Three new Ambassadors; a suggestion to the Government.

July 6th, 2018

Sudath Gunasekara 6.7.2018

It was reported few days back that the government has decided to appoint the Ex-Secretary to the President Austin Fernando as Ambassador to UK.  In this backdrop I have a brilliant suggestion to fill the vacancies in New York, Moscow and Singapore. Lf there is no vacancy at Singapore then they can create one  Because necessity is the mother of invention.

Now that the Prime Minister has requested the President to temporally suspend Vijayakala Maheswaran wife of late Prabhakaran for her famous Kilinochchi   speech instead of sacking her from Parliament and putting her behind bars for violating the Constitution and instigating the Tamils to take to arms.  It is obvious that he is playing with time, being his usual game, until the people forget in 15 days a, to bring her back to Parliament or at least appoint het to a high post under his own Ministry as he did to Mahendaran for robing the Central Bank, why not he ask the President to this LTTE woman to one of the vacant positions, preferably to New York as she would be the ideal person to help Atul Kesap and US State secretary to handle the Sri Lankan case at the UN and Geneva.

Secondly, I strongly suggest that the PM ask the President to appoint Arjun Mahendran as High Commission to Singapore, perhaps he can take the letter of appointment by hand and hand it over to his chum when he goes there on this Sunday. Singapore will be more than happy to have  Arjun as their Ambassador as he has all the qualification to hold that high post. Apart from him being a Singapore citizen who will look after their interests he also has helped to empty the Central Bank of Ceylon and he is also trusted by the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. If Ranil feels it not practicable then he can at least bring him back with him when he returns after the Singapore meeting and hand over Mahendran to the CID to prove the country that Ranil is honest enough to hold that post for some more time. This mission want be a problem in any case as he will definitely meet his old chum at least to find out whether he is in good health. After all it is his family obligation.

Such appointments will fall in line with the Government’s policy of appointing defeated politicians, or spouses of dead MPP, Army and Police high up who have failed in war and keeping peace at home or close relatives and friends of ministers and some of those people who have helped the Government at elections etc as Ambassadors.

Past experience proves that the President will never say no to Ranil if he makes this suggestion. Because he can’t afford to say no to him. First he is there today thanks to Ranils votes and second as he has repeated time again and time again he owes an obligation to Tamils as he thinks the they have voted en-masse to him although that is far from the truth and it is only wild imagination he etched in his mind.

Hopes for a better Sri Lanka

July 6th, 2018

Lionel Rajapakse

No question, Sri Lanka is in a muddy puddle because of the politicians we selected during the last couple of decades and their actions. Lots of Gurus are talking about how can Sri Lanka get out of this muddy puddle. There is no second alternative,  Gotabhaya is the only hope for Sri Lanka in the horizon.

So, to help him to get Sri Lanka out of this muddy puddle, can we suggest the basic things he has to address when he becomes the next President of Sri Lanka. Followings are the few things he should give priority as I think.

  • Give priority for the development of rural economy rather than giving priority to urban developments.
  • Work out an independent system to recruit for public service and other affiliated institutions such as state banks and corporations on merit system, without any interference from the politicians.
  • No political interference for any appointment either in public service or private sector.
  • Make it compulsory for Sinhalese public servants to learn Tamil and Tamil public servants to learn Sinhala.
  • Make it compulsory for the Sinhalese students to learn Tamil from the grade 3 and vice versa.
  • Make a full review of the judicial system. Consult Naganada Kodituwakku and get his views / assistance
  • Get rid of the provincial councils as it is a waste of money. This may be a hard task and some one can come with an alternative.
  • Review foreign service and open it for only qualified people. No political appointments.
  • Let JVP to suggest what they expect from Gota. Implement whatever suitable.

I invite all of you to add what you think it is necessary for Gota to do to get Sri Lanka out of the current muddy puddle. There are lots of Pundits who talk about big changes to happen in Sri Lanka. Let us get real and suggest the simple things the common man expect from the next leader in Sri Lanka.

 ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිළිබඳ මනෝ විද්‍යාත්මක විශ්ලේශණයක්

July 6th, 2018

කතෘ – වෛද්‍ය රුවන් එම් ජයතුංග  ගොඩගේ  ප්‍රකාශකයෝ  විසිනි  

වෛද්‍ය රුවන් එම් ජයතුංග විසින් ලියන ලද ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය පිලිබඳ මනෝ විද්‍යාත්මක විශ්ලේෂණයක් නම් කෘතිය ගොඩගේ ප්‍රකාශකයන් විසින් එළි දක්වා තිබේ.   මෙම කෘතිය හරහා වේළුපිල්ලේ ප්‍රභාකරන් තුල තිබූ නායකත්ව සාධක මෙන්ම ඔහු තුල තිබූ සමාජ විරෝධී පෞරුෂ ලක්‍ෂණද පෙන්වා දෙනු ලබයි.  

ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ තිස් වසරක යුදමය ක්‍රියාදාමය පරාජය කිරීම ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ලත් සුවිසේෂි ජයග්‍රහණයකි. මෙම ජයග්‍රහණය ලබා ගත්තේ දහස් ගණනක ජිවිත පරිත්‍යාගයෙනි. මෙම යුද්දය නිසා කායික සහ මානසික වශයෙන් ආබාධිත වූ සංඛ්‍යාව සටනින් මියගිය ප්‍රමාණයටත් වඩා අධික ය. එසේම එල්.ටී.ටී.ය විසින් ආර්ථික මර්මස්ථාන වලට කරන ලද පහර දීම් සහ සිදුකල විනාශයන්, යුද්දය සඳහා සිදු කල වියදම් මෙන්ම යුද්දය විසින් ඇති කළ ආර්ථික අවපාතය නිසා ගතවූ කාලය තුල ලංකාවට අහිමි වූ මුදල අතිශයින්ම විශාල ය. එම නිසා යුද්ධය ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට කළ විනාශය අති දැවැන්ත බව පැහැදිලි කරුණකි. මේ හේතුවෙන් තිස් වසරක යුද්දයක ශාපයෙන් ශ්‍රී ලංකාව මිදීම යනු, මේ රටේ සිංහල දෙමල, මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව ලත් ජයග්‍රහණයකි.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුල ඇතිවූ යුද ගැටුම සමහරු අර්ථකථනය කරන්නේ ජනවාර්ගික ගැටලුවක් ලෙසට ය. සමහරු එය ත්‍රස්තවාදී ප්‍රශ්නයක් ලෙස දකිති. ඇතැමෙකු එය ඉන්දියානු ව්‍යාප්තවාදයේ අතුරු එලයක් ලෙස පෙන්වා දෙති. කුමන අර්ථකථන තිබුන ද යුද්දය සෑම ජන වර්ගයකටම විනාශයක් වූ බව ඇස් පනාපිට ඔප්පුවූ කරුණකි. දෙවන ලෝක මහා යුද්දයෙන් පසු ආසියානු කලාපයේ රටක දැවැන්ත ගරිල්ලා යුද්දයක් ඇති වුයේ කෙසේද යන්න අධ්‍යනයට, විමර්ශනයට සහ විශ්ලේෂණයට බඳුන් කළ කරුණක් වුවද ඊලාම් යුද්දය වාර්තාකරණය මිස හැදෑරීම පසුගිය දශක තුන පුරා ලක් කොට නොමැත. එය හැකි ඉක්මනිම සිදු කළ යුතු කර්තව්‍යකි.

සමාජ විද්‍යාත්මක කෝණයෙන් බලන විට අවිහිංසාව ගරු කළ උතුරේ දෙමල සමාජය තුල හිංසනය සහ ත්‍රස්තවාදය පැන නැගුනේ කෙසේ ද යන පැනයකි. පෘතුගීසි යුගය දක්වා ඉතිහාසය බලන විට දමිල ප්‍රජාව අතර රණකාමීන්ට සිටියේ සන්කිලියන් පමණි. සියවස් ගණනාවක් පුරා උතුරේ ද්‍රවිඩ සමාජය තුල ප්‍රචණ්ඩත්වය සඳහා හිතකර උපස්තරයන් නොවිය. නමුත් 1976 පමණ කාලය වන විට මෙම තත්වය උඩු යටිකුරු වන්නේය. මහාචාර්ය රාජන් හූල් පෙන්වා දෙන අන්දමට 1970 දශකයත් සමග ද්‍රවිඩ ප්‍රජාව තුලින් ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී පරමාර්ථ ක්‍රමක් ක්‍රමයෙන් ගිලිහි යාමට පටන් ගනියි. මේ සඳහා දකුණේ දේශපාලන ක්‍රියාකාරකම් ද ඉවහල් වූ බව නොරහසකි.

ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකය යනු නිදහසින් පසු ශ්‍රී ලංකාව මුහුණ දුන් බරපතලම අර්බුදය විය. ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ දේශපාලන ආර්ථික සහ සමාජ ගමන් මග වෙනස් කිරීමට ප්‍රභාකරන්ට හැකි විය. ඔහුගේ මරණින් පසුවද ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකයේ තර්ජන අවසන් වී නැත. ප්‍රභාකරන් යනු සාධක රැසකින් ජනනය වූ විනාශකාරී බලවේගයකි. සිංහල සහ ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතිවාද විසින් ප්‍රභාකරන් නමැති ප්‍රපංචය නිර්මාණය කරන ලදී. ඔහු තමන්ගේ ජනතාව පවා අනතුරේ හෙළුවේය. ඔහු ද්‍රවිඩ සමාජයේ අධ්‍යාත්මය විනාශ කළේය. ද්‍රවිඩ ඩයස්පෝරාව විසින් උපයන මිලියන ගණනක මුදල් සහ එකී මුල්‍යමය වාසි නිසා ඇතැමෙකු ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකයේ පැවති විනාශකාරී පාර්ශවය ගැන කතා නොකල ද යම් දිනක ද්‍රවිඩ ජනතාව විසින් ම ඔහු පිළිබඳව විනිශ්චයක් දෙනු ඇත.

ප්‍රභාකරන් තුල ව්‍යාථවේදී පෞරුෂ සාධක දක්නට ලැබුණි. නමුත් මේ ගැන කතිකාවට බඳුන් වී ඇත්තේ ඉතාම අඩුවෙනි.  ප්‍රභාකරන් තුල දැඩි ආත්ම කේන්ද්‍රියතාවක් (self centered) තිබුණි. ඔහු සංවෘත (introverted) පෞරුෂ ලක්ෂණ දැරිය. එසේම ධ‍්‍රැවගත සහ ඒකාකෘති චින්තනයකින් යුක්ත විය. හීන වූ සහකම්පනිය අවබෝධයක් සහිත නාසිස්ටික නිව්රෝසියතාවයේ (Narcissistic Neurosis) ලක්ෂණ ඔහු කෙරෙන් දැක ගත හැකි විය. (හීන වූ සහකම්පනිය අවබෝධය නට්සීන් තුලද තිබු බව හර්මන් ගෝරිඞ් ඇතුළු නට්සි නායකයන් මනෝවිද්‍යාත්මකව විශ්ලේෂණය කළ ගුස්ටාව් ගිල්බර්ට් පෙන්වා දෙයි) ඔහු මරණයට බිය විය. (මේ පිළබඳව ද්‍රවිඩ කවියෙකු වූ කාසි ආනන්දන් පවා කියා තිබේ) එම නිසා මරණය කල්ට් වන්දනාවක් ලෙස කරමින් මරණය උත්කර්ෂයට පත් කරමින් මරණය වන්දනා කරන කළු කොටි සංකල්පය ඔහු බිහි කළේය.  හිංසනය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කල සම්ප්‍රදායික දමිල සමාජය උඩු යටිකුරු කරමින් සයනයිඩ් සංස්කෘතියක් ඇති කළේය. ළමා සොල්දාදුවන් ඇති කිරීම මගින් ද්‍රවිඩ සමාජයේ අනාගතය ද විනාශ කළේය. මේ සියලු විනාශකාරී ක්‍රියා සිදු කළමුත් නාභිගතවූ චින්තනයක් සහිත වූ ප්‍රභාකරන් දැඩි ආත්ම ශක්තියකින් යුක්ත විය. පුරා වසර 30 ඔහු ලංකාණ්ඩුවට එරෙහි ව්‍යාල යුද්දයක නිරත විය.

මෙම පොත පිලිබඳ අදහස් දක්වන විශේෂඥ මනෝ වෛද්‍ය සරත් පඞුවාවල ප්‍රභාකරන් සාධකයේ සැඟවුනු මනෝ විද්‍යාත්මක පාර්ශවයන් කතුවරයා විසින් හෙළි කරන බව පෙන්වා දෙයි. 

 

Sri Lanka is indeed trapped, but not by Chinese debt – Embassy

July 6th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

The spokesperson said that Chinese loans are not the main part of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt. According to the Annual Report 2017 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, the total external debt of the Island country counts US dollars 51.824 billion, among which outstanding Chinese loans takes up only about 10.6% with the amount of USD 5.5 billion. 

Besides, 61.5% the Chinese loans (USD 3.38 billion) are concessional ones with a much lower interest rate than the international market. The commercial loans from China are also negotiated at an appropriate rate by the two sides according to then international market.”

The Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka says that some foreign forces without willingness or abilities to help, are fabricating lies to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka and keep Sri Lanka in the trap of poverty.

Mr. Luo Chong, Spokesperson and the Chief of Political Section of Chinese Embassy, made remarks on the so-called Debt Trap” allegations and some other related issues during an media briefing at the Chinese Embassy on Thursday.

During the Q&A session, Mr Chong stressed that Sri Lanka is indeed trapped, not by Chinese debt but by the lack of development due to historical and external reasons.

 

What China has been doing is to provide all kinds of support including financial assistance to help Sri Lanka pulling out of the trap, while some foreign forces without willingness or abilities to help, are fabricating lies only trying to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka and keep Sri Lanka in the trap of poverty.”

The spokesperson said that Chinese loans are not the main part of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt. According to the Annual Report 2017 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, the total external debt of the Island country counts US dollars 51.824 billion, among which outstanding Chinese loans takes up only about 10.6% with the amount of USD 5.5 billion. 

Besides, 61.5% the Chinese loans (USD 3.38 billion) are concessional ones with a much lower interest rate than the international market. The commercial loans from China are also negotiated at an appropriate rate by the two sides according to then international market.”

He said the so-called Debt Trap” is a false proposition created by the Western media, with a direct attempt to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka, while the fundamental purpose is to maintain the Western world’s traditional” superior position in the international and regional politics and economics.

China will continue to provide selfless support including much-needed funds for the development of Sri Lanka, and would like to work together with Sri Lankan governments, business community, media and the general public to eliminate interference, strengthen confidence, and jointly promote the pragmatic cooperation for the benefit of the two countries and the two peoples.”

Ms. An Xin, Deputy Managing Director of Representative Office of China Habour Engineering Company Ltd and Mr. Tissa Wickramasinhe, COO of Hambantota International Port Group Ltd (HIPG) were also present for the briefing.

REASONS FOR THE FAILURE OF THE RECONCILIATION PROCESS IN SRI LANKA

July 6th, 2018

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

Since the beginning of human settlements in Sri Lanka, there had many conflicts between communities motivated by different elements.  The history of Sri Lanka affirms that Lord Buddha visited the country on one occasion to reconcile a conflict between Naga leader Chulodara and his uncle, Mahodara and the followers of both sides. The conflict was not associated with religious or ethnic elements but it was a combat between two guys and their followers on account of a gem set throne. This conflict cropped up before Vijaya and his associated arrived to Sri Lanka. This example points out that Sri Lanka obtained outside assistance for conflict resolutions in the history.  This experience recorded before Vijaya embarked and established a kingdom as a Sinhala state. The conflict was among indigenous people, who lived in Sri Lanka before the arrival of Vijaya. It would have been a large-scale fight (Tribal Fight) similar to the civil war has been experienced during 1983 – 2009.

Lord Buddha visited as a mediator who was recognized by two parties to the conflict and this historical example clearly indicates that a successful conflict resolution in Sri Lanka will be dependent on selecting a neutral mediator who is recognized by the parties to the conflict. The next vital characteristic of the mediating role of Lord Buddha was that Tathagata was not involved in a facilitating role, which generally focuses on financing for the negotiations.  The facilitating role for conflict resolution during the LTTE wartime denoted that it involved in many corrupt activities that were not acceptable to the general public, for example, conducting training programs in luxury hotels, offering travel opportunities for influential people in the government and opposition, providing motor vehicles for influential characters, making various supports to temples and many other bribery types supports for the parties involved in the conflict.  The role of facilitation also reflected that it has involved in making hidden influences to the parties, which were not expected from a mediator. The positive outcomes from the conflict resolution were expected by countrymen, but the behaviour of outsiders echoed that the reconciliation process has been involved in a double game more than the expectations of the country (Bandarage, A 2009, The Separatist Conflict in Sri Lanka, Terrorism, Ethnicity Political Economy, NY Bloomington, iUniverse Inc pp 176-200).

The mediating involvement of Lord Buddha had not involved in hidden functions or purposes with strings of hegemony over any party to the conflict.  The historical experience also clearly showed that for a successful conflict resolution and a reconciliation process should have some essential ingredients in the process similar to the practice used by the Lord Buddha. The conflict resolution and reconciliation process between Chulodara and Mahodara did not aimed at setting standards for the future conflict resolutions. However, when negotiations were going on between the government and the LTTE movement, it was not appeared that the negotiators really considered the historical example. As a result, people of the country had a doubt about the reconciliation process.

If the talks between the government and the LTTE movement were based on the pathway illustrated by the Lord Buddha, the civil war could have been ended in 1980 decade at a less damage. It seems that Sinhala Buddhist community had not agreed with the principles followed by the negotiators.  The history of conflict resolution in the world also evidence that a genuine reconciliation cannot be wielded by a forceful condition insistent of outside parties.  The best example was a conflict resolution eventuated under the leadership of Norway in the Middle East and African countries.

After the historical conflict for a gem set throne, there were many conflicts, which were mainly hinged on ethnic and religious issues and some instances castes and class struggles also contributed to bloodletting conflicts, unlike other conflicts, caste related clashes have considerably diminished in Sri Lanka as a result of the rapidly expanding education, which successfully effected in changing the attitudes of people. The education plays a significant role in the society and helps people to understand and evaluate a conflict whether it should be continued or abandoned on the basis of possible outcomes. This situation shows that broader understanding of a conflict by the community would be highly useful to a successful reconciliation. When people have a clear understanding of a conflict and its background, people can get out of the problem or continue with the problem or can suggest an alternative instead of a continuing conflict.

Humans are species with feelings and thinking power. The emerging of conflicts based on various reasons relating to human feeling, however, continuing differences within the community without respecting to the diversity of human will become a prime cause to create a crisis. The emanating conflicts in unpredictable instances would become concerned matters to the public and the international community.  The governing of a country in a conflict environment would be wasting of resources which should apply for much needed human developments. People have observed that Sri Lanka had been wasted a huge volume of human and physical resources during the 30 years of civil war. The conflict diverted a large sum of economic resources for military purposes and nobody has gained advantage from the war except personnel who dealt with military supplies.  This situation invites the development of permanent policies for conflict resolutions in the absence of constitutional and legal provisions for it.  As the government policymakers and the executive of the country did not make attention to this area, the conflicts resolution and the reconciliation have become an unsuccessful drive.

How can apply a successful reconciliation process when a conflict between ethnic, religious or any other groups are going on the basis of different philosophical matters?  The day to day operations of the country show that there are never-ending conflicts of trade unions, university students, farmers and many other groups. The negotiations are always unsuccessful due to the lack of common policy guidelines for negotiations as well as a reconciliation process on the basis of agree conditions of the outcomes of the negotiation. It appears that the major reason to unsuccess negotiations is the dishonesty of either party involved in a conflict or any other reasons, which are not acceptable to either party to a conflict.  This situation is not affordable to the country as it generates high costs, wastage of resources and unresolved disputes between individuals.

The strategic approach to this situation is that the country has to develop conflict resolution and reconciliation policies with the approval of the government and the opposition.  The current practice reflects that a bipartisan approach of political parties in relation to nationally vital issues is not working in the country.  As people of the country are fully aware, the reconciliation process with the international assistance began after ending the Civil War in 2009, but the process has already failed without any meaningful result. What were the contributing factors to the failure?  Although there may be different opinion, the major reason seems that there are no conflict resolution and reconciliation policies in the country.  This situation leads to an anarchic environment.

After the presidential election in 2015, a yahapalana government was established with a view to forming a stronger government with the support of majority of voters. The majority of citizens has been divided as UNP and SLFP by the party politics since the independence. The majority of voters in the country (75%) consists of Sinhala community, however, they divided to two major parties and this division created problems to implement a successful reconciliation process but some international advisors considered that a unity government of Sinhala people would be supported to an effective reconciliation process and making acceptable solution to the ethnic crisis in the country.  However, the formulation of a unity government has displayed lacking transparency to the general public.  As there was not a common program accepted by the public and underhand elements against the political process of the country has been growing during the past several years. The unity government has lost its confidence and the provincial government election in 2008 clearly displayed that there is clear the opposition of the majority of people to the misleading policy actions of the unity government.

The presidential election results in 2015 did not reflect that the majority of Sinhala voters in the country were with Mr. Maithripala Sirisena and many UNP, JVP, Muslim, Tamil political parties wrongfully assumed that election results were to punish Rajapaksa family and catching embezzlers without provable evidence. As a result, within a short period after the elections in 2015, a new political force under the leadership of Mahinda Rajapaksa emerged and Sinhala power divided to three parties and the major promise of the Yahapalana government has blotted disabling performance what they have promised to do.

People of the country or the political representatives in the parliament have not endorsed the process of reconciliation as the government did not disclose what would be really going on in the reconciliation process and what would be the expected outcomes from the process.  For example, the introduction of a new constitution to the country with a federal system was not an outcome expected by the majority of people from the reconciliation process, but the yahapalana government attempted to hide the expected outcomes during the presidential and parliament election as the yahapalana government clearly knew that they cannot attract the majority support. Nearly 76% of Sri Lanka’s population consists of Sinhala people. It is natural that when there is an attempt to draw a conclusion through a reconciliation process that is against the will of the majority of the population would not be successful.

Why the Yahapalana government which was formed to be transparent and was openly talking about transparency before the election attempted to conceal the significant matters in relation to the reconciliation process?  The independent points of views show that the yahapalana government has attempted to mislead to the general public of the country as well as the international community and as a result of the lacking transparency, the reconciliation process has come to grief.   Now a democratic process of review with all political parties would be required to take successful initiatives for concrete policy developments with a view to resolving future conflicts as well as the past conflict.

What were the contributing factors for the failure of the reconciliation process initiated after the civil war in 2009?  We need to critically look at such factors, otherwise, Sri Lanka would be a failed state as well as subject to a playground of international power players with different motives. Ten years after the independence, Sri Lanka would have developed policy guidelines and initiated a reconciliation process in 1958 after the first ethnic conflict.  At that time there was a good environment for a genuine reconciliation process because India was supportive to Sri Lanka and China was not a country where concerning on the policy developments in Sri Lanka. However, nobody was interested in the developing guidelines for conflict resolution policy.  During the British rule, there was a serious crisis between Sinhala and Muslim people, but as the sole administrators of the country, Britain had no interest in such a policy development, perhaps divided ruling was the underhand objective of the British rule, which prevented successful policy development for ethnic and religious harmony.

After the rule of Nehru and his colleague Shastri, Indira Gandhi entered to the political leadership of the Congress Party and won the election in the 1960s. The foreign policy of India strongly aligned to Russian bloc, which expected India to play a police role in the Indian ocean. As a result of the new role, the government of India got away from America and turned to Russia for military purchases and had to face a conflict with China.  In that environment, Sri Lanka genuinely helped India without creating any problem with China.  Sri Lanka has been depending on India for the reconciliation with Tamil community. The support of India to Sri Lankan government visibly ignored the fact that there should be policy guidelines for conflict resolution and reconciliation process for ethnic and religious conflicts.

The elected government in 1970 strongly stressed on making a new constitution and the next major conflict after 1958 was JVP insurrection in 1971, which was militarily defeated by the government with a strong support of India and Pakistan. The history of conflicts in Sri Lanka clearly indicates that the mentality of rulers in respect of conflicts was to apply military power to resolve the conflicts. It is common to other countries too, because there is a strong belief that if the ruling government can successfully control a conflict by using military power, it would be supported to eliminate rebellion and to stabilize the authority of the government.  This principle has positively applied many countries and some countries failed to create an environment that supports long-lasting peace and unity.

SRI LANKA MUSLIM VOTE BANK MUST HAVE THE COURAGE TO FACE THE TRUTH.EACH MUSLIM VOTER SHOULD DECIDE WHOM TO VOTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE.

July 6th, 2018

By Noor Nizam – Peace and Political Activist, Political Communication Researcher, SLFP Stalwart and Convener – “The Muslim Voice”, July 5th., 2018.

SRI LANKA MUSLIM VOTE BANK MUST HAVE THE COURAGE TO FACE THE TRUTH.

MUSLIMS SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY ACT ON THEIR OWN. WE DO NOT NEED POLITICAL BROKERING PARTIES AND POLITICIANS, SO-CALLED COMMUNITY LEADERS, THE ACJU OR MUNAAFIKKS TO TELL US HOW TO VOTE. 

EACH MUSLIM VOTER SHOULD DECIDE WHOM TO VOTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE.

IT IS BETTER FOR THE SRI LANKA MUSLIMS TO SUPPORT GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA FROM THE BEGINNING AS THE POSSIBLE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FOR 2020, Insha Allah. GOTABAYA SHOULD REACH OUT TO THE MUSLIM VOTERS, NOT THE MUNAAFIK SO-CALLED POLITICAL LEADERS, COMMUNITY AND CIVIL SOCIETY LEADERS AND THE ACJU.

What WE AS SRI LANKA MUSLIMS HAS FORGOTTENT is about the aspirations and inspirations of the Sri Lanka Muslims and Muslim Vote bank. We/our votes are sold to either the UNP or SLFP (UNF or UPFA) for the benefit of the deceptive “MUNAAFIKK” Muslim political leaders/party leaders. “The Muslim Voice” believes that the country’s thinking that a “CHANGE” in the Prime Minister post is correct. It has been proved beyond doubt that the present PM Ranil Wickremasinghe is really involved in the Bond Scam. Moreover, he has also betrayed the Muslims since he came to power because of the “EN-BLOCK” Muslim votes/vote bank. Since 2014,”The Muslim Voice” spoke in favour of the Sri Lanka Muslims supporting the “MAHINDA PELA” or now JO which has reborn as a political party – the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (POTTUWA).

Why “The Muslim Voice” advocated this view was because, the Sri Lanka Muslims would have worked out to win the confidence of the Mahinda Pela and its Sinhala Buddhist Nationalistic supporters/voters. Today the Muslims, trusting the UNP and flocking en-block and have traded nearly 800,000 Muslim votes to the UNP/Yahapalana (Hansaya) government of Mathripala Sirisena and Ranil Wickremasinghe, has betrayed and dumped the Sri Lankan Muslims in the political dustbin, beaten and penalized as a result of the conspiracies of the UNP/BBS/Rajitha Seneratne, Champika Ranawaka and the so-called Civil Society groups like the Puravasibalaya which is supported by our own Muslim Civil Society groups such as the Muslim Council of Sri Lanka (an ad-hock group gathered without a constitution and by-laws), the National Shoora Council and ACJU.

The political principle/ideology that “The Muslim Voice” advocated and is advocating it even now is because it is based on the political vision shown to us by the late Dr. T.B.Jaya, viz-a-viz – “NOT TO PUT ALL OUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET WHEN IT COMES TO POLITICS”. It is Time up that the Sri Lanka Muslims should rethink their stand to gain advantages for the future by supporting/negotiating with the SLPP or the Mahinda Pela. THEREFORE IT IS BETTER FOR THE SRI LANKA MUSLIMS TO SUPPORT GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA FROM THE BEGINNING AS THE POSSIBLE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FOR 2020, Insha Allah.

“The Muslim Voice” is followed by many thousands of well-wishers supporters who have appreciated our “NOBEL” cause in the struggle to get rid of the Sri Lanka Muslim Community of “MUNAAFIKK” Muslim politicians, Civil Society groups and the deceptive ULEMA, the ACJU, Alhamdulillah. We will therefore continue our Nobel mission till we achieve the end political goal of creating a NEW POLITICAL FORCE that will be honest and sincere to stand up and defend the Muslim Community politically and otherwise, especially from among the YOUTH, which will have to emerge from within the Sri Lanka Muslim Community to face any new election in the coming future. IF WE DO NOT ACCEPT TO SUPPORT GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA AS A COMMUNITY NOW, OUR MUNAAFIKK” AND DECEPTIVE HOODWINKING Muslim politicians, Civil Society groups and the deceptive ULEMA, the ACJU will give all their support to GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA, leaving the Sri Lanka Muslims in the LURCH at the last moment with the UNP and praise GOTABAYA to gain personal favours, Insha Allah.

හිට්ලර් සමග ප‍්‍රභාකරන් ඉල්ලන අපේ මෝඩකම

July 6th, 2018

කුසල් පෙරේරා ලංකාදීප

යාපනයේ සාම්ප‍්‍රදායික දේශපාලනයේ විජයකලා මහේස්වරන් තරමක ආන්දෝලනාත්මක චරිතයකි. මීට දින 03 ට ඉහතින් ජූලි 03 වන අ`ගහරුවාදා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඇතිවූ බරපතල නොසන්සුන්තාවට හේතු වන්නේත් ඇය ය. ඒ ගාලගෝට්ටිය නිසා කතානායක විසින් පසුදින තෙක් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කල් තබන ලදී. එයට පාදක වූයේ යාපනයේ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ මන්ත‍්‍රීනි වනිතා හා ළමා කටයුතු රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිනි විජයකලා මහේස්වරන් ඊට පෙර දින කළ ප‍්‍රකාශයකි. ‘‘ජනාධිපති ජනතා සේවය’’ වැඩ සටහනෙහි 08 වන ජන හමුව යාපනයේ වීරසිංහම් ශාලාවෙහි පැවති විට ඇය ‘‘කොටි සංවිධානය’’ වර්ණනා කරමින් කළ කතාව උසාවි යන්නටද හේතුවී ඇත. එදින පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කල් තැබීමට අමතරව, කතානායක කරු ජයසූරිය ඇයගේ කතාව නීතිපතිගේ අර්ථ දැක්වීමටද යොමු කළේය. යාපනයේ එම උත්සවයට ජනාධිපති සිරිසේනට අමතරව, මලික් සමරවික‍්‍රම හා වජිර අබේවර්ධන ඇමතිවරුන්ද සහභාගි විනැයි වාර්තා විය. විජයකලා මහේස්වරන් සාමාන්‍යයෙන් වග විභාගයක් නැතිව කතා කරන්නියක් යැයි යාපනයේ දෙමළ ජනතාව අතරද මතයක් ඇත. එහෙත් ඇයගේ මේ කතාව වගකීමකින් තොර නොමේරු දේශපාලන කතාවක් වූවත් එයට කොළඹදී ලැබුණු ප‍්‍රතිචාරය විකාරරූපි ප‍්‍රතිචාරයක් වූවකි.  

ඇයගේ ‘‘කොටි’’ කතාවට විරෝධය පාමින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පෙරළි කළ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ මන්තී‍‍රවරුන් ‘‘හිට්ලර් කෙනෙකු’’ සඳහාවූ දකුණේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ යෝජනාවට හීන් හ`ඩකින් හෝ විරුද්ධ නොවූහ. බලය ලබා ගැනීමට හැකි නම් ඔවුන් ලොව ම්ලේච්ඡුම නායකයෙකු වූ හිට්ලර් වර්ගයේ අපේක්ෂකයෙකු වුවද වැළඳ ගැනීමට සූදානම්ය. එහෙත් දෙමළ දේශපාලනඥයින්ට හිට්ලර්ගේ ‘‘පොඩි මලයා’’ ගැන කතා කිරීමත් තහනම්ය. මේ අතාර්කික පරස්පරයෙහි ඇත්තේ ඒකාධිපතිත්වයට හෝ රට බෙදීමට ඇති විරෝධයක් නොව එවැන්නක් අලෙවිකර දකුණේ සිංහල ඡුන්ද ගොඩ ලොකු කර ගැනීමේ අති බාල උත්සාහයකි. ඒ වෙනුවෙන් හිරිකිතයක් නැතිව නීති තර්ක හදමින් උසාවි යන්නට ඉදිරිපත්වන නීතිඥයින්ද ඇත.

එනමුත් ඉකුත් අ`ගහරුවාදා උදය ‘ලංකාදීප’ වෙබ් පුවත් පිටුවෙහි වාර්තාකර තිබූ අයුරු යාපනයේ ජනාධිපති ජනතා සේවය උත්සවයේදී විජයකලා මහේස්වරන් අවධාරණය කර ඇත්තේ නීතිය බිඳ වැටීමෙන් විශේෂයෙන් කාන්තාවන්ට හා ළමුන්ට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුව ඇති බරපතල අවදානම හමුවේ නිරුත්තරව ඉන්නා දෙමළ ජනතාව සඳහා ඇය දකින විසඳුමය. ‘‘උතුරේ කාන්තාවන් බරපතල වශයෙන් දුෂ්කරතා රැසකට මුහුණ දෙනවා. මෑතක යාපනයේ සය හැවිරිදි පාසල් දැරියක ඝාතනය කළා. එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ සංවිධානය සක‍්‍රීයව සිටීයා නම් මේ වගේ ඉරණම් අත්වෙන්නට කිසිදු ඉඩක් නැහැ.’’ යැයි ඇය කියා ඇත. ඇය දෙමළෙන් කළ කතාව සිංහලට නගා තිබූ එම වාර්තාවට අනුව ඇයගේ පැහැදිලි කිරීම වූයේ ‘‘අප ජීවතුන් අතර සිටීමට නම්, අපට මහ මග නිදහසේ ඇවිදීමට නම්, අපගේ දරුවන් පාසල් වෙත ගොස් නැවත නිවසට පැමිණිය යුතු විමට නම්, උතුරු නැගෙනහිර පළාත්වල කොටි සංවිධානය හිස එසවිය යුතුයි’’ යන්න ය.

මේ කතාවේ අරුත, දකුණේ නායකත්වයට හිට්ලර් වැනි නායකත්වයක් ඉල්ලා සිටීමේ අරුතට වෙනස් නැත. මෙවර ඇය ප‍්‍රභාකරන්ගේ එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊය ගැන කතා කරන්නේ ‘‘රට බෙදීමට’’ නොවේ. ඊළමක් හැදීමට නොවේ. ඇය යෝජනා කරන ‘‘කොටි සංවිධානය’’ සරළව ගතහොත් 1990 දී කරටිය කඩා දැමූ පසු හීලෑවී කැලෑවෙන් එළියට පැමිණි ජ.වි.පෙ වැනි ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය නොදන්නා නමුත් විනයක් ඇතැයි සිතන සංවිධානයකි. ඇය කතා කරන්නේ ඔවුන්ට අවශ්‍යව ඇති අපරාධ වලින් තොර ආරක්ෂාවක් ඇති නිදහස් ජීවිතයක් සඳහාවන කොටි සංවිධානයකි. අස්ගිරි මහ නිකායේ අනු නායක වෙ`ඩරුවේ උපාලි හිමි උන්වහන්සේගේ හිට්ලර් කතාව පසුව පැහැදිලි කර තිබූයේද එවැනිම හේතු දැක්වීමකිනි. රට ගෙන යාමට මේ යුගයේ අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ වහා තීන්දු ගත හැකි, නීතිය අකුරට කි‍‍රයාත්මක කරන්නාවූ නොසැළෙන අධිපති නායකත්වයක් බැව් කීමෙනි.

එවැනි බලහත්කාර පාලන වෙනුවෙන් එළිපිට පෙනී සිටින්නට, තම ස්වාමියා ප‍්‍රභාකරන්ගේ අනුමැතිය ඇතිව ඝාතනය කරනු ලැබී යැයි සැළකෙන වගකිව යුතු උතුරේ දෙමළ ඇමතිවරියක් හා දකුණේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ සමාජයේ උත්තරීතර නිකායක අනු නායක වහන්සේ නමක් වන වෙ`ඩරුවේ උපාලි හිමි ඉදිරිපත් වන්නේ ඔවුන්ගේ තනි කැමැත්තටම නොවේ. එවැනි පාලනයකින් තොරව විසඳුම් නැතැයි යන සමාජයේ දිගින් දිගටම ගොඩ නැගෙමින් ඇති විකල්ප මතයක් දැඩිව විශ්වාස කිරීමට ඔවුන්ටද එකතුකර ගත හැකි වූ හේතු සාධක සමගින්ය. එය තේරුම් නොගෙන මේ දෙපළට දොස් නැගීමේ හා විරුද්ධවීමෙන් සමාජීය ප‍්‍රතිපලයක් ලැබෙන්නේ නැත. අන්තවාදී යැයි හෝ බෙදුම්වාදී යැයි හෝ මේ දෙදෙනා හෙළා දුටු පමණින්, ජනතාවගේ ප‍්‍රශ්න වෙනුවෙන් විසඳුම් නැති රටක සමාජ මානසිකත්වය වෙනස් කළ නොහැකිය. ඒ සඳහා අවම තරමින් යහපත් පසුබිමක් හැදෙන්නේද නැත.

සමාජීය ප‍්‍රශ්න ඔඩු දුවමින් සමාජ පැවැත්ම සමග තම ජීවිත අවදානමකට තල්ලූ වන කාලයන්හි ඒ සඳහා පොදු පිළිගැනීමක් සමග ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදී විසඳුම් ඉදිරිපත් නොවන විට සහ ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය වෙනුවෙන් යැයි ඉදිරිපත් කෙරෙන විසඳුම් සතු කිසිදු පලයක් අර්ථයක් නොමැති විට, ‘‘සොඳුරු අඥාදායකයෙකු’’ ඉල්ලා සිටීම අපට පමණක් සීමාවන අලූත් අදහසක් යෝජනාවක් නොවේ. දෙවන ලෝක යුද්ධයෙන් පසු එවැනි සාර්ථක ‘‘ආඥාදායකයෙකු’’ ලෙස ආර්ථික වර්ධනයක් ලැබූ සිංගප්පූරුවෙහි පියා ලෙස සැළකෙන ලී ක්වාන්-යූ පිළිගනු ලබන්නේය. හිට්ලර් එසේ නොවී අවමානයට හා පිළිකුලට පත් වන්නේ ඔහු කතා කළ පිරිසිදු ආර්ය ජාතික බලසම්පන්න ජර්මනිය හැදීමට ඔහු අසමත් වූයෙනි. එබැවින් ඔහු ගැන කතා කිරීමට ඉතිරි වූයේ ඔහුගේ කුරිරු, හිතුවක්කාරී අමනුස්ස විනාශය පමණි. පොල් පොට්ටද එයම විය. ‘‘හිට්ලර් ලේබලය’’ නොවැදී ස්ටැලින් යම් පමණකට ගොඩ ආවේ, ඔහුට ඇමෙරිකානු බලයට එරෙහි සෝවියට් බලය පිටු පස සැ`ගවීමට හැකි වූයෙනි. 1961 හමුදා කුමන්ත‍්‍රණයකින් බලයට පැමිණ තමන්ගේම ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවෙන් 1963 දී ජනාධිපති වූ දකුණු කොරියාවේ පාක් චුං-හී ගේ දරුණු ඒකාධිපති පාලනය ගැන කතා නොවන්නේද ඔහු දෙවන ලෝක යුද්ධයෙන් පසු දෙකඩවී ඉතිරිවූ ඉතා දිළිඳු රටක් ලෙස පැවති දකුණු කොරියාව 70 දසකය වනවිට ආර්ථික වශයෙන් ශක්තිමත් රටක් බවට පත් කළ හෙයිනි.     

විසඳුම් සොයා ගැනීමට වෙ`ඩරුවේ උපාලි හිමි ‘‘හිට්ලර්’’ ලේබලය යොදා ගන්නේත් දෙමළ ජනතාවගේ නිදහස වෙනුවෙන් ප‍්‍රභාකරන්ගේ එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊය අවශ්‍ය යැයි විජයකලා මහේස්වරන් කියන්නේත් එවැනි සම්මිශ‍්‍රිත ලෝක අත්දැකීම් අසන්නට දකින්නට ලැබෙන පසු බිමකය. අපේ රටේ උතුරු-නැගෙනහිර මෙන්ම දකුණේ ජනතාවටද තමන්ගේ ප‍්‍රශ්න වෙනුවෙන් වැදගත් යැයි පිළිගත හැකි විසඳුම් නොමැති පසු බිමකය. එවැනි අතරමංවීමක අප රටක් ලෙස නතරව ඉන්නේ අද ඊයේ සිට නොවේ. අවුරුදු 30 ට ආසන්න යුද්ධයකට හසුව ඉන් නොමැරී ගැලවුනු දෙමළ ජනතාව ඔවුන්ගේ ජීවිත සඳහා විසඳුම් ඉල්ලන්නේ මහේස්වරන් ඇමතිනිය කියු අයුරු 2009 මැයි මාසයේ සිටය. ඒ වෙනුවෙන් ඔවුන්ද බුරුතු පිටින් හවුල් වී ඡුන්දය දී පත්කර ගත් මේ ආණ්ඩුවෙන්ද විසඳුම් නොලැබෙන්නේ යැයි ඇය ජනාධිපති ඉදිරියේම කියා තිබුණි. ඇයගෙන් ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත් වූ දෙමළ ජනතාවගේ අසහනයෙහි ඉවසීමේ සීමාව සටහන් වූයේ, ආණ්ඩුවේ සාමාජිකාවක් ලෙස අදහස් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමේ සීමාවක් තිබුණද අද දෙමළ ජනතාව වෙනුවෙන් ඒ සීමාව ඉක්මවා යෑමට තමන්ට සිදුව ඇතැයි ඇය කියූ කතාවෙහිය.

දකුණේ සිංහල සමාජයේ අති බහුතරයගේ කතාවද ඊට වැඩි වෙනසක් නැත. ආදායම් තත්ත්වය බිඳ වැටීමේ සිට, ළමුන්ගේ හිස් අරුතක් නැති පාසල් අධ්‍යාපනය, මහ මග රස්තියාදු කෙරෙන මගී ප‍්‍රවාහනය, අවශ්‍ය විට වෛද්‍යවරුන්, ෙඖෂධ සහ ඇඳන් නැති රෝහල් සහ සෞඛ්‍ය සේවය, සෑම වසරකම ලක්ෂයකට ආසන්න තරුණ මව්වරුන් හා තරුණියන් මැද පෙරදිග ගෘහ සේවයේ ඛේදවාචකයට තල්ලූ කෙරෙන ග‍්‍රාමීය දිළිඳුකම, කොළඹ නගරයේ ඉහළ පෙල මහල් නිවාස සංකීර්ණ හා යෝධ වාණිජ සංකීර්ණ වෙනුවෙන් ඉවතට තල්ලූ කෙරෙන නාගරික දුප්පත්කම, වැනි අතොරක් නැති ජීවිත ගැටළු වෙනුවෙන් දසක ගණනාවක සිට දකුණේ බහුතරයටද විසඳුම් නැත.

ඒ අතරතුර පිහිටක් පැතීමට, සාධාරණත්වය ඉල්ලා සිටීමට ඇති අධිකරණ කි‍්‍රයාවලියද අද සමාජ විශ්වාසය අහිමි කරගත් කි‍්‍රයාවලියක් බවට පත් වූවකි. නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය ගැන විශ්වාසය තැබිය හැක්කේද දේශපාලන හෝ මුදල් බලය ඇත්තේ නම් පමණි. නීතිය රැුකිය යුත්තන්ගේ ලොක්කන් අතර කොන්තරාත් මිනීමැරුම් හා විවිධ අපරාධ වෙනුවෙන් චෝදනා ලබන වුන් සිටීම, සාධාරණ සමාජයක් පිළිබඳ බලාපොරොත්තු පොළොවේ ගසා විනාශ කරන්නක් වැනිය. රටේ ඉහළම විධායකයේ සිට පහළ ග‍්‍රාම සේවා නිලධාරි තනතුර දක්වා සමස්ථ රාජ්‍ය සේවාවම අද රීතියක් ලෙස ¥ෂිත වූවකි. මහජන ඡුන්දයෙන් පත් කෙරෙන ව්‍යවස්ථාදායකය බරපතල ලෙස හෑල්ලූවට ලක් වූ හා ජනතා පරමාධිපත්‍ය යන්නෙහි කිසිදු වැදගත්කමක් ඉතිරි නොකළ නියෝජන ආයතනයකි.

මේ වනවිට ඉතිරිව ඇති දේශපාලන පක්ෂ යනු කිසිදු ජන සහභාගිත්වයක් නොමැති කොළඹ කේන්ද්‍රීය ජාවාරම්කාර කල්ලි විසින් හසුරුවනු ලබන ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය නොදන්නා සහ නොසළකන ඒකාධිපති සංවිධාන ව්‍යුහයන්ය. අද වන විට සියලූ රාජ්‍ය හා සමාජීය ආයතන හා සංවිධාන මේ ¥ෂිත දේශපාලනීකරණයට යටත්වී හමාරය. වැදගත් යැයි සිතන හැම වෘත්තියක්ම, හැම රාජ්‍ය ආයතනයක්ම, හැම සේවාවක්ම ¥ෂිතවී, දේශපාලනීකරණයවී අහවර ය. ඒ කිසිත් ස්වාධීන කොමිසම් මගින් ගොඩ දැමිය නොහැකි බැව්, පසුගිය තෙවසරක කාලය තුල ස්වාධීන කොමිසම්වල කි‍්‍රයාකාරිත්වයෙන්ම ඔප්පු කර ඇත.

දසක කිහිපයක් පුරා හැම පැත්තෙන්ම එවැනි ගරා වැටීමකට සිංහල, දෙමළ හා මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව හසුව ඉන්නා මේ රටේ දිග හැරෙන සමාජ ආර්ථික හා දේශපාලන අර්බූද සඳහා විසඳුම් සෙවීම වෙනුවට ඊළග ජනාධිපතිවරණය සඳහා සිංහල බෞද්ධ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකයින් සෙවීමේ අනුවණකම රජ වී ඇත. කොළඹ නාගරික ඉහළ මැද පංතිය හා ¥ෂිත සල්ලිකාරයින් පෙරමුණ ගන්නා ඒ හැම සිංහල බෞද්ධ තේරීමක්ම මානව හිමිකම්, වගවීම්, ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය වෙනුවෙන් පොරොන්දු සමග ඉදිරිපත් කෙරුණු තේරීම් වූ නමුත් ඒ ජනාධිපතිවරුන්ගෙන් හා ආණ්ඩු වලින් කිසිවක් නොවූයෙන් දකුණේ ඊළග සිංහල බෞද්ධ තර්කය වන්නේ, ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය අත හැර දමා හයිය ඇති සිංහල බෞද්ධ නායකයෙකු සෙවීමය. වෙඩරුවේ උපාලි හිමිගෙන් හිට්ලර් කතාව කියැවෙන්නෙ එබැවින් ය. ‘කැත්තට පොල්ල’ මෙන් සිටිය හැකි නොසැළෙන නොනැමෙන නායකයෙකු අවශ්‍ය යැයි මතයක් කොළඹ ඉහළ මැද පංතිය හා අතිශය ¥ෂිත ජාවාරම්කාරයින් අතර හැදෙන්නේද ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය පිළිබඳ කතා වලට මෙතෙක් වැදගත්කමක් නොලැබූණු බැවින්ය.

එහි විලෝමය දෙමළ සමාජයේ හැදෙන්නේ කොළඹ සිංහල මැද පංතිය හා ¥ෂිත ජාවාරම්කාරයින් යෝජනා කරන  සිංහල බෞද්ධ ‘‘හිට්ලර්’’ කෙනෙකු වෙනුවට ඔවුන්ගේම දෙමළ ‘‘ප‍්‍රභාකරන්’’ කෙනෙකු යළි සෙවීමෙහිය. සිංහල සමාජයේ පැහැදිලිව මතු නොවන කුල ප‍්‍රකාශනයක්ද එහි ඇත. ප‍්‍රභාකරන් සමයේ බලහත්කාරයෙන් යටපත් කර තිබූ ඉහළ ‘‘වෙල්ලාල’’ කුලයේ බලය විශේෂයෙන් යාපනය හා වන්නිකරයේ දැන් නැවත මතුව ඇත. ‘‘වෙල්ලාල’’ බලය ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ පමණක් නොව, වෙළඳ හා වාණිජ සමාජයේද යළි තහවුරුව ඇතැයි උතුරුකරයේ ඇති ප‍්‍රධාන මැසිවිල්ලකි. කණස්සල්ලකි. පොදු සමාජයේ ආර්ථික, සමාජීය හා දේශපාලන අර්බූද සඳහා පිළිගත හැකි විසඳුම් නොමැති හෙයින් ඔවුන් නැවත හැරෙන්නේ වඩා යහපත් යැයි ඔවුන් සිතන්නාවූ හා ඔවුන් දන්නාවූ විසඳුම වෙතය.

හිට්ලර් හා ප‍්‍රභාකරන් වැනි මෘග ඒකාධිපතියන් සොයා යෑමේ සිංහල හා දෙමළ සමාජයේ මැද පංතික ප‍්‍රවණතාවයට උත්තර දිය හැක්කේ එවැනි යෝජනා ඉදිරිපත් කරන කණ්ඩායම් වලට හා පුද්ගලයින්ට පහර ගැසීමෙන් නොවේ. එයට උත්තර දිය හැක්කේ විසඳුම් නැතිව අවුරුදු ගණන් පල් වෙමින් ඔද්දල් වෙමින් ඇදෙන සමාජීය ගැටළු සඳහා තිරසර විසඳුම් සෙවීමෙනි. දකුණේ සිංහල සමාජයේ බහුතරයට බලපාන්නාවූ අධ්‍යාපනය සෞඛ්‍ය මගී ප‍්‍රවාහනය ග‍්‍රාමීය හා නාගරික දිළිඳුකමට සහ ඔවුන්ගේ නිවාස ප‍්‍රශ්නයට ඔවුන්ගේ මාසික ආදායමට උත්තර සෙවිමෙනි. ඒ ගැටළු සියල්ල සමග යුද්ධයෙන් හෙම්බත්වූ දෙමළ ජනතාවගේ සුවිශේෂී ප‍්‍රශ්න සඳහා වහා විසඳුම් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමෙනි. එය මග හැර යළි සිංහල බෞද්ධ හිට්ලර්ලා මගින් විසඳුම් සෙවීමේදී දෙමළ සමාජය යළි ප‍්‍රභාකරන් ගැන කතා කිරීම බලාපොරොත්තු විය යුත්තකි. ප‍්‍රශ්න සඳහා සාධාරණ විසඳුම් නොමැතිව එය මෘග ලෙස තලා දැමිය හැකි යැයි සිතීම අතිශය භයානක මෙන්ම අනුවණ බොළඳ අදේශපාලනික සිතුවිල්ලකි.

කුසල් පෙරේරා

ලංකාදීප

2018 ජුලි 06 වන සිකුරාදා දින

US-China Trade war begins: China retaliates with 25% tariffs on $34 billion worth of US imports

July 6th, 2018

Courtesy RT

Just hours after the United States introduced 25 percent trade tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, Beijing has retaliated with mirror measures against American imports.

After the United States introduced the new tariffs, China’s reciprocal measures also immediately took effect,” said the spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry Lu Kang. He did not specify the amount or types of the US goods that will be taxed by China.

China’s commerce ministry earlier said the country has no choice but to fight back after the US “launched the largest trade war in economic history.” Beijing also accused Washington of breaching trade rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

These tariffs violate the WTO rules and represent a typical “trade bully”, posing a grave threat to the security of global industry and value chains. Moreover, it will hamper global economic recovery and trigger global market turmoil while dealing a blow to many multinationals, enterprises and ordinary consumers,” said the ministry on Friday.

It added that instead of serving the interests of US companies and people, the move will prove to be counter-productive and damaging.”

US tariffs of 25 percent apply to 818 Chinese imports worth $34 billion. They are the first stage in levies threatened by the Trump administration on a total of $450 billion worth of Chinese goods.

US President Donald Trump told reporters on Thursday that US tariffs on an additional $16 billion in Chinese goods are set to take effect in two weeks. He added the US is ready to target an additional $200 billion, and then $300 billion more should Beijing retaliate.

That would bring the total of targeted Chinese goods to potentially $550 billion which is more than the $506 billion in goods that China shipped to the US last year.

Beijing earlier released a target list of $34 billion worth of imported US goods, including automobiles and agricultural products that also faced 25 percent tariffs.

China promised to not fire the first shot, but to defend national core interests and the interests of the people it has no choice but to strike back as necessary,” said the Ministry of Commerce.

China says West wants to push Lanka into an “under-development trap”

July 6th, 2018

The embassy said this in response to a recent New York Times article which said that China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative is pushing vulnerable countries around the world, including Sri Lanka, into a debt trap” fuelling corruption and autocratic behavior in new democracies.

Chinese Embassy Spokesperson, Luo Chong said that Sri Lanka is not facing a debt trap” as alleged, but another kind of trap , namely a state of under-development.

Sri Lanka has been trapped by the lack of development” because of low investment in development for decades, Luo said.

What China is doing is not setting a debt trap for Sri Lanka but to pull it out of the trap of under-development.

China says West wants to push Lanka into an “under-development trap”

But  what some Western media are doing is that they are setting a trap for Sri Lanka,” Luo said.

A statement issued by the embassy said:  As a most important development partner of Sri Lanka, China has provided great support including financial assistance to Sri Lanka for its post-war reconstruction and national development at its most needed and crucial moments.

Debt To China Is 10.6% of Total Debt

Chinese loans are not the main part of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt. According to the Annual Report 2017 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, the total external debt of the Island country is US$ 51.824 billion, among which outstanding Chinese loans takes up only about 10.6% with the amount of USD 5.5 billion.

Besides, 61.5% the Chinese loans (US$ 3.38 billion) are concessional ones with a much lower interest rate than the international market.

The commercial loans from China are also negotiated at an appropriate rate by the two sides according to then international market.

The Chinese projects in Sri Lanka adhere to the golden rule combining: extensive consultation, joint contribution and 0shared benefits”.

Most of the major projects related to the national economy and people’s livelihood such as ports, roads, airports, power stations, and water conservancy. They are based on the urgent needs of the economic and social development of Sri Lanka, and proposed by the successive governments on the basis of sufficient feasibility studies.

However, Sri Lanka itself lacks relevant funds, experience and technicians to meet the difficulties of large capital requirements, low returns, high risks, long return times, and high technical thresholds of these projects.

As a result, Sri Lanka turns to request cooperation from the international community including China.

The Chinese government has made special arrangements in terms of funds, while Chinese companies work hard to overcome the difficulties and actively participate in projects construction.

This has greatly stimulated Sri Lanka’s economic growth, largely provided employment opportunities, and well improved people’s livelihood, which completely renewed the economic and social outlook of the country.

China is pleased to see that the major projects and technical talents built and trained with the support of the Chinese side have become valuable assets of the Sri Lankan nation and people, and will provide a continuous momentum for the all-round development of the future. China is full of confidence in the future development of Sri Lanka.

Just as the construction of the Hambantota Port project, the transfer of operation of the port was also proposed by the Sri Lankan government to the Chinese side, and finally agreed through rounds of friendly and equal commercial negotiations.

The purpose was to fully exploit the geographical advantages of Hambantota, improve operational efficiency and revitalize good assets, so as to further develop the port economy of Sri Lanka.

At present, the port business is operated by Sino-Sri Lankan joint ventures, the port revenue is shared by both sides, and the port security is entirely under the responsibility of the Sri Lankan government.

West’s Hidden Agenda

The so-called Chinese taking advantage of the debt for its hidden agenda and other attempts are simply untenable.

In summary, the so-called Debt Trap” is a false proposition created by the Western media, with a direct attempt to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka, while the fundamental purpose is to maintain the Western world’s traditional” superior position in the international and regional politics and economics.

China will continue to provide selfless support including much-needed funds for the development of Sri Lanka, and would like to work together with Sri Lankan governments, business community, media and the general public to eliminate interference”, strengthen confidence, and jointly promote the pragmatic cooperation for the benefit of the two countries and the two peoples.

(The featured image at the top shows Colombo Port City being built by the China Harbor Engineering Company)

China confident of facing second probe into allegation of funding Rajapaksa poll campaign

July 6th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, July 5 (newsin.asia): The Chinese government owned China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC), which has been accused by the New York Times of funding former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s 2015 election campaign said on Thursday, that it had faced the same allegation in 2015 and had refuted it with strong evidence.”

It is therefore ready to face a second probe which, as stated by the Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in parliament on Wednesday, will be conducted by the Crime Investigation Department (CID).

The confidence of the CHEC was expressed by An Xin, General Manager of the CHEC (Sri Lankan Branch), at media briefing in the Chinese embassy here.

This NYT story is stale as this was already reported three years ago. At that time, the CHEC had fully cooperated. Our attitude is still the same. We will fully cooperate with local authorities in any kind of investigation,” An said.

China confident of facing second probe into allegation of funding Rajapaksa poll campaign

Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had told parliament on Wednesday that the Crime Investigation Department would probe the NYT allegation that the China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC), which built the Hambantota port and has been building the Colombo Port City, had given the then President Rajapaksa US$ 7.6 million as contribution to his 2015 Presidential election campaign fund.

Such allegations are completely inconsistent with the facts,” CHEC General Manager An asserted.

Chinese President Xi Jinping with the then Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa

The CHEC has never been involved in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka and even when the matter was initially reported in the media in 2015, and the matter diverted to the Sri Lankan authorities for a probe, CHEC had offered its fullest co-operation to the authorities,” An recalled.

At the same press conference Chinese Embassy spokesperson Luo Chong said that such Western media reports are only preventing Sri Lanka from getting much needed development funds from foreign countries such as China.

This article is full of distorted facts and is full of critical prejudice. China maintains its stance that it does not involve in Sri Lanka’s internal matters,” Luo said.

In 2015 and 2016, the CHEC and Chinese Embassy officials in Sri Lanka had already responded to this issue with strong evidence,” he recalled.

I cannot comment about the political issues in Sri Lanka, but on behalf of the Chinese Embassy we are very confident that all these allegations are false,” he said.

He further clarified that nobody from the New York Times had contacted the Embassy over any issues regarding the controversial article.

If they had really contacted the Embassy it would have definitely briefed the journalists with the true facts,” Luo said.

He then went on to point out how the NYT was selective in its use of information.

I read a very interesting comment made by the former Governor of the Central Bank, Dr Ajith Cabraal. The NYT journalist Ms Maria, if I am correct with her name, met Mr Cabraal and did an hour long interview. The former Governor briefed this journalist about the whole story and finally not a single word uttered by him was written in the article. So even if this journalist had turned to the Chinese Embassy or Chinese companies, not a single word would have been quoted in the article!” Luo said.

Timing of the NYT Article

Pointing out the timing of the publication of the article, Lo said” It was published on June 25, exactly after CMPort made the final tranche payment for  the Hambantota Port. I do not know if it is a coincidence or was done on purpose. But it seems that they somehow do not want to see the smooth growth of our two countries’ cooperative relationship” Luo said.

He said that the Chinese embassy had noted the strong” statements made by Prime Minister  Wickremesinghe, Ports Minister Mahinda Samarasingha and former President Mahinda Rajapakse, dismissing the allegations in the NYT on the Hambantota Port deal.

The co-operation between China and Sri Lanka is not with particular parties or persons. Our co-operation is with the Sri Lankan government and our strong ties in diplomatic relations have only continued even during the island’s civil war, or during the end of the war or in the post war development. And so far the co-operation between China and Sri Lanka has been on a common consensus. We are very glad to see that,” Luo said.

As for allegations that China intends to use the Hambantota Port for military purposes, Chief Operating Officer of Hambantota International Port Group, Tissa Wickremesingha said: CMPort Holdings (which has take the port on a 99 year lease) is a commercial organization and we made a commercial investment on the invitation of the Government of Sri Lanka and that is where we are.”

Chinese Embassy, CHEC slam New York Times over ‘false report’ on Sri Lanka

July 6th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

The Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka says that some foreign forces without willingness or abilities to help, are fabricating lies to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka and keep Sri Lanka in the trap of poverty.

Mr. Luo Chong, Spokesperson and the Chief of Political Section of Chinese Embassy, made remarks on the so-called Debt Trap” allegations and some other related issues during an media briefing at the Chinese Embassy on Thursday.

During the Q&A session, Mr Chong stressed that Sri Lanka is indeed trapped, not by Chinese debt but by the lack of development due to historical and external reasons.

What China has been doing is to provide all kinds of support including financial assistance to help Sri Lanka pulling out of the trap, while some foreign forces without willingness or abilities to help, are fabricating lies only trying to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka and keep Sri Lanka in the trap of poverty.”

The spokesperson said that Chinese loans are not the main part of Sri Lanka’s foreign debt. According to the Annual Report 2017 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, the total external debt of the Island country counts US dollars 51.824 billion, among which outstanding Chinese loans takes up only about 10.6% with the amount of USD 5.5 billion.

Besides, 61.5% the Chinese loans (USD 3.38 billion) are concessional ones with a much lower interest rate than the international market. The commercial loans from China are also negotiated at an appropriate rate by the two sides according to then international market.”

He said the so-called Debt Trap” is a false proposition created by the Western media, with a direct attempt to obstruct the joint development of China and other developing countries including Sri Lanka, while the fundamental purpose is to maintain the Western world’s traditional” superior position in the international and regional politics and economics.

China will continue to provide selfless support including much-needed funds for the development of Sri Lanka, and would like to work together with Sri Lankan governments, business community, media and the general public to eliminate interference, strengthen confidence, and jointly promote the pragmatic cooperation for the benefit of the two countries and the two peoples.”

Ms. An Xin, Deputy Managing Director of Representative Office of China Habour Engineering Company Ltd and Mr. Tissa Wickramasinhe, COO of Hambantota International Port Group Ltd (HIPG) were also present for the briefing.

Mete out the highest punishment to Terrorist Tigress Vijayakala – Will this Govt. do that?

July 5th, 2018

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

The question being asked by everyone devoid of party politics is why Vijayakala Maheswaran is so precious for the UNP for the Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe, UNP General Secretary Akkila Viraj Kariyawasam, the loquacious Rajitha Senaratne and the frog in the well known as Gonjan” Ramanayake to defend her while many UNP MPs have criticised her recent speech in which she has urged for the revival of the LTTE in the North and East?

Vijayakala is the widow of T. Maheswaran, who was a ship owner who transported goods from Colombo to Jaffna and a Member of Parliament who was assassinated by the Eelam People’s Democratic Party, a government backed Tamil paramilitary group, in January 2008. The assassin John Pauline Wellington, was a former LTTE intelligence carder and was sentenced to death.

During the 2015 election she was accused of along with dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Colombo V. T. Thamilmaran helping a Paedophile who was found guilty of gang raping and murder of a young girl Sivaloganathan Vithya in Jaffna. High Court Judge N. Illancheliyan, in his ruling, noted that Vijayakala had taken steps to secure the release of the main accused when he was captured by residents following the rape and murder.

The United National Party (UNP) group leader for Jaffna district Vijayakala Maheswaran denied reports that one of her campaign vehicle No 65-9815 was exhibiting a poster of the Tamil Ealam map.

Reports said that she strongly denied accusation leveled by the High Priest of Naga Vihara in Jaffna that she had told media that under the UNP rule all police stations in the North would be closed. Down.

Making a special statement in Parliament, the Prime Minister said that what action should be taken against the State Minister Vijayakala would be decided after a meeting with her. Defending the bias attitude displayed by the Speaker in preventing the Parliamentarians to demonstrate their protests amid express their condemnation he said that the Speaker had already taken steps to hold an inquiry with regard to the matter. Referring to the commotion made by the Joint Opposition MPs in Parliament Ranil has said that strict action should be taken against their behaviour.  What he had implied was that pro separatist, terrorist elements are free to say anything under his neo liberal democracy and people in the South should not make any protests over such utterances.

The General Secretary of the UNP Akila Viraj Kariyawasam has said that he spoke to Vijayakala and she has made the alleged speech under emotions and severe stress over the rape and murder of a child in Jaffna and he cannot find fault in her speech.

The political chamelom, loquacious Rajiha Senaratnw who in an earlier occasion described Tiger Terroriss as our own children has said that the Anunayake thero of the Asgiriya asking for a Hitler rule and Vijayakala’s demand for a Probhakaran rule are same and there is nothing wrong in her statement.

The frog in the well known as Gonjan” Ramanayake has held a media conference and during which he has contacted Vijayakala over the phone and has carried out a shameless lovers’ chat defending her.

UNP MP, Kavinda Jayawardena, whose father Dr. Jayalath Jayawardene was the most ardent tiger terrorist supporter next to Ranil Wickremasinghe and even addressed LTTE gatherings in Canada and London has said that he feels that Vijayakala  might have become an ally of the extremist groups in the South and has made her statement in a bid to end the controversy surrounding The New York Times article on Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Hambantota Port. And he wonders if Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa is behind this..

Commenting on the issue the former President Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa has asked the government whether thousands of security forces and police personnel sacrificed their lives and limbs for it to welcome the revival of the LTTE. He has pointed out that Vijayakala’s statement clearly showed her motive and the masses were quite aware of her dreams of a Tiger revival.  He has further stated that no right thinking person in this country will forget the services rendered by the security forces during the 30-year civil strife and has added that Security forces, the police as well as the public are disgusted at the statement made by an irresponsible State Minister,.

Patriotic people opine that the views expressed Vijayakala during the ‘Janapathi Nila Mehewara’ gathering in Jaffna, in the presence of the Foreign Affairs Minister Tilak Marapana and Home Affairs Minister Vajira Abeygoonewardene is extremely seditious. They point out that stopping short of calling for separation, she claimed “Now we remember how we lived before May 18, 2009. In the present conditions, she has said that their main intention is to bring back the LTTE. They point out that what she has said was iff they want to live freely, if they want to walk freely, and if they need their children to attend schools and return back”.the need to revive the LTTE They allege that coming from a sitting Member of Parliament and State Minister it pushes the boundaries of free speech to an unacceptable level.. It is hilarious to find a person who was safely ensconced in Colombo with no fear of forcible conscription by LTTE of any of her three children perhaps at least until her husband was killed on January 1sr 2008 about the so-called freedom they had enjoyed under LTTE and she should hae.ve asked that from the mothers of teenagers and young men forcibly conscripted by the LTTE.

The organization of ‘Women for Justice’ demanded the relevant Minister to be sacked and arrested. Addressing a news conference – ‘Women for Justice’ Co-President Sharmila Gonawala said what she had proclaimed could not be condoned because she wanted the LTTE, a prohibited organization to come again and put the people of this county in danger.

We can’t remain silent when such controversial statements were being made by State officials. She must have forgotten the miserable era we had during the time of war. We never want such an era again,” Gonawala said.

She said they hoped to lodge a complaint to the Terrorist Investigation Division (TID) over the statement of the Minister. ‘Women for Justice’ Secretary Savithri Gunasekara said MP Vijayakala is not even eligible to hold the post of MP She being the State Minister of Child Affairs said the children of the North and East would be safer when the LTTE would come again. She has forgotten how the children were deprived of their education and forced to join the LTTE military groups by wearing cyanide capsule during the war,” Gunasekara said. They insisted the Government to take prompt action over her statement

The National Sangha Council has demanded that Vijayakala be arrested immediately over her recent statement in Jaffna, where she called for revival of the LTTE.

NSC National Organiser Ven. Waga Vijitha thera  has said that her declaration reflected the thinking among the UNP and SLFP parliamentary groups which constitute the so-called National Unity Government.

The thera alleged that a section of the government was taking advantage of an extremely weak National Unity Government to promote separatism.

The JVP which is reported to be having closing links with separatist elements in the North now and had joint May Day functions n Jaffna this year has said that the government has created an environment, which is used by people to make various statements similar to the one made by Vijayakala.  Without blaming or condemning her JVP MP and Propaganda Secretary Vijitha Herath has told a media conference that the breaking down of the rule of law had left room for Vijayakala to make such a statement. He has said it was the government which was responsible for the breakdown of rule of law and order.

Sri Lanka’s top constitutional lawyer Manohara de Silva, PC, commenting on the issue said that the Attorney General could file an indictment in accordance with Article 157 A against State Minister for child affairs, Vijayakala Maheswaran. He emphasised that the Attorney General could act on his own and in case the Attorney General refrained from acting in this instance, the Court of Appeal could be moved by an interested party.

The Attorney General could be made to fulfil his obligations by filing a writ of mandamus, Counsel De Silva said..He also stated that in accordance with Article 157 A, indirectly supporting secession was also an indictable offence and the police could not take action as only the Attorney had the power to indict a person. Mr. Manohara de Silva pointed out as there was sufficient evidence that the primary objective of the LTTE was to divide the country on ethnic lines, reviving the terrorist group therefore amounted to encouraging terrorism.

To concude this article, here is an extract from the Lanka Web weekly editorial dated 2nd July which excellently covers the whole issue:

State Minister of Child Affairs Vijayakala Maheswaran  has had the audacity make a public statement to the effect that the LTTE needs to be revived ‘ which is a mind boggling suggestion by her that is not only treasonous but also a violation which points to a suggested breach in National Security and incitement to the Tamil people to help  reorganize the LTTE  and calls for a full investigation.

There should be zero tolerance towards such irresponsible people especially those holding public office .It is treasonous as it suggests a revival of the ineffective terror group which almost destroyed the Nation but was quelled and annihilated with the brave and concerted efforts of a forceful President and his Armed Forces.

She has said in a public statement obviously with no decorum , insight nor intelligence that quote –

” It is seen that there is a huge need of reorganization of the LTTE in the North and East, while addressing the ‘Janapathi Nila Mehewara’ event at the Weerasingham Hall in Jaffna.

She  has said that reports relating to traces of LTTE reorganizing are heard regularly as a result of the people in the North and the East not willing to discard the LTTE from their hearts”. However it needs to be said that it could well be an expression of her own sentiments where she has no right to such, as it portrays her as an LTTE sympathiser where her puerile dogma is plainly visible and  should never be tolerated remembering the atrocities of the LTTE.

She also says Now we remember how we lived before May 18, 2009. In the present conditions our main intention is to bring back the LTTE If we want to live, if we want to walk freely, if we need our children to attend schools and return back.,” which has a touch of ingratitude to it considering how well the Tamils of Sri Lanka are treated today and perhaps a misinterpretation on her part where she takes kindness for weakness.

She pointed out that a 6-year-old child had been raped and killed and now people feel why they appointed the present President into power.” a whole collection of worthless  albeit typical  LTTE jargon without a semblance of related truth to it beyond speculation and innuendo where the perpetrators of such atrocities could well be LTTE supporters.

She said that they ( presumably the Tamils) had committed a lot to appoint the President ( food for thought indeed ! ! ) and despite not protecting the people, he is working to protect party matters..

PS: Latest reports said that this terrorist tigress has handed over her temporary resignation letter to her confidante Sirisena and the matter should not be allowed to rest with.  People should hold strong demonstrations throughout the country including North shutting down schools, closing down offices and work places including with the participation devoid of party politics demanding to present her in the Courts amid mete out the highest punishment..

 

Vijayakala’s Treachery: Removal from Ministerial Post is not enough

July 5th, 2018

When a MP, not once but several times publicly & openly professes to revive a terrorist movement that murdered thousands of innocent people it is an act of treason that cannot be erased simply by removing the person from his/her post. From 1980s to 2009 a wave of horrendous murders, suicide missions, assassinations were committed by the LTTE. Ironically people are mourning the LTTE & neglecting the lives LTTE eliminated for no fault of theirs. It took the lives of over 30,000 soldiers to eliminate the top ranks of the LTTE fighters. That many LTTErs ran away & are living in foreign countries is good enough reason for people to still fear the return of terrorism & force the government to be alert & take precautions to ensure terrorists do not take up arms again. So when a member of the government in the presence of even its foreign minister says that her main target is to revive the LTTE, this statement cannot be taken lightly & as damage control be removed from her portfolio & the citizens forced to forget & forgive her. She has to be charged & sentenced. In a country where people are sent to prison for stealing mangoes to eat, or insulting people when a Minister says she wants to resurrect a terrorist movement the sentence cannot be simply a removal from post & be given another post when people have forgotten the incident!

As per Sri Lanka’s constitution if according to Chapter 7 Article 38 (2) (II) the President can be removed for TREASON, given that Parliament is also voted by the people, an MP committing treason should also be not only removed but criminal charges filed against him/her. No MP can be immune from justice simply because they hold a portfolio of a Minister. Given that MPs enjoy the tax payers money the punishment for committing treason should be harsher.

Capital punishment reinstated since 2004 also includes treason.

Sri Lankan Penal Code Section 120 

Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise, excites or attempts to excite feelings of disaffection to the State, or excites or attempts to excite hatred to or contempt of the administration of justice, or excites or attempts to excite the People of Sri Lanka to procure, otherwise than by lawful means, the alteration of any matter by law established, or attempts to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the People of Sri Lanka, or to promote feelings of ill will and hostility between different classes of such People, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years.”

The relevance of the 6th amendment and Article 157A is crucial should also be applied.

Some main points covered in this 1983 amendment are

  • it is the duty of the State to safeguard, the independence, sovereignty, unity and the territorial integrity of Sri Lanka
  • IF the sovereignty, unity and the territorial integrity of Sri Lanka has been threatened by activities of certain persons, political parties and other associations and Organizations…it has become necessary to prohibit such activities and to provide punishments

What are these violations that Persons, Political Parties & Other Associations & Organizations commit in violation of the independence, sovereignty, unity & territorial integrity of Sri Lanka as per Article 157A?

(1) No person shall, directly or indirectly, in or outside Sri Lanka, support, espouse, promote, finance, encourage or advocate the establishment of a separate State within the territory of Sri Lanka.

(2) No political party or other association or organization shall have as one of its aims or objects the establishment of a separate State within the territory of Sri Lanka.

(3) Any person who acts in contravention of the provisions of paragraph (1) shall, on conviction by the Court of Appeal, after trial on indictment and according to such procedure as may be prescribed by law

It is clearly stated that if a person violates above, IF CONVICTED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL, the punitive measures are:

(a) be subject to civic disability for such period not exceeding seven years as may be determined by such Court

(b) forfeit his movable and immovable property other than such property as is determined by an order of such Court as being necessary for the sustenance of such person and his family

(c) not be entitled to civic rights for such period not exceeding seven years as may be determined by such Court

(d) if he is a Member of Parliament or a person in such service or holding such office as is referred to in paragraph (l) of Article 165, cease to be such Member or to be in such service or to hold such office

(4) Where any political party Of other association or organization has as one of its aims or objects the establishment of a separate State within the territory of Sri Lanka, any person may make an application to the Supreme Court for a declaration that such political party or other association or organization has as one of its aims or objects the establishment of a separate State within the territory of Sri Lanka. The Secretary or other officer of such Political party or other association or organisation shall be made a respondent to such application

Therefore, the video which very clearly states that the UNP MP’s desire is to resurrect the LTTE is linked to her appearance in a private television debate which she said life was better under LTTE rule & gave a list of reasons for it. Not only was no action taken by the political party against her comments but she ended up getting a Ministerial portfolio too. What is also interesting is that the banned LTTE fronts are doing their utmost to not only remove the Prevention of Terrorist Act but also the removal of the 6th amendment too… Their money has even influenced EU, US, UK & UN officials who are plugging aid & other government to government transactions with the assurance of removing, clipping or diluting these provisions & these are all eliminated in the draft new constitution also being promoted by these same players which is enough reason to completely refuse to accept a new constitution by these lobby groups.

Justice cannot be applied selectively and directed against political opponents only. It is only when proper justice is delivered that it serves as a deterrent for others not to commit similar acts breaching the constitution, the penal codes & the general morals that every citizen of Sri Lanka is expected to up hold.

We cannot have a government claiming to be the beacon of good governance & punishing only its opponents while its own MPs are committing a plethora of illegalities & irregularities. No person can be above the law & therefore the whole nation must demand punishment against this Minister so that others don’t follow her thinking they too can stand on stages and dream about bringing back terrorists for there are plenty of people ready to fulfil that dream to open avenues for them to make money. Let us not forget the LTTE while murdering people was & is making $300m annual profits which must have now doubled since they don’t have to spend on procurement of arms & ammunition & the maintenance of its terrorist cadres.

Shenali D Waduge

http://www.pubad.gov.lk/web/eservices/circulars/1983/E/222-1983(e).pdf

https://www.lawnet.gov.lk/1947/12/31/sixth-amendment-to-the-constitution-2/

New York Times allegation regarding threats to journalists

July 5th, 2018

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa

Following President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s response last Sunday to the New York Times article of 25 June 2018 on the Chinese acquisition of the Hambantota port, the NYT published yet another article last Tuesday where they accused parliamentarians associated with the Joint Opposition of intimidating the two Sri Lankan journalists who had helped them to produce the article of 25 June. The original article making the allegation that China Harbour Co had contributed a large sum of money to President Rajapaksa’s 2015 presidential election campaign and that this money had been used among other things, to buy campaign T-shirts and mementoes first appeared three years ago in the government owned Daily News of 22 July 2015. The New York Times by their own admission was helped by the Chief Editor of the government owned Sunday Observer to write their article of 25 June. Informing the public about this at a press conference is not a case of intimidating anybody – this is a case of revealing a material fact which will help the people understand what is going on.

The NYT has not published the rejoinder to their article of 25 June sent last Saturday by Joint Opposition parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa who represents the Hambantota district. All they have done in terms of giving us a right of reply is to post a link to President Rajapaksa’s response as inconspicuously as possible in their latest article.  What we learn from this is that a newspaper that is ideologically aligned to the Obama-Clinton liberal camp and is not fair even to the incumbent President of the United States, cannot be expected to be fair towards the former President of Sri Lanka. In last Tuesday’s article, the NYT has said that it was from a government news release issued in 2010 that they obtained the information that the feasibility studies on the Hambantota port had been negative. In this era, nobody should base a serious allegation on a mere internet post. If the NYT had asked the former Central Bank Governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal whom they had interviewed, he could have enlightened them about the feasibility studies done by SNC Lavalin of Canada and Ramboll of Denmark.

As for the money that is supposed to have been given for President Rajapaksa’s 2015 presidential election campaign by China Harbour Co, the present government did not suspend the activities of all Chinese Construction companies in Sri Lanka to check on their engineering credentials or their project experience.  The only matter investigated was whether these companies had any improper dealings with members of the Rajapaksa government. China Harbour Co was cleared of any wrongdoing and all their projects including the flagship Colombo Port City project, were restored to them. In last Tuesday’s article, the NYT has once again said that the present government of Sri Lanka handed over the Hambantota port to China because they were unable to repay the loan taken to build it. The reason why the NYT clings so doggedly to this idea despite President Rajapaksa’s explanation last Sunday, is probably to explain away the embarrassing fact that the Hambantota port was given to China by the very government that the Obama administration had spent hundreds of millions of Dollars to bring into power – as admitted by former US Secretary of State John Kerry in 2016.

 

Rohan Welivita

Media Secretary to

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa

 

මාධ්‍යවේදීන්ට තර්ජනය කිරීම ගැන නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් නිවේදනය

July 5th, 2018

හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පතේ ඉකුත් ජුනි 25 වනදා හම්බන්තොට වරාය චීනයට නතුවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් පලකොට තිබූ ලිපියට හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා පසුගිය ඉරිදා මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයක් මාර්ගයෙන් ප්‍රතිචාර දැක්වූ පසු, තම විමර්ශනය සිදුකිරීමට උදවු දුන් ශ්‍රී ලාංකික මාධ්‍යෙව්දීන් දෙදෙනෙකුට ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් තර්ජනය කළ බව කියමින් තවත් ලිපියක් නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පත පලකොට ඇත. චයිනා හාබර් සමාගම රාජපක්‍ෂ ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ 2015 ඡන්ද ව්‍යාපාරයට විශාල මුදලක් ලබාදුන් බවත්, එයටී-ෂර්ට්  හා ඡන්ද දායකයන්ට බෙදන නොයෙක් තෑගි බෝග මිලදී ගැනීමට වියදම් කළ බවට වූ චෝදනාව මුලින්ම පල වූයේ මීට අවුරුදු තුනකට පෙර 2015 ජුලි 22 ආණ්ඩුවට අයත් ඩේලි නිවුස් පුවත්පතේය. මේ චෝදනා නැවතත් පුනරුච්චාරණය කරමින් මෙම වසරේ ජුනි 25 වෙනිදා නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පතේ ලිපිය සැකසීමට රජයට අයත් සන්ඩේ ඔබ්සර්ව පුවත්පතේ ප්‍රධාන කතෘ සහභාගී වූ බව පුවත්පත් සාකච්ඡාවකදී අනාවරණය කිරීම,තර්ජනය කිරීමක් නොව සිදුවන්නේ කුමක්දැයි අවබෝධ කරගැනීමට මේ රටේ ජනතාව අත්‍යාවශ්‍යයෙන්ම දැනගත යුතු කරුණක් පැහැදිලි කර දීමක් පමණි.

පසුගිය සෙනසුරාදා හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කය නියෝජනය කරන නාමල් රාජපක්‍ෂ මන්ත්‍රීවරයා නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පතට යැවු පිලිතුරු ලිපිය ඔවුන් පලකොට නැත. ඔවුන් අපට පිළිතුරු දීමේ අයිතිය හැටියට ලබාදී ඇත්තේ මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ ජනාධිපතිතුමා පසුගිය ඉරිදා කල පැහැදිලි කිරීමට ‘ලින්ක් එකක්’ පමණක් නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පතේ මේ සම්බන්ධ නවතම ලිපියේ පෙනෙන නොපෙනන ආකාරයට පල කිරීම පමණි. අපට මෙයින් පැහැදිලි වන කාරණය වන්නේ, ඇමරිකාවේ ඔබාමා-ක්ලින්ටන් ලිබරල් කඳවුරට මතවාදී වශයෙන් බැඳී සිටින හා ඇමරිකාවේ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාටවත් සාධාරණයක් ඉටු නොකරන පුවත්පතකින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හිටපු ජනාධිපතිවරයාට සාධාරණයක් බලාපොරොත්තු විය නොහැකි බවයි. පසුගිය අඟහරුවාදා පලවූ දෙවෙනි ලිපියෙන් නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පත කියා ඇති එක් කාරණයක් වන්නේ, හම්බන්තොට වරාය සම්බන්ධයෙන් කරන ලද සියලුම ශක්‍යතා අධ්‍යයන නිශේධනාත්මක වූ බවට ඔවුන්ට තොරතුරු ලැබුණේ 2010 මගේ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් පලකරන ලද ප්‍රවෘත්ති නිවේදනයකින් බවයි. අද කාලයේ අන්තර්ජාලයෙන් මතුවන ලියවිල්ලක් මත කිසිවෙකුවත් වෙනත් අයෙකුට  චෝදනා නොකල යුතුය. නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පත රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්ඩුවේ හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපතිවරයා සමඟ සම්මුක සාකච්ඡාවක් කර තිබුණු අතර, ඒ අවස්ථාවේදී ඔහුගෙන් විමසුවේ  නම් කැනඩාවේ එස්.එන්.සී. ලවලින් හා ඩෙන්මාර්කයේ රැම්බෝල් යන සමාගම් දෙක විසින් කරන ලද ශක්‍යතා වාර්තා ගැන තොරතුරු ඔවුන්ට ලබාගැනීමට හැකියාව තිබුණි. 

2015 ජනාධිපතිවරණයට චයිනා හාබර් සමාගම විසින් ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතාගේ ඡන්ද ව්‍යාපාරයට මුදල් දීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපට කීමට ඇත්තේ වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව බලයට පැමිණි විගස සියලුම චීන සමාගම්වල වැඩ තහනම් කරනු ලැබුවේ ඔවුන්ගේ ඉංජිනේරු සුදුසුකම් හෝ ව්‍යාපෘති අත්දැකීම් ගැන සොයා බැලීමට නොවන බවයි. වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව විමර්ශනය කලේ මේ චීන සමාගම් රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්ඩුවේ සාමාජිකයන් සමඟ කුමක් හෝ අයතා මූල්‍යම  සම්බන්ධතාවයක් පවත්වාගෙන ගියේද යන්න පමණි. චයිනා හාබර් සමාගම ඒ විමර්ශනයෙන් නිදහස් කොට වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව විසින් කොළඹ වරාය නගර ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඇතුලු ඔවුන් කරමින් සිටි සියලුම ව්‍යාපෘති ඔවුන්ට ආපසු ලබාදෙන ලදී. වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුවට හම්බන්තොට වරාය ඉදිකිරීමට ගත් ණය ගෙවීමට නොහැකි නිසා ඔවුන්ට එම වරාය චීනයට බදු දීමට සිදු වූ බවනිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පත ඔවුන්ගේ දෙවෙනි ලිපියෙන්ද නැවත වතාවක් පවසා ඇත. ලංකාව කිසිදු චීන ණය උගුලක  පැටලී නොසිටි බවට රාජපක්‍ෂ මැතිතුමා කළ සවිස්තරාත්මක පැහැදිලි කිරීම ඔවුන් පිලිගෙන ඇති බවක් පෙනෙන්නට නැත. නිව්යෝක් ටයිම්ස් පුවත්පත මේ තරම් උවමනාවෙන් මේ අදහසේම එල්බගෙන සිටීමට හේතුව ඇමරිකාවේ හිටපු රාජ්‍ය ලේකම් ජෝන් කෙරී 2016 දීකළ අනාවරණයට අනුව ඔබාමා පාලනය විසින් ඩොලර් මිලියන සිය ගණනක් වැය කොට බලයට ගෙන එනු ලැබූ ආණ්ඩුව විසින්ම චීනයට මේ වරාය ලබා දීම නිසා බටහිර ලෝකයේ මුලු ලිබරල් කඳවුරටම සිදුවූ මහත් ලැජ්ජාවත් අවමානයත් වසාගැනීමට විය හැකිය.

රොහාන් වැලිවිට

හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මැතිතුමාගේ

මාධ්‍ය ලේකම්

The China Harbour Engineering Company responds to allegations of funding Rajapaksa’s elections campaign

July 5th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

The China Harbour Engineering Company says that the speculation by an international media organization that CHEC funded former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s 2015 Presidential Election campaign is completely inconsistent with the facts.

The construction of the Hambantota Port by CHEC was an important national task based on mutual agreement between Sri Lanka and China Governments, and was implemented under a transparent model,” the company said.

CHEC said it has never been involved in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka and that the Hambantota Port was built for the Sri Lankan Government and its people.

We wish to jointly safeguard Sri Lanka’s investor friendly environment. The relevant media report has distorted the facts and provided a false opinion.”

The Chinese Embassy in Colombo held a media briefing today (5) with the participation of Mr. Luo Chong, Spokesperson and the Chief of Political Section of Chinese Embassy, Ms. An Xin, Deputy Managing Director of Representative Office of China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd and Mr. Tissa Wickramasinhe, COO of Hambantota International Port Group Ltd (HIPG) who made remarks on the so-called Debt Trap” and some other related issues.

The company also said that Sri Lanka was expecting India to assist in the development of the Hambantota Port, however after India’s lack of interest, Sri Lanka approached China for assistance.

Considering the traditional friendship and long-standing relationship with Sri Lanka, China decided to offer selfless support in Sri Lanka’s national development initiative to construct the Hambantota Port.”

China also provided financial assistance at the request of Sri Lanka including a large sum as a concessional loan, it said. Therefore, it is evident that China never coerced Sri Lanka to construct the Port and nor did China lure Sri Lanka in to any debt trap.”

Full CHEC Press Briefing:

First of all, successive elected Governments in Sri Lanka have invited internationally renowned engineering consulting companies to conduct feasibility studies on the development of the Hambantota Port.

During Honorable Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s previous tenure (Dec 2001 – Apr 2004), the Government invited SNC Lavalin Group Inc., the internationally renowned Canadian engineering consulting firm, to conduct a feasibility study, which was completed in 2003. During former President Chandrika Bandaranaike-Kumaratunga’s two terms Ramboll Danmark A/S, an internationally renowned Danish engineering consulting company, was invited to conduct a feasibility study twice, which was successfully completed in 2007.

In summary, developing a port in Hambantota given its location advantage was to promote the economic development of the Southern Region and Sri Lanka as a whole. This was the consensus among different elected Governments led by the main political parties of Sri Lanka.

Secondly, Sri Lanka did not initially approach China to develop the Hambantota Port. After contacting other countries not receiving any interest, the Sri Lankan Government approached China to support the development of this port.

According to our knowledge and based on official statements released by Government officials, Sri Lanka was expecting India to assist in the development of the Hambantota Port. However, after India’s lack of interest, Sri Lanka approached China for assistance. Considering the traditional friendship and long-standing relationship with Sri Lanka, China decided to offer selfless support in Sri Lanka’s national development initiative to construct the Hambantota Port. China also provided financial assistance at the request of Sri Lanka including a large sum as a concessional loan. Therefore, it is evident that China never coerced Sri Lanka to construct the Port and nor did China lure Sri Lanka in to any debt trap.

Thirdly, China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd. is a World-class Port construction Company. Hence, the operations including the construction of the Hambantota Port was carried out in full compliance with international standards.

CHEC’s parent company, China Communications Construction Company Ltd. (CCCC), ranks 103rd in the Fortune Global 500 Companies, and is ranked 3rd amongst the top international contractors in the Engineering News Record (ENR) in 2017, the only company in Asia to be amongst the top 10. CCCC has independently designed and built seven out of the ten largest ports in the World in terms of throughput.

CHEC is well reputed in Marine Engineering, Dredging & Reclamation, Roads & Bridges, Airports, Buildings & Machinery Procurement. CHEC’s Sri Lankan operations began in 1998 and our projects such as the Colombo International Container Terminal Project, the Northern Road Reconstruction & Infrastructure Restoration Projects, and the Colombo Outer Circular Expressway have significantly contributed to the economic development of Sri Lanka and have been appraised by all parties. After the Tsunami disaster in 2004, CHEC also actively got involved in the rescue and reconstruction activities, and carried out the construction of the Fishing Harbor Project aided by the Chinese government, reflecting the Company’s commitment towards social responsibility.

Based on above-mentioned factors, both Sri Lankan and Chinese governments invited CHEC to participate in the construction of the Hambantota Port in 2007. As the project is financed via a loan by the Chinese Government, it is reasonable and also in line with international practice to invite a Chinese company to carry out the construction. This practice is also followed by countries such as Japan, South Korea and India when providing loans to Sri Lanka.

Fourthly, the construction of Hambantota Port follows the principle of business and is in compliance with the laws of the market from beginning to end, reflected by the principle of wide consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits.

Port construction of such size is a big project in any country. The port construction process will bring a lot of employment and help the economic development of the country. Throughout the construction of the Hambantota Port, 6,500 local workers were employed both directly and indirectly.

The development of the Hambantota Port project was carried out in on the basis of equality and friendship between Sri Lanka and China and has been following the principle of business and in compliance with the laws of the market from the beginning to the end. The specific construction situation is open and transparent. In particular, the majority of the funds for the entire project are loans of a concessional nature provided by the Chinese Government; and even the small proportion of commercial loans provided was lower than the international market interest rates at that time.

Finally, the speculation by an international media organization that CHEC funded former President’s 2015 Presidential Election campaign is completely inconsistent with the facts.

The construction of the Hambantota Port by CHEC was an important national task based on mutual agreement between Sri Lanka and China Governments, and was implemented under a transparent model.

CHEC has never been involved in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. The Hambantota Port was built for the Sri Lankan Government and its people. We wish to jointly safeguard Sri Lanka’s investor friendly environment. The relevant media report has distorted the facts and provided a false opinion.

China Harbour Engineering Company denies NYT report, pledges cooperation with SL on CID investigation

July 5th, 2018

Kelum Bandara Courtesy The Daily Mirror

the New York Times report that it funded the election campaign of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, China Harbour Engineering Company said today it would cooperate with any investigation by the Sri Lankan authorities in this regard.

Addressing a press conference, Joint Managing Director An Xin said the speculation by an international media organization that the CHEC funded former President’s 2015 Presidential Election campaign was completely inconsistent with the facts.

She said the construction of the Hambantota Port by CHEC was an important national task based on mutual agreement between Sri Lanka and China Governments, and was implemented under a transparent model.

CHEC has never been involved in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. The Hambantota Port was built for the Sri Lankan Government and its people. We wish to jointly safeguard Sri Lanka’s investor friendly environment. The relevant media report has distorted the facts and provided a false opinion,” she said.
She said her company would fully cooperate with the Sri Lankan authorities three years ago.

We will give any kind of cooperation to the Sri Lankan authorities in any kind of investigation according to the law,” she said.

President’s Secretary Austin Fernando resigns

July 5th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

Secretary to the President Mr. Austin Fernando resigned from his position and bid farewell to his office a short while ago, the President’s Media Division said.

The former Governor to the Eastern Province was appointed to the position in  July, 2017 following the resignation of then Secretary to the President P.B. Abeykoon.

A former Defence Secretary and reputed civil service officer, Austin Fernando retired as a senior official in the Sri Lanka Administrative Service (SLAS) before he was appointed as an adviser and later governor by the President.

Earlier in his illustrious career, he served as the Government Agent for Polonnaruwa District and Nuwara Eliya District. He was later appointed as the Commissioner of Cooperative Development and Postmaster General.

He became the Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Rehabilitation, Ministry of Public Administration, Home Affairs and Provincial Councils.

President Sirisena appointed Fernando as a presidential adviser on 15 January of2015. He was thereafter appointed Governor of the Eastern Province on the 27th of January 2015. He resigned in order to become Secretary to the President of Sri Lanka on the 1st of July 2017.

Vijayakala decides to resign from post

July 5th, 2018

Vijayakala Maheswaran says that she has decided to resign from her post as the State Minster of Child Affairs, in the wake of her recent controversial statement regarding the LTTE.

Speaking during a state event held in Jaffna on June 2, she had said that the LTTE should be resurrected for the freedom of the Tamil people.

If Tamil people want to live freely, the LTTE should raise their hand again, she had reportedly said.

Several parties including sections of the United National Party (UNP) had demanded action against Maheswaran.

The Speaker has informed the Attorney General to investigate whether State Minister Vijayakala Maheswaran’s controversial statement has violated the Constitution or any laws and to take necessary legal action.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had requested President Maithripala Sirisena to temporarily remove Vijayakala Maheswaran from her ministerial portfolio until inquiries are completed.

The PM had summoned Maheswaran yesterday (4) to inquire regarding the statement while she had reportedly decided to resign following the meeting.

මහ බැංකුව යටතේ පවතින විශ්‍රාම අරමුදලුත් දුෂිත පර්පචුවල් බැදුම්කර වංචාව යොදාගෙන.  මහ බැංකු අරමුදල් සදහා පාඩුව රු. මිලියන 78 යි.

July 5th, 2018

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රයෙන් බැදුම්කරය ගැන තවත් අනාවරණයක් -මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව යටතේ පවතින අරමුදල්/භාරයන් 6  ක මුදල් ද, දුෂිත පර්පචුවල් බැදුම්කර වංචාව සදහා යොදා ගෙන ඇති බවත්, එමගින් ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව සතු අරමුදල්වල අවම වශයෙන් රු. මිලියන 78 ක අලාභයක් සිදුව ඇති බවත් ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍ර‍යේ විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ කීර්ති  තෙන්නකෝන් නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් අනාවරනය කරයි.  

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව යටතේ පවතින උක්ත අරමුදල් 6 හි පාඩුව වන රු. මිලියන 78 ක් හෝ එයට වැඩි මුදල අය කර ගැනීම සදහා කිසිදු ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් ගෙන නැත.  මෙම අරමුදල් සදහා භාරකාරත්වය දරන ආයතන මෙම පාඩුව අය කර ගැනීම සදහා නඩු පැවරිය යුතුය.  මේ වන විට පර්පචුවල් සමාගම දුෂිත බැදුම්කර වංචාවෙන් උපයාගත් රු. මිලියන 8500 ක් අය කර ගැනීම සදහා රාජ්‍ය ආයතන 5 ක් වෙනුවෙන් නීතිපතිවරයා නඩු පවරා ඇත.   සේවක අර්ථසාධක අරමුදල, සේවක භාරකාර අරමුදල, රක්ෂණ භාරය, ජාතික ඉතිරිකිරීමේ බැංකුව, විශ්වවිද්‍යාල ප්‍ර‍තිපාදන කොමිෂන් සභා අරමුදල් හා මහපොල උසස් අධ්‍යාපන භාර අරමුදල් මෙසේ නඩු පවරා ඇති ආයතන වෙති. 

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුවේ විශ්‍රාම අරමුදලේ තැම්පත් ද, මෙම දුෂිත බැදුම්කර ගණුදෙනුවට යොදා ගෙන ඇති බවත්, එමගින් ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුවේ සේවකයින්ට ද පාඩුවක් සිදුව ඇති නමුත්, එම අරමුදල් අයකර ගැනීමට හෝ මේ දක්වාම නඩු පැවරීමක් සිදුව නැත.

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය

UNP’s Minister for Child Affairs is a woman who wants to revive LTTE which recruited child soldiers

July 4th, 2018

The UNP leadership boasts of allocating Ministerial Portfolios to some scientific method which is yet to explain how or why the UNP gave ministerial portfolio of children to a woman who wants to revive the LTTE. For the benefit of everyone who supports the UNP & the rest of the citizenry in Sri Lanka as well as the international community that enjoys throwing accolades at the good governance of the present government let us reveal the record of the terrorist movement that remains banned & its time line of murderous achievements since 1980s. Wijayakala with only 13,071 votes thinks by saying on behalf of the UNP that she wants to revive the LTTE her diminishing popularity will arise & UNP will boost its election prospects in the December provincial elections!

Wijayakala Maheshwaran

Was elected to Parliament from the UNP in 2010 Parliamentary Elections from the Jaffna District though she lives in Colombo.

She was sworn in as State Minister of Child Affairs on 9 September 2015 at the 2015 Parliamentary Elections.

Her election campaign centred on assuring to create eelam or a separate state. Inspite of all these assurances only 13,071 voted for her in 2015!

UNP & Wijayakala wish to resurrect a terrorist movement that was militarily defeated in 2009 & remains banned not only in Sri Lanka but in 32 countries around the world & 75% of its cadres comprised females & child soldiers!

In wanting to resurrect the LTTE, Wijayakala & the party she is representing – the UNP desires to bring back a wave of killings that took place since 1980s – we will highlight the women & children killed by LTTE since UNP has scientifically selected her to be the role model Minister for women & children.

While Wijayakala’s children and the children of all other Tamil politicians & high caste/class leaders are going to private or international schools in Colombo or abroad, the ordinary Tamils had to send their children in fear to school as LTTE would kidnap them. Many parents chose not to send their children to school thus these children lost the opportunity to show their academic skills. Some daughters had their hair cut like boys to prevent them being taken.

It is with great sadness & with much pain that as a mother myself, I pen the fact that some fathers made their daughters pregnant so that pregnancy would prevent their child from being taken & made a child soldier. Imagine the torment that both father, mother & daughter would have gone through to come down to this level in fear of losing a child to LTTE. These are not stories that any of these parents would now like to come out & tell in the open. The whole world would sneer at them & cause them further sorrow.  Yet, people like Wijayakala are so selfish to grab onto any power that they come out with bizarre statements without knowing how ordinary Tamils suffered by LTTE and how the rest of the country suffered equally too.

How many women activists will even raise a voice against the many female LTTE cadres who would have been raped & treated as comfort women for male LTTE cadres & their sexual lusts!

1980s saw LTTE mercilessly attacking villages & killing in the most inhuman ways pregnant women, babies & sleeping children starting off with the Kent & Dollar Farm massacres.

THIS IS WHAT UNP & WIJAYAKALA WANT TO RESURRECT?

The Gonagala Massacre (Ampara district) on 18 September 1999 – LTTE hacked to death over 50 Sinhalese men, women and children in the middle of the night. Of those 54 victims of the massacre, 27 were men, 17 were women and 10 were children. Out of the 17 women who died in the killings, two of them were pregnant. Most of the LTTE cadres who took part in the attack were WOMEN LTTE cadres. This incident is depicted in the film Gamani.

https://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1620/16201340.htm

Some of the other civilian massacres killed by LTTE are included in this list http://www.sinhaya.com/Massacres.htm

“Most of the LTTE fighters are kids, say Tiger captives”, The Hindustan Times, 4/10/98 by P K Balachandran says a group of LTTE child soldiers who surrendered in October 1998 claimed that 75 per cent of LTTE fighters are children!

The elite Sirasu Puli (Leopard Brigade) is reportedly composed entirely of children drawn from LTTE-orphanages and is one of the LTTE’s most fierce fighting forces.

Tamil Tigers Recruit Child Soldiers As Young As 11

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/04/tamil-tigers-recruit-chil_n_195607.html

Kill or be Killed” is what LTTE told kidnapped Tamil children.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/kill-or-be-killed-11yearolds-forced-to-fight-for-tamil-tigers-20090504-asm4.html

UNICEF has “reliable reports” that children as young as 14 are being forced to fight for the LTTE – James Elder, spokesman for UNICEF

UNICEF has recorded more than 6000 cases of children recruited between 2003 and the end of 2008

Human Rights Watch has documented on LTTE child soldiers too

https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/11/10/living-fear/child-soldiers-and-tamil-tigers-sri-lanka

Living in Fear – Child Soldiers & Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka

https://www.hrw.org/news/2004/11/11/sri-lanka-tamil-tigers-forcibly-recruit-child-soldiers

Sri Lanka Tamil Tigers forcibly recruit child soldiers

Please listen to Ms. Sharmila Gonawala chairperson of Women for Justice https://www.facebook.com/WeR4SL1/videos/577163292684812/UzpfSTEwMDAwMTEzMjIzMDkzNToxNzgwMjg2NjcyMDE5MDU3/?comment_id=1781649348549456&notif_id=1530630702524174&notif_t=feed_comment_reply

While Wijayakala’s children were studying in Colombo, ordinary Tamils from poor families were taught not from books but how to hold the AK47 & kill

Wijayakala’s children & TNA children want to wear gold round their necks but the low caste Tamil children should wear cyanide capsules & kill themselves before capture.

Ananthi Sasitharan in Geneva : Question her on husband Elilan’s role in LTTE child soldier recruitment

Just listen to some of the rehabilitated children to understand what they had gone through & the UNP’s child affairs minister wants to bring back the LTTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnOl7wHNpo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnloGsgnKrc

Just imagine how many Tamils forcibly turned into child soldiers or other cadres (male & female) would have ended up had they not taken to the gun? An entire generation of talented youth were misled & ended up dead just to fulfil the fancies of a handful of high caste racist Tamil leaders who wanted the Tamils to be their servants & pretended the enemy was the Sinhalese.

If Wijayakala wants the return of terrorism then she must give up living in Colombo & go to the Vanni jungles & learn to use the gun – why should she go about in fancy cars & put innocent people into the jungles & tell them to fight her battles! Same goes for all in the TNA & the LTTE diaspora. The Tamils must tell them very clearly – if they claim there is discrimination & wish to take the gun – then they must do so without outsourcing the job to others while they end up enjoying all the comforts & having Sinhalese bodyguards to protect them too! This nonsense must stop.

In ancient times the kings led the battle/wars. They led their warriors, they showed by example – now we have Wijayakalas, Sivajilingams, Wigneswarans, Sambanthans, Sumanthirans et al nicely enjoying a life of luxury and feeding lies to people & telling them to start trouble & chaos. Please wake up people and stop falling for their lies.

Wijayakala the UNP’s child affairs Minister has not embarrassed the UNP but exposed the UNP’s falsehoods & brought it into the open & the best way they know to damage control is to fling blame on the Rajapakses! So now Rajapakse is supposed to have told Wijayakala to tell that LTTE needs to be resurrected and there are fools to believe this spin too….

Shenali D Waduge

Wijayakala’s LTTE Resurrection: Tamil Racism Self-Exploding

July 4th, 2018

UNP MP Wijayakala Maheshwaran’s public speech revealing her desire to resurrect the LTTE needs to be looked at from a different angle. Certainly, her statement has violated the National Constitution, the oath taken by MPs & to publicly claim that a banned terrorist organization needs to be revived warrants not only disciplinary action but removal from ministerial portfolio. No MP can enjoy tax payers money & work towards resurrecting a banned terrorist movement. However, there is a far bigger issue that we need to now deal with & that is how do we handle the racist politicians now in power, for they are the biggest hurdle to peaceful coexistence & amity among the communities.

Wijayakala is a UNP MP, she is enjoying position of Minister as a result of the assassination of her husband by the very terrorist organization she wants to resurrect. Ironical but true & it is the same case with another widow leader who is also flirting with the tiger foreign lobby. Is it because they were never living in the tiger terrain that they presume life was great under LTTE rule? Is it because people are bigger racists that these politicians chant racist rhetoric thinking that they are articulating what the voters want? This is called playing to the gallery. This seems to be the case with many minority politicians & majority politicians who are wooing minority votes. However, this time round playing to the gallery & expecting accolades & bouquets did not transpire for Wijayakala. Timed close to an election, the effort to resurrect her own fast declining image among Tamils has backfired and there are plenty of reasons for this which Tamil leaders will now need to seriously address if they wish to be representatives of their own ethnic group. As far as the remaining LTTE are concerned not only Wijayakala but the entire TNA are no friends of the LTTE. The farewell to Col Ratnapriya Bandu in Vishwadu is a slap to all the pro-LTTE UNP MPs (Tamil & Sinhalese) as well as the Tamil racist politicians. The lies & falsehoods of these Tamil leaders are now thoroughly exposed. Have any LTTE village carried or cried for Wigneswaran, Sambanthan, Sivajilingam, all the pro-LTTE church priests, UNP pro-LTTE MPs or even the University of Jaffna academics– NO? Not even when they wanted to have LTTE memorials, LTTE statues etc.. the LTTE now realize that these Tamils are only trying to advance their own agendas using the LTTE… and the LTTE do not wish to be party of the show!

Wijayakala like all other Tamil MPs cannot hide themselves under the oft battered ‘Sinhala discrimination’ mantra they have been flogging all these years. Since 2012 the TNA have been put in the saddle of governance of the Northern Province but they have little to show as against the development the Sinhala” government rolled out from 2009 to 2012. The Tamils are no fools. With no LTTE, they want to have a better life economically & socially & the Tamil leaders do not want to offer them that. Instead they want to continue the ‘Sinhala discrimination’ chant but it is not working any longer. Only now Tamils are realizing that LTTE big shots were enjoying $300m annual profits while they were suffering in the jungles. When Wijayakala says life was better under LTTE – these people are now asking why not a dollar was spent throughout 30 years for them when LTTE ruled! The Tamils also know that the LTTE Diaspora are enjoying far more than $300m annual profits now since there is no expense incurred for LTTE cadre maintenance, arms or ammunition – so the annual profits must have now doubled. So who is enjoying this money? Not the LTTE cadres but the supposed to be white-collard LTTE diaspora leaders & their families are having a whale of a time flogging the Sinhala discrimination, demanding Tamil Eelam song & singing all the way to their bank accounts getting fatter by the day! Its time the LTTE families demanded chunks of this money which includes illegal & legal income from a global network of businesses. Wake up Tamils! Wake up Low Caste Tamils!

The mistake Wijayakala & TNA leaders are making is continuing to make reference to LTTE – they have completely forgotten the LTTE cadres & their families who have been completely sidelined by their own Tamil society. This has brought to the surface another fact that had been hidden from the world by the Tamil leadership hierarchy. All of the lower tiers of the LTTE were low caste & poor Tamils. They are considered Dalits of Tamil society – good enough to only fight & die, good for Tamil rich & high caste to use them to advance their own socio-political-economic agendas. This fact that had been kept hidden has resurfaced following the defeat of the LTTE. The high caste/class Tamil society now blame these dalit Tamils for the LTTE defeat so not only are they caste-wise shunned they are now treated as losers by the Tamil society.

Now you can understand the overwhelming love & affection the LTTE villages afforded to Col. Ratnapriya Bandu. He showed these shunned LTTE families the compassion that Tamil politicians & Tamil society refused to provide. Today, ask any LTTE family & they would say the Sri Lankan Army are far better than the TNA politicians. This is a major blow to the Tamil leadership & while UNP & Wijayakala think they can continue to batter & verbally say LTTE can be resurrected it cannot be done using the same LTTE cadres. Now, they are not only 30 years older than they were, but their children too have seen their suffering & with new opportunities for them, none of them are likely to want to suffer in any jungle with AK47s knowing that their supposed leaders are enjoying while they are suffering inside the jungles.

As for UNP MP Wijayakala, she has only herself to blame. Her entire election campaign has been nothing but racist. This is how she campaigned in 2015

https://politicslk.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/unp-mp-wijayakala-maheswaran-reveals-her-tiger-stripes/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrHj-cExW2c&t=31s

UNP didn’t take action against her when she promoted LTTE in 2015 too. In a tv interview she claimed people were safe during LTTE, girls could even go out at 12 midnight – then who kidnapped Tamil children & turned into child soldiers? The only females walking on the road at midnight would have been female LTTE cadres but how was she to know, Wijayakala never lived in the North, she was living in Colombo!

UNP Maheshwaran cannot shed crocodile tears about rape either. She is implicated in the rape & murder of Vidya having intervened to help the culprit escape & coming to the police to release the suspect. Her name is included into the report that has been submitted to the AG’s Department.

https://www.newsfirst.lk/2017/09/state-min-vijayakala-interrupted-free-suspect-wanted-rape-murder-vidya/

http://www.dailynews.lk/2017/08/11/local/124867/cid-questions-state-minister-wijayakala-over-alleged-involvement

Another factor being hidden is the rise in rapes by Tamils – fathers, uncles, family members raping their own children & relations. Domestic violence has also increased in the Jaffna peninsula. These were highlighted by the Jaffna GA Imelda Sukumar herself.

The other issue plaguing Tamil society is the rise in drug & alcoholism for which both men, women & teens are now victims. The free flow of narcotics from kerala is one of the reasons why the hotel that the PM recently attended was pelted with stones because the people allege the hotel owners were linked to this smuggling.

A better understanding of the gravity of the situation socially can be deciphered in taking the police entries of rapes & other cases of domestic violence in the entire Jaffna peninsula.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqTjQpdfqXY Sri Lanka’s Parliament is a buzz following the speech by UNP MP Wijayakala.  For UNP it is a blow to their election campaigning and would want to take damage control measures. Why can’t PM take action against his own party MP without asking President to temporarily remove her until inquiry, we can recall how his former Finance Minister was relieved of his duties but ended up working from Temple Trees! All these are sham shows to fool the masses.

UNP cannot afford to have all its links to LTTE over the years brought back into the open. It is nothing UNP wishes to expose & something UNP voters themselves wish to keep hidden.

There is a constitution. There is the 6th amendment & there is article 157 which the government & Parliament are bound by.

Prohibition against violation of territorial integrity of Sri Lanka – https://www.lawnet.gov.lk/1947/12/31/sixth-amendment-to-the-constitution-2/

Even the punitive actions to be taken by the Supreme Court is clearly written. If 6th amendment is applied TNA will have to close shop! Legal action must be filed against Wijayakala & all others who have been violating the territorial integrity of Sri Lanka.

Imagine if as per demands of the EU, US, UK & UN the PTA had been removed & LTTE in another format is resurrected? What would be the scenario for the country having clipped the mechanism to take action against terrorists?

The question before all voters & citizens is why are politicians being vocally racist? Are they making these racist utterances because they think that is what the people want? If so, the ball is now in the court of the people to show otherwise. This is a golden opportunity for the people themselves to realize that in surrounding racist politicians (whether they are Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Islam, Catholic or Christian) the people are only encouraging racism to prevail in Sri Lanka.

For starters therefore, stop attending events of racist politicians. Stop promoting these politicians even via social media or other platforms, unite to denounce them & then when an election comes make sure they do not receive your vote. Is that so hard to do, if you are not a racist?

Shenali D Waduge

Reactionaries launch 2019/2020 election campaign through the NYT article

July 4th, 2018

By : A.A.MNIZAM – MATARA

It was more than two years before the Presdential Election in 2015 January, the anti Sri Lankan forces the CIA and M16 repreesentitg the U.S.A and the West, the RAW representing the hegemonic India, TGTE representing the Tamil diaspora the TNA and the UNP with the blessings of Ranil and Chandrika signed a 10 point agreement in Sngapore in 2012 Io nstitute a regime change in Sri Lanka and handed over the task od implementing this agreement to a gang of quislings headed by Sobitha thero and supported by more than 40 dollar voracious NGO outfits.  Hiding these moves from the government were meticulously carried out by the despicable Ministrs in the government such as political chameleons Pa.Cha,Ranawaka and Rajitha Senaraatne, some MPs including Rajiva Wijesinghe and the leaders of minority community political parties.

It was indeed sad to note that Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa or others in the government were not aware of these moves until the last moment when Aappaya” Sirisena crossed over in November and with that the treacherous elements launched their well drawn up plan titled A Compassionate Maithri Governance – A stable Country to provide all false promises, and to launch a horrendous smear campaign against Rajapakses and the government.. Anyone carefully reading this document would realize the impracticable nature of it and it was parrated by Sirisena at his political meetings and was distributed among the masses. People of this country are well aware what and what they promised and said and what and what they have done and need no elaboration and it was their anger relating to this factor they displayed in the February 10th local government elections

Now as the Presidential and Parliamentary elections are due in less than two years the enemies of Sri Lanka have once again launched a smear campaign using an Indiam borm journalist of thw New Yoek Times which President Trump recently labelled as creating fake news” to .disparage the most popular personality of this country. The defamatory report writtenen by Maria Abi-Habib says that Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa had solicited funds from a Chinese company for his 2015 election purposes with the intention of creating the image that Mr. Rajapaksa’s Presidential election campaign in 2015 was carried out in a illegal manner..

The article published on 25 June, claimed that Sri Lanka was entrapped by China due to various loans obtained by it during the leadership of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa nd alleged that China had funded Rajapaksa’s 2015 presidential election campaign. It said that 7.6 Milluon U.S.Dollars were spent by Mr. Rajapaksa for his election campaign through the China Harbour account. It also stated that China Harbor Company had given U.S.Dollars 38,000 to Elle Gunawansa Thero for his support to Mr. Mahinda, two cheques of U.S. Dollars 1.7 million each had been handed over to the Temple Trees and another 3.7 Million U.S.Dollars had been used to purchase promotion materials. The writer has claimed that she obtained this information from politicians and government officials. The frog in the well Ranjan Ramanayake has confirmed that he had discussons with Maria.

Responding to the New York Times article, which alleged that Sri Lanka was placed in a debt trap by China due to the loans obtained for various development projects, Luo Chong, Chief of the Political Section and also the spokesperson of the Embassy, in a statement, has insisted that the report was full of political prejudice and completely inconsistent with the fact. The Embassy said that China would oppose any country’s interference in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka and will continue to firmly support the latter’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity.  It has also emphasized that, despite any interference from a third party, China would like to work together with Sri Lanka to actively implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries and concentrate unwaveringly on our fixed goals, continuously promote the pragmatic co-operations under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiatives following the ‘golden rule’ of ‘extensive consultation, joint contribution and shared benefits’, to better benefit the two countries and the peoples.

The former President Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa has told Ceylon Today that there is not an iota of truth in this massive defamatory report and he has filed litigation papers with his lawyers and will claim damages, and the report has been filed for political reasons to tarnish his name and that it had been planted by interested parties in Sri Lanka.

Any sensible Sri Lankan will gree with what Mr. Rajapaksa says and he is the most popular figure at present in Sri Lanka except for fraction of separatist pro terrorist and the reactionary cabal has come to the conclusion that his popularity should be tarnished before the forthcoming elections. New York Times’ Maria is the first choice they have made for this purpose and anyone will wonder why she wited almost 3 ½ years to revealher so-called findings.

In the following few months to th e;lections we can see a flurry of rconcocted eports from western and Indian journalists and our dollar voracious NGO vultues to mislead the Sri Lankan masse, to tarnish the images of Rajapaksas and other JO leaders severe than the misleqding reports carried in prior to 2015 elections as the popularity and Ranil are at the extremely bottom level.  These quislintgs should realize that they cannot in any way change the future deestiny of Sri Lanka under Rajapaksas which has been already sealed and it would be the end of a disastrous period and the beginning of a bright future. .

Vijayakala epidsode

July 4th, 2018

Sudath Gunasekara

4.7.2018

First of all I request you all to read the following news report attributed to a living tigress, Vijayakala UNP MP and Minister for Women’s Affairs and Child care (Tamils only).

Vijayakala sees need for LTTE in N-E

2018-07-02 22:53:36

It is seen that there is a huge need of reorganization of the LTTE in the North and East, State Minister of Child Affairs Vijayakala Maheswaran claimed today addressing the ‘Janapathi Nila Mehewara’ event at the Weerasingham Hall in Jaffna.

She said that reports relating to traces of LTTE reorganizing are heard regularly as a result of the people in the North and the East not willing to discard the LTTE from their hearts.

Now we remember how we lived before May 18, 2009. In the present conditions our main intention is to bring back the LTTE If we want to live, if we want to walk freely, if we need our children to attend schools and return back.,” she said.

She pointed out that a 6-year-old child had been raped and killed and now people feel why they appointed the present President into power.

She said that they had committed a lot to appoint the President and despite protecting the people he is working to protect party matters.

She also questioned the development carried out in the last three years in the North and East.

We do not know what development they have done in our area. But I only thank the Government for one good thing and that is to release and return our lands to us. Other than that the Government had done nothing to us,” she said.

She also said being a minister in the present administration there is a limit that she can speak against their leader but had to cross the limit on some occasions. (Romesh Madushanka)

Comment

This again and again proves the stupidity and the double standard this Government adopts for the North and the South from the inception.

Why doesn’t the Government take immediate action against this woman on the following three counts at least?

  • That she has violated the oath taken as an MP under the Forth Schedule of the Constitution
  • Violated the 6th amendment
  • she is espousing the LTTE cause and instigating the youth to rise against the State

All these are clearly criminal offences and they amount to traitorous acts against the State

All these counts could be proved with what is on record as to what she said at that meeting. As such the police can arrest her even without a complaint. So my complaint is as to why the police don’t arrest this woman for treachery.

Now we remember how we lived before May 18, 2009. In the present conditions our main intention is to bring back the LTTE If we want to live, if we want to walk freely, if we need our children to attend schools and return back.” she said.”

Isn’t this statement alone is sufficient to arrest her

She pointed out that a 6-year-old child had been raped and killed and now people feel why they appointed the present President into power”.

Is she trying to say by this that the President has raped this little girl  The whole world knows it was committed  by aging of her own people for which the President has nothing to do or had no power over Vijayakalas own crowed who has done it

This is not the first time she has aired her true LTTE colours and opened her foul moth. She had done so several times even before. Once she has refused to raise the National Flag at a Government function though she is a Minister in the very Government that organized the function. Second she also once refused to honour the National Anthem at a public meeting.

She also has criticized the Government and the President at this public meeting. Had this stupid Government taken action when she did so at the very first time she would not have come out with this kind of rubbish any more?. All other Ministers who attended this meeting have kept dead silent. That implies that they all concurred with her.  I can understand Vignesvarana and Sumanthidaran here. But what I can’t understand is the behavior of other Government Ministers At least they should have objected then and there itself.  They may have done so for the fear of losing Tamil votes.

It is also high time that Government, particularly the President, must put an immediate stop to his duplicity between the North and the South in implementing the law. If his Government could sentense a Buddhist monk Galabodatte for 6 months for an alleged defamation against the court why can’t it takes action against this kind of the Government waiting till Vignesvaran, Sambandan, Sumantidaran and Vijayakala unilaterally declare North and East as Independent States, with the blessings of India perhaps?

The Government must either govern or depart. This is what all people in this country, including  even people like Vijayakala, of this country are asking you Mr President? Please go before a mirror and ask as to what you people have been doing for the past 3 ½ years other than trying to fix your enemies and infighting and taking the country to a no return situation.

Save the nation from neo-liberal quislings and pseudo-Buddhists  

July 4th, 2018

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

It is after a long interval I am penning this article as I was bed ridden following a vehicle accident and underwent some surgeries.. During this period there were many articles, news reports and web postings related to the positive and negative socio-economic and political aspects of Sri Lanka which included fortunately Ranil Wickremasinghe becoming unable to force feed the Western, Indian and Tamil diaspora tailored federal and secular constitution, and the failure of the JVP hooligans to get their 20th amendment to provide dictatorial powers to their buddy and puppeteer Ranil Wickremasinghe passed.

While ignoramus Sirisena made meaningless hollow speeches his bête noir Lanka E News website shreaded him exposing corruption activities of his family members Ranil Wickremasinghe blatently carried out his commitments through establishment of offices at Temple Trees under the directin of despicable individuals like Raeen Sally, George Soros and his IDU (International Democratic Uniion) and MPS (Mont Pelerin Society) colleagues to make Sri Lanka iast losing its economic sovereignty under which Policy choices are being ceded to the US Administration, IMF/World Bank, Western aid agencies, corporate-backed think tanks, transnational corporations, and a small clique of legal and financial consultancy firms in the multimillion-dollar privatisation business, giving advice, then profiting from that advice people and nation becoming dispensable commodities; their labour, wealth, natural resources, economic activities being on auction with foreign bidders determining their worth.

Then there was a blatent interference in the internal affairs of the country by the American Ambassador Atuel Ketchap warning against fielding Mr. Gotabhaya Rajapaksa as the next Presidential candidate.

A well planned stage drama by Sirisena imprisoning his confidante Gnanasara thero attempt to jumper him and bailing him out while another 15 Buddhist monks are reported to be serving prison sentences wearing jumpers.

On top of all these, the sermon delivered  to a a private audience at Mr. Gotabhaya Rajapaksa’a residence on his 69th Birthday by Ven Venduruwe Upali Thera, the Anunayake of the Asgiriya chapter became the subject of condemnation by neo liberal non practising pseudo Buddhists, reactionary mercenary journalists and quislings suffering from an ailment called Gota phobia despite Ven. Upali Thera issuing a statement blaming politicians for misinterpreting his remarks and those who extracted a couple of words” from his lengthy anusasana. He compared them to those who tried to determine the shape of an elephant by touching only its tail.

Among the protesters of Ven. Upali Thera’s speech blaming it as anti Buddhist included the agnostic Goebbles Mangala who gained notoriety by holding unashamedly and in utter disrespectfully a statue of Lord Buddha by neck at Pinchi Borella a few years ago, western slavish Ranil Wickremasinghe who make use of Buddhism only for political expediency, and a host of neo liberal non practising Buddhistswho are suffering from Gota phobia. The view expressee by these reactionaries had been fittingly countered by the patriotic writers such as Rohana R.Wasala (Island 29th JUNE0 and Mr. M.P.D.Dissanayake (24th JUNE – lankaweb) and several others in the Island newspaper and the Lankaweb. It was very strange that the Catholic Anura Kumara or any other JVP hooligans or the dud coin Chandrika, who is also a neo liberal did not make any comments on this matter

 

Ven Venduruwe Upali Thera

 

What Ven. Upali had actually meant by his sermon had been expression of his deep sorrow about the deterioration of the country and the need to arrest this trend even by grasping dictatorial measures and liberate this country,. This is the same admonition that had been given throughout the history of this country by the Maha Sangha to King Dutugemunu and other monarchs when they launched their expeditions to liberate the nation when it was in peril and was under foreign aggressiom. At that time fortunately there were no pseudo Buddhists and quislings to oppose such admonitions. .

Let us now examine the story about the alleged holocaust and murder of over 30 millon people by Hitler.  It has been proved that it was a fabricat3d claim by Zionist Jews to gain the land of Israel and the western world has ignored many challenges made so far disputing this claim and there had been several books claiming that Hitler killed only 6 million Jews and he would have brought the whole Europe under his control  if it was not for the intervention by the Russians under the leadership of Joseph Stalin.  This figure of 6 million shows that it is much less than taken altogether the number of  people massacred by the American, the British,  the Dutch. The Belgians, the French, the Japanese and Pol Pot.  For the Western world these are not atrocities against the humanity.

The Americans are responsible for massacring the whole population of the Japanese islands Hiroshima and Nagasakai and it is reported that still the children borne in these islands are borne with brain and physical inabilities.  Americans did not stop with that and wiped out the people in Indo China and North Vietnam wwas a testing ground to test their weapons such as Napalm bombs and attacks by B-52 bombers.  They did not stop with that and carried out massacre of people iunder concocted false pretexts n Iraq, Libya, and Syria and their Syrian mission failed due to timely intervention by President Putin.  Those responsible for these massacres George Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Barak Obama are still alive and no action has been taken against them for their crimes against humanity.

In Sri Lanka the British massacred the total population of Uva Wellessa and in addition to that killed all cattles and uprooted all fruit bearing trees and soaked the soil of Uva Welless with blood.  They carried out similar killings in India and their neighbour Northern Ireland, Burma (Myanmar) and several West African nations such as Rhodesia (Zimbabwe),  Zambia, Tanzania, etc.  Similar atrocities were carried out by Dutch in Indonesia, French in Algeria and some East African nations and Belgians in Central Africa, and Japan in the Korean Peninsular and China.  .  It has bgeen reported thyat the Japanese buried Korean and Chinese people alive up to their neck in beach fronts and then chopped off their heads.

Dueing his 5 year tenure as the Defence Secretar Mr. Gotabhaya Rajapaksa has not shown any of these unhuman tendencies bu instead rescued neary 300,000 Tamil eople who were being held by LTTE terrorists as human shields.

The latest weapon being used by these enemies of humanity is the concept called neo-liberalism under which they take total control over the territory of nations, their wealth, natural resources and economic activity, national identity and culture will be dismantled,  the ability to determine domestic policy and foreign policy by the nativesw will be denied, and along with it independence and sovereignty through active collaboration of some local stooges such as Ranil Wiciremasinghe.

The horrendous nature of these attrocites is clearly articulated by one of our most distinguished diplomats, Tamara Kunanayakam which is bound to send shivers down the spine of any patriotic Sri Lankan. Based on a public lecture she delivered at the University of Colombo, three articles titled “Sri Lankan sovereignty, non-negotiable!”, appearing in ‘The Island’ from Monday 25th to Wednesday 27th, should be compulsorily reaad by any, who has even the slightest concern for the future of Sri Lanka.

It is under these circumstances that we need a firm personaliy like Mr. Gotabjaya Rajapaksa, the right choice made by Ven. Upali Thera to rescue this country from the domination of neo liberals.

 

Sri Lankan academic campaigns for a dictatorship

July 4th, 2018

By K. Ratnayake  Courtesy World Socialist Web Site
4 July 2018

Nirmal Ranjith Dewasiri, a professor at the University of Colombo, is conducting a thinly-veiled social media campaign for a dictatorship in Sri Lanka. Having previously postured as a supporter of democracy, Dewasiri is justifying his backing for a dictatorship by claiming it would be an inducement” for a democratic revolution.”

Dewasiri began his political career as a student radical in the mid-1980s and embraced postmodernism in the early 1990s. He is prominent as an opinion maker among academics, postmodernists, pseudo-lefts and sections of the media and has cultivated close relations with the Colombo political establishment. At the same time, Dewasiri openly opposes Marxism, socialism and the Russian Revolution.

In a Facebook comment, Dewasiri posed the rhetorical question: Why do we need [former defence secretary] Gotabhaya Rajapakse as next President [in Sri Lanka]?”

He then answered: The Sri Lankan democratic revolution would receive an inducement from a person who does not know an iota about democracy and, because of that, who does not hesitate to violate democracy, someone like Gota. Germany became democratic society, highly conscious about democratic values because Hitler came to power.”

The reference to Germany and the rise of the Nazis is telling as the Stalinist German Communist Party (KPD) employed the slogan After Hitler, our turn” to justify their passivity in the face of the danger posed by fascism. What emerged from Hitler’s coming to power, facilitated by the KPD’s splitting of the working class through its ultra-left denunciations of German Social Democracy, was not a turn to democracy but the systematic destruction of democratic rights and all workers’ organisations, and the opening of the road to war and the Holocaust that cost the lives of millions.

While Gotabhaya Rajapakse does not head a fascist movement, he is notorious for his wholesale abuse of democratic rights. An ex-colonel, he was installed as secretary of defence in December 2005 as his brother, former President Mahinda Rajapakse, resumed Colombo’s bloody communal war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

He is directly responsible for war crimes, including the massacre of tens of thousands in the final weeks of the conflict in 2009 and the activities of the military-backed death squads that carried out violent attacks, abductions and the murders of Tamils, political opponents and journalists. He also presided over the brutal crackdown on protests by workers and the poor, and would do so again if he came to power.

The only way of halting the drive towards dictatorship is through a political struggle to unify and mobilise the working class in a struggle for a workers’ and peasants’ government to implement a socialist program. However, just as Stalin and the KPD opposed the mobilisation of German workers, fearing it would trigger a movement of the Soviet working class, so Dewasiri is organically opposed to any fight for a socialist perspective by Sri Lankan workers.

Following up his initial comments, Dewasiri declared: Gota should be made president because he cannot be blocked.” He used an idiomatic term in Sinhala that means that one should kiss the hands of someone who one cannot defeat. He then blamed the Sri Lankan people who voted for the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) of Mahinda Rajapakse in local elections in February, falsely claiming that the tendency of the society [in Sri Lanka] is towards a dictatorship.”

In reality, the bulk of the vote for the SLPP was not support for the Rajapakses but a protest against the current right-wing national unity” government led by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. It was helped to power by various pseudo-left groups and NGOs such as Citizens’ Power and the National Moment of Social Justice (NMSJ) in which Dewasiri was a leader.

These groups all campaigned for Sirisena against Mahinda Rajapakse in the January 2015 presidential election claiming that he would usher in a new government that would provide good governance, democracy and reconciliation.” It was a blatant lie. Sirisena had been a minister in the Rajapakse government and is thus responsible for all its crimes. His chief ally—the United National Party of Ranil Wickremesinghe—has a long history of authoritarian rule.

The ousting of Rajapakse was a regime-change operation orchestrated from Washington on the basis of a bogus human rights” campaign. The US, which had backed Rajapakse in his brutal war against the LTTE, was not concerned about democratic rights but the ties that his government developed with China. But the US, and its stooges in Colombo, could not have pulled off the operation without the assistance of figures like Dewasiri who dressed up Sirisena and Wickremesinghe in democratic clothes.

Three years later, the warnings made by the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) have proven correct. The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government has ruthlessly implemented the austerity demands of the International Monetary Fund and has not hesitated to use the military and the police against the mounting opposition, protests and strikes by workers and the poor. These struggles have produced a major political crisis within the government, which was compounded by its humiliating defeat in the February local elections by Rajapakse’s SLPP.

The response of Dewasiri is symptomatic of a sharp shift to the right by the various middle-class groups that backed Sirisena and Wickremesinghe. Terrified by the emerging struggles of the working class, they are all backing police-state measures to crush any opposition.

Wickremabahu Karunaratne, leader of the pseudo-left Nava Sama Samaja Party (NSSP), is sticking by the government and calling on Prime Minister Wickremesinghe to use the police to silence his rivals. Karunaratne also supports the use of police against striking workers, who he has accused of being in cahoots with the Rajapakses.

Dewasiri has taken different track, throwing his lot in with Gotabhaya Rajapakse, who has issued a call for a strong leader” for Sri Lanka and is campaigning through his right-wing Viyath Maga movement to become the next president. He is backed by Sinhala chauvinist groups, along with sections of the military and big business elite, who are looking to him to crush the working class (see: Ex-Sri Lankan defence secretary calls for brutal big business regime”).

On June 20, Gotabhaya Rajapakse’s birthday, a top Buddhist prelate Vedaruvey Upali urged him: If they call you a Hitler, then be a Hitler and build this country.” The monk went on to declare that he should become even a military ruler,” in order to end the country’s instability. The reactionary Buddhist establishment is a major prop of capitalist rule in Sri Lanka and this leading monk is expressing the sentiments of sections of the bourgeoisie.

On the same day, Dewasiri displayed Gotabhaya Rajapakse’s photo with a beaming smile on his Facebook page and wished him happy birthday.” This obsequious greeting to an aspiring dictator makes clear that Dewasiri and the middle-class layers he represents are embracing Rajapakse, not because he believes that his victory will usher in a democratic revolution” in the future, but precisely the opposite. They hope that such a regime will viciously suppress the working class so as to maintain capitalist rule and their own privileged existence.

As the SEP alone has insisted all along, the only social force capable of defending basic democratic rights is the working class as an essential component of the political struggle for a workers’ and peasants’ government to implement socialist policies. It is this revolutionary perspective to which Dewasiri and his ilk are utterly opposed.

Why Western media rush to badmouth Belt and Road initiative

July 4th, 2018

Source:Global Times Published:2018/7/4 18:13:40

Sri Lanka’s debt problem is a hot topic nowadays. Western media outlets like the New York Times are keen to find fault with the China-proposed Belt and Road initiative (BRI).

This time the South Asian island nation is their target. They are full of gloat when declaring that Sri Lanka was trapped by the loan taken from China for the construction of a port.

They want to send a warning to countries which borrowed from China, forcing them to think about their ability to repay and speculating that defaulting nations will have to forego their land to China as compensation.

They are probably forgetting that China suffered the same problem at the beginning of the 21 century when short-term foreign loans reached 45 percent of the total external debt, above the internationally recognized red line of 40 percent.

Some foreign experts then took the same line as the New York Times, sending a warning to the world and even proclaiming that China’s development would soon meet its Waterloo.

When we look back at the debt problem China experienced in 2004, it appeared as only a brief interlude in the nation’s long symphony of modernization.

By the first half of 2003, the World Bank had lent $36.6 billion to 245 projects in China, making the country its largest and most reputable client. The bank’s lending played a significant role in China’s success, particularly in the development of remote areas.

China was confident of its ability to repay the debt – by sheer hard work and riding on its manufacturing prowess.

China’s experience of overcoming its debt problem has lessons for developing countries.

First, if the bank provides you with a loan, you have the liberty to act according to your ability, but remember, if you are not indebted, probably you wouldn’t want to work harder. Debt puts you under pressure, but is also an incentive. People without debt are not motivated to work harder. Not working harder magnifies the burden of the debt, even if it is small.

Second, infrastructure is of immense importance in the early stages of industrialization. China made full use of the money borrowed from the World Bank for the construction of first-class infrastructure which facilitated FDI to flood in and finally helped create a “world factory.”

When discussing the debt problem of China’s Belt and Road initiative, Western media deliberately overlooked China’s experience and misled the developing countries.

When the loan and the project become a hot political issue, it points at another danger where the situation turns chaotic and different parties join the melee. After this, no one knows how long it is before the situation improves.

India is an example. Everybody knows India suffers from extensive shortage of electricity, but when the power projects were caught up in red tape, there was no end to the wait.

If a nation only concentrates on how much it borrows rather than how to use the money to create new value efficiently, it will be hard to pay it back.

The difference between China and many other countries is when borrowing money, we think how we can pay back by hard work and making more money from the borrowed capital. Debt is not a problem, the problem is the unwillingness to work harder.

In the future, China will pay more attention to the solvency of the recipient countries, but at the same time, under the Belt and Road initiative, the cooperation will not stop at the construction of infrastructure. It will expand to the industrial parks in those countries.

The New York Times report is a reminder that China may need to start building some of the industrial parks and transfer the manufacturing industrial chain more quickly, which will create conditions for the borrower to repay the loan.

It is impossible to replicate the Chinese model in its entirety, but it is not impossible to learn from China’s experience.

The Belt and Road initiative is in its early stages, but the New York Times is in a hurry to come to conclusions.

Could you be a bit more patient, sir?

The author is a senior editor with People’s Daily, and currently a senior fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China. dinggang@globaltimes.com.cn. Follow him on Twitter @dinggangchina

Chinese State Media Attacks New York Times for Questioning ‘One Belt, One Road’

July 4th, 2018

breitbart.comChina’s state-run Global Times published an angry post against the New York Times (NYT) on Monday for a report critical of China’s immense One Belt, One Road” infrastructure project, specifically the controversy surrounding China’s lease on a port in Sri Lanka.

The NYT said on Tuesday that angry Sri Lankan lawmakers launched a social media campaign to discredit two local reporters who worked on the piece.

The New York Times report published on June 25 was entitled How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port.” The gist of the report was that China pumped a vast sum of money into the Hambantota Port Development Project despite years of failure – the port was only visited by 34 ships in 2012 even though it sits near a major shipping lane – and Sri Lanka’s obvious inability to repay the Chinese loans.

Three years after the Sri Lankan president who oversaw the port debacle left office, China called in its markers and pressured the new Sri Lankan government into surrendering the port and 15,000 acres of land to Beijing in a 99-year lease.

Hambantota Port might not have been a moneymaker for Sri Lanka, but it is very valuable to China given its close proximity to China’s rival India and its position on a strategic waterway. The Times portrayed the lease deal as a paramount example of Chinese debt imperialism, in which One Belt, One Road loans become the cheese in a string of debt mousetraps for smaller countries surrounding China’s sphere of influence.

The Times further alleged that China actively interferes in local politics to set and spring its debt traps, citing the suspicious amount of port construction money that flowed into the campaign of the Beijing-aligned former president, Mahinda Rajapaksa. China’s leverage over Sri Lanka did not dissipate with the port deal, either, even though a billion dollars in Sri Lankan debt was forgiven to grease the wheels for the deal. The lease agreement nominally forbids Chinese military activity at the Hambantota port, but Indian officials are highly skeptical that agreement will be honored, or that Sri Lankan officials are in a position to enforce it.

Outright land grabs are but the final stage of China’s debt imperialism, as the Times detailed:

The first major loan [the Sri Lankan Ports Authority] took on the project came from the Chinese government’s Export-Import Bank, or Exim, for $307 million. But to obtain the loan, Sri Lanka was required to accept Beijing’s preferred company, China Harbor, as the port’s builder, according to a United States Embassy cable from the time, leaked to WikiLeaks.

That is a typical demand of China for its projects around the world, rather than allowing an open bidding process. Across the region, Beijing’s government is lending out billions of dollars, being repaid at a premium to hire Chinese companies and thousands of Chinese workers, according to officials across the region.

There were other strings attached to the loan, as well, in a sign that China saw strategic value in the Hambantota port from the beginning.

Nihal Rodrigo, a former Sri Lankan foreign secretary and ambassador to China, said that discussions with Chinese officials at the time made it clear that intelligence sharing was an integral, if not public, part of the deal. In an interview with The Times, Mr. Rodrigo characterized the Chinese line as, We expect you to let us know who is coming and stopping here.”

China’s Global Times was livid, trashing the New York Times in an editorial on Monday that began by quoting China-friendly Sri Lankan officials, arguing that the NYT cherry-picked the worst available data (like the 34 ships that visited the port in 2012) to make the Hambantota project look transparently absurd, and claiming China was the only nation ready to step in with significant infrastructure aid after Sri Lanka emerged from its long civil war.

The Global Times built on that last point to defend One Belt, One Road as a humanitarian endeavor, contrasting it with the alleged callous selfishness of the West:

In the meantime, what have Western countries done? They play up the human rights issue to pressure the South Asian country that was plundered heavily by Portuguese, Dutch and British colonists during its nearly 450 years’ colonization. Last year the Trump administration even proposed to slash its aid to Sri Lanka by 92 percent, which was blocked by the US Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, citing the country’s geostrategic importance.”

As the world witnesses seriously imbalanced development, what is needed most now is not the blame game or a hands-off approach, but authentic investment and aid as well as cooperation. Unfortunately, when China offers such help, these countries do nothing but chime in quickly through biased lenses.

China has been exploring ways to better help other developing countries, such as the Belt and Road initiative. It is always open and welcome to the participation of developed countries toward common development. In this complicated process there are unavoidable problems. Simply exaggerating the problems while suspecting China’s intentions is counterproductive. Instead of the New York Times demonizing China’s efforts, isn’t it better if it explores how the US can participate in aiding impoverished countries?

The New York Times reported on Tuesday that lawmakers allied with former President Rajapaksa held a news conference to denounce Sri Lankan journalists Dharisha Bastians and Arthur Wamanan, accusing them of acting as paid character assassins working for the current governing party. These lawmakers built up to the press conference by running a social media campaign against Bastians and Wamana for several days.

Times international editor Michael Slackman denounced the campaign against the Sri Lankan reporters and said it is unacceptable for journalists to be intimidated in this way.”

This action appears intended to silence critics and curb press freedoms, and ultimately deprive Sri Lankans of information in the public interest,” said Slackman, adding a call for the Sri Lankan authorities to ensure the safety of the journalists.

The NYT noted that journalists were routinely beaten and killed” during Rajapaksa’s ten years in power, with 11 murders still unsolved. It also pointed out that contrary to the Sri Lankan and Chinese complaints about unfair reporting, Rajapaksa and his aides were contacted several times by the authors of the June 26 article on the Hambantota Port but refused to comment on the record. The Chinese embassy also did not respond to requests for comment before the article was published.

Former president Rajapaksa himself threatened on Monday to sue the New York Times for publishing the story. He denied the report’s allegations that he accepted Chinese financial assistance for his political campaign in 2015 and dismissed investigations by the current Sri Lankan government as partisan mud-slinging.

Chinese financing to MR: Govt should down play

July 4th, 2018

By Ranga Jayasuriya Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The recent story by New York Times that China Harbour Engineering Company financed the 2015 election campaign of ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa has caused ripples in politics. That they are only ripples and not tidal waves may imply a degree of political maturity of the government, unseen when it came to power in 2015 and suspended most of Chinese funded projects. That the government has so far reined in its ranks from pouncing upon MR and more importantly China, the largest bilateral lender, is also a somewhat departure from the usual Sri Lankan politics where no stone is un-turned to sling mud at the opponent.

According to the New York Times story by its South Asian correspondent Maria Abi-Habib, ‘at least $7.6 million was dispensed from China Harbour’s account at Standard Chartered Bank to affiliates of MR’s campaign, according to a document, seen by The Times, from an active internal government investigation.’ Abi-Habib alleges that the Chinese loans and inducements effectively created a debt trap and led Sri Lanka to handover the Hambantota port to Beijing on a 99-year lease.

Both MR and the Chinese embassy in Colombo have denied the allegation.

This story does not tell much, other than trying to substantiate the old story of growing Chinese tentacles in Sri Lanka, or for that matter in much of the developing world, via insidious means of predatory loans disguised as development assistance given to autocrats.


  • $ 7.6 mn dispensed from China Harbour A/c at SCB to affiliates of MR’s campaign 
  • Abi-Habib alleges the Chinese loans, inducements created debt trap and led SL to handover H’tota port to Beijing on a 99-year lease
  • MR and Chinese embassy in Colombo denied the allegation
  • China’s economic presence, will sooner or later seek to influence domestic politics

That is however a subjective call with subjective geopolitical connotations. In fact, empirical studies of Chinese financing and those of other international lenders such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank and other regional institutions reveal that their main borrowers are the same countries. For instance, data compiled by Deborah Brautingam and Jyhjong Hwang revealed, three out of top five recipients of Chinese and Word Bank development aid to Africa during 2000-2014 were the same. Same applies in South Asia, where countries such as Bangladesh, which is heavily tilting towards China for infrastructure loans, still have more outstanding loans to Japan than to China. Same has been true for Pakistan until the influx of CPEC loans and Sri Lanka until the loss of access to concessionary loans due to its elevation to the lower middle income status. Other studies have revealed that the long term benefits of  China’s infrastructure loans and those by multilateral lenders in Africa were largely similar.

However, Abi-Habib’s story is important for one reason. She cites ‘an active internal government investigation,’ which allegedly details the disbursement of financing from China Harbor’s accountat Standard Chartered Bank to affiliates of MR’s campaign. Now if such a document exists, the government has a responsibility to reveal it. If it believes doing so would strain relations with China, which it probably will, leaking it to New York Times was not also the most sensible option. My hunch of this document is that its substance is no different from the earlier claims of billions of dollars of stolen funds that the government said it has found in the bank accounts in Dubai. Yes, there may be documents, but, as the past has proved those are an assortment of numbers concocted by a figment of imagination. They are nonetheless good enough to assail your political opponent, and take a swipe at MR as he is plotting to make a political comeback .

But, such gambles however have their own foreign policy cost as we know from the previous experience of the politically motivated suspension of development projects, and their immediate and still felt residual effect on the country’s economy.

This narrative of implied sinister implication of China’s power has concocted a new terminology: sharp power, which are mechanizations adopted by authoritarian states to manipulate and intimidate political and social institutions by preying on the very democratic structures of these societies. Unlike soft power, i.e. the ability of states to affect others by attraction and persuasion rather than the hard power of coercion and payment, sharp power is a sinister form of power that, according to those at National Endowment for Democracy who coined the term, ‘pierces, penetrates, or perforates the political and information environments in the targeted countries.’

However, rather than the power sources that are being used-or even their intended objectives- it is the internal characteristics of the states that set apart sharp power from soft power. So when China allegedly bribes politicians, that is sharp power, when India does the same, that is perhaps , discursive power, when George Soros does it, it is something else.

And then it lumps together, all potential civilian and non-coercive sources of power resources of these supposed authoritarian states into sharp power.

Effectively,  Russia orchestrated fake news that swung elections, Chinese students in Australia, Chinese companies in the West, and probably Chinese scholarships given to government officials, all could well be termed as potential vehicles of sharp power.

Of course, internal characteristics of states can influence their foreign policy as democratic peace theorists- those who claim democracies do not fight wars against each other, partly because their leaders are restrained by their societies and that they also have other means to resolve problems – have argued.

However, sometimes, these broadsided narratives are also part of a strategy of de-legitimization of a rising power, and they fit the template of off- cited description of revisionist power that could be destabilizing for its neighbours and the world.

We are indeed living in the same world. However, given our social economic conditions, we do have priorities different from those of Australians or Americans. Countries should conduct their foreign policy to advance, first and foremost, their self- interest. That would mean, in navigating those real and imagined claims of Chinese mechanizations, Sri Lanka has to assess the larger implications on overall national interest.

We also need to be realistic. Given the scale of China’s economic presence, it will sooner or later seek to influence the domestic politics. On the other hand, China’s regime friendly relations with whoever in power also exposes it to the ire of the opposition parties.

China is not the only country to vie for influence, others too do so through their own agencies, defence attaches and other influence peddling vehicles. There again, the problem here is the murky election financing in Sri Lanka, which needs to be regulated.

However, mingling foreign policy with cut- throat domestic politics is a dangerous gamble.

This is good time to take a swipe at the Rajapaksas, but that could come at the expense of Sri Lanka’s ties with China, and by extension, our long term national imperatives. The government should desist its back-benchers from opening a can of worms.

Follow @RangaJayasuriya on twitter  

Interim order preventing proceedings of Avant-Garde case

July 4th, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The Appeal Court today issued an interim order staying the proceeding of the Avant-Garde case at the Colombo Magistrate’s Court, against former defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa and 8 other defendants until October 3, 2018.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress