Manuka Wijesinghe.
It has been said that the great emperor Ashoka, seeing the immense bloodshed he had caused in the battle of Kalinga, filled with great remorse had introduced a new public policy; Ahimsa; ‘do no harm to living beings.’
Ahimsa was inspired by the idea that all living beings, possessing the spark of divine energy should not be harmed. Ahimsa is the seed that gave birth to the Jainism. On the other hand, we have been taught that the emperor Ashoka, filled with compassion after Kalinga, had converted to Buddhism and sent missionaries to surrounding kingdoms in order to spread the idea of ahimsa; non-violence.
It is immaterial if Ashoka was a Jain or a Buddhist, for ‘Ahimsa’ is noble and the foundation upon which the greatest pacifist religious philosophies of Jainism and Buddhism were built.
Yet, let us consider another angle. What if emperor Ashoka had adopted the policy of non-violence, not due to compassion but so as to make passive the neighboring kingdoms, so none would take revenge upon him? Or wage war against him?
Despite reason of motivation, Ahimsa was a noble decree. If not; history’s noblest. For two thousand years Ahimsa had been our Asian moral code. Even the many satyagrahas or passive resistance, with which Gandhi resisted the British empire were guided by the principle of Ahimsa.
Ahimsa is the first of Buddhism’s five precepts and it was the codex of the non-aligned movement, which was built upon the idea of Pancasila; the five precepts of Buddhism. These precepts, applied to geo-politics was understood as – Mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, Mutual non-aggression, Mutual non-interference in domestic affairs, Equality and mutual benefit and Peaceful co-existence.
These were the five cardinal features of the non-aligned movement founded in Bandung, Indonesia, by the Muslim head of the Indonesian state, President Sukarno, who insisted that ‘ahimsa’ should be the binding that held the non-aligned nations together.
The non-aligned movement was born, not immediately after the great war, but during the Cold War when it was evident that the west, unlike emperor Ashoka, was filled neither with remorse nor compassion, but continued to proliferate their military industrial complex; killing machines, in a new and imagined state of Cold War. And, into its black hole of Soviet bashing, idealism killing, lies, hate, propaganda and avarice, the third world was expected to gravitate.
The non-aligned movement was the grid that prevented this gravitational pull.
Unlike Asia and other third world nations, Europe has been a slaughter house for most of history. The United States has been a slaughter house, even in pre-history. But, after the second world war, when Europe was broke, its youth killed and crippled and Britain and its western alliances had won the war, not for their moral goodness, but for the superiority of their weapons and the sacrifice of human pawns, conscripted from the colonies and slaughtered in millions, for a war that had been caused by the most enlightened and industrialized of western nations; Germany, belatedly satiating its desire for colonial expansion, Lebensraum; living space, only then, when the Germans began moving east did Allies declare a war. Not because Hitler did anything extraordinary, for what he did was what the British, Belgians, French and Dutch had been doing in the colonies for most of modern history, but he was a contender in the colonial gambit. He had to be stopped before he conquered the vast terrain of natural resources in the Soviet homelands. He was stopped, not by the Allies but by the ten million Soviets who laid down their lives for Allied victory.
When the second world war ended the colonies had come of age. Furthermore, the colonial powers had reached their financial limits and could no longer execute direct influence in the colonies. Then, upon an idea of the US president, the United Nations (UN) was established for the purpose of preventing future wars. The UN charter required that member states maintain international peace and security, uphold international law, achieve higher standards of living for citizens and maintain human rights and fundamental freedom for all without distinction.
The member states had long realized that the achievement of higher living standards for citizens could be won, only with decolonization. Hence, in 1960, the UN general assembly passed Resolution 1514(XV), declaring the granting of Independence to colonial countries and people. Former subjects were about to get the same rights as their masters. ‘Equal rights and the self determination of people’ was the modern world’s Ahimsa.
But, was its intent the same?
It was not. Deceiving the recently independent nations with democratic and equal rights rhetoric, the west continued to do what they always did; siphon the wealth of nations though privately owned foreign companies and corrupt native elites. Along with it, their modus operandi, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) began the weaponization of religion.
The United Nations had a noble charter, but even its General Secretary’s hands were tied by its western veto powers. While the first general director paid lip service to the charter, its second general director, Dag Hammarskjöld, opposing the will of the imperial powers attempted to ensure the correct and just decolonization procedure so that new nations would have the fiscal reserves to survive.
In the bitter battle that erupted in Congo, when former imperialists sabotaged a legitimate election, refused to cede the most lucrative copper and cobalt mines and had its elected leader, Patrice Lumumba kidnapped and killed, Dag Hammarskjöld did everything contained in the UN charter to enable the peaceful birth of the new republic of Congo. For that, he was killed. (1)
Dag Hammarskjöld’s murder was the proof that the colonial game, despite the United Nations had not ended. The western veto powers were stronger than the united voice of the third world nations. And their fine words, Democracy, human rights and equality to all races; mere sophistry.
Is the west inherently evil?
By 1977, with the beginning of our neo-liberal adventure, many of the founders of the non- aligned movement had been deposed by militaries funded and trained by the CIA. And our own mother of non-alignement, Sirimavo, was about to be removed of her civic rights.
Yet, had Ceylon been spared?
Five years after the first non-aligned summit in Bandung, Indonesia, in 1959, we lost a Prime Minister to an assassin’s bullet. This Prime Minister, in contrast to his predecessors was a Socialist. Coincidentally, it was the fear of Communism and its milder version of Socialism against which the United States built its military industrial complex, under the pretext of the Cold War, began the funding of clandestine CIA operations such as the USAID, the Asia Foundation and many more. Their intention was that social equality, which is enshrined in Communist theory, should never prevail. And the best weapon to oppose it was the weaponization of religion.
In this context, let us consider, if Ven. Talduwa Somarama, the monk who assassinated the Prime Ministers. Had truly abandoned Ahimsa or had he merely been weaponized, as Buddhist monks had been, in South East Asia, during the Cold War? (2)
Would a Buddhist monk have abandoned ahimsa, merely because the Prime Minister wanted to give parity of language to the Tamil regions? In 1959, had language been a reason to kill? And if, who would have manipulated a monk’s mind that he would desecrate the very foundation upon which the Buddha’s dharma had been constructed? The order into which he had been ordained since the young age of fourteen. Would such a man kill a man at the age of 46? Would he so desecrate Buddhism, when the foundation of his very existence was Ahimsa? Or had he been indoctrinated and instigated in the cold war weaponization of Buddhism?
The famous Buddha Jayanthi of 1956, which manifested a birthdate for the Buddha, did not manifest from astrologers or soothsayers born in India or Ceylon. That birthdate was concocted by the CIA funded Asia foundation. (3) CIA and its operations were aimed at undermining traditional society. Its weaponization of religion frayed people and faiths which had coexisted amicably in mutual respect and reverence. The Buddha Jayanti created racial disharmony and a belligerent monkhood to whom chauvinistic nationalism was of greater importance than ahimsa.
Or, was Talduwa Somarama indoctrinated through his close association to Ven. Buddharakhita, the chief incumbent of the Kelaniya temple, whose main functionaries were pro American political actors of Ceylon’s United National Party?
A village monk, how much did Talduwa Somarama know of geo politics? Would he have killed a Prime Minister for an issue such as the parity of language for minorities when the Prime Minister had done something far greater for us? SWRD Bandaranaike had rid the British from their naval base in Trincomalee and returned the Trincomalee harbour back us. Could it not be perceived that the monk had been used as a pawn in a perceived threat of Socialism in Ceylon?
That what cannot be denied is that when the Buddhist monks, including Talduwa Somarama were assembled at Rosmead place, the Prime Minister’s residence, the last person to have seen the Prime Minister had been Bernhard Gufler; the US ambassador. Gufler had worked as a career officer for the US foreign service and after the second world war been instrumental in the winning over of Nazi Prisoners of War to serve American and European (Allied) interests in Europe and East Germany. He arrived in Ceylon, shortly after SWRD’s victory, when it was perceived that Ceylon, under the new Prime Minister was turning left. Gufler was no ordinary ambassador, he was an ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary. In other words, an officer of the highest rank, clearly on a special mission. As ambassador James J. Lowenstein, in his interview with ambassador Dennis Kux describes his time in Ceylon, when he was just a political officer,
‘Ambassador Lampton Berry rarely came to office and was replaced by a career officer by the name of Bernhard Gufler, a German expert but had been the deputy commissioner of the mission before. He knew everybody in the place. He knew the country well.’
‘He (Gufler) had begun life in the foreign service. He was one of the people who were originally trained in Russian…..’
‘I went with Gufler to the Prime Minister as a note taker When I got there he said, ´´I don’t think I will take a note taker, stay in the car and wait for me.’’. He went in and came out and we left Bandaranaike’s house. As we drove out, there was a popping sound. When we got back to the embassy a friend from British mission, who was their intelligence said to me, ‘Chap’s been shot’. I said, ‘what chap?’. He said, ‘The PM old boy’. I said, ‘Really, that’s impossible, we just saw him’. ‘Well’, he said, ‘He was shot right after you saw him.’ And indeed, he was. I think Gufler was the last person who saw him alive, I can’t imagine anybody else could have gotten in there between Gufler’s departure and the time of that shot. ‘
Had SWRD’s murder been an American and British plan of action?
On answering the question as to what the US’ issues were in Ceylon. Löwenstein states,
‘I would say benign neglect. The issues were cold war issues. Chinese presence. Chinese and Russian economic and political penetration, the cultural wars, non-alignment’
It was believed that the death of the Prime Minister would hail the UNP back to power, the UNP members who SWRD called ‘Black Englishmen’. But, contrary to expectation SWRD’s widow became the new Prime Minister. She may have faulted in leadership, but she did not return Trincomalee to the former colonial masters nor did she distance herself from non-alignment. Her loyalty to non- alignment’s charter ensured that India did not intervene in our local issues, despite local unrest. We were trusted and respected neighbours.
But, seven years later, one of SWRD’s ‘white Englishmen’ won the election. JR Jayawardane. His nickname was Yankee Dickey. With no hesitation, JR began to destroyed that what an independent post-colonial nation had worked hard to achieve and to sustain; national sovereignty with mutual friendship with bordering countries.
Firstly, he handed Trincomalee to a US proxy; a Singaporean company.
Then he allowed for the operation of the voice of America in Sri Lanka.
Then, in utmost secrecy, in 1978, just a few months following his victory, he sent his finance minister Ronnie de Mel to Washington, USA, to hammer the first nail on the coffin of non-alignment.
In Memorandum of Conversation 482; Sri Lanka’s finance Minster’s call on the secretary;
‘De Mel sates that Jayawardane’s government has adopted a pragmatic and practical policy in many areas and the time had now come for it to be more practical and pragmatic in its foreign policy. It has studied with great care, president Carter’s State of the Union message. Particularly the reference to the US’ desire to cooperate with States of South Asian region’
Furthermore he states, While Sri Lanka would remained basically non-aligned it now wished to play a different role in the area…..It could play a useful role in working out some form of consultative process amongst them in the face of Soviet aggression…..
There was no such thing as basically non-aligned. Either one was non-aligned or not. And, Sri Lanka, was not facing, either in 1978 or in the years before, any kind of Soviet aggression. The Soviets had always assisted us in education, culture, commerce and industry.
De Mel’s words as communicated by the foreign office states, President Jayawardane was prepared to take the initiative and that Sri Lanka was prepared to be responsive to Carter’s State of the Union address regarding the United States ‘’pursuing the possibility of gaining access to military facilities in the region in times of trouble’’ and in the event of open confrontation Sri Lanka would have ‘Only one friend, the United States.
That was an outright betrayal non-alignment. Yet, it does not end there.
JR’s Sri Lanka was prepared to give the US access to naval and other facilities.
And finally, special emphasis was laid on the importace that the offer be kept secret. For a leak cold be damaging to the JR Jayawardane government.
JR’s betrayal damaged, not the government, but the nation and its people forever.
Paddy lands were confiscated and made into free trade zones. These zones had no labour movements, worker rights nor compensation for physical injury. We became Asia’s Chile for in 1973, the Chilean Prime Minister Salvador Allende was assassinated by the CIA so that the United States could execute its Neo-Liberal agenda. It was a reign of terror with disappearances and torture, made possible by the military junta, with whom US and Chilean elite economists, executing the neo-liberal plan collaborated. They were known as the Chicago boys.
Was the purpose of Ronnie de Mel’s visit to Washington so that JR could implement the same Neo-Liberal agenda in our country? Was he preparing for a reign of terror too?
Yet, would we take it lightly if we were told that our government was building up its military arsenal against us? We would not. But what they planned could be done, through deception, by making us believe that the Tamil minority was preparing to create a separate Tamil state on our island.
And that is what the JR’s government did. They created ethnic conflict.
For the spread of lies and ethnic hatred, the Voice of America and the recently founded television stations proved its worth. Thus, ethnic harmony was shredded apart for the fruition of the Neo-Liberal plan; privatization, deregulation and the transfer of assets and control from the government sector to the private. Into the hands of JR’s clique; the neophyte Sinhala Buddhists who would achieve their objectives through the murder and the forced migration of our traditional urban traders; the Tamil trading communities.
The Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) was brought into being in 1979. Military medals and decorations created in 1981. A military Junta was being born, recruited only from Sinhala youth, who were indoctrinated into believing that Tamils, with whom we had shared this island since the birth of time, were our enemies. And had to be killed.
JR bragged a Dharmishta society. But it had no ahimsa.
When the Colombo blew up in flames, JR’s goons and thugs, who were brought in by Sri Lanka transport board vehicles, burned Colombo with election lists in their hands. They knew which homes, shops, factories, stores and restaurants was Tamil owned and which were not. The burned, only those that were Tamil.
Our civil war no accident. It was not because 13 soldiers had been killed. It was planned.
When a friend of mine questioned the director of the Indian Research and Analysis wing (RAW) as to why India supported Tamil terrorism. His answer was, ‘Because your President aligned himself to the USA.’
When JR betrayed non-alignment, he created a volcano which has been erupting since fifty years. And our religion, born from the compassion of Mahavira and the Buddha, lost ahimsa.
By the time his war ended 100,000 civilians, 50 thousand fighters, 27,000 thousand cadres, 28,000 army personnel, 1000 policemen, and 60,000 suspected subverts captured, killed and disappeared. Satya; truth, was elusive, for the PTA act had no transparency, no justice and no law.
Neo Liberalism has turned inwards – it is killing its children
Now, having destroyed a multitude of sovereign nations for a Neo-Liberal agenda, while propagating an apparition called Democracy, neo- liberalism has now turned inwards and begun the destruction of the human future. Its children.
This is the religion of gender ideology. Gender ideology is not science, it is a religious cult spread through the fanatical fervour of privately funded Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) in the pockets of the American financial institutions and the super rich. This ideology is nudging children towards the delusional belief that sexual identity is like a yo-yo and could be changed at whim, through medical intervention.
I have written about it, in an essay titled ‘Live not by lives’, which was intended, not for those who have decided to undergo sexual transition as adults, but for parents who are too gullible as to not realize that this ideology has nothing to do with human rights advocacy, but is a crime against the child.
‘Live Not by Lies’ was met with abuse and anger. I have lost friends and have been condemned as a white Christian, although I am neither for merely declaring that the human species has two distinct genders. Most of us have eyes to see and a brain to think. Indeed, there is the rare hermaphrodite, but that is caused by natural privation, not because nature decided to have a third sex.
Parents are losing fast against this ideology for most online platforms, peer pressure and well-funded NGO crusaders, such as the USAID, the EU, the Family planning and Psychiatric Associations are crusading for the transitioning of children. Gender fluidity is not a natural compulsion, it is a digitally advocated surrealist ideology. It could belong to a Dali painting or a science fiction movie, but it is not reality. And when made reality, is accompanied with incredible pain and harm. It is a dangerous fad that inevitably leads to puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, mastectomies, castration, cosmetic surgeries and finally, to a life of pain killer and anti-depressants and sterility.
In our country, a mother’s movement is striving to bring awareness. And indeed, as expected, they are being denounced. No man is unflawed. None of these mothers claim to be unflawed, but they have gathered, from many walks of life, as mothers, in the effort to inform the general public about the harm done to our children with the fallacies being taught in schools, under the subject of sex education. Today’s sex education claims that the human species has more than two sexes and sex is not designed at birth. But by choice. And a child has the freedom to make that choice.
But what is a price of that freedom of choice?
We need to practice ‘ahimsa’ towards our children.
But those who dare to speak are targeted as homophobes and anti-gays. They are not anti-gay; they merely want to protect children. Homosexuality has been accepted in our society and some of the most creative and artistic people are of the gay community. No one are against them, on the contrary they are loved, respected and even adulated; for their brilliance, wit and creativity.
That what is happening with the gender ideology is an insult to homosexuality too. That they too are being nudged, no longer to be happy about loving a person of the same sex, but to transition his physical form so as to become a medically and surgically manipulated trans male or a trans woman.
Again, an adult has the capacity to reason and apply that reason to the decisions he or she makes. If he decides for a life of a transgender, it is the choice he has made after receiving the necessary information regarding causal effects of his decision. A minor does not belong to this category. A minor (mostly under 18 years of age) is legally incompetent and unable to enter contracts and handle his own affairs. Hence, unfit to make life changing decisions for not comprehending the consequences of his decisions. We have a duty to protect them.
The youth who are leaning towards transitioning know no history, no medicine nor the debilitating consequences of medical intervention. They live in a world of science fiction, especially accentuated in the years of Covid policy and lock downs. These policies, ordered by the WHO and implemented by sovereign nations, disassociated children from friends, peers, families, activities, play and sports. Instead of calming them, policies pushed them towards computer screens where tech companies highlighted their fears, heightened their depression and nudged them towards digital platforms advocating trans gender ideologies as a way out of lock down misery.
Covid policy was a crime against everyman, but those who suffered the most were children. Their world ceased to be real and was made surreal. Their lives ceased to be based on empirical reality, instead; digital reality. Thereby, they lost touch with their parents and elders.
It was no accident. It was deliberate, orchestrated and planned. To create a generation of miserable and fearful children, susceptible to all the temptations of the medical industrial complex.
Such evil ideologies never came from the east. We are the regions that have born and cultivated ahimsa. But, since our economic deprivation we are forced, not only to take the west’s monies but to adopt their ideologies too. A Colombo 7 kid recently said to me, ‘gender ideology is good, it represents the rights of those who are stoned in our country for being gay’.
This kid goes to an international school, does not speak his parent’s mother tongue, orders Uber food instead of dining with family and spends his holidays in boutique and 5-star hotels and abroad. How would he know any normal man in this country, leave alone who is being stoned or lynched for being gay? This kid is disassociated from reality. He does not know that homosexuality was not considered a deprivation in our countries (we are not the prudish Chistian west) but an attribute. In a country that is still in awe of the arts, the gay community has been our finest artists. Furthermore, the occasional transvestite parties were places many loved to attend. They were lively, happy and carefree. While parenthood filled one with the burden of duty, gayness preserved the filigran beauty of the human creation.
Again, my argument is not brandishing adults who make informed choices, but children. How many of us have not, in school days, not been attracted to the same sex? What we used to call a crush? Like we got into it, we got out of it. Some of us became straight, a few gay. And some of us, despite early crushes, became parents and continued the species. And those crushes, happy memories of the age of childhood.
Today, there is no more age of childhood.
A child with a crush on another child of the same sex, before confiding in a parent or a friend, he checks out on internet what it means to have a crush on the same sex. Algorithms direct him to platforms which nudges him or her to think, that he could be gender fluid. That biological sex does not count. That the X and Y chromosome, the depositors of biological sex, is a lie. He is already self-diagnosed before being sent to a therapist. And then therapist then continues the charade. Parents are rendered helpless.
Biology does count. The whole edifice of gender theory is based on the fabricated research of a man named John Money whose own psychological trauma dealing with a violent father made him hate the male sex. He performed the castration of male babies when they could have lived lives as homosexuals or even straight, with a prescription of hormones that activated the pituitary gland in cases of retarded primary genitalia. John Money, the lore of Gender Theory and its dire consequences leading to the suicide and death of healthy children can be read and understood in John Colapinto’s book, ‘As nature made him.’
What are we doing to our children? Are we removing them of agency? Are we no longer raising them through storytelling, play acting and reading so they may discern between reality and fantasy. Wherever I speak to the young, they are all in the trap of therapy. These kids are not mentally diseases, they are ordinary children whose anxieties are normal.
Recently I met a child whose anxiety had risen shorty before an exam. The parents, instead of descending from their high horse of parental ambition and placating the child, send the child to therapist. Thus, indicating to the child, that his natural instinct is a state of disease. Kids do not need therapists, they need play.
The therapist is dependent on an imagined diseased state of mind for his income. In the case of this child, he recommended psychiatric consultation which led to the prescription of brain altering, addictive psychiatric drugs. Drugs were followed by further therapy. Exams have always stressed children. Parents of yester year, instead of creating disease out of a natural state, encouraged children to go out and play and to do what kids usually did. This was the best stress remover. The child did not lose his agency, but created within him the power to overcome stressful situations. That was the first lesson of endurance.
Or, a child goes to a foreign university and has difficulty finding friends. He calls his parents saying he has no friends The parents, instead of urging him to join some kind of activity group, where he could meet likeminded, recommends therapy. If everything in life has been digitized and reduced, that what has done a reverse turn has been psychiatric diagnosis.
Psychiatric disease are not pathologies, they are inventions. The DSM, or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is not science, it is fiction. There, everything we once considered to be normal has now been categorized as disease. Shyness, introversion, apprehension, anxiousness, melancholia, loneliness. These are not fixed states, they are like the ebb and flow of the tides, normal and fluctuating sentiments, now considered psychiatric disorders. That poor child who just left an Asian family to go to a Canadian university, for the inability to make immediate friends is diagnosed as having social anxiety disorder, limited exposure to situations conductive to meeting people disorder and low self-esteem disorder. And since the child is now at the receiving end of drugs, his personality is bound to change and in little time would be diagnosed as a schizoid personality and prescribed even more detrimental psychiatric drugs. The chances that this child would return to his former self, is slim.
No one who goes to a foreign country makes friends immediately. Friendship requires time, effort and above all; will. Parental recommendation of therapy instead of joining a club or an activity group in which the child may participate is a supreme indication of their incompetence and the ease with which they transfer a child’s agency to a complete stranger.
Strangers do not know children, parents do.
As Thomas Zsasz, the Hungarian American psychiatrist says, ‘The mental health apparatus of today is a gigantic apparatus of molestation. And its greatest victims are children.’
Do parents have no more influence on their children, are they no longer a child’s guide or seers? Have they been so disempowered by the digital revolution that they are unable to recollect the wisdom they received from mothers and grandmothers?
What is a woman? A woman is not just a birthing person as inclusive language (language of gender ideology) claims. A mother is far more; she is infinite. For us in the east, born into a heritage of ancient Vedic and puranic wisdom, creation occurs due to the moon’s interaction with the sun. The sun, while it is a symbol of male activity, the moon represents the mind, emotion, calm and intuition; the feminine principle.
The feminine principle is the seed that gives life to the male principle.
This feminine principle is, in the puranas, known as Jyoti; light.
She is none other than the supreme feminine goddess, Parvati, sitting in the middle of the Jyotilingam surrounded by the 7 rishis; the saptarishis or the seven seers. As Parashara, the author of Hora shastra; the science of Vedic astrology says, ‘each Rishi represents the energy of the 7 planets; Its intelligence and its rasa.’ Rasa is not merely taste, it is an essential life defining attribute. And Paravati, the divine mother is called Jyoti or light, for she absorbs the light of the seven Rishis. Jyoti in her maternal form is Saraswati. ‘Sa’, meaning all, ‘Rasa’, meaning quality and ‘Wati’, the possessor of the divine rasa.
That is the mother. And it is the rasa she receives from the Saptarishis she gives to her child through her nadi; pulse.
The mother is light. She is the light which dispels darkness. In a mother, agni burns and it is its light that she emanates from her right eye as dharma, from the left as compassion, while her third eye, the ajna, is rooted in satya; truth.
She knows if her child is a girl or a boy. And when in doubt, she has the ability to dispel the darkness of doubt. That is ahimsa. A mother must accept responsibility. She must know that our ancient wisdom has, the many clues to a child’s distress. It is sometimes easily explained through the movements of the planets. One only needs to wait for them to pass, as distress is likely to pass.
The Cyberspace that controls and grabs children is a maze created and controlled by those to whom the confusion, mutilation and the sterility of children are of material advantage. To whom it brings profit. ‘Follow the trail of money’ says the journalist Jennifer Bilek in her book, ‘Transsexual, Transgender, Transhuman’.
Instead of falling into the hollow rhetoric of social justice, one must, if one’s intent is saving the life of children, seek truth. Truth is not contained cyberspace. Cyberspace that that what is controlled by algorithms developed for maximum profit. It is a space that denounces those who do not sway from truth as right-wing extremists, religious fanatics and Nazis. Saving a child from the injuries he causes to himself for he is just too young to know is not right-wing extremism. That is ahimsa. Do no harm.
The history of medicine has two theories. Miasma and Germ theory. Miasma theory is that of fortifying the immune system through nutrition while reducing the body from exposure to toxins. Germ theory blames microbial pathogens to be the cause of disease and creates poisons to kill it. The totalitarian activity around the recent Covid industry is the evidence of the conquest of germ theory upon public health. The nudging and transitioning of children towards self-damaging puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, castration, top and bottom surgeries is the continuation of germ theory on a mental level. It is the antithesis of ahimsa; our Asian heritage which loves children.
Manuka Wijesinghe. 31.3.25
(1) Who killed Hammarskjold, Susan Williams (2) Cold War Monks, Eugene Ford (3) Freedom’s Laboratory, Andra Wolf (4) The Carter Documents
Further Reading.
Bad Therapy by Abigail Shreir. Transnation by Miriam Grossman, Transgender by Jennifer Bilek. Trans by Helen Joyce.
