SLFP firmly behind ‘Gota for Prez’ – Susil

August 14th, 2019

Jayasuriya Udukumbura Courtesy Ceylon Today

Parliamentarian Susil Premajayantha claimed that the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) has joined the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) in campaigning for former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa in order to gain victory at the upcoming Presidential Election.

Addressing a Media briefing held today (14), he claimed that the SLFP has understood the policies put forward by the SLPP and has wisely chosen to accept the decision and support Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

He further said that MP Dayasiri Jayasekara is under a false impression that the Members of the SLFP have not positively accepted the Presidential candidate put forward by the SLPP while saying that Gotabaya Rajapaksa has received undeniable public acceptance which is evident through the public gatherings that took place to wish him following the announcement made by the SLPP.

 Jayasuriya Udukumbura 08:01 PM Aug 14 2019  0   

Selecting Presidential candidate UNP MPs mull secret ballot

August 14th, 2019

By J.T. de Silva and W.K. Prasad Manju Courtesy Ceylon Today

A group of United National Party (UNP) Parliamentarians are attempting to select the Presidential candidate, by holding a secret election at the Working Committee, and in the Parliamentary Group Meetings.

Minister Gamini Jayawickrama Perera said that a document has been prepared by the MPs to request a secret election from Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.


He further added that Deputy Minister Nalin Bandara is making that document, and that he has refused to sign it.


There is a possibility of holding a secret election on 19 August at the MPs meeting. However, Wickremesinghe and Minister Sajith Premadasa should discuss about it and come to a decision, and if not a secret election should be held to solve the issue, he further added.


Meanwhile, a UNP backbencher said that a considerable number of United National Party (UNP) backbenchers are against the plan to hold a meeting at Dr. Rajitha Senaratne’s house on 20 August, to discuss the Presidential candidate and the proposed formation of the Democratic National Front (DNF).


He opined that Senaratne cannot be trusted, as he is against a candidate being put forward by the UNP. He added that Senaratne is expecting the General Secretary post of the proposed Front, and that a majority of UNPers were against it. He proposed that such a decisive discussion should be held at Temple Trees or Sirikotha, and the policies of the UNP should not be betrayed to pander to the needs of certain father and son combinations.

 CT Web 02:00 AM Aug 15 2019

Hiru News 9.55 PM | 2019-08-14

August 14th, 2019

Hiru

එජාප ජනපති අපේක්ෂකත්වය ගැන විවිධ අදහස්

August 14th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ ජනාධිපති ධුර අපේක්ෂකත්වය සම්බන්ධයෙන් දේශපාලනඥයින් කිහිපදෙනෙකු අද අදහස් පළකළා.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය කම්පාවට පත්වෙයි

August 14th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාස්කු ඉරුදින ඛේදවාචකය සම්බන්ධයෙන් යුක්තිසහගත, සාධාරණ සහ අපක්ෂපාතී පරීක්ෂණයක් මේ දක්වා සිදු නොවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් තමන් බලවත් කම්පාවට පත්වන බව ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය පවසනවා.

නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ඔවුන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ එම ඛේදවාචකයට වගකිව යුතු සියලුදෙනා වහා නීතිය හමුවට පමුණුවන ලෙසයි.

පාස්කු ඉරිදා ප්‍රහාරයෙන් පසු රටේ පවතින තත්ත්වය පිළිබඳ සාකච්ඡා කිරීම සඳහා ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය රැස්වීමක් පවත්වා ඇති අතර, ඉන් අනතුරුව මාධ්‍යයට නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කෙරුණා.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනයේ වැඩිදුරටත් සඳහන් වන්නේ ජනතාවගේ සිත් තුළ තවමත් බිය සහ සැකය පවතින බැවින් රටේ සෑම දෙනාටම නිතිය එක ලෙස බලපවත්න බවට රජය සහතිකයක් ලබාදිය යුතු බවයි.

සහතික කළ ලෙසින් පරීක්ෂණවල ප්‍රතිඵල දැනගැනීමට ජනතාව විමසිල්ලෙන් බලා සිටින බවත්, ස්වාධීන සහ අපක්ෂපාතී පරීක්ෂණයක් පැවැත්වීම හදිසි සහ අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය කරුණක් බවත් ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනයේ සඳහන්.

ප්‍රහාරයට වගකිව යුතු සියලුදෙනා ජාතිය ආගම හෝ වෙනත් තත්ත්වයන් නොතකා රටේ නීතිය හමුවට වහා පමුණුවන ලෙස ශ්‍රී ලංකා කතෝලික රදගුරු සම්මේලනය රජයෙන් සහ දේශපාලන නායකයින්ගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.

මේ අතර, ඊයේ නල්ලූරු කෝවිලේ ආරක්ෂක තත්ත්වය සම්බන්ධයෙන් නිරීක්ෂණ චාරිකාවකට එක්වෙමින් යුද හමුදාපති ලුතිනන් ජෙනරාල් මහේෂ් සේනානායක මහතා මෙරට වත්මන් ආරක්ෂක තත්ත්වය පිළිබඳ අදහස් පළ කළා

සැමට නිවාස දෙන බවට පාරම්බාන දේශපාලකයින් නොදුටු අසරණ පවුල

August 14th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

දහසකුත් එකක් දුක් කම්කටොළු මැද ඔත්පලව ඇති සිය සැමියාත්, කුඩා දරු දෙදෙනාත් ජීවත් කිරීමට වෙර දරන මවක් පිළිබඳ පුවතක් අපට වාර්තා වුණේ රත්නපුර – නගරසභාගම ප්‍රදේශයෙන්.

මේ රත්නපුර නගරසභාගම ප්‍රදේශයේ පදිංචි 41 හැවිරිදි නිල්මිණි දිල්රුක්ෂි බර්තලමියුස්.

අනේකවිද සුන්දර  බලාපොරොත්තු මහ ගොඩක් නොතිබුණත් සිය සැමියාත් සමග කාටවත් අත්නොපා ජීවත්වූ අතීතයක් මේ අයට තිබුණා.<br /><br />කුලී වැඩ කර එදිනෙදා වේල සරිකරගත් දිල්රුක්ෂිගේ සැමියා ගසකින් වැටී එක්තැන් වීමත් සමග ජීවිතය ගැටගහගන්නට අද කාගේ හෝ සරණක් පතන්නට සිදුවී තිබෙනවා.

සැමට නිවාස දෙන්නටත්, රට සුඛිතමුදිත කරන්නටත් දේශපාලන වේදිකාවල අතොරක් නොමැතිව පාරම්බාන මෙවන් සමයක මේ පවුල ජීවත්වෙන්නේ හිටවූ උන බට වලට ඉටි රෙදි ගසා සාදාගත් පැල් කොටයකයි.

/>ඔත්පල වී ඇති සිය සැමියාත් සමග ඉතා අපහසුවෙන් ජීවිතය ගැටගසාගන්නා නිල්මිණි තමන්ට ඇති අපහසුතා වචනයට නැගුවේ මෙලෙසින්

මහින්ද-රවී හමුවේ.. සජිත් අපේක්‍ෂක කලොත් තමන් ඇතුළු 08ක් එජාපයෙන් ඉවත් වන බව දන්වයි..

August 14th, 2019

lanka C news

හිටපු ජනාධිපති වත්මන් විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සහ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ උප නායක විදුලිබල, බලශක්ති හා ව්‍යාපාර සංවර්ධන ඇමැති රවී කරුණානායක මහතා අතර හමුවක් ආසන්න දිනකදී සිදුවී ඇති බව සිරස රූපවාහිනි වාර්තා කළේය.

යම් ලෙසකින් සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතාට එජාප ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකත්වය ලබා දුනහොත් තමන් ඇතුළු අට දෙනෙකු පමණ පිරිසක් එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයෙන් ඉවත්වීමට සූදානම් බව රවී කරුණානායක මහතා එහිදී පවසා ඇතැයිද වාර්තාව පැවසීය.

කෙසේ වෙතත් ඊට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා නිශ්චිත පිළිතුරක් දී නැති බවද එම වාර්තාවේ කියැවින.

තමන් හා එක්වන්නැයි ගෝටාභයගෙන් ෆොන්සේකාට ඇමතුමක්… ෆොන්සේකා බෑ නොකියයි..

August 14th, 2019

 lanka C news

හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රී ෆීල්ඩ් මාෂල් සරත් ෆොන්සේකා මහතාට දුරකථනයෙන් ඇමතූ බව එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ කැළණිය ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා හිටපු මන්ත්‍රී මනෝජ් පෙරේරා මහතා පවසයි.

මෙම ඇමතුම ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා විසින් කැලණියේ ප්‍රසිද්ධ ස්ථානයක දී ෆොන්සේකා මහතාට ලබාදුන් බව ද ඔහු සඳහන් කළේය.

පැරණි තරහ අමතක කර තමන් සමඟ ගමනක් යන්න එක්වන්නැයි ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා විසින් සරත් ෆොන්සේකා මහතාට ආරාධනා කළේ යැයිද ඔහු පැවසීය.

ඊට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වමින් ෆොන්සේකා මහතා එය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප නොකර ‘බලමු’ යැයි පැවසූ බවද ඔහු සඳහන් කළේය.

මාධ්‍ය හමුවක් අමතමින් ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේය.

Sri Lanka shares gain after wartime defense chief launches presidential bid

August 13th, 2019

Courtesy London South East

COLOMBO, Aug 13 (Reuters) – Sri Lankan shares closed marginally higher on Tuesday, easing from early gains of 1.2%, after the main opposition party named a hardline former defence chief as presidential candidate, seeking to capitalise on public clamour for a decisive leader.

** The rupee ended slightly weaker on importer greenback demand.

** The benchmark stock index gained 1.26% as soon as trading resumed on Tuesday. Markets were closed for a holiday on Monday. The index ended 0.1% firmer at 5,949.30, its highest close since July 30. It gained 0.82% last week. ** Gotabaya Rajapaksa, 70, served under his older brother, ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa, and is widely seen as the frontrunner in a presidential election that must be held before Dec 9. Gotabaya is immensely popular among Sri Lanka’s powerful Sinhala Buddhist majority, who credit him with ending the island nation’s 26-year-long civil war in 2009 and believe Colombo needs a seasoned hand after the April 21 bombings. nL4N256051] ** Market sources said early gains could not be sustained as retail investors sold shares.

** So far this year, the index dropped about 1.7 %.

** Turnover was 2.69 billion rupees ($15.21 million), more than six times of this year’s daily 

රුවන්මැලි සෑ, අටමස්ථානාධිපති හිමිවරුන් ගෝටාට ජනපති වෙන්න නියත විවරණ දේ.. දලදාව වදින්න පිටත් වේ.. මග දිගට උණුසුම් පිලිගැනීම්..

August 13th, 2019

 lanka C news

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදු ජන පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂක හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා අනුරාධපුරයේ ජයශ‍්‍රී මහා බෝධියේ, රුවන්මැලි මහා සෑයේ, අටමස්ථානයේ ආශිර්වාද ලබාගත්තේය.

නාහිමිවරුන් විසින් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට මීලග ජනාධිපතිවරයා වීම සඳහා පුර්ණ ආශිර්වාදය පිරිනමනු ලැබීය.

අද දිනයේ මහනුවර ශ්‍රී දළදා මාලිගාව වැඳ පුදා ගැනීම සඳහා ඒ මහනා අද පස්වරුවේ මහනුවර බලා පිටත් විය.

ඒ මහතා ගමන් කරද්දී මග දෙපස ස්ථාන ගණනාවක පිළිගැනීමේ උත්සව සංවිධානය කර තිබිණි.

සෑම ස්ථානයකම ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට ඉතා උණුසුම් පිළිගැනීම් ලැබිණි

Hong Kong phooey! Would you like any hypocrisy with that?

August 13th, 2019

George Galloway Courtesy RT

Where to start? For nearly 40 weeks hundreds of thousands of French people have been on the streets in anti-government demonstrations against President Emmanuel Macron’s rule.

Some have lost eyes and hands in the police response. The public has begun to view the smell of tear gas as a normal part of a weekend in Paris. France is 29 miles from the coast of England. Siri just told me that Hong Kong is about 5,992 miles from London as the crow flies.”

So complete has been the British media blackout on the Yellow Vests that many believe, wrongly, that there is some British government order banning on any mention of les événements en France.” The truth is that there is no need for one.

Like a homing pigeon in reverse the entire UK media has flown like a bat out of hell away from France all the way to Hong Kong (as they had earlier flown to Caracas until the big protests turned into the wrong kind of protests).

There is nothing, except the shoe-sizes, of the demonstrators in Hong Kong that I don’t know thanks to the veritable blizzard of in-depth analysis of the protestors there and their each and every demand. Protesters in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain can be executed, but we will never be told their names.

And the hypocrisy of the media is just for starters.

If a group of British protesters broke into the British Parliament and hung, for argument’s sake, a Russian flag over the Speaker’s chair it is highly likely” that a commando force would quickly and violently overwhelm and arrest them accompanied by volleys of accusations about Russian interference.

If a crowd of British protestors occupied Heathrow Airport in such numbers and so disruptively that British Airways had to stop flights in and out of the airport, causing massive financial loss, dislocation, and personal inconvenience, I promise you that their protest would have been cleared out by the above mentioned commandos on the very first day of their protests.

If protesters in London were hoisting Chinese flags and singing the Chinese national anthem then, well, I’m sure you get my point.

The struggle between the government of China and its citizens is no more the business of the British than it is of the Slovakians. It’s true that Hong Kong was a British colony for 150 years but the least said about the shame and disgrace of how that came to be, the better, I promise you. 

Suffice to say that to acquire territory by force, followed by unequal treaty at gunboat-point to punish the actual owners of the land for resisting the British opium trade, is, even by British Imperial standards, extraordinary. So shameful is it you’d think the British would want to draw a veil over it. But not so.

The British tell us that Hong Kong want democracy but nobody ever says that across a century and a half of British rule in Hong Kong the people there were allowed no democracy of any kind. 

They tell us about the justice system without ever mentioning that even today the ‘draconian’ courts of Hong Kong are still stuffed by white English judges.

They tell us about NGOs and civil society” without telling us whose pounds and dollars the NGOs” are stuffed with.

In fact, these foreign-funded and guided organisations are carefully stabled Trojan Horses chomping their British and American supplied hay until the time came for them to be told to gallop, and gallop they now are.

This is all Hong Kong phooey! No other country in the world would have shown such forbearance in the face of foreign-sponsored rioting destruction and sabotage of the national economy as China has. If in the days to come China’s patience runs out, it will not be before time so far as the great majority of Chinese citizens, including Hong Kong citizens, are concerned.

China signed up to the one country, two systems in the territory. It did not agree to two countries, two systems. Not one inch of Hong Kong belongs to anyone but China. The days when foreign countries could impose their will on China are long gone.

George Galloway was a member of the British Parliament for nearly 30 years. He presents TV and radio shows (including on RT). He is a film-maker, writer and a renowned orator.

Tamils should be granted land and police powers – Navin Dissanayake

August 13th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

Minister of Plantation Industries Navin Dissanayake says he personally believes that Tamil people must be granted the powers of land and police vested by the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Addressing an event held in Mullaitivu, the minister stressed Sinhalese leaders must heed the demands of the Tamil people.

If their demands are not attended to, the country will have to face a tremendous issue in the future, Minister Dissanayake said further.

The minister stated that he expects to seek a fair solution for this issue, along with Tamil political leaders, by calling for a referendum in the areas where Sinhalese majority reside. 

Catholic Bishops urge govt to hold unbiased probes into Easter attacks

August 13th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Catholic Bishops’ Conference in Sri Lanka (CBCSL) has appealed to the government to hold an impartial inquiry in the Easter Sunday attacks and bring the perpetrators before the law.

Issuing a media release, the CBCSL said a fair and impartial investigation on the incident has not taken place yet.

We observe that several committees have been established and their main focus appears to be to find out those responsible for the serious lapses in security,” the release said.

The CBCSL insists that as a matter of justice, the final aim if the inquiries should be to ascertain who the perpetrators are and those have aided and abetted in any way in this dastardly act.”

The Conference added that it does not see any positive signs in this direction.

Stating that the report of the three-member Presidential Commission of Inquiry is yet to be revealed, the CBCSL added that the government is yet to give an assurance to the people that there is only one set of Laws in the  

The CBCSL has urged the government and all political leaders of the country to ensure an independent and impartial inquiry as a matter of utmost urgency.

The release reiterated that what is more important is to do justice in this regard, by bringing those responsible before the Law of the country expeditiously.”

The release was signed by Archbishop of Colombo Hiss Eminence Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith, the President, Vice President, Secretary-General of the CBCSL and two other Catholic Bishops.

The faith Maha Sangha has on Gotabaya

August 13th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

13 වන සංශෝධනයේ ඇති සියලු බලතල දෙමළ ජනතාවට ලබාදිය යුතුයි -නවීන් දිසනායක

August 13th, 2019

Hiru

Hiru News 9.55 PM

August 13th, 2019

Hiru

රටේ ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු කිරීම මගේ පළමු පොරොන්දුවයි –

August 13th, 2019

Hiru News

රටේ ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු කිරීම මගේ පළමු පොරොන්දුවයි – පොහොට්ටුවේ ජනපති අපේක්ෂකත්වය භාරගත් ගෝඨාභය කියයි –

Presidential Speech & Policy Statement by Gotabaya Rajapakse – Sri Lanka’s Presidential candidate for SLPP

August 12th, 2019

It was a moment many had awaited with much impatience. ‘My choice didn’t matter – the Nation had already selected & elected him… My brother is yours” was enough to put to rest any doubts. Gotabaya Rajapakse was thus declared the Presidential nominee of the SLPP a party formed & steamrolled into public popularity after the 2018 local government elections. A very dignified and articulate speech was delivered by the former President & present Opposition Leader, Mahinda Rajapakse. It touched every area that needed to be touched and set the tempo for the grand finale and then came the Nation’s new hope with what no one expected was to become his National Policy statement.

Gotabaya Rajapakse articulated his speech well and was perfectly suited for the occasion. It was toned to show what he would do, was acceptable and believable.

I love my Nation, I have a vision for my Nation, I will serve my Nation & I will accept the challenges and prove I can overcome the challenges responsibly & successfully’ was all that the People wanted to hear Gotabaya Rajapakse say.

As Mr. Gotabaya Rajapakse said, the country was at a very decisive juncture – it was nothing anyone was not aware of. The country had been misled, misused and manipulated by those that had orchestrated the January 2015 regime change. It was only natural that the patriotic and national-minded individuals and organizations would search for an alternative leader. Thus, Gotabaya Rajapakse acknowledged the trust placed in him by the Maha Sangha and the citizens of Sri Lanka for that role. He pledged to encompass the hopes of all Citizens on behalf of the Nation. That pledge received a resounding applause.

Gotabaya Rajapakse reminded the Nation of his 20 year’s services in the armed forces and the note by late Gen. Cyril Ranatunga who had inked in pen that Gota was one to take any initiative & complete it over and above the line of duty. This he proved throughout the 10 years he was tasked to handle the most challenging roles as Defense Secretary throughout the conflict & thereafter. That role, everyone knows he did with exemplary acumen unmatched by any of his predecessors.

The listeners were automatically taken back to his post-conflict role in a quest to beautify Colombo and suburbs turning Sri Lanka’s capital into one of the most beautiful cities in the world & gaining international recognition for it.

As Mr. Gotabaya Rajapakse rightfully said – not only does the country need a leader with a vision but a leader who can plan & complete that vision. Everyone knew that as Defense Secretary and throughout his post-LTTE defeat role he had shown to the Nation that he was a man with a vision and a man who could turn that vision into action and complete the action within a short time.

SLPP’s Presidential Candidate covered some very sensitive areas with finesse placing confidence in the People that he would :-

  • Give prominence to National Security
  • Bring Law & Order & Discipline to the Country
  • Deal with all countries without kneeling before anyone
  • Not compromise the country’s culture – heritage or sovereignty in dealing with the international community
  • Not allow any nation to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka
  • Not allow anyone to breach the Sovereignty of Sri Lanka
  • And to make Sri Lanka the safest country to live in

I will take responsibility for you & your children’s safety’ was all that parents wanted to hear and People sighed in relief that they were now safe.

Gotabaya Rajapakse did not forget the history or heritage or the place of Buddhism in the ethos of Sri Lanka when he said that the 2600 written history had taught to respect all other communities and religions and that would be the basis of his rule. Inspiring people further he declared that Our Unity was Our Strength and we needed to nurture that & certainly that meant we needed to remove the obstacles that were trying to divide the Nation & its People. In so saying he immediately declared that he would not allow or tolerate extremist terrorism and that gave further confidence in him to the People.

Environment was a topic close to everyone’s heart and to declare that under his government he would protect environment and sustainability was welcome news just as much as the commitment made to reforestation. The Green Town concept and beautifying towns and cities that began with Colombo would continue across Sri Lanka under a Gota Rule.  

He took listeners back at the period 2005-2014 and the development that took place and that would continue to take place once again and everyone realized that the development had stalled and stopped after 2015.

For any country to develop the economy must be handled well. Mr. Rajapakse assured that the new economic environment would synergize with the local economy under the concept ‘Gama Samaga Pilisandara’ and that under the Eliya & Viyathmaga programs meeting rural people and tapping their wants and needs, he was well placed to set a program that would result in success – economic liberty, respectful living, safe environment, people-centric economy, human resources put to best of use, innovations, talents & skills given due recognition and all these would affect better employment and new jobs opportunities. An area that has been under much scrutiny has been agriculture and it was welcome to hear that agriculture would be developed and sustained further just as transportation, road, rail, school, water, village development and work from home using technology would also be areas that he would address.

He gave much promise to youth who are looking at their own future and youth have much to look forward to.

Another hot topic that he gave a policy statement for was the role of the public sector and he firmly committed that it should be devoid of political interference with promotions on merit & skills.  

Before ending his policy statement SLPP’s Presidential Candidate raised the bar in requesting that his campaign should be one of total discipline – no revenge, no hate, no vengeance, no polythene, no lies, no mud-slinging, no counter arguments but one based on truth, logic & facts.

He assured that he would set an example as a leader should and that Sri Lanka would soon rise up to greatness that existed during ancient times.

Thus spoke a Real Leader and Hope was reborn among all Citizens.

Shenali D Waduge

President Rajapakse hands GR to the Nation as Presidential-Candidate of SLPP

August 12th, 2019

It was one of the finest & most refreshing speeches delivered by former President Mahinda Rajapakse now Opposition Leader and had all the power and verbatim of a national leader. He raised the tempo high enough before declaring to the Nation the candidate whom he said the Nation had already elected. Some of the salient points covered in his speech delivered at the Sugathadasa Stadium is noteworthy.

Date: 11 August 2019

Venue: Sugathadasa Stadium

Event: Sri Lanka PoduJana Peramuna National Convention to announce its Presidential Candidate

https://www.facebook.com/AdaDeranaLive/videos/2568173230070582/UzpfSTEyNTQzOTQ5MTQ4MTYyMDozNzAzMDU3MTAzMjgzMjk/?epa=SEARCH_BOX

The President took us back through memory lane from how the SLFP was first formed, the ideological basis on which the SLFP existed and the manner SLFP had weathered political victimization that even included the removal of Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s civic rights by UNP for 7 years. To all who lived during this period every word spoken by Mahinda Rajapakse would have brought home emotive sentiments.

He also took us back to the day he stepped down before election results were released and went to his hometown where for months lakhs of people travelled to show the world that they still loved him.

The journey thereafter that began with the formation of the SLPP he credited rightly to Basil Rajapakse. The cheers & applause acknowledged his role.

All that President Rajapakse spoke about what the country now needs showed what the country had lost under the present government.

When President Rajapakse told the Nation that we need to bring back law & order, he reminded all of the law & order lost since January 2015.  

When he spoke of the numerous methods adopted to crush their spirits, and defeat their popularity amongst the public, it brought to mind the string of revengeful politics that was always part of UNP ideology.

When he spoke about the imprisoning Maha Sangha & Armed Forces personnel and victimizing SLFP supporters, the people’s minds were taken back to all the revengeful incidents that happened since January 2015.

When he spoke of the 19th amendment and highlighted how a constitution was amended to prevent 3 brothers from being elected by the People – the reality dawned on how and who was part of this set up.

When he said that inspite of the victimizations, vengeful politics and revengeful acts, that he or his family did not betray the Nation’s sovereignty for their independence, it was nothing other than the truth.

While the UNP 24×7 and their supporters threw mud & humiliated the Rajapakses – President Rajapakse did not utter a word against them.

When President Rajapakse said that this government has attacked all religions, all religious heads and humiliated them – Buddhists, Catholics/Christians, Hindus and Islamic adherents would have all nodded in silent acknowledgement.

When he said that hate-filled revenge politics had lasted long enough & must be put to rest – it was a sentiment we all wanted to hear.

His ideology was never hatred or to take revenge and that is what makes him Mahinda Rajapakse

– වෛරකර මට දිනන්න දෙයක් නෑ

කාලය විසින් අපව නිර්දෝශී කලා.

කාලය විසින්ම අපිව නිර්දේශ කලා.

– මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ -“

“රටම බලාපොරොත්තු වූ ජනාධිපති අපෙක්ෂකයා ගෝ

President Rajapakse also took many on a guilt trip … he roared…

When Hambantatot Port was put for sale

When Mattala Airport was put for sale after referring to it as a paddy storage

When  the Govt went to Geneva and signed resolutions in UNHRC against our forces

When even betal leaves were taxed

When people had to wait in queues for petrol

When people suffered from natural disasters

When murders were taking place in broad daylight… People remembered the independence that the Rajapakse Government gave

When garbage piled & the stink became unbearable.. People remembered us, he said

When this government began delaying elections .. people remembered us

When bombs went off … all communities remembered us

These victims had no solace – the SLPP is for them and the thunderous applause was enough.

President Rajapakse went on to say that the lifespan of the Government was no almost over.

Time had returned faith in them and had absolved them but he reminded the Nation that what happened after January 2015 had reversed all that they had accomplished since 2005 and that a new government was retaking a destroyed nation, a nation that was not the same as that handed over in January 2015. It brought home a lot of realities to the People.

He reminded all where the destructions have taken place since January 2015

Sri Lanka was now a nation that had given little attention to National Security and he reminded the Nation that without National Security there can be no Nation and safety for its People.

He brought relief to mothers when he said a new government must put an end to mothers guarding school, it was the task of the law enforcements not parents. He mocked at the manner that the present government had said Rs.100,000 would be given for every dead child. He said that national security must return so that all religions can practice their faith without fear.

We don’t need a government who tells civilians to look after national security, he said.

President Rajapakse took people down memory lane covering all that his government had done

  • People didn’t think we could end 30 years of terrorism – but we did
  • The Jaffna people didn’t think they could ever travel by train to the South – but they did
  • The Muslim refugees never thought they would come out of their refugee camps- but they did
  • The People never thought development could happen at such a fast pace – but we did
  • People never thought Colombo could become such a beautiful city – but they saw
  • It was only after elections were held in North that even TNA was free to travel to the North, President Rajapakse thundered!

President Rajapakse next went on to draw in our minds the picture of what the Nation needs and who the Nation needs to rebuild the Nation

  • We need a person who will take ownership of the Nation’s National Security
  • We need a person who will prevent without taking action afterwards
  • We need a person who grew up with discipline because only such a person can bring discipline to the country
  • We need a person who will not bend the law, who has the courage & will to take on the task of rebuilding the Nation
  • We need a person who knows how to protect our national assets both on land & in sea
  • We don’t need a person who has only tons of vision with no action
  • We don’t need anyone who boasts he will do – we now need someone who has shown he can do
  • We need a leader who will not fool the youth with promises like free wifi, chewing gum, bracelets, small cars – the Youth must have a leader they can believe in & look up to
  • We need a leader who will terminate poverty, drugs, mafia
  • We need a leader who both Youth & Old can look up to, a leader who loves the Nation
  • We need a leader who doesn’t just boast – we need a leader who is honest, with courage, who is fond of children & who leads a good marital life   

President Rajapakse said that the Nation has been seeking such a leader since January 2015 and he too was aware of what the Nation was seeking, but he went on to say that his decision didn’t matter because the People had already chosen their to be future leader, that person has already won the hearts of the People, whatever the government has been doing against him has not spoilt their hope in him.

In a very emotive few seconds later, former President Rajapakse declared

‘I am now handing my brother to you – he is no one else but Gotabaya”

He also declared to the Nation that Gotabaya never asked to be made President, he never begged to make his hands strong and he told Gotabaya that he was now selected not to make his hands strong but to strengthen the Nation & to strengthen the hands of the People.

President Rajapakse next declared, that just as his ideology was to put the Nation – first, second & third … Gotabaya must also put the Country & Nation first at all times.

Thus, President Rajapakse handed over his brother Gotabaya as Presidential-candidate of SLPP and the rest of the story will be written by the People of Sri Lanka.

Shenali D Waduge

Gota wins first battle

August 12th, 2019

Editorial Courtesy The Island

The SLPP is cock-a-hoop, having picked former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa as its presidential candidate while the UNP is still struggling to name its. The SLFP/UPFA, which tried to coalesce with the SLPP to field President Maithripala Sirisena at the next presidential election, has been left with egg on its face.

The SLPP, in a state of euphoria, seems to think everything is now copacetic, and the upcoming presidential race is going to be a walk in the park. But, an early start does not necessarily lead to victory in any contest. The outcome of the last presidential race is a case in point. President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s re-election campaign had been on for years by the time that election was announced. Maithripala Sirisena was not even in the picture, at that time, but turned out to be a dark horse within a matter of a few weeks after being nominated.

An early start can also prove disadvantageous if the contestant concerned fails to pace himself/herself properly in the race. For election campaigns tend to slacken with the passage of time. The first challenge, before the SLPP, will be maintaining the momentum of its presidential election campaign for over three months.

Having won his first battle on the political front, Gotabaya, on Sunday, said, inter alia, that the mistakes of the former administration had to be rectified. He said, “We must work towards achieving our long-term objectives whilst undertaking necessary course corrections swiftly and correcting the mistakes that have been made in the past.” This, in our book, is a textbook example of understatement or litotes. What characterised the last government were not just mistakes, but colossal blunders and serious wrongdoings, which were legion.

The fact that the present dispensation has failed to make good on its election promise to throw some of the former rulers behind bars for corruption, abuse of power, etc. does not mean that all the allegations it levelled against them were baseless. They are lucky that their successors, upon savouring power, started making up for lost time and got exposed for the bond scams, among other things, which allowed them to secure a bridgehead and launch a devastating counterattack. The UNP and the SLFP/UPFA have not recovered both politically and electorally.

The former rulers have been able to bounce back not so much because they have become very popular but because the UNF government has ruined things for itself and failed to live up the expectations of the people. Good governance has become just pie in the sky; national security was neglected to the point of government leaders and top bureaucrats ignoring a warning of terror attacks, which happened on 21 April; the government expected funds to pour in from the countries that had thrown their weight behind it at the last presidential election, only to be disappointed; there has been no discernible development and the much-touted election promise to provide one million jobs to the youth has remained unfulfilled. The government has been in overdrive, making state sector appointments, for the last several months, but whether the method will yield the desired results in term of votes in sufficient numbers is in doubt.

The UNP’s strategy worked last time; it succeeded in bringing together the TNA, the JVP, the SLMC and the ACMC and harnessing their collective power to defeat President Rajapaksa. It may not be able to secure the JVP’s support this time around, but the alliance it is planning to cobble together will be a force to reckon with in a nip and tuck. The SLPP will have its work cut out to win over the minority voters.

Gotabaya will be put through the paces in debates, etc. in time to come and he will have to convince the public that he is equal to the task of hoisting the country out of the politico-economic mire it finds itself in. Defeating his foes is not the biggest challenge he will have to overcome; instead, it will be saving himself from the unsavoury elements who were responsible for Mahinda’s downfall. On Sunday, some of them were seen crawling out of the woodwork. It was a disgusting sight!

YAHAPALANA AND THE ECONOMY Part 12

August 12th, 2019

KAMALIKA PIERIS

Revised  14.9.19

Section 1. SERVICES.

SHIPPING

New regulations are to be introduced soon to open up Sri Lanka’s shipping sector to transform the country to a Singapore-style shipping hub, Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera announced in March 2019. This sector is at present controlled by five local companies.   They control the agencies of shipping lines that account for 74 per cent of the global shipping market.

Budget 2019 will lift Restrictions on the foreign ownership on the shipping and the freight forwarding agencies, under these new regulations,” he said adding that it will enable major international shipping lines and logistics operators to base their operations in Sri Lanka.

According to the present law, a foreign entity cannot own more than 40 per cent of a shipping company in Sri Lanka. By introducing new regulations the country would be able to attract major global shipping companies like Maersk to make an anchor investment in the country. Companies like Amazon could be attracted for warehousing for e-Commerce in the region. Support services such as financial services, legal services and other professional services can flourish in this environment, he said.

The Ceylon Association of Shipping Agents (CASA) and Sri Lanka Logistics and Freight Forwarders Association (SLFFA) vehemently protested against this move, saying it will not bring in any additional investments or benefits to the country. All aspects of the shipping industry except for agency including terminals, warehouse and depot infrastructure, ancillary service infrastructure, etc are already liberalized.

 If this change goes through, all profits of a shipping agency will be repatriated and not retained and reinvested within the country, as done at present by local agents. Also, shipping lines will charge all owners costs to the agency and make it a cost centre, depriving the government of tax revenue.

There are currently 130 shipping agents handling 35000 container vessels and 6000 non container vessels. They employ 12,000 people. These shipping agents will lose their livelihood by the government’s move to liberalize the shipping sector. Foreign investors from countries in the region will set up small agency offices for caller vessels and reduce business available to local small agents.

PETROL (1)

The National Movement for Consumer Rights Protection (NMCRP) complained in July 2019 that the fuel stations across the country were selling substandard 92 octane petrol. This had been proved by a test conducted by a Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) lab on samples collected from all parts of the country.”We lodged a complaint with the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA) that the 92 octane petrol was of inferior quality. The CAA tested samples at the CPC lab and the test results show that 92 octane petrol is actually similar to 90 octane petrol. Some time back the CPC stopped selling 90 octane petrol due to its low quality. But it seems that we still buy 90 octane petrol.”

PETROL (2)

The government had incurred a loss of Rs. 11.3 million when Ceylon Petroleum Storage Terminals Ltd ( CPSTL) bought five 13,200-litre oil bowsers from a bidder who had quoted the highest price, the Presidential Commission of Inquiry investigating corruption in the current administration was told. The Commission was also told that four out of the five trucks were being operated in Kandy and  the drivers of those trucks had complained about various issues regarding the performance and facilities.

The tender board had not selected the second lowest bidder, Senok, citing the exhaust system in the vehicle it offered was different. General Manager of Senok said: “In Sri Lanka we usually use Euro 1 and Euro 2 standard. So when these vehicles are brought in, our mechanics make some changes to the exhaust system to improve vehicle emissions. That’s what the tender document had mentioned. However we explained in our tender document that the engine in the vehicle we had quoted adhered to Euro 3 standard. So we didn’t have to make that change to the exhaust system. Senok had been supplying UD Trucks to the CPSTL since 1990 and over 140 such vehicles had been sold to them.

RAJAGIRIYA – ATURUGIRIYA HIGHWAY PROJECT

The Elevated Highway Project from Rajagiriya to Athurugiriya, has hit a snag over its proposed route.  The initial proposal of the RDA was to have an elevated highway over the recently constructed Averihena Lake, which serves as a flood retention area, and surrounding paddy fields. The selected area was a part of the Thalangama wetland which was declared an Environmental Protection Area under the National Environmental Act in 2007.

  However  Central Environment Authority (CEA)objected to the project. CEA said, There is a tank constructed by the Irrigation Department, some paddy fields and a flood retention area. This area is important in terms of hydrology and it has rich ecology. The wetland is also the habitat of a large number of bird species. The entire area is rich in scenic beauty. We fear that the proposed elevated highway may damage this sensitive eco-system.”

 The RDA told us that the elevated highway would not cause much environmental harm since it is constructed over pillars, but it is our opinion that there will be significant damage to the wetland when the construction starts,”  CEA said. We are unable to approve such a proposal. True, it is not a natural eco-system, but over the years, it has gradually acquired the same status,”

RDA thereafter  proposed an alternative route from Pothuarawa. For this, the government  will have to acquire 750 land lots . It requires the resettlement of 1,010 families and the demolishing of about 34 shops, 42 shop houses and 42 self-employed business places. The land acquisition will leave 106 structures partially affected and 634 fully affected.  residents  objected. They asked why the RDA chose a highly residential area for this highway. Many families would lose their properties if the proposed elevated highway goes through Pothuarawa.

We cannot understand the rationale of choosing a highly residential area for the project, shedding the initial proposal which would have caused the least social impact, residents said. RDA’s initial proposal to have the elevated highway over the Thalangama wetland  will not cause much environmental harm as claimed by the CEA.It is a man-made environment with uncultivated paddy fields, a flood retention area and even jogging tracks. The lands belong to the Sri Lanka Land Reclamation and Development Corporation (SLLRDC). No private property will be affected if the RDA goes ahead with that plan. Any development project must be designed to cause minimal impact on the people’ they said.

GARBAGE DISPOSAL (1)

The garbage collection process in Colombo city was abruptly stopped in August 2019, after the CMC was advised not to send garbage to Kerawalapitiya as it had reached the maximum limit of garbage intake per day.  CMC was told to send it to Arawakkalu hereafter.  There was a delay and garbage started piling up on the streets of Colombo. In April 2019, People living in Ukwatte were told to go away as it was unsafe. They complained on television news that they had nowhere to go except to the temple. Garbage was still coming in.   Derana news of 7.8.19 showed piles of garbage in  many places in Colombo, with people  complaining loudly and angrily  about it.

Eventually, after several days, the necessary agreement was signed, payments made and   the garbage went to Aruwakkalu . It was taken by a  private transportation company and  CMC complained that the operation was costing a mint of money.  However, Derana news of 11.8.19 showed the residents of Aruwakkalu strongly  objecting to Colombo garbage coming there.

GARBAGE DISPOSAL (2)

Prior to the inception of the Fairway Karadiyana Waste Management project, the landfill consisted of two disposal sites; A and B. A plot of land in extent of 10 acres was allocated adjacent to Site B, which was being used to dispose of waste. With the project initiation, the old closed landfill, Site A, was re-opened by the Waste Management Authority as a temporary measure, for the project to progress unimpeded. At present, the re-opened site accepts approximately 60%-70% of the 500 tons per day from 8 local authorities that are legally allowed to dispose of waste at Karadiyana.

As a result of an extended delay in the implementation of the  Fairway Karadiyana Waste Processing Project the temporary disposal site continues to grow in size and at a rate that is not sustainable. The slopes of this landfill are becoming dangerously steep, echoing the memory of the catastrophe that took place at Meethotamulla two years ago.

The National Building Research Organization (NBRO) recently issued a report highlighting the precarious situation of the landfill and the danger of a possible collapse if garbage disposal continues at this site at the current rate. The report highlights the current situation, the dangers (steepness of the slopes, geophysical characteristics of the landfill, potential for gas collection and explosion) and the possible consequences and a set of recommendations to the WMA that can lead to full closure of the largest landfill in Colombo district.

The community in the area continues to bear the brunt of the consequences arising from the landfill and the inaction of the government. The ground and surface water pollution continues unabated and will only get worse with the rains. There are dangerous levels of gas build up as more and more garbage is piled on top. Leachate from the landfill continues to flow into the surface water bodies around the landfill, namely Weras Ganga that feeds into the Bolgoda River.

GARBAGE DISPOSAL (3)

In April 2019, the media reported that the Fairway Waste Management Project at  Karadiyana    was at a standstill. The project has been delayed due to various issues  raised by the CEB, followed by the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Power & Renewable Energy, and by the Treasury, while the importance and urgency of the issue had been pointed out repeatedly by the concerned authorities.

The developer having spent a total of LKR 1,312 million on the project from site preparation, engineering design, advanced payments and civil works (has completed 90% of the piling work), was forced to stop work and demobilize from the site.  

In April 2019, media reported that Fairway was still waiting for the Ministry of Power & Renewable Energy to act on the cabinet decision requesting the CEB to sign a PPA with Fairway Waste management. The government is yet to sign the PPA even after obtaining cabinet approval. The project remains a standstill, as of now. The developer is still hopeful that good sense will prevail and that it will be able to continue albeit the losses that it has incurred.

If the Fairway Waste to Energy project was allowed to proceed as planned , the facility would have been accepting a limited quantity of waste by July 2019  and the full 500 tons/day by not later than November 2019. The project would have  provided for the safe disposal of all Colombo South waste.

The landfill could have been reclaimed as a public space in a short span of 4 years allowing its use for recreational activities (walking path, biking and hiking etc.), as have been achieved with many closed landfills around the world. The inert byproducts from the facility would have been used as a landfill cover as a primary step.

The project would have addressed two critical issues that the country is facing today ,sustainable waste disposal and electricity generation. The waste processing facility would have provided enough electricity to power approximately 40,000 households (based on World Bank statistics of average energy use in Sri Lanka), by supplying approximately 83,000,000 kWh/year to the grid. The plant would have been considered a base-load facility as it is designed to operate approximately 8000 hours/year. It would have produced power at a rate significantly cheaper than what is considered to be paid for emergency power today.

The Karadiyana waste Processing Project would have been the most advanced Waste processing plant with integrated biological and thermo-physical treatment. It is  already recognized as a landmark project and is cited in international industry publications. The project has met the most stringent environmental, social and Health requirements required by the World Bank to receive USD 6.7 million through its private financing arm, the International Finance Corporation (IFC). It is the only waste project to receive IFC funding.

GARBAGE DISPOSAL (4)

The idea of a landfill for garbage at Arawakkalu in Puttalam was first considered in August 2014. The project involved loading sorted municipal solid waste into sealed containers at a transfer station built in Kelaniya, to be transported by rail and unloaded at an engineering sanitary landfill site  at Ganewadiya.

, the project costing US$ 274 million  was to be funded by Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (US$ 115 million)  the World Bank (US$ 115 million) and Government of Sri Lanka  (USD  44  million). The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and feasibility reports were ready by December 2014. 

 Yahapalana government rejected the EIA on January 2016.  Yahapalana said that Ganewadiya was within the buffer zone of the Wilpattu National Park   and that the Wildlife Department insisted that Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance did not permit waste dumps in buffer zones.  Also that the site was frequented by wild animals including elephants. Once garbage comes in, it could aggravate the human–elephant conflict near the fishing village.

Yahapalana selected Seerakkuli instead. The public living in Seerakkuli protested. “Ganewadiya is several kilometres away. We have no objection to that place, but this has now been shifted to Seerakkuli.  We were told that officials from the Wildlife Department protested since it would have disastrous effects on the wildlife. What of us then?”

By August 2018, the Kerawalapitiya garbage site was full and garbage was to go to Seerakkuli ahead of schedule  by road.  More than 600 tons of garbage were to be transported from the Western Province by road daily to Puttalam. They would be transported by rail from mid 2019. 

The public strongly objected. In august 2019, four tipper trucks transporting garbage from Colombo to the Arawakkalu garbage dump were attacked twice by an unidentified group near the 4th km post on the Puttalam – Mannar old road. The tipper drivers complained that iron poles and rocks were used to attack the tippers and the protestors had even tried to drag them out of their seats without success. The four trucks were among a convoy of 29 transporting garbage from Colombo to Arawakkalu and were escorted by army and police. Four suspects arrested in this connection were released on bail by the Puttalam Magistrate’s court.

The protests continued. Stones were thrown at the trucks as they came in.  Puttalam Police were asked to take stern action against the offenders. Instructions have been given to tighten security provided to trucks transporting garbage to Arawakkalu, the police said. The army was also brought in.

In September 2019 the media reported that there were protests in Puttalam town against dumping of garbage from Colombo at Arawakkalu. Protestors came along Serakkuliya lagoon, accompanied by Muslim and Catholic priests, they invaded the construction site and protested. They removed the machinery also attacked the office of the project. The protest was so strong, the laborers ran away. Police were summoned .Television news showed the protest. The police anti riot squad was brought in to quell the protest.

SECTION 2 INDUSTRIES

COIR INDUSTRY

Sri Lanka’s coir industry, once a flourishing business that provided a major income to thousands of people is now in difficulties, the industry said in March 2019. The small, medium and traditional coir and coir-based industrialists in the country  complain that they are now compelled to close down their businesses owing to foreign company invasion in joint ventures with local partners.

Foreign companies engaged in the lucrative coir-based product exports with local partners are enjoying unlimited business freedom granted to them by Sri Lanka government authorities including the line ministries and the Board of Investment (BOI), they alleged. The local companies cannot survive in the stiff competition of foreign firms with modern machinery and resources.

A combination of factors has brought about a steady decline in the business of local entrepreneurs, including non availability of raw material, subsequent surge in input prices, the lack of modern machinery, and failure to mechanize their manufacturing process.Foreign companies in Sri Lanka have moved ahead with pre-crushing machines. All necessary facilities and approvals have been given to them by the North Western Provincial Council authorities.

A stock of over 2000 metric tons of calcium nitrate chemical fertilizer is being imported to the country yearly and 90 per cent of it is used for coco peat washing process. These multinational companies operating in Sri Lanka wash raw coco peat with water first and calcium nitrate with water thereafter  and discharge effluence to the environment causing severe water pollution in the area.

The wastewater produced in the process of removing unwanted elements in the coir substrate manufacturing process should be managed properly to prevent environmental pollution. Some companies are maintaining wastewater treatment plants in their coir factories. However, a Norwegian multinational firm was dumping waste water to some pits near the river contaminating ground water at Deduru Oya area in Kobeigane. All these complaints against such companies have fallen on deaf ears, coir manufacturers complained.

CANNED FISH INDUSTRY

Canned Fish Manufacturing Association of Sri Lanka complained that it  has not received support from  the present government  or the previous government. Mahinda Rajapaksa government had  agreed to purchase their products and sell them through the Lak Sathosa network granting an Rs 20 concession for each can. However neither Lak Sathosa nor the Treasury  has settled the arrears accumulating to Rs. 26 million. This has severely hampered their production ability.

Then in February 2015,   Yahapalana government reduced the import duty levied on canned fish by more than 50 percent. This had a negative impact on locally produced canned fish.the Association urged the government to reinforce the duty on imported canned fish to at least the level that existed before February 2015.

Four companies were engaged in canned fish production in Sri Lanka currently and the country’s capacities were thoroughly under-utilized due to large stocks being imported from countries such as China, Chili and Thailand. The local canned fish industry has purchased over Rs 100 million worth fish from the local fishing community for the past seven months

If the government  supports the local canned fish industry  it could be self-sufficient,  said the Association. With some relief, we could develop the industry and save the country US$ 64 million annually which is spent on the import of canned fish from overseas. The canned fish consumption is approximately 175,000 cans per day in Sri Lanka and we have the capacity to provide 75 percent of the total requirement.

FISHING NET INDUSTRY

Northsea Ltd, a government owned fishing net manufacturer, had taken over the  fishing net project  of Cey-Nor Foundation . CeyNor  had made  fishing nets from material from Toray Industries, Japan. “Toray is well known throughout the industry and Cey-Nor had  asked Northsea to keep using Toray.

Northsea had purchased substantial amounts of   material from J.P. Fernando and Sons, between 2014 and 2017. We were approached, in 2014, because we worked extensively with Toray Industries, Japan. The management that took over after August 2015, following the change of government, started reducing the purchases. “Towards the end the purchase order was at retail levels. Still, we delivered the stocks to Northsea fishnet factories in Jaffna, Weerawila and Lunuwila. However, they stopped working with us from May 2017 and instead of importing Toray products directly Northsea started material importing from India.”

Fishnet suppliers told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry investigating corruption in the current administration that Northsea then systematically got rid of suppliers of high quality material used in fishnets and started importing low quality material from India. The  owner of Delly Enterprises stated that Chairperson of Northsea S.T. Parameswaran threatened him in July 2017 after he had taken part in the bidding process to supply material to Northsea that year. “He told me that he was the brother of a Jaffna politician and that I should not mess with him. And, I didn’t want to continue for obvious reasons.( Island 4.7.19 p 3)

MINERAL SANDS INDUSTRY

Lanka Mineral Sands Ltd (LMSL) will be restructured under a public private partnership with a leading Japanese conglomerate, to take over strategic mineral production, especially ilmenite at the Pulmoddai deposit, reported the media in January 2019. This firm will  manufacture Titanium dioxide from ilmenite, .This deal was a major outcome of President Sirisena’s visit to Japan.

LMSL is not in a position to enter into value added production such as making Titanium dioxide, as it has neither the financial and human resources or the  necessary expertise. The only option is to enter into a joint venture with local or foreign investors to produce value added mineral products.

The LMSL sells its main mineral products such as Ilmenite, Rutile, Zircon, ilmenite, etc through an  international competitive bidding procedure. LMSL currently exports mineral sand to Russia, Japan, US and the UK.  The present production is limited to 90,000 tons of ilmenite, 9,000 tons of Rutile and 5,500 tons of Zircon annually. LMSL has already mined a massive stock of mineral sands over the past 50 years along the beach from Pulmoddai-Kokilai exhausting mineral sands  and therefore the company is not making much money at present, it is currently running at a loss and  salaries are paid jointly with Treasury.

Employees of the company are up in arms against this attempt to divest the mineral resources at Pulmoddai. They  say the  agreement with the Japanese company was through an unsolicited bid.  They said that modification and upgrading of the present plant in Pulmoddai has been completed, and the company is contributing large sums of money to the national coffers but it cannot carry out its functions with maximum productivity due to lack of human resources and other facilities.

They point out that these mineral sands are public assets. They  contain strategic Rare Earth Elements. Minerals and deposits are found along the eastern coastal belt from Mullaitivu to Pulmoddai and from there to Kotuwakambi. This is one of the most treasured natural resources of Sri Lanka.

GARBAGE RECYCLING INDUSTRY

In July 2019  it was discovered that  a consignment of 102 container loads of garbage consisting of ‘clinical waste’ had been imported from the United Kingdom.   Some  loads had had been dumped  on high ground at Katunayake and   the rest was held at the Colombo Port. They had remained uncleared for more than 15 months.

 On examination, Sri Lanka customs  found that  the waste had been imported as used mattresses, but contained bio and clinical waste, in contravention of international laws on the transport of waste material. Extremely hazardous” materials were  mixed in with mattresses, plastics and clinical waste. There was a gas emanating which could be harmful   and the stench is unbearable.” This is a well-organized racket that has been going on since 2017,” said Customs.  It is violating environment laws including  the international treaty which prevents import of  hazardous waste,

Minister of Finance, Mangala Samaraweera told Parliament that these   imports had begun in Sept 2017. From September 2017 until March 2018, 241 waste containers had been imported to Sri Lanka. The waste included used metal consignments, used mattresses, used carpets, bird feathers, worms and glass scrap.   “Of these containers 111  were detained at Colombo Port. 130 containers were released by Hayley’s Free Zone Limited. Hayleys has  re-exported 17 of them in 2017 and 2018 to India and Dubai.

Hayleys Free Zone Ltd ,an integrated logistics and entrepot trading company operating within the Katunayake Export Processing Zone, was reported  as the importer of the  consignment of clinical waste.  The company  firmly denied this.  Hayleys said this consignment was sent from the UK by a company named Vangaard Ltd  to be received here by  Ceylon Metals  Co. Hayleys said that Muthurama Shri Sashikumaran who was the head of Ceylon Metals had  got into financial difficulties,  his business operation got stalled and the consignment had been left un-claimed for the past seven months. Sasikumaran denied that the containers he had imported contained bio waste.

Sri Lankan authorities said they were going to send the   consignment back to the UK. The British government  looked into the matter, and announced  that it was willing to take back the  containers.  The public were told that Indonesia and the Philippines had also returned shipments of foreign rubbish to their ports of origin,. Indonesia announced it was sending more than 210 tonnes of garbage back to Australia and Canada has agreed to accept 69 containers of rubbish it had shipped to the Philippines between 2013 and 2014. 

Gomi Senadhira, former Trade Commissioner, had previously warned the government of dire consequences of importing of garbage of all sorts in accordance with the Sri Lanka-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (SL-SFTA)

The Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ)  filed a writ of Certiorari and Mandamus in the Court of Appeal over the two consignments.. The petitioners said that some importers have brought in consignments of waste material including clinical waste, used cushions and mattresses, plant parts, plastic waste and other uncategorized and hazardous waste into country from United Kingdom in the guise of importing permitted consignments with the intention of disposing such waste within the country and such action may cause severe damage to the environment and serious threats to public health.

The petitioners  pointed out that if any such consignments containing chemical waste are permitted to be buried here or sent to open dumps, the underground water table and the surrounding environment will be severely affected. They have said that such waste imports have been done without adhering to the terms of the BASEL Convention on the Control of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal for which Sri Lanka is a signatory and had ratified the said convention in 1992.

Petitioners seek a Writ of Certiorari quashing the validity of all documents/permits granted by any authority to import waste in violation of the provisions of the NEA.  Also a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Customs Department to act under and in terms of the customs Ordinance No. 17 of 1869 as amended in taking measures to punish the offenders. They also seek the court to direct the respondents to take steps to re-export the waste containers back to United Kingdom, the country of origin. 

Foreign garbage is reported to have been brought here for the last several years thanks to a an amendment passed in 2013 to the Finance Act. This amendment had removed certain strict restrictions which enabled the Customs to monitor  such imports. This was done to facilitate imports for BOI ventures.

Under Gazette notification No. 1818-30 of 2013  any new enterprise where at least 65 per cent of its total investment has been from foreign sources of which the total turnover is from export of goods and services were exempted from certain provisions of the Customs Ordinance, Exchange Control Act and the Imports and Exports (control) Act.  This meant that Sri Lanka  Customs has no right to inquire into these illegal imports or at least to check those containers. . This is in turn meant that no investigation can be carried out into illegal imports of this nature.”

BOI Chairman  disagreed. This extraordinary gazette notification facilitated trade activities such as entrepot trade, offshore business, front-end services, operations of the headquarters of leading buyers and logistic services. Certain goods have been limited or prohibited from being imported into the country as per the Custom’s Ordinance. If someone has violated these regulations, legal action can be taken against them.

He  said that the Regulations to this Act provides for the operational guidelines and the BOI Agreement too stipulates the conditions the Hub Operator has to fulfill. The Act enables electronic monitoring of all CUSDECS by Sri Lanka Customs (SLC) and with the adoption of synchronized procedures by the SLC and the BOI and monitoring of the cargo movement using GPS there is no room to smuggle anything, leave alone waste material,” he said. The government did not see any valid reason to cancel the  said extraordinary gazette notification. .the government did not see any valid reason to cancel said extraordinary gazette notification.”  ( Continued)

YAHAPALANA AND THE ECONOMY Part 13

August 12th, 2019

KAMALIKA PIERIS

SECTION 3 AGRICULTURE

FERTILIZER (1)

Auditor General’s Department has found that billions of rupees were erroneously credited to the bank accounts of persons who were not farmers under Sri Lanka’s cash transfer scheme for fertiliser and paid out towards untilled paddy lands instead of cultivated ones,  reported Namini Wijedasa in  May 2019.

The subsidy was introduced in 2006 under the Mahinda Chinthana to provide a hundredweight of paddy fertiliser at Rs 350 with the Treasury absorbing the difference. The objective was to raise production, to encourage more paddy cultivation by cutting input cost and to improve the living standards of the farmer community.

In 2016, the subsidy scheme was changed to a cash transfer system, ostensibly to make it more efficient. Farmers were instructed to provide bank account numbers into which money would be credited for fertiliser purchases. The paddy land registers of divisional Agrarian Services Centres were not updated, making it impossible to obtain the correct number of beneficiaries. Nevertheless, estimates were prepared on outdated statistics.

A computerised system was used for the disbursement of cash assistance before the 2017/2018 Maha season. Even under this program, Rs 4.8mn was overpaid to 985 farmers from the Alugolla Agrarian Services Centre which was sample tested. There are deficiencies even after the Rs 375mn facelift.

A circular pertaining to the 2017 Yala set the maximum payment receivable by a farmer for a single season at Rs 25,000. But sample tests found many cases of overpayment. That money could not be recovered.

The Auditor-General had carried out sample surveys in several districts. It found multiple instances of money credited to the accounts of non-farming beneficiaries during the 2016 Yala and 2017 Maha season. In the Bulathsinhala division, for instance, Rs 2.2mn was credited to 441 persons who were not the farmers. In Kalutara, Rs 6mn was paid to 1,170 ineligible persons. In Anuradhapura, 1,684 non-farmers received Rs 18mn. Similar instances were found in Galle and Badulla. During a sample test in 16 districts, the Auditor General also identified disbursements towards uncultivated paddy lands instead of cultivated ones. The amount thus squandered was Rs 1.1bn.

Further, financial assistance was not granted on time, severely inconveniencing farmers who must apply fertiliser at a specific time. There was a procurement fiasco that led to severe delays in fertiliser supply in 2017 and 2018. A total of Rs 5.4bn was paid after the required period of the 2016 Yala and Maha and the 2017 Yala seasons.

FERTILIZER (2)

It was initially planned to import 18,000 metric tonnes of urea for the 2017 Yala season under the accepted procurement procedure. The procurement method followed over three decades was unexpectedly shelved in favor of a new format that precluded equal participation by all suppliers.

instead of calling for bids from prequalified registered suppliers,  the Chairmen of the two State-owned fertiliser companies—Lanka Fertiliser Ltd and Colombo Commercial Fertiliser Company Ltd— decided to import fertiliser through open international bidding on ‘documents against acceptance’ (DA) terms. No reasonable explanation was given for the deviation.

When bids were called in November 2017, only Jat Holdings qualified for the contract to import 72,000 metric tonnes of prilled urea at US$ 327.40 per metric tonne. But the lab reports presented by Jat Holdings proved forged, resulting in the contract being canceled and the crisis emerged as time was running out. The company’s bid security of US$ 240,000 (Rs 42mn) has still not been confiscated.

.On December 11, 2017, the Agriculture Minister, presented a Cabinet memorandum to deviate from procurement procedure and order 36,000 metric tonnes of prilled urea within seven days and without an appeals procedure; and to grant Treasury backing to the State-owned fertiliser companies to open Letters of Credit for the import. It also proposed that the Treasury reimburses the two enterprises in the case of a deficit caused by price fluctuations.

Of the two types of urea, the import price of prilled urea is higher than that for granular urea.  World market reports show that the free on board (FOB) price of granular urea ranged between US$ 206 and 240 a metric tonne at the time. As of December 14, 2017, the maximum price was US$ 240. Freight and other expenses amounted to US$30 a metric tonne. So, at the most, it should have cost the Government US$ 270 a metric tonne of granular urea. It remains questionable how Sri Lanka imported these stocks at US$ 316.20 a metric tonne, the Auditor General states, calling it an overpayment”. The difference in price was US$ 46.20. And the 54,000 metric tonnes were bought. It was more than the requirement. This amounts to a further uneconomical expenditure” of US$ 17,074,800 at US$ 316.20.

Cabinet approved the proposal and Agri Commodities & Finance FZE got the contract to supply the specified quantity of fertiliser before January 15, 2018, at US$ 316.20 a metric tonne. On the same day, however, a special Cabinet procurement committee annulled the decision.

On December 12, another Cabinet memorandum was submitted. It said that President Sirisena had ordered Ceylon Fertiliser to find a supplier. The paper sought to import 72,000 metric tonnes of granular urea, not the required prilled urea, outside accepted procurement procedure through Agri Commodities and Finance FZE from a port in the Middle East before December 28, 2017, at US$ 316.20 a metric tonne.

Cabinet approved the proposal subject to Treasury concurrence. This was never obtained, a query by the Auditor General revealed. And while the Cabinet memorandum had said Ceylon Fertiliser was told to find a suitable supplier, there was no evidence of such instructions either.

It is not known on what basis Agri Commodities was selected. And no reason was given for why 76,000 metric tonnes of low-priced granular urea was ordered at US$ 316.20 despite 36,000 metric tonnes of prilled urea having been earlier ordered for an identical price.

The delay which started during the 2017 Yala season dragged on till the 2017/2018 Maha season. Lapses in decision-making and procurement caused colossal” expenditure to the Government, the Auditor General states. In the end, fertiliser supply was declared an emergency and high-priced stocks were imported outside procurement procedure in quantities exceeding the requirement.

 To avert a full-blown crisis, Cabinet authorized an emergency purchase of urea at a price much higher than world market rates. The loss to the Government — from paying US$ 46.20 more than the prevailing price for a metric tonne — was Rs 516mn.

The fertiliser requirement for the rest of the months of the Maha Season 2017/2018 was stated in writing to be 36,000 metric tonnes. But 72,000 metric tonnes were ordered. This, too, did not come within the mandated time period. Only 40,500 metric tonnes were received on January 08, 2018 while 32,000 metric tonnes came on January 15. The delay was around 10 days but seemed longer as the cultivation season had already begun, concluded Namini.

PEPPER

The Auditor General’s Department observed in August 2019 that the import of pepper from Vietnam, Indonesia and India under special tax concessions and at lower prices during the harvesting periods has depressed the price of pepper in the local market, while export demand has declined by 77 percent. Tax concessions had been granted for pepper imports without taking into consideration the harvest of pepper in Sri Lanka. AG recommended suspending the import of low-quality pepper to the country.

A surplus of pepper was observed in the local market due to increased imports and the price dropped. The price of black pepper at the local market was between Rs 1,200-1,400 per kilogram in 2015, the purchase price of black pepper remained between Rs 600-800 per kilogram in 2019.

Even though Sri Lanka has exported pepper to Vietnam in the past, pepper had been imported to Sri Lanka from Vietnam since 2016. The total volume of pepper imported in 2018 was 3.39 million kilograms. Eighty percent of that volume had been imported from Vietnam, Indonesia, and India. Pepper had been imported during the period from November to December and April to July, which are the harvesting seasons of pepper in Sri Lanka

Pepper imports have marked a significant increase whilst the pepper exports to the Western and Middle East countries, which pay higher prices, had marked a decline. The demand from 18 Western and Middle East countries for Sri Lankan pepper had marked a decline by 77 percent in 2016 compared to 2015 and again by another 40 percent in 2017 compared to 2016. It is necessary to win these markets again.

Hayleys Free Zone Pvt Ltd had imported pepper in bulk from Vietnam, using various tax concessions. It had thereafter, in 2018, re-exported 2.6 million kilograms of pepper.  Nearly 85 percent of the total pepper exports had been to India at lower prices. As a result, the local market for quality pepper dipped to a low of Rs 400- 450 a kg during the past three years.

There were mass street protests by pepper growers, o with the participation of UPFA parliamentarians at Pallebadda on Ratnapura – Uda Walawe Main road in 2017, and in many other places. We have 32291 hectares (78,000 acres) of cultivated pepper smallholdings, and 38 percent of them are in Matale and Kandy Districts. Sizes of smallholdings vary from 3.5 hectares to very small plots more than 100,000 families in the country benefiting from pepper cultivation, and they are affected by inferior pepper imports for reshipment, the protesters said.

Publicity has been given to one particular piece of export. 2800 tonnes of inferior quality black pepper imported from Vietnam has been transshipped to India, under the “made in Sri Lanka ‘ label in 2018,  by a  rogue, said one complainant.  Robberies of this nature are not possible without the blessings of politicians and big wigs in the state machinery. A single ‘parasite racketeer’ has earned Rs 1400 million by exploiting the tax benefit of 0%, for the first 2500 tonnes given to Sri Lanka, to benefit our pepper farmers, announced another. He is supposed to be a brother of a pole-vaulter minister, and it is well known that this Minister is hailed as a friend of the country, even by wild animals of Wilpattu.

TEA INDUSTRY

Tea factory owners are facing bankruptcy in the wake of low yields and poor quality products with some of them forced to close shop as well, said Sri Lanka   Tea Factory Owners Association   They were compelled to pay high interest. About 23 of around 531 proprietary owned factories had closed down due to bankruptcy and about 50 on the verge of collapse while about 12 have been put up for sale by the banks.

Factories were ridden with issues particularly due to the lack of crop as a result of which about 95 percent of them were running under capacity. Factory owners had also raised the issue that a minimum amount of Ceylon Tea is blended with teas imported from Darjeeling and Assam and CTC’s main grades for re-export in a bid to sustain the auction prices.

The factory owners wanted to be brought under the same category as exporters with regard to the Economic Service Charge (ESC). He pointed out that as manufacturers they were compelled to pay 0.50 percent whereas the exporters pay a reduced 0.25 ESC. The ESC payment was to be made for the total turnover but factory owners had to share 68 percent of this turnover with the smallholder and retain the balance. The Treasury should then ideally charge the factory owners only for their share of the earnings.

RUBBER INDUSTRY

Rubber factories owned by Sri Lankan plantation companies, were faced with the threat of bankruptcy as companies receiving BOI concessions had increased the import of liquid rubber, said President of Lanka Plantation and Mercantile Services Union, in April 2019. He said so while taking part in a demonstration organised by the employees of a rubber factory on Mirishena rubber estate, owned by Horana Plantation Company, protesting the decision to close down the factory. A large number of employees had been terminated. The factory usually produced about 2,500 kilos of crepe rubber daily. A large number of other factories would also be closed down in the future.

FALL ARMY WORM (‘SENA”)

In January 2019 it was reported the Fall Army Worm has been reported in all major maize growing areas in Sri Lanka and it was also affecting sugarcane cultivation and there was the fear that it may affect other crops, including rice. 

The Fall Armyworm (Sena) is still spreading across farming areas despite the government’s claim that the severity of threat was abating, All Ceylon Peasants Federation, National Organiser, told the media on February 2019.

The government insists that it has destroyed the pest. I have asked the Department of Agriculture officers to visit Ampara and find out whether the worm has not spread to new areas here. Nothing concrete has been done to eradicate it. The corn prices also dropped and the farmers will have to commit suicide as they did in the early 1990s.” He asked the government to increase the compensation paid to farmers affected by Rs. 75,000 per acre.

Distribution of compensation for farmers affected by the Fall Armyworm (FAW or Sena caterpillar) infestation commenced ceremonially in March  2019, beginning with the Ampara district.  Yahapalana announced that approximately 12,000 hectares of paddy as well as other crops were destroyed due to the infestation of the Sena caterpillar and the affected farmers will receive compensation of Rs. 40,000 per acre. The government has already allocated Rs. 250 million for this purpose and the compensation will be distributed by the Agricultural Insurance Board, 

One farmer said that it is obvious that this attack of the Fall Armyworm is a   biological attack and evidence has been received for farmers to prove it. There are many who are responsible for this. Some companies import seeds for a very low price. The Customs had not done its duty.

COWS FROM AUSTRALIA (1)

Ministry of Rural Economic Development had imported high- yielding pregnant milch cows from Wellard Rural Exports Pvt. Ltd., Australia. They had arrived in November 2017. These cows were imported as part of an initiative by the Ministry of Rural Economic Development. The Ministry had ignored the warnings given by the Department of Animal Production and Health that cows from Australia carried highly contagious and deadly diseases.

3,030 of these cows were distributed to 46  middle-scale dairy farmers around the country. Investors paid Rs. 200,000 per cow and the government contributed Rs. 265,000.  The dairy farmers were told that these cows would produce 20 liters of milk a day on average. They were advised to get rid of the Sri Lankan animals they already had.

the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the corruption of the Yahapalana government was told that these cows carried the deadly Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) virus infection, which was new to Sri Lanka.  The cows also had fasciola hepatica (common liver fluke) a disease that had not been detected in Sri Lanka since 1973. Fasciola hepatica could affect humans as well.

These cows were in bad shape when they landed here, the dairy farmers said. A number of cows died, while a number of calves aborted or were stillborn. Dairy farmers had complained about the matter to the authorities.

They pointed out that BVD was known as the ‘dairy industry’s silent killer’ since cows carry BVD throughout their lives and infect others. In foreign countries, such animals are immediately killed. We also suggested that we follow similar procedures, but the government ignored the suggestion. The calves live in many of our farms. This is a threat to our dairy industry.

The government also failed to send the diseased cows back to the supplier. The Ministry was not prepared to ask Wellard to pay compensation nor was it prepared to obtain compensation from the Cabinet, complained to the farmers.

Many farmers testified that they were plagued by financial difficulties due to loans taken by them to take part in this government-subsidized scheme because the cows produce less milk than what was promised.

Kingsley Walter Senanayake, who had thrice won the award for the best milk farmer of Matale, yesterday, told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry  probing corruption in the current administration that he was plagued by financial difficulties due to loans taken by him to take part in this government-subsidized scheme to introduce high-yielding imported pregnant cows, in 2017. I took part in the project because of the assurances given by the Ministry but now I am in debt. I had never been in debt before.”

. “We were assured by the Ministry of Rural Economy, that the Ministry would ensure that the farmers received cattle feed at a concessionary rate of Rs. 40 a kilo and that steps would be taken to procure the milk produced at a higher price. However, we were never given subsidized cattle feed and I soon discovered that I was making a loss.” Senanayake said that he had bought 16 cows and six of them had died. 

Senanayake said that it cost him about Rs 30 to 35 to produce a liter of milk from local milch cows and it fetched about Rs. 65. “To maintain a local milch cow, on average, I spend about Rs. 350 a day and I can earn about Rs. 603 daily. For an imported cow given to me by the Ministry, I have to spend about R. 1,100 per day but I can make only about Rs. 1,088. This is when they produce the most amount of milk.” The imported milch cows consumed about 10 kilos of cattle feed a day and that alone costs over Rs. 600.

He had drawn a loan of Rs. 10 million from the Commercial Bank to finance the project and since the project had been a complete failure he had not been able to pay back the loan for eight months. The bank keeps telling me that it would sell the land I mortgaged as it wants to recover the loan.

Wellard Rural Exports Pvt. Ltd. Australia and its local agent Foresight had provided the plan for constructing cattle sheds to all farmers who took part in the project regardless of the climate and geography. “Wellard assured that they would provide medical facilities for two years. But these cows died between 8 and18 months and I feel that if they had responded on time when I complained, some of the cows could have been saved.

COWS FROM AUSTRALIA (2)

There have been five investigations into the matter.  First, the Ministry appointed a committee to evaluate the phase I of this cow scheme. That was not to inquire into the disease issue but to move on to phase II of the project. The committee met in January, February, and March and prepared the report. The team only visited six farms, out of 66, before preparing their report. On receiving the reports, the government then paid an advance to import another batch of 15,000 cows.

Questioned by the Presidential Commission of Inquiry the chairman said did not possess any minutes of the meetings or a list of farms the committee had visited. The committee had visited six farms. He could remember the names of two owners. , but I can’t remember the names of the owners of other farms I visited’. He also said that he wasn’t sure how many cows he had observed.

This Committee told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry that they had found the cows to be weak, but they had not taken into consideration whether the animals suffered from serious diseases. When asked by the Commission about the possibility that the cows were weak because they were suffering from the disease the chairman said, “I don’t know. I don’t know about diseases. Checking diseases is not my specialty.”

The main problem according to the investigating committee, was the feed. “The main issue was food. Farmers thought they could give feed that they give to local cows. But these imported cows weigh about 400 kilos and need about 50 kilos of feed. Most farmers were not educated on the need to grow grass or to stock feed. We could see that the cows were not getting enough feed by looking at their bodies.

 The second issue with the cows,  said the committee,  was that farmers hadn’t done enough to place the cows in a climate similar to where they came from. He added that the sheds built for cows were not suitable.  However, they had been built according to a design provided by Foresight, Sri Lankan agent for Wellard.

The second investigation was by the government Veterinarians. They conducted their own inquiry and they too gave evidence before the Presidential committee. They, however, knew about disease and informed the Committee  “Our officers kept tabs on those animals and they found several cows with  BVD when they commenced investigations. Soon after they found live eggs of fasciola hepatica in cow dung”.

The Vet dept of the Ministry, made inquiries and  it then emerged that the Chief Veterinarian Officer of Australia  had informed  his Director of Animal Production and Health  that the animals sent to Sri Lanka, were from a farm that had been free from BVD for one year, but on November 22, 2017, a lab report showed that 21 cows had been infected with BVD. They delayed sending the report to the Sri Lankan officials, Chief Animal Quarantine Officer, Sri Lanka got this report only on January 10, 2018, and Director,- Livestock Planning and Economics saw this only two weeks later.

The Vets said that it was clear that Wellard had been aware of the lab report before shipping the cows to Sri Lanka because they had removed the cows diagnosed with BVD from the shipment. However, the cows which had been with them were sent. “It was the responsibility of Wellard to send Sri Lanka healthy cows.  The Ministry could have taken action. “Unfortunately nothing happened.”

Further according to the relevant quarantine  Act,  every animal imported to Sri Lanka shall be subject to quarantine for a minimum period of thirty days. While usually they were held in one designated location, in this case, the cows were sent to various farms across the country, before the end of the quarantine period. This kind of thing has never happened before”.

The third investigation came from Australia. A team of auditors from Export Finance Australia arrived in Sri Lanka in July 2019 to conduct an independent assessment at the farms that took in milch cows.  They selected 15 farms out of 67. The local dairy farmers said the Australian team had visited some farms and attempted to find fault with farming practices there.

Fourthly, the Presidential Commission of Inquiry investigating corruption in the current administration, announced in July 2019  that they will commence an inspection tour of farms which have got 3,030 substandard imported Australian cows from the government. They will also inquire into claims that the cows are suffering from Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD), hitherto not found in Sri Lanka.

Lastly, Minister of Public Reform and Public Distribution Dr. Harsha de Silva dismissed allegations that the government had distributed 3,030 substandard imported Australian cows among 46 investors and dairy farmers in 2017. The Minister said, in July 2019, that he had visited several farms on his way to Sri Pada. He said he could not recall the names of the farms he visited, but on one farm, a farmer got nearly 40 liters of milk each per day from the cows imported from Australia”. But on some farms, the cows were in pretty bad shape. My conclusion is that farms that were able to maintain the cows properly, got bigger yields than those which were not properly maintained, he said.  ( CONCLUDED)

ලංකා වෙබ් අඩවිය පරිශීලනය කරනා සියලුම ජාති හිතෛසින් වෙත අයචනාවක්!

August 12th, 2019

පාලිත ආරියරත්න

යහපාලනය රජය කාලය තුල  රටට මහා විපත් ගෙනදුන්,ගෙනදීමට, නියමිත අහිතවත් සිද්ධි සමුදාය පක්ෂ/විපක්ෂ /එන්ජිඕ / අන්‍යාගමික කරණය/ විදේශ කුමන්ත්‍රණ පිලිබඳ දැනගැනීමට විශේෂයෙන් (ආරක්ෂාව, බුදුදහම, ජාතියට එරිහි බලවේග ගැන ) කැමති විශාල පිරිසක් එම තොරතුරු විමසමින් සිටියි. උගත් බුද්ධිමත් ජනතාවකගේ දැනුම අඩුකම නිසා සට කපට දේශපාලකයන් උපන් බිමෙම අපව අනාත කරමින් සිටි. එබැවින් .

ලංකා වෙබ් අඩවිය පරිශීලනය කරනා සියලුම ජාති හිතෛසින් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ රටට එරිහි සියලුම කාරනා පහලින් ඇති කොමෙන්ට් තිරයේ කාරුණිකව සඳහන් කරන ලෙසිනි. නැතහොත්,

( කැමති මාතෘකාව ඔස්සේද ලියා එළිදක්වන්න )

ස්තුතියි

පාලිත ආරියරත්න  

ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශන වලංගු ඒවාද? – විශ‍්‍රාමික විගණකාධිපති සරත් සී. මායාදුන්නේ

August 12th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

පසුගිය ජනාධිපතිවරණ කිහිපයේදී ජනගත කළ විවිධ චින්තන හා ප‍්‍රකාශනවල මෙන් මෙවරද ඉදිරිපත් කෙරෙන ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අඩංගු කරන බව පෙනෙන කරණු අනුව පැහැදිලිව පේන්නේ ජනාධිපති තනතුරට පත්වුණු, පත්වීමට පෙරුම්පුරන හා ඔවුන්ට ආවඩන බොහෝ දෙනාට ජනාධිපති තනතුරට අයිති හා අයිති නැති කටයුත්ත මොකක්ද කියා නොතේරෙන බවයි. නැතහොත් හිතාමතාම ජනතාව මුළා කරන බවයි. ඒ හැර අප රටේ මේ දක්වා ජනාධිපති තනතුරට පත් වූ බොහෝදෙනා කළ කියූ, එසේම අදත් කරන කියන දේවලින් පේන්නෙත් එම තනතුරට අයිති හා අයිති නැති කටයුත්ත මොකක්ද කියා කිසිම අවබෝධයක් නැති විත්තියයි. ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අඩංගු කෙරෙන බොහොමයක් කරුණු සැබැවින්ම තිබිය යුත්තේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මහ මැතිවරණයක ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවලයි. විශේෂයෙන්ම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට අයිති කාර්යයන්, ජනාධිපති තනතුරට අයිති කාර්යයන් ලෙස සලකා ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අඩංගු කළ හා අඩංගු කිරීම් ගැන බුද්ධිමත් පාඨකයා විමසිලිමත් වියයුතු වෙනවා.

 අපේ ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව රටේ රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති සම්මත කිරීම හෙවත් ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක කටයුත්ත ඉටුකරන්නේ හා කළ යුත්තේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසිනුයි. පාර්ලිමේන්තු මහ මැතිවරණයක එක් ප‍්‍රධාන අරමුණක් වන්නේ රටේ රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය ගැන එක් එක් දේශපාලන පක්ෂ හා කණ්ඩායම් ජනතා අනුමැතිය ඉල්ලන යෝජනාපත‍්‍ර ගැන ඡුන්දය මගින් ජනතා අනුමැතිය ප‍්‍රකාශ කිරීමට අවස්ථාව සැලසීමයි. පාර්ලිමේන්තුව පනත් ලෙස සම්මත කර කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළ යුතුවන්නේ එලෙස මහ මැතිවරණයකදී ජනතා අනුමැතිය ලබන ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවයි. රාජ්‍යය සඳහා භාවිතා කිරීමට යෝජිත ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධන, ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්බන්ධතා කරුණු, ජාතික ආරක්ෂාවට හා සංහිඳියාවට අදාළ කරුණු, ආර්ථික සංවර්ධනයට, විරැකියාවට, උද්ධමනයට, විදේශ සංචිතවලට මෙන්ම අධ්‍යාපනයට, සෞඛ්‍යයට ආදී සියලූ ජාතික ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිවලට අදාළ කරුණු ගැන ජනතා අනුමැතිය ප‍්‍රකාශවන්නේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මහ මැතිවරණයකදීයි. පොදු රාජ්‍ය මණ්ඩල ආකෘතිය යටතේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතර ජනතා අනුමැතිය නියෝජනය කරන කණ්ඩායමෙන් සමන්විත අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය පාර්ලිමේන්තු අනුමැතිය සඳහා ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ මහ මැතිවරණයකදී ජනතා අනුමැතිය ලබන එම රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවයි. 1978 ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවෙන් විධායක ජනාධිපති ක‍්‍රමය හඳුන්වා දුන්නත් රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති සම්මත කිරීම හෙවත් ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක කටයුත්ත ජනාධිපතිවරයාට නොව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට එලෙසින්ම භාර දී තියෙනවා. ඒ බව 4(අ) ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ ජනතාවගේ ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක බලය ජනතාව විසින් තෝරා පත්කර ගනු ලබන මන්තී‍්‍රවරයන්ගෙන් සමන්විත පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසින්ද ජනමත විචාරණයකදී ජනතාව විසින්ද කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළ යුත්තේය.’ යනුවෙන් දක්වා තියෙනවා. ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක බලය යන්නෙන් අදහස් කරන්නේ රට කරගෙන යාමට අවශ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති සමුදාය පනත් ලෙස සම්මත කර රටේ නීතිය බවට පත් කිරීමට ජනතාව විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට පවරන ජනතාවගේ බල වරමයි. ඒ අනුව රටේ රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය පනත් ලෙස සම්මත කරනු ලබන්නේ හා කළ යුතුවන්නේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසින් මිස ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් නොවේ.

 4(ආ) ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව දැක්වෙන ‘රටේ ආරක්ෂාව ඇතුළුව ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය ජනතාව විසින් තෝරා පත් කර ගනු ලබන ජනරජයේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කළ යුත්තේය.’ යන්න ජනාධිපතිවරයාට අපගේ ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව පැවරී ඇති ප‍්‍රධාන කාර්යභාරයයි. එහිදී ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය යන්නෙන් කියැවෙනුයේ රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය තීරණය කිරීමේ බලය නොව, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අනුමත කරන නීතියට යටත්ව රට කරවීම හෙවත් ආණ්ඩුකරණයයි. එහි සඳහන් නීතිය වන්නේ ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශන නොව, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසින් නීතිය ලෙස සම්මත කරන රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවයි. ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අඩංගු කළයුතු වන්නේ ජනාධිපතිිවරයා තම කටයුතු ඉතාමත් උචිත ලෙස ඉටු කරන ආකාරය මිස තමන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කටයුතු ආක‍්‍රමණය කරන ආකාරය නොවේ.


 ඉහත කී විධිවිධානයේ ‘රටේ ආරක්ෂාව ඇතුළුව ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය…’ යන්නද අප නිවැරදිව තේරුම් ගතයුතු වෙනවා. එය ‘රටේ ආරක්ෂාව හා ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය…’ යනුවෙන් දක්වා තිබුණේ නම් ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය යන්නට රටේ ආරක්ෂාව ඇතුළත් නොවන බව සැලකීමට ඉඩ තිබුණා. එනමුත් ඉහත දැක්වෙන විධිවිධානය අනුව ජනතාවගේ විධායක බලය යන්නට රටේ ආරක්ෂාවද ඇතුළත්වන බව පැහැදිලියි. ඒ අනුව නිශ්චය වනුයේ රටේ ආරක්ෂාව පිළිබඳ නීති සම්පාදන බලය හෙවත් ජනතාවගේ ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක බලය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවටත්, එය ක‍්‍රියාත්මකකිරීමේ බලය ජනාධිපතිවරයාටත් පැවරී ඇති බවයි. එනම් රටේ ආරක්ෂාව පිළිබඳව ජනාධිපතිවරයාට අයිති වගවීම වන්නේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසින් සම්මත කරන නීතියට යටත්ව රටේ ආරක්ෂාව ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කළ යුතු බවයි. මෙය අපට වැදගත් වනුයේ සැකසෙමින් පවතින සමහර ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අදහස් දක්වනුයේ ඔවුන් පත් කරන ඊළඟ ජනාධිපතිවරයා රටේ ආරක්ෂාව පිළිබඳ පූර්ණ බලධරයා ලෙස, එනම් ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා විධිවිධාන ඉක්මවා බලය හිමිකර ගන්නා අයෙකු ලෙස හඳුන්වන නිසයි. එසේ කිරීමක් ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව උල්ලංඝනය කරමින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව සතු බලය, ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ අතට දීමක් වෙනවා.

 විධායක බලය ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට අමතරව රාජ්‍ය නායකයා වශයෙන්ද ජනාධිපතිවරයාට කටයුතු ගණනාවක් පැවරී තියෙනවා. එලෙස ජනාධිපති කාර්යභාරය පිළිබඳව අනිකුත් විස්තරාත්මක විධිවිධාන 33 හා 34 ව්‍යවස්ථා වලත් 41 ව්‍යවස්ථාව ඇතුළු තවත් ව්‍යවස්ථා වල සඳහන් වෙතත් මේ කිසිදු ව්‍යවස්ථා විධිවිධානයක ජනාධිපතිවරයාට ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක බලතල හෙවත් රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය තීරණය කිරීමට අදාළ රටේ නීති ව්‍යුහය සැකසීමට කවර හෝ බලයක් පවරා නැහැ. ඔහු නායකත්වය දෙන විධායකයට පවරා ඇත්තේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව පනවන රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවට අනුව රටේ ආණ්ඩුකරණය හෙවත් රාජ්‍ය පාලනයේ විධායක කාර්යයයි. එනිසා ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල අඩංගු විය යුත්තේ රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය කුමක් විය යුතුද යන්න නොව පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අනුමත කරන නීති රාමුව යටතේ ජනතාව වෙත රාජ්‍ය සේවය ලබාදීමේදී හා රාජ්‍ය නායකයා ලෙස කි‍්‍රයා කරද්දී අනුගමනය කරන ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිහා කි‍්‍රයාකාරකම් මොනවාද යන්නයි. එනම් රාජ්‍ය පාලනයේදී තම කාර්යය යහපත්ව ලබාදෙන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න පැහැදිලි කිරීමයි.

 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අනුමත කරන රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තියට අදාළ පනත් සඳහා වන කෙටුම්පත් වලින් අතිබහුතරය සැකසෙන්නේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා ඇතුළු අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසින් බව ඇත්තය. එම පනත් කෙටුම්පත් කරන අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ ප‍්‍රධානියා ජනාධිපතිවරයා බවත් ඇත්තය. එසේ වුවද එම කෙටුම්පත්වල අන්තර්ගතය විය යුත්තේ ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති නොව ජනතාව රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිය ලෙස පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයේදී කළ අනුමත කිරීම්ය. ඒ, ජනාධිපතිවරයා ඇතුළු අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට අනුමැතිය සඳහා අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩල සංදේශ ඉදිරිපත් කරනුයේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයට අවශ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිමය කරුණු නීතිගත කිරීමට නොව මහ මැතිවරණයකදී ජනතා අනුමැතිය ලබන ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාව රටේ නීතිය බවට පත් කිරීමට වන නිසයි.

 ප‍්‍රජාතාන්ත‍්‍රික පාලන ව්‍යුහයකදී ජනතාව විසින්, ජනතාව උදෙසා, ජනතා නියෝජිතයන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට තෝරා පත්කර ගැනීමේදී ජනතාවට තමාව පාලනය වියයුතු රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාව නිශ්චය කිරීමට දේශපාලන පක්ෂ ක‍්‍රමය අත්‍යවශ්‍ය වෙනවා. ඒත් රටක දේශපාලන පක්ෂ ක‍්‍රමය අවශ්‍යවන්නේ ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක කාර්යයට මිස නිර්දේශපාලනික වියයුතු විධායක කාර්යයට හෙවත් ආණ්ඩුකරණයට නොවෙයි.

 ජනාධිපතිවරණයකදී රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවක් ජනතා අනුමැතියට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම මෙතෙක් සිදුවුවත් කරුණු කිහිපයක් නිසාම එය වැරදි කි‍්‍රයාවක් බව මේ අනුව පෙනී යනවා. එක අතකින් එය ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ අරමුණට පටහැනි වෙනවා. අනිත් අතින් ඉන් ඉතාම බරපතළ වැරදි පණිවිඩයක් ජනගත වෙනවා. එනම්, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයක් 

 ජයගන්නා පක්ෂයක් ලබාගන්නා ඡුන්ද ප‍්‍රතිශතයට වඩා වැඩි ඡුන්ද ප‍්‍රතිශතයක් ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ ජයග‍්‍රාහකයා ලැබීමකදී ජනතාව ඉහළ ප‍්‍රතිශතයකින් අනුමත කර ඇත්තේ ජනාධිපති රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාව බවටත්, එනිසා කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළ යුත්තේ ජනාධිපති රාජ්‍ය ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාව බවටත් සහ මුලින්ම වැරදි අර්බුදකාරී අර්ථකථනයකට එය ඉඩ සලසනවා. ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ජයග‍්‍රහණයට සැබෑ හේතුව ඔහුගේ ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාව නොව වෙනත් හේතූන් වුණත් ඉහළ ජනතා අනුමැතිය ලැබී ඇත්තේ ඒ ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවට බවට තර්කයකටද එය ඉඩ සලසනවා. ජනාධිපති ධුරය හා පාර්ලිමේන්තු බලය ප‍්‍රතිවිරුදධ දේශපාලන පක්ෂවලට අයත් වුවහොත් හා එහිදී අසමාන ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශන දෙකක් අනුමත වුවහොත් එය මුළු රටම මහා අර්බුදයකට ගෙන යනවා. අද ඇති අර්බුදය ඊට නිදසුනක්.

 ඉහත දැක්වෙන ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති මාලාවට අයත් වියයුතු ආණ්ඩුකරණයේ ප‍්‍රධාන කොටස් දෙකක් තියෙනවා. ඉන් එකක් නම් ජනතාවට යහපත්ව රාජ්‍ය සේවය ලබාදීමේදී රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් ඉතාම යහපත් අයුරින් සේවයේ යෙදවිය හැකි රාජ්‍ය සේවා නිලධාරී ව්‍යුහය සකස් කරන ආකාරයයි. වැදගත් වන අනිත් කරුණ නම් ඉතාම යහපත් අයුරින්, භීෂණයෙන් හා දූෂණයෙන් තොරව, තම දේශපාලන පාක්ෂික නෑදෑ හිතවතුන්ට ප‍්‍රමුඛතාව ලබාදෙන පක්ෂ, පාට, ජාති, භාෂා, ආගම්, කුලමල ආදී භේදයන්ගෙන් තොරව, සමාජ සාධාරණත්වය ඉටුවන පරිදි, ජනතාවට යහපත්ව රාජ්‍ය සේවය ලබා දෙන ආකාරයයි. ආණ්ඩුකරණයේදී ඉතාම වැදගත් මේ ප‍්‍රධාන කොටස් දෙකම පසුගිය කාලය පුරාම ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිවල නොතිබීම නිසා ගෙන දුන් විනාශය මනාව පැහැදිලි වුණා.

 ජනතාවට රාජ්‍ය සේවය ලබාදීමට අදාළ ඉහළම රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරී ව්‍යුහය පත්කර ගැනීමට ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව මඟින් ජනාධිපතිවරයාට අභිමතානුසාරී බලයක් ඍජුවම ලබා දී තියෙනවා. ඒ, මුළු රාජ්‍ය සේවයටම නිකැළල්, පිරිසිදු, පලදායී, කාර්යක්ෂම හා සුපිළිපන්න ආදර්ශවත් නායකත්වයක් ලබා දිය හැකි ඉහළම රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් තෝරා පත්කර ගැනීම සඳහායි. පසුගිය දශක කිහිපය පුරාම මෙම ඉහළම නිලධාරීන්ගෙන් බහුතරය තෝරාගෙන ඇත්තේ කිසිදු සාධාරණ පදනමක් නැතිව දූෂිත ආකාරයට බවත්, එම නිලධාරීන්ගෙන් බහුතරය කි‍්‍රයාකර ඇත්තේද ඉතාම දූෂිත ආකාරයට බවත්, අද සනාථ වී තියෙනවා. මුළු රාජ්‍ය සේවයටම නායකත්වයක් දෙන ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ඇතුළු සම්පූර්ණ ජනාධිපති කාර්ය මණ්ඩලය, අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩල ලේකම්, අගමැති ලේකම් සහ සියලූම අමාත්‍යාංශ ලේකම්වරු තම අභිමතයම අනුව පත් කිරීමට ව්‍යවස්ථාව ජනාධිපතිවරයාට පූර්ණව බලය දී තියෙනවා. අග‍්‍ර විනිශ්චයකාරතුමා ඇතුළු සියළුම ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිශ්චයකාරවරු, සභාපතිතුමා ඇතුළු සියලූම අභියාචනාධිකරණ විනිශ්චයකාරවරු, නීතිපතිවරයා, විගණකාධිපතිවරයා, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මහලේකම්වරයා, ඔම්බුඞ්ස්මන්වරයා සහ පොලිස්පතිවරයා පත් කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ නිර්දේශය අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය වෙනවා. ඒ තනතුරකට ජනාධිපතිවරයා නිර්දේශ නොකරන කිසිම නමක් අනුමත කරන්නට ව්‍යවස්ථා සභාවට බලයක් නැහැ. පසුගිය කාලයේදී සුදුස්සන් නොසලකා හැර නුසුදුස්සන් නිර්දේශ වූ අවස්ථා අනන්තවත් තිබුණා. එම කිසිම පත්කිරීමකදී ජනාධිපතිවරයා කිසිවෙකුගේ උපදේශයක් තබා නිර්දේශයක් ලබා ගැනීමකටවත් බැදීමක් ඇති කර නැහැ. තානාපතිවරුන්, ති‍්‍රවිධ හමුදාපතිවරුන්, ජනාධිපති නීතිඥවරුන් ආදී පත්කිරීම්වලදීද එලෙසින්ම විශාල අභිමතානුසාරී බලයක් ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුවම ජනාධිපතිවරයාට ලැබී තියෙනවා. එනමුත් ඒ ජනාධිපතිවරු කිසිවෙක් එම විශ්වාසය හා වගවීම මෙතෙක් ආරක්ෂා කර ඒ කටයුතු බොහොමයක් සිදුකර ඇත්තේ ඉතාමත් දූෂිත හා ප‍්‍රශ්නකාරී ආකාරයකටයි. ජනාධිපතිවරණයකදී අපේක්ෂකයන් තම ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල ඇතුළත් කළයුතු ප‍්‍රධාන ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති අතර තම අභිමතය අනුව සිදුකරන මෙබඳු සෑම පත්කිරීමක්ම ඉතාමත්ම උචිත ලෙස කිරීමට භාවිතා කරන සංවරණ හා සංතුලන ක‍්‍රම මොනවාද යන්න හා ඒවා නිසි ලෙස ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කෙරෙන බව තහවුරු කෙරන පාලන ක‍්‍රම මොනවාද යන්න නිශ්චිතව දැක්වීම සුදුසු වෙනවා.

 පොදු ජනතාව වෙත රාජ්‍ය සේවය ඉතාම යහපත් අයුරින් ලබාදීම ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කරන්නේ කෙසේද යන්නත්, ඒ කටයුතු සැලසුම් කරන්නේ, ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති සාදන්නේ, තීරණ ගන්නේ, ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම්වල උචිතානුචිතභාවය 

 අගැයීමට ලක්කරන්නේ, අපේක්ෂිත ප‍්‍රතිඵල හා සැබෑ ප‍්‍රතිපල සසඳන්නේ, පසුවිපරම් කටයුතු කරන්නේ, විචලතාවයන් හඳුනාගන්නේ හා එම විචලතා පිළිබඳ කි‍්‍රයා කරන්නේ කෙසේද යන්නත් ජනතාවට අවබෝධවන අයුරින් ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල ඇතුළත් කිරීම අවශ්‍ය වෙනවා. පසුගිය දශක 

 ගණනාව තුළම පොදු ජනතාව වෙත ඉතාමත් අශීලාචාර ලෙස රාජ්‍ය සේවය ලබාදුන්නේ මේ කටයුතු කිසිවක් ජනතාවට විවෘත නොකර පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට අයිති කටයුතුවලින් තම ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශන පුරවා ජනතාව මංමුළා කරමිනුයි.

 මේ සියලූම කාරණා සලකා බලා බැසිය හැකි සරලම නිගමනය නම් ජනාධිපති ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල ඇතුළත් විය යුත්තේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ කාර්යභාරයට අදාළ කරුණු බවයි. ජනාධිපතිවරයා වශයෙන් කරන්නේ කුමක්ද යන්න පමණක් නොව කරන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න දැක්වීමද අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය වෙනවා. විශේෂයෙන්ම, තම බලතල ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමේදී ඒවා අත්තනෝමතිකව නොකොට සම්මුතිකභාවය, සහභාගිත්වය, නීතියේ පාලනය, වගවියයුතුභාවය, විනිවිදභාවය, ප‍්‍රතිචාරාත්මකභාවය, පිරිමැසුම්භාවය, කාර්යක්ෂමතාවය හා සඵලතාවය, සමානාත්මකතාවය ආදී ගුණාංගවලින් පරිපූර්ණව සදාචාරසම්පන්නව කරන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න පැහැදිලිව දැක්වීම අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය වෙනවා. උදාහරණ ලෙස එක් එක් වර්ගයේ පත්වීම් කිරීමේදී හෝ අධිකරණයෙන් වරදකරුවන් කළ අයට සමාව දීමේදී කොයි කොයි මණ්ඩල හෝ කණ්ඩායම් විමසන්නේද, නිර්දේශ හෝ උපදේශ ලබාගන්නේද ආදී කරුණු එම ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල ඇතුළත් කිරීම උචිත බව පෙනෙනවා.

 ඒ සියල්ල එසේ නමුත් ජනාධිපතිවරණයකදී ඡුන්දදායකයා තම ඡුන්දය දීමේදී එකී එක් එක් ප‍්‍රතිපත්ති ප‍්‍රකාශනවල ඇතුළත් කුමක්ද යන්නෙන් ඔබ්බට ගොස් එම ජනාධිපතිධුරාපේක්ෂකයා හා ඔහුගේ ප‍්‍රකාශන කෙතරම් දුරට විශ්වාස කළ හැකිද යන්න තේරුම්ගෙන සිටිය යුතු වෙනවා. එසේ කියනුයේ ඔබ රැවටුනහොත් එහි හානිය ඔබට පමණක් සීමා නොවෙන නිසයි.

“SOMETIMES BEING A BROTHER IS EVEN BETTER THAN BEING A SUPERHERO” MARC BROWN. “FROM TODAY, MY BROTHER IS YOUR BROTHER, HE WILL NOW BE YOUR BROTHER”- MAHINDA RAJAPAKSE

August 12th, 2019

By M D P DISSANAYAKE

For political opponents,  if MR is no good, then GR is also no good.  GR made MR great when in power.  Now MR has made GR great. 

If the country rejects MR, it will also reject GR.  If the country rejects GR at the presidential election, then it will also reject MR at the next General Election.

It is what the Nation thinks of you, yourself alone.  The Nation has a specific feeling about MR, GR, BR, RW, MS, SP, etc. That is Not Negotiable.

In Singapore, Late Mr. Hon. Lee Kwan Yew groomed his son to Premiership.  Now Mr. LKW is no more.  Lee’s son ( Prime Minister) is being challenged by his own brother ( qualified Doctor) and has formed a new opposition political party known as Singapore Progressive Party. Tan Cheng Bock at the age of 79  is leading the new party against PAP (formed by his father LKW).  Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is 67 years of age.

In Sri Lanka, the Bandaranaike family disintegrated after parent’s death. They sold Nittambuwa properties to their servant and the servant Somawathi sold small lots to buyers through Anagi Property Sales. Loyal Somawathie for 34 years, siphoned funds off back to Chandrika and Suneththra for a kick-back.  Anura Bandaranaike was not a financial beneficiary of the deals  Singapore brothers are also fighting politically, but family property settlement is at the core of the issue.

Sajith Premadasa has no children, so there will be no fighting amongst brothers and sisters for his massive wealth.   Ranil (relatively poor) also has no children, so he is also on the same platform as Sajith. Mangala Samaraweera does not believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.  So he is not married to a woman.

Insinuations, innuendo is common in politics.  Your unknown enemy is very near you.  Your tomorrow’s enemy is today’s very close family relative or friend.  Your known enemies respect you.  But your unknown Enemy will not respect you.

Greed will overtake them.

Thankfully, the Rajapakse family is still together.  They respect their parents.  Still, there are pockets of opponents who would like to create a non-existing conflict even before the results of any Election.

දේශපාලන සහරාන් ලා ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂට එරෙහි අවසන් සටනට පැමිණේ

August 12th, 2019

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය සුදත් රෝහණ සභාපති නිදහස් කලා සන්ධානය

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකයා ලෙස ප්‍රකාශයට පත් වූ ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා වෙත නිදහස් කලා සන්ධානය දේශමාමක සියලූ‍ කලාකරුවන් වෙනුවෙන් සුභාශිංසන පළකර සිටී.

ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ යනු මේ මොහොතේ රට ඉල්ලා සිටින නායකත්වය බව ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකයා ලෙස ප්‍රකාශයට පත් ව පසු එතුමා කළ කතාව මගින් නැවත තහවුරු විය.

ඵලදායී පුරවැසියෙක්, සතුටින් ජිවත්වන පවුලක්, විනයගරුක සමාජයක් හා සෞභාග්‍යවත් දේශයක් ගොඩනැගීම ස්වකිය අරමුණ බවට ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා කළ ප්‍රකාශය ගැන සමස්ත සමාජයම විශේෂ අවධානයක් යොමුකළ යුතුය. පවුල් ඒකකය පදනම් කරගනිමින් ආර්ථීක සංවර්ධනය හා සමගාමී සමාජ සංවර්ධනයක් ඇතිකිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාව එතුමා විසින් හඳුනා ගෙන තිඛෙන බව එයින් පැහැදිලිය. කලාව ආදී සංස්කෘතික සාධක රඳා පවතින්නේත් සමස්ත සමාජයේම ස්ථාවරත්වය රඳා පවතින්නේත් සතුටින් ජිවත්වන විනයගරුක පවුල් සංස්ථාවක් මත පදනම් වූ සමාජයක ය. එය වටහාගත් නායකයකු පහළවීම පිළිබඳ කලාකරුවන් වශයෙන් අපි සැබවින්ම සතුටට පත්වන්නෙමු.

ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ නම ජනාධිපතිවරණ අපේක්ෂකයා ලෙස ප්‍රකාශවීමත් සමඟ ඇතැමෙක් කලබල වී සිටිති. ඒ කවුරුන්ද යන්න ජනතාව විමසිල්ලෙන් බැලිය යුතුය. මේ කලබල වී සිටින්නේ අසාර්ථක දේශපාලකයන්, විජාතික කොන්ත්‍රාත්කරුවන්, ඛෙදුම්වාදීන්, දුරාචාර චින්තකයන්, එන් ජී ඕ කුලී කාරයන්ය. ස්ථාවර ව තිබු රට අස්ථාවර කර විනාශකළේ ඔවුන්ය. නැවත රට ගොඩනැගෙන්නට වෙරදරන මොහොතේ එයට අකුල් හෙලන්නේ ඔවුන්ය.
මේ පිරිස කලබල වී සිටින්නේ ඇයි? ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා මේ රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා වීම නිසැක බව ඔවුන් දන්නා නිසාය. ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ වැනි දේශ ප්‍රේමයක් සහ නව දැක්මක් සහිත කාර්යශ=ර නායකයකු ගේ පාලනයක් තුළ නැවත ඛෙදුම්වාදයට, පරගැතිභාවයට, දුරාචාරවාදයට හා දුගී දුප්පත් භාවයට ඉඩක් නොමැති බව දන්නා නිසයි. ඒ නිසා මේ දේශපාලන සහරාන් ලා තමන් ගේ දේශපාලන අනාගත පැවැත්ම වෙනුවෙන් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ට එරෙහිව අවසන් සටනටය මේ සැරසී සිටින්නේ. ඒ බව ජනතාව වටහාගෙන සිටි.

සුදත් රෝහණ සභාපති

I won’t let anyone interfere with the sovereignty of my country – Gotabaya

August 12th, 2019

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera

As professionals and entrepreneurs, we expect the future president to have the qualities of what Gotabaya preaches.

Though freedom of the nation is of utmost importance, but at the end of the day, poor masses need food, shelter and also to live peacefully.

We cannot achieve that unless the whole country is put on High gear of development.

In order to achieve above, we need to be a disciplined nation which Gota is preaching

When you talk about discipline we need to make sure that discipline should start from home, family, on the road, at the workplace.

The young generation getting an education with public money should be made to understand that they have an obligation to serve the country.

Gota need to bring discipline not only in matters related to the environment but also in general behavior of the youth

Slightest miscommunication with university management they go on demonstrating and disturb day to day life of the masses

Gota need to stop this

Unbearable bureaucracy in the public sector which is an obstacle and impediment for investment should be eradicated

That means Gota need ruthless ministers and secretaries who can take decisions 

Gota needs to have a dialogue with Judiciary so that national interest is given priority when delivering judgments.

Gota need to make clergy involved only on religious matters and leave politics 

Gota need to emulate Lee Kwan Yew and be above board

People should not fear him but respect him

All bad eggs in the party should be asked to stop interfering 

If Gota can do this I will surely vote for him 

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera

The House is in cession

August 12th, 2019

ABHINAV CHANDRACHUD Courtesy The Hindu BusinessLine

The last and final amendment of Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution, brought in to prevent the use of ballots to break away from the Union, had a specific target

In 1963, Article 19(2) of the Constitution was amended for the last and final time, and the words ‘the sovereignty and integrity of India’ were inserted in it, creating one more enumerated exception to the right to free speech. The Constitution (Sixteenth Amendment) Bill, 1963 (hereinafter, the ‘Bill’) was informally referred to as the ‘Anti-Secession Bill’. It was designed to prevent local political leaders in different regions within India from using the electoral process to peacefully propagate secession from the Union. In the past, the Muslim League in British India had used the electoral process to demand Partition. It was now feared that local political parties with regional, not religious, affiliations were getting elected to office on the promise that they would advocate secession for their region from India. The chief target of this constitutional amendment was the southern political party Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (the ‘DMK’) in the state of Madras, which had advocated secession of parts of the south, and the creation of a separate nation state called ‘Dravida Nadu’ or ‘Tamilnad’. Calls for secession in Punjab and Nagaland also inspired the Bill. Ironically, it was enacted at a time when demands for secession had died down in the country in the wake of the Chinese aggression.

Mask slips: Though the DMK in Madras State was the primary target of the Bill, the amendment was also designed to quell calls for secession in other parts of the country, particularly Nagaland and Punjab. Seen here are DMK cadres in Karunanidhi masks. Photo: M Moorthy

The DMK was a political party which was founded in 1949 by followers of ‘Periyar’ (meaning ‘great man’) E.V. Ramaswami Naicker. The DMK used the parliamentary process itself for articulating demands for secession. It won a few seats in the 1957 election for the Madras Legislative Assembly, and their slow success began to trouble the government.

It was not the outbreak of war with China in 1962 which precipitated the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution. In fact, during the war, the DMK had scaled back its demands for secession. Much prior to the war, in January 1961, the Congress party at its Bhavnagar session had set up a ‘National Integration Committee’, under the chairmanship of C.P. Ramaswami Aiyar, to look into steps that could be taken for promoting national integration. Prime Minister Nehru had called a meeting of the chief ministers in August 1961, where it was recommended that advocacy of secession be made a criminal offence. In September 1961, a National Integration Conference was convened. The committee submitted its report to the prime minister on 5 November, 1962. It made only one recommendation, viz., that Article 19 be amended to prevent Indian citizens from demanding secession. The DMK was kept out of these proceedings, and was not consulted by the committee.

The debates in Parliament make it very clear that the Bill was primarily being enacted as a reaction to the DMK’s demands for secession. Law Minister A.K. Sen, who moved the Bill, said that it was the Bill’s purpose to outlaw ‘all activities of a secessionist nature, so that we may not have a repetition of what happened from 1940 in this country when the Muslim League made the partition of India . . . its main political platform and fought elections on that resulting in a disaster . . . ’. Sen informed the House that he had initially intended to speak in Hindi, but since ‘most of the challenge came from areas whose representatives might not have understood Hindi,’ he had decided to speak in English instead. ‘The immediate provocation or the immediate cause’ for the Bill, said M.S. Gurupada Swamy, ‘is obviously the activities of the DMK.’ Speaking in favour of the Bill, R.N. Reddi referred to the movement for a separate ‘Dravidnadu in the South’. Opposing the Bill in the Lok Sabha, DMK party member Nanjil Manoharan admitted that the DMK was carrying out ‘propaganda’ for ‘the formation of Dravidastan’.

Another opponent of the Bill, Narasimha Reddy, said that the Bill was being referred to in the press as the ‘anti-cession Bill’, but it was known in Madras as the ‘anti-DMK Bill’. He said that the Bill was ‘primarily intended for the suppression of the DMK organization, so some people think’. For Reddy, the Congress party was exacting its revenge against the DMK for giving it trouble in the previous elections. The debate on the Bill in the Rajya Sabha reads as though the DMK member, C.N. Annadurai, was himself on trial. Annadurai said that the Bill might have been ‘aimed at others also’, but that the newspapers and political speeches suggested that its target was only ‘the despicable DMK, not others’.

However, though the DMK in Madras State was the primary target of the Bill, the amendment was also designed to quell calls for secession in other parts of the country, particularly Nagaland and Punjab. Several members of the House referred to the situation in Nagaland as a possible justification for the Bill. Law Minister Sen expressly rejected the allegation that the DMK was the only reason that the Bill was being enacted. He said that there were others who ‘openly want secession from India and who openly preach (the) disintegration of India’. ‘One familiar example’, he said, was the ‘rebel or hostile Nagas on the eastern border’, who had not yet given up their demand for a separate nation state of Nagaland. Sen said that ‘forces of disintegration’ had taken hold in India ‘[s]tarting from the Punjab, right up to the South’. Thus, Sen referred to Madras, Nagaland and Punjab in support of the Bill.

The Bill was thought to be necessary because the words ‘security of the State’ in Article 19(2) were considered insufficient to prevent a person from using the electoral process to advocate secession peacefully. The amendment bill did not only seek to add an exception to the right to free speech. Among other changes, it also made ‘the sovereignty and integrity of India’ an enumerated exception to the rights to assembly and association contained in Articles 19(1)(b) and (c). Law Minister Sen said that ‘some of the decisions of the Supreme Court (had) made it quite clear that ‘security of the State’ is a limited expression and it does not comprehend any power to ban organizations or political activities so as to bring them within the exceptions under the article unless something more is there. The government thus appeared to be keen to ban associations which advocated secession, and the words ‘security of the State’ in Article 19(2) were thought to be insufficient for this purpose.

The amendment Bill was also symbolic. It introduced, for the first time, an oath which was now required to be taken by any person who was even merely nominated as a candidate to fill a seat for the Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha or a state legislature. In other words, a person who wanted merely to contest an election for a state legislature or Parliament now had to take an oath. The Bill also amended the oaths that were required to be taken by elected members of Parliament and state legislatures. The Bill now required all these persons to swear that they would, among other things, ‘uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India’. Law Minister Sen believed that this would have ‘a salutary effect’ on elected representatives. Interestingly, even Supreme Court judges and high court judges are, following the Sixteenth Amendment, required to take an oath to uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India. This presumably means that Supreme Court and high court judges are bound by their oaths to deny any person the right to peacefully propagate secession from India.

While the war with China might not have been the cause for the Bill, it certainly provided the necessary rhetoric for its enactment and created a general feeling of insecurity and paranoia which reduced opposition to it. The Bill was enacted at a time when India was under its first national emergency, when civil rights and civil liberties had been suspended. Even though the war with China had lasted between October-December 1962, the national emergency was continued from October 1962 to December 1967. As Communist Party member Bhupesh Gupta noted in the Rajya Sabha, ‘[t]oday, as we are discussing this subject [i.e., the Bill], the irony of it is that article 19 is frozen, it does not exist.’ In his speech in the Lok Sabha, Law Minister Sen referred to the ‘hard-won freedom’ which India had earned ‘at the cost of millions of patriots’ lives’ and to ‘the flag of independence which we have earned for ourselves with the blood of many a martyr’, in support of the Bill. On another occasion, Sen said that it was ‘unfortunate that at a time when we are facing the most major threat in our history since independence, we should have to contend with such activities and have to ask for powers to deal with such activities’. Surendranath Dwivedy said that there were parties in India which had ‘extra-territorial’ loyalties, an obvious reference to the Communist Party, which another member said had two factions, one loyal to Peking, the other to Moscow.

Abhinav Chandrachud practises as an advocate at the Bombay High Court

Kashmir episode further dims chances of devolution of power to Sri Lankan Tamils

August 12th, 2019

What is happening in India now in regard to federalism and devolution of power to Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir (J and K) region could further dims prospects of Sri Lankan Tamils’ getting power devolution beyond what they have been given de facto under the 13th Amendment of the Sri Lankan constitution.

Through a Presidential Order on August 5, the Indian central government headed by strongman Narendra Modi, nullified Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution which had given J and K State a large degree of autonomy. The Presidential Order also divided the State of J and K into two Union territories with very much less autonomy.

This was done with three objectives in mind: to fight Pakistan-inspired terrorism and separatism in J and K; to integrate J and K with India fully, and to facilitate economic development, hitherto hampered by restrictions placed by Art 370 and Art 35A on the application of Indian laws to J and K, and on the influx of labour and capital from outside the State.

RAJAPAKSA GIVES IT AWAY

In a significant interview to the Tamil daily Virakesari last Saturday, former Sri Lankan president and head of the opposition Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Mahinda Rajapaksa said that the devolution debate in the country will have to take into account the developments in J and K.

Rajapaksa did not elaborate, but given his expressed concern about national security in the context of perceived threats from Islamic terrorism and Tamil separatism, it was clear that he approved the steps taken by the Narendra Modi regime in India.

There are two strands of opinion now. Some want a new constitution. Some want a federal arrangement. And some say that a political solution based on the 13th Amendment would suffice. But a solution should not be one that divides the country. Look at what has just happened in Kashmir. We need to take steps keeping all these in mind. We have to understand these factors while we pursue a political solution,” Rajapaksa said.

Adding weight to this contention, Rajapaksa said that the SLPP’s candidate for the December 2019 Sri Lankan presidential election would be a person who would strengthen national security”.

By Saturday it was clear that the SLPP’s presidential candidate would be Mahinda’s brother and former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, known for his no-nonsense approach to terrorism, separatism and devolution of power. He is also seen as a proponent of majoritarianism like Modi, a line favoured by Mahinda.

Gotabaya’s chances of winning have been enhanced by three factors: the Apr 21 multiple bombings carried out by Islamic zealots; the disregard shown to timely intelligence inputs from India about the attacks; and the progressive and manifest weakening of the Lankan security apparatus under the United National Party (UNP)- led government.

Given such a prospect, the UNP-led government’s bid to frame a new constitution to give greater power to the provinces in tune with the aspirations of the Tamil minority, is likely to be abandoned. In fact, it has been abandoned.

The bid to draft a new constitution had reached a final stage, but the government chickened out at the last moment because of perceived opposition both within the UNP and the opposition.

Speaking in parliament on July 26, Rajapaksa said: After holding many discussions and releasing numerous reports over a period of more than two and a half years, on Jan 1, the prime minister tabled in Parliament a document which was described as the report of the panel of experts of the Steering Committee of the Constitutional Assembly.”

Even in presenting that document to parliament, the prime minister insisted that its contents are not the views of the government but only of the panel of experts that compiled the report. Ultimately the report that was tabled in Parliament had no owner. How can a constitutional reform process succeed when nobody takes responsibility for the drafts that are tabled in parliament?”

We are resolutely opposed to the draft constitution that was presented to parliament by the Prime Minister. It would have had the effect of dividing Sri Lanka into nine semi-independent states. It contained proposals to set up nine separate police forces, and provisions that would have made it impossible for the centre to take back any powers devolved to the provincial units.”

Some say that I too spoke of ’13 Plus’ – a system of government going beyond the provisions of the 13th Amendment. I once told the then Indian Foreign Secretary that I was thinking of establishing a second chamber of Parliament made up of representatives of the provincial councils so as to get provincial leaders to participate in national affairs. It was the Indian Foreign Secretary who described my idea as 13 Plus. So it should be understood that what I meant by 13 Plus was not dividing the country into nine semi-independent units as proposed in the draft constitution that was tabled by the prime minister.”

The draft constitution that was presented to Parliament was prepared by (Tamil National Alliance) parliamentarian Sumanthiran and some NGO activists. After presenting it to Parliament, the Prime Minister repeatedly denied ownership of the document. Ultimately it appears that this government had taken the Tamil National Alliance too for a ride.

Parliamentarian Sumanthiran always drafts constitutional amendments that will lead to a separate state without the name. They have stated their views very clearly on paper.”

With Gotabaya likely to win the coming presidential election given the felt need among the majority Sinhalese for a strong and functioning government in contrast to the bumbling and directionless incumbent UNP-led regime, the chances of the minority Tamils getting power devolution beyond what is available de facto are slim indeed.

SEPARATING POLITICS FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SECURITY OF SRI LANKA

August 11th, 2019

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

It has been reported in news media in Sri Lanka that Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa stated if he becomes the president of Sri Lanka from the next election, he will give all politics and political-related activities in the country to Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa and fully concentrate on the economic development, elevating the economy and national security of the country.  No presidential candidate in the past made such a strong statement or promised to separate politics from national activities and even practically activated to work the same way after the election to the presidential position. In 2015, Mr. Maithripala Sirisena showed to work the same way as a candidate of Yahapalanaya, however, after few weeks acquiring the presidentship, he also acquired the leadership of his opponent’s political party (SLFP) and stuck in a political mud puddle.  The statement of Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa is a highly appreciated and respected statement compared to other presidential candidates. When compared to so-called presidential hopeful or self-proposed presidential candidates, Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa demonstrated his suitability to be the president and his maturity and understanding of the major issues of Sri Lanka.

UNP and its associated parties show internal conflicts to select the candidate for the presidential election and Mr. Sajith Premadasa and Mr. Karu Jayasuriya make conflicting statements to the community, most probably they are intending to covering up the real behavior of them during past five years. There is no argument that they behaved like henchmen of Western forces despite the will of people of Sri Lanka.  It is quite clear that Mr. Sajith Premadasa has no idea about Sri Lanka’s economy, elevating the economic status and national security. Can UNP candidate separate politics from economic development and the national security if he/she becomes the president of the country? It seems that the associated parties with UNP aim at playing politics as they played after 2015 and the people of Sri Lanka don’t want such games.

The experience since 2015 has been shown that UNP or it supported a candidate for the presidentship could not separate the politics from the economic activities and national security. The upliftment of the economy has been a pipe dream of supporters and people voted for them in 2015 realized with a short period that they did a mistake voting to so-called Yahapalanaya.   The current behavior of much-publicized UNP choice reflects that Mr. Sajith Premadasa is in a mud puddle without understanding or practical experience in the economy and national security and foreign affairs. There is no doubt that acting like Mr. R. Premadasa means taking arms against poor youth who struggle for a life with basic needs.   Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe learned many strategic options for administration under Mr. JR Jayewardene and Mr. ACS Hameed but Mr. Sajith Premadasa did nothing and people will twice consider whether voting for Mr. Sajith Premadasa could be justified.

There are many negative points against Premadasa’s politics in Sri Lanka since the era of the last stage of Mr. Dudley Senanayake. What happened to Puravasi Peramuna established by the leadership of Mr. Premadasa and Mr. Gamini Fonseka is known to nobody.  Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa after the defeat in 2015 publicly stated that a mistake he has done during his administration was helping Mr. Sajith Premadasa’s sister, Mrs. Dulanjali Jayakody to get away from the case of printing fake money or attempting to deposit fake money to her account.  These are moral issues against the honesty of Mr. Premadasa’s family.  If these issues emerge, Mr. Sajith Premadasa cannot answer to them but Mr. Sajith Premadasa attempts to show he is a superior person by words of mouth and pointing figure to a housing scheme, which is clear to people but there is more spending for publicity than the value of houses. 

People of Sri Lanka want a concrete person with excellent ideas and practical experience for development activities and national security.  Sri Lanka doesn’t want a presidential candidate, who purely attracted popularity because of playing Cricket or acting in movies or spending money for attracting popularity. If Sri Lanka wants a Cricketer, Mr. Arjuna Ranatunga was the best person who brought the Cricket world cup defeating Australia, but he might not be the choice of UNP. Sri Lankans are highly concerned with culture and religion.  Culture means rules, regulations, laws, and procedures, etc. Any presidential candidate disrespects culture and religion he or she is not the choice of Sri Lankans and candidates from any political party must be a respected person for human values and understand the expectations of people without racial differences.  The economy is the giant challenge of Sri Lanka which has been complicated by the changes during the past five years and the economy should be able to fulfill the expectations of the young generation.

Recent speeches of Mr. Sajith Premadasa reflected that although he studied in the London School of Economics, that he does not know about Schumpeter’s idea about investments, profit, and entrepreneurship. If so, how can he bring investment to the country? Can he develop an environment in Sri Lanka to attract investments as Schumpeter explained and why didn’t he work during the past five years to attract investment without money laundering in Sri Lanka?

Sri Lanka is a small country, which is subject to global hegemony and has no power to react or respond to global hegemony.  Mr. J.R. Jayewardene said without surrendering to India he works to live under the shadow of India.  Now Sri Lanka needs to live under the shadow of India, China, and America to attract investments without constraints. The future presidents of Sri Lanka must be able to live the shadow of these powers and the next presidential candidate needs to show the skills for it.  Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa has shown his capability and people of Sri Lanka have a clear understanding of his capabilities.

To do these, politics need to be separated from economic development, elevating the economy, national security, and foreign affairs.  Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa already stated that he will do it and he will be the best choice to Sri Lanka. Politics means differences and when a person elected as the president, he or she must be a national leader working for the country without any differences.  Mr. Sirisena elected in 2015, but he could not work as a national leader and he had to work for people who supported him to be the president.

The statement of Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa confirmed that he will be a national leader, who is desperately required by the people of the country. People of the country never expect a henchman in the way that Mr. Karu Jayasuriya acted in October 2018.  Therefore, Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa can understand what is needed for the people of the country.  


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress