Cigarettes and beedis
Posted on February 15th, 2015

Island Editorial  Courtesy Island

President Maithripala Sirisena, who as health minister in the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration took a special interest in ensuring that a powerful health warning that would hit smokers between their eyes, is carried on cigarette packets. He must surely be more than happy that he is finally having his way. While Sirisena wanted the graphic health warning to cover 80 percent of the front and back panels of cigarette packs, and gazetted regulations to that effect, the courts by a two to one split verdict held that 60 percent would be sufficient. It is now going to be 80 percent following legislation and no reasonable person would contest that decision. The information and evidence available conclusively establishes the incontrovertible fact that cigarettes are a killer and it is only the most stupid who will continue smoking. While it may be difficult for already addicted smokers to give up, the present efforts will certainly discourage young people from acquiring the self-destructing habit. So the present developments must be unanimously welcomed.

Having said that, we would like to return to a subject we have dwelt with before and ask why the money spinning beedi industry which flourishes in this country has been totally let off the hook as far as health warnings on their packaging is concerned. Apart from that, beedis are barely taxed. Successive government have over a long period of time been beating the cigarette industry with a price stick and today over 90 percent of the price that a smoker pays for a cigarette goes to the government as taxes. Neither prohibitive prices – each time a smoker lights up a popular brand of cigarette, he/she is literally burning 20 or 30 rupees – nor the increasingly tight regulations including chillingly graphical health warnings has driven Ceylon Tobacco Company PLC (CTC), the country’s only legal cigarette manufacturer, out of business. It continues to post super profits, pays its shareholders (the vast majority of who are foreign) fat dividends and its share price is among the highest among companies quoted on the Colombo Stock Exchange. The business continues to be most profitable both for British American Tobacco (BAT), the predominant shareholder of CTC, and for the Government of Sri Lanka which collects nearly Rs. 80 billion annually in taxes from the tobacco industry.

Collecting taxes from CTC is as easy as eating cadju nuts as the popular saying goes. One of the best organized companies in the country controlled by a multinational with a regional and global presence, it renders unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s. Understandably, no doubt with the knowledge that it is in a controversial industry, CTC does not tire of publicizing its tax payments which are repeatedly stressed in its quarterly financial statements and annual reports. Every budget, with monotonous certainty, raises excise duties on alcohol and tobacco products. These taxes, often with an industry price increase added, are passed on to the consumer who pays more for his tot of arrack or cigarette as the case may be. Price increases usually depress consumption temporarily but sales pick up as time passes although available statistics show that where cigarettes are concerned the volume of sales, thankfully, is on a downward curve though CTC continues to prosper. The government hammering the legitimate cigarette industry with huge taxes results in a price deterrent on consumption and, no doubt, drives at least lowest end smokers to beedi. Similarly, the taxes on arrack must surely drive imbibers into the clutches of the kasippu mudalalis.

While beedis are not an industry as large as cigarettes, it generates more employment with published figures indicating that nearly 18,000 people are engaged in connected jobs. Against this, CTC employs a total workforce of just 1,426 of which 124 are direct factory employees. Beedis which are individually wrapped by hand is a labour intensive industry concentrated in the Kegalle and Mawanella areas as against the highly automated cigarette industry. In terms of size, the cigarette industry according to a Nielsen report generates an income of nearly Rs. 90 billion, most of which goes to government as taxes, while the beedi industry is worth Rs. 4.6 billion and hardly pays any tax. The major tax charge on beedis is customs duty on tendu leaves in which they are wrapped. Rs. 360 million was paid on this account in 2012 for which figures are available and around Rs. 22 million on the import of beedi tobacco. We do not know whether health-wise, smoking a beedi is less or more dangerous than smoking a cigarette. Visually a beedi is much slimmer and shorter than a cigarette and it may be assumed to contain less tobacco. But on the other hand, most cigarettes have filters that are claimed to remove at least a part of the harmful nicotine content.

There is no sense (or equity) in not including beedis in the health warning regulations. While the packs are far less ostentatious than cigarette packs, it is time that the authorities thought of getting beedi manufacturers to publish fairly prominently at least a simple health warning without insisting on graphics that cover 80 percent of the pack face. Importantly, beedis must also be taxed and government must rake its fair share of revenue from the product and ensure a price deterrent on consumers as in the case of cigarettes. President Sirisena, in his previous avatar as health minister, once went public with the claim that he could have made enough for generations if he soft-pedaled his campaign on graphic health warning. He did not offer details on who did what in this regard. Be that as it may, there has been pussy footing on taxing beedis with a perception that the industry commands some muscle thanks to the numbers it employs and political contacts. It was well known that the illegal `white’ cigarettes which paid no taxes but was freely available once-upon-a-time (though no longer) had a political godfather.

It is time the government used the tax stick on beedis too, may be less heavily than on cigarettes. Also the health warnings must be compulsorily displayed at points of sale of all tobacco products. Very few people can today afford to buy a packet of cigarettes and all but the affluent buy cigarettes by the stick. Thus the graphic warnings on packets will not be conveyed as powerfully to this class of smokers. Both the present president as well as successive governments must be congratulated for their efforts to make people desist from smoking. We do not know whether smoking is totally prohibited anywhere in the world but many countries have made it both more expensive and harder to persist with the bad habit. Meanwhile the beedi loophole here in Sri Lanka urgently needs plugging.

4 Responses to “Cigarettes and beedis”

  1. Susantha Wijesinghe Says:

    THE DEFINITION OF A CIGARETTE, AS TOLD BY OUR MASTERS IN COLLEGE, TO PREVENT US FROM TAKING TO SMOKING:-

    ** IT IS AN OBLONG OBJECT, WITH FIRE AT ONE END, AND A FOOL AT THE OTHER.**

    I do hope that this definiition will also get on the cigarette packs too. PRESIDENT MAITHREEPALA, PLEASE NOTE.

  2. NeelaMahaYoda Says:

    Sorry SW

    My3 is only concerned with rich people taking to smoking. Beedis are Called “the poor man’s cigarette, and Sirisena completely ignores health risk of the poor.

    Smoking beedis has been independently proven to cause:

    Cancer of the tongue (International Journal Cancer, 1989; 44(4):617-621)
    Cancer of the gums (British Journal of Cancer, 1989; 60:638-643)
    Cancer of the floor of the mouth (International Journal Cancer, 1989; 44(4):617-621)
    Other squamous cell oral cancers (Indian Journal of Cancer, 1997; 34:49-58)
    Cancer of the larynx (International Journal of Cancer, 1990;45:879-882)
    Cancer of the esophagus (International Journal of Cancer ,1991; 49:485-489)
    Lung cancer (Thorax, 1982; 37:343-347)
    High blood pressure (Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 1995; 43:253-258)
    Coronary heart disease (Indian Heart Journal, 1989; 41:62-65)
    Cancer of the stomach (Public Health 2000;114:123–127)

    Each beedi cigarette is loaded with cancer-causing, chromosome-damaging, genetic poisons, far more than are found in a regular cigarette. “The safe alternative” also contains two to three times the tar and nicotine of regular cigarettes. In a chilling experiment, smoke from regular cigarettes and beedis was given to Swiss albino mice. Bidi smoke reliably caused cancer in doses small enough that the regular cigarette smoke left the mice apparently healthy (Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 1988; 114:647-649).

    Teens might care, though, that when smoked during adolescence, beedis hasten the closure of the growth plates in the long bones–stopping them from ever reaching their full height. Those who smoke as few as two beedis daily for as little as 2.5 years have been proven to end up significantly shorter than their peers (Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1980; 34:295-298).

    Because of their sense of justice, teens might care about the poor working conditions of the impoverished factory laborers rolling their beedis. This “natural” product is produced in toxic conditions. Even those who never smoke a bidi are damaged by the mutagenic and carcinogenic compounds in the air (International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1992; 64:101-104). The dust mutates their skin and damages their chromosomes (Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 1994; 120:485-489). They get sick and die at an alarming rate just from making the beedis (Mutation Research, 1995; 334:139-144 ).

  3. Ananda-USA Says:

    Well said … BOTH SW and NMY!

    The Adverse Health & Economic Effects of smoking on individuals, their families and the society at large ARE ENORMOUS!

    Cigarettes & Beedies should be SEVERELY Taxed to DISCOURAGE SMOKING, SMOKING banned in public places, their Advertising banned, sale to minors prohibited, and WARNING LABELS be made MANDATORY on the packages!

    In ADDITION, remedies for quitting smoking, including nicotine patches, pills, chewing gums, and doctor’s services should be SUBSIDIZED by the GOSL!

    Adverse Health Effects of SMOKING IMPOSE a SEVERE BURDEN on the FREE HEALTHCARE provided to its citizens by the GOSL! It makes ECONOMIC SENSE for the GOSL to implement the steps I have outlined above!

  4. Susantha Wijesinghe Says:

    NMY and ANANDA !!!!

    I have never smoked in my life. I have never kept a cigarette between my two lips, NEVER. Well Professor Carlo Fonseka was my class-mate at St. Joseph’s. Iam his age. I still have hair on my head, though grey. My father was a Teetotaller, never smoked, never touched Alcohol. He was an All Ceylon Boxer. I ofcourse started with Fine Old Port, with Carlo and three other friends on the last day of the term, to celebrate holidays. Do you know where ? At Medina Hotel, opposite Maradana Railway Station. Fine old Port was Rs.6.50 a bottle. Carlo equally pours into five glasses. Buriyani was Rs2.00 per head.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2018 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress