පාලනයක් ඇතිව රට විවෘත කළත් කොරෝනා තර්ජනය තවම අවසන් වී නැහැ- විශේෂ සාකච්ඡාවේදී ජනපති කියයි(වීඩියෝ)

April 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

යම් පාලනයක් ඇතිව රට විවෘත කළත් කොරෝනා වෛරසයේ තර්ජනය තවම අවසන් වී නොමැති බව ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ ප්‍රකාශ කරනවා.

ඔහු මේ බව ප්‍රකාශ කළේ ජනාධිපති ප්‍රධාන උපදේශක ලලිත් වීරතුංග සමග කළ විශේෂ සාකච්ඡාවකදියි. හිරු ටී වී ඔස්සේ විකාශය වූ එම සාකච්ඡාවේදී ජනපති වැඩිදුරටත් පැවසුවේ තවත් රට වසා තැබීම කළ හැකිද යන්න බැරෑරුම් තීරණ ගැනීමට සිදුවූ බවයි.

ජනතාව අත විශාල වගකීමක් ඇති බවත්, ඔවුන්ගේ සහයෝගය අතිශය වැදගත් බවත් ජනපති සඳහන් කළා.

විදේශවල සිටින ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් ප්‍රමුඛතා අනුපිළිවෙළට මෙරටට ගෙන්වා ගන්නා බවද පැවසු ජනපති, මැතිවරණය ගැන සම්පූර්ණ  බලය තිබෙන්නේ ස්වාධින මැතිවරණ කොමිසමට බවද කියා සිටියා.

සම්පුර්ණ සාකච්ඡාව ඇතුළත් වීඩියෝව පහතින්

දිනක වැඩිම කොරෝනා ආසාදිතයින් අද වාර්තා වෙයි – කොළඹ – බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවතෙන් ආසාදිතයින් 32ක්

April 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

දිනක් තුළ මෙරටින් හමු වූ වැඩිම කොරෝනා ආසාදිතයින් ප්‍රමාණය අද වාර්තා වුණා. එම සංඛ්‍යාව මේ වන විට 32ක්.

වසංගත රෝග විද්‍යා අංශය නිකුත් කළ නවතම වාර්තාවට අනුව පෙරවරුවේ තහවුරු කර ගත් රෝගීන් 24 දෙනාට අමතරව අලූතින් ආසාදිතයින් 8 දෙනෙකු පස්වරුවේ සොයා ගෙන තිබෙනවා.

ඔවුන් ද කොළඹ – කෙසෙල්වත්ත – බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවතේ පදිංචිකරුවන් වීම විශේෂත්වයක්.

මේ සමඟම එම ප්‍රදේශයෙන් මේ දක්වා සොයා ගැනුණු රෝගීන් සංඛ්‍යාව 57 දක්වා ඉහළ ගියා.

බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවතෙන් පළමු කොරෝනා ආසාදිතයා වාර්තා වූයේ පසුගිය 15 වන දායි.

59 හැවිරිදි කාන්තාවක් වන ඇයට වෛරසය වැළදී ඇති බවට කොළඹ ජාතික රෝහලේදී තහවුරු වුණේ පවුලේ සමාජිකයින් සමග දඹදිව වන්දනාවේ ගොස් මෙරටට පැමිණ දින 33කට පමණ පසුවයි.

එදින සිට එම ප්‍රදේශයෙන් අඛණ්ඩව ආසාදිතයින් වාර්තා වන අතර, මේ දක්වා වාර්තා වන  රෝගීන්ට පූර්ව රෝග ලක්ෂණ නොපෙන්වීම ද විශේෂත්වයක්.

වෛද්‍යවරුන් සහ මහජන සෞඛ්‍ය පරීක්ෂකවරුන්ගේ මැදිහත්වීමෙන් ඊයේ සහ පෙරේදා මෙම ප්‍රදේශයේ පදිංචිකරුවන්ගෙන් ජෛව සාම්පල ලබාගෙන පරීක්ෂණ සඳහා යොමු කෙරුණා.

ඒ අනුවයි අද දිනයේ අලූතින් රෝගීන් තිස් දෙදෙනෙකු සොයා ගැනුණේ.

ඊයේ දිනයේ බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවත ප්‍රදේශයට සබඳතා ඇති දෙදෙනෙකුට ද කොරෝනා වෛරසය වැළදී ඇති බව තහවුරු වුණා.

ඉන් එක් අයෙකු, දඹදිව ගොස් පැමිණි කාන්තාවගේ ස්වාමි පුරුෂයා සේවය කරන ස්ථානයේ සේවකයෙකු වන අතර, ඔහු කොළඹ 12, ගෝමස් පටුමගේ පදිංචිකරුවෙක්. ග්‍රැන්ඞ්පාස් ප්‍රදේශයේ පදිංචි අනෙක් පුද්ගලයා කාන්තාවගේ පුත්‍රයෙකුගේ මිත්‍රයෙක්.

මේ අතර, ගෝමස් පටුමග සහ බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවත යන ප්‍රදේශ වල වෛද්‍ය පරීක්ෂණ සඳහා සම්බන්ධ වූ මහජන සෞඛ්‍ය පරීක්ෂකවරුන් ඇතුළු පුද්ගලයින් 50 දෙනෙකුගේ පමණ පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ ලබා ගැනීම අද සිදුකෙරුණා.

වැඩිම කොරෝනා ආසාදිතයින් සංඛ්‍යාව සොයා ගත් සෞඛ්‍ය වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරී කොට්ඨාශය වන්නේ ද බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවත පිහිටි මැදකොළඹ සෞඛ්‍ය වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරී කොට්ඨාශයයි. මීට පෙර වැඩිම ආසාදිතයින් ප්‍රමාණයක් වාර්තා වී තිබුණේ බේරුවල  සෞඛ්‍ය වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරී කොට්ඨාශයෙන් වන අතර එම සංඛ්‍යාව 36 ක්.

කොළඹ මහනගර සභාවේ ප්‍රධාන වෛද්‍ය නිළධාරී රුවන් විජේමුණි කියා සිටියේ බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවතේ අධික ජන ඝනත්වයක් පැවතීම ද වෛරසය ව්‍යාප්ත වීමට හේතුවන් වී ඇති බවයි.

මේ අතර, නීතිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සේවය කරන පෞද්ගලික ආරක්ෂක නිලධාරිනියකට කොරෝනා වෛරසය ආසාදනය වී ඇති බව තහවුරු කර ගැනීමත් සමඟ එම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව නැවත දැනුම්දෙනතුරු වසා තැබීමට තීරණය කර තිබෙනවා.

එම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සේවය නිරත පෞද්ගලික ආරක්ෂක සේවයේ නිලධාරින් සියලූදෙනාට දෛනික ආහාර වේල් සපයා ඇත්තේ බණ්ඩාරනායක මාවතේ පදිංචිකාරිනියක් වන ඇය විසින්.

අවට පවතින තත්ත්වය සලකා අලූත්කඬේ අධිකරණය විවෘත නොකිරීමට තීරණය කළ බව අධිකරණ අමාත්‍ය නිමල් සිරිපාල ද සිල්වා සදහන් කළා. එසේම, අලූත්කඬේ ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් අධිකරණය හමුවේ විභාග වන නඩු සියල්ල කොළඹ කොටුව මහේස්ත්‍රාත් අධිකරණය හමුවේ කැදවීමට පියවර ගන්නා බවයි ඔහු කියා සිටියේ

දිස්ත්‍රික්ක 4කට හැර අනෙකුත් දිස්ත්‍රික්කවලට අද 8ට යළිත් ඇඳිරි නීතිය

April 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

කොළඹ, ගම්පහ, කළුතර සහ පුත්තලම දිස්ත්‍රික්කවල හැර සෙසු දිස්ත්‍රික්කවලට ලිහිල් කෙරුණු ඇඳිරි නීතිය අද පස්වරු 8ට යළිත් පැනවීමට නියමිතයි.
එලෙස පැනවෙන ඇඳිරි නීතිය අප්‍රේල් 24 සිකුරාදා දක්වා ක්‍රියාත්මක වන්නේ රාත්‍රී අටේ සිට පසුදා අලූයම පහ දක්වා පමණක් බවයි ජනාධිපති මාධ්‍ය අංශය සඳහන් කළේ.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, මේ මස 25 වනදා සහ 26 වනදා සති අන්තයේදී මෙම දිස්ත්‍රික්කවල ද ඇඳිරි නීතිය අඛණ්ඩව ක්‍රියාත්මක කෙරෙනු ඇති.
ඒ අනුව 24 වනදා රාත්‍රී 8 ට පනවනු ලබන ඇදිරි නීතිය ඉවත් කරනු ලබන්නේ 27 වන සදුදා අලූයම 5 ටයි.

මේ අතර, කොළඹ, ගම්පහ, කළුතර සහ පුත්තලම යන දිස්ත්‍රික්කවලට අනිද්දා ඉවත් කිරීමට නියමිතව තිබූ ඇඳිරි නීතිය මේ මස 27 වන සඳුදා අලූයම 5 දක්වා යළි දීර්ඝ කර තිබෙනවා.

මීට අමතරව එම දිස්ත්‍රික්කවලට පිවිසීම සහ ඉන් පිටවීම සියළු දෙනාට සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම තහනම්  වන බවයි ජනාධිපති මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය වැඩිදුරටත් සඳහන් කළේ.

ඇඳිරි නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කාලය තුළ අත්‍යවශ්‍ය සේවා පවත්වාගෙන යාම සහ කෘෂිකාර්මික කටයුතු ආදිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් කළින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කළ කොන්දේසි සහ උපදෙස් නොවෙනස්ව පවතින බවද ජනාධිපති මාධ්‍ය අංශය ඇඳිරි නීතිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් නිකුත් කළ නවතම නිවේදනයේ සඳහන්.

ඇදිරි නීතිය කඩ කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් මේ වනවිට පුද්ගලයින් 34,183 දෙනෙකු අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන තිබෙනවා.

මේ අතර, අද ඇඳිරි නීතිය ඉවත් කෙරුණු ප්‍රදේශවල ජනතාව මීට පෙර අවස්ථාවල මෙන් නොව අද දිනයේ නගර වෙත පැමිණීමේ අඩුවක් දක්නට ලැබුණු බව හිරු වාර්තාකරුවන් සඳහන් කළා.

ඇතැම් ප්‍රදේශවල ජනතාව සෞඛ්‍යාරක්ෂිත ක්‍රමවේදයන් අනුගමනය කර තිබුණ ද ප්‍රදේශ රැසකින් වාර්තා වූයේ ආරක්ෂිත ක්‍රමවේදයන් අනුගමනය නොකොට සිය දෛනික අවශ්‍යතා ඉටු කර ගත් බවයි.

>ඇඳිරි නීතිය ඉවත් කරන ලද ප්‍රදේශවල බස් රථ සහ දුම්රිය සේවා ක්‍රියාත්මක වූ අතර සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍යාංශය ඊයේ දිනයේදී ඒ සඳහා විශේෂ උපදෙස් මාලාවක් ද නිකුත් කළා.

එහිදී ප්‍රවාහන බලධාරීන් සහ සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍යාංශය දැනුම් දුන්නේ මීටරයක පරතරය පවත්වාගෙන යමින් ප්‍රවාහන කටයුතු සිදුකරන ලෙසටයි.

එහෙත් එම උපදෙස් නොතකමින් මගීන් බස් රථවල ගමන් ගන්නා බවට ප්‍රදේශ රැසකින් තොරතුරු වාර්තා වුණා.

එවැනි අවස්ථාවලදී සෞඛ්‍ය බලධාරීන්, පොලීසිය හා එක්ව මගීන්ට සහ එම බස් රථ රියදුරන්ට අවවාද කළා.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, ඇඳිරි නීතිය ලිහිල් කළ ප්‍රදේශවල සෞඛ්‍ය උපදෙස් පිළිනොපදිමින් මගීන් ප්‍රවාහනය කරන සියලූ බස් රථ රියදුරන් සහ කොන්දොස්තරවරුන්ට එරෙහිව නීති මගින් කටයුතු කරන බව අමාත්‍ය මහින්ද අමරවීර පවසනවා.

හිරු ප්‍රවෘත්ති අංශයට අදහස් දක්වමින් ඔහු කියා සිටියේ එවැනි බස්රථ වල ධාවන බලපත්‍රය අහෝසි කිරීමට කටයුතු කරන බවයි.

එමෙන්ම, එළඹෙන බදාදා විවෘත කිරීමට නියමිතව තිබූ කොළඹ – කටුනායක අධිවේගී මාර්ගය එදින විවෘත නොකරන බව මාර්ග සංවර්ධන අධිකාරියේ සභාපති චමින්ද අතුලූවගේ පවසනවා. බස්නාහිර පළාතට ඇඳිරි නීතිය ඉවත් කිරීමේ දිනය දීර්ඝ කිරීමත් සමඟ මෙම තීරණයට එළඹුණු බවයි ඔහු සඳහන් කළේ.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, මීට පෙර දැනුම් දුන් පරිදි දක්ෂිණ අධිවේගී මාර්ගයේ කොට්ටාව – හම්බන්තොට දක්වා කොටස සෑම දිනකම පෙරවරු හතේ සිට රාත්‍රි 7 දක්වා විවෘතව පවතිනු ඇති.

කෙසේ නමුත් එය භාවිත කළ හැක්කේ ඇඳිරි නීති බලපත්‍ර දරන්නන් සහ අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය සේවාවල නිරත වන්නන්ට පමණක් බව ද ඔහු කියා සිටියා.

මේ අතර, සිල්ලරට මත්පැන් විකිණීම සඳහා වූ සුරාබදු බලපත්‍ර සහිත ස්ථාන, ඒ, ඒ ප්‍රදේශවල ඇඳිරි නීතිය ලිහිල් කරනු ලබන කාලසීමාවට යටත්ව නැවත විවෘත කිරීමට සුරාබදු දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ අනුමැතිය ඊයේ හිමි වුණා.

ඒ අනුව ඇතැම් ප්‍රදේශවල ජනතාව මත්පැන් මිලදී ගැනීම සඳහා පෝලිම්වල රැදී සිටි බවයි හිරු වාර්තාකරුවන් සඳහන් කළේ. විශේෂයෙන් මසකට ආසන්න කාලයක් වසා තිබී යළි විවෘත කෙරුණු වතුකරයේ මත්පැන් අලෙවිසැල් ඉදිරිපිට අද දින දිගු පෝලිම් දක්නට ලැබුනු අතර, ඇතැම් මත්පැන් අලෙවිසැල්වල මත්පැන් දහවල් වනවිට විකිණී අවසන් වී ඇති බවට ද වාර්තා වනවා.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, මධ්‍යසාර හා මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය තොරතුරු මධ්‍යස්ථානය නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් සඳහන් කළේ මේ මොහොතේ සුරාසල් විවෘත කිරීමට රජය ගත් තීන්දුව කිසිසේත් අනුමත කළ නොහැකි බවයි.

මේ අතර, කොළඹ, ගම්පහ, කළුතර සහ පුත්තලම දිස්ත්‍රික්කවල ඇදිරි නීතිය ලබන 27 වනදා දක්වා අඛන්ඩව ක්‍රියාත්මක වීම හේතුවෙන් කොළඹ කොටස් වෙළදපොල යළි විවෘත කිරීම කල් දමා තිබෙනවා.

ඒ අනුව එය ලබන 22 වනදා ගනුදෙනු සදහා යළි ආරම්භ නොවන බවයි කොටස් වෙළදපොල නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ප්‍රකාශ කළේ.

THE GENERAL ELECTION OF 1956 Part 2

April 19th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

REVISED 17.3.21

 In 1956, SWRD formed his last ‘party’ the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP). The MEP consisted of Sri Lanka Freedom Party led by SWRD, Viplavakari Lanka Sama Samaja Party (VLSSP) led by Philip Gunawardene,   the Samastha Lanka Sinhala Bhasha Peramuna led by W. Dahanayake and an ‘Independent Group.’ These were the four constituent parties mentioned in the MEP   program given in Daily News, March 8.1956.  ‘Bhasha Peramuna’ was an organization of Sinhalese teachers and literati who wanted Sinhala as state language.

These four parties were joined by the Uda Rata Peramuna led by TB Ilangaratne and TB Tennakoon, and K.M.P. Rajaratna’s Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna.  Two Tamil lawyers of the SLFP, A.C. Nadarajah, and S Thangarajah as well as ACS Hameed and Badiudeen Mahamud also joined the MEP. Mettananda, Kularatne and many other leading Buddhists supported the movement.

Eksath Bhikshu Peramuna  was formed in 1956.  It was led by Henpitagedara Gnanasiha, with Talpavila Wimalawansa, Mapitigama Buddharakhita, Hewanpola Ratanasara, Kotagama Vachissara, Bambarende Siri Sivali and Madihe Pannasiha. Eksath Bhikshu Peramuna was a major contributor to the success of the MEP at the 1956 General election.

Eksath Bhikshu Peramuna presented a programme of action to the MEP shortly before the 1956 elections. They wanted, inter alia, the implementation of the Buddhist Commission Report and Sinhala made the official language of the country. Ven. Yakkaduwe Pragnarama, Walpola Rahula, Ven. Baddegama Wimalawamsa, and Henpitigedera Gnanasiha of Ratnapura were foremost in this matter.

MEP issued its manifesto on March 1956. The four parties had agreed to the programme. This manifesto was published in Daily News of March 8.1956.

 The manifesto said, firstly that the MEP wanted the Constitution amended. The MEP objected to Dominion status. MEP wanted Ceylon to be a democratic Republic.  In foreign policy, MEP wanted Non-alignment and the immediate removal of   the two foreign bases in Sri Lanka. 

MEP supported the Buddhist Commission recommendations and wanted Buddhism given special recognition as the religion of the majority, but said ‘‘we guarantee the fullest freedom of worship to all. There shall be no discrimination on religious grounds.

Sinahla must be declared the sole Official language of the country, said MEP, but this will not involve the suppression of such minority languages as Tamil whose reasonable use will receive due recognition.

If MEP came to power there will be national planning .Key industries would be run by the state. Small industries by the private sector .There would be special emphasis on sugar, textiles, fisheries, salt and fertilizer industries. Foreign owned plantations, transport, banking and insurance companies will be progressively nationalized.  Trade and commerce would ‘go into Ceylonese hands’. Agriculture would be diversified to include cotton and sugar cane.  There was a vast extent of land still uncultivated.

Housing would be the responsibility of the central government. There would be village expansion schemes for the landless and colonization schemes where ownership of land will be vested in the farmer. MEP  wanted to set up  regional councils to help with local government. 

 MEP promised full employment with satisfactory wages and conditions of service, without discrimination on the  grounds of  language. Full trade union rights will be given to all workers, also fundamental rights such as 8 hour working day, guaranteed minimum wage and pension or provident fund schemes. Full trade union rights  to public servants too.  MEP would introduce health and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. Cost of living would be lowered by reducing the price of necessities like rice and sugar.

We shall repeal the Public Security Ordinance, Police amendment Act, Trade Union Amendment  Act and all undemocratic public service regulations and similar restrictions and invasions of public and personal rights, particularly those affective the freedom of Association, assembly and speech, said MEP. Lastly, MEP would complete without delay the new Town of  Anuradhapura, see to the preservation of the ancient city of Anuradhapura as well as other ancient cities and monuments.

Sudath Gunasekera recalled that the first public meeting of the MEP held at Ananda College, SWRD with Philip Gunawardene, Iriyagolla and others vowed to implement the recommendation of the Buddha Sasana committee. As a schoolboy of 17, I attended the meeting and saw SWRD and his team sat on the floor of the stage in front of the Maha Sangha said they would implement the recommendation of the committee if they came to power. This as the historic meeting at which the MEP for the first time received the acceptance of the people. 

The General election of 1956 was announced. The UNP had enough money, the backing of the bureaucracy and had won two by-elections just before 1956. UNP confidently dissolved Parliament early. The UNP foolishly brought forward the gen election date from 1957 to April 1956, which was    Buddha Jayanti year.

The fledgling MEP negotiated a no contest pact with LSSP and CP  and launched into election work. Marxist parties  were so anxious to defeat the UNP that they gave their support to the MEP. SWRD had no candidates and no funds for the election, no affluent patrons or mudalalis, observed Meegama. SWRD had gone to the Bank of Ceylon to ask for a loan but the General Manager would not see him and he had to go home empty handed. General Manager was Chelliah Loganathan.

SWRD mortgaged his properties to pay for election expenses of his candidate since most of them had no money to spend on an election. B.H. Aluvihare deserted MEP just before the election and SWRD nominated Nimal Karunatilleke who had no contacts in Matale, but he won handsomely. In Anuradhapura Sirimevan Godage, an Office assistant contested PB Bulankulame.

SWRD had some of the best Sinhala orators and writers on his side, such as Somaweera Chandrasiri, a brilliant Sinhala scholar and poet.  He was a fine orator, clever at coining words, and could compose Sinhala verse on the spot. He was a fine addition to MEP, said Meegama.

But the election swung decisively to MEP only when the bhikkhus came out in support. UNP had managed to anger the Buddhists, by its statements and actions.  The Buddhists had asked that the election be held after the Buddha Jayanti. But government  did not agree. The Lake House newspaper group had ridiculed the Buddhist Commission report and the monks who were campaigning for it. This had angered the Sangha and the Buddhist public too. From the poorest house to the richest Bhikkhu was treated with the greatest veneration.

 Sangha sabhas actively came out in favour of MEP and everywhere the saffron robe   was seen in vehicles flying the blue and red flag of the MEP. In many areas monks went house to house campaign urging support for SWRD. 

The night before the 1956 election, Ratnapura town saw on the hill above the road to Potgul vihara, a row of lanterns moving as in a perahera. It was Ven.Henpitigedera and his supporters going from house to house in the distant villages on the hill asking people to vote for the hand symbol of MEP.

SWRD was never considered a winner.  He had no proper candidates and the MEP coalition lacked financial resources. Meegama says SWRD has arrived to speak at meeting organized by his supporters at the University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, the audience was very small.

Only the Lankadeepa” newspaper, edited by DB Dhanapala supported the MEP, said Meegama. Lankadeepa ran MEP speeches and   gave news of MEP meetings.90% of its editorial staff were sympathetic to the anti UNP movement.  It had some young Turks  who were to become famous in the future, such as  Karunasena Jayalath   and   Nimal Karunatilleke.  Lankadeepa showed a staggering 61.7% increase in circulation  in the run up to the election. No other newspaper could match this.

Lankadeepa played a key role in the UNP years to keep the issues that were  stirring the people in the limelight. The paper gave publicity to the  demand for switch over to Sinhala, rightful place for Buddhism, simple living, liberation from servility to degrading foreign customs,  and liberation of people from capitalism. Lankadeepa gave sizzling editorials just before the election. 

Now I know why, in my home, in the 1950s, when everybody else down the street was reading the Dinamina, ‘Lankadeepa’ arrived every day. It had a cartoon by Motagedera Wanigaratne on the front page. That is all I can remember now.

But the MEP gained support as the campaign went on. The MEP was supported by the Pancha maha Balavegaya,” sangha, veda, guru, govi, kamkaru.  It  would be observed that there is no ‘lipikaru’ in the Balavegaya.

 At the election meetings Philip was wanted everywhere for his thunderous denunciation of UNP. In the last day of the campaign there were scenes verging on hysteria. When SWRD came to   Kandy, he could hardly be heard, there was cheering and shouting. People were rushing to touch him. Such were the emotions.

The general election of 1956 was spread out for 3 days. A staggered poll was held to help the UNP. The first day the elections were held in key UNP electorates and the rest on the next two days. UNP only secured the 8 seats they won on the first day.  UNP lost all seats on the 2nd and 3 days. in this election for the first time symbols were allotted. Later the SLFP introduced the one day poll. 

 I.D.S.Weerawardana remarked that the electorate displayed a surprising maturity. The electorate voted clearly for the party and not for individuals. Voter turnout was 69% which was considered good for that period of time, said Weerawardene.  It is considered good even today, in most countries. Bradman Weerakoon said that unlike in the previous elections which had resulted in many electoral challenges, there had been few instances of bribery, violence or impersonation in this election.

 P.A. Samaraweera observed ‘people took all the money lavishly given by rich UNP politicians, wore the green bush shirts given by them, took the lunch packets, went to the polling booth and voted for the MEP.’ It was said later that they would have voted for even a polpiththa.

DRO of Kalagam Palatha in Anuradhapura district had asked an elderly lady how she had voted. She said Mudalali of our village is Christian. He gave each of us Rs.  10, bread and tea and led us to the school. He said we should mark a cross in front of the elephant and put in the box. I could not go against my religion so I voted for the Sri Hasthaya symbol.

MEP coalition at the start looked impractical and unlikely. 60facing a solid UNP phalanx of 76 many of them sitting members. Yet MEP had a landslide victory. The momentum was unstoppable. Result left us speechless, recalled Bradman Weerakoon.

The first result was Matale at 10 pm .Nimal had won with a majority of 2500. Lankadeepa office was jubilant as he had written for it since its inception. Dhanapala said ‘now that Nimal has won, victory is certain for Bandaranaike.’ The MEP won 51 out of the 60 seats it contested.  43 of them were won by the SLFP.  UNP got 8 seats.

MEP got 1,046 277 votes and 39.5% of the votes cast. LSSP came second with 274,204 and 21    seats. Third was Federal Party with 142,758, 5.4 % and 10 seats.  The ranking of a separatist party in third position in this historic election is significant and should be noted. On a mere 5.4% they got 10 seats.

The results of the general election were a surprise even to the victors. It baffled even the architects of its victory. The ignominious defeat of UNP was also a surprise, said analysts. But there w as a sense of freedom and liberation in the air among students, peasants, urban workers and the intelligentsia. It was a time of great happiness, said Meegama.  It was Ape aanduwa.”

I still recall the excitement of listening to the election results,   hearing the words Mahajana Eksath Peramuna spoken over and over again,  very dramatically by an announcer, who could not keep his delight out of his voice. The words ‘Mahajana Eksath Peramuna” has a lilt to it and that added to the impact.

The Mahajana Eksath Peramuna MPs, took their oaths in national costume at the request of the Maha Sangha.  On 20.4. 56 when Parliament had finished its business, the public invaded the chamber. SWRD, as Prime Minister said ‘let them in.’ This should be applauded. This was a once in a lifetime experience for the island and SWRD realized this.

However, a shocked observer reported ‘ the people came like a horde of wild horses ,not only that day into the Chamber of the country’s supreme legislature but for days and weeks  and months after that to the other citadels of the government .’

 In 1962, one of the officers   involved in the attempted coup, gave as a reason for his animosity to SWRD, that when he was trying to prevent people rushing to the Parliament chamber after the “ape aanduwa” victory in 1956, SWRD’s order to him, was Let them come in.”  

The General Election of 1956 was a watershed in the modern history of Sri Lanka, said I.D.S. Weerawardena.It changed the political landscape, said Meegama. 1956 was a major landmark in Sri Lanka, said Wiswa Warnapala. The common man for the first time understood that he could change the government of the country peacefully, through ballot. (Continued)

පාත් ෆයින්ඩර් මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ ට්‍රෝජන් අශ්‌වයෙක්ද?

April 19th, 2020

චන්ද්‍රසිරි විජයවික්‍රම, LL.B., Ph.D.

මෙහි පහතින් දැක්‌වෙන්නේ මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ ගැන අන්තර්‌ජාල විකිපීඩියාවේ සඳහන් වා‌ර්‌තාවකි. මෙහි ඇත්ත-නැත්ත මම නොදනිමි. එහෙත් ගින්නක් නැතුව දුමක් නඟින්නේද නැත. ඒ කාලයේ තමන්ට එල්ලවූ අල්ලස්-දූෂණ චෝදනා වෙනුවට අද රටේ විශාල ඩොලර් බලයක් සහිතව මහ ඉහළින් වැජඹෙන මිලින්ද ගෙන් ප්‍රවේශම් වන ලෙස හාමුදුරුවරු වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුවට ප්‍රසිද්‌ධියේම අනතුරු ඇඟවීමක් කලේය. නිදහස් සංවාද වැඩබිමේ චපා බණ්ඩාර විසින් මිලින්දව සළකන්නේ මිලේනියම් උගුලේ ඔත්තුකරුවෙකු ලෙසය. මෙහි පහතින් ඇති ඇමෙරිකන් තානාපති කාර්යාලයේ රහස් කේබල් පණිවුඩය අනුව මිලින්ද නියමම, කදිම ඇමෙරිකන් ඒජන්ත කෙනෙක් බවට විවාදයක් නැත. මිලින්ද ගැන තොරතුරු රට වැසියාට පෙන්වාදීමට වගකීමක්, යුතුකමක් ඒ ගැන යමක් දන්නා අයට ඇත. මිලින්දට කරුණු පැහැදිලි කිරීමට අචස්‌ථාවක් ලැබෙන්නේද මෙසේ ඔහු ගැන ලිව්වොත් පමණය.

ඇමෙරිකාව ඒජන්තලා සොයා ගන්නා ආකාරය විෂ්මය දණවයි. එය ඔවුන්ගේ දක්‍ෂතාවයයි. උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් 2010 රොබට් බ්ලේක් ගෙනා සරත් ෆොන්සේකා වෙනුවට 2019 දී හදිසියේම කඩාවැටුන මහේෂ් සේනානායක, ඇමෙරිකන් තානාපතිනියගේ ඉත්තෙක් බව දැනගන්නට ලැබුණේ චන්දයෙන් පසු මහේෂ් ඇමෙරිකා යුද කඳවුරක පරණ රක්‍ෂාවට පලාගිය පසුවය. සර්වෝදයේ වින්ද්‍යා ආරියරත්න හා තවත් ඉංජිනේරුවෙක් සමඟ මහේෂ් තානාපතිනිය මුණ ගැසී තුන්වන බලවේගයක් වශයෙන් නොමිනේෂන් දුන්නේය. සිදුවූයේ ඒ නිසා ගොඨාභයගේ චන්ද කැඩීයාම නොව තව තවත් වැඩිවීමය!

මිලින්ද උපන්නේ ඇමෙරිකාවේය. මිලින්ද විවාහ වුනේ ඇමෙරිකන් කාන්තාවක් සමඟය. ඒ කාලයේ කතාව වුනේ ඇය ජනාධිපති බුෂ් පවුලටද දුරින් සම්බන්‌ධ කෙකෙන් යනුය. මිලින්ද සුරතලෙක්‌ වූයේ ඇමෙරිකන් රිපබ්ලිකන් පක්‍ෂයේ සෙනේට් සභිකයින් අතරය. ඔහු ප්‍රසිද්‌ධකල, විත් අ වෝම් හාර්ට්, අ කූල් හෙඩ් ඇන්ඩ් අ ඩීප් බ්‍රෙත්, නම් ලිපි එකතුවට (2003) පෙරවදනක් ලිව්වේ 2008 ජනාධිපති අපේක්‍ෂක‌වූ ජෝන් මැකේන්‌ය. සරත් ෆොන්සේකාට, රොබට් බ්ලේක් හෝ මාදුළුවාවේ සෝභිත හිමියන්ට මිචෙල් සෙසන් හෝ රංජන් රාමනායකට ඇලිනා ටෙප්ලිස් හෝ මෙන් නොව මෙවැනි මිලින්දගේ සම්බන්‌ධකම් හොඳින් අක් මුල් සහිතය. උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් සමන්තා පවර්ස්ගේ මුද්ද ඉම්බ මංගල සමරවීරව, ඇමෙරිකන් රහස් සංදේශයේ සඳහන් කර තිබෙන්නේ ජෝකර් කෙනෙක් කියාය.

බිම් බෝම්බ ඉවත් කිරීමේ, පාත් ෆයින්ඩර් ක්‍රියාවෙන්, ලංකාව හැදීමේ පාත් ෆයින්ඩර් කමට මිලින්ද ඉබේම පාත් විය. මිලින්ද හා කෙළින්ම සම්බන්‌ධ දෙන්නෙක්ම (ජෙනරාල් දයා රත්නායක හා අද්මිරාල් මහාචාර්ය ජයන්ත් කොළඹගේ) ගෝඨාභය පාලනයේ ඉහළම තනතුරු දෙකක් දරණ බව චාපා බණ්ඩාර එලිකලේය. හාමුදුරුවරු එකනමක් වත් (ඔහුගේ සංවිධානයේ පඩි ලබන?) මිලින්දට ස්ත්‍රොත්‍ර ගායනා කලත් (ලිට්‍රෝ ගෑස් සල්ලි ලබාගෙන දඹරාවේ අමිල හිමි යහපාලන වේදිකාවේ සිවුර ගැලවෙන තරමට යකා නැටුවා මතකද), 2019 නොවැම්බර් 18 දා ගෝඨාභය දිනවා රටේ හාමුදුරුවරුන් කල විප්ලවය බකල් කිරීමට, මිලේනියම් හුටපටය කෙසේ හෝ රටට රිංගවීමට ඇමෙරිකාව ගන්නා නොනවතින උත්සාහයට ජනාධිපති අසුවේද යන සාධාරණ බියක් රටේ සිංහල බෞද්‌ධයින්ට ඇත. මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා නම් දැන් නැතත්, අතීතයේ නම් හොඳ මිලින්ද වාදියෙකි.

මිලින්දගැන ඇති බියට හේතුව නම් ඔහුගේ අතීත හා වත්මන් ක්‍රියා යුරෝපය උතුම්‌ය යන ආකෘතිය මත පදනම්‌ව තිබීමය. ඔහු යෝජනා කරණ පාත් එක (ප්‍රතික‌ර්‍ම) ලෝක බැංකු පාරය. කොරෝනාවට පෙර තිබූ දුප්පත් රටවල් සූරා කෑ කොම්පැනි ධනවාදයට, මොන අන්‌දමින් හෝ පැලැස්තර දමා කොරෝනාවට පසු ලෝකයේ ඒවා දිගටම ගෙන යාමේ ඇමෙරිකන් ප්ලෑනට අඩතැබීම මිලින්දගේ අළුත් ප්‍රොජෙක්ට් එකේ අරමුණ බව පැහැදිලි වන්නේ, දැන් ඒ අළුත් උපක්‍රමය සඳහා ඔහු පත් කල 20 දෙනාගේ කොමිටියේ සාමාජිකයින්ගේ වතගොත සොයා බලන විටය. ඉන් බොහෝ දෙනෙක් යහපාලන කාලයේ රනිල්-මංගල-මලික්-රවි ගැත්තන්‌ විය. මේ අය ඇල්ලේ ගුණවංශ හාමුදුරුවන් කියන බුදු අම්මෝ අයද්, ඕ මයි ගෝඩ් අයද? පැහැදිලි එකම දේ නම් රටේ සිංහල බෞද්‌ධයින් වෙනුවෙන් ප්‍රසිද්‌ධියේ කතාකරණ එක් අයෙක්‌වත් මිලින්දගේ කොමිටිවල නොසිටීමය. එවැනි සුදුස්සන් නැද්ද, එවැනි අය ආරාධනාව ප්‍රතික්‍ෂේප කලාද,එසේත් නැත්නම් එවැනි අයවළුන් මේ වැදගත් කොමිටිවලට සහභාගි කරගන්නවාට විරුද්‌ධ බලවේගයක් යටින් තිබෙනවාද?

උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් සංවර්‍ධනය සඳහා, නාස්තිය, කුණු කසළ හා වස-විස කළමනාකරණය පිළිඹදව ධර්‌මපාල පරපුරේ නිර්‌මාතෘ ඉඳුරාගාරේ ධම්මරතන හිමිඳුන් හා, අතුරැලියේ රතන, බොදු බල සේනාවේ ඥානසාර යන හාමුදුරුවරුන් ඉදිරිපත් කරණ පාත් එකට මිලින්දගේ පාත් එකේ ඉඩක් තිබේද? ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය ගැන මිලින්දගේ අදහස කුමක්ද? රට යායුතු මෙග ව්‍යාපෘති පාරේද, නැත්නම් කර්‌ක් පැට්‍රික් සේල් ගේ හියුමන් ස්කේල් නම් පරිසරවාදී තිරසර සංවර්‌ධන පාරේද? මේ සියල්ලටම වඩා වැදගත් වන්නේ මිලින්ද, ජනාධිපතිට දෙන සංදේශ ප්‍රසිද්‌ධ නොකරන්නේ මන්ද යන කරුණය. ඒවා රහස් ලියවිලි වන්නේ මොන ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රය යටතේද?

තවද මිලින්දගේ ඩී.එන්.ඒ (ජාන) වල මහාවංශ විරෝධී අංශු තිබිය හැකිය. ඔහුගේ සීයාගේ පියා රෙස්ට්‌හවුස් කීපර් කෙනෙකුගේ පුතෙකි. මේ පුතා (එන්. යූ. ජයවර්‌ධන) ඉගෙනගෙන අන්තිමේදී මහ බැංකුවේ අධිපති විය. ජේ. ආර්.මුදල් ඇමතිව සිටියදී නීති විරෝධි වැඩක් කරණ ලෙස ඔහුට කල ඉල්ලීම ඔහු ප්‍රතික්‍ෂේප කලේය (සර් ජෝන්ට එංගලන්තයේ වත්තක් ගන්නට විදේශ විනිමය දීමට). මේ නිසා ඔහුගේ රක්‍ෂාව අහිමි කලේය. ඔහු ලුනාව දේවාලයේ භාරයක් වෙමින් දේවාල මිදුල දිනපතාම අතුගෑවේය. පසුව බණ්ඩාරනායක අගමැති ඔහුව එම බොරු අල්ලස් චෝදනාවෙන් නිදොස් කලේය.

එහෙත් මේ දක්‍ෂ, අවංක සීයාගේ පුතා (ලාල්) හා ලේලි (විශාඛා කුමාරි සොයිසා) යුවල රට කැඩීමේ ඊළම් ව්‍යාපාරයට වක්‍රව හෝ දායක විය. තම්බයියාගේ (බොරු කරණාද ඇතුලත්) බුඩිසම් බිට්‍රේයිඩ් (1992) යන පොතේ පිටකවරයට තරුණ මාදුළුවාවේ සෝභිත හිමියන්ගේ යක්‍ෂාරූඪ වූවා වැනි පින්තූරය සැපයූවේ සුදු මවක් සමඟ එංගලන්තයේ හැදී වැඩුණු මේ විශාඛා තොමෝය. සමහරු හිතුවේ ආනන්ද තිස්ස ද අල්විස් ගේ නම මෙන් මැයද ඇගේ නම අනුව හොඳ සිංහල බෞද්‌ධ උපාසිකාවක් කියාය! බෞද්‌ධයින් කුහකයින්‌ය යන ලේබල් එක ගෙනා ආ ඈ උග්‍ර මාක්ස්වාදියෙකි (ඒ පොත ලංකාවේ තහනම් කිරීමට මේ පින්තූරයද හේතුවක් විය. ගණනාත් ඔබේසේකරලා පොත තහනම් කිරීමට විරුද්‌ධ ලිපි ලියුවේය). ලාල්, ඊට යූ. එන්. ඕ. සරසවියේ වයිඩර් ආයතනය හරහා අරමුදල් සපයා, දිග පෙරවදනක්‌ද ලිව්වේය.

ඇන්.යූ. ජයවර්‌ධනගේ දුවගේ සැමියා, පින්තු මොරගොඩ (මිලින්දගේ පියා) ලෝක වාර්‌තාවක්ද තැබු අයෙකි. ගුණපාල මලලසේකර මහතා යූ.එන්.ඕ. සභාපති ධූරයට චන්දය ඉල්ලූ අවස්ථාවේදී එවකට එහි සේවය කල පින්තු, මලලසේකරට චන්දය දෙන ලෙස ඉල්ලා, ඔහුට පක්‍ෂ යයි සිතූ රටවලට යැවීමට පිලියෙල කල සංදේශය, මලලසේකරට විරුද්‌ධව චන්දය දේය සිතූ රටවලට යවා, මලලසේකරට පක්‍ෂව චන්දය දේයයි සිතූ රටවලට, ඔහුට විරුද්‌ධව චන්දය දේ යයි සිතූ රටවලට යැවීමට පිලියෙල කල අනිත්, වෙනස් සංදේශය යැව්වේය! මෙසේ පින්තු සිදුකල බරපතල අකරතැබ්බය අත්වැරදීමක්ද නැද්ද යන්න ගැන මලලසේකර මහතා සිතුවේ කුමක්දැයි අපි නොදනිමු. දිණන්නට සිටි මලලසේකර පැරදුණේය. පින්තෝ තවමත් ජීවත්‌ව සිටින නිසා ඔහුට අවංකව මෙය පැහැදිලි කල හැකිය. යූ.එන්.ඕ. වනාහි ලෝක හොර ගුහාවකි. යම් රහසක් කතාකරන්න ඕනෑ නම් ඒ සඳහා බිල්ඩිමෙන් ඉවත්‌ව මිදුලට එන්නේ චරපුරුෂ සේවය ඒතරමටම උග්‍ර නිසාය!

Political career of Milinda Moragoda

United National Party
During his political career of almost 10 years, Moragoda has worked in a number of key areas. He was a principal Government negotiators in the peace talks of 2002–2004. He was Minister of Economic Reform. He also gave leadership to the development and implementation of Sri Lanka’s ICT policy, E-Sri Lanka.
Moragoda was first entered to Parliament as a National List Member in 2000 with the United National Party (UNP) and was re-elected in 2001 and in 2004 from the Colombo District.[6]

Sri Lanka Freedom Party
Upon crossing over the government Moragoda was appointed as the Minister of Tourism by President Mahinda Rajapaksa. During his tenure, he was able to successfully implement the Tourism Act of 2001. In July 2009 he was appointed as Minister of Justice and Law Reform. Even though he sat and voted with the government, he remained a member of the opposition UNP until 2010 when he started the Sri Lanka National Congress (SLNC). The SLNC was disbanded in 2011 when Milinda joined the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, the main party of UPFA led by President Mahinda Rajapaksa. In the 2010 general election he lost his parliamentary seat.

In 2011 he became the UPFA’s mayoral candidate in the October 2011 municipal election in Colombo. He was elected to Colombo Municipal Council, becoming its opposition leader.

Allegations of Corruption
In 2007 Moragoda’s party was in the opposition having lost the 2005 elections to the UPFA. As the UPFA Government sought to expose corruption during the UNP regime the Parliamentary Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) released a report accusing Moragoda of widespread corruption and abuse of power.
Mercantile Credit Ltd, a subsidiary of Mercantile Merchant Bank, founded by Moragoda was found to defaulted on loans of 4.7 Billion Rupees (which had been obtained by providing false information) while Moragoda was Minister for Economic Reform. COPE conducted three inquiries into these loans and their defaulting but on each occasion the investigations were never allowed to reach the final stages due to political pressure.
In 2002 Lanka Marine Service (Pvt) Limited owned by state-owned Ceylon Petroleum Corporation which sat on an 8.5-acre plot in the Colombo harbour was sold to the Sri Lankan conglomerate John Keells Holdings. The Supreme Court ruled that as then PERC chairman, Dr. P.B. Jayasundara and Executive Director of JKH Susantha Ratnayake had acted with dishonest intent in the sale of LMSL shares. The Bribery Commission also began investigations into criminal charges against Dr. Jayasundara, former Ministers Milinda Moragoda (PERC was under him) and Karu Jayasuriya (CPC was under him) on the charge of abusing public property in connection with this deal.
Before the investigation could reach conclude both Moragoda and Jayasriya crossed over to the government. Reporting on the privatisation of Lanka Marine Service COPE stated that by his actions Moragoda had at the very least incurred a loss of 1.7 Bn rupees for the government.

The COPE report also alleged severe irregularities in the privatisation of Sri Lanka Insurance which happened under the tenure of Moragoda. The report stated that Moragoda created a loss of over 3 Bn Rupees for the government solely through non-compliance with the 4th term of the contract. These investigations too were not concluded before Moragoda crossed over to the government.

Links to the USA
US Embassy cables released by WikiLeaks show Moragoda to be a long time information source of the US Embassy in Colombo. The cables also state the US Government’s interest in Moragoda as their key partner in Sri Lanka. Writing to Washington in 2003, then US Ambassador to Sri Lanka Ashley Wills says of Moragoda:

[Regarding] the U.S., the intelligent, articulate Moragoda is a perfect fit. born in Washington, D.C, he is a dual national Amcit (please protect) married to an American, with plenty of Washington connections, many from his days as a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation and at Harvard. A “big picture” person, Moragoda is also highly aware that the U.S. is the most powerful country in the world, and he feels that it is better that Sri Lanka recognize that fact and work within it.

Other work
Moragoda has served as a member of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, which was co-chaired by Madeleine Albright and Hernando de Soto.
He has founded a number of non-profit organisations. Among them is the Milinda Moragoda Institute for People’s Empowerment, under whose aegis operates a humanitarian de-mining programme in the North and East which has been in operation since 2002 and Apeksha, a free English Education Programme for children of low income families.

Honors….

BULLETS, NEUTRON BOMBS Vs COVID-19

April 19th, 2020

Engr. Kanthar Balanathan, Australia

DipEE (UK), GradCert(Rel-Eng-Monash), DipBus&Adm(Finance-Massey), CEng. MIEE(UK) Former Specialist Engineer Power & Control NRG-GPS, Australia

Planet earth underwent two world wars, because of four or more psychiatric patients (leaders) who wanted to show their muscle strength. Still, the egoism and the shortfalls in perception with a weak mind of a few leaders who were driven into a mental state wanted to show their strength or maybe wanted to liquidate their old weapons to replace with new state of the art automatic weapons. Mankind has experienced a few wars within the last century; Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, SriLanka, South America, and the current devastating, destructive and dreadful killing in Syria. Why were these wars fought for decades? It may be difficult for humans to assess whether the reason is: power, wealth, superiority, or eliminate a certain race from the face of this earth?

The planet administrations have a common body known as the UN. Quote: The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization that aims to maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, achieve international cooperation, and be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations; Ref: https://www.un.org/en/

There are several other UN bodies to address the various areas/divisions. Quote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_organizations.The United Nations (UN) is an organization between countries established on 24 October 1945 to promote international cooperation. It was founded to replace the League of Nations following World War II and to prevent another conflict. When it was founded, the UN had 51 Member States; there are now 193. The UN is funded primarily by member countries. The United States remains the largest donor to the United Nations, contributing more than $10 billion in 2017, roughly one-fifth of the body’s collective budget.

Under the contribution, USA makes maybe it gains dominance in the indirect governance of the UN.

Who was dominating these organisations? No doubt, it’s the USA. E.g. WHO ‘s responsibility is to promote the mental and physical health of humanity. Just a question? To what extent have they achieved in promoting the mental health of people and state leaders? Second question? Can people assume that WHO operates with little or no fraud, well to state kickbacks”? What is the operating transparency, clarity, cleanliness of these organisations, which is; non-partisan policy, nepotism, ideology alliances etc. e.g. a common man in Nigeria may not know about the UN and the other orgs and their functions? Even when they query, their government will shut them down.

With the UN and other orgs in place, countries carry on doing their research to develop modern weapons to kill more people in a short time. Production increased to maximise productivity for local consumption and sale to their friendly countries. In 1960 a modern weapon was produced to fire one million bullets per minute. Quote Ref; https://www.businessinsider.com/worlds-fastest-gun-2016-2?IR=T

Quote: (i) The highest rate of fire for a machine gun in service is the M134 Minigun. The weapon was designed in the late 1960s for helicopters and armoured vehicles. It fires 7.62 mm calibre rounds at a blistering rate of 6,000 rounds per minute, or 100 rounds per second — about ten times that of an ordinary machine gun, according to the Guinness Book.

(ii) The Metal Storm gun, on the other hand, makes the M134 look like a toy. The prototype gun system was rated at 16,000 rounds per second or 1,000,000 rounds per minute. The gun system was developed by an Australian weapons company of the same name. In 2007, Metal Storm Inc. started delivering its gun systems to the US Navy for surface ships. This video shows how the Metal Storm gun achieves its head-spinning firing rate.

(iii) Bombers, aircraft careers, Drones, Nuclear submarines, Tanks, and so on are not be forgotten.

With the ‘x’ number of orgs to maintain and achieve peace on this planet (åUN-orgs) do the humans need such fast-acting guns which can kill more people within a short time? Time for humans to shift to the thinking mode.

Purpose of maintaining a body known as UN and the branch orgs is questionable if they cannot control the eruption of war, whether nuclear or WMD. Today the Syrian people are suffering because of the avidity of some warmonger countries. Islamists are greedy people with the Jihad slogan. They need more education to enhance their knowledge to live in peace on this planet.

It is a request that the UN form a council to research into the need of a UN body. OR formulate regulations to manage the body with clear justice.

Bombs

Bombs by local hand made to professional manufacture has been produced. Quote: (i) https://www.britannica.com/technology/thermonuclear-bomb (ii) The largest and most powerful thermonuclear weapon of all time was the RDS.-220 hydrogen bomb, also known as the Tsar Bomba. On 30 October 1961, the Soviet Union exploded the RDS.-220 over Novaya Zemlya Island in the Russian Arctic Sea. (ii) The Soviet Union also tested the most powerful explosive ever detonated by humans, (“Tsar Bomba”), with a theoretical yield of 100 megatons, intentionally reduced to 50 when detonated. After its dissolution in 1991, the Soviet weapons entered officially into the possession of the Russian Federation.

To know the extent of damage to the world if all bombs are detonated at the same time, please visit;  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyECrGp-Sw8

Already we know that the USA dropped old bombs in Vietnam and destroyed Vietnam. Today Vietnam has proved that they are a capable, intelligent & knowledgeable country which can compete with any other literate country.

COVID-19 Corona (CO)- VI(Virus)-D(December) 19 (2019)

In the recent time in 2019 till now, a dangerous virus is travelling around killing humans. The truth is said to be that it originated in Wuhan in China. Anatomy and physiology of the coronavirus. Quote:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus.

Check to see the extent of infections of some countries. Ref: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

It’s not originated in the USA. People shall be clear of this fact. With the intellectual capacity and technical competence that the USA possess, USA need not develop a WMD and pass it onto humans around the world killing millions of humans, particularly the Europeans. The USA preaches Freedom, Democracy and independence with abreast of technological advancement. Further, they are the only country who assist in the form of aid to countries in need. Well, the USA is the neuron of the whole åUN+ to give intellectual dictation in most areas. No one can deny that sometimes the USA walk into territories which they are not supposed to.

Epidemiology Mers-Cov was first detected in Jeddah Saudi Arabia. Sars Cov and Sars-Cov2 were detected in China. The Middle East virus was detected in Saudi Arabia (SA). Quote; Ref: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-(mers-cov)

Saudi Arabia claims that they own the purest Islam location (Mecca) and that they are the purest and richest country. With their Wahabi promotion. Quote; For more than two centuries, Wahhabism has been Saudi Arabia’s dominant faith. It is an austere form of Islam that insists on a literal interpretation of the Koran. Strict Wahhabis believe that all those who don’t practice their form of Islam are heathens and enemies.

Islamists have three different sects. Sunnies, Shiites, Wahhabis. Muslims may have killed millions of people to conquer countries via their Jihad movement and still, they have in mind to take over India via terrorism.

Is China the culprit who let the virus infects the humans in China and the world. What is the reason? Is it for world economic dominance? China knows that they cannot win any war with weapons, hence shovelled to this low level of WMD destruction. Could this be the beginning of karmic retribution to China? Quote Ref: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Countries spend trillions of dollars to research military warfare. A portion of the funds could be diverted to research deceases and cure/prevention etc. Hundred years ago, countries developed vaccines and cure for smallpox etc. Until now no vaccine or cure is available for COVID-19.

Superpowers should know that every time they test a nuclear bomb under the sea or earth, they are exerting a tremendous amount of force onto a revolving ball (earth), which may or may not influence in the wobble or shift the path of rotation by a negligible amount. NASA should clear this fact. Testing nuclear bombs may be a violation of NATURE’S norm.

  1. On the whole; the World Health Organisation has failed in its goal, vision and mission. WHO’s objective should have been to find a solution and make a decision to the WMD development. i.e. the UN should have a decree for member countries to stop researching into WMD if the UN is a meaningful org.
  2. Every country’s health research orgs have failed in its vision and mission.
  3. UN should have banned on trade wars between countries.
  4. No more nuclear or heavy weapon development.
  5. It is the NATURE that controls the planet.
  6. Nothing shall be done to bring about an imbalance in NATURE.
  7. Countries possess WMD lab for destruction should be removed from the Security Council.
  8. Sanctions should be brought against such countries. E.g. Sanctions shall be made against CHINA for violating the peace. Afterall US invaded Iraq on the pretext of WMD.
  9. Those who eat infectious living things that crawl, flies, walks, jumps should be treated as another kind of two-legged animals.

Let the Earth be a planet for humans to live in peace.

Request technical support from Russia: GMOA writes to President

April 19th, 2020

Dr Sarath OBEYSEKERA 

Above article was written two years back

THE same GMOA protested against the Russian affiliated SAITM. How come now GMOA approves Russian Medical system

When Russian trained educated Sri Lankan  doctors to return to Sri Lanka return to Sri Lanka so many hurdles like passing Act 16 exam etc are created by GMOA

 Luckily Anil Jasinghe managed because he did post-graduate degree and became a specialist an£ he is given the position rightly 

GMOA was dead against anyone educated outside Sri Lanka

Thi# is the best time for GR to break th3 backbone of GMOA union like Thatcher killed Arther Cargills’s coal miners union 

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera
CEO Walkers Colombo Shipyard
Colombo
Sri Lanka

Measures to contain COVID-19 will continue despite relaxed curfew – President

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has stressed that the measures to contain the local outbreak of COVID-19 will follow despite the curfew being relaxed in several areas from tomorrow.

He also noted that the objective of relaxing the curfew is to reactivate the economy.

Taking to his official Twitter account, the President urged the public that it is imperative to adhere to the health guidelines & act responsibly for the safety of society at large.


The government Saturday (18) decided to relax the ongoing curfew, which was imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19, in several districts and police areas.

Accordingly, the curfew for 18 districts will be relaxed from 5.00 am to 8.00 pm on a daily basis starting from tomorrow, until further notice.

The government has decided not to relax curfew imposed in Alawathugoda, Akurana, Warakapola and Akkaraipattu police areas in Kandy, Kegalle and Ampara districts. However, the curfew for the rest of the police areas in these three districts will be lifted at 5.00 am and re-imposed at 8.00 pm from April 20.

In the meantime, curfew for several police areas in Colombo, Kalutara, Puttalam and Gampaha districts the curfew will be lifted from 8.00 am to 5.00 pm on a daily basis from April 22, except for the following police areas:

Colombo District: Kotahena, Grandpass, Bambalapitya, Keselwatte, Maradana, Gothatuwa, Mulleriyawa, Wellampitiya, Mount Lavinia, Dehiwala and Kohuwala police areas

Gampaha District: Ja-Ela, Kochchikade and Seeduwa police areas

Puttalam District: Puttalam, Marawila and Wennappuwa police areas

Kalutara District: Bandaragama, Payagala, Beruwala and Aluthgama police areas


Measures have been taken to disinfect train stations and trains today, while also certain cities underwent the disinfection process as the public transport services are scheduled to resume tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the government also issued a set of guidelines to Heads of state entities especially in the district of Colombo on resumption of work once the curfew is lifted.

Two petitions filed seeking release of lawyer arrested over alleged links to Easter attacks

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Two Habeas Corpus petitions have been filed with the Appeals Court seeking the release of the attorney-at-law who was arrested by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) on suspicion of having links to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

The petitions, filed by his father and brother through, have cited the Acting Inspector General of Police (IGP), the Director of the CID and the Attorney General as respondents.

Petitioners have alleged that the arrest of the lawyer in question is unlawful and baseless.

The petitioners are further seeking an order directing the CID to grant access to legal counsels to obtain instructions from the corpus in confidence for the purpose of prosecuting his application and or any other proceedings before a court of law.

They have also sought an order directing the respondents to release the corpus.

COVID-19: Seventeen new cases bring total to 271

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Two more persons have tested positive for COVID-19 as of 9.40 pm today (19), says the Ministry of Health.

Accordingly, a total of 17 coronavirus cases were confirmed in Sri Lanka during the course of the day as the tally escalated to 271.

The 15 positive cases that were confirmed earlier today have been identified from Keselwatte, an isolated area in Colombo. It was reported they have had close contacts with COVID-19 infected patients.

In the meantime, the COVID-19 recoveries in the country have risen to 96, the Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry said.

Currently, 168 active cases are under medical care at Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH), Welikanda Base Hospital, Colombo East Base Hospital and Iranawila Hospital.

Earlier Fifteen persons have tested positive to have contracted the COVID-19 virus as of 5 pm today (19), said the Ministry of Health.

All 15 new patients have been identified from Keselwatte, an isolated area in Colombo, according to the Health Ministry. Reportedly, they have had close contacts with COVID-19 infected patients.

In the meantime, the total number of coronavirus recoveries in the country stands at 91.

Currently, 158 active cases are under medical care at Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH), Welikanda Base Hospital, Colombo East Base Hospital and Iranawila Hospital, the Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry says.

Sri Lanka has so far confirmed 7 fatalities from the novel coronavirus.

Second attack planned to follow Easter bombings, investigations reveal

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Investigations have revealed that a second attack had been planned following the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings, said Police Media Spokesman SP Jaliya Senaratne.

The Police Media Spokesman, holding a special press conference at the Department of Government Information today (19), said that according to investigations, a second-tier team had been recruited and trained for another attack to follow the Easter attacks.

However, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has been able to thwart those plans through their investigations, the Spokesman added.
 
As per previous investigations, Zahran Hashim’s team had divided and a portion parted ways, while Hashim’s team continued to plan and carry out the attacks. However, the latest investigations have revealed that the division of the team was fabricated to misguide intelligence units and mislead investigations.

Currently, 197 suspects have been arrested in connection to the attacks. Some suspects have established, led and funded organizations that misinterpreted Islam and spread extremist ideas among youth to create a second-tier team, said Senaratne. The suicide bombers who carried out the attack had also been directly involved in this process, he said.

Information has been uncovered on individuals who have aided, abetted and prompted such plans and investigations are carried out along this new information, according to Senaratne.

It has also been revealed that foreign nationals, too, have been involved in the process, he added.
Further, information has been recovered that there had been plans to hide some foreign nationals in Sri Lanka after they carry out an attack against a certain South Asian country, said Senaratne.

Responding to a journalist’s query regarding the arrest of a lawyer, the Media Spokesman clarified that the aforementioned suspect was not arrested over a telephone conversation with a client, as per certain social media posts. Senaratne said that relevant suspect was arrested with sufficient facts and evidence and that the Police completely reject accusation made through social media.

He further said that the CID has not carried out investigations targeting a certain person or a profession. All investigations are based on sufficient facts, information and evidence with legal validity, he added.

Act with aim of not getting infected after curfew lifts – Army Chief

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva says that the public should make sure not to loiter or idle outside once the curfew is lifted.

The Commander of the Army mentioned this joining the ‘Derana Aruna’ Breakfast Show on TV Derana this morning (19).

The decision to relax the curfew regulations was taken considering the hindrances caused to the public by the curfew, he said. He pointed out that many are unable to attend work or pay salaries without running businesses.

The Army Chief saluted the Sri Lankan public for their cooperation in measures to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 in the country.

Silva says that the government led by the President and the Prime Minister has taken this difficult decision to move the country forward and not for people to go out freely.

Therefore, the Sri Lankan citizens should consider it their duty to act with the ultimate aim of not becoming infected by the virus, he said.

Gota plays a captain’s innings at the crease

April 18th, 2020

H. L. D. Mahindapala

The sartorial signatures of the three main leaders of recent times  – Mahinda Rajapakse, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and Gotabaya Rajapakse — have escaped the notice of the commentariat. Each one of them has come out sporting three different garments signifying their respective brands of politics. Mahinda Rajapakse displays the most recognisable costume – the white national dress with the kurakkan satakaya of his father thrown round his neck. He is saying that his roots run deep into the soil.  Ranil, of course, sticks stubbornly to his Western attire refusing to concede to anything that smacks of being national”.  He walks around nervously with his hands in the pockets to prevent his trousers from slipping down to his ankles. It depicts the embarrassing plight of the UNP leader: how to keep his trousers up when everything else around him is falling down.  The most plain – and, therefore, the significant — is the shirt and trouser of President Gotabaya without the Rajapakse signature symbol wrapped around his neck. It announces to the world that he is a different kind of Rajapakse. He is messaging emphatically that he has not only his own style of clothing but style of governance as well.

He has opened his innings with calculated strokes signalling clearly that he is not  the run-of-the-mill batsman, either tha-at-tu-fying” defensively, or risking too much with rash flashes of the bat. He whacked the Swiss Embassy spin for a six. He stepped forward and lifted the American underarm ball to go over the head of the American Ambassadress. He left the crude ball lobbed by Rajitha Senaratna severely alone. He didn’t have to do anything with it either. It went on its own, flying past the wicketkeeper all the way to the boundary. In Geneva, he cut the ball nicely to outmanoeuvre the Western umpires and his foreign-funded fielders in the NGOs. Of course, like all state leaders he has been stalled by the corona balls. Even that has been managed by him to prevent any disastrous collapse. The commentators in the box are pleased that his performance so far has been surprisingly sound. Better than expected indeed! They were hoping to stump him if he stepped out of the crease. But his footwork so far has been cautious nearing almost perfection.

They were also hoping to catch him in the slips. And the anti-Rajapakse gang is now howling that they had caught him with a ball that had snicked off his bat. It came  from the Legal end of the  field. The controversy is whether he should have let the ball go and not touched it at all, or followed the precedent set in Lords – the hallowed grounds of this global game. To come down to the nitty-gritty, the controversy is focused on President Gotabaya’s decision to release Staff Sgt. Sunil Ratnayake, overriding the judgement confirmed by two of the highest courts.

This decision is overblown to project President Gotabaya as the ogre preparing the way to establish a dictatorship by undermining the judiciary. The usual mediocrities in the moral mafia are pretending that the President’s decision is an unprecedented political act of a wannabe dictator determined to whittle down the integrity and the independence of the judiciary. The other threadbare argument is that the punishment imposed on Sgt. Rathnayake would stand as a deterrent to others in the battlefields – a bogus claim that has never been proved in any recorded battle fought by human beings. They also argue that releasing Sgt. Rathnayake is not only against all known norms of democratic states but also a blow to the process of reconciliation. 

These are tiresome arguments recycled for political ends by the mythomaniacs in the moral mafia whose bread, butter and whiskey depend solely on dancing to the drum beat of Western masters who have not hesitated to discard, with absolute contempt, all known moralities and universal laws of justice whenever it suits them to pursue their self-interests. Besides, the pretentious political purists tend to go berserk when one branch of the triumvirate in a democratic state – i.e., the legislature, executive and the judiciary —  tries to challenge or override any one of the other two branches. In a sense it is a good sign of a vibrant and healthy democracy.  But it cannot  be pushed to extremes. In the perennial and ineluctable contest between these three branches the rising tensions should not be exploited for cheap political ends. In these confusing times it is the historical precedents set by the Westminster model – the reputed  mother of all parliamentary democracies – that can prevail as a model to the parallel or lesser democracies.

If there is any doubt or suspicion, one solid example from Westminster should suffice to validate President Gotabaya’s action. And there isn’t a better historical precedent than the landmark case of Augustino Pinochet, the head of the Chilean government, who was rated as a despicable political criminal of his time. Gen. Pinochet overthrew the elected government of Salvador Allende, a socialist. And with the backing of US government Pinochet went on a spree of liquidating the leftist dissidents. The sole political objective of the regime was to wipe out all traces of Allende’s socialism. In the process Pinochet earned three new middle names: Persecution. Disappearance. Execution. Chile became the leading terror state in Latin America. Corrupt capitalism triumphed under Pinochet. It was another feather in Henry Kissinger’s anti-communist cap.

But Pinochet’s world turned topsy-turvy the day he stepped into UK for medical treatment. On a charge made by Spain for torturing Spanish citizens he was put under house arrest in UK. Spain requested that Pinochet be extradited. Never in the history of modern international relations has a head of state being arrested by the host nation on behalf of another state. To cut to the chase, the British courts, going up to the House of Lords, the highest judiciary in the land, upheld the decision to extradite Pinochet. But pressure was mounting from the international Right-wing. Two former heads of state, Margaret Thatcher and George H. W. Bush appealed to the British government to release Pinochet. They urged that he  be sent to his homeland and  not to Spain. Thatcher even went to the extent of sending Pinochet a bottle of single malt whiskey with a note saying: Scotch is one  British institution that will never let you down.”

In 2000 all eyes were on Jack Straw, the Foreign Minister, who had taken office boasting that British Foreign policy under him would be run unwaveringly on principles of high morality. Legal scholars were agog as this was a unique case that would make history.  Human rights activist were beside themselves believing  that they had won the day. They were cock-a-hoop believing  that Jack Straw would abide by the decision of the judgement of the House Lords. After all the judicial hierarchy had decided that  Pinochet should be extradited to Spain. But Jack Straw rejected the judgement of the highest courts in the land and freed Pinochet.

What is relevant to President Gotabaya’s case is the key element of the British government dismissing the judgement of its highest court. It has set the precedent for President Gotabaya to act accordingly without being accused of being  dictatorial, or violating the principles of separations of powers, or undermining the authority and dignity of the judiciary. If her Majesty’s Government can dismiss the judgement of her Law Lords – the supreme judicial authority – what justification is there to accuse selectively President Gotabaya who has adopted the same precedent and exercised the identical political power to fulfil the mandate given by the people? Releasing soldiers who defended the nation was a mandate given in the last presidential election. President Gotabaya did no act arbitrarily to pave the way for the establishment of a dictatorship. Jack Straw did not have a mandate to reject a judgment of the courts. For what  it  is worth, President Gotabaya had a mandate from the sovereign people.

Besides, the underlying principle that applies to both cases is the same: under exceptional circumstances the government of the day can decide to overrule a selected decision or two of the judiciary without undermining  the overarching independence of the judiciary.  President Gotabaya is unerringly in line with the practices of the Mother of Parliaments in freeing Sgt. Rathnayake. When is adhering  to a notable precedent  set by the Mother of Parliaments a violation of the principles of parliamentary democracy? Besides, Jack Straw’s decision has  not brought down British democracy or destroyed the independence of the judiciary.

The morality of  it, of course, is a different issue. Critics can argue that Sgt. Rathnayake is the Pinochet of Sri Lanka and both deserve the same punishment for violating human rights. Or both should be judged on the identical moral metrics.  But Pinochet’s case cannot be compared by any rational metric to that of Sgt. Rathnayake. They are two different cases packed with two different circumstances, carrying two different set of moral and political values. For instance, the enormity of the crimes of Pinochet  cannot be compared to the dubious and questionable legal issued that surround the sentencing of Sgt. Rathnayake. The case against Pinochet was cut and dry. There were no issues of questioning the identity, culpability, and responsibility of Gen. Pinochet.  Violence committed in a battlefield by a sergeant in  an isolated incident in which the responsibilities and culpabilities of the accused are questionable cannot be compared to a criminal who had deliberately gone on the rampage to liquidate his opponents on a mass scale throughout his regime (1973 – 1990).

Pinochet’s  was an open and shut case. The Courts did not have to depend on some controversial clause of command  responsibility or collective responsibility to sentence Pinochet. The Law Lords did not have to ferret out an obscure law to sentence Pinochet on a charge of guilt by association. Besides, the evidence that was accepted to sentence Sgt. Rathnayake is open to considerable doubt. In the absence of certain proof the Courts resorted to a legal excuse of fixing his guilt by association.  It is tantamount  to giving a dog bad name and hanging him. Normally, punishment  is meted out  to fit the crime. But Rathnayake’s was sentenced for being a part of a gang who had committed the crime. The charge of guilt by association  is a controversial law. If there is no direct evidence to  prove that he had executed the Tamils then what was his crime? Did he  dig the  graves? Or was he the one who dragged the bodies to the grave? Or was he the one who gave instructions for the execution? If, for instance, he  did  not  commit the crime of killing the victims then is it fair to sentence him  to death for digging the graves? Unlike in the case of Pinochet there are a set of doubts that can justify the exoneration of Sgt. Rathnayake like the others who were with him. Not only the precedent set by the Lords but the doubts surrounding the role of Sgt. Rathnayake are two factors that validates his release.

Coronavirus pandemic and the postponed Parliamentary election

April 18th, 2020

Mahinda Rajapaksa Prime Minister

MEDIA RELEASE

The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine.

The financial powers vested in the President under Article 150(3) of the Constitution is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease.

People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic.

The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.  

The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that.

The yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the yahapalana government changed the provincial councils elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority.

As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial councils elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past.

Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.

On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfill its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.   

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Prime Minister

කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය හා කල් දමනු ලැබූ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය

April 18th, 2020

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය  අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය ඇමරිකාව, ඉන්දියාව, බංග්ලාදේශය වැනි රටවලට බලපෑවේ එම රටවල් කාලයක් මුළුල්ලේ වේගවත් ආර්ථික වර්ධනයක් සාක්ෂාත් කරගෙන, ශක්තිමත්ව සිටි අවස්ථාවකය. නමුත් ලංකාවට මේ උවදුරට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවූයේ දරුණු ආර්ථික කඩාවැටීමක් මධ්‍යයේය. 2015 සිට 2019 දක්වා සිදු වූ අවපාලනය නිසා අපේ ණය බර 71% කින් වැඩි විය.  රුපියලේ අගය 30% කින් කඩා වැටුණි.  ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය  2.7% ක් දක්වා අඩුවිය. 2019 නොවැම්බරයේදී අපි ජනාධිපතිවරණය දිනා අලුත් ආණ්ඩුවක් පිහිටෙව්වද, අපට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරයක් නොමැති වීම හේතුවෙන් පහුගිය ආණ්ඩුවේ බෙහෙත් හා පොහොර සැපයුම්කරුවන්ට හිඟ මුදල් ගෙවීම සඳහාවත් අතුරු සම්මත ගිණුමක් සම්මත කර ගැනීමට නොහැකි විය.

මේ අවස්ථාවේදී අස්වැසිල්ලට ඇත්තේ ව්‍යවස්තාවේ 150(3)  වගන්තිය යටතේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාට හිමිවෙන මුදල් බලතල පිළිබඳ විධිවිධාන පමණි.  අපිට කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතයට මුහුණ දීමට සිද්ධ වූයේ මේ සියලුම අවාසිදායක තත්ත්වයන් මධ්‍යයේය.  පසුගිය මාර්තු 11  වැනිදා පළමු කොරෝනා රෝගියා  හමුවීමත් සමගම,  අපි රෝගය කල්තියා හඳුනා ගැනීම, රෝගීන් වෙන්කර ප්‍රතිකාර කිරීම, අවදානමට ලක්වූ පුද්ගලයන් නිරෝධායනයට ලක් කිරීම,  රෝගීන් ඇසුරු කළ පුද්ගලයන් සොයා ගැනීම සහ සමාජ දුරස්ථ භාවය පවත්වා ගැනීම වැනි පාලන ක්‍රමවේදයන් හඳුන්වා දුන්නෙමු.  මේ ආකාරයේ මෙහෙයුමක් අපගේ ජීවිත කාල තුළ කිසිදාක අපි අත්දැක නැත.  රෝගය පැතිරීම වැළැක්වීමට සති ගණන් එක දිගට ඇඳිරිනීතිය පැනවීමටත් අපට සිදුවිය. 

රට පුරාම තම නිවෙස්වලින් පිටවීමට නොහැකි ජනතාවට ආහාර,  බෙහෙත් වැනි අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය ද්‍රව්‍ය ලබාගැනීමට ක්‍රමවේදයක් සැලසිය යුතු විය.  අඩු ආදායම්ලාභී පවුල්වලට ආධාර සැපයිය යුතු විය.  රටේ නිෂ්පාදන ක්‍රියාවලිය පවත්වාගෙන යෑම සඳහා වී ගොවීන්,  එළවළු ගොවීන්,  හා ධීවරයන්ගේ නිෂ්පාදන මිලදී ගත යුතු විය.  මේ සියලුම දේවල් එක විට ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක් තුළ සංවිධානය කර ගැනීමට හැකිවීම සැබැවින්ම කලමනාකරණයේ ප්‍රාතිහාර්යයකි.  කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය පාලනය කිරීමේදී ලංකාව ලබාගෙන ඇති සාර්ථකත්වය අද මුළු ලෝකයම පිළිගනී.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා  මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද්විතීය නායකත්වයක් සපයා ඇත.  අපේ රජයේ වෛද්‍යවරුන්, හෙදියන් ඇතුළු සෞඛ්‍ය කාර්ය මණ්ඩල මුලු ලෝකයේම අවධානය දිනාගෙන ඇත.  රෝගීන් ඇසුරු කළ පුද්ගලයන් සොයාගැනීමේදී අපේ බුද්ධි අංශ පෙන්වා ඇති දක්ෂකම හා කැපවීම නිසාත්,  නිරෝධායනය ක්‍රියාවලිය පවත්වාගෙන යාමේදී  ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාව පෙන්වා ඇති කාර්යක්ෂමතාවය නිසාත් රෝගය පැතිරීම පාලනය වී ඇත.  පොලීසිය ඇතුළු සෑම තරාතිරමකම රජයේ සේවකයන් කොරෝනා මර්ධන ව්‍යාපාරයේ සාර්ථකත්වයට දායක වී ඇත.  අද කොරෝනා වෛරසය නිසා අනාරක්ෂිත වී ඇති ලෝකය තුළ අපේ රට වඩාත්ම සුරක්ෂිත ස්ථානයකි.  අපිට මේ තත්ත්වයට ඒමට පුළුවන් වූයේ විනාශ කරන ලද ආර්ථිකයකුත්,  පුළුවන් හැම අවස්ථාවකදීම ආණ්ඩුවේ කකුලෙන් අදින,  රටට ආදරයක් නැති අවස්ථාවාදී විපක්ෂයකුත් මේ රටේ තිබියදීය. 

නිරෝධායනයට යෑම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කළ අය දිරි ගැන්වීම තුළින් විපක්ෂනායකවරයා මුල් අවස්ථාවේ සිටම කොරෝනා වෛරස් මර්ධන ව්‍යාපෘතිය  කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට උත්සාහ දැරීය. ඉන්පසු, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැර තිබෙන අවස්ථාවක රජයේ මුදල් වැය කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාට බලය නැතැයි කියමින් ඔවුන් සෞඛ්‍ය සේවය ඇතුළු සියලු රජයේ  සේවාවන් කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට උත්සාහ දැරුවේය. නව පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ජූනි දෙවැනිදාට කලින් හමුවිය යුතු බවත්, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය ඊට කලින්  පැවැත්වීමට නොහැකි බවත්, එම නිසා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හරිමින් නිකුත් කළ ගැසට් පත්‍රය අහෝසි කළ යුතු බව අද ඔවුන් පවසා සිටී.

යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව අවුරුදු තුනකින් පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය කල් දැමූ ආකාරය අපට මතකය. ඒ ඡන්දය උසාවියට ගොස් දින නියමයක් නැතිව කල් දමා ගැනීමට ඔවුන් ගත් උත්සාහය  ව්‍යාර්ථ වූයේ නඩු නැති පළාත් පාලන ආයතන වලට හෝ ඡන්දය පවත්වන බව මැතිවරණ කොමිසම ප්‍රකාශ කළ නිසා පමණි. 2017 දී පළාත් සභා විසුරුවා හැරීමට දින කිහිපයක් තිබියදී,  පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය පැවැත්වීම  වැළැක්වීමට යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද ක්‍රමය වෙනස් කළේය.  ඒ සංශෝධන පනත සම්මත කිරීමට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ තුනෙන් දෙකේ බලයක් අවශ්‍ය බව නීතිපතිවරයා ප්‍රකාශ කළ විට ඔවුන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කොරිඩෝවේ දැමූ ඩීල් තුළින් ඡන්ද වෙනුවෙන් ප්‍රතිපත්තිය පාවා දී අවශ්‍ය බහුතරය ලබාගත්තේය . 

ඒ අපකීර්තිමත් ගනුදෙනුවේ ප්‍රතිඵලයක් හැටියට 2017 අගෝස්තු 25 වැනිදා  සම්මත කළ පළාත් පාලන මැතිවරණ සංශෝධන පනතේ සමානුපාතික නියෝජිත  ප්‍රතිශතය 40% ක්  වන අතර,  ඊට මාසයකට පසු සම්මත කරනු ලැබූ පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ සංශෝධන පනතේ සමානුපාතික නියෝජිත ප්‍රතිශතය 50% ක් වේ. ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට  පෙත්සමක් ඉදිරිපත් කොට ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කර තිබුණු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයක් අවලංගු කර ගත් දේශපාලන පක්ෂ සිටින ලෝකේ එකම ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී රට වෙන්නෙත් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවය.  වත්මන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය කල් දමා ගැනීමට මේ ගෙනියන උත්සාහය ඒ අපකීර්තිමත්  යටගියාවේම දිගුවකි. 

කුමන අවස්ථාවකදී හෝ සාමාන්‍ය ජනජීවිතය මෙය රටේ නැවත ආරම්භ විය යුතුය.  අපේ පරිපාලන දිස්ත්‍රික්ක 25න්, එකොළහක එකම කෙරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයෙක් වත් නැත.  තවත්  දිස්ත්‍රික්ක හතක ආසාදිතයන්  හමුවී ඇත්තේ එක්කෙනෙකු හෝ දෙදෙනෙකි.  තවත් දිස්ත්‍රික්ක  දෙකක රෝගීන් පස් දෙනෙකුත් හත් දෙනෙකුත් අතර ගණනක් සොයාගෙන ඇත.  රෝගීන් සැළකිය යුතු ගණනක් සොයා ගෙන ඇත්තේ  දිස්ත්‍රික්ක පහක පමණි.  

පසුගිය මාර්තු දෙවැනිදා ජනාධිපතිවරයා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හරිමින් මැතිවරණය පවත්වන දිනය අප්‍රේල් 25 හැටියටත්,  අලුත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව මුල් වරට හමු වෙන දිනය මැයි 14 වැනිදා හැටියටත් නියම කළේය.  ඊට දින දහයකට පසු පළමු කොරෝනා රෝගියා සොයා ගත් අවස්ථාවේදී මැතිවරණය පවත්වන දිනය කල් දැමීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාට බලය නොතිබුණි. 1981 අංක 1 දරණ  පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණ පනතේ 24(3)  වගන්තියට අනුව ජනාධිපතිවරයා නියම කළ දිනයට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට නොහැකි නම්,  ඒ සඳහා වෙනත් දිනයක් නියම කිරීමට මැතිවරණ කොමිසම බැඳී සිටී. දිනයක් නියම නොකොට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය කල් දැමීමට මැතිවරණ  කොමිසමට  බලයක් නැත. 

සති ගණනක් හෝ මාස ගණනක් ඉදිරියට අනාගතයේ විය හැකි හෝ නොහැකි දේවල් පිළිබඳව ඇතිකරගන්නා උපකල්පන මත අනිවාර්යෙන්ම පිළිපැදිය යුතු නීතිමය ප්‍රතිපාදන නොසළකා හැරිය නොහැක.  මැතිවරණ කොමිසම මුලින්ම 24(3) වගන්තිය යටතේ ඔවුන් වෙත පැවරී ඇති කාර්‍යභාර්ය නීතියට අනුකූළව ඉටුකර, ඉන් පසුව සාකඡ්චා කළ යුතු කාරණයක් ඇත්නම් ඒ වෙත යොමු විය යුතුය.  

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ
අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය

THE GENERAL ELECTION OF 1956 Part 1

April 18th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

REVISED     17.3.21

The General Election of 1956 is associated with the name of SWRD Bandaranaike. SWRD came from a long line of native administrators appointed by the British administration.

SWRD’s two paternal great-grandfathers   held the positions of ‘Mudaliyar of Siyane Korale East’ and ‘Mohandiram of the Governor’s Gate.’ Their names were Don Solomon Dias Bandaranayake, and Phillipsz Gysbertus Panditaratne. SWRD’s grandfather   also held the positions of ‘Mudaliyar of the Governor’s Gate’ and ‘Mudaliyar of Siyane Korale’. Grandfather’s name was Don Christoffel Henricus Dias Abeywickrema Jayatilake Seneviratne Bandaranaike, with the prefix ‘Gate Mudaliyar’.

SWRD father, Solomon Dias Bandaranaike (1862-1946) was ‘Muhandiram of the Governor’s Gate’ then ‘Mudaliyar of the Siyane Korale East’ and finally, ‘Maha Mudali’. Maha Mudali was the highest position available to a native Ceylonese in British Ceylon .The post had been held earlier by his uncle, Conrad Petrus Dias Wijewardena Bandaranaike. Solomon had applied for the post and was successful.

 SWRD’s father was  knighted and became Sir Solomon.  He was also awarded the CMG. The letters CMG  stand for  ‘Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George’.This is a very high honor given by the British monarch. Clearly, the British have appreciated father’s loyalty.

Sir Solomon was one of the richest men in Siyane korale, now Gampaha .He was a wealthy land owner with large estates, mainly coconut and valuable urban property. He had inherited a walauwwa in Horagolla, (Attanagalla), which he converted to stables and built Horagolla Walauwa next to it. He was the first Ceylonese to own a house in Nuwara Eliya, which was an exclusive holiday destination for the British.

Sir Solomon was educated at S.Thomas College. He was a collector of antiquities. He donated Sir Henry Blake’s collection of palm leaf manuscripts to the Colombo National Museum. He was a life-member of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society.

A keen horse breeder, he was Life President of the Colombo Turf Club, which erected a statue of him, during his life time, in front of the Turf Club in Colombo. This statue was in a neglected state until Yahapalana arrived. Yahapalana in 2018, turned it into an imposing monument, enclosed with installations and water pools. The message is clear, ‘Honor British rule.’

Sir Solomon has been very proud of his special position and haughty too. When told  that H.V. Perera, later Sri Lanka’s leading lawyer, was going to study in London, Sir Solomon had told  H.V’s  father, haughtily ,  that his son could not possibly dream of ever  making it to London. H.V. had won a scholarship, explained the father, humbly. H.V.’s father had been a surveyor and the first to do ground water surveys. He would probably have been at Horagolla in his professional capacity. (Personal communication from Ralph Pieris, nephew of H.V. Perera.)

 historian  KM de Silva said  of the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera clan.  that no other indigenous family in the whole of the British Empire has had such a long record of collaboration with the imperial power, in crushing indigenous resistance movement, enthusiastic assistance in the processes of conquest and support of consolidation of colonial rule.

SWRDS great grandfather had been given a medal in 1803 for helping the British forces in the Kandyan war of 1802. The Sinhala representative in Legislative Council from 1833-1911 were form the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera group, (with one exception).

They were also subordinate part of the governing elite,  a position which they flaunted with much arrogance. They saw themselves as a group set apart by birth and rank from all others. the Sinhala representative,  in Legislative  council  from 1833-1911 were form the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera group,( with one exception) As time went on the family assumed aristocratic status,  said K.M. de Silva.

SWRD father was Maha Mudaliyar  for 32 years, continued de Silva. In his hands, the position was a blend of major domo, i.e. steward of a household and principal aid to governor in matter relating to the natives. He was very prominent in public life, gloried in his proximity to the governor and visiting royalty on ceremonial occasions, concluded KM de Silva.

The subject of this essay, Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike, (1899-1959) was named after the Governor, West Ridgeway, who also agreed to be the baby’s godfather. This indicates the privileged position held by Sir Solomon.  It also indicates that Sir   Solomon hoped that baby Bandaranaike would also enjoy similar privileges and in return,   continue the family tradition of loyalty to British rule.

SWRD was tutored at home by 2 English tutors. For a short time he attended S. Thomas’ College, Mutwal, boarding at Warden Rev. Stone’s residence.  He passed the Cambridge Senior examination with distinctions in English, Latin, Greek and French. He had come second in the exam, out of all the candidates in the British Empire.

He then read Modern greats at Christ Church, Oxford  but did not get the first class he hoped for.Sir Solomon had entered his son’s name for Oxford, ten years earlier in 1923. SWRD did well as on orator at the Oxford Union.  He had strongly criticized British rule In India. The applause had gone on for several minutes. Unfortunately Bandaranaike     did not become President of the Oxford union as he had   hoped. Bandaranaike  was the Secretary of the Oxford Union and the President of the Majlis Society. Majlis was a debating society founded by the Indian students of Oxford.

Bandaranaike did not change into a Brown Sahib at Oxford but remained an earnest easterner. He wrote of many bitter memories of his time at Oxford. He gained great prestige and standing at oxford for his debating ability but anti colonialism was always to be seen there, observed HSS Nissanka.

In 1924, he was called to the bar as a Barrister in the Inner Temple. He returned to Ceylon in 1925 and took oaths as an Advocate of the Supreme Court of Ceylon. He practiced as a lawyer and got an  adequate income which made him independent of his father, observed KM de Silva

SWRD did not join the British administration as his father would have hoped. Instead he took to politics. From the beginning, SWRD wanted a leading role in politics, nothing less.   In 1926 he started his own political party, Peoples Progressive Party, but this failed. This was the, the first of the three parties started by him.

SWRD   then joined the Ceylon National Congress. In 1927 SWRD became Secretary of the Congress. This was his arrival on the political scene, said Wiswa Warnapala.  SWRD was President of Ceylon National Congress in 1931.

SWRD went into electoral politics as soon as possible. In 1927 he was elected to the Colombo Municipal Council, from the Maradana Ward, defeating the trade unionist A. E. Goonesinha. SWRD had the money to win the election, Goonesinha did not, observed Meegama.

  SWRD also participated in local government. In 1928, SWRD became President of All Ceylon Village Committee Conference    (est. 1925).  Under Bandaranaike , it underwent a change and became an effective pressure group. It was an emerging pressure group with wide influence in rural areas, said Wiswa. And the Young Lanka group, who published a magazine of that name, had complained that Bandaranaike converted    the Conference to a political one.

 SWRD had got the Village committee Ordinance amended to remove restrictions and democratize it. In 1929, SWRD became Chairman of Veyangoda Egoda Peruwe Pattu Gamsabha. SWRD, in this manner, gained a political foothold at all three electoral levels, village, urban and national. 

SWRD established a network of contacts with village committee chairmen, monks of village temples, and the intelligentsia of the village, which was of immense support to him later when forming the SLFP, observed Meegama. SWRD was able to establish links with the emerging rural intelligentsia and the rural political leadership, agreed Wiswa Warnapala.,

SWRD formed the Sinhala Maha Sabha (SMS) in 1934.  SWRD was President. There were eight vice presidents and they included CWW Kannangara, and Sir John Kotelawela.  There was at the time no political party that could articulate the nationalist issues.  The objective of the SMS was the unity and advancement of the Sinhalese. It was a loosely knit pressure group which revolved around one personality, SWRD . All the other political groups that emerged in this time were also like this, said Wiswa.,

The name of the Association, Sinhala Maha Sabha” was given by Piyadasa Sirisena. At the inaugural meeting SWRD had wanted the word ‘Sinhala’ changed to ‘Swadeshi.’ But Munidasa Kumaratunga, who was present, had given a scholarly analysis of the word ‘Sinhala’ and asked ‘Why are people frightened of the word Sinhala.’ Munidasa Kumaratunga was the first to raise the Sinhala language to the status of a cause and a mission, observed Wiswa.

The parent organization of the SMS was the Lanka Mahajana Sabha formed by F.R. Senanayake in 1919, said Wiswa.  But SMS would surely have tapped into the full Mahajana Sabha network as well.

There were nearly 27 Mahajana Sabhas primarily in rural areas in the mid twenties. There were Mahajana sabhas in Matara, Moratuwa, Lunugala, Panadura, Gampola, Dodanduwa, Polgahawela, Rambukkana, Kalutara, Kandy, Negombo and Dehiwela. Some were branch organizations of   Ceylon National Congress and Ceylon National Association, as well, said Wiswa. This showed that a new trend was emerging with the rural segment also getting   politically activated, observed Wiswa. Proceedings were conducted in Sinhala in these sabhas. .

There were a few political Associations as well. There was Kurunegala Political Association (est. 1920), Ratgama Association (1928) Ambalangoda Association (1920,) and Anuradhapura Association (1912). The population was becoming politically activated, said Wiswa. The Sinhala Maha Sabha would undoubtedly have approached these as well.

Three   organizations which SWRD had been associated with also   joined. They were   All Ceylon Village Committees Conference, Urban District Councils of Ceylon Association and All Ceylon Ayurvedic Sammelanaya.

SWRD was always an ardent supporter of local government, specially  All Ceylon Village Committees Conference, Urban District Councils of Ceylon Conference, All Ceylon Town Councils Conference.  These were major pressure groups, and he used them for his political party, said Wiswa. SWRD regularly attended their annual sessions, and made speeches. He was mobilizing this emerging village leadership around his magnetic personality, said Wiswa.

SMS attracted a galaxy of nationalists such as Piyadasa Sirisena.  Other writers such as Ananda Rajakaruna, Munidasa Kumaratunga   and ayurvedic physicians such as W. Daniel Fernando Waidyasekera and Pundit G.P. Wickramarachchi joined SMS.

Hemapala Munidasa who had edited Sinhala Bauddhaya took over the SMS newspaper ‘Sinhala Balaya’ in 1941. This newspaper played a key role in awakening the Sinhalese, said Wiswa. It overtook ‘Sinhala Bauddhaya’ in no time.  Later Hemapala was imprisoned on a fraud charge and Sinhala Balaya went into decline. SWRD had to sell the press.

SMS became a platform for the Sinhala literati.  They met at a special meeting at Ananda College to discuss Sinhala language and literature. Another meeting presided   by Kalukondayawe Pannasekera was on Buddhism. This would have strengthened the Sinhala Buddhist nature of the organization.

Before long SWRD had successfully welded SMS into a monolith. SMS soon emerged as a political force and eventually, SMS superseded the Ceylon National Congress as an influential political organization. SMS provided a much needed link between nationalism, the Buddhist resurgence, and the national heritage associated with Buddhism” said Wiswa.  A national committee was formed in 1941.

Leftist forces openly campaigned against SWRD saying SMS has been formed to fight the minorities.  However, N.M.Perera, while criticizing SMS for its communal bias, said that SMS had aroused an apathetic Buddhist public to a full recognition of its rights. SWRD often held meetings in Anuradhapura, to draw public attention to the need to reawaken the ancient heritage, observed Wiswa. SMS held its meetings in rural centers.

The Sinhala Maha Sabha was not a political Party in the modern sense of the word, said Wiswa Warnapala.  It was a loosely knit pressure group which revolved around one personality, SWRD. SMS played a pioneering role in the construction of a mass base in politics. This was more significant than the arrival of the Marxists, said Wiswa.  It was the beginning of the road to 1956, said Meegama.  Wiswa, on the other hand, observed that SWRD   saw the SMS only as an intermediate venture, ‘a passing role’, on the way to wider national unity.

SMS met with much opposition from vested interest, as well as non Buddhists and non Sinhalese. SMS was dubbed an extreme Sinhala organization. SWRD was called a chauvinist   SMS was dubbed an extreme Sinhala organization. Leftists were scornful. The emerging professional class also protested.

The Christian sector spearheaded a virulent campaign against the SMS. They said there was no need for a SMS. The CNC and the Mahajana sabha are both completely Sinhalese.  The SMS was ‘avowedly and unashamedly Sinhala, much more than the CNC and the Mahajana sabhas’. This segment was also very critical of SWRD. They did not like his rise in politics.  They feared and resented his influence.

Wiswa Warnapala assessed the SMS. It provided a link between nationalism and Buddhist resurgence, and the national heritage associated with Buddhism. SMS held its meetings in rural areas. SWRD often held them in Anuradhapura, to draw public attention to the need to reawaken the ancient heritage.

This link was much more significant than the arrival of the Marxists, continued Wiswa. Even SWRD’s marriage helped. It was a union between a first rank family of the lowlands and a first rank family of the Udarata. SMS superseded CNC as an influential political organization. CNC specialized in the politics of the Europeanized middle class. Now it was necessary to have a nationalist platform for expressing Sinhala nationalism, concluded Wiswa.

SWRD was a member of the two State Councils set up under British administration. SWRD was elected unopposed from Veyangoda to the first State Council of 1931.  He was elected unopposed to the second State Council of 1936, too. He was also seen and heard on important political platforms. He spoke at the memorable Galle Face rally in 1937, in support of Bracegirdle.

SWRD was Minister of Local Government in the second State Council 1936–47,  One of SWRD actions as Minister was to declare Anuradhapura a sacred city. V.C. Jayasuriya, then Commissioner of Local government, said that SWRD had made many improvements to local government when he was Minister. The Abeywardene report (1999) also said that SWRD in 1936 was instrumental in preparing the necessary legislation and took steps to deliver development through the local government system.’

SWRD had revoked the Local Government Ordinance of 1920 under which local boards were created.  This led to the modernization of the local government institutions. SWRD had introduced the Gam Sabha Ordinance no 60 of 1938. The enactment of this Ordinance was a major landmark in the modernization of Gam sabhas. 

The subject of Health was added to his Ministry later on. George E de Silva was Minister of Health earlier. SWRD and George set up a countrywide network of maternity hospitals, rural hospitals and provided the service of trained midwives, said Meegama. together with the eradication of malaria,  these measures   of 1937-47,  helped to lower infant mortality and maternal mortality,  to what was a record low for a third world country, he said.

SWRD played an important role in the independence negotiations. This is not well known. In the 1940s, the issue of independence had advanced to the vital stage of drafting the conditions of independence. State Council needed persons who could interpret a document and spot hidden meanings and lapses.

The incisive mind of SWRD was particularly useful,” said Jennings. He saw our weak points with remarkable speed and expressed them with ruthless logic.  SWRD represented far more than DS the section of opinion which was suspicious of British intensions and therefore insisted on precautions that otherwise would not have been taken.”

Queens House also recognized SWRD .London had written to Colombo to say that the Secretary of State in London was not prepared to accept the ‘Ministers Draft’ but had read it with interest. SWRD who had called at Queens House on some other business, had been shown the document, even before DS Senanayake saw it. 

  When the independence negotiations were coming to a close, DS Senanayake had asked Sir Oliver Goonetilleke discuss with Bandaranaike as leader of the Sinhala Maha Sabha the draft agreements for independence. SWRD had viewed the draft with mixed feelings, but refrained from objecting. The agreement was signed, making way for Ceylon to gain self-rule.

When D. S. Senanayake presented the Soulbury Constitution to the State Council, Bandaranaike seconded the motion stating that he does so as the Sinhala Maha Sabha was the largest party in the State Council. It was also decided that DS would move the vote for Dominion status and SWRD would second it as the best debater and the leader of the Sinhala Maha sabha.

With Ceylon heading for self-rule, D. S. Senanayake invited Bandaranaike to combine his Sinhala Maha Sabha with other smaller parties into the United National Party (UNP) which Senanayake was forming to contest for the 1947 election  DS had asked CWW Kannangara and A. Ratnayake to speak to SWRD, who agreed to join the UNP.

The very first United National Party was therefore composed of Ceylon National Congress, Sinhala Maha Sabha, Muslim League and Moors Association. It was a coalition representing different shades of opinion from socialism to conservatism. Opposing the UNP were LSSP, BLP, CP and All Ceylon Tamil Congress.  The SMS was the most powerful group in the UNP, recalled Sirimavo Bandaranaike. His SMS was the most powerful group in the UNP. SWRD and his SMS constituted a vital segment of the UNP, agreed Wiswa. 

A general election was held in 1947. UNP won but did not get the sweeping victory it hoped for. it got  only 42 out of a total of 95 seats. This was a weak majority.  [1] The opposition said that the UNP   did not command the confidence of the country.  A certain group had wished to form an alternative government with SWRD at its head. They were going to build it ‘around the personality of SWRD’, said Meegama. This shows the importance of the personality of SWRD and the SMS.

This group met to discuss the possibility of creating an alternative government consisting of SMS, the Left and independent members, with SWRD as leader. Nearly 50 MPs had been prepared to support SWRD, said Wiswa.  The talks were held at ‘Yamuna’, the home of H. Sri Nissanka, on the initiative of H Sri Nissanka, IMRA Iriyagolle and Wilmot Perera,  who incidentally came from three different castes, Goigama, Karava and Salagama. These discussions were   known as the ‘Yamuna talks’. The exact dates are not available.

The Yamuna proposal became a near possibility but SWRD was reluctant said Wiswa.SWRD thought that DS should not be prevented from becoming the first Prime Minister of Ceylon. . This led to the breakdown of the talks. If the strategy of the Yamuna talks had succeeded, SWRD would have become the first Prime Minister of Ceylon, said Wiswa. Others agreed. H. Sri Nissanka thought that SWRD, had, on his own, missed an ideal opportunity, to become the first Prime Minister of Ceylon.

SWRD however rejected the proposal. Instead he  joined the UNP. SWRD later  explained that he thought the country needed a strong and stable government  at the time of independence. He added that the UNP would not have come into being, if not for him. D.S. Senanayake therefore became Prime Minister. SWRD was elected the Leader of the House. This made Bandaranaike the most senior member of the cabinet, after the Prime Minister.  

Vernon Mendis said, Even before he became Prime Minister SWRD gave a foretaste of his inborn statesmanship by his impressive role at the Asian Relations Conference held by Nehru in New Delhi in 1947,  where  SWRD presented his vision of Asia as a brotherhood of independent states.

Ceylon had sent a delegation of 20, for this Conference, led by SWRD. The calls for Asian Federation were endorsed by Solomon Bandaranaike of Ceylon and Aung San of Burma, reported one account.

SWRD wanted the portfolio of Agriculture and Land but was given Health and Local Government.  Dr. L.O Abeyratne, who was head of Lady Ridgeway Children’s Hospital, pleaded with SWRD to improve the hospital. So after much persuasion and difficulty SWRD managed to get funds allocated in the Budget for a completely new hospital.

He also got, again with difficulty, funds for improving Ratnapura hospital, which often got flooded by the Kalu Ganga.  But Kotelawala who headed the Ministry of transport and Works, including public works, was obstructing the Health Ministry building projects, so this   project did not even start. The UNP wanted to keep SWRD down, recalled Sirimavo Bandaranaike.

SWRD had thought that the UNP could be   turned into a truly national party,  under the direction of the SMS.  But his plan to convert  the UNP was not successful. SWRD had hoped to influence the UNP from within.  Instead he found his own position was being assailed from within. The leaders of the UNP were opposed to the SMS and its nationalist agenda. Opponents complained that SWRD had converted the All Ceylon Village Committee Conference to a political one.

SWRD was also unsuccessful when it came to policy. UNP was   reluctant to implement the clauses in the manifesto, with regard to language, religion and culture. SWRD failed to get legislation passed on these subjects.

SWRD made scathing reference to the UNP government. He said UNP was drifting to a one party dictatorship. SWRD also   complained that no important questions were ever placed before the  Executive Committee of the UNP. 

SWRD opponents objected to both SWRD’s politics and his speeches. SWRD had complained to the All Ceylon Village Committees Conference that the UNP had failed to implement the proposal of the SMS. UNP working committee asked SWRD to send in an explanation, which he did, saying the UNP should implement the policy set out in its manifesto, not hold tamashas.

The SMS held its annual sessions at Madampe in 1951. Several resolutions approved by the branch organizations of the SMS were unanimously passed. These Madampe resolutions included  the  need for an official language policy,  recognition of Buddhism, Sangha to be given  a special place, a national industrial policy, the  essential  services  to be in the hands of the state, implement recommendation of the Social services Commission, development of ayurveda,  improve  public services, banning horse racing and a sound foreign policy. SMS also decided to urge the government to implement the policies promised in the 1947 election.

UNP working committee said that under the UNP constitution, SMS could not place these resolutions before the UNP. According to the UNP constitution all constituent members were under the UNP and had to conform to its rules and ‘loyally accept all decisions of the UNP.’   further, the Madampe resolutions went against the policy of the UNP and they could not be accepted.

SMS  sent a deputation to DS,  without any result. SMS pointed out that SMS has been sending resolutions to the working committee for the last four years.  Also that UNP permitted resolutions to be presented at the annual conference.

The Madampe resolutions were the  precipitating event.  SWRD was urged to leave the UNP. It was clear that DS did not intend to retire and make way for SWRD, though SWRD was considered the successor to DS Senanayake. 

In July 1951, SWRD left the government benches and crossed the floor of the House to the Opposition, followed by five others, including DA Rajapaksa. They expected more to follow but they did not. There were 18 SMS members in Parliament.

Crowds had gathered in front of Parliament to garland him and also at his house, recalled Sirimavo. SWRD had taken the precaution of keeping the SMS going. He had also given leadership to the Swabhasha movement and the Buddhist resurgence of the time. Crowds had gathered in front of Parliament to garland him and also at his house, recalled Sirimavo.

The Sri Lanka Freedom Party was started on September 2nd, 1951 at Colombo Town Hall. The public were informed of the launch and invited to the Town Hall to participate at the launch. A crowd estimated at over 10,000 attended.  The crowd had overflowed onto the verandah and the lawn of the Town Hall. The meeting was attended by bhikkhus, also Buddhist nuns. Some bhikkhus were   seen standing outside with the rest of the crowd.

The SLFP was built on the SMS, this is   forgotten today. Sinhala Maha Sabha had a formidable base, a network of pressure groups of the villages. SWRD utilized this to form the SLFP said Wiswa. The SMS, had taken care to maintain its political identity as a separate organization, and had continued its activities while functioning as part of the UNP government. 

In addition, SWRD had built up strong links with the local government agencies.  He had spoken before the various local government Conferences, every year. This became very useful when the SLFP was formed.  SWRD also  recruited political activists for his political party through the Gam Sabhas.

Throughout out the 1930s and 1940s Bandaranaike had created powerful pressure groups at the local level and the leaders of these organizations became a vital segment of the Party. The All Ceylon Village Committees Conference and the All Ceylon Ayurvedic Physicians Conference were activated to support the party. 

The name Sri Lanka Freedom Party was given by H Sri Nissanka. It is important to note that the word ‘Sinhala’ has been left out. This aversion to the word ‘Sinhala’ should be noted. SWRD was appointed President, with Badiuddin Mahmud and S. Thangarajah as joint secretaries. The Udarata Socialist Front   led by TB Ilangaratne dissolved into the SLFP.

SWRD formed the SLFP for two reasons. To offer a political party in  the middle ground between the UNP and the Marxist parties, and to provide a means of political expression for Sinhalese and Buddhist vested interests.

This brand new SLFP had to face a general election in May 1952.  It made an attempt to form a common front with leftist’s parties but failed.   SLFP had no cash and no suitable candidates, but it did quite well, observed Meegama. SLFP won 9 of 48 seats   got 15.5% of the vote and came second. SWRD became Leader of the Opposition. LSSP also got 9 seats out of 30. But SLFP secured more votes than LSSP.

SLFP came into existence to fulfill certain historical tasks, said Wiswa. It had identified certain interest groups, which taken together formed a kind of social movement.  SLFP had to cater to the needs of these interest groups..  Unlike the other parties, SLFP knew how to make use of these interest groups.

SLFP  had the support of the rural peasantry and the rural elite. Grass roots support constituted an important source of  recruitment.  The rural intelligentsia were the main stay of the party for decades, Wiswa added.

SLFP throughout the period of its existence successfully maintained organization unity, comparable stability and continuity as the major political formation of this country.

The SLFP has survived several crises. Powerful politicians were unable to oust the SLFP.  The party faced internal dissention but it never went into oblivion, due to its political and ideological resilience. SLFP is not a fragile organization. The Party was expected to remain loyal to its rural base. Rural forces never allowed the party to move in any other direction.

Sri Lanka  unlike other counties in Asia has not shown a dislike for party government.  The traditional two party rivalry is a very powerful factor in the rural   sector, and the party alignments are very sharp in those areas. Control of village politics has been a vital factor in political power and influence , observed Wiswa. (Continued)


[1] W.A.Wiswa Warnapala. Sri Lanka Freedom Party. Godage. p 51

Pathfinder sets up eminent panel to prepare post-COVID-19 economic strategy

April 18th, 2020

Dilrook Kannangara

This is very dangerous. These people are known to align with a certain political ideology that in my view is not in the best interests of SL.

Moragoda was the foreign minister under Ranil’s 2001 to 2004 regime that is known to be the most treacherous.

They presented a National Security Strategy for Sri Lanka 2020 and a Study on Managing Foreign Policy and Relations with the UN System to President Rajapaksa. Any such policy must be widely discussed. A policy created by a small group of people who don’t even represent SL is not valid.

What is going on behind the scenes? Why weren’t these presented to media? I smell a rotten rat.

The Pathfinder Foundation has set up a study group chaired by Pathfinder Senior Fellow and former Central Bank Governor Dr. Indrajit Coomaraswamy, to prepare a set of action-oriented recommendations aimed at steering the Sri Lankan economy into the post-COVID-19 era.

Dr. Sisira Pinnawala, Department of Sociology University of Peradeniya, and Dr. Ganeshan Wiganaraja, Executive Director Lakshsman Kadirgamar Institute, will serve as principal authors for this initiative. The report is expected to be presented to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa by the end of April.

Other members of the Study Group, which will consist of twenty leaders from academia, research and the private sector, include Prof. Sirimal Abeyratne, Prof. Saroj Jayasinghe, Prof. Rohan Samarajiva, Prof. Muttukrishna Sarvanthan, Ashroff Omar, Dr. Hans Wijayasuriya, Krishan Balendra and Mohamed Mushin.

Recently the Pathfinder Foundation was responsible for preparing 1) a National Security Strategy for Sri Lanka 2020 and 2) a Study on Managing Foreign Policy and Relations with the UN System. Both of which were presented to President Rajapaksa.

Pathfinder sets up eminent panel to prepare post-COVID-19 economic strategy | Daily FT

මහමැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට ඇති සූදානම සම්බන්ධවයි

April 18th, 2020

ජනමාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයයි ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය

2020. 04. 18  

සභාපති,
මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව,
රාජගිරිය.

සභාපතිතුමනි,

මහමැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට ඇති සූදානම සම්බන්ධවයි


#කොරෝනා වසංගතය හමුවේ මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව විසින් කල් දමන ලද මහ මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම සම්බන්ධව විශේෂයෙන් වසංගත රෝග විශේෂඥයින් හා අනෙකුත් රෝග විශේෂඥයින් ඇතුළු සෞඛ්‍ය අංශවල නිර්දේශ මත මිස අගමැතිවරයාගේ, ආණ්ඩුවේ මැති ඇමතිවරුන් හා විවිධ සංවිධාන හරහා සිදුකරමින් තිබෙන බලපෑම මත මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම සඳහා තීරණ ගැනීමට ඉක්මන් නොවන ලෙස ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය ඉතා  ඕනෑකමින් යුතුව ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.

02. මෙහිදී  විශේෂයෙන් වෛද්‍ය විශේෂඥයින් හා රජයේ වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරින්ගේ සංගමය ප‍්‍රකාශ කරන ආකාරයට මැයි මස පළමු සති දෙක විශේෂ අවදානම් සහිත කාල වකවානුවකි. එමෙන්ම මේ වනවිට දින 14 ක් ව තිබූ නිරෝධායන කාල සීමාව දින 21 දක්වා දීර්ඝ කිරීමට සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ තීරණය කිරීමද විශේෂයෙන් අවධානයට ගත යුතුව ඇත.

03. තවද මහ මැතිවරණයකදී දිවයින පුරා ගුරුවරුන් හා විදුහල්පතිවරුන් ලක්ෂයකට අධික පිරිසක් මැතිවරණ රාජකාරි සඳහා යොදා ගන්නා බව ඔබ හොඳින් දන්නා කරුණකි. මෙවැනි පසුබිමක විශේෂයෙන් ආණ්ඩුවේ මැති ඇමතිවරුන් මේවන විට සිදුකරමින් තිබෙන ප‍්‍රකාශ නිසා මැතිවරණයක් පැවැත්වීමේ අවදානම පිළිබඳව ඔවුන් නිරන්තරයෙන් විමසමින් මේ සම්බන්ධව අප සංගමයට මැදිහත් වන ලෙස බල කරමින් සිටින බවද පෙන්වා දිය යුතුව ඇත.

04. තවද මේ වන විට ව්‍යවස්ථානුකූලව මැතිවරණ කොමිසන් සභාවට පැවරී ඇති බලතල හමුවේ සෞඛ්‍ය අංශවල නිර්දේශ මත පිහිටා ව්‍යවස්ථාමය අර්බුද ඇති නොවන ලෙස මහ මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම පිළිබඳව ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ මතය විමසන ලෙස ජනාධිපතිවරයාට සිදු කරන ලද ඉල්ලීම හා කොමිසම තවදුරටත් එම ස්ථාවරයේ සිටීම පිළිබඳව අප සංගමය බෙහෙවින් අගය කරමු.

එහෙයින් අප පෙන්වාදුන් කරුණු මෙන්ම කොමිසන් සභාව ද තවදුරටත් සිටින ස්ථාවරයේ සිටිමින් රටේ ජනතාවගේ ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු වූ දිනෙක මෙරට ජනතාවගේ පරමාධිපත්‍යය තහවුරු කළ හැකි අපක්ෂපාතී නිදහස් සාධාරණ මැතිවරණයක් පැවැත්වීමට සියලූ පියවර ගන්නා මෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින අතර ඒ සඳහා  ඕනෑම සහයක් ලබාදීමට ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය සූදානම් බව ද මෙහිදී තවදුරටත් පෙන්වා දීමට කැමැත්තෙමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
විධායක සභාව වෙනුවෙන්,
මහින්ද ජයසිංහ
ප‍්‍රධාන ලේකම්,
ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය.


රු. 5000/- ක දීමනාව ගෙවීමට අදාළව මතු වූ ගැටළුකාරී තත්වය හේතුවෙන් ඊට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලින් සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් ඉවත් වීමේ තීරණය අත්හිටුවයි

April 18th, 2020

සංවර්ධන නිලධාරී සේවා සංගමය.  ජනමාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයයි

2020. 04. 18  
රු. 5000/- ක දීමනාව ගෙවීමට අදාළව මතු වූ ගැටළුකාරී තත්වය හේතුවෙන් ඊට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලින් සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් ඉවත් වීමේ තීරණය අත්හිටුවයි. අපේ‍්‍රල් 18 සිට රාජකාරී වල පෙර පරිදි.


#Covid-19 වසංගත තත්වය හමුවේ ආදායම් මාර්ග අහිමි වූ ජනතාව වෙනුවෙන් එක් පවුලකට එක් වරක් පමණක් රු. 5000/- ක් ගෙවීමට රජය විසින් තීරණය කරන ලදි.

එම තීරණයෙන් පසු එම කටයුත්ත බරපතල ලෙස දේශපාලනීකරණය කරමින් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ද පසෙක තබා ආණ්ඩුවට සම්බන්ධ ඇතැම් ප‍්‍රාදේශීය දේශපාලඥයන් විසින් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් වෙත නිකුත් කළ මුදල් ගෙවීමේ වවුචර්පත අයදුම්පතක් ලෙස මුද්‍රණය කර බෙදාහැරීම් ඇතුළු කටයුතු වල නියැලූණි.

එමෙන්ම රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමේ දී සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන්ගේ කිසිඳු නිල හා රාජකාරී අනන්‍යතාවයක් නොතිබූ හෙයින් 2020.04.16 දින සිට එම රාජකාරියෙන් ඉවත් වීමට තීරණය කරන ලදි.

ග‍්‍රාම නිලධාරීන් හා සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් මෙම රාජකාරියෙන් ඉවත් වූ පසු උද්ගත වූ තත්වය හමුවේ 2020. 04. 17 දින රාත‍්‍රී රජය සමඟ පැවති සාකච්ඡාවේදී ගනු ලැබූ තීරණ අනුව සංවර්ධන නිලධාරී සේවා සංගමය මගින් ගනු ලැබූ තීරණය අවසන් කර රු. 5000/- දීමනාව ගෙවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදාළ රාජකාරීවල නියැලීමට තීරණය කර ඇත.

01. 2020. 03. 01 අග‍්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම්තුමාගේ අත්සනින් යුතුව නිකුත් කළ චක‍්‍රලේකයේ සඳහන් කමිටුව මගින් සකස් කළ ප‍්‍රතිලාභී නාමලේකනය යළි අදාළ කර ගැනීමත්, 2020. 04. 15 දින අග‍්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම්තුමාගේ අත්සනින් යුතු චක‍්‍රලේකයේ ප‍්‍රතිලාභී කාණ්ඩ අනුව නම් ඇතුළත් කිරීම හෝ ඉවත් කිරීම යළි කමිටුව විසින් සලකා බැලීම.

02. 2020. 04. 12 සමෘද්ධි සංවර්ධන අධ්‍යක්ෂක ජනරාල්වරයාගේ චක‍්‍රලේකය අනුව සමෘද්ධි සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීවරයා කැඳවුම්කරු කරමින් සකස් වීමට නියම්තව තිබූ කමිටුව අදාළ නොකරගැනීමටත් වසමට අයත් නිලධාරීන් පස්දෙනාම 2020.

03. 31 චක‍්‍රලේකයේ කමිටුව ලෙස ක‍්‍රියාත්මක වීමත්

03. රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමේ දී අදාළ වවුචරයේ වසමට අයත් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් පස්දෙනාම අත්සන් කිරීමත්

යන ඉහත තීරණ මත රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලදී සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් 2020. 04. 18 දින සිට සාමාන්‍ය පරිදි එම රාජකාරී කටයුත්තේ යෙදීමට තීරණය කළ බව දන්වා සිටිමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
චන්දන සූරියආරච්චි  

අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධාන පිරිණමන තෑගි [MCC] සහ ණය පිළිගැනීමට අධිකරණ බලය අවලංගු කල යුතුද ?

April 18th, 2020

නීති පරීක්ෂණ කණ්ඩායම

   අප රටේ 

1] ඉඩම් ප්‍රතිපත්තිය,  2] ඉඩම් නීති 3] ඉඩම් ආයතන  සියල්ල     වෙනස් කිරීමට දැඩි උත්සහයක් දරති.   මෙසේ  කිරීමට  ආධාර  ලබාගැනී මට  අත්සන් තබන  අන්තර්ජාතික  ගිවිසුම් වල   කැපීපෙනෙන කොන්දෙසියක්වන්නේ   ඉඩම් සම්බන්දයෙන්  අදිකරණයට ඇති    බලය  අහෝසි කර    ඉඩම්හිමියන්ට    උසාවියට පිවිසීමට ඇති මූල්යමය අයිතිය   අවම   කිරීමය.  

මෙය ගෝලී  කරණ වැඩසටහනේ කොටසකි.    ශ්රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය  විනිසුරවරයකුවූ   ගරු    . ර් .බි  අමරසිංහගේ   බුද්ධිමත් වචන—-  ———– — ‘’අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධානයන්ගේ  ෂණික  උවමනාව  වන්නේඉඩම් විකිනීමට බාදාකරන සියලු නීති හා  ආයතන අහෝසිකොට, කඩිනමින් ඉඩම් විකිණීමේ හා උකස් කිරීමේ නව නීති  හඳුන්වාදීමය.’’      [1970 වර්ෂයේ  ‘ටයිටල්  ඉන්ෂුරන්ස්  ‘නමැති පොතේ   පෙරවදනෙයන්  ]

ලෝක බැ න්කුවෙන්,  USAID ,  ඇමෙරිකානු තානාපති කාර්යාලය සහ  වෙනෙත් ඇ මෙරිකා ණු   ආයතනවලින්  ආධාර ලබා,  පුරවැසියන්ට කිසිදු දැනුම් දීමක්   නොකොට,    විදේශ රටවල ඉඩම් නීති හඳුන්වා දීම දැනට සිදුවේ . බිම් සවිය  ඉඩම් නීතිය ඉන් පළමු ස්ථානය ගනී

1]  බිම් සවිය  ඉඩම් නීතිය හා අධිකරණ බලතල අහෝසි කිරීම    

බිම් සවිය නීතිය පැනවුවේ 1998 -අං ක 21  පනතින්ය.    මෙම  ‘  පනතේ  ‘ බිම් සවිය නාමය කොහෙවත්  සදහන් කර නොමැත.  1998 -අං ක 21  පනතින්   ලංකාවට හඳුන්වා දී ඇත්තේ විදේශීය  නීතියකි.  මෙම නීතියේ  අන්තර්ජාතික නාමය    'ටො ර න් ස් ‘ නීතිය  ' නොහොත්  ටයිටල්   රෙ ජි ස් ට්රේෂන්ය '. අන්තර්ජාතික නාමය භාවිතා නොකිරීමෙන්   මෙම  නීතිය පිළිබද දැනුම ඉඩම්  අයිති කරුවන්ටත්  නීතිවේදීන්ටත්  ලබා ගැනීමට අපහසුවී ඇත.   [therefore refer to   Torrens  law or Title Registration  on the  internet -  Few references  are mentioned below ]  .බිම් සවිය යන නාමය භාවිතා කරන්නේ මහජනයා නොමග යැවීමටද ?.  නීතිය රටට  නොගැලපෙන විදේශ  නීතියක්  යන්න වසා  දැමීමට ද ?.      
බිම් සවිය  නීතිය ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට මහත් පුදුමයක් විය හැකිය.  ලංකාවට හදුන්ව දී ඇ ති   මෙම නීතිය   නව ලිබරල්   ආථික ප්‍රතිපත්තිය    මත සැදුනු නීතියකි .  එනම් ගැනුම් කරුවන්ට  , උකස් කරුවන්ට  ලෙහෙසියෙන් ඉඩමවල අයීතිය සොයා  ගත හැකි ,  නව  ලියා පදිංචි  රෙජිස්ටරයක් සකස්කිරිමයි.   කඩිනමින් විකිණීම හා උකස් කිරීම,  ආථිකය  වැඩිදියුණු කිරීමේ  හා දුප්පත් කම ඉවත් කිරීමේ  මාර්ගයයි 
නව ලිබරල්   ආථික  ප්‍රවීණයන්ගේ ප්‍රකාශයයි  .

බිම් සවිය  නීතිය අනුව   රෙජිස්ටරයේ   ඇති අයිතිකරුවන් ගේ  අයිතිය  විභාග කිරීමට   උසාවියකටවත්  බලයක්  නැත.  මෙම බලගතු ලියාපදිංචි කිරීමට  ‘Indefeasible’  [වෙනස් කළ නොහැකි ]   යන නාමය භාවිතා  කරනු ඇත.   එබැවින් වංචනික  ඔප්පුවක් මත හෝ නීතියට පටහෙනි   ඔප්පුවක් මත රෙජිස්ටරයේ  නම ලියාපදිංචි කරගතහොත්  ,   වංචාකරුට  ඉඩම  අයිතිවේ.  .  [මෙය ඇතුලත් කර ඇත්තේ  අංක 21 පනතේ 33 වගන්තියේය.  උදාහරණයක්—– සරෝජාගේ  ඉඩම නිමල්ට් විකුණු පසු සරෝජාගේ නම මැකියයි. නිමල්ගේ නම පමණක් රෙජිස්ටේරයේ  සදහන් වේ.   උසාවියට ​​පිවිසීමේ මූලික අයිතිය   සරෝජාට නොමැත

තවද පනතේ  73  වන වගන්තිය  අනුව,   අං ක 21   පනත  වෙනත්  ලිඛිත නීති  කිසිවක් නොතකා  සියළුම  නීතිවලට වඩා ඉහළින් පවතී.    එබැවින්  ,   අං ක 21   පනත      පුද්ගලික ඉඩම් , රාජයේ ඉඩම් ,  පූජනීය ඉඩම්, දේවාල   ඉඩම් , කුබුරු ඉඩම් , වගාව හුවමාරු  කිරීමට අදාල , හා පොලොව  යට සම්පත් ආරක්ෂා කිරීමටයොදා ඇති  නීති සියල්ල බිම් සවිය නීතියට යට කරන්නේය  .   රෝම ලන්දේසි නීතිය,  අවුරුදු 100 ක් පැරණි උසාවි තීන්දු ,[ judicial precedence ] බෙදුම් නඩු පනත, [ Partition Acct  ] හවුල් අ යිතිවාසිකම් [co-ownership] බුක්තිය පිලිබඳ නීතිය [ Presciption  Ordinance] තහනම් නියෝග වාර [ injuctions]   මේ සියල්ල  අහෝසි  කරන්නේය    

බිම්  සවිය  නීතියෙන්  ඉඩම්  වලට  අදාල  අවුරුදු සීයයක් පමණ     පැරණි  රටේ  නීති  මෙසේ අහෝසි  වන  බව  දැනසිටින්නේ  සුළු පිරිසකි.

 ලංකාවේ පන්සල් වල ඉඩම් වලට මෙම නීති  කිසිසේත් නොගැ ලපෙන බව අස්ගිරිය  ගෞරවනීය  මාහිමියන් විසින්  ප්රචාරයකර කර  ඇති අතර පන්සල්  හා දේවාල  බූමි මෙම නීතියෙන්  වහාම  ඉවත් කරන ලෙස  අ න කර ඇත    https://srilog.com/sri-lankan-chief-prelate-threatens-to-launch-protest-over-government-failure-to-amend-land-laws_3206.htmlSri Lankan Chief Prelate threatens to launch protest over government failure to amend land lawshttps://srilog.com/sri-lankan-chief-prelate-threatens-to-launch-protest-over-government-failure-to-amend-land-laws_3206.htmlSri Lankan Chief Prelate threatens to launch protest over government failure to amend land laws

Posted on April 17, 2014 by jamal Leave a comment

විදේශ රටවල ඉඩම් නීති ලංකාවට  හදුන්වා  දීමේදී  ගෞරවනීය බෞද්ධ පූජක පක්ෂයටත් , වෙනත් ආගම් වල ගෞරවනීය පුජකවරුන්ටත්  මහජනයාට පැහැදිලිකිරීම   ඉතාමත් අවශ්වූ නමුත් එය එසේ නොවේ

ලංකාවේ අවුරුදු  සීයයක් පමණ  පැරණි  පෙලපත ලියවූ, ලියාපදිංචි පොත්   අහිමි වේ .

අංක 21  පනතේ,    53  වගන්තිය අනුව පසු ගනුදෙනු  ලියාපදින් චි   ලේඛන  විනාශ කෙරේ . 

ලියාපදිංචි  කන්තෝරු 45 ක්  ලංකාවේ ඇත . මෙහි  ලක්ෂ 2 ක් පමණ පොත් ගබඩා කොට ඇත . මෙම පොත්වල 18  හා 19  ශත වර්ෂයන්  වල සිට මෙ රටේ ඉඩම් වල  ඉතිහාසය  සහ පසු ගනුදෙනු සටහන් කර ඇත . එනම් ඉඩමේ පැ ටිකිරිය  නොහොත් ඉඩම් පැ වත ආ ආකාරයයි.

  ලංකාවේ ඉඩම් නීතිය බිම් සවියට වෙනස් කල විට  අයිතිකරු  පමණක්     බිම් සවිය නීතියෙන් ලියාපදිංචි පොත්වල පෙන්නුම් කරයි .  මුල්  ඉඩම්  කරුවන්ගේ නම්    මෙම නීතියෙන්  සම්පූර්යනයෙන්  අස්කර යි.  මේ රටේ ලාංකිකයන් ට  තමාට ඉඩම ලැබුනේ කෙසේද යන්න සොයා ගත නොහැකි වේ

ඉඩම් අයිතිකරුවන්ගේ පෙළපත ඉතිහාස ගතවන පොත්   වලට‍ යන ඉරණම  ගැන රජයේ  නිලධාරීන්ගේ ඉල්ලීම .  https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/documents/paperspresented/performance-report-land-title-settlement-department-2017.pdf  ඉඩම් අයිතිකරුවන්ගේ පෙළපත ඉතිහාස ගතවන පොත්  ගණන  ලක්ස දෙකක් [200000] පමණ වේ   බිම් සවියෙන් පසු ලංකාවේ ඉඩම් ඉතිහාසය ලියාඇ ති පොත් විනාස වීමට ඉඩ ඇත 

 පොත්වල චායරුපයක්  

  නොසලකා හරින ලද   පොත් ගබඩා— පොත් අහුරා  තිබෙන්නේ මෙසේය  —– 2017https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/documents/paperspresented/performance-report-land-title-settlement-department-2017.pdf

 ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරුවේ පොත් සංරක්ෂිතය කළ යුතුය. ------ ඉඩම් හිමිකම් නිරවුල් කිරීමේ කොමසාරිස්  ජනරාල්   මෙස්සේ කියයි --------
2017 වාර්තාව ----- -දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ වාර්තා කාමරය ජාතික වැදගත්කමක් ඇති මුල් ලේඛන සහිත ස්ථානයකි. එහි ඇති ලේඛන නිසි ලෙස පරිලෝකනය කර සුරක්ෂිත කළ යුතුය. කෙසේ වෙතත්, මේ සඳහා අවශ් භෞතික, මානව හා මූල් සම්පත් මෙන්ම අවකාශයන්  ඉතා සීමිතය.  අනුව, එක් එක් ලේඛනයේ ස්කෑන් කරන ලද පිටපතක් ලබා දෙන ලියකියවිලි භාරගෙන සංරක්ෂණය කරන ලෙස ඉල්ලා ජාතික ලේඛනාගාර දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව සමඟ අවශ් සාකච්ඡා පවත්වන ලදී. එහි ප්රති files ලයක් ලෙස ලිපිගොනු 650 ක් ඔවුන්ට ලබා දෙන ලදී. ලිපිගොනු 200,000 ක් වාර්තා කාමරයේ ඇති බැවින්, මෙම ක්රියාවලිය වේගවත් කළ යුතු අතර ජාතික වැදගත්කමක් ඇති ව්යාපෘතියක් ලෙස සැලකිය යුතුය.’
 ඩිජිටල්කරණය

.  දියුණු රටවල මෙම  වෙනස් කම්  කරන්නේ  , නීතිය හා පරිඝනික භාවිතය ගැන  පර්යේෂණ  කිරීමෙන් හා මහජනයා දැනුවත් කිරීමෙනි.     හොන්කොන්  වෙනි රටවල්  මෙයට  අවුරුදු 12 පමණ කාලයක් ගත කලේය .

 අවුරුදු 100ක් පැරණි පොත් සංරක්ෂිත නොකොට, ඉඩම් ලියාපදංචි කන්තෝරු සකස් නොකොට  විෂයේ  විශේෂිත වූවන් ද නීති  පොත්ද නොමැතිව , අප  රටේ නීති උපදෙස් හා අපගේ පනත්  බාවිතා නොකොට මෙවැනි දැවෙන්ත වෙනස්කම් කිරීම ‘කරත්තය ගොනා  ඉසරහෙන් සිටින්නා’  සේය  කියා  මා හට පෙනෙන්නේය. [ cart before the horse ]  .  

  පුද්ගලික හා ආණ්ඩුවේ ඉඩම්  ගණුදෙනු සියල්ල්ල රෙජිස්ටරයේ  සටහන් වී නැති අතර,  ව්යාජ  ඔප්පු තැන්පත් වී ඇති    බව රෙජිස්ටාරා ජෙනරාල්  කියාසි ටී.  මේ සියල්ලම  මගහැර  හිමිකම්  පරණ රෙජිස්ටරයෙන්   රෙජිස්ටරයට  පිටපත් කිරීම   ඊ රෙජිස්ට්‍රේ තත් වය කුමක්ද ?    අපරටේ පර්යේෂණ සමග   උත්හසහායක්    නොකරන්නේ  සියල්ල  පැවෙතෙන්නේ විදේශ  මුදල් හා විදේශ  පර්යේෂණ  මත  බැවිනි. අප රටේ  රහසිගතව  පනත් ඉදිරිපත් කරන බැවින් [බිම් සවිය එස්සේ පැමිණි නීතියකි ]  ඉඩම් හිමියන් පමණක් නොව නීතිඥයාවරුන් ට  මේ සම්බන්දව එතරම්  දැනුමක් නැති බව පෙනී යයි  

දැනට  බිම් සවිය රේජිස් ටරය  සකස් කලාට  පසු,  දෙවනුව ඉඩමේ නම වෙනුවට  .  ඉල්ලක්කම් 12 කින් යුතු  නොම්බෙරයක්   [ 12 digit number ]     අයිතිකරුට ලැ බෙන්ට සලස්ව යි.    කඩදාසි ලේඛන යුගය  අවසන් වන අතර   ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරුවල පරිගණක යුගය මෙතැන්සිට ආරම්බ වෙයි. 

මෙම හදිසි තීරණ වල   බලපෑම් කුමක් වේද යන්න දැනට යටපත් වී ඇත.

 මේ සම්බන්දව කිසිම දැනුමක් මහජනයයාට නැත. අප රටේ නව නීතිය [බිම් සවිය] සම්බන්දයෙන් සහ පරිගණක ඉඩම් ලේකන පිළියෙළ  කිරීම සම්බන්දයෙන් කිසිදු නීති පොතක් නැති  අතර , දැ නුම ලබා  දීමට උගතුන් ද  නොමැත.  අපි   සම්පූර්ණයන්  විදේශීය  උපදේශකයන්ට  සහ බාහිර කොන්ත්‍රාත්කරුවන්ට බාරදී   මේ  වෙනස්කම්ර  කිරීමට බලපොරෝතුවෙමු. 

මේ සියල්ල කෙරෙන්නේ එකම මතයක් උදෙසාය; ව්‍යාපාර දර්ශකයේ ඉහළට නැගීමටය .[ Doing Business Index] .   ඉඩමට නොම්බරය ක්  තබා  ලේඛන පරිලෝකනය කරන්න,  කඩදාසි ලේඛන නැතිව ඉඩම් ගනුදෙනු කරන්න ‘ ඩිජිටල් කරණය , ඉඩම් නීති විදේශ නීති වලට පරිවර්තනය කිරීම සියල්ල සිදුවන්නේ අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධාන  පිරිණමන    තෑගි[MCC]   සහ ණය  පිළිගැනීමටය .

මෙහි ඇති බයානක කම    වෛරස් සහ සයිබර් ක්රයිම් වලට ගොදුරු වීමය    එ වැනි දෙයක් සිදූ වූ වොත් අප රටට  ඉඩම් වල අයිතිය රැකගන්න ශක්තියක් තිබේද?

2] බිම් සවිය ව්‍යප්ත  කිරීමට --- දෙවෙනි වරටත් අධිකරණ බලතල අවලංගු කරන තවත් ගිවිසුමක් ඉදිරිපත්වේ MCC  6.8

අවුරුදු 5 ක ට  දිස්ත්රික්ක 7 ක  අධිකරණයේ බලය ඉවත් කොට බිම් සවිය ලියාපදිංචිය සහ ඉ රෙජිස්ටර සකස් කිරීට විදේශිකයන්ට බාරදීම

. MCC සහ එක්සත් ජනපද රජය මෙම සංයුක්තය යටතේ සිදුවන ක්‍රියාකාරකම් හෝ අතපසු වීම් හේතුවෙන් පැන නගින කිසිදු හිමිකම් පෑමක් හෝ අලාභයක් සඳහා කිසිදු වගකීමක් දරන්නේ නැත. මෙම සංයුක්තය යටතේ සිදුවන ක්‍රියාකාරකම් හෝ අතපසු වීම් හේතුවෙන් ඇති වන පාඩු හානිය, තුවාල හෝ මරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් රජය විසින් එම්.සී.සී. හෝ එක්සත් ජනපද රජයට හෝ වර්තමාන හෝ හිටපු නිලධාරියෙකුට හෝ එම්.සී.සී. එවැනි අලාභයක්, හානියක්, තුවාලයක් හෝ මරණයක් සඳහා ඉහත කිසිදු ආයතනයකට හෝ පුද්ගලයන්ට එරෙහිව කිසිදු ආකාරයක හිමිකම් පෑමක් හෝ නෛතික ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් ගෙන නොයනු ඇත. එම්.සී.සී. සහ එක්සත් ජනපද රජය හෝ එම්.සී.සී. හෝ එක්සත් ජනපද රජයේ වර්තමාන හෝ හිටපු නිලධාරියෙකු හෝ සේවකයෙකු ශ්රී ලංකාවේ සියලුම අධිකරණ හා විනිශ්චය සභාවල අධිකරණ බලයෙන් නිදහස් විය යුතු බවට රජය එකඟ වේ.

විදේශිකයන්ට අප රටේ ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු බාරදීම

  ඉඩම් රෙජීස්ට්රිය  ආරක්ෂා කිරීම සඳහා ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයේ විශේෂ නීති තිබේ. වෙනත් රටවලත් එසේමය . [ රටවලට ගිය අපට පෙනීයන්නේ ඇතුල් වීම  තහනම් බවය  ] මන්ද යතහොත්,  ඉඩම් ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු වල රටේ ධනය [ රටේ ඉඩම් වල විස්තර ]  ගබඩා කර ඇති  බැවිනි . ඒවා රහසිගතව තබා ගත යුතු බැවිනි  . 

රටේ  ඉඩම් නීති වෙනස් කිරීම  හා  ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු වල අවුරුදු 5 ක්  රටේ නීති වලට  යටත් නොවන ආකාරයට සම්පූර්නයෙම්ම   නිදහසේ ඇතුල් වීම    විදේශිකයන් අතට පැවරීම කණගාටු දායකය

විසඳුමක්

නීති  සංගමය සහ ගරු  ජනාධිපති මහින්ඳ රාජපක්‍ෂ කොමිටුව  පිලියෙල කල නීති පිළිගැනීම.  බිම් සවිය වැනි  අධිකරණ  බලය  නැති කරන නීති අප රටට  හඳුන්වා දීම අවම කල යුතුය. මේ සියල්ල සම්බන්දයෙන් රෑපවාහිණි ය හා පත්තර මහජනයාව දැනුවත් කලුතුය . 

 ඉඩම් ඔප්පු  දුප්පත් අය ට පිරිනමා ඔවුන්ට ඉ රෙජිස්ටෙරය භාවිතා  කොට විදේශීය නීති අනුගමනය කරන්ට කීම ඔප්පු නුදුන්නාසේය

ඉහත කරුණු උපුටාගත්තේ 

1]     වෙනත් රටවල්  Torrens law [බිම් සවිය ] හදුන්වාදී මෙන්  අධිකරණයට සහ ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට  සිදුකල බරපතල ගැටළු  දැක්වෙන අධිකරණය  වාර්තා  ———–

A]Mlaysian experience  —   උදාහරණයක් වසයෙන් එම රටේ ඉඩම් දැන්  වංචාකරුවන්ට බිම් සවිය නීතිය හරහා  බාරදෙයි .   මෙසේ සිදුවී ඇත්තේ අවලංගු  ව්‍යාජ   ඔප්පු  ලියාපදිංචි කරුවන්ට,   විරුද්දව ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට  උසාවියට යෑමට නොහැකි වීමය  http://www.hba.org.my/laws/CourtCases/2000/adorna.htm. —-Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd – vs -Boonsom Boonyanit]   –නඩු පැවරු ඉඩම් හිමියාට මැලයසියාවේ උසාවියට  උදව්  කිරීමට නොහැකි  වීමේ  නඩු තීන්දුව 

B] UK experience– අවලංගු  ව්‍යාජ   ඔප්පු සම්බන්දව  එන්ගලන්ත යේ   අධිකරණය මෙම නීතියට හිරවී ඇත .  එහි නඩුකාරවරු  නොතාරිස්  [ solicitors]වරුන්ට වන්දි ගෙවන ලෙසට තීන්දු දී ඇත.   නොතාරිස්වරු මවිත කෙරුණු , ඉතිහාස ගතවන නදුතීන්දුවක් 2018 ප්‍රථම වරට   ඉතිහාසගතවනු  ඇත.නඩුව  [ reamvar-v-mishcondereya-]—  https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/real-estate-law-blog/property-fraud-after-dreamvar-v-mishcon-de-reya

C]Singapore experience  --- බිම් සවිය නීතිය වංචාකරුවන් සඳහා අදහස් කරන ලදී-- ? https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2325/
2] what happened Papua New Guinean?----judicial assault on the citadel of indefeasibility of title under the Papua New Guinean Torrens System of conveyance By John Mugambwa[*]http://www.paclii.org/journals/fJSPL/vol05/2.shtml
3]  Evaluating Land Governess Issues by B Kirubanathan 2013 https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/librarywww/papers_2013/msc/la/kirubananthan.pd
4] Title Insurance book  by  Justice A.R.B.Amerasinghe 
5] Equality and Freedom book by Justice C.G.Weeramantr
6]New  Perspectives On Land Registration contemporary problems and solution by Amy Gaymour Stephen Watterson NAD Martin Dixon https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/new-perspectives-on-land-registration-9781509906031/
7] World Bank reports land title project  Sri Lanka –see web sites years  2002  and 2007 and 2016
8] Annual reports of the Commissioner of Title and Survey General Sri Lanka see web sites
9] Australian Torrens system --https://api.research- repository.uwa.edu.au/portalfiles/portal/34721286/ Thesis_doctor_of_philosophy_Carruthers_Penelope_Jane_2018.pdf 
10]   http://www.colombopage.com/CGImgs_reps/MCC.pdf  Millennium  Challenge Compact 

මී ළග  ළිපිය MCC   හා බිම් සවිය

It’s time we returned to Wedakama and Ayurveda to fight COVID-19

April 18th, 2020

By Suryamithra Vishwa/Harmony Page-DailyFT Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

The ancient medical systems of Sri Lanka and India will help build immunity which is currently absent in the population

Colombo, April 18: In the background of one of the worst global pandemics in recent history, the COVID-19 virus, South Asian countries such as Sri Lanka and India could be described as nations gifted with a rich and diverse medical heritage, such as Desiya Chikitsa (Sinhala Hela Beheth), Ayurveda and Siddha.

Encompassed within the broad Ayurveda system are many life-saving healing methods, disease preventive methods and knowledge of the use of the many of nature’s gifts including medicinal herbs, plants, trees, fruits/vegetables, a significant number of which are considered luxuries in the West.

Most of these comprise our traditional diet and contribute to boosting our immunity against diseases. It is pertinent to mention that the meaning of the Sanskrit term AyurVeda could be translated as knowledge or science of life; Ayur meaning life and Veda meaning knowledge or knowing.

In the face of the global pandemic, where we do not know what more intriguing diseases are in store for us, in both Sri Lanka and India, there are those lobbying for our traditional values of well-being, agriculture and nutrition as well as avoiding harmful ‘modern’ diets of genetically modified and chemically induced foods that are not part of our agro heritage.

Even those who are more comfortable with Western medicine or allopathy would agree on the point that the philosophy of Ayurveda is largely around prevention of disease with a correct lifestyle, thought patterns and diet practices where the mind, body and spirit are all taken as an integral whole, a time-tested outlook. Sri Lanka and India share a near common medical history.

Sri Lanka, which was thought to be an ancient medicinal hub, has a medical system that pre-dates Ayurveda, known as Desiya chikitsa or Sinhala Wedakama (medicine of the Sinhala race). It is believed that Ravana, the prehistoric king of Lanka of Ramayana fame, was well versed in medical lore. It is mentioned that he represented Sri Lanka at a medical conference held in India during his time (where he met Seetha and unleashed the first Indo-Lankan war), points out Dr. C.G. Uragoda, author of the book, ‘History of Medicine in Sri Lanka’.

Uragoda, an allopathic doctor and past President of the Sri Lanka Medical Association and the Ceylon College of Physicians, explains in the book under the 2nd chapter ‘Ancient medical practices’, that a majority of the medical plants used in India and Sri Lanka are the same.

Sri Lankan author, Dr. Seela Fernando in her book ‘Herbal Food and Medicines in Sri Lanka’ quotes Dr. George Clarke, M.D., M.A. of Philadelphia, as stating as follows, after reading the Charaka Samhita, the ancient text on the Ayurvedic medical tradition: As I go through a part of Charaka, I come to the conclusion that if present day physicians drop all modern drugs and chemicals from their Pharmacopoeia and adopt the methods of Charaka in treating diseases, there will be less work for undertakers and fewer invalids in the world.”

Dr. Clarke was referring to the overall medical system of both India and Sri Lanka.

Against the coronavirus backdrop, what is being recommended by the Chinese and other experts who have studied the COVID-19 virus (and found it being eliminated when exposed to high levels of heat) are methods such as steaming which Indian and Sri Lankan traditional medical practice uses for respiratory health. The herb-infused inhalation clears the lungs and restores respiratory health.

Among the herbs (raw or dried) used are lime leaves, coriander, thulasi (holy basil), ginger, garlic, nidhikumba (mimosa) flowers, karapincha (curry leaves), kuppameniya (Indian copper leaf), kohomba (neem leaves/bark), devadara and vishnukanthi (to name a few). The general regular consumption of herbs/spices such as lime, turmeric, pepper, ginger, onion and coriander that is part of our diet, is known to enhance and fortify immunity.

Ayurvedic practices such as oil pulling (gargling with coconut oil, putting drops in nose and eyes) is used especially in India for ridding impurities from the body and boosting overall immunity.

Revive ancient medical heritage

Although it is allopathic medicine that has taken a central stage in India and Sri Lanka there are calls to revive our ancient medical heritage to face present and future threats of global pandemics.

Indian Padma Shri award winner for his services for promoting Ayurveda, J. Hareendran Nair, a renowned Ayurvedic doctor and entrepreneur from Kerala, opined that it is sad that Ayurveda medical practices have today become an ‘alternative medicine’ for countries such as India and Sri Lanka where Ayurveda is and was a key part of our collective inheritance.

Meanwhile, D.H. Tennakoon, former Director of Sri Lanka’s National Ayurveda Teaching Hospital, who is currently talking to the media to educate people on Ayurveda in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, points to an ancient Sanskrit sloka that advised, through Ayurveda, contact based prevention techniques when faced with human to human transmitted contagious diseases.

He points out that this is the same as those prescribed today by the World Health Organisation (WHO), pertaining to the prevention of the COVID-19 virus.

The sloka advising distancing/isolation/avoidance of touch, when threatened by contagious diseases is as follows:

Prasangath (close intimate contact, sexual) gathra

sansparsath (touch; such as shaking hands)

nisswasath (exhalation and droplets thereof)

sahabojanath (shared meals or community eating)

ekashaiyasanaschaiwa (close proximity habitation such as in a family; carrying children, etc.)

wastra (exchange of clothes/sharing of clothes)

malanu (ornaments such as chains and exchanging such)

lepanath (cosmetic application such as lipstick)

jawaran kushtancha shoshan cha (diseases such as rashes, TB, fever)

nethra abhisyanda mewacha (eye diseases such as sore eyes, conjunctivitis)

awupasargika rogas thu sankramanthi naran nara (all these that are passed from person to person).

Well, isn’t this what is told to us now by Western medical experts for the prevention of the coronavirus, which our ancient physicians told us so many hundreds of years ago in exact precise detail, advising us how to avoid the spreading of such diseases?” asks Dr. Tennakoon.

He also points to the Ayurvedic advice to communities during pandemics in ancient times. When a disease was widespread, ‘Janapada Udwansa’, there was a directive to ‘lockdown’ as we know now in today’s parlance, or ‘isolation’ of villages and towns. Within families the sick person would be isolated. He or she would use separate plates, cups etc.

If one looks at the ancient Sri Lankan/Indian medical practice; when there was a sick person in the family , herbs and leaves such as lime fruit/Kohomba (Neem) leaves were hung outside the door indicating that the particular house is temporarily under isolation because a member in that household is having an infectious sickness. Well that is exactly what the Public Health Inspector (PHI) of today is doing in Sri Lanka, pasting a sticker on the door (indicating that the house has a patient with the COVID-19 virus). The only exception is that the sticker is not a herb having medicinal properties and anti-bacterial benefits that all the medicinal leaves have,” Dr. Tennakoon points out.

Turn attention to nature

We have to turn our attention to nature of which we are all a part,” says Meera Sai Murali of Coimbatore, a former banking professional who is now an example of how to live with and in nature without disease, cultivating her own food/medicine through organic nature-based methods and following the path of nature cure for disease prevention.

Right now, when many of us in Sri Lanka and India are struggling with food shortages and fear of contracting the COVID-19 virus, Meera lives happily in the security that she will neither have a lack of food nor fear for her immunity.

This lockdown is not affecting me and my family as we are anyway in a permanent ‘lockdown’ with nature where we have in our forest garden everything we need; what mother earth gifts us are our foods. All the elements of mother earth are our medicine. We spend a maximum of only around Indian Rs. 2,000 a month and that too for expenditure such as fuel,” points out Meera who engages in what is called ‘nature-based cultivation’ (dictated by nature and not by man and his devious modern introductions of pesticides/weedicide).

Known in Sinhala as ‘Swabahdaham govithena’ that Sri Lankan experts on the subject such as Tilak Kandegama promote, is the pathway for the future for us to become what we were before colonization/globalization. We were strong, using our formidable ancestral knowledge.

The sun and the air and clean water are all compulsory for good immunity. Every plant has multiple uses. Nature is providing all of us multiple options; it gives us tooth cleaning material, body cleaning agents, fruits, greens, vegetables, medicines, toys.. the list is endless,” says Meera.

There are others who echo Meera on awakening to self-sufficiency in nutrition, both at an individual and national level.

Begin a new path

Countries like Sri Lanka and India have to begin a new path to secure their food and nutrition based on traditional/indigenous models. Ayurveda emphasizes disease prevention and it is time we resurrected our own philosophy of living right,” says Western and India trained Lankan food and nutrition specialist, Dr. Damayanthi Perera who holds a PhD in Human Nutrition from the University of London and M SC, B Sc, P.G. Diploma in Public Health and Policy from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in UK. She also holds a Masters degree in human nutrition from the University of Bombay and B.Sc from the University of Allahabad, India.

She opines that the Western economic, agriculture, food and nutrition models have failed to serve humanity.

During the early days of the Indian lockdown, a friend from India called me and the conversation was on COVID-19. He informed me that his Indian doctor friend had advised him to take zinc supplements to boost immunity,” recalls Dr. Perera.

I immediately responded by reminding him that he is from the ‘Land of Ayurveda’ and that there are plenty of foods recommended in Ayurveda for boosting immunity. I told him that we are taking ‘Golden Milk’ with turmeric, ginger and black pepper and milk… which is a traditional Ayurvedic recipe for boosting immunity. I also informed him to consume at least one teaspoon of virgin coconut oil (VCO) three times a day since it has been reported in scientific literature that VCO destroys lipid coated viruses,” she said.

Western consumers have been gulping down synthetic vitamins and minerals for long, but the comparative data from the global north and the global south on COVID-19 pandemic indicate that consumers from the global north are immune-compromised. Further, synthetic vitamins and minerals may be toxic in the short and long-run. Our traditional food cultures and traditional agriculture have been destroyed by the West. This is our last chance to reform our food and agriculture to prevent both non communicable (NCDs) and communicable diseases,” she emphasizes.

The coronavirus is a dark cloud over the world but let our Sinhala Wedakama and the Ayurvedic system and our nature based agro heritage be the silver lining on disease prevention and immunity boosting.

(The Harmony page will continue to publish interviews, articles, analysis and book reviews on our wealth of traditional indigenous medicinal and lifestyle practices recommended through Hela Wedakama, Ayurveda and Sidha as well as continue our mission to draw humanity closer to Mother Earth. We therefore will continue to actively promote the cultivation methods that are in sync with our ancient Lankan heritage where we did not poison the earth and ourselves or kill any other creature; weed or insect just because humans have to be fed.)

Are we all set for an early June Parliamentary Election?

April 18th, 2020

Gagani Weerakoon Courtesy Ceylon Today

Due to the imposition of curfew, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the Sinhala and Tamil New Year 2020 had to be celebrated in solitary comfort of their homes.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa also remained in his residence in Mirihana during this period. At the dawn of the New Year, Rajapaksa contacted his siblings, the Minister of Mahaweli, Agriculture, Irrigation and Rural Development, Chamal Rajapaksa and the Prime Minister, Mahinda Rajapaksa and extended his New year wishes.

The President also received calls from the public while he constantly was in contact with officials for the discussion on measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken for the country to return to normalcy.
On 15 April he arrived at the Presidential Secretariat and called on the Presidential Task Force, appointed to combat COVID-19, to inquire into the updates of the measures taken.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa also celebrated the New Year with his family at the Carlton House in Tangalle. Although generally a huge crowd gathers at the Carlton House during New Year season, this year was an exception.

Certain New Year traditions have been consistently followed at the Carlton House every year and this year it took place in the presence of his whole family.

On 14 April, Minister of Passenger Transport Management, Power and Energy, Mahinda Aamaraweera arrived at the Carlton House to wish Premier while the former Governor of the Central Bank, Ajith Nivard Cabraal and Rajapaksa’s parliamentary affairs secretary, Kumarasiri Hettige travelled from Colombo to Tangalle to wish him.

On 15 April, Premier visited his elder brother Chamal Rajapaksa’s residence and spent a few days at the Carlton Estate in Weeraketiya while constantly making contact for updates on measures implemented to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

The President, head of the Presidential Task Force, Basil Rajapaksa, the Minister of Health, Pavithra Wanniarachchi, Director General of Health Services, Anil Jasinghe and the current Commander of Army, Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva were constantly in contact during the New Year period.

Prasanna blames JVP

The National Organizer of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and the former Minister of Economic Development, Basil Rajapaksa appears to be held up in a busy schedule although he is not a Cabinet Minister or even a deputy minister.


While the SLPP has long been preparing for the upcoming General Elections, Rajapaksa, right after having handed over nominations, has been vested with a huge additional responsibility.


He has been appointed as the head of the Presidential Task Force formed by the President Gotabaya Rajapaksa in order to take necessary steps to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, including the curfews that have been imposed and other precautionary measures adopted by the government.


Basil has had experience in such involvement. Discussions in furtherance for measures that have to be adopted for the country to return to normalcy have thus taken place at Temple Trees under his leadership.


A similar discussion was also held on 15 April chaired by Rajapaksa. This discussion was more far-fetched as in addition to steps that have to be implemented for the country to return to normalcy, measures pertaining to that of Sri Lankans currently overseas were also discussed.


The discussion focused on the return of Sri Lankan citizens overseas who want to return to their homeland during the pandemic as there is a considerable number of such individuals. Minister of Foreign Relations, Dinesh Gunawardena and the Minister of Industrial Exports and Investment Promotion, Prasanna Ranatunga were also present at this discussion.


Basil stated that these individuals have to be brought back to Sri Lanka upon the instructions of health officials while the spread of COVID-19 will also be controlled.


Meanwhile Gunawardena noted that information on these individuals have been obtained from Embassies and High Commissions and the process of ensuring their return is being carried out methodically.


Ranatunga added that the SriLankan Airlines will begin preparations for their return upon the approval of the State while emphasizing that the instructions of the State and health officials in this regard is mandatory.


Upon approval, they will be tested at the airport following which the report could be obtained within six hours until which they will remain in the airport. They will then be subject to a 14 day quarantine period.


During the previous Cabinet meeting, matters pertaining to Sri Lankans stranded in International airports was also discussed.


Ranatunga said issue of over 33 Sri Lankans having been stranded in foreign airports and measures that have to be adopted for their return were discussed in this Cabinet meeting adding that two Sri Lankans who arrived from the London Heathrow Airport have also been subject to quarantine.


He also stated that JVP’s, Wasantha Samarasinghe had alleged that Sri LankanAirlines is operating as usual while not taking measures for the return of Sri Lankan citizens overseas.


”This is a complete hoax as this entity has carried out their social responsibility by ensuring the safe return of Sri Lankans from Wuhan China and will continue this by bringing back all other Sri Lankans overseas when time permits,” he said while blaming JVP for consistently making false accusations and not carrying out clean politics.
 Rajapaksa then instructed officials to take steps and formulate mechanisms for the quick return of all those who are employed overseas, involved in business and students studying in foreign universities.


It’s all about elections


The Party led by South Korea’s President, Moon Jae-In, has scored an emphatic victory in the parliamentary poll held early this week. More than 17 million had cast their vote despite some 30 persons being tested positive for the coronavirus every day.


Though political pundits had expressed doubts about people being eager to vote, due to the rapid spread of the killer virus, the voter turnout had been 66.2 percent, dispelling those predictions.


Despite the presence of some 3,100 COVID-19 infected people throughout the nation, the South Korean Government had taken measures to conduct the election at eight quarantine centres, too.


Also, unlike previous polls there, an additional five million voters had cast their vote at the poll. The Democratic Party led by President Moon Jae-In had won 180 seats in the 300-seat National Assembly.


Political pundits have pointed out that what had enabled the ruling party to post an emphatic win had been its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the prevention of the spread of the deadly virus throughout the country.


Political analysts have noted that the COVID-19 pandemic had proved to be a blessing in disguise for President Moon Jae-In and his party as they won comfortably.


However, at the onset of the disease, the handling of the pandemic by President Jae-In had come in for severe criticism.


An internet petition containing over 1 million signatures had been posted over the South Korean President’s decision taken not to prohibit travel between Seoul and Beijing.


But, despite such criticisms the handling of the spread of the pandemic by the South Korean Government sans any lockdown had come in for much praise from around the world.


Meanwhile, the South Korean Government had also made facilities available to some 44 million qualified voters to cast their vote at the election.


The talk in the town is that even Sri Lanka too, in the past, had conducted elections at the height of JVP insurgency, where people were massacred when involved in the democratic process and also when Prabhakaran obstructed the Tamils in the North and East from voting in 2005.


If both, the Director General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasingha and the head of the presidential taskforce, to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, Army Commander Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva, were to grant approval, the stalled General Election (GE) could be held during the last week of May, sources attached to the Election Commission (EC) say.


The Election Commission headed by Mahinda Deshapriya is already planning to hold a crucial discussion regarding the present situation in the country as well as the measures that could be taken to conduct the postponed General Election which was originally slated to be held on 25 April.      


These sources noted that Dr. Jasingha, who is the sole authority empowered to enforce the COVID-19 Quarantine Act in the country, as well as several other health officers have been invited for a discussion with Election Commission officials on 20 April.


Among others who have been invited for this discussion have been the Army Commander, Acting IGP Chandana Wickremaratna, DIG Priyantha Weerasuriya and PMG Ranjith Ariyaratna.


Meanwhile, Election Commission sources stated that all necessary measures to conduct the 2020 General Election has been undertaken by the Commission and they are also planning to publicize the preference numbers of all candidates through the publication of a gazette notification shortly.


A senior officer from the Commission added that if the General Election is to be held during the final week of May, the Election Commission would need a period of five weeks commencing from 20 April.


In the meantime political analysts have said that akin to South Korea staging its own General Election despite the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic there, Sri Lanka too would be able to take a lead from that book and hold its own General Election both successfully and effectively.


However, legal circles have pointed out that based on the gazette notification issued by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa the General Election would have to be held before 2 June this year.


Former Speaker Karu Jayasuriya on Friday (17) requested the Government and the Opposition to work together with the Election Commission (EC) to avoid a possible Constitutional crisis if the Parliamentary Election could not be held on time.


In a statement, Jayasuriya said that if a Constitutional crisis erupted at this particular time, there would be a risk of delegitimising and destabilising the country, which could gravely impact Sri Lanka’s prospects of obtaining economic relief.


“Sri Lanka is the only democracy to face the COVID-19 crisis without a Legislature to pass laws and financial appropriations to combat the pandemic and its economic consequences. It is my opinion that the Government and Opposition must engage with the EC and with each other urgently and in good faith. If there are any precautions or new laws that the Commission determines would allow it to safely hold the Election on time, these must be explored immediately,” he said.


Jayasuriya said he had recently been contacted by religious and political leaders, former Parliamentarians, academics, civil society and trade union representatives and members of the public seeking clarification on the impasse between the EC and the Executive on the Parliamentary Election.


“Sri Lanka is faced with an unprecedented health and economic crisis. As the prospect of a Constitutional crisis further compounding the plight of our country is a matter of grave national concern, I am setting out my position publicly rather than replying to each query individually,” he said, issuing the statement.


He noted that it was the position of the EC that the prevailing situation and logistical constraints prevented the Parliamentary Election from being held in time for the new Parliament to be summoned to meet by 2 June while the Government was of the view that there wasn’t necessarily any impediment to holding the Parliamentary Election on or before 28 May.


“In the interest of the nation, I appeal to the Government, the Opposition, and other stakeholders to set aside their political differences and to take urgent and meaningful steps to avoid an unnecessary third crisis for our country,” Jayasuriya said.


Meanwhile, all active election observation missions urged all relevant authorities to resolve their issues regarding a new election date, with the mutual understanding of not creating a Constitutional crisis against the backdrop of COVID-19.


Issuing a joint statement, they pointed out that: i) It is undesirable to head into an election with the EC and the Executive at odds with each other, ii) An environment of relief provision to those affected by the crisis is not ideal for an election campaign, as it can be exploited by candidates for their own political gain, as can already be seen; and iii) The National Operation Centre for the Prevention of COVID-19 Outbreak and health authorities must confirm that the new election date will not put voters and election officials at risk.


The tug-o- war, as to who should take initiative to declare the next date for General Election is continuing,  issuing a statement on the matter, Prime Minister Rajapaksa has elaborated on holding elections amid COVID-19.
Full Statement:


The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. 

Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine.


The financial powers vested in the President, under Article 150 (3) of the Constitution, is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease.


People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic.


The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. 

The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.


 The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that.


The yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. 

With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the yahapalana government changed the provincial councils elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority.


As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial council elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past.


Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.


On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. 

They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfill its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.


Sajith begins online campaign


The members of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya have continued to communicate with the public almost every day through online platforms amid the curfew regarding the current situation of the country and through this method Former opposition Leader and SJB Party Leader Sajith Premadasa has taken the initiative to educate people on the faults evident within the relief mechanism established by the Government.


Due to this reason, the members of the SJB decided to meet President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and share with him their opinions on how the country should function under the present circumstances.  Apart from this, Premadasa has also taken steps to advice his party members to help provide relief to people in any way they can sans political bias.


However the members of the SJB replied to Premadasa claiming that it is not the SJB who are favoring the people based on their political bias but rather the Government and added that the Government only provides relief to a selected group of people from which the majority is biased towards them. The members of the SJB further claimed that it is only Premadasa who truly helps people in need without having his own political agenda and further added that during the Presidential campaign there were individuals who voted for the opposing political parties while living in houses that were provided to them by Premadasa.


Premadasa then noted that political leaders should lend help to people in need without taking politics into consideration and added that he is not used to working with the hope of winning an election but rather he wants to help the people in need regardless of the time and place. Premadasa then questioned as to why the Government has failed to provide equal relief to everyone when they have successfully lead the health and defense sectors to control the spreading of COVID-19 and opined that the Government should not involve politics when helping the public.


During discussions held by Premadasa through the media, he also took the initiative to communicate to the people regarding a few important topics such as the reopening of the tourism and apparel industries.  Premadasa also opined, via a message posted on twitter on 16 April, that Sri Lanka should be made into a medicine producing center and added that if the relevant authorities focus on developing modern machinery that is capable of producing medicines then the country can use its existing resources to manufacture medicines.  


Meanwhile during a discussion held between party leaders Premadasa as the former Opposition Leader was given permission to use the Opposition Leader’s Office on a rent basis for the next few days due to not having a proper office to conduct his duties as the former leader of the opposition.

කොළඹ යාචයන් තාවකාලික ස්ථානයක නිරෝධායනයට

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

p1 13

– ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ උපදෙස් මත විශෙෂ පොලිස් මෙහෙයුමක්

රට තුළ පවතින වත්මන් තත්ත්වය සැළකිල්ලට ගනිමින් කොළඹ නගරයේ සිටි යාචකයන් 360 දෙනකු පමණ තාවකාලික ස්ථානයක ර`දවා නිරෝධායනයට ලක් කිරීමට පියවර ගෙන තිබේ.

ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතාගේ උපදෙස් මත බස්නාහිර පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාරවරයාගේ අධීක්‍ෂණයේ පොලිසිය මැදිහත් වී මෙසේ යාචකයන් එක් තැනක ර`දවා තැබීමට කටයුතු කර තිබේ.

ඒ අනුව මෙම යාචකයන් කොළඹ ගුණසිංහපුර ප‍්‍රදේශයට රැුගෙන විත් නහවා පිරිසිදු කර අලූත් ඇ`දුම් ලබාදීමෙන් පසු ඔවුන් ර`දවා තබන තාවකාලික ස්ථානය වෙත යොමු කිරීමට පොලිසිය කටයුතු කර ඇත

සමන් ගමගේ
ඡායාරූපය – නිශාන් එස් ප‍්‍රියන්ත

Response to Mano’s statement on COVID-19 infection tally

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

https://youtu.be/OMrfwHkpBdo

5,000 buses & 400 trains to be deployed for public transport from Monday

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Minister of Transport Mahinda Amaraweera has instructed to deploy 5,000 buses and 400 trains for public transport services starting from Monday (20).

The decision comes days after the government announced that public and private services, which came to a halt due to the local outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, will resume under several phases. 

Minister Amaraweera on Friday (17) gave instructions to the officials of the ministry to recommence public transport services for the staff members who are returning to their workplaces.

He has further instructed them to strictly implement proper healthcare measures issued by health officials and the security forces.

In addition, all staff members of transport services will be provided with face masks and required steps will be taken for disinfection.

The Minister has also inquired into the use of trains as a solution to the shortcomings in transporting vegetables and fruits to Colombo and other urban areas from the countryside. The General Manager of Railways has responded that power-sets can be deployed for the purpose upon request.

Election Commission not authorized to postpone poll without fixing alternate date – PM

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Election Commission has no authority to postpone the General Election without fixing an alternate date, says Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

In a statement on the COVID-19 pandemic and the postponed parliamentary election, the Premier said that under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, the Election Commission is required to announce an alternate date for the election when it cannot be held on the date fixed by the President

Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future,” PM Rajapaksa says.

He added that the Election Commission should fulfil its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.


Read the Prime Minister’s full statement below:

The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of Yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine. 

The financial powers vested in the President under Article 150(3) of the Constitution is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease. 

People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic. 

The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.  

The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that. 

The Yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the Yahapalana government changed the provincial council elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority. 

As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial council elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past. 

Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.

On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfil its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.

Coronavirus risk has not yet subsided – Dr. Jasinghe

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Despite the spread of COVID-19 within the country has been controlled to a certain point, the risk still has not subsided, says Director-General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

He says that the risk will not cease to be until the end of the COVID-19 outbreak.

The virus may spread in the country as a second wave of infections, Jasinghe pointed out.

Further, responding to a statement by former MP Mano Ganesan, Dr. Jasinghe said that persons without knowledge of the health sector or epidemics should not make statements on COVID-19.

The Director-General of Health Services was referring to a statement made by the Leader of Tamil Progressive Alliance that the government is concealing the true figures of the spread and infections of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Epidemiologists cannot make successful studies of an epidemic without true facts and figures, pointed out. He further said that a health process that involves the people cannot succeed by hiding true facts from the people.

Meanwhile, issuing a statement, Dr. Anil Jasinghe said that no circulars had been issued halting routine surgeries in hospitals.

He said that circulars on how to maintain health services were issued at the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak and they were updated as necessary.

He added that the hospitals can perform such surgeries with certain protocols.

However, with the downsizing of the daily staff to maintain social distancing, there may be inadequate staff to perform routine surgeries, he pointed out.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවෙන් වාර්තාවූ කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 254ක් දක්වා ඉහළට

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවෙන් වාර්තාවූ කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 254ක් දක්වා ඉහළ ගොස් තිබෙනවා.

ඒ තවත් පුද්ගලයන් 6 දෙනෙකු කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් බවට තහවුරු කර ගැනීමත් සමගයි.

ඔවුන් 6 දෙනා ද වාර්තාවී ඇත්තේ වැලිසර නිරොධායන මධ්‍යස්ථානයේ නිරෝධායනයට ලක්වෙමින් සිටින පිරිස අතරින් බවයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ කියාසිටියේ.

ඒ අනුව අද දිනයේ පමණක් වාර්තාවූ ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 10ක්.

මේ වන විට පුද්ගලයන් 161 දෙනෙකු වෛරස ආසාදනයෙන් රෝහල්ගතව ප්‍රතිකාර ලබනවා.

86 දෙනෙකු සුවය ලබා රෝහල්වලින් පිටව ගොස් ඇති අතර වාර්තාවූ මරණ සංඛ්‍යාව 7ක්.

කිසිදු රෝහලක ශල්‍යකර්ම නතර කිරීමට උපදෙස් ලබාදී නැහැ – සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

කිසිදු රෝහලක සාමාන්‍යයෙන් සිදු කරන ශල්‍යකර්ම සිදු නොකරන ලෙසට කිසිදු අවස්ථාවක චක්‍රලේඛ මගින් දැනුම්දී නැතැයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ පවසනවා.

කිසියම් පාලනයක් සහිතව අදාළ රෝහල්වලට එම ශල්‍යකර්ම සිදු කළ හැකි බවයි නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ඔහු කියාසිටියේ.

කෙසේවෙතත් කල් දැමීමෙන් ගැටළුවක් ඇති නොවන ශල්‍යකර්ම පසුව සිදු කිරීමේ හැකියාව පවතින බව ද අදාළ නිවේදනය මගින් සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

පිළිකා රෝගීන් සඳහා පිළිකා රෝහලේ සැත්කම් සිදු කළ ද අනෙක් රෝහල්වල සැත්කම් සිදු නොකරන බවට ඇතැම් පාර්ශව පළකරන අදහස්වලට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වමිනුයි අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා මෙම කරුණු අනාවරණ කර ඇත්තේ.

මේ අතර පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කරනු ලබන්නේ විද්‍යානුකූල පදනමක් මත පමණක් බව සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ අවධාරණය කරනවා.

විවිධ ප්‍රදේශවල ජනතාව සහ ජන කණ්ඩායම් විසින් පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකර දෙන්නැයි කරන ඉල්ලීම් පිළිබඳ කරුණු පැහැදිළි කිරීමක් සිදු කරමිනුයි අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා මේ බව කියාසිටියේ.

මෙය ඉල්ලීම් කර සිදු කරගත යුතු පරීක්ෂණයක් නොවන අතර විද්‍යාත්මක සාධක අනුව සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ විසින් තීරණ කර සිදු කරන පරීක්ෂණයක් බව අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

විද්‍යාත්මක සාධක අනුව තීරණය කර ලබාගන්නා සාම්පල පරීක්ෂණයට ලක් කිරීමට පැය 5ක් 6ක් වැනි කාලයක් ගත වනවා.

මේ සඳහා ගතවන කාලය යෙදවිය යුතු කාර්ය මණ්ඩලය මෙන්ම වියදම පිළිබඳව ද සලකා බැලිය යුතු බවයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා පෙන්වා දෙන්නේ.

මේවන විට පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කරනු ලබන්නේ අවදානම පිළිබඳ සලකා බලා තෝරාගත් පිරිස සහ අවදානම පිළිබඳ සැක සහිත කණ්ඩායම්වලට බව ඔහු කියාසිටියා.

ඒ රෝහල්ගත වී රෝග ලක්ෂණ පෙන්නුම් කරන පුද්ගලයන් නිරෝධායන මධ්‍යස්ථානවල සිටින පුද්ගලයන් සහ රෝගය ඇතැයි සැක කරන අවදානම වැඩිම පුද්ගලයන් සඳහායි.

එමෙන්ම කොරෝනා වෛරසය වැළඳී නොමැති බවට සහතික ලබාදෙන ලෙසට යම් පුද්ගලයන් ඉල්ලා සිටින බව වාර්තාවන බව ද සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනය මගින් පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කළ යුත්තේ කුමන පුද්ගලයන් සඳහාදැයි සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ සහ නිසි බලධාරීන් තීරණය කරනු ලබන බැවින් එම පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකරන ලෙසට මහජනතාව ඉල්ලීම් සිදු කිරීම අවශ්‍ය නොවන බව විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා අවධාරණය කරනවා.

මේ වන විට දිවයින පුරා පර්යේෂණාගාර 13ක පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකෙරෙන අතර මඩකලපුව ශික්ෂණ රෝහලේ ද අදාළ පරීක්ෂණ ආරම්භ කර තිබෙනවා.

තනිව ජීවත්වන ආබාධිත මවකට ආධාර දෙන්න ගිය STF නිලධාරීන් පිරිසකට ලැබුණු ආශිර්වාදය (වීඩියෝ)

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress