I would like to protest to your speech on a so-called Tamil Memorial Day.

May 25th, 2020

Vijitha Bulathsinghala

Hi Bonnie,

I would like to protest to your speech on a so-called Tamil Memorial Day.

Please do your homework about this front line of  Terrorist group Who kill their supporters. Rajiv Gandhi Prime-Minister of India was supporting LTTE terrorist group and he was blasted into pieces and Sri Lankan President Premadasa  extended hand to them and He was blasted into pieces. Please do not help to bring this Terror to Canadian territory.

 
Racist Terrorism should be defeated. We should live as brothers and sisters of one country in Canada. Tamil Genocide Bill and Ontario Education Bill is a hindrance to the peaceful co-existence of Canadians in Canada as well as for Sri Lankans in Sri Lanka. Let ‘s reject both with due contempt it deserves. Let’s stop transplanting of Extremists’ Tamil racism from Sri Lanka to Canada. Let’s live like one race of human beings. Bonnie if you help Tamil Terrorists and Terrorist Sympathisers, you are doing a great mistake. Tamil terrorist propaganda machine is powerful but full of bogus and fabricated lies, created videos and pictures.

They even post innocent Civilians Killed by Tamil Terrorists as killed by Government forces. 

There was never a Genocide, In fact it was the other way May 18th Sri Lankan Armed forces saved more than 300,000 Tamils, who were kept by force, from the clutches of Tamil Terrorist Leader. In fact, the Tamil population in Sri Lanka has been going up all alone.

Only selected Terrorists were killed and millions of people were saved on the so-called Tamil Memorial day. IT IS NOT THE OTHER WAY.

The Terrorists were doing mass killing by blasting mass suicide bombs at Railway stations, Commercial centers, Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Also responsible for Killing thousands of innocent Civilians and Leaders of Sri Lanka including President of Sri Lanka, President of India Rajiv Gandhi, etc. It is time to stop this nonsense now.  

Please do not get carried away by false propaganda. Please do not issue any statements for bogus “Tamil Memorial day” hereafter – it is actually a Terrorist memorial day.

Vijitha Bulathsinghala
549 Novostar Drive 
Mississauga ON L5W1C8
416-505-0099

P.s. I am ready to meet you and share my knowledge with you if you need any information on Sri Lankan affairs related to the destruction of Sri Lanka by Tamil Terrorists. Be careful they pay and send people to work for you as volunteers during elections. Those people are supposed to work hard and win you.  So that you tend to believe what they say. PLEASE BE CAREFUL WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE YOU AS MAYOR FOR SOME MORE TIME PLEASE DON’T FORCE US TO VOTE AGAINST YOU.

Thank you, 
Vijitha Bulathsinghala FRI, CRES, CNE, ABR, MBA, B Sc.Civil Engineering
Certified Real Estate Specialist, Real Estate Broker, Insurance agent
A fellow member of Real Estate Institute of Canada, Accredited Buyer Representative, Certified Negotiation Expert, Cell –416-505-0099 2nd Cell 416-836-0380 Fax 905-670-3428
Email-bulath.com@gmail.com,   Website: www.bulath.com
Office-Century 21Leading Edge Realty Inc., T- 905-405-8484 Fax-905-405-8881 Remax “Hall of Fame”, “Centurion Producer 2010 – 2018″,”Top Producer” 2005,2006,2007,2010,2011,2012,2013,2014,2015

Genocide of Tamil people in Sri Lanka.

May 25th, 2020

Gyan de Mel. Melbourne.

LETTER SENT TO

Mr. Hugh McDermott MP: State Member for Prospect

24/05/2020

Dear Mr. McDermott,

Achieving your political ambitions by fuelling racial disharmony and insulting a sovereign nation.

This is in regard to the fictitious statement made by you about the genocide of Tamil people” in Sri Lanka.  Let me state categorically that you are engaging in the lowest form of gutter politics. How can you go so low?  You are continuing in the footsteps of politicians in the International Community” Eg. Britain,(David Cameron, David Miliband, Boris Johnston, ) Canada,((Justin Trudeau) the USA (Hilary Clinton, Robert Blake, Obama)  and some Nordic countries (Erik Solheim – Norway)  who deceive the Tamil people in their electorates. Similarly, the gullible Tamil souls in your electorate believe that your noble heart is bleeding because of the genocide” their kith and kin were subjected to during the civil disturbances in Sri Lanka. Just for a few stark lies in your Facebook” or a few juicy” words at some public function, these people will fund and support you all the way to the Australian Parliament. They make very good foot soldiers for any political campaign.

In your statement, you have quoted 160,000 innocent, unarmed men, women and children Many were murdered because of their culture, faith, language and traditions” Congratulations Hugh,  you have won the Numbers Game” Your  160,000 is at the top of the heap. Other numbers bandied by different people in the international community” are given for you reference: –

Navi Pillay UN High Commissioner for HR  2,800
Gordon Weiss. UN spokesperson in Colombo.  Civilian casualties  7,000
Gordon Weiss on his return to Australia 15,000
Gordon Weiss in his book The Cage” written in Australia  10,000 to 40,000
Journalists Frances Harrison & Alan Keenan  147,000
Journalists for Democracy and Channel 4.    147,676

Please be a gentleman and clarify how you computed the 160,000 innocent, unarmed, men, women and children. Were they inclusive or exclusive of the following categories: –

  1. the LTTE’s mostly unrecorded ‘blitz’ conscription of combatants and auxiliaries during the last five months;
  2. the unknown number of Tigers and civilians who slipped through the Navy cordon in 2009 and reached India;
  3. those who were killed by the Tigers during their escape into government controlled areas.
  4.  those who drowned when fleeing across Nanthikadal lagoon;  
  5. those corpses – from whatever cause – buried without a record being kept (then or subsequently in testimony);
  6. those corpses in the jungle that simply decomposed or became food for monitor lizards, jackals and termites; and finally
  7. the considerable number of Tigers and civilians who survived but slipped out of the detention centres before being formally registered.
  8. death by natural causes.

If genocide” were genuinely tugging at your heart-strings, you have to look no further than your backyard. You will see a well -planned genocide that was executed for more than 100 years. The ultimate aim of this extermination was to “eventually forget that there were ever any Aborigines in Australia”

The original owners of this land, were poisoned, hunted as animals, tortured, murdered, raped etc., and an entire generation uprooted from a land they occupied for 40,000 years.

The book The Killing Times” counts the human cost of more than a century of frontier bloodshed and how it would be swept under the carpet.

The truth of Australia’s history has long been hiding in plain sight.

The stories of The killing times” are the ones we have heard in secret, or told in hushed tones. They are not the stories that appear in our history books yet they refuse to go away.

The colonial journalist and barrister Richard Windeyer called it the whispering in the bottom of our hearts”. The anthropologist William Stanner described a national cult of forgetfulness”. A 1927 royal commission lamented our conspiracy of silence” ………….”

And a 1914 letter to the editor of the Northern Star, a newspaper published on the NSW north coast, gives you some insight into what was going on:

"Besides the Myall Creek massacre there were other and greater massacres perpetrated … for trivial offences, and sometimes for no substantial reason at all. The whites had a method of seeking retribution that was a disgrace to Christianity – that of punishing a tribe, probably an innocent one, for the crime of an individual. The whites, far from showing any regard for the lives of the original owners of the country, ignored all their rights as to property, and yet were most brutal when their own rights were transgressed."


Would you, Mr. McDermott, face the truth and speak about these people rather than speak on a subject you know absolutely nothing about, on a myth created by Western nations? Only one problem Mr. McDermott. The original owners of   Australia do not possess money to fund your political campaigns, but the Tamils do have plenty of the stuff.

Coming back to the issue of genocide”, if you sincerely want to know the truth about Sri Lanka, I invite you very sincerely, to come with me to Sri Lanka, where I can introduce you to ex-LTTE cadres who surrendered to the Security Forces and are now leading normal civilian lives. I also have video footage of how these people campaigned for the newly-elected President, who was supposed to be their sworn enemy. These young men and women were at the epi-centre of the conflict and lived to tell the story. Tamil people living in Australia are living in a world of bitter disappointment or are refugees who have told stories of torture and rape” to enter Australia through the back door.

Julie Bishop and Scott Morrison, when they were in the opposition, in February 2013, made an investigative journey to Sri Lanka, met independent individuals and politicians of all persuasions and concluded that life was fast returning to normal. They did not make an armchair” assessment of what was happening in that country. (video clip available)

Incidentally, I have withdrawn my membership of the Labour Party because I can no longer be associated with people who are the very epitome of dishonesty.

All the Best and take care,

Gyan de Mel.
Melbourne.

Sheep clothed Sumanthiran’s tiger spots exposed

May 25th, 2020

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

Sumanthiran, the protégé o9f Tamil separatists, since 2012 Singapore Agreement was signed with quisling Mangala Samaraweera was making all efforts together with Terrorist Grandpa Sambanthan against whom visual evidence of fund raising for the terrorists in Canada are available, to get a new constitution, a federal and secular constitution adopted and to repeal the existing constitution.  It was almost ready to be adopted but calling of the presidential election obstructed the sinister move and then this separatist promoter vigorously campaigned for Sajith Premadasa (SP) brazenly calling on Tamil voters to vote for SP to defeat the Sinhalese.(repeat to defeat the Sinhalese).

Having failed in all sinister moves from 2012 to 2019 this separatist Clone, sporting a sheep\s cloth has recently attempted to pretend that he is opposed to megalomaniac Prabhakaran’s ideals and his terrorist struggle and gas said that he does not acknowledge Prabhakaran’s armed struggle for a separate state, and he abhorred Jaathivaadaya and extremism.  His primordial allegiance with separatist policies is however well known even to elementary students.

If this hypocrite was genuinely opposed to Prabhgakaran’s strategies, being in the safe zone of Colombo during the 30 years of terrorist aggression why he remained silent without opposing Prabhakaran’s horrendous terrorist aggressions, closing of Mavil Aru anicut and depriving the innocent farmers’ cultivation and drinking water, suicide bombings targeting strategic places and buses and abduction of students in the North to be used as child soldiers and commend our war heroes for rescuing nearly 300,000 Tamil civilians who were being ferried by the terrorists using as human shields. 

The man who strongly urged to defeat the Sinhalese is now attempting to fool the Sinhalese (Gonaata Andanna) thinking as Prabhakaran said that Sinhalese will forget anything in one or two weeks and hence any atrocities can be caused to them as they will vanish into thin air.  

An important question that Chamuditha Samarawickrema has missed to ask was where was Sumanthiran all the years of terrorist aggression and who was responsible for bringing him to politics and the agenda that has been assigned to him?

Sumanthiran who was considered as the leader of the TNA in waiting as Sambanthan is in a Wala payay goda payay (one foot in the grave and the other on the surface) status has created a thundering storm in the TNA and Tamil political circles by the statements he made in the interview.  Four former TNA parliamentarians – Charles Nirmalanathan (Wanni), S. Sivamohan (Wanni), Easwaran Saravanapavan (Jaffna) and Mavai Senathirajah have written a letter to their leader Sampanthan, protesting against the remarks as to their view reportedly is that Prabhakaran had made a great sacrifice to win the rights of the Tamil people and Tamil youth had laid down their lives. These former MPs have said that Sampanthan should take whatever action he deems necessary and Sumanthiran should immediately be dismissed as the party’s media spokesman.

Samnbanthan in turn for reasons unknown has defended hypocrite Sumanthiran saying that the remarks have been made in his personal capacity although, in the nearly 22-minute interview, Sumanthiran does not say so. In this interview he has answered a variety of questions and continued to acknowledge the key role he played in the TNA and has said that  Sampanthan contacted him on all matters” related to the alliance before making decisions. He has also stated that he accepted the Sri Lanka national flag and the national anthem.

Charles Nirmalanathan yjr former MP for Wannidisreict has written a separate letter to Sampanthan stating that Sumanthiran has been expressing views opposing the ultimate sacrifice made by the LTTE for the sole purpose of the liberation of the Tamil people in the recent past. He has said that Sumanthiran should stop expressing critical views against the LTTE and has asked the old man to call for the Central Committee meeting of ITAK immediately to take a decision in this regard.”

Sumanthiran’s effigy tied to a lam[ [pst near the Nallur Kandaswamy Kovil which says that I am an enemy of the Tamil race”.  It was reported that similar effigies were found in some other parts of the North as well and even in Chennai, Tamil Nadu put up by the staunch LTTE supporter film producer Seeman who attended the Maavir day commemorations in Jaffna last Novermber..  

Northern political sources claim that he was trying to cut a deal with the ruling alliance.  The furthest is that he has moved away from his former Yahapalana partners and ambitiously leaned on the government. An Intelligence source said that when the Tiger guerrillas dominated the ground in the north during the separatist war, a close relative of Sumanthiran had been tied to the same lamppost and assaulted for being critical of them. Northern political sources also indicate that the lamp post effigy instances clearly show that there still remains a deep-rooted affinity in the minds of some of the people towards the former Tiger guerrillas. Most of them have lost a brother, sister or a relative to the movement and still regard them as martyrs.”

Making matters worse for Sumanthiran with northern voters was a meeting he held with Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa on May 13th  It was to be slotted originally for the previous day Tuesday, but two TNA former MPsSelvam  Adaikalanathan and Dharmalingam Siddharthan had raised issue with those at the Premier’s Office claiming that Sumanthiran alone cannot represent the TNA and the meeting should therefore be disallowed. Later, the matter has been resolved with other TNA leaders agreeing that Sumanthiran could go for the meeting since he was in Colombo.

Sunday Times Political Editor (STPE) on 17th May reported that by then Minister Douglas Devananda, having come to know about that Sumanthiran had sought a meeting with Premier Rajapaksa., he met the PM together with a group of his Central Committee members prior to Sumanthiran’s meeting and discussed a number of issues including the release of more private land to their owners in the Jaffna peninsula, the release of LTTE suspects and the conversion of the Oluvil Port in the east as a fisheries harbour. He has said that the port not fully operational, sand bars were forming and from the meeting, the Premier telephoned his Secretary Gamini Senarath and asked him to formulate a Cabinet Paper for this purpose.

STPE said that it was at 7.30 p.m. on Wednesday when Sumanthiran had a one-on-one meeting with Premier Rajapaksa at the latter’s Wijerama official residence. He had brought along with him a list of Tiger guerrilla suspects who have remained in custody for more than twenty years. This is a sequel to this issue being raised at Premier Rajapaksa’s May 3 meeting with former MPs. The Premier has told Sumanthiran that he would place the matter before President Gotabaya Rajapaksa whose task it was to take a decision on the matter and the government is not averse to releasing at least some of the cadres after a whetting process. The Premier has also told him that he wished to have a meeting with women who have been widowed by the separatist war when he visits Jaffna soon.

Sumanthiran has also discussed matters relating to a new Constitution and opined that the issue was whether the country should have a presidential system or revert to the parliamentary form of government saying that he preferred the latter. The Prime Minister has explained that it would depend on President Gotabaya Rajapaksa who had won the people’s mandate at the November presidential election and  he would brief the President on the issues discussed.

Commenting on the constitution issue the STPE says it is noteworthy that Sumanthiran should now talk of a return to a parliamentary system of governance but under the previous yahapalana” government, Sumanthiran was a principal architect when the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. Together with Jayampathy Wickremeratne,, they were responsible for drafting many a provision with the acquiescence of the UNP. That is not all. At his, and Sampanthan’s behest, the TNA supported legislation under the previous regime to put off elections to Provincial Councils (PC). It was paradoxical from a party that had demanded more devolution of power to make the PCs stronger. Even today, not one PC is functioning.

STPE further states that Sumanthiran’s remarks, which he has now claimed are personal, will nevertheless impact on the voters at the impending parliamentary elections and in a bid to do some damage control, Sumanthiran has now told Tamil social media that he did not criticised the Tiger guerrillas or Velupillai Prabhakaran. However, the recorded video interview in Sinhala, has gone viral.

Reoports said thatcriiticism against him in the Tamil social media has been on the increase and there is little doubt it will place him on a confrontation course with the Tamil diaspora. Sections of them are demanding a public apology that should also endorse the contribution or sacrifices the guerrillas and their leader have made for Tamils.

Sumanthiran’s meeting on Wednesday with Premier Rajapaksa at his Wijerama Road residence

The foreign based pro-terrorist racist scribe D,B,S,Jeyaraj stated that the past week or more saw Sumanthiran being attacked viciously by many in a heated exhibition of ‘manufactured rage’ over the mainstream Tamil media and social media within and outside Sri Lanka. A number of media statements were issued by Tamil politicians condemning Sumanthiran.

He said a common factor in most of the rants and raves was the labeling of Sumanthiran as a Tamil traitor.and effigies of Sumanthiran were displayed with a placard around the neck saying Naan Our Thamizh Thurogi” (I am a Tamil traitor)


In a desperate attempt to defend Sumanthiran Jeyaraj says that Sumanthiran himself released a 12-minute YouTube video where he gave an ‘explanation’ of what had actually transpired and how his interview in Sinhala was being distorted by interested parties to vilify and attack him and the ex-MP from Jaffna stated that he had responded with restraint to many hostile questions by the interviewer as he wanted to explain some points rationally to a Sinhala audience.

Jeyaraj says that Sumanthiran pointed out that a TV aligned to the ruling regime had taken a few of his comments out of context and publicized them in Tamil in a distorted manner and to his credit Sumanthiran defiantly stood by all that he had actually stated in the interview while denying the unfounded accusations of his critics. Jeyaraj adds that this YouTube video by Sumanthiran turned the tide in his favour as far as sensible people were concerned.

In further defense of Smanthiran, Jeyaraj says the targeting of Sumanthiran as a ‘Tamil traitor’ indicates that the recurring phenomenon of ‘traitorisation’ is occurring again within the sphere of Tamil nationalist politics in Sri Lanka and reminds that he has written about this tragic curse afflicting the Tamil people in the past and – given its longevity – he may have to write about it in the future too. It is against this backdrop therefore this pro-terrorist scribe says that he makes some specific observations on the traitorzing tragedy in the Tamil polity relying to some extent on his earlier writings.

This pro-terrorist scribe says that in this writing he uses the word traitorisation instead of treachery or treason in order to differentiate between those who are actually treacherous or really are committing treason as opposed to those being falsely accused or labeled as ‘traitorous’ or traitors. The reality is that most persons dubbed as traitors or ‘thurogigal’ by their political opponents are not ‘guilty’ as charged and do not deserve such a description. ‘Traitorisation’ is a terrible ‘Goebbelsian’ process by which political rivals are falsely portrayed or depicted as traitors.

The ‘traitor’ label in contemporary Tamil political discourse refers generally to Tamils accused of working against the so-called Tamil cause and/or collaborating with the enemy. Concrete proof of such conduct is not necessary. What is required is a massive propaganda effort by which the cry ‘traitor’ is repeated incessantly at multiple levels as advocated by Herr Goebbels in Nazi Germany and the s Goebbelsian approach is patently visible in the orchestrated attacks on Sumanthiran. Tamil nationalist politics made use of the Goebbels technique liberally in dubbing those perceived political rivals as traitors. Merely holding a different political view was sufficient to be called traitors to the cause or collaborators with the enemy. The problem was that both the cause and enemy were difficult to define clearly. Moreover, the nature of the cause as well as the identity of enemy underwent changes periodically. Despite these variations, what has remained constant is the practice of traitorisation.

In order to justify his attempts to protect Sumanthiran this pro-terrorist scribe presents long narrations from the past political activities covering the periods of G.G.Ponnambalam. Chelvanayagam and up to Neelan Thiruchelvam which I have omitted mentioning here as they were  irrelevant to Sumanthiran’s issue. 

Meanwhile the Tamil Guardian published from London reported that Sumanthiran has denied that was critical of the LTTE and Prabhakaran and said that his statements in the interview with Chamuditha had been mistranalated and misquoted by the Tamil media and the vested interests.

How the Speaker deprived the franchise of judges, lawyers, university lecturers, teachers, public servants, journalists and other citizens in 2015, which was secured by the Supreme Court in 2002.*

May 25th, 2020

Aruna Laksiri Unawatuna B.Sc(Col), PGDC(Col), AAL

1.) The 19th Amendment Bill was first presented to the Parliament in 2002 by amending Article 70 of the Constitution to remove the power of the President to dissolve the Parliament one year later.

2.) Seven Supreme Court judges unanimously decided on the 2002 bill, amending the 70th Article of the Constitution for removing the president’s power to dissolve the Parliament one year later which requires to  be passed by  the special majority and approved by the people at a  referendum.

The final paragraphs of the determination are as follows;

“[(3)    The  inconsistency  with  Article  3  read  with  the  relevant provisions  of  Article  4  would  cease  if  clauses  2,  3,  4  and5 are deleted and substituted with an appropriate amendment to proviso  (a)  to Article 70 (1) of the Constitution by removing the  period  of  one  year  in  the  proviso  and  substituting  that with  a  period  not  exceeding  three  years.

SARATH  N.  SILVA,  CJ.

S.  W.  B.  WADUGODAPITIYA,  J.

DR.  SHIRANI  A.  BANDARANAYAKE,  J.

A.  ISMAIL,  J.

P.  EDUSSURIYA,  J.

H.  S.  YAPA,  J.

J.  A.  N.  DE  SILVA,  J.

Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution unconstitutional and requires to  be passed by  the  special majority and approved by the  people at a  referendum  subject  to  item  3  of the  determination.)]”

3.) The Supreme Court determination of the 19th ammendment bill of 2002 can be read by selecting the following link of the website of the Ministry of Justice.

https://www.lawnet.gov.lk/2002/12/31/in-re-the-nineteenth-amendment-to-the-constitution/

(The above mentioned Supreme Court determination will be provided in Sinhala language by the writer in the near future.)

4.) The 19th Amendment Bill which was presented to the Parliament in 2002 was  abandoned because the Supreme Court stated that the 19th Ammendment should be approved by the  people at a  referendum.

5.) For the second time, the 19th Ammendment of the Constitution was presented to the parliament in 2015 for ammending another 16 provisions of the Constitution and also for removing the president’s power in Article 70 of the constitution regarding the dissolving the Parliament one year later.

(Total of 17 provisions including 16 new provisions and the other provison of

removal of the power of the President to dissolve the Parliament one year after as in 2002)

6.) The Supreme Court determination was delivered in 2015 by three Supreme Court judges for 16 out of 17 provisions of the 19th Amendment Bill that was presented to Parliament for the 2nd time.

7.) The Supreme Court determination of the 19th ammendment bill of 2015 can be read by selecting the following link of the website of the Parliament.

https://www.parliament.lk/si/business-of-parliament/sc-decisions-on-bills

(The above mentioned Supreme Court determination will also be provided in Sinhala language by the writer in the near future.)

8.) In 2015, the Supreme Court decided on 16 provisions, other than the provision which seven Supreme Court judges had made a determination  on the removal of the President’s power to dissolve Parliament a year later by amending Article 70 of the 19th Amendment in 2002.

9.) In 2015, the Speaker of the Parliament violated the last proviso of Article 79, Sub Article 80.2 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court determination regarding the 19th ammendment in 2002 and also did not consider both the determinations of 2002 and 2015  ( all 17 provisions) of the 19th Amendment of the Constitution, although it was legally required to do so.

10.) The Speaker deprived the franchise of the President, Supreme Court judges, other judges, lawyers, university lecturers, teachers, public servants, journalists and all other citizens by violating the decision of the referendum given for the ammendment of article 70 which was secured by the Supreme Court.

11.) The Executive and the Judiciary’s ‘soundless procedure’ regarding the fact that the Speaker of Parliament acted in contravention of the unanimous determination of the Supreme Court in 2002 and deprived the referendum franchise right of the people raises serious doubt about the people’s voting right which belongs to excercising their sovereignty.

12.) Who are the so-called (Maha) democrats who deprived the referendum franchise right which was given to the people by the Supreme Court in the 19th Ammendment in 2002, with an English conspiracy in 2015?

Why is that?

* [This  is an English translation of the writer’s article dated 16.05.2020 –

“ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය විසින් 2002දී තහවුරු කළ විනිසුරුවරු, නීතිඥවරු , විශ්ව විද්‍යාල කථිකාචාර්යවරු, ගුරුවරු, රජයේ සේවකයන්, මාධ්‍යවේදීන් ඇතුළු ඡන්ද දායකයන්ගේ ඡන්ද බලය 2015 දී කථානායකවරයා විසින් අහිමි කළ ආකාරය. 

Aruna Laksiri Unawatuna

B.Sc(Col), PGDC(Col), AAL

Email <arunaunawatuna@gmail.com>

The Newsroom – America is not the greatest country in the world anymore…(Restricted language)

May 25th, 2020

tpratt441

Will McAvoy (Jeff Daniels) hits the nail straight on the head in the opening minutes on HBO’s new series ‘The Newsroom’. He is asked by a college student a simple question during a campus debate. ‘What makes America the greatest country in the world?’. Daniels initially goes the politically correct route then at the last minute goes with a honest, bold, straight forward answer that sums up a lot of the worlds problems that so many are afraid to accept because we all want to believe in our system and that it is our system that works. The evidence that is out there today is to the contrary and he discloses such information in his argument. We used to be the worlds best of the best and now we are just pretending. The first step to solving a problem is to admit there is one.

Flight from Qatar cancelled after 70 COVID-19 patients found among previous arrivals

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

A flight with Sri Lankan passengers which was scheduled to arrive in the country tomorrow from Qatar was cancelled after more than 70 COVID-19 patients were found among the 466 passengers previously arrived from Qatar and at quarantine centres, Additional Secretary to the President for Foreign Relations Jayanath Colombage said.

He said previous passengers arrived in the country from Kuwait on May 19. 

The cancelled flight (UL218) was scheduled to leave from Doha at 5.45 a.m with 273 Sri Lankan Passengers.

However, a senior official of the airport said a large number of persons including Airport service personnel, health service officers and armed forces personals had taken to PCR tests at the airport today following the arrival of 466 Sri Lankan passengers from Kuwait on May 19.

Meanwhile, an Emirates flight had arrived in the country from Dubai with one Sri Lankan passenger who was stranded in South Africa for two months.

That passenger was a technical officer attached to the Emirates Airlines. He has been stranded in South Africa for two months after completing his trainings. (T.K.G. Kapila)

Eighteen more COVID-19 cases confirmed in Sri Lanka

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Eighteen more persons have been diagnosed as Coronavirus infected patients increasing the tally of confirmed cases in Sri Lanka to 1,182.

The Ministry of Health said that all new positive cases are returnees from Kuwait.

Forty-one new cases of COVID-19 have been identified so far within the day.

A total of 477 patients who have tested positive for the virus are currently under medical care while the number of recoveries in the country stands at 695.

The 10th death due to the virus was reported in Sri Lanka today after a 52-year-old woman, who had returned from Kuwait and had been undergoing quarantine at the Trincomalee center, succumbed to the virus this evening.

Sri Lanka confirms 10th death from coronavirus

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka reported its tenth death from the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, a short while ago, confirmed Director General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

A female who had arrived from Kuwait and had been undergoing quarantine at the Trincomalee quarantine center has succumbed to the virus in this manner.

The 52-year-old deceased woman had been suffering from heart conditions prior to death, the Director-General said.

Accordingly the total number of deaths reported in the country due to COVID-19 has now reached 10.

Meanwhile, the total count of coronavirus cases reported in the country is at 1,162.

Currently, 458 active cases are under medical care at selected hospitals across the country, as per the Epidemiology Unit.

A total of 695 COVID-19 patients have been discharged from the hospital upon complete recovery from the illness

Flight repatriating Sri Lankans from Qatar cancelled

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The special flight scheduled to bring back stranded Sri Lankans from Qatar tomorrow morning (May 26) has been canceled.

A SriLankan Airlines charter flight was previously scheduled to leave the Bandaranaike International Airport (BIA) at 5.45 am tomorrow to repatriate 273 Sri Lankans from Doha, Qatar.

This is in the backdrop of 70 among 466 individuals who were repatriated from Kuwait on May 19 have tested positive for COVID-19. Further, one of the returnees succumbed to the virus earlier this evening (25) marking Sri Lanka’s 10th death from the disease.

A large number of airport workers, health service personnel, and military personnel who had provided the necessary service for the group which arrived from Kuwait on May 19 at the BIA, were subjected to PCR testing yesterday (24).

Meanwhile, a Sri Lankan who had been unable to return to the island from South Africa arrived in Sri Lanka last evening through an Emirates flight from Dubai. He, a technical officer of the Emirates Airlines had visited South Africa for a training program.

Seychelles issues statement on arrival of 35 Seychelles nationals in Sri Lanka

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The High Commission of the Republic of Seychelles issued a statement on the recently disputed incident of admitting a group of Seychelles national to Sri Lanka for urgent medical treatment.

The High Commission stated that 35 citizens of Seychelles – 24 of whom require urgent medical care, of which 11 critical patients are being accompanied by their relatives -were admitted into Sri Lanka on May 23, before promptly being directed to a hotel in Waskaduwa to be quarantined under the monitoring of the Sri Lanka Army and the Ministry of Health.

According to the statement, PCR tests carried out on all 35 passengers by both countries have produced negative results for COVID-19.

On completion of the mandatory quarantine period set by the Sri Lankan government the Seychelles nationals will be admitted to the Hemas Hospitals in Thalawathugoda and Wattala to continue their treatment and procedures, read the statement.

The High Commission also noted that Seychelles had only reported 11 cases of coronavirus infections in total, the last infection being identified on May 06. Further, no deaths have been recorded which gives the country a clean COVID-19 bill.

Stating that Sri Lanka had been a preferred destination for medical tourism among the Seychelles nationals the High Commission states that this travel is testament to the trust and credibility on the health system of Sri Lanka.

This also highlights the confidence Seychelles has on Sri Lanka as a safe destination to send their non COVID patients for treatment even during a pandemic”, read the statement.

Full statement issued by the High Commission:

On behalf of the Government of Seychelles, we wish to place on record our gratitude to the Government of Sri Lanka, its Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Health, for enabling the visit of a group of 35 citizens of Seychelles, 24 of whom require urgent medical care, of which 11 critical patients are being accompanied by their relatives, for coronary angiography and angioplasty, tetralogy fallout corrective surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, retinal detachment repair and many other high end surgery and interventions.

The group arrived in Sri Lanka on Saturday, 23rd May, on a special Air Seychelles flight.  This turnaround flight took back 14 Seychelles nationals who found themselves stranded in Sri Lanka due to the current situation and then onto Chennai to evacuate more Seychellois.

The patients have fulfilled all precautionary measures including the PCR Tests in Seychelles and were cleared for foreign travel. On arrival, they were transferred to a hotel in Wadduwa for paid quarantine and were under the watchful eyes of Sri Lanka Army and Ministry of Health, thereby complying fully with the quarantine protocol of the Government of Sri Lanka. The HEMAS Hospital medical team was present at the quarantine center to receive the patients, assess their health condition and to decide on the care plan while in quarantine. The HEMAS Laboratory team extracted the PCR samples from all 35 citizens of Seychelles and was sent for immediate testing. All tests were negative.

On completion of the quarantine period and clearance obtained after a second round of PCR testing for Covid 19, they will be admitted to Hemas Hospitals in Thalawathugoda and Wattala to continue their treatment and procedures.

The Seychelles side further wishes to state that there has been no active Covid -19 cases in Seychelles since 07th May 2020 after the last of 11 positive patients was discharged from its qrantined centre. It is also to be noted that Seychelles is testing for seven gene targets with RSPCR, making the test accurate in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Seychelles implemented very strict measures to contain and control the spread of the virus and its international airport is only to be reopened on 1st June 2020.  The last case (11th) was detected on 6th April and no deaths have been recorded which gives the country a clean COVID-19 bill.

Sri Lanka has been a preferred destination for medical tourism among the Seychelles nationals over last few years and we wish to thank Hemas Hospitals for their untiring effort in facilitating the visit of this group of patients and wish to state that this travel is testament to the trust and credibility on the health system of Sri Lanka. This also highlights the confidence Seychelles has on Sri Lanka as a safe destination to send their non COVID patients for treatment even during a pandemic. We salute the armed forces and the medical teams in Sri Lanka led by His Excellency President Gotabhaya Rajapakse for managing the pandemic very well that has given us the confidence to select Sri Lanka for medical treatment for foreign patients needing urgent critical care.

This is yet another milestone in promoting the long standing bilateral relationship between the two nations.”

WHO pauses tests for hydroxychloroquine amid safety concerns

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The World Health Organization on Monday suspended its trial of hydroxychloroquine, the drug backed by President Donald Trump to combat the deadly coronavirus. 

The Executive Group has implemented a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm within the Solidarity Trial while the safety data is reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters at a press briefing.

The other arms of the trial are continuing,” Tedros said. This concern relates to the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in Covid-19. I wish to reiterate that these drugs are accepted as generally safe for use in patients with autoimmune diseases or malaria.”

Hydroxychloroquine, which Trump has repeatedly touted as a potential game-changer in fighting the coronavirus, is an anti-malarial drug that’s also used by doctors to treat rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

Numerous clinical trials are looking to see if it’s effective in fighting the coronavirus, but it is not a proven treatment.

But despite the lack of scientific evidence presenting hydroxychloroquine as a viable coronavirus treatment option, Trump told reporters earlier this month that he has been taking the drug to avoid contracting the disease. 

I happen to be taking it,” Trump said during a roundtable event at the White House.

A lot of good things have come out. You’d be surprised at how many people are taking it, especially the front-line workers. Before you catch it. The front-line workers, many, many are taking it.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC. 

The outbreak has spread to dozens of countries, with more than 5.4 million confirmed cases worldwide and over 345,059 deaths, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. There are at least 1.6 million cases in the United States and at least 97,000 deaths, according to the latest tallies.

Source: CNBC
-Agencies

Govt mulls limiting repatriation of Sri Lankans stranded abroad

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The government is currently looking into limiting the repatriation of Sri Lankans who are stuck overseas due to the COVID-19 pandemic, stated Director-General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

He points out that the arrival of a large number of people from foreign countries could be problematic in a context where the issue of Sri Lanka Navy infections has not been resolved as of yet.

Therefore, the government may take a decision to restrict the repatriation of Sri Lankans abroad, Jasinghe said.

Meanwhile, nearly 50 guidelines for carrying out various social activities are set to be released within the upcoming 2 days, the Director-General of Health Services said.

The relevant guideline will inform the general public on action to be followed once the curfew is lifted, he added.

Those who fail to maintain social distance will be arrested – Ajith Rohana

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Individuals who do not maintain social distance once the curfew is lifted will be arrested from tomorrow (May 26) onwards, stated DIG Ajith Rohana.

He mentioned this speaking to the Ada Derana’Big Focus’ program today (25).

Accordingly, any person who does not maintain the prescribed social distance, whether at queues or in buses, they will be arrested and prosecuted under Section 264 of the Penal Code of Sri Lanka, he said.

The DIG further said if convicted of such an offense, one could face up to six months in prison.

Joining the program, Minister Mahinda Amaraweera said that buses can transport passengers only up to the number of seats available.

The National Transport Commission has been instructed to take necessary legal action if a bus is found transporting passengers exceeding the number of seats available on the bus, the Minister said.

With the ease of curfew regulations tomorrow, traveling between districts except in the two districts of Colombo and Gampaha will be permitted.

Inter-provincial bus services will also recommence operations from tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the Railways Department will be deploying 29 trains for the general public to reach Colombo.

However, those who wish to take the train may enter the train station only if they hold the token provided by the Railways Department once the passenger is registered at the Department through their employee ID, said Deputy General Manager of Railways A. D. G. Seneviratne.

Guidelines issued by the health authorities, including disinfection, wearing face masks, washing hands from time to time, and maintaining social distance should strictly be followed during the use of public transportation, stated President’s Media Division.

Colombo and Gampaha will reopen after 66 days – Curfew lifted at 5.00am

May 25th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

Curfew lifted at 5.00am tomorrow Tuesday 26 May 

The curfew imposed in Colombo and Gampaha districts for more than two months will be temporarily relaxed tomorrow.

This is with the two day all Island curfew that will be lifted tomorrow (Tuesday, 26 May) at 5.00 am. Curfew will be effective only between 10.00 pm to 4.00 am daily in all the districts in the island from tomorrow, May 26th onwards until further notice.

Following the detection of the first Sri Lankan coronavirus patient in Sri Lanka on March 11, police curfew was imposed on March 20 in order to curb the spread of the virus.

However, after 52 days, curfew that was imposed in all districts of the island except for Colombo and Gampaha was relaxed under the program to restore the normalcy of civilian life.

Curfew lifted guidelines have to be followed

The police stated that although the curfew has been relaxed from tomorrow, guidelines prescribed by the health authorities to prevent the spread of the Coronavirus should strictly be followed during the operations of factories, institutes, offices and shops as well as public transportation.

Speaking at a press conference held at the Police Headquarters today, DIG Ajith Rohana stated that action will be taken tomorrow to arrest persons who do not maintain social distancing.

Hotels, restaurants and cafes in Colombo, approved by the Tourist Board permitted to open

Colombo Municipal council states that the Tourist Board approved hotels and restaurants within its limits could be opened for business effective tomorrow.  

Chief Medical Officer of the Council, Ruwan Wijemuni said such business entities should follow strict health guidelines while in operation.

Gyms, pavement hawkers, weekly fairs not permitted to operate still

Meanwhile, food outlets, gyms/bodybuilding centers, weekly fairs and pavement traders throughout the country are not permitted to operate at this time.

Railways – can get in with work ID

Meanwhile, the General Manager of Railways Dilantha Fernando stated that due to the addition of extra compartments for the trains, people who have not registered with the Department of Railways will be able to travel after producing their office Identity cards.

He further stated that the general public can use the trains in all districts excluding Colombo and Gampaha districts.

However, the Secretary of the Railway Engine Drivers Union Indika Dodamgoda stated that the trains deployed is not sufficient due to the prevailing situation.

Bus Service – 5000 buses deployed

Meanwhile, inter-provincial bus services will also be allowed to operate from tomorrow onwards in all districts except Colombo and Gampaha. Chairman of the Sri Lanka Transport Board Kingsley Ranawaka stated that 5000 buses have been deployed for this purpose.

Similarly, Minister Mahinda Amaraweera requested the public of Colombo and Gampaha districts to use buses for service requirements only.

Buses operating from the Southern Expressway will be travelling only to Kottawa. The bus service will commence at 4.30 am and will end at 6.00 pm. The fare should be charged only to the location a passenger is dropped and the buses should display the destination in the front.

The National Transport Commission has also decided to extend the present validity period of the permit of the buses up to June 30.

The Ministry issued a statement regarding the decisions taken at the meeting.

Buses travelling along five routes to Colombo will not enter Colombo but stop at the entry points as noted below.

Inter-provincial buses coming to Colombo on Kandy road will be limited to Nittambuwa.
Inter-provincial buses coming to Colombo route 5 will be limited to Minuwangoda
Inter-provincial buses coming to Colombo on Galle Road will be limited to Panadura
Inter-provincial buses coming to Colombo via Avissawella on low level and high-level roads limited to Avissawella.
Inter-provincial buses coming to Colombo on Negombo Road from Puttalam and Kuliyapitiya will be limited to Negombo. 

Similarly, with the curfew in the Colombo district being lifted tomorrow, there is a trend of cleaning up the city and a group of cleaning workers have expressed their views.

Colombo stock exchange operational hours extended

Meanwhile, it was announced that the Colombo Stock Exchange will resume trading tomorrow. Renuke Wijayawardhane, the Chief Regulatory Officer has stated that the CSE has decided to extend the trading hours from Tuesday 26th May 2020 as set out below:

Pre-open session – from 10.30 a.m. to 11.00 a.m. Open Auction – at 11.00 a.m.
Regular Trading – will commence after the Open Auction at 11.00 a.m. Market close – at 2.30 p.m.

Weddings 

In addition, the Ministry of Health states that it is illegal to bring more than 100 people to weddings even if there is a large seating capacity in the hall.

The ministry also announced the need to maintain the minimum number of participants and to maintain personal distance in accordance with health instructions during the festivals.

During the time the function is held, it should be based on health guidelines including maintaining individual distancing of one meter. Only a maximum of 40 percent of the usual number of guests the hall can accommodate under normal situations, should be invited. 

The guidelines include hand washing before entering the halls, disinfecting the utensils and furniture before the event, temperature checks, wearing of face masks, ventilation, avoiding physical greetings, displaying health guidelines and several other instructions. Responsibility is with the people However, it is the people who are at the forefront of the entire effort to restore normalcy to civilian life.

The Director General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasinghe stated that the coronavirus can be eradicated from the country only if people follow proper health procedures.

Sooka’s ITJP is a National Security threat: Sri Lanka must question EU & take Legal Action

May 24th, 2020

No Vetting for Sri Lanka’s New Major Generals”is the latest of Sooka’s witch hunt against Sri Lanka and adds to her record of issuing close to 70 reports against Sri Lanka since 2009. The disclosure of military details publicly by a foreign government funded entity raises serious concerns about the security and risks to the lives of Sri Lanka’s military personnel. The concern is valid given the debacle faced in 2002 as a result of disclosing military intelligence details that led to LTTE assassinating 58 intelligence personnel and close to 80 intelligence operatives whose identities had been disclosed to LTTE. It is clear that this witch hunt is by remnants of the LTTE operating from overseas and if the lives of these gallant officers that contributed to deliver peace in Sri Lanka are in any way compromised Sooka and her ITJP must take direct accountability. The GoSL must take serious note of the increasing threats to the Armed Forces.

Sooka or her ITJP have no legitimacy beyond the fact that they are a foreign funded entity. On what basis can they make public statements regarding the decisions of a sovereign country and publicize personal details of the armed forces. Is this not indirectly exposing them and making them an open target for misadventure similar to what took place in the Millennium City debacle of 2002?

Where does it say that an elected President of a sovereign country has to seek permission from a foreign government funded foreign NGO to appoint or promote military officers to its National Army? That’s the first question ITJP and Sooka must answer.

If Yasmin Sooka can question the choice of individuals and claim them as ‘highly politicized’ we too would like to question who Sooka is to pass judgement. She is not an elected political leader, she is nothing but a paid employee of a foreign government.

We would also like to know who she defines ‘victims’ – is it the victims of LTTE or the LTTE to whose events she gets welcomed as comrade – no wonder she sees the gesture of Maj. Gen. Priyankara Fernando as a crime and not the stomach slitting of pregnant mothers by LTTE during its attacks on villages or the butchery of other innocent unarmed victims of LTTE.

For Sooka a hand gesture is a crime but LTTE shooting to death 146 Buddhists in prayer in Sri Maha Bodhiya Temple Anuradhapura and killing 147 Muslims inside Kattankudy mosque is not even worthy of mention or even a report. A woman who has not said a word against LTTE’s crimes or produced a single report on LTTE crimes has no business to be making statements against anyone. It just completely nullifies her credibility.

Her apparent bias is further strengthened in claiming Isaipriya as a ‘Tamil TV presenter’ when she was SHOBA the LTTE TV anchor. Isaipriya’s LTTE ID card was 03424-T ESAYRUVI. She was married to senior LTTE Trincomalee sea tiger Siri Ram. She is no civilian and any female combatant dying during exchange of hostilities cannot feature as a civilian dead in any report.

Who are these torture suspects that the ITJP has interviewed? While she is rolling out the curriculum vitae of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces with their brigade details etc, why is she keeping secret the details of the ITJP interviewees. Is she hiding their identity because they are runaway LTTE?

Out of curiosity, given that her entity is not even set up to monitor Sri Lanka, why is her concentration only on Sri Lanka? What about civilian casualties from collateral damage by US and NATO bombings in countries they are illegally intervening in? How about running a dossier on these US NATO pilots and armed forces dropping bombs or shooting civilians? What is preventing her producing reports and naming Western army personnel?

Why is she gunning after only Sri Lankan Armed Forces? Sooka, your answers are long overdue.

Sooka is issuing these reports courtesy ITJP – International Truth & Justice Project which is incidentally administered by the Foundation for Human Rights in South Africa. The FHR was set up in 1996 funded by the EU to deal with issues related to South Africa. Sooka was its Executive Director from 2001 to September 2019.  This means she was an EU employee while being selected as a member for the Ban Ki Moon personal report.

If the funding by EU is for South Africans, is EU funding ITJP too? If not, why is ITJP administered within a EU funding project for South Africa? 

However, though she left FHR as its Executive Director in September 2019 there has been 13 reports since September 2019 on Sri Lanka. 9 ITJP reports in 2020 alone. Does this mean Sooya is still part of FHR but only ITJP? This type of witch hunt under the façade of human rights, accountability and other mumbo jumbo cannot denigrate a sovereign state and its armed forces and character assassinate their personalities and career track records.

Besides all this Sooka and the entity cannot be allowed to jeopardize their lives by exposing their details publicly. The US, UK, NATO or even India will not allow disclosure of their military personnel. The GoSL must also protect its Armed Forces by not allowing some publicity-seeking hardly known entities to make public, personal details about Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces.

The GOSL through the Foreign Ministry must question the EU and the South African Government as well as the present Board of the FHR regarding Sooka’s role in FHR and in particular reconfirm if ITJP continues to be administered within the FHR by Sooka.

If Sooka has left FHR as Executive Director does it mean she is still continuing the ITJP within the FHR or has ITJP been transferred elsewhere, if so, where to? ITJP’s latest report continues to be part of the FHR so we now question whether Sooka is still part of the FHR to continue ITJP work in which case EU, South African Government & FHR would still need to provide Sri Lanka an explanation.

The GoSL in protecting Sri Lanka’s Armed Forces and Intelligence Personnel must seek legal consultation to take action against ITJP and all entities linked to it for exposing personal details of a National Army and issue notices to them that they will be personally held responsible if any harm should come to them. 

Shenali D Waduge

US singer Cher champions release of Kavan, Sri Lanka’s ‘lonely elephant’ from a Pakistani zoo

May 24th, 2020

Kavan, the elephant has been in Murghazar Zoo, Islamabad, Pakistan since 1987 when he was gifted by President J R Jayawardena to Pakistan’s President Gen. Zia-ur Haq. Just 1 years old he was taken from his mother and given as a State gift to another country. Sri Lanka’s leaders did not think to seek permission from Kavan’s mother. What mother would like to have her precious child taken away and sent across the seas, never to be seen again? It was a morally wrong Presidential decision sans compassion. Were there no better gifts to give in exchange for diplomatic pleasantries?

Kavan lost his companion Saheli who arrived from Bangladesh in 1990 and died in 2012. Kavan had no companion since and loneliness was affecting him badly. He soon came to be known as Pakistan’s lonely elephant. It was in 2016 that American singer Cher heard about Kavan.

She inquired about him from Zoo officials in Pakistan. She petitioned for his freedom and she kept the struggle to free Kavan.  Good news arrives 4 years later.

A Pakistani court in Islamabad has given Kavan his freedom after 33 years cooped up in a zoo.

Kavan is to be a slave no more and Cher has played a major role to secure his freedom. Where does Kavan go to now is the question we all want answered. Kavan can no longer be put into a zoo. He must be allowed to move with fellow elephants in his home Sri Lanka and Sri Lanka’s officials and animal rights groups must ensure Kavan finally enjoys his freedom.

Singer Cher must be applauded for campaigning for 4 years to secure his release having felt saddened by photos of the elephant living alone and held in chains. Naturally Cher is jubilant. She had broken into tears hearing the news.

Even humans came to value freedom during lockdown with covid-19. Animals began to enjoy freedom as a result of humans being under lockdown. These lessons cannot be ignored. How humans felt imprisoned inside their homes is the life animals suffer inside zoos.  Animals too have feelings just like humans and the only thing setting animals and humans apart is our ability to speak.  Arahant Mahinda declared to King Devanampiyatissa some 2300years ago:

Oh! Great King, the birds of the air and the beasts have an equal right to live and move about in any part of this land as thou.

The land belongs to the peoples and all other beings and thou art only the guardian of it”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/22/cher-sheds-tears-of-joy-as-pakistans-loneliest-elephant-wins-freedom

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/05/pakistan-free-elephant-kaavan-campaign-singer-cher-200522082957974.html

(those who have not heard Cher — here’s some of her most memorable songs)

Shenali D Waduge

VEN. ELLAWALA MEDHANANDA Part 3

May 24th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Ven. Ellawala Medhananda was very active politically. He took an active part in settling Sinhalese in Maduru Oya, in the 1980s, when Accelerated Mahaweli” started, Gamini Dissanayake; Minister for Mahaweli had asked Ven. Medhananda to do a study of the history of the Mahaweli region. While engaged in this, Medhananda had met Ven.  Kithalagama  Seelalankara of  Dimbulagala.  

Ven. Kithalagama  had come to Toppigala area in 1960s.   He  created the  Dimbulagala vihara and had   started to settle Sinhalese in the surrounding  area  when the Mahaweli scheme started. Mahaweli scheme included the  development of Maduru Oya basin in the  Batticaloa district.

Dimbulagala and Medhananda decided that the best way to prevent  LTTE coming into the East was to settle Sinhalese in the Maduru Oya area.    ‘We settled the excess population from Hingurakgoda  and Minneriya, numbering 40,000 in Toppigala, Kunchanamalai,  Nelugala,  Atubandigala,  Vesibandigala and  Piyangala.     We informed President  JR  Jayewardene that we were going to settle Sinhalese there. JR was against this, but we  continued  with the project, recalled Medhananda .

The settlers were    assaulted and chased away, on JR’s orders, by Paul Perera, said Medhananda .  UNP Minister Paul Perera was  the invisible leader of the Gampaha underworld, observed Dharman Wickremaratne. The houses of the settlers were set on fire. The settlers  took refuge in Dimbulagala pasala. They were later sent to Dollar and Kent farms  where they were  killed, said  Medhananda.

Sociologist Asoka Bandarage confirms this. Ven. Kithalagama Seelalankara had  led the movement to settle some    40,000 landless Sinahla peasants  in Maduru oya, she observed. The proposed settlement of Sinhalese on Maduru oya right bank  came under opposition from  Tamil separatists and international donors. Under their growing pressure JR ordered the forcible removal of all settlers. The settlements were dismantled and the Sinhalese displaced. Subsequently Maduru oya and 20 other small projects were close down,  concluded Bandarage..

In 2008, Medhananda went to courts to stop Muslim encroachment on to Dighavapi lands. This  is case  no SC FR 178/08. Ven. Ellawala Medananda thero vs. District secretary, Ampara and others

Medhananda was joined by other petitioners for this case. They included   the Viharadhipathi of the Deeghavapi Raja Maha Viharaya, the President of the Dighavapi Surakeemay Sanvidanaya, the Deeghavapi Pratisanskarana Sabhawa and other bhikkhus who, coming from different Buddhist organizations, represented the interests of persons concerned in preserving the Deeghavapi Raja Maha Viharaya.

The petitioners informed court that 60 acres of land to the south of the Dighavapi Raja Maha Viharaya was given to 500 Muslim families without a good reason. Sinhalese who had requested land were not given any. The settlement of such a large number of Muslims within  close proximity to Dighavapi Raja Maha Vihara would have an adverse effect on the temple.

The Petitioners submitted that the Deeghavapi Raja Maha Viharaya is one of the 16 most venerated sites of Buddhists in this country. They provided historical evidence to support their statement, including a Report of the Director General of Archaeology.

According to this report the name Deeghavapi has been used from the 2nd Century B. C. and the Viharaya was constructed by King Saddhatissa in the lst century B. C. Further, the Viharaya had been reconstructed by King Kirti Sri Rajasinha of the Kandyan Kingdom in 1746.

In the circumstances nothing further need to be stated as regards the sensitivity which has been affected by the impugned action from the perspective of the Buddhist, not only in that area but in the entire country, said Supreme Court. Supreme Court agreed with the petitioners that fundamental rights have been infringed and allowed the application.  Medhananda had  won the case

Ven. Medhananda   also spoke out about unethical conversion of Buddhists to Christianity. He had encountered this on a visit to Ampara district. In 1993, Ven. Kalutara Dhammananda of Buddhangala monastery, Ampara had asked Medhananda to help 46 families living in Ratugala village, situated near Wellassa, Galgamuwa. He had gone there with dry rations, clothes, books soap, toothpaste, coconut, medicines in July 1993.

He then found that Ratugala village was in the clutches of a Christian evangelistic church, Kristiani subharanchi sabhava”. The headquarter of this evangelistic church was in Makandura, Gonawela. A team of three persons had come to Ratugala and set up a society called Jinaloka samaga subha sadaka sanvidanaya in 1990.

This team had established contact with the leaders of the village, Kaira and Gombira. Gombira said that his two children had converted and the missionaries had taken them away. His granddaughter was staunchly Christian and refused to speak to Medhananda.

 The evangelists had got hold of Kaira’s land and built a chapel on it.  They baptized 23 children on Poson Poya day.  Before the baptism, the children had been made to smash and trample Buddha statues, they were given dodol to eat and told that this was the Buddha’s flesh. The evangelists were making use of the poverty of Ratugala and other such places, said Medhananda .  (Kahatapitiya p 357-358)

This situation is also seen in Badulla, Moneragala, Ampara, Polonnaruwa and  Hambantota, very strongly said Medhananda, and at a lesser level elsewhere. He pointed out that to protect and preserve Buddhism, it was necessary to preserve the Buddhist population, not temples. What we need to look after it not the temple, it is the Buddhist population. Temples came later. To look after temples we need a Buddhist public”, he said.  

Ven. Medhananda was responsible for the birth of the Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya. Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya started under my direction, said Ven. Medhananda. The first discussions were at Kuppiyawatte Jayasekeraramaya. We met there to discuss how to combat the anti- national and anti-Buddhist activities that were taking place in the island.

 Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya (JSS) was set up as a formal organization  in 2002 in Colombo  Ven. Medhananda was appointed President. We had all island meetings and talks, recalled Medhananda. We set up districts units of the JSS.

Medhananda played a prominent role in all JSS proceedings. He addressed the Sammelanaya at its inaugural meeting. He gave the key note address when the Gampaha district branch was set up.

JSS was very active in 2002 and 2003. There was a huge Sangha Samuluva at BMICH in September 2002. Medhananda presided. The JSS decided to meet the President that night itself. They went straight from the   conference to meet President Chandrika Kumaratunga and placed before her the recommendations of the Conference. Ven. Medhananda led the  group.

 JSS held another well attended meeting at Dharmavijaya Foundation in  2002. A second Sangha samuluva was held in 2003 at BMICH. JSS also went to Kandy, in 2003 and there it set up Trinikaya committee   with Medhananda as President. At this meeting, JSS vowed to protect the unitary state. 

In 2003  JSS also went to Ministry of Buddha Sasana and complained.  Buddhist ruins were being destroyed, Buddhist lands were in danger, unethical conversion of Buddhists was going on at a rate. What was the Ministry doing? The Minister should resign if he cannot take action, said JSS . JLL asked for military protection to go and look  at the Buddhist remains in North and east.

JSS was very clear as to what its focus was. Its focus was    ‘rata, jatiya and agama.’  When rata agama, jatiya are  in danger ,it is traditional for the Sangha to  intervene, said JSS. The Sangha have the right to comment on all matters relating to this country. In a situation  like today, it is the duty of the Sangha is to alert the public as to what is happening,  there are international conspiracies hatched to undermine the sovereignty and independence of Sri Lanka. 

Medhananda went around the country making speeches on the political situation . He addressed the meeting of  Delgamu hela  bodu Sanvidana, held  at Degamuwa Sri Dalada raja maha vihara, Kuruwita .

He was firmly against the  Tamil Separatist Movement. He criticized the four conditions put forward by Tamil Separatist Movement at Thimpu. There is no historical basis for a Tamil homeland in the north and east said Medhananda .  

He heavily  criticized the Ceasefire Agreement.. The LTTE has got strengthened as never before due to the Ceasefire agreement. What  is happening now beats everything that  Dutugemunu,  Valagamba, Dhatusena  had to face, he said. But there is no one speak up on the matter.  LTTE was  now getting ready to get itself    recognized    internationally using a foreign country.

Medhananda  was well informed on the Eelam issue.  Tamil nationalism was created by the British, he said. He commented on Pongu Tamil movement   and noted that the LTTE had created a half hour time difference for the ‘state of Eelam’. LTTE went for peace talks whenever it got weakened, he said.  He  also pointed out that LTTE  were destroying Buddhist   monuments in north and east .

Shivajilingam had said that there were now two countries in Sri Lanka . Medhananda pointed out that if so, Shivajilingam  could not have arrived in Colombo as he had done. Shivajilingam was able to do so, because Sri Lanka was one country. There is only one government and just one breakaway province, declared Medhananda .

JSS found it  was not getting anywhere despite its efforts. It was suggested that JSS should enter Parliament. A new political party, Jatika Hela Urumaya, was launched for the purpose. Ven. Ellawala Medhananda together with Kolonnawe Sumangala  and Omalpe Sobhitha were founding members.

The Jathika Hela Urumaya contested its first parliamentary election on 2 April 2004. All of its candidates were Buddhist monks,  led by Ven. Medhananda. The other monks entered Parliament through elections. Medhananda went to Parliament on the National List. He stated later that he was sent to Parliament, ‘giya nova yavuna’.

Medhananda said that he was firmly opposed to the idea of a bhikkhu contesting  the post of President of Sri Lanka . Medhananda explained his view of Bhikkhus in politics in an interview with CA Chandraprema.

We first became politically active through the Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya,” he said. At a certain point, we came to the decision that in order to win the war against terrorism and to put an end to unethical conversions, bhikkhus should be represented in Parliament. I agreed to the decision to contest elections only after discussing it six times, rejecting the idea and finally agreeing to it in the seventh round of discussions.

I stated very clearly that a bhikkhu whether in Parliament or in the temple had to remain a bhikkhu. We held large meetings and protest campaigns but in all such instances I ensured that the bhikkhus maintained the decorum expected of them by the laity. For example we held a protest in front of the British High Commission which was attended by a large number of bhikkhus all of whom behaved in a manner befitting a monk.”

Medhananda replied an MP who had been very  critical  regarding the arrival of  bhikkhus into Parliament. Medhananda said, our  Parliament  has been  modeled on the British Parliament, but this is not England. This is a Sinhala Bauddha rata and  JHU came into Parliament on the Sinhala- Buddhist  wave. JHU  has been the first to challenge the English model in  Parliament.  Certainly, we do not stand when the Speaker comes in, but that does not mean that  we do  not recognize  him, Medhananda said.

Ven. Medhananda made use of his period as an Member of Parliament,  to make lengthy speeches and place certain facts on record.  He spoke forcefully.  At one point he was asked by the Speaker whether he was taking the full 15 minutes allocated to the JHU. Yes, said Medhananda firmly, there is no other speaker,  only me.

Medhananda drew attention to the privatizing of national assets. He referred to stoning of judges houses  and garlanding  a person declared guilty in J.R Jayewardene’s time. But his main subject was the ethnic issue, in its various manifestations.

He relentlessly attacked the Tamil Separatist Movement, the Eelam war and Eelam itself. The government must as soon as possible  defeat the LTTE, he said. He pointed out that the basic services in the LTTE controlled areas was provided by the government using government funds. He criticized the merger of North and east.  He condemned the Millenium City raid.

Medhananda spoke out against  a Tamil homeland. Sampur is  a historical Tamil village, said Sampanthan.  I will show you  how Tamil  it is, replied Medhananda, with gusto,  and  gave the documented  history of  Sampur, citing Sinhala king after Sinhala king. Medhananda  also said that by putting ai” before   a word, such as Wellawattai,”   does not  make it Tamil. 

Medhananda submitted a long memorandum , with supporting documents, to Parliament, to be  recorded in Hansard. It  showed the Sinhala Buddhist history of north and east. It contained detailed information on the Buddhist ruins and other archaeological remains, such as  tanks, irrigation channels, still visible there. 

Medhananda also drew attention of Parliament  to a statement forwarded to  the UN Human Rights Council, Geneva by K Sachchitanandan   which argued that the north and east belonged to the Tamils.  He has distorted our history, said Medhananda .  I  have provided a 12 page reply to be included in Hansard. The Speaker agreed to include the statement in the Hansard.

In his reply  Medhananda had taken each statement made by Sachchitanandan, and demolished them one by one.  Medhananda said that there was no Sivam Senior and Sivan  Junior ruling in Jaffna.  There was only one Siva in history and that was Devanampiyatissa’s father. Many of the Tamil names were actually  distortions of  the original Sinhala name, e.g. Mannakamam was Medagama.

Medhananda was regularly interrupted by Tamil MPs, especially when he spoke out against  a Tamil homeland.  Medhananda, continued undisturbed. Shout as much as you wish ,said Medhananda. MP Sri Kantha said ‘if you will allow me I will educate you.’ Medhananda replied ”Sit down, It is I who is speaking. You can speak after me, if you wish.  MP Shivajilingam was reprimanded by the Speaker, for threatening Medhananda.

Medhananda spoke strongly against the LTTE .he started by listing the villages LTTE had attacked. The LTTE had hit the following villages and towns, Bakkiella ,Bakmitiyawa, Damminna Gonagala, Keenwatte, Kent farm,  Kiri ibban wewa,      Kombanachchi,  Lankapatuna,  Mangala oya, Mutur, Namalgama, Omanna, Pottuvil, Sampath town ,Sastravela, Seruwila, Thamalthala, Tirumangala,   Trikonamadu    and Villumale . LTTE also attacked Hulannuge School,   and chased away Sinhalese from Akkaraipattu

Medhananda  referred to a training given by LTTE to young persons, this was supposed to be  health training. Did they need guns for such a training asked Medhananda . He observed that a  LTTE  group  who had gone to Norway  to  study federalism had actually been given training by Norway’s Special Forces.   He spoke against the  NGOs  in the north. ZOR was one of the  NGOs that is helping LTTE, he said.

He spoke favorably of standardization. Medhananda gave statistics of education, for all  28 districts (year was probably 2005).  He  showed that  Jaffna with 492,000 population had 33 schools ,Colombo with 17,00,000  pop had 32. Jaffna with  2434  (sic) pupils had 32 schools, Colombo with  7454  (sic) had 40. Similarly, Colombo had  9301 doing science  , Jaffna had 2486, Kandy 1124, Galle 1208.

He took a strong Sinhala Buddhist line.  He said the government did not give any land to the Sangha for  providing houses for tsunami affected person, but they gave 207 acres to World Vision,  a Christian NGO. He drew attention to unethical conversion of Buddhist to Christianity.   He spoke of the plight of  viharas. Of the 10,200 vihara about 3000 are in difficulties. 

He spoke of Muslim assertiveness. He said that it was not necessary to obtain permission from Muslims, to erect a Buddha statue at Pottuvil.  He spoke of a [Muslim] bank  where they give easy loans to Sinhala businessmen. Then when they fail to pay back they seize their property. 

He spoke of colonization schemes.  Gal oya settlements were to going into the hand of non-Sinhalese, he said. In 1974 7597  acres were allotted to settlements 1,2,3,4,7,8.  Of these 3,4, and 7 are now held by non Sinhalese. 

 At Dighavapi 585 acres were set aside for Sinhalese. Of these settlements several are now  occupied by  non-Sinhalese. The land was taken forcibly and houses built. In 1996, against Sinhala Buddhist opposition, 250 acres at Dighavapi were bulldozed  and non-Sinhalese were given houses with 2 ½ acres each. 

In the Akkaraipattu water scheme in 1994,  three projects were for Sinhala settlements but the was reduced to one.  Eventually it is Akkaraipattu which will be the main town of the district not Ampara, said Medhananda .

Medhananda stated firmly that he did not make use of  any of the perks available to MPs. He did not go on foreign jaunts, or  obtain land in Colombo to build a house.   His car permit he gave the JHU,  and continued to use his own old car. He did not even  use  his position to improve Napawala temples. The decentralized  budget he received was used to improve roads, electricity supply, drains  etc.

The money he received as a Member of Parliament  was  used  to help others. He was particularly keen on opening bank deposits  of Rs 1000 for  poor students  in schools and daham pasal. The first beneficiaries were 70  pupils in Gomadiyagala village, Kurunegala district. This was followed by schools in Dambahara gammanaya in Madahapola,  and Kukulega in Kahatagasdigiliya.

He also provided every child who left for school from Napawala preschool, with a bank deposit. . 120 clever children from Siripura, Padaviya and   Weli oya  were given  assistance including clothes..Medhananda had  also provided books to   school children, who were poor. He has also donated books to school libraries  and Pirivena libraries.

He had also  helped the poverty stricken people in the north and east. At Padavi Siripura he came across  an old woman who   had had an operation on her neck and was asked to attend a monthly clinic at Anuradhapura,  but she was unable to do so as she did not have the money to travel there. Medhananda made arrangements to provide her with the money. 

Medhananda  helped badly off temples in north and east as well as other far flung places with monthly deposits paid into their  bank accounts.  In 2004 he started a scheme at Siripura Pirivena  to provide dane, pirikara and money  to these  monks.

Ven. Medhananda was openly critical of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. He was heavily critical of  the Ceasefire agreement which he attributed directly to Ranil Wickremesinghe  Medhananda also noted that Ranil Wickremesinghe had got ready to celebrate  the  500th anniversary o f the  arrival of the Portuguese in Sri Lanka   .

Ranil Wickremesinghe returned the compliment.  He used the car permit given to Medhananda as MP  to discredit him. Medhananda explained to his biographer that he had collected his car permit and put in a drawer and forgot about it, The JHU bhikkhus has decided that they would not obtain cars nor would they sell  the permits.   Since the JHU kept asking for the  permit, he had, after three months,  taken it to a JHU central committee meeting and placed it on the table, saying ‘here is the permit, do what you want with it.’ He said that was the last he saw of the permit.

Ranil Wickremesinghe  however, thought differently. He charged that Medhananda had bought himself a silver, E-class Mercedes Benz car with the permit. Ranil Wickremesinghe   personally travelled in it  to   a  media conference held at Vidyodaya. Medhananda flatly  denied purchasing the car and said that he had never seen it before. He knew nothing about it.

The foreign press, including New York Times, pounced on this issue. The tale of the Buddhist monk and his shiny, new Mercedes-Benz has sparked a national drama that has enthralled Sri Lanka and left many questioning the political and religious ethics of the cleric’s hawkish political party, said Indian Express.

Medhananda did not last long in Parliament. In 2010, at the party’s seventh national convention JHU ousted Ven. Medhananda from the post of party leader and elected Ven. Omalpe Sobhitha. JHU said Ven. Medhananda had  resigned from the post   as he needed to devote time to his archaeological research. He did not have the time to engage in full time politics. 

Medhananda denied this. He had not told the party that he wished to be relieved of leadership. At no time had he cited time constraints and  said his archaeological work was  an obstacles to his work in the party. He was unaware of what happened during the Jathika Hela Urumaya national convention. He was in Mullaitivu on an archaeological study at the time.

In  2014, Medhananda  stated that he was not in agreement with the JHU.The Jathika Hela Urumaya and Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya are now working against their [original] policies, he said. If the common candidate Maitripala Sirisena wins the Presidential election, [the country will get divided.] The bhikkhus of the Jathika Hela Urumaya and National Bhikkhu Council who  see this looming danger will rally round President Rajapaksa[ at the next election].   (  to be continued)

The Eminent Surgeon Dr.M.H.De Zoysa

May 24th, 2020

Dr. Newton Jayawardane FRCS

A Consultant surgeon who was much dedicated to the patients and profession was a very honest gentleman.!! I was very fortunate to work under him get trained by him.He saved so many lives. Prevented misappropriation of public money during the tender procedures. He was a devoted Buddhist and one day he told me ” Jayawardane I may be suffering in this life for the things I have done in the past which I do not have any control, but one thing is sure that I will not be suffering in my next birth as I have not done any wrong thing to anyone.”The day he got the retirement from the government service he joined the military. This was the time the war spreading and so many military casualties without much medical personnel to care for them. He showed an extraordinary love towards the servicemen. Until he died he was serving the Military. Sir, you attain the Supreme bliss of Nirvana.!!!   

Sri Lanka after yahapalanaya, Easter Sunday and Covid-19

May 24th, 2020

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa

According to the IMF, in 2014, Sri Lanka was among the fastest growing economies in Asia. Economic growth averaged 6% during the war years from 2006 to 2009 and increased to 7.4% in the post-war years from 2010 to 2014. The debt to GDP ratio was reduced from  90% in 2005 to 75% at the end of 2014. The All Share Price Index rose from 1,922 in 2005 to 7,299 by the end of 2014. Sri Lanka’s per capita GDP in US Dollar terms increased threefold from USD 1,242 in 2005 to USD 3,819 by the end of 2014. The biggest infrastructure building programme in post- independence history was also carried out between 2006 and 2014. This economic boom was achieved despite the war, the global food crisis of 2007, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the highest crude oil prices in history. Crude oil cost an average of USD 74 per barrel from 2006 to 2009 and USD 103 from 2010 to 2014.

After January 2015 everything went in reverse. The economic growth rate dropped to 5% in 2015 and declined year after year ending up at 2.3% by 2019. The value of the US Dollar appreciated against the Rupee from Rs.130 in 2014 to 181 by October 2019. Sri Lanka’s total outstanding debt increased by 74.4% from Rs. 7.39 trillion at the end of 2014, to Rs.12.89 trillion by October 2019. Between January 2015 and October 2019, the total foreign currency borrowings of the yahapalana government in the form of Sovereign Bonds, Sri Lanka Development Bonds, Syndicated Loans and Currency Swaps totaled over USD 26 billion. Despite this borrowing spree, absolutely nothing of lasting value was built by the yahapalana government. The All Share Price Index declined from 7,299 in 2014 to 5,990 by the end of October 2019. Yet during the entire period from 2015 to 2019 the average price of crude oil was USD 60 per barrel – the lowest in recent history.

There were no external, global reasons for this economic collapse. India and Bangladesh experienced robust growth between 2015 and 2019. The Easter Sunday bombings of April 2019 exacerbated the yahapalana recession. On 16 November 2019, President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa inherited an economy that was in shambles. It was in such a context that the entire world was engulfed by the Covid-19 pandemic. A worldwide economic crisis reminiscent of the 1930s Great Depression is widely expected to follow the Covid-19 pandemic. In this new global environment, even the option of going overseas in search of greener pastures will be very limited because all countries will be facing economic hardship and mass unemployment. The Covid-19 pandemic has left all Sri Lankans with only one option – building Sri Lanka. The choice is stark – pull together or perish.

When the Secretary to the President Dr P.B.Jayasundera in his capacity as the foremost officer of the public service, recently appealed to public servants to contribute whatever they can from their salaries to tide over this crisis, the opposition attacked him viciously. Knowing fully well that this was only a request for voluntary contributions, they tried to portray it as a compulsory deduction. Dr. Jayasundera played a central role in the 2006-2014 economic boom. The opposition obviously hopes to undermine the government’s economic recovery efforts by singling out capable state officials like him for attack.  

We should all realize that this yahapalana political culture of vilification and false propaganda has no place in the post-Covid-19 world. In the difficult times that lie ahead, Sri Lanka’s economic survival and the futures of our children, depend on the vision, ability and skill of those running the country. German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently stated that Covid-19 had hit Germany at a time when the economy was doing well and they had the strength to face the crisis. The situation in Sri Lanka was the exact opposite. We should all be mindful of this reality and make our choices and decisions accordingly. Everyone knows what would have happened if the yahapalana cabal had been in power when the Covid-19 pandemic hit Sri Lanka. The team that is now running the country from the President downwards, won a war that was deemed unwinnable, and presided over the greatest economic boom since independence despite impossible odds between 2006 and 2014. That is the kind of leadership needed to steer this country forward in the post-Covid-19 world.

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Prime Minister

යහපාලනයෙන්, පාස්කු ඉරිදා ප්‍රහාරයෙන් හා කොවිඩ් -19 වසංගතයෙන් පසු ලංකාව

May 24th, 2020

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය  මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

ජාත්‍යන්තර මූල්‍ය අරමුදලට අනුව, 2014 දී ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ආසියාවේ වේගයෙන්ම සංවර්ධනය වන රටක් විය. 2006-2009 යුද සමයේ වසරකට 6% ක් වූ සාමාන්‍ය ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය යුද්ධයෙන් පසු 2010-2014 කාල පරිච්ඡේදයේ 7.4% දක්වා වැඩිවිය. 2005 දී දළ ජාතික නිෂ්පාදිතයට සාපේක්ෂව 90%ක් වූ සමස්ථ ණයබර 2014 අවසන් වන විට 75% ක් දක්වා අඩුවී තිබිණි. කොටස් වෙළඳපොලේ සමස්ත මිල දර්ශකය 2005 දී 1,922 ක් වූ අතර, 2014 අවසන් වන විට එය 7,299 ක් දක්වා වැඩිවී තිබුණි. 2005 දී ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් 1,242 ක් වූ ඒකපුද්ගල ආදායම 2014 අවසන් වන විට ඩොලර් 3,819 දක්වා තුන්ගුණයකින් වැඩිවී තිබුණි. නිදහස ලැබීමෙන් පසු ලංකාවේ විශාලම යටිතල පහසුකම් ඉදිකිරීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙල ක්‍රියාත්මක වූයේද 2006-2014 කාලපරිච්ඡේදය තුළදීය. මේ සියලුම ආර්ථික ජයග්‍රහණ අපි ලබා ගත්තේ 2007 ලෝක ආහාර අර්බුදයත්, 2008 – 2009 ගෝලීය මූල්‍ය අර්බුදයත්, ලෝක ඉතිහාසයේ ඉහළම තෙල් මිලත් මධ්‍යයේය. 2006-2009 කාලපරිච්ඡයේදී බොරතෙල් බැරලයක සාමාන්‍ය මිල ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් 74 ක් වූ අතර 2010-2014 කාලපරිච්ඡයේදී එය ඩොලර් 103 ක් විය. 

2015 ජනවාරියේ සිට මේ සියල්ල කණපිට හැරුනේය. 2015 වසරේදී ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය 5%ක් දක්වා පහත වැටී ඉන්පසු සෑම වසරක් පාසාම ක්‍රමානුකූලව  අඩුවී 2019 වන විට 2.3% ක් විය. රුපියලට සාපේක්ෂව ඇමරිකානු ඩොලරයක වටිනාකම 2014 දී  රුපියල් 130ක් වූ අතර, එය 2019 ඔක්තෝබර් වන විට රුපියල් 181 දක්වා වැඩිවී තිබුණි. රටේ සමස්ථ ණය බර 2014 අවසානයේ  රුපියල් ට්‍රිලියන 7.39 සිට 2019 ඔක්තෝබර් මාසය වනවිට රුපියල් ට්‍රිලියන 12.89 ක් දක්වා 74.4% කින් වැඩිවී තිබුණි. 2015 ජනවාරියේ සිට 2019 ඔක්තෝබර් දක්වා යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව සවරින් බොන්ඩ්, ශ්‍රී ලංකා සංවර්ධන බැඳුම්කර, සින්ඩිකේටඩ් ලෝන්, කරන්සි ස්වොප් වැනි නොයෙක් මූලාශ්‍ර වලින් ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් බිලියන 26 ක විදේශ විනිමය ණය  ලබා ගෙන තිබුණි. මේ ආකාරයට ණය ගත්තද යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව කිසිදු කල් පවතින, ආදායම් ලබන වත්කමක් නිර්මාණය කළේ නැත. 2014 අවසානයේ 7,299 ක් වූ කොටස් වෙළඳපොලේ සමස්ත මිල දර්ශකය 2019 ඔක්තෝබර් මාසය වන විට 5,990 දක්වා අඩු විය. මෙවන් ආර්ථික බිඳවැටීමක් සිදුවූය්  2015 සිට 2019 දක්වා මුළු කාලපරිච්ඡේදය තුළම බොරතෙල් බැරලයක සාමාන්‍ය  මිල ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් 60 ක තරම් මැත ඉතිහාසයේ පහතම අගයක පැවතියදීය.

යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව යටතේ සිදු වූ මේ දරුණු ආර්ථික බිඳවැටීමට කිසිදු බාහිර හේතුවක් නොවීය. 2015 හා 2019 අතර ඉන්දියාව, බංග්ලාදේශය වැනි රටවල් වේගයෙන් වර්ධනය විය. 2019 පාස්කු ඉරිදා බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරය නිසා ලංකාවේ ආර්ථික බිඳවැටීම තවත් උත්සන්න විය. 2019 නොවැම්බර් 16 වනදා ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂට ලැබුණේ සහමුලින්ම විනාශ වූ ආර්ථිකයකි. කොවිඩ් – 19 වසංගතය විසින් මුළු ලෝකයම ගිල ගනු ලැබුවේ එවන් තත්ත්වයක් යටතේය.  කොවිඩ් – 19 වසංගතයෙන් පසු 1930 ගණන්වල ඇති වූ මහා අවපාතයට සමාන ලෝක ආර්ථික අවපාතයක් ඇති වනු ඇති බවට පුරෝකථනය වී ඇත. එවන් තත්ත්වයක් යටතේ සියලුම රටවල් ආර්ථික දුෂ්කරතා හා මහා පරිමාණ විරැකියාවට පාත්‍ර වෙන නිසා ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන්ට සෞභාග්‍යය සොයා විදේශගත වීමට ඇති අවස්ථාවන්ද සීමා වනු ඇත. කොවිඩ්-19 නිසා සියලුම ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයින්ට අද ඉතිරි වී ඇත්තේ එක විකල්පයක් පමණි – ඒ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ගොඩනැඟීමයි. මේ සිදුවී ඇති විපතෙන් ගොඩ ඒමට අපි එකාවන්ව කටයුතු කළේ නැතිනම් රටේ අනාගතය අතිශයින්ම අඳුරු වෙනු ඇත. 

මෑතකදී, රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ ඉහළම නිලධාරියා වන ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ආචාර්ය පී. බී. ජයසුන්දර, තමන්ගේ වැටුපෙන් හැකි ප්‍රමාණයක් පරිත්‍යාග කරන මෙන් රජයේ සේවකයන්ගෙන්  ඉල්ලීමක් කළ විට, විපක්ෂය ඔහුව නිර්දය ලෙස විවේචනය කළේය. මෙහිදී සිදුවූයේ හුදෙක්ම ස්වේච්ඡා පරිත්‍යාගයක් සඳහා ඉල්ලීමක් බව දැන දැනත්, එය අනිවාර්ය වැටුප් කපාහැරීමක් හැටියට ඔවුන් හුවා දැක්වුයේය. ආචාර්ය ජයසුන්දර යනු 2006-2014 කාලයේ මේ රටේ ඇති වූ ආර්ථික පිබිඳීමට දායක වූ ප්‍රධානම රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරියෙකි. එවැනි දක්ෂ නිලධාරීන් තනිකොට පහරදී, ආණ්ඩුවේ ආර්ථික පුනර්ජීවන වැඩපිළිවෙල අඩාල කිරීම විපක්ෂයේ අරමුණ බව පැහැදිලිය.

මඩගැසීම හා බොරු ප්‍රචාර මත පදනම් වූ මේ යහපාලන දේශපාලන සංස්කෘතියට පශ්චාත් කොවිඩ්-19 ලෝකය තුළ කිසිදු තැනක් නැති බව අපි වටහා ගත යුතුය. ඉදිරියට එන අසීරු ගෝලීය තත්වයන් යටතේ, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආර්ථික පැවැත්ම හා අපගේ දරුවන්ගේ අනාගතය රඳා පවතින්නේ රට පාලනය කරන අයගේ දෘෂ්ටිය හා හැකියාව මතය. ජර්මානු චාන්සලර් ඇන්ජලා මර්කල් මැතිනිය මෑතකදී පවසා සිටියේ ජර්මානු ආර්ථිකය ශක්තිමත්ව තිබුණ අවස්ථාවක කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගතය පැමිණි නිසා ඔවුන්ට එයට මුහුණ දීමට හැකියාව තිබුණු බවයි. නමුත් ලංකාවට මේ වසංගතයට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවී ඇත්තේ ඊට හාත්පසින්ම වෙනස් තත්වයක් යටතේය.

මේ නිසා ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සෑම පුරවැසියෙක්ම මෙම කාරණා ගැන හොඳින් කල්පනා කර බලා, රටට වඩාත්ම හිතකර තෝරා ගැනීම සිදු කළ යුතුය. කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගතය ලංකාවට එන විට බලයේ සිටියේ යහපාලන කල්ලිය නම්, මේ රටට යන කලදසාව ගැන අමුතුවෙන් කිව යුතු නැත. වර්තමානයේ මේ රට පාලනය කරන ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ සිට පහළට සියලුදෙනා, ජයග්‍රහනය කිරීමට නොහැකි යැයි කියූ යුද්ධයක් දිනූ, 2006 – 2014 අතර දැවැන්ත අභියෝග මධ්‍යයේ වුවත් මේ රටේ නිදහසින් පසු විශාලම ආර්ථික පිබිදීම ඇති කළ කණ්ඩායමකි. කොවිඩ්-19 වසංගතයෙන් පසු ලෝකය තුළ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ඉදිරියට ගෙන යෑම සඳහා අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ එවන් නායකත්වයකි. 

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය

Lack of equality among member Nations: Using HR to selectively target countries

May 24th, 2020

By Sugeeswara Senadhira Courtesy Ceylon Today

It is no secret that the hypocritical Western lobbies use human rights as a tool to target selectively against countries that resist their undue interferences. They selectively attack the Governments they perceive as too self confident and not amenable to their policies. This is contrary to the United Nation’s principle of equality. The Article 1 of the UN states that the mission of the organisation is to “develop friendly relations among Nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights’.

Realising the biased nature of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), Foreign Relations Minister Dinesh Gunawardena  announced that Sri Lanka would withdraw from the resolutions 30/1 and 40/1 titled ‘Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka’ co-sponsored by Sri Lanka 2015 and 2019 respectively. The Resolution 30/1 co-sponsored by the then Government in 2015 was described by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa as a ‘historical betrayal’. 

The UNHRC was established by the UN General Assembly on 15 March 2006 (by resolution A/RES/60/251) to replace the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR, herein CHR) that had been strongly criticised for taking biased decisions by picking on countries on a selective basis.

Former UN Secretaries General Kofi Annan and Ban Ki-moon, former President of the council Doru Costea, the European Union, Canada, and the United States have accused the UNHRC of focusing disproportionately on selected countries. One charge was that there was an anti-Israel bias. The Council has passed more resolutions condemning Israel than the rest of the world combined. The new Council (UNHRC) also came in for criticism from many quarters. It came to a crisis situation when the United States announced its withdrawal from the 47-member body.

On 19 June 2018, President Donald Trump’s Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley announced that the United States was pulling out of the UNHRC, accusing the council being ‘hypocritical and self-serving’. The issue they cited was the UNHRC’s ‘chronic anti-Israel bias.’

“When the Human Rights Council treats Israel worse than North Korea, Iran, and Syria, it is the Council itself that is foolish and unworthy of its name. It is time for the countries who know better to demand changes,” Haley said in a statement at the time, pointing to the council’s adoption of five resolutions condemning Israel. 

Sri Lanka was a member of the UNHRC from its inception in 2006 to 2008. However, the country failed to get sufficient number of votes to get reelected as the influential Western countries did not support the Government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa because of its continuation of war against LTTE terrorists. The US and Western Europe wanted to stop the war, which had then reached the final stage. The US withdrawal from UNHRC was due to Washington’s policy of protecting Israel at any cost. 

Israel has been condemned in 78 resolutions by the UNHRC since its creation in 2006—the Council has resolved more resolutions condemning Israel than the rest of the world combined. The UNHRC voted on 30 June 2006 to make a review of alleged human rights abuses by Israel a permanent feature of every council session. The council’s special rapporteur on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is its only expert mandate with no year of expiry. The resolution, which was sponsored by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, passed by a vote of 29 to 12 with five abstentions. Human Rights Watch urged it to look at international human rights and humanitarian law violations committed by the Palestinian armed groups as well. Human Rights Watch called on the Council to avoid the selectivity that discredited its predecessor and urged it to hold special sessions on other urgent situations, such as that in Darfur.

Ccusing SL armed forces and ignoring LTTE brutalities

The US and the Western lobbies called for an international probe on alleged human rights violations during the last phase of the war in Sri Lanka. While accusing the armed forces, they turned a blind eye on the brutal killings of innocent civilians by the LTTE. While the US President called the UNHRC a “cesspit of biased politics,” the US and the West have already launched the above strategy in Sri Lanka as well through the Joint UNHRC Resolution 30/1. 

This has proven that allegations on Human Rights violations have been used as a common strategy by the US and the West to interfere with internal matters of countries which they have identified as vulnerable in the process of enforcing global power politics. They have been used to implement their own agendas on the pretext of regularising Human Rights records of those countries, the end result of which would be disastrous to the very existence of the countries concerned. 

Since the Government came to power in November 2019, Sri Lanka reviewed the credibility of the Joint UNHRC Resolutions 30/1 30/4 and decided to withdraw from the resolution in March 2020.

The announcement of withdrawal from the UNHRC resolutions was followed by very convincing arguments elaborated by Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, who does not tolerate injustice, particularly when the integrity of the Motherland is at stake. 

After Sri Lanka’s announcement, the perturbed pro-LTTE front organisations in the West doubled their disinformation campaign using gullible politicians who swallow their fabricated stories on the alleged human right violations.

McDermott absurdities 

The most recent allegation came from Australia’s Hugh McDermott MP, State Member for Prospect in New South Wales. He accused the armed forces ‘conduct of genocide against Tamils’ and claimed that ‘150,000 persons were killed’. Such totally false absurd statements coming from a parliamentarian is rather surprising. In these circumstances, it is essential for Sri Lanka to be absolutely vigilant regarding attempts to sully the good name of the country aboard.

The Government is determined to protect the image of Sri Lanka and its armed forces. Hence, the significance of the statement made last week by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa that Sri Lanka will not hesitate to withdraw from any international forum if the members of armed forces were targeted or harassed. “Our troops were up against the world’s most feared terrorist group who paid no respect to the law. Even the world’s most powerful countries have said they would not subject their troops to be harassed by anyone,” he said.

As President Rajapaksa pointed out, because of the exceptional sacrifices made by the war heroes, today all the communities have the opportunity to live in peace and harmony in a unitary state and it is the duty of everybody to withstand undue pressures from within or outside.

Time to clean out the UN Stables: Pillay’s caustic inaccuracies

May 24th, 2020

By Shivanthi Ranasinghe Courtesy Ceylon Today

At the National Ranawiru Day commemoration President Gotabaya Rajapaksa caused a stir when he stated, “If any international body or organisation continuously targets our country and our war heroes, using baseless allegations, I will also not hesitate to withdraw Sri Lanka from such bodies or organisations.” Many have few doubts as to which international bodies or organisations the President referred to. 

Former Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office at Geneva Tamara Kunanayakam noted, “The President is most likely referring here to the UN Human Rights Council and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The statement indicates he is either wrongly advised about the UN or plain politics, which could go against Sri Lanka at a time it desperately needs international support precisely to protect its war heroes.” The statement has been widely picked up by Western Media agencies, which have a global influence. 

Why is there a problem with the statement? 

“SL is not a Member of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) it is only an Observer State, so the question of ‘pulling out’ does not arise. Besides, HRC is an integral part of the United Nations, a subsidiary body of the UN under the General Assembly, which elects HRC members from among UN member States. The only way to completely withdraw from HRC is to leave the United Nations. “As for ‘pulling out’ of OHCRC, the only way to do so would also be by leaving the UN altogether, OHCHR being a body of the United Nations, not a Specialised Agency. 

“It is preposterous that SL should even consider quitting the only global multilateral organisation that exists today capable of defending multilaterism, in accordance with the UN Charter, and hence the interests of less powerful states such as ours. The world order established under the UN Charter, whatever its weaknesses – and there are many – is the only order capable of defending the sovereignty of less powerful states and former colonies such as ours, against external interference, intervention, aggression, and wars. “The system must be strengthened, not weakened, in the light of the increasing resort to unilateral coercive measures by the US (especially) to exert pressure on sovereign states to compel a change on policy through sanctions or threats of sanctions, embargoes, blockades, conditionality, intimidation, etc.  …

“Withdrawing from the United Nations will only strengthen the US supremacist unilateralist vision of the world ; undermine multilateralism which the Non Aligned Movement has fought for and largely contributed to developing in the interest of former colonies; isolate Sri Lanka; weaken its ability to negotiate from a position of strength; deprive it of the means to resolve problems with global dimensions (such as COVID-19, climate change, trade, finance…); and, ultimately, erode its independence, sovereignty and possibly its territorial integrity. 

“It is incongruous that the President should make such a statement at an event to pay tribute to war heroes who sacrificed their lives in the war against LTTE terror and separatism that was fought precisely on the basis of defending those very same principles unilateralism seeks to undermine. “And how will such a statement be interpreted by our potential allies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, whose very existence and survival as independent and sovereign Nations depends on respect for the purposes and principles incorporated in the UN Charter, and at a time that US President Donald Trump uses the exact same threat to quit WHO in the midst of a global pandemic?”

Resolution 30/1 infringes on the sovereignty of Sri Lanka

However, the President has never indicated a bias against the UN. Rather, he has initiated a dialog as to what can and cannot be delivered in terms of the UNHRC Resolution 30/1. He was always of the stance that a country cannot co-sponsor a resolution against itself. Communicating the President’s stance, Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena on February 26, 2020 addressed the 43rd session of the UNHRC and noted the challenges Sri Lanka is facing when trying to honor the Resolution 30/1. 

“Constitutionally, the resolution seeks to cast upon Sri Lanka obligations that cannot be carried out within its constitutional framework and it infringes the sovereignty of the people of Sri Lanka and violates the basic structure of the Constitution,” stated the Foreign Minister. “Notwithstanding withdrawing from co-sponsorship of this Resolution, Sri Lanka remains committed to achieving the goals set by the people of Sri Lanka on accountability and human rights, towards sustainable peace and reconciliation.”

Flawed OISL report chose to ignore provided evidence 

The FM also observed that, “the previous Government ‘noted with appreciation’, the much flawed ‘OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka’ (OISL) Report, which was used as the basis not only for Resolution 30/1, but also to unjustly vilify the heroic Sri Lankan security forces, possibly the only National security establishment that defeated terrorism in recent times. This was despite there being an abundance of evidence to the contrary, contained in;

1. Domestic reports such as the LLRC and the ‘Paranagama Commission’

2. Information presented before the UK House of Lords by Lord Naseby, challenging among other things the vastly exaggerated civilian casualty figures,

3. Other reports from the UN and international agencies including the ICRC

4. Exposed diplomatic cables.”

The UN was founded on the mandate to ensure an equal platform for sovereign Nations to engage constructively. Thus, it seems incredible that the UN should be responsible for a flawed report that vilified a Nation’s military.

Navi Pillay’s biased FB statement

However, it is obvious from the Facebook message posted by Navi Pillay who served as the United Nations High Commissioner for HR from 2008 to 2014, the extreme biases certain top level UN officials (former and perhaps present) hold against Sri Lanka. 

Pillay stated, “I join in the remembrance of the Tamil victims of the war in Sri Lanka that ended up in 18th of May, 2009…. on this Remembrance Day it is important that we honor the Tamil victims, and we inspire ourselves to continue their struggle for justice, freedoms and reparation for their loses.”

It is interesting that as a former UN High Commissioner for HR, Pillay completely overlooked the Sinhala and Muslim victims, who lost their homes, land and properties, loved ones, limbs and lives. In fact she justified their trauma by blatantly endorsing terrorism, which she termed as “their struggle”, ignoring that Tamils, including children, were also victimised by the LTTE, who also assassinated almost every notable Tamil politician from the North and East. How did their elimination factor in “their struggle” figure is an interesting question. She also overlooked that over 50 percent of Tamils live in harmony with all communities outside the North and East provinces. 

Pillai falsely accuses the SL Army

She accuses the Sri Lanka Army of having “stolen” the property of Tamils. Yet, since the end of the war most of this land has been already released to the owners. Almost all are already resettled in their homes. International experts estimated 12 years to complete the de-mining of anti-personnel mines planted by the LTTE haphazardly. Unwilling to keep people as internally displaced, the Sri Lanka Army cleared the area within two years. Considering that it is mostly the Tamils who have since found their way home, it is a pity that people like Pillay fail to appreciate the Herculean task done by the Sri Lanka Army. 

Pillay also noted, “The United Nations investigations determined that during the war in Sri Lanka, international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed and yet there has been no judicial mechanism, no perpetrators have been brought to justice.”

This investigation that Pillay refers excluded the UN internal findings that only around 7,000 died during the war’s last phase. Instead, the Darusman report that was commissioned by the then UNSG Ban Ki-moon for his personal use speculated without justification that the number killed could be as high as 40,000. The contentious OISL report blindly included this figure without even a breakdown of the number of combatants or civilians killed. 

LTTE’s people buffer zones

If 40,000 lost were lives, the LTTE bears the blame for it, for they compromised over 300,000 civilians by forcibly keeping them as a human buffer zone against the advancing military. Furthermore, they conscripted children to the war effort, discarded their uniforms to blur distinction and installed military hardware inside the No Fire Zones, amidst civilians. 

Pillay’s statement should shake the UN to the core. The UN must recognise the personal prejudices that has corrupted the UN and has rendered it a useless body unable to arrest any of the human catastrophes due to hegemonic forces. The recent reaction of the Special rapporteur for religion and belief in an internal matter of Sri Lanka was also based on personal biases. Hence Pillay’s self-expose is not an isolated incident. 

This is a systematic corruption procedure that the UN must make an effort to immediately eliminate. If the UN fails to clean its own house, Sri Lanka will not be the only country that will be compelled to leave the UN. 

ranasingheshivanthi@gmail.com

Details of attempted terror attack at Taj Samudra revealed at PCoI

May 24th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Details of attempted terror attack at Taj Samudra revealed at PCoI

It was revealed before the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) on the Easter Sunday attacks that the common practice of the Taj Samudra Hotel is to submit its guests’ details to the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and the President’s Security Division (PSD) on a daily basis.

As such, on the day of the attacks, the hotel submitted a similar list, before the explosions occurred to the two entities, which included the details of the suicide bomber who detonated explosives in Dehiwala.

This was revealed by the Security Manager of Taj Samudra Hotel Sujeewa Fernando, who gave evidence before the PCoI on Easter attacks.

He said the hotel’s CCTV footages had shown that one of the bombers had entered the Taj Samudra Hotel at 4.53 pm on the day before the attacks.

The bomber had stayed at room 365, however, he had exited the hotel at 5.44 pm on the same day and had not returned.

He also noted that the suspect was registered at the hotel under the name Abdul Latif Jameel Mohammed and that a copy of the suspect’s National Identity Card (NIC) was attached to the registration.

He went on to say that it is the common practice of the Taj Samudra Hotel to submit the details of its guests to the SIS and the PSD, on a daily basis.

He added that the register of the hotel guests, including the suspect, for April 20, 2019, was sent to the SIS and the PSD, between 7.00 am and 8.00 am.

On April 1, suspect Jameel Mohammed had entered the Taj Samudra Hotel at 7.09 am and the at 8.32 am he had made his way to the hotel’s Ports of Call restaurant, with a backpack and wheeled luggage.

The CCTV footages showed the suspect looking restless, attempting to do something.

While being seated, the rattled suspect is engaged in some attempt involving his backpack, and he even ignores the incoming phone call.

The witness said that the suspect had exited the restaurant with the backpack and a hotel employee brought him to two wheeled luggage, adding that judging by the manner one of the hotel staff lifts one of the luggage it seemed that the bag was empty.

The panel then asked the witness if another suspicious person had visited the hotel before the suspect did. The witness replied that on the 17th of April 2019, at around 1.45 pm, such a person did come to the hotel and had enquired about how to book a room. 

The Commission then showed the witness the footage of the person who visited the Kingsbury Hotel prior to the attacks, to which the witness said that it could well be him who visited the Taj Samudra Hotel.

When asked whether a VIP was at the Taj Samudra Hotel when the attacks took place, the witness said if a VID with state sponsorship is staying at the hotel, he would have been given prior notification. He added that no such person stayed at the hotel when the attacks happened.


Subsequently, 3 three-wheeler drivers who the bomber had hired after leaving the Taj Samudra Hotel gave evidence before the Commission.

The first three-wheeler driver said an individual who looked like a Pakistani national had boarded his vehicle at around 8.55 am.

He said that although the passenger initially wanted to be dropped off in Dehiwala, he, however, disembarked near the Wellawatte market complex.

The second three-wheeler driver, meanwhile, told the Commission that the suspect who boarded his vehicle from Wellawatte asked whether there is a rest house near the Dehiwala zoo.

He said that as per the request of the passenger, he had driven him to the Tropical Inn rest house owned by a person known to him, near the Dehiwala zoo, at around 9.35 am.

Meanwhile, the third three-wheeler driver told the Commission that the individual who had boarded his vehicle at around 1.5 pm near a mosque in Dehiwala, had travelled a short distance and disembarked near the Tropical Inn.

Subsequently, the bomber had entered the Tropical Inn and detonated the explosives at around 1.30 pm.

Yahapalana culture of vilification and false propaganda has no place in post-COVID-19 world – PM

May 24th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa states that the Yahapalana political culture of vilification and false propaganda has no place in the post-COVID-19 world.

Issuing a statement titled ‘Sri Lanka after Yahapalanaya, Easter Sunday and COVID-19, Premier Rajapaksa said the economic boom in Sri Lanka between 2006 and 2014 went in reverse after the Yahapalana government took over in January 2015.

Rajapaksa pointed out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in 2014, had declared Sri Lanka to be among the fastest-growing economies in Asia.

He states that this economic boom was achieved despite the war, the global food crisis of 2007, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, and the highest crude oil prices in history.

However, there were no external, global reasons for the economic collapse since January 2015, he said. Pointing out that Sri Lanka’s total outstanding debt increased by 74.4% from Rs. 7.39 trillion at the end of 2014, to Rs.12.89 trillion by October 2019, Rajapaksa said claimed that nothing of lasting value was built by the Yahapalana government despite its borrowing spree.

Prime Minister Rajapaksa further said that the Easter Sunday bombings of April 2019 exacerbated the Yahapalana recession.

While a worldwide economic crisis reminiscent of the 1930s Great Depression is widely expected to follow the COVID-19 pandemic, it has left all Sri Lankans with only one option – building Sri Lanka, said Premier Rajapaksa.

The Prime Minister went on to say that the Opposition hopes to undermine the government’s economic recovery efforts by singling out capable state officials for attack. He stated this quoting the spark of dialogue that followed the Secretary to the President P. B. Jayasundera’s appeal to public servants to contribute whatever they can from their salaries to tide over this crisis.

In the difficult times that lie ahead, Sri Lanka’s economic survival and the future of the children depend on the vision, ability, and skill of those running the country, says Rajapaksa.

The team that is now running the country from the President downwards, won a war that was deemed unwinnable and presided over the greatest economic boom since independence despite impossible odds between 2006 and 2014. That is the kind of leadership needed to steer this country forward in the post-COVID-19 world”, he concluded.

The full statement issued by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa:

According to the IMF, in 2014, Sri Lanka was among the fastest growing economies in Asia. Economic growth averaged 6% during the war years from 2006 to 2009 and increased to 7.4% in the post-war years from 2010 to 2014. The debt to GDP ratio was reduced from 90% in 2005 to 75% at the end of 2014. The All Share Price Index rose from 1,922 in 2005 to 7,299 by the end of 2014. Sri Lanka’s per capita GDP in US Dollar terms increased threefold from USD 1,242 in 2005 to USD 3,819 by the end of 2014. The biggest infrastructure building programme in post- independence history was also carried out between 2006 and 2014. This economic boom was achieved despite the war, the global food crisis of 2007, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the highest crude oil prices in history. Crude oil cost an average of USD 74 per barrel from 2006 to 2009 and USD 103 from 2010 to 2014.

After January 2015 everything went in reverse. The economic growth rate dropped to 5% in 2015 and declined year after year ending up at 2.3% by 2019. The value of the US Dollar appreciated against the Rupee from Rs.130 in 2014 to 181 by October 2019. Sri Lanka’s total outstanding debt increased by 74.4% from Rs. 7.39 trillion at the end of 2014, to Rs.12.89 trillion by October 2019. Between January 2015 and October 2019, the total foreign currency borrowings of the yahapalana government in the form of Sovereign Bonds, Sri Lanka Development Bonds, Syndicated Loans and Currency Swaps totaled over USD 26 billion. Despite this borrowing spree, absolutely nothing of lasting value was built by the yahapalana government. The All Share Price Index declined from 7,299 in 2014 to 5,990 by the end of October 2019. Yet during the entire period from 2015 to 2019 the average price of crude oil was USD 60 per barrel – the lowest in recent history.


There were no external, global reasons for this economic collapse. India and Bangladesh experienced robust growth between 2015 and 2019. The Easter Sunday bombings of April 2019 exacerbated the yahapalana recession. On 16 November 2019, President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa inherited an economy that was in shambles. It was in such a context that the entire world was engulfed by the Covid-19 pandemic. A worldwide economic crisis reminiscent of the 1930s Great Depression is widely expected to follow the Covid-19 pandemic. In this new global environment, even the option of going overseas in search of greener pastures will be very limited because all countries will be facing economic hardship and mass unemployment. The Covid-19 pandemic has left all Sri Lankans with only one option – building Sri Lanka. The choice is stark – pull together or perish.

When the Secretary to the President Dr P.B.Jayasundera in his capacity as the foremost officer of the public service, recently appealed to public servants to contribute whatever they can from their salaries to tide over this crisis, the opposition attacked him viciously. Knowing fully well that this was only a request for voluntary contributions, they tried to portray it as a compulsory deduction. Dr. Jayasundera played a central role in the 2006-2014 economic boom. The opposition obviously hopes to undermine the government’s economic recovery efforts by singling out capable state officials like him for attack.

We should all realize that this yahapalana political culture of vilification and false propaganda has no place in the post-Covid-19 world. In the difficult times that lie ahead, Sri Lanka’s economic survival and the futures of our children, depend on the vision, ability and skill of those running the country. German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently stated that Covid-19 had hit Germany at a time when the economy was doing well and they had the strength to face the crisis. The situation in Sri Lanka was the exact opposite. We should all be mindful of this reality and make our choices and decisions accordingly. Everyone knows what would have happened if the yahapalana cabal had been in power when the Covid-19 pandemic hit Sri Lanka. The team that is now running the country from the President downwards, won a war that was deemed unwinnable, and presided over the greatest economic boom since independence despite impossible odds between 2006 and 2014. That is the kind of leadership needed to steer this country forward in the post-Covid-19 world.”

Six arrested over assault on Ada Derana reporter at Atulugama

May 24th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Six arrested over assault on Ada Derana reporter at Atulugama

Six including the main suspect who assaulted the Ada Derana journalist Atulugama, Bandaragama have been placed under arrest, the police said.

The assault took place this morning (24) when the journalist in question went to Atulugama area to make coverage on Muslim devotees celebrating the Ramazan festival while adhering to social distancing regulations.

The journalist in question, Bimal Shyaman, had initially spoken to the chairman of the mosque association in Atulugama, Najeed Hajjiar Mohamed Najeed.

He had then obtained footages of one of the mosques in the area and as he was set to leave, a group of residents had threatened blocked his way and threatened him. They had also caused damages to his vehicle.

However, another group of persons had assisted the journalist to pull out of the situation.

The Atulugama mosque association’s chairman also arrived at the site to help out Ada Derana journalist.

Bandaragama Police launched an investigation into the incident following the complaint lodged by the Ada Derana journalist.

Sri Lanka’s coronavirus cases reach 1,140 with two new patients

May 24th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Two new COVID-19 positive cases have been detected as of 11.00 pm today (24), says the Ministry of Health.

Sri Lanka’s total count of coronavirus infections thereby increased to 1,140.

The two patients are confirmed to be arrivals from Kuwait, who are undergoing mandatory quarantine in Trincomalee.

Accordingly, a total of 51 positive cases of coronavirus has been detected so far within the day.

Meanwhile, 674 of these coronavirus patients have been discharged from hospitals so far upon complete recovery.

The Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry says that 457active cases are currently under medical care at selected hospitals.

The country’s death toll due to coronavirus currently stands at 09.

Twenty more test positive for COVID-19 as tally leaps to 1,138

Fifteen more persons have tested positive for COVID-19 as of 9.45 pm today (24) as Sri Lanka’s total count of coronavirus infections reached 1,138.

One of these positive cases has been identified as a navy man and the rest of the 19 cases are returnees from Kuwait undergoing mandatory quarantine procedure at the facility in Minneriya.
 
Accordingly, a total of 49 positive cases of coronavirus has been detected so far within the day.

Meanwhile, 674 of these coronavirus patients have been discharged from hospitals so far upon complete recovery.

The Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry says that 455 active cases are currently under medical care at selected hospitals.

The country’s death toll due to coronavirus currently stands at 09.

COVID-19: Cases reach 1,118 as Indonesia returnee tests positive

One more person has tested positive for COVID-19 as of 6.00 pm on Sunday (24), says the Ministry of Health.

Sri Lanka’s total count of coronavirus infections thereby reached 1,118.

Meanwhile, 674 of these coronavirus patients have made complete recoveries so far.

According to the tally of Epidemiology Unit, 435 active cases are under medical care at IDH, Welikanda Base Hospital, Navy Hospital, Colombo East Base Hospital, Iranawila Hospital, Kattankudy Base Hospital, Homagama Base Hospital and Minuwangoda Base Hospital.

The country’s death toll due to coronavirus currently stands at 09.

COVID-19 cases in Sri Lanka climb to 1,117

Eleven more COVID-19 positive cases have been identified raising the total number of coronavirus cases reported in the country to 1,117.

The new cases have been identified among persons who had been undergoing the mandatory quarantine at the Trincomalee quarantine center upon arriving from Kuwait.

Accordingly, 28 new coronavirus cases have been detected from the country so far today (24). All 28 patients had returned from Kuwait, according to the Ministry of Health.

Currently, 434 active COVID-19 cases are under medical observation at selected hospitals across the island.

Meanwhile, 14 more COVID-19 patients recovered today (24) raising the total tally to 674 cases.

Sri Lanka has recorded nine fatalities from the virus.

Twelve more coronavirus cases bring tally to 1,106

Twelve more persons are confirmed to have contracted the novel coronavirus, confirmed the Ministry of Health a short while ago.

With the new cases, 17 new coronavirus cases have been detected in the county within the day so far. Previously, 5 individuals who had arrived from Kuwait were declared to have contracted the virus.

The 12 new cases, too, have been identified from persons who arrived in Sri Lanka from Kuwait and undergoing the mandatory quarantine process at the Trincomalee quarantine center.

Thereby the total number of COVID-19 cases in Sri Lanka is at 1,106.

As per the Epidemiology Unit of the Ministry, 423 active cases are under medical care at selected hospitals across the country.

Meanwhile, 14 more COVID-19 patients recovered today (24) raising the total tally to 674 cases.

Sri Lanka has recorded nine fatalities from the virus.

Five COVID-19 cases among Kuwait arrivals push total to 1,094

Five more individuals who had arrived in the country from Kuwait have tested positive for COVID-19, stated the Department of Government Information.

They had been undergoing the mandatory quarantine process at the Trincomalee quarantine center.

Thereby, the total number of coronavirus cases reported in Sri Lanka has climbed to 1,094.

As per the Epidemiology Unit of the Ministry, 411 active cases are under medical care at selected hospitals across the country.

Meanwhile, 14 more COVID-19 patients recovered today (24) raising the total tally to 674 cases.

Sri Lanka has recorded nine fatalities from the virus.

Origins of Tamil political violence

May 23rd, 2020

H. L. D. Mahindapala

May 14, 1976 is one of the most underreported, underestimated, underexamined dates in the political calendar of independent Sri Lanka. It was the date on which the Tamil leadership which had gathered in Vadukoddai passed a resolution declaring war against the democratically elected state demanding a separate state. Stitching bits and pieces of selected events from here and there, they painted their version of history which consisted of highly controversial accusations to demonise the Sinhala-state” – their terminology to stigmatise the democratically elected state as a racist entity with no space for the minorities, particularly the Tamils. So shedding copious tears for the Tamils, the Vadukoddai Declaration of War urged the Tamil youth to take up arms and never rest until they had achieved Tamil Eelam – a political haven of the Tamils, by the Tamils for the Tamils.

The call to take up arms was declared in the last two paragraphs of the Vadukoddai Resolution. It said: This Convention directs the Action Committee of the TAMIL UNITED LIBERATION FRONT to formulate a plan of action and launch without undue delay the struggle for winning the sovereignty and freedom of the Tamil Nation;

And this Convention calls upon the Tamil Nation in general and the Tamil youth in particular to come forward to throw themselves fully into the sacred fight for freedom and to flinch not till the goal of a sovereign state of TAMIL EELAM is reached.”

In these two concluding paragraphs the Tamil leadership assembled at Vadukoddai called upon the Action Committee  to formulate a plan of action” for the Tamil youth in particular to take up arms, abandoning their pretensions of being a non-violent movement. And from 1976 onwards both the Tamil elders and the Tamils youth followed the declared objective of winning the sovereignty and freedom of the Tamil Nation” through violence. It was a clear and decisive declaration to pursue a military course of action to achieve political goals This was the primary message delivered by the Tamil leadership to the Tamil people. It was the fateful day on which the Tamil leadership made their biggest political gamble by deciding to abandon the non-violent, democratic mainstream and go down the path of violence. They decided to change the course of history – and their destiny — with violence. They invested everything they had in pursuing violence and failed. Failed miserably!

Throughout the post-independent decades, the ageing Tamil leadership had pushed Tamil communalism to the extreme end and by May 14, 1976 the force of events generated by them had cornered them. They discovered rather late that the consistent, unrelenting and massive political campaigns they had whipped up, blaming everything on the Sinhala state” in the post-independent phase, had not gone in the direction they had wanted. Their aim was to divide Sri Lanka into two states – a task which they set out achieve with the typical Tamil arrogance boosted by historical distortions, political fictions, and anti-Sinhala-Buddhist venom. They had raised the hopes of the Jaffnaites overestimating their peninsular power and underestimating the consolidated historical forces that had created, built and sustained the nation over the ages.

By 1976 the false expectations they generated had risen to fever pitch and the internal forces – mainly, the Tamil youth — that rose with the high expectations had gone as far as they could and reached the end of their political tether. The Tamil youth were impatient and rebelling against the conservative and failed Tamil leadership demanding a change of course. The internal dynamics within the peninsula had gathered a momentum which demanded instant solutions. Eelam remained in the Never-Never land, elusive as ever. The hate politics of mono-ethnic Tamil extremism, targeting the Sinhala-Buddhists of the South, had gone too far to a point of no return, leaving no room for peaceful co-existence. Any moves for compromises were decried by one or the other Tamil party as surrender to the Sinhalese. Following Jinnah’s partioning of India the Tamil leadership declared that the marriage of partnership was over. They were determined to go for divorce which in their desperate circumstances seems to be the only way out.

In the Vadukoddai Resolution the Tamil leadership was throwing not a challenge but an ultimatum to the Sinhala state”. Pumped up by their mono-ethnic rhetoric, wrapped in mythologies, they were hoping to force their way into Eelam. The plan of the Tamil elders was to make use of the Tamil youth to pull their political chestnuts out.  In the process, they had painted themselves into a mono-ethnic extremity from which they could not get out except through violence. They were determined to dissolve the marriage made by the gods of geography and history. All what they needed was a public declaration justifying the hate politics of the North for them to declare war. The Vadukoddai Resolution was introduced to spell out the reasons why they refused to coexist. Demanding disproportionate shares of positions (particularly in the government service), power in the legislatures, privileges enshrined in the various constitutions and, most of all, territories as ethnic enclaves they had pushed themselves into a self-destructive political extremity. It led them to mono-ethnic politics, excluding the other”.  With this agenda they had nowhere else to go except to embrace violence.  This confirms the proposition that separatism and violence are inseparable.

It was amidst these overwhelming pressures that the Tamil leadership met in Vadukoddai and gave the official nod for the Tamil youth to take up arms against the elected state of Sri Lanka, hoping to ride on their backs to the seats of power in Eelam. The old Tamil leadership did not realise at this stage that they were handing over their traditional power, which they had wielded from feudal times, into the hands of the untried, untested and inexperienced Tamil youth. The immature Tamil youth who took over were armed with the Vadukoddai Resolution that legitimised their violence. Fired up by the Vadukoddai ideology they came out of their cells like bulls in a china shop. They literally went berserk believing that they had the Vadukoddai license to kill everything that crossed their path, including their political fathers.

In the meantime, the ageing Tamil leaders and the Tamil youth continued to maintain their two-pronged attack on the South. Needling the lower-level ethnic leadership of the South was a deliberate and chosen tactic of the Northern provocative politics, wrote Prof. A. J. Wilson, son-in-law of S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, father of Tamil separatism. The joint front of the Tamil elders and the youth were heading towards violence. Clearly, 1976” was segueing, slowly but surely, into 1983”. The explosion of 1983 did not come out of a misguided government turning a blind eye. It was the cumulative reaction to the collective violence unleashed in the Vadukoddai Resolution. No doubt, the aggressive reaction of the lunatic fringe in the South, provoked by the hate politics of Jaffna jingoism, too had aggravated the worsening inter-ethnic relations with reactive mob-violence breaking out sporadically. But the ultimatum issued in the Vadukoddai Resolution, and the provocative violence targeting the Sinhala state” that followed, were heating up communal tensions. Sinhala CTB bus drivers were returning to Colombo from Jaffna complaining that the Tamil shops were refusing to serve even a glass of water. By 1983 the two communities had drawn as far apart as they could. The last straw that broke the back of the Sinhala camel was the killing of the 13 soldiers.

Looking back, it is obvious that 1983” was the Southern reply to the arrogant politics of 1976” and the subsequent increase of violence of the Tamil youth threatening the sovereignty of the nation – the only place available to the Sinhalese in this lonely planet. At least nominally, the Tamil and Muslim communities had other historical havens to which they could withdraw in case the worst came to the worst. The Sinhalese had only Sri Lanka. It was the only base they built exclusively for themselves. Generations of Sinhalese sacrificed their lives to make it their safe haven. They had a historical right to claim it their own. It was not narrow racism / chauvinism. It was their legitimate, historical and natural right. The Vadukoddai Resolution posed a threat to their security and history and their defensive reaction was predictable.

The debate on the whys and the wherefores of 1983”, of course, is not going to end in a hurry. Taken out of its context and viewed as an anti-Tamil outburst of a society gone mad, the Tamils made 1983” the ultimate proof of their need for a divorce. But if it is placed in the context of consequences flowing from the ideological and political violence unleashed in the politics of 1976” and after, it is logical to conclude that 1983” was an inevitable outcome of the preceding Tamil aggressive and provocative politics. They asked for and they got it, was the general reaction of the Sinhalese. The sequence of events that flowed from 1976” ran incrementally, step by step, one leading to another, until escalating violence reached its explosive peak in 1983”.

Provocative rhetoric and actions of the North unravelled slowly but surely into 1983”. The explosion of 1983 was the counter-violence to end Tamil expansionism and aggressive power grab threatening the territorial integrity and the historical heritage left behind by the Founding Fathers of the nation. The ideological and emotional ambience for an ethnic explosion was prepared and fertilized by the Tamil leadership. The Tamil have always been quite clever in digging their own grave. The other two minorities escaped the horrors of a 33-year-old war because their leadership was wise enough not to hand over their grip on power to the misguided youth. It is the restoration of power to the non-violent stream of Tamil politics by the Rajapakse brothers that has introduced a new normalcy which, hopefully, will grow into a new nation.

Sinhala violence has invariably been reactive, responding to provocative political violence of the minorities. And 1983” is no exception. Besides, no responsible Sinhala leader, no respected or established Sinhala community organisation, nor the Sinhala state” had officially declared war against another community, despite the provocative violence they had faced. Like any other state it had reacted defensively to restore peace, and protect territorial integrity and sovereignty. It has never declared a war to impose its supremacy over the other communities.

The live-and-let-live policy of the Sinhala majority did not go beyond sporadic violence of the fringe freaks against the provocative acts of the minorities. Without condoning any kind of violence, it is clear that those explosions were like the fizz of the soda bottle. Sinhala violence has always gone down almost instantly, soon after its explosion, returning the nation to peaceful co-existence. Only the Tamil leadership decided to declare war against the Sinhala state” at Vadukoddai, creating the longest period of brutal violence. Their politics of hate leaves no room for peaceful co-existence. Vadukoddai Resolution was a recipe for separatist violence and chaos. But it was a wave of tsunamic violence that came from the volcanic sifting of the territorial plates in Vadukoddai and nowhere else.

I repeat, separatism and violence are inseparable. It is the kind of politics that can breed only hatred and not reconciliation.

To be continued

VEN. ELLAWALA MEDHANANDA Part 2

May 23rd, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

After ordination, Ven. Medhananda continued to live at Sri Sumangalaramaya, Napawela, Getahatta.  That remains his permanent address today.

When Medhananda first went there,   the temple was very new. It had an image house but no image. Loku Hamuduruwo, Ven. Soratha got a stone mason down from India and   had a Buddha statue made. He also constructed a bodhighara. The villagers were poor and could not support the temple very much. They sent dry rations as dane. When Ven. Soratha died, Medhananda was placed in n charge of the temple. Ven. Medhananda developed the vihara. He provided an access road, boundary wall, library.

Ven. Soratha had started a daham pasala in the temple in 1946. Medhananda taught there from the time he was a samanera and after higher ordination he took complete charge of the daham pasala. Medhananda came to Napawela every week end, from where ever he was, to supervise the daham pasala.  the village had retired teachers and retired principals but they were not prepared to   teach in the daham pasala, complained Medhananda. Medhananda therefore turned to past students and appointed them as teachers. Even today the teachers are those he taught, said his biographer.

Medhananda expanded the activities of the daham pasala. He held an annual celebration, with an art exhibition. We organized daham pasal trips to places of importance in Sri Lanka. We took them to sites of archeological interest and asked them to write reports on them.  We did all this with great difficulty, said Medhananda.

Medhananda was concerned about the future of those living in Napawela. Napawela residents could only hope to get employment as drivers of vehicles, he said. Medhananda tried to improve their prospects. He started a free tuition class in the temple, for ‘school exams’. This was probably for O levels, perhaps A level too.    Medhananda also established a computer training institute in the temple later on.  

Ven. Medhananda acquired Hendadola estate and distributed it to the villagers. This was probably during Land Reform. The estate had 76 acres of untapped rubber. He told the new owners to cut and sell the trees. He had got a permit for this. Medhananda said he went to Hendadola every week to see whether they were cultivating the land. He had an EN 1956 Peugeot car, at the time, recalled Medhananda.

From 1970 Medhananda has held a   well attended all day Nikini pinkama in August. For the first thirty years this pinkama was held in Anuradhapura. Thereafter Medhananda moved it to other places, such as Buddhangala, Tissamaharama, Tantirimalai, Seruwila.    This pinkama continues today.

 Ven. Ellawala Medhananda was a popular bana preacher. He received invitations to preach from all over the island.  In Anuradhapura after listening to a sermon from Medhananda, a member of the audience   donated his house and land. Medhananda   used the donation to establish a temple, Ranasiharamaya, near Mawatagama.

Medhananda‘s personal needs as a bhikkhu would have been minimal. Therefore his salary as teacher was spent on the schools he was teaching in. The pirikara he received was used to help monks in poor temples. He found dayakas for these temples, who were prepared to give monthly donations.   He also arranged pilgrimages to these temples, to help boost   the income of the temple.   Medhananda had once provided robes and ata pirikara to all the viharas in Trincomalee and Vavuniya for Katina. 

Medhananda has been involved in a wide range of activities, possibly far wider than most activist monks. Medhananda was head of Napawela Grameeya Nishpadana Mandalaya,   Chairman of Balangoda Deaf and Blind school and advisor to Senior citizens Home, Mallawapitiya, Kurunegala.

During his time in the Department of Education, he was involved in the preparation of History text book for grades 3, 4, 5 and 9. He   helped prepared question papers for O level and A level, also to set standards for Pirivena exams.

Medhananda ‘s archaeological research was recognized at  national , provincial  and district level. He was a member of Advisory council, Department of Archeology, a   member of Mahavamsa committee, and   member of the At lipi Commission, Colombo.  He was Coordinator for  Attakata translations. He was President of Ratnapura District Cultural Board,  and the Ratnapura Archaeological committee. He was  Research chairmen, Sabaragamu  itihasa Puravidya gavesana Ayathanaya.   

Ven. Medhananda  held positions in Sangha  organizations at local and national level. He was a Member of the Buddha Sasana   Fund. He was  a member of   Sabaragamu Maha Sangha Sabha, Ratnapura and Eheliyagoda  Sasanaraksaka bala mandalaya. He was secretary of  Rajya sansta Bauddha bala Mandalaya, Balangoda, and  of Trinikaya bhikshu bala mandalaya, Eheliyagoda. He was  also  Advisor to  Arugam bay Aukana  Committee and  the  Tarulengala Aranyaya, Hulannuge.    

Ven. Medhananda  did not have very high opinion of the lay Buddhists. Those who help and support the Sangha  are very few, he said. We carry on as monks with great difficulty, he lamented. Buddhists do not value the Sangha. They do not help to develop  the temples. Very few think that they must protect and preserve the Sangha.

 Monks never fail to carry out their duties but if they  see any  little lapse or mistake on our part,  the public insult and scold us. That is the reward the Sangha gets. That is why they leave robes.   And so the Sangha lose fine monks.” 

But the public may have their reasons. A school teacher had refused to help Medhananda  when he was leaving to study at Ratmalana.  She had said ‘why bother, he will leave robes, we need  not help him.’ Medhananda was not pleased, but I think that the teacher’s view  cannot be dismissed.  ( continued)

කොරෝනාවෙන් ලංකාවට ලැබී ඇති වෙස්‌වලාගත් භාග්‍යය

May 23rd, 2020

චන්ද්‍රසිරි විජයවික්‍රම, LL.B.,Ph.D.

දිසාපති හාමුදුරුවෝ මන්තිරීට සර් කීම

පක්‍ෂ දේශපාලකයින් විසින් ලංකාව විනාශ කිරීමේ එක් සන්‌ධි ස්ථානයක් වූයේ රාජ්‍ය සේවය සඳහා අයැදුම් කිරීමේදී මන්ත්‍රීගෙන් ලියුමක් ඊට ඈඳන ලෙස ශ්‍රී ලංකා-සමසමාජ සභාග ආණ්ඩුකාලයේදී (1962-64, 1970>) ගත් තීරණයය. මහ බැංකුවට බඳවා ගන්නා ආධුණික විධායක නිලධාරී තනතුරු වලදී, විශ්ව විද්‍යාල ආර්ථික විද්‍යා ගෞරව උපාධිධාරීන්ට පවා මෙසේ කරන්නට සිදුවිය. චන්ද කාලයේ යමෙකුගේ දෙමාපියන් වැඩකලේ මන්ත්‍රීගේ පක්‍ෂයට වෙනස් පක්‍ෂයකට නම් මේ නිසා ඇතිවන අනිසි මානසික බලපෑම (හීනමානය) අතිමහත්‌ය.

උසාවි බාල්දු කිරීම

ෆිලික්ස් ඩයස් විසින් කුරුණෑගල දේශපාලකයෙකුවූ ජයා පතිරණව සුප්‍රීම් උසාවියට පත් කිරීමේ සිට, ලංකාවේ සිදුවු මේ විනාශකාරී පෙරළියට හොඳම උදාහරණය නම්, පසු කලෙක ලංකාවේ පක්‍ෂ මාරුකිරීමේ ඔස්තාර් යයි ප්‍රසිද්‌ධවූ රොනී ද මැල් ය. සිවිල් සේවය අතහැර දේශපාලනයට ඒමට ඔහු තීරණය කලේ නිලධාරියා අභිභවා මන්තිරී පරාණ හිස ඔසවන්නට වීමේ උපනතියත් සමඟය. එහෙත් පානදුරේ කෝටිපති බස් මුදලාලි ලියෝ ප්‍රනාන්දුගේ එකම දරුවාවූ ඔහුගේ බිරිඳ ඊට ඉඩදුන්නේ නැත. දිසාපති හාමුදුරුවන් ඉදිරියේ සර් කියන මන්තිරීලා ඇය නිතරම දැක ඇත. එහෙත් අන්තිමේදී ඇයටද පෙනීගියේ තම සැමියා නිවැරදි බවය. ඔහු කෙතරම් සතුටු වූවාදයත්, විශ්‍රාම වැටුපත් එපා කියා සේවයෙන් ඉවත් ‌විය!

දේශපාලක ගැට

නිලධාරී පංචස්කන්‌ධ, මන්තිරී පංචස්කන්‌ධ විසින් යටපත් කර ගැනීමේ උපක්‍රමයේ හොඳම නිදසුනක් එක් නිලධාරිනියක් මට කියා සිටියාය. පරිපාලන සේවයට බඳවා ගන්නා ආධුනික නිලධාරීන්ට පුහුණුවීම් පාඨමාලා ලබාදෙන එක්තරා ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ නිලධාරීයෙක් ඔවුන්ට දෙන එක් අවවාදයක් නම්, තම රාජකාරියේදී, විශේෂයෙන් ඉඩම් බෙදාදීමේදී, මන්ත්‍රී පරාණ දාන <ඇමට> අසු නොවන ලෙසය. ඒ ඇම නම්, මිනිසුන්ට ඉඩම් කට්ටි බෙදන අවස්ථාවේදී, ඉතා අහිංසක ලීලාවෙන් මන්ත්‍රී විසින් ඉඩම් බෙදීම භාර නිලධාරීයාට කියන, <මහත්තයෝ, ඔන්න ඔය කට්ටියකට ඔබතුමාගෙ නමත් දාගන්නකෝ> යන යෝජනාවය! ඕනෑ තරම් ඉඩම් කට්ටි ප්ලෑනේ ඇති නිසා, යම් නිලධාරියෙක් ඒ අවස්ථාවේදී ඇතිවෙන ක්‍ෂණික තන්හාව උඩ මේ ලණුව ගිල්ලොත්, ඔහු සදාකාලිකවම මන්ත්‍රීගේ පඹයෙක් නොව ප්‍රාණ ඇපකාරයෙක් වන්නේය. ඔහුගේ රාජකාරී තීරණ ගෙදර නෝනාට/ මහත්තයාටවත් කියන්නට බැරි තරමින් පාච්චල් වන්නේය.

මේ අන්දමේ කතා දුසිම් ගණනක් වුනත් ලියන්නට හැකිය. තව කිවයුතු එක කතාවක් නම් මා දන්නා තරුණ යුවලක, ස්ත්‍රියට දුෂ්කර පලාතක සිට කළුතරට ගුරුමාරුවක් ගැනීමය. අවශ්‍ය අවම කාලයවූ අවුරුදු 5 වෙනුවට 7 ක්ම සේවය කල ඇයව ඈ ඉන්නා පාසැලෙන් මුදාහැරීමටත්, ඈ ව භාරගන්නට කළුතර පාසැලේ විදුහල්පති කැමතිවී සිටියත්, අධ්‍යාපන කාර්යාල දෙකේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂකලා දෙන්නා ගුරුවරියව අවුරුදු දෙකක් පුරාම රස්තියාදු කලේය. ඉහළ දේශපාලන සම්බන්‌ධයක් හරහා මහ ඇමතියාට බැගෑපත්‌ව ඉල්ලා සිටියත් ඔහු එයද නොසලකා හැරියේ ලොකු පගාවක් බලාපොරොත්තුවෙන් බව නිසැකය.

අන්තිමේදී සිදුවූයේ කුමක්ද? මහ ඇමතියාගේ එක් සම්බන්‌ධීකරණ ලේකම් කෙනෙක් රුපියල් 50,000 කට එක දවසින් මාරුව සදා දුන්නේය! අවුරුද්දකට පමන කලින් පිටරට සිට ටෙලිවිෂන් එකක් ගෙනත් දෙන ලෙස ඔහු ඉල්ලා සිටියත් එය අතපසු කලේ යුක්තිසහගත මාරුවක් එසේ හෑල්ලු කිරීමට තිබූ අකමැත්ත නිසා මිස ටෙලිවිෂන් එකකට සල්ලි දීමේ ලෝභ කමකට නොවේ. ඒ ලේකම්, මහ ඇමතියාගේත්, ඔහුගේ චැක්ගෝල අධ්‍යක්‍ෂකගේත් හොර ගණු දෙනු දන්නේය. ඒවායේදී ඔහුද අධ්‍යක්‍ෂකට උදව්කර තිබේ. වරක් අධ්‍යක්‍ෂකට ලැබුණු ස්ථාන මාරුවක්ද මහaැමතිට කතාකර නතර කර දුන්නේය. දුෂ්කර පලාතේ නගරයත්, කළුතරත් අතර මාරුව ලබාදීමට වාහනයේ එහාට මෙහාට රවුම් ගසනා අතුර ලේකම්, ගුරුවරියගේ ස්වාමියාට කිව් කතා, පලාත් සභා මට්ටමින් රටට සිදුවන විනාශය ගැන චිත්‍රපටියක් බැලුවා වැනිය. මහaැමතිට දියයුතු දඬුවම හිරගෙදර නොව, වැව් ශුද්‌ධ කිරීමට ගෙනයාමය.

මේ අන්දමට විනාශය කරා ගිය රටකට, අළුත් ජනාධිපතිට, කොරෝනාව දිව්‍ය වරමක් වැනිය. රටේ ජනයා විසින් දේශපාලක හොරා දමණය කර, ඒ <රස්සාව> ඔවුන්ට අතින් පාඩු වෙන එකක් බවට පෙරලිය හැකිය, යුතුය. රටට විනයක් ගෙන ඒමේලා ජනාධිපතිට උපදේශක මණ්ඩල ක්‍රමයක් තිබිය යුතුසේම, වහාම වැරදි නිවැරදි කල හැකි, හොරුන් හා වංචාකාරීන් අල්ලාගත හැකි චරපුරුෂ සේවා ක්‍රමයක්ද තිබිය යුතුය. චෝදනා ප්‍රසිද්‌ධ කර කඩිනමින් ඒවා විසඳන ක්‍රමයක් තිබිය යුතුය. ගම් මට්ටමින් මෙය සිදුවිය යුතුය. ඒකාධිපතිවාදයක් යන චෝදනාව වැලකෙන්නේ එසේය.

හෝමාගම අළුත් ක්‍රිකට් ක්‍රීඩා භූමියක් සැදීමේ යෝජනාවට වූ දෙය මේ සඳහා හොඳ මඟ පෙන්‌වීමකි. ක්‍රීඩා දක්‍ෂතාවය නිසාම (නෑකම්, දේශපාලන පන්දම් නොව) දිවයිනේ නමක් දිනාගෙන ඇති දෙතුන් දෙනෙක් මැදිහත්‌වී මෙම යෝජනාවේ නුසුදුසුකම එලිකල නිසා එය අකුලා ගන්නට දේශපාලකයින්ට සිදුවිය. මෙය මොන අන්දමකටවත් සාධාරණීය කරණය කල නොහැකි පුදුමම යෝජනාවකි. එය මඩවඟුරක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවක් සදා රටට කල දියවන්නා හෝටල් හානිය වැනිමය. ඒ අවට මෙන්ම කොළඹ පවා වැස්සෙන් යටවෙන්නේ මේ නිසාය. අළුත් එකක් ඕනෑනම් එය සැදිය යුතුව තිබුනේ කොළඹින් ඈත රජරටය.

ඒ කාලයේ ගල් ඔය ඉහළ නිම්නයේ කුඩා ජලාශ කීපයක් වෙනුවට, පහල යෝධ සමුද්‍රයක් සදන්නට එපා යයි දොස්තර එස්. ඒ. වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා කල ආයාචනය ඩී. එස්ලා විසින් නොසළකා හැරීමේ විපාක රටම විදෙව්වේය. මේ සඳහා කොපි කල ඇමෙරිකාවේ ටෙනසි ගංඟා නිම්නයේ කර තිබුනේද වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා කී දෙයමය. හුණුගල් තට්ටු උඩ යෝධ වික්ටෝරියා ජලාශය සැදීමද මෙවැනි අඥාන වැඩකි. එහි බර නිසා හුණුගල් පාෂාණ දෙදරා ඇතිවන ප්‍රතිඵල ලැබෙන්නේ තව පරම්පරා දෙකකට පසුවය. දේශපාලකයින්ගේ මහා පරිමාණ යෝධ වැඩ පිස්සුව, කොරෝනා යුගයත් සමඟ 2020 සිට අවසන් කිරීමට ක්‍රිකට් මෙන්ම අනිකුත් අංශවල උගත්, බුද්ධිමත්, දක්‍ෂතා සහිත විශ්‍රාම ගිය හා නොගිය පුරවැසියන් බලකර සිටිය යුතුය. දැන් ජනයාගේ සිත් තුල කිඳාබැසගෙන තිබෙනා මතයක් නම් මේ යෝධ ව්‍යාපාර රෝගයට හේතුව ඊට සම්බන්‌ධ කොමිස් කුට්ටි ගාය බවය.

ලංකාවේ අධිවේගී ගායද මෙවැනිය. ඉදිරියට හෝ සිදුවිය යුත්තේ ප්‍රධාන රේල් පාරවල් ඩබල් ලයින් කර, ගොවියන්ට තම නිෂ්පාදන ඊට ගෙන ඒමට පහසු වන සේ පාරවල් රටාවක් සැදීමය. මෙතරම් පැහැදිලි ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් වෙනුවට සංකීර්‍ණ පරිවහන සැලැස්මවල් හදාගෙන දඟලන්නේ ඇයි? ලංකාවේ ගම්වල නම්වල ආරම්භය පිළිඹඳව ආකරාදියක් සදා ඇති කැනඩාවේ වසන මහාචාර්ය චන්ද්‍රේ ධර්‌මවර්‌ධන කියන්නේ යාපනයට විදුලි දුම්‍රියක් දැම්මොත් යාපනය, දැන් වැල්ලවත්ත-දෙහිවල මෙන්, කොළඹ පරිවාර නගරයක් වෙන බවය. ඊළම් ව්‍යාපාරය ඉබේම කොට උඩ යන බවය!

කොරෝනාව, කොසොල් රජතුමාගේ සීන දාසැය ලෝකයටම සැබෑ කලේය. එහි පෙන්වා දී ඇති රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන දූෂණ නැති කිරීමේ අවස්ථාව, ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභයට ලැබී ඇත. මේ සඳහා ජන මූල සභා (ජනසභා) මට්ටමෙන් රටේ විනයක් ඇති කිරීමේ යෝධ කාර්යයට (පාරේ කෙළ ගැසීමේ-ග්‍රාම සේවකට පගා දීමේ සිට ඉහළට), රටේ යුද හමුදාවත්, රටේ පන්සල් හා පල්ලිත් යොදාගත් විට, මිලිටරීකරණයක් ගැන තටමන යහපාලන හොරුන් නිරුත්තර වනු ඇත. මෙහිදී සුද්දගෙ නීතිය සංශොධනය කල යුතු, ඒ නිතීය හිරි-ඔත්තප්ප වලින් භය පමණක් සළකණ නිසාය. ජේවීපීකාරයින් 1971, 1988/89 කාලයේදී කලා මෙන් භයත්, ලැජ්ජාවට පත් කිරීමත් යන දෙකම අවශ්‍යය. කොරෝනා ඇඳිරි නීති කඩ කරමින් මිනිසුන් හැසුරුණු ආකාරයෙන් රටේ මධ්‍යස්ථ ජනයාට අවභොධවූයේ එයය.

Reply to Mayor Combie Canada Supporting Tamil Genocide Day

May 23rd, 2020

Dr. Chula Rajapakse MNZM

Dear Mayor Crombie, 

I regret very much that you have been badly mislead. There never was a Tamil genocide.The Tamil Tigers , labelled by the FBI US as the most brutal terrorist organisation,, that pioneered suicide bombing and the suicide west worn by all suicide bombers after them, waged a 30 year old war against the legally elected government Sri Lanka, alleging discrimination against Tamils post independence in Sri Lanka, for what in reality was the post independence loss of priveleges bestowed on them by colonial Britain as a part of their divide and rule policy where the Sinhalese were the victimised majority. 

In this war in the final few months leading to their defeat on 19.May 2019, they used nearly 300,000 Tamil civilians hostages as human shields, for their protection against the Sri Lankan security forces to ward off their defeat that eventuated on 19.5.09, when their leader Prabakaran became a victim the SL forces fire. The 300,000 Tamil civilians were rescued as a major objective of the final operation and rehabilitated and live peaceful and productive lives in SL now. The SL forces were under strict instruction from their President on a ” no civilian casualty policy” .They accomplished the Tiger defeat with about 7000 civilian casualties at most , very creditable considering the scale of the operation and the Tigers use of these civilians as human shields deliberately and mercilessly. 

These including the numbers were confirmed by the resident UN representative inSL at the time Sir John Holmes, and later by a census carried out in 2010 by Sri Lanka Tamil University Teachers. Diiplomatic cables despatched from the US and Uk embassies in Colombo at the time tabled in the British house of Lords by Lord Naseby in Oct 2017. also confirmed these numbers and also that but for the care exercised by the SL forces , the war would have been over much sooner and and with less security forces casualties. However,the powerful Tamil diaspora based largely in UK and Canada that funded the Tiger brutality for three decades, who had a track record of unbelievable misinformation that woud Dwarf Joseph Goebelle , Hitler’s propagand minister ,along with distortion extortion and drug trafficking, refusing to accept defeat responded by alleging that the Sri Lankan security forces achieved their defeat of the Tigers with an unaceptably high civilian casualty rate which they alleged without presenting any evidence , at different times and from different sources to be anything from 40,000 to 100,000. 

They then used their war chest of billions accumulated using distortion, extortion and drug trafficking to orchestrate this internationally using news media such s Channel 4 UK and unsuspecting and well meaning western politicians, who became easy pray to their presenting these entirely unsubstantiated numbers as representing ” victimisation of Tamil minority in SL and so a genocide”.  

They also found a powerful ally in the Darusman commission, a commission appointed by the then UNSCG Banki Moon against the wishes of the UNGA and UNSC so not a UN commission, to advice on accountability provisions in SL re HR, whose three commissioners had conflict with the SL government previously, who came up with their report receiving representations from the Tiger diaspora only and not from th SL administration. In their report they concluded that ” there was credible evidence of unacceptably high civilian casualties, but kept the source of this information secret for twenty years, so providing a reflection of the credibility and authenticity of these conclusions.

However, it provided the fodder that the TIger diaspora wanted and orchestrated this using the same resources claiming it a UN report. I urge you to verify the claims I have just presented many of which can be done surfing the internet.I would be happy to provide you with these too if you could email me your email . Thank you for your indulgence in reading to my side of the story. The statements like yours following crafty misleading, is very hurtful to the likes of me of Sri Lankan origin , who have a fundamental human right not to be accused, with no basis, as a Sri Lankan of being complicit to geneocide .How wonderful it would be if you withdrew your statement after verifying the information I have presented 

Sincerely Dr. Chula Rajapakse MNZM cnarajapakse@gmail.com, +64274768797, Wellington, New Zealand.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress