The only way to ensure permanent peace in the North is for sinhala catholics, sinhala buddhists and muslim people to live in the Northern Province in at least equal number to the tamils
Posted on March 30th, 2014

plumblossom

It is very clear that the TNA is a separatist and extremist party and it is painfully clear that their final goal remains Eelam in a combined North and East of Sri Lanka.
 
What is of great concern is the TNA’s insistence in keeping the ethnic ratio of the Northern province static in order to finally achieve Eelam at some future date.
 
In my opinion, the only way to solve the tamil issue is for sinhala catholics, sinhala buddhists and muslims and any others (burghers, malays and others) to be relocated to the Northern province so that there is at least one third sinhala, one third muslim and one third tamils living in the Northern province, the same as in the East. Further, it is only justice in order to compensate for the gross ethnic cleansing of the sinhala catholics, sinhala buddhists and the muslims from the North by the ruthless tiger leadership in the past.
 
The TNA will jump up and down and complain to the so called ‘international community’. However, the Government should stand firm and respond by saying:
 
Has not the ethnic ratio changed in the Western province, North-Western province and the Central province drastically over years let alone the Uva province or even the Sabaragamuwa province during the last hundreds of years? Don’t these provinces have many ethnic groups living side by side in these provinces?
 
When the TNA gets dumbfounded by this statement, ask them then why should the ethnic ratio of the Northern province remain the same when the ethnic ratios of all other provinces have changed drastically over the years and almost all other provinces are ethnically diverse with many sinhala, tamil and muslims living side by side in almost all other provinces!? It is only justifiable in an ethnically diverse country such as Sri Lanka that all it’s provinces become ethnically diverse if there is to be peace in the island.
 
Why does the TNA think the Northern province is so special when almost all other provinces are ethnically diverse!?
 
Since the North and East of Sri Lanka comprise 28% of land, it is only reasonable that landless people from other areas of the country which is already over-populated at present be allowed to live in the North and cultivate since there is more free land available there. The Government should initiate a scheme immediately and invite the landless to apply to live and cultivate in the North from the other provinces.
 
Demand forcefully in an official demand by the Sri Lankan Government once and for all from the TNA and all other separatists (including the US, India , Canada and the UK) to stop calling the sinhalese ‘colonisers’ since the sinhalese have lived in this island for well over 2,500 years (including in the North for thousands of years). How dare all these people call us ‘colonisers’ in our own native island, in our own native country!? Demand once and for all never ever to use this abhorrent term ever again!
 
Ask the US and Canada in particular, how dare they call the sinhalese ‘colonisers’ (who have lived in this island for over 2,500 years including in the North of the country for thousands of years)? Then what on earth should anyone call the Americans and the Canadians (who in reality stole the native American’s and native first people’s land in those countries!)?
 
If India complains, tell them once and for all to stop calling for a ‘United Sri Lanka’ and tell them to their face straight that the name of our country is Sri Lanka and not ‘United Sri Lanka’ and that there is no such thing as a ‘United Sri Lanka’ and there is only a Sri Lanka and to respect the name of our country!
 
Also tell India once and for all to stop demanding Sri Lanka hand over land and police powers to the Provincial Councils since Sri Lanka will do no such thing since the Provincial Councils have been give the powers that they already have and that is more than sufficient and that this is it and no more discussion in this regard is welcome!
 
It is quite alarming that officials of the US Embassy along with the TNA have questioned sinhala returnees to the North recently. How dare the US or the TNA question the sinhala people’s right to live anywhere in our own country? It is our own fundamental right to live where we please (as long as we do not bother anyone else in the process). It is we sinhala people who should demand from the US official (in these circumstances) to explain to us why they stole native American’s land to ‘create’ a US!
 
Also, how dare the US officials question sinhala or muslim returnees since these people first suffered gross ethnic cleansing by the LTTE and is now being questioned about their right to live anywhere they please in their own God damned country!? How dare they indeed!
 
Additionally the US, India, Canada and the UK are only after the mineral, oil and other resources of the North and the East and to relocate their naval bases to Trincomalee that they are insidiously hatching up plans to create ‘Eelam’ at a future date that they are passing bogus resolutions at the UNHRC and creating a great hue and cry about land and police powers. As if these resource hungry and cunning countries have any right whatsoever to demand from us the natives of this island that we ‘hand over’ this and that to anybody. The North and the East is an integral part of Sri Lanka and this should be forcefully explained to the US, UK, India and Canada and they should be told that they have no business pushing their weight about in Sri Lanka.
 
The Government should initiate a relocation program for sinhala catholics, shinala buddhists and muslims from other over-populated provinces to relocate to the Northern province to live there since there is land there now to cultivate on.
 
This is the only way to bring peace to the North and the East to have at least one third sinhala, one third muslim and one third tamils live in the North. Otherwise we will have extremists and separatists like the TNA bother the peace of the island forever (including India who will also not stop bothering us ever and who will harass us forever as they have done for the past thousand years at least) and especially when thinking about the future generations, this is the best way forward and especially when thinking about the future peace and harmony of the island.

3 Responses to “The only way to ensure permanent peace in the North is for sinhala catholics, sinhala buddhists and muslim people to live in the Northern Province in at least equal number to the tamils”

  1. Lorenzo Says:

    ABSOLUTELY!

    This is the ONLY solution.

    IF DS Senanayake didn’t settle Sinhalese in the East, TNA would have had another Vigneswaran as CM in the East and NO SINHALESE. DSS did it FORCEFULLY and we are so grateful to him.

    We need another DSS.

    (BTW DSS was arrested after the 1915 riot and imprisoned for a while. God knows for what!! Brave man. Surely it made him even MORE popular.)

  2. nilwala Says:

    I ENDORSE THIS SUGGESTION AS THE ONLY LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO A BELLIGERENT, RACIST TAMIL MINORITY FOCUSED ON ETHNIC SEPARATISM, AND QUITE WILLING TO GO THE TERRORISM ROUTE AGAIN WHILE IT STEADILY ENCROACHES INTO THE SOUTH UNHINDERED.

    THE DOUBLE STANDARDS, HYPOCRISY AND LIES THAT CONTINUE TO BE USED TO FURTHER TAMIL INTERESTS AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHER COMMUNITIES IN THE COUNTRY CAN ONLY RESULT IN CONTINUED POLARIZATION OF THE COMMUNITIES IN SR LANKA, WITH MORE PROBLEMS DOWN THE ROAD.

    IT WAS ITAK LEADER CHELVANAYAKAM WHO SAID SOMETHING LIKE “WE WILL HARASS THEM (THE SINHALAS) UNTIL THEY GIVE IN”……

    IT IS TIME THE SINHALA PEOPLE UNDERSTOOD THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS STATEMENT CLEARLY.

  3. Ananda-USA Says:

    Lest We Forget in 2014, the COST in BLOOD and TREASURE of the heroic struggle that rescued our Motherland and Our People only five years ago.

    Let us not BETRAY today those who offered the last full measure of their devotion to their country.
    …………………………
    Reflections on the Tigers

    By Sergei DeSilva-Ranasinghe
    TheDiplomat.com
    May 21, 2010

    A year after the LTTE’s defeat, evidence shows criticism of Sri Lanka’s army is misplaced, says Sergei DeSilva-Ranasinghe.

    A year ago this week, the Sri Lankan government officially declared victory over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in one of the most extraordinary counter-insurgency campaigns in recent times.
    The endgame of the conflict, particularly from January to May 2009, saw the bloodiest fighting, often with the presence of tens of thousands of civilians that the LTTE desperately used to fend off its inevitable defeat. Since then, new evidence has become public that offers further insights into the final months of Sri Lanka’s secessionist civil war.

    For decades, the jungle-laden Mullaitivu District, located in Sri Lanka’s northeast, served as the LTTE’s main stronghold. However, under significant military pressure from the Sri Lankan Army during the final stages of the conflict, the LTTE conducted a fighting retreat towards its last bastion astride the Mullaitivu coastline.

    As it did so, the LTTE used all means at its disposal to inflict casualties to delay, halt or even push back the Army’s advance. For example, the LTTE constructed a series of embankments between two and three metres high, also known as earth bunds, which proved to be formidable defensive obstacles. Assault troops also encountered camouflaged LTTE armour plated bunkers.

    According to one frontline Army officer from the time: ‘You don’t know where they are, and you can’t even see them until your right on them…The first you know is when you are wounded in the leg. All we can do is to fire towards the sound, throw grenades and send off RPGs [Rocket Propelled Grenades] in the general direction.’

    In addition, frontline infantry often confronted elaborately laid LTTE minefields that required field engineers equipped with Bangalore torpedoes to clear pathways. Similarly, the LTTE cleverly utilised booby traps made of discarded rubbish and metal that were tied to hidden explosive caches dispersed over a wide area that when triggered caused multiple and devastating explosions.

    Each passing month saw increasingly fierce combat. Reports suggested that the Army absorbed anywhere between 10 and 20 fatalities per day—sometimes more—while the Army claims that the LTTE suffered average losses ranging from 25 to 40 combatants per day. Due to high levels of attrition and the need to augment its depleted conventional formations, the LTTE had little choice than to continue to rely heavily on forced recruitment of civilians, a practice that it revived full-scale in late 2007.

    To ensure a ready supply of civilians, the LTTE adopted a series of coercive measures such as that reported in one Sri Lankan newspaper which quoted a 14-year-old female child soldier saying the LTTE had warned her that her family would be punished if she didn’t join. Indeed, the Army confirmed that an increasing number of conscripts were seen at the frontline, notably child soldiers. ‘It’s like looking at your own child. Quite large numbers [of the LTTE fighters killed or captured] are under 16,’ one Army Brigadier told the Telegraph. ‘They grab them from their parents and [when] they try to pull them back they [the parents] get shot. These children have dog tags and cyanide capsules.’ Indeed, it was later revealed, according to the independent Sri Lankan daily, The Island, that in the final months of the war the LTTE planned to carry out a massive offensive against the Army with 300 suicide bombers, but was forced to cancel it as many suicide bombers were either killed in action or deserted to government-controlled territory.

    The incidence of civilian casualties was low prior to the commencement of the Mullaitivu campaign, as combat was essentially between two conventional armies in the field, and civilian concentrations were situated far from the fighting.

    However, as the territory controlled by the LTTE rapidly contracted, the density of trapped civilians increased rapidly, meaning civilians were often being caught in the crossfire. In an effort to provide safe passage from the combat zone, the Sri Lankan government declared two limited ceasefires, which saw civilian safe zones created at Vishwamadu and Oddusudan. However, such measures were doomed to failure when the LTTE rejected them and chose not to offer any alternative locations.

    According to Tamil journalist DBS Jeyaraj: ‘The Sri Lankan government had…declared two limited ceasefires. But the LTTE imposed further restrictions and the number of civilians coming out dropped during ceasefire days…the LTTE exploited the ceasefire in February to mount a very effective counter strike…The April ceasefire was used to construct several new “trench-cum-bund” defences.’

    Meanwhile, the LTTE positioned its artillery and mortar assets near or amidst civilian concentrations, tactics confirmed by a range of media outlets including Reuters India in February 2009, which quoted a 74-year old Catholic nun as claiming: ‘The LTTE fired from close to civilians. We had objected, but that didn’t work.’
    Out of desperation, thousands of civilians defied the LTTE edict, forbidding any civilians from leaving LTTE-controlled territory, and attempted to escape under cover of darkness and brave crossfire from running battles, LTTE-laid minefields and LTTE fire targeting escaping civilians.

    At a press conference in Colombo last July, Dr. Shanmugaraja, a former LTTE physician who surrendered in the final weeks of the war, said: ‘Many civilians were killed and wounded as the LTTE opened fire at them when they tried to flee from the Tiger’s grip…Their strategy was to keep the civilians around them and survive. That was why they came along with civilians once safe zones were demarcated for the civilians by the Security Forces.’

    In addition, there’s ample evidence to suggest that civilians in LTTE-controlled territory were integrated into the LTTE military-logistical system and war effort. For example, Sri Lankan-Australian scholar Michael Roberts, an expert on Sri Lankan politics and anthropology, wrote in his article, Dilemma’s at War’s End: ‘All young people seem to have been inducted as auxiliaries. As they lost territory, the LTTE also used heavy machinery and marshalled labour to build ditches and embankments…a task that clearly involved massive logistical operations.’

    He added: ‘In effect, over the last year or so, many able-bodied people in the LTTE command state have been rendered into an integral part of their logistical support for war, being more or less part of the frontline. In such circumstances, of course, the category “civilian” is an ambiguous category.’

    In fact, the presence of more than 280,000 civilians in LTTE-controlled territory served a clear and diverse purpose, which was highlighted in their use as military labour to build fortifications; porters shuttling food, ammunition and supplies to frontline LTTE units; of manpower to augment the LTTE’s military strength; human shields that gave the LTTE significant bargaining power with the international community to call for a permanent ceasefire; and the maintenance of its supply lines.

    In effect, the LTTE depended indirectly almost entirely on regular Sri Lankan government convoys to areas under enemy control for food, medicine and essential items—an extraordinary situation. Another former LTTE physician, Dr. Vardharaja, elaborated on this exploiting of civilians by the LTTE to ensure supplies kept coming in, when he said: ‘The problem was that the LTTE took medicine from us to treat their injured. They asked us to tell the media that we don’t have medicine. There was as a shortage of medicine because LTTE took the whole stock.’

    By mid-April 2009, the Army had successfully repulsed all LTTE counterattacks and finally cornered the group on a sliver of territory along the coast, 13 kilometres long and just 3 kilometres wide. The LTTE decided to stage its last stand in its coastal stronghold with an estimated 240,000 civilians still present, leaving the Army facing an unprecedented difficulty of capturing the last patch of land while ensuring civilians’ safety.

    It is this reality that underscores how misplaced the international criticism of the military’s conduct in the final stages of the civil war was. On February 9, for example, a suicide bomber reportedly infiltrated an internally displaced persons registration camp and detonated her suicide jacket, killing 8 civilians and 24 soldiers. On April 20, 3 LTTE suicide bombers infiltrated and detonated their suicide jackets, killing 17 civilians and injuring 200. The LTTE shrewdly used tents, make-shift shelters and bunkers to conceal snipers, machine gun nests and artillery/mortar emplacements, which were often merged with civilian dwellings. Given this, assault troops had no choice but to systematically clear tens of thousands of tents, makeshift shelters, bunkers and trenches, which left them exposed to LTTE ambushes laid inside tents, makeshift shelters or subterranean bunkers. As such, in an attempt to mitigate the incidence of civilian casualties, the Army relied heavily on dozens of trained snipers to great effect in neutralizing LTTE combatants.

    In the final weeks of the war, the LTTE continued to aggressively conscript civilians who were given crash training and assigned to scratch units at the frontline. For instance, in a now public April 2009 report, Rajan Hoole, who heads the dissident Tamil University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna) and who is known for his criticism of both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE, pointed to conversations with civilians who fled LTTE controlled territory.

    ‘The LTTE has recently started the practice of sending out teams of 6 cadres with instructions for each team to return with 30 conscripts,’ Hoole wrote. ‘If they fail they are reportedly subject to heavy and often lethal punishment.’

    However, the LTTE’s efforts were in vain. After bitter fighting on May 16 and 17, the last civilians were extracted from the combat zone, leaving 400 hardcore LTTE leaders and fighters exposed. By the morning of May 19, the LTTE lay defeated and its leaders eliminated, bringing a decisive end to the nearly three decade long Sri Lankan civil war. The Army’s final operation involved 4 weeks of heavy fighting and the loss of over 500 soldiers.

    The evidence revealed by the LTTE’s own former sympathisers indicates the lengths the group was willing to go to and the difficulties facing conventional militaries confronting a fanatical adversary that conducts itself with impunity. Under such circumstances it’s unrealistic to believe civilian casualties can be avoided. Indeed, the very success of the Army in extracting more than 280,000 civilians from the combat zone from January to May 2009, despite this effort contributing to it suffering heavy casualties in process, is an indication of the complexity of conducting military operations in an environment where an enemy is willing use civilians as a key element of its military strategy.

    Civilian casualties are, of course, tragic. But the endgame of Sri Lanka’s civil war requires a much more in-depth and nuanced understanding of the dilemmas that faced the Army before any conclusions can be drawn.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress