Distorting Thirukkural in a bid to justify cruelty to animals
Posted on March 11th, 2017

Maneka Gandhi Courtesy The Island


In all the recent sound and fury about Jallikattu, many people from Tamil Nadu quoted the Thirukkural to justify their support to this horrendous cruelty to helpless animals. In fact, after it was forcibly restarted by a very strange notification by the state governor, who overrode two judgments of the Supreme Court, thereby weakening the very fabric of India’s administration, hundreds of people have been wounded and some have died in these so called peaceful games that only demonstrate the “Tamil love for the bull”. Many of the maimed and injured bulls have subsequently been sent to slaughter in Kerala.

In any case, quoting the poet Thiruvalluvar to support violence is literally twisting everything the Thirukkural stands for. While the book of verses is revered all over the world and translated into 82 languages (the treatise has earned the title “Ulaga Podhu Marai” the universal scripture or Potumaṟai – “The Universal Veda” or “Book for All”), it is little known in India and it is time we learnt some of its wisdom.

article_image

The Thirukkural is the Bible of Tamil Nadu. Meaning Sacred/Respected Couplets it was authored by the poet Thiruvalluvar (of whom nothing is known. The first instance of the author’s name is found centuries later in a song of praise called the Garland of Thiruvalluvar in Thiruvalluva Malai) and has 1,330 couplets or kurals dealing with morality, ethics and virtue. It is a truly sage and beautiful work and is one of the finest, non-religious, works of philosophy. Written in Old Tamil, it is a palm leaf manuscript of the 4th to1st century BC. It was printed for the first time in 1812. The first complete English translation of the Kural was the one by George Uglow Pope in 1886, which brought the Tirukkural to the western world.

It has 133 chapters of ten couplets each. Tirukkural was originally known as ‘Muppaal’, meaning three-sectioned book. There are three parts that the Tirukkural is divided into, namely, aram /dharma (virtue), porul/artha(wealth) and inbam/kama (love). He has left out moksha as he felt if a person followed the first three doctrines diligently in life, he or she would automatically attain it.

What is different about the treatise is that it expounds a moral and practical attitude towards life. It makes no promises of heaven beyond earth. It speaks of the ways of behaving to achieve bliss in the present life itself. The ideas of the poet are luminous, humane: humility, charity, nonviolence, forgiveness, asceticism, good administration. It is a perfect guide to live your life at the highest and purest level so that you are happy and make everyone around you happy. Thirukkural deals with dilemmas that normal people face every day – over morals, politics, economy, love and domestic life, providing practical solutions to these problems.

Albert Schweitzer said “There hardly exists in the literature of the world a collection of maxims in which we find so much of lofty wisdom. Like the Buddha and the Bhagavad Gita, the Kural desires inner freedom from the world and a mind free from hatred. Like them it stands for the commandment not to kill and not to damage. There appears in the Kural the living ethic of love.”Leo Tolstoy was inspired by its concept of non-violence.”What are wanted for the Indian as for the Englishman, the Frenchman, the German, and the Russian, are not Constitutions and Revolutions: the knowledge of the simple and clear truth which finds place in every soul that is not stupefied by religious and scientific superstitions – the truth that for our life one law is valid – the law of love, which brings the highest happiness toevery individual as well as to all mankind.” Mahatma Gandhi studied Tirukkural in prison and called it “a textbook of indispensable authority on moral life” and went on to say, “The maxims of Valluvar have touched my soul. There is none who has given such a treasure of wisdom likehim”.

Here is the heart of the work:

“Mannuyir ompi arulaalvaarkku illenpa thannuyir anjum vinai”  For he who treats other living beings with kindness, In his own soul the dreaded guilt of sin shall never feel — 244th verse. Another translation of the same verse is “The compassionate, who care for all other lives, do not fear for their own lives.”

This week let me give you the Thirukural verses on not eating the flesh of animals.

How can someone possess kindness, if one eats meat from another body to grow one’s own body?

251

One, who doesn’t value money can’t be wealthy; one, who eats meat, can’t be compassionate.

252

The heart of one who has eaten and relished flesh, is like the heart of one leading an army: it cannot be compassionate.

253

The heart of one who has eaten and relished flesh, is like the heart of one holding a deadly weapon: it cannot be compassionate.

253 V2

What is compassion, and the lack of it : not killing and killing; it is not virtuous to eat meat got by killing.

254

Compassion is exemplified by not killing; and the lack of it, by killing: to eat meat so obtained, is not virtuous.

254 V2

Kural 254 is structured very interestingly, allowing another interpretation: “Lack of compassion is exemplified by straying from the value of ‘not killing’; to eat meat so obtained is not virtuous.

254 V3

Survival of species, depends on not being eaten; those who eat them…hell will not split its mouth to spit them out.

255

The rationalist in Kalaignar, finds another interpretation (literally more accurate, but contextually not quite convincing) for Kural 255: “Even a swamp will not swallow a life; survival of species is ensured by presence of vegetarians

255 V2

There won’t be anyone selling meat for the sake of earning, if the world stops killing for the sake of eating.

256

Meat is the wound of somebody; if one gets this realization, stop eating it.

257

Those who have wisdom, free of flaws, would not eat a body, freed of its life.

258

To desist from killing a life and eating it, is better than doing a thousand rituals, offering oblation.

259

To one who doesn’t kill and refuses meat, all lives will fold their arms and pay obeisance.

More next week.

To join the animal welfare movement contact gandhim@nic.in , www.peopleforanimalsindia.org

One Response to “Distorting Thirukkural in a bid to justify cruelty to animals”

  1. Christie Says:

    These Indians talking about not killing and non violence are cunning.

    We Sinhalese are victims of Hindu nonviolent aggression and oppression.

    Mohandas Karamchand the most celebrated Indian Colonial Parasite and most celebrated pedophile in the world is the best example of cunning Indians. He is known as Mahatma Gandhi and he made his fortune from black Africa. He was part of the British Indian Empire and worked as a Sepoy (a pole bearer for the armies that killed tens of thousands of Great Zulus) and a Peon (a magistrate who helped British rulers and Indian Colonial Parasites) in South Africa.

    The biggest threat to Sinhalese comes from Hinduism at the moment.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

 


Copyright © 2017 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress