ඉන්දියාවේ ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂක උපදේශකතුමා අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා හමුවෙයි

November 27th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

ඉන්දියාවේ ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂක උපදේශක ශ්‍රී අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා හා ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා අතර හමුවක් අද 2020.11.27 දින විජේරාම නිල නිවසේදී පැවැත්විණි.

ප්‍රථමයෙන් ඉන්දියාවේ ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂක උපදේශක ශ්‍රී අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා විසින්, ඉන්දීය අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය නරේන්ද්‍ර මෝඩි මහතාගේ සුබ පැතුම් පණිවිඩයක් ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා හා නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ මහතා වෙත එක් කළේය.

කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගතය හේතුවෙන් ලොව බොහොමයක් රටවල් මුහුණ දී ඇති අර්බුදකාරී තත්ත්වයට කලාපයේ සෙසු රටවල්වලට ද මුහුණ දීමට සිදුව ඇති බව ප්‍රකාශ කළ හෙතෙම, වසංගත තත්ත්වය යටතේ වුවත් කලාපයේ රටවල ආර්ථික, සමාජීය සංවර්ධනය ඉදිරියට පවත්වාගෙන යාමට සිදුව ඇති බව පැවසීය. 

එසේම කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගතය තත්ත්වයන් හමුවේ රටවල් අතර සංවර්ධන ක්‍රියාදාමයන් පිළිබඳව රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රික සාකච්ඡා සිදු කිරීමට වැඩි වශයෙන් සිදුව ඇත්තේ අන්තර්ජාලය හරහා වීඩියෝ තාක්ෂණය ඔස්සේ බවද අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාව, ඉන්දියාව ඇතුලු මෙම කලාපයේ රටවලට ද විදේශ ශ්‍රමිකයින් නිසාවෙන් විශාල ආර්ථික ශක්තියක් ලැබුණ ද, වර්තමාන කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගත තත්ත්වය හමුවේ ඔවුන්ගේ රැකියා අහිමිවීමත්, සිය රටවලට ශ්‍රමිකයින් පැමිණීමත් නිසා සෑම රටකටම ලැබුණු විදේශ විනිමය අවම වී ඇති බව අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා පෙන්වා දුන්නේය.

කෙසේ වුවද, කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගත තත්ත්වය හමුවේ ආර්ථිකය ශක්තිමත් කළ යුතු බව ප්‍රකාශ කළ හෙතෙම, මෙම කලාපයේ සෙසු රටවල් ද සමඟින් ආර්ථිකය නගා සිටුවීමේ හා සංවර්ධනය කරා ගමන් කිරීමේ ක්‍රමෝපායන් සොයා ගත යුතු බව ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

එ් සඳහා, කලාපයේ සෙසු රටවල් අතර සංවාදයක් ගොඩ නැඟීමට මෙන්ම, ආර්ථික අවපාතයට විසඳුම් සොයමින් ආර්ථිකය නගා සිටුවීමේ ක්‍රමෝපායන් සොයා ගැනීමට හා ක්‍රමෝපායන් සකස් කර ගැනීමේ කතිකාවක් නිර්මාණය කිරීමට ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට මූලිකත්වය ගන්නා ලෙස ද ඉන්දීය ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂක උපදේශක ශ්‍රී අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා යෝජනා කරන ලදී.

ඒ සඳහා ඉන්දියානු රජයේ සම්පූර්ණ සහයෝගය ලබා දෙන බව පැවසූ අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා, කොවිඩ්-19 තත්ත්වය යටතේ වුවත් ශ්‍රී ලංකාව, ඉන්දියාව ඇතුළු කලාපයේ සෙසු රටවල සංවර්ධනය යළි ගොඩනැගිය යුතු බව ද ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

ඉන්දියානු රජයේ ආධාර යටතේ උතුරු නැගෙනහිර හා කන්ද උඩරට ප්‍රදේශවල නිවාස යෝජනා ව්‍යාපෘති ක්‍රියාත්මක කර ඇති බව ප්‍රකාශ කළ ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා, එවන් නිවාස යෝජනා ව්‍යාපෘති දකුණු ප්‍රදේශය කේන්ද්‍ර කර ගනිමින් ආරම්භ කිරීමට ද සහයෝගය ලබා දෙන ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිටියේය. ඒ සඳහා ඉන්දියානු රජයේ සහයෝගය ලබා දෙන බව ශ්‍රී අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා පැවසීය.

එසේම ඉන්දියානු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය නරේන්ද්‍ර මෝඩි මහතාගේ මඟ පෙන්වීම යටතේ නවීන තාක්ෂණය යොදා ගනිමින් ඉන්දියාවේ ආරම්භ කර ඇති පානීය ජලය ලබාදීමේ ව්‍යාපෘති පිළිබඳව අවධානය යොමු කරමින්, එම තාක්ෂණය යොදා ගනිමින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළ  ජල යෝජනා ක්‍රම ආරම්භ කිරීම සඳහා  මෙම හමුවේදී එකඟතාව පළ විය.

මේ පිළිබඳව ඉහළ පෙළේ නිලධාරීන් සමඟ සාකච්ඡා ආරම්භ කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය කටයුතු කඩිනමින් සූදානම් කරන ලෙස ඉන්දීය ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂක උපදේශක ශ්‍රී අජිත් දෝවාල් මහතා, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ඉන්දීය මහ කොමසාරිස් ගෝපාල් බාග්ලේ මහතාට උපදෙස් ලබා දුන්නේය.

මෙම අවස්ථාව සඳහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ඉන්දීය මහ කොමසාරිස් ගෝපාල් බාග්ලේ හා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම් ගාමිණී සෙනරත් මහත්වරු එක්ව සිටියහ.

රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂමට නියෝජිතයින් ලෙස නුසදුසු පුද්ගලයන් පත්කිරීම සම්බන්ධවයි.

November 27th, 2020

ජාතික වෘත්තිය සමිති මධ්‍යස්ථානය

ගරු ජනාධිපති,
ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්‍ෂ මැතිතුමා,
ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලය,
කොළඹ 01.

ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමණි,

රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂමට නියෝජිතයින් ලෙස නුසදුසු පුද්ගලයන් පත්කිරීම සම්බන්ධවයි.

රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ ඉහල නිලධාරීන් පත්කිරීම්, උසස්කිරීම් හා විනය කටයුතු සම්බන්ධව බලධාරියා වන්නේ රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාවයි. දිගින් දිගටම රාජ්‍ය සේවාවට දේශපාලන අතපෙවීම් සිදුවන්නේ යැයි යන විවේචනය තදින් පවතින පරිසරයකදී එහි ස්වාධිනත්වය ආරක්‍ෂා කර ගැනීම මූලික කර ගනිමින් 17 වන ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය මගින් එය පිහිටුවාලූයේ රාජ්‍ය සේවකයාද රාජ්‍ය සේවයේද විනිවිදභාවය අපේක්‍ෂා කරන සියළු දෙනාගේ ආශීර්වාදය ඇතිවය.

ඉන් අනතුරුව 19 වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය මගින් තවදුරටත් එය තහවුරුවූු අතර, අඩුපාඩුකම් මධ්‍යයේ වුවද එය ක්‍රියාත්මක විය. 20 වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට අනුව රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂම වෙත නියෝජිතයින් පත්කිරීමේ පූර්ණ බලය ජනාධිපතිවරයා ලෙස ඔබ විසින් පවරාගෙන ඇත.

එම පත්කිරීම් සිදු කිරීමේ දී කොමිසමේ විෂය පථයට හා බලතල වලට අනුව එම කාර්ය නිවැරදිව හා විනිවිදභාවයෙන් යුතුව ස්වාධීනත්වය ආරක්‍ෂා වන පරිදි කටයුතු කළ හැකි නිලධාරීන් නම් කිරීම පත්වීම් බලධාරියා වන ඔබගේ වගකීමයි.

නමුත්, ඔබ විසින් නව කොමිෂමට නිලධාරීන් පත්කිරීමේ දී රාජ්‍ය සේවය පිළිබඳව කිසිදු අත්දැකීමක් නැති රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් සමග රාජකාරිමය කිසිදු කාර්යයක නියලී නැති පෞද්ගලික ව්‍යාපාරික කටයුතු වල නියුතු නුසුදුසු පුද්ගලයන් පත්කිරීම රාජ්‍ය සේවයට එල්ල කරන ලද බරපතල අතුල් පහරකි. එහි බලපෑම වඩාත් තීව්ර වන්නේ ආණ්ඩුවේ කොන්ත්‍රාත් ටෙන්ඩර් හරහා තමන්ගේ ව්‍යාපාරික ආයතන වලට ලබාගන්නා ආණ්ඩුව සමග ඝෘජුවම ව්‍යාපාරික කටයුතු වල නියුතු දිලිත් ජයවීර නැමැත්තා රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂමේ නියෝජිතයෙකු ලෙස පත්කිරීමයි. රජයේ අමාත්‍යාංශ හා දෙපාර්තමේන්තු ප්‍රධානීන් ඇතුළු රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ ඉහල වගකීම් දරණ නිලධාරීන්ගේ පත්කිරීම්, මාරුකිරීම් හා උසස්වීම මෙන්ම විනය කටයුතු සම්බන්ධයෙන් වගකීම් දරණ රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂමේ නියෝජිතයෙකු විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති ටෙන්ඩර් පත්‍රිකා සම්බන්ධයෙන් සාධාරණ තීන්දු ගැනීමේ අයිතිය මෙමගින් අහෝසිකර ඇති බව ඔබතුමාට නොතේරීම පුදුමසහගතය. දිලිත් ජයවීර මහතාම පවසන පරිදි ඔහු ඔබ සමග සමීප සබඳතා පවත්වන අතිජාත මිත්‍රයෙකි. එම සබඳතාවය රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට තමන්ගේ කටයුතු නීති ගරුකව යුක්ති සහගතව කරගෙන යෑමට ඇතිකරන බාධාව සුළුපටු නොවේ.

මේ කෙලෙසී යන්නේ කොමිෂමේ ස්වාධීනත්වය පමණක් නොව සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවයේම ස්වාධීනත්වයයි. අහෝසිවී යන්නේ රටත් ජනතාවත් වෙනුවෙන් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට නිවැරදිව හා විනිවිදභාවයකින් යුතුව කටයුතු කිරීමට ඇති අවකාශයයි. මෙයින් ගොඩනැගෙන තත්වය ඔබගේ දැක්ම ලෙස ප්‍රරසිද්ධියට පත්කළ සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්ම තුල ඇති විනය ගරුක රටක් ගොඩනැගීමට දායක වන්නේ කෙලෙසද යන්න ප්‍රහේලිකාවකි.

බලතල තමන්ට අවැසි ආකාරයට සකසා ගනිමින් කටයුතු කිරීම අපේ රටේ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයට එල්ල කරන ලද මරු පහරකි. රාජ්‍ය සේවය යනු යම්කිසි පාලකයෙකුගේ පෞද්ගලික අභිමතයන්ට අනුව කටයුතු කළ යුතු සේවාවක් නොවේ. එහි වගකීම හා වගවීම පවතින්නේ රාජ්‍යට මිස කාලයෙන් කාලයට පත්වන ආණ්ඩු වලට හෝ පාලකයන්ට නොවේ. එය ඔබ වටහාගත් බවක් මෙම පත්කිරීම් තුලින් ගම්‍යමාන නොවේ. එසේම මේ හරහා විද්‍යමාන වන තවත් කරුණක් වන්නේ රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂම සම්බන්ධයෙන් හා එයට පත්කළ යුතු නියෝජිතයන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඔබගේ ඇති අවබෝධයේ ප්‍රමාණයයි. කරුණු මෙසේ හෙයින් මේ පිළිබඳව අගතිමානි නොවී රාජ්‍ය සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාවට එයට ගැලපෙන සුදුසු පුද්ගලයන් පත්කිරීමට කටයුතු කරන ලෙසත් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට කරනු ලබන දේශපාලන බලහත්කාරී මැදිහත් වීම නතර කිරීමට කටයුතු කරන ලෙසත් සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවය වෙනුවෙන් ඔබතුමාට අවධාරණය කිරීමට කැමැත්තෙමි.

ස්තූතියි.

කේ.ඩී.ලාල්කාන්ත
සභාපති,
ජාතික වෘත්තීය සමිති මධ්‍යස්ථානය.

පිටපත්
අගමැති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මැතිතුමාදැ.ගැ.පි
සියළු ජනමාධ්‍යජනතාවගේ දැනගැනීම පිණිස ප්‍රචාරය කිරීමට

ධරණීය නීල ආර්ථිකය බෙංගාල බොක්ක ආශ්‍රීත රටවල අනාගතය බව ශ්‍රී ලංකාව පවසයි

November 27th, 2020

ශ්‍රී ලංකා තානාපති කාර්යාලය, තායිලන්තය

ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මුතීන්ට අනුව සුරක්ෂිත මෙන්ම ආරක්ෂාකාරී ලෙස යාත්‍රා කිරීමත්, සාමකාමී මෙන්ම ධරණීය ලෙස සමුද්‍රීය සම්පත්වලින් ප්‍රයෝජන ගැනීමත්, බෙංගාල  බොක්ක ආශ්‍රිත කළාපයේ සහ බහු ආංශික තාක්ෂණික හා ආර්ථික සහයෝගිතාව සඳහා වූ බෙංගාල බොක්ක ප්‍රවේශය (BIMSTEC) රටවල අප සියලුදෙනාම ප්‍රමුඛත්වයක් ලෙස සලකන බවත්, ශ්‍රී ලංකාව එකී ප්‍රමුඛතාව පිළිබදව විශ්වාස කරන අතරම එය ප්‍රවර්ධනය කිරීමටත් කටයුතු කරන බව,  2020 නොවැම්බර් 20-21 දිනයන්හි තායිලන්තයේ බැංකොක්හි පැවැති BIMSTEC විශේෂ  මහජන උත්සවය අමතමින් තායිලන්තයේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා තානාපතිනි සමන්තා කේ. ජයසූරිය මහත්මිය පැවැසුවාය. 

‘බෙංගාල බොක්ක: ධරණීයත්වය සඳහා වන අභිලාෂය’ යන ප්‍රධාන තේමාව යටතේ පැවති එම විශේෂ උත්සවයේදී ‘BIMSTEC පිළිබඳ මගේ රටේ දැක්ම’ පිළිබඳව තවදුරටත් අදහස් දක්වමින් ධරණීය නීල ආර්ථිකය අපගේ කළාපයේ අනාගතයවන නිසා මෙම කළාපය සියලුම සම්ප්‍රදායික හා සම්ප්‍රදායික නොවන ආරක්ෂාව පිළිබදව වන අභියෝගයන්ගෙන් නිදහස්ව පැවතීම අපගේ අභිලාෂය වේ” යැයි තානාපතිතුමිය පැවැසුවාය. එමෙන්ම මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් අන්‍යෝන්‍ය නෛතික සහයෝගීතාව ශක්තිමත් කිරීම, ආරක්ෂාව සම්බන්ධ තොරතුරු සහ බුද්ධි තොරතුරු හුවමාරු කරගැනීම, සමුද්‍ර සම්බන්ධතාවය පුළුල් කිරීම පිළිබඳ සාමූහික ප්‍රයත්නයන් වැදගත් භූමිකාවක් හොබවන බවද ඇය පැවැසුවාය. ශ්‍රී  ලංකාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් ගත්විට මේවා හුදෙක් අභිලාෂයන්ම  පමණක් නොව, ශ්‍රී  ලංකාවද, එයින් ඔබ්බට ඇති බෙංගාල බොක්ක ආශ්‍රිත  කලාපය තුලද  සාමය  හා සෞභාග්‍යය තහවුරු කරන අරමුණින් අතිගරු ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ ජනපතිතුමන්ගේ සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්ම ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවේද  නිසිපරිදි දක්වා ඇති බව තානපති තුමිය පැවැසුවාය.

බහු ආංශික තාක්ෂණික හා ආර්ථික සහයෝගිතාව සඳහා වූ බෙංගාල බොක්ක ප්‍රවේශය (BIMSTEC) සංවිධානය පිළිබඳ මෙම දින දෙකේ මහජන උත්සවය චූලාලොංකෝන් විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ ආසියානු අධ්‍යන අංශය, BIMSTEC පිළිබඳ ප්‍රතිපත්ති චින්තකයින්ගේ ජාලය, තායිලන්තයේ විදේශ කටයුතු අමාත්‍යාංශය හා එක්ව සංවිධානය කර තිබූ අතර, බෙංගාල බොක්ක ආශ්‍රිත භූතානය, බංගලාදේශය, ඉන්දියාව , මියන්මාරය , නේපාලය, ශ්‍රී ලංකාව සහ තායිලන්තය යන රටවල් හත වැදගත් කලාපීය කණ්ඩායමක් ලෙස පවත්වාගෙන යෑමට අවශ්‍යය විවිධ සහ පොහොසත් සම්ප්‍රධායන්, සංස්කෘතීන් හා ජීවන රටාවන් පිළිබඳ දැනුම බෙදාගැනීම හා තායි වැසියන් අතර මනා අවබෝධයක් ඇති කිරීම  මෙහි අරමුණ විය.

BIMSTEC සංවිධානයේ වර්තමාන සභාපතිත්වය දරණ ශ්‍රී  ලංකාව, එහි ධූර කාලය තුළ BIMSTEC සම්මුතිය සැකසීම අවසන් කිරීම, හා ආංශික හා උපාංශික සහයෝගීත්වය වඩා තාර්කික ලෙස සැකසීම  ඇතුළුව, එහි ආයතනික ව්‍යූහය හා පදනම ශක්තිමත් කිරීමේ කාර්යය ඉටුකර ඇති අතර, සාමාජික රටවල්වෙත නිශ්චිත  ක්ෂේත්‍රයන් පැවැරීම BIMSTEC  සංවිධානයේ අරමුණු හා අනාගත ක්‍රියාකාරකම් වෙත අවධානය යොමුකිරීමේ හැකියාවද වර්ධනය කර ඇති බව තානාපතිතුමිය පැවැසූවාය.

 සාමාජික රටවල ආර්ථිකයන්ද ඇතුළුව සාමාන්‍යය ජන ජීවිතයේ සියලුම අංශයන් කෙරෙහි දැඩි බලපෑම් ඇතිකළ COVID 19 වසංගත කාලයේ තාක්ෂණය, සෞඛ්‍යය  හා මානව සම්පත් සංවර්ධනය යන උප අංශ සහිතව විද්‍යාව, තාක්ෂණය හා නවෝත්පාදනය යන අංශයන්හි ප්‍රධානත්වය දරණ රට ලෙසද, ශ්‍රී  ලංකාව, නව  තාක්ෂණය භාවිතා කිරීම මෙන්ම BIMSTEC තාක්ෂණ හුවමාරු පහසුකම (TTF) ක්‍රියාවට නැංවීම පිළිබඳ යෝජනා ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමේ අභිලාෂයෙන් පසුවෙන බවද තානාපතිනි ජයසූරිය මහත්මිය පැවැසුවාය.

ලෝකයේ විශාලතම බොක්ක වන බෙංගාල බොක්ක ආශ්‍රිත BIMSTEC රටවල් හත සහල් පදනම් කරගත් ආහාර සංස්කෘතියක සිට විචිත්‍ර ශිෂ්ටාචාරයක් දක්වා විහිදෙන පොදු ඉතිහාසයන්ගෙන් හා සංස්කෘතීන්ගෙන් පෝෂිත වනවා මෙන්ම ස්වෛරී රාජ්‍යයන් ලෙස අද්විතීය අන්‍යතාවක්ද පවත්වාගෙන යන අතර එම BIMSTEC රටවල් හතේ  විවිධත්වය හා අද්විතීය බව BIMSTEC සංවිධානයේ ශක්තිය වී ඇතැයි තානාපතිනි ජයසූරිය මහත්මිය වැඩිදුරටත් පැවැසුවාය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාව සහ තායිලන්තය අතර රාජතාන්ත්‍රික සබඳතා ආරම්භ කිරීමේ 65 වැනි සංවත්සරය 2020 නොවැම්බර් 20 වැනි දිනට යෙදී තිබීම හේතුවෙන් මෙම අවස්ථාව තවත් සැමරුමකට නිමිත්තක් උදා කරදී ඇතිබව බව තානාපතිතුමිය පැවැසුවාය. එළැඹෙන වසරේදී BIMSTEC සංවිධානයේ නායකත්වය ශ්‍රී ලංකාව විසින් තායිලන්තයට පැවැරීමත් සමඟ තායිලන්තයේ විශිෂ්ඨ නායකත්වය තුළ BIMSTEC සංවිධානය ඉදිරිගමනක් අත්පත් කරගනු ඇතැයි ශ්‍රී ලංකාව විශ්වාස කරන බවද තානාපතිතුමිය පැවැසුවාය.

BIMSTEC රටවල් හතේ තානාපතිවරුන් සහ රාජතාන්ත්‍රික නියෝජිතයින් මෙම අවස්ථාවට සහභාගි වූ අතර එක් එක් රටවල් විසින් BIMSTEC සංවිධානය සම්බන්ධව අදහස් ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. තායිලන්තයේ ශ්‍රි  ලංකා තානාපති කාර්යාලයේ චාන්සරි ප්‍රධානී පූර්ණිමා ගුණසේකර මහත්මිය මෙම උළෙල සඳහා ශ්‍රී  ලංකා සහභාගිත්වය සම්බන්ධීකරණය කළ අතර තානාපති කාර්යාලයේ කාර්යමණ්ඩලය විසින්  සංචාරක කර්මාන්තය,  සිලෝන් ටී සහ කුළුබඩු සහ දේශීය ආහාරපාන ප්‍රවර්ධනය සදහා ඉදිරිපත් කළ ශ්‍රී ලංකා ප්‍රදර්ශණ කුටිය, උත්සවයට සහභාගී වූ තායිලන්ත වැසියන් අතර ආකර්ෂණයට ලක් විය .

ශ්‍රී ලංකා තානාපති කාර්යාලය,තායිලන්තය

2020 නොවැම්බර් 26

Rating action by Fitch Ratings based on uncorroborated facts – Ministry of Finance

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy  Hiru News

The Ministry of Finance has responded to Fitch Ratings downgrading Sri Lanka to ‘CCC’. 

Issuing a statement the MoF states that Fitch Ratings have failed to recognize the robust policy framework of the new Government for addressing the legacy issues, including the concerns raised by Fitch Ratings, and ensuring ongoing economic recovery and Macroeconomic stability of the Country.<

It further states that Fitch Ratings project a government debt to GDP ratio of 100 per cent at end 2020 and 116 per cent at end 2024, while grossly overestimating the budget deficit at around 11.5 per cent of GDP in 2021 and 2022. As the relative share of outstanding foreign debt has already fallen to 44 per cent as per the latest available data, projecting a rise in foreign debt servicing obligations in the period ahead cannot be corroborated with facts.

The Ministry of Finance states that the Government wishes to reiterate that Sri Lanka will engage with all investment and development partners and implement necessary measures to build up reserves through non-debt creating inflows.

Therefore, investors are invited to approach the Sri Lankan policy authorities at the highest levels who are dedicated to facilitate any one-on-one or roadshow discussions, without being dissuaded by such baseless rating action.

The Full text of the message is given below

We observe, with disappointment, today’s rating action by Fitch Ratings expressing concerns about Sri Lanka’s external debt repayment capacity over the medium-term, financing options and debt sustainability risks, at a time when the newly appointed Government has just announced its medium term policy framework in its Budget 2020. We do not accept this downgrade as it fails to recognize the robust policy framework of the new Government for addressing the legacy issues, including the concerns raised by Fitch Ratings, and ensuring ongoing economic recovery and macroeconomic stability of the Country.

It is surprising to note that Fitch Ratings’ assessment has ignored several key proposals presented in the Government Budget 2021 with regard to deficit financing in the period ahead. As indicated in the Budget 2021, the Government has adopted a novel approach in relation to foreign financing while enhancing the effectiveness of already secured financing channels, aimed at reducing the share of foreign financing of the budget deficit over the medium term. Yet, Fitch Ratings builds up its argument based on the ‘existing financing model’, thus adopting a backward looking approach. In contrast, the forward looking financing model of the Government, which is skewed heavily towards domestic financing and will capitalize on the benefits of increased domestic savings and the low interest rate regime already in place given subdued aggregate demand conditions and well anchored inflation expectations. It is also noteworthy that the low interest rate regime will improve economic growth prospects in the period ahead, alongside the incentives being offered for capital investment, thereby supporting the envisaged debt consolidation efforts significantly. As the relative share of outstanding foreign debt has already fallen to 44 per cent as per the latest available data, projecting a rise in foreign debt servicing obligations in the period ahead cannot be corroborated with facts. Based on such unfounded assumptions, Fitch Ratings project a government debt to GDP ratio of 100 per cent at end 2020 and 116 per cent at end 2024, while grossly overestimating the budget deficit at around 11.5 per cent of GDP in 2021 and 2022. The rating action announced today is based on these ill-informed model projections, without any evidence-based and objective analysis. Further, as the share of domestic government debt rises in a low interest rate regime, some increase in overall public debt to GDP in the near term is not considered as a significant concern. Furthermore, with the strong pro-growth policy orientation of the Government as clearly articulated in the Budget 2021, a possible rise in local currency denominated government debt in the near term can be effectively managed within the envisaged fiscal consolidation path in the medium term, as government revenue increases helped by the envisaged take-off of the economy. It is also unrealistic to assume that the Government will take a rigid expenditure path, if by any chance, the expected improvement in revenue does not materialize.

Sri Lanka, similar to many of its peers in the emerging market group, experienced initial capital outflows, exchange rate depreciation, slowdown in activity, and pressure on government finances, in response to the effects of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Sri Lanka recognized its priorities early, and swiftly introduced a policy package to withstand and mitigate potential adverse effects of slowing economic activity, while building buffers for countering possible external financing challenges. With the decisive conclusion of the Parliamentary election in August 2020, the Government of Sri Lanka is now moving along a recovery path towards growth and stability even in the midst of the transitory disruptions caused by the second wave of the pandemic. The Sri Lankan economy is expected to have recovered strongly during the third quarter of 2020, when the second wave hit economic activity. Earlier than expected return of merchandise exports to pre-COVID monthly averages of US dollars 1 billion and the curtailment of non-essential imports have reduced the trade deficit notably for the sixth consecutive month in October 2020, saving US dollars 3.3 billion in import expenditure so far during the year. Meanwhile, larger than expected increase in workers’ remittances, together with other services exports, including IT services and shipping, helped mitigate the impact of the pandemic. Improvements in trade balance and workers’ remittances have helped cushion the current account deficit to a large extent in spite of the downturn in tourism, thereby reducing pressure on the exchange rate and official reserves.

Foreign Direct Investments, which slowed in the first half of the year, appear promising in the period ahead, particularly with the expected inflows to the Colombo Port City project and for new manufacturing projects in industrial zones, including Hambantota. The new legal framework conducive to promote commercial services and investment in Port City will be presented to the Parliament in January 2021. The first phase of the Port City project is scheduled to begin in 2021, boosting economic activity and attracting sizable non-debt creating financial flows to the country. Further, from the list of FDIs approved by the Board of Investment totaling over US dollars 5 billion, a considerable share is expected to materialize, supported by the new business-friendly environment of the country, and several major investment projects are already in the process of implementation. Other expected investments include import alternative industries as well as investments by the World Bank and other international development finance institutions. Nevertheless, the Government will adopt a policy of ‘guided’ imports as the envisaged improvements in growth prospects would experience some rise in import demand on raw material and investment goods, as the foreign exchange liquidity concerns are expected to wane in the period ahead. It is noteworthy, however, that the Government will remain committed to strengthening the dynamics of the economy based on the principle of self-reliance. With regard to portfolio flows, foreign inflows to the government securities market are yet to resume but no significant outflows were noted in recent months. Stock market indices have improved continuously and surpassed the pre-COVID levels with a record level of activities over the last three months. The tourism sector has been supported by domestic tourism and is expected to flourish once global tourist flows resume after the pandemic subsides. Despite the COVID-19 driven slowdown in economic activities in the first half of 2020, the economy is expected to rebound strongly in 2021 and sustain its growth momentum over the medium term, supported by the stimulus measures already in place and the effective implementation of the pro-growth policy proposals announced in the Government Budget 2021.

Given these developments, the exchange rate remains broadly stable, and the Central Bank was able to absorb foreign exchange of over US dollars 500 million on a gross basis since May 2020. Gross official reserves were estimated at US dollars 5.9 billion at end October 2020, with an import cover of 4.2 months. The Government has repeatedly expressed its ability and willingness to meet all its debt obligations falling due in the period ahead. With the observed rise in foreign debt servicing and public debt in the period ahead, the Government focused more on curtailing government expenditure, by resorting to several self imposed austerity-like economic measures on the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, through announcing measures such as restricting imports of non-essential goods, encouraging the State Owned Enterprises to curtail non-essential expenditure including purchasing of motor vehicles, instructing the state entities to strictly manage expenditure on fuel and other utilities, non-priority procurement, etc. The Government’s strategy in foreign debt management is to avoid total rolling over of the upcoming maturities, while its strategy in overall debt management is to repay the outstanding debt, while not raising more loans over the existing level over the medium term.

The recently introduced measures to entice foreign investors to the government securities market and the real economy through an attractive foreign exchange swap arrangement are likely to help enhance foreign currency inflows, in addition to the support of friendly countries, such as the swap arrangements and the expected disbursement of the 2nd tranche of the Foreign Currency Term Financing Facility proceeds from the China Development Bank in December 2020. Accordingly, gross official reserves are expected to improve to around US dollars 6.5 billion by end 2020.

Sri Lanka’s policy environment remains facilitative of enabling high economic growth beyond the recovery phase while preserving macroeconomic stability. On the back of over 11 years of well anchored mid-single digit levels of inflation, the Central Bank has pursued an increasingly accommodative monetary policy stance. Fiscal policy, as re-emphasized in the Budget 2021, remains focused on supporting the economy, while expecting to return to the envisaged path of consolidation from 2022. Hence, both fiscal and monetary policies have prioritized supporting people, businesses and thereby the economy, without jeopardizing the macroeconomic balance of the country.

In the above context, it is puzzling why Fitch Ratings downgraded Sri Lanka when the well-articulated policy framework presented in the Budget 2021 is receiving wider commendation for consistency and continuity, with a clear medium term view of fiscal consolidation on a realistic economic footing. Such action simply demonstrates the prejudicial approach of Fitch Ratings, and lacks due consideration to alternative strategies that the Government is committed to embark on in the period ahead. Practices of this nature by an international rating agency without a constructive engagement with the Government on the promising alternative, policy approaches are likely to make the agency concerned completely irrelevant as the country rises strongly in the period ahead.

Given these circumstances, the Government of Sri Lanka wishes to reaffirm to foreign investors that have put faith in Sri Lanka continuously over the past several years that Sri Lanka remains willing and able to meet its debt obligations, as it has done impeccably in the past. Furthermore, Fitch Ratings question Sri Lanka’s ability to meet its external debt repayments based on their forecast of a decline in foreign exchange reserves in 2021 and 2022. Fitch Ratings also raise concerns on Sri Lanka’s external financing options. The Government categorically denies all such uncorroborated concerns. It is notable, that the Government has honoured all its liabilities so far during the year amounting to over US dollars 4 billion, in spite of the adverse speculation faced by the Sri Lankan economy since the end of 2019. The Government wishes to reiterate that Sri Lanka will engage with all investment and development partners and implement necessary measures to build up reserves through non-debt creating inflows.

Investors are invited to approach the Sri Lankan policy authorities at the highest levels who are dedicated to facilitate any one-on-one or roadshow discussions, without being dissuaded by such baseless rating action

Fitch downgrades Sri Lanka as default fears loom

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy Reuters

LONDON, Nov 27 (Reuters) – Ratings agency Fitch downgraded Sri Lanka’s sovereign debt to CCC” on Friday, warning that the country was at increasing risk of missing debt payments due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Heavily reliant on tourism and garment exports for foreign exchange reserves, the island nation has been hit hard by the pandemic, which has dampened consumer demand and curtailed almost all global travel this year.

The CCC rating means Fitch considers default to be a real possibility”.

We think there are now increasing risks to Sri Lanka’s ability to meet its external debt repayments,” Fitch analysts said in a note.

Sri Lanka has around $4 billion of debt repayments due annually until 2025, while total foreign exchange reserves stand at just under $6 billion.

Earlier this month Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa presented an ambitious budget that aimed to more than halve the fiscal deficit over the medium term.

But Fitch said it expected the country’ fiscal position to worsen, not improve, over the next few years.

It expects Sri Lanka’s government debt-to-GDP ratio to increase to about 100% in 2020 from 86.8% in 2019, and to rise to around 116% in 2024.

This is in sharp contrast to Sri Lanka’s own targets, which see a reduction in debt-to-GDP to 75.5% in 2025, from an estimated 95.1% in 2020.

Spokesmen for Sri Lanka’s finance ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The ministry said in September that a similar downgrade by Moody’s was reckless” and unwarranted”, noting Sri Lanka has consistently received support from India and China. (Reporting by Alasdair Pal; Editing by Susan Fenton)

House of Commons to bring in resolution against SL at UN Human Rights Council sessions

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The government should take note of the decision made by the British House of Commons to bring in a resolution against Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council sessions in March next year, Chief Opposition Whip Lakshman Kiriella stressed yesterday.    

Mr Kiriella told Parliament yesterday that the British House of Commons had approved a resolution to request the UN Human Rights Council to take a token against Sri Lanka for withdrawing from the resolution 30/1 which it co-sponsored with the US.   

The resolution 30/1 was approved at the UN Human Rights Council sessions in 2015.   

I cautioned you on Wednesday on this matter but the British House of Commons had approved a resolution to request UN Human Rights Council to take action against Sri Lanka,” he said.  Leader of the House Dinesh Gunawardena said on Wednesday that Sri Lanka is committed to uphold democracy and human rights of all Sri Lankans based on the mandate the present government had received in November last year and August this year. (Yohan Perera and Ajith Siriwardana) 

08 more COVID- 19, deaths reported – Country total to 107

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

08 more COVID- 19, deaths reported increasing COVID- 19, death toll in Sri Lanka to 107.

01. An 87 year old female a resident of Colombo -13, died at home.

02. A 54 year old female a resident of Colombo -09, died in hospital.

03. A 78 year old female a resident of Maradana, died at home.

04. A 36 year old male a resident of Colombo -15, died in hospital.

05. An 83 year old male a resident of Colombo -02, died at home.

06. A 58 year old female a resident of Colombo 10, died at home.

07. A 69 year old male a resident of Colombo -13, died at home.

08. A 70 year old male from the Colombo Prison died in hospital



Sri Lanka adds 221 fresh Covid-19 cases

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Total count of Covid-19 cases registered by the Minuwangoda-Peliyagoda cluster reached 18,963, as more persons were tested positive for the virus. 

The Department of Government Information said 221 more fresh cases have been detected within the day.

All the new cases are close contacts of the Peliyagoda fish market cluster, reports confirmed.

With the new development, Sri Lanka has confirmed 22,500 novel coronavirus infections to date.

According to the Health Ministry’s data, 16,226 of the confirmed patients have made complete recoveries from the virus.

However, 6,175 active cases are still under medical care at selected hospitals and treatment centres across the country.

Prof G.L. Peiris underscores the consequences of unlimited freedom (video)

November 27th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

The Minister of Education Prof. G.L. Peiris stated in Parliament today (27) that the consequences of allowing foreigners to teach any course during the government of Yahapalanaya  has to be faced now.

This was in response to a question raised by Samagi Jana Balavegaya MP Kavinda Jayawardena.

Summary of the proposal submitted to the Expert Committee to draft a new constitution

November 26th, 2020

C. Wijeayawickrema

November 27, 2020

Secretary,
Expert Committee (EC) to draft a new constitution
Colombo.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Topic 2(h) – Decentralization – Jana Sabha

I wish to submit this summary of the proposal sent by me a few days ago. Several readers who saw a printed version of it in a popular website (Lankaweb), suggested that I provide a ‘summary’ of it, which was in Sinhala.

Considering the fact, that this Island is the only piece of real estate on earth, historically demarcated for the Sinhala race, facing the danger of extinction, it is my view that the topic 2(h) is the most important one on the list of topics.  Ironically, the first section in the line, decentralization, is facing a threat from the other two separations anchored comfortably with the support of the 13th Amendment, Sri Lanka’s death-trap.

The non-majoritarian solutions offered to world ethnic conflicts, and Sri Lanka’s specific issue of fight for self-rule to achieve Tamil Aspirations are covered by the phrase, ‘meaningful devolution,’ first used by Robert Blake, the then American ambassador, followed by a long line of European and Indian politicians. When one asks devolution to whom, they look upward and see the likes of Vigneswaran, Sumanthiran and Gajendran, and a block of large land area.

The reasonable, rational and science-minded, Sinhala Buddhists look downward, and see Tamil and Sinhala villagers, who lived together peacefully, their lives shaped by the socio-economic and political Model, the Trinity of Village-Tank- and the Temple, where organic unity of the man and his environment and Small Is Beautiful is cherished.

Thus, one force is toward the balkanization of the island; while the other is to keep a 2,600-year old civilization intact, despite 550 years of attacks from both whites and black-whites. My proposal is aimed at the latter purpose, where (1) the concept of region in geography, (2) the reasonableness doctrine in jurisprudence and (3) the Middle Path in Buddhism, work in unison to promote sustainable development and build ethnic harmony again in the Island, in a just and fair manner.

The experience so far in the world scene of the non-majoritarian path of ethnic Nirvana, ended up in misery and disastrous new ethnic wars. So far, Sri Lanka has been saved from this fate by an unforeseen divine power, but see what is unfolding in Ethiopia right now with a prime minister who won the Noble peace prize for implementing non-majoritarian solutions (Ranga Jayasuriya, Daily Mirror, 24/11/2020).

The answer lies, therefore, with the indigenous solution of our own Gam Sabha (Jana Sabha, Indian Panchayatha Raj Institute), which the father of the non-majoritarian genie, Donald Horowitz, has ignored in all his writings on this subject! The Rural Reconstruction and Crime Eradication Island-wide Movement of the Ven. Kalukondayave Pragnasekera in the 1940s, sabotaged by both white officers and black-white politicians, and the successful  Gami Diriya Program, free of politician interference, suddenly stopped, more recently, indicate how hard it is to convince politicians to think of a paradigm shift toward a real people-centered ‘yahapalanya’, instead of ‘Euro-centric’ cancer feeding.

You could, therefore, appreciate why one must justify in detail, Why Jana Sabha is the best solution available to cover the politician-created topic of ‘center-periphery relations,’ because, in Sri Lanka there is no ethnic issue, but a problem of Spatial Inequity, and lack of Equal Access of Opportunities to all. There is no center and no periphery here. Just ten miles from Colombo, or in Kotahena, one could see this periphery! In Buddhism, individuals are unique panchas kandhas, and he/she lives in a much diverse physical and human environment. Besides, Sri Lankan ethnic distribution is more like a pan of scrambled eggs!

Summary

(A)  Main proposal relating to 2(h) in point form is:

1. Re-demarcate boundaries of the 14,022 GSN units (grama seva niladharee), using natural criteria based on geography, geohydrology and ecology, so that they become language-blind (religion-blind now with the Sharia village fortresses project), civil lowest-level administrative units. 

2. Use these natural GSN units to create Jana Sabhas (Jana Muula Sabha) to empower people with delegated governmental powers. Instead of separation of powers vertically at the national level, think of distribution of the total/sum of  governmental power to a maximum number of smaller units at the grass root level.  What Montesquieu meant by his famous doctrine was not what USA is now in crisis, but power distributed spatially, including some judicial power. This new discovery of M’s idea is called, M standing on his head. The village temple priest is such sovereign body not subjected to edicts from a central agency! In ancient Sinhale, only the king could give the capital punishment.

3. Create a National Jana Sabha Council to function as a Senate, with limited powers.

4. In case 2 above is not accepted, develop a land use database for each GSN unit with other socioeconomic data that a GSN routinely collects to create and a national database to be utilized in economic planning and effective  plan implementation.

(B) Miscellaneous other suggestions to think about:

1. Re-introduce history & geography as school subjects;

2. Change the name of the country back to Sinhale from which the name Ceylon was derived in the past by the European colonial masters;

3. Make Sinhala and Tamil mandatory subjects for school children (including international and private schools);

4. Discontinue separate state school system based on language or religion;

5. Establish, a Sanghadhikarana with civil jurisdiction on matters relating to monks;

6. For premediated murder make jury trial and death sentence mandatory;

7. Utilize prisoners for public works in army camps or under military guard with targeted tasks; pay an allowance for such work and allow remittance of money by them to dependents;

8. Make the declaration of assets by political representatives and public servants mandatory; allow people access to such information after paying a reasonable fee;

9. Introduce the right to recall their elected representative by petition to voters.

Will ‘Citizen vs Judiciary’ be given ‘Leave to Proceed’?

November 26th, 2020

MALINDA SENEVIRATN​E

It’s a mischievous headline, admittedly. Citizens are not taking the judges to court. And, even if that happened, the simple matter of interest-conflict would force all judges in all courts to recuse themselves from entertaining such a petition.

We don’t have a perfect judicial system. Neither is it as horrendous as some have claimed it to be. Those in the legal profession, the judges themselves and citizens from all walks of life, however, would not doubt unanimously claim that improvements are in order.

Now ‘The Ills of the Judiciary in Sri Lanka’ could be the title of a doctoral dissertation. A capture-all comment is impossible. We can but flag certain (and not all) issues that require urgent attention from relevant authorities.

We can talk about the entire process of appointments and promotions. We can talk about the way political loyalists are promoted or shifted from the AG’s Department to either the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court. We can lament the fact that the 20th Amendment removed the ‘say’ of civil society via the Constitutional Council. We can lament that the 19th, which instituted the Constitutional Council couldn’t stop loyalists being favored and the fact that the CC and the so-called independent institutions in fact colluded with the regime in appointing such people. One could argue that this allowed excellent students of the law to bring that expertise into judicial deliberation but it is also true that this doesn’t stop the judicial equivalents of Professor James Moriarty (the arch-enemy of the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes upon whom the author conferred a mind equal to or even better than that of his hero) holding the post of Chief Justice. The AG’s office as half-way-house for a judicial career is wrong. This too can be discussed.

We can applaud President Gotabaya Rajapaksa for doing what the Constitutional Council and the Yahapalanists were loath to do — recommending the senior most judges for promotion to the Supreme Court. We can celebrate this as a good precedent which makes it harder for his successors to do what the Yahapalanists did. We can however offer caution: it is always worrisome when such things are dependent on the wisdom of the ruler, for we’ve had all kinds of executive presidents whose CVs we needn’t unfold here to prove the folly of sanctioning such discretion.
 

We can resurrect President Rajapaksa’s ‘One Country, One Law’ rhetoric as well as the notion of ‘Inclusive Nationalism,’ and ask what’s being done on this. We can bring up, in this context, the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA) and ask Justice Minister what’s stopping him from amending/repealing it in line with party rhetoric.  

We can discuss the merits and demerits of adversarial and inquisitorial systems of justice, about which the following observation was made two years ago in this column:  ‘The formeris we have whereas the latter was what we had. Both target justice but whereas one does not care of social fallout, the other does. The argument for retaining the current system is essentially a product of conservatism and sloth, not to mention the fact that it is remunerative to the key stakeholders in the system. So we have come to this: this is what we have and this is what we will always have; we could only, at best, tweak things a bit.  Are we that poor, though? That’s a question that needs to be addressed.’


And we can and must talk of delays. There are obviously many other categories of infringement. They are different from one to the other, even within categories. One commonality is delay. Inordinate delays is so common that the entire system and the process can on this point alone be described as designed to make mockery of the adage ‘justice delayed is justice denied.’  

The salaries of judges were raised a couple of years ago, in some cases to the tune of a 250% increase. Perhaps this was an incentive to get things moving. However, delays remain, land cases for example taking on average over 30 years. Court vacations (originally declared to allow British judges to go home to see their families) are a part of the problem, but that’s only part of the story. We can get rid of the colonial remnant and still have delays.

On Tuesday (November 24, 2020), the Batticaloa Magistrate granted bail to former Eastern Province Chief Minister Sivanesathurai Chandrakanthan alias Pilleyan who was arrested five years ago (October 11, 2015) over a charge alleging involvement in the murder of Batticaloa District TNA parliamentarian Joseph Pararajasingam. No trial. This is also true of suspected LTTE cadres.

They are/were held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). If one abided by the adage ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ these people have to considered innocent. It is prudent to err on the side of caution in the case of suspected terrorists, but that is not a license for indefinite detention. What if courts rule one day that such an individual was in fact innocent? That’s years of a life being robbed. You cannot put a rupee-value on lost years, not to mention the trauma of years of suspicion and abuse by irresponsible sections of the media which confuse allegations with guilt.

Take the case of Hejaaz Hizbullah, arrested on April 14, 2020 on the basis of phone calls made to Inshaf Ahamed, the suicide bomber who attacked the Cinnamon Grand Hotel on Easter Sunday 2019. Hizbullah was the lawyer representing Ahamed’s family in a couple of cases and claims that he has had conversations with Ahamed in relation to litigation over a land issue. That’s association, but essentially a non-sequitur. For the record, even Justice Minister Ali Sabry has represented the same family. It simply ‘does not necessarily follow.’ Reason enough, given the enormity of the crime, for caution, but not an excuse for sloth in the judicial process.

Hizbullah’s case is not being helped by NGO hordes who, finding themselves in reduced circumstances after the defeat of the Yahapalana regime have to badmouth the regime at every turn to buttress its tall tales of dictatorship, majoritarianism and rights violation. They’ve done the accusation=guilt number long enough and now find themselves on the flip side of that story. It simply rubs people the wrong way. On the other hand, the President, who claims he’s not just another politician, should not allow such things to color reason. He should realize that this is in fact the flip side of the NGO number referred to above. Use when convenient, decry when not is not good politics and Gotabaya Rajapaksa would do well to do a think on this.

I presume Hejaaz Hizbullah to be innocent. I would not be happy if indeed he is innocent and several years of his life is robbed on account of ‘suspicion’ and/or consideration of political expediency. It has happened before, it can be argued it is happening even now and it could happen in the future too. That’s ‘precedent’ and no citizen is immune to what could amount to persecution. If he is guilty, the court must determine so. Court could go soft on the sloth of prosecutors, but that would detract from the citizens’ confidence in the judiciary to be fair in the affirmation of justice.

Appointments, promotions, constitutional reform that corrects systemic error and accommodates promises voted for, fair and reasonably fast determinations need to be addressed. Citizens vs Judicial system is not a case that can be filed in any court. However, the title alludes to the fact that systems are at odds with citizens.

malindasenevi@gmail.com.

A NEW CONSTITUTION – THE LEGISLATURE – TO BE OR NOT TO BE? How to get Parliament under control

November 26th, 2020

Stanley Gunaratne 

There was a time when our Parliament was filled with statesmen and women. Honourable members with integrity, vision and integrity. Whose oratory was full of class, wit and wisdom which any legislative chamber in the world would consider it an honour to bear witness to. 

Sadly today, this once august chamber is full of unscrupulous characters, rogues and traitors. It has become an embarassment to the nation and certainly no example to children whether it be the vulgar language exchanged between thugs, or the rugby scrums and fistfights which ensue. 

A proposal that this writer believes deserves serious consideration by our People in the NEW CONSTITUTION:

Journalists must NOT use “Maveer”, or “Mahaviru” and other glorifying names for suicide terrorists who are “Maha-viyaru” individuals.

November 26th, 2020

Chandre Dharmawardana, Canada

Many English newspapers, and even some Sinhalese language newspapers have carried news items with headlines like Mullaitivu and Jaffna courts prohibit Mahaviru commemorations”,  Court orders to prohibit Mahaveer Commemorations”. To  unthinkingly  take over the narrative and vocabulary of the pro-Tiger activists and use them in news items and headlines is a corruption of the language.

If journalists need an alternative word, then can refer to these suicide terrorists as Mahaviyaru” in Sinhala, and  Maaveriyan”  மாவெறியன்  in Tamil. This  alludes to the fact that these suicidees were not acting rationally, and had  become viyaru”, i.e., mentally deranged.

The claim made by pro-LTTE writers that they wish to commemorate those who have fallen and sacrificed their lives in their struggle for Tamil rights and aspirations is nonsensical.

If so, why are they not commemorating Mr. Amirthalingam and other leaders of the TULF who were assassinated?

What about the leaders of TELO, EROS, and EPRLF who also rose to liberate” the Tamils, only to be massacred by the LTTE? If there is genuine commemoration, why are they not included. What about people like Mr. Neelan Thiruchlevan?

It seems that these planned commemorations of the Maaveriyan, i.e., the  Maaveriyar Naal” exclude those individuals that the LTTE labeled as traitors”, or Thurogi” purely because they followed other, more peaceful approaches to achieving Tamil aspirations. It is clearly evident that the so-called Maaveer” who are commemorated are  restricted to those individuals who were mentally so deranged as to blow themselves up to cause maximum violence to civilians.

LTTE attack on a funeral party in
Akressa, Sri Lanka.

A pro-LTTE writer’s view,  published in the Colombo Telegraph (26-11-20) says that The terrorism label given to the LTTE group of Tamil freedom fighters who fought for the peace and freedom of all Tamils in Sri Lanka, is a clear depiction of the Sri Lankan government’s effort to diminish the Tamil struggle and deny the rights of the Tamil population, forcing them to the status of a permanent minority in their own land”.

These pro-LTTE spokesmen forget that the LTTE has been identified as a ruthless terrorist group by most countries of the world, and not just by the Sri Lankan government.  These individuals forget that their own social analysts and political activists like Mr. Chandrahasan, son of S. J. V. Chelvanayagam, journalists like D. B. S. Jeyraj, or  Sebastian Rasalingam have pointed out that the Tigers have killed more Tamils than all the state terror of the Government of Sri Lanka.

Mr. V. Anandasangaree, General Secretary of the Tamil United Liberation Front stated at the 2008 December General Meeting of the party that the LTTE eliminated its own injured cadre and injured civilians as they were considered a liability in their retreat to Nandikadol. Are those individuals being commemorated as well? They are the disappeared and the forgotten buried in the horrors of the LTTE.    

In Germany, at the end of the war against  Hitler, a strong de-Nazification program was undertaken, and there are no commemorations of Nazi warriors” or Nazi Maaveer” allowed, for good reasons. Let us hope that the court rulings against commemorations of Mahaviyaru” individuals auger a new era where the horror of violence against innocent civilians becomes a part of Sri Lanka’s public opinion, irrespective of ethnicity. Violence against civilians cannot be sugarcoated with claims of liberation struggles”.

Chandre Dharmawardana, Canada

මාධ්‍ය වීදීන් සහ ලේඛකයෝ “මරු-වියරු” වූ එල් ටී ටී ඊ ත්‍රස්තයන්ට “මාවීර්”, “මහවිරු” වැනි ගෞරව් නාම නොදිය යුතුය.

November 26th, 2020

චන්ද්‍ර ධර්මවර්දන විසිනි

මේ නොබෝ දා පුවත් පත් වල පල වූ ශීර්ෂ තල අනුව මුලතිවු (මූලදූව ) සහ ජාපනය උසාවි මගීන් “මාවීර අනුස්මරණ උත්සව” පැවැත්වීම තහනම් කොට ඇත. එම අන්දමේ පුවත් පල කරන විට එවැනි ත්‍රස්තයන් ට  “මාවීර” වැනි ගෞරව පූර්වක නාමයන් නොදිය යුතුය. ඔවුන් හින්සාව සහ ත්‍රස්තයෙන් වියරු වැටුනු, එනම් පිස්සු වැටුනු, මාර චේතනා වලින් උසිගැන්වූ  පුද්ගලයෝ බව සලකා ඔවුන්ට “මරුවියරුවන්” යයි නම් කිරීම සුදුසු ය.   

දෙමල බසින් පවා මොවුන්ට “மறவெறியன்” හෙවත් “මාරවෙරියන්”  යන නම පාවිච්චි කල යුතුය.

මෙම උත්සව ඇත්ත වශයෙන් දමිලයන්ගේ “අයිතිවාසිකම් සංදහා නැගී සිටි අය” අනුස්මරණය කිරීමට පවත් වන්නේ නම්, අමිර්තලිංගම්, කනගරත්නම් ආදී, කොටි ඝාතනයට යට වූ දමිල නායකයන් අමතක කොට ඇත්තේ ඇයි? ජාපන සරසවියේ කටයුතු කල  ආචාර්‍ය  තිරානගම, හෝ නීලන් තිරුචෙල්වන් වැන්නන් අනුස්මරණය නොකරන්නේ ඇයි?

TULF, TELO, EROS,  EPRLFආදී අන් දමිල ඊලම් වාදී පක්ෂවල නායකයන් අනුස්මරණය නොකරන්නේ ඇයි? කොටි ඝතනයට බිලි වූ හෙයින් ඔවුන් ගැන කථා කිරීමට  මරුවියරුන් අනුස්මරණය කරන මොවුන් ඉදිරි පත් වන්නේ නැත.

ජාපන සහ මුලතිව් (මූලදූව ) උසාවි වලින් දුන් තීරණයන් අනුව, තව දුරටත් මෙවනි මරු-වියරු ත්‍රස්තයන්ට ගරු කිරීමට ඉඩ දිය නොහැක.  මානව අයිතිකම් සහ දමිල අයිතිකම් රැකින්ට ඉදිරිපත් වූ උතුමන් ලෙස සැලකීමට ඉඩ නොදිය යුතුය.


ලිපි ලියන මාධ්‍යවේදීන් මේ ගැන වෙසෙසින් සැලකිය යුතුය.

Trump bowing out; Opportunity for Australia to mend fences with China?

November 26th, 2020

By Raj Gonsalkorale

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make them mad

Donald Trump has taken the USA down an abyss of despair and duplicity. Domestic divisions and international disorder dominated the Trump era. Many questioned the sanity of Trump’s approach to governance, nationally and internationally. Now, more than 80 million voters and popular vote majority in excess of 7 million, and 306 electoral college votes has given Joe Biden a clear victory over Trump. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will have a tough time resurrecting some trust and confidence that their own people, and others in the rest of the world, had with the USA.

In the age of information technology, the world has become smaller and closer to each other whether one likes it or not, and whether it is a good thing or a bad thing. Various social media platforms link people with each other before one could blink an eye and millions are inter connected. There is computer hacking, listening in, cyber spying and all the evils of this information technology bringing out the worst in human beings. In this environment, internationalisation today is inevitable and the world has to find ways and means of capitalising on the positives and taking collective action against the negatives. Countries cannot crawl into the cocoons and pretend they can live happy ever after by doing so.

The rest of the world has no choice as to who sits in the White House. However, even if that person sneezes or coughs, the effect reverberates throughout the world. Stock markets can go up and down and oil prices could fluctuate wildly. In this context, it does matter to the rest of the world who sits in the White House. Due to the inability of the rest of the world to decide on this, they are probably hoping and even supporting alternate world leaders and emerging powerful economies to cushion the blows they get when the incumbent of the White House behaves irresponsibly and irrationally. Many in the world today who are so interconnected would want a Vladimir Putin or a Xi Jinping or an Angela Merkel or a Narendra Mody to help keep the world more stable even if they are not supporters of such leaders or their modes of governance.

What characterised the Trump era was his own belligerence and the increasing counter belligerence of leaders like Xi Jinping. Many Nations distanced themselves from the USA, and they are doing that with China. Belligerence is not a strength and it is well for both the USA and China to remember this. China does have the money to buy friends and influence people. However, what money buys are not genuine friends. In contrast, despite all its negatives, the money spent by the USA, not just its government but by Billionaire philanthropists like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and a host of others have helped to fight decease, and supported causes like providing potable water for millions of human beings living in deplorable conditions. Comparatively, the government of China nor its many billionaires have done little to support impoverished countries ridden with avoidable catastrophes.

The world does need a strong and decent USA. Not a USA that has destroyed the lives and livelihoods of millions in the Middle Eastern region on the pretext of hunting for non-existent weapons of mass destruction. The world need a kinder USA that recognises the limitations in trying to introduce democracy to countries who have never known democracy. The USA has to work with authoritarian regimes and work towards gradual reforms and human rights improvements.

When an incumbent challenges its own democratic choice, questions are raised about democracy in the USA. The voice of the USA becomes less credible if what it practices is not what it preaches. It cannot be the stone thrower who is in a glass house.

Unknowingly and unwittingly, COVID has given the USA, China and the rest of the world an opportunity to recalibrate and reset the pathway towards a kinder, less avaricious and a more humanitarian world that realises it is part of a whole that includes the natural environment that sustains all living beings. If the worlds powerful nations do not recognise this and save the environment, they will not have a world they could dominate

The change of leadership in the USA gives an opportunity for Australia to do their own resetting as far as its relationship with China is concerned. While Australia’s steadfastness about its values is commendable, it needs to be pragmatic about the realities in China. Human rights abuse is levelled against China, however, there is no recognition that more than 850 million Chinese people have been lifted out of extreme poverty in the last three decades according to the World Bank. China’s poverty rate fell from 88 percent in 1981 to 0.7 percent in 2015. In 2019 it had been reduced to 0.6 percent. For those who have visited China in recent times, these changes are quite evident.

China could get on the pulpit and talk about the human rights of Australian Aboriginal people. They could wheel out statistics about the health status, life expectancy, literacy rate and other social indicators of Australian indigenous people. They could also talk about the 1.2 million children who are said to be in poverty according to the charity organisation, the Smith Family.

Australia might be in a defence pact with the USA and also have a long standing relationship with the USA. However, Australia needs to look after its people whose economic wellbeing had got closely intertwined with the trading relationship that had developed and grown with China. This trading relationship has now got seriously threatened due to belligerence on the part of both countries. Australia needs to do be pragmatic and stop being the Deputy Sheriff of the USA for the region. They need to practice diplomacy as it should be practiced.

Perhaps it is time for the government to send an emissary to China to help thaw the heated relationship between the two countries. If such a thawing does not happen and things get worse, many Australians will face the economic consequences of biting the hand that has been feeding it.

THE POHOTTUWA GOVERNMENT OF SRI LANKA Part 2 C7b

November 26th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Economists agree that China has made a spectacular rise from a very poor nation in 1949 to very rich one in 2019. Chinese banks are among the largest cross border lenders in Asia, said Economist in 2019. Seven of the top 20 equity underwriters in Asia In 2018 were Chinese. Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway had invested USD 232 million in BYD, a Chinese energy products company, in 2008.  In 2019, China had the world’s largest high-speed rail network of 29,000 kilometers. This is about two thirds of the world’s total high-speed rail network.

China is now due to become the biggest economy in the world, ousting the US from that position, analysts said in 2019.     In 2020, China had become the world’s largest economy in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). China’s economy had reached a stunning 25.4 trillion USD in 2020, said analysts. By 2030 China will be the leading economy. By 2030 China will also have the largest navy and the most powerful aircraft carrier, they said.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a massive global network of ports, railways, roads and industrial parks spanning Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Europe, with trillions invested in new infrastructure.  China’s B&R is supported by a bank, unlike other similar ventures. Sri Lanka is a member.

More countries are joining it. Iraq announced in September 2019 that Iraq will join China’s “Belt and Road” project.  Iraq is grateful to China for its valuable support and is willing to work together in the ‘One Belt, One Road’ framework,” said the Prime Minister of Iraq during a state visit to China.  Beijing is Baghdad’s biggest trade partner, while Iraq is China’s second biggest oil supplier.

This November (2020) China and 14 other Asia-Pacific countries signed the world’s largest trade agreement, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. (RCEP). China has joined forces with more than a dozen countries across the Asia Pacific region to sign a huge free trade deal nearly a decade in the making, said analysts.

 The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership spans 15 countries and 2.2 billion people, or nearly 30% of the world’s population. Their combined GDP totals roughly $26 trillion and they account for nearly 28% of global trade based on 2019 data. The deal includes several of the region’s richest countries, China, Japan, South Korea. It also includes New Zealand, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.

The trade agreement was first proposed in 2012 as a way to create one of the world’s largest free-trade zones. Tariffs and quotas would be eliminated on 65% of the goods that are traded in the region.  The economic benefits are modest and would take years to materialize but this was a coup for China, said Citi Research analysts.

The Communist Party intends to keep a firm grip on its capitalist economy.  Keeping big business in check is part of that plan, said analysts. There was a crackdown on global spending. Anbang Insurance was nationalised, putting the Waldorf under the ownership of China’s Ministry of Finance. Baoshang was taken over by the state. Acquisitions of European football clubs by Chinese groups came to an end. HNA, an airlines and logistics group that bought a large stake in Deutsche Bank and Hilton Worldwide, faced difficulties. . (Economist)

 China’s overextended financial conglomerates and China’s tech billionaires were brought to heel. Six of China’s 20 most valuable listed companies are tech firms with billions of users.  In addition, firms were asked to launch Party committees that will oversee corporate decisions. Also set up monitoring units that would allow the Party to audit company managers. (Economist)

The Republic of China celebrated its   70th anniversary with a very impressive, very long parade which included an ‘awesome display’ of military equipment. In the military parade in 1949, only 70 planes could be found so they had been ordered to fly past twice. In 2019 there were 160 aircraft and 580 pieces of military equipment on display. China has developed military abilities that can reach potential adversaries across the globe, said experts. 

The military parade was broadcast live, so everybody now knows that the China has invented powerful new weapons. China has no recent experience in sea or air battles, observed critics, but they are developing

[effective]

missiles and asymmetric systems.

The military parade showed off China’s most advanced weapons, some being shown for the first time.  They included the following.  The J-20 supersonic stealth fighters,  the H-6N with an aerial refueling probe added,  that could be used to deter US aircraft carriers venturing into the South China Sea  and the DF-26 ballistic missile which, fired from land bases, is believed to have the accuracy to strike at US Navy’s aircraft carriers.

Also on display was the DR-8 or WZ-8 supersonic drone, a reconnaissance drone that that could potentially be deployed by aircraft, to infiltrate enemy airspace and gather intelligenceincluding determining the damage done by China’s missiles. It could be used to spot distant targets on very short notice and hit them with a conventional ballistic strike.

The Dong Feng  41, or DF-41, is an intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 15,000 kilometers, allowing it to reach anywhere in the United States in about 30 minutes.  It is capable of hurling multiple nuclear warheads all over the United States, said experts.” It could be moved around by road and fired quickly.

 Its range of up to 15,000 kilometers would make it the world’s longest-range military missile. Some analysts say it can travel up to 25 times the speed of sound. It could carry as many as 10 independent warheads, which can hit 10 different targets over a wide area.”

One of the most closely-watched weapons was the Dongfeng-17, a new hypersonic ballistic nuclear missile believed capable of breaching all existing anti-missile shields deployed by the U.S. and its allies. Experts say it can breach any defence system.  The DF-17 missile is thought to be able to travel at more than five times the speed of sound. It’s designed to bypass enemy missile defense systems by traveling at speeds more than 3,400 miles per hour at low altitudes. 

DF-17 is a nuclear-capable glider that is designed to maneuver at high speed to evade anti-missile defenses. The glider is believed to be able to carry conventional and nuclear devices. The emergence of such a system would have a considerable impact, highlighting China’s progress in designing hypersonic non-strategic gliders, a segment in which Russians and Americans are lagging behind, said experts.”

China kept up its contact with Sri Lanka during the USA-controlled Yahapalana rule of 2015-2019. Tianjin Symphony orchestra played at Nelum Pokuna in 2017, to a full audience. Ceylon Chamber of Commerce and the Beijing Chamber of International Commerce signed an MOU to promote trade and commerce between the two countries in 2015.

 In 2014 Beijing Foreign Students University signed two memoranda with University of Colombo to set up a China Sri Lanka study Centre and a Confucius Institute. China said that there is a high demand for Sinhala degree courses at the Beijing Foreign Students University, due to the increase of Chinese investments and business groups. The university has facilities for PhD programs in Sinhala too. Chinese international broadcasting service had a Sinhala channel, they added.

China did not relax once Pohottu came to power. China remained watchful. Two criticisms of Port City were made. China replied. CHEC Port City Colombo (Pvt) Ltd wishes to draw your attention regarding, a misleading reference about Port City Colombo, in an article, titled ‘Did Expert Committee use similar standards in evaluating MCC and Port City loans’, by Harim Peiris, published on  09/07/2020, and subsequently another opinion article titled ‘Saving nation from Chinese loan strategies’ by G.A.D Sirimal, on  11/07/2020.

Both articles say “the issue that arises is whether the SLPP and its experts use the same criteria and standards when evaluating the MCC grant with Port City loans and project.”  Port City Colombo is not a Chinese loan. Port City Colombo is purely a commercial trade agreement and a 100% direct investment.

After the Eelam victory of 2009, Mahinda Rajapaksa wished to embark on a development progamme. The only country that came forward to invest in Sri Lankan infrastructure in a big way was China. Therefore, it wasn’t a foreign policy shift but an economic necessity, said Colombage. West had boycotted us on the grounds of human rights violations. So China filled the vacuum.

China became the biggest foreign investor in Sri Lanka, dwarfing foreign inflows from other countries by a significant margin. According to a March 2020 study by the London-based Chatham House think tank, Chinese infrastructure investment in Sri Lanka amounted to $12.1 billion between 2006 and July 2019.  Beijing is the largest foreign source of investment in Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Maldives, according to a 2018 study by Mumbai-based Gateway House think tank. Although the US is Sri Lanka’s biggest export market and a major development partner, it has been unable to match the Chinese economic might.

Since the election of Gotabaya Rajapaksa as the President last year, the government has once again deepened its relationship with China.  We have always had excellent relations with China, said President Gotabaya.  Sri Lanka relations with China is mainly economic, he observed.

China has offered to help mitigate the financial crisis faced by Sri Lanka. Pohottu asked for a $700 million loan. China gave US$500 million  on a 10-year concessionary loan. China also provided generous support towards controlling Covid-19.

Pohottu has bluntly pointed out to its pro-US, anti-China critics that it is China that has the most amount of cash now”. In different times in world history, different countries have had the most amount of cash. And now it happens to be China, Pohottu explained.  However, Sri Lanka is exploring different options to repay its debt, in addition to loans from China, currency swap facilities with India and China, and Samurai and Panda bonds, Pohottu added.

Despite the fact that Chinese loans to Sri Lanka remain below 10 percent of our overall debt burden, and those loans are concessionary loans with an interest rate around two percent, Pompeo and other US officials have tried to portray that China has Sri Lanka in a ‘debt trap”, complained Pohottu.

Pohottu dismissed the accusation that China is setting up “debt traps” in developing countries. China is Sri Lanka’s largest creditor but Sri Lanka is not caught in a China debt trap. 90 percent of Sri Lanka’s debt is in fact owed to western and multilateral financial institutions,   Pohottu said.

This statement has received support from abroad. Min Ye, Professor of International relations at Boston University has stated that studies conducted by scholars and researchers at US-based institutions have disproved the charge of a debt entrapment policy by China, whether it refers to Sri Lanka or Pakistan, or elsewhere.

China’s support was to enable Sri Lanka to pay off debt to other lenders. This could leave Sri Lanka completely in the hands of China, said . Mick Moore. At any moment, China could decide not to extend further loans to Sri Lanka.  On the other hand China could agree to give very large, low cost loans to enable the government to pay its debt to other lenders, he added.

Epithets like Trojan Horse” and Greeks bearing gifts” have been used to refer to offers of assistance by China to Sri Lanka.  Pohottu has ignored these warnings”. Analysts observe that Pohottu has pulled the plug on a light rail transit system that was to be financed and constructed by Japan. It is believed that the construction of the project will now be handed over to a Chinese company. (Continued)

Professionals Quash chicken-brained Mangala’s Budget criticisms Part II

November 26th, 2020

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA.

Although the chicken-brained lingerie designer cannot understand the economic progress being made by this government it must be pointed out despite progress affecting in many firlfd of economic development inflation for which the opposition rabb;e-rousers make even poojas for a steady increase is reported to be dwindling appreciably,  Inflation in October reached 5.5%, which was a reduction from 6.4% in the previous month. The Census and Statistics Department said that the reduction was largely down to changes in food prices.  

We now present fitting responses given to the chicken-brained lingerie designer who attempted to mislead the people about the visionary futuristic budget thinking that the people of this country are economic liliputs similar to him.

National Chamber welcomes 2021 Budget; stresses on implementation

The National Chamber of Commerce (NCCSL) welcomed the 2021 Budget presented on by Prime Minister and Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and stressed its success hinged on effective implementation.

Following is the full text of the NCCSL statement:

The National Chamber at the outset acknowledge and appreciated the Government efforts to maintain consistency in taxation policy framework commenced last year with introduction of certain tax cuts and relaxations, without resorting to ad-hoc revenue enhancement measures in the midst of extremely difficult times confronted with the COVID-19 pandemic on behalf of the membership, business community and general public at large. 

We observe the Budget proposals deliberated under agriculture, local diary industry, fishery economy, plantation, etc., with budgetary allocations under the Ministries of Agriculture, Irrigation, Water Supply, Plantation, Trade, Fisheries and Land, etc., together with a wide spectrum of tax exemptions extended would augur well for SMEs of the economy where the National Chamber has a remarkably high level of representation. 

The National Chamber is cognisant that the budgetary framework revolves around the sustainability of local entrepreneurship under ‘Vistas of Prosperity and Splendour’ while keeping certain import restrictions in order to maintain economic stability of the economy as elaborated under foreign trade and national economy of the Budget speech. We sincerely expect that the Government would endeavour to reconnect with global value chain eventually starting with the regional trade collaborations at the appropriate time moving forward.

We are of the view that up-skilling of the technical knowhow of the local work force would be of paramount importance in order to improve productivity level and quality of the output of the local entrepreneurs. While appreciating Budget proposals directed towards in the areas of technological infrastructure, connect Sri Lanka, techno parks, distance education, and specifically opportunities for vocational education and expansion of university facilities we stressed that such efforts need to be continued under ‘Vistas of Prosperity and Splendour’ vision of the Government in order reap the benefits in the medium and long term horizon.

Finally, we are of the view that the successful implementation of the Budget proposals of 2021 hinges on achieving the revenue targets of the Government which would be challenging under current prevailing circumstances and expect more light will be shed in this area through deliberations within the next few days finally extending the assurance in the minds of rating agencies, investors and foreign financing agencies.”

CCC welcomes ‘growth-oriented’ Budget

  • Awaits timely implementation and private sector consultation 
  • Wants engagement on holistic labour reform, change in retirement age and COVID insurance fund 
  • Says wage reform should rely on time-tested collective bargaining and Govt. reconsiders plantation wage in Budget 
  • Wants focus on debt management and SOE reforms

The Ceylon Chamber of Commerce said it welcomed the proposals put forward by the Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa in the National Budget 2021 which it termed as business friendly, production-oriented and demonstrative of policy continuity. 

The Budget has focused on boosting economic growth by enhancing exports, providing investment relief for key thrust sectors supplemented by public investment proposals, promoting capital markets and supporting the growth of startups and SMEs,” the Ceylon Chamber said in a statement. 

The emphasis on tax policy continuity and measures announced to strengthen tax administration demonstrates a strong commitment to policy consistency while strengthening and broad basing revenues. 

The Chamber said in its pre-Budget proposals highlighted the importance of the Government maintaining the current tax laws and rates at least for the next five years or so thereby providing the necessary consistency in tax policy. The adoption of a consistent tax policy under the National Budget 2021 would not only provide a platform for proper planning for business but would also help the Government in long-term cash flow planning and strengthening fiscal consolidation.

The Chamber also welcomed the tax relief for investment in machinery and equipment for domestic manufacturing and exports and the relaxing of import restrictions on certain sectors in line with past recommendations by the Chamber. 

Proposals on enhancing digital governance, investments in technology and infrastructure including rural connectivity to facilitate digital inclusion are also notable.

We trust the commendable proposals in the Budget will see timely implementation and will continue to involve private sector consultation.” 

The Chamber said it looked forward to the facilitation of further stakeholder engagement with respect to holistic labour reform and the placement of the proposals related to the extension of the retirement age and the contribution of 0.25% on turnover towards an insurance fund, within the context of the said broader reform agenda.  

With respect to wage reform, the Chamber recommended the placing of continued reliance on the time-tested mechanism of collective bargaining which has so far been adopted consistently across industry sectors and encompasses factors related to productivity and worker welfare, and as such that the Government reconsiders the budget based wage intervention for the plantation sector. 

The incorporation of productivity linkages within the proposal to increase wages of plantation sector workers is also a subject which merits further consultation. 

The Chamber said it trusted that the positive benefits accrued from the macro stability set out by National Budget 2021 would provide a foundation for sustainable growth acceleration over the medium and long-term as envisaged. 

The Chamber is also hopeful that the Government will pivot on the growth foundation established, to continue its progress in reforms on several key agendas including but not limited to those related to Local and Foreign Investment, Debt Management, Export Promotion, State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), Capital Market and productivity enhancements in the public sector. 

The Ceylon Chamber in its capacity as the premier representative of the private sector, looks forward to an ongoing engagement with the Government, and for the opportunity to play a meaningful role alongside the private sector at large, with respect to the implementation of the Budget proposals. 

The Chamber will continue to support the Government’s initiative to effectively execute a public-private shared vision for accelerated economic revival and social sustenance,” the statement added.

2021 Budget more significant given COVID-19 challenge: – CEO of Standard Chartered Bank.  

CEO of the Standard Chartered Bank Sri Lanka Nr.Bingumal Thewarathanthri said that the National Budget of 2021 was more significant given the challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

He emphasised that Year 2020 has been challenging. Extended lockdowns in Sri Lanka contributed to a loss of business, affecting both domestic production and the import-export economy. Needless to say, this adversely affected the banking sector, both in terms of (necessary) loan moratoriums and a rise of NPLs.  In this backdrop, the National Budget plays a significant role as compared to any other time,”  

According to him, all over the world successful governments have accepted stress on fiscal deficit to support the industries and Sri Lanka is not an exception. However, Sri Lanka will have to balance its ambition with medium-term debt sustainability. 

After a long time, we have seen some assurance on policy consistency with this Budget, which will support the FDI agenda for the country and will also boost the domestic companies venturing into sectors specified by the Strategic Development Projects Act,” Thewarathanthri pointed out.

Now, the banking sector needs to boost confidence in the market, repurposing financial instruments to suit the unique needs of the economy and innovate more holistic value propositions to respond to differing circumstances. Whilst financial sector stability is a top priority, it is imperative that banks offer unconventional financial services with calculated risks,” the SCB Sri Lanka CEO emphasised.

With the Government flagging the national need to change the Sri Lankan mindset to a production-based economy that supports exports and domestic production capabilities with less imports, the onus is on the banks to assist the Government to kick-start the economy, for businesses to thrive and the nation to progress,” Thewarathanthri added. 

New era for local motor vehicle assembly with 2021 Budget,

claims Sri Lanka Automative Component Manufacturers Association (SLACMA)

In appreciation of the Government’s efforts to encourage entrepreneurs in the automobile industry engaged in vehicle assembly using locally-manufactured brand-new auto components, SLACMA President Dimantha Jayawardena said the 2021 Budget had proposed local automotive assembly using 30% of locally-manufactured brand-new parts; promotion of local automotive products by giving them preference in Government tenders (domestic preference) and elimination of unfair competition for local auto manufacturers by preventing under-invoicing by importers.

SLACMA has submitted a 10-year master-plan to the Finance Ministry as a crucial step to take the local assembly industry and component supply to the next level, as they seek quality certification from their regional counterparts to boost growth. 

The association reiterated the role of the Ministry of Finance under the Prime Minister, Ministry of Industry and Supply Chain under Wimal Weerawansa and Dilum Amunugama, MP, the State Minister of Vehicle Regulation, Passenger Transport Services, Railway Carriages and Automobile Industries, the Department of Motor Traffic, Export Development Board and the Board of Investment of Sri Lanka for their active support in driving this policy forward. 

The SLCMA said it was currently in talks with seven world-renowned automobile companies, in order to supply locally-assembled and manufactured automobile components. Jayawardena expressed confidence in a better future for the industry in creating many jobs in the months to come.

EDB lists key 2021 Budget proposals and impact on export sector

The Export Development Board (EDB) said it was pleased to see an export-focused budget, which will support strong export growth led by investment, value addition and maximising Sri Lankan natural resources. 

This is a pivotal change in Sri Lanka’s growth strategy, which will be led by the exporters,” the EDB said.                

Following is the list of export focused proposals of 2021 Budget, it said..

 Corporate Income Tax

Exports, Tourism, Education, Medicare, Construction and Agro processing – 14%

Manufacturing – 18%.

Trading, Banking, Finance, Insurance, etc. (Standard Rate) – 24%. Manufacture and Selling/Import and Selling Liquor, Tobacco, Betting and Gaming – 40%.

Income generated from the supply of Health Protective Equipment to arms of Government and similar products by BOI companies on the request of Ministry of Health and Indigenous Medical Services, Department of Health Services, Tri-Forces and Sri Lanka Police to be considered “Deemed Exports” (Tax rate – 14%).

VAT rates.

Standard rate – 8% (effective from 1 December 2019).

Supply of Financial Services – 15%.

Export of goods and services – Zero Rated.

Exemptions apply for speccified goods and services.

Economic Service Charge (ESC).

ESC was abolished with effect from 1 January.

Nation Building Tax (NBT).

NBT was abolished with effect from 01 December 2019. 

Impact of Budget 2021 on the Sri Lankan IT/BPM industry

The potential for exponential growth 

The National Export Strategy of Sri Lanka aims to generate $ 5 billion of revenue creating 200,000 direct jobs and establish 1,000 IT/BPM startups via the IT/BPM industry. This Budget clearly codified this message through incentivising the IT/BPM industry as a thrust or core industry.

Imran Furjhab, the CEO Tresync stated that thre The IT/BPM industry requires little capital, can grow exponentially very fast and can help prevent brain drain while offering the capacity to grow internationally and boost efficiency of every other industry as well. 

Signals to IT/BPM industry

The Budget proposals signalled that Earnings from both domestic and foreign sources by those engaged in businesses in Information Technology and enabling services and also their earnings when made while being resident or non-resident will also be exempted from income taxes”.

Removing all taxes would influence more people to get in to the industry while also be helping to attract Sri Lankan diaspora to invest in Sri Lankan startups plus physically return to the country to work in this industry.

Additionally, it gives long-term certainty for larger projects as well. Investments exceeding $ 10 million with potential to change the landscape of the economy, in the areas of export industries, dairy, fabric, tourism, agricultural products, processing and information technology will be provided with concessions up to a maximum of 10 years under the Strategic Development Law.”

Therefore, the Budget meets the requirements of the IT/BPM industry in terms of generous tax exemptions. 

Encouraging listings of IT/BPM companies

Many local startups such as PickMe are now ready to list hence the incentives such as to provide a 50% tax concession for the years 2021/2022 for such companies that are listed before 31 December 2021 and to maintain a corporate tax rate of 14% for the subsequent three years” will encourage more listings of IT/BPM companies and let the general public benefit from the growth of the IT/BPM industry. 

Enabling legal framework

The intention to introduce laws relating to data security, cyber security and intellectual property rights, which I have been personally pushing for will protect IT/BPM stakeholders and help establish the country as a favoured investment destination. 

Enabling telecom infrastructure framework

Creating a ‘technology-based society and digitally-inclusive Sri Lanka’ is the Government’s vision. Under this the ‘Gamata Sanniwedanaya’ (Communication for the Village) aims to grow the telecom infrastructure to provide high speed access across the country, which will permit the IT/BPM industry to be located anywhere. 

Continued ………….

අධ්‍යාපනවේදී උපාධිධාරීන් ගුරු පත්වීම් – ඌව පළාත්

November 26th, 2020

A.J.M. Muzammil Media Unit

ඌව පළාත් සභාවේ අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශයට බඳවා ගනු ලැබූ අධ්‍යාපනවේදී උපාධිධාරීන් 26 දෙනකුට ගුරු පත්වීම් පිරිනැමීම අද දින ( 26-11-2020 ) ඌව පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාරවර ගරු ඒ.ජේ.එම්. මුසම්මිල් මැතිතුමන් ගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් ඌව පළාත් සහා ශ්‍රවණාගාරයේදී  සිදු කෙරිණි.

මෙහිදී කොළඹ, කැළණිය සහ පේරාදෙණිය යන විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයන්ගෙන් අධ්‍යාපනවේදී උපාධිය ලැබූ උපාධිධාරීන් සහ භික්ෂුන් වහන්සේලා දෙනමකට ද ගුරු පත්වීම්වලට අදාළ පත්වීම් ලිපි පිරිනැමීම ආණ්ඩුකාරවරයාගේ අතින් සිදුවිය.

මෙසේ බඳවා ගනු ලැබූ උපාධිධාරි ගුරුවරුන් විසි හයදෙනා මොණරාගල, බිබිල, වැල්ලවාය, තණමල්විල, වැලිමඞ, පස්සර, මහියංගනය හා වියළුව යන අධ්‍යාපන කලාපවල පිහිටි පාසල් වෙත අනුයුක්ත කර ඇත.

මෙම ගුරු පත්වීම් පිරිනැමීමේ අවස්ථාවට ඌව පළාත් ප්‍රධාන ලේකම් පී.බී.විජයරත්න මහතා, ඌව පළාත් රාජ්‍යසේවා කොමිෂන් සභා සභාපති විජිත මල්ලැහැව මහතා ඌව පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාරවර ලේකම් නිහාල් ගුණරත්න මහතා,පළාත් අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් සන්ධ්‍යා අඹන්වල මහත්මිය ඇතුළු නිලධාරීන් පිරිසක්ද එක්ව සිටියහ.

Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekara takes oaths as Public Security Minister

November 26th, 2020

Courtsey Ceylon Today

Rear Admiral (Retired) Sarath Weerasekara has taken oaths as the Minister of Public Security today (26).

The President established two new Ministries under an extraordinary gazette recently.

Foreign force behind Easter Sunday attacks – Sirisena

November 26th, 2020

By Rathindra Kuruwita Courtesy The Island

A powerful foreign country or an agency was behind the Easter Sunday bombings and the National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ) leader Zaharan Hashim, former President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday told the PCoI investigating the Easter Sunday attacks.

I also do not believe that Zaharan was the leader of that organisation. Because a leader would never have initiated a suicide attack and died during the first wave,” Sirisena said.

The former President also said that Islamic extremism had spread rapidly in the country due to the support extremists received from Muslim politicians.

Sirisena also said that the military and intelligence officials had been demoralised by harassment they suffered during the yahaalanaya administration. This was the reason why local institutions failed to uncover NTJ’s plans. But this incident is a conspiracy because it appeared that Zaharan was being manipulated by some foreign hand,” the former President said.

The President further said that during the previous administration, UNPers had headed the Ministry of Law and Order for several years that they had significantly weakened the intelligence services. Although he had taken the Ministry of law and Order in the last stages of the yahapalana government, he had not been able to undo the damage the UNP had done in four years, the witness said.

Commissioner: Did you know that during your tenure as President, Muslim MPs and ministers were forcible acquiring land in Vanni and Batticaloa and they were constructing Muslim villages and mosques there?”

Sirisena: Some ministers used their political power to clear forests and cultivate lands. Some ministers were angry with me when I tried to stop them. I tried hard to control those actions. But it was difficult for me to deal with that situation. Fundamentalism rose due to the protection given by Muslim political leaders. Certain political parties are based on religion, race and language. This is disastrous. I tried to stop these people but my decisions were not implemented.”

553 new cases of coronavirus reported in Sri Lanka

November 26th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Ministry of Health confirms that 211 new cases of novel coronavirus have been detected today.

All new cases are close contacts of COvid-19 positive patients from the Peliyagoda cluster.

A total of 553 new cases have been reported so far today.

Meanwhile the tally of coronavirus cases from the Minuwangoda and Peliyagoda cluster has now increased to 18,491.

Sri Lanka’s Covid-19 death toll climbs to 99

November 26th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Director General of Health Services has confirmed three more deaths of Covid-19 infected persons, increasing the total number of coronavirus deaths in the country to 99.
 
One of the deceased is an 87-year-old male from Colombo 08, who passed away at the Colombo National Hospital today (26). The cause of death is cited as a bacteria infection with Covid-19 infection and chronic lung disease.

An 80-year-old resident of Bambalapitiya who was receiving treatment at the Mulleriyawa Base Hospital after being identified as a Covid-19 patient had passed away on November 25. The cause of death is reported as high blood pressure, pneumonia and a heart attack caused by Covid-19 infection. 

The other is a 73-year-old woman from Peliyagoda who had passed away at the Colombo National Hospital on November 23. The cause of death is cited as high blood pressure, diabetes and a stroke resulting from COvid-19 infection. 

Defense Ministry assigned under President; Sarath, Chamal gets new ministries (English)

November 26th, 2020

Ada derana

President’s Address to Nation: Taking the Bull by the Horns

November 25th, 2020

By Rohana R. Wasala

I do not normally speak as a Sinhalese, and I do not think that the leader of this council ought to think of himself as a Sinhalese representative, but for once I should like to speak as a Sinhalese and assert with all the force at my command that the interests of one community are the interests of all. We are of one another, whatever race or creed.

  • D.S. Senanayake, 1945 (‘Don Stephen Senanayake’ by H.A.J. Hulugalle, 1970)

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, in his address to the nation, on completion of his first term in office, on November 18, 2020, touched on a number of crucial points. Any less committed executive president would normally choose to fight shy of the foremost of these: the ever growing threat to the survival of the Sinhalese as a race, their country, their Buddhist religious culture, and their ancient archaeological heritage; he also made mention of the challenges of extremism and foreign interference in the country’s internal affairs. These are directly connected with national security. He called for investments rather than loans from friendly nations; the president also briefly outlined how the government is managing poverty alleviation, Covid-19 containment, and improvement of public administration. Excerpts from the president’s speech as gleaned from the media (some parts of the following two paragraphs are my own renderings – unmarked – from the Sinhala spoken text as I heard it, with my own comments in parentheses):

‘A year ago, more than 6.9 million voters in this country elected me as your new President. It is no secret that the majority who voted for me then were Sinhalese. They rallied (round me) because they had legitimate fears that the Sinhala race, our religion, national resources and the heritage would be threatened with destruction in the face of various local and foreign forces and ideologies that support separatism, extremism and terrorism. The main appeal made by the people to me was to, Protect the Country’. (There is overwhelming evidence to show that, throughout their very long history, the Sinhalese fought to protect the country from invaders for all those who lived there; they have always been real patriots, not racists. The minorities didn’t trust him under the influence of the few racists among minority politicians.This was in spite of both Gotabaya and Mahinda Rajapaksa bending over backwards to please the minorities and plead with them for their support during both elections. – RRW)

‘During this short period of time we have taken steps to ensure the security of the country as requested by the people. The public should not have any apprehensions in this regard any longer. …..We have contained the danger of any kind of extremism raising its ugly head. There will be no room for indulging in drug trafficking or directing the underworld from within the walls of prisons as happened in the past.  The era of betraying our war heroes, of accepting any agreement for short-term gain, of allowing foreign forces to interfere in the internal affairs of the country, has come to an end…… I act on the principle that the post of president is not a position of privilege, but that it is an onerous responsibility….. An administration that protects the rights of all citizens regardless of racial or religious differences will be established during my tenure. I have always acted in accordance with the pledge I made in the sacred precincts of the Ruwalweli Maha Seya to protect the unitary status of the country and to safeguard and nurture the Buddha Sasana as per the Constitution, the supreme law of this country. I meet with an advisory council comprising leading Buddhist monks of the Three Chapters every month to seek their advice on matters pertaining to governance….It was because the people highly rated the manner in which I performed my duties within this period that they gave a two thirds majority in parliament. Public opinion is the perfect measure of my success, not the organized false propaganda spread by political opponents through the social media………I am a person who has constantly faced challenges and successfully dealt with them. I am not afraid of empty threats. I am not used to running away from problems instead of solving them. I don’t want to please anyone in expectation of votes. What I want is to usher in an era of prosperity  for the people as promised. I will not hesitate to take any step in accordance with my conscience in pursuit of that goal. I love my country. I am proud of my country. Teruvan Saranai!’ (End of direct reference to the President’s speech. The following comprises this writer’s reflections.) 

Post-independence politics in Sri Lanka has been characterised by a continuous struggle between exclusive minority communalism and inclusive majority nationalism, in the form of roughly thirty years of cold war between the two and another thirty years of open conflict, which ended with the defeat of armed separatism in 2009. (In the same breath I would like to emphasize this fact: In each of the minority communities – mainly Tamils and Muslims – only a handful of politicians act as communalists, but they contrive to electorally dominate the community while their really progressive, often younger, rivals get sidelined. The vast majority of ordinary Tamils and Muslims, like ordinary Sinhalese, are not racial extremists or religious fanatics.) Minority communalism (found only among opportunistic politicians) has gradually acquired a religious dimension with intensifying fundamentalist Christian and Islamic subversive activities targeting Buddhists and Hindus; Islamists have been active particularly since the early 1970s. On top of this, Sri Lanka’s strategic geographic location has led global and regional superpowers to be actively engaged in exploiting these anti-majority movements to their advantage, thereby condemning Sri Lanka to constant political destabilization, economic stagnation, and deterioration of national security, sovereignty and independence. 

Sinhalese politicians (like most ordinary Sri Lankans) have always been true to the idea of continuing as the united nation and the unitary state that the British left them. This was the vision articulated by D.S. Senanayake, who came to be revered as the Father of the Nation as he had provided the final victorious leadership to the independence struggle. Senanayake didn’t believe in claiming any special status for the Sinhalese although he was not unaware of the horrendous discrimination that the Sinhalese were subjected to by the Euroean colonialists as the conquered in need of being kept under control; 1915, for example, was not such a distant memory to him. Every prime minister from 1948 to 1978, and every executive president since then have been extra-careful not to violate that ideal. President Gotabaya is reasserting the same principle of national unity, without which there will be no national security nor economic development nor political independence. 

It is a fact that in Sri Lanka there is a simmering problem of religious fundamentalism, which is an incubus that takes away the peace of mind of the majority of the people and disengages their attention from the more vitally important problems that the country is facing as a nation. It is being used as a weapon of destabilization by the powers that be that want to exploit Sri Lanka’s strategic location in the Indian, lately Indo-Pacific, Ocean.  There are numerous fundamentalist Christian and Islamic sects that have been active in the country for several decades. For a long time we thought that they are not of the type that is likely to set the traditionally peaceful mainstream Christians and Muslims against Buddhist Sinhalese and Hindu Tamils. But we were wrong. It is now clear that religious fundamentalists are a problem to the respective mainstream Abrahamic religions as well, giving rise to internecine doctrinal disputes within those communities. This particularly applies to the Muslim community, sections of which seem to have been radicalised under the influence of foreign sponsored Jihadist groups. It was reported that some young Muslims travelled to Syria to join the IS, and even got killed there. The monks said that they were approached for help by some persecuted Muslims who told them that  there were clashes between Jihadist and traditional Muslims, involving attacks on the mosques of the latter and even murders in the eastern province, where all three communities live together peacefully, though Muslims dominate.

Unlike in the case of traditional Christians and Muslims, the fundamentalist attitude to Buddhists and Hindus is not one of peaceful coexistence. They treat the latter as spiritually misguided subjects  ripe for conversion. The twofold fundamentalist  menace shows no sign of abating in the near future. The most virulent form of religious fundamentalism that is posing a formidable challenge to Sri Lanka’s intercommunal unity and peace right now is Islamist extremism. Activist Buddhist monks and their lay followers allege, based on evidence as they claim, that Jihadist agents have already infiltrated practically every department of life in the Sri Lankan state. (It is upto the authorities concerned to check the veracity of these claims.) The problem could worsen if politicians of both the main parties choose to follow the Three Wise Monkeys’ example: See no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil where evil is seen and heard, but nothing is said against it. Unfortunately, successive governments have failed to grab the bull by the horns for reasons that are not far to seek. The expedient political correctness policy of the UNP/SJB and the SLFP/SLPP is a boon to racists and religious zealots, while it betrays the monk and other activists who expose them and oppose them, and the up and coming progressive young Tamil and Muslim politicians who make common cause with those patriotic elements. 

An online Sinhala news website, Lankacnews, reported October 24, 2020 that, according to government sources, there was a possibility that state minister portfolios will be given to two of the nine MPs of the Opposition who voted for 20A. I, for one, originally believed that this was not true; the website could have been reporting an unfounded rumour or somebody’s fabrication. But, another online publication, Colombo Telegraph, which is usually critical of the present government, lamented in a headline: ‘20A Once Again Proved: Muslim Political Opportunists Are Up for Sale’. Meanwhile, the more authoritative and reliable website referred to at the beginning, Lankacnews, again reported (26) that Dayana Gamage, one of the nine SJB MPs who voted for 20A with the government, as saying that she would like to accept, if offered, the post of minister for child and women’s affairs though she did not support 20A in expectation of a ministerial portfolio or any other reward. This faintly hints at such offers having probably been made, after all. If that is true, isn’t it possible that the Muslim MPs were enticed with even bigger quid pro quos? The marked cordiality that minister Chamal and MP Rishad greeted each other with in that picture that shocked us all would not help neutralize such speculation. 

But there was absolutely no need for horse trading with questionable characters in the circumstances. What is the use of legislation passed with assistance from wheeler-dealer politicians whom the majority consider duplicitous? (In the case of 20A, however, their help was not critical; their votes were actually redundant.) Besides, these MPs were (and still are) in a politically vulnerable situation of their own making in which they didn’t know (and still don’t know) which way to look. The latest news I read about Hakeem was that he wanted to launch an internal inquiry into why his four MPs violated his party’s policy of opposing 20A! This is in spite of the fact that he had given his four MPs tacit permission to vote for the amendment. National list MP Dayana Gamage of the SJB told a You Tube journalist that her leader Sajith Premadasa knew beforehand that she was going to vote for the amendment, for her husband had phoned him and told him the night before about her decision, though, later, like Hakeem in the case of his MPs, Premadasa threatened to take disciplinary action against her. There is no doubt that both Premadasa and Hakeem are partly trying to salvage the little prestige that they ever had and that they have now irretrievably lost. Be that as it may, until the government establishes clarity in this respect, negative speculations will not stop. More important, what about the just anger and frustration that the ambitious MPs of the SLPP and allied parties must feel at the danger of some crooks of the Opposition who worked for the downfall of Gotabaya and Mahinda getting ministerial positions that even they were denied?  

Doesn’t this mean that a government which has got an overwhelming popular mandate to rule by restoring law and order, national security, and political and economic stability (all of which had appallingly deteriorated under the previous administration) could not have taken even the first step towards that goal by abolishing the controversial 19A and bringing in the stopgap 20A, without having to buy over MPs or to engineer desertions from the Opposition benches? It is no ordinary mandate: it is a doubly confirmed mandate in the form of a president elected by 69.9  million voters and a prime minister leading an alliance that won 144 seats in parliament, the kind of huge mandate that is not likely to be repeated unless those who have been given that mandate act sensibly.  Whenever is Sri Lanka going to make headway as an independent sovereign nation?  Seventy-five percent of the voters are Sinhalese, who don’t cast their vote on a communal basis. They overwhelmingly account for the above people’s mandate. The passage of 20A with due amendments was what they wanted. If a few anti-majority extremists were allowed to be in a position to decide on its fate, who was to blame for that grievous anomaly? Wasn’t it the fault of the Sinhalese MPs elected by their own people to serve the nation whether they happen to sit in the Government or in the Opposition? (By ‘nation’, Sinhalese Buddhists and the sensible majority of the minorities mean all those who make Sri Lanka their home; that is what ‘people of Sinhale’ had implied before Western imperial powers destroyed the healthy social cohesion in the country through their ‘divide and rule’ stratagem; it is difficult if not impossible for religious and racial extremists among the minorities to understand, let alone appreciate, this fact. On the other hand, the unsophisticated Sinhalese cannot understand, nay, don’t know, that they are being misunderstood as racists and religious extremists in the outside world because of diabolical misinformation about them propagated through the English medium by the minuscule minority of  real racists and religious bigots among those opposed to them.)    

The appointment of two more ministers is constitutionally defensible thanks to a clause that is being retained in 20A as a salutary feature from the now abolished 19A, which nevertheless set limits on the numbers of cabinet and state minister portfolios respectively at 30 and 40. Currently, there are only 38 state ministers; so, there are two vacancies. The Yahapalana coalition rechristened itself as a national government in order to increase the number of ministers beyond these limits until practically every government MP was some sort of minister.  Awarding ministerial positions to corruptible MPs as mere political sinecures just to ensure their mechanical Ayes and Noes on appropriate occasions in the legislature is a despicable ruse that must be put an immediate end to. If it had to be resorted to particularly at this juncture (when the undeniable fact of the majority community being victimized by a few communalist opportunists is so evident), it was all due to there being not enough patriotic Sinhala MPs in the Opposition. Not that all Sinhala MPs in the Government are patriotic either. What I found as an independent observer trying to penetrate the real motives and concerns that drove them as revealed in their speeches and occasional acts during electioneering prior to the August 5 general election was that nearly all of them, with a very few exceptions, were unashamedly narrowly focused self-seekers worried only about their personal ‘political careers’, not about their mandatory obligations to the country/nation. 

But still there is time for them to think, and support, from wherever they are, the only technocrat that we have got since independence in the non-partisan Gotabaya Rajapaksa. I believe GR is free from political ambitions that might distort his vision and that might cause him to baulk at taking action when it is necessary but difficult to do so.  The detractors of the few innocent Buddhist monks who had been warning persons in authority in vain about what the Jihadists were up to for years  do not denounce those Muslim extremists when they bombed some Catholic churches and hotels, and killed and maimed hundreds, but instead only insult these monks as Buddhist zealots and terrorists. 

But the truth cannot be denied that both Mahinda and Gotabaya Rajapaksa who were supported by the monks and other patriotic citizens are real national heroes who have served the country in ways that no other leader has ever done since independence. Had it not been for them the separatists would have survived to this day. The country achieved a lot of economic development (highways and vastly improved infrastructure, particularly in the war-damaged north and east provinces, to mention just one example among many) for the country between 2009 to 2015 in the wake of the civil war and despite its disastrous legacy. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s quick response to the first signs of the Covid-19 affliction in March 2020 wiped it out completely before, unfortunately, it made a mysterious re-entry courtesy some unseen or unrevealed agency.  He has just completed one year in office amidst untold obstacles mounted by oppositional elements with communalistic and extremist affiliations sponsored by meddlesome foreign powers as well as the Covid-19 pandemic.

Communalistic behaviour is out of character for Sinhalese MPs, whatever their other defects.  However, for the time being, there is no alternative for them but to give priority to the problem that the president prefaced his speech with: dealing with the legitimate fears of the majority community that he spelt out. Yet, on the contrary, right now, it looks as though most Sinhalese MPs in parliament are behaving like willing dupes of some Islamist extremists or their sympathisers; they seem to voluntarily assist the miscreants in their stratagems. Chief Opposition Whip Lakshman Kirielle has asked the Speaker in writing (as reported in the media October 31) that a special seating plan on the government side be made for the nine SJB members that he claims have been expelled from the party. Seven of these are Muslims, one Tamil, and one Sinhalese. In effect, the SJB is palming off the extremists that it fostered and used to prolong the Yahapalana misgovernance onto the government, in the apparent vicious hope that they initiate a cankerous relationship with it. Kirielle and the rest of the SJB hierarchy cannot be expected to take kindly to this criticism, but this is my gut feeling.

State minister Dayasiri Jayasekera has long been complaining that the SLFP MPs are not receiving the recognition they deserve within the government. Its leader, former president Sirisena, who was expecting an agrapalaya or an ultimate reward got nothing, but the PM was reported to be ‘creating’ a suitable post for him. Anyway, do these people worry as much about vital national issues including the Grim Reaper abroad in the form of the Covid-19 pandemic? Are the disgruntled SLFP’ers within government ranks trying to rock the boat? The President twittered November 1st that he was presented with a locally produced Lion Flag by state minister Dayasiri Jayasekera. A former provincial Governor Rajith Tennekoon complained that the Lion in this flag was holding the sword by its blade, not by its hilt! and that this was a grave violation of the Constitution, because disfigurement/distortion of the Flag is a criminal offence. Probably, Tennekoon, who is another political activist, was exaggerating an apparent shortcoming in the drawing of the flag. A careful look at the image of the locally produced flag will reveal what I mean: the cross guard that separates the blade from the grip part of the handle of the sword is not properly drawn; it is as if it is not there. Having said this, it is a big defect that must be corrected. Is it a result of a genuine oversight or of an act of deliberate sabotage? Tennekoon’s demand that the circulation of this new local flag be immediately halted must receive the attention of the authorities. (It was later reported that Dayasiri Jayasekera acknowledged this error and took immediate action to rectify it.)

The few communalists and religious extremists that there are will try to cripple the government whether they are in it or in the Opposition. However, it is clear that they get little support from the general public. Foreign interventionist powers are laying siege to the country, but they can’t do much damage if Sri Lankans manage to put their own house in order and stick together. In this all Sri Lankans have a collective responsibility. Each community must be united within it and act in solidarity with other communities as equal Sri Lankan citizens, and this must be reflected among the MPs in parliament. Partisan politics must be shelved while bracing to deal with the manifold crises before the nation. People of each faith must take responsibility for and deal with the extremists among them, without giving in to their extremist ideologies. If there is any terrorism, let the government security apparatus deal with that, as they did with the separatists. People of all faiths must be united as a single nation. It will be of the strongest support for overcoming religious fundamentalism in general and the Islamist terrorism in particular if Sinhalese Buddhists and Tamil Hindus, who share similar peaceful nonviolent religious and cultural values, overcome artificial divisions and enmities of the past and decide to find refuge in each other as children of Mother Lanka against both overt and covert aggression and oppression. That will be the end of meaningless fratricidal separatism as well.

(Ps: Lankaweb readers, please bear with me for having cannibalized parts of one of my own articles that appeared here a few weeks back. This is an appropriately updated,enlarged and enhanced version of the same.) 

How to fix the current FLAWED constitution which allows ethnic laws and is NOT “One law”

November 25th, 2020

Stanley Gunaratne 

The current 1978 Constitution’s “Equality” clauses are meaningless since they are superseded by 600+ personal laws thanks to Article 16 overriding Article 12. 

Article 16 currently permits any personal laws made by Parliament before, or after 1978 to override the Constitution! This flies in the face of equality.

The best Constitution we had was the Soulsbury Constitution which had ironclad guarantees to prevent such nonsense. 


PROPOSAL IN A NEW CONSTITUTION:


THE CEYLON BASIC LAW

(Section 1) The Republic shall ensure the preservation of its ancient heritage, that Buddhism is inviolable, and the apolitical teaching of factual history. All representatives of the people shall be servants of the People and it is their duty to uphold this Constitution, the People’s sovereignty, the Rule of Law, and make laws for the peace, order and good government of the Island.

(Section 2) Unless affirmed by this Constitution, No Law shall:

(a) prohibit or restrict the free exercise of any religion, or

(b) make persons of any community, or religion liable to disabilities, or restrictions to which persons of other communities or religions are not made liable; or

(c) confer on persons of any community or religion any privilege or advantage which is not conferred on persons of other communities or religions

(Section 3) Any Law that has been made before, or made in contravention of this Basic Law, shall to the extent of such contravention be void.

THIS WILL END THIS NONSENSE ONCE AND FOR ALL.

Furthermore:

An “Ethnic Integration Policy” (EIP) for Ceylon must be put in place and enforced to preserve the Ceylonese identity and promote ethnic integration and harmony. 
It will ensure that there is a balanced mix of the various ethnic communities in all Districts, monitored by a designated Civil Service Housing Board.

The EIP limits shall be set at block, neighbourhood and District levels based on the ethnic make-up of Ceylon:
– For the purchase of a flat, land, or house, a household with members of different ethnic groups can choose to classify their household ethnicity under the ethnic group of any owner or spouse (co-owner or occupier)

– Bands will be set for communities in each district that conform approximately to the overall national demographics of the entire country according to the latest population census
– The four communities are classified as thus; 
Sinhalese, 
Tamil, 
Moor/Malay, 
Burgher or any other community.

THE POHOTTUWA GOVERNMENT OF SRI LANKA Part 2 C7a

November 25th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

China has   stepped up its diplomatic relations with Sri Lanka after Pohottu government came in.  A very experienced Chinese diplomat Qi Zhenhong   arrived in November 2020 as ambassador to Sri Lanka. Qi Zhenhong was head of China Institute of International Studies, a premier international relations think tank in China. He has an excellent understanding of the complex realities in the Indian Ocean, said analysts.     He comes here at a time when the actions of USA, India and several other countries are rapidly militarizing the Indian Ocean and is applying pressure on smaller nations to join them.  

There were three important meetings between Sri Lanka and China in the months of October and November, 2020, ChinesePresident Xi Jinping spoke with Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa via Zoom in November 2020. The two leaders shared their experience on administrative matters. Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardane, Prof.G.L. Peiris, Namal Rajapaksa, Sagara Kariyawasam and several Provincial Councillers   also participated in the discussion that followed.

A highlevel Chinese delegation, led by Chinese leader Yang Jiechi, visited Sri Lanka in October 2020. They were on a tour which included UAE, Algeria and Serbia. Sri Lanka was their first destination. This was a very significant visit. The delegation met President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

The Chinese delegation comprised seven members.  Its leader Yang Jiechi holds a position equivalent to Vice Premier. Yang Jiechi was Chinese Foreign Minister from 2007-2013 and China’s Ambassador to US from 2001 to 2005.  He is presently a member of the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party and the director of its Central Committee’s Foreign Affairs Commission, a top policy-making body.

Also in the delegation were China International Development Cooperation Agency chairman Wang Xiaotao, Assistant Foreign Minister Deng Lee and the Foreign Ministry’s Asian Affairs Deputy Director General Chen Song.

The leader of the delegation said that the present status of bilateral relations between China and Sri Lanka was highly satisfactory. Maintaining and promoting this friendship is a key priority of President Xi Jingping. China wanted to maintain high-level exchanges and consolidate political mutual trust. President Xi Jinping considered further improvement of China-Sri Lanka relations a priority. 

The delegation   recalled past history. China–Sri Lanka relations have stood the test of time, they said. What continued from the ancient spiritual ties since the visits of Chinese Buddhist monks centuries ago, received a big boost when the Rubber-Rice deal was signed in 1952, even before the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two newly emerged independent countries. The Ceylon–China Trade Agreement of 1952 was undoubtedly the most useful trade agreement negotiated by Sri Lanka and one of the most successful and durable trade agreements in the world, having been in operation for 30 years, the delegation said.

The head of the delegation said that China will firmly stand with Sri Lanka to protect the country’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity at international fora including the United Nations Human Rights Council.

We will support not from words but by action,” said Jiechi. Sri Lanka would shortly sign an agreement with China to obtain a US $ 500 million concessionary loan from her. China also announced a US$ 90 million grant to Sri Lanka, for medical care, education and water supplies in Sri Lanka’s rural areas. Thirdly, the Chinese ambassador met Ajith Nivard Cabraal, State Minister of Money & Capital Markets and Professor W. D. Lakshman, Governor of the Central Bank to discuss financial instruments to be implemented after the Yang Jiechi visit.

Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) held an advanced seminar on governance via video in November 2020.  This was a follow up to the meeting between the two heads of State and the Yang Jiechi visit. The discussion centered on aligning the Belt and Road Initiative with Sri Lanka’s Vistas of Prosperity and Splendor.”

Minister Song Tao of the International Department of Central Committee of CPC, Party Secretary Liu Cigui of CPC Provincial Committee of Hainan Province, and Qi Zhenhong spoke for China. Prof. G.L.Peiris, Sagara Kariyawasam, Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, Namal Rajapaksa, Ramesh Pathirana and some State Ministers and Mayors from the Western Province spoke for Sri Lanka.

The China-Sri Lanka Belt and Road Political Parties Joint Consultation Mechanism” was established in June 2020 between the Communist Party of China (CPC) and main political parties of Sri Lanka .The first meeting of the Mechanism,  was  held via video link.   United National Party, Sri Lanka Freedom Party, and People’s United Front of Sri Lanka   participated.

Song Tao, Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee, addressed the event. He said China was ready to work with Sri Lankan political parties to strengthen the exchange of experience in state governance, promote bilateral cooperation in all areas and contribute to the high-quality Belt and Road cooperation. The meeting also approved a joint initiative of the political parties of China and Sri Lanka to support Belt and Road cooperation.

Analysts observed that CPC has established contacts and exchanges with more than 400 political parties and organizations in over 140 countries. CPC maintains friendly relations with a dozen political parties in Sri Lanka both in the government and the opposition.

In November 2020, the  China Reform Forum which is affiliated to the Communist party of China signed an MOU with China-Sri Lanka Cooperation studies Centre at Pathfinder Foundation.  CRF has dialogues with more than   30 countries.  CRF uses these dialogues  to briefs China on its foreign policy.

Sri Lanka had a successful presentation at the Third China International Import Expo (CIIE) held in Shanghai from November 5-10, 2020. The Sri Lanka Embassy in China and Consulate General in Shanghai in coordination with Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB) and the Foreign Ministry teamed up with seven Sri Lanka companies to showcase tea, coconut products, and spices including Ceylon cinnamon, herbal products, rubber products and confectioneries at this event.

Twenty-Seven Sri Lanka companies took part in business matchmaking meetings online. An MoU to create an online Sri Lanka Pavilion in Womai.com online platform was signed between the EDB and the China Oil and Foodstuffs Company (COFCO).

China’s Prestige International Company Ltd would promote Sri Lankan products on its JD.Com platform. JD.com is the most popular online platform in China and one of the 500 fortune companies. It is China’s largest online retailer and also the biggest overall retailer. It is the country’s biggest internet company.

Three strategic cooperation agreements were signed between the Prestige International Ltd. and Silver Mills SL Ltd., Stuarts Tea Sri Lanka Ltd. and Saraketha Organic Ltd. These agreements are expected to generate 5.5 million of RMB trade between the parties in 2021.

In November 2020, the Sri Lanka-China Buddhist Friendship Association (SLCBFA), with financial assistance from the Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka, commenced a programme to donate dry rations and hand sanitizers to Buddhist temples in Sri Lanka, to overcome Covid 19. They started with Sri Wijayalokaramaya Temple in Rukmalgama, Pannipitiya. (Continued)

The 19th Amendment: get over it already!

November 25th, 2020

MALINDA SENEVIRATN​E

There are all kinds of yahapalanists. There are those who cannot be in denial simply because they were right in the middle of the yahapalana project or rather a project by that name (for good governance was certainly not their cup of tea as history showed and practice demonstrated). Then there are those who opted for a change of clothes. Name change, symbol change, address change etc., didn’t make them unrecognizable. SJB and UNP, telephone and elephant, it’s the same. All yahapalanists. The praise and blame accrue to one and all. Well, add to this the Yahapalana Fan Club made of sideline politicians who are double-headed and double-addressed, i.e. rights advocates and professionals.

Now these worthies are big fans of the 19th Amendment. It was great, they say. And they add, ‘the 20th is draconian and dictatorial; it rolled back the gains of the 19th and is even worse than what JR initially instituted in 1978.’

Where’s the substantiation, though? Let’s take a look.

Let’s start with the brag. The brag of course had to do with the 18th. It also had to do with a peculiar political context where the champion and the intended beneficiary (Ranil Wickremesinghe) led a party that had minority representation in Parliament whereas the man whose powers were to be clipped, Maithripala Sirisena had just assumed office with a majority of the national vote.

The 18th would be effectively repealed, they bragged. It was. The 19th would embody the Yahapalana promise(s). We would have accountability and transparency. Democracy would be enhanced. Good governance assured. Cabinet would be limited to 30 ministers. That was part of the brag. Seniority and meritocracy will mark appointments and promotions, they told us. We know how that fell by the wayside! The independence of the judiciary would be restored, they promised. Well, they made a mockery of the last by turning the Supreme Court into a political circus almost immediately after Sirisena was sworn in as President.

Let’s get to the process which includes the passage of the amendment. It was drafted. Nothing wrong with that. The Supreme Court was petitioned. Nothing wrong with that. The Supreme Court offered a determination. Essentially, important elements of the draft were shot down. Now what did the Yahapalanists do?  Did they follow yahapalana practice to the letter?

Well, the objections were of an order that amending the document in ways that took these into consideration would have violated established parliamentary procedure. Typically, at the committee stage, only minor corrections are made. In other words, yahapalana theory would have required the yahapalanists to withdraw the amendment, get back to the drawing board and come up with a fresh draft.

They didn’t do that. They produced an amendment that was very different to what was tabled. That’s giving a finger to established procedure. Not very yahapalana-like, was it? It only demonstrated (and rather early in the tenure of that regime) that ‘yahapalanaya’ was a lie. A hoax.  It was voted on in the dead of the night by clearly irresponsible and perhaps tired and sleepy MPs. Sarath Weerasekera voted against it. Only he. Kudos to him.

The substance. As mentioned it was about giving power to a man who, at that point, did not have the trust and confidence of the people. One must mention that Wickremesinghe’s swearing-in was also a travesty of established procedure. The incumbent was sacked by way of the newly sworn in President signing a letter. Immediately, i.e. before the letter was delivered, President Sirisena appointed Ranil Wickremesinghe

So it was done. It was done in such a way that no one knew who really called the shots. Ball-passing between the Prime Minister and the President became a common occurrence. Finger-pointing was frequent. It was the easy out for a bunch of people lacking imagination, suffering innovation-lack and who were absolutely incompetent. Things were so confusing that it took the  Supreme Court to say what was what and that too only with respect to dissolution-power. This was when Sirisena joined forces with Mahinda Rajapaksa in late 2018.

Cabinet-size. This was a joke. On paper, we got the number 30. It was cheered. It was bragged about. On paper also was this neat device called ‘National Government’ which the amendment-drafters left undefined. ‘In a National Government, cabinet size would be determined by Parliament. The matter finally hit the ‘constitutional experts’ in the yahapalana camp only when it could no longer be hidden. When Sirisena took the SLFP out of the coalition, Jayampathy Wickramaratne, the big boss behind the drafting, unashamedly said that since the SLMC (Sri Lanka Muslim Congress) was with the UNP, it remains a ‘national government.’ In other words, in his mind, a bloated cabinet was still constitutional! The yahapalana braggarts maintained a dead silence on the matter.

Much was made of the Constitutional Council (CC) which, the braggarts claimed, corrected the clauses of the 18th that crippled independent institutions. However, in reality, it was Ranil Wickremesinghe’s whims and fancies that held the day. The composition of the CC, naturally and understandably tilted in favor of the regime. It was politician-heavy, which of course wasn’t quite yahapanish. However even the non-politicians (non-political only because they weren’t in Parliament, let’s keep that in mind!) were partisan. Check the names of those ‘civil society’ people in the CC, the names of those appointed to various commissions and the appointments and promotions recommended by the commissions themselves. Friends and loyalists. That’s it. Why else would some of these ‘independents’ resign the moment Gotabaya Rajapaksa was elected President?

So now we have the 20th. Much of the confusion has been sorted out. Some of the better elements of the 19th have been retained. Are we ok now? Of course not. Cabinet size is still not cleared, although President Rajapaksa has kept it within the ceiling mentioned in the 19th. The CC just rubber-stamped Wickremesinghe’s wishes. President Rajapaksa has far more sway and that’s not necessarily a good thing.  Nevertheless, unlike the yahapalana braggarts, he has recommended that the six senior most judges be promoted to the Supreme Court. The yahapalana regime didn’t do that, not even with the so-called democracy-safeguards instituted to ensure independence of the judiciary. If it was Sirisena, Wickremesinghe or even Mahinda Rajapaksa, this might not have been the case. That itself shows the flaw. It should not be dependent on whether or not the incumbent values meritocracy.

Sri Lanka has a long way to go to resolve a simple issue: what’s best for us, a parliament-led system or an executive presidential system of governance? The proposed new constitution might sort this vexed issue out and hopefully in a way that effectively blocks the possibility of abuse.

That said, the 19th is nothing like its champions make it out to be. A piece of trash that did away with another piece of trash (the 18th). Stank. Get over it already.

malindasenevi@gmail.com

A Plan To Ensure Every Sri Lankan Plate is Full During COVID and Thereafter

November 25th, 2020

A paper submitted By  The Sri Lanka Study Circle 

The COVID Attack 

In the first quarter of 2020, the world was plagued by a COVID virus which has, as at now, caused the deaths of over a one and a half million people. 

A tiny bug has literally brought the world -the globalised world – to a standstill with economies dislocated, education retarded, food chains ruptured, ‘goods and services’ chains scuppered and health services disrupted. 

The virus has adversely affected, albeit in different ways, both the purveyors of globalisation and those dragooned into globalisation.  

Globalisation impacted 

Globalisation is a socio-economic and political template created and thrust upon the world by the global money-lenders operating out of America and Europe; it spells out the rules on how the world, as a single unit, should conduct itself, politically, economically and socially.  

This ‘Globalisation’ template broadly established many parameters, such as: The food, the services, the goods, the medicines, each country is permitted to produce and consume: The tariffs  to be imposed when countries engage in trading: The mandatory use of the American dollar in international transactions: Fixing the value of all the currencies in the world to the dollar: Determining the wage rates applicable to each country: Determining the prices payable for the resources of each country: Determining the rate of  interest to be applied in each country: Determining, the total value and conditions of financial loans -including rates of interest and prior compliance requirements- that would be advanced to a country: Coaching countries seeking loans to parrot the geo political script in public fora: and many more.  

The underlying theme in the ‘Globalisation’ template is that ‘private-interest’ shall always prevail over ‘public-interest’ and that the land of a country is, but a mere commodity, to be bought and sold and made accessible to the global money lenders; in the Globalisation model, the engine of development is the ‘Private’ sector.  

These notions are quite contrary to the views of Sri Lanka, clearly enunciated in the Country’s Constitution. Public interest shall always prevail over private interest; the Country’s land is not a commodity for trade but a priceless resource, belonging to all Sri Lankans, that sustains man and nature. 

Globalisation cause of poverty, bondage and loss of Sovereignty  

In the Globalisation template there is no place for sovereignty, for the former colonies of Europe and America; the need, for the architects of ‘Globalisation’, is to possess and control the land and resources of these former colonies. 

To induce these former Colonies to accept the ‘Globalisation’ template, the Global Loan sharks allured the leaders of these countries by zeroing in on their frailties; these leaders thereafter frog-marched their countries into the inevitable debt trap.  

The tactics adopted by the Global loan sharks are no different to the tactics adopted by their local cousins, the ‘Poli-Mudalalies’. 

And the end result of ‘Globalisation’ has been poverty, indebtedness and bondage to the countries at the apex of the ‘Globalisation’ pyramid.  

Sri Lanka is at the base of this pyramid. 

Globalisation wobbles 

With COVID 19, Globalisation has taken a major whack; the countries which contrived the globalised template and controlled the pyramidal structure from their imperious positions, have suddenly found the pyramid wobbly and unstable. 

The countries at the base of the Globalisation pyramid, although ‘wounded’ by COVID, have discovered that COVID has loosened the shackles of ‘Globalisation’; these countries are in a position, now, to free themselves from Globalisation and walk away from this trap of ‘perpetual bondage’.  

American threatens Brandix type operations 

 The Americans too, realise that COVID has caused a situation where some ‘captive’ countries are contemplating escape from their captors; to counter the collapse of the ‘Globalisation’ model and to prevent a mass escape of the captive countries from the bondage of Globalisation, the captors are menacing the captives with the threat of  deliberately infecting them with COVID ; the captors are hectoring the captives to follow the ‘New Normal’ rules which could lead to a situation, like in America, where people are literally  dying like dogs, on the streets.  

There is strong suspicion, among the people, that this modus operandi was adopted in the Brandix-COVID- Cluster- Bomb case; the people are eagerly awaiting the results of the criminal investigations that have been initiated.  

In Sri Lanka, all the post COVID solutions, proposed by notorious American agents, are based on continued activity within the framework of the impaired ‘Globalisation’ template.  

This would be disastrous. Conceding that a vaccine for COVID 19 is found, what happens when, for example, COVID 30 hits us? 

The Government has gone into shell shock; after eight months of COVID it has yet to come out with a holistic plan to tackle the post COVID scenario. There has been no thinking ‘outside the box’ in this regard. 

With the lockdowns, many people have lost their jobs, some work on half pay and others are unable to generate a daily income; their power to purchase food for the table has dwindled. There is uncertainty, gloom and fear in these homes. 

The Plan – Human lives first 

Taking Maslow’s theory of hierarchical needs as a start point, the Country’s slogan should be ‘Human Lives First’.  

The Government needs to adopt a strict zero tolerance policy for deaths by COVID. Within this policy framework the Government must ensure that primary needs of food, shelter, clothing, health and education are provided to all the people.  

In this paper, the Sri Lanka study circle presents a broad outline of a plan to ensure that all Sri Lankans, poor and rich, young and old will never ever go hungry. The plan is in a skeletal form and needs to be fleshed out.  

The COVID attack was a revolutionary attack on human civilization and this plan to provide food, as a response, we dare say, is revolutionary. Many sacred cows may have to be sacrificed in the implementation of the plan. 

The people would have to be put on a war footing to ensure the plan is implemented expeditiously. 

In this plan, the Study Circle recognizes that Sri Lanka is a very fertile country and most, if not all, of the food that people eat can be grown here. And this includes fruits too. 

The project would be a government led initiative. 

Perforce therefore, we need to begin immediately growing all our needs in respect of food by way of crops, plants, creepers, trees, etc, etc after: 

  • Making an assessment of population distribution  
  • identifying localities where these crops etc would be grown 
  • identifying requirement of local organic fertilisers, local non-chemical weedicides, potential anti-fungal and pest control requirements.  
  • Identifying Warehouse requirements. 
  •  Identifying transport requirements to plantations, warehouses and retail outlets. 
  • Doing research and making plans to prevent crop failure and making back-up plans in the event of such failures.     
  • Finding markets for excess produce 

In this plan, the Government shall buy all the produce from the farmers, store them in Government warehouses, where necessary, and distribute them to the distribution Centres. 

The people have a choice in buying the food of their liking. 

Print Purple Money 

To provide the people with purchasing power to purchase their food requirement, the Government will distribute, for example, Rs: 30,000/= per month to each and every family.  

From where would the Government find the money to give the people?  

Yes, they will print the money, but this money will be different to the normal currency in circulation; for example, it would be purple in colour and this can only be used for purchasing and selling food. 

The money thus printed will not create inflation since it would be used to purchase the food produced; there would be inflation if the food targets are not met. 

Excess supplies of food produced can be bartered with other countries to obtain essentials which cannot be grown/made here. 

Dump the Dollar 

We shall develop bilateral Agreements with countries, closing the books on previously regulated global tariffs. Wherever possible we shall do barter trading, disregarding the US dollar as the global currency of exchange. 

The ‘purple’ currency will run parallel to the normal currency; the ‘purple’ currency will only buy food and ensure that people have a full plate of food in front of them, always; this is not a burden to the Government.  

With time, Sri Lanka would have a highly developed agricultural sector where production, distribution and research will be at the highest of levels.  

Even if we are plagued by a COVID 20 or 25 or whatever, one thing is certain; no Sri Lankan will ever go hungry or be malnourished.   

Professionals Quash chicken-brained Mangala’s Budget criticisms Part I

November 25th, 2020

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA.

Sri Lanka’s worst quisling who was kicked out of parliamentary politics by the Maha Sangha and the patriotic people of Matara and was forced to become a political orphan who exposed his economic lacuna by attempting to criticize the visionary and futuristic budget 2021budget due to sheer jealousy with Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksea.  Unlike this ignoramus nincompoop, the budget has been hailed by the business community, academics and economists as a as a long term futuristic budget while this lintgerie designer says that it is a budget that facilitates money laundering.  This political discard seems to be very familiar with money laundering as the British Parliamentarian Lord Sheikh Ahmed said in the British House of Common that he met Samaraweera and he was very friendly with Tamil diaspora elements in Britain.  There were many allegations that this political orphan was the main money launderer of the Tamil diaspora as he had the impunity of passing through Customs unchecked due to his Ministerial portfolio. 

Issuing a media message this quisling has said that the budget 2021 which has no vision or programme of work has only facilitated for money laundering by the government’s political cronies.  The message translated from Sinhala as published in the Lanka C News website says that the government has acknowledged that the economy collapsed during the past year and has hence the budget has facilitated money laundering as a stimulus for improving the economy and this would place the country in a dangerous situation in respect of international monetary policies.

This lingerie designer who accidently became a Finance Minister and who acknowledged that the portfolio was much above his capabilities as it was a portfolio that had been previously held by eminent persons of this country such as J.R.Jayawardene, Dr. N.M.Perera, and Mr. Felix R. Dias Bandarabaike states that the budget has given an amnesty of Tax concession of paying only 1% for investing the undeclared foreign and locally held money. ( It must be reminded that a similar method was adopted by Sri Lanka’s best ever Finance Minister Dr. N.M.Perera to pull out hidden currency notes by cancelling the validity of currency notes high denominations within a target period and through this measure he was very much successful in drawing out all hidden money in tthe country. The people who were hoarding money queued up in front of Banks for several days with suitcases of money to get it exchanged for new currency notes. This ignorant and chicken brained lingerie designer may be unaware and cannot understand the deep rooted values of these economic strategies which even surprised many well-known reputed economists. And it was such a progressive minded government that father together with C.P.de Silva toppled by backstabbing Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike in 1964).

He says that the global policy formulator on money laundering that Financial Task Force FATF had Sri Lanka on its Gray List” following efforts made by the Ministry of Finance Sri Lanka was removed from that list in October 2019.  (He acknowledges by this statement that Sri Lanka was designated as a country facilitating money laundering until October 2019, including the period he was the Finance Minister of this country. He says that since that there are international restrictions on money laundering that foreign banks may not accept money transfers to Sri Lanka). 

This political orphan further states that this government has no proper plan for economic development of this country and that is why they are looking forward for an economic policy like this and claims that this government obtained the votes of the people of this country by misleading them to vote for rescuing the country.

(Economically dwarfed this lingerie designer says that there are criteria to prove that the country is marching backward economically.  He says that under the guidance of Ranil Wickremasinghe the mega marketing agent for selling the country’s national and natural resources) that he made surplus budgets in the years 2017 and 2018 after about 45 years.This statement is a shameless acceptance that but budgets presented by him were babies of Ranil Wickremasinghe and not his own).

He further states that controlling the economy on a visionary basis, in order to stimulate private investments which was very essential for the country the Enterprise Sri Lanka” programme was launched (it has been commented by many qualified and eminent economists that this was a programme forced on Sri Lanka by the IMFin order to strangle the country’s economy under their watch) their government was able to make available more than Rs. 90,000 to the private sector at low interest rates.  In addition to this that their government carried out development work in all electorates at a cost of Rs. 300 Million  under the Gamperaliya programme. (The effect of this wild boasting was clearly indicated in both Presidential and Parliamentary election and he was forced to withdraw his own nomination, UNP was decimated to 2.5% country wide polling in the General Election, which even put an end to Ranil Wickremasinghe’s several decades of political life. ).

This quisling says that although his government decided in 2018 to provide annually for 10 berst Advanced Level passed students to study in popular international Universities, the people will understand the objective of this government which attempts to build a money laundering economy., (Why they waited until 2018 to take decisions.  Was it to fool the voters in the ensuing elections?  What happened to the free Tab computers for Advanced Level students and the Free Wi Fi services that were promised at the very beginning of their government?).

This quisling asserts that by introducing subjects like salary increases for the plantation workers the budget which decides about the direction of the economy has been diluted and it is sad to note the budget has created a wrong precedence by this measure.  (It is not surprising to find this measure hurting this lingerie designer because Ranil Sirisena destructive government in the first few weeks of its coming to power held a one to one meeting with the CWC leader late Mr Arumugam Thonda,man and promised to increase the daily wage of the plantation workers to Rs. 1,000 and for the last 4 ½ years this promise was not fulfilled despite plantation workers staging wage increase demand demonstrations almost daily in upcountry towns such as Hatton, Nuwara Eliya, Talawakele, Kotmale etc..The representatives of plantation workers participating in the Shakthi TVs weekly Minnal” programme profusely thanked the government for the wage increase from January and flayed yamapalana government for cheating them for the last 41/s years )

He says that this government has proved during the last 12 poya day period that that it doesnot have a strategic plan.  It has been said that the objective of the budget is to reduce poverty through extensive village development, and increase of employment opportunities and increase of avenues of working environment.  But the proposals and programmes that has been presented by the budget are unrealistic and it happens to be mere announcements.  (What happened to the programmes and measures announced by the Sirisena/Ranil government?  What happened to the 100 days fancy programme from which Sirisena dissociated during his last few months saying that it was an absurd programme?  What happened to the one million employments promised?  How many were given employment for the last 4 ½ years?> What happened to the much bloated Kuliyapitiya Valkswagen vehicle producing factory and the Horana Heavy duty tyre manufacturing factory? Why there was a peculiar hurry to get the MCCagreement signed?  It was said that western investors are in queue to come and invest in the country.  How many of these imaginery investors came and wha tinvestments they made?  Why MOUs signed with India to hand over Trinco Oil Tank Farm, Colombo Port Terminal, the proposed Sampur coal power plant and the proposed Kerawalapitiya LNG plant and to sign ECTA? What benefit the country achieved from the Sri Lanka Singapore Agreement?)..

Generally immediately after presenting a Budget people expect some immediate cocessions for their life standards.  But this budget has neither provided such concessions or hopes.  (Well, it was the practice of the previous four budgets presented by Bond Ravi and this quisling to increase VAT, prices of goods and hurl many promises that never took place.  Under hose budgets the concession givern to the people was to reduce the price of Beer and liquoraaaaa with a view to making this country a boozers’ paradise.)

Immediately after this government came to power the economy of the country was destroyed by giving tax concessions to its cohorts and thereby the country lost a revenue of about Rs. 700 Billion .(Immediately after the yamapalana government came to power the country’s historic ever robberies the Treasury Bond Scams were carried out on two consecutive years and the country lost trillions of U.S.Dollars.  Only those benefited by these robberies were Bond Ravi and the so-called shameless Foot Note Gang and some other government MPs.)

The Budget indicates that the estimated revenue in 2020will be Rs. 1588 Billionand the estimated revenue in 2021 will be Rs. 2029 Billion. However it has not been indicated how this increase will be achieved.Accordingly it is an increase by 27% in one year and it is grossly unrealistic .The only important thing in this budget is facilitating money laundering and the people are well aware who will get benefited by this measure.  (Experience speaks.  It was alleged that you functioned as the money launderer of the tiger terrorist diaspora using the ministerial impunity while travelling in and out of the country as Minister.  In addition to this your companion Bond Ravi a large amount of money sent to his bank account by the notorious insider dealer Rajaratnam and the court case related this money transfer was allegedlyhushed up protecting Bond Ravi).

The budget has allocated Rs. 1,000 Million for the construction of 4 Universities under the City University concepy.  It amounts to Rs. 250 Million for each University.  Presently even a building cannot be built with Rs. 250 Million, let alone a University.  (Again experience speaks.  This political orphan who came to Matara with a house of his own to reside, is reportedly have built two multi roomed luxury palatial mansion, one in Panadura facing the Bolgoda Lake and the other in Nakulugama facing the sea.  Hence he knows how much it costs to construct buildings.  The people should demand for him to disclose his source of funds for constructing these mansions).

Under the communications to the villages programme only Rs. 15 Million has been allocated.  (It is pathetic to find that this lingerie designer who once was the Minister of Communications attempts to hide the fact that the communication field in this country is under the purview of the private sector privatized by them and these communication companies have more than sufficient funds to carry out their activities without any government assistance  and that is why he too got a Credit Card for his use from Mobitel which people known to him says that he used the Card to watch LGBT blue Films)

Rs. 20,000 Million has been earmarked for the development of 50,000 kilometers of roads and it is strange to accordingly that Rs. 400,000 has been allocated for construction of ome kilometer.  That amount is not even sufficient to carpet one kilometers of roads, and as such figures have been haphazardly presented. And only such comic statements have been included..  (It is funny to find this lingerie designer attempting to find faults with the Prime Minister on road construction who is the Father of Road Constructions in Sri Lanka who introduced the concept of Expressways to Sri Lanka).

Despite the promise made to reintroduce the provisions made by the previos government to allay the anomalies of descrepancies in the payments to pensioners and special allowances for Executive officers, the budget has misled the majority of public servants who cast their postal votes to this government.  (Another bogus elerction promise made by the previous government.  Why they waited until their last budget to make this misleading bogus promise.  These culprits should understand that government servants are not damn fools to get beguiled by this type of bogus promises).

As a whole there is no concession for the public servants from this budget. Out of the public servants who amount to about 1.4 million, permission has been granted for non executive grade public servants to attend to a job after their office hours.  By this measure the government has given the following message : We do not have anything to give for you.  It is also not possible to give. If possible go out to do a job and thereby acquire some economic gain for the family economy.  (The destruction created in the country for the last 4 ½ years severely affected the income level of the public servants while the government Ministers and MPs got super luxury fuel guzzling super luxury vehicles for them and their spouses, enhanced allowances for telephones, for maintaining offices in Colombo and their hometowns, for functioning as observer MPs in various Ministries, opportunities to provide sophisticated jobs for their spouses and children in various Ministries, Corporations and Statutory Boards and the public servants had no way of earning an additional income.  The new measure would facilitate many public servants by getting employed in this manner.  If doctors are allowed to engage in channel practice what is wrong if a public servant got engaged in an additional job legitimately?)

Proposals have been made to introduce GST Tax to to get the lost revenue from removing the VAT ceilings.  Although it has been proposed it only to four segments initially, it is possible to extend it to cover all segments.  The excessive taxes proposed to levy from telecommunication, gambling and excise activities indicate the fiscal deterioration being faced by the government. (When VATwas introduced by Bond Ravi Sirisena acted as he was furious about it and threatened to dismiss everyone who were responsible to introduce the new system.  This threat was also ended up as the series of bogus threats he used to make from time to time such as taking stern action against the person who threw a Brassier to the stage of a musical show, that he has a sharp sword and hewould chop the heads of all miscreants, that he ha a Madu Waligaa to whip all miscreants etc.  As regards increase of the increase of Excise tax thi lingerie designer is very much concerned because it was his plan to make this country a boozers’ paradise by reducing Beer and liquor prices).

This budget which gas been presented with magic figures states that there will be a 5.5% economic development next year.  The economic developmentin the 1st quarter of 2020 was -1.6% and the government has failed to announce the economic development rate for the 2nd quarter yet. Meanwhile the World and the IMF have predicted thatour economy will register minus 5 – 6%. Next year. (Absurd predictions!  When the WB and IMF have correctly predicted economic developments of developing countries? Only fellows like this lingerie designer will believe them.  This country had only minus economic development only during the oafish Chandrika’s period in which++h this lingerie designer played a major role).

The government has acknowledged that foreign trade has dwindled by about 27%. Despite that the budget predicts 30 – 40% increase in foreign trade next year in an attempt to fool the people.  (All economic problems of the previous government resulted die to excessive imports.  The new government has completely changed the import/export pattern with maximum import restrictions and to seek emnhanced export opportunities with diversified export products.  The present economic crisis situation isnot something that is unique to Sri Lanka but it is a global trend)

The total loan obtainable for the year 2021  is indicated as Rs. 2,997 Billion.Combined with the year 2020, the total loans for the two years amount to Rs. 5.828 Billion. It is a quandary as to why such a large amount f loans have been taken at a time when there is no development activities taking place? (It is the policy of the new government to get as much as foreign direct investments (FDIs) as possible.  The President has clearly stated this matter to the new Chinese Ambassador when he presented his credentials to the President.  On the other hand the yamapalana government did not carry out any development work from the funds they obtained as foreign loans and they were only used for importing luxury items such as vehicles)..

It must be stated no country in the world which upholds law and order and the values of democracy resort to mechanisms money laundering. And due to the myopic policies of this government the people will have to face many obstacles in the future. (An alleged money launderer of terrorist funds shamelessly laments about money laundering!)

The objective of this government as well as the budget to create capitalist economy that would benefit only a few cronies instead of the international community. Also to create an economy that has no local competition but a robbers’ economy.  (Response to this para is given from comments made by the National Chamber of Commerce, the Ceylon Chambert of Commerce, boi, Bankers, Economists, and the erudite general public detailed in Part II of this article.)

To be continued………….

A budget presented amid celebrations and acquittals

November 25th, 2020

MALINDA SENEVIRATN​E

Over the last few weeks there has been a concerted campaign in social media attacking President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The ‘Gota Fail Campaign,’ as it was, promoted a strong response questioning the success of the President’s detractors. The campaign was clearly targeting the President’s first anniversary celebrations and the impending reading of the budget. The campaign failed or rather, now that the moment has passed, the campaigners have taken a break.

It was a week made of celebratory days, depending on one’s political preferences of course. We had Mahinda Rajapaksa celebrating his 75th birthday. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa completed his first year in office and addressed the nation to mark the occasion. The first budget of the Government that came to power in early August was presented. Secretary to the then President (Mahinda Rajapaksa) Lalith Weeratunga (also the ex officio Chairman of the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission) and Anusha Palpita (former Director General, TRC) were acquitted of all charges of misappropriation by the Court of Appeal.

Quite a week, to say the least.

Ranjan Ramanayake, predictably, ridiculed Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Mahinda Rajapaksa ‘for not standing while presenting the budget.’ Leader of the Opposition Sajith Premadasa rapped Ramanayake on the knuckles for doing so, in a gesture of good grace rarely seen in Parliament.

Obviously, Mahinda Rajapaksa is no longer the energetic man he used to be. This of course does not necessarily mean he is infirm in mind. He still remains one of the most effective communicators in our tribe of politicians. He’s had his good days and bad ones, like anyone else. He receives praise and blame, which again indicates strong passion, fierce loyalty and, on the part of his detractors, equally intense sentiments which include envy, fear and disgust.

That said, as ‘The Gadfly,’ a regular contributor to the website www.theleader.lk observed, when the post-independence history of this country is written, there will be a special chapter devoted to the man, whereas the likes of Ranil Wickremesinghe, Sajith Premadasa, Rajitha Senaratne an Wijedasa Rajapaksha would get, at most, a line or two. Again, depending on who is writing the history, someone might say. However, the man’s mark is unmistakable and certainly hard to brush aside.

Some argued that he should have gracefully retired in 2015. Maybe he should have. On the other hand, ‘Mahinda Rajapaksa’ is not just a man but a brand and moreover a name that’s etched in the political consciousness of the nation, and, as the August 5 results indicated remembered with gratitude that obliterates memory of his blemishes. If Gotabaya Rajapaksa was captain-designate and Basil Rajapaksa the man chartering course, Mahinda Rajapaksa was the name of the ship (with a tagline, ‘Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna’) and ‘MR’ a signature that was on every element of the vessel.

So, let us wish him, belatedly (on account of circumstances), a very happy 75th birthday, good times ahead, good health, continued guidance of his younger brother the President in matters political and restraint in deference to changed times and more importantly the leadership and power that is constitutionally granted to Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

The budget is still being debated. Predictably Harsha De Silva has come down hard on it. He tweeted, ‘the most boring budget speech in years.’ He added, ‘…a weak n inspiring (he probably meant ‘uninspiring’) budget w totally unrealistic revenue figures…a shift towards protectionist n failed ‘Import Substitution Industrialization’ model.’ Having opened the debate for the Opposition, he then tweeted ‘a short edit’: 1. Figures fudged. 2. No stimulus package. 3. About to explode foreign debt issue ignored. 4. Import Substitution Model has failed; need bridges not walls.’

Now De Silva is a fear-mongerer if ever there was one. There was a time when again he was in the Opposition, when he would issue dire predictions of imminent economic collapse almost on a weekly basis. The man had to keep quiet when the UNP regime he was a part of mishandled the economy. He had nothing to say on the Central Bank bond scam.

He might have been thrilled when that regime wagered on the West coming to Sri Lanka’s help, but he didn’t contradict his then leader Ranil Wickremesinghe who, when ‘Brexit’ happened, suddenly said ‘we will look East.’ This after badmouthing China in the run-up to the January 2015 presidential election. We remember De Silva posting selfies with the Port City construction in the background at the time when his party was swearing to put a stop to the project. Finally, his government signed an agreement even less favorable to Sri Lanka. This was to be expected; after all the Yahapalana Government cheered itself while compromising sovereignty by way of Resolution 30/1 in Geneva. Anyway, neither De Silva, Wickremesinghe, Premadasa and pretenders to various political crowns now in the Opposition seem to have cottoned on to the fact that the USA is no longer the big boss in the global economy and that the sun set on the British Empire a long time ago.
Nevertheless, the onus is on the Government to respond to the charge that figures were fudged. As for the revenue plan, we will certainly assess it, realistic or otherwise, as time goes by. The rest is obviously Harsha rattling off received (non) wisdom about things economic.

Stimulus packages are about bailing out the rich. Nothing more, nothing less. Such things hinge on the erroneous premise that the private sector is the one and only engine of growth, where ‘growth’ itself is a concept that is contentious at best in the development discourse and has by and large been rubbished considering what that model has done to the world, the health of the planet and of course the most vulnerable sections in the global population.

Pertinent here, as has been editorially pointed out in www.gammiris.lk is Harsha’s myopia about the Bretton Woods institutions. Here’s a quote:

‘He (Harsha) does not seem to have gone through Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz’s Globalization and its Discontents, which talks in succinct detail how these institutions operate, particularly in underdeveloping countries. A pity, because Stiglitz took the trouble of writing on Sri Lanka, and more to the point, of cautioning the then administration against hedging its bets on the IMF-World Bank paradigm of, what else, globalizing and liberalizing.’
Siglitz, interestingly, observed, that if Sri Lanka is to progress, it should start learning to produce, learning to export, and learning to learn.” Harsha of course can’t think beyond the neoliberalism model, which has failed and whose admirers show a marked reluctance to acknowledge the role of the state in the success stories they offer as examples. The state did and still does play a pivotal role in the so-called developed nations that have embraced the capitalist model. Practice is quite a distance from theory in their case.

The budget has sought to empower local production. This is not the same as import-substitution, though. In any event, Covid-19 has forced certain hard choices which even Harsh, had he presented the budget or was the President of the country, could not have ignored.
 It must be pointed out that the strategy laid out doesn’t make sense if the banking institutions are not focused on development. The Bretton Woods institutions have always been against development banks. There has been talk of setting up a cooperative bank, but the details are still to be worked out. This was an opportunity to get it down in black and white.
Meanwhile a delegation of the European Union and the Embassies of France, Germany, Italy Netherlands, and Romania issued a statement slamming the government’s trade policy, ‘with an obligatory non-sequitur to human rights,’ again editorially observed by ‘gammiris.’

‘Thanks to the EU’s special Generalized System of Preferences (GSP+), Sri Lanka enjoys competitive, predominantly duty- and quota-free access to the EU market,” they said. Trade, they pointed out, ‘not a one-way street,’ and observe (gravely) that ‘a prolonged import ban is not in line with World Trade Organization regulations.’  A reference was also made to the Government withdrawing from the (treacherous, what else?) Resolution 30/1, which, they say is ‘a source of concern’.
The hypocrisy of Europe crying foul over human rights is well known. But why talk of WTO rules here? Just last year Indonesia complained to the WTO over EU restrictions on palm oil imports. Both Germany and France blocked their own exports of crucial personal protective equipment (PPE) at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hypocrisy much, eh?
Well, if the EU’s ‘concerns’ (threats?) do translate into action, it would only push Sri Lanka even further into the Chinese circle of influence. Sri Lanka would have no option but to promote domestic production and rebuild as per the demands of the home market.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa completed one year in office. Not given to pomp and pageantry, his first year has been relatively subdued. He promised ‘work’ and ‘systems.’ Covid-19 was an obvious dampener. And yet, in this one year, we saw a mandate overwhelmingly reiterated. We also saw the passage of the 20th amendment which resolved the confusion of the 19th Amendment with respect to who really rules the country. The 19th, let’s recall, as acknowledged by its authors themselves, full of flaws. The Supreme Court shot it down and the then regime introduced what was almost a fresh document, quite in contravention of established parliamentary procedure (in the UK, the House of Lords can make changes but only minor ones). Here, there were wholesale changes at the committee stage. In contrast, the 20th a) retained certain elements of the 19th such as term limits and b) incorporated the observations of the Supreme Court).

The President’s anniversary speech was essentially a rehashed version of  his ‘throne speech.’ He didn’t detail the modalities of getting the ‘One-Country, One-Law’ going. He probably should have explained the controversial circular on ‘Other State Lands’ over which he has been getting a lot of flak. It was a no-frills anniversary speech quite in keeping with the personality he has projected or even the person he is seen to be. The proof of everything is in the ‘works’.  Work is where he will be judged eventually.

Given the announcement that the Government is planning to introduce a new constitution, the buzz over the 20th seems silly. The Government could have incorporated the 20th into a new constitution and seek passage in one go. 

 
Covid-19 has framed the president’s first year. He has had to balance coping mechanisms with keeping the economy going. The Opposition, as pointed out in a television discussion on Thursday by Deputy Editor, The Island, Shaminda Ferdinando, was bailed out by Covid-19. Now they have something to talk about, he said. There are charges of mishandling. The rise in numbers is certainly worrying. The Government does have a plan and it is as reasonable as any given multiple constraints.

However, it is certainly ridiculous that so many government officials and healthcare professionals are commenting and contradicting each other on Covid-19. The Government should authorize a single person to do this. Others should obtain from what this person says and not act as though they are epidemiologists. That goes for the opposition and political commentators as well, of course.

In Canada, for example, according to a Sri Lankan who is a long time resident there, ‘there’s a chief medical officer  giving daily recaps at the federal level with Prime Minister Trudeau offering a daily non medical brief. At the provincial level,  the chief provincial medical officer gives a daily briefing. All financial assistance information is conveyed by Trudeau since it’s all federal at this stage.  In Sri Lanka, in contrast, everyone except the Minister of Health is an authority on the pandemic!’  

Finally, the court decision on Lalith Weeratunga and Anusha Pelpita. Now they were acquitted not by judges appointed by this government. The charge that they were politically motivated is therefore silly. In this regard it is pertinent to point out that the President has nominated the six most senior judges for promotion to the Supreme Court. Seniority was spurned out of hand by the much-celebrated Constitutional Council of the previous regime. Friendship and loyalty were rewarded. Good move by the President but one which he ought to apply across the board in the matter of appointments/promotions.

The 62-page verdict notes, ‘There is no dishonest intention with which both accused appellants have acted. They were not actuated by men rea or actus reus. There has been a bona fide exercise of their powers and duties. Neither accused was enriched. Whilst the board authorized a transaction which is protected by law and corporate social responsibility, it is a travesty of justice that only two members of the TRC had to endure the traumatic experience of a selective prosecution at a prolonged trial, causing a senior public servant of long years of meritorious public service humiliation and anguish.’
Intention of course is always assessed subjectively. It’s the act that the court has to assess. The court was of the view that the prosecution failed to establish the ingredients of the offenses laid in the indictment. The court also determined that the circumstances in which the presiding judge came to hear the case created a serious doubt on the impartiality and validity of proceedings adopted. In other words, there was selectivity and deliberate maneuvering to obtain a pre-arranged outcome.

Weeratunga is a seasoned public servant. He probably knows the Establishments Code inside out. He probably knows not only what’s possible and what’s not but all the loopholes that can be used and abused. Both Weeratunga and Palpita were responding to a request from the top. They did it legally. He didn’t benefit. Neither did Palpita. One can argue that had Mahinda Rajapaksa won in January 2015, whether or not the sil redi issue was a factor, both would have benefited. At the very least they wouldn’t have been subjected to the obvious harassment meted out by overzealous yahapalana operatives (who essentially turned the FCID into a kangaroo court and commandeered operations from the Prime Minister’s office). That’s however in the territory of speculation. Courts are not in that business. 

The court has ruled. That’s that.

malindasenevi@gmail.com.

A shorter version of this article was published in the SUNDAY ISLAND (November 22, 2020). 


Copyright © 2025 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress