Amjad Sabri (45) was killed in a targeted killing incident in the Liaquatabad Town of Karachi, the provincial capital of Sindh, on June 22, 2016. Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP)-Hakimullah Mehsud faction ‘spokesperson’ Qari Saifullah Mehsud claimed responsibility for the attack. In 2014, the Islamabad High Court had issued a notice in a blasphemy case against Amjad Sabri along with two TV channels for the playing of a qawwali during a morning show. The traditional qawwali sung by Amjad Sabri had mentioned religious figures, which was deemed offensive.

Salman Taseer (the then Governor of Punjab Province) and Shahbaz Bhatti (the then Federal Minister of Minority Affairs) were brutally murdered in 2011 for questioning violence linked to allegations of blasphemy. Taseer was killed on January 4, 2011, by one of his own body guards, Malik Mumtaz Hussain Qadri, who had reportedly been incensed by the Governor’s efforts to secure marginal amendments to the Blasphemy Law, as also his advocacy of Asia Bibi. Bhatti was killed on March 2, 2011, by unidentified militants, who fired 30 bullets at him and managed to escape. Pamphlets from two self-styled TTP factions, Fidayeen-e-Muhammad and al Qaeda Punjab Chapter, were found at the incident site, which declared, “anyone who criticises the blasphemy law has no right to live”. Asia Bibi, a Christian was the most prominent ‘blasphemy’ prisoner in recent times, was accused of blasphemy by neighbours, who objected to her drinking water from a particular well. The charge in 2009 lead initially to a death sentence in 2010, followed by years in indefinite detention. Subsequently after years of suffering, on January 29, 2019, Pakistan’s Supreme Court upheld her acquittal on blasphemy charges and subsequently she left Pakistan due to the risk to her life, and on May 8, 2019, reached Canada.

Regrettably, not only the accused, but judges and lawyers associated with blasphemy cases also face danger. According to a February 27, 2020, report, a former judge who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that magistrates in Pakistan’s lower courts remain very vulnerable to intimidation in blasphemy cases, given that they often live among the communities they serve. Due to the risk of being labeled blasphemers themselves if they acquit, they tend to always convict”. It is common for lawyers to be threatened to stop defending those accused of blasphemy. Saif-ul-Malook, Asia Bibi’s lawyer and renowned Human Rights lawyer of Pakistan has faced several death threats, and was offered asylum in the Netherlands. As reported on June 12, 2019, he and his family are under Pakistani Police protection. Earlier, on May 7, 2014, Rashid Rehman, a Human Rights lawyer, was killed in his office, in Multan, Punjab, after he had been repeatedly threatened to stop defending Junaid Hafeez, a lecturer at Bahauddin Zakariya University, accused of blasphemy.  

In the early phase after the birth of Pakistan, there were no legal provisions for religious discrimination. Nevertheless, deviations occurred during the military rule of Zia-ul-Haq (1978-1988) and the most debatable laws, Section 295-B of PPC, (blasphemy against the Holy Quran) was introduced in 1982, and Section 295-C, PPC (desecration against Prophet Muhammad) in 1986. In 1992, the government of Nawaz Sharif, went a step ahead and introduced the death penalty for a person held guilty of blasphemy under Clause 295-C of the PPC. The clause thus reads,

Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

The Freedom of Thought Report, 2019, explaining the situation of victims of blasphemy law noted:

Most blasphemy cases are either brought by those wishing to undermine minority groups or by those wishing to eliminate individuals against whom they have a grudge… Mullahs will often come to court to intimidate the judiciary, and obtaining a lawyer to ensure a fair trial is often impossible. Those accused of blasphemy, and who have been acquitted by the courts, often either flee Pakistan… Clerics and radicals have been found to have brought forward cases of blasphemy after fabricating evidence.

The strange combination of a weak democratic government and Islamised blasphemy laws in Pakistan has given the perpetrators of violence impunity to openly threaten, mobilise, attack and kill others in the name of blasphemy. The violence in the name of Blasphemy Law is increasingly consuming Pakistani society from within, giving validity to terrible crime and human rights violations in a country that is ranked 152nd out of 164 countries in the 2020 Global Peace Index. Unfortunately, the climate of hate and revenge has worsened violence in all possible forms.

ERASING THE EELAM VICTORY Part 17 C7

September 15th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

The two JVP insurgencies of 1971 and 1987 have not been looked at deeply or analytically. Commentators have concentrated on describing what the JVP did, not why they did it.  Commentators treat the JVP with great indulgence, calling the JVP an idealistic, romantic youth movement.

 Dharman    Wickremaratne said that, as a working journalist, he had associated with many JVPers. They had a broad vision, much energy and strong voices, he said.  Neville Jayaweera and S. Nadesan were also sympathetic. These commentators have only looked at the JVP student and youth base, observed analysts. JVP was not a youth rebellion at all, said Chandraprema. The youth were merely used by the JVP.

Analysts also suggested that the JVP movement arose primarily   due to the poverty and unemployment in the country.  It is these two factors that drove the youth to JVP, said analysts. That is not so. The poor and unemployed did not run to the JVP. The JVP came after them. JVP was a shrewd, externally directed movement, which needed an obedient cadre. They got one without any difficulty.

In recruiting cadres, JVP made contact with most downtrodden and desperate    persons. These were indentified and JVP made contact with them and convinced them that they should support JVP. JVP focused on the lumpen proletariat and used them for their own purposes, said Chandraprema.

JVP knew to exploit the envy and anger of those who could not make it, those who were unemployed or in low paying jobs with no hope of advancement for their children. JVP gave them ‘the psychological factor of hope’, said Chandraprema. The notion of revolution gave the youth a zest, he added. There was also disenchantment with the traditional left, pointed out Wiswa Warnapala. When Wijeweera was discharged from prison in 1970, he was treated as a hero and garlanded.

JVP also used caste. In 1971, JVP had support from Karawa, Wahumpura and Batgam in the south. Govigama, Navandanna and Berava did not support, said analysts. Mahawatte village consisted mainly of  Batgama, Wahumpura, Durawa, Nakathi castes and most of the villagers supported JVP. Menikhinna consisted mainly of Batgam caste and was a hot bed of JVP activity.

Initially, there was much sympathy for JVP in villages, said Rohan Gunaratna. Many people had genuine sympathy for JVP because they too when they were young, had experienced the frustrations articulated by JVP.  The lower and lower middle class thought JVP offered a better alternative to UNP and SLFP. They had high expectations from JVP. There was also the feeling that unemployed and underprivileged youth had the right to revolt, observed Chandraprema.

Some writers, using their imagination, saw this as ‘the first revolutionary organization of the Sri Lanka peasantry’. JVP was trying to convert a rural backward peasantry to a revolutionary force, they said.

JVP leaders however, did not come from the unemployed group or the lower classes. They came from the middle class.  They were educated and employed. This is to be expected. An uneducated group could not lead an insurgency. There were professionals among the JVP leaders. Lalith Chandrasiri was an electrical Engineer of Steel Corporation. Viraj Fernando was a mechanical engineer at Steel Corporation.

Some were in stable employment. Somawansa Amarasinghe was a technical assistant in Irrigation Department. Jude Anthony was electrical technician at St Anthony’s Consolidated. Wijepala (1971 insurgency) was an employee of Colombo Port commission. Beli sira” was a bullock cart renter at Hambantota.     One member in the   Womens division was a teacher, another was a local government employee, and a third had worked in Singapore.

The JVP Politburo of 1980 had seven University graduates or drop outs, observed Rohan Gunaratna.  The JVP top rankers also included graduates and University drop outs. J.G. Wijegunasekera was a graduate in mass communications, University Kelaniya. Upali Jayaweera had graduated from University of Kelaniya with an honors degree in economics. Saman Piyasiri has been in University of Kelaniya. Lalith Wijeratne (Aravinda) studied in the Arts Faculty at University of Peradeniya.

The JVP leadership became politicized due to various factors. Ananda Idamegama was an engineering student at Peradeniya suspended for assaulting pro UNP students.  Shantha Bandara had studied at Trinity College, Kandy and Ananda College Colombo.   He was in the Science Faculty, Peradeniya, and was secretary of Socialist Students Union.  He was suspended from the university   few months before his final exams.

JG Wijegunasekera was an active trade unionist at Coconut Cultivation Board, and Small Industries Board.  He was dismissed after the 1980 strike. Upali Jayaweera applied for dozens of jobs, but could not get a job because of his leftist leanings. Palitha Dissanayake was a school boy when he went to prison in 1971. He became a full time JVPer.

JVP seems to have had good intelligence and knew to sniff out sound recruits. Upali Jayaweera was the son of village headman, his mother was a school teacher, his brother was an engineer and Upali was in the Medical Faculty. He went back home when University closed in 1987. He was approached   when reading at the Nuwara Eliya Public Library.

 His potential was immediately seen. Upali was appointed leader for Maskeliya, and was sent to University of Colombo for training, as Peradeniya   University representative from Medicine, together with the representatives for English, science and arts.  Rohan Gunaratne was impressed by Upali Jayaweera, and said Upali would have commanded the party, if he lived.

JVP posed as a Marxist party. But no one took their Marxism seriously. Wijeweera was not supported by either Russia or China, the two leading Communist powers. Wijeweera‘s own Marxism was always suspect. Wijeweera changed from Leninist to Trotskyite in 1973. 

 Wiswa Warnapala   heard Wijeweera address students at Peradeniya In 1971. Wijeweera was all revolutionary rhetoric, gestures, and gesticulations, said Wiswa. Wijeweera traversed the entire course of the history of revolution and referred to all revolutionary ideologies in the world. Wijeweera‘s own revolutionary ideology was a hotchpotch of all these ideologies without a clear cut strategy. His ideology was, in Marxian terms, not ideology at all, said Wiswa.

My assessment was that this man, with neither ideology nor political strategy would put the youth of the country into serious trouble, concluded Wiswa. In one   manifesto Wijeweera had said that if a person wrote to the government in French he would get a reply in French.

Dr.  Wasantha Bandara   had maintained secret links with Rohana Wijeweera throughout 1984-1989 period. During regular secret meetings with Rohana Wijeweera, Bandara said he realized Wijeweera was not in full control of the operations undertaken by the JVP.

Indradasa said Wijeweera was ‘a person easy to control,’ though his speeches sounded fiery.   Facing the camera for a video statement when arrested, the expression on his face was one of disappointment and dismay, said Indradasa. He had spoken in a shattered voice, with emotion.

When he was captured in 1971, Wijeweera was very docile, unlike his public image, said Chandraprema. He had told everything about everybody while trying to hide his own liability for the insurgence. His statement went to 400 pages, in 1989 he was brief, said Chandraprema.

JVP was a hard headed cynical  organization under a ruthless leadership, said critics. Noble sentiments were lacking. There was a lack of heroism and moral uprightness in the JVP, said Chandraprema.. The JVP leaders were never idealistic.  Rank and file may have had idealistic  views’ but not the leadership.

JVP had boasted of their simple life style. Then  in September 1989 Rupavahini showed the public the mansions, cars, and personal luxuries including  foreign aphrodisiacs used by the top JVP leadership.

For the JVP high command , self protection came first. When they ordered villagers out on a demonstration, JVP got those they disliked to march first so they were the first to get killed. JVP leaders stayed  in the rear,  they never went in the front.  They were safe from fire. They had followed this from the time they started forced demonstrations, said Chandraprema. An enterprising officer had once got a helicopter to fire at the rear of the procession.

In 1989 JVP did not display much bravery in captivity. Top leadership  told all within 24 hours. They were captured within  less than 24 hours of each  other. JVP was only willing to kill for a cause but not to die for it,  critics observed.   Analysts noted that the junior cadres were much better,  under interrogation .They did not sing even under torture. I do not think this was due to courage and loyalty, they probably  knew very little  about the  organization .

JVP had two levels of activity, open and secret. One genuine, the other bogus. They had two parallel political agendas  to match this, one for the public and another for the  insiders  in the party. The entire organization was conspiratorial, said Wiswa Warnapala.

JVP ‘s  public agenda said the JVP wanted  to create a socialist revolution which would benefit the masses.  This bogus agenda was  put forward to win  the popular support   JVP needed  in order to capture political power. The  cadres were told that the public agenda was  an  ‘upakrama’. Whenever a party cadre showed any uncertainty over the dual strategy, the answer was eka upakramayak,  sahodaraya”

The secret  agenda, which was the real one,  was armed seizure of power by a trained cadre of young men. JVP  while holding meetings for the  public was secretly arming.  They were  getting ready to kill. Emphasis was on weapons and training . It was to be  a Fascist type putsch, said Wiswa Warnapala. 

JVP only had short term plans, not long term ones, observed Chandraprema, indicating that  JVP was  only a tool obeying its handlers. JVP ‘s task was to bring the country to a grinding halt through terror and killing.

JVP had foreign contacts and foreign support. Ananda Idamegama  had contact with foreign ministries in Colombo. DJV had  trained a few of its members in India. In 1985 Amnesty International  issued a report on Sri Lanka taking the side of the JVP.  When an armed gang  abducted eight bhikkhus of the Manawa Hithawadi Organization in 1988  Somawansa phoned Amnesty  international  in London.  BBC  filmed an attack on JVP at University of Sri Jayewardenepura and showed it as  ‘island of terror’. When JVP were arrested there were Habeas corpus applications. These were paid for by applicant’s relatives or by an aid  organization . 

Early in the 1971 JVP insurgency,   it was rumored that  JVP was receiving covert aid from a foreign source. Godahewa  stated firmly that JVP had received funds in 1971   and named Middle East, Thailand and Japan.  It was obvious that the JVP was receiving some form of external aid in the period 1977-83 , said Chandraprema.

JVP tried to show that all funds were obtained locally,  through membership fees,  donations,  robberies.  JVP robbed cash from banks and petrol sheds. Dalandagama Maho   cooperative petrol shed, Polgahawela  and Galagamuwa  petrol sheds were robbed in 1986. In 1988, Digana Peoples Bank  was robbed of Rs 8 million, Wellawatte Peoples Bank robbed of  Rs 20  million in  cash. JVP robbed cash and jewellery from Marandagahamula Peoples Bank in 1987, and Wallewatte Peoples Bank in 1989. A pay roll of Rs 4 lakhs was robbed in Balangoda.  Another pay roll from Kalebokka was taken in 1989.

But JVP could not have funded its two  insurgencies  in this ad hoc manner. JVP had heavy expenses. Some Rs 1,000,000 to Rs 1,200,000 was needed  as  payment to full timers . Two activists in Kandy were given Rs120,000 and 150,000 .   Money was also needed to lease houses,  purchase and maintain vehicles.  In the late 1980s  JVP  bought three houses. Araliyawatte in Lilambe area Wariyapola, the house at Gonapola junction Batuwita and the mansion Katugaha Walawwa in Neluwa near Attampitiya road . When Shanta Bandara  was captured    Rs. one million  had been offered for his release.

After the 1989 defeat, the JVP was rescued by its foreign contacts. The foreign links of the JVP came to light only then, said Godahewa. This fact has not received the publicity it deserves., India’s RAW had arranged to provide accommodation and other assistance in India to fleeing JVP cadres.  Nearly 400 were given sanctuary. In April 1989 Somawansa’s wife and son had been sent to Japan, then    UK via Kerala,  Thailand and Italy.’

The sole Politbureau member to escape, after the 1987 insurgency,  was  Somawansa Amarasinghe. He  left in March 1990. The media said  Somawansa Amerasinghe was assisted by RAW  to safely flee Sri Lanka, and he was initially given refuge in India. Shamindra Ferdinando said Somawansa was helped by a section of the government to escape to India where Indian authorities looked after him before facilitating his migration to the UK.

  In UK Somawansa had run a special international JVP cell. This was used,  very successfully to conduct special meetings in different countries in Asia, on behalf of the JVP. According to Dharman Wickremaratne, Somawansa had traveled to Italy via France and thereafter to Switzerland.. Somawansa  lived in Paris and London  for 12 years and  returned to Sri Lanka to  lead the JVP in 1994.  ( Continued)

අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්නා මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ජාවාරම්කරුවන් විසින් නීති විරෝධීව උපයා ගන්නා ලද දේපල හා මුදල් රජය භාරයට ගැනීම සම්බන්ධව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් සාකච්ඡාවක්

September 15th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ජාවාරම් ඇතුළු නීති විරෝධීව එක් රැස් කර ගත් මුදල් සම්බන්ධව ඉදිරි කටයුතු කිරීම පිළිබඳව නීතිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව, ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොලීසිය සහ අනෙකුත් අදාළ රාජ්‍ය ආයතනවල උසස් නිලධාරීන් පිරිසක් ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා සමඟ 2020.09.14 දින අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේදී සාකච්ඡාවක නිරත වූහ.

නීති විරෝධී ලෙස උපයා ගත් මුදල්, රථ වාහන, ඉඩම්, නිවාස, ගොඩනැගිලි, යනාදියට අදාළ පුද්ගලයන් අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන රිමාන්ඩ් බන්ධනාගාර ගත කිරීමෙන් පසුව ද නඩු විභාගය අවසන් කර දේපල රාජ සන්තක කරන තෙක් ඒවා ඔවුන් විසින්ම භුක්ති විදීම හා ඒවායෙන් මුදල් ඉපයීමත්, එම මුදල් හා දේපල තවරදුටත් නීති විරෝධී අරමුණු සඳහා යෙදවීම වැළැක්වීම සඳහාත් ගත යුතු ඉදිරි පියවර සම්බන්ධව සාකච්ඡා කිරීම මෙම සාකච්ඡාවේ මූලික අරමුණ විය.

අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්නා පුද්ගලයින් නීති විරෝධී ලෙස උපයා ගත් මුදල් හා දේපල රාජසන්තක කිරීම සම්බන්ධව කටයුතු කිරීමට පෙර මුල් අවස්ථාවේදීම එම දේපල රජය භාරයට ගැනීමට කටයුතු කිරීම සම්බන්ධව මෙම හමුවට එක් වූ නිලධාරීන් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගේ අවධානය යොමු කළේය.

මුදල් විශුද්ධි කරන පනත සහ 2006 අංක 06 දරණ මුදල් ගනු දෙනු වාර්තා කිරීමේ පනතේ ප්‍රතිපාදනයන් සම්බන්ධව මෙම හමුවේදී දීර්ඝ ලෙස සාකච්ඡා කළ අතර එම පනත් අවශ්‍ය සංශෝධනයටන්ට ලක් කිරීම සහ දැනට තිබෙන  ප්‍රතිපාදන ප්‍රකාරව කටයුතු කළ හැකි ආකාරය සම්බන්ධව නිලධාරීන් විසින් කරුණු දක්වන ලදී.

ඒ අනුව තිබෙන ප්‍රතිපාදන මත වහාම කටයුතු කිරීමටත්, අවශ්‍ය නීති සංශෝධනයට ලක් කිරීම සලකා බැලීමටත් තීරණය විය.

මෙම අවස්ථාව සඳහා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම් ගාමිණී සෙනරත්, ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් විශ්‍රාමික මේජර් ජනරාල් කමල් ගුණරත්න, අධිකරණ අමාත්‍යංශ ලේකම් එම්.එම්.පී.කේ.මායාදුන්නේ, වැඩ බලන පොලිස්පති සී.ඩී.වික්‍රමරත්න, මහ බැංකුවේ මූල්‍ය බුද්ධි ඒකකයේ අධ්‍යක්ෂ චනෝකා මොහොට්ටි, නීතිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ ජ්‍යේෂ්ඨ නියෝජ්‍ය සොලිස්ටර් ජනරාල් හරිප්‍රියා ජයසුන්දර මහත්ම මහත්මීන් ඇතුළු නිලධාරීන් විශාල පිරිසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

20 වෙනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය අධ්‍යයනයට පත් කළ කමිටුව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාට වාර්තාව භාර දෙයි

September 15th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

20 වෙනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය අධ්‍යයනය කිරීමට පත් කළ කමිටුව විසින් අදාළ වාර්තාව අද 2020.09.15 දින අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේදී අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය  මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට භාර දෙන ලදී.

කැබිනට් අමාත්‍යවරුන්, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන් හා පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ගෙන් සැදුම්ලත් අදාළ කමිටුවේ සභාපතිත්වය දරනු ලැබුවේ කැබිනට් අමාත්‍ය මහාචාර්ය ජී.එල්. පීරිස් මහතාය.

විසි වෙනි සංශෝධනය සම්බන්ධයෙන් කළ අධ්‍යයනයේදී හඳුනාගත් අලුතින් එක් කළ යුතු හා සංශෝධනය කළ යුතු කරුණු සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදාළ කමිටු සාමාජිකයන් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා දැනුවත් කළේය.

20 වෙනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අධ්‍යයනය කිරීමට අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මෙම කමිටුව පසුගිය දා පත් කර තිබිණි.

දරුවන් 46 දෙනෙකු සමඟ සිරගතව සිටින මව්වරුන් පිළිබඳ වාර්තාව අග්‍රමාත්‍යතුමාට භාර දෙයි

September 15th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

සිරකරු  සුභසාධක දිනය වෙනුවෙන් නිකුත් කරන සමරු කොඩිය අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට පැළඳවීම අද 2020.09.15 දින අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේදී සිදු විය.

ජනාධිපති විශේෂ ව්‍යාපෘති අධ්‍යක්ෂ සිරකරු  සුභ සාධක සංගමයේ  හිටපු උප සභාපති, හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ආර්.ඒ.ඩී. සිරිසේන මහතා, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට සමරු කොඩිය පැළඳුවේය.

කොඩි අලෙවි කිරීමෙන් ලැබෙන මුදල් සෘජුවම සිරකරු සුභ සාධනය වෙනුවෙන් වැය කිරීමට නියමිතය.

ජාතික පුවත්පතක පළ වූ, මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ජාවාරම් ඇතුළු විවිධ අපරාධ සම්බන්ධයෙන් චෝදනා ලැබ දරුවන් 46 දෙනෙකු සමඟ සිරගතව සිටින මව්වරුන් පිළිබඳ වාර්තාව බන්ධනාගාර ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ හා සිරකරුවන් පුනරුත්ථාපනය පිළිබඳ රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිනී  සුදර්ශනී ප්‍රනාන්දුපුල්ලේ මහත්මිය  මෙම හමුවේදී අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා වෙත භාර දුන්නාය.

එම වාර්තාවේ සඳහන් කරුණුවලට අදාළව දරුවන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් කළ හැකි විශේෂ වැඩසටහනක් සොයා බලන ලෙසත්,  ඔවුන්ට නිදහස ලබාදීමට හැකි නෛතික පසුබිම සොයා බලන්නැයි ද අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා අමාත්‍යවරියට උපදෙස් දුන්නේය.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මෙම හමුවට එක්ව සිටි බන්ධනාගාර හා පුනරුත්ථාපනයට අදාළ, විෂය භාර ප්‍රධානීන් සමඟ දැනට බන්ධනාගාර තුළ පවතින දුෂ්කරතා සම්බන්ධයෙන් ද සාකච්ඡාවක නිරත විය.

දැනට රිමාන්ඩ් බන්ධනාගාර ගතව සිටින මත්ද්‍රව්‍යයට ඇබ්බැහි වූවන් පුනරුත්ථාපනය කිරීමේදී ඔවුන් නිසි ක්‍රමවේදයක් යටතේ වැඩබිම්වලට යොමු කිරීමට පියවර ගන්නැයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා විෂය භාර අමාත්‍යතුමියට උපදෙස් දුන්නේය.

ඒ අනුව මත්ද්‍රව්‍යවලට ඇබ්බැහි වූ රැඳවියන් ගොවිපළ හා කර්මාන්තශාලාවලට යොමු කර, නිසි පුනරුත්ථාපන ක්‍රමවේදය සපිරූ යහපත් පුද්ගලයන් ලෙස  සමාජගත කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය වැඩපිළිවෙළක්  අධිකරණ අමාත්‍යංශය සමඟ  ඉදිරියේදී සාකච්ඡා කොට සකස් කරන්නැයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා  අවධාරණය කළේය.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට බන්ධනාගාර ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ හා සිරකරුවන් පුනරුත්ථාපනය පිළිබඳ රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිනී  සුදර්ශනී ප්‍රනාන්දුපුල්ලේ මහත්මිය, ජනාධිපති විශේෂ ව්‍යාපෘති අධ්‍යක්ෂක සිරකරු  සුභ සාධක සංගමයේ  හිටපු උප සභාපති, හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ආර්.ඒ.ඩී. සිරිසේන, බන්ධනාගාර කොමසාරිස් ජනරාල් තුෂාර උපුල්දෙනිය, බන්ධනාගාර කොමසාරිස් (පාලන) චන්දන ඒකනායක මහත්වරු ද එක්ව සිටියහ.

සමස්ත ලංකා බෞද්ධ මහා සම්මේලනයේ 14 වැනි බෞද්ධ සාහිත්‍ය උත්සවයට අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා එක්වෙයි

September 15th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

සමස්ත ලංකා බෞද්ධ මහා සම්මේලනය 14 වැනි වරටත් සංවිධානය කළ බෞද්ධ සාහිත්‍ය උත්සවය සඳහා අද 2020.09.15 දින ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා එක්විය.

බුද්ධ ශාසන, ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යංශය හා එක්ව සංවිධානය කළ, මෙම බෞද්ධ සාහිත්‍ය උත්සවය කොළඹ 07, බෞද්ධ සම්මේලන ශාලාවේ දී පැවැත්විණි.

පරිවර්තන, පර්යේෂණ, නව ප්‍රබන්ධ, ගී කාව්‍ය නිර්මාණ, ශාස්ත්‍රීය පරිවර්තන, ළමා සාහිත්‍ය, ජනශ්‍රැති පර්යේෂණ ඇතුළු බෞද්ධ සාහිත්‍ය ඔපවත් කරන කෘතීන් උදෙසා මෙහිදී අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා අතින් සම්මාන හා ත්‍යාග ප්‍රදානය කෙරිණි.

බෞද්ධ මහා සම්මේලනයේ හිටපු ජ්‍යේෂ්ඨ සභාපති, මහාචාර්ය ගුණපාල මලලසේකර, බිතු සිතුවම් ශිල්පී සෝලියස් මෙන්දිස් සහ බ්‍රහ්මචාරී වලිසිංහ හරිස්චන්ද්‍ර මැතිතුමන්ලා සිහිපත් කරමින් මෙහිදී විශේෂ ගුණානුස්මරණ සම්මාන ප්‍රදානයක් ද සිදු විය.

ජ්‍යේෂ්ඨ මහාචාර්යවරුන් වන සුනිල් ආරියරත්න, මහින්ද සෝමතිලක, මහාචාර්ය අසංක තිලකරත්න, ආචාර්ය මාලිනී ඩයස්, විශාරද නන්දා මාලිනී ඇතුළු මහත්ම මහත්මීන් රැසක් සම්මානයට පාත්‍ර වූහ.

මෙම  අවස්ථාවට අමරපුර ශ්‍රී ධර්මරක්ෂිත නිකායේ ශ්‍රී ධර්මරක්ෂිතවංශාලංකාර රාජකීය පණ්ඩිත ශාස්ත්‍රපති අති පූජ්‍ය තිරිකුණාමලයේ ආනන්ද මහානායක ස්වාමීන්වහන්සේ, අති පූජ්‍ය විද්‍යා චක්‍රවර්තී ශාස්ත්‍රපති පූජ්‍ය එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද නායක ස්වාමීන්වහන්සේ, කොළඹ විද්‍යෝදය පරිවේණාධිපති රාජකීය පණ්ඩිත දර්ශනපති අතිපූජ්‍ය බලංගොඩ සෝභිත නායක ස්වාමීන්වහන්සේ ඇතුළු මහා සංඝරත්නය ප්‍රමුඛ, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන විදුර වික්‍රමනායක, සරත් වීරසේකර, සමස්ත ලංකා බෞද්ධ මහා සම්මේලනයේ සභාපති ජගත් සුමතිපාල මහත්වරු ඇතුළු සම්භාවනීය අමුත්තන් රැසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

The many reasons behind SLPP’s decision to revisit the draft 20th Amendment

September 15th, 2020

By P. K. Balachandran/Daily Express Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Among the main reasons is opposition within the ruling party and alliance

Colombo, September 14: The ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna’s (SLPP) decision to revisit the draft 20thAmendment (20A) to the Constitution follows multiple dissensions over it both within the party and its alliance. Although the draft 20A was cleared by the Cabinet without objections and was even published in the gazette, the moment it came to the public domain, it ran into very rough weather inside the SLPP, the SLPP-lead alliance, the Opposition and the media.

This resulted in Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa appointing a committee to go into the controversial issues and submit a report to him by September 15.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa would have been surprised when the Sinhala nationalist theoretician and Mahinda Rajapaksa acolyte, Dr. Gunadasa Amarasekere, and a Sinhala nationalist lawyer, Manohara de Silva, protested against some of the provisions of the draft 20A. Left with no option, Gotabaya was compelled to tell them he would issue an alternative draft.

There is yet no clarity about what the Sinhala nationalist lobby exactly wants, but many suspect it fears the lifting of the ban on dual citizens standing for elections could lead to the infiltration of the pro-West Sinhala Diaspora and the pro-Tamil separatist Tamil Diaspora. Some like National Freedom Front leader Wimal Weerawansa, who are said to be against SLPP honcho and dual citizen Basil Rajapaksa, do not want him to be in Parliament again. The last time he was in, he took up the Economic Affairs portfolio and became Sri Lanka’s Economic Tsar, second only to the then president Mahinda Rajapaksa in power.

The general complaint against the draft 20A appears to be that it was prepared in a non-transparent and hurried manner by a set of lawyers close to President Gotabaya and associated with his organization ‘Viyathmaga’, which is a collection of non-political intellectuals and professionals. These non-political intellectuals generally have a dim view of politicians and consider politics, elections and parliaments full of the hoi polloi as a hindrance to good governance, justice, efficiency and national progress.

The draft 20A also represents the notion that the Executive Presidency should be an all-powerful office without any effective checks and balances, all for the sake of efficiency. It nullifies Parliament as a checking mechanism and envisages it only as a needed to pass laws and money bills. The Prime Minister and the Cabinet (all members of Parliament) will only be implementing agencies with little or no role in policy making or in appointments to key offices of state.

According to some MPs, this is not at all liked even by members of the ruling SLPP as they would be rendered powerless if all powers are given to the Executive President. The situation will be even more difficult for them if the President is a recluse, not easily accessible.

It is also said that Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa is aggrieved, though he has not openly objected to the draft 20A. Perhaps his silence was meant to test the political waters or let the polity speak for itself. However, the moment he found that the 20A, in its present form, had created resentment, even in the SLPP’s own ranks, he set in motion a corrective mechanism and set up a committee to go into the issue.

Commenting on the reported objections from a section of the Buddhist clergy, a leading Tamil MP said perhaps, the Sangha fears that Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism would be appropriated by the armed forces and that the monks might have to kowtow to the new military standard-bearers of Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism.

Colombo District MP Mano Ganeshan said while Sinhala-Buddhist nationalists might want to deny the minority Tamils and Muslims their political rights, they are committed to preserving democracy for the Sinhala Buddhist majority. They see the draft 20A as a threat to the democracy they have been enjoying for the last 70 years.

The Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) leaders, who are allies of the SLPP, worry that with the 20A, their role in the government will be further eroded. Top minister Nimal Sripala de Silva has reportedly warned some opposition MPs that attempts might be made to buy them off in time for voting on the 20A. The SLPP leader asked them not to yield to blandishments from the SLPP.

The SLPP now has 149 MPs, but it needs 150 at the barest minimum to get the 20A passed by the required two thirds majority. According to Ganeshan, the SLPP’s managers are fishing for at least ten MPs from the opposition and are ready to take even Muslims, who they have been avoiding since the Easter Sunday blasts in 2019. But till date, there is little or no sign of any crossovers from the opposition.

To exploit the current predicament of the ruling SLPP for the benefit of the Opposition, and in the absence of any effort by the Samagi Jana Blawegaya leader Sajith Premadasa to act, former Speaker and UNP leader Karu Jayasuriya, initiated a mass movement to oppose the 20A.

Everybody recognizes that the 19thAmendment has its flaws. The incumbent government could have amended some of its clauses to get rid of the dysfunctional aspects, and we in the opposition would have supported the move. But it is wrong to replace it with a draconian and dictatorial 20A. The solution to the ills of the 19A is not 18A plus,” Ganeshan said recalling the 18A of 2010 by which the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa got extraordinary powers.

The 18A was repealed and 19A was enacted in 2015 by the United National Party-led government.

Sino-Lankan relationship is a strategic partnership not limited to economic development, says China’s Acting Ambassador

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

China never forces Sri Lanka to choose sides and is happy with the latter’s friendship with its neighbors, Hu Wei told Kelum Bandara of Daily Mirror.

Sino-Lankan relationship is a strategic partnership not limited to economic development, says China’s Acting Ambassador

By Kelum Bandara/Daily Mirror

Colombo, September 14: The Acting Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Hu Wei, spoke to Daily Mirror about the present status of bilateral relations between China and Sri Lanka and responded to questions about controversial issues relating to China’s relations with the US and India. Here are Excerpts:

*How do you analyze the present status of Sino-Lankan bilateral relations?

I think it might be the best time of our bilateral relation in history. During the past half of the year, both the countries suffered a lot from the COVID-19 pandemic. Our bilateral relations have stood the test of difficulties again, and got even stronger. One best thing in the pandemic is that we learnt much more about our friendship. The two peoples supported each other during the past few months. With mutual support, we managed the situation better than other countries.

*In my recent interview with Foreign Secretary Jayanath Colombage, he spelled out that Sri Lanka will reach out to China for economic cooperation. However, he said Sri Lanka would never compromise strategic security concerns of India. How does China view it?

First of all, every independent country should not compromise its own national interests for others. As far as Sri Lanka’s concerned, it should be Sri Lanka First. Secondly, China is a best friends and partner of Sri Lanka when we talk about economic cooperation. But actually our friendship is far beyond that. Our relationship is based on strategic partnership cooperation, not economic development only. As you know, we supported each other even during the past few months in the fight against the pandemic. Numerous amounts of urgent medical supplies including more than 73,000 testing kits, 4.5 million face masks, 54,000 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) have been donated after the coronavirus outbreak in Sri Lanka, which were not only from Chinese central government, but also from local governments, companies, organizations and ordinary people. During the past decade, in the international arena, China always defended Sri Lanka for many key issues. We should not limit our cooperation to economic relations only. It is much more colorful, broader and deeper than that.

*When you say strategic partnership cooperation, what do you mean by it?

As strategic partners, we should have a better understanding with each other. We support each other in matters of our core interests and defend each other. Whenever Sri Lankan government comes to China during difficult times, we will definitely help. If China need support in bilateral or multilateral issues and come to Sri Lanka, we receive similar solidarity from the island. It is a comprehensive partnership.

*How do you look at the security aspect in this case?

Sri Lanka, as an independent country, has normal security cooperation with all the neighboring countries no matter it is India, China or any other countries. We respect it. We are also open to it.

*Now, both China and Sri Lanka have contained COPVID-19. How do you see the potential for economic cooperation?

It is already on the way. We should not wait. Even during the past few months, even before the general election, both sides gave mind to strengthening economic cooperation, particularly to help the revival of economy in Sri Lanka. The embassy tried to extend cooperation both in finance and investment. We have already made some positive progress. In March, Sri Lanka needed some urgent loans to settle external borrowings and fight the pandemic. The China Development Bank provided a very concessionary loan of US $ 500 million within 10 days. There is another big investment of some US $ 300 million lined up in Hambantota, a big tyre manufacturing centre, under very positive negotiation. A lot of rubber is needed for tyre manufacturing. More than 2,000 direct and indirect jobs would be created for Sri Lanka.

*How big is demand for Sri Lankan rubber in China?

In China, there are already quite a few tyre manufacturing centres. But there is still a huge demand in the domestic and international markets. The only thing to worry about is whether Sri Lanka can provide enough rubber supplies to meet the demand.

*What is the current status of Colombo Port City Project?

It is a US $ 1.4 billion project. It has generated a lot of jobs as you see. They have already reclaimed land from the sea. For the past few months, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, a lot of infrastructure work has been done. According to the master plan, an international financial centre will come up as a pioneer. We are waiting for the enactment of legislation by Sri Lankan Parliament for the next phase of development.

*Recently, the United States imposed sanctions on China Communications Construction Company. It is the parent company of China Harbour Engineering Company which constructed the port city. Will it affect work here?

The Colombo Port City is Sri Lanka’s largest Foreign Direct Investment. US $ 1.4 billion is only for Phase 1. For the second phase in next two decades, there will be another US $ 13 billion investment and creating more than 83,000 jobs. It will be the new engine for economic revival of Sri Lanka.

Some subsidiary companies of CCCC are blacklisted, but China Harbour Engineering Corporation itself is not on the list as far as we learn. What more important is, I don’t think we need to worry about it too much. The Colombo Port City is a joint project in Sri Lankan territory, not in the US. Such unilateral sanctions from the US that severely intervene other sovereign countries’ internal affairs have no international legal effect at all and will not be accepted.

In 1950s, China and Sri Lanka signed the remarkable Rubber-Rice Pact” to break the blockade of the US. Its legacy is still guiding us. I do have confidence in current Sri Lankan government. The President and the Parliament were elected by the people. I believe they understand what people need and will firmly safeguard the national sovereignty and interests. If a government cannot even protect the largest foreign investment which benefits greatly the country and people, who will come for future investments? We have no reason to doubt about it. Colombo Port City project will be a new version of Rubber-Rice Pact” to break the western blockade. We will definitely succeed again.

*In the Indian media, we see a lot of criticism of projects involving China. Earlier, there was an idea for talks involving Sri Lanka, China and India on matters of concern. How receptive are you to that idea?

We should not be driven by some biased media. We are open to the idea of regional cooperation in Sri Lanka and the region. As a true friend, China never says China First and force Sri Lanka to choose sides. We don’t want to do so. We are happy that our friend is making friends with others, especially with its neighbors. That is normal and healthy international relations.

*Border tension is high between India and China. Will it have ripple effects in the region?

China and India are in close communication through diplomatic and military channels over the recent developments in the border areas. I do not wish to go into further details. While you will hear many stories from the other side, I would just like to emphasize one fact: during the past decades China has already solved the border issues with 12 out of its 14 neighboring countries through friendly and peaceful negotiations, not via conflicts and wars. After boundary demarcation, borders are not lines of tension anymore. They become bridges to connect two countries and two peoples together. We’ve developed the border areas with most of our neighbors successfully. China never seeks hegemony over its neighbors.

*Your idea on the impact of the U.S- China trade war on Sri Lanka?

I don’t think there is any big impact. You may have heard some stories from the western media about many foreign companies’ relocating from China to other countries. It’s not true. There are indeed some companies that moved out of China. It is not because of the so called trade war, but due to stricter regulations in China for environment protection and labour protection. Most of the international companies chose to stay in China because they cannot find a better or safer place than China especially after COVID-19 breakout. The US-China Business Council which represents more than 200 American companies with decades of experience in China, found that in its latest survey that its U.S. member companies remain focused on a long-term commitment to China, with 83% viewing China as the number one, or in the top five, priorities for global strategy, and almost 70% saying they are optimistic about the commercial prospects of the market over the next five years. 87% of the companies indicate they have no plans to move production operations out of China. Actually, in the second quarter of this year, the GDP growth of China is 3.2 percent, which marks the best performance compared with other major economies and provides more confidence to all the international companies in China.

*What is the next step of Sri Lanka – China cooperation on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)?

After the parliamentary elections, Sri Lanka has established a very strong government with two–thirds majority. This might be the best time for our cooperation. We can proceed with cooperation faster and broader. We can attract more investment from China to help Sri Lanka promote its economic and social developments.

*What do you push for more- infrastructure development or industrial zones?

To be frank, Sri Lanka needs both. In China, we say if you want to get rich, build the road first. Transportation is vitally important. Now It only takes two and half hours to reach Hambantota from Colombo thanks to the southern expressway. In the past, it might be more than seven hours. Industrial development is also very important for the whole nation, which is one of the biggest experience China learned from its 40 years reform and opening up. The potentials of Sri Lanka’s industrialization is huge.

*Is there any Chinese investment lined up for the construction of the central expressway and the Colombo-Ratnapura expressway?

As far as I know, Chinese companies and financial institutes are well engaged in the Central Expressway. Some of them are also interested in the Ratnapura part.

*Earlier, your President Xi Jinping invited President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to visit Beijing. Now, both the countries have contained COVID-19. Is there any possibility for such a visit to take place?

There is surely a possibility. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s visit to China is always on the top of priority list for both sides. Under current situation, we need to find a convenient time for both sides. Before that, some minister level visits may take place first to warm up, which is a normal practice for state visit. At the moment, Sri Lanka’s border is closed for visitors. We expect that there would be some flexible arrangement for the warming-up visits before the state visit.

*When it comes to the concept of free and open Indo-pacific policy advocated by the west, what does China expect?

We have no problem with free and open navigation. We are always supportive of it but sorry to see it has been used as an excuse to attack other countries especially China. The U.S. has not only set up its Indo-pacific command with over 300,000 personnel, but also deployed their military bases in the Indian Ocean. China doesn’t have any command or military base in the region. Who is threatening the free and open region, and who has more reason to worry about it?

*What do you expect Sri Lanka to do in this regard?

Sri Lanka with a unique strategic geo-political location, should adhere to free and open navigation. I think the island should stick to its sovereignty, independence and not accept any foreign interference . That is the key to its national interests.

*Is there any plan for the implementation of the next phase of the Hambantota port project?

As I mentioned, we have investments coming up. There is also bunkering business opened recently. Even HSBC set up Express Banking Centre there last month. We do have confidence in the bright future of the project.

*What are the plans for people to people exchanges?

That is also one of the most important things we are expecting to do. After the pandemic, there will be more and more people to people exchanges. Both the President and the Prime Minister told me that Sri Lanka was expecting more Chinese tourists. We also expect Chinese people to choose Sri Lanka first if they intend to travel abroad.

*In you view, what is unique about Sri Lanka?

First of all, the general perception among Chinese people is that Sri Lanka is a friendly country. That is the most important part. Chinese people are sometimes very cautious. They think about safety and security first when they choose their destination. In Sri Lanka, of course, we also have a lot of beautiful views.

*Finally, Sri Lankan government asks for a debt moratorium from China. Are you responding positively?

To be frank, I don’t think debt moratorium is a good option for Sri Lanka. It might only solve a small percentage of existing problems but with huge prices. Sri Lanka has a very good reputation of settling its debts although there are a lot of foreign debts. The island always honours its debt commitments, which is highly appreciated and should be cherished. The reputation helps Sri Lanka a lot in the international financial markets to get more assistance and confidence. Furthermore, investment is a much better option which could not only bring direct income for Sri Lankan government, jobs for Sri Lankan people, but also rebuild international confidence on Sri Lanka. As a true friend , China will always try to help in all the possible manners.

Sri Lankan Diplomatic Missions Abroad

September 15th, 2020

By Dr. Tilak S. Fernando Courtesy Ceylon Today

A major overhaul of Sri Lanka’s diplomatic service is well overdue. The new Government aims to re-organise and make significant changes in overseas diplomatic missions abroad. According to news Media in the Sunday newspapers, the reorganisation will come into effect within a month. 

Those diplomats who had been in service for too long, and who are over sixty years of age, and be over the age of sixty on 4 October 2020 will have to get back. It should also include minor staff (such as handymen, drivers and office assistants), sent from Sri Lanka, who have passed their retirement age. There have been cases in the past due to favouritism or nepotism where retired people were sent to overseas missions to circumvent their resident visa in the UK. A case in point was an educated chap sent to London as a handyman who could not even change a fused bulb! 

A diplomat is appointed to a foreign country by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Sri Lanka and maintained by the Government. His salary is paid in foreign currency according to the Sri Lankan salary structure. Still, other supplementary privileges such as housing allowance, entertainment allowance, and all other tax-free services including duty-free petrol, free telephone and exemption from TV licence fees etc., compensate for his salary in rupee conversions.

Development

The responsibility of the Diplomatic Corps is to maintain inter-Governmental relations with other Nations and diplomats of other countries to improve trade relations, tourism, exports and imports. Their function includes seeking assistance through periods of difficulty on the supply of arms and ammunition during conflicts (such as during the Separatist War in Sri Lanka). Diplomats also receive unique advantages and immunities to ensure efficiency in carrying out their duties on a mutual understanding.  They are immune to prosecution for any criminal offence, overseas Missions become inviolable and a diplomatic mission cannot be entered unless the diplomatic privilege is waived.

The diplomatic facility is often part of the Government service. In Sri Lanka, it forms a constituent part of the Foreign Ministry. Diplomats are supposed to use tact and diplomacy to aid effective communication, especially during negotiation, when attempting to be persuasive or assertive. Tact and diplomatic skills centre on an understanding of other people and being sensitive to their opinions, beliefs, ideas and feelings. They need to use thoughtful methods to aid effective communication. 

Reformation

During the reorganisation, some of the new diplomatic appointments will be hand-picked personally by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. They include individuals of standing, well qualified and after assessing their background and taking into consideration Sri Lanka’s Sovereignty, National Security and Implementation of the ‘Saubaghagye Dekma’  policy. Among them is a ‘founder cum a CEO of a Company Conglomerate,’ which is a resident in Los Angeles, USA.   The Presidential Secretariat issued a statement (news item) to refrain from protesting about the new appointments because selections were made personally by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa taking loyalty to the Nation into careful consideration.

Rotten Eggs

In the Forces, be it the Police, STF, Prisons and other Governmental Departments there are bound to be rotten eggs in the basket. Similarly, it happens in the Diplomatic service too. There have been instances where the same Ambassador/High Commissioner overstays longer than the contractual period (it might be the fault of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs).  In the case of the UK  Foreign Office, stringent actions was taken by the British Foreign Office once due to non-return of diplomatic officers at the Sri Lanka High Commission once their tour of duty expired. 

The fundamental problem stemmed from diplomatic officers, and non- diplomatic grade (so-called home-based staff) sent to London with families having school-going children. Once the families arrive in London (at the expense of the Sri Lanka Government), children get admitted to British seats of learning. The problem arises when such children get through ‘A’ level examinations or enter universities. In such circumstances diplomatic parents become reluctant to abandon their children in foreign environments. It is a natural feeling for which parents maybe pardoned. Parents, therefore, have no alternative but to seek any menial job to be with their children disregarding their former diplomatic status.

Political Asylum

There was a time when even diplomatic officers were allowed to seek ‘political asylum’ in the UK. Such conditions have since changed. Diplomatic officers could stay in Britain as long as the London Mission employed them.  It was due to a loophole in the British Immigration Law when diplomatic officers arrived in London, the  Immigration Officer at the Heathrow Airport stamped in their passports  only the date of arrival. All other visitors had a clause stating: The condition attached to the United Kingdom is at this moment varied to require the holder not to remain in the United Kingdom later than… …” It enabled the diplomatic staff to live within the UK as long as they wished, but could not leave the UK or re-enter had they left the diplomatic service. When they decided not to return, they forego the guarantee given to the Sri Lanka Government and lose out on their pension rights.

The most expensive outlay the Government had to bear was the rent paid on diplomats’ accommodation. Late Lakshman Kadirgamar then Minister of Foreign Affairs had a vision to buy suitable quarters for diplomatic staff in all overseas countries. The Foreign Minister’s wishes were supported only in one or two countries, and the allocated funds were returned to the Treasury. However, the Government managed to procure a residence for the High Commissioner in the UK at St. John’s Wood, North London. 

It was the only purchase made out of the Foreign Minister’s proposal. The investment comprised of an additional three bed-room house used by the seller’s gardener. A practical choice made by a junior secretary, who had newly arrived in London, who decided to convert the gardener’s cottage as his accommodation. It helped Sri Lankan diplomats, who succeeded him, to use it for years on end up to this day. In doing so, it allowed the Government to save thousands of Foreign Exchange from draining out of the diplomats’ housing budget in London. Nevertheless, some senior diplomats preferred to live in luxury apartments with swimming pools etc., and paying exorbitant rents, when their children were in University hostels. The Government’s monthly outlay on London diplomat’s accommodation was approximately £72,000 a month in the 1980s.

Missed opportunities

What the responsible Officials at the Sri Lanka High Commission  in London needed was to seek funds from the Bank of Ceylon, London Branch, to stand as a guarantor seek mortgages from British Banks/Building Societies to solve the accommodation problem of diplomats. But they missed the chance. It was a period when the UK went through an economic depression and the housing market slumped. 

The late President R. Premadasa had an alternate opinion to solve the accommodation problem in London.  He wanted to convert the un-used basement at 13, Hyde Park Gardens (High Commission building) into several flats. To fulfil his dream, he sent construction workers from Sri Lanka and transformed the vast basement into several apartments, thus solving the accommodation problem for diplomats to a certain extent.

Selection to Foreign Service

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs conducted a special examination to select Diplomatic officers for the overseas posts with a low pass-rate of test-takers. Even out of those who passed the exam, some officers did not show any knowledge of communicative English to promote trade and commerce, technology or friendly relations in the UK. They were unable to intermix with diplomats of other nations in London due to the language barrier. Instead, it was shameful on the part of some diplomatic officers getting involved in social intercourse by inviting their friends (in the same office) for a weekend ‘rice and curry sessions’ and vice versa. 

COVID-19

COVID-19 perhaps made a global change to the diplomatic corps. As the COVID-19  pandemic spread like wildfire, many Sri Lankans in foreign countries pleaded with President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to bring them home. It was because Sri Lanka acquired International recognition for controlling the pandemic by maintaining a centralised health care system effectively. 

The President advised all foreign Missions to register those who wanted to return home in a recurring schedule. It made some of the Embassies work at full tilt and arrange everyone’s return systematically. Some Sri Lankans being over-anxious to return home, behaved irrationally blaming the Sri Lankan Embassy officials.  

The Sri Lanka embassy in  Rome is a typical example where embassy staff were working heartily and enthusiastically to help the stranded Sri Lankans in all parts of Italy  to return home due to the spread of COVID-19. Although the Sri Lankan Embassy in Rome and Consulate General of Sri Lanka, Milan, complied with the President’s order, yet, some Sri Lankans in Italy have gone on record for blaming and cursing the embassy staff out of their frustration.

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the attitudes of people globally and made them  think and act differently. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s wise decision to overhaul the entire diplomatic service abroad is timely.  One hopes the new set of diplomats and those who are already in service enthusiastically pull up their socks and follow the instructions of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who is a strict disciplinarian and who commits himself personally to working towards the welfare of every citizen.

The writer confirms and stands by his statements written about the Sri Lanka High Commission in the UK during the 1980s. He was living in London for many decades and experienced activities of the Sri Lanka High Commission in London, particularly by working as an additional London Correspondent for Sri Lankan newspapers. Many articles written about the Sri Lanka High Commission in London appears in his tilalksblog.com, under the ‘Bandia Series’.

tilakfernando@gmail.com

Tamil and Sinhala-Buddhist Unity: Cow Slaughter Ban

September 15th, 2020

By Dr. C. G. Ilangakoon Courtesy Ceylon Today

Tamil and Sinhala-Buddhist Unity: Cow Slaughter Ban

It’s high time we made use of the power of intelligence, gifted by God and discard fake concepts of political deception and obfuscations of scriptural texts, rooted, consecutively, in communal violence and religious racism. The Tamil voters, in the void of destructive racist politics and power-greedy opportunism, must understand that their peace and prosperity is a possibility, in the main, with the unity of the Sinhala Buddhist absolute majority. 

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, with the blessings of the President of Sri Lanka has courageously pioneered the initiative of proposing the cow slaughter ban. This is clearly the hands of friendship stretched out in cooperation and communal unity. The proposal comprises not only communal, but also religious unity, since the value of the cow slaughter ban is well analysed and thoroughly elucidated in Buddhism and Hinduism both being dignified global religions. 

Division destroys and unification builds. Unity is impossible by electing leaderships weakened by imbecility. That was what the Tamil and Muslim voters were engaged in, when electing strengthless and irresolute leaders of governance, demoralised by the absence of patriotism, respect and love for the rights of the original community and ever ready to brutally betray the community, Nation and religion. 

They enjoyed the fruits of weak leadership after the election of ‘good governance’. The Tamil and Muslim voters should be intelligent enough, not to underestimate the majority of the original community in this country. They are well capable of uniting, if and when really needed. The best examples were the last Presidential and General Elections. They successfully defeated even the system of proportional representation, branded to have been the judicial messiah, which constrains the absolute majority in Parliament.

Now, the Nation has elected a powerful and courageous leadership, well capable of naming things, for what they truly are. Hence, this is the best chance for Tamil voters to reshape their racist deception, inculcated by a politics of racist opportunism and be reframed into an innovative, farsighted, non-racist and profit-making vision.  Spring was brought to the North subsequent to the eradication of the exacerbation of the LTTE terrorism by the SLPP founded by the Chairperson of the Economic Prosperity Task Force of Sri Lanka, Basil Rajapaksa. 

It is true that Sri Lanka, notwithstanding the presence of its multi-ethnicity and multi-religiosity, predominantly is the land of the Buddha. The title, ‘The Land of Buddha’, the pearl of the Indian Ocean has won to own, by the strength of the firm Buddhist roots, gripped in Heladiva, for an unbroken colossal period of more than 2,500 years, when no other community or religion ever existed in this land, to a degree, to the exclusion of the Tamils. The Dharma or the Teachings of Buddha is, one of the most beautiful and doctrinally deep, intelligently logical, above and beyond blind belief religions in the world, enriched with absolute tolerance of other religions and multi-culturalism, though some extremist groups of so-called religions try to abuse the innocence of its tolerance, to destroy Buddhism itself.

First Commandment

The first Commandment among the universal precepts of Buddhism is ‘Thou shall not kill’, which no other religion contains as its first Commandment and hence, it perfectly demonstrates the depth of its innocence and the altitude of loving-kindness it showers, towards life and the environment in general. And this is where; the killing of innocent animals to gratify the human greed of flesh consumption flexes its ignominious muscle of disgrace to the total contravention of wondrous ethics, compassionately elucidated by the Buddha.

Real Culprits

Animals are killed for consumption in the presence of a demand for their flesh. In the absence of a demand, no sane-thinking person is crazy to kill animals for joyous entertainment. Therefore, the actual sin of slaughtering animal’s falls, not on the butcher, but on the greedy community, whose insistence for flesh is the real cause that causes the slaughter. Thus, the sinful responsibility for killing innocent animals is to be ascribed to those, who are gripped by the greed of demanding flesh.

Who demands blood-oozing out flesh? Muslims can be pardoned. Their religion and tradition is not specific in prohibiting flesh. The Tamil banning focuses on the cow, though many Tamils are vegetarians. But, the Buddhists, in this respect have no excuse whatsoever. They simply are not supposed to kill and devour animal flesh!

Attacking Muslims

Some religionists, who seasonally or on an ad-hoc basis propagate the stoppage of cow slaughter, design attacks against Muslims. For example, when a Buddhist priest set himself on fire and sacrificed his life, demanding the abolition of cow slaughter, an anti-Buddhist tendency of attacking Muslim abattoirs and flesh-selling outlets erupted across the country. A team with two Buddhist monks came to the office of the current writer as well and demanded to join them in the charging campaign.

 It was categorically refused and they were compassionately explained that the true path to stop the cow slaughter is not attacking those who slaughter the animal. Instead by conquering oneself of the greed in one’s own mind for ‘stinking’ flesh, through the realisation of its atrocious sinfulness and as a result relinquishing the consumption of flesh of innocent animals in general and cow-flesh in particular. 

Why?

If people stop buying flesh, animals would not be killed, just to heap their flesh up in a corner until it will be spoiled with bundles of worms rolling around, defiling the environs with an unbearable stench. The majority of this country is Sinhala Buddhists. If they honestly observe the first Commandment of Buddha earnestly, 80 per cent of the cow-slaughter would stop with no necessity to attack anyone, proving the world, the beautiful silence, innocence and non-violence, elucidated by the Buddha.

Powerful Lesson

If the 80 per cent of Sinhala Buddhists would refrain from eating flesh in general and from devouring beef in particular that benevolent act would trigger an enormous energy, which will inject the power of compassionate kindness in to the hearts of all communities, including Muslims, who’s religious and community traditions allow flesh consumption. They will begin to think and re-think. To intelligently analyse and re-analyse, what they, up to now knew and believed in. Adoubt in what they were confident hitherto would spring up and the question, Can 80% of the populace of this island be wrong?” will begin to flex its muscle. This along can play the role of the catalyst, making ignorant people aware of the truth, innocently teaching a powerful lesson to flesh consumers, in the void of attacking them.

Blatant Lie

It is said that the Buddha discoursed that under certain circumstances a Buddhist is allowed to eat meat: If One did not kill the animal oneself, If one was not an accomplice to the slaughtering and one knows well that the animal was killed not for oneself.  

This is totally disrespectful to such an innocent teacher of wisdom as Buddha. It is totally and utterly impossible. A beautiful human-being, who never sinned even in his dreams, will not teach such spiritual rubbish! Which indirectly coax spiritually uninstructed common people, to consume flesh? The Buddhist priests, who teaches such criminal nonsense, are either ignorant or if not, willfully selfish. Some priests are ignorantly trapped in this ecclesiastical hogwash innocently, blindly believing in what the seniors preach and believing in some limited scriptural writings. Such scriptures must be destroyed to save Buddha from disrepute, they cause. Thus, such brutal explications should not be applied in our beautiful discussion here.

Mother Cow

The cow is virtually our second mother. It feeds us as our moms feed us by converting her blood to milk. The milk of the cow is not meant for us humans, but for its own calves. Yet, we get it. Then, the milk is not an end by itself. It is used to make lots of other products, we consume and relish like butter, cheese, gee, curd, fresh cream, ice cream and what not. It works in our fields. The bull carries our loads. Its dung is used as the manure. It is an innocent animal. It causes us no harm nor harms anyone else. It depends on grass for its survival. How can we slaughter this innocent animal and eat its flesh without remembering, pondering and feeling that we eat and devour our own Amma’s flesh? I am shocked. Perpetrating this heinous crime, can one call himself a human being? Hence, let’s drop eating cow-flesh.

Immediate Counter-argument

Flesh-lovers, who trust that animals are in this world, for them to kill and eat, on being encountered with the present suggestion, forthwith bring forth the following argument: Why must only beef be dropped? If flesh of other animals like goats, hens, rams etc. can be eaten, then why not beef?” The question seems to be logical, but not right. The appearance of its logicality is in the intelligence of one’s mind but the empirical existence of its righteousness is in the wisdom of the heart. The mind cannot feel. 

The mind alone cannot make a being, a human-being. It is the heart, with its beautiful feeling and perceptions that makes a being, a man. Hence, the answer, for the intelligence of such people, who counter with the above argument, is that, the fundamental objective of this innocent and humble proposal is, not to eat only beef and continue to consume other flesh types. But, to respectfully and compassionately initiate an inception or beginning, to stop the most cruel and brutal type of flesh-eating and then,…. to generate a  psychic foundation of self-respect and self-reliance,  to relinquish the consuming of other-flesh types and be, if possible, a vegetarian. Hence, lets drop eating cow-flesh.

Buddhist and the Follower of Buddha‘s Dharma

The majority of this island is Buddhists. The First Commandment of Buddha is ‘Thou Shall Not Kill’. My suggestion is Please don’t be a Buddhist, but, be a follower of the Buddha”. Until one becomes a follower of the Dharma of Buddha, one is destined to continue the animalistic instinct of devouring innocent animals’ flesh. While eating, you, not only eat its flesh, but also suck the blood of the animal. Now, what is the difference, between you and a vampire? One can become a Buddhist by means of a passport or an Identity Card or by being born in to a so-called Buddhist family. Yet, one cannot be a follower of the Buddha, without observing the Dharma, He taught. 

Then, if one violates the First Commandment, elucidated by the Buddha, he cannot self-identify and proclaim to the world that he is a Buddhist. He is an anti-Buddhist and his religion is not the Dharma, as was educated by Buddha. Therefore, by giving up eating beef, we can set a beautiful start to becoming an authentic Buddhist, who follows the existential contents of Dharma. Hence, let’s drop eating cow flesh.

Negativities of Flesh Consumption

By eating flesh a Buddhist becomes an anti-Buddhist. Further he also becomes a hypocrite. It converts one’s stomach in to a graveyard, wherein dead bodies are buried. It reduces one in to a person of anger. Without anger one cannot eat others’ flesh. The stupidity of intelligence cannot grasp the depth of this truth. One needs to be wise. It ruins one with the contamination of hatred. Without hating one cannot eat others flesh. It empowers one’s greed. It makes one selfish and self-centred. Without greed one cannot eat others flesh. 

The stupidity of intelligence cannot grasp the depth of this truth. One needs to be wise. It depicts that one is deluded. It is only someone who is deluded, who can eat flesh. With the right knowledge one cannot eat others flesh. 

The stupidity of intelligence cannot grasp the depth of this truth. One needs to be wise. It causes pain and agony to the animal. That pain and agony, energetically are deposited in the dead flesh. Thus one becomes the eater of pain and agony. Naturally, one cannot be a happy person.It causes fear and fright in the animal. That fear and fright energetically are deposited in the dead flesh. Thus one becomes the eater of fear and fright. Naturally, one cannot be a life fulfilled person. Direct killing or indirect influencing to kill is a shameful sin. Eating animal flesh indirectly influences the slaughter of animals. Thus, one becomes a shameless sinner.There are thousands of negativities. I shall not waste your time. The above are only few.

About the writer:

Dr.Gamini Ilangakoon is a Lawyer, specialising in International Treaty Laws

Sri Lanka’s trade deficit narrows in July 2020 as imports decline and exports rise

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

September, 15, 2020

According to the latest external trade data released by the Central Bank, country’s trade deficit narrowed in July 2020, with a more than expected rebound in merchandise exports and notable reduction in merchandise imports.

Sri Lanka’s external sector recovered further in July 2020 supported by an increase in merchandise exports and increased workers’ remittances amidst reduced merchandise imports.

Several notable achievements were observed in spite of the COVID-19 pandemic. Earnings from merchandise exports surpassed US$ 1 billion in July for the first time since January 2020 and recorded a positive year-on-year growth for the first time since February 2020.

As expected, merchandise imports remained subdued with the continuation of restrictions imposed on the importation of non-essential goods.

The deficit in the trade account narrowed by US$ 509 million in July 2020 to US$ 209 million, from US$ 717 million in July 2019, as exports increased while imports recorded a decline.

Also, on a cumulative basis, the trade deficit narrowed by US$ 844 million to US$ 3,470 million during the period January-July 2020 from US$ 4,314 million in the corresponding period of 2019.

Meanwhile, terms of trade, i.e., the ratio of the price of exports to the price of imports, declined by 4.1% (year on year) in July 2020 as export prices declined at a faster pace than the decline in import prices.

Exports

Earnings from merchandise exports continued to increase to US dollars 1,085 million in July 2020 from US dollars 894 million that was recorded in June 2020, with the gradual recovery of both domestic and global supply and demand chains and efforts by the government to support the export industries. On a year-on-year basis, earnings from merchandise exports recorded a growth of 8.7 per cent in July 2020. This positive growth observed for the first time since February 2020 emanated from increased earnings from all three major categories of exports, namely, agricultural, industrial, and mineral exports.

Earnings from agricultural exports increased significantly in July 2020 on a year-onyear basis. Except unmanufactured tobacco and seafood, all subcategories of agricultural exports recorded increases. Earnings from tea recorded a growth for the second consecutive month in July 2020, with higher average export prices and volumes, compared to July 2019. Earnings from spices increased with the higher export volumes of all sub categories of spices, while earnings from coconut products increased with higher average export prices of kernel products and higher export volumes of non kernel products. Meanwhile, earnings from minor agricultural products increased, led by higher exports of arecanuts. In contrast, earnings from seafood exports declined resulting from reduced demand for seafood from major export destinations including the USA.

Industrial exports recorded a growth in July 2020, year-on-year, for the first time since February 2020. This increase was due to increased earnings from exports related to food, beverages and tobacco, plastics and articles thereof, animal fodder, rubber products and printing industry products. With the considerable increase in earnings from personal protective equipment (PPE) such as face masks and protective suits, which are categorised under other made up articles, earnings from textiles and garments declined only marginally by 1.4 per cent in July 2020, led by lower garments exports to the USA and the EU. Meanwhile, despite a marginal decline in tyre exports, earnings from rubber products increased, led by exports of surgical and other gloves. Earnings from other subcategories of industrial exports including petroleum products, gems, diamonds and jewellery, base metals and articles and machinery and mechanical appliances declined during the month of July 2020.

Earnings from mineral exports increased in July 2020, year-on-year, led by higher earnings from ores, slag and ash exports along with earths and stone exports.

The export volume index improved by 26.1 per cent while the unit value index deteriorated by 13.8 per cent, in July 2020, indicating that the increase in exports was driven entirely by higher export volumes, compared to July 2019.

Imports

The year-on-year declining trend observed in expenditure on merchandise imports since March 2020 continued in July 2020 as well, recording a decline of 24.6 per cent, to US dollars 1,294 million. Expenditure on all major import sectors declined in July 2020. This reduction is partly attributed to the measures taken by the government to restrict the importation of selected non-essential goods.

The expenditure on intermediate goods imports declined in July 2020, year-on-year, led by fuel imports (-36.3 per cent) and the importation of textiles and textile articles (- 20.7 per cent). The reduction in expenditure in fuel imports was due to the refined and crude oil imports with lower petroleum prices in the international market. The average import price of crude oil declined to US dollars 46.23 per barrel in July 2020, compared to US dollars 68.73 a year ago. Import volumes of refined petroleum also declined, while higher volumes were recorded in crude oil and coal imports in July 2020 compared to July 2019. Meanwhile, the reduction in import expenditure of textiles and textile articles was led by lower imports of fabrics and yarn. Further, expenditure on all other sub categories under intermediate goods also declined in July 2020 compared to July 2019.

The expenditure on investment goods declined notably, with decline in all sub categories in July 2020, on a year-on-year basis, resulting from the restrictions imposed by the government to curtail import expenditure. Accordingly, expenditure on machinery and equipment (mainly engineering equipment, electronic equipment, telecommunications devices and machinery and equipment parts), building material (mainly iron and steel and articles thereof, plastic, rubber and glassware, ceramic products and cement) and transport equipment (mainly commercial vehicles such as tankers and bowsers and auto-trishaws) declined in July 2020 when compared with July 2019.

The expenditure on consumer goods declined led by non-food consumer goods imports, although the expenditure on food and beverages increased. As a result of import restrictions, the non-food consumer goods imports declined with lower expenditure on all sub categories except telecommunication devices (mainly mobile phones) and medical and pharmaceuticals. Expenditure on personal vehicle imports declined considerably by 93.6 per cent in July 2020, the lowest monthly outlay since December 2009. Meanwhile, import expenditure on food and beverages increased in July 2020, led by import of sugar, fats and oils (mainly coconut oil) and vegetables (mainly lentils).

Both the import volume index and the unit value index declined by 16.1 per cent and 10.1 per cent, respectively, in July 2020, indicating that the decrease in import expenditure was driven both by lower volumes and lower prices when compared to July 2019.

Sri Lanka has potential to become one of world’s leading maritime hubs – President

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka can use its unique locational advantage to become one of the world’s leading maritime hubs, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa said today (15).

He pointed out that development goals could be achieved speedily by developing the ports in the country while emulating the world’s most advanced ports as examples.  

The President emphasized the need to develop the country’s ports to a higher level that would make them capable of attracting world’s largest cargo ships each with a capacity of 24,000 containers.

He made these remarks during a discussion held at the Presidential Secretariat today (15) on the future activities of the State Ministry of Warehouse Facilities, Container Yards, Port Supply Facilities and Boat and Ship Building Industry Development, the President’s Media Division (PMD) said.

The President further noted that the port system should be developed to cater to the needs of international vessels plying close to the country and in parallel to these initiatives Ports in Colombo, Galle, Trincomalee, Kankesanturai and Oluvil should be developed.   

The development of the Eastern and Western Terminals of the Colombo Port should be accelerated. A special attention was paid to upgrading the reshipment handling capacity, offering warehouse facilities and container terminals as well as supply facilities of international standards. 

It was also discussed to construct new warehouse facilities in areas such as Ratmalana, Peliyagoda and Veyangoda to promote Colombo Port as a Transshipment Hub. 

The government should intervene to construct fuel storage tanks and supply fuel to the vessels, the President said while authorizing the construction of a docking bay in Beruwala to facilitate the launch of large boats into the sea.

It is necessary to expand manufacturing, repairs and maintenance of ships and boats aiming the global market. The expansion of facilities to exchange naval staff centering main ports is also important’, President highlighted.

Minister Rohitha Abeygunawardena, State Minister Jayantha Samaraweera, Head of the Presidential Task Force on Economic Revival, Mr. Basil Rajapaksa, Secretary to the President P.B. Jayasundera, Secretaries of both Cabinet and State Ministries, Heads of the Line Institutes and entrepreneurs in the shipping industry were present at the discussion.

Six more arrivals test positive for COVID-19

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The total number of positive COVID-19 cases confirmed in the country reached 3,271 as six more arrivals tested positive for the virus today (15).

In the meantime, the number of recoveries from the disease in Sri Lanka moved up to 3,016 as 11 persons infected with the virus were discharged from hospitals upon recovery.

The Epidemiology Unit says that 242 active cases are currently under medical care.

Sri Lanka has thus far witnessed 13 deaths due to the virus outbreak.

Former intel. chiefs reveal national security flaws at PCoI on Easter attacks

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) investigating the Easter Sunday Attacks, heard evidence on Monday (14) from two former intelligence service chiefs – Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena and Retired DIG Sisira Mendis – who exposed a lack of responsibility and leadership in the country’s national security establishment.

During their individual testimonies, the subject of whose responsibility it was to take up the foreign intelligence warning of an imminent attack and the intelligence coordination meetings chaired by the Defence Secretary were disputed by both parties.

Testifying before the PCoI on Easter Sunday terror attacks for the 5th day, the former National Intelligence Chief was questioned on the letter of forewarning which was sent by the Director of State Intelligence Service Nilantha Jayawardena.

In response, Mendis told the Commission that he had received the letter marked Top Secret” in the morning on the 8th of April 2019 and that it noted a possible imminent attack by National Thowheed Jama’ath led by Zahran Hashim.

When the Additional Solicitor General asked the witness to divulge his religious faith, Mendis said he is a devout Buddhist and that his wife is a Roman Catholic.

Mendis was then questioned on the steps taken upon learning from the letter on the 8th of April that important churches could be targeted.

He replied: As soon as I received the letter in the morning on April 08, I tried to meet then-Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando, but it was futile. However, I was able to mee with him in the evening. During that meeting, I informed him of the foreign intelligence which raised a possible attack on churches.”

Then-Defence Secretary had stated, Let’s make Nilantha raise this during tomorrow’s intelligence coordination meeting.

The Additional Solicitor General has then inquired the witness whether the Director of State Intelligence was informed of the matter to which the witness replied, I forgot to inform that. However, it is the responsibility of State Intelligence to raise the piece of intelligence which was first received by him.

The Additional Solicitor General then asked if the former SIS chief Nilantha Jayawardena had expected some instructions from the chief of the National Intelligence by forwarding the initial piece of intelligence.

The witness responded that although he was the national intelligence chief, the SIS chief was not under him. He was under the Defence Secretary. Hence, I don’t know what instructions should be given to him. Besides he is the most senior officer in charge of the country’s main organization, which provides intelligence. He has never sought instructions from me.”


Meanwhile, former Director of SIS Nilantha Jayawardena appeared before the PCoI on Easter Sunday terror attacks where he was cross-examined by President’s Counsel Anura Meddegoda, representing IGP Pujith Jayasundara.

The witness was asked if he did not get the impression that Catholic churches frequented the most by people could be targeted since the initial foreign intelligence noted the possibility of an attack on important churches.

The response of Jayawardena was that he did have such an impression and thus informed the police department of intelligence information.

The chairman of the Commission then asked the witness as to why the term important churches” contained in the initial piece of information was revised to popular churches.

To this, the witness replied that although such a change was made during his translation, copies of the initial piece of intelligence were attached to the documents which were forwarded to the chief of the National Intelligence and the IGP.

He added, I also informed that ringleader Zahran Hashim is linked to the Kattankudy blast prior to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.”

Jayawardena went on to say, had the relevant officials taken the warning of a possible imminent attacks contained in the foreign intelligence, received on April 04, seriously, they could have asked him whether it is the same Zahran Hashim mentioned in the foreign intelligence who is linked to the Kattankudy motorcycle blast.

Yet no one made such an inquiry prior to the attacks,” he added.

Committee appointed on 20th amendment hands over report to PM

September 15th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The committee appointed to study and review the draft bill of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution handed over its report to Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa at Temple Trees today (15). 

Committee appointed on 20th amendment hands over report to PM

The nine-member committee comprised of Cabinet Ministers, State Ministers and MPs is chaired by Minister of Education Professor G.L. Peiris. 

The committee members briefed the Prime Minister on what needs to be added and amended, as identified by them during the review of the draft bill, the PM’s Office said.

PM Rajapaksa recently appointed the committee to study the proposed draft bill and make recommendations while its members had met yesterday (14).

The report is also expected to be tabled at the meeting of the Cabinet of Ministers scheduled for tomorrow (16).

The committee, chaired by Minister of Education Prof. G.L. Peiris, also consists of Cabinet Ministers Udaya Gammanpila, Ali Sabry, Nimal Siripala de Silva, Wimal Weerawansa, and State Ministers Susil Premajayantha, S. Viyalendran as well as MPs Dilan Perera, and Premanath C. Dolawatte.

Ruwan wins the vote to succeed Ranil

September 14th, 2020

H. L. D. Mahindapala

When the Working Committee of the UNP met yesterday at Siri Kotha  to decide who will succeed the Leader, Ranil Wickremesinghe, the voting was decisive: 28 voted for Ruwan Wijewardene and 10 voted for  Ravi Karunanayake, according to informed Party sources. It was a secret ballot. Shamal Senarath prepared the ballot papers. After the count Ranil did not declare the results officially.

The meeting began around 4.p.m with the Working Committee targeting  the 20 A. It was after that the issue of the next leadership came up.  Ranil began by saying that he had announced his intention to step down and according to Party rules it is necessary to appoint a successor. The Working  Committee was meeting today to pick the new leader. He was not going to name his choice. This meant that he was going to be neutral.

The first to open fire was Ravi Karunanayake. He led the attack pointing the finger directly at Ranil for not backing him. He told him bluntly that he had worked for him loyally and served the Party to the best of his ability. He said that he had also acted his Assistant Leader and he had all the qualifications. Pointing a finger at Ranil he asked : What is wrong with me? Why can’t I be the leader?”

Vajira Abeywardena urged the Ranil to name his nominee for the deputy leader as that would end any controversy. He said that no one  will oppose his nominee. We will all vote for your nominee” he said.

Lakshman Wijemanne said that Ranil had said  that he would step down and it is time that he appointed Karu Jayasuriya as the Leader.

Ranil Wickremesinghe replied that this was nor the time to discuss the leadership issue. The meeting was held  to discuss only the deputy leadership. There is time to discuss the question of leadership, he added.

Navin Dissanayake said that Ranll has the power to appoint General Secretary, Chairman, Treasurer and he also could nominate the Deputy Leader.  And, therefore, he should nominate a deputy leader. Why don’t you do that?” he asked.

But Ranil that he was not going to nominate anyone.

Ranil also asked the other contenders about their stand on the deputy leadership. Arjuna Ranatunga, Ranga Bandara, Daya Gamage, Akila Vajia Abeywardena, who had put out publication to boost his  chance, had declined at the last minute, leaving the contest open  for Ruwan and Ravi. At this point Ruwan Wijewardene was asked by Ranil what his position was on this issue.

Ruwan  explained that he has come forward at the request of the people and he had to respect their wishes. They had asked him to lead the Party in this  critical hour. He said that it was a request that he could not turn down.  He said he was ready to take on the responsibilities of restoring the Party to its former glory.

Ranil in his speech said that the issue of Deputy leader has been settled. There is still time to discuss future steps. The question of leadership will be discussed at a later time.

According to the Party constitution the term of the current Working Committee will end in December. A new Committee will be appointed by the new leader.

The meeting lasted till about 6.30. It has virtually ended the leadership issue that has plagued the Party in recent times, which culminated in Sajith Premadasa running away with the majority to form his wing of the UNP. However, political sources noted that Ranil Wickremesinghe will not step down from the leadership yet. He will remain as leader till end of the year. One of his mission in the interim will be to groom the new leader and ease him into his chair.

The Working Committee did not discuss the issue of Ranil being kicked upstairs into the UNP seat waiting to be filled by a Party nominee.

On the surface level it looks as if Ranil has thrown his weight  behind his nephew. But the numbers that worked of Ruwan indicate that the Working Committee has democratically elected the best of the two candidates. Between Ravi and Ruwan there was no other option – not to the Working Committee that has faced the worst defeat in the history of the UNP. What happened to the UNP at the Presidential and Parliamentary elections was stunning. It is like the entire population getting together and levelling the Himalayan mountain to sea level.  The task before the new leader is to raise the Party from the bottom to it former height. Rejuvenating the Party and regaining its historic status is the immediate task of the Party. To achieve this the UNP needs not only a new face but a clean face. 

To his everlasting credit it must admitted that Ranil Wickremesinghe, the departing leader of the UNP, has done two great deeds for the nation : 1. He established the ambulance service with the help of the Indians and 2. Put his weight behind the election of Ruwan Wijewardene as the new leader of the UNP. He had the choice of backing Ravi because the latter was his No.2 at the Right-wing International Democratic Union (IDU). Ravi, indeed, was the clone of Ranil in matters that were foreign. Both of them were the Sri Lankan representatives at the IDU. That is the closest political alliance linked by a Right-wing party to the Right-wing of the Western establishment. The Communist Party had links to  the Second Comintern under Stalin. Ranil and Ravi were hoping that they could reap substantial international and economic benefits being a part of the Bush-Howard-Thatcher gang. But it didn’t work they hoped it would.

Besides, Ravi’s is not the kind of material that would the inspire the nation to follow him. His image was ruined with his involvement in the Bond scandal. He was also linked to the issue of money he received from the convicted LTTE wheeler-dealer in New York, Raja Rajaratnam. Ruwan, on the contrary, has the credible and unsullied record behind  his image. If the UNP is to go anywhere it has to be on the back of one who can take it back to its roots of the Senanayakes. And who in the UNP can fit into that role other than Ruwan, the great-grandson of DS”? 

A Story from Coffee. Ideas for our economic revival.

September 14th, 2020

By Garvin Karunaratne , former G.A.Matara

The other day, locked down in Sri Lanka because of the Corona,  I ran out of the Starbucks Coffee I had brought with me. Being a coffee connoisseur,  the tastes of Island, Hariischandra and Wijeya Coffee did not satisfy me. I have yet to find Soul Coffee.  They are all the same- the same taste as half a century ago. They were all pure coffee, not blended to different tastes. I went to Coffe Bean, the leading coffee maker in Colombo that has a countless number of coffee outlets in Colombo  . Most of those joints only sold the coffee as a drink and ultimately they directed me to go to their headquarter store on Ward Place .  At Ward Place they offered me a pack of coffee beans imported from the USA-    at Rs 2400. That was a pack of 8 ozs. That size of  packet is sold at around  five pounds at Starbucks in London and Island Coffee sells this quantity  for around five hundred rupees

They ground the coffee and it tasted good.. I made inquiries.. The coffee beans, all roasted to taste,  had been imported from the USA- California, Camarillo CA 93012. California does not produce coffee. So the coffee comes from a non producing country to us, a coffee producer!  Coffee beans come mainly from African countries. the pack is sold in Califorrnia  for around seven dollars come to us and gets sold to us at Rs 2400 the equal of some ten pounds.

Sri Lanka instead of growing coffee has been importing from China, Malaysia, Thailand all countries visited by me where I have been struck with how they organize their agriculture. We also import from Mid East countries that do not grow coffee.

That is where our foreign exchange has been going since 1977. Once we did produce the best  coffee in the world. On my irrigation inspections in Kitulgala long ago I have seen coffee bushes full of coffee beans, bright red in colour. I have not seen that much of luscious growth anywhere else. I have also seen similar coffee in coffee bushes at Kotmale when I worked in Nuwara Eliya. But now Kotmale has been axed  by the Kotmale Dam- all to produce some  200 MW of power- some power that we could have easily produced from some 70    wind turbines scattered in Kotmale itself and the luscious productive  land in Kotmale and the charming people would have been saved. But that is another story. See   my Paper: Sitawaka Hydro Project:  in Lanka Web11/8/19. to understand the nuances in our development order where we sacrifice what development and production we have and more we justify doing it. I am sad that Sri Lanka had no leaders who could avoid getting bluffed by interested influentials and I hope that our new President will tackle problems efficiently. That brain that tackled the LTTE will I am dead cert will stand up to that task.

Kitulgala  is our coffee belt.  We do need to ban the import of coffee which  our President has done, I think. Simultaneously we have to encourage the picking of coffee pods from the existing coffee bushes, immediately get going with encouraging the coffee growers to put some manure and cow dung, and wear a mask and additional clothes when plucking because coffee bushes are also full of mosquitoes . There has to be a village organization to activize the coffee growers and also the Government must offer   a guaranteed price to buy coffee-like what we did in the Marketing Department in the Fifties when we offered guaranteed prices for many items that  we imported- that was in the Fifties and when production increased we ended that scheme. But now we have no organization to buy the produce.  Both the Marketing Department and the worthwhile sections of the Agrarian Services have been axed at the dictate of the International Monetary Fund that the Government should not attend to any commerce.

We do talk big about having guaranteed prices but the IMF axed the organization that we had built to implement that scheme. Motoring around Sri Lanka today I often spot the Agrarian Services stores- now overgrown with shrubs, neglected. Then they were  places vibrant with life, where the multipurpose cooperatives that purchased produce from producers and handed over. It is easy to talk of guaranteed prices but we should know that we do not now have the officialdom to purchase the produce. Take paddy we talk big about what we collect every season, but we forget that the benefit of the premium price has fattened the trader. The paddy producers have no cooperative stores to hand it over and sell to the traders for a song who hands it over to the government stores and benefit from the premium price. And our economic sleuths in our Ministries fail to grasp that the producer is left in the lurch while the traders benefit. The main aim of a  guaranteed premium price is to help the producer gain a premium price so that he will be encouraged to grow more.

Once in the Fifties working in the Agrarian Services in charge of the Anuradhapura District I had ten smart and able, very vibrant divisional officers, who could even sell ice to the Eskimoes. Under them I had some fifty trained overseers and they manned two hundred and ninety eight cultivation committees- where farmers would meet very often and get coaxed by me and my team to use fertilizer, improved seed and that was how the Green Revolution brought Sri Lanka to the brink of self sufficiency in paddy- all while implementing a scheme to offer rice at reduced rates to the needy- a target that had never been achieved in any country. Then I had the organization,. In fact then I remember we did import maize and I offered to produce all the maize that was imported in one season. One word from me and my giants- they were real giants and I was proud of them, would have mobilized the people through the vibrant cultivation committees.. The Government did not approve my suggestion and we worked only on paddy. Now we talk. The Government has to bring back the Marketing Department and the sections of the Agrarian Services that were axed. There is no other way.

Let us use our expertise to see what can be done for coffee. To start with   sad to say the Department of Agriculture is dead at the village level today. They have no organization at the village level and no men.  This happened some twenty eight years ago in 1992 when President Premadasa in one of his unguarded moments  promoted all Agricultural Overseers, some 2400 of them to the rank of Grama Niladhari. The specialists in agriculture the trained overseers all became white collar workers as Grama Niladharis, pushing pens on paper instead of working in the villages.

Sad to say till today there is no field level overseer trained in agriculture. Today the closest trained agricultural officer works at the divisional level. This officer  has a few thousands of farmers to cater to =  the needs of some 3500 farmers in Ranorawa and as much as 13,000 farmers in Yodakandiya, (From patriot Ranith Mulleriyawa : The Island 04/06/2013) In short today our specialist agriculture department has no base and as far as organizing be it coffee or any other crop our officers can plan on paper and send it to the divisional level. After that there can be no action whatsoever other than the Agricultural Instructor at the divisional level  meeting a few farmers and writing something back to the District Agricultural Officer. Then the statistics get transformed to documents on glazed paper and  ably documented. The Department of Agriculture,  figuratively is a monster  with provincial ministers, secretaries and directors with no legs, producing only reams of reports without a base!

So ends anything in agriculture, be it coffee, potatoes, maize or any other crop.

What we need immediately for Coffee is a guaranteed price and an organization to help the producer to produce more. There has also to be subsidies offered to get people to plant more coffee bushes. Further it is necessary that  some government organization gets cracking  to the task of finding how coffee can be blended to taste. Therein comes what I directed in Matara as the Government Agent in 1971. Our President has got the State Ministers on the move. It is necessary to get the mass of Government Agents and their vast staffs amounting to thousands cracking. Perhaps what I did at Matara may offer ideas.

I wanted to find the art of making a crayon to establish an industry. We requisitioned the science lab at Rahula Collage every evening from six to midnight and  we- my Planning Officer, a chemistry graduate and katcheri  officers were hard at work helped by the science teachers of Rahula to find the art of making crayons. It took a myriad of experimental trials and we did find the art of making crayons in three months. Then we dragged in the cooperatives  to establish Coop Crayon, which was a great success.  Sumanapala Dhanayake the Member of Parliament for Deniyaya happened to be the President of the Coop Union at Morawaka  and I can in nostalgia recall getting down to make crayons. It was done in double quick time-in three weeks working on a 24 hour basis- on most days I too broke rest.  It was hailed as great success by the Minister of Industries Mr Subasingfhe and crayons were sold islandwide. That is what we immediately require for coffee- someone to experiment. Recently I stayed a few nights in a leading star resort in Anuradhapura and got to know the chief chef. I had a chat with him trying to entice him to blend coffee with a flash of vanilla and the likes to get different tastes. I can do no more- only talk. The Government has to take the lead to find the blends and get cracking in production  so that we can chase away Nescafe from our shores and save our valuable foreign exchange and also creating employment for our own people..

 In the days of Sirimavo we did have that organization – the Divisional Development Councils, the brain of Dr NM at work.  Dr NM is no more. . Our President is kindly requested to get cracking with a programme like the DDCP, a better one which will get down to work in producing what we need and thereby save foreign exchange as well as finding employment for our people. Stopping imports is the first step. This has to be supplemented  with a production base which we do not have.  My own work the Youth Self Employment Programme does flash in my mind. Then  I was marching with the Youth Officers in the villages and marshes of Bangladesh, guiding vocationally trained youths to establish ventures and they did succeed. Today the Ministry of Youth Development has  reformed to a  role of guiding youth to establish enterprises and mind you by now three million of them are at work- the largest employment creation programme the world has known. . My Paper Youth Employment: A Prime Necessity” in Lanka Web: 11/10/2019   tells it all. . (www..lankaweb.com/news/items/2019/10/11/youth-employment-a-prime-necessity)

We need new thinking for Sri Lanka to emerge under our new President.

I hope this paper will somehow reach the eyes of our new leaders.

Garvin Karunaratne, , Ph.D in Non Formal Education and Agricultural Economics (Michigan State University) garvin_karunaratne@ hotmail.com

Former Senior Assistant Commissioner of Agrarian Services and G.A. Matara

13/09/2020

People mandated to a new constitution, which must ensure Security, Safety, Law & Order, & Development:Please empower president with full executive powers without delay. -Public

September 14th, 2020

Sunil Yatalamatta Gamage 

Almost 41 years ago the first president of this country who had a long nose introduced a constitution which he boasted himself that he is capable to do anything in his power as the president, except converting man to a woman and women to man. he belong to present day demised UNP political wing of Sri Lanka.

People well aware the person in the above description. In those days there was a political analysis from well respected politicians of this country.They request not to appoint the above personal to take power of the country. And not to take back the country from the person after all as well. It is because his legacy & ideology will inflict much damage to country. The truth was his constitution was not designed to develop the country, or ensure security, safety, law and order of Sri Lanka. In a nutshell it was not a constitution to build the Sri Lanka our nation want to own. That constitution was made to become himself a little less status of a dictator. Otherwise, we would have been a proud nation in the world map by now. But our nation had the potential to be nation of such a glory in the world stage. Instead above presidents constitution brought curse to our nation. The curse represented in many forms to our country and its beautiful people of Tamils & Sinhalese. Some of them were 30 years long civil war, fragile economy, cultural devastation. During his time of ruling; Prof. Ediriweera Sarathchandra was attached with bicycle chains and dragged on the way, He falsely intervened to judiciary to abolished the civil rights of world first lady premier Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranayake. So that politician was a dictator to our motherland. I will not write down his name because he had done enormous tragedy to our beautiful country. The above person on the stage publicly addressed what is the use of learning history of the country” So the history subject was gradually removed from the books. Today history and anthropology are vital subject to learn because they are creative subjects for new inventions. Apple computers hires engineers who learned history & anthropology those people need for creativity & inventions. Some of the people will agree with me of that rulers rule was disgusting, but others will not, however that was the truth of his rule and legacy. Finally, he died suffering from a simple cold. Over the past yahapalana government his follower Ranil Wickramasinghe did the similar devastation to this country with his colleague Maithree. Both the people must retire from politics of this country and they are already convicted on the people judiciary.

19th amendment created commissions and they have been boasting of that achievement. Even present day speaks of the value of those commissions. But those institutions useless if they failed to protect security of the country. The police chief is held accountable for public security and he failed to deliver his security obligations to public in his capacity as the police chief and he himself had been in favor of politicians. The president cannot terminate his employment due to commissions involvement. Justice ministers came out with statistics the increasing numbers starting from year 2015. Doses the commissions do anything to reduce the increasing numbers? Democracy is not a company for few favoured people of the country. Democracy should be for the deserving people of this country. The commissions and 19th amendment was unable to ensure the safety of this country. Ranil and the gang defending each other for power. I am aware Ranil created a parliamentary committee to investigate Pascu Sunday attach. It was a jolly good investigation to pass time and forgotten the incident and they did that way. What was the outcome? Just after the meeting people in front of the committee of investigation those each other discussing and enjoying coffee in the back.What was the outcome of those cowards in this country? They have been playing games and enjoying the innocent people deaths of the massacre. The investigation was a clear slap on the face of Cardianl Malcom Ranjith. People have seen those videos and So called Fonseka, Ravi Karunanayake, A. Marasinghe was there with others. It was a complete joke for the people of this country. First of all most of those parliamentarians have been convicted in the peoples court doing crimes against the humanity. Eg. Ravi karunanayake  was in the committee as a member. Should he be in any committee of this country?

Arjuna Ranatunga wants Ranil wrickramasinghe to be name as the national list member to current legislative assembly. Arjuna Ranatunga want to be the leader of United National Party as well. I feel so sad about this person. He was a brilliant cricketer of our country. He brought big cricket win to our country. Sri Lankan people respect him a lot as he was the only person who brought that prestige to our nation. There is no doubt about it. In those days he was a national hero t. Then he entered into politics. Mr. Ranatunga it was a mistake that he entered into politics of this country. He needs to understand that he was fallen from a cliff and ruined his entire flushing respect he had earned from the people of this country. Now he is nothing in this country. People who earned respect doing some great performance better to stay and maintain that prestige and away from politics, which he or she doesn’t know in depth. People of this country do have a huge respect to our legendary Muttiah Mulidharan and please stay as the way you are right now and keep your earned respect and don’t let it spoiled by entering into politics of this country. Same tragedy happen to Sanath Jayasooriya. Arjuna Ranatunga never ever help to develop cricket in this country but he critisizied incidence with giving solutions. I believe if he stayed in cricket he would have been a great person in cricket world in this country as well as abroad. I thing he was not capable or he didn’t have such a vibrant personality to be a veteran cricketer after all. 

We urge the government to implement 20th constitutional change and make the way to president to continue his work for the country. People of the country always behind this government. Until the new constitution drafted; executive presidency is a must to this country to remove all the constitutional mockery to be removed which had been introduced by so called Yahapalana regime. Yahapalanaya trying their best to convince people that they won democracy in this country through commissions and introduced a democracy nowhere in this world. But it was not, simply it was a fake gang democracy in the country to satisfy certain interested groups of the country and abroad. Dual citizenship is not a problem to discuss anymore. There is nothing wrong having dual citizenship. Many civilized countries in the world accept dual citizenship and has achieved much development because of those people. For example I want to serve my country in my field of studies, which will be more beneficial to public. If I could do that service that would have been outstanding to deserving people of the country. General public will be benefited out that service in every where of the country. So when it comes to dual citizenship; it need to be find out intention of the personal. Most expatriate want to serve their motherland, and it will be much more progressive to our motherland. I do not understand Harsha de Siva so reluctant to dual citizenship. I personally unhappy of this person as he is not doing to the country out of his academics. He has become a cheap politician in this country. 

Deforesting of wanathavilluwa hurts a lot as I am a person of loving and caring to forest reserves of the country. We have seen in our own eyes person called Abu Bhakkar Insaffe a provincial politician bribing some media people when they actively making photos of the area. We have a minister and so many institutions to protect and nurture the nature but trees have been cut down and vandalized after all has been done media public those pictures. It is heart breaking to see all these, as they are going on with this president’s government. We are quite worried of  national forests devastation. The ministerial intervention to protect them not adequate enough. The person may be punished upon the investigation of cut down trees but with the devastation; the contribution to ecological balanced will never be able to back to normal again. Please introduced heavy fines and life imprisonment for ecological damages of this country. Unfortunately, most of them done by politicians of this country.  These are heinous crimes to the country. If Wanathavilluwa forest reserve was protected and educated people the valued trees would have been protected. It would have been turn to a park of protected trees of scarce trees in world” this could have been the concept to earn money from tourist attraction and earn money. 

Media has surfaced the huge deforestation pictures, and again 5 acres of land has been cut down? Who is responsible for these activities. The forest and wild life minister does media briefing to punish those people who are responsible. But Mr. Minister your primary jobs is protect those forest reserves before cutting them down.  If you are the minister your prime job is to protect them. If you are unable to do so please resign from your job let president to appoint a suitable person to the ministerial position. It is quite sad and you must be regret as the minister has been unable to protect those valuable trees preventing cutting down. It seems like people need to take a different approach to protect our forest reserves. The best way to protect the forest reserves is organize community watch groups. If they were to find out information involving to cut down forest reserves they must complain municipalities & police and the president. I know he is tough on issues of environment. Most information we hear through media quite difficult as most rare but expensive Burutha, Kaluwara trees have being cut down. I believe people involved into such big forest devastation is doing with the political help of the Puttalam district. Please jail those criminals in life time imprisonment without a payroll. Sanath Nishantha Perera says the land which has been cut down trees, E.G Burutha , palu , and Kaluwara belong to deserted and isolated piece of land. This person sometime ago fall into trouble with environmentalist, and the environmentalist lady came up very rightly against him as he was defending the act of forest devastation. This person must be aware when it come to environment; they are sensitive subjects to people. We know this person is lying, and he is undermining the whole heart focused efforts of protection of the environment. The argument here is we accept right live of people but we want accept cutting down trees of the environment and then justifying the act of damaged caused by commenting false claims. The Previous government Bathudeen did same to Wilpattu. This is bad as it is happening again, and we are so unfortunate to experience the environment tragedy with this government as well. Please don’t let forest reserves devastation an incident of Water Gate” to topple the present government of Sri Lanka.    

Dharshana Haundungoda has a typical way of blog presentations. If he is criticizing the government from his point of view; it has to be the view of the general public. Otherwise you will not be able to make a living through your presentations. Love your country, stand for the country when you criticize incidents or people. I remember your discussion with Ranil wickramasinghe, if you were to educate people public and if you were a patriot of country; you could have ask a valid questions, which always right to ask from Ranil Wickramsinghe. The question is this. Do you think Hon. Ranil Wickramasinghe the decision to appoint Arjun Mahendran as the governor of central bank was a correct decision in midst of a protest? You could have dig into more question knowing more about him. Unfortunately, you never did it. If you want to make a living from media you need to make sure to be patriot to your country and try to represent people’s honest feelings through media.

The Ranil Maithree wickramasinghe government was not a single entity. There were many people & parties belong to that rule. There were huge media journalist panel campaign parallel to support them. One of the key members of the group was the soft spoken Sarath Wijesooriya, Late Maduluwawe Sobitha, Gamini Weyangoda, Jayampathi wickramaratna with Sumanthiran of constitution council for constitutional change, NGO, Foreign ambassadors of this country, American Embassy, etc. All of those were involved to that rule. They were campaigning democracy and rule & discussions in media. The key people in those discussions were Mr. Janaranjana, Gamini Veyangoda. There was looming instability through out the country Janaranjana, and Gamini Veyangoda, soft spoken Sarath Wijesooriya was trying to convince democracy they achieved over Mahinda Rajapakse government. However, at the same time a huge influx of public at Madamulana, wanting them to come back Mahinda into politics in the country.

Political commentator Chameera Perera at Dawasa program has promoted something which is detrimental to our country. Chameera Perera belong to same   members of the group with late Maduluwawe sobitha who tried to made Rotti” by mobilizing the people against the Rajapakse government. Keerthi Thennakoon alson was commenting against constitutional change. I am surprised of these people are they working for the people of this country or some others. People mandated the government to do the change, and that change is inevitable. I want to highlight Roshan Watawala to promote good things happening in this government.  Igniting and mobilizing public to an unknown freedom is bad, that is not the good practice of media freedom. Please try to identify good things happening in this government & discuss that good activity with a panel of expertise which will be more benefit to people of this country. Sri Lankan media institutions and their media personal need more training on how to identify what is reporting, distinguish good reporting form bad. They always compete with other media channels to gain more ratings only. The defense ministry and forces in full operational to counter & eradicate underworld and drug business and its spreading in the country. Just to let everybody know; 3 decades ago when first heroin addicted person identified the reporting was amazing. I do not remember the name of the reporter. But it was the most informative information to public as we were not aware about habit forming drugs and their abuse. The reporter reported The seed has planted in a fertile soil so we need to be vigilant of its danger to this country”. Please understand how dangerous the underworld and drug use in this country by now. The whole country is falling line with the government effort with unconditional support to eradicate the drug problem and underworld activities in this beautiful country. Please report that everyday if you are falling line with the pulse of the people of this country.

MCC – A Crime like no other!

September 14th, 2020

Sarath Bulathsinghala

14 Sep 2020

What is the use of all the sacrifices people have been asked to go through and are making if the likes of MCC come to pass. People will be made vassals in their own country. The nation is being encouraged to save, to grow, to be more self-reliant, to be more disciplined. All these for whose gain? Can the authorities be more honest with the people and let them know the specific advantages and benefits they will receive in the event MCC and the sister agreements come into effect? They have no moral right to talk with foreign powers behind the back of the people like the previous regime. They have no right to engage dubious individuals with shady pasts to decide on the future of our Motherland.

It is obvious the Americans want to use Sri Lanka as a staging post for their war like activities in the region according to the Indo-Pacific Strategy, they intend setting up to counter the Chinese influence in the region. If all these come to pass Sri Lanka will be left a desolate land desecrated and violated by the US soldiery as has happened in so many other countries before. China too has a role to play by not unnecessarily involving Sri Lanka in a power struggle not of their making.

The world has witnessed similar before when the US went to Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos to save the East from Communism. We saw what happened when Yugoslavia was destroyed and the resulting carnage – all in the name of restoring democracy. We saw what happened when the US led forces invaded the Middle East to save the world from Saddam Hussein that finally led to 9/11 and another invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq leading to ISIS destabilizing a swathe of countries and their citizenry. We saw the effect of ‘colour revolutions’ that ultimately ended up creating divided nations and more human misery. The established order however distasteful has now being replaced by a state of disorder leading to more human misery than ever before. Now we see all those people affected by the US led Western Christian Powers, invading the European heartland as refugees. In other words, they have messed up the world and now they are reaping an immigrant invasion.

We have to ask the people of Okinawa, Subic Bay, the Panamanians, Honduras, Chargossians, Haiti, Hawaii   Porto Ricans and similar others how much they love the Americans. Have they left any of those countries in any better shape since the American involvement in those countries? Finally, we have to ask if all those people who shout to heavens Black Lives Matter” how they feel about their own country?

The US intend setting up a land corridor from Colombo to Trincomalee through which they can move all their war logistics and Sri Lanka will never be the same again. The reason for land titles and improvements to the road infrastructure are all to benefit the invader – for him to buy land and then use the road facilities to move about freely all over Sri Lanka – no passports. no visas, not subject to Sri Lanka law. Even the British during World War II referred to the Americans as – “overpaid, overfed, over dressed, oversexed and over here”!

This very same thing happened to Hawaii and today the Hawaiians are second class citizens in their own country. To sell country down the drain for a mess of pottage amounting to less than $500 Million Dollars is a crime like no other in the history of Sri Lanka! 

Furthermore, this is an issue which should be tackled in consultation with all other countries in the region. Definitely an American presence of this scale does not bode well for anybody – not in Sri Lanka – not in South Asia!

The reason the previous Yahapalanaya led by Ranil W sold Hambantota to the Chinese is a fait accompli to make MCC happen! This to give an excuse to the Americans, Indians and others of their ilk to ask for a pound of flesh from Sri Lanka to even out the balance of forces. 

The Chinese loan for the construction of the Hambantota Port was ~$1.5 Billion. Now for a consideration of less than that amount we have handed over not only the Port per se but also an indescribably a valuable piece of real estate on which the port sits on a supposed to be lease that can go up to 198 years! There is nobody living today to witness what will happen to this land with a title that goes in history beyond 2600 years. What sort of a deal is this? Those involved must be brought to book and sent to prison!

RANIL W WAS TASKED TO MAKE SRI LANKA A FAILED STATE. DURING THE LAST 5 YEARS THAT WAS HIS MAIN JOB SET UP BY HIS TASKMASTERS IN WASHINGTON AND TO WHICH HE AND HIS COHORTS SO WILLINGLY SUBSCRIBED IS NOW MORE THAN OBVIOUS. HE MADE ARRANGEMENTS TO BRING DOWN THE ECONOMY WITHIN WEEKS OF GRABBING POWER – RESULT BOND SCAMS! HE MADE ARRANGEMENTS TO DESTROY SRI LANKA’S SECURITY STRUCTURES – RESULT EASTER SUNDAY ATTACKS AND RISE OF JIHADISM! ATTACK ON AGRICULTURE – RESULT IMPORT DEPENDENT NATION. ALL THIS CAME TO PASS. FORTUNATELY FOR SRI LANKA, THE ORDINARY SRI LANKANS – MAJORITY SINHALA BUDDHISTS PREVAILED AND BROUGHT ABOUT A CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT AND A RESOUNDING WIN FOR POHOTTUWA AT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND LATER AT THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS NOT WITHSTANDING THE PANDEMIC! ARE ALL THESE SACRIFICES TO NO AVAIL! 

All those who voted for Pohottuwa never envisaged that they will have to face an issue so dire and traitorous such as the MCC sell out so early in this administration. This would out rank even Ranil W’s Central Bank Bond Scam several fold if it ever come to pass! May wise counsel prevail!

Only way is to strengthen Sri Lanka’s armed forces and begin national conscription. Only a strong Sri Lanka that can withstand the outside forces as well as provide security guarantees to India on her southern flank and to other nations in the region. It is strange how India is going to benefit from going into a partnership with the US, Japan and Australia to counter China. India should very well understand that the ultimate end game of the US led Western Christian Powers is to balkanize India – a country that is aspiring to be eventually as powerful as China in the coming decades. 

It is in the best interests of India and China to keep Sri Lanka neutral. Sri Lanka, just like Singapore should be afforded the wherewithal to become powerful militarily and keep the sea lanes south of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean safe for all comers including the US, Japan, Australia and other nations of the world.

CHINA IS NOT HELPING ANYBODY INCLUDING THEMSELVES IN HER STEAMROLLER DRIVE TO ‘COLONIZE’ OTHER NATIONS USING HER ECONOMIC STRENGTH. WHAT HAPPENED TO OTHER EMPIRES WILL BEFALL CHINA TOO IN THE END. BEING A NATIONS WITH MUCH WISDOM AND A KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE FROM HISTORY, CHINA SHOULD REFRAIN FROM BECOMING ANOTHER BULLY AND A FOLLY!

All compounded things are impermanent! Anichchawata Sankhara! – Lord Buddha

The Baseless & Diabolical Claim Of Tamil Genocide In Sri Lanka It’s Genesis and The Way to Eliminate It-A New Zealand Perspective-Webinar 16.8.20

September 14th, 2020

Dr. Chula Rajapakse MNZM FRCP(UK)FRACP( Aust/NZ) Wellington New Zealand

The about 10% Tamil minority in Sri Lanka were the privileged minority of one hundred and fifty years of  Divide and Rule” British Colonial administration, while the about 75% Sinhalese majority were the oppressed and disadvantaged majority, as they posed  the greatest threat to the colonial administration.

Thus at independence, nearly 90%of Engineers  and Surveyors and 60% of doctors, and a vast majority of the civilian administration were from the 10% Tamil minority. The first Sri Lankan to act as head of state in post independence Sri Lanka was a Tamil, Justice  C Nagalingam , i1954 as acting Governor General. The first army commander in post independent Sri Lanka was a Tamil, Brigadier Anton Muthucumaru . The longest serving attorney general in SL was a Tamil, Siva Pasupathy. Till the time of the LTTE uprising in July 1983, that forced, many Tamils to flee SL as refugees to the west, lest their children would be forcefully conscripted into the LTTE ranks, the level of Tamil representation in all walks of Sri Lanka life was  way more than the 10-12% Sri Lankan Tamils represented of the islands population.  This is hardly the picture of Tamil discrimination they had by now started orchestrating in the west and to the world

When the British left  Sri Lanka in 1948, attempts were made to redress the disadvantages of the Sinhalese especially in education. This led to the inevitable loss of the privileged status of Tamils and the over representation of Tamils in all walks of Sri Lankan life, especially in the much sort after positions. This was seen as and deliberately presented by some Tamils as discrimination to both fellow Tamils and the western world, ready to   believe any claim of  ‘’discrimination of a minority” . This led to the call in 1976  by some Tamils the TULF n Vadukuddai Northern SL, for  a separate state of Elam consisting of 2/3rds of the coast line  and 1/3 of the land  of Sri Lanka , for this now 12% minority. This really reflected the privileged mind set, they still had.

They tried to draw support for this avaricious objective by claiming Elam to represent the Traditional Homeland of Tamils” . This picture of  A Collection of Buddhist Shrines Dating Back To 3rd Century BC , still evident in the heart of Jaffna peninsula and other Buddhist archeological  monuments scattered through out Sri lanka   is witness to the fact that all of Sri Lanka was homeland to it’s Buddhist Sinhalese civilisation for 2500 years, as the Mahavamsa records. Tamis , Arabs & Malays were able to settle in various parts of SL , due to the kind & welcoming disposition inherent to Buddhism, acknowledged many times recently by no less a person than Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, head of the Roman catholic Church In SL

In 1983 this  separatist Elam movement became a brutal terrorist war against the rest of Sri Lanka, waged by the LTTE, ( Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam)., at one stage labelled the world’s most brutal by the FBI US, no less. They drew support in finance and propaganda for their bloody campaign from an Internationally based Tiger Diaspora, that had by then become well established in the west , especially in the UK, Canada and USA, cleverly exploiting their claim of  Minority Discrimination”, to hoodwink their unsuspecting host countries. Their hosts were ready believe these claims , without any evidence being supplied to support these claims, accepting it as the inevitable for a minority in a third world country.

The making of Sinhala, the mother tongue of the 75% majority in 1956, as the state language was one major complaint of the 12% Tamil minority. In most countries, much lesser percentage of the majority community would have been adequate to justify this. Not so for this minority used to 150 years of colonial privileges. The provisions of the Reasonable use of Tamil act that enshrined the right of every Tamil child to receive a free state education in the Tamil medium upto end of tertiary education, no different from a Sinhalese child, the right of every Tamil citizen to address the government for their wants in Tamil and receive a response in the same language, the provision for the courts in the Tamil majority districts to conduct their affairs in Tamil, and the right for any Tamil to compete for entry into the public service without any knowledge of Sinhalese provided they gained competence upto some level a few years later, did not satisfy the avaricious appetite of this once privileged group. Additionally this requirement to gain competence in Sinhalese , after joining  however was not a requirement in professional fields like in medicine  .   Now Both Sinhalese & Tamil are state languages on par with each other.

After three  decades, the brutal terrorism of the Tigers came to an end on 19th of May, 2009, when all of the LTTE Terrorists were laid to rest on the banks of Nandikadal Lagoon in Mullaitivu. This victory was  thanks to the transformation of what was once ceremonial security forces to a truly professional service, conforming to the highest standards, as was widely acknowledged .

However, the internationally based Tiger Diaspora, that supported   the Tigers with finance and propaganda  throughout,  were left entirely unscathed  as was their Billion dollar war chest amassed through Distortion (misinformation to justify tiger terror so enable collections in the west), Extortion , ( forcibly compelling Tamils whom the diaspora helped to achieve refugee status in the west to contribute large portions of their social service handouts and forcibly taxing”  by then well established Tamil businesses in the west) and Drug  & Human Trafficking (Tiger Diaspora groups have been exposed  of being guilty of this many times).  With this burgeoning war chest no longer required for arms purchases, they had plenty of resources to procure cash trapped TV stations like Channel 4  UK to produce infamous films like Sri Lanka Killing Fields”, to discredit SL and their war achievements. A New York times critic described this as a collection of video strips, un authored and unlocated  held together by a partial commentary that led the viewer to attribute all the ills shown, to be acts of the SL Security forces. Much of these strips have since been shown to be Tamil Tigers, clad in the uniforms of captured soldiers committing atrocities on these victims  

This new phase of discrediting the war efforts after  the annihilation of the Tiger fighters in SL in May 2009, was clearly a well planned move that was executed   within days of the fall of the Tigers in Sri Lanka, by this well  resourced , powerful and devious  Tiger Diaspora, to discredit  the Security Forces, by claiming that their victory had been achieved at the expense of gross human rights violations alleging an  unacceptable  loss of Tamil civilian lives of any  thing between 40,000 -100,000  in the last few weeks of the war. They claimed this to be the result of indiscriminate & even directed fire at fleeing civilians. Though all the evidence was that nothing was further from the truth, & that the civilian toll was of the order of 7000,  , they persisted in orchestrating these Tiger Diaspora allegations  internationally with Joseph Goebbelian zeal, as they had done with all their false propaganda through the earlier three decades, till these were believed in the west .

The assessment of the UN representative based in Colombo at the end of the war Sir John Holmes was that the Tamil civilian casualties were about 7000 at most. This  number was confirmed a few months later by a census carried out by the Tamil  University Teachers, as the probable number Tamil civilian casualties. Wiki leakes  leaked information   also revealed that defence attaches in both the UK and US embassies at that time had confirmed these numbers in their dispatches to their various countries and had also mentioned that but for the care taken by the SL security forces to minimise Tamil civilian casualties, the war would have been over well before and with less SL security forces casualties. Besides, it made no sense for the SL forces to attack civilians and then a few weeks later for these same civilians, nearly 300,000 of them to flee straight into the arms of the security forces to escape from the Tigers who had held them as hostages to use as human shields against the advancing SL forces. These were all confirmed by these civilians once in the safe haven of the camps arranged by the SL forces. Even more these civilians were resettled in their homes within a few months after the war , once the SL forces had risked their lives to demine these areas , heavily mined by the retreating Tigers.

All of these were confirmed by documents tabled in the British House of Lords in 2017 by Lord Naseby , who after a long battle accessed some of these original dispatches from  the UK  H/Commission in Colombo. Additionally the Paranagama Presidential Commission tasked with investigating allegations of missing ersons, cleared  SL forces of been complicit of systematic or direct killing of civilians .  Additionally these findings were endorsed by a panel of several internationally well known panel of legal experts on war crimes, headed by Sir Desmond de Silva QC from UK

 The Tigers derived their story of 40,000 casulaties or more initially  from  Gordon Weiss claiming from unnamed sources who later retracted it under questioning . He was  an UN employee based in Colombo in May 2009, who was after boosting sales of his book. The major boost for the claim came from the Darusman commission Report. This commission  having only interviewed the Tigers and Not SL sources, suggested this number as a credible allegation” but refused to reveal the source of this information for thirty years. So much for it’s credibility   This commission was appointed by the then UNSG to report to him on accountability provisions in SL, without the authority of the UN or UNSC and against the specific wishes of two of its members, Russia and China and hence not a UN report. However , this did not deter the Tiger Diaspora from orchestrating this as a  UN report to add muscle to their allegation. This label  UN Report”has since stuck

It did not take long for them to go a notch higher making these   evidence  of Tamil Genocide , even more appealing to the unsuspecting liberal western minds.  This allegation of Tamil Genocide has been craftily orchestrated since , even luring unsuspecting and misinformed  western  liberal parliamentarians to make this call, on their behalf,. This we saw most recently in May’20 with the Mayor  Columbine from Canada and NSW state parliamentarian Mr Hugh McDermott  from Australia, to coincide with the 11th anniversary of the fall of the Tigers.

If this is to be countered the first requirement would be  making this information on the truths behind the Tamil Genocide Claim , widely known in the west,  especially, Canada, UK and US , amongst it’s media  and politicians , state and federal.  These would  then need to be orchestrated repeatedly, at every opportunity and creating opportunities, just like the Tiger Diaspora has done with misinformation.. These message would need to be repeated using modern media of email and others . Messages  should be short  where the bold titles conveys the main message, and repeated frequently. Eye balling the title is what most would do and that should convey the main message  The aim would be to achieve  a default position in the minds of these recipients  and institutions  that Tamil Genocide has no factual basis” and that it was post independence loss of privileges enjoyed  under British colonial rule, was what was presented as discrimination”.

The next requirement is to highlight the motivation  among  a large section of the Diaspora, to continue to paint a negative picture  of Sri Lanka and a risk to their safety in SL if they were sent back to SL, even if there is none , as their continuing to enjoy western privileges  as refugees , depends on this.

On the other hand these should be coupled with information on life of Tamils in Sri Lanka now , showing the freedoms and opportunities they enjoy back in SL. A truly tri lingual Sri. Lanka would help the cause immensely. The Covid crisis has exposed the potential for TV & E teaching  & learning  and could be utilised to achieve this and so win –  win for all.

The third requirement   should be to focus  spot light  on  The Tiger Diaspora, the funders of terror in Sri Lanka  for over thirty years that saw the loss of over 300,000 lives , , now sitting snug in the comfort of their western homes. The call should be for a commission of inquiry, initially perhaps a Presidential Inquiry in Sri Lanka with a view to ultimately having them brought before courts, even international courts. This should provide something to keep them occupied, and away from orchestrating unsubstantiated calls of Tamil Genocide. There should also be an investigation to see if legal avenues could be used to curb the ongoing baseless allegations of Genocide, as a violation of the basic human rights of the accused , not to be subjected such ongoing baseless accusations

This three pronged approach should be coordinated and driven from Sri Lanka, utilising expatriates on the ground for advice , ideas and  to execution . The expatriates should use their clout with the vote to get the message across to their rulers , as the Tiger Diaspora has done so effectively.

Almost certainly, these should be driven by a dedicated  devision in the Foreign Ministry in the Government in SL , prepared for the long hall of a few decades. That was how long the battle with the sword  took to win and this battle with the pen would be more devious and could be even more prolonged . It is certainly more challenging than the battles on the field ,&  against a very wily opponent.

There should be a realisation in Colombo that, left unchecked or countered half-heartedly, the Tiger Diaspora has the capacity to undermine the SL administration’s  best developmental efforts, for a long time to come, using mislead western governments, and UN agencies, to aid them in this ,as we have seen since 2009.  

 However, these efforts, should not detract  from ongoing efforts at Integration rather than segregation as the answer to SL’ ethnic issues. Being truly trilingual and encouraging a fusion culture, perhaps fusion dances of the two cultures Barata Natyam and Kandyan Dancing ,  as we have in NZ who always sing the National anthem in two languages  English & Maori  are some thoughts.  

Thank You


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress