Pakistan calls for new Global Cricket governing body to replace ICC ‘ “to keep the spirit of the gentleman’s game alive”

April 6th, 2026

Source:  Facebook

Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has called for the creation of a new global cricket governing body, saying the current International Cricket Council has become overly influenced by Indian political and commercial interests.

In a social media post on Tuesday, Asif said a new organisation was needed to keep the spirit of the gentleman’s game alive,” accusing the ICC of being hostage to Indian political interests.”

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1481090724027313&set=a.702366768566383

Source:  Facebook

The Watch, the Crook, and the Caviar in Russia 

April 6th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

The summer trains of the Soviet Union had a rhythm of their own—metal grinding against steel, a steady heartbeat echoing across endless plains. From Belorusskaya railway station, I began my long pilgrimage westward—two days across borders and ideologies, through guarded crossings into Poland, then through the divided veins of Germany, eventually spilling into the softer edges of Netherlands.

From there, across the grey waters of the English Channel, I would reach Harwich Pier—and like clockwork, onto British Rail, landing in bustling Liverpool Street station.

London in those days was alive—noisy, industrious, and wonderfully foreign. Bengali shipowners argued loudly in tea shops, buses roared past, and for a few shillings, one could find a Sri Lankan meal that tasted like home. Nights were spent at the Sri Lanka Students’ Centre, days wandering toward Marble Arch, and sometimes, elbow-deep in soap suds at a dishwashing job—ten pounds a week, just enough for survival and the occasional indulgence.

But the real story began the following year, in Leningrad.

I was strolling past grand imperial buildings, lost in admiration of Russian history, when he appeared.

A man of the south—sharp eyes, confident stance, and the unmistakable air of someone who lived by his wits. He noticed my watch immediately—a fine Seiko watch, gleaming under the pale northern sun.

Two hundred and fifty roubles,” he said, as though it were already agreed.

I hesitated—but youth is often tempted by quick bargains. I nodded.

We stepped under a steel lamp. He counted the money slowly, deliberately. I counted too.

Short,” I said. Twenty-five missing.”

Without protest, he added more notes, smiling faintly, returning the bundle. It looked right. It felt right.

I handed over my watch.

He vanished.

It wasn’t until later, when the crowd thinned and silence returned, that I counted again.One hundred roubles short.

Not a mistake. A master performance.

I had been outplayed.

Disappointed, but not defeated, my companion and I made our way toward the freight station. We were to board a ship bound for Dover via Finland and Sweden. Hunger struck, and we joined a long queue outside a popular restaurant.

Then—fate intervened.

There!” my friend whispered sharply.

I turned.

The crook. Standing casually in line.

Wearing my watch.

There are moments in life when hesitation costs everything. This was not one of them.

I walked straight toward him.

No anger. No shouting.

Just purpose.

I grabbed his wrist firmly—his left hand—the one bearing my watch. In one swift motion, I unclasped it and slipped it back onto my own.

Leaning close, I whispered:

Walk away now… before I call the police and say you stole this.”

His confidence evaporated.

Without a word, he bolted.

Victory tastes better when earned.

That night, instead of regret, we celebrated. We bought a massive 5-kilogram tin of Russian beluga caviar for fifty roubles—a treasure we would later sell at the Hilton London Metropole near Edgware Road for a tidy profit.

Pocket money, Soviet style.

Looking back, those journeys were more than travel—they were training.

The long trains, the strange borders, the cunning crooks, and the small triumphs—they shaped something deeper. Courage. Awareness. A refusal to be outsmarted twice.

Years later, facing far more complex challenges in shipyards and negotiations, I would often remember that day in Leningrad.

Because sometimes, life prepares you not in classrooms—

…but under a steel lamp, counting roubles with a thief.

Why is the Cardinal harping on a “Maha-Molakaarya” in regard to the Easter bombing by ISIS zealots? 

April 5th, 2026

Bodhi Dhanapala

A group of avowed Islamic exrimists carried out the Easter bombing where several prominent Christian Churches and devotees attending them were killed. The assassins also died in the blasts, or were captured by the police. All the pesidential commissions and investigations picked Zahran as possibly the lead individual. Several people closely connected with the present NPP government were close family members of these Islamic Zealots. There is evidence that one aspect of the attack was to revange the attack in New Zealand against Islamists.

Warnings that there would be an attack had been issued to the top security officials of Maithreepala Sirisena but they did not take the warnings serious. The Catholic MP Mr. Harin Fdo had got the warning from his father, a devout Catholic. So, in all likelihood, the Harin’s father would have also informed the Catholic clergy that he personally knows.

When questioned by the Presidential Commission of Inquiry as to why he did not directly warn the public or church authorities after receiving the warning from his father, Harin Fernando testified that he relied on his father to pass the message to the church. He stated that his father, Malcom Fernando (a devout Catholic and former diplomat), was better connected to the church hierarchy than he was. Fernando explicitly told the commission that he asked his father to inform the church. authorities about the threat. Following the attacks, Harin Fernando posted on his Twitter account (now X): “Some intelligence officers knew of this attack. I told them and I told the church. What more could I have done?” This public claim that he “told the church” is the primary piece of evidence he offered to the public. 

So, in all probability, some Catholic clergy would have been informed. And, in all probaility, they too may have regarded the threat as being far fetched and done nothing. It is this fact that Malcom ranjith, the Cardinal, finds so difficult to digest. So, in order to put a different spin on it, he has denied that any church offical or clergy was aware of a threat. Instead he has tried to move the responsibility onto Sinhal-Buddhist leaders as having cooked up a plot to create termoil in the country, so that Gotabhaya (then known as a man for law and order) could get votes on that score! Surely, what a whimsical hypotesis? How can any one with even an iota of intelligence present such a claim?

And yet, that is the story that the Cardinal has been pushing! He claims that there is “an invisible hand” and an as yet undiscoverd “Maha-molakaaraya” who plotted an dplanned the violence against the Catholics to bring a “sinhala-Buddhist” leader into power. This pathetically empty story has been picked up by channel-4 and other purveyors of sensational information and, backed by various NGOs, got converted into a “serious theory”.

Instead, we should ask how the church ignored the warnings of Malcolm Fdo, a devoute Catholic and experience diplomat who would surely have known his rfesponsibility to God and to Ceaser.

Sri Lanka is a country where we don’t dare to ask the right questions or do the right thing. Instead we are ready to appease the Tamil-Tiger terrorist on the one hand, and kiss the Pope’s ring without hesitation, when it was the Pope’s predecessors who sent the Portuguese to destroy our temples and our land in the name of God.

By not questioning Malcolm Fdo before his death in 2021, the PCoI allowed a crucial piece of the puzzle regarding the “prior warning” timeline to die with him. The decision by the PCoI not to summons Malcolm Fernando to testify under oath remains one of the most criticized omissions by legal analysts and the Sri Lankan public.

I believe that the PCol did not question Malcolm Fdo because PCol did not wish to tangle with the Church was was the “Victim” of the attack, given the already adversarial attitude of the church. During the hearings, there were stark public clashes. At one point, PCoI Chairman Janak de Silva publicly criticized Cardinal Ranjith for making political statements regarding the attacks, telling the media that the Cardinal should “not act like a politician.” The Church viewed the PCoI as hostile to its interests. There is no direct evidence that the Catholic Church influenced the PCoI to avoid questioning Malcolm Fernando, primarily because there were no influential Catholic members on the Commission, but yet, it is clear that the PCol stood intimidated by the church and spared Malcolm Fernando who should have been immediately questioned.

So, the big question regarding the Easter attacks is “Why wasn’t Malcolm Fernando” questioned by the police investigations that immediately follwed the Easter attacks? Were they protecting the persons who spoke to Malcolm Fernando?

Bodhi 

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත! වින්දිත ඔබගේ දැණුම පිණිසයි!

April 5th, 2026

Ratanapala 

Easter Sunday –  5 Apr 2026

ගම්මන්පිල මහතගේ පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ මහා මොලකරු සොයා යාමේ කෘතියේ  සඳහන් කරනවා අල් බග්ඩාඩිගේ ලෝක ඉස්ලාමීයකරනයේ ISIS න්‍යායපත්‍රයේ සහරාන් මෙහෙයුම කිරීමේ බරපැන වශයෙන් රු 300 මිලියනයක් සැපයූයේ ජවිපේ සාමාජික ඊබ්‍රහාමි නානාබව. මේබව පසුපස යෑමට ලංකා නීති පද්ධතියටත්, දනට බලයේ ඉන්න ජවිපෙටත්, කතෝලික පල්ලියටවත් අවශ්‍ය නැත. කතෝලික පල්ලිය පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ කතෘකම මුස්ලිම් ඝාතකයන්ගෙන් වෙන දිසාවකට ගෙනගොස් ආගමීය සහ දේශපාලන  සිතැඟි ඉටුකර ගැනීමට රාජපක්ෂ වරුන් වෙත ගෙනයාමට යත්න දරනවා.  මෙය ඔවුන්ගේ සැමදා ගමන් සගයන් වන කොටි ඩයස්පොරව සතුටු කිරීමේ වැයමක් බව සියලු නිදහස් මතධාරීන්ට පෙනෙනවා නොඅනුමානයි. අවට සිටින අනෙකුත් පූජකවරුන්ට – 1950 ගණන්වල කතෝලික ආක්‍රමණයේ ( Catholic Action ) දූ දරුවන්ට  ඇත්තේ ලංකාවේ ක්‍රිරිස්තියානි දේව රාජ්‍ය ගොඩ  නැගීමට අවහිර කරන සිංහල බෞද්ධයන් කෙරෙහි ඇති භීතියයි, වයිරයයි. එහි වරක් තාවකාලික මුහුණුවරවූ ගෝඨාභය කෙරෙහි ඇති වයිරයයි!  අවුරුදු 500 කට පෙර දොන් ජුවාන් ධර්මපාලගෙන් කරවා ගත නොහැකිවූ දේව රාජ්‍ය ලංකාවේ ස්ථාපනය කිරීම නූතන දොන් ජුවාම්ලා වන රනිල්, සජිත් සහ අනුරලාගෙන් කරවා ගැනීටය! සිරිලක බෙදා වෙන්කිරීමේ මිරිඟුව  පිටිපස යෑමෙන් කාට සෙතක් වේද? බෙදුණු , අස්වාභාවික සීමාවලින් වෙන්වුනු රටක සාමය, සතුට සහ නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය බලාපොරොත්තු විය හැකිද! එවැනි බෙදී වෙන්වී සාමයෙන් සිටින රටවල් ඔබ දන්නවාද?  ඉන්දියාව, නුතන සුඩානය, ඔට්ටෝමන් අධිරාජ්‍යය බින්දවටීමෙන් පසු ඇතිවූ මැද පෙරදිග මේ ක්‍රියාවන්ට කදිම නිදසුන් ගෙන එනවා! ඇත්තේ සදාකාලික ගැටුමයි, ත්‍රස්තවාදයයි, කෙලවර නිම නොමැති යුද්ධයයි!

තමාගේ පුතුන් දෙදෙනා බිල්ලටදී කන්‍යාවන්  සමග මොක්සුව  පතන ඊබ්‍රහිම් නානා නිදැල්ලේ සිටිනවා! ඔහුට විමර්ශන නැත. ඔහු ඔහුගේ ඉස්ලාමීකරන ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඉදිරියටත් කරනවා ඇති. ඊට හේතුව ඔහු සහ ඔහුගේ වහාබ්වාදී ප්‍රජාව කතෝලික සභාව සහ ලංකාව අස්ථාවරකර කෑලිකරන (balkanize) ව්‍යාපෘතියේ ගමන් සගයින් නිසාය. ගම්මන්පිල මහතා නිදැල්ලේ ඉන්නා මරාගෙන මැරෙන ත්‍රස්තයින් 300 ගැන පැවසුවේ ඒ නිසාය. Born Again විශ්වාසවන්තයෙකු ලෙස සලකන සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාසටවත් ඔහුගේ මුස්ලිම් / ක්‍රිස්තියානු මුදල්වලට සහ ඡන්දවලට ගැති NGO වලින් යැපෙන ඇම්බට්ටයින්ටත්, බොහෝ අනෙකුත් ඒහා සමාන අනාගත බලාපොරොත්තු ඇති අයටද සත්‍ය කුමක්ද යන්න අවශ්‍යම නැත. ඔවුන්ට  ඇත්තේ ජනාධිපති සිහිනය මිස අන්කිසිවක් නොවේ! වින්දිතයන්ට  ලබාදීමට උත්සහ ගන්නේ නියම ඇත්ත නොව සිංහල බෞද්ධ වයිරය පවත්වාගෙන යෑමය; බෙදා වෙන්කර පාලනය කිරීමයි. රාජපක්ෂ භීතියෙන් පෙලෙන මොවුන් කරන්නේ පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ ආක්‍යානය (narrative) රාජපක්ෂ කඳවුර වෙතට ගෙනගොස් අහිංසක වින්දිතයන්ගේ මනස විකුර්ති කරීමයි, ඇත්ත පාස්කු ප්‍රහාර විමසුම තමාගේ එදිනෙදා සිතැඟි පරිදි වෙනස්කර ජනමනස අතරමං කිරීමයි! අද මහ මොලකරු – ඉංදියාව, අබුහින්ද් සහ සොනික් සොනික් පසුකර ගෝඨාභය දෙසට ගමන් කරමින් සිටී. මෙහි ආන්තික මෙහෙයුම එදා බෙදුම්වාදය පරාජයවීම නිසා අද මාරාන්තික වයිරයකින් ඉන්නා දෙමල ඩයස්පෝරාව සැනසීම පිණිස ගන්නා ප්‍රයත්නයක් බව ඔබට වැටහෙන්නේ නැද්ද? LTTE ක්‍රියාන්විතයන්ට උතුරේ ත්‍රස්ත උපකාරක සහායද, දකුණේ යුද්ධය අතරමග බකල් කිරීමට සාම දූතයන් වූ කල්ලි කව්රුද යන්න ඔබ දන්නවා! එය අකුරුවලින් කිව යුතුද? 60 දාහක් ඝාතනය වූ ඒ කුරිරු යුද්ධයට අනුබල දීම ගැන විමර්ශන සිදුවිය යුතු නැද්ද?

සියලු වින්දිතයන්ට, විශේෂයෙන් කතෝලික බැතිමතුන්ට කියන්න තියෙන්නේ මේ මහා පාපයට දායක නොවන ලෙසටයි! ඔවුන්ගේ පැවැත්මට සහ සුඛවිහරනයට ඔබගේම කතෝලික සභාව ඔබ වහලුන්මෙන් පාවිච්චි කරනවා! මධ්‍යස්තව සිතන්න, ඇත්තටම මොකද වුනේ කියලා. ඔබ හොදටම දන්නවා මේ මලේඥ ප්‍රහාරය ගැන දැනුම එදා පැවති රජයට තිබුණ බව. ඒ සදහා නිසි විමර්ශන නොකල වගකිවයුත්තන් අදද එම පුටුවල සිටිමින් ඇත්ත වසන් කිරීමේ කාර්ය එදාටත් වැඩිය හොදින් කරගෙන යනවා. විස්තර ගැන යම් දැනුමක් තිබුන හරීන් ප්‍රනාන්දුවවත් මහ මොලකරු ප්‍රබන්ධය ගෙන ආ හිටපු නීතිපති දප්පුල ද ලිවේරාවත් තවම විමර්ශනය නොවූයේ මන්දැයි ඔබට කිසිම චකිතයක් නැත්ද?

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ ආදිතම මහමොලකරු ලෝක ඊස්ලාමිකරනයේ අත්පොත කුරානය, ඊට අදාල ෂාරියා නීතිය  සහ සර්වලෝක ඉස්ලාමීය කරණයයි. පලමු කාලිෆේටය ඇතිවන්නේ ඒ දර්ශනයට අනුවය ෂාරියා නීතිය අනුවය. මෑතකදී මහමොලකරුවන්නේ Petrodollars වලින් පොහොසත්වී ලෝක ඊස්ලාමීයකරනයේ දිගුවක්වන  වහාබ්වාදයත්, අල්බග්ඩාඩීගේ නැවත පුරාණ කාලිෆේටය ඇති කිරීමේ ISIS / ISIL ව්‍යාපාරයත්, ලංකාවේදී මේ න්‍යාය පත්‍රයට නායකත්වය දුන් සහරාන් ඇතුලු කල්ලියත්ය. ඔවුන්ගේ පුරවැසියන්ද වින්දිතයන්වූ නිසා  ඇමෙරිකාවේ FBI , ඔස්ට්‍රලියාවේ AFP සහ මහා බ්‍රිතානයේ ස්කොට්ලන්ඩ් යාර්ඩ්ද  ප්‍රහාරය පිලිබඳ විමර්ශන සිදු කළා.  ප්‍රහාරය ගැන කතෝලික පල්ලිය ඔවුන්ගෙන් වැඩි දුර ප්‍රශ්න නොකරන්නේ මන්ද? බොදුනුවන් සහ කිතුනුවන් අතැර ඇති විශ්වාශය, සමගිය  බිඳ දමා රට බෙදීමේ සහ දේව රාජ්‍යය යන කුට ව්‍යාපාරය සාර්ථක කිරීමේ තවත් අංගනයක් නේද මේ?

එදා නවසිලන්තයේ සිදුවුනු කිතුනුවෙකුගේ මුස්ලිම් පල්ලි ප්‍රහාරය නිසා කෂණික පලිගැනීමක් ලෙස දලදා පෙරහැරට  මේ ත්‍රස්තයින් ජූලි මාසයේ කරන්නට සැලසුම් කර තිබු ප්‍රහාරය ලංකාවේ කිතුණුවන් සහ බටහිරයන් වෙතට යොමුකල බව ඔබට නොදැනේද? ඒ පිලිබඳ තීරණය කලේ ISISද සහරාන්ද යන්න වෙදගත් නැත, මන්ද ප්‍රහාරයකට අවශ්‍ය සියලු දේ ඒ වනවිට සැලසී තිබුන නිසාය.  පලමු ප්‍රහාරයට ආනයනයකල කඩු 12,000 ගැන විමසුමක් නැත්තේ මන්ද? ඒ කඩු ගෙනාවේ මුස්ලිම් පල්ලිවල තනකොල කැපීමට යන්න ඔබ පිලිගන්නේද? මේ සියල්ල මැදපෙරදිග මුදල්වල බලයෙන්  බහුතරයක්  දේශපාලුවන් යට ගහන බව ඔබට වැටහෙන්නේම නැද්ද? අද සාර්ථකව මේ මුසාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඉදිරියට ගෙනියන්නේ  සමගි ජන බලයේ (සජබ)   මුජිබුර් රහමන්ය. අල් ටාකිය ( Al Taquiyaa) නියාවට අනුව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ  හිරිකිතයක් නොමැතිව මුසා දොඩන්නේ ඔහුය. ලංකාවේ සීග්‍රයෙන් සිදුවන  ඉස්ලාමීකරනය වසන් කිරීමේ කාර්ය ඔහු මැනවින් ඉටු කරමින් සිටී. 

ලෝක ඊස්ලාමීය කිරීමේ න්‍යාය පත්‍රයේ සැලසුම් දැනට ඔඩුදුවා ඇතිබව යුරෝපය සහ ඇමරිකාවේ ජනතාව වටහා ගනිමින් තිබෙනවා.   ලංකාවේ මෙන්ම සවීඩනය, ඩෙන්මාර්කය, නෙදර්ලන්තය, ප්‍රංශය, ජර්මනිය සහ අනෙකුත් වින්දිත රටවල් අතර ඉතාලියත් ඉන්නවා. එම රටවල් එදා මුලු ලෝකයටම මානුෂික අයිතිවාසිකම් සහ ප්‍රාජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය ගැන බන දෙසුවත් දැන් දැන් ඒ තත්වයන්ගෙන් බැහැරවී ජාතිකත්ව මගට යමින් සිටිනවා! තම තමන්ගේ සභ්‍යත්වය, සංස්කෘතිය සහ ජාතිකත්වය – මානුෂීය අයිතිවාසිකම්, මූලික අයිතිවාමිකම්, ඉහවහාගිය ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය යන උද්වේගශීලී එහෙත් මහ පොලොවේ පැලනොවෙන තර්කවලට ඉහල බව තේරුම් ගනිමින් සිටිනවා. ඔඩු දුවපු ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය නිසා ශිෂ්ටාචාර රාජ්‍යයන් විනාශ වෙමින් තියෙන බව කියනවා.  මේ අතරින් මුලධර්මවාදීන්ට රටවල් ගිල ගැනීමට අවකාශය ඇති වෙමින් පවතිනවා. දියුණු වෙමින් සිටි රටවල් අස්ථාවර කිරීමට යොදාගත් ඉහත සඳහන් අයිතිවාසිකම් නිසා තමන්ගේ රටවල් තමාටම අහිමිවීගෙන යනබව ඔවුන්ට යතාර්ථයක් වෙමින් තියෙනවා. අද  ලන්ඩනය ඉංග්‍රීසියන්ට අයිති නැත. නිව්යෝර්කයත් එසේමය. වෙනත් ජාතීන් අයිති කරගෙන ඇත. අනෙක් බොහෝ රටවල තත්වයද මෙසේමය.  එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංගමය (UNO) හිස සුන් කුකුලන් මෙන් හැසිරෙන්නේ ඒ නිසයි. බලරහිත නපුන්සකයින් බවට පත්වී ඇත්තේ ඒ නිසයි. 

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ මුල හෙවත් ලංකාව ඉස්ලාමීකරණයේ අතීතය දිවයන්නේ මහින්ද රාජපක්ස දේශපාලනයට එන්න දශක ගණනකට ප්‍රතමය. 1976 යේ නොබැඳි ජාතීන්ගේ සමුළුවට පැමිණි කර්නල් ගඩාෆි ලංකාවේ මුස්ලිම් වරුන්ට කීවේ ඔවුන්ගේ ජනගහනය වැඩිකර ගන්නට, පාරවල් වලට යාබද ඉඩම් මිලදී ගන්න සහ මුස්ලිම් පල්ලි විශාල වසයෙන් ඉදිකරන්නය. ඉදිරියේදී ලංකාව ඉස්ලාමීය කරණයේ අඩිතාලම එදා දැමුයේ එසේය. දශක පහකට පසු 2026 දී මේ  තත්වය කොපමණ දුර ඇවිත්ද යන්න ඔබම තේරුම් ගන්න.  ඔබේ වටපිටාවේ ජන සංයුතිය වෙනස් වෙන හැටි නොපෙනේද?   ෂරියා නීතියට අනුව ක්‍රිස්තියානින් සහ බෞද්ධයින් වසරකට වරක් දෙවියන්ට පුදන ගව සම්පත පමණි! අතීතයේ මාල දිවයිනට, මැලේසියාවට, ඉන්දුනීසියාවට වුනදේ අනෙක් බොහෝ රටවලට සිදු කරන්නයි ඔවුන්ගේ නියාය පත්‍රය!

රාජපක්ෂලා රටට ඉතිහාසගත සේවයක් කර ඇත. කොටි ත්‍රස්තවාදය රටෙන් තුරන් කර ඇත. ඔවුන් 2009 යේ කොටි මර්දනයෙන් පසු සිදුවුනු දරුණු ත්‍රස්ත ක්‍රියාව පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයයි. ඒ වසර දහයකට පසුවයි. එතකන් සාමය පැවතුනේය. උද්දච්ච් කමින් තොරව රට නියම ලෙස පාලනය කරානම් මේ කිසිවක් සිදුවන්නේ නැත. හරියට පාලනය කරානම්   2015 දී යහපාලනය යනුවෙන් නුතන දොන් ජුවාන් වන රනිල් බලයට පත්වන්නේ නැත. මහා බැංකු කොල්ලය සිදුවන්නේ නැත. පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරය සිදු වන්නේ නැත.  තම පව්ලේ පැවැත්ම සහ අනෙකුත්  ආත්මාර්ථකාමී වැඩ පිලිවැල් නිසා රාජපක්ෂවරුන්  ඉතිහාසයට එක්වන්නේ ඉතිහාසය හරියට කියවා නොගත් අඳබාලයින් ලෙසය. 

එහෙත් රටෙන් පිට සිටින කොටි සාමාජිකයන් නැවත ත්‍රස්තවාදය රට තුලට ගෙනීමට වලිකනවා. නොයෙක් ආකාරයේ ප්‍රයත්න දරනවා. ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රභාකරන් මරා ඔහුගේ ත්‍රස්ත ව්‍යාපාරය අතුගා දැමීමට පලිගැනීමක් හැටියට රාජපක්ෂලාගෙන් පළිගන්නට කොටි ඩයස්පෝරාව නොකරන දෙයක් නැහැ. රාජපක්ෂ කෙනෙක්  දකුණේ රජයකින්ම  සිපිරි ගෙයට යවන එක ඔවුන්ගේ  ඉතාමත් වැදගත් අරමුණක්.  මේ ප්‍රයත්නයේ දිගුවක් හැටියට තමයි පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරය රාජපක්ෂ වරුන්වෙත ගෙනියන්න තැත්කරන්නේ.  කරුණු මෙසේ තිබියදී කලකදී බෙදුම්වාදයට කඩේ ගිය කතෝලික පල්ලිය ඉස්ලාමීය ආක්රමනයට සුදු හුණු ගාන්නේ  මන්ද යන්න කතෝලික ජනතාවම කරුණු කාරණා නිසි ලෙස පසක් කර වටහා ගත යුතුය. 

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ මහ මොලකරු කෘතිය එලිදක්වන විට ශාලාවේ ඈත මුල්ලක වැඩසිටි ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥනසාර හිමියන් දුටුවිට මට ඇතිවූයේ දරාගත දුකකි, අසරණ බවකි, මන්ද උන්වහන්සේ පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ අක්මුල් සියල්ල ප්‍රහාරයට බොහෝ වසර ගනනකට පෙර පැවති සියලු රජයන් වෙත නොබියව පවසා සිටිය නිසාය. අන්තිමට ගොටාභය ජනාධිපති සමග මුළු රටට – “එක රටක් එක නීතියක්”  ගෙන එන්නට වෙර දරූ උන්වහන්සේ අද අසරණය! මේ සියල්ල දකින උන්වහන්සේගේ සිතිවිලි කුමක් වන්නට ඇත්ද?  මේ කරුණු එලිකිරීමේ වරදට  කිහිපවරක් සිර දඩුවම් විඳි උන්වහන්සේ දිනක ලක් ඉතිහාසයට එක්වන්නේ  ලක්දෙරණේ  අද්වීකීය විරුවෙක් ලෙසය. එය වැලැක්වීමට නීති පද්ධතියේ ඇති කිසිම ජගතෙකුට  නොහැකිවනු ඇති. උසාවියක උස්හඬින් කතා කෙකරුවාට අවුරුදු 19 ක බරපතල වැඩ සහිත සිර දඩුවම් ලැබෙන්නත් බුදුන් වහන්සේට අගෞරව කල ජෙරොම් ප්‍රනාන්දුට දඩුවම් නොලබන්නටත්  නීතිය නැමෙන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න පැහැදිලි නැත. අධිකරනයට අපහාස කල පද්මිණී රණවක නිදැල්ලේය. ලංකාවේ නීතිය අපැහැදිලිය, නිරුත්තරය, නිරුවත්ය! ජනතාවගේ චන්දයෙන් පත්වුණ රජයක් පිටස්තර බලවේග පිළියෙළ කල අරගලයකින් පන්න දමනවිට අත්පොලසන් දුන්නේ කව්ද?  ඔවුන් කලේ 1931 සිට පවත්වාගෙන එන සර්වජන චන්දය සහ ප්‍රජතන්ට්‍රවාදයේ  නග්න බව  විහිලුවට ලක් කිරීම නොවේද?  ජනතාව අද්වීතිය යනුවෙන් අදහන අධිකරණය දේශපාලනීකරණය වී නැත්ද?

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ ආඛ්‍යානය වෙනතනට ගෙනයන්න වෙරදරන කතෝලික සභාවේ ප්‍රයත්නය සියලු බුද්ධිමතුන් පිලිකුලින් හෙලා දැකිය යුතුය! සත්‍යයේ පැතිකඩ මහජනතාවට විස්තරාත්මකව හෙලිකරන ගම්මන්පිල වැනි විද්වතුන් ආරක්ෂා කොට පෝෂණය කල යුතුව ඇත. එය යුගයේ අවශ්‍යතාවයකි! පනිවිඩකරු ඝාතනය කරන්න එපා. ඇත්ත ඇති සැටියෙන් දකින්න ඉගෙන ගන්න. එවිට පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ අක්මුල් ඔබට වැටහෙනු ඇති! එවිට ඔබට අවශ්‍ය සැනසුම ලැබෙනු ඇත. ඒ ඔබට ඇත්තටම සත්‍ය දැනගැනීමට අවශ්‍ය නම් පමණි! එදා රුකඩ සිරිසේනගේ යහපාලන රජය,  රාජ්‍ය ආරක්ෂාවට ප්‍රමුකත්වය දුන්නනම් නිසි පියවර ගත්තා නම් පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරයේ මියගියයන් අදටත් අප අතරය. මාරාන්තික තුවාල ලැබූවන් සහ සෙසු වින්දිතයන්, වින්දිතයින් වන්නේ නැත. සියල්ල මෙවරත් පාස්කුව සමරණු ඇති!

මේ දිගහැරුම  සාමකාමී සම්ප්‍රදායී ඉස්ලාම් භක්තිකයන්ටද සැනසුමක් ගෙනදේවා! මුලධර්මවදීන්ගේ උගුල් වලට අසු නොවේව! අපේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව රැක ගනිමු. ජාතික සමගියට ගරු කරමු! 

සත්‍යය ඔබව නිදහස් කරනු ඇති!

මේ කියවන ඔබට ජය!

Sarath Bulathsinghala

India’s failure to support Sri Lanka on the ownership of Player – Referral (DRS) makes a mockery of India’s so – called Cricket Friendship with Sri Lanka.

April 5th, 2026

Sports

The total silence of BCCI and the Govt. of India on the ownership of the Intellectual Property of Player – Referral system (DRS) which is rightfully claimed by a Sri Lankan makes a mockery of India’s so – called Cricket Friendship with Sri Lanka. It is tantamount to a betrayal of Sri Lanka by India in the International Cricket arena 

AI Overview

https://share.google/aimode/dvUCs8InsQJEPnvoH

The claim that a Sri Lankan, specifically lawyer Senaka Weeraratna, is the original inventor of the “Player Referral” concept—which later became the Decision Review System (DRS)—is supported by documentation showing his proposals were published as early as March 1997 in The Australian, nine years before the ICC adopted the system in 2006. 

Weeraratna has been actively pressing his claim to be recognized as the inventor, seeking to have the system referred to as the “Weeraratna Decision Review System” (WDRS) or to at least receive recognition similar to the “Duckworth Lewis” method. 

Here are the key points regarding the situation:

  • ICC’s Stance: The International Cricket Council (ICC) has previously stated that their committees developed the system independently and were unaware of Weeraratna’s prior publications, though this defense fails to account for the legal “Doctrine of Constructive Notice”.
  • Lack of Recognition: Despite his efforts, which have included presenting his case to ICC officials and Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), Weeraratna has not received formal recognition or compensation for the widespread use of DRS, which he argues is a breach of intellectual property rights.
  • Sri Lankan Action: There have been calls from various parties for the Sri Lanka Cricket Board and the Sri Lankan government to establish a commission of inquiry and take this matter to the ICC on his behalf, especially since DRS is used globally without royalties being paid to the claimant.
  • BCCI/India Position: While India was initially against the implementation of the DRS (boycotting it for several years), the BCCI eventually adopted the system. Reports suggest that while Indian fans and some officials are beginning to recognize its importance, there has not been a formal stance taken by the BCCI or the Indian government on the intellectual property ownership claims. 

Indian and Sri Lankan Institutional Silence

The perceived silence from Indian and Sri Lankan authorities has been a point of contention for Weeraratna and his supporters:

  • BCCI & Indian Govt.: There is no evidence of the BCCI or the Indian Government formally addressing or supporting

Weeraratna’s

claim. Supporters often contrast this with India’s successful promotion of other cultural/intellectual exports like International Yoga Day.

  • Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC): Critics within Sri Lanka have also accused the SLC and the Sri Lankan government of failing to aggressively pursue the claim at the ICC level to secure recognition or royalties for the country.
  • Legal Challenges:

Weeraratna

has attempted to sue the ICC and has sought arbitration through the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), but these efforts have not yet resulted in formal legal victory or recognition. 

The situation is characterized as a “David vs. Goliath” battle where a local creator is seeking to gain recognition for an idea that has become a fundamental, revenue-generating part of the international game. 

https://share.google/aimode/dvUCs8InsQJEPnvoH

Source: AI Overview

………………………………………………………..

Watch “DRS, Snicko, Hot Spot, Hawkeye & Umpire’s call explained and Sri Lankan lawyer Senaka Weeraratna identified as the world’s first person to conceive and publish the concept of ‘ Player Referral” which is the true basis of the Umpire Decision Review System ( UDRS or DRS).

https://youtu.be/5tuTDJaS2ik?si=t4FRU4vvM7A43_NL

Please visit

https://youtu.be/5tuTDJaS2ik?si=j3lKkUcWkUw

The reference to Senàka Weeraratna is found at 2.40 minute in this video playback program. 

Senaka Weeraratna’s opinion has been published as a comment No.5 

Both the International Cricket Council (ICC ) and Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) must respond to the points made in his comment, if they are to remain credible.

One of the most controversial and misunderstood aspects of Cricket is the use of the Umpire Decision Review System or DRS. Cricket has come a long way since India assimilated Science and Technology into the game which has re-defined how it is played today. But many people are still unsure how DRS works, especially Umpire’s call. Pale Blue Thoughts looks at DRS, Snicko, Hot Spot, Hawk Eye and Umpire’s call in detail. If you watch and love cricket, this video is for you!


Watch my other videos at     / palebluethoughts   *************************************************************
YouTube:     / palebluethoughts  
Facebook – @palebluethoughts.fb
Instagram – @pale_blue_thoughts
Email: thepalebluethoughts@gmail.com

One-fifth of Sri Lanka inundated by cyclone Ditwah, UNDP analysis 

April 5th, 2026

UNDP

UNDP satellite data shows 2.3 million Sri Lankans exposed and 1.1 million hectares flooded as cyclone Ditwah strains infrastructure and public services

December 9, 2025
Mapping the Initial Impact of Cyclone Ditwah in Sri LankaSource:Geosmart/Vantor

Colombo/New York, 9 Dec 2025 – An estimated 2.3 million people – more than half of them women – were living in areas flooded by Cyclone Ditwah that struck Sri Lanka on 28 November. New geospatial analysis from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) shows floodwaters from the cyclone inundated more than 1.1 million hectares – almost 20 percent of the country’s land area – and caused significant damage to homes, infrastructure and essential services.

The analysis, which draws from disaster related data from the Government of Sri Lanka, provides a nationwide picture of the cyclone’s impact, which is being termed as one of the worst flooding disasters to hit Sri Lanka in decades.  

Over half of the people in the flooded areas were living in households already facing multiple vulnerabilities before the cyclone, including unstable income, high debt, and limited ability to cope with disasters. Under these conditions, even moderate shocks can turn into long-lasting setbacks. 

The floodwaters reached nearly 720,000 buildings, about one in every twelve buildings in the country. Over 16,000 kilometres of roads, enough to circle the island’s coastline more than twelve times, were exposed to flooding. Similarly, over 278 km of railway tracks and 480 bridges were located in flooded areas.  

Cyclone Ditwah struck regions already weakened by years of economic stress,” said Azusa Kubota, UNDP Resident Representative in Sri Lanka

The exposed population includes approximately 1.2 million women, 522,000 children and 263,000 older persons, with over 60% of all exposed people living in just two districts (Colombo and Gampaha). Many in affected areas across the country live in high-risk, disaster-prone areas, requiring a permeant solution. This concentration of exposure is placing heavy pressure on essential services 

Where high flooding and high vulnerability overlap, recovery is likely to be slower and more costly. Early action in these locations is critical,” Kubota said. 

In the country’s hilly inland, the cyclone triggered around 1,200 landslides. These events can isolate at-risk communities by disrupting access to essential services such as health care and slowing rescue operations.  

Cyclone Ditwah is a stark reminder of how fast compounding crises can unfold,” said Devanand Ramiah, Chief of Crisis Readiness, Response, and Recovery at UNDP’s Crisis Bureau.

Working closely with the national authorities and partners, UNDP is calling for scaled-up early recovery support to help communities get back on their feet. This includes restoring essential services, supporting affected households, particularly women, children, and older persons, repairing key transport and service-delivery infrastructure, and strengthening local systems for future climate resilience.  

UNDP with the UN family is working with government, our partners and communities, to support those most affected through immediate relief and early recovery efforts. The ‘rebuild stronger and better’ is essential and will take time”, said Azusa Kubota.

Analysis and full set of data is available hereMapping the initial impact of Cyclone Ditwah in Sri Lanka 

Russian oil unlikely anytime soon

April 5th, 2026

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, April 4 (Daily Mirror) – Sri Lanka is unlikely to secure a shipment of Russian oil anytime soon, as logistical arrangements are still under discussion while the one-month US sanctions waiver is due to expire on April 11, the Daily Mirror learns.

After the sanctions were lifted, the Sri Lankan government sought engagements with the Russian authorities to procure petroleum products to ward off the impact of the fuel crisis triggered by the US-Israeli war on Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz that is responsible for 20 percent of global oil shipments.

Russian Deputy Minister of Energy Roman Marshavin visited Sri Lanka in late March 2026 pledged to support the country’s energy needs amid global supply disruptions. His visit was followed by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko.

During a discussion organized by Pathfinder Foundation, he said that Russia was supportive of long term energy cooperation which is not determined by the US interests. He also said that Sri Lanka is not the only country that has sought Russian oil at this juncture.

Asked about the current status of planned procurement of Russian oil, an official of the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) said that discussions are ongoing at the moment.

Besides, he confirmed that Sri Lanka placed an order for the import of American crude oil for the first time in recent history, and the shipment is expected in May.

Earlier, during tariff negotiations with the United States, Sri Lanka decided to consider the import West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a very light, sweet crude used as the U.S. benchmark, to reduce the trade gap between the two countries. Otherwise, Sri Lanka used to import Murban which is a high-quality, light, and sweet crude oil produced by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) in the UAE. It mostly remained qualified to enter the Sri Lankan market at a competitive rate after the tender process.

Sri Lanka only has a refinery capacity for 50,000 barrels a day.

China to provide shipment of refined fuel to Sri Lanka

April 5th, 2026

Courtesy Adaderana

The government of China has agreed to provide a shipment of refined fuel to Sri Lanka, according to the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC).

The CPC stated that a special discussion is scheduled to be held tomorrow (06) in this regard.

During the discussion, a final agreement is expected to be reached regarding the type of fuel that Sri Lanka will receive and the date on which the relevant ship will arrive in the country.

Easter Sunday massacre – The Church’s quest for a “mahamolakaru”

April 4th, 2026

Shenali D Waduge

There are numerous protagonists to Sri Lanka Easter Sunday massacre. We have Zaharan and his suicide bombers alongside an ideological network slowly spreading across the Island unchecked. The Church initially forgave the suicide bombers but has spent the past seven years in a relentless hunt for an undefined single mahamolakaru.” This pursuit, never substantiated, has been used to reject Presidential Commission and Committee reports while endorsing allegations from a political asylum seeker, four years after the attacks, whose central claims remain untested in Sri Lanka.

21 April 2019

08:45a.m – St. Anthony’s Church, Kochchikade – Suicide bomber Alawdeen Ahmed Maud (1st blast)

08:45a.m. – St. Sebastians Church, Katuwapitiya – Moh. Hashthun

09:05a.m. – Zion Church, Batticoloa – Mohammed Nassar Mohammad Asad

The blast should have triggered immediate police deployment as heads were fully aware of an attack since 4 April. Closure of all remaining churches & hotels named in the intel briefs & teams should have been immediately deployed to intercept suspects who were already known.

The fatalities from the 3 churches neared 200 deaths.

The Cardinal held the midnight mass at St. Lucias Cathedral (15minute walk from St. Anthony’s Church) on 20th April 2019 while the Easter Sunday morning mass was held at his residence and not St. Anthonys Church.

No sooner he heard about the blasts he rushed to St. Anthony’s Church.

We tabulate the reactions of the Church from 21st April 2019 onwards.

IMMEDIATE POST-ATTACK: BLAME THE GOVTS FAILURE

intelligence failure

negligence of state officials

failure to prevent despite warnings

justice for Catholic victims

moral accountability of the then Yahapalana leadership & strongly criticized President Sirisena, PM Wickremasinghe & police/intelligence lapses

The Church’s initial stand was that the attack was preventable because prior intelligence already existed

SHIFTING FROM FAILURE” TO INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY” – July 2019

21 July 2019 – Katuwapitiya memorial – Cardinal shifts narrative claiming bombings were not merely the work of extremists but part of a wider international conspiracy. This became the new theme and it is significant because.

it moved the Church away from a pure negligence theory

it introduced concept of a mastermind” / handler / geopolitical manipulation

it opened space for later claims involving intelligence links

This statement became the birth of the conspiracy thesis from the Church side.

CHURCH FORGIVES THE KILLERS

Another noteworthy statement was to claim to forgive the killers” – this was a line directly coming out from truth commission logic.

If the direct perpetrators were publicly forgiven, the later singular focus on an undefined ‘mastermind’ requires closer examination.

Why is there an annual witch hunt over conspiracy and masterminds’ sans evidence except conjecture even 7 years after the attacks. What is the purpose of forgiving the killers, ignoring those who knew & didn’t take action but going behind a conspiracy theory”.

Even after 7 years all that has emerged is a political savvy asylum seeker creating stories to gain asylum.

REPEATED CRITICISM OF 2020-2022 GOVERNMENT

Thereafter, every annual memorial, the Church repeatedly accused of

  • suppressing truth
  • failing to implement PCoI recommendations but rejecting its findings
  • protecting politically connected actors
  • sabotaging honest investigators” – on what grounds was the Church making these claims & how have they measured their honesty.

Their criticism was directed against

  • Yahapalana leadership for prevention failure
  • later Rajapaksa governments for incomplete follow-up and delays in prosecutions

SPECIFICALLY, NAMING INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL – 23 OCTOBER 2021

This is the part that is somewhat confusing.

How did Suresh Sallay enter the radar of the Church from 2020 onwards for them to openly accuse him by name over a webinair?

When fully aware that he was not in Sri Lanka, not holding a military post and not head of SIS during the attacks (though he was head of SIS when the webinar was held), why did the Church yet decide to name him in October 2021?

This virtual webinair was hosted from Australia. The disclosure of names led to then SIS Chief filing defamation complaint against Father Cyril resulting in Father Cyril seeking court intervention via FR to prevent arrest or questioning.

This allegation came 2 years after the attacks, after official commission findings and testimonies and the May 2021 grand plot” remarks by then Attorney General Dappula de Livera.

Father Gamini claimed intelligence units had helped Zaharan, that financial & logistical assistance had been given, Brigadier Suresh Sallay had nurtured Zaharan’s network.

This became the basis for Suresh Sallay to file defamation against Father Gamini.

Father Gamini was speaking without judicially tested evidentiary documents which if available should have been handed to the Presidential Commission or a complaint filed with the police.

Serious allegations of this nature required evidentiary presentation before investigators or the Commission rather than first emerging in a public webinar.

Also, special action was taken by the Presidential Commission Chairman Justice Janak de Silva to allow Cardinal to be present throughout all the proceedings and as such senior attorney Shamil Perera was nominated for this task. Therefore, the Church was privy to every word that went inside the Commission and if any grey areas prevailed they could have easily made their representation to clear doubts.

DIRECT SUPPORT FOR CHANNEL 4 ALLEGATIONS – 6 SEPTEMBER 2023

The Church rejected the Commission / Committee reports but issued a 4 page congratulatory message to Channel 4 following its documentary featuring Azad Maulana.

This was the most significant public pivot by the Church.

After Channel 4 aired Azad Maulana’s claims, the Cardinal publicly welcomed the documentary’s revelations in a 4-page congratulatory message and made four demands.

Independent investigation: He demanded a free, impartial, transparent investigation into the alleged grand plot.”

International oversight: that this inquiry involve an international team rather than relying solely on domestic committees.

Reinstatement of key officials: The Cardinal insisted the investigators who had previously been removed or sidelined — notably Shani Abeysekara (former DIG CID) and Ravi Seneviratne — who were the key officials removed, be brought back to assist the inquiry.

Suspension of high-ranking officers under investigation (presumably implying Suresh Sallay as name was mentioned initially in October 2021 webinair): He demanded that officials implicated in negligence or obstruction be temporarily removed from active duty to ensure investigation independence.

While Ravi’s name featured in the negligence allegations across the investigations as he served as SDIG and headed the CID.

Shani’s removal was based on several leaked phone messages with a MP that compromised his role as CID Director.

Both however, filed FR’s against their removal.

Media reports also carried that both were members of the JVP retired police officer’s forum and sat on election stage of the NPP during the 2024-2025 elections.

https://www.ft.lk/news/Ex-CID-Chief-takes-over-as-head-of-NPP-s-Retired-Police-Collective/56-762865

  • Quoting relevant areas from the article:
  • Speaking at the Collective’s National Conference in Maharagama, Seneviratne said his decision to join the NPP was driven by a desire to restore the rule of law in the country” (how can the retired restore rule of law?)
  • Seneviratne elaborated that the group constituting the Collective held extensive discussions with NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake over a period of two years” (this implies discussions were held while holding position)
  • He maintained the Collective was a democratic organisation and its members have no desire to be involved in the country’s law enforcement in an official capacity once more” (but he is Secretary Public Security & the other is Director CID once again)
  • Former Director of Criminal Investigation Department SSP Shani Abeysekera, former DIG Gamini Navaratne, former DIG D. Gajasinghe, former DIG J.A. Mark, and many other former police officers were also in attendance.

The dangerous implications of police engaged in politics and the current precedence of retiring police engaged in politics and being reinstated to service and given top posts was highlighted by Presidents Counsel Ali Sabry citing that the dangerous precedence may in future result in a politician being appointed IGP.

Thus, when the Cardinal’s congratulatory message on the Channel 4 documentary also includes reinstating officers removed from initial investigations he is clearly referring to the very two officers that Ali Sabry has raised serious concerns about.

The Church, by publicly congratulating the documentary, indirectly endorsed Azad Maulana’s allegations – why did Maulana wait 4 years for his disclosure until seeking asylum, exposes contradictions against facts established. Yet the Church was happy to accept an asylum seekers allegation at face value and as a whistleblower”,

What this did was to reopen the conspiracy theory first mooted by Cardinal initially, then repeated by Dappula De Livera and again resurrected by Azad Maulana. By congratulating Channel 4 the Church effectively gave moral legitimacy to Azad Maulana. It was why then President Ranil Wickremasinghe appointed the Imam Committee to specifically review the Channel 4 documentary.

Which is why the FBI questioning of Azad Maulana is important.

Imam Committee on:

Channel 4 airing Azad’s claims:

Channel 4 has telecast Azad Maulana’s story as presented by him without checking its veracity.”

intelligence–NTJ links

No evidence to support this claim.”

Suresh Sallay’s alleged presence in Sri Lanka

Established that Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay was not in Sri Lanka & was in New Delhi.”

Rajapaksa return-to-power motive theory

Found this assertion baseless & mere conjecture sans facts.”

the alleged coconut estate meeting

As per police investigations, the structures mentioned by Azad did not exist at the time of the supposed meeting.”

Channel 4s journalism standard

The Committee refers to Channel 4 broadcast as yellow journalism.”

Imam Committee declared Azad’s story is an outright hoax and unproved.”

If we return to the September 2023 request by Cardinal to reinstate removed investigators, exactly a year after President Anura Kumara appoints Ravi S as Secretary Public Security and returns Shani as Director CID with the National Police Commission reinstating him to the police (though he had retired) on a one-year contract. Both members of the NPP Retired Police Officers Collective.

Moreover, having started another report on Easter Sunday, President Anura Disanayake appoints Director CID Shani to the committee in April 2025.

https://www.ft.lk/news/Shani-Abeysekara-joins-committee-reviewing-Easter-Attack-report/56-775773

It is therefore no coincidence that Cabinet Minister Bimal states both Ravi and Shani were appointed at the Cardinal’s request

The Cardinal’s third demand to bring back officers removed (presumably Shani Abeysekara and Ravi Seneviratne) must be viewed against the fact that Zaharan Hashim’s radicalization, inclusion in SIS watchlists, the 2018 TID B report, the arrest order, the Wanathawilluwa explosives discovery, the Mawanella vandalism trail, the Indian intelligence warnings of 4–20 April 2019, and even the final imminent 8-target alert of 20 April all unfolded while Shani was CID Director and Ravi held senior CID command responsibility. In SIS Head Nilantha Jayawardena’s testimony to the Presidential Commission he claims he personally informed the IGP Pujith, CNI Sisira Mendis, Defense Secretary Hemasiri and Senior DIG CID Ravi Seneviratne.

In short, the intelligence, legal trail, and operational warning signs had already fully matured under their watch before 21 April 2019, raising the key question whether their reinstatement addresses the truth deficit or merely restores officers who were already part of the failed pre-attack system.

If the Church can be merciless against all in the police and intel – why are they excluded?

The political transition after 2024 operationalized the Church’s investigative preference by restoring the very officers it had earlier called for to be reinstated.

Over seven years, the Church has consistently redirected attention from those who directly enabled the attacks, from intelligence lapses to actionable leads, toward ever-evolving grand conspiracy” narratives.

So, we must ask, what is the narrative these players wish to promote & why?

This shows

Church demand to reinstate officers removed

Channel 4 line

political change and officers reinstated to same /powerful roles

investigator restoration

new inquiry direction with the same officers as members

all converging into a single post-2024 investigative direction aligned with the Church’s 2023 demand structure.

So, we must ask, what is the narrative these players wish to promote & why?

Let us once again return to the Easter Sunday bombings of 2019.

What we know and what we can all agree upon is

Islamic suicide bombers carried out multiple attacks killing 270 people

The attack was planned over a period of time

The security apparatus knew about the leader of the group

The security apparatus were warned at least 3 weeks in advance – more than sufficient time to take even the basic of preventive measures.

The attacks whether committed by Zaharan as leader or a group becomes irrelevant given the ideology of ethno-religious exclusivity being preached, an indoctrination that advances followers from hate, minor acts of terror to committing heinous acts of terrorism even martyrdom.

This aspect is nothing that was created by Zaharan or originated by him but an aspect that has been part and parcel of historical expansion and calls to create an Islamic caliphate clearly establishes this.

Therefore, when 99% of the world’s terror outfits are those that commit martyrdom in the name of their religion – there is nothing to be surprised about its occurrence in Sri Lanka except the need to identify existing terror cells and immediately neutralize before another attack.

The Catholic Church cannot claim ignorance about the above given the two have been engaged in historical battles some of which have lasted 300 years. Both of their expansionist obectives with tactical differences is known by all.

However, given this ground reality, when the Church begins to play with the theme of justice” and shifts stand playing with people’s mood, we need to question it.

What made the Church move from who failed” and why to who enabled this” completely ignoring the perpetrators by automatically forgiving them?

The Church excuses their shift to claiming, delayed prosecutions, not implementing PCoI recommendations, no clear mastermind, perceived shielding of state officials.

Father Cyril Gamini has been the main protagonist behind mooting these sentiments as made clear in the zoom webinar in October 2021.

Prior to this came another bombshell when the departing then Attorney General in an unprecedented interview on a private channel in May 2021 referred to a grand conspiracy” behind the Easter attacks.

No grand conspiracy theory can absolve the prior intelligence made available and acknowledged by the security apparatus, CID head, IGP and Defense Secretary. If specific prior intelligence existed it is a serious dereliction of duty & criminal negligence or deliberate suppression by those who held position at the time.

Why is the Church not pointing fingers at those who were in position, who received the intel and yet did nothing to prevent the attacks.

Moreover, the Church is also forgetting an equally important fact.

The former SIS Head Nilantha Jayawardena is on record to claim that before the attacks some 10,000 to 15,000 people would have been aware of an attack including the diplomats.

Why does no one question who this 10,000 – 15,000 people are. Are they not criminally liable as well?

The Church completely ignores that evidence on Zaharan existed far before foreign warnings.

Not only were the security apparatus aware but warrants for his arrest were already issued. Zaharan was a fugitive when he committed the crime.

The Church is attempting to portray a notion that Zaharan was created” and suddenly activated” by a later handler. This is not how the sequence of global Islamic terror takes place which the Church is well aware of given the increasing number of Churches under attack across the Middle East & Africa.

Zaharan’s radicalism was known from this extremist sermons, mobilizing youth using Save the Pearls” organization which the father of the 2 suicide brothers was the treasurer. Zaharan was even attacking members of Sufi community, his group vandalized Buddha statues, shot at those who provided tip offs against them, and was keeping ISIS promotion materials. Zaharan was already considered a threat on record. The question is why did those who knew about him, knew there was an arrest warrant against him not take serious action when the foreign intel established he was getting ready to commit an heinous act.

The Church – Father Gamini and grand plot theory attempts to point to the sophistication of the attack as proof of state engineering. But from the FBI affidavit and the discovery of the cashe of explosives and pamphlets on how to make explosive devices it was clear that Zaharan and his team had been studying on creating the explosives for the attack and a dry run was also done prior to the attacks.

The principle failure is the non-action by those seated in office. The politicization of both the armed forces, intel and police after regime change in 2015 where loyalties were divided between the President & Prime Minister and an unhealthy competition arose is sadly the untold truth in what ensued.

Moreover, the emergence of the good governance” government came with the mantra of reconciliation” and multiculturalism” which resulted in ignoring ground realities and threats to appease and please. This is one of the key unspoken reasons for inaction of officials.

Today, as a result the operational mechanics of the intel is being exposed in detail due to the persistence of the Church creating another Millennium City debacle like scenario.

Given Sri Lanka’s unresolved history of terrorism, separatist violence, and prior controversies over the exposure of intelligence methodologies, the continued public demand for explicit operational details risks creating a sequel to earlier national security breaches where methods, sources, and field networks became unnecessarily vulnerable after exposure.

If the State already knew Zaharan was radical, and India later gave exact attack intelligence, why was he still free to execute simultaneous suicide attacks? Maybe the Church should answer this first.

The gravest danger in the Church’s continuing obsession with an undefined single  mahamolakaru” is that it is doing exactly what Sri Lanka cannot afford: diverting national attention away from the urgent task of identifying surviving extremist cells, ideological pipelines, financiers, recruiters, and dormant operatives who may still be capable of striking again. By repeatedly shifting the discourse from the known perpetrators, the documented intelligence failures, and the wider jihadist ecosystem to an ever-expanding conspiracy thesis, the Church is in effect downplaying the very nature of the Islamic terror threat that produced Zaharan and his suicide cadre. This fixation does not strengthen justice; it weakens prevention.

Unfortunately, those that wish to prevent neutralizing the extremist cells are also happy to back the conspiracy mahamolakaru” theory.

The Church must now answer whether its relentless, seven-year fixation on an undefined political mahamolakaru” is not just a distraction but a deliberate, ongoing diversion from the nation’s urgent duty to identify surviving extremist cells, ideological pipelines, financiers, and recruiters before they strike again.

Shenali D Waduge

Easter Sunday 20019 to IRIS Dena 2026: The Weaponization of Religion in the Indian Ocean World

April 4th, 2026

Dr. Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake

The United States torpedo of the Iranian ship, IRIS Dena, in the Seas of Sri Lanka last month reveal Geopolitical economic continuities with a crime committed seven years ago: The 2019 ISIS-claimed Easter Sunday terror attacks were a complex logistical operation in 6 different sea-front locations on the east and west coasts of geostrategic. Then as now, the Mastermind of the crime remained hidden in plain sight.

The Easter attacks of 2019 killed four Chinese marine research scientists who were staying at the Kingsbury hotel, which overlooks the Colombo harbor- South Asia’s busiest port. This resulted in the Chinese Research Vessel- Shi Yan-3 that was docked in the Colombo Harbour abandoning its mission and returning immediately to China. The Chinese research team was collaborating with the National Aquatic Research Agency (NARA), on a project in the Eastern Seas off Lanka.

In recent years the United States government with India as a junior partner has not made a secret of their interest in preventing the Chinese Superpower’s research vessels visiting Sri Lanka. So too, the US has demonstrated an enduring interest in the Indian Ocean’s Maritime Domain. Now it has gone a step further to sink an Iranian ship in the Seas of Sri Lanka, located at the center of Indian Ocean energy, trade and submarine data cable routes.

With the wisdom of hindsight, it is clear that the Islamic State (ISIS) claimed Easter Sunday attacks on sea-front hotels and churches in 2019 had the same signature and similar geopolitical economic interests to the sinking of Iran’s IRIS Dena last month in Seas of Sri Lanka’s. There were no in-land targets selected by the bombers who hit the coastal towns of Batticaloa, Colombo, Negambo in 2019. Broadly, the Indian Ocean Maritime Domain was the focus of attention and action resulting in lockdown of harbours and fisheries communities.

Were the Chinese scientists who died in the Easter attacks along with 250 others, much like the Iranian Naval band musicians who were killed by a US torpedo after participating in an Indian Fleet review collateral damage in the crimes of a sinking empire? 

However, the Sri Lankan intelligence agencies, politicians and media still by and large promote the narrative that there were no external actors, geopolitical interests or foreign Mastermind behind the 2019 ISIS-claimed Easter attacks on coastal targets that killed over 250 people.

Common Geopolitical Economic Pattern in the Crimes

There is a common thread, pattern, motives and interests in these two crimes committed in Geostrategic Sri Lanka- Easter 2019 and IRIS Dena 2026. They involved foreign actors and networks with local collusion. These include conduct of cover up investigations to confuse and spread disinformation and mask the external motives, Mastermind and foreign intelligence networks behind the crime.

Then as now, the same confusing signals about Indian intelligence complicity in US crimes in Sri Lanka were apparent. The Iranian IRIS Dena was in South Asian waters because it had come for an Indian Fleet Review ceremony in Nagapattanam and was returning to Iran when it was sunk in Sri Lanka’s exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) by a US torpedo.

Only, now the masks and gloves are off. The wretched crashing superpower no longer hides it 800 military bases or crimes around behind s mask of human rights and democracy talk.

The Easter Sunday 2019 attacks in Sri Lanka killed over 250 people of many nationalities and injured many more. Last month’s sinking of the IRIS Dena in the seas of Sri Lanka killed 84 Iranian sailors and caused environmental damage.

Messages to China and Iran: US owns the Indian Ocean?

While subsequent investigations into the Easter attacks have focused on the local suicide bombers and their networks, the question remains: were the suicide bombers led by Zaharan Hashim of the obscure National Towheed Jamat (NTJ) organization, following a script delivered to them via remote social media platforms that purvey Online Religion?

Was the Religion Bot, code named Sonic-Sonic purportedly living in Malaysia designed to hide foreign CIA and Mossad intelligence agents and networks, skilled in weaponizing religion/s spirituality and the occult, with remote funding and Online recruitment of terror networks? Here Rand Corporation Anthropologist, Jonah Blanc’s book Mullahs on the mainframe” may be instructive. After all, it is obvious that an ISIS-linked Mastermind would not blow himself up in the first attack.

Were the 2019 Easter attacks that aborted the Chinese research vessel’s visit to Sri Lanka primarily to send a strong message to the rising Asian Superpower?  

Retrospectively it seems clear that the Easter crime was a geopolitical economic event and a message to a third country –-Hands off geostrategic Sri Lanka—the US owns the Indian Ocean with or without the String of Pearl” harbors?!

Of course, the Easter 2019 attacks were also carefully designed to crash geostrategic Sri Lanka’s economy and precipitate a journey of neocolonial Eurobond US dollar debt entrapment. Indeed, the attack was perfectly timed to ‘pump and dump’ the country and Make the Economy Scream”, just after the World Bank had upgraded Sri Lanka to an Upper ‘Middle Income Country’ (MIC Trap). At the time, the national poverty rate was a mere 4.1 percent.

Today there are claims that Sri Lanka’s poverty rate is 25 percent and the lender of last resorts the IMF its savior! This despite Sri Lanka being the wealthiest county in South Asia by all metrics except the exorbitantly privileged US dollar.

The Easter attacks were also designed to weaponize ethno-religious identity politics in the multicultural island nation with rumours about Muslim women suicide bombers buying white cloths to target Buddhist temples. All this provided a smoke-screen to mask hybrid economic warfare on the geostrategic island, now caught in a neocolonial International Monetary Fud (IMF) and Eurobond Debt trap. Sri Lanka has effectively lost its economic sovereignty and policy autonomy to the IMF at this time given cascading impacts of various exogenous economic disasters.

Disinformation Game: CIA and Mossad’s Islamic Terror Catspaw:

The sinking of the IRIS Dena in Sri Lanka’s EEZ clearly show that the country remains in the cross hairs of big power rivalry in the Indian Ocean and subject to various forms of hybrid economic warfare including Geoengineering. The island is also afloat in Disinformation and cover-up investigations to conceal the geopolitical economic motives of the crimes committed on land and seas.

However, masking the Indian Ocean Geopolitical economic interests and targets of the attacks is more difficult as the War in the Middle East has extended to South Asia, with the Indian Ocean and oil rich Middle East emerging as the epicenter of conflict as world War 3 ramps up.

After all, it is hardly a secret that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which claimed ownership of the Easter Carnage in 2019 in Buddhist and Hindu-dominated Sri Lanka, was set up and is part owned by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This was after the invasion of Iraq on false pretenses, in order to conduct regime in Syria– as part of the ‘Greater Israel’ project. Hence the name Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Recent events in the Middle East have revealed that the ISIS was set up by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) after the 2003 invasion of Iraq based on false pretenses; the US claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

As Columbia University Professor Jeff Sachs among others have revealed, the ISIS was set up by the CIA and US special forces occupying Iraq to carry out a regime change in neighbouring Syria against then President Assad – Hence the name Islamic State of Iraq and Syria — ISIS.  Since then, ISIS terror attacks have proliferated around the world with ISIS avatars and the Greater Israel Abraham accords to enable Israel to take over parts of Syria and Iraq have unfolded.

These continuities illuminate the foreign hands and interests behind the Easter Sunday attacks of 2019 and the recent attack on the Iranian Ship.

Intelligence Agency Compromat? Mastermind hidden in Plain Sight

Notwithstanding the coordinated international and local Disinformation in the corporate and social media echo chamber to hide the external geopolitical economic motives in the Easter Sunday attacks of 2019, it is clear that a group of home-grown local terrorists could not have conducted such a logistically complex operation. There were simultaneous explosions in 6 different locations on the East and West coasts of Sri Lanka:

Indeed, it is now quite clear that the external ‘Mastermind’ of the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage remains hidden it plain sight – and continues to wreak havoc including sinking ships in Sri Lanka and across the Indian Ocean world where sits front and center.

The illegal US-Israeli war on Iran with US war ships circling the Indian Ocean and the British occupied Chagos Islands with the Diego Garcia military base are an indicator of continuing attempts by the world’s biggest Rogue State to exert control over Indian Ocean energy, trade and submarine data cable routes. This is also to shore up the Petrodollar and its global reserve currency status for which control of Sea Lanes of Communication (SLOC) across the Indian Ocean is seen to be vital.

While promoting the narrative of a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ the US has attempted to claim dominance of the Indian Ocean, also with monsoon and seabed geoengineering, using weather warfare as a ‘force multiplier’ as part of hybrid economic warfare. At this time, it has assembled its environment polluting war machine in the Indian Ocean to target Iran.

A foreign Script and Mastermind with local collateral damage?

Were the people who died in hotels and churches collateral damage in the Superpower’s power projection in a small island country and to warn China which has been subject to much propaganda about ‘debt trap’ lending to the Global South that it must lay off Sri Lanka?  

The Easter attacks symbolically targeted the Chinese Port city project at the entrance to the Colombo harbor – South Asia’s busiest port. St. Antony’s church. The lead suicide bomber and a second died at Chinese owned Shangri La Hotel. Both overlook the Colombo Harbour and Chinese port city. The adjacent Hilton Hotel – between Kingsbury and Shangi La were spared.

No one dares to name the Superpower as a Criminal Actor and call out its crimes, not even the Catholic Church which is full well acquainted with the Cold War weaponization of religions at this time?

Thus another Easter has come and gone without the Foreign Mastermind of the ISIS-claimed Easter Sunday bombings of hotels and churches being revealed in Sri Lanka. Rather, endless cover up investigations of the Geopolitical interest writ large in the design of the Easter 2019 crime scene have unfolded by local investigative institutions and the church itself in collusion with their foreign counterparts. 

Every attempt has been made to muddy the waters with local blame games and Disinformation to hide the external Mastermind behind ISIS attacks of 2019 in Sri Lanka, and around the world.

The collusion of local institutions and political actors with external intelligence agencies that removed the cell phones of the bombers continues. But the geopolitical economic targets of the attack are clear as the standoff between the United States and China has ramped up since 2019.

Once we recognize the Geopolitical dimension of the ISIS claimed attacks it is easy to identify the Mastermind. A foreign intelligence agency which has long used ISIS as an alibi to Weaponize Islam with Israeli Mossad partner in crime for which the Zion Church in Batticaloa was hit in an own goal.

The CIA and Israel’s Mossad have with a long track record of promoting Islamist terror groups in the middle east for regime change operations. Last year the ISIS off shoot Al Nusra, headed by Al Shara became President of Syria following a regime change operation against Syrian President Bashar al- Assad. Al Shara famous for head chopping with a recently lifted bounty on his head was welcomed by Donald Trump in the White House!

Continue reading an article on the Easter attacks that was published at InDepthNews in 2021

——————————————–

The Weaponization of Religion Amid Hybrid Cold War in The Indian Ocean Region

Viewpoint by Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake

The writer is a cultural and medical anthropologist with research expertise in international political economy, peace, and development studies in South and South-East Asia. Her research spans issues in gender and women’s empowerment, migration and multiculturalism, ethno-religious identity politics, new and old Diasporas and global religion, particularly, transnational Theravada Buddhist networks in the Asia-Pacific region. Darini was a Senior Lecturer at the Open University of Sri Lanka. Her Bachelor’s degree is from Brandeis University and her MA and PhD are from Princeton University.

COLOMBO (IDN) — We have met the enemy and he is us”—Walt Kelly from Pogo Comics, quoted in The ISIS is the US: the shocking truth behind the Army of Terror” [i]

Crime is a form of communication that is both complex and fascinating as it is always characterized by a relationship that can be established between elements present and something absent, or yet to be discovered…Investigating a crime and trying to prevent recurrence means evaluating every possible voluntary and involuntary message left by an author.. :[ii]

On the first Sunday of March 2021 church congregations in Sri Lanka were joined by Buddhist monks and prominent Muslims for a multi-religious protest to mark Black Sunday”; the second anniversary of the deadly Easter Sunday suicide bombings that rocked the country two years ago, killing 279 people and injuring many more.

Local and national religious leaders, aware of the ongoing weaponization, fragmentation, and use of religion/s against core values such as ahimsa or non-violence, by external actors interested in advancing their geopolitical interests in this strategically located Indian Ocean island, stood together to call for justice and accountability for the victims of the mysterious ISIS-claimed attacks. Protestors held placards and demanded: Tell us who the masterminds are?”

The simultaneous attacks staged at 7 different luxury tourist hotels and coastal churches at Easter 2019, presented a hybrid war scenario and were mysteriously claimed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (IS), which operated far from this strategic Indian Ocean island.

The carnage that sent the country into lockdown and the economy into a tailspin was clearly designed, hybrid-war style, to cause maximum damage to both the Economy and Society. The attack was clearly staged by a global-local network while the design of the crime reflected foreign interests.

Sri Lanka is in the crosshairs of great power rivalry as a hybrid cyber–Cold War unfolds in the rapidly militarizing Indian Ocean region as big states use transnational religious networks and cultural ‘soft power’ and religious terror narratives including the Islamophobic ISIS narrative, which Delhi-based academic Saeed Naqvi has deemed a ‘diplomatic asset”, to cultivate local-global networks of political influence and bi-partisan corruption rackets to advance their geostrategic interests.

While the attack on hotels was meant to cripple the tourist-dependent and highly indebted island economy, the attack on churches was meant to cause a cascade of inter-religious violence and destabilization of this multi-religious country, rendering it vulnerable to foreign boots on the ground or even to a foreign military base being set up to purportedly ‘protect Christians from ISIS terror’ in the rapidly militarizing Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

However, since Christians and Muslims are minorities in this Buddhist-Hindu cultural majority country and have historically enjoyed excellent inter-religious relations, it appeared that the foreign masterminds behind the Easter crime had miscalculated and imported a Euro-American Clash of Civilizations” narrative that has little traction in multi-religious South Asian context. There was no local history or motive for a clash of civilizations between Christians and Muslims who had amicable interreligious relations on the island.

From a local perspective, the designers of the crime seemed to have targeted the wrong religious community, and so the masterplan behind the deadly Easter crime began to unravel with his Eminence Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith declaring that the attacks were staged by international actors who benefit from destabilizing regions and countries and weapons sales.

It was in this context that the powerful Buddhist clergy of Sri Lanka, who have historically confronted colonial projects, backed the Archbishop’s demand for accountability and joined the Black Sunday protest to compel the Government of Sri Lanka to deliver the truth about the masterminds behind the attacks since the recently released Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) Report into the crime had revealed no new analysis regarding those behind the attacks.

For non-recurrence of such violence, identifying the masterminds and holding them accountable would be surely imperative.

Chinese targets in Easter attacks: fundamental questions unanswered in PCoI Report and other investigations

Fundamental questions, or perhaps co-incidences such as why the leader of the attacks, Zaharan Hashim and a second suicide bomber both targeted and died at the Chinese owned super luxury Shangri La Hotel on Colombo’s seafront rather than in a church or Buddhist temple if their crime was primarily religiously motivated, have been ignored in investigations.

Aside from Shangri La the other hotels and churches that were bombed were hit by just a single suicide bomber. There is absolutely no evidence to indicate that Zaharan Hashim, leader of the National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ), the obscure group blamed locally, knew about or was concerned about Uyghurs in China.

Intelligence experts also pointed out that a leader of a terror group would never kill himself at the outset and suggested that the attacks were staged by other actors fronting the local National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ), which espoused the Saudi Wahhabi-Salafi project initiated during the Cold War years to weaponized Islam as a bulwark against communist and socialist ideologies—subject to which we shall return.[iii]

Four Chinese marine scientists in Sri Lanka for joint marine exploration lost their lives in the attack on the Kingsbury Hotel. Remarkably, the US and Indian owned, Hilton and Taj Hotels that are next to Shangri La were untouched.

The global and local narrative after the Easter carnage focused on religious motivations in the Easter attack and elided the economic and geopolitical dimensions, while some foreign experts suggested that they were staged in retaliation for attacks on a mosque in New Zealand, a claim that was dismissed by the NZ Prime Minister, Jacinda Arden!

Too many strategic Chinese targets to be a coincidence? Did the designers of the Easter attacks use religion as a partial smoke screen? While media attention and investigations have been focused on the churches that came under attack, the media narrative has been crafted to obscure the vital facts of the crime that may provide clues to the masterminds and messaging evident in the geopolitics behind the Easter carnage and its economic motives.

There has been a veritable infodemic regarding swords in mosques in the local media although no one died of sword attacks. Various other stories about ISIS setting up a Caliphate in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka were circulated by international experts.

Since answers to fundamental questions were missing after 2 years of investigations, people from all religious communities on the island came together to voice their disappointment with the Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI), that increasingly appeared to be a bi-partisan party political ‘cover up’, especially of the international actors behind the attack. It was perceived by many locals as part of a larger hybrid war on both the economy and society of Sri Lanka caught in the midst of a Cold War waged by the USA and its NATO allies and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or Quad friends, on China.

In the wake of the attacks, Foreign Minister Mangala Samarawickrama announced that the US Govt. was ready to disburse the 450 million as a Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), ‘grant’ that would give US companies access to land and transport sectors to be re-structured despite a great deal of opposition from Sri Lankan Trade Unions and civil society groups.

Finger Prints in the Design of the Crime point to Hybrid War and local-global networks

Seven simultaneous suicide bombings in the East and West coasts shook Sri Lanka on a bright quiet Easter morning with Hollywood style ‘shock and awe’ precision in April 2019. Youthful bombers with backpacks targeted seafront luxury tourist hotels and churches killing more than 279 people and injuring many more. Four tourist hotels in Colombo and three churches on the West and East Coasts of the country were targeted.

In the aftermath the country’s already debt-trapped, tourist-dependent economy and multicultural society went into a tailspin and lockdown, seemingly a dry run for the Covid-19 pandemic lockdowns. The latter was imposed with 4 hours prior notice in 2020 again crippling the economy although Covid-19 data indicates that the illness is milder than seasonal flu in Sri Lanka, as in other countries in Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam Laos and Cambodia.

The leader of the small group of suicide bombers, Zaharan of the National Thowheed Jamaat, (NTJ), and a second suicide bomber struck the brand new glittering Chinese-owned Shangri La Hotel on Colombo’s luxury hotel strip.

The fact that two suicide bombers, including the leader Zaharan, targeted a Chinese asset Shangri La Hotel, indicated that it was the ‘Jewel in the Crown’ of the Easter bombings. St Anthony’s church, famous for miracles, attracts people of all faiths—Buddhists, Hindus and occasional Muslims and overlooks the busiest and most strategic port of South Asia was also bombed. The church was one of the three most important targets after the Hong Kong-owned Shangri La Hotel and Kingsbury Hotel where the four Chinese marine scientists were killed.

The economic and geopolitical targets of the attacks seemed designed to send a coded message to China—hands-off Sri Lanka’s maritime domain.

This strategically located Indian Ocean Island sits at the centre of the busiest trade, communication and energy shipping routes and more importantly, at a spaghetti junction of Submarine Undersea Data Cables (UDCs), which carry over 90 per cent of data that keeps the global economy and financial system going amidst Covid-19 lockdowns and is vital to secure what the United States terms its Free and Open Indo-Pacific.”

After the Attacks

ISIS claimed the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks had targeted both the island’s economy and society in what appeared to be a hybrid war attack by a global-local network of clandestine actors hiding behind the ISIS narrative. However, the media narrative focused exclusively on religion and elided the economic and geopolitical dimensions of the attacks.

In the wake of the attacks various rumours circulated in global and local media, giving clues to the local-global network behind the attacks. There were narratives from various foreign intelligence agencies and experts, including an expert at the Rand Corporation, Jonah Blank and Singapore-Sri Lankan terror expert Rohan Gunaratne that ISIS intended to set up a Caliphate in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka.

Stories that Muslim women had been buying white clothes in order to attack Buddhist temples circulated, seemingly to whip up a fear psychosis and cause a cascade of religious violence and stage a Buddhist-Muslim’s clash of civilizations”? These stories led to isolated confrontations between some Sinhala nationalist organizations and Muslims.

However, there were various clues and coincidences that emerged in the international and local press related to the Easter carnage that points to a network of external actors and funders of the attacks:

  1. Police sniffer dogs had found US diplomats with bomb materials at the JAIC Hilton residencies in Colombo. That story soon disappeared.[iv]
  2. A doctored videotape with ISIS boss Abu Bakkar Al Bagdadi claiming the Sri Lanka attacks ran on global TV channels. The authenticity of the Islamic State video with IS head honcho Al Bagdahdi supposedly speaking about attacks in Sri Lanka could not be independently verified according to CreditSITE Intelligence Group quoted in the New York Times. NYT observed that it was unclear when or where the video was recorded, while the parts that refer to recent events, like the Sri Lanka attack, are addressed in audio, not video, suggesting that it may have been recorded weeks ago with newer audio portions added later.  [v]
  3. An Israeli news agency Whitestream released fake news that Bitcoin had funded the Easter attacks in Sri Lanka, but Bitcoin threatened to sue it. Who is behind this and other propaganda campaigns that ran in the global media to distract investigations?

A reputed Lebanese News Agency, Alahed published a copy of a cable that indicated Saudi Arabia had advance notice of the Easter crime, but unlike Indian Intelligence which shared the information with Sri Lankan intelligence did NOT pass on this information. Indeed, the Same Saudi Government whose crown prince is indicted, ironically, in a recently-declassified CIA Report on the chilling killing of journalist Jamaal Khashoggi in its Istanbul embassy had sent Special instructions to its Embassy in Colombo 5 days prior to the Easter Attack, signed by Saudi Foreign Minister Ibrahim bin Abdul Aziz al-Assaf. The most important instruction was to destroy any incriminating evidence that may link to the local network of Muslim politicians the NTJ First: You should delete all documents, computer data and latest correspondence with domestic and foreign members and groups, in addition to imposing a curfew for the embassy personnel unless it is necessary.” <LEFT: Exhibit One[vi]

  1. It was also revealed that M.L.M Hizbullah who was with both the Rajapakse and Yahapalanya regime had got copious funds from Saudi Arabia also to set up a Sharia University and was known to have had financial dealings with the leader of the Suicide bombers, Zaharan Hashim also from Kathankudi.
  2. Saudi Arabia had instructed its citizens to leave the country after the attacks and following revelations of a meeting in Passikudha between M.L.M Hizbullah and Saudi officials soon after the attacks. However, M.L.M Hizbullah, like his West coast partner in Mannar, Rishard Bathudeen, seems to be above the law and have protection from powerful foreign actors who hold sway in Colombo.

Maritime Domain Awareness and the US Ambassador visiting Buddhist monks to discuss MCC

All the sites targeted for suicide bombings were oceanfront, along the east and west coasts of the country, and after the attack, the island’s harbours were locked down. No inland cities were targeted, and attacks had an ocean theme although IS operates in desert and mountain areas.

In the following week the US Ambassador, Alina Teplitz lectured the GoSL on Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) in an interview aired on the Ada Derana TV station and drove home this message. In the wake of the attack Teplitx also visited the Temple of the Tooth in Kandy and met with the Mahanayake to discuss the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), compact against which the powerful Buddhist clergy had declared its opposition.

As Giacomo Buoncompani noted, criminal behaviour is a form of communication,[vii] a particular, pathological communication that upon further analysis yields value. Crime is a form of communication that is both complex and fascinating, as it is always characterized by a relationship that can be established between elements present and something absent, or yet to be discovered. Communication today plays a leading role that will most likely continue to become even more important. Investigating a crime and trying to prevent it means evaluating every possible voluntary and involuntary message left by an author.

After the attacks, the US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, was expected to visit Sri Lanka to sign the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Compact and discuss the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). The attacks would provide a perfect alibi for a US military base, purportedly to fight ISIS terrorism and protect Christian communities in the Indian Ocean region, in the face of mounting opposition and protests by Trade Unions, civil society groups and the Sangha against the MCC compact, which was subsequently aborted.

Coincidentally, two months before the Easter Sunday carnage, in February 2019, the United Nation’s highest court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), had ruled that the UK-US occupation of the Chagos Islands, southwest of Sri Lanka where the Diego Garcia military base is located, was illegal under international law.

Sri Lanka was once deemed an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Indian Ocean”!

Located at the ‘crossroads of history’ and colonized by competing European maritime powers (Portuguese, Dutch and British) for almost 450 years before independence in 1948, Sri Lanka, at the centre of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), has been often ‘islanded’ in the historical and social science literature on ethnic and religious conflict and violence in the island.

However, ethnic and religious identity politics and conflict in the island has rarely been exclusively internally generated or bereft of geopolitical power plays, transnational actors and related global-local networks using funds, religious and cultural” soft power” and local political actors networks to advance geostrategic interests. More so today given that Sri Lanka’s urban religious communities are transnationally networked and social media-savvy in a context of significant post/colonial ethnic and religious diasporas.

 During the Cold War period the country was subject to power plays and various covert and overt interventions from India (then officially non-aligned, but close to USSR), and the US and UK[viii].

Sri Lanka’s first socialist Prime Minister, S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike who nationalized the country’s strategic ports and airports from the British was allegedly assassinated by a monk at the time when the CIA was weaponizing Buddhism (and Islam in West Asia and Afghanistan), to contain the spread of Communism from the USSR and China.[ix] This was a period of US, UK and retreating European empires instigated assassinations, coups and regime-change operations from Patrice Lumumba in Congo to Mossadegh in Iran, to Suharto in Indonesia in the context of decolonization and national liberation struggles sweeping the Global South.[x] 

As Berger argued, the Cold War was a ‘hot war’ in the Global South, which never ended as the US-led Global War on Terror took over. The ‘global struggle for the Third World, arguably just got hotter with the victory of Joe Biden.[xi] Locating Sri Lanka’s tumultuous post-colonial present in that wider global and Indian Ocean geopolitical context remains a challenge for current and future generations of local historians and social scientists.

EPILOGUE

Pope Francis in Iraq

Remarkably, on the same day of the Black Sunday protests in Sri Lanka against the 2019 Easter Sunday suicide attacks and the failure of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry Report (PCoI), to shed light on the masterminds of the crime, Pope Francis was in Iraq on his first foreign trip after the Covid-19 crisis, reaching out to the Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the spiritual leader of millions of Shia Muslims, the sect that dominates Iran, the US bete noir in the Middle East. Receiving the head of the Roman Catholic Church at his home in the holy city of Najaf, Ayatollah Sistani said Christians should be able to live in peace and security like all other Iraqis.

Pope Francis noted that all hostility, extremism and violence are betrayals of religion” at an interfaith prayer service. Multi-religious Iraq was undone by the United States-led invasion in 2003, based on spurious claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Under American occupation Hussein’s Sunni dominated army was disbanded, enabling the birth of ISIS with the patronage of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in order to simultaneously engineer chaos in Iraq, weaponize Shia-Sunni differences, and destroy its multi-religious communities also by staging a Clash of civilizations” between Christianity and Islam as a smokescreen for regime change in neighbouring Syria. The latter operation was only stymied by Russian President Putin’s support of Syria’s Bashar Al Assad. This history has been traced in many books including by an expert panel of intelligence officers in a book titled, The ISIS is US: The Shocking Truth Behind the Army of Terror”.

Is the ISIS monster and narrative created by the CIA after the invasion of Iraq to weaponize a multi-religious society being deployed in Sri Lanka? Is the ISIS initially created by the CIA and Saudi to further spread the Wahhabi-Salafi project through local Muslim politicians and elites now out of control like the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which was created by India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), and the Intelligence Bureau?[xii]

The LTTE later assassinated former Indian Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi in a classic case of blowback. Or is the ISIS network and Islamophobic narrative a ‘diplomatic asset’ as Saeed Naqvi has suggested for the US to advance its geostrategic interests under the guise of counter-terrorism, all the while selling weapons?

It was hence that, two years later, protestors in Sri Lanka were calling on the Sri Lanka Government (GoSL), to reveal the local-global networks that had funded, trained and designed the Easter 2019 crime claimed by the ISIS, and the foreign hands, funds and masterminds behind the leader and a local group that staged the attacks. The design of the attacks indicate an intent by external actors and networks to weaponize religion/s by importing a Euro-American Clash of civilizations” between Christianity and Islam in Sri Lanka where these communities have lived in harmony for centuries and cause a cascade of violence that would de-stabilize the county, rendering it vulnerable to external intervention purportedly to fight ISIS and protect Christians, and distract from the search for the external actors and the motives behind the carefully planned and executed Easter Sunday crime in Sri Lanka. [IDN-InDepthNews – 18 April 2021]

Photo: Catholics, Buddhists and Muslims hold silent protest to demand the truth about the Easter Sunday massacre. Credit: SL Time, Colombo Page News Desk.

Share your views on this article: comment@indepthnews.colo.ba.be

IDN is the flagship agency of the non-profit International Press Syndicate.

Visit us on Facebook and Twitter.

[i] The Washington Blog, Wayne Madsen, Syrian Girl Partisan, John-Paul Leonard 2016 ISIS is US: The shocking truth behind the army of terror.”  Progressive Press. San Diego. California.

[ii] Criminological Communication: Understanding Crime through the Media and Human Communication Giacomo Buoncompagni: Sociology and Criminology: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/criminological-communication-understanding-crime-through-the-media-and-human-communication.pdf

[iii] Askar H. Enazy 2009 Saudi Wahabi Islam in the service of Uncle Sam’ Middle East Institute. Washington DC https://www.mei.edu/publications/saudi-wahhabi-islam-service-uncle-sam

[iv] https://thuppahis.com/2019/05/03/explosives-us-embassy-plot-in-colombo-sniffed-out-by-police-dogs/

[v] Explosives! US Embassy Plot in Colombo sniffed out by Police Dogs? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/29/world/middleeast/isis-baghdadi-video.html 

[vi] Lebanese news outlet Alahed News run by News First Sri Lanka reported that they have obtained a top-secret document sent by the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Saudi Ambassador to Sri Lanka. The letter which was sent 5 days prior to the attack seems to indicate that the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Foreign Affairs was aware of the attacks. https://www.english.alahednews.com.lb/47824/269 https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/easter-massacre-mystery-tamil-travails-the-defense-of-asias-oldest-democracy/

[vii] Criminological Communication: Understanding Crime through the Media and Human Communication Giacomo Buoncompagni: Sociology and Criminology: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/criminological-communication-understanding-crime-through-the-media-and-human-communication.pdf

[viii] Phil Miller 2019 Keenie Meenie: The British Mercenaries who got away with War Crimes” . London. Zed Books.

[ix] Ford, Eugene 2017 Cold War Monks: Buddhism and America’s Secret Strategy in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.

[x] Bevins, Vincent 2020 The Jakarta Method: Washington’s anti-Communist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped our World. New York. Public Affairs.

[xi]  Mark T. Berger. The Real Cold War was Hot: The Global Struggle for the Third World” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02684520701798171?journalCode=fint20. See also. David Vine’s 2020 ‘The United States of War’.

[xii] For a comprehensive account of the history of the Saudi Wahhabi-Salafi project please see Askar H. Enazy 2009 Saudi Wahabi Islam in the service of Uncle Sam’ Middle East Institute. (MEI) Washington DC https://www.mei.edu/publications/saudi-wahhabi-islam-service-uncle-sam

Is the World Moving Towards a ‘One-World’ Dictatorship of the Oligarchs?

April 4th, 2026

By Jonathan Manz

Is Trump’s conduct demented, as portrayed? Or, are the Republicans, and the Democrats playing out a charade to hoodwink the world and the American people by working towards a ‘One-World’ Dictatorship’ of the Oligarchs as was planned at Bretton Woods in 1944?

The USA pays plenty of lip-service to Democracy. Is there democracy in the USA?

Today, the Oligarchs control the USA totally; the American peoples are helpless, tied down with a 4.5 trillion Dollar debt, owed to the oligarchs.

The American people were unable pay even the 1.5 trillion Dollar annual interest that was payable last year to the oligarchs; they were compelled to borrow the amount payable to the oligarchs, as has been the practice, from the oligarchs themselves.

The USA military is reportedly the strongest in the world; sadly, it is a mercenary military maintained by the oligarchs and fighting wars selected by the oligarchs. The USA is so debt-ridden that it cannot afford to start any war.

Trump and the congressmen are sacrificing American lives, using the American military to fight a war in Iran, on behalf of the oligarchy.

Are Trump and the congressmen the only players aware that the war in the Middle East is the oligarch’s war to achieve the oligarchs’ ends.

Is Iran too, complicit in this drama?

The question on many lips is, ‘Is it not strange that Iran permitted its navy to participate in military exercises conducted by India, at Visakhapatnam, while hostilities were continuing between Washington and Teheran? If it had been prearranged, Iran could quite easily have withdrawn.

India is one of the four countries in the QUAD military partnership, the largest American military alliance in the Indian Ocean.

Another question arose, shortly thereafter, when the Iranian ambassador to Sri Lanka went on air to say that the three Iranian ships had come to Sri Lanka – after the Indian military exercises – on an invitation extended by the Sri Lanka Navy Commander.

Protocol does not permit Sri Lanka’s navy commander to extend such an invitation.

Many were calling, and are calling, rightly, for the immediate resignation of the Navy Commander and demanding that he be investigated and prosecuted if found culpable.

But what went almost unnoticed was the role of the Iranians; does their protocol permit a mere contingent naval commander to accept an invalid invitation from a foreign Naval Commander to visit that foreign country, placing at risk the Naval assets and the lives of those serving on those assets?

This happened at the height of hostilities between USA and Iran, and the country the Iranians were visiting, had, just three months prior, signed a memorandum of understanding – the Montana military agreement – that gave the USA the right to intervene, unsolicited, in the event of a disaster in Sri Lanka.

Was it a coincidence, that the USA think-tank with strong bonds to the CIA – the ‘Pathfinders’ – which persist in describing Sri Lanka as a ‘neutral’ country when in fact she is a ‘Non-Aligned’ country, was conducting in CBO, at the time of the Indian war games, a seminar discussing the response of countries in the Indian Ocean region, to a disaster in the Indian Ocean.

Was it a Freudian slip that gave the lie to a close connection between President AKD of Sri Lanka and the CIA think-tank ‘Pathfinders’, when AKD described, in a flurry of exchanges that followed the Iranian ambassador’s revelation, that Sri Lanka is a ‘neutral’ country.    (Ceylon Today -March 29, 2026 2:02am)

As a Non-Aligned country, Sri Lanka should have been roundly condemned USA’s actions and rallied the NAM to bring the USA and its administration to justice, as war criminals.

But what ADK did and told the world publicly, amounted to, ‘We Sri Lankans don’t care whether the leaders of nations are assassinated or abducted, whether thousands of men, women and children are murdered or whether their homes are razed to the ground; we, as a neutral country only look at the advantage we can derive from the situation’.

This is what being ‘neutral’ means, as was practiced by countries like Switzerland and the Scandinavians during WW2, looking the other way when Hitler and the Nazi’s engaged in pogroms and atrocities. 

As events turned out, one of the visiting naval assets of Iran was torpedoed in Sri Lankan waters, reportedly after the vessel’s locational coordinates had been ‘mysteriously’ communicated to USA. 

Was the Sri Lankan drama orchestrated and scripted by the Oligarchs? Was President AKD also in the know?

The transitory stepping stone to a one-world dictatorship that the oligarchs perceived, is the creation of a hegemonic world of states which could be reduced to bankruptcy and vulnerability.

For this purpose, the oligarchs established the US dollar as a currency for global transactions and the IMF and World Bank as the debt creating agencies of the oligarchs.

Feeding on an existing hegemonic mindset in the global South – a hangover of centuries of colonialism – it was easy to market the theory that spending more money than what a nation earned, was the panacea to its development; this theory was blindly accepted.

Providing ready and easy loans to nation states, while pushing it as Keyne’s theory of deficit budgeting for prosperity, were the IMF and the World bank.

To ensure the maintenance of the hegemonic mindset amongst the new sovereign nation-states, now physically disconnected from their colonial past, the oligarchs used the newly created UN (and its many agencies), and NGOs to replace the former colonial powers; sovereign nation states were fed by these agencies the dictates of the former colonial powers as norms and ‘better’ practices towards establishing a civilised and civilised world.

Nothing therefore had changed; the new ‘sovereign’ states continued to act to the dictates of the former colonial powers; the dictates now being dished out through the UN and the NGOs.

Thirty years after ‘Bretton Woods, if not all, most of the nation states were so badly in debt that any one of them could be bankrupted and taken down; to be bankrupted, all the IMF had to do was to demand the return of the monies lent and, the interest payable.

These indebted countries are unable to honour their debt, if such an evantuality is forced on them by the IMF.

The lending agencies then did a volte face in the early 1970’s; they declared that Keyne’s theory was erroneous and what should be practiced is the Friedman type of economics with strict financial discipline. Overnight, surplus budgeting became the order of the day.

Eighty years from Bretton woods the oligarchs perceived that the world was ripe for the next phase of the oligarch’s plan, one -world dictatorship or global slavery.

With hostilities escalating in Teheran, the shipping insurers have virtually closed the Strait of Hormuz; Hormuz is one of the many critical chokepoints in the marine world.  It is important to China, especially to have uninterrupted flow of oil and gas to keep their productions lines running. For similar and other reasons too, it is important to Washington.

Hostilities do not have to escalate for the crisis to deepen; as days go by and the Strait remains closed, the world will begin to spiral into an unimaginable crisis; one by one, the lights will flicker and die as country after country will go down like dominoes, if Hormuz is not opened.

If the red sea is also closed by the shipping insurers – the Houthis have not been attacked yet – the world will go down faster than anticipated.

The conflict between Iran and the USA no longer remains the prime issue of the world; the issue has been cleverly manipulated by the oligarchs.  The need to keep the Strait of Hormuz and the red sea open has now taken centre stage.

For this to happen the intervention of the big countries, especially those centered around the current crisis area, is very important; besides USA and Iran, China and Russia will carry much clout in such an intervention for peace.

If the bigger powers were to negotiate for peace, it is likely that Russia and China would like to look at a larger canvas; the canvass could include many other marine chokepoints that exist.

The Russians could possibly be looking at the black sea, Kuril Islands and perhaps even events leading to the end of the problem in Ukraine.

The Chinese could possibly be looking at the Panama Canal, the Malakar straits and Taiwan.

Control of marine chokepoints and bringing them under ‘international ‘control would fit in nicely to the ‘one-world’ concept; disentangling the chokepoints from Nation- State control would be one step closer to One- World Government.

China is not a socialist country; Zi is a successor to Deng Xiaoping, the father of modern China, described by Mao as a capitalist roader and, who was imprisoned by Mao’s Red Guards.

China also has a One-World perception of the world; they describe it as the ‘Belt and Road’ initiative and the concept is being developed simultaneously as the Americans develop their One -World act.

Putin is no stranger to international capitalism and is not averse to making deals with oligarchs, if it is advantageous to Russia.

In the ‘One – World’ canvas, the oligarchy of the USA, Russia, China, and Iran appear to be major emerging players.

’’සෙනෙවිරත්න ඒක පුද්ගල කොමිසමෙන්’’’ රට නිදසුන් සමග පළාත් සභා ගැන පාඩමක්

April 4th, 2026

ධර්මසිරි සෙනෙවිරත්න—-ඇමරිකාවේ සිට  

19 සියවසේ සිට  20 සියවස දක්වාම  ඇමරිකානු කලුජාතීන් කොන්කිරීමේ ජිම් ක්‍රෝ  නීතිය  ඔවුන්ගේ උපතේ සිට මරණ මන්චකය දක්වා  සෑම අංශයක ම   ඇමරිකාවේ  ඉතා කුරිරු අන්දමින්  ක්‍රියාත්මක විය.රටේ විවිධ ප්‍රාන්තවල විවිධ මතධාරීන් එක පොදුමතයකට ගෙන රට එක්සත් කරතබා ගැනීමට  ෆෙඩරල්  හෙවත් මධ්‍යමරජය ගන්නා බොහෝ සාධනීය පියවර  නිෂ්ක්‍රිය හෝ අකර්මන්‍ය කිරීමටහෝ හැකිතාක් කල් ප්‍රමාදකිරීමට බොහෝ  බලලෝභී ආත්මාර්ථකාමී ප්‍රාන්ත පාලකයන් විසින් පියවරගන්නා ලදී. 13 ව්‍යවස්තා සංශෝධනය මගින් 1863 වහලුන් නිදහස් කිරීමේ ප්‍රකාශනය නිකුත් වු පසුව  දකුණේ ප්‍රාන්ත බොහොමයක්  මධ්‍යම රජය සමග වයිර බැඳගත්හ .

                                                                           දකුණේ ප්‍රාන්ත  වලට  අ වශ්‍ය වුනේ කළු වාර්ගිකයින් සදා වහලුන් ලෙස තබාගනීමටය.. මධ්‍යම රජයේ නියෝගයෙන් ලද නිදහසෙන් පසුව වෙනත් පලාත්වල  රැකියා සොයා යන කළු මිනිසුන්,එසේ යාම  වැලකීමට නොහැකිනම්   බුරුතු පිටින්  මරා දැමීමට පවා   සුදු  මිනිසුන් පැකිලුනේ නැත .වගා කටයුතු සඳහා වහලුන් අවශ්‍ය දකුණේ ධනවතුන් පමණක් නොව දුප්පත් සුදු මිනිසුන් පවා මධ්‍යම රජය විසින් වහලුන් නිදහස් කිරීමට  පමණක් නොව  ඔවුන්ට අවම  මානුෂික අයිතිවාසිකම් දීමටත් විරුද්ධ වුහ ..දකුණේ පමණක් නොව අනෙකුත් පළාත් වල සුදුමිනිසුන් අතරද  ඒ අදහස් ඇති අ ය බොහෝ වුහ .

                                                                             1873  සිට  ‘ස්ලෝටර් හෞස් ,විලියම්ස් හා වෙනත් අ ය නඩුවේදී  සුප්‍රීම් උසාවි විනිසුරුවන් පවා  13 ,14 ,15  ව්‍යවස්ථා මෙන්ම ENFORCEMENT AND FORCE   පනත පැනවූ විගසම   ඉතා සියුම් ලෙස හා සැක ඉපදවියයුතු  අයුරින්  එයත් ලත් තැන ලොප් කිරීමට කටයුතු කරතිබුණි   .                            .(((ලංකා! ,ප්‍රවේසම් වෙනු :පළාත්  සභාවේ වුව මධ්‍යම රජයේ වුව දේශද්රෝහී මත ඇති විනිසුරන්ගෙන්  සිදුවිය නොහැකි දෙයක් නැත )))

   ‘’ෆෙඩරල් ව්‍යවස්ථාවට අකුරටම කීකරු වෙන අතරම නිග්‍රෝ  වරු  සුදු ජාතියට සමානය යි උන්ට හැඟවෙන හිතෙන යම් දෙයක් යම් පනතක  ඇත්නම් එහි  ‘’ජීව වායුව ‘ අකාමකා බෙලහීන කිරීමට  අපි  කඩිසර වුනෙමු ‘’ යයි   ජෝර්ජියා සෙනෙට් සභික  වෝ ල්ටර් ජෝර්ජ්  උදම් ඇනුවේ ය                   ((ලංකා ,ප්‍රවේසම් වෙනු .ලන්දේසි කාලයේ සිට යාපනේ කුලපීඩි තයෝ  අදත් දුක් විඳිති  .))                           1903  GILES .v HARRIS නඩුවේදී  HOLMS විනිසුරු මෙසේ සටහන් කළේය ‘’’ ප්‍රාන්ත රජයන් හෝ එහි නියෝජිතයන් විසින් කරන  වැරදි ක්‍රියාවන්ට  විරුද්ධ වීමට ව්‍යවස්ථාමය ලෙස  හෝ ප්‍රායෝගික බලයක් හෝ   ෆෙඩරල් උසාවිය ට  නැත ‘’.            ((ලංකා !,ප්‍රවේසම් වෙනු: අග විනිසුරුවරයෙක් ව සිට මහා ඇමතිවරයෙක් වූ පසුව එක අයෙක් වැමෑරූ බෙදුම්වාදී අදහස් මතක් කරගන්න  )).

                                                                                         මෙවන් අදහස් මත වැඩකළ බොහෝ ප්‍රාන්ත මධ්‍යම රජයේ මානුෂීය හා නිදහස් මතවාදී අණ පනත් වලට විරුද්ධව කළහැකි සියලු කෙනෙහිලිකම් හා  විරුද්ධ වාදිකම්  කළහ . කිසිදු අධ්යාපනයක්  තහනම් කර සිටි  කළු මිනිසුන් ට අධ්‍යාපනයට අවසර දීමටත්  විරුද්ධ වූ සුදු මිනිස්සු  ඊළඟට  යුදවැදුනේ  සුදු දරුවන් සිටින පාසල් වලට  කළු දරුවන් ඇතුල් කිරීමට විරුධ්ධවය . මෙම වාර්ගික කොන්කිරීම   රටේ ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ  14 හා 5 වගන්ති වලට පටහැනි බව  1952  BROWN  v. TOPEKA BOARD OF EDUCATION නඩුව අනුව 1954   දී සුප්‍රීම් උසාවිය  තීරණය කළේය.  තම අරමුණුවෙනුවෙන්   යුදවැදීම සඳහා  අවි ගබඩා පුරවමින් සිටි  දකුණේ දේශපාලකයනට මෙම තීරණය  සැබවින්ම යුද්ධ ප්‍රකාශ කිරීමක් විය. .       .((ලංකා! ,ප්‍රවේසම් වෙනු ))                                      .                                                                                                                                         

.    .  .                                                                                   කළු විරෝධී සියලු ක්‍රියාවන්ට එරෙහිව සටන් වැදුන NAACP ආයතනය  1935 තරමේ  සිට  එවන් ව්‍යවස්ථා විරෝධී  ව්‍යාපාරවලට  විරුද්ධව   රට පුරා  එක පිට එක නඩු පවරමින්  උනදුවෙන් කටයුතු කළේය .මේරිලන්ඩ් සරසවියට එරෙහිව  1935 දී මේ ආයතනය  පටන්ගත් පළමු  නඩු පැවරීම  මිසුරි ,ටෙක්සාස් , ඔක්ලහෝමා ,ඩෙලවෙයා , වර්ජිනියා ,දකුණු  කැරෝලයිනා,,වොෂින්ටන් DC, කැන්සාස්  හා තවත් පෙදෙස් දක්වා ගෙන ගියේය .   1950 වන විටත්  දකුණ කරෝලයිනාවේ  19 කවුන්ටියේ කලුදරුවන්ට එකදු  උසස් ((HIGH SCHOOL) පාසලක් නොවීය .ක්ලරන්ඩන් කවුන්ටියේ සුදු දරුවන්ට පාසල් බස් 30 ක් තිබුනත් කලුදරුවන්ට  එක බසයක් හෝ  දුන්නේ නැත ..’’මම ආන්ඩු කාරයාව සිටින තුරු  සුදු පාසල්වලට එකදු කලු  දරුවෙක් වත් ඇතුල් කරනොගනිමි ‘’ යි ජෝ ර්ජියා ප්‍රාන්තයේ  ආණ්ඩු කාරයා 1949 දී  වහසි බිනුවේය  .  මේ  කඩාකප්පල් කාරී අමානුෂික ක්රියා  වර්ධනය වීම නිසා , කළු සුදු ලෙස වර්ගවාදීව පාසල් බෙදීම අත්හිටුවීමේ කාර්යය වේගවත් කරන ලෙස  1955 05 01  නැවතත්  ප්‍රකාශ කිරීමට  සුප්‍රීම් උසාවිය  කටයුතු කළේය 

                                                                    වර්ගවාදීන් නැවතුනාද ? නැත .’’ප්‍රාන්ත තීරණ වලට විරුද්ධව මධ්‍යම රජය  තීරණ නොගත යුතුය .මධ්‍යම රජයේ සුප්‍රීම් උසාවි තීරණ ප්‍රාන්ත රාජ්‍යයේ කටයුතුවලට කරන අනවශ්‍ය ඇඟිලි ගැසීමකී  ‘’  වර්ජිනියා ප්‍රාන්තය ප්‍රකාශ කළේය .    —-…..’’’’’ දේශසීමා මායිම් ප්‍රශ්නවලදී  හැර   ප්‍රාන්තයක වෙනත්  කිසිදු තීරණයකට විරුද්ධ වීමට  අධිකරණ බලයක්  මධ්‍යම රජයේ උසාවි වලට නැත ‘’’ යි  1956 දී ජෝර්ජියා ආණ්ඩුකාරවරයා ප්‍රකාශ කළේය .            ((ලංකා !,ප්‍රවේශම් වෙනු ))

                                                                                ””  මහා රජයේ සුප්‍රීම් උසාවියේ 1952  බ්‍රවුන් නඩු තීන්දුවේ  තීරණ මිසිසිපි  ප්‍රාන්ත සීමා  තුල දී ව්‍යවස්ථා විරෝධී ය .ප්‍රාන්ත සීමා තුල ඒ තීරණ බල රහිතය ””යි මිසිසිපි ප්‍රාන්තය ප්‍රකාශ කළේය .   —-  ‘’’මධ්‍යම රජයේ  ඒ බ්‍රවුන් නඩු තීරණය  හෙලාදකිමි . මෙය මධ්‍යම රජය කරන අනීතික නොමනා ඇඟිලි ගැසීමක් මෙන්ම ප්‍රාන්ත ස්වාධිපත්‍යයට  එරෙහිවීමකි ‘’ යි  දකුණු කරෝලය්නා ආණ්ඩු කාරයා පැවසුවේය .                           ((((ලංකා ! නීති කණපිට හරවා අර්ථකතන දීමට  හැකි නීතිඥයන් හා විනිසුරුවන්ද  පළාත් සභා මහා ඇමති වරු විය හැකි බවත් එසේ වූ බවත්  හිතේ තියා ගන්න )).

                                                                            මධ්‍යම රජයේ   සියලු ප්‍රගතිශීලී පියවරයන්ට එරෙහිව   බලලෝභී ආත්මාර්ථකාමිත්වය ජනතාව තුල අවුළුවා  සිය අභිලාෂයන් මුදුන් පත් කර ගැනීමටඋත්සාහගත්   මේ  මිනිසුන්ට  රටේ ඉදිරිගමන හෝ මනුෂත්වය ගැන  අල්පමාත්‍ර හැඟිමක්  තිබුනේ නැත    එනිසාම  ඕනෑම දුෂ්ට කමක් කිරීමට පසුබට   නොවූ  මොවුන් ගිය දුර  මෙන්න  පහතින් දැන් කියවන්න . හිතේ ධාරණය කර ගන්න .

.                            ’’ඇමරිකන් ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ  අංක 13 ,14 , හා 15  වෙනි වගන්ති  සංශෝධනය කල යුතුය . මේ වගන්ති බලාමක කරන තීරණ ගන්නා විනිසුරුවන් දෝෂාභියෝගයට  ලක් කල යුතුය ‘’යි ජෝර්ජියා ප්‍රාන්තය යෝජනා සම්මත කර ඉන් නොනැවතී  1956 ජුලි 1 දින  අලුත් කොඩියක් ද  හඳුන්වාදී වහල් සේවය අත්‍යවශ්‍යම බවත්  වර්ණ භේද වර්ගී කරණය  රැකගැනීමට  තමන් දිවි පුදා  සටන් කරන බවත්  ප්‍රකාශ කලේ   මධ්‍යම රජයට අනතුරු  ඇඟවීමක් ලෙසිනි .                                   .(((ලංකා ! උතුරේ තේසවලාමේ නීතිය රැකගෙන සිංහල පදිංචිය නැතිකිරීමටත් එළවීමටත්   හා  නලවාර් කොවියාර් වැනි පීඩිත කුල  මර්ධනය කිරීමටත්  නැගෙන හිර අමානුෂික ෂරියා නීති හිතුමතේ ක්‍රියාත්මක කරමින්   ඒ පලාතෙන් සිංහලයන් එළවීමටත්  සියලු බලතල සහිත පළාත්  මහඇමති වරු  ක්‍රියා කිරීමට ඕනෑ  තරම් ඉඩ ඇත )) 

                                                                                                 ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ සංවරණය හා තුලනය –checks and balances– ඉවත් කිරීමේ අරමුණින්  ටෙක්සාස් ප්‍රාන්තය මෙවන් යෝජනාවක් ගෙනා වේය .  ””””සුප්‍රීම් උසාවිය කොන්ග්‍රසයට  වග කිව යුතුය යනුවෙන් ව්‍යවස්ථාව වෙනස් කල යුතුය””””

 ‘’’ 

                                                                             ((ඉහත සඳහන් කල )   බ්‍රවුන් නඩුවේ  තීරණ  ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන මධ්‍යම රජයේ  ඕනෑම විනිසුරු වරයෙක් හෝ මාෂල් වරයෙක්   ලුයිසියානා ප්‍රාන්තය තුලදී අත් අඩංගුවට ගැනීමට  ලුයිසියානා ආණ්ඩුකාරයා තම   පොලිසියට   බලය පැවරුවේය .

                                                                                    යම් කාලයක් ඇවෑමෙන් කෙසේ හෝ හෝ මධ්‍යම රජය සිය අපේක්ෂාවන් මුදුන් පත් කරගන්න බවත් තමන් ට පසු බැ සීමට සිදුවෙන බවත් දැන දනම  බොහෝ අ ය  කිසියම්  කාලයකට හෝ හැකිපමනින් විශේෂ වරප්‍රසාද රැකගනුවස්   මධ්‍යම රජයේ කටයුතුවලට අවහිර වෙන සේ හැකි පමණින් කටයුතු කිරීමට උත්සාහ ගත්හ. මේ  ප්‍රයත්නය  සාර්ථක විය  1963 වෙන තුරුත්  ඇලබාමා , මිසිසිපි , හා වර්ජිනියා  ප්‍රාන්තවල  සුදු පාසල් ලෙස වෙන්කළ  පාසල් වලට එකම කළු ළමයෙක් හෝ  ඇතුල් නොකර සිටින්නට ඔවුන්ට හැකිවිය .

                                                    විරෝධය කෙතෙක් දුර ගියාදැයි යන්න ආකන්සෝ ප්‍රාන්තයේ  මේ  බරපතල ප්‍රකාශයෙන්   පෙනී යායුතුය ‘’’’   තම ප්‍රාන්ත භුමි සීමා තුල බලපැවැත් විය යුතු නීති රෙගුලාසි –  LAW OF THE LAND,– මොනවාදැයි තීරණය කිරීමේ  බලය ඇත්තේ ඇමරිකන්  සුප්‍රීම් උසාවියට නොව.ප්‍රාන්තයේ ආණ්ඩු කාරයාටය .’’((((ලංකා ! උතුරේ නිජබිම් සංකල්පයක් ඇත .’’භුමිය’ යන වචනය  ගැන සැලකිලිමත් වෙමු )))                                                   

                                                                              ඇමරිකන් මහා රජයේ මේ  ප්‍රගතිශීලී  වැඩදායී මානුෂික  මෙහෙවර දාමය  පරාද කිරීමට හා  කඩා කප්පල්  කිරීමට  මෙසේ මේ ප්‍රාන්ත  කටයුතු කළහ . ලංකාවේද පරාජය දැකදැකත්  අමානුශිකයයි දැන දැනත් තම ජීවිත කාළය තුල හෝ විශේෂ වරප්‍රසාද රැක ගැනීමට උත්සාහ කරන අන්තවාදී පිරිසක් උතුරේ හා නැගෙන හිර  කටයුතු කරන විට  අපි ප්‍රවේසම් විය යුතුය 

                                                                           අමරිකාව  වැනි  විශාල රටකට  ප්‍රාන්ත ක්‍රමය  නැතුව බැරුවා වියහැක .මේ ත රම් විඳවන්නට සිදු වුනෙත් එනිසාය . එහෙත් අපි කුමට  විඳවමුද ? පුංචි ලංකාවේ  රජයේ  ප්‍රතිපත්ති ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට  රාජ්‍ය  නිලධාරීන් හොඳටම  ප්‍රමාණවත්ය . පළාත් සභා අ පමත බලෙන් පැටවූ එකකි.මේ බෝම්බයේ කැබැල්ලක් වත් ඉතිරි නොකර විනාශ කල යුතුය.කැබලි ඉතිරි කළහොත් දිනෙක හතුරෝ ඒවා පුරුද්දා ගනු ඇත .   SWRD අගමැති   රන්පවුම් වතු  හා විදේශ සමාගම් ජනසතු කරමින්  බැරෑරුම් කාරය භාරයක් කලේ  ද  සිරිමාවෝ මැතිනිය රට ස්වයං පෝෂිත කිරීමේ  පරමාර්ථයෙන්     දේශීය නි ශ් පාදන නංවමින්  සල්ලහුක දිවියකට රට හුරු කිරීමේ භාරධුර කාර්යයට  අ ත ගැසුවේත්,, එමෙන්ම  අපට කිසිදා නුපුරුදු    හෙළුවැලි ආර්ථිකය ක්  JR විසින් අවලං ලෙස බලවත් විරෝධයන් මැද වුවද  ක්‍රියාත්මක කලෙත්  නිලධාරී න් මගින් පමණි . ඉදින්  මේ කාරියට  නිලධාරීන්ට අමතරව  මේ පුංචි රට කරවන්නට පළාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රීවරු ((2024 ගණන )) 455 + පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්රීන් 225  කුත් අවශ්‍යද ?  නිලධාරීන් ගේ වංහුං  අ යථා වැඩ සොයා බැලීමට  අවශ්‍යම නම්  සොයාබලා  බලා වාර්තා කිරීමට පමණක්(((( රාජකාරියට ඇඟිලි ගැසීමට නොව )) ‘’ජනතා මණ්ඩල’’ පත් කල හැක එය දුෂණ විරෝධීන්ගේ යුතුකමකි . ඒ අනුව ක්‍රියා කිරීමට 225 ඕනෑවටත් වඩා ප්‍රමාණවත්ය . නිලධාරීන්  ගසා කෑවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරු ගසාකන ප්‍රමාණයෙන් දාහෙන් එකක් වත් ගසා කන්නේ නැත .  ‘’ කුරුළු පාළුව ‘’’කුඹුරු ගොවියාටද පුරුදු එකක් නිසා  ඒ පාඩු දරා ගැනීම අපට එතරම් අපහසු නොවේ. ප

ධර්මසිරි සෙනෙවිරත්න—-ඇමරිකාවේ සිට         .

Iron, Vodka, and Coin Tricks – A Soviet Journey

April 4th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

It began in the vast, cold stretches of the Soviet Union—between the industrial smoke of Orenburg, the oil-stained yards of Azerbaijan, and the distant authority of Moscow—a young foreign trainee navigating a world that was equal parts discipline, danger, and adventure.

My first year was spent inside a compressor factory that still echoes in my memory—the famous Borets plant. It was a place of relentless noise, metal, and precision. Among the machines was one press I would never forget. It punched perfect circular discs out of thin 1mm steel sheets—each disc almost exactly the size of a British one-pound coin.

Curiosity turned into mischief.

I quietly pocketed a handful of these discs. Months later, in London, those same pieces of Soviet steel slipped effortlessly into slot machines—earning me a few pounds and a private smile at the absurdity of it all.

The second year was a different world entirely.

I was sent to an oil field repair yard in Azerbaijan—a rough place filled with hardened men, opportunists, and survivalists. I was the only foreigner. That alone made me a target—and an attraction.

Men would approach me casually, their eyes always drifting to my jeans.

Sell?” they would ask.

Western denim was more valuable than money.

One day, a policeman noticed a suspicious man trailing me. He stopped him cold and said, in a tone that needed no translation:

If anything happens to this foreigner, I will catch you.”

For the first time, I realized I was both vulnerable—and protected.

Weekends were surreal.

Russian boys and girls would take me to the beach. There I was—somewhere between cultures—wearing swimming trunks, expensive jeans slung over my shoulder, laughter in the air, and tension never too far away.

One afternoon, I made a decision.

I sold my jeans.

And walked all the way back to the dormitory wearing nothing but my swimming trunks—feeling both ridiculous and triumphant.

But not all ventures ended well.

Trying to make extra money, I struck a deal. Through a Burmese diplomat, I acquired gold coins—valuable, discreet, and highly desirable. Buyers appeared quickly—Georgian students with sharp eyes and sharper intentions.

The exchange was set in a dark alley.

A mistake.

The moment I handed over the coins, one of them struck me and disappeared into the shadows. Just like that, the gold was gone.

I was left not only bruised—but in debt.

I had to repay the diplomat with money I didn’t have. A hard lesson, learned the Soviet way.

Life in Orenburg was another story.

It was a gas field town where workers drank vodka as if it were water. The government, worried about productivity, tried to reduce consumption by limiting vodka sales.

The result?

People started drinking perfumes and eau de cologne.

Soon, even those disappeared from shop shelves.

That was the Soviet solution—remove temptation, and people will find another.

Then there was Kslushkaya—remote, raw, and unforgettable.

I was taken there by my bulky Jewish professor, a man who believed rules were flexible—especially internal travel permits, which we did not have.

On that journey, we met with an accident.

The police got involved.

Reports were sent.

Back at the university, I was reprimanded—not for the accident, but for being there in the first place.

That was another lesson: in the Soviet system, procedure mattered more than circumstance.

Amid all this chaos, my academic work continued.

My thesis focused on compressors—specifically, diagnosing bearing wear through lubrication pressure monitoring. It was technical, precise, and demanded practical experimentation.

But equipment was scarce.

One day, I noticed a man at the university replacing a small compressor from a gas water spring machine—a common appliance in those days.

Opportunity again.

I paid him 100 roubles and took the discarded compressor.

That small, salvaged machine became the heart of my research.

Looking back, it was a life of contradictions.

Danger and laughter.

Scarcity and ingenuity.

Rules—and the constant bending of them.

But above all, it gave me something invaluable: real, practical experience.

That experience carried me forward—to my first job on a Norwegian oil platform, where the cold winds of the North Sea felt strangely familiar.

Life in the Soviet Union was not easy.

But it was never dull.

And for a young man far from home, it was the greatest classroom of all.

I leant hardway and reached pinnacle in my carrier in years to come 

Regards

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Two observations regarding Udaya Gammanpila’s book about the Pasku Attack

April 4th, 2026

C. Wijeyawickrema

UG has done a courageous act by presenting a clear picture of an incident, that local and foreign agents with vested interests tried to capitalize for their ulterior motives. JVP politicians no longer trick people by promising an annual Aladdin’s Lamp. The Cardinal does not have to confuse his followers anymore. 

But I see two missing links in his presentation.

1. While talking about the need to erase the ISIS ideology and the state support to radical Islam (school textbooks by govt. promoting others as enemies), the problem goes beyond the Muslim youth. It is about the spread of Islamification all over the country and in the state governing apparatus including the judiciary (Nalimists, who appear as normal citizens but Muslim extremists in brain).

This is why UG should have given credit to Ven. Gnanasaara of the BBS publicly, for what he has done to warn the country about this ideological threat. He correctly identified this extremist interpretation of the Koran as a cancer and the AG’s Dept, Police, politicians like Mrs. Chandrika all got together to send him to jail (this cancer story is prevalent in the West).

Perhaps, UG did not know that the Pasku Commission used Ven. G’s report extensively in its report. It directed the govt. to give police protection to him after he gave evidence for several days.

2. When Wijedasa Rajapaksa disclosed in the parliament about ISIS extremists (it was Ven G who provided him lot of data) Mujiber Rahaman ridiculed him as a liar seeing crocodiles in a clay pot! Mujiber is supporting Shani Abeysekara-Ravi Seneviratne couple and still looking for a Sara Jasmine to appear from somewhere! The rumor is that it was Mujiber who gave a dead-rope to Nalin Bandara to say that an IA image not real Sajith Premadasa who appeared at the Book presentation!

These Muslim politicians are responsible in so many ways for the carnage that took place and UG failed to tell a spade is a spade. 

For example, Ibrahim NaNa is now a free man and JVP-NPP political campaign was full of ISIS agents. 

The Sinhala Buddhist civilization will end sooner rather than later unless this real threat is properly digested.

World Bank is on the wrong track 

April 4th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

My personal opinion  is that we should concentrate on attracting  FDI to develop marine resources with Trinco as a nucleus 

Youngsters wasting their energy and education  in driving Tuk Tuk should be given more training and develop vocational training and make them

Available for Marine sector development 

We keep nudging but stare should request WB to reallocate assets 

Quote 

the World Bank has strongly suggested that Sri Lanka develop its tourism and agriculture sectors as key drivers for economic recovery, job creation, and sustainable growth. In a five-year Country Partnership Framework (CPF) launched in April 2026, the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) committed over US$1 billion to support Sri Lanka’s recovery, specifically targeting these areas. 

World Bank +3

Here are the details of the World Bank’s suggestions and support for these sectors:

1. Developing Tourism

  • Focus: The strategy aims to expand the tourism sector by protecting natural and cultural assets, creating jobs, and ensuring benefits flow to local communities.
  • Strategic Plan: The partnership supports the “Sri Lanka Tourism Strategic Plan 2026–2030”.
  • Targeted Investment: The World Bankincludes a $200 million package focused on tourism expansion.
  • Regional Growth: Specific attention is given to developing tourism in the Northern and Eastern provinces. 

World Bank +1

2. Developing Agriculture

  • Climate-Smart Farming: The World Bankemphasizes moving toward climate-smart agriculture to build resilience against floods and droughts.
  • Value Chain Enhancement: Support is designed to help farmers adopt modern technologies, reduce food loss, and access better markets for products like cinnamon, coconut, and seafood.
  • Investment: A $100 million initiative was announced in 2025 to support agri-food producers and improve rural jobs.
  • Private Sector Integration: The IFC is working to link smallholder farmers with private finance and agribusiness opportunities. 

World Bank +5

3. Contextual Goals

  • Economic Growth: The overarching goal is to achieve 7% medium-term economic growth by leveraging these sectors, attracting private capital, and creating jobs for youth and women.
  • Economic Stability: The development of these sectors is meant to diversify the economy and support a “Rurban” (Rural and Urban) development approach to ensure inclusive growth. 

World Bank +2

These recommendations are part of a broader shift from crisis management (following the 2022 economic collapse) to long-term sustainable, private sector-led growth. 

මහමොළකරු, සොනික් සොනික් හා මාතා හාරී

April 4th, 2026

Maathalan – (මාතලන්)

BASES, BLUE JEANS AND SHIA ISLAM

April 3rd, 2026

Manuka Wijesinghe

‘The Iranian’s are playing chess, while Trump is clueless’, a recent news caption stated, regarding the US president’s erratic warfare in Iran. Indeed, it does seem that the sitting US president is clueless, but is he? Or, does he appear clueless to one who only sees Iran. For that what cannot be ignored is that the playbook for Iran’s destruction is the same playbook as in Palestine, of Lebanon, of Syria. It is the deliberate and the methodical obliteration of the cradle of ancient civilization and religious history.

If, assuming the US president is clueless, where are those Americans who inherited the baton of British Imperialism? That baton which made and unmade national leaders for overt Nationalism or suspected Socialism, the truth being, not political credo but their refusal to execute Imperial and Manifest Destinies of those who received the reins of empire. For example, the refusal to grant rights for the operation of British military and naval bases in recently independent colonies.   

The strategic island of Cyprus’ first independent president, the Archbishop Makarios’ efforts to terminate the British base resulted in a coup d’etat which ousted him. It resulted in Turkey’s invasion of Northern Cyprus and the eventual division of Cyprus into Turkish and Greek Cyprus. Having seized the north, Turkey, a NATO member, granted the US the rights to establish a military base in Northern Cyprus while Britain maintained their base in the south. It is from the British base that the Americans are currently conducting their deadly against the Republic of Iran.

Ceylon, had a similar history. During the second world war, after the fall of Malaya, Ceylon was identified as an important location for the British control of the Indian Ocean and a Royal Navy base was established in Trincomalee and British troops stationed, for Ceylon was the empire’s main source of rubber which was essential for the manufacture of tyres, gas masks and other military equipment.

In 1942 Singapore fell and the Japanese navy launched an operation against the British naval fleet based in Trincomalee. They did not succeed and the Japanese kamikazes were deterred. But, on the 3rd of March, the Japanese forces occupied the Andaman Islands, and British focus on Ceylon was intensified upon which the Allied headquarters of the South East Asia command was located in the hill capital of Kandy. The Ceylonese thus became targets in another’s war.  

A few years later, in 1948, Ceylon received her Independence. But the British base remained. Why did DS Senanayake, Ceylon’s first Prime Minister allow it? Browsing through some old papers I found a book of newspaper articles contributed to the ‘Island’ by one Amita. One article that caught my eye. It was titled the ‘Farsightedness of DS’

One day, Muhandiram Pedrick Wakwella, a front line UNP er had come to the Prime Minister’s home, most agitated and said to him, ‘What is this Sir, these Leftist fellows are going around the country telling that the Independence we got was a fake one.  They are saying that no independent country will ever permit any foreign country to have a military bases on their soil. But we have permitted the British to have bases here. So, where is our Independence, they ask? They say when Britain gets involved in a war, we will get dragged in too.’

Thereafter DS had replied, ‘Pedrick, the Tamils want a share of the national pie, Ponnambalam, Chelvanayagam, Suntheralingam and even Peri Sundaram and Thondaman. They are educated and cultured men. They will fight for their rights in parliament and political platforms. They believe in Gandhi’s principles. Now, there is a new threat, a very dangerous threat.’

‘Who is that sir?’ Pedrick has asked.

‘SWRD Bandaranaike’, DS replied. ‘Don’t underestimate the man. With this cry of ‘Sinhala Only’, the due place for Buddhism, a place in the sun for the common man, he will one day unleash forces that cannot be controlled. He is going to rouse communal and religious passions that will make this country go up in flames. Men will go crazy and it will be the rule of the mob. And the Tamils are going to be its target. And, in a few years hence, a new kind of Tamil youth is going to emerge, sick of the supineness of their old leaders, these Tamil men, without the education and the culturedness of their fathers, will go for an armed showdown with the government and its forces. They are going to play hell and there is going to be a blood bath’

Thereupon Muhandiram had asked him, ‘But sir, what does this have to do with the bases?’

Thereupon DS said, ‘My dear Pedrick. We have an agreement with the British. If there is any aggression from without or WITHIN, they have to come to our rescue. When violence and rebellion breaks out in the north and the east, we can ask the British troops in Trincomalee to halt it. They are obliged to protect the democratically elected government in Ceylon. And Britian will pour in men and arms until the rebellion is completely routed. So heaven protect this country if some misguided super patriot ever asks the British to quit and hand over the bases back’   

Indeed, we did have a Tamil uprising more than thirty years later. But how could DS have predicted its inevitability, then? Did he have prophetic powers? His assumption was not based on past experience for we, that is the Sinhalese and the Tamil had shared this island, without mutinies, since known time. Furthermore, the last several kings of the Sinhalese had been Tamils kings. They had ruled, honouring the majority religion, from the seat of Buddhism in the Kandyan kingdom, with the complete acceptance of their subjects, despite the difference of faith. We had never needed an outside force to protect us from each other, why now?

Hence, what one needs to ponder is if DS has been subjected to British brainwashing, which Britain had done, most successfully, with their selected elite in the colonies. Part of the indoctrination protocol of British Colonialism was to convince the new elite that the inevitability of Independence was uprising of minorities against majority rule?  Or vice versa, like in the case of the new Arab states carved up from the former Ottoman empire?

Divide and Rule was British policy. And Independence’s legacy. The Tamils had no reason to rise against us if our leaders would rule as they had, before the advent of colonialism. We spoke two languages, but had a shared geography, tradition, culture and many aspects of faith.

Though DS was in British stooge, the man who followed him, SWRD Bandaranaike differed. He was ardently committed to non-alignment and a staunch supporter of Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser and defended his right, at the United Nations General Assembly, to nationalize the Suez Canal company and to take the Suez’s control from the British and the French. Thus, SWRD went against Britain and Israel. One year after the Suez affair, on the 15th of October 1957, Ceylon’s Prime Minister, SWRD Bandaranaike nationalized the British base in Trincomalee and brought complete Independence to Ceylon. Less than two years later he was assassinated.

Unfortunately, although SWRD ceased British military operation in Ceylon, Ceylon was unable to return to the peaceful state of ethnic coexistence as prior to Colonialism for the Ceylon Civil Service which Britain had created to administer the colonies, continued, after Independence, to executed public policy in the colonial legacy of ‘Divide and rule’. In its spirit, it was none other than SWRD’s own advisor Neil Quintus Dias, a civil servant who Neville Jayaweera, the former government agent of Jaffna describes in his book as, ‘the epitome of a colonial civil servant and a pukka sahib. He could neither speak nor write Sinhala well. He was arrogant and aloof. A man of wealth and birth, he played tennis with charm as a member of the Colombo tennis club for the Colombo gentry, he regularly lunched at Galle Face hotel with his favourite digestive liquor, gin and tonic….he was committed to his extreme nationalism’

Neil Quintus Dias, was a creation of Empire, not of Ceylon. A Sinhala Buddhist neophyte who masterminded SWRD’s political victory by engineering his ultra nationalist ‘Sinhala Only’ campaign. Thereafter he began to establish Buddhist dominance in the Public Services and local government services. Upon SWRD’s death, as the chief advisor to his widow, the new Prime Minister, NQ began the militarizing of the north with the deployment of Sinhala speaking forces which led to the gradual alienation of the Tamils.

Neville Jayaweera further states, ‘NQ Dias revealed to me his extraordinary vision of a series of events that were bound to happen in the near future. He was convinced Tamil insurgency would develop into an armed struggle in the next 25 years and the government should be prepared to deal with it now’

Coincidentally, DS had the same vision. If every man in government has the same vision, and these men were not prophets, and their vision is not based on historical analogy, what one must realize is that their visions are nothing but the doomsday aggregation of colonial ideology. NQ and DS, respectively, as a civil servant and as colonial collaborator, had been fed a diet of Tamil uprising.

Anyway, with the loss of Ceylon’s naval base, the Allies had no more naval bases in the Indian ocean and a plan was hatched, between Britian and the US to obtain an Indian ocean base. So, in the 1960s, through legal manipulation, the island of Diego Garcia, the largest island of the Chagos peninsula was separated from Mauritius and brought under a brand new British proclaimed entity called, the ‘British Indian Ocean territory’, and given to the United States for the creation of a joint military and naval base.  The island had a native population, but they were inconsequential, even subjected to nuclear testing. But it was austerities that caused them to take boats to Mauritius for the purchase of essentials and their subsequent return prohibited for not being in the possession of a special British Indian Ocean territory pass.

Their islands had been sold to the Americans by Britian.

Thus, an indigenous population which had lived on those islands for centuries were forcibly removed for being a security threat to the joint military command. The manipulation, lies and corruption; even of the international court of criminal justice before which the islanders appeared is described brilliantly in Philippe Sands’ book, ‘the Last Colony’. Additionally, the Australian journalist John Pilger has made excellent documentaries and books called ‘Stealing a nation’, on the plight of the Chagos islanders.

Since the early sixties, the Chagossians have been homeless refugees. They belong to no sovereign nation for their islands were annexed into a high security zone called the ‘British Indian Ocean territory’ and the Chagos archipelago’s largest island, Diego Garcia, used as a US military base. This base was used for the gulf war, for air strikes against Afghanistan. Against Iraq.

These American and British bases are being used for the rampant destruction of an ancient world, those which still have, not just tradition and faith but has also preserved the cultural and aesthetic heritage of the entire human race. They are being made into rubble. Mesopotamia died when the united west destroyed Iraq. They repeated it with Syria. Its oldest city Aleppo, with its limestone architecture is gone. Now, they are finishing off the last bastion of beauty to drag it too, even as a cadaver, into the ugly club of Globalization, where the map of the world is dotted with Mc Donalds, Seven Elevens, Wendys and Starbucks. It is said that seeing Isfahan is like seeing half the world. A city founded by the Safavids who made mystical Shia Islam the empire’s faith. If faith equals beauty, can one fault faith?  Perhaps the rational west and its paranoid Zionists have no eyes for beauty, no ears for Persia’s poetry? Nor the aesthetic sensitivity to appreciate art, music and architecture; the pinnacle of human genius. Is the will for destruction all that has been programed in the manufacture of the rational and scientific creature?

After great effort by the Chagossians, in 2019, it was ruled that the dismemberment of colonial territories before independence was a violation of the United Nations charter and that the Chagossians had the right to return to their islands. Britain ignored it.

Yet, in its immediate aftermath, in the same year, the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) Agreement, a legally binding treaty was up for signing with Sri Lanka. It was an arrangement made between the US authorities and the Sri Lankan Prime Minister, Ranil Wickramasinghe, in view of the fact that if US loses its naval base in Diego Garcia it would require an alternate base and that would be Sri Lanka.

Fortunately, massive public protest stopped it.

But, where is such reaction in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates? Cyprus has just begun. But those nations of the Arabian Peninsula, are they sovereign nations or mere fiefdoms? Do their people have nothing to say when their leaders collaborate with infidels to annihilate fellow Muslims?

Where is the brotherhood that Islam claims? Be it Shia or Sunni Islam, is its origin not from one source?  Did the prophet not say, that a Muslim is the brother of a Muslim. He does not oppress him nor does he fail him. He does not lie to him and he does not hold him in contempt. Whoever fulfills the need of his brother, Allah will fulfill his needs. Whoever relieves a Muslim from distress, Allah will relieve him from distress. Did he not say, ‘do not envy one another and do not inflate prices for one another and do not hate one another but be slaves of Allah and brothers amongst yourselves’. Where is that brotherhood now?

Why does Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) support Infidels and Zionist rather than brothers, united in one faith?

Or, should one try to understand western cunning before one tries to understand the betrayal of brothers. Perhaps the same tactic that influenced DS to assume that British protection was vital to defend the Sinhalese from Tamils has been the credo of their indoctrination too.   

The British were skilled and cunning, but to understand the American, one must watch a western movie and observe that lone ranger, on horseback, with a gun, killing American Indians for land, for gold or for boredom’s sake. Those lone rangers, when they congregated, became known as the United States of America. Their nation was built by forcing native American Indians into barren reservations and the occupation of their lands with the barrel of the gun. They are the archetypes of Zionism; settler colonials devoid of moral compass. Their state of Israel, like the great marches of the American Indians, was founded on the Nakba, the catastrophe which made the Palestinians stateless refugees.  

‘When the white man comes in my country, he leaves a train of blood behind him’, (Red Cloud of the Sioux)

‘We were once friends with the whites, but you nudged us out of the way by your intrigues, and now when we are in council you keep nudging each other, why don’t you talk, and go straight and let all be well’ (Black Kettle)

The above quotations are from Dee Brown’s ‘Bury My heart at Wounded knee’. It is the elegy of the Indians. But that what Black kettle requests is precisely that what they do not do. They nudge and manipulate.  Their moral compass has no honesty. When murder was considered a crime, they began with the decimation of cultural memory. They abducted native children, forced them in reeducation camps and indoctrinated them. When they were done those Indian children had red skin but a white youl. They spoke white language, worshipped white gods and married white men. 

What was done in the Americans, was done, under settler Colonialism, and subsequent British Colonialism, in nearly every colonized nation.  

But, when Islam was born in Arabia, it was like lush oasis in the barren desert. It was to them, not a new faith, but an improvement of the old. And the holy Quran; the final edition of the Torah and the Bible. And Islam’s prophet Muhammed, the last in the lineage of prophets of the Abrahamic faiths. The one who followed ‘Isa ibn Maryamu’, Jesus; the son of Mary.

Islam spread across the region like a powerful desert wind, where men had no choice, but to submit to its human grandeur for it was the only human faith that had blown their way, that had no hierarchy and called out for social justice, pluralism and non-violence.  

Karen Armstrong, a former Catholic nun turned author writes in her book titled, ‘Mohammed, a prophet of our times, ‘Muhammed was a brilliant, compassionate leader who navigated immense political and social challenges, emphasizing his humanity and dedication to peace over violence. He was decisive and whole hearted in his role in promoting justice and kindness in the 7th century Arabia’.

Islam was a magnet of the times.

Unfortunately, that magnet was also a threat to the Christian church. And, once Islam began to spread, not by swords, religious missionaries nor colonial conquest, rather the beauty and kindness of its faith, it became a threat to the Catholic popes and the crusades against the Muslims were commissioned. If Christianity managed to halt the spread of Islam, it was not through the superiority of their faith, but the superiority of their weapons.

Thus, Islam has always been the west’s crown of thorns. Islam’s preaching of brotherhood and community is an anathema to western capitalist civilization whose Christian God has been replaced by Consumerism. The western mind is devoid of faith and his life is one of hedonism and his death, of medical intervention. His churches are no longer places of worship but of tourist attraction reminding the visitor of a golden age when Christian crusaders plundered the wealth of Muslim lands to build their fine monuments to Christian glory. Magnificent cathedrals were financed from robbery, it was the law of the jungle, not the religion of Jesus Christ.  

Therefore, the Christian west’s greatest intent is to destroy Islam. It got their mightiest chance with the fall of the Ottoman empire and has not stopped since. To enable the Ottoman demise, it lured the Mufti of Mecca, to organize an Arab revolt against the Ottomans, promising him the Ottoman territory and kingship. That was an Islamic leaders first act of betrayal. ‘‘Let no believers take disbelievers as allies’’. But the Mufti broke a fundamental edict of Islam and allied with infidels and delivered to the British what he had promised.

The Arab revolt was the end of Ottoman rule. But the British betrayed the Mufti. They agreed to deliver their promise if the Mufti would forfeit Palestine to European Zionists. By this time, the European Zionist lobby, the militant wing of political Judaism had begun lobbying the British for a Jewish state in Palestine.

The house of Islam was on the eve of destruction, not by Arab Jews living in Ottoman territory such as Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, but by Zionism, a western idea born from the Dreyfuss affair which convinced European Jews that a separate state for Jews was all that could save them from Christian barbarism.  Those who imprisoned Dreyfuss were French, not Arabs. The architects of the Holocaust were Germans, not Arabs.  Christians, not Muslims.   

The desert faiths were simple. So were desert minds. They survived nature, not through craftiness, but endurance for in these large barren spaces, endowed with nature’s sandy impermanence, all that was lasting was the sweetness of their eternal God, to whom they prayed five times a day. The desert faith was not of rocks and mortar that built stone cathedrals of vain glory, but of faith, prayer, alms, fasting and pilgrimage; cemented upon brotherhood amongst its community of believers.

What has happened to that brotherhood now? The world is in a state of war and that brotherhood has turned against its brother and is letting infidels, Americans and Zionists, use their territory for the destruction of his brother.

Did it not happen before, during the reign of King Faisal?

When the Mufti refused to cede Palestine the British, they had had no more use of him and found amongst the Arab tribes, one greedy and ambitious man from the house of Saud which had recently allied itself with the powerful Abd al Wahhab, the father of Wahhabism. His name was Abdul Aziz. Abdul Aziz was going to be Britain’s ally in breaking the unity of the community, the prerequisite for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Following the UN resolution for the partition of Palestine, when 700, 000 Palestinians were violently displaced and dispossessed by the Zionists, the king of Arabia, Abdul Aziz turned a blind eye. He had a handsome army, but sent none for the protection of fellow Muslims from militant Zionists.

Yet, Abdul Aziz’s second son, Faisal, did pride to his faith and to his tribe and rose to the defense of Palestine. ‘We believe’, he proclaimed, ‘that there will never be a lasting peace in the area unless Jerusalem is liberated and returned to Arab sovereignty, unless liberation of all the occupied Arab territories are achieved and unless Arab people of Palestine regain their rights to return to their homes and be given the right to self-determination’.

To Faisal, the eradication of the state Israel from Palestine territory was the Only means to territorial sovereignty that would bring peace to the Arabs and to the region. But the west was not interested in peace. Only in an eternal state of crisis which they exploited to plunder the wealth of third nations. The Colonial gambit never ended.

So, when Egypt and Syria began to the Yom Kippur, to take back Palestinian territory lost to the 1967 war, Faisal, now the regent in place of his corrupt brother Saud, supported Palestine. But, as victory was imminent, the Americans entered the war on the Zionist side and the Arab armies were defeated.

It angered Faisal and he refused to sell any more oil to the west.

The crisis of 1973 was as serious as Hormuz is today.

While the west suffered in darkness and economies lagged without oil, Faisal became instrumental in the creation of the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC), where all the heads of Muslim states joined Faisal and agreed to make liberation of Palestine a universal Muslim issue. He brought to the gathering of Muslim leaders, the spirit of the Prophet Mohammed, whose core premise was justice. And to whom his community of believers were not individuals, but one body, united in mutual goodness and suffers when another suffers and responds accordingly.

The seeds Islamic solidarity had been sown, but even before it could take root Faisal was assassinated.  By nis nephew, the son of his elder brother Saud. A prince who had lived in the United States for a greater part of his life and was known for womanizing and drugs.

Upon Faisal’s death, most of the Muslim leaders who had joined him, were pulled like puppets on a string to the west and the question of Palestine went into the dustbin of history, becoming a refugee issue, not a political issue, until one country, in the spirit of Islamic community picked it up; Iran. Not during the reign of the Shah, but after 1979 when the Islamic revolution brought Ayatollah Khomeini from France and placed him as the supreme leader of Iran and its Shia Muslims.

Yet, what are the Shia and how do they differ from the rest of the Muslim community?

It is said that the word ‘Shia’ was first uttered from the prophet’s mouth. ‘The Shia (followers of the prophet) and his household are pious, they obey God and one recognizes them by their humility, submission to God, honesty, abundant praise of God, fasting and their goodness to parents, attention to poor and needy. Debtors and orphans. The Shia speaks the truth, recite the holy Quran and hold back their tongues for good work and for trustworthiness towards one’s relatives. These are the characteristics of the Shia. They follow God, the holy Quran, prophet Muhammed and after him the nearest people to the prophet who have been appointed by the prophet and that is ‘ahl il bayt’; the family of the prophet’.

He has further cemented it by saying, ‘Islam is like a tree, in which I am the root. Ali is the branch Hassan and Husein are the fruits and the Shiite are the leaves’, as according to the Sunni scholar Ibn Hajar.

But Ali, the prophet’s son in law, was bypassed for Abubakr the prophet’s companion and when Ali did finally become the leader of the community, after the murder of Sunni Islam’s 3rd caliph Uthman, Ali became the first Imam of the Shia but the fourth caliph of the Sunnis. Tragically, his leadership was short for he was assassinated at the great mosque at Kufa. Yet, to the Shia, Ali’s life was an embodiment of piety, justice and courage and his death, one of martyrdom.  Even today his death marks a day of national mourning where Iranians spend nights in prayer and vigil while mourning and reciting the holy Quran, weeping, for Imam Ali.

Hence, the fundamental difference between Sunni and Shia Islam is the question of leadership.

Yet Twelver Shiism, that special branch of Shia Islam which is Iran’s national religion, which was introduced to Persia under the Safavid dynasty not only believes that the leader of the community should be from the Prophet’s family, but also believes that if none are manifest, a religious scholar, known for his piety and theological knowledge must guide the community until the rightful leader, the Mahdi (the hidden Imam) will emerge at the end of time and establish peace, justice and also redeem Islam. It is called Twelver Shia for it recognizes 12 Imams beginning with the prophet Muhammed and following him, his son in law; Ali.

Not only Ali, but the prophet’s grandson was martyred too, one in the Najaf and the other in Karbala; in Iraq. The blood of martyrs run deep in Iranian veins. Hence, when Imam Khamenei was killed, the west created another martyr. Imam Khamenei’s death does not weaken the Iranians; it strengthens them for he gave his life, for nothing less than a battle against infidels for having been martyred, not at any given time but when he was in discourse, trying to find appeasement to western ambition and Zionist paranoia, through dialogue.

If the west assumed that killing Imam Khamenei was comparable to the murder of Sadam Hussein or Muhammar Qaddafi, they made a terrible mistake. Those murders were heinous crimes, but not sacrilegious. Ayatollah Khamenei’s assassination was an attack, not against a political system, but against faith.   

But how would the west even identify faith when most of them are members of the Eppstein sect which is the supreme evidence of moral debasement. The assassination of a spiritual leader shows the ethical bankruptcy and moral debasement of western society. Perhaps it would be wise to recollect the words of Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘God is dead. God remains dead and we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers. What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives, who will wipe the blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves?’

Nietzsche wrote this passage in in the nineteenth century, illuminating the western society in which he lived. Today, that society is in a worse state. It cannot identify truth, is devoid of empathy and resides in the new Realism of Digital Platforms and Disneyworld. Its God is Consumerism, its dress is blue jeans, its food is the burger and its drink is coca cola and its high priest; Jeffery Eppstein. Was the murder of 175 Iranian school girls by the western powers an offering to that high priest?

The breath of God was in every one of those 175 dead little girls. By killing them, the west created 175 more martyrs. The Iranian is not alone; all those who have a heart and a sense of faith will hate Israel and its ally and fight unto the last man for the death of those little girls. And when America wins, for it always wins, even when it loses, the world’s citizens would have rediscovered faith; Islam.

Let us hope it will be the peaceful and just the Islam of the prophet Muhammed. Not like Islam of the Taliban, ISIS and Boko Haram; the results of the west’s weaponized effort to destroy the equality and justice of the faith revealed to Muhammed of Mecca.

Islam has been the greatest threat to western Capitalism. For it preaches brotherhood; the anathema to western society’s rabid individualism. Hence, it has done its utmost to destroy it. Had they not ruined Afghanistan, there would be no Taliban. Had they not destroyed Syria, there would be no ISIS, had they not killed Qaddafi, there would be no Boko Haraam. The root of Islamic fundamentalism is not Islam, it is in the Crusades, which was not the religion of Jesus Christ, but that of popes and kings.  

My heartfelt condolences to the people of Iran, you have lost your supreme spiritual leader. May you have in his son, a spiritual leader as able and wise as his father. May he guide you in the true spirit of Islam and of the prophet Muhammed. And may peace come to you soon. And your faith redeemed. If one does not see its beauty, it is for the privation of their gaze. And may you be rewarded on the day of judgement. For you alone remembered that the human family creates no refugees.  

Manuka Wijesinghe

The politician Gammanpila claims in a new book that he has identified Zahran Hashim as the brain behind the Easter Sunday attacks.

April 3rd, 2026

Chandre Dharmawardana.

In his book titled “Searching for the Mastermind of the Easter Sunday Attacks” (or Uncovering the Mastermind of the Easter Attacks), launched on March 31, 2026, Udaya Gammanpila identifies Zahran Hashim as the sole mastermind behind the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

Gammanpila’s findings, which he claims are the result of over a year of research, include several specific assertions:

Gammanpila argues that evidence and logic confirm Zahran Hashim alone was the mastermind, dismissing theories of an “invisible hand” or external masterminds as misleading.

Role of Shani Abeysekara: At the book launch event held at the Sri Sambuddhatva Jayanti Mandiraya, Gammanpila claimed that former CID Director Shani Abeysekara “paved the way” for the attacks, citing 11 specific reasons.

Motivation for the Timing: The book alleges that while the attacks were originally planned for August 2021, Hashim accelerated the timeline to April 2019 following commands from ISIS leaders to seek revenge for an incident in New Zealand.

Controversy and Criticism: The book has faced criticism from political figures like Navin Dissanayake, who noted that Zahran Hashim had already been identified as a key figure in previous official reports, such as the Presidential Commission. 

If the Predidential commission had also identified Zaharan as the main person, what is wrong or novel or surprising about Gammanpila also confirming it?

Nevertheless, the Archbishop of Colombo, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, has expressed strong dissatisfaction with Udaya Gammanpila’s book and recent “revelations” as they go against the main stand taken by the Cardinal.

The Cardinal believes in a “Grand Plot”: The Cardinal has long maintained that the attacks were not just the work of a few isolated extremists but part of a “grand political plot”. He has specifically questioned whether the attacks were used to create chaos and fear for electoral gains in the 2019 presidential election.

By identifying Zahran Hashim as the sole mastermind, Gammanpila’s book dismisses the existence of a broader, more powerful group or an “invisible hand” that the Church believes pulled the strings. The Cardinal remains suspicious that the “real” masterminds who funded, trained, and aided the terrorists are being protected, but he has not presented any tangible evidence. The Cardinal ignores the fact that Zaharan and others had connections with the Middle-East, their extremist teachers, video and literature. They were not all that isolated and it was not the attacks of a few isolated extremists, but people in sync. with ISIS and wanting to revenge the New Zealand attacks.

Unanswered Questions: The Church has raised specific, unresolved issues that Gammanpila’s findings do not adequately address, such as the identity and role of “Sonic Sonic,” the links to military intelligence, and why prior warnings—including those from India—were ignored by authorities.

The “rumor” regarding Sonic-Sonic refers to an intelligence operative who is central to the Catholic Church’s claim that the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks involved a state-sponsored conspiracy rather than just isolated religious extremism. The government has officially identified “Sonic-Sonic” as a code name for a local intelligence officer. State officials claim this officer was tasked with “infiltrating” the National Thowheeth Jama’ath (NTJ) and extremist rings to extract information. The controversy intensified after a 2023 Channel 4 documentary alleged that Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay (then a senior military intelligence figure) managed “Sonic-Sonic” and even met with the attackers. Whistleblowers claim this was part of a plot to create a security crisis that would influence the 2019 presidential election in favor of Gotabaya Rajapaksa. This remains a very far-fetched claim. In February 2026, Suresh Sallay was arrested by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) on charges of “conspiracy and aiding and abetting” the bombings. The Church views this as a breakthrough in finally uncovering the truth behind “Sonic-Sonic” and the broader network.

Accusations of Misdirection: The Cardinal has described these new writings by Gammanpila et al as attempts to “mislead the public” and “create confusion”. He believes certain groups are trying to distract from the pursuit of the full truth by rehashing old findings or targeting specific officials, like Shani Abeysekara, to settle political scores.

The Case of Harin Fernando’s Father

 It was revealed during the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) that Harin Fernando’s father, who was in a hospital ICU at the time, received a call from a CID officer on the night before the attacks.

The officer reportedly warned him of an imminent threat, leading the father to tell his son not to attend Easter services.

 For the Cardinal, this is proof that the security apparatus knew exactly what was coming but chose to warn only a “select few” while leaving the general public and the Church in the dark. The Cardinal claims that if a CID officer could warn an MP’s father, the state clearly had actionable intelligence but purposefully failed to inform the Church hierarchy. Others claim that even senior church officials may have known about it but they had not taken it seriously, but no evidence has been adduced.

Of course the security apparatus KNEW about an impending attack as the Indian Secret Service had sent the warning. But President Sirisena’s top officials did not take it seriously and did not act. The Cardinal clearly has his suspicions, but he has no additional evidence to back up his theory of a grand design.

Chandre Dharmawardana.

Balancing Sovereignty, Development, and Democracy: Lessons for Sri Lanka from Burkina Faso 

April 3rd, 2026

Prepared by: Sarath Obeysekera

1. Executive Summary

Recent global developments, particularly the rise of assertive leadership in Burkina Faso under Ibrahim Traoré, have sparked debate on whether traditional democratic models are effective for developing nations.

This paper argues that while Sri Lanka should not abandon democracy, it must urgently reform governance by:

  • Prioritizing national interest
  • Strengthening economic sovereignty
  • Reducing dependency on external actors
  • Enforcing disciplined, long-term policy execution

Sri Lanka must adopt a Strategic Democracy Model”—combining democratic legitimacy with strong, consistent, and nationally focused leadership.

2. Background

Burkina Faso’s leadership has openly challenged Western influence and questioned the effectiveness of democracy in delivering rapid development.

Sri Lanka, in contrast:

  • Is a long-standing democracy
  • Is highly dependent on global trade, tourism, and finance
  • Has faced repeated economic crises due to policy inconsistency and external dependency

The comparison highlights a central issue:

Governance effectiveness—not regime type—is the key determinant of national success.

3. Key Lessons from Burkina Faso

3.1 Assertion of National Sovereignty

Burkina Faso has prioritized control over its resources and decision-making processes.

Implication for Sri Lanka:

  • Reassess agreements involving strategic assets (ports, energy, land)
  • Ensure all foreign investments align with national priorities

3.2 Courage in Leadership

Leadership in Burkina Faso has demonstrated willingness to resist external pressure from powers such as the United States and European nations.

Implication:

  • Sri Lanka must negotiate with confidence with all partners, including India and China
  • Avoid policy reversals driven by political cycles

3.3 Emphasis on Self-Reliance

Reducing dependence on foreign aid and imports is a central theme.

Implication:

  • Develop domestic industries:
    • Maritime services
    • Energy production
    • Agro-processing
  • Promote export-oriented growth

3.4 Resource Nationalism

Burkina Faso seeks to retain maximum value from its natural resources.

Implication:

  • Sri Lanka must maximize returns from:
    • Trincomalee Harbour
    • Hambantota Port
    • Offshore energy and marine resources

4. Risks of Misapplication

Sri Lanka must avoid misinterpreting these lessons.

4.1 Rejection of Democracy

Abandoning democracy risks:

  • International isolation
  • Economic sanctions
  • Loss of investor confidence

Examples include instability in Myanmar and Sudan.

4.2 Economic Isolation

Sri Lanka’s economy depends on:

  • Exports
  • Tourism
  • Foreign investment

Aggressive geopolitical positioning without economic strength would be counterproductive.

4.3 Militarization of Governance

Military-led systems often:

  • Undermine institutional stability
  • Reduce transparency
  • Discourage private investment

5. Policy Recommendations for Sri Lanka

5.1 Adopt a Strategic Democracy” Framework

  • Maintain democratic governance
  • Introduce long-term national planning insulated from political cycles
  • Strengthen independent institutions

5.2 Establish a National Strategic Assets Authority

Mandate:

  • Evaluate all foreign investments
  • Protect critical infrastructure
  • Ensure technology and knowledge transfer

5.3 Strengthen Economic Sovereignty

  • Reduce import dependency
  • Promote local manufacturing and services
  • Expand renewable energy capacity

5.4 Maritime and Logistics Hub Development

Capitalize on geographic advantage by:

  • Developing Trincomalee Harbour as an energy and industrial hub
  • Enhancing Hambantota Port for logistics and bunkering
  • Expanding ship repair and shipbuilding industries

(This aligns strongly with my  prior strategic proposals.)

5.5 Balanced Foreign Policy

  • Maintain neutrality
  • Engage all major powers strategically
  • Avoid overdependence on any single country

5.6 Governance Reform

  • Enforce accountability in public sector
  • Digitize government services
  • Introduce performance-based evaluation systems

6. Strategic Model: Discipline within Democracy

Sri Lanka should emulate elements of countries like Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew:

  • Strong institutions
  • Policy continuity
  • Zero tolerance for corruption
  • Long-term national vision

7. Conclusion

The experience of Burkina Faso is not a model to replicate, but a signal to reflect.

Sri Lanka’s path forward lies not in abandoning democracy, but in strengthening it through:

  • Strategic clarity
  • Institutional discipline
  • Economic independence

The real challenge is not choosing between democracy and control—but achieving effective governance within a democratic framework.

8. Final Note

Sri Lanka stands at a critical juncture. With decisive reforms and strategic leadership, it can transform from a dependent economy into a self-reliant maritime and economic hub in the Indian Ocean.

“Bluster Without Strategy: Trump’s Ill-Fated Iran War”

April 3rd, 2026

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir

Trump’s address to the nation on the Iran war was intended to project control and resolve. Instead, it revealed indecision and disarray, marked by contradictions, self praise, and shifting objectives. What was billed as a declaration of strength became a striking exposé of confusion and faltering leadership—both at home and abroad.

Bluster Without Strategy: Trump’s Ill-Fated Iran War

Trump’s address to the nation about the Iran war failed to persuade anyone beyond his devoted base that the war has strengthened America’s national security. Instead, it exposed a president struggling to control a conflict he couldn’t clearly define, projecting an unsettling portrait of confusion. At one moment, he celebrated mission accomplished,” claiming victory over Iran’s military capabilities; at the next, he vowed to finish the job.” His incoherent claims, shifting objectives, and self congratulatory tone only deepened doubts about the logic and purpose of the conflict. His shifting justifications, exaggerated claims, and disregard for facts revealed not confidence but weakness, leaving even his closest advisers unclear about what victory means.

Refusing to Call It a War

In a bizarre twist, Trump refused to call the ongoing conflict with Iran a war,” preferring the term excursion,” even as he compared it to Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The contradiction reflected both rhetorical manipulation and historical amnesia. His linguistic gamesmanship was meant to minimize accountability while evoking the stature of past commanders in chief. Instead, it exposed his incoherence—an effort to claim victory without admitting the moral and strategic costs of open warfare.

The Enriched Uranium Mystery

Trump briefly touched on Iran’s stockpile of 60 percent enriched uranium, claiming that US strikes obliterated” Iran’s nuclear sites and stating that it would take months to get near the nuclear dust,” presumably referring to the enriched uranium itself—a statement as absurd as it is woefully convoluted. The comment was emblematic of a speech full of exaggerations and distortions, casting further doubt on nuclear security.

Boasting About a Declining Economy

Trump lauded what he called the greatest economy in history,” disregarding data showing rising inflation, growing long-term unemployment, and a ballooning deficit. His address read more like a campaign rally than a sober wartime report. By reciting outdated talking points, he appeared detached from the economic hardships Americans face. Far from projecting confidence, his hollow rhetoric amplified the perception of a president insulated from reality and desperate to sustain the illusion of competence.

Energy Independence and the Gas Price Paradox Declaring that the US is self-sufficient in oil and gas production, Trump ignored an inconvenient reality: Americans are paying more than $4 per gallon, nearly 40 percent higher than before the war. His attempt to blame global speculation” sidestepped the fact that his own actions destabilized markets. The contradiction between his claim of independence and the economic pain at the pump highlights his disconnect from policy consequences, eroding trust in his economic leadership.

Misreading Iran’s Motives

In his address, Trump misinterpreted Iran’s attacks on Gulf states, presenting them as acts of unprovoked aggression rather than strategic retaliation. He seemed unaware—or unwilling to acknowledge—that Iran targeted US bases because it cannot strike American soil. This failure to grasp the logic of deterrence blinds his administration to predictable regional escalations. The omission signals not strength but ignorance of the basic dynamics driving the very conflict he initiated.

Ignoring Israel’s Role in the Conflict

Notably absent from Trump’s remarks was any mention of Israel’s hand in shaping the war’s trajectory. Netanyahu’s influence in urging direct confrontation with Tehran is well documented, yet Trump avoided the subject entirely. This selective silence suggests both political indebtedness and reluctance to face domestic criticism. By obscuring Israel’s part in the conflict, Trump distorted the public’s understanding of responsibility and reinforced the perception of a presidency guided by personal alliances over national interest.

Bluster and Comparisons to Predecessors

True to form, Trump filled his speech with boasts about accomplishments allegedly surpassing those of Obama and Biden. He portrayed himself as the only leader willing to act decisively, yet offered no evidence that his approach yielded better results. The hyperbolic comparisons betrayed insecurity rather than strength. His address became an exhibition of ego, not leadership—reaffirming the view that for Trump, the battlefield is not Iran but the contest for personal validation.

Blaming European Allies over the Strait of Hormuz Trump chastised European allies for failing to join his effort to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He insisted the US no longer needs Middle Eastern oil and that Europe should handle its own mess.” This unilateral tone further alienated NATO partners and deepened existing tensions across the Atlantic. His message offered nothing new to alter the bleak trajectory of the conflict, reinforcing their fears that Washington is more committed to escalation than diplomacy. Far from rallying unity, his remarks confirmed Washington’s isolation and reinforced perceptions of an erratic, unreliable superpower.

The Myth of Renewed American Respect

Trump’s speech, to be sure, laid bare his repeated claims in the past that America is more respected than ever.” The reality is starkly different: the US is increasingly feared, distrusted, and viewed as unpredictable. His aggressive rhetoric and disregard for alliances have corroded the moral authority that once underpinned American leadership. What he presents as power is in fact isolation—a superpower adrift, its reputation diminished by a president who confuses intimidation with respect.

A Speech That Exposed America’s Limitations Trump’s address did not convince the public or America’s allies that the war against Iran advanced US national security. Instead, it revealed a superpower constrained by its own contradictions—alienating partners in the Gulf, straining ties with Europe, and exposing the fragmentation of American strategy. Rather than inspiring confidence, his words magnified distrust and uncertainty. He appeared weaker, discombobulated, arrogant, and bombastic as usual—his opponents gratified, his supporters demoralized and perplexed.

No Exit Strategy in Sight

Despite his extended justifications for continuing hostilities, Trump failed to present any plan, timeline, or measurable goal for ending the war. He offered no vision for stabilization, no diplomatic channel, and no criteria for success. This omission underscored an administration operating on impulse rather than strategy. As he said in the past, he will feel it in his bones when to end the war. The absence of an exit plan speaks volumes—it reflects a president driven by political optics rather than substance, leaving America entangled in yet another costly quagmire.

Trump’s speech failed to convince anyone beyond his devoted followers that the war enhanced America’s security. His contradictory claims and hollow boastfulness projected weakness, not power, alienating allies and deepening mistrust. What emerged was a portrait of a leader lost in his own illusions, isolated and increasingly irrelevant.

Dr. Alon Ben-Meir is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He taught courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies.

Pathfinder Foundation Hosts Russian Deputy Foreign Minister for High-Level Dialogue on Global Geopolitics

April 3rd, 2026

The Pathfinder Foundation

The Pathfinder Foundation hosted a high-level discussion featuring Andrey Rudenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, during his official visit to Sri Lanka. The event brought together diplomats, policymakers, academics, and media representatives for an in-depth exchange on evolving global geopolitical dynamics and bilateral relations.

The session was attended by Alexey Pavlovsky, Director of the Second Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Levan S. Dzhagaryan, Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Sri Lanka, and senior officials from the Embassy of the Russian Federation.

Welcoming the delegation, Chairman-Pathfinder Foundation, Ambassador (Retd.) Bernard Goonetilleke noted that the visit of the Deputy Minister marked the second high-level engagement by the Russian Federation with Sri Lanka in a short period, following recent discussions on energy cooperation led by Deputy Energy Minister Roman Marshavin. He observed that while earlier engagements focused on addressing Sri Lanka’s immediate energy challenges, the present dialogue provided an opportunity to broaden discussions to include the wider geopolitical and strategic environment.

Ambassador Goonetilleke highlighted that the meeting takes place at a time when the international system is under considerable strain, with ongoing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, rising tensions in the Persian Gulf, and disruptions to major maritime corridors. He stressed that for countries such as Sri Lanka, located at the crossroads of key global shipping routes, these developments are not abstract concerns but have direct implications for economic resilience, supply chains, energy security, and national stability. He further noted that the world appears to be in the midst of a transition toward a new international order, the contours of which remain uncertain, making it particularly important for Sri Lanka to engage with major global actors such as the Russian Federation.

In his remarks, Deputy Minister A. Rudenko expressed appreciation for the opportunity to engage with the Pathfinder Foundation and described his visit to Sri Lanka as both his first and an important opportunity to better understand the country’s role in a changing global landscape. He emphasised that the international system is undergoing a profound transformation from a unipolar structure to a more multipolar order, where multiple centres of power will play a role in shaping global outcomes. He noted the increasing influence of countries of the Global South, including major economies such as China and India, as well as regional groupings like ASEAN, in determining economic, political, and security dynamics. He observed that the transition to a multipolar world is complex and often accompanied by instability, with current conflicts reflecting deeper structural changes in the international system. While acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding the eventual shape of the emerging order, he reiterated Russia’s position that future global arrangements should be based on principles of sovereign equality, mutual respect, and non-interference.

Deputy Minister A. Rudenko also referred to Russia’s proposal for a broader Eurasian security architecture, aimed at fostering cooperation across a vast region extending from Europe to Asia. He suggested that such an approach could help create more inclusive and coordinated mechanisms for addressing shared challenges, while allowing regional organizations to interact more effectively on the basis of equality.

A significant portion of the discussion focused on the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and its global repercussions. The Deputy Minister described the situation as highly volatile and unpredictable, with potential consequences extending well beyond the immediate region. He stressed that continued escalation could have serious implications for global energy markets, maritime security, and economic stability, particularly for countries dependent on energy imports and secure shipping routes.

In response to questions on energy security, he reaffirmed Russia’s willingness to supply energy resources to countries in Asia, including Sri Lanka, and emphasized the importance of long-term agreements to ensure stability and predictability. He noted that while geopolitical pressures and sanctions have at times constrained cooperation, there is now renewed opportunity for engagement, provided countries pursue independent and sustainable energy strategies. He also highlighted the growing trend towards conducting trade in national currencies, reflecting broader shifts in the global financial system.

On the issue of global governance, Deputy Minister A. Rudenko acknowledged the challenges facing multilateral institutions, particularly the United Nations, and expressed support for reform efforts aimed at making them more representative and effective. He emphasized that countries of the Global South should have a stronger voice in international decision-making processes, including in the United Nations Security Council, while noting that such reforms require careful and consensus-based approaches.

The discussion also touched on the role of groupings such as BRICS, with Deputy Minister A. Rudenko noting that while differences exist among member states, the platform provides an important mechanism for coordination and dialogue among emerging economies. He highlighted ongoing efforts to bridge differences and enhance cooperation within such frameworks.

Participants raised a wide range of questions on regional security, trade dynamics, investment opportunities, and Sri Lanka’s strategic position in the Indian Ocean. Deputy Minister A. Rudenko acknowledged Sri Lanka’s importance as a regional hub and noted the potential for expanding cooperation in areas such as tourism, trade, and investment. He emphasised the need for improved connectivity, reliable financial mechanisms, and stronger institutional frameworks to support deeper economic engagement. The session concluded with an exchange of views on the challenges and opportunities presented by the evolving global order, highlighting the importance of continued dialogue and cooperation in navigating a period of significant geopolitical change.

The Pathfinder Foundation expressed its appreciation to the Russian delegation for their participation and reaffirmed its commitment to fostering informed discussion and international engagement on issues of strategic importance to Sri Lanka and the wider region.

Pictures

01-   Alexey Pavlovsky, Director of the Second Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Andrey Rudenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, and Chairman-Pathfinder Foundation, Ambassador (Retd.) Bernard Goonetilleke

02-   Alexey Pavlovsky, Director of the Second Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Andrey Rudenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Chairman-Pathfinder Foundation, Ambassador (Retd.) Bernard Goonetilleke and His Excellency Levan S. Dzhagaryan, Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Sri Lanka

03-   Alexey Pavlovsky, Director of the Second Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Andrey Rudenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Chairman-Pathfinder Foundation, Ambassador (Retd.) Bernard Goonetilleke and His Excellency Levan S. Dzhagaryan, Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Sri Lanka,

04-   Alexey Pavlovsky, Director of the Second Asian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Andrey Rudenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, and Chairman-Pathfinder Foundation, Ambassador (Retd.) Bernard Goonetilleke

Key unsolicited Projects Executed in 70/ 90 

April 3rd, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Key unsolicited Projects Executed in 70/ 90 

  • Kotmale Dam – fast-tracked with Swedish funding under Gamini Dissanayake
  • Parliament of Sri Lanka dredging – awarded to Boskalis
  • Sea sand dredging project – linked to Dutch funding + loans
  • Canal rehabilitation – feasibility by WS Atkins
  • Project management – Nippon Koei
  • Execution – Keangnam Enterprises

These represent a classic 1970s–1990s model of development:

👉 politically driven

👉 externally financed

👉 consultant-led

👉 quickly executed


 Lessons to Learn

1.  Speed vs. Process

Then:

Projects moved very fast—decisions taken at ministerial level, minimal bureaucracy.

Lesson:

  • Speed is essential for development
  • But lack of structured procurement can lead to:
    • inflated costs
    • poor negotiation outcomes
    • dependency on external parties

Today’s takeaway:

Create a fast-track approval system” WITH safeguards—not without them.

Unsolicited Proposals – Double-Edged Sword

Then:

Foreign companies like Boskalis brought ideas + financing.

Advantages:

  • No need for government to conceive projects
  • Access to technology and funding
  • Quick start

Risks:

  • Supplier-driven (not country-driven)
  • Weak price discovery (no competition)
  • Hidden long-term costs

 Lesson:

Accept unsolicited proposals—but subject them to competitive benchmarking (Swiss Challenge” model).

Foreign Funding Comes with Influence

Examples:

  • Swedish funding for Kotmale Dam
  • Dutch grants + loans for dredging
  • Japanese and Korean firms executing canals

Reality:

Funding often tied to:

  • contractors from donor country
  • technology lock-in
  • political alignment

 Lesson:

Diversify funding sources and negotiate from strength—not urgency.

Strong Political Champions Matter

Figures like Gamini Dissanayake drove projects personally.

Positive:

  • Projects didn’t stall
  • Bureaucracy was bypassed

Negative:

  • Decisions concentrated in individuals
  • Weak institutional continuity

Lesson:

Blend political leadership with institutional frameworks

not personality-driven development.

 Role of Consultants – Value vs Dependency

  • WS Atkins (feasibility) with RDV local company 
  • Nippon Koei (project management)

Observation:

  • High-quality planning and execution
  • But local capacity remained limited

 Lesson:

Every foreign consultancy must include:

  • technology transfer
  • local engineer training
  • knowledge retention

 Financing Structure Matters More Than Speed

Projects were funded by:

  • grants
  • soft loans
  • export credit

But often:

  • repayment terms were not fully scrutinized
  • revenue models were weak

 Lesson:

No project should proceed without a clear repayment + revenue model.

 Missed Opportunity: Build Local Industry

While foreign companies executed:

  • dredging
  • canals
  • infrastructure

Sri Lanka did not build its own large-scale contracting capability.

 Lesson:

Every project should:

  • mandate local contractor participation
  • develop domestic industry (like what South Korea did)

 Strategic Takeaway for Today

If Sri Lanka wants to replicate that clock  work” speed again:

 What to Keep

  • Decisive leadership
  • Willingness to engage foreign partners
  • Bold infrastructure vision

What to Fix

  • Transparent procurement
  • Competitive pricing
  • Strong legal frameworks
  • Local capacity building
  • Debt sustainability

Final Insight

The past model worked because:

  • the country was starting from a low base
  • urgency justified shortcuts

But today:

 The stakes are higher

debt is heavier

geopolitics is sharper

When the World Drops Multiculturalism, Poor Sri Lanka Embraces Their Droppings

April 3rd, 2026

Dilrook Kannangara

Sri Lanka tends to arrive late at the party; often embracing what the world flushes down the toilet. The latest is multiculturalism which failed and doomed the countries that embraced it. The world is dropping it faster than it adopted it. But poor Sri Lanka embraces this failed concept as refuse comes cheap. Instead, Sri Lanka must learn from the failures of the countries that went head in into multiculturalism and avoid it like the plague today. New laws have been introduced to curtail it. Migration is under strict rules to weed out harms to the domestic and native culture. External arrivals are diversified across the large number of different cultures so that no single external culture can establish itself. Unless multiculturalism is dropped, Sri Lanka will be forced to embrace permanent economic collapse, social collapse, lack of legal and values driven collectivism, violence and other ills.

Once upon a time the world scientific community demonized coconut consumption as high-fat food leading to cardiovascular disease. However, subsequent studies debunked this myth and found it contains many beneficial nutrients with protective properties. A coconut craze swept across the world and continues.

The original anti-coconut movement arrived in Sri Lanka in the late 1980s and lasted a long time. During this time people with some western medical knowledge shunned the healthy food over false, old and outdated western claims. Coconut farms slowly divested, demand fell and people moved to palm oil and other extremely unhealthy oils. Good news about coconuts arrived very late in Sri Lanka and by then the damage was done.

Multiculturalism is the same. It is now considered nothing more valuable than body waste in countries that touched it. None of them want it. They flush it down the toilet and unfortunately Sri Lanka picks it up from there.

Nations that did not embrace multiculturalism survived its ills. These include Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, most Nordic countries, conservative European countries, Arabic countries, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, etc. They value their firm historical and cultural foundations and would not fall for every fad that sweeps the world.

Sri Lanka must shed multiculturalism. A population of different ethnic and cultural values is not by itself multiculturalism. Diversity is a normal part of modern nations. However, giving equal importance to all cultures is the evil of multiculturalism. The dominant and native culture must be given exclusive importance. Others must be recognized and respected for what they are – foreign cultures – mostly originated from far less-developed and poorer South Indian and Pakistani sub-cultures. They have their motherlands across the seas, just not Sri Lanka where a far superior culture has taken hold for over two millennia and it must be protected and promoted exclusively. Claiming others’ cultures as ours is also an injustice to the rightful (overseas) owners of those cultures. They rightly enjoy exclusive importance in their native lands.

Mastermind or not, Zahran Hashim had pivotal role in the Easter bombings

April 3rd, 2026

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

One of the mostly viewed photos available on the internet of Zahran Hashim


Whatever Gammanpila’s critics may say, it is indeed a fact that Zahran Hashim played a pivotal and pre-eminent role in the Easter bombings of April 21, 2019, perpetrated by suicide bombers. Zahran Hashim may or may not have been the mastermind, but he certainly was actively involved in the dastardly exercise

‘Pasku Praharaye Mahamolakaru Soyayema (In Search of the Mastermind of the Easter Attacks)’ is the title of a book written by ‘Pivithuru Hela Urumaya’ party leader and former Cabinet minister, Udaya Gammanpila. The book launch event held in Colombo on March 31 was well attended. Among those in the audience were Leader of the Opposition Sajith Premadasa and  former Presidents Maithripala Sirisena and Gotabaya Rajapaksa. 

According to media reports on the event, Udaya Gammanpila has pointed the finger at Zahran Hashim – the former leader of the National Thowheeth Jamaat – as being the ‘Mastermind’ behind the Easter bombings of April 21, 2019. Mohammed Zahran Mohomed Hashim, also known as Zahran Hashim, the fiery Muslim preacher from Kattankudy in Batticaloa District, was a man about whom very little was known outside of Islamic circles before the Easter Sunday bombings. Subsequently, Hashim became well-known after  the terror attacks on April 21, 2019 in which he  was deeply involved. 

Zahran Hashim has been frequently named as the mastermind behind the Easter attacks in the past. This has been disputed by several others. Despite Hashim’s deep involvement in the attacks,  it was doubted that the man from Kattankudy was the mastermind behind the Easter bombings. Several conspiracy theories have been afloat about who the actual mastermind was. Now Udaya Gammanpila, through his book, has beamed the spotlight again on Zahran Hashim as the mastermind. 

Since I have not read Gammanpila’s book, I do not want to comment at this juncture on the case made by him against Zahran Hashim as the mastermind. However indictments have been filed in court against some suspects while investigations are yet continuing to ascertain whether there was indeed a mastermind and if so, to identify the person or persons.  Under these circumstances there may be many who doubt Gammanpila’s ‘discovery’ and ascribe political motives to him, in alleging Hashim was the mastermind. 

Whatever Gammanpila’s critics may say, it is indeed a fact that Zahran Hashim played a pivotal and pre-eminent role in the Easter bombings of April 21, 2019, perpetrated by suicide bombers. Zahran Hashim may or may not have been the mastermind, but he certainly was actively involved in the dastardly exercise. Therefore this column – with the aid of earlier writings –  focuses on Zahran Hashim alias ‘Abu Ubaidah’  this week. 

Kattankudy 

Mohammed Zahran Mohomed Hashim was born in the Muslim coastal town of Kattankudy in 1985. Kattankudy pronounced in Tamil as ‘Kaathaankudy’ is situated 211 miles away from Colombo in the eastern littoral known as ‘Ezhuvaankarai’  (shore of the rising sun). 

The thickly populated Kattankudy is arguably the most prosperous Muslim town in the East.  It is said that Kattankudy is the busiest business centre in the Batticaloa District. The natives of Kattankudy are well-known for their entrepreneurial skills and business acumen. A very large number of leading Muslim commercial establishments in the East as well as in other areas of the island belong to people from Kattankudy. 

However, in recent times Kattankudy has acquired the hallmarks of an Arabian town. Kattankudy today is a modern township bustling with women clad in black abayas and men sporting bristling beards. Date palms are grown within urban precincts and many signboards and street arches have Arabic lettering. Kattankudy has more than 60 registered and unregistered mosques. Except for a handful, most of them are in practice influenced by Wahabi ideology. 

Cassim to Hashim

is in this Kattankudy milieu that Zahran Hashim was born in 1985 to Hayath Mohomed Hashim and Sameema Hashim. It is said that the surname Hashim was earlier spelt as Cassim but later changed to Hashim. The family resided in the Ward 3 area in the town. Zahran was the eldest of five children. Following Zahran were two brothers Zain and Rilwan. The youngest two were sisters Madaniya and Yaseera. All of Zahran’s siblings were married with children.

Zahran Hashim himself was married in 2010. His wife Fathima Haadiya is from Kekunagolla near Narammala in the Kurunegala District. She was a student at the Kekunagolla National School when the wedding took place. They had two children, a boy and a girl. The boy was killed along with Zahran’s parents, siblings and their families at Saainthamarudhu, in an explosion triggered off by Zahran’s brother. Zahran’s wife and daughter survived with injuries.

‘Jamiyyathul Al-Falah Madrasa’

After obtaining primary and secondary education up to GCE O/L at a government school in Kattankudy, Zahran enrolled at the Jamiyyathul Al-Falah Madrasa (Theological College) in Ward 4 of Kattankudy in 2001. He was a very bright student but soon fell foul of his teachers due to his insolence and contrarian views. Young Zahran became very fluent in Arabic and was soon attracted to fundamental Islam and Thowheedism encapsulating the ‘indivisible oneness concept of monotheism in Islam.’ 

Zahran Hashim became extremely rebellious at the madrasa and argued vehemently with his teachers. He also refused to abide by norms and rules. As a result, he was expelled from Al-Falah Madrasa in 2007. Had he completed his full course of studies, Zahran would have become a Moulavi or religious scholar/teacher. But he did not and therefore was officially denied such status. 

In later years, many of his followers addressed him as Zahran Moulavi and Hashim did not correct them. Some of his disciples opined that Zahran had completed his studies at a school in the South.

Sri Lanka Thowheeth Jamaath

After being ejected from the madrasa, Zahran Hashim attached himself to Sri Lanka Thowheeth Jamaath (SLTJ). Thowheeth also spelt as, Tawheed, Thawheed and Tawhid, denotes oneness with God. The Oxford Dictionary of Islam states as follows: Tawhid is the defining doctrine of Islam. It declares absolute monotheism – the unity and uniqueness of God as creator and sustainer of the universe. Used by Islamic reformers and activists as an organising principle for human society and the basis of religious knowledge, history, metaphysics, aesthetics, and ethics, as well as social, economic, and world order.”  

Jamaath on the other hand means assembly or congregation in Arabic. 

National Thowheeth Jamaath

Zahran Hashim initially worked with the Sri Lanka Thowheeth Jamaat (SLTJ) in Kattankudy after his madrasa studies ended abruptly. But Zahran with his ultra-radical views was soon at loggerheads with SLTJ. He then struck out on his own and formed his own organisation called National Thowheeth Jamaath (NTJ). Associated with Zahran in this venture was his one-time mentor Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Naufer known as Naufer Moulavi. Neither SLTJ nor its off-shoot the Ceylon Thowheeth Jamaat (CTJ) had anything to do with Zahran Hashim’s National Thowheeth Jamaath.

Although short of funds, Zahran set up a makeshift prayer centre at a wooden shed in Kattankudy and got down to work. Hashim was a very powerful orator in Tamil and Arabic. He was forcefully effective in putting his viewpoint across. Soon Zahran Hashim became a popular figure in Kattankudy. Furthermore, he was invited by Muslim devotees in different parts of the island to conduct religious lectures. Zahran Hashim travelled to many districts in Sri Lanka to address Muslim congregations.

It was during the course of such visits to the North Western Province that he met his wife Fathima Haadiya in Kekunagolla and married her. She was introduced to Zahran by Naufer Moulavi who was married to Haadiya’s aunt.

Zahran Hashim with his ultra-radical views and fiery speeches in flowery language became a magnet for young people of both sexes. He opened a Tamil website for NTJ and propagated his viewpoint. This attracted many in Tamil Nadu as well as those from Sri Lanka, who were working in gulf countries. He later operated a Facebook account on the same lines. Soon donations began to pour in.

‘Tharul Athar  Athaviva’

The NTJ Mosque was now housed in a modern building at New Kattankudy – Ward 3. Although Zahran’s oratory was relished by many at meetings, not many participated in the prayers conducted at the National Thowheeth Jamaath Mosque also known as Tharul Athar Athaviva.” This may have been due to the proliferation of different mosques in Kattankudy. 

Zahran Hashim also travelled around the country enrolling members for his Jamaath. The National Thowheeth Jamaath (NTJ) began to grow in strength and influence. Even as NTJ began developing into a significant entity, Zahran Hashim’s political thinking became more and more extreme. He began sympathising openly with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Islamic  State

The turning point came in June 2014 when ISIS rebranded itself as Islamic State (IS) and announced the creation of a ‘Caliphate’ (Islamic State) erasing all State borders and making Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi the self-declared supreme leader of the world’s estimated 1.5 billion Muslims. 

Thereafter, Zahran Hashim became an avid propagandist of IS in Tamil. He kept posting news items about IS battlefronts in Tamil and also wrote opinion pieces in support. Zahran Hashim was seen as the voice of IS in some Muslim circles. 

Baduriya Mosque

Everything seemed hunky-dory for him but Zahran Hashim got into trouble by overreaching himself. To most Wahabi influenced Muslims in Kattankudy, the Baduriya Mosque at the Aliiyar Junction in Ward 6 is anathema. This is because Baduriya Mosque adheres more to mystical Islam known as ‘Sufism’ and adopts practices such as paying homage to saints and indulging in grave worship. Wahabis regard this as blasphemous and heretical.

So in an ill-advised bid to teach a lesson to Baduriya Mosque people, Zahran Hashim organised a NTJ meeting at the Aliyar Junction in close proximity to the mosque. When the meeting commenced on March 16, 2017, speaker after speaker made insulting references to Baduriya Mosque. The intention was to provoke Baduriya Mosque devotees. Zahran Hashim had brought clubs and swords clandestinely to the venue and kept them concealed on the stage. 

As expected, Baduriya Mosque devotees were provoked by the insults and retaliated by pelting stones at the stage. Zahran Hashim and his followers then set upon their rivals and attacked them with swords and clubs.

In the clash that ensued several persons on both sides were injured. Three sustained serious injuries and were hospitalised. The people of Kattankudy were incensed at the violence done in the name of religion. A protest demonstration organised by the Baduriya Mosque management opposite the Kattankudy Islamic museum was well attended. There was tremendous pressure on the Police to take action. 

As a result, nine from NTJ Mosque and two from Baduriya Mosque were arrested and remanded for several months. These included Zahran’s brother Zain. Zahran himself was wanted by the Police. He chose to evade arrest by absconding. A story was spread in Kattankudy that Hashim had gone to the Maldives.

Kerala – Tamil Nadu

Zahran Hashim left Kattankudy and moved to the North Western Province  where his wife hailed from. After spending some time in Sri Lanka, Zahran relocated to India where he began interacting with Muslim extremist groups in the South Indian States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala. His sojourns were mostly in the Malappuram District of Kerala and the Coimbatore, Trichy, Thirunelvely, Vellore, Nagapattinam, Kanniyakumari and Ramanathapuram Districts of Tamil Nadu. 

All these districts have sizeable Muslim populations. It was during his lengthy stay in India that Zahran Hashim underwent a transformation. From a radical activist propagating fundamental Islamic ideology and eulogising the Islamic State, Zahran Hashim, turned into an exponent of armed militancy and practitioner of violence. 

In a remarkable turnaround, Zahran Hashim resolved to return to Sri Lanka and promote violence for what he thought was the cause of Islam.

Anti-Muslim violence

After returning to Sri Lanka, Zahran began cultivating links with rich and educated supporters of the Islamic State (IS). The aim was to enlist more volunteers to go to the Middle East and fight for the IS. But the anti-Muslim violence in Amparai town in February 2018 and the Kandy District anti-Muslim violence of March 2018 made Zahran change his mind.

Zahran now wanted to attack a symbolic Buddhist target like the Ruwanweli Seya in Anuradhapura or the Esala Perahera in Kandy. New members were recruited, arms and explosives collected and arms training workshops held. 

Jamaate Millat Ibrahim

This re-invigorated extremist fervour caused a split in the NTJ. Zahran and his militant disciples broke away and began functioning as the extremely militant Jamaate Millat Ibrahim (JMI) group.At some point of time, Zahran supposedly influenced by Naufer Moulavi put on hold his plans of attacking Buddhist” targets. Instead he opted to take on the Christian West”. It is presumed that Hashim thought this would grab worldwide attention and help ingratiate himself further with the Islamic State. Thus churches and luxury hotels catering mainly to Western tourists were selected as targets.

Islamic Caliphate

The Islamic State (IS) objective of eliminating or subjugating the ‘kaffirs’ (non-believers/infidels) and establishing a worldwide Islamic ‘Calpihate’ was something which Zahran embraced wholeheartedly.

 I have seen some video clips of Zahran’s speeches. They were very powerful spectacles of persuasive oratory of an inhuman nature. He referred to the Christians as siluvai vanangihal” (worshippers of the cross) and Hindus and Buddhists as silai vanangihal” (worshippers of statues). While calling for the destruction of Kaffirs”, Zahran emphasised one point strongly. He said that even if the Kaffirs were good people who were friendly and helpful towards Muslims, they had to be destroyed when necessary. 

‘Bloody’ Easter

Those disturbing words came brutally alive when Zahran and his followers launched the Easter bombings on April 21, 2019. Two Catholic Churches, an Evangelical Church, three upmarket tourist hotels and another hotel   were targeted in Colombo, Negombo and Batticaloa, in the morning. Suicide bombers with explosives strapped to their bodies exploded themselves while worship was going on in churches and breakfast was being partaken of in hotels. 270 people were killed and over 500 injured as a result of that ‘bloody’ Easter Sunday.

Two days later, the international ‘Jihadist’ or Islamic militant movement known officially as Islamic State (IS) claimed responsibility for the terror and horror of ‘bloody’ Easter in Sri Lanka. It attributed the attacks to Islamic State fighters”. A few days later in April 2019, the then-leader of ISIS Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi praised the attackers for what he called retaliation against ‘the West’ for defeating ISIS the previous month in Baghuz, Syria.

The IS, known earlier as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), aimed at establishing a worldwide ‘Caliphate’ or a single Islamic government. In 2014, the IS controlled extensive swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria. Subsequently, the areas held by IS shrank greatly, thanks to the military defeats inflicted by the US-led coalition of forces. 

F.B.I.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the USA, men who were part of a group of ISIS supporters which called itself ‘ISIS in Sri Lanka’ had collaborated with IS in carrying out the Easter attacks in Sri Lanka. Some  believe that Zahran Hashim was the linchpin in this lethal nexus between the Islamic State and the ‘ISIS in Sri Lanka’.

Zahran Hashim alias ‘Abu Ubaidah’ was one of the two suicide bombers who targeted Shangri-La Hotel at Galle Face on Easter Sunday. A media release by the ‘Aamaq’ news agency on behalf of the Islamic State (IS) revealed that Zahran had adopted the nom de guerre Abu Ubaidah” in the IS. 

‘Abu Ubaidah’

Abu Ubaidah refers to Abu Ubaidah Amir ibn Abdillah ibn al-Jarra who was one of the 10 prominent companions of Prophet Muhammad. He later served as a commander of the Rashidun Army under Caliph Umar. Abu Ubaidah, credited with several military victories, was hailed then as the commander of all commanders”.

(D.B.S. Jeyaraj can be reached at dbsjeyaraj@yahoo.com)

‘UNFORGIVABLE MISTAKE!’: China BLASTS Trump After Deadly Attack On Iran’s Karaj Bridge | Watch

April 3rd, 2026

China has strongly condemned recent U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, calling them a violation of international law. Speaking in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said the attacks lacked UN authorization and targeted civilian infrastructure, urging all sides to return to dialogue to avoid a worsening humanitarian crisis. The remarks came hours after U.S. airstrikes destroyed the B1 Bridge, also known as the Karaj Suspension Bridge, near Tehran. Iranian state media reported casualties, claiming the second strike hit while emergency crews were already responding. Washington has defended the attack, stating the bridge was used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to transport missiles and drones.

A $25 Trillion Economic Bloc Emerges Around China — But It’s Not BRICS

April 3rd, 2026

Entangled News

FBI must verify claims by asylum seeker Azad Maulana regarding Sri Lanka’s 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, Including Documentary and Forensic Evidence

April 2nd, 2026

Shenali D Waduge

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) must undertake an independent review and verification of the statements made by Mohammed Hanzeer alias Azad Maulana concerning the Easter Sunday terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka on 21 April 2019, which killed 270 people, including 45 foreign nationals and 5 American citizens, and injured more than 500.

Azad Maulana publicly alleged, through Channel 4 in August 2023 and later statements made in Geneva, that Maj-Gen (Retd) Suresh Sallay, former Director of Sri Lanka’s State Intelligence Service, orchestrated and coordinated these attacks.

He has not produced any documentary, digital, or witness evidence to support these allegations, and refuses to testify before domestic Sri Lankan authorities, limiting the verifiability of his claims. His allegations were made public only in 2023 through a foreign media documentary, 4 years after the attacks and after multiple domestic investigative, judicial, and commission processes had already recorded findings.

He specifically claimed that Sallay arranged meetings with the National Thowheed Jamath (NTJ) leadership, including Zahran Hashim, in February 2018, and that Sallay communicated operational instructions to him on the morning of the attacks.

While every person deserves the opportunity to be heard, these allegations appear to materially conflict with the local findings and those contained in the FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Goodwin affidavit and the U.S. Department of Justice indictment, both of which identified Zahran Hashim and his NTJ/ISIS network as the direct planners and executors of the Easter bombings.

Furthermore, the FBI and DOJ findings are based on direct access to forensic evidence, recovered devices, SIM cards, and witness interviews, whereas Maulana’s claims are largely uncorroborated.

Maulana himself has declared that he is willing to testify only before an international forum, He is currently seeking asylum in Switzerland.

Azad Maulana has already submitted a five-day evidentiary interview before a non-judicial UN evidence-preservation mechanism that lacks prosecutorial authority, this gives even greater justification for the FBI — which possesses actual criminal investigative expertise and forensic jurisdiction linked to the murder of 5 U.S. citizens — to independently test those same claims from Azad Maulana. The FBI is ideally placed to question him and test the credibility of his allegations against the evidence already gathered by U.S. investigators.

1) Timeline Impossibilities

Passport, immigration, and travel records reportedly place Sallay in Malaysia in February 2018 and in New Delhi in April 2019.

The FBI must therefore ask Maulana to provide documentary evidence, travel corroboration, communication metadata, or witness confirmation proving:

  • that he arranged any meeting in Puttalam in February 2018
  • that Sallay personally gave him instructions on Easter morning, 21 April 2019

Without such evidence, these claims remain unverified assertions.

2) Contradiction with FBI & DOJ Findings

The FBI affidavit sworn by Special Agent Merrilee R. Goodwin reportedly concluded that Zahran Hashim was the mastermind and operational commander of the Sri Lankan ISIS cell, while the U.S. Department of Justice indictment charged additional NTJ/ISIS associates with providing material support.

The FBI must therefore ask Maulana to produce specific evidence implicating Sallay in planning, directing, financing, facilitating, or executing any operational aspect of the Easter attacks.

If his claims materially contradict the FBI’s own terrorism findings, the discrepancy must be resolved transparently.

3) Witness Credibility Must Be Tested

Maulana was a former TMVP propaganda officer, with no publicly established operational role inside the NTJ network.

The FBI must therefore require him to substantiate:

  • how he obtained access to NTJ members
  • why Zahran Hashimwould trust him
  • what direct links existed between him and Sallay
  • which portions of his allegations are based on direct personal observation and which are based on statements allegedly made by third parties
  • whether he possesses messages, call logs, notes, location records, financial trails, or witness support

This is especially important because he has refused to testify before Sri Lankan courts. The FBI should also clarify why these allegations did not surface before the Presidential Commission of Inquiry, CID investigations, or earlier judicial processes if they were genuinely based on direct knowledge.

4) Channel 4 Must Also Be Questioned

Channel 4 aired Maulana’s allegations globally, significantly influencing public perception.

It is publicly known that the broadcaster sought Sallay’s response before airing the documentary and that he rejected the allegations as false.

The FBI should therefore obtain:

  • all raw interviews
  • editorial notes
  • source communications
  • legal review memos
  • fact-checking material
  • corroborative evidence used before publication
  • timeline verification records
  • travel-location corroboration
  • independent witness validation

The key question is simple:

On what evidentiary basis did Channel 4 decide to broadcast allegations of complicity in mass murder after the principal accused party categorically denied them?

5) Victims’ Families Deserve Facts, Not Endless Narratives

The families of the Easter Sunday victims have been subjected to years of competing narratives, political theories, media sensationalism, and bizarre claims.

These must now be buried by facts.

Given that Mohammed Hanzeer alias Azad Maulana is currently in Switzerland, the FBI may lawfully seek his testimony through the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty mechanisms and Swiss law-enforcement authorities under its established international terrorism investigative mandate based on what FBI has already investigated regarding Sri Lanka’s Easter Sunday attacks.

  • telecom data
  • recovered SIM cards
  • device forensics
  • ISIS communications
  • witness interviews
  • crime-scene evidence
  • DOJ prosecution materials

Unchecked dissemination of unverified allegations risks:

  • misattributing responsibility
  • damaging reputations
  • distorting the historical record
  • undermining media credibility
  • compromising the integrity of international justice discourse

We trust the FBI will take this request seriously and act with the diligence, neutrality, and professionalism that the victims (both local & foreign) deserve.

The families of the Easter Sunday victims, and indeed the people of Sri Lanka as a whole, have for years been forced to endure an endless cycle of competing narratives, political theories, media sensationalism, and bizarre floating claims that resurface annually around the tragedy. These repeated attempts to weaponize the memory of the dead for political ends have only deepened public grief and eroded trust.

Today, the people stand increasingly united in their loss of faith and confidence in all those who continue to use Easter Sunday as an annual instrument for political agendas rather than truth and justice.

It is precisely for this reason that the people now look to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), with its internationally recognized expertise in terrorism investigations, forensic analysis, and evidentiary verification, to finally bring clarity to these unresolved contradictions.

The victims’ families deserve facts.

The nation deserves closure.

And the truth deserves to be separated from narratives that have drifted too far from the evidence.

We trust the FBI will take this request seriously and act with the diligence, neutrality, and professionalism that the victims, their families, and the people of Sri Lanka deserve.

By independently questioning the central witness whose claims have redirected public understanding of the attacks, the FBI has the opportunity to determine whether those claims are supported by admissible evidence or whether they have merely prolonged confusion and distrust.

We are confident that the FBI will provide long-overdue clarity and closure to the victims’ families in Sri Lanka & abroad as well as to the people of Sri Lanka.

Shenali D Waduge

Entry of  Shell plc  into Sri Lanka LPG Market

April 2nd, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

During the 1990s, particularly under the government of Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga (CBK), Sri Lanka moved toward privatization and foreign investment.

  • The Colombo Gas Company, which handled LPG distribution, was privatized.
  • Shell plc entered Sri Lanka by acquiring a controlling stake.
  • This was part of a broader policy shift to bring in foreign expertise, capital, and technology.

It was an unsolicited proposal aligns with how many privatizations and BOI-era investments were structured at the time.

2. Infrastructure Development – Storage & Engineering

The construction of LPG storage was a major technological leap for Sri Lanka.

Key features:

  • Installation of pressurized spherical LPG tanks (highly specialized engineering structures).
  • Initial land identified near Bloemendhal / Port Road industrial areas.
  • Final relocation to Muthurajawela, which was more suitable due to:
    • Safety buffer zones
    • Availability of larger land extent
    • Distance from dense urban settlements

3. Role of 

Colombo Dockyard

My own contribution here is significant from an industrial policy perspective.

  • I ensured local participation by pushing for Colombo Dockyard to construct the tanks.
  • This had multiple benefits:
    • Technology transfer
    • Skill development
    • Foreign exchange savings
    • Industrial capability building

Challenges faced:

  • Sri Lanka lacked coded welders for high-pressure LPG tank fabrication.
  • Skilled welders were imported, likely under supervision of foreign consultants (as you mentioned, Dutch expertise).
  • The project resembled a Middle Eastern industrial camp, reflecting:
    • Strict safety protocols
    • Temporary worker accommodation
    • High engineering standards

Spillover Benefits

This project created a multiplier effect:

  • Dockyard later secured overseas work (e.g., tank construction in Maldives).
  • Sri Lanka gained exposure to:
    • Pressure vessel fabrication
    • International welding standards (ASME, etc.)
    • Industrial project management

This is a textbook example of learning by doing” industrialization.

5. Transition to  Litro Gas Lanka

Later developments took a different turn:

  • The government restructured the LPG sector.
  • Shell plc exited Sri Lanka.
  • Litro Gas Lanka was established as a state-owned entity.

Likely reasons:

  • Political pressure to regain control of strategic assets
  • Pricing and subsidy issues
  • Nationalistic policy shifts
  • Patronage-based employment (as you pointed out)

6. Strategic Analysis

Following observation highlights a recurring issue in Sri Lanka:

What went right:

  • Successful FDI attraction
  • High-quality infrastructure built
  • Local capacity development (Dockyard)

What went wrong:

  • Policy inconsistency
  • Weak long-term investor confidence
  • Political interference in commercial operation

Big Picture Lesson

This case is similar to missed opportunities in:

  • Trincomalee oil tank farm
  • Hambantota industrial investments

The key lesson:

Sri Lanka is good at initiating high-value projects—but struggles with policy continuity and long-term strategic discipline.

Rebuilding Sri Lanka in a War-Economy World: A Pragmatic Survival Strategy

April 2nd, 2026

By Sarath Obeysekera

The global economy is increasingly shaped by conflict-driven disruptions—energy shocks, food insecurity, and supply chain fractures. For a small nation like Sri Lanka, survival demands not ideology, but adaptation.

When Lee Kuan Yew took charge of Singapore in 1965, he inherited a poor, divided society. His solution was not abstract theory—it was discipline, housing, jobs, and food security. Sri Lanka today faces a similar inflection point.

1. From Welfare to Productivity: A Social Contract Reset

Sri Lanka must shift from a consumption-driven welfare model to a productivity-linked social contract.

  • Provide basic housing, food access, and healthcare
  • In return, require participation in productive sectors:
    • Agriculture
    • Fisheries
    • Manufacturing

This is not authoritarianism—it is structured national discipline.

2. Affordable Living: The Singapore Hawker Model Adapted

Singapore’s early hawker centres ensured cheap, hygienic food for workers.

Sri Lanka can replicate this by:

  • Creating state-supported food courts in urban and semi-urban areas
  • Standardizing low-cost meals:
    • Rice + fish curry + vegetables
    • Manioc (cassava), sweet potato alternatives
  • Supporting small vendors with subsidies and regulation

This reduces household costs and increases workforce participation.

3. Food Security Revolution: Eat What We Can Grow

Rice dependency is a strategic weakness.

We must:

  • Promote alternative staples:
    • Manioc (cassava)
    • Sweet potatoes
    • Kurakkan (finger millet)
  • Launch a Grow Your Own Food” campaign
  • Encourage:
    • Home gardening
    • Backyard poultry
    • Small-scale aquaculture

This is how rural India survived poverty—not comfortably, but sustainably.

4. Blue Economy: Sri Lanka’s Untapped Goldmine

As an island, Sri Lanka has a natural advantage.

A national Blue Economy Mission should include:

  • Coastal fish farming zones
  • Seaweed cultivation for export (pharmaceuticals, food industry)
  • Lagoon-based aquaculture (prawns, crabs)
  • Public-private partnerships for offshore fisheries

This can generate foreign exchange quickly.

5.Chemical & Pharmaceutical Innovation – With Caution

Your idea of converting illegal substances into pharmaceuticals is conceptually similar to how some controlled drugs are used in medicine.

However:

  • It must strictly follow international law and safety standards
  • Focus should be on:
    • Licensed pharmaceutical research
    • Value-added herbal and marine-based products

Sri Lanka could build a niche in natural medicine exports, not unsafe shortcuts.

6. Decentralized Micro-Production Economy

Instead of relying only on large industries:

  • Encourage home-based production units
  • Provide:
    • Micro-financing
    • Tools and training
  • Focus areas:
    • Food processing
    • Garments
    • Fisheries-related products

This spreads income across the population.

7. Governance: Strong State, but benevolent dictatorship

While decisive leadership is essential, history shows that unchecked power often leads to corruption and inefficiency.

Sri Lanka needs:

  • Efficient, technocratic governance
  • Clear targets and accountability
  • Reduced bureaucracy
  • Digital monitoring of production and subsidies

The goal is not dictatorship—but disciplined democracy.

8. Cultural Shift: Living Within Means

A difficult but necessary transformation:

  • Reduce dependence on imports
  • Encourage simple diets and lifestyles
  • Promote dignity in labor

Economic recovery begins with behavioral change.

Conclusion

Sri Lanka cannot copy Singapore entirely, but it can learn from its pragmatism and discipline.

The future lies in:

  • Feeding ourselves
  • Producing more than we consume
  • Using our natural advantages—especially the sea
  • Building a society that values work over entitlement

This is not a return to poverty—it is a transition through austerity toward resilience.

Regards

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Sri Lanka and World Bank launch new partnership to create jobs, attract private investment

April 2nd, 2026

Courtesy Adaderana

The World Bank Group and the Government of Sri Lanka today (03) launched a new five-year Country Partnership Framework (CPF) to support Sri Lanka’s continued recovery, help achieve its 7% medium-term economic growth target, and support job creation.

We are committed to building on the continued macroeconomic stability, strengthened governance and revenue-based fiscal consolidation that we have already achieved. Our goal is to confidently steer our economy towards strong, sustainable and inclusive growth. We are working towards an economic growth rate of over 7% in the medium term,” said President of Sri Lanka Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The World Bank Group has been with us for more than 7 decades. This partnership will further strengthen that relationship.”

Private sector-led job creation is at the heart of the new partnership. Nearly one million young Sri Lankans are expected to enter the job market over the next decade. 

Without stronger growth and greater private investment, the economy will create only around 300,000 new formal jobs — leaving roughly 7 out of every 10 young job seekers without access to a quality job, according to a statement issued by the World Bank Group.

Sri Lanka’s recovery over the past three years has been hard-won and impressive. This new partnership framework is designed to ensure that the benefits reach everyone,” said Johannes Zutt, World Bank Vice President for South Asia. By pairing public resources with private capital and innovation, we aim to help Sri Lanka create quality jobs, including for women, young people, and communities that have been left behind.”

The partnership will mobilize significant resources from the World Bank Group, including more than $1 billion in direct and mobilized investment over five years by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and up to $1 billion in low-interest financing over the next three years from the World Bank. 

It will deploy the full range of WBG instruments — financing, guarantees, advisory services, and private capital mobilization, the statement said.

Sri Lanka’s next phase of growth will be driven by a private sector that can compete, innovate, and create jobs for all,” said Sarvesh Suri, IFC Vice President for Asia and the Pacific. With its strategic location and skilled workforce, Sri Lanka is well-placed to expand its role in the region—and we are committed to supporting the private sector as a catalyst for progress.”

The partnership focuses on four key areas:

  1. Making it easier to do business. Simplifying government regulations, modernizing trade processes, and bringing more government services online will make Sri Lanka a more attractive place to do business and invest. These reforms will support Sri Lanka’s ambition to double annual export earnings to $36 billion by 2030.
  2. Stronger infrastructure that benefits everyone. Investments will expand the capacity of the Port of Colombo and attract private operators to help it remain one of Asia’s leading maritime hubs. In the energy sector, a phased program will help Sri Lanka generate 70% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030, adding 1 gigawatt of new clean power. This aims to lower electricity bills for households and businesses, which are currently among the highest in South Asia.
  3. More and better jobs in tourism and agriculture. Recognizing that tourism and agriculture are two of Sri Lanka’s greatest assets and offer strong potential to create jobs across the island, the partnership will support Sri Lanka’s Tourism Strategic Plan 2026–2030, as well as connect farmers to new technologies, markets, and financing. The Northern and Eastern Provinces, with remarkable natural and cultural endowments, yet representing less than 10% of the national economy, will receive dedicated investment and advisory support.
  4. Preparing for future shocks. Following Cyclone Ditwah in November 2025, which caused an estimated $4.1 billion in damages and affected 2.2 million people, the partnership will fund stronger early warning systems and resilient infrastructure to help communities recover faster from future crises and with greater support.

Implementation begins immediately. The World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors has just approved the first major project under this framework: the Regional Empowerment through Vibrant, Inclusive, and Viable Economies (REVIVE) Project — a $100 million investment in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. 

REVIVE will boost local economic opportunities in key areas like Jaffna, Pasikuda, Trincomalee and Arugam Bay, spanning the tourism and fisheries sectors that are central to the region’s economic revival; provide targeted support to small businesses, with a particular focus on women entrepreneurs; and is expected to create 3,000 new jobs and benefit around 260,000 people by 2031, the statement said.

The World Bank Group has been working alongside Sri Lanka for more than 70 years. Today, it supports 13 active projects worth over $1.5 billion spanning education, health, energy, transport, agriculture, and social protection. The IFC has committed nearly $1.8 billion in both long- and short-term financing to Sri Lanka’s private sector from 2021-2026, it added.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress