The Attorney General has requested for another Trial-at-Bar for the trial of the Bond Scam involving the third Treasury Bond Auction of March 31, 2016.
The Coordinating Officer of the Attorney General State Counsel Nishara Jayaratne stated that Attorney General Dappula de Livera made this request to the Chief Justice today (February 15).
The new set of judges has been requested to try former Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake, former Governor of Central Bank Arjuna Mahendran, Arjun Aloysius, and 07 others with regard to the relevant trial.
The Attorney General made a similar request on February 11, 2021, after the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) informed the court that investigations into the Rs. 51.98 billion financial irregularities in the 2nd Central Bank bond issue against 11 suspects named in the case have been concluded.
The
73rd anniversary of independence was officially celebrated in Colombo on
February 4 with some of the accustomed pomp and pageantry associated with the
event. Faced by the still rampant Covid menace and the looming economic and
political crises, the current regime, which is still struggling to reach its
cruising altitude, couldn’t have done better in the circumstances. This is so,
particularly, in view of the fact that today the relevance of celebrating the
1948 dominion status independence to the emerging Sri Lanka is increasingly
coming into question. The independence anniversary has become a virtual political-cultural
anachronism that keeps Sri Lankans religiously reminded of the eminently
forgettable fake independence grudgingly offered after the humiliating
experience of one and a half centuries of rapacious British colonialism, whose
evil legacy is still blighting their beloved motherland.
Meanwhile
one could see that the occasion was observed in different, but ultimately
complementary, ways in two particularly significant venues apart from Colombo
where the national independence anniversary was perfunctorily observed. Let’s
for the moment forget about various other places that may have held customary
annual freedom day functions. The two centres meant here are Jaffna and Kandy.
A group of young Tamils including women and school children (as reported in the
media) marked the day in Jaffna with a march displaying national flags and
placards calling for national unity and peace and expressing opposition to
conventional Tamil politicians who, they alleged, were working to create
divisions and disharmony for narrow party political ends. The group was led by
a young Tamil known by his birth name Arulanandan Arun or his alias Arun
Siddharth, who claims that his grandfather was a toddy tapper, fiercely
criticises the entrenched Tamil political elite of the north . (He revealed
during a subsequent TV interview that he was not so young being forty-three
already.) He has gained some popularity among ordinary people in the south as
well as in the north as a sincere critic of the existing reactionary political
elite of the north who reside in clover in Colombo or live in and/or operate
from Europe, while doing nothing to improve the lot of the suffering Tamils in
the north. His criticisms of prominent northern Tamil politicians are so
authentic that one feels that he should be able to play an important liaison
role, if he wishes, with similar minded young southerners of all three
communities that will ultimately contribute towards forging national unity.
Ordinary Tamils don’t want separation; what they want is development and jobs,
free from interference from India and the West.
It
has long been argued that ordinary Tamils in the north actually suffer from
casteist discrimination among themselves, and not from any Sinhalese
majoritarianism as falsely alleged by separatists and their ignorant backers
abroad. This is a truth that Arun has clearly pointed out. The same news
sources reported that a supposedly anti-government protest march which had
started from Pottuvil in Ampara in the east the previous day (February 3), was
planning to finally arrive at Polikandi in Jaffna on the 7th after a five day
trek..
Though
police had obtained a court order against the protest march, it went ahead,
nevertheless. These demonstrators were demanding a halt to what they called
encroachment of ‘Tamil lands’ under the pretext of archaeological excavations,
fulfilment of the promised Rs 1000 daily pay for upcountry estate workers and
for a relaxation of the mandatory cremation order in respect of corona-dead
Muslims, etc. (Important: These are fake demands; there are no Tamil, Muslim,
or Sinhalese lands in Sri Lanka; the whole island belongs to all the
communities; archaeological sites come under the archaeology department, and
lawful excavations are done under its supervision; the extensive archaeological
relics of the country are now the common heritage and property of all Sri
Lankans; much of the tourist industry depends on these, and as such, they are
also a big economic asset to the country; the Rs 1000 daily pay demand is duly
being met; the decree to burn corona-dead corpses is a scientific decision, not
a political one; the PM revealed in parliament February 10 in reply to a Muslim
MP’s query that burial will be allowed hereafter, implicitly because it has now
been established that the virus is not transmitted through water.)
The
protest march organized by some TNA-led Tamil political parties and NGO
elements provoked a negative response from the young enlightened Tamils among
the northerners in the form of counter demonstrations. These northern
Tamils held rallies against the seemingly anti-government march at the old bus
stand in Vavuniya (February 6) and at Murungan in Mannar (February 7).
According to them the march that started on February 3 from Pottuvil was
completely unjustified. It was organized only to promote the exclusive
interests of some regional political parties, and to hoodwink the common
people”. Of course, the march had little to do with independence day
celebrations. It may be suspected that its actual aim was to further undermine
Sri Lanka at Geneva in two or three weeks’ time. TNA MP M.A. Sumanthiran
expects India to support West-sponsored anti-Sri Lanka resolutions at the UNHRC
at its 46th session there next month, according to The Island/February 13.
However, as public security minister Sarath Weerasekera says, more countries
than before are likely to support Sri Lanka this time since the country has
withdrawn from co-sponsorship of the those baseless resolutions under the
present government.
Back
to the Pottuvil to Polikandi march, going by media reports, no one can deny
that a fairly large number of Tamils and Muslims (strange bedfellows, no doubt,
with conflicting long term ambitions) took part in the protest march though
obviously it was well short of the highly exaggerated figure of 60,000 that MP
Gajendra Kumar Ponnambalam mentioned in parliament on February 9, 2021. He
however claimed that the march was not something against the government. GKP
stated what he called ‘the four core demands’ of the marchers: 1) recognition
of the north-east as the Tamil and Muslim Tamil speaking people’s homeland, 2)
the recognition of Tamils as a distinct nation, 3) the right to
self-determination of the Tamil nation, and 4) the referral of Sri Lanka to the
ICC and other international accountability mechanisms to look into and
investigate the acts of genocide that happened and that continue to happen that
is being committed by the state”. GKP’s risible nonsensical definition of
alleged ‘Tamil genocide’ as dismantling the identity of Tamils” belied his
charge. Listening to his loud speech in the House, I remembered the lines a tale /
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,/ Signifying nothing” in the
Shakespeare play Macbeth, and thought that probably he was himself in
need of a referral letter from somebody to a specialist. But he was treated to
a curative blast from MP Pramita Bandara Tennekoon who described him as a
popular LTTE sympathizer”. PBT pulverized him point by point and reduced him
to silenced embarrassment. No need to say that the tired, backward, Tamil old
guard are still bent on avenging the defeat of the terrorist LTTE, instead of
looking forward to building, together with the rest of the communities, a
peaceful and prosperous Sri Lanka for all its citizens as PBT urged, and as the
young generation Tamils and their fellow Muslims and Sinhalese across the
country are now focused on doing.
Nevertheless
I personally believe that these actions and reactions in the north and
east demonstrate, instead a revival of the dead terrorism, a healthy democratic
trend that is developing among Tamils, particularly the Tamil youth, who are
set to work with their counterparts in the south in together creating a unitary
Sri Lanka without allowing outsiders (geopolitical, military and economic
powers with axes to grind) to get involved in our internal affairs in pursuit
of their own selfish ends at our expense. They need to be mindful of the new
religious dimension of the growing overall threat to pan-Sri Lanka unity: The
vulnerability of peaceful, non-violent, and non-extremist multiethnic Sri
Lankans (including the majority Buddhists and Hindus) who form 98% of the
population, is being aggravated by various extremist fundamentalist sects of
both types (Christian and Muslim), through their intensified activism by
effectively adding to the anti-Sri Lanka arsenal of interventionist powers
while the country is engulfed in political and economic crises amidst the
corona pandemic.
Meanwhile
the independence day was remembered with a twist in Kandy on February 4, that
too, only by default, when a small group of white clad, mostly young people led
by a hitherto unknown Buddhist monk named Medirigiriye Sikhi, prepared to hoist
‘the flag of Sinhale’ at the Dalada Maligawa premises, but were prevented from
doing so by the police acting on a court order issued prior to the event. Two
separate You Tube videos of the episode that I came across showed what happened
outside and inside the Sri Dalada Maligawa that morning. Ven. Sikhi agreed to
obey the court injunction after the head police officer on the scene explained
to him that it was illegal to hoist his Sinhale flag in the Maligawa premises
because it is not what the existing constitution decrees as the national flag,
and that, besides, displaying a lion flag as the national flag without the two
vertical bands is prejudicial to some sections of the society and so cannot be
allowed even in terms of the ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights) to which Sri Lanka is a signatory. But still, as an
alternative, the monk wanted to make an offering of the flag to the Tooth Relic
while stating his alleged intentions on the occasion. Police let him display
the controversial flag to the media and the few people around, which was the
correct thing to do in the emotion charged context, because it enabled the monk
to assert his and his partners’ right to freedom of expression. He took the
opportunity to re-stress the ‘One Country, One Law’ pledge that the present rulers
committed themselves to during the elections.
The
monk stated that he had concocted some indigenous medicines to fight the
currently raging coronavirus disease, including a medicinal oil called
‘ahivaataroganivarana thailaya’ at his own expense. He offered this ‘hela
osuwa’ (indigenous Sinhala medicine) to the rulers, advising them to use it on
the local population against the coronavirus disease, presumably as a
resistance/immunity builder, and to export it to other countries, which
incidentally would, in his opinion, ease the debt burden on the country; but
they didn’t listen to him, he complained. He expressed his deep disappointment
that his medicinal preparations still remain neglected. We don’t like
innocent people dying; we are against extremist activities and the destruction
of the environment. Many prominent speakers and monks, as media have reported,
argue that there is no real independence (in the country). This is true”, Ven.
Sukhi said. (Ill-wishers determined to harm Sri Lanka at every turn went to
town in the media attacking the government’s alleged reliance on superstition
instead of science, when it implicitly allowed practitioners of traditional
medicine to try their remedies on potential victims of Covid-19 to boost their
immunity. However, its failure to manage the damage done by quacks who
naturally exploit such situations cost the government dearly in terms of an
adverse press in this regard. That was unfortunate. So is its apparent wavering
on the burial non-issue.)
Then
Ven. Sukhi offered kirihara (milk rice) and the medicines to the Sacred Tooth
Relic and all other Buddha relics. Next, he placed three copies of the
Sinhale Flag on the altar, offering it to the Dalada, though he had been
prevented by the state authorities from raising it in the sacred
premises. The monk exonerated the police officers from any blame for
this, explaining that they were just doing their duty, but that they helped him
do the offerings before the sacred shrine. His dedicatory words were: I am leaving
one of these flags as a gift to the Tooth Relic, while taking the other two
back; one of these two, I will hand over to the President, and I will keep the
other with me. The flag that I am retaining with me is for honouring it and for
getting all Sri Lankans to rally round it in unity. I solemnly pledge before
you (the Buddha) to do this (i.e., dedicate myself for this solemn
undertaking)”.
The
symbolism of the monk’s act is likely to be lost on many who experience no
empathy with the majority Sinhala Buddhist community. Kandy was the last seat
of government of the island kingdom of Sinhale, which, by the time of the
British imperial takeover or annexation in 1815 (executed through intrigue),
was hemmed in on all sides by the littoral provinces successively occupied by
various foreign powers over the previous centuries. Nationalist movements
invariably have the non-political leadership or patronage of Buddhist monks
because of the over two millennia old organic linkage between Buddhism and the
majority Sinhalese who built up the uniquely humane and hospitable island’s
Buddhist civilization. What was brought down at Kandy when the British raised
their union jack on signing the Kandyan Convention of 1815 was the royal
standard of the last king of Sinhale, which had only the image of the sword
wielding lion. This same royal flag was what was raised on February 4, 1948,
the arbitrarily chosen day of independence. It remained the national flag of
(at least nominally independent) Sri Lanka for the first three years before it
was modified in 1951 by adding two vertical stripes to represent the two
minorities (the green for Muslims and the orange for Tamils). It has been
further modified since 1972 when Sri Lanka was declared a republic. Some
nationalists argue that the 1951 addition of differently coloured bands to show
minorities was an unnecessarily divisive innovation, because the lion image
represents the whole country of Sinhale with all its diverse communities who
are well ensconced and secure within its generously accommodating Buddhist
culture (which is in that respect identical with the very tolerant Hindu
culture of our big neighbour India that Jawaharlal Nehru described in his
monumental ‘Discovery of India’ as enfolding alien cultures within its generous
embrace), so compatible with secular democracy.
The
lion image in the Lankan royal standard is as old as the Sri Lankan state’s
2500 year written history. However, we have to accept the fact that today’s
national flag is a product of historical evolution; an earlier form of it
cannot be reintroduced a second time as it will be incongruent with the new
realities. Historical wrongs cannot be corrected through individual arbitrary
action. The government cannot allow it since it is against the existing
constitution and is also in violation of the ICCPR treaty as explained to the
monk by the police officer. Sri Lanka signed the particular covenant in June
1980.
As
revealed in another You Tube video uploaded on February 4, 2021, something else
had happened at Kundasale one day before, that anticipated the monk’s ‘Sinhale
flag’ scene in Kandy. Police (from Kandy or Teldeniya) delivered a restraining
order issued by Additional Magistrate’s court No. 2/Kandy to Amith Weerasinghe,
at his residence at Kundasale, warning him that he would be arrested if he
participated in a certain independence day celebration event (different from
the officially scheduled ones) in the Maligawa premises to be held on February
4. Amith Weerasinghe (30) is the leader of a nonviolent (in spite of the name)
nationalist youth group (known as ‘Mahason Balakaya’ or Mahason Battalion,
named after an ancient Sinhala warrior) agitating against aggressive,
unacceptable activities of Islamist extremists. As he credibly claims, among
his 275,000 followers across the country are young Tamils and Muslims. His
popularity makes him a challenge to the entrenched traditionalists among politicians
in Kandy like his counterpart Arun Siddharthan in Jaffna to his established
seniors there. He contested the last parliamentary election from the Kandy
district as an independent candidate.
He
didn’t win a seat though he and his supporters had been sure he would. He
firmly believes that he has been robbed of his certain victory ‘by an unseen
hand’, and has initiated legal action demanding a recount of the vote.
According to Weerasinghe, his case is to be taken up by the court next
month.
Weerasinghe
says that he knows nothing about the so-called nationalist organisation dubbed
‘Sinhala jatikawadi sanvidhana’ (Sinhalese Nationalist Organization) mentioned
in the court order, and that he was not due to take part in any independence
day ceremony or protest in Kandy on February 4. He suspects that this could be
the work of some senior politicians who are worried that he might contest the
upcoming provincial council elections to their disadvantage, and who want him
imprisoned so he would be neutralised and safely got out of their way. He is
already facing twenty-seven cases filed under the ICCPR for his agitational
activism against Islamist extremism over many years.To be arraigned under the
ICCPR for opposing Islamist extremism is a sad irony, because it is actually
Islamists who tend to violate all the five key human rights enshrined in that
covenant. Weerasinghe doesn’t want a twenty-eighth case to be filed against him
for no reason. The last time he was similarly trapped, he had to serve nine
months in prison. Incidentally, Ven Sikhi who led the protest against what he
believed to be unfreedom called his organization ‘jatiye peramunagath sinhayo’
(Lions Leading the Nation), not what Weerasinghe was alleged to belong to by
the police.
Weerasinghe
does not approve of monks dabbling in politics or going to parliament. He says
that he fights for only three key demands, occasioned by the need to neutralize
the existential threat posed by religious extremists to the Buddha Sasana: a
birth control law, a common marriage law for all, and an anti-unethical
conversion law. The monks are agitating for the same, in addition to such
issues as saving from vandals and landgrabbers the overwhelmingly Sinhala
Buddhist archaeological heritage sites of the country for posterity, the
preservation of the environment, and protecting innocent citizens of all
communities from the depredations of totalitarian religious extremists. If they
seem to fight for any political changes, that is incidental, but not central to
their demands. Their methods are nonviolent, though the forces that they come
into conflict with in the course of their activism have turned them into demons
in the eyes of the world through adverse propaganda. The dead silence of the
Ven. Mahanayakes who have so far failed to provide these well intentioned young
monks the proper monolithic leadership they need is largely responsible for
their present predicament. But now they are well positioned to facilitate the
emerging enlightenment and desire for peace among the young of all communities.
The fact that the Sinhalese are predominantly Buddhist and the Tamils
predominantly Hindus is important to recognize. They are the common target of
murderous Jihadists as well as fanatical Christian proselytizers. Unity among
Sinhalese and Tamils favourably viewed by peaceful mainstream Christians and
Muslims will be indispensable for defending themselves against their common
enemies.
The Government should
not permit religious functionaries to cross over to the political space, said
Dr. Rohan Gunaratna, in an exclusive interview with the Sunday Observer. Dr
Gunaratna is an Honorary Professor at the Sir John Kotalawala Defence
University and Senior Advisor to its Department of Defence and Strategic
Studies. Here he speaks about some current issues in Sri Lanka.
Q: `Born Again’ is a
hot topic in Sri Lanka these days. Would you comment on it?
A: All religions
are being used and misused by interested parties to spread their ideologies
aggressively. The Government should create a Presidential Council of religious
harmony to manage the religious challenges transforming into security threats.
The Born Again Movement in Sri Lanka is not an exception.
All faiths are
manipulated. No faith is immune. We have recently witnessed first-hand how
Salafism, especially its Saudi version Wahhabism, was exploited by Zahran to
attack Christians. During the P2P rally Hindu and Christian groups were
exploited – the P2P protesters ended up worshipping suicide terrorists and
terrorists in Jaffna.
Religious space is
sacred. It should be treasured and protected by religious leaders. If religious
leaders cannot control their faith communities, the Government should step in
and act decisively. The Government should not permit religious functionaries to
cross over to the political space.
The Thai Constitution
forbids bhikkhus participating in politics. Thai authorities disrobe and punish
bhikkhus who cross the red line. The Hindu nationalist organisation, Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) member Ramachandra Vinayak Godse assassinated Mahatma
Gandhi. To the detriment of the Hindus and Sri Lanka, the RSS has established a
presence in Sri Lanka.
The exploitation of
religion and ethnicity by politicians and other interested parties, both
domestic and foreign, should be firmly dealt with. Religious freedom should
come with responsibility – no religion should encroach in the space of others.
Sri Lanka can never
move from a third world to a first world country unless the Government and
community leaders develop legislation to regulate the religious and ethnic
space. Ethnic and religious harmony is paramount for social and political
stability and economic prosperity.
The Born Again
Movement is a cult group that has deviated from mainstream Christianity.
Similar to Salafism and its Wahhabi strain criticised by the local and
traditional Muslims, the Born Again Movement is criticised by the mainstream
Christians who coexist with other communities.
As the Yahapalana regime
did not control the spread of the Born Again Movement, the cult is gathering
momentum. A few hundred people are gathering around this faith group in Sri
Lanka after a handful of Sri Lankan singers and cricketers participated in Born
Again practices.
The Government in
cooperation with the mainstream Christian leaders should stop the conversion of
Buddhists and Hindus. The cult provides benefits to the converts while non
converts are treated differently. With their healing sessions used as a
technique to reach out to other faith communities, the cult is perceived as a
threat by other faith communities in Sri Lanka.
Wearing Western attire
and speaking fluent English, the preachers attract a cross section of society
to the cult. Such practices lead to misunderstanding and disharmony. In a
country where other religions coexisted peacefully until the 2000s, the Born
Again Movement should be monitored and regulated.
From a psychological
perspective, these practices and behaviours explain man’s obsession with god(s)
from the beginning of civilisation where he needed help, meaning and answers to
the unknowns around him.
The cult members
perceive that the challenges of their personal and professional lives can be
addressed by joining these faith groups. When help is not within sight, they
simply put the problem in God’s hands and then they think they are free.
The members self
isolate themselves. Despite being criticised and sidelined by the larger
community, the cult members meet the solace, company and sense of acceptance.
Their belief in God
makes the adherents feel that God is on their side, and that they are accepted
by God. A segment of the spectators with similar unaddressed grievances who
observe this process start to follow the cult. They validate the cult.
The danger of
permitting religious cults to operate has been evident in many instances.
1. Jonestown incident
1978 where 918 people died due to the instruction of cult leader Jim Jones
2. A Buddhist and
Hindu cult Aum Shinrikyo led by Shoko Asahara used sarin to kill people in
Tokyo in 1995. He was executed by Japan on July 6, 2018.
Like Zahran, these
cult leaders were charming, charismatic and capable of fluent speech and
assertive communication. The leader appeared in symbolic dress, beard, mannerism
and gestures.
They surrounded
themselves with wealthy followers who funded and protected them. The personal
or occupational lives of the followers were in turmoil. Despite negative
publicity, they continued to attract vulnerable segments of the population.
To attract and
convince followers they demonstrated extraordinary skills and performances such
as magic shows, especially, healing the blind, deaf, dumb and curing the
possessed people.
Q: How do you
interpret the latest behaviour of certain Tamil politicians displayed during
Sri Lanka’s 73rd Independence celebration?
A: To disrupt Sri
Lanka’s 73rd Independence Day celebration, a handful of Tamil activists and
politicians organised a protest march from Ampara to Jaffna from February 3 to
6, 2021. The face of the march was the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) that had
suffered electoral defeat.
To revive, the TNA
highlighted among others, investigations into disappearances and called for the
release of imprisoned LTTE terrorists. To enlist Muslim support, the TNA also
raised the burial issue and to enlist plantation workers’ support, they
demanded for them a Rs. 1,000 salary increase.
Referring to the
Muslims as ‘Tamil speaking people’, MA Sumanthiran of the TNA attempted to woo
the Muslims. Except Ameer Ali in Batticaloa and Imran Maharoof in Trincomalee,
Muslims in general kept away from the TNA, considered a proxy of the LTTE. The
LTTE ethnically cleansed 72,000 Muslims from the north and staged repeated
massacres of Muslim villages in the east. The Muslims’ memories of LTTE
brutalities persisted.
Commonly known as P2P,
the march originated in Poththuvil (P) and ended in Polika’ndi (P). After the
protesters left the east, the march was heavily infiltrated by LTTE supporters
and sympathisers. A hundred red and yellow flags without the Tiger emblem was
paraded.
The rally ended with
protesters saluting Millar, the first LTTE suicide terrorist and Thileepan, an
LTTE leader. In parallel, the LTTE international network staged their P2P march
in the UK on February 7, 2021. The march was disrupted when the British police
stopped the LTTE motorcade in Harrow, Middlesex and noted their vehicle numbers
for investigation.
There were attempts to
stage P2P marches in Canada, Switzerland, and Australia where LTTE flags were flown,
cutouts of Velupillai Prabhakaran paraded, decorated lamps were lit, LTTE
slogans sung and other LTTE memorabilia displayed.
Police investigations
revealed that the LTTE headquarters group and other LTTE entities partly funded
the protest. The P2P protests witnessed Tamil children carrying LTTE flags
including the son of Pulavar alias Thumpan, the deputy leader of the LTTE
headquarters group in the UK. An arms trafficker from North Korea, Pulavar was
based in Indonesia moving weapons to Sri Lanka.
Like most LTTE
functionaries that engaged in terrorist support activity, Pulavar masquerades
as a human rights activist.
According to foreign
intelligence, the headquarters group led by Anthony Cruz alias Sangeethan alias
Dayabaran has been funding LTTE attacks in Sri Lanka. Cruz, a functionary of
the LTTE national intelligence under Pottu Amman 1990 to 2009 was based in
India from 1998-2003. With the end of Sri Lanka’s battle against terrorism in
2009, Cruz travelled to the UK through India.
In addition to the HQ
group, known as World Tamil Historical Society, the P2P has been funded by the
Tamil Coordinating Committee, another LTTE front led by Nediyawan.
Q: Does Sri Lanka
really need the 13th Amendment?
A: The 13th Amendment to
the Constitution of Sri Lanka (13A) created Provincial Councils in Sri Lanka.
The Councils were created after July 29 1987, when the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord
was signed between Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and President J.R.
Jayewardene.
The background to the
Accord was India providing sanctuary, financing, arming, training, and
directing the LTTE. With India compelling Sri Lanka to sign the Accord, the
government faced an insurrection in the south. The unhappiness was reflected
when a naval rating hit Rajiv Gandhi nearly assassinating him.
The LTTE assassinated
Gandhi after returning to violence having reneged on the Agreement. The reality
in Sri Lanka is that any Government devolving powers to the North and East will
be toppled. The historical experience is that devolution of power to the
provinces will be exploited by the separatists to secede.
Tamil politicians both
TNA and others are not trusted. They are either associated with the LTTE
international network or with India. In February 2016, the Chief Minister of
Sri Lanka’s Northern Province, C.V. Wigneswaran sought India’s direct
intervention in the complete implementation of the Amendment.
Having suffered from
Indian covert assistance to the LTTE and five other terrorist groups, Sri
Lankans detested Indian intervention. Although India is unlikely to rearm the
LTTE, Sri Lankans are suspicious of Indian designs especially, in the north and
the east.
Increasingly, an
opinion is building in Sri Lanka to abrogate the 13th Amendment along the lines
of India revoking the special status, or limited autonomy, granted under
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region
administered by India as a state which consists of the larger part of Kashmir
and which has been the subject of dispute among India, Pakistan, and China
since 1947.
On August 5, 2019, the
Government of India, cut off communication lines in the Kashmir Valley, a
region gripped by a prolonged separatist terrorism and insurgency. Kashmiri
politicians were taken into custody, including the former chief minister.
The Government is
aware of the LTTE planning to harness the political freedoms in the north and
the east and subvert the Tamil community. If there is a revival of the LTTE,
the Sri Lankan Government will not hesitate to move in this direction.
The current strategy
by the separatists is to masquerade as human rights activists and provoke
Government overreaction. As such, the Government did not respond decisively to
the P2P protest. However, having witnessed the detrimental impact of the
protest, the Government will no longer permit a similar episode as it
compromises the hard won stability and security.
The Government is also
aware of the LTTE working both on the political and terrorist fronts. In
addition to plotting intermittent attacks, the LTTE network overseas is
building a support infrastructure in the north and the east.
After the military
defeat of the LTTE in May 2009, Sri Lankans are unwilling to devolve land,
police and financial powers to the provinces. The structure implemented in the
North and the East should be acceptable to all parts of the country.
The latest show in town for all matters concerning the law. Today’s topic – Sri Lanka cannot compromise at the UNHRC sessions Guest : Former permanent representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Tamara Kunanayakam,
In
September 1973 a Military Coup helped by the USA against Salvador
Allende, President of Chili in which he died, and the suffering of the
people that followed cannot be understood by any one, other than those
who went through it.
So
it is with Sri Lanka, no one can understand the suffering the
people went through under a ruthless terrorism for 30 years. In Sri Lanka
the Armed Forces were only doing its duty to protect the country and the people
from an enemy who was aiming to brutalise the people to finally divide the
country territorially.
This
Her Excellency the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet will
agree with if she were to take an unbiased objective look at the
situation Sri Lanka was facing at the time.
Mme
Bachelet, no one can understand the Mental Situation of His Excellency
Salvador Allende the President of Chili, when Palais de la Moneda was
surrounded in an Army Coup led by Pinochet supported by the USA.
Was Salvador Allande assassinated or did he commlit suicide shooting
himself with the gun his friend Fidel Castro had presented to him ?
President Salvador Aillende’s suffering ended with his death , but
that of the Chilean people only began after his death.
Chilean
People- men and women were arrested and imprisoned according to the whim
and fancy of the armed forces. They were being questioned and tortured for
days. All typpes of gruesome methods of torture were invented and used against
the people.
One torture method, which was very commonly used, was the
“grill” or “La
Parrilla.” In this torture, electricity was fed
from a standard wall outlet through a control box into two wires each
terminating in electrodes…… The naked prisoner
was stretched out and strapped onto a metal bed frame, or a set of bedsprings,
and tied down. He or she was subjected to electrical shocks on several parts of
the body, especially on sensitive areas like the genitals and on open wounds.
(The Valech Report )
Villa
Grimaldi, located in Santiago, was DINA’s (Office of the National Intelligence)
most important torture center that began operating in 1974. Prisoners were
interrogated for long periods of time. Once people were incarcerated on a
massive scale, new places were reconditioned to hold them. The
“tower” was designated as a holding center for political prisoners.
There was a water tank on the top floor of the building, which included ten
tight spaces where prisoners were held. These spaces were so small that victims
had to enter them by crawling on their knees. The tower also included a torture
chamber, where prisoners were kept in isolation. Many of them were never seen
again. Food was scarce and the conditions were extremely unsanitary.
President
Aillende was being accused by his enemies as a dictator, and thus
prepared the ground for a Military take over of Chili.
The
above facts were given to remind the UN Commissioner for
Human Rights, what had gone in her own country to make her
understand how difficult it is to make outsiders understand the genuine
intention of an Armed Force of a country which is people friendly, and was
doing its best to save the Tami civilians from a group of ruthless
terrorists who were unconcerned about the suffering of the people; but
only interested to set up a separate Tamil State in the North and East of this
little Island.
The
Sri Lanka Armed Forces never tortured the terrorists or the civilians, because
such cruelty is not in their nature. But the terrorist caught
the soldiers and policemen who strayed into areas under their control and
tortured them.
The
terrorists were determined to carry on its perilous intentions careless of the
suffering of the innocent Tamil civilians consisting of young and
old men, women and children, who were forcibly kept as a human shield to
protect themselves from probable attacks by the Government armed forces.
However,
the Armed Forces despite risking the lives of its soldiers were intent on
saving the innocent Tamil people being kept by the terrorist as a human shield.
At a given moment before the final assault against the terrorists
the Armed Forces decided to evacuate the Tamil Civilians serving as a human
shield for the terrorists. The Armed Forces risked their lives in a
most daring rescue operation perhaps carried out for the first time by any
Armed Force in the World, bringing away to safety 292,000 Tamil
civilians held by the terrorists as a human shield.
This episode of the evacuation of 292,000 Tamil Civilians by the
SrI Lanka Armed Forces has not been mentioned by the Tamil
diaspora, nor have the UNHuman Rights Commissioners have mentioned
it in their reports. The Tamil civilians are still not allowed to speak
freely of the kindness , friendly and human treatment they received from the
Soldiers and the Officers of the Sri Lanka Government Armed Forces.
The
damning annual report that is presented at the UNHR Council Session in Geneva
is an accusation of the Sri lanka Armed Forces, all blame and
damnation heaped on it, as the Armed Forces carried out a war
against ordinary Tamil people, as if the existence of terrorism in Sri
Lanka was mere imagination, and the claimed 30 years of suffering of the
people of Sri Lanka under terrorism was hallucination.
To
write such a report, white washing the terrorists clean, putting all the
blame on the Sri Lanka Armed Forces, those in the Office of the UNHuman Rights
Commission who wrote the report, may have perhaps been generously
compensated by the Tamil diaspora that gather in great numbers during the UNHR
Council Sessions in Geneva, shouting slogans, condemning the
Government and the Armed Forces of Sri Lanka. These Diaspora personnel have
easy access to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, as they have access
to the UK Parliament where they even have the meetings and celebrations in it.
That is how close the Tamil terrorist lobby is to the West and UK.
Therefore, Mme Michelle Bachalet considering the experience
you have as a politician , your socialist background, and the suffering you
yourself went through under a dictatorship in your homeland, it is
important you read the Maxwell Paranagama Report presented to the UNHR
Council by the Government of Sri Lanka, and revisit the report
prepared by your Office before it is presented at the Geneva Session. You may
perhaps make a more progressive move Mme Bachelet, by consulting the Government
of Sri Lanka before the Report is presented to the UNHRCouncil Session in
Geneva.
For
the Sri Lankans Madam Bachelet, the Officers of the Army, Navy and
Air Force, Soldiers of the Army, sailors of the Navy, the men of the Air
Force, some of those who gave their lives; others who gave their limbs
and still live, are all their heroes, who saved them from a probable
atrocious death under terrorism, gave them peace, and provided them
security.
Therefore, they are happy to see army personnel occupying
responsible posts in the administration of the government , because they can
trust them and the soldiers are there to help them whenever they are
faced with natural disasters. The Armed Forces gave them peace and
security, now they assure their protection. The people of Sri Lanka do not
consider having them working in government administration a militarisation. The
Armed Forces are actively helping the people in the pandemic. For the
people of Sri Lanka the Tri Armed Forces are a source of strength.
The
people are happy to have their war heroes taking responsibility in the
administration of the country, their country whichthey saved from its
enemies.
The British were said to have been Gentlemen. But that
was a long time ago. When the US wanted to declare war against Iraq, Tony
Blair the Prime Minister of the UK prepared a false document to say that
Iraq was producing Weapons of Mass destruction. The USA declared war against
Iraq on Tony Blair’s false report. Iraq was bombed, turned to
rubble. American and British Forces occupied Iraq and searched,
but they found no weapons of Mass destruction anywhere in Iraq.
Now it is this Britain that is leading the Core Group.
It
is not surprising that the UK has announced that it, along with Germany, Canada
Macedonia and Montenegro, is forming a Core Group to present another
resolution to replace the US Resolution 30/1 from which Sri Lanka withdrew
its sponsorship. Now a Core Group with bloody hands. The UK which
has committed violation of human rights throughout its imperial past
massacred people in some areas in Sri Lanka killing all males above 18
years, and burnt villages. It had been so even in other countries it colonised
including in India. Canada continues to violate human rights of its own first
citizens, the native Indians, kept strictly in reservations meant for
them . Germany we do not know why it joined the Core Group unless it wants to
own Naazi Holocaust. Macedonia and Montenegro are like puppies running
after adopted masters.
Yasmina
Sooka who was one of the three member Darusman Committee that wrote the false
Darusman Report, keeps yelling accusations against the Officers of the Sri
Lanka Armed Forces each time they are offered a responsible position in
the Government, is probably paid by the Tamil Diaspora and now doing it
for a living.
The Armed Forces of Sri Lanka cannot be compared to any other
armed force of the world. The equipment our Armed Forces have is only
that required to protect the country and its people. To help the people
in any natural calamities the country may face such as floods, a tsunami; a
pandemic like the Covid-19, or other unforeseen situations. We have no material
for heavy bombardment or equipment for toture chambers. Our Armed Forces
serve as a peacetime Army constructing Temples, reconstructing
ancient places of worship which are our National Heritage, Churches or homes
damaged in wind and flood. Even help in emergency construction of roads,
hospitals and buildings of utility value. They even engage in farming,
hoteliary, or special transport services using boats.
The retired Army Officers with special training in
Administrations are appointed where their experience could be made use of
elsewhere. This is useful to a developing country such as ours as
frugal use of the economy is a need.
The
members of our Armed Forces consist mainly of Buddhists, who are kind and
serviceable. Those of other religions are reliable and religious.
Therefore
the men of our armed forces should not be seen as undesirables, but as
respectable persons worthy of serving Sri Lanka which is their
country, or if needed serve in any country in the world which
requires honourable men of good moral conduct.
It
is only the Tamil diaspora abroad, the Tamil politicians who represented the
terrorists in Sri Lanka Parliament, acted as a voice of the terrorists, who
still lead the Tamil political groups to setup a separate Tamil State,
that carry damaging false propaganda against the Armed Forces and retired
members of the Armed Forces who now help in administration.
It
is the USA that helped in the Chili army coup against the
Government of Salvadore Aillande, which leads the western countries such
as the UK led Core Group against Sri Lanka. It is supported by the
Tamil Diaspora and the local Tamil politicians. It is they who are behind
these accusations which you have supported in your report to be presented at
the next UN High Commissioners Human Rights Council Sessions in Geneva.
Madam Michelle Bachelet as a Socialiist yourself, and twice
the President of Chili, in view of what has been written above, it
is necessary that you revisit your report, and perhaps consult the
Government of Sri Lanka before you present your greatly exaggerated
report to the Council Session in March,2021.
Mahinda Gunasekera Tambrook Drive Agincourt, ON M1W 3L9
Dear Madam Jean Yip,
MP Gary Anandasangaree’s baseless campaign to push for a Mono-Ethnic Separate State in the North and East of Sri Lanka
I am a resident of Scarborough-Agincourt for the past 38 years having migrated to Canada in 1975. I understand that MP Gary Anandasangaree who is a member of the Liberal Party caucus has arranged a Zoom meeting for parliamentarians on the 10th of February to canvass support for a resolution on Sri Lanka aimed at establishing a Mono-Ethnic Separate State encompassing 35 percent of the island’s land area and 60 percent of the coastline and adjacent territorial waters for Tamils numbering approximately 5 percent resident in the region. Majority of the Tamils in the range of 55 – 58 percent live outside the region in mixed ethnic surroundings cohabiting peacefully with the Sinhalese, Muslims, Malays, Indian Tamils, and Burghers living in the rest of the country. The Tamil community which stood at 12 percent in 1981 has declined to around 10.5 percent with a million or more immigrating mainly to western countries, while the Sinhalese are around 75 percent, with the Muslims accounting for about 9 percent, the Indian Tamils brought in by the British in the 19th and 20th centuries for work on plantations making up about 5.5 percent and the balance 0.5 percent made up of Malays, Burghers and others. Gary A seems to be more interested in creating a separate state for Tamils in Sri Lanka than the welfare of Canadians and the advancement of Canada although elected to Canada’s parliament.
The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) which was designated an international terrorist movement by the UNSC in September 2001 has been described as the most ruthless terrorist group by the FBI, and similarly proscribed by Canada in April 2006. Canada also banned the World Tamil Movement (WTM) designating them a terrorist group in 2008, as they were found to be raising funds for the LTTE’s terrorist activities. Soon after a new organization called the Canadian Tamil Congress (CTC) was formed with new faces while the activists of the WTM operated from behind the scenes. Gary A claims to be the Legal Advisor to the CTC, and has been among the first to meet with former LTTE cadres and supporters who came by boat to Vancouver to seek asylum in Canada aboard the Ocean Princess and Sun Sea apparently to coach them to navigate the legal procedures prior to grant of refugee status.
Following the adoption of a motion by the extremist Tamil political parties in 1972 called the ‘Vadukkodai Resolution’ to set up a separate state called “Eelam”, where they envisaged the youth to take up arms, violence spread throughout the areas predominantly settled by Tamils with the youth targeting and killing unarmed police officers, local politicians, the Mayor of Jaffna, needing the introduction of emergency regulations. India which had close ties to the Soviet Bloc at the time did not like Sri Lanka building ties to the USA with broadcasting rights being granted to the Voice of America. India the regional power stepped in to arm, train and fund the Tamil guerrilla groups in Indian military bases in order to destabilize her tiny neighbour Sri Lanka. The LTTE led by Velupillai Prabhakaran engaged in internecine warfare with the other Tamil rebel groups killing large numbers to gain ascendancy of the separatist armed warfare. With the funding received from India, Tamilnadu and expat Tamils, the LTTE grew into a formidable fighting force with a land army, naval wing called the Sea Tigers, a large fleet of ocean going vessels to transport and store armaments, a miniature night time bombing air force, a squadron of 600-750 suicide bombers, Over five thousand abducted and conscripted Child Soldiers used as storm troopers in unceasing waves many of them under 15 years making it a war crime, and a trained people’s army of around 12,000 called the Makkal Padai.
In addition to money raised through human smuggling, drug smuggling, passport fraud and other illicit activities, the LTTE amassed a huge war chest by extorting Tamil individuals and businesses sums extending from $5,000 to $100,000 to launch their so called final war of liberation at the end of 2005.( Refer: https://www.hrw.org/report/2006/03/14/funding-final-war/ltte-intimidation-and-extortion-tamil-diaspora ). The LTTE cut off drinking and irrigation water to 30,000 families dependant on waters from the Mavil Aru in July 2006. The Sri Lankan authorities sought to have the water restored with the intervention of the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission made up of Nordic representatives, but as they failed to have the LTTE resume the water supplies from the sluice gate even after two weeks, the Sri Lankan authorities were compelled to take military action to compel the LTTE forces to withdraw. The withdrawing LTTE forces next threatened Sri Lanka’s naval base at Trincomalee thereby extending the military confrontation to other regions as well. The Sri Lankan Army succeeded in forcing the LTTE forces spread out throughout the north and east to retreat from their strongholds. The retreating LTTE forces compelled the Tamil civilians living in the regions usurped by them to accompany them from the northwest coast to their final stronghold in the northeast in Mullivaikkal. They used the Tamil civilians to exploit them for their labour, conscript them to replace fallen cadre and serve as a human shield in the final battleground which is a war crime.
The ICRA reported that over 50 percent of the LTTE fighting cadres battled in civilian attire thereby blurring the distinction between innocent civilians and their armed fighters. The LTTE did not allow the civilians to move out of their area of control despite Sri Lanka declaring two 48 hour ceasefires in February and April 2009, and even fired on those Tamil civilians that attempted to flee to safety including artillery fire and suicide attacks to keep them from abandoning the LTTE fighters. This is confirmed in dispatches sent by Britain’s Military Attache in Colombo, Colonel Anthony Gash in his reports submitted to the UK Government’s Foreign Office, according to the presentation by Lord Naseby in the British House of Lords. Col. A. Gash has estimated a total of around 7000 deaths of which 25 percent or more is attributed to the LTTE shooting at fleeing civilians and not the hundreds of thousands claimed by LTTE supporters. The military action taken against the LTTE was successfully concluded on May 19, 2009.
The UNSG appointed a Panel of three led by Marzuki Darussman on his own accord without the sanction of the UNGA or the UNSC which reported that 40,000 had been killed during the latter stages from January 1 to May 18, 2009 without distinguishing between LTTE fighters and civilians. The panel admitted that their report did not meet the standards of a UN report and based their conclusions on what they claimed are “Credible Allegations”. They claimed that tens of thousands had perished during the latter stages in 2009 which they estimated at 40,000 without distinguishing between LTTE cadres and genuine civilians. The UNSG’s panel of experts recommended that their one sided report prepared from their offices in New York without visiting Sri Lanka be locked away for the next 20 years till the year 2031.
ICRC which ferried injured for treatment stated the total WIA was 18,439. The injured normally is 2-3 times the KIA which makes the injured total to be between 80,000 and 120,000. Gordon Weiss the UN Spokesperson in Colombo claimed a total of 7721 deaths to May 13, 2009 based on verified information gathered from UN/INGO employees, doctors and pastors within the battleground. In his book titled ‘The Cage’ he claimed 40,000 deaths with an eye to profit from sales to the over one million Tamil expats living in the west.
The Tamilnet a propaganda arm of the LTTE reported a total of 7398 deaths. The GOSL carried out a census in 2012 using teachers and public servants from the Tamil community as enumerators to arrive at a figure of 7432 deaths. Lord Naseby revealed in the UK House of Lords that according to the British Military Attache, Col. Anton Gash, the total killed was about 7000. Amnesty estimated 10,000 deaths while the US embassy fixed the death toll at 5,000. The Pro-LTTE groups, Yasmin Sooka of ITPJ, and Frances Harrison reported deaths in excess of 100,000 without a shred of evidence. Amnesty and HRW commissioned a report from AAAS to study the satellite imagery of the final battleground where they determined a total of 1346 burial spots in three sites within the Civilian Safety Zone which did not support the alleged high casualty figures.
295,873 persons including 12,000 former LTTE fighters plus a further 594 child soldiers were rescued, provided medical attention and place in welfare/rehabilitation camps before being released following the demining of their villages.
To deal with the complex questions of international law relating to internal armed conflicts, the Justice Maxwell Paranagama Commission was assisted by a panel of globally recognized legal luminaries headed by Sir Desmond de Silva,QC. (UK), Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice, QC. (UK) and Professor David M. Crane (USA), who had earlier been appointed by the UN to prosecute cases filed against those tried for HR and IHL violations before the ICC. This panel was assisted by Mr. Rodney Dixon, QC.(UK), Prof. Michael Newton (USA), Prof. Nina Jorgensen (Harvard,USA), Commander William Fenrick (Canada), and Maj. Gen. Sir John Holmes former Commander of the SAS (UK) who looked at the military aspects to determine if the loss of civilian life could be deemed as collateral damage if it occurs in the performance of a military necessity and proportionality in terms of IHL. In fact, I do not believe that the strategic difficulties of resolving the last phase of the war have been fully appreciated by military strategists until relatively recently” he says. Holmes concludes, on the evidence, that the SLA’s operations, in broad terms, were proportionate in the circumstances”.
Following the conclusion of the military action, Sri Lanka undertook a massive rehabilitation and reconcilation program, some aspects of which are noted below for your information:
Two American scholars recently debunked the myth of the Chinese “debt trap,” saying that exhaustive research shows that Chinese banks have never actually seized an asset from any country and are willing to restructure the terms of existing loans.
They called the Chinese debt-trap narrative “a lie, and a powerful one.” Deborah Brautigam, one of the authors of the research, published their findings in The Atlantic along with a professor from Harvard Business School last week.
For years, there has been an anecdotal myth saying that China inveigles poorer countries to take loans that they can’t afford to build expensive infrastructure, and when they can’t pay back the loan, China would try to take control of those assets from borrowers, according to the paper.
One such myth is that a Chinese firm pushed Sri Lanka to borrow money for the construction of Hambantota port, and a Chinese firm eventually took over the port when Sri Lanka defaulted on the debt.
However, the academics found it to be a lie. According to the research paper, around two decades ago, a Canadian company, then a Danish company both explored the feasibility of building the port at Hambantota, a city in the southern tip of Sri Lanka. They didn’t move forward due to a variety of reasons. Then Sri Lanka’s government approached the U.S. and India with the plan of building a port there, and both denied. Meanwhile, China Harbor Group learned the Sri Lanka government’s hope, and won the contract, backed by China Eximbank.
Sri Lanka’s debt burden soared since the government embarked on a debt-financed push to build and improve the country’s infrastructure after the civil war came to an end in 2009. According to The Atlantic, of the $4.5 billion in debt service Sri Lanka would pay in 2017, only five percent was because of Hambantota, and the central bank governors under both Rajapaksa and Sirisena said that “Hambantota, and Chinese finance in general, was not the source of the country’s financial distress.”
When responding to former U.S. Vice President Mike Pence worrying that Hambantota could become a “forward military base” for China, the report explained that Hambantota’s location is strategic only from a business perspective. “The port is cut into the coast to avoid the Indian Ocean’s heavy swells, and its narrow channel allows only one ship to enter or exit at a time, typically with the aid of a tugboat. In the event of a military conflict, naval vessels stationed there would be proverbial fish in a barrel,” the report says.
The Atlantic mentioned that companies from other countries have also benefited from Chinese-financed projects. For instance, Meghraj, an Indian-led company, joined the UK-based engineering firm Atkins in an international consortium to write the long-term plan for Hambantota Port and for the development of a new business zone.
As for authors, one is Deborah Brautigam, a professor of International Political Economy at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University while the other one is Meg Rithmire, an associate professor at Harvard Business School.
Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) today confirmed that its leader and Leader of the Opposition, Sajith Premadasa had met former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe a few days ago.
SJB MP Gayantha Karunatilleka who was responding to a question raised by journalists at a press conference confirmed that there was a meeting between Mr. Premadasa and Mr. Wickremesinghe and said the duo discussed the report of the Presidential Commission on political victimisation.
There was a discussion with the UNP at the highest level. However, according to my knowledge, the discussion has been centred on the report of the Presidential Commission on political victimisation and how to face the political consequences regarding same,” Mr. Karunatilleka said.
The arrangement is to deal with the presidential commission together and to make a common call for the tabling of documents in Parliament without delay,” he added.
It was reported that Mr. Premadasa had met Mr. Wickremesinghe at the latter’s residence and had discussed forming a broad political alliance.(Yohan Perera)
Former Speaker of Parliament W.J.M. Lokubandara has passed away today (February 14) at the age of 81, his family sources said.
He was under medical care for Covid-19 at the Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH) at the time of his passing.
Earlier this month, it was revealed that the former speaker had tested positive for novel coronavirus.
A lawyer by profession, Lokubandara embarked on his political career in 1977 after being elected as a Member of Parliament representing the United National Party.
He was appointed as the Cabinet Minister of Cultural Affairs, Education and Media in 1989.
Following the UNP’s defeat in the parliamentary election in 1994, Lokubandara became the Chief Opposition Whip of the House.
He was the Cabinet Minister of Justice, Law Reforms, National Integration and Buddha Sasana in the UNP administration which was formed in 2001.
Lokubandara also served as the 16th Speaker of Parliament from 2004 to 2019.
Total COVID-19 deaths reported in Sri Lanka climbed to 397 on Sunday (February 14) as seven more persons were confirmed to have fallen victim to the virus.
According to the Department of Government Information, one of the deceased is an 85-year-old man from Gothatuwa area. He was transferred from a private hospital in Colombo to National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) where he passed away today. The cause of death was cited as COVID-19 pneumonia, blood poisoning and kidney disease.
A 72-year-old female from Angoda area also died today due to shock from blood poisoning, COVID-19 pneumonia and complications of kidney disease. According to reports, she was transferred from Colombo National Hospital to Homagama Base Hospital after testing positive for the virus.
Meanwhile, a 65-year-old woman from Kurunegala succumbed to the virus on Saturday (February 13). She was receiving treatment at Teaching Hospital in Kurunegala before being transferred to the Homagama Base Hospital. The cause of death was reported as acute liver failure with Covid-19 virus and blood poisoning.
Further, a 60-year-old woman who was residing in Mahawela died on February 11 while receiving treatment at the Matale District Hospital. She has fallen victim to hart infection, heart failure and Covid-19 pneumonia.
Another woman, 82, from Peradeniya also died of novel coronavirus infection on February 11. She had been under medical care at Theldeniya Base Hospital at the time of her passing. The cause of death was recorded as acute blood poisoning with Covid-19 infection.
A 51-year-old woman from Gampola is also among the most recent Covid-19 related fatalities. She passed away on Saturday (February 13) while being treated at the Theldeniya Base Hospital for Covid-19 pneumonia.
The last victim, is a 79-year-old woman from Jaffna who fell victim to acute Covid-19 pneumonia on January 28. She was under medical care at the Theldeniya Base Hospital, the Government Information Department said.
The Attorney General has been forwarded information regarding the filing of charges against 30 persons involved in the 2019 Easter Sunday terror attacks, says Minister of Public Security Sarath Weerasekera.
Speaking to journalists in Colombo, he stated that 251 suspects have been remanded in connection with the attacks.
The cardinal has a responsibility towards the Catholic people. We understand his need.
We have provided information to the attorney general about 30 murders and conspiracies. The cases will be filed only after the report of the Presidential Commission goes to the Attorney General. Once we commence legal action, people will understand how we work.”
The decisions that can be taken by the police have already been taken, Weerasekara pointed out.
The Minister further said, Geneva has always been against us. Our only relief is that we have withdrawn from the 30/1 resolution. Therefore, many countries will be in support of us.
This time, 5 countries are bringing a resolution against us. We hope to bring a counter-proposal to that.”
It is true the Sinhalese are an ethnic majority in Sri Lanka, but it is also true that the Sinhalese are the only ethnic group in the world. The Tamils & Muslim may be ethnic minorities in Sri Lanka but there are 76million Tamils living in all parts of the world with 72million Tamils living in Tamil Nadu alone while only 2.2million Tamils live in Sri Lanka. Of the 1.8billion Muslims the world over, 1.9million Muslims live in Sri Lanka. So the Sinhalese who are just over 15million are the real MINORITY against 76million Tamils and 1.8billion Muslims. This reality is something that’s Lanka’s political framework must be aware of. It is the reason why protective measures for Sinhalese are needed. While Tamils and Muslims have plenty of nations to welcome them, there is no place or protection for the Sinhalese other than Sri Lanka. Therefore, these hard facts must be presented internationally to secure the protection for the Sinhalese as an ethnic minority facing endanger of its lands, its language, culture, Buddhist heritage etc.
While this island is home to all, that the people of the world are mixed following the out of Africa theory is accepted – however, it is only the Sinhalese who has evolved as a separate ethnic group with an exclusive language, culture, tradition & ruled of the entirety of this island. No other ethnic group can claim to have evolved in Sri Lanka other than the Sinhalese. The veddahs remain part of a tribal group from ancient times. The Tamils have their roots and evolution in Tamil Nadu, while the Muslims were allowed to settle down after arriving as traders.
The Sinhale kings ruled under the banner of the tenets of Buddhism following the Dasa Raja Dhamma. The pristine place was given to Buddhist values and incorporated into how the Kings ruled. It is to be noted that the palaces of the Kings were built at a level lower than the Tooth Relic of Buddha in all of the Sinhale civilizational kingdoms. The sacred tooth relic that was enshrined in a magnificent structure was always given pride of place above the King. This showcased the prominence given to Buddhism even by the Kings that ruled our island nation.
Sinhalese DID NOT EVOLVE from Vijaya. This is the first lesson for Sinhalese to learn.
The collage from images of Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka – temple and medieval capital of Ceylon at Sri Lanka
With the advent of colonial rule, the place enshrined to Buddhism was subtly usurped. Therefore, various means and modes were applied to replace Buddhism by other faiths. That larger plan prevails still. The Christian/Catholic Action/new faith cults & Islamic fundamentalism are the present day challenges for Sri Lanka. All these have billions of followers, billions of dollar funding and subtle methods to brainwash people to become their foot soldiers. Thus, the protection of Buddhism, Buddhist heritage, Buddhist land, Buddhist architecture complimentary with the identity of the Sinhalese is also a must.
There is a well-funded psychological operation to make Sinhalese feel inferior. Programs are heavily funded to make Sinhalese feel ashamed of being Sinhalese, there are campaigns that laugh at our proud history, our inventions, our exclusive traditions and our unique cultures. These in turn are subtly put into efforts to remove the place of Sinhalese, Buddhism from are history books, from being spoken of and venerated. All these are subtle attempts to denationalize the Sinhalese from defending their nation.
Thus the school text books need to be immediately changed, history must return to bring back the proud history of our nation. The Buddhist temples and Daham Pasal must reawaken the pride in our children. The universities and academics must invest in more academic papers on the proud history of the Sinhalese and showcase to the world their civilization. It is the Sinhalese who built the world’s only man made irrigation works that are still a puzzle even to the greatest of modern engineers. The modern engineers are even puzzled at how our Vesak pandols are lit!
The Sinhala language, writings are one of the prettiest in the world and needs to be protected and nurtured. If there are only 15million Sinhalese – this necessitates the global protection of the Sinhala language & its writings.
So in reality, it is the Sinhalese who are the real minority. It is the Sinhalese who are discriminated even in their own country where they are the majority. How is this possible?
When a developing nation, full of a political framework and system that is corrupt enough of avenues are open to on the guise of ‘development assistance/aid’ push agendas inimical to the Sinhalese.
The 1.3billion Catholic/Christian faith exerts power through Western governments, EU bloc nations inside the UN where trade is controlled by them and threats on the camouflage of human rights etc are used while these governments send faith-based NGOs to convert and brainwash the people preying on the poor to follow their prayers!
The 1.8billion Islamic/Muslim work may be divided by sects but when it comes forwarding their expansionist agenda, these OIC nations always flock together to protect their own first while using the billions of funding to change country laws and systems to their advantage. In a corrupt system these changes are a piece of cake!
Then we have what should be Hindu India, where an entire state comprises 72million Tamils who uses this power to exert pressure on Sri Lanka while its government uses this Tamil state to claim they only want to protect Tamil interest.
So we have Western nations/Catholic/Christian entities protecting their people in Sri Lanka,
India claiming to protect Tamils in Sri Lanka & over 50 nations of the OIC/Islamic nations exerting pressures to protect the Muslims in Sri Lanka – the question the Sinhalese must now ask themselves is – WHO WILL PROTECT THE SINHALESE? WHO IS COMING FORWARD TO PROTECT THE SINHALESE?
In the absence of any other nation or international group, shouldn’t Sinhalese campaign to protect themselves and protect their history & heritage? Something for all Sinhalese to seriously think about. What all Sinhalese must first do is to be PROUD of BEING A SINHALESE and not think that being proud of being a SINHALESE is something that looks down on others as this is the feeling funded campaigns are trying to infuse into Sinhalese.
Colombo, February 12: Sri Lankan Foreign Secretary Adm.Jayanath Colombage has told Xinhua that Chinese investments will create job opportunities for locals and that Sri Lanka is keen on reaping the benefits of the Belt and Road Initiative.
Sri Lanka will also look to boost local production in order to join the global supply chain,” he said in a recent interview to the Chinese news agency.
Following the COVID-19 outbreak, Sri Lanka closed its borders in March last year in order to prevent a further spread. Since then, its tourism industry has suffered severe setbacks with a halt in tourist arrivals.
In order to revive the economy, Colombage said, Sri Lanka will pay more attention to the ocean as he believed that Sri Lanka has the great potential to be a maritime hub in the Indian Ocean.
In that, I see the Belt and Road Initiative as a great prospect for Sri Lanka to be more connected to the global supply chain.”
Sri Lanka has three deep water ports, which are viewed by Colombage as the country’s biggest assets.
So we need to benefit from that. We need to benefit economically from the Belt and Road Initiative. We need to develop our maritime-related infrastructure,” he said.
COVID Containment
China has helped Sri Lanka in its fight against the COVID-19 pandemic and the island country now looks forward to furthering its ties with China in order to recover from the pandemic, Foreign Secretary Colombage said.
2021 will be a very challenging year for countries including Sri Lanka due to the fight against the pandemic, and Sri Lanka now needs the support of its friends more than in any other years in history. China has already assisted Sri Lanka since the first local COVID-19 patient was detected in March last year. Since then, China has sent medical assistance such as surgical masks, personal protective equipment, and surgical gloves in large quantities to the country’s health authorities,” Colombage said.
This has helped Sri Lanka in its battle against the pandemic,” he pointed out.
China has fought the virus very effectively as it has begun producing vaccines in large quantities and is helping other countries by donating vaccines. China is going to give us a large number of vaccines and arrangements are being made. I was told these vaccines will arrive here soon. That is a really great gesture. We need more support in this battle against the COVID-19.”
The foreign secretary said the COVID-19 has shattered the Sri Lanka’s hope for development progress.
We now really need to catch up,” Colombage said.
I think China, being one of the leading economies in the world, and the number one development partner of Sri Lanka, can help us,” he added.
The Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) says restrictions on non-essential imports including vehicles will remain in place until the balance of payment issues are resolved.
CBSL Governor Prof. W.D. Lakshman noted that the government’s interest and determination to move away from the heavy dependency on imports are significant for long-term policy approach. However, there could be some adverse impacts in the short run, he said further.
The governor’s remarks came during a press conference held yesterday (February 12) to announce recent economic policies.
There are also many clear signs of domestic industrial investment picking up, Prof. Lakshman added.
He further responded to the negative press reports on the country’s economy, revealing that 5.5% to 6% growth is expected this year due to a host of timely government measures.
CBSL governor explained a combination of factors including vaccine optimism, policy directions and decision such as import restrictions and positive interest rates have given key sectors enough relief to surge ahead this year.
The pandemic-hit tourism sector is now picking up with various incentives that have been provided and the Information Communication sector is likely to generate foreign exchange in the time to come, he elaborated.
There is also the expected global recovery,” Prof. Lakshman said adding that the IMF is predicting a 5.5% of global growth. He noted that the base effect will help Sri Lanka achieve higher growth rate by the end of this year as the country started off from a negative growth process in the previous year.
A UN member state is being accused of committing war crimes, crimes against humanity & even ‘genocide’.Sri Lanka has been the victim of an annual witch hunt sponsored by blood-money for 12 years. All of these allegations has credibility if and only if they can prove Sri Lanka intentionally killed 40,000 and the deaths are disproportionate to the military advantage legally accepted in a non-international armed conflict.Sri Lanka has given Geneva 12 years to come out with the basic requirement of 40,000 dead names. They have failed. Sri Lanka must now refuse to respond to any of the non-conflict related questions being askedfor these are traps riding on the bogey of ‘accountability & truth’. If it is accountability Sri Lanka must demand where was the UN and its apparatus for all the victims of LTTE. If its truth, Sri Lanka must take UNHRC back to the conflict & demand answers for the initial allegation of 40,000 or more dead. Sri Lanka must refuse to answer anything until UNHRC can produce credible evidence beyond a shred of doubt to prove 40,000 or more was intentionally killed by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces disproportionate to international laws. It is in taking this principled stand that Sri Lanka can turn the tables on the UNHRC.
This is the 1sttime that the UNHRC and the former UNSG chose to take up a conflict that had ended.
Sri Lanka’s conflict was 3 decades old. Why were there no resolutions seeking truth & accountability when LTTE were committing pre-meditated murder on Sinhalese, Muslims, Burghers, Tamils & even foreigners?
Why did UN, UNSG and UNHRC wake up only after Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces ended LTTE ground force on 19 May 2009?
Why are death estimates ranging from 7000 to 9000 by US State Dept (6710 casualties), UN Country Team (7714 casualties), ICRC reports, and dispatches of US & UK military attaché’s as well as census statistics by Sri Lanka not accepted?
The numbers game & the challenge to accusers
Present the evidence that Sri Lanka Armed Forces INTENTIONALLY targeted civilians
Present evidence that Sri Lanka Armed Forces attacked without military necessity to intentionally kill civilians
Present evidence of disproportionate killing of Tamil civilians (LTTE Armed Civilian Force does not belong to this category)
Darusman Panel must present evidence that the Sri Lanka Army killed civilians through widespread shelling (as alleged in its report which is contradicted by ICRC, UN Country Team reports)
Darusman Panel must respond to why it inserted ‘there could have been as many as 40,000 civilian deaths’
Bishop Rayappu Joseph, Francis Harrison & Yasmin Sooka claim deaths from 147,000 to 200,000
Sooka now on a campaign of her own against Sri Lanka cannot produce names of 40,000 supposed to be dead! She keeps presenting dead LTTE names.
UNHRC cannot be allowed to be recommending changes and interfering into the internal affairs of a sovereign nation WITHOUT proving its allegations.
A person is born. His/her birth is registered. A national identity is issued. Grama sevaka registry has records and election registry also has records. A marriage certificate is issued at marriage. A death certificate is issued at death. Anyone missing, a police entry is lodged. All these methods have a means of verification via passport office/immigration/emigration etc.
Therefore, bring on the evidence that these 40,000 were even born, produce the police complaints by families to claim them missing, produce complaint to the Presidential Commission on Missing Persons.
Point to note is that a missing or untraceable person is not necessarily dead because they can be in hiding, they can be living in a foreign nation under a fictitious name, they may have changed their looks with cosmetic surgery. All these possibilities can be verified if foreign governments share the refugee/asylum seeker details with the Sri Lankan inteliigence services. There were reports that NGOs played a key role in sending some of these hardcore LTTE members overseas claiming to be going for training. Did they return to Sri Lanka?
All the allegations of murder being hurled against Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces makes any to think that the LTTE was keeping 300,000 Tamil civilians and handing them roses and sweets while Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces were hunting them down. How ridiculous can even the UNHRC be. They may like to count the many times the UNSG and diplomats appealed to LTTE not to shoot fleeing civilians, not to keep Tamil civilians as hostages and the manner that freed Tamil civilians cried how LTTE stole provisions sent by GoSL and ICRC to feed their combatants and the families of combatants. So clearly, LTTE gave preference to its combatants & their families and to the Tamil civilians who sided with them. Can the UNHRC come up with some numbers for these divisions?
Sri Lanka must tell UNHRC, to hold its horses and demand that the script returns to 2009, the end of a 3 decade conflict and ask UNHRC to come up with the evidence to prove its allegations.
All of the sugar-coated resolutions by UNHRC bloc nations have been aligned to fulfilling their geopolitical agendas via Sri Lanka using the May 2009 concluded conflict as ruse.
Sri Lanka should not fall for any more traps.
Sri Lanka must now demand UNHRC to come clean. No more non-conflict related items. The whole basis of this international stigma campaign against Sri Lanka taking place all over the world claiming Sri Lanka committed war crimes, crimes against humanity & even ‘genocide’ must be proved with facts not fairytales. UNHRC must remove the 20 year cap on their supposed ‘witnesses’ to see if they were even born!
NO MORE RESOLUTIONS
NO MORE RESPONSES BY SRI LANKA
Until UNHRC can prove Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces intentionally killed civilians disproportionate to the military advantage accepted in international law in a non-international armed conflict.
Prove we killed 40,000 or more or just shut up & close the case against Sri Lanka!
Before
coming to power, members of the current government promised various policy
actions to people, and now it has come the right time for evaluating such
policies whether they were fulfilled or initiated to work on. This is a
critical question to people as they are eager to see the performance of the
government. The nature of politics in Sri Lanka is giving many promises without
evaluating whether they could fulfill or ability to at least initiate them
during be in power. This is the misunderstanding or misreading of the term
democracy. The promises were based on the policy statement that was called a
Prosperous Vision, voters had not a clear understanding of the vision and the
mission that was so vague as the document didn’t specifically express what kind
of work will be fulfilled. Now, the time
is evaluating promises made to the public and the compact policy statement
needs to allocate the corporate role to each minister.
Despite
evaluating the process, the media highlights that there are conflicts among the
cabinet team members that have not been expected by people when they were
voting at the election. For example, Mr. Wimal Weerasinghe promised to
establish an Industrial Development Bank as the country needs medium-term
credits for industrial development purposes which could not be offered by
trading banks with short-terms, and on-demand liabilities base. Without
monitoring the promise Mr.Wimal Weerasinghe gives lorry talks on positions of
Podujana Peramuna.
The
policy conflicts are a common nature of the democratic system, the nature of
conflicts in Sri Lanka seem to be gone beyond the limits. When investigating
the elected governments since 1947 it discloses that Sri Lanka’s politics is
subject to division and people don’t care whether divisions were based on the
philosophical points of the parties or any other matters. People want to do work on the mission that was
given at the election. The objectives
and activities were not properly defined in the vision, and people have faced a
giant confusion about how to evaluate the implementation of the government
policy process. Many works in Sri Lanka
cannot complete in a short period as they are involved in macroeconomic
factors.
Is
there a team to evaluate the policy process relates the prosperous vision and
who are the members of the evaluating team is undisclosed truth to people, and
state ministers are responsible for initiating work for the mission. Some state
ministers are going behind media men to give voice cuts and others look to
react for the original voice cuts. That is why Sri Lanka wants a partial
dictatorship to avoid this type of joke.
The
obvious nature is State and Cabinet ministers use to give voice cuts to media
and they bring points that should be talked about in the darkness as they are
contrary to the original statement of prosperity. The best example was the
conflict between Mr. Wimal Weerasinghe and the secretary of Podujana
Peramuna. Do these issues need to
publish in media or they should be talked about in a closed-door room to
evaluate and kids who are in grade 12 political science class know the
statement of Lord Ramse McDonald that ministers, you can talk whatever in this
room, but when you go out you should be abiding by one statement should express
to people. It seems that the idea of
co-responsibility has deteriorated among the members of the cabinet, and it
could be further illustrated by a traditional saying if the fence and the
embankment ate the paddy cultivation whom to complain about the problem?
In
this environment, it is difficult to make a judgment on the role played by the
ministers since they have been appointed to the role. There is no difference
between ministers of this government and that previous government the old poet
that said until the role was achieved all do misleading and the truth in the
politics in Sri Lanka without difference whether they are in government side or
the opposition. All lie to the public with a view to gaining power and in the
democratic system rulers as well as the public are behaving like crooks as
stated by Machiavelli.
It
is a truth the entire world has suffered from the Covid pandemic and
Mr.Gotabaya Rajapaksa has given the leadership to tackle the issues. Policy
development, policy monitoring, and remedial management are equally vital
actions to the government and the big bosses of the government need to engage
in this role.
Mr. Antony Blinken US Secretary of State 2201 C Street NW, Room 206 Washington D.C 209520-2204 US.
Dear Mr. Blinken:
It was with special interest that I read the announcement of 8
February that the U.S. is rejoining the United Nations Human Rights
Council to re-engage immediately and robustly with the body to pursue a foreign
policy centered on democracy and human rights.
That is indeed a challenge and honourable on the part of President Biden’s Administration instructions.
However, Mr. Blinken, your involvement won’t be that easy to
unhook, thousands and thousands and thousands of members of the Sri
Lanka-Sinhalese Diaspora community from the bold words of Nikki Haley who said,
that the UNHRC is a cesspool of political bias, and a self serving body
that makes a mockery of Human Rights, and pulled out US being part of that
body. And not even wanting to touch it with a barge pole. I am one who
got hooked as she was so absolutely right.
As for USA’s record of human rights back-drop, I for one cannot
forget your former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright calmly asserting that
U.S. policy were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children during the
US-Iraq war, My stomach is still doing somersaults of anger and
sadness. If that is indeed the US stance on Human Rights, killing more
innocent children than who died in Hiroshima during the attack of Iraq on
a lie, then may God forbid!
How do you expect us to erase that from our memory? It is nice to
tell us that you want to engage with the UNHRC robustly, but will you be able
to win my trust? That is the bottom line Mr. Blinken after all that was
said by Madeleine Albright.
The recent-American history of Human Rights is defined by
the sentencing to death, the 46 year old African-American, George Perry Floyd
Jr, to die in 8 minutes and 46 seconds choked by one of your ‘white’
policeman’s kneeling knee on his neck. This sentencing of death was for
having passed a counterfeit $20 bill in a Minneapolis Store.
You know Mr. Blinken, you’re a Dad and so am I. What is
brutal about this killing was how this Dad was not given a chance to hug one of
his daughters to say ‘good-bye’ and telling her,
Listen, sweetheart, I am sorry, I did something wrong and I am
sentenced to die. I am leaving you and won’t be coming home for ever. Tell
Mummy, I am sorry, and that I love her genuinely and deeply, and all of
you. Lead a good life angel and have fun. Be nice to Mummy. She is
the best Mummy in the whole world, Give me a hug and don’t cry. And
give Mummy a Hug from me when you get home. I love you and I have always
loved you. Good-bye!”
Mr. Blinken, your American robust human rights
didn’t give Floyd that humanitarian last chance, and that was wicked, and that
was brutal. So
much of the US, Human Rights that you are hoping to sell me.
Mr. Blinken, I didn’t know this guy. All I knew of him was that he was a Dad and an American Black. As a Dad I cried my heart out – and I wrote this therapeutic poem. I had to and I want you to read it.
Tears of Blood
(for George Floyd)
Just now a cloud
of screaming black ravens
flew over Minneapolis,
perched on the leafless
trellis
of branches
of trees at the Powderhorn
Community and shed tears of
blood
from their paining red eyes
and I sighed
O my
brother George
O my
people.
It was no more a faceless
horror
that got you
it was a knee of a white-man
in a blue-serge uniform who
forced pressure
on your neck
Please
Please
I can’t
breathe
Mama
Mama
I can’t
breathe.”
It is this irrational
white-terror
O my God
I can’t
breathe
don’t kill
me officer,
Come on man
I cannot
breathe.”
And the clock keeps ticking’
every minute,
it is 5…6…7…8
that finally caught up with
Him and he couldn’t run.
Where is
Oprah Winfrey
Martin
Luther King,
Barack
Obama
are
you not going to give me
a spoon
full of water?”
O my brother
O my people
What have you done to meet
this whiteman’s
savagery’
in a country that you too
helped to build.
‘It’s my face
man
I didn’t do
nothing serious man
Please,
please man
I can’t
breathe.”
The clock counts minute 8
and 46 seconds,
and George Floyd is gone.’
He is dead!
I join the ravens singing
from the trees.
We shall
overcome
Some
day,
we shall
overcome
some day,
O deep in
my heart,
I do
believe
We shall
overcome
one day.”
And the ravens flew
away cawing loud
in an angry black cloud.
Brother George Floyd,
watch out for me, when
I will meet you in heaven,
Keep me a comfortable nook
and I promise I will look
forward to share my ration
of the spoon full of water.”
(Asoka Weerasinghe
2 June 2020)
Mr. Antony Blinken, when you re-engage with the United Nations
Human Rights Council immediately and robustly” the alleged Human Rights
violations in Sri Lanka during the last five months of the Eelam War will
be on your table for your American opinion and voting. I
hope and pray that you will be robust” with Your honesty too, and ask
the UNHRC members to be honest too like you:
Tell them,
I know what terrorist wars are all about. We are still fighting the
Talibans in Afghanistan. If you talk of alleged killings of
Tamils by the Sri Lanka Armed Forces on their way to annihilate the most
ruthless terrorists in the world, on March 19, 2009, where the
numbers have been bandied from 40,000 to 100,000s being killed. Why
is it that we are not talking of the casualties of 80,000 to 200,000
Tamils, struggling, to walk, hopping with the help of crutches and
sticks, bandaged like mummies, soaking with blood, moving in single
file along the roads for safety. Why? Is it because the alleged
killings” are an exaggeration, or perhaps it never happened. May
I have the truth, and nothing but the truth as an answer.”
Madam
Bachelet, could you also tell me, how did the 80,000 casualties manage in a
sliver of land at Nandikadal, on improvised crutches, bandaged like mummies in
blood soaked bandages, and hopped over 40,000 dead Tamil bodies?
Can you explain to me in detail, Madam Michelle Bachelet. We are
now talking of the real Eelam war-theatre and not a surreal FairyTale War
theatre. Who is it that sustained these 80,000 casualties with food and
water?; Let’s be honest. Who organized these war theatre logistics.
Sounds surreal to me!
Is this why
Nikki Haley called your outfit a cesspool of political bias and a self
serving body that makes a mockery of human rights.”
This is
quite an indictment, and I believe that there is no smoke without a fire!.”
Why is that we, at UNHRC, have not acknowledged
the Classic Textbook example of a major rescue mission inside a theatre of war.
The
Sri Lankan soldiers rescued, which is a recorded fact, 295.873
Tamil
refugees who were used as a human shield for 6 months by the
Tamil
Tiger terrorists, marching them from the west coast to the east
coast
under a scorching Jaffna-Killinochchi sun, like a herd of
unwashed
cattle. Why?
Madam
Bachelet, if your UNHRC is the police that is monitoring world’s
human
rights violations, why was it that UNHRC found it not that
important
and justified to recognize an amazing act of humanitarianism
when
Sri Lanka housed the 295,873 Tamils who were rescued by their
soldiers
in a temporary ‘White Camp-village”, and sustained them by
preparing
a million hearty meals of breakfasts, lunches and dinners
every
day. Why..why not?
Is
this not the very reason why Nikki Haley was bold enough to
tell
the world that your United Nations Human Rights Council was a
Cesspool
of political bias, and a self serving body that makes a
mockery
of human rights”.
Mr. Blinken, when you announced that the US will be rejoining the
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to re-engage immediately and
robustly” with the body to pursue a foreign policy centered on democracy and
human rights”, a light was switched on in my honest democratic psyche”
and I thank you for that serendipitous moment.
The honest answers to the above probing questions will
be a good start not to harass the national heroes in khaki, blue-serge and
whites, of 20.5 million peoples in Sri Lanka, who gave back to them their
right-to-life which had been hijacked by the Tamil Tiger
terrorists who were aided and abetted by several forign countries like India,
US, UK, Canada, Norway, France and so forth, for 30 bloodying years.
That is no secret. And, of course,
the World Police of Human Rights, UNHRC, did nothing about it.
Mr. Blinkin, if you are honorable enough to clean the UNHRC, the
cesspool of poilitical bias, who have an ingrained habit of
cherry-picking their choice targets in support of their funding international
clients, for them to gain support from specific groups in their countries, like
the Tamils in the Greater Toronto Area in Canada, you take my word, that I will
unhook myself from Nikki Haley’s strong rightful indictment of the UNHRC,
and join you in your walk forward to create a Louis Armstrong world of
–
The colours of the rainbow
So pretty oi the sky,
Are also on the faces
Of people going by.
I see friends shaking hands
Saying ‘how do you do’
they are really saying,
‘I love you’
What a wonderful world.”
And you can be sure of one thing, that Madam Michelle
Bachelet at UNHRC won’t be in my this year’s list to send Valentine greetings
to celebrate Saint Valentine’s Day in two days.
Mr. Antony Blinken, my right palm is on my heart, to show my
honour and sincerity when I say to you, Congratulations on your
appointment as the US Secretary of State, Good Luck and God Bless!”
The
numbers of positive Covid cases have increased rapidly during past 2
months. We are fast reaching 1000 positives cases per day within
next week or two.
The
resources of health authorities have been stretched to near break-down
levels. The public co-operation for the adherence of health and safety
guidelines is waning. The security forces are overworked, arrest
of persons for violating Rules are creating further unrest in the society.
A
pandemic of this proportion cannot be ignored just by media
announcements and police arrests. The current system need breathing
space, where health and security officers need to revisit the existing
policies and administrative arrangements.
In
the meantime, the government must declare complete Lockdown forthwith together
with offer financial and food subsidy assistance to the vast
community. At least 3 weeks lockdown could possibly save the nation
from disaster.
It
is true nations like Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Germany have
not yet imported any vaccinations, whereas a poor country like Sri Lanka has
taken initial steps to look after its people. Singapore Prime
Minister and the Ministers of Cabinet received the first dosage of
vaccinations, quoting, we need to prove it is safe”.
The
next shipment of vaccinations are not due till April-May, the government
need to arrest the rapidly increasing trend by enforcing a complete Lockdown
immediately. We need to bring the casualty numbers within controllable
limits, whilst expediting the arrival of vaccinations.
“Potential collusion by medical profession /administrators,
organisations (e.g., WHO, NIH, Medical Associations), with Big-Pharma at the
expense of the public–human lives:”
While the information in the above link may exaggerate, the
recommendations by the mentioned organisations against” the use of three most
cost-effective therapies for COVID-19 that can save human lives (even to date),
are unprofessional and immoral. Many scientists believe that they should
be held accountable for the harm.
The attached figure illustrates the efficacy of one of these
agents, Ivermectin in preventing COVID-19, complications, and deaths.
Notably, three agents are available in all countries, have several decades of
experience using these for other diseases, cheaper, and have less adverse
effects than all antiviral agents and COVID-19 vaccines. Additional
information is on the following links:
