Hang Your Head In Shame, Instead Of Hanging Convicts!
Posted on July 27th, 2018

Rohana R. Wasala 


The cabinet spokesman told the media on July 25, 2018, as reported on Hiru News, that the cabinet has unanimously approved the (presidential) decision to implement the death penalty even if the EU withdraws the GSP+ facility in response as warned. Though I personally do not attach much credibility to the particular person’s statement, I thought as a patriotic Sri Lankan that it would be in the national interest to sound a warning before it is too late. (Caveat: It is hoped that no one will get upset by this personal opinion of a non-politician which is being described here for what it is worth.)

Beware! The forfeiture of the GSP+ concessions is not the real issue. The real issue is the impact of bringing back the death penalty on the amelioration of the law and order situation in the country. Those who are determined to impose a ‘final solution’ on Sri Lanka have cynically manipulated for a noose to be slung around her neck in the form of this controversial proposal for implementing the death penalty at this particular juncture after a suspension of over forty years. They are trying to give a dog a bad name and hang it. To elaborate: these very same people who have now begun loudly criticizing the proposed re-implementation of the capital punishment and threaten Sri Lanka with a suspension or total withdrawal of the GSP (The previous government did very well without it, though, and without the death penalty either) were suspected to be behind the 2015 regime change, which was a geopolitics centred exercise; the change, by now, has proved disastrous for the country. Their protégés are in the process of fulfilling their promises against the popular will, but the economic help (investments, financial grants, etc) that they were made to expect) appears to be not forthcoming, understandably because their own economies are in bad shape. Now it is convenient for them to find an excuse for washing their hands of their obligations to their potentially useful third world ‘protectorate’.

They know, as the saner citizens among us do, that hanging the convicts currently in the death row is no solution for the problem of drugs trafficking. It would be unfair for us to expect outsiders such as Americans, Europeans and Indians, though no doubt they are our friends as they have already demonstrated, to be so deeply worried about this problem as we are, who are the people directly affected by it. They are not worried about whether convicted drug traffickers hang or not, either. The people who are the most worried about the ever growing drug addiction menace among the young are their parents. But these friends in disguise are not worried about that. Neither should we expect them to be. However, the anarchic situation prevailing in all spheres of governance including particularly law and order (whose handiwork that is, let us forget for the moment) seems to have suddenly thrown up this apparent demand for the immediate resumption of executions as a deterrent against serious crime (particularly, narcotics traffic, murder and rape). Desperate but innocent ordinary citizens unaware of the far-reaching implications of  the president acting like a reckless autocrat bent on a vindictive crusade on this occasion dealing death to the convicted drug traffickers might hail him as a hero. But he himself is unlikely to resort to such a foolhardy course of action even though he might find it an easy way to try to restore at least some of his lost credibility. His two immediate predecessors also came under pressure for re-implementing the death penalty, but they somehow managed to wiggle out of it. It must be admitted, whether we like it or not, that under the previous government, the better maintenance of law and order minimized underworld criminal activity including drugs trafficking, without the help of the judicial executioner.

Buddhist monks have already expressed their disapproval. However, many ordinary citizens, in their desperation, appear to be in favour of the convicts being hanged. An old woman of 71 has offered to do the job of executioner for free! Some well meaning civil leaders including a few religious dignitaries seem to endorse the idea as a last resort for controlling serious crime. An outspoken politician of the nationalist camp stated recently that the Buddhist teaching was that the monks and the laity should obey the law of the country, which, of course, is true. However, this politician apparently endorses the bringing back of the capital punishment, considering it as an essential part of the country’s law enforcement machinery. My opinion, though, is that even judicial killing is contrary to the Buddhist teaching. The Buddhist stand (i.e., no death penalty) is compatible with the modern secular view of morality that is gaining ground across the world.

Out of the 195 countries in the world, according to Amnesty International, 101 countries have abolished the institution of capital punishment; in 39 countries it is in abeyance; so, judicial killing as punishment is not practiced in 140 countries. This means that nearly 72% of the countries do not have the death penalty. I think a Sri Lanka without the death penalty should be in good company.

I, for one, am against the re-implementation of the death penalty, which has been suspended since 1976. The capital punishment is an uncivilized, inhuman way of ‘exacting’ justice. It is not restorative justice; it is retaliatory justice (the savage medieval an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” system of justice). When the resumption of executions was proposed within a few months of the inauguration of the present regime, as it is being done now even more menacingly, I participated in the general exchange of views regarding the subject at the time by contributing an article to this newspaper. It was under the title Abolition of capital punishment: an acceptable absurdity” (The Island/June 10, 2015). The concluding paragraph of that particular write-up was as follows:

“There are those who think that death by hanging or other method is ‘just deserts’ for someone who has been found guilty of murder, rape, or drug dealing. They would argue that it is absurd to worry about the human rights of criminals who have deprived innocents of their human rights. But I feel that our concern for a person convicted of a crime does not actually exceed that for their victim. It is that we tend to extend the same degree of fellow feeling towards both in spite of the stark differences in their circumstances. We share the general unsatisfactory nature of human existence with both. The resultant feeling of compassion for another human being is the essence of humanity. Therefore the abolition of the death penalty should be seen as an acceptable absurdity.”

So, my position is that not only should the suspension continue, but eventually the death penalty must be totally abolished. Of course, judicial punishment is indispensable in administering the law in any society. But it needs to be applied for the reform of the offender, and in a broader context for the deterrence of crime. Proper administration of the law is the inescapable duty of any government. No excuses can be allowed for a government’s remissness in executing this responsibility.

To me it appears that the president has been bamboozled (i.e., fraudulently persuaded or bewildered) by someone to take this questionable decision, ignoring the obvious. The immediate circumstance that triggered his seemingly ironclad resolve to hang the condemned for drug trafficking (18 of them as reported) who have been languishing in jail for years now is the alleged discovery that some of them have directed murders and other crimes from their prison cells. There is a problem here. Can executing all of them including those who are suspected of having masterminded crimes from within the prison walls be a good solution?  Of course not.

A vital question is ‘Who is to blame for making it possible for the convicts to do this sort of crime?’ Has the minister in charge of prisons resigned over this unspeakable lapse or at least done something about the prison authorities whose failure to prevent such heinous breaches of inmate supervision? Shouldn’t that real problem be solved first and remedial action taken to prevent any repetition of similar criminal negligence of duty on the part of prison officials? Of course, this is not the first time such a thing happened. It must have happened in the past too. There is also a perception that there is a longstanding link between criminals and politicoes, a deplorable situation for which politicians present and past share direct responsibility. Though that is true, it should not be cited as an excuse for the incumbent administration to perpetuate the pernicious tradition and exploit it for their own ends. Bad politics is largely  responsible for the recrudescence of drug related and other types of criminal violence in our society.

The question that naturally arises where the death penalty is abolished or not practiced is ‘What is the alternative?’ Strict enforcement of the law is the answer. If the existing laws are inadequate, let’s make new laws. Judicial killing is revenge killing by the society or retaliatory justice. Is there any reformative value in it? None, because the person to be reformed is dead. It could be of some limited deterrence value, though, because it could discourage potential murderers, rapists, etc. But hardened criminals are usually suicidal. Fear of losing the right to live – of risking the death penalty – is nothing for them. In place of the death penalty, appropriately extended  life imprisonment can be made so grueling for unrepentant murderers, unpardonable rapists and drug traffickers as to make them rue the day they were born. That will prove a more severe punishment for them than instant death through hanging or other form of execution. But even that kind of extreme punishment in lieu of capital punishment need not be inhuman. Human beings change. Convicted criminals are also human. After serving a prescribed maximum period of time, they should be able to qualify for being considered for parole (temporary or permanent) when they have reformed and when their release from prison is certified to be 100% safe to the society  by qualified official psychiatrists. The primary responsibility for this must be shouldered by politicians, but they must be careful not to politicize crime and prison management.


10 Responses to “Hang Your Head In Shame, Instead Of Hanging Convicts!”

  1. Dilrook Says:

    Singapore and Japan carry out the death penalty for drug dealers and anyone possessing drugs. That has saved the youth of these countries. Sri Lanka must also do so.

    Some politicians are publicly associated with drug dealers. Obviously they oppose it.

    Historically Sri Lanka had the death penalty.

  2. Vaisrawana Says:

    Dilrook says: “Historically Sri Lanka had the death penalty” Which country didn’t? I wonder. Is that a cogent reason for bringing in executions? It is a fact that some politicos maintain underworld connections, mainly drug dealers, because the latter are rich. But are these politicians who oppose the death penalty because they are in cahoots with drug traffickers? How can you simplify this serious issue (capital punishment )like this? It is not only about the drug dealing problem. When bona fide people oppose the death penalty for rapists, does that mean at least some of them have to be supporters of rape? Actually, if we isolate the drug trafficking problem, killing the dealers who get caught cannot be a final solution as you suggest. It is equivalent to suppressing the symptoms of a serious disease, and more important, it is immoral, inhuman in a civilized society.

    In a recent newspaper article, a Christian father wrongly referred, with apparent approval, to the medieval retaliatory form of administering justice ‘an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’, which agrees with the institution of the death penalty for murder and certain other serious crimes, as ‘restorative justice’. The accepted definition of restorative justice is “a system of criminal justice which focuses on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community at large”. Does this sound like ‘an eye for an eye……’ sort of justice, which is actually limited to exacting revenge, not justice.

    As far as law administration is concerned, it is mainly the responsibility of the government. But crime management is a much more complicated affair that calls for the participation of sociologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, lawyers, scientists, social reformers, and other stakeholders working in synergy.

  3. Vaisrawana Says:

    Oops! The 4th sentence should read: “But who are these politicians who oppose the death penalty because they are in cahoots with drug traffickers?”

  4. Christie Says:

    1. Who are the drug dealers in the row to be hanged?

    2. They are the lower level operators in the drug dealer pyramid. At least according to Hon. Minister Mangala Samaraweera.

    3. The king pins of the drug business in our country have been Indian Colonial Parasites not only in our country but in other Indian Colonies like Singapore.

    4. One of our biggest enterprise Eswaran group have been caught importing almost half a billion dollars worth of Cocaine.

    5. They have been in the top of the drug pyramid from the time they landed here.

    6. These parasites are also in the Cabal of Indian who finance our politicians since democracy was introduced.

    7. Take for example Wele Suda who we Sinhalese accepts as a king pin.

    8. But unfortunately he is probably the second tier.

    9. His master the drug king pin is the son a man who started drug dealing from the time he landed here. He sold “Kanji” in the streets of Colombo suburbs.

    10. Now they are in legitimate businesses like land development, financing and illegal businesses like money laundering.

    11. They operate mainly from Singapore where lot of work was done to install the current administration.

    12. Ever heard of Gnanams who financed people like Phillip and he was a man who collected bottles and gunnies and sold Sakkara Hakuru while selling opium to the masses.

    The current Indian puppets want to kill these second tier dealers because they can be easily replaced while the king pins are not even mentioned.

  5. Dilrook Says:

    The historical relevance is important to bust the false notion that because of the Buddhism association, it must not be carried out.

    Ultra modern Asian countries including Japan and Singapore also have it. Death penalty is an effective deterrent against drug trafficking.

    Those politicians are very well known. Courts, not voters decide what wrong they have done. Using their money, these politicians win elections.

    If death penalty is so bad, why does Sri Lanka specify death as punishment for a number of offences? The law should be changed (for compatibility) by removing death as punishment. Two wrongs don’t make it right. Remove death as punishment and don’t carry it out or keep death as a punishment and carry it out. Preferred outcome is to carry it out.

    Of course the heroin mafia is very powerful and influential as it is a multi-billion dollar industry! The death penalty camp is very poor financially as it has no financiers.

  6. Christie Says:

    The so called Western countries the Amnasty International support keep the death row inmates in solitary confinement.

    Solitary confinement or death?

  7. Randeniyage Says:

    Will the win of Imran Khan encourage good people out side the current corrupt political gangs ?

  8. Sarath W Says:

    If Sri Lanka want to impose death penalty to drug dealers it is fine as they destroy many lives. But if they want to do that then the country also should introduce the death penalty to traitors before any one else as they destroy the whole country. But this government certainly will not do that as the top three in this government head the traitor list.

  9. Susantha Wijesinghe Says:


  10. Vaisrawana Says:

    You are spot on, Sarath W. Betraying the sovereignty of one’s country is the most serious crime that a citizen can commit, for it amounts to killing the whole country. That is why treason has been considered a capital offence from time immemorial. This is not likely to ever change. Is it the case that, when the abolition of capital punishment is discussed, death for treason is excluded from such discussions? Could a lawyer friend volunteer to enlighten us on this?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Copyright © 2019 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress