මුග්ධ භාවය

January 11th, 2018

වෛද්‍ය රුවන් එම් ජයතුංග

මධ්‍යතන යුගයේදී යුරෝපයේ දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ  බයිබලය පමණි. මේ නිසා යුරෝපය අන්ධකාරයේ ගැලී ගියේය​.  නව පුනරුදය තෙක් යුරෝපය පුරා නූගත්කම පැතිර ගියේය​. යුරෝපයට එළිය ලැබුනේ නව පුනරුදයත් සමගය​. ඉන් පසු ඔවුන් ක්‍රිස්තියානි ආගම වෙනුවට විද්‍යාව හරහා දැණුම ලබා ගැනීම ආරම්භ කලේය​. 
යුරෝපය අන්ධකාරයේ ගැලී සිටින විට අරාබිය දැණුම අතින් පොහොසත් විය​. ගණිතය , රසායණ විද්‍යාව , වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාව තාරකා විද්‍යාව අතින් අරාබිය යුරෝපය පසු කරමින් යන්නට විය​. එහෙත් අරාබිය  දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස  ඉස්ලාම් ආගම භාවිතා කිරීමත් සමගම අරාබියේ ඥාණ පුනරුදය ඇණ හිටියේය​. 
කලක් ඉන්දියාව දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ හින්දු ආගමය​.  එහි ප්‍රතිඑලය වූයේ ඒක පුද්ගල වැසිකිලි වලට වඩා ඉන්දියාවේ තිබෙන දේවාල ප්‍රමාණය වැඩිවීමය​. 
ලංකාව දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ බුද්ධාගම පමණි . මේ නිසා ලංකාව විද්‍යාව සහ තාක්‍ෂණය අතින් යුරෝපයට පරාජය විය​.  
ඕනෑම ආගමක් අනවශ්‍ය ලෙස සෑම විශයක් වෙතම ආදේශ කිරීමට යාම භයානකය​. ප්‍රතිඑලය මුග්ධ භාවයයි 

Sri Lanka : Darusman Report

January 11th, 2018

Asoka Weerasinghe Kings Grove Crescent . Gloucester . Ontario . Canada

1 January 2018

Garnett Genuis, MP

Conservative MP for Sherwood Park-Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta

Cc. Matt DeCourcey, Liberal MP

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister  of Foreign Affairs

Dear Garnett Genuis:

May the year ahead be filled with Happiness, Love and Joy and hopefully will bring

some sane conclusions about Sri Lanka in the Canadian parliament  when commenting on the alleged criminality of her soldiers that brought the end of Tamil Tiger terrorism that hemorrhaged that pretty island for 27 years for the want of their mono-ethnic, racist, separate Tamil state, Eelam  That too to be  33 % of the northern and eastern real estate bordered by 66%  of the coastline for 12.6% of the Tamil population (census 1981). This percentage was reduced to 4.8% by 2011 (World populations) after the foreign countries floodgates were opened for the Tamils after the July 1983 riots who claimed that they were  discriminated and persecuted by the majority Sinhalese population of the island. They are in the scores of 1000s as refugees in Canada, UK, USA, France, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Australia,  to name a few.  With such exodus of Tamils searching for greener pastures, the Tamil population couldn’t be held at 12.6%, any more.  No way.

I would like you to consider this letter as a continuation of my response of 2 December 2017, to your Statement in Parliament on Sri Lanka’s Tamil community in Canada.

My point Number 7 of that letter was on Human Rights in Sri Lanka, and your statement to Parliament on November 20th, 2017 said – the Liberals promised to support justice and reconciliation, to address the terrible crimes committed at the end of the civil war.”

I dealt with that statement of yours truthfully in detail, and concluded that there were cartloads of buckets of Hogwash, and the lack of honesty makes most of the Canadian parliamentarians look like a bunch of fools having sold their souls for Tamils votes so that they could sit on a chair in the parliament’s chamber during daily Question Period telling us that they are working hard and have done their homework on Sri Lanka’s violation of Human Rights.  What Tosh! What poppycock!

If harassing the Sri Lankan soldiers for eliminating the internationally sponsored (including Canada) Tamil Tiger terrorism is based on the UN’s Darusman Report, then let me make some comments on this Report for you to understand where I am coming from, and what my concerns are.  Which I hope would be your concerns too.

The Darusman Report:  When former South Korean Secretary-General of the UN Ban Ki-Moon was reduced to be a puppet by his Western pay-masters and being ordered to go on the warpath to hurt Sri Lanka, he appointed a Special panel of three to advise him on Sri Lanka’s alleged war crimes, the very issue that was dealt in June 2009 at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva where members decided in a 29 to 12 votes not to intervene in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs.  Yet,  Ban Ki-Moon exceeded his powers prescribed in Chapter XV of the UN Charter where his authority was detailed clearly in Articles 97 and 98.

Although Ban Ki-Moon is South Korean I believe he was competent enough in his English to read and understand the UN Charter written in English.  But this South Korean failed in that endeavour to comprehend.

So what did Ban Ki-Moon, the former UN Secretary-General do to satisfy his Western paymasters?  He appointed three panelists two of whom were viscerally prejudiced against the Sri Lanka Government and were suspect.  Yet, he still went ahead foolishly with this panel which ended up with the Darusman Report.  What a

shady fool he was, who was up to a lot of mischief.

  • Garnett Genuis, here are some facts that you should consider about the Canadian Liberal and Conservative Governments Bible on Sri Lanka – the Darusman Report, which is used to harass the Sri Lankan Government’s alleged human rights criminality during the last five months of the 27 year long Tamil Tiger Terrorists separatist war which ended militarily on 19 May 2009
  1. The Three Panel Report should not be termed UN Panel Report, but should be recognized as the Moon Panel Report”, as the composition of the panel of the so called ‘experts’ is from outside the UN organization. As such it violates the authority under which the Secretary-General of the  UN is expected to function under Article 100, Clause 1 of the UN Charter.  This is the Charter that provides guidance to the Secretary-General to maintain his/her strict neutrality of the UN.
  2. b. Ban Ki-Moon, the Secretary-General of the UN did clearly violate Article 2 (7) of the UN Charter which prohibits intervention in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, thus this UN Panel Report known as the Darusman Report and released for international consumption is a good reason for the Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to have been impeached.
  3. The Panel that Ban Ki-Moon had appointed was headed by Marzuki Darusman, a former Attorney General of Indonesia who was also a member of the International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) invited to observe the working of Sri Lanka’s Presidential Commission looking into alleged serious violations of human rights in March 2008.

Darusman left the Commision in a huff disagreeing with the Sri Lanka Government and yet signed the IIGEP Report without paying a single visit to Sri Lanka to ascertain himself the actual ground situation.   Ummmm…….interesting, isn’t it!    Obviously, Ban Ki-Moon may have known that Marzuki had some telepathic power

which absolved him of  being a dishonest Humbug. Then his signature on the Report entitled him to accept a handsome consultant fee.  That is how the UN’s questionable cookie crumbles

d   The second Panelist Steven Ratner was an adviser to a Non-Governmental Organization known as Human Rights Watch (HRW) that has been very critical of Sri Lanka from the very inception of the Eelam War.  Ratner co-authored a book with Jason Adams titled ‘Accountability of Human Rights: Atrocities in international law beyond the Nuremberg legacy’ where in page 123 he has stated that the convention on banning apartheid should be invoked in relations to countries such as Sri Lanka.”  That statement itself should have disqualified him to be a panelist.  But then Ban Ki-Moon had to satisfy his western pay masters, and so he decided to go ahead with Steven Ratner as a panelist, also to gain another opportunity to Moon at Sri Lanka one more time.   Shish….what power these UN characters have to go after a pound of flesh of a puny island, notwithstanding that her soldiers by eliminating the Tamil Tiger terrorists gave back her 21 million peoples their right-to life which had been hijacked by the Tamil Tiger terrorists for 27 bloody-years. Garnett, I hope you are following my thread,  There is honesty in every word I said so far  Steven Ratner also had written elsewhere that the Tamils represented by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (aka Tamil Tigers) are an oppressed minority.  More than his ignorance this statement revealed his bias when he calls the most privileged” minority, the  Tamils (12.6%) during the British Rule for 131 years and many years after Independence in February 4, 1948, as the oppressed minority”, compared to the wronged” majority, the Sinhalese (74%).  What a crock of codswallop!

Well, Garnett, let’s be honest, what expert knowledge, can Steven Ratner give Ban Ki-Moon when he comes with this kind of ill-informed punditry.  This statement should have disqualified Steven Ratner instantly.

e,   And the third panellist, the South African lawyer Yasmin Sooka, was heavily dependent on EU funds to be impartial.  She was also a close associate of the South African-Tamil Navi Pillay who was then a patron of the Sooka Foundation, and also responsible for the failed resolution that was brought against Sri Lanka before the UNHCR in May 2009.

  1. With such credentials none of the three panelists would qualify to be an honest non-partisan member of any panel dealing with the alleged human rights violations in Sri Lanka as they carry with them full baggages of anti-Sri Lanka attitudes. It clearly showed that Ban Ki-Moon was up to a lot of mischief wanting to hang Sri Lanka cold by denying the island the much deserved prosperity of reconstruction, rejuvenation and reconciliation since the end of the 27 year war on 19 May, 2009, thus Ban Ki-Moon should not have held that all important office of neutrality as Secretary-General in the UN, and had a good reason to be impeached.
  2. g. Let us not ignore the fact that, in Canada’s anti-Sri Lanka Bible – the Darusman Report, where the authors Darusman, Ratner and Sooka insists that they have no investigating power and that they are not embarking on any investigation at all.   So why is the Canadian Government on such vengeful hoopla, such crap and after a pound of flesh of every Sri Lankan Government soldier who gave back to 21 million people their paramount human right, their right-to-life after eliminating the Tamil Tiger terrorists who had hijacked that human right for 27-bloody years.  Are you able to respond to that, Garnett.  Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau able to respond to that too other than telling me – Hey, Asoka, come on Man, you know that we are soliciting every Tamil vote in the Greater Toronto Area to come to us Liberals. And that is why we have accepted the Darusman Report with all the lies and warts.”  Right, Garnett!
  3. h. In the Executive Summary of the Darusman Report they say, The panel’s mandate however does not extend to fact finding or investigation.” In confirmation of this, the page 3 of this Report says, The panel has not conducted fact finding as that term is understood in United Nations practice.”  Again on page 6 of the report the Darusman, Ratner, Sooka panel says, The panel and the United Nations officials repeatedly made clear to the government the scope of its mandate as an advisory panel to the Secretary-General including that it was not engaged in any investigation.”

And again the Darusman, Ratner, Sooka panel stresses on page 14 of the Report that the panel’s mandate precludes fact finding or investigation.”

  1. Garnett, here is a bit of cunning to get at Sri Lanka and nail her onto a burning cross  which is not kosher in my eyes.  And I say POX to all these nasty players who are after a pound of flesh of Sri Lanka.

If Canada is so concerned  about the alleged numbers (40,000) of deaths during the last 5 months of the 27 year long war, why is that Sri Lanka does not fit into the American and British formula that such deaths happen to be collateral damage and that they are sorry.  Surely what is good for the goose should be good for the gander.  Tell my why Garnett!

The panelists Darusman, Ratner and Sooka, I believe, had taken the assignment with preconditioned minds wanting to destroy the progress of the development and reconciliation among the ethnic communities of this sovereign island state and play Russian roulette with the lives of 21 million peoples when their cunning becomes so transparent when on page 15 of the Report says :”The panel has chosen to present the allegations it finds credible, in a narrative account.”  And again on the same page they say, this account should not be taken as proven facts.”  This contradiction proves the fact the panelists Darusman, Ratner and Sooka wrote a  Halloween  horror story of fiction hoping that it would be a bestseller

among the gullibles like the Canadian Government and her Parliamentarians.  But it turned out to be a sick attempt by these three Musketeer- voyeurs in Halloween masks, and this book of fiction is nothing to get excited about and will no way win the Pulitzer Prize nor the Booker Prize.

  1. Now let me comment on the point of contention of this discussion – the alleged 40,000 Tamilian deaths during the last five months of the Eelam IV War, as mentioned as the Holy Truth, and nothing but the Truth” as endorsed by the then Secretary-General of the UN, Ban Ki-Moon who had the habit of Mooning at my Motherland, Sri Lanka.

I concluded my letter to you of 2 December 2017 thus:

7.   The whole exercise based on the Darusman Report which is used as the Bible to nail Sri Lanka’s armed forces, the only national army in the world that whipped the most ruthless terrorists in the world, the Tamil Tigers, says that their credible sources are protected by the UN confidentiality Clause until 2031.  And there lies the gutless, spineless HUMBUGS.  What! what is their problem?

When 2031 comes around Ban Ki-Moon who appointed the panel of experts will be 87 years old, Marzuki Darusman will be 86.  Steven R. Ratner and Yasmin Sooka, hopefully are young enough to be still around in 2031.

The chances are that the Sri Lankan Army personnel whose dignity was assaulted by the UNHRC will get a chance to challenge them in court to prove that the UN’s panel of experts had done a con job, a botched up job on them to try and haul them to an International Criminal Court of Law to charge them on Human Rights violations to satisfy the Tamil separatists who have bought their voices with votes and funds.

That will be when the fireworks start, if it did happen, Garnett.

Stay tuned as UKs Lord Naseby’s well researched assertion that the Vanni death toll maximum is 7,000 to 8,000, and not 40,000 as reported in the Darusman Report by Ban Ki-Moon which will be hard for the UN to dismiss his unchallengeable position as his revelations are based on sound diplomatic dispatches sent from Colombo by the British military Attache Lt. Colonel Anton Gash to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Stay tuned Garnett, it is going to be interesting as there will be a lot of rotten eggs slapped on so many embarrassed International-caucasian lobster-red faces…….”

Garnett, Stay tuned” I said.  Much has happened since 2nd December 2017.  Lord Michael Naseby has presented in the British Parliament the most damning evidence, that his government lied and concealed the truth about what really happened during the last five months of the  27 year long Tamil Eelam war in north and east of Sri Lanka when the Tamil Tiger terrorists were whipped and wiped out militarily on the 19th May 2009.

Lord Naseby, in his speech to the British parliament paid scant respect to the guesstimate number of 40,000 civilians killed during the last five months  of the Tamil Tiger terrorist Eelam war. Several sources he cited estimated the number to be in the range of 7000 to 8000.   The material evidence that he had elicited and

received with much effort from the Commissioner of Information under UK’s Freedom of Information Act, were the dispatches to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office from the UK’s own Defence Attache in Colombo, Lt.Col. Anton Gash from 1st January  until 19th May 2009.   Although the material received by Lord Naseby were highly redacted he was sure that the UK government knew the ground realities which contradicted the negative propaganda that had been extracted from the questionable and suspect Darusman Report presented by the UN.

He spoke to the British parliamentarians in search of support from the sane among them.  It was in  September 2011 that the British Labour Party MP Siobhan McDonough (Mitcham and Morden) told the House of Commons that 100,000 Tamil civilians perished during January and May 2009 during military operations.  I suspected that she threw the number at her colleagues in support of her Sri Lankan- Tamil  constituents, the Subramaniams, the Nadarajahs, the Sellathambis, the Pakiasorthy’s who had promised her their votes and those of other Tamils too.   This bizarre number prompted me to ask her in a letter to tell me what she had smoked when she woke up that morning..  Not a word from her.

Lord Naseby said that he hoped that as a result of the debate in Parliament on Sri Lanka, the UK will recognize the truth that no one in the Sri Lankan Government ever wanted to kill Tamil civilians.  This fact is evidence and shows proof, when by 19 May 2009, the Sri Lankan soldiers rescued 295,873 Tamil civilians from the clutches of the Tamil Tigers who used them as a human shield and herded them like unwashed cattle from the west coast to the east coast under the scorching Jaffna sun for 30  months.  Not only that Garnett, the Sri Lankan soldiers were part of the army of cooks who prepared a million hearty breakfasts, lunches and dinners  daily to feed and sustain the Tamil refugees housed in temporary camps.  No one seems to want to talk of these amazing humanitarian efforts of love and compassion by the majority Sinhalese towards the minority Tamils.  Not a single Canadian parliamentarian, not a single person of the Foreign Ministry nor members with halos over their heads of the concerned Human Rights Organizations have spoken of these acts of humanitarianism.   Why…why not, Garnett?  There lies the cruel, disingenuous and  hypocritical Canadian-Humbugs who want to get at my Motherland, Sri Lanka, who are resting their bleeding hearts in nests of ballots for the Tamil separatist cause.  But, Oh, No, when Quebec wanted to separate from Canada, the anglophones sang in unison -” Hell, No…We won’t let you Go.”  Remember!  And that is the rub Garnett.

Garnett, we all got choices in life…and you have arrived at one of them.   Either to accept the Darusman Report’s, 40,000 Tamil civilians killed during the last five months of the Tamil separatist War in 2009, or rubbish the Darusman Report and go with what Lord Naseby’s well established number somewhere between 7000 and 8000.    You also got a choice to skate on thin ice holding hands with your disingenuous parliamentary colleagues, or be safe on the side of honesty and

keep away from the treacherous lying ethnic-politics thin-ice.

Which ever the number that your honest dice fall on, you should clear your conscience by asking – show me the bodies…show me the skeletons so you could reconcile and accept the touted number of 40,000.

Sincerely,

Asoka Weerasinghe

(a former card-carrying Conservative -C11255047, and a Sustaining Donor)

 

 

මගේ කාලයේ බැඳුම්කර නිකුතු ගැන ඕනෑම පරීක්‌ෂණයකට මා සූදානම් – හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් අභියෝග කරයි

January 10th, 2018

ශ්‍යාම් නුවන් ගනේවත්ත උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

තමාගේ අධිපති ධුර කාලයට අදාළව ඕනෑම පරීක්‌ෂණයකට තමා සුදානම් යෑයි හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා පවසයි .මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපතිවරයා ඉකුත් ජනවාරි 08 වැනිදා කොළඹ රාමඩා හෝටලයේදී මාධ්‍ය හමුවක්‌ද පවත්වා බැඳුම්කර ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව ගැන ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සිදු කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයට ප්‍රතිචාර දැක්‌වීය. ජනාධිපතිවරයා සිය විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ එක්‌ තැනක zමෙම කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාවලින් හෙළිවන කරුණුවලට සමාන තත්ත්වය 2008 වසරේ සිට සිදුව ඇති බව කොමිෂන් සභාවේ අදහසයි.

fea8 2

එම කටයුතු සොයා බැලීම සඳහා එනම් 2008 වසරේ සිට සිදුවූ දූෂණ සහ අක්‍රමිකතා පිළිබඳව මුලින්ම කළ යුත්තේ වෝහාරික විගණනයක්‌ බවත් එය ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව විසින් කළ යුතු අතර, ඉන් පසු ලැබෙන තොරතුරු මත නීතිමය ක්‍රියාමාර්ගවලට යා යුතු බවත් කොමිසම දන්වා සිටිනවා.z යනුවෙන් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. මේ කාරණය ඇතුළු බැඳුම්කර ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව ගැන හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා දැක්‌වූ අදහස්‌ මෙසේය.

fea8 3ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා 2018 ජනවාරි 03 දින කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රටකාශයෙන් බැඳුම්කර කොල්ලය පිළිබඳව 2016 ජූනි මස අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගේ ධූර කාල සීමාව අවසන් වන විටත් රටේ ජනතාව දැන සිටි දේවලට අමතරව අලුත් යමක්‌ කියවුණේa නැහැ. අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතා දින 487 ක්‌ම තම ධුරයේ රාජකාරි කළා. ඉන් දින 91ක්‌ම ගෙවුනේ 2016 මාර්තු මස සිදුවූ දෙවන බැඳුමකර මංකොල්ලයටද පසුවය. මුළු රටම මේ සිද්ධිය ගැන කතා කරද්දීද, රටේ ආර්ථිකයට විශාල හානියක්‌ වී ඇති බව විද්වතුන් හා දේශපාලනඥයන් පෙන්වා දෙද්දීද ජනාධිපතිවරයා හෝ අගමැතිවරයා අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන්ගේ සම්පූර්ණ ධුර කාලය අවසන් වනතුරුම ඔහුව මහ බැංකු අධිපති ධුරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීමට ක්‍රියාකළේ නැහැ .

පළමු මහ බැංකු බැඳුම්කර සිද්ධියට දිනකට පෙර රවි කරුණානයක, මලික්‌ සමරවික්‍රම, කබිර් හෂීම් යන මහත්වරු මහ බැංකුවට ගොස්‌ අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් සමඟ කළ සාකච්ඡාව ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ අඩංගු වූයේත් නැහැ. බැඳුම්කර මගඩියේ ඉතා වැදගත් සාක්‌ෂියක්‌ විය යුතුව තිබුණේ ලංකා බැංකුව විසින් රුපියල් බිලියන 10 ක පමණ මුදලක්‌ ප්‍රාථමික ගනුදෙනුකරුවෙකුට දුන්නේ කෙසේද සහ එසේ දුන්නේ කාගේ උපදෙස්‌ මතද යන්නයි. ජනාධිපතිවරයා මේ ගැන ද කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ කළේ නැහැ .

දෙවන බැඳුම්කර කොල්ලය වන රුපියල් බිලියන 40 කට ආසන්න ගනුදෙනුව සඳහා මහ බැංකුව විසින්ම මුල්‍ය ක්‍ෂේaත්‍රයේ සමාගම් වල හදිසි අවස්‌ථා සඳහා මුදල් නිකුත් කරන දෛනික ද්‍රවශීලතා පහසුකම භාවිතා කරමින් අදාළ සමාගමට මුදල් ලබා දී තිබීම ගැන ජනාධිපතිවරයා කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ කළේ නැහැ.

දෙවන බැඳුම්කර සිද්ධියේදී මුදල් ඇමතිවරයා විසින් රාජ්‍ය බැංකු තුනක ප්‍රධානීන් ගෙන්වා අඩුවෙන් ලංසු තබන්නට උපදෙස්‌ දුන් බව බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම හමුවේ හෙළිවිය. මේ ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ ඇතුළත්ව නැහැ.

µqට්‌ නෝට්‌ කල්ලිය යනුවෙන් ජනතාව හඳුන්වන කෝප් කමිටු සාමාජිකයන් පිරිසක්‌ අවසාන කෝප් කමිටු වාර්තාවට බලපෑම් කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළ හැටි, විගණකාධිපතිට බලපෑම කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළ හැටි, සැකකාර සමාගමේ ප්‍රධානීන් සමඟ දුරකථන සම්බන්ධතා පවත්වාගෙන ගිය හැටි මීට පෙර වාර්තාවී තිබුණා. ඔවුන්ගේ µqට්‌ නොට්‌ සම්බන්ධයෙන් කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරමින් මහ බැංකුව විසින් එවු ලිපියක්‌ අගමැතිවරයාගේ විරෝධය නිසා ඉල්ලා අස්‌කරගත් බවක්‌ද වාර්තා වී තිබුණා. මේ අය ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශය තුළ නැහැ.

බැඳුම්කර මංකොල්ලය නිසා සේවක අර්ථ සාධක අරමුදලට වූ විශාල පාඩුව යම් දුරකට ලඝූ කොට පෙන්වීමක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ප්‍රකාශයෙන් සිදුවෙලා තිබෙනවා. මීට පෙර වාර්තා වී තිබුණේ එම පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 20ක්‌ පමණ වන බවයි.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා කියනා ආකාරයට කොමිසමේ එක්‌ යෝජනාවක්‌ වනුයේ 2008 -2014 කාලය තුළ මහ බැංකුව බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු කළ ආකාරය පිළිබඳවද පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ කළ යුතු බවයි. ඔහුට අමතක වී ඇත්තේ හිටපු මුදල් ඇමතිවරයා විසින් මුල්‍ය පනතේ 43(2) වගන්තිය යටතේ 2016 අගෝස්‌තු 19 දා කළ ඉල්ලීමක්‌ අනුව රජයේ විගණකාධිපතිවරයා විසින් මේ පිළිබඳ සම්පූර්ණ පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ සිදුකර 2017 ජනවාරි 17 වනදා සිය වාර්තාව බාර දී ඇති බවයි. ජනාධිපතිවරයාට කරන්නට ඉතුරුව තිබෙන්නේ එම වාර්තාව ගෙන්වාගෙන කියවීම පමණයි. මේ වාර්තාව දැනටමත් විගණකාධිපතිවරයාගේ වෙබ් අඩවියේ තිබෙනවා.

2008 -2014 කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන එතරම් අවධානයක්‌ බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම යොමුකළ බවක්‌ පසුගිය කාලයේ මේ පිළිබඳ මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා අධ්‍යයනය කරන්නෙකුට දකින්නට නැහැ. නමුත් 2008 -2014 කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන පදනම් විරහිත ප්‍රකාශයක්‌ 2017 මාර්තු 17 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ කරමින් මහා ඝෝෂාවක්‌ නගමින් අතීතයේදී බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනුවල දූෂණ සිදුවී ඇති බවට මතයක්‌ ජනගත කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළේ 2015 පෙබරවාරි 27 සිදු වූ බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය හෙළිවීම නිසා කුපිතව සිටි අගමැතිවරයා විසින් බව නම් ජනතාවට මතක තිබෙනවා.

රුපියල් බිලියන 2000 ක පමණ අගයකට සිදුවන භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර නිකුතූන් යනු වාර්ෂිකව රජය විසින් කරනු ලබන විශාලතම ගනුදෙනු වන අතර රුපියල් බිලියන 375 ක පමණ අගයකට සිදුවන තෙල් මිලදී ගැනීම්ද එයට දෙවෙනි වෙයි. ඒ නිසා මෙම භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර නිකුතූන් දේශපාලන ඇඟිsලිගැසීම්වලින් තොරවූ ඉතාමත්ම නීත්‍යානුකූල හා පාරදෘෂ්‍ය ක්‍රමයකට අතීතයේ පටන්ම කරගෙන එනු ලැබුවා. 2014 අවසන් වන විට රජයේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර වගකීම රුපියල් බිලියන 4000කට වැඩි වී තිබූ අතර ඒවායේ පොලී අනුපාතයේ 1% ක ඉහල යැමක්‌ වුව රජයට රුපියල් බිලියන 40 ක පමණ විශාල පාඩුවක්‌ ගෙන දෙන බව මුල්‍ය ක්‌ෂේත්‍ර්‍රයට සම්බන්ධ ඕනෑම අයෙක්‌ දන්නා කරුණක්‌. උදාහරණයක්‌ වශයෙන් මත්තල ගුවන් තොටුපළ විකුණා රජය ඉපැයීමට බලාපොරොත්තු වන මුදල ඉන් අඩක්‌ පමණ වෙනවා. බැඳුම්කර නිකුතුව සඳහා වෙන්දේසි හා Rජු ක්‍රමවල සම්මිශ්‍රණයක්‌ 1997 සිටම මහ බැංකුව අනුගමනය කළේ රජයට අඩුම වියදමකින් මේ කටයුත්ත කළ හැකි ක්‍රමය බව විශේෂඥයන් විසින් සොයාගෙන තිබුණ නිසාය. නමුත් 2015 දී මෙයට ප්‍රථමවරට දේශපාලන ඇඟිලි ගැසීමක්‌ කළ අගමැතිවරයා එතෙක්‌ පැවති ක්‍රමය වෙනස්‌ කරන ලෙස හිටපු මහබැංකු අධිපති අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන්ට Rජුවම උපදෙස්‌ දීම නිසා රටට අති විශාල පාඩුවක්‌ සිදුවුණා. මේ හරහා ඉතිහාසයේ විශාලතම මුල්‍ය වංචාවට මඟපෑදුනා පමණක්‌ නොව එවකට රටේ පැවති පොලී අනුපාතයන් 2% කටත් වඩා ඉහළ යමින් රටේ ආර්ථිකයේ විශාල අර්බුදයකට හේතුසාධක වූ බව ද කිව යුතුයි.

මේ තත්ත්වය රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා හා අගමැතිවරයා අතිශයින් ලැඡ්ජාවට හා අපහසුතාවට පත්කරවන්නක්‌ බව තේරුම් ගැනීම අපහසු නැත. ඒ නිසා සත්‍යය වසන් කිරීම සඳහා ජනතාවගේ අවධානය වෙනතකට යොමුකිරීමේ අරමුණින් අතීතයේ බැඳුම්කර නිකුත් කිරීමේදී දූෂණ සිදුවී යෑයි පදනම් විරහිත චෝදනාවක්‌ කිරීම ගැන පුදුම වන්නට හේතුවක්‌ නැහැ. ඉන් ඔවුන් උත්සාහ කරන්නේ රජය තුළම සිටින සැබෑ හොරුන්ගෙන් ජනතා අවධානය ඉවත් කර ගැනීමටයි.

මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් තවත් හොඳම උදාහරණයක්‌ වන්නේ 2015 දී ඩිව් ගුණසේකර කෝප් කමිටු වාර්තාව සභාගත කිරීම වැළැක්‌වීම සඳහා ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරවමින් හොරුන් ආරක්‌ෂා කළ ආකාරයයි. මේ ආකාරයට හොරුන් ආරක්‌ෂා කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයා ක්‍රියා කිරීමේ ප්‍රතිපලය වූයේ 2016 මාර්තු මස යළිත් වරක්‌ ඊටත් වඩා විශාල බැඳුම්කර මගඩියක්‌ කිරීමට ඔවුන්ට අවස්‌ථාව ලැබීමයි.

හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‌ෂ මහතා දැනටමත් කියා ඇත්තේ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාද කැබිනට්‌ ඇමතිවරයෙකුව සිටි පසුගිය රජය කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන පූර්ණ විගණනයක්‌ කිරීමට තමුන් කිසිදු විරුද්ධත්වයක්‌ නැති බවයි. අගමැතිවරයාගේ හා ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ප්‍රකාශවල සත්‍ය අසත්‍යභාවය ඉන් තහවුරු වේවි.

පසුගිය රජය කාලයේ සිදුවූවා යෑයි කියන දූෂණ වංචා ගැන සෙවීමේදී ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන මහතාගේ විශේෂ අවධානය යොමුවිය යුතු කරුණක්‌ වන්නේ ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියාවේ ෙµඩරල් පොලිසිය විසින් විධිමත් පරීක්‌ෂණයකින් පසු සොයාගත්තා යෑයි විදේශ මාධ්‍යවල විශාල ප්‍රචාරයක්‌ දෙනු ලැබු z ස්‌නෝවි මවුන්ටන් ඉංජිනියරිං (Sබදඅහ ඵදමබඒසබි Eබටසබැeරසබට) නමැති සමාගමක්‌ විසින් ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියන් ඩොලර් මිලියන 2.3 ක්‌ වටිනා අපජලය කළමනාකරණ ව්‍යාපෘතියක කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව ලබා ගැනීම සඳහා පසුගිය රජයේ ප්‍රබල ඇමතිවරයෙකුට අල්ලසක්‌ ලබා දුන්නාය යන සිද්ධියයි. මීට අමතරව ලෝක බැංකු ආධාරය යටතේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වූ ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියන් ඩොලර් මිලියන 1.82 ක්‌ වටිනා තවත් ව්‍යාපෘතියක වේල්ලක්‌ ඉදිකිරීම සඳහා දේශපාලන අල්ලසක්‌ ඉල්ලීම පිළිබඳවද ඊ මේල් සාක්‌කි අදාළ සමාගමේ අභ්‍යන්තර පරිගණක පරීක්‌ෂාවේදී හමුවූ බවක්‌ද කියෑවුනි. මේ ඇමතිවරයාගේ නම ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියානු මාධ්‍ය මගින් ප්‍රචාරය කරන ලද නිසා එය රහසක්‌ නොවෙයි. යහපාලනය පිළිබඳ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ඇති විශේෂ කැපවීම සලකා බැලීමේදී ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියාවේ zසිඩ්නි මොර්නින් හෙරල්ඩ්z යන පුවත්පතේ පිටු ගණනාවක්‌ පුරා විස්‌තර සහිතව පළවී තිබූ මේ සිද්ධිය ගැනද වහාම රජය විසින් පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ ආරම්භ කිරීමෙන් දූෂිතයන් සොයා ඔවුන්ට දඬුවම් දීමට රජයට ඇති දැඩි අවශ්‍යතාව තවදුරටත් ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ තහවුරු වෙනවා.

මේ කරුණු තුළින් ගත හැකි නිගමනය වන්නේ මෙයයි . එනම් ජනාධිපතිවරයා 2018 ජනවාරි 03 දින කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශය හා ඉන් පසුව රජයේ ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ හැසිරීම අධ්‍යයනය කිරීමෙන් පෙනී යන්නේ මේ මහා මුදල් වංචාවට රටට හෙළිදරව් වීම නිසා ඔවුන්ට වන දේශපාලන අවාසිය අවම කරගැනීමේ යම් එකඟතාවකට රජය කරවන දෙපාර්ශ්වය විසින් පැමිණ ඇති බවයි. එමගින් මේ වංචාවේ Rජු හා වක්‍ර කොටස්‌ කරුවන් ලෙස රජයේ ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ ඇති සම්බන්ධතාව යට ගැසීම ඔවුන්ගේ අරමුණ බව පැහැදිලියි.

බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම් වාර්තාව අනුව වරදක්‌ සිදුවී ඇති බව දැනටමත් ඔප්පුවී අවසන්. අපරාධයක්‌ කිරීම, කුමන්ත්‍රණ කිරීම මෙන්ම අපරාධයට ආධාර අනුබල දීමද නීතිය අනුව වරදක්‌. මේ බව දණ්‌ඩ නීති සංග්‍රහයේ පැහැදිලිවම සඳහන් වෙනවා. එසේම සාක්‌ෂි ආඥාපනතට අනුව අපරාධයට පෙර හා පසු සැකකරුවන්ගේ හැසිරීම නඩුවකදී සැලකිල්ලට ගත යුතුයි. බැඳුම්කර මංකොල්ලය සිදුවීමට පෙරත් පසුවත් රජයේ යම් ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ හැසීරීම අනුව ඔවුන් මේ මහා කොල්ලය කිරීම සඳහා කුමන්ත්‍රණය කිරීම, සම්බන්ධවීම හෝ ආධාර අනුබල දීමේ චෝදනා යටතේ යම් දිනක නීතිය හමුවට ගෙන ආ හැකියි .

ශ්‍යාම් නුවන් ගනේවත්ත 

JO’s ‘No-Faith’ motion against PM to Speaker today

January 10th, 2018

BY Kaushi Sendanayake, Ravi Ladduwahetty and W.K. Prasad Manju Courtesy Ceylon Today

Joint Opposition (JO) and Sri Lanka Freedom Party Kandy District Parliamentarian Mahindananda Aluthgamage said that the No Confidence motion, drafted by the JO, against Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe for his alleged involvement in the Central Bank Bonds scam, will be handed over to the Speaker during the special session of Parliament set to convene today (10) morning.

The MP said that the JO had compiled the motion against the Premier, having gained input from several prominent lawyers in the country and expressed confidence of winning the motion against Wickremesinghe, who he described as one of the biggest culprits behind the Bonds scandal.

Aluthgamage added that the no confidence motion will be submitted to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya after all of the JO MPs had signed it this morning.

He noted that all MPs of the legislature will have the opportunity to sign the motion against the Prime Minister which he said will ultimately force the President to remove him from office for the hefty sum that had robbed from the State.

Aluthgamage stressed that the MPs from the United National Party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, the Tamil National Alliance and other small parties will also have an opportunity to cast their vote in support of the No Confidence Motion brought against the Premier. He warned that if any MP attempts to defeat the motion brought against the Premier, he or she will be exposed before the nation as those who had colluded with the Prime Minister to rob the Central Bank.

Meanwhile, Minister of Higher Education and Highways and Leader of the House, Lakshman Kiriella said that the decision taken by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to permit a debate in Parliament on the Central Bank Bond scam shows the transparency existing within the Government.

Kiriella added that Premier Wickremesinghe and the United National Party were ready to engage in any kind of debate and would not under any circumstance run away from the debate relating to the Central Bank Bond scam, unlike the previous regime of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Meanwhile, Colombo District United People’s Freedom Alliance and JO MP Bandula Gunawardena, speaking at a press conference yesterday (9), mentioned that the JO Leader in Parliament, Dinesh Gunawardena, had requested President Maithripala Sirisena, via an official letter, to release the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry, which investigated the issuance of Treasury Bonds immediately, according to which contents the No Confidence Motion would be drafted.

Expressing his views at the same press conference held in Colombo, Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna Professor G.L. Peiris said that the Prime Minister should at least resign temporarily from office. He added that the report’s recommendations would not be implemented while he remained in office. He alleged that the Prime Minister is to be blamed for the scandal. He pointed out to the evidence given by the former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran before the Commission that he had clearly received orders from the Premier to change the system in place at the Central Bank, which subsequently led to the whole scam.

The vice of vices!

January 10th, 2018

Laksiri Warnakula  

This kind of a letter may not be fitting in the circumstances that it should only be on a cheerful note instead as a year ended and another just began. Yet fake must never be allowed to mask fact, even at the expense of fashion or tradition!

A lot has been written about it by many concerned citizens. If not talk of the town any more as it has now become such a common sight, it still is a topic very often referred to and spoken about by as many in the country.

Alas, only the leaders don’t seem to take much notice of what the people say. That is if their repertoire of eloquently-delivered sermons cloaked in colourful verbiage, which however is mostly nothing but garbage, rhetoric and blame often peppered with attention-getting obscenities mostly directed at their opponents, is anything to go by.

The corruption and vice have taken our country in a vice-like grip so much so that to any sane person, the situation may seem hopeless and beyond salvation. It has been going on for many decades now and almost all the governments both past and present in spite of their promises did next to nothing to pry open the rotten fist and break themselves and the country free from it.

The tentacles of these vile practises have now spread so far, climbed so high and gone so deep, the escape seems impossible. The murmurs of a soon-to-come thunder-like boom, unless urgent measures are taken, of a society slowly collapsing under its own weight of immorality, can be heard already.

Yes. It is not an exaggeration to say that we are now standing not far from the edge of the abyss of moral doom.

From the smallest village boutique to the largest commercial or any other enterprise or organisation, the governing philosophy of running the business has now become ‘grab while you can’!

And the leaders of the country have been doing a very good job at it and for many decades too, by setting excellent examples as to how most effectively and efficiently this can be done.

Dreams of ‘Sooner or later all will be well’ don’t last long like all other dreams. And we will have to confront the bitter reality one day, only to realise that it’s too late to do anything about it then!

I sincerely hope that the ‘New Year’ will see all conscientious from all walks of life united as one working towards making our beautiful land aglow with moral health too.

Laksiri Warnakula

Heated exchange in Parliament during PM’s address පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටිබැට හුවමාරුවක්

January 10th, 2018

 

COLOMBO MUNICIPALITY GRANTS SRILANKAN JOBS TO INDIANS.

January 10th, 2018

Susantha Wijesinghe

 The Colombo Municipality has granted   a  Parking Fees contract to an INDIAN COMPANY.  Does this Municipality have Authority to give Jobs to Foreigners ? Have they received authority from the Ministry of Local Government to grant Silankan jobs to Foreigners ? I firmly believe that it is serious breach of the Srilankan Constitution.
This contract is for  jobs as  Parking Attendants, and  does not require High Educational Qualifications, and is a low remuneration job.  There are thousands of Boys and Girls of low income Family households who are awaiting for such jobs for a livelihood. Some of them go without a meal for a day. They have no income at all to meet daily needs. What needs to be addressed immediately is as follows.
a)…..Who is the Officer in the Municipality who took the Final decision, to award this contract to an Indian Company, who Charges Rs.50.00 for even TWO MINUTES Parking.
b)…..Has this Officer looked around to see if he could find Emloyees within  the Municipality to handle this Administration of Parking Attendants. If not, Why not ?
c)…..This Officer appears to have  no Organisational Skills, or was he attracted by a quick reward for awarding the contract ? If so, HE should be moved to another lower seat.
d)…..This Job is not a temporary Job, but a Permanent day to day Job, and as such the Municipality should absorb them as Permanent Parking Attendants, with all facilities. This is EMPLOYMENT.
e)…..WE HAVE TO EMPLOY SRILANKANS AND NOT INDIANS.
It is my point of view that this Contract to an Indian Company, should be withdrawn immediately, and local Boys and Girls employed. Iam astonished to know that an INDIAN COMPANY is in Srilanka as an Employment Agent, and it would be interesting to know whether this Company is registered with the Registrar of Companies, and in what Capacity of Services rendered is reflected. If the Company is acting over and above their mandate, they should be asked to leave the Country immediately.
OVER TO THE MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR HIS RESPONSE.

මම කෑගහනකොට ඔය ගොල්ලාත් කෑ ගහන්න‘ ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ ලැජ්ජා නැති ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව!

January 10th, 2018

ගොනු කළේ – කැෆේ සංවිධානයේ විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්.

බැදුම්කර වාර්තාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් රවී කරුණානායක මහතා බිල්ලට දී ජාම බේරා ගැනීම සදහා බැදුම්කර වාර්තාව නොමැතිව පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසියක් පැවැත්වීමට ගොස් අද නැවත වරක් ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පොර පිටියක් බවට පත්වී ඇත.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍ර‍මසිංහ මහතා ‘මහින්ද හොරා යැයි කෑගැසීමත් සමගම’ එජාප මන්ත්‍රී මරික්කාර් හා ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ ගාමිණී ලොකුගේ අතර ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවක් සිදු විය.  එයට චමින්ද විජේසිරි, මරික්කාර්, ජොන්ස්ටන්, හෙක්ටර් අප්පුහාමි ද එක් වූ අතර මන්ත්‍රීනි කවිරත්න මහත්මිය ඇතුළු මන්ත්‍රීවරු එයට මැදිවිය.  සැලසුම් සහගත ලෙස පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසිය කඩාකල්පල් කිරීමට උපදෙස් ලබාදීමෙන් පසුව මෙම ගැටුම ඇති වූ බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිව හදුණා ගත හැකිය.

ගැටුමක් ඇති කර ගැනීමේ මුලික අපේක්ෂාව සහිතව ‘ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවක් ඇති කර ගත් පළමු අවස්ථාව ලෙස’ අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව ඉතිහාසයට එක්වනු ඇති අතර අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයෙකු විසින් ඒ සදහා පූර්ණ අනුග්‍රාහාත්මක ප්‍රවේශයක් දැරූ පළමු අවස්ථාව ලෙස ද එය ඉතිහාසයට එක් වනු ඇත.

කලකට පෙර මා ලියූ ‘ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි කෙළි පුරාණය’ ලිපිය මේ සමග නැවත අමුණා ඇත!

ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි කෙළි පුරාණය

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් අතර පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භයේ, කොරිඩෝවේ, සහ ලොබියේ දී ඇති වූ ගුටි බැට හුවරමාර් පිළිබද කෙටි ඉතිහාසය අද සවස මරදාන සීඑස්ආර් හි පැවති පුවත්පත් සාකච්ඡාවක දී මා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබීය.

මලල්ගොඩ බන්දුතිලක මහතා ට මැතිවරණ පුරාණයේ හෝ කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්ට වාරණ පුරාණය’ කෘතියේ ලියන්නට අවශ්‍ය නොවූ මේ කථාව මා අද ලියා තබන්නේ ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ පළමුවරට සැලසුම් සහගතව, මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකුට එරෙහිව තවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් ප්‍ර‍චණ්ඩත්වය වැපිරවූ පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය වන බැවිනි.

1. පිලිප් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා විසින් සර් ජෝන් කොතලාවල මහතා ට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කොරිඩෝවේ දී සිදු කළ පහරදීම ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් දෙදෙනෙකු අතර සිදු වූ පළමු ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවයි.

2. 1956 ආණ්ඩුවේ මැද කොළඹ තුන්වන මන්ත්‍රී ඇම්.අස්.තේමිස් සර් ජොන් කොතලාව ට ‘හලෝ ජෝන්’ යැයි ඇමතීමෙන් පසුව ඔහුට පහරදීමට කොතලාවල මහතා ඔහු බිත්තියට හේත්තුකොට ඇත. මේ ගැන බණ්ඩාරනායක මහතා පවසා ඇත්තේ “මමත් ජොන් ට කථා කරන්නේ සර් ජොන් කියාල යි. හලෝ ජොන් කිව්වාම නොගහ ඉදීද?” (කෙසේ නමුත් තමන්ට සර් ජෝන් පහර නොදුන් බව තේමිස් මහතා ඉතා මෑතක දී පුවත්පතකට ප්‍ර‍කාශ කොට තිබුණි)

3. බණ්ඩාරනායක ඝාතනය සම්බන්ධයෙන් වූ විවාදය පැවැත්වෙන අතර තුර ඩඩ්ලි සේනානායක සහ මෛත්‍රීපාල සේනානායක මහතා ට පහරදීමට උත්සහ දැරීය. ඩඩ්ලි සේනානායක මහතා කථා කරමින් සිටින අතර මෛත්‍රීපාල සේනානායක මහතා අසා ඇත්තේ Who? (ඒ කවුද?) කියා ය. නමුත් එය ඩඩ්ලිට ඇසී ඇත්තේ YOU (ඔබ) කියාය. සාමාන්‍යයෙන් ඉතා නිහඩ පුද්ගයෙකු වූ ඩඩ්ලි තමන්ට ඇසුණු දේ වැරදියට වටහා ගැනීමෙන් කෝප වූ නිසා මෙම සිදුවීම සිදුවූ අතර ඉලංගරත්න මහතා වැනි කිහිප දෙනෙකු සිද්ධිය වළවක්වා ගෙන ඇත.

4. 1965-70 ආණ්ඩු සමයේ වලපනේ මන්ත්‍රී ටී.බී.එම්.හේරත් හා රඹුක්කන මන්ත්‍රී සමාජ සේවා අමාත්‍ය අශෝක කරුණාරත්න අතර කුල ප්‍ර‍ශ්ණයක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් වචන හුවමාරුවක් සිදු විය. සභා ගර්භයෙන් පිටතට පැමිණෙන තෙක් රැක සිටි හැඩි දැඩි අශෝක කරුණාරත්න ශරීර ප්‍ර‍මාණයෙන් කුඩා මිනිසෙකු වූ හේරත් මහතාට සැගවෙන තෙක් පන්න පන්නා පහර දුන්නේය.

5. 1974 දී සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය ඩබ්ලිව්. පී.ජී. ආරියදාස මහතාට කර්මාන්ත අමාත්‍ය එස්.කේ.කේ.සුරිආරච්චි විසින් සිදු කළ පහරදීක් සිදු විය. එකම ආණ්ඩුවේ අමත්‍යවරුන් දෙදෙනෙකු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි ඇණගත් පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය යි.

6. වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මහතා ට ගාමිණී ලොකුගේ අතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ දී පහරදෙනු ලැබූවේ වාසුදේව සොන්කෝලය ඔසවාගෙන යාමට උත්සහ දැරීමේ දී ය. 1992-1993 දී එම ප්‍ර‍හාරයට සම්බන්ධ වූ කිහිප දෙනෙකුම වත්මන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරයි.

7. මර්වින් සිල්වා ඇතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් ජාතික හෙළ උරුමය කොළාන්නාවේ සුමංගල හිමියන්ගේ ලිංගික අවයව මිරිකා පහර දෙනු ලැබූවේ ය. පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භය තුළ ඇති වු බලවත්ම ප්‍ර‍චණ්ඩක්‍රියාව එය විය.

8. කෑගල්ල දිස්ත්‍රික් මන්ත්‍රී සන්දීප් සමරසිංහ මහතාට ගම්පහ දිස්ත්‍රික් මන්ත්‍රී ප්‍ර‍සන්න රණවීර විසින් 2016 මැයි 4 දින පහරදීම හා පාලිත තෙවරප්පෙරුම සම්බන්ධ වූ ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භය තුළ දී මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු තවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු ගේ ලේ සෙලවීම සිදු කළ පළමු අවස්ථාව යි.

 

බත් පාර්සලයක්‌ රු.10 කින් ඉහළට

January 10th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

 ප්රදීප් ප්රසන්න සමරකෝන් සහ චමින්ද සිල්වා

ලන්ච් ෂීට්සහ ෂොපින් බෑග් මිල ඉහළ යාම නිසා බත් පාර්සලයක මිල රුපියල් 10 කින් ඉහළ දමන බව ආපන ශාලා හිමියන්ගේ සංගමයේ ජාතික සංවිධායක අසේල සම්පත් මහතාදිවයින ඊයේ (09 වැනිදා) පැවැසීය.මේ අතර මාසයක්ඇතුළත බත් පාර්සලයක මිල රුපියල් 10 කින් වැඩි කළ දෙවැනි අවස්ථාව මෙය බව පාරිභෝගිකයෝ පවසති.
කොළඹ නගරයේ බත් පැකට්ඇතුළු ඇසුරුම් කරන ලද ආහාරවල මිල ගණන් රුපියල් 20 ත් 30 ත් අතර මිලකින් ඊයේ සිටම ඉහළ දමා ඇති බවත්, මෙය අසාධාරණ බවත් පාරිභෝගිකයෝ රැසක්‌ “දිවයින පැවසූහ.මෙතෙක්රුපියල් 100 ත් 120 ත් අතර මිලකට අලෙවි වූ බත් පාර්සලය ඊයේ වනවිට රුපියල් 150 දක්වා ඉහළ නැග ඇතැයි පාරිභෝගිකයෝ කියා සිටියහ.

I usually take my lunch in a box or wrapped in a banana leaf ( I cannot consume  ripened  bananas in my plot as urban monkeys keep eating them !)  .So I decided that feeding monkeys may also be a meritable act  and decided to use the leaf for wrappig food .Some people use the internal stem of the banana tree to cook with dahl rather that throwing away .

Back to food parcel

When I leave early with no time to cook rice and curry I buy a food  parcel from the canteen near by .

I have noted that the quantity of rice in a parcel is so excessive and Sri Lankans try to consume the whole amount despite the fact that over eating rice can increase threat to advance  diabetes and obesity  .Excessive starch is also converted into fat hence one’s cholesterol level rapidly increases.

All the researchers in Sri Lanka shall get together and decide the optimum size of a cup which shall be used to measure the amount of rice to be placed in a parcel.

People who thrive on cooking and selling food parcels can surly reduce cost of rice by just reducing 10% of the rice quantity. One kilo gram of cooked  rice may be enough to wrap seven packs instead of six ?

By doing Price increase of food parcel due to high cost of wrapping can be avoided

( I  noted that soap,toffees ,cool drink packs ,etc etc are reduced is size by he manufacturers in order to keep the price at it is )  .

 

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

බදුල්ල ප්‍රදේශයේ  විදුහල්පතිනියක් දණගස්වා පාසැලට දරුවන් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලපෑම් කිරීම  සම්බන්ධයෙනි

January 10th, 2018

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය 

2018/ 01/ 10

අධ්‍යාපන ලේකම්තුමා

අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යංශය

ඉසුරුපාය

බත්තරමුල්ල

ලේකම්තුමනි,

බදුල්ල ප්‍රදේශයේ  විදුහල්පතිනියක් දණගස්වා පාසැලට දරුවන් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලපෑම් කිරීම  සම්බන්ධයෙනි

 ඌව පළාත් ප්‍රමුඛ දේශපාලනඥයෙකු විසින්  ඌව පලාත් සභාව යටතේ පාලනය වන බදුල්ල දෙමළ බාලිකා විද්‍යාලයක විදුහල්පතිනියක්   තම නිල නිවසට කැඳවා දණ ගස්වා සිසුවියක් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලැපෑම් කළ බවට අප වෙත තොරතුරු වාර්තා වී ඇත.  එම දමිළ බාලිකා විද්‍යාලයට සිසුවියක් ඇතුලත් කරගැනීම සඳහා අදාල සිසුවියගේ දෙමව්පියන් විසින් අදාළ දේශපාලනඥයාගේ  ලිපියක් රැගෙන  විදුහල්පතිනිය හමුවීමට ගොස් ඇති අතර අදාල විදුහල්පතිනිය එම ලිපිය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරමින් පවසා ඇත්තේ තමන් බැඳී සිටින්නේ දේශපාලඥයන්ගේ නියෝග ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට නොවන බවයි.   අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යංශ බලධාරීන්ගේ නියෝග වලට අනුව පමණක් තමන් කටයුතු කරන බව මෙම විදුහල් පතිනිය අදාල දෙමව්පියන්ට දන්වා තිබේ.

මේ  බව එම දෙමව්පියන් විසින් එම දේශපාලනඥයා  වෙත දැන්වීමෙන් පසුව පළාත් අධ්‍යාපන බලධාරීන් හරහා එම විදුහල්පතිනිය  බදුල්ලේ පිහිට තම නිල නිවසට ගෙන්වා ගෙන  තමන්ගෙන් වැඳ සමාව ගන්නා ලෙස අදාල විදුහල්පතිනියට දන්වා බලහත්කාරයෙන් වන්දවා ගෙන තිබේ.

මෙම ක්‍රියාව රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ ගරුත්වය කෙලෙසන ශිෂ්ඨ සම්පන්න නොවන, අමානුෂික ක්‍රියාවක් බව අපගේ හැඟීමයි.  එබැවින් මේ පිළිබඳව සොයා බලා සුදුසු පියවරක් ගන්නා මෙන් කාරුණිකව ඉල්ලමි.

මීට

කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්

විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ

කැෆේ සංවිධානය  සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය

Propaganda as poetry

January 10th, 2018

By Rohana R. Wasala (Courtesy The Island)

(This is The Mask of Anarchy continued from January 6, 2018)

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 151-155)

Shelley composed ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ with the explicit and express purpose of communicating a powerful political message to the working Men of England that would rouse them to ‘Rise like Lions’ in the manner suggested in the lines quoted above. The new title under which I am here presenting to the reader the second or the concluding part of my essay on ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ is intended as a tribute to the poet, in spite of the well known negative connotations of the word ‘propaganda’. It is true that the term usually refers to biased, misleading information designed to promote a political or other viewpoint whose inherent badness or hollowness requires such distortion of the truth for its existence. Shelley’s reformist ideas are based on democracy, egalitarianism, peace, humanity, and justice. The method he advocates for the workers to achieve freedom from slavery is nonviolent resistance. But the implicit insistence that they envisage no failure means that Shelley’s nonviolence should not be equated with blind pacifism (a sort of peace at any cost).  Awakened lions are not known for pacifism. Shelley’s message has this ambiguity. But there is no attempt at misleading his principal target audience, the workers of the early 19th century England. On the contrary, he is determined to bring them awareness  of their own enslaved state, and to persuade them to free themselves from it through peaceful nonviolent democratic means using their vast numerical superiority over the minority ruling elite  : ‘Ye are many – they are few’.

The speech is delivered by an indistinct, rather airy, flitting ‘Shape’, which appears to be a persona for the poet himself. The ‘I’ found at the beginning of the poem (‘I lay asleep in Italy’)seems to have dissolved into the voice of this Shape. Where does the Shape originate in the dream narrative?

The ‘maniac maid’  or Hope lay in the street before the horse’s feet patiently expecting ‘Murder, Fraud and Anarchy’ (lines 98-101). Then ‘a mist, a light, an image’ arose between Hope and her foes, growing into ‘a Shape arrayed in mail’ (line 110). The Shape fled past over ‘the prostrate multitude’ (line 126).  Its momentary presence revived the maiden Hope. Though the Shape was insubstantial and very quickly vanished into ‘empty air’, it was something powerful that registered on the ‘heads of men’ (that is, it was something intellectual), and ‘Thoughts sprung where’er that step did fall.’. ….. The Shape’s soft fleeting touch gives rise to ‘Thoughts’ in the same manner that the spring brings forth flowers, ‘As flowers beneath May’s footstep waken’ (line 122).

And the prostrate multitude

Looked — and ankle-deep in blood,

Hope, that maiden most serene,

Was walking with a quiet mien: (lines 126-129)

When this happened, Anarchy died along with the murderers thronged behind him (as described in the following lines).

And Anarchy, the ghastly birth,

Lay dead earth upon the earth;

The Horse of Death tameless as wind

Fled, and with his hoofs did grind

To dust the murderers thronged behind. (lines 130-134)

The death of Anarchy and his murderous companions would have marked a happy conclusion to a story that started in despair. But then a moment of reflection tells us that Shelley is still dreaming, and he hasn’t finished relating what he sees and hears while dreaming. Though he has passed the nightmare part of the dream narrative, he implies that he has much more to say. To Shelley a dream-delivered closure in the theatre of his sub-conscious mind to a   problem in the real world that he so passionately feels about is of no use. If he was satisfied with that, then he could not be the politically engaged authentic Shelley that we usually come across in his poetry. So lines 135 – 146 announce: These words of joy and fear arose” as if the ‘indignant Earth – Which gave the Sons of England birth’ …… ‘had turned every drop of blood’ that had ‘bedewed her face’

To an accent unwithstood” –

As if her heart had cried out aloud:

Men of England, heirs of Glory”, (lines 145-147)

The words of joy and fear ‘arose’, not ‘were spoken’; no speaker is given.  (The Shape that we identify as the persona through which Shelley himself speaks is an indeterminate presence.) This is similar to the earlier phrase Thoughts sprung….”.  The ‘indignant Earth’ of England (Mother England) is not the speaker either, for it is only ‘As if’ she cried them out. The words of joy and fear which apparently spontaneously arose constitute a long political harangue. It accounts for more than half of the poem, from line 147 to the end of the 372-line poem. The voice or the idiom or the verbal mechanism that the poet is searching for, by which to rouse the ordinary working men of England (the previously ‘adoring’, ‘prostrate’ benighted, benumbed ‘multitude’) to Rise like Lions” should be found, if at all, in this latter part of the poem.

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 151-155)

The same lines are repeated at the end of the poem. (They are printed at the top as an epigraph to this essay.) The rest of the poem embodies material that infuses these memorable lines with special potency.

The speaker addresses the ‘prostrate multitude’. He asks them the most important question. ‘What is Freedom?’ (l. 156).  But he doesn’t expect them to answer that question, because he knows that they have no idea about freedom. So he  approaches the question  through its opposite, slavery, which they can describe

…………..too well —

For its very name has grown

To an echo of your own. (lines 157-159)

We, the readers, could find an allusion here to slavery practiced in Europe and North America at that time. Just as the word ‘slavery’ echoes the name of its well known victims the Africans, it has grown to echo the name of the working men of England. They have been reduced to the state of the tools of their trades:  Loom, and plough, and sword, and spade, for the ‘defence and nourishment’ of the tyrannical , oppressive rulers. The workers will be treated like this until a point comes when they are strong and

……………… feel revenge

Fiercely thirsting to exchange

Blood for blood — and wrong for wrong — (lines 193-195)

But the speaker admonishes them in line 196: Do not thus when ye are strong.” (i.e., Do not think of taking revenge or of resorting to violence, when you have become strong through enhanced awareness and unity). He advocates only non-violent  resistance. Yet again, the speaker says that even forest-dwelling savages, birds and beasts in the wild and domestic animals have food to eat and somewhere to rest, except Englishmen! Even those jungle men or wild animals would not endure deprivation, without resistance, unlike you (as suggested in lines 197-204). These are words hardly likely to promote nonviolence!

This is Slavery — savage men,

Or wild beasts within a den

Would endure not as ye do —

But such ills they never knew. (lines 205-208)

In spite of his advocacy of non-violent resistance a moment ago, this sort of language could provoke violence among the oppressed workers.

Then, in the next section of his speech the speaker asks the question to Freedom itself: ‘What art thou Freedom?’ The slaves cannot answer the question from their ‘living graves’; the tyrants would flee at this demand, as they would be compelled to do if the workers who currently show the ignorance and passivity of a ‘slave in soul’ were to articulate what freedom actually is; at present they cannot do that though they are familiar with slavery through experience. In an apostrophe to Freedom, the speaker (who must be the poet himself) launches into a long series of instances where freedom manifests itself.

Thou art clothes, and fire, and food

For the trampled multitude —

No — in countries that are free

Such starvation cannot be

As in England now we see”. (lines 221-225)

To the rich you are a check on their oppression of the poor (trampled multitude). You are Justice – your righteous laws are not sold for gold as they are in England. You are Wisdom. ‘Freemen never dream’ that

All those who think those things untrue

Of which Priests make much ado” (lines 236-237)

will be damned for ever!

Science, Poetry, and Thought are Freedom’s lamps, the speaker continues. Let deeds, not words, express your (i.e., Freedom’s) loveliness. Then the speech makes a practical proposal: Let there be a great Assembly ‘On some spot of English ground’ attended by people from ‘the haunts of daily life’ and even from the ‘palaces’,

Ye who suffer woes untold,

Or to feel or to behold

Your Lost country bought and sold

With a price of blood and gold” (lines 291-294)

Such a gathering is for the purpose of making a solemn declaration ‘with measured words’ that  ye (i.e., the working men of England) are free ‘as God has made ye’. ‘Let your strong and simple words be keen to wound as sharpened swords, and wide as targes (small shields) to protect you’. But all this must be within the law.

It sounds as if the speaker fears that he would be mistaken to be an advocate of violence. Even if the tyrants should violate the old laws of England, ‘the blood will rest on them, not on you’;

(you, i.e., the working men of England, should let them)

Slash, and stab, and maim, and hew –

What they like, that let them do.

……………………………………………………….

With folded arms and steady eyes,

………………………………………………………

Look upon them as they slay.” (lines 342…..347)

 

Then the ‘tyrants’ will be ashamed of themselves:

‘And the bold, true warriors

Who have hugged Danger in wars

Will turn to those who would be free,

Ashamed of such base company.’ (lines 356-359)

 

Men of England will need great courage and forbearance to abide by Shelley’s admonition. But he is confident that

‘….. these words shall then become

Like Oppression’s thundered doom

Ringing through each heart and brain,

Heard again — again — again —‘ (lines 364-367)

‘These words’ here may be interpreted as referring to lines 151-155, which are repeated at the conclusion of the poem:

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 368-372)

Shelley was writing two hundred years ago. But his refined rational voice against oppression of different kinds – political, economic, religious – resonates with meaning for many nations in the world even today.

Kaduwela-Fort light trains from 2018: Champika

January 10th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

 

SEE COMMENTS BELOW

Fort bound Light Railway Service would be initiated from Kaduwela funded by the Japanese Government, Megapolis and Western Development Minister Champika Ranawaka said.He said the feasibility study for the project was being conducted and the Ministry was acquiring lands in the area for the purpose.Participating in an event to the Kaduwela Public Fair and the additional bus halt, the Minister said the construction of the light railway service would be initiated end of 2018.Apart from Colombo, he said the Kaduwela and Homagama areas had been identified economically valuable areas and would be populated more in the near future.Therefore, Minister Ranawaka said a proper city planning had been proposed by Ministry to the Government considering the commercial demand of the lands in the areaHe said it had been proposed to develop the areas surrounding Parliament to create office complex, including the Prime Minister Office and offices of various Independent Commissions.It is our vision to develop the Kaduwela – Battaramulla area as professionals’ city with many State institutions. The construction work of three large buildings for the purpose will commence soon,” he said.He said the area between Malabe and Homagama would be converted in to a tech city, including technical colleges and technology institutions.

He said 16 companies had already come forward in favour of the Ministry’s strategy

An election is at the door step .Rjagiriya fly over has been declared open.Traffic is still moving in a snarling speed ,Canal passenger Trans port plan was  given wide publicity .Water is flowing and no boats as yet. Completion of connection of Kaduwela Kerawapitiya from Airport highway to Souhern highway is still in the horizon .Improvement to Kelaniweli Rail Line  is still far behind .

It takes over 1 -1.5 hours to reach Colombo from Kaduwela.

Building  an elevated light railway will take at least three years in Sri Lanka.How can it be completed  in 1 year  .Officials and politicians are all talking in many forums ,professors from Universities giving lectures about the transport technology .But the poor people who use public transport keep cursing the rulers .

Why are we hoodwinked by the politicians?

How long can the people wait ?

Battling stress the most effective way

January 10th, 2018

Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

A new book, ‘Stress in Security Forces’ edited by Anil Varma with Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge, Dr. Franklin D. Jones, Stephen A. Young and Gautam Navalakha has been published by the ICFAI University Press, India.

Stress management is vital in the fields of defence and public safety. Positive stress management is a decisive factor in mission accomplishment. The articles covered in this book endeavour to extend the discussion and consolidation of stress management beyond just breath or exercise solutions often promoted in short articles addressing the topic. Instead the information provided will offer insight into stress dynamics so that individual readers can determine appropriate management solutions.

 

Anil Varma and Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge who have studied the deep psychological impacts of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) emphasize the importance of psychological therapies such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing ), the latest and effective psychotherapy mode which is accepted by the APA (American Psychiatric Association).

Stress in Security Forces is an important book for the members of the armed forces, trainers and policy makers.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) – A Malady Shared by East and West

January 10th, 2018

Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder that can occur in people who have experienced or witnessed life-threatening events such as natural disasters, serious accidents, terrorist incidents, war, or violent personal assaults. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs in an estimated 8% of men and 20% of women who are exposed to traumatic events.

The cross-cultural validity of the PTSD has been questioned by many experts. Some consider PTSD is a Western culture-bound disorder. However psychological trauma is a universal phenomenon. Traumatic experiences are universal and it has psychological, neurological, biological, and social impacts. Although there are ethnocultural variations in PTSD it is a common occurrence around the globe. Many cultures report PTSD type anxiety based reactions.

 The History of PTSD
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a relatively newly defined disorder with a very long medical history. Historical literature reveals clinical symptoms similar to PTSD dating back to the ancient Egyptian civilization. In 1900 B.C. an Egyptian physician eloquently described hysterical reactions of a patient after traumatic experience.

Great literature from around the world provides stories of individuals and peoples with extraordinary suffering due to the trauma experienced in great calamities. For example, the biblical story of Job records a heartbreaking story of human trauma. Job was subjected to extreme suffering, loss of material possessions, and psychological anguish.

In his 1952 book Answer to Job, pioneer psychiatrist Carl Jung analyzed the psychological components associated with the nature of his emotional suffering. Job was deeply shattered by the trauma that fell upon him. He expresses self-pity and troubled desolation. The trauma left him feeling hopeless, and his mental agony is similar to one who suffers from PTSD. Job could very well be diagnosed with PTSD within today’s clinical definitions.

Another ancient sacred text from a separate cultural tradition, the Mahabharata, describes vivid combat stress reactions exhibited by the ancient warriors. This epic tale of India chronicles a great war between the Pandavas and the Kauravas in 3139 B.C. The horrendous combat events described in the Mahabharata and the demeanor and death of the main warrior characters such as Jayadratha graphically illustrate the trauma and symptoms now recognized in the PTSD diagnosis.

Homer’s great epic, The Iliad, which was composed circa 730 B.C., narrates a series of harrowing episodes of battle stress that were experienced by the ancient Hellenic combatants. He clearly paints the picture of the horror of war and trauma of combat. Achilles, the archetypal warrior, cries out in anguish and rage at the death and mutilation of his friend Patroklos.

Battle scenes and human suffering occupy much of The Iliad. When exposed to the atmosphere of combat, soldiers have feelings that become more intense and unpredictable. They may include amplified emotional responses or the reawakening of past mental disturbance. Homer artfully captures such responses. In The Iliad some combatants suffer from extreme confusion and experience feelings of insecurity. Their reactions are similar to modern-day combat-related PTSD.

The Iliad epitomizes another tragedy of war: the agony of war widows when encompassed with physical and mental trauma. The pages of The Iliad echo the woe and affliction of the Trojan women. Homer expounds their lamentation and helplessness comprehensively. Trojan women have become the ultimate symbol of the consequences of war on the survivors.

Buddhist Jataka Stories 
According to archaeological and literary evidence, the Jataka stories were compiled in the 3rd Century B.C. to the 5th Century A.D. The Khuddaka Nikaya contains 550 stories the Buddha told of his previous lifetimes as an aspiring Bodhisattva. According to Professor Rhys Davids, Jataka stories are one of the oldest fables.  The Jataka stories deeply analyze the human mind. They contain profound psychological content. In the Jataka stories there are numerous characters who have displayed hysteria-type reactions. For instance, in the Maranabheruka Jataka one monk shows anxiety-based reactions that are similar to modern day PTSD. This monk displays extreme fear, hyper-arousal, avoidance, having frightful mental pictures (flashbacks?) and emotional anesthesia.

Shakespearian Work and British Experience of PTSD
The eminent English poet and playwright William Shakespeare created many characters that appear to be afflicted by psychological and psychiatric disorders. Shakespeare had an extraordinary ability to grasp the dynamics of the human mind and fathom the dysfunctions of the human psyche. Indeed, Shakespeare was very comprehensive in his descriptions of various psychological and psychiatric symptoms. Shakespeare’s influence on psychopathology was immeasurable. Many of Shakespeare’s lead characters seem to be having mental disorders and even psychoses.

Macbeth, probably written sometime between 1603 and 1607, reveals an act for which the perpetrator is subsequently filled with guilt, one that is emotionally overwhelming, replete with nightmares, hallucinations, and disturbing reminiscences. Macbeth was a Scottish Army general who wanted to rise to nobility and become the king of Scotland. To fulfill his ambition he was pushed to kill King Duncan by his ambitious wife. Macbeth murders Duncan while Duncan is a guest at his castle. After the murder Macbeth and his wife become emotionally unstable. Lady Macbeth sleepwalks (a form of dissociation that is evident in trauma). She continuously washes and wrings her hands in an attempt to make them clean (an obsessive-compulsive disorder type of behavior that could be co-morbid with PTSD). Her nights are full of disturbances and she becomes hyper-vigilant. Following the distressing mental condition, Lady Macbeth commits suicide.

Around half a century after Shakespeare’s death English civil servant Samuel Pepys witnessed the great fire of London in 1666. His diary famously and vividly described nightmares, intrusions, and flashbacks, all of which are associated with what we today call PTSD.

PTSD victims of Russo-Turkish War 
From 1676 to 1681 a series of military conflicts occurred between the Russian and Ottoman Empires. Professor V.I Buganov, a renowned Soviet Historian, described unusual events that occurred during the war between the Turkish troops and the forces of Peter the Great. According to Buganov, some soldiers lost their voices (became aphonic as a result of a hysteria-type dissociative reaction). Some manifested fear feelings and became insane (possibly a stress-related behavior following acute stress disorder).

Railway Hysteria 
In 1800 a condition was identified that bore a remarkable resemblance to modern-day PTSD. It was called railway hysteria or railway spine. The sufferers of this condition showed anxiety and somatoform symptoms after having been in catastrophic railway accidents. Railway spine was a nineteenth-century diagnosis for the post-traumatic symptoms. A large numbers of casualties were reported on Britain’s Victorian railways between the 1840s and the 1860s. The medical experts regarded Railway as a condition produced by a jolted and shaken spinal cord to one of traumatically-induced mental and nervous collapse fraught with implications of hysteria, neurasthenia and degeneration.

Neurasthenia 
In 1879 neurologist George Beard called a group of symptoms he observed neurasthenia.”9 This was characterized by chronic fatigue and weakness, loss of memory, and generalized aches and pains, formerly thought to result from exhaustion of the nervous system.

Soldier’s Heart
In 1876 US Civil War physician Dr. Mandez Da Costa introduced the term soldier’s heart,” which illustrated the physical and emotional symptoms displayed by Civil War veterans, including startle responses, hyper-vigilance, dyspnea (difficulty in breathing), palpitation, chest pain, fatigue, faintness and heart arrhythmias. Soldier’s heart or Da Costa’s syndrome is considered the manifestation of an anxiety disorder, and treatment is primarily behavioral, involving modifications to lifestyle and daily exertion.

Effort Syndrome
The term effort syndrome” was introduced in 1900. This condition was characterized by chest pain, dizziness, fatigue, palpitations, cold moist hands, and sighing respiration. The condition is often associated with soldiers in combat, but occurs also in other individuals. The pain often mimics angina pectoris, but is more closely associated with anxiety states and occurs after, rather than during exercise. (7) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (introduced in 1900) Chronic fatigue syndrome is a complicated disorder characterized by extreme fatigue that may worsen with physical or mental activity, but does not improve with rest. There are many theories about what causes this condition, ranging from viral infections to psychological stress.

Shell Shock 
By 1918 British military doctors identified a group of symptoms that included tiredness, irritability, giddiness, lack of concentration and headaches among the soldiers who fought in  World War I. Colonel Fredrick Mott, a British pathologist, coined the term shell shock,”11 and he considered it an organic condition produced by miniature hemorrhages of the brain. Between 1914 and 1918 the British Army identified 80,000 men as suffering from shell shock. Shell shock was generally seen as a sign of emotional weakness or cowardice.

Combat Fatigue 
Over 110 million persons were mobilized for military services in World War II. The term combat fatigue” was introduced to describe the combat trauma reactions that occurred during the war. Combat fatigue was characterized by hypersensitivity to stimuli such as noises, movements, and light, accompanied by overactive responses that include involuntary defensive jerking or jumping, easy irritability progressing even to acts of violence, and sleep disturbances, including battle dreams, nightmares, and inability to fall asleep. A longitudinal study of Harvard University alumni found 56% of World War II veterans who experienced heavy combat were chronically ill or dead by age 65.

Pierre Janet on Trauma
In 1889 Pierre Janet published L’automatisme psychologique, his first work to deal with how the mind processes traumatic experiences. Janet coined the word dissociation” and explained the effects of dissociation of the traumatic memories and their return as fragmentary reliving experiences

Jean-Martin Charcot
In 1901 the Parisian clinical neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot, known as the founder of modern neurology,” described traumatic memories as parasites of the mind. He formulated a comprehensive, neurogenic model of the great neurosis.” For Charcot, hysteria was strictly a dysfunction of the central nervous system. In Charcot’s view, traumatic hysteria and male hysteria were identical. He acknowledged the relevance of psychological traumas, dissociated from the patient’s consciousness, in determining the nature of its symptoms. Charcot’s views immensely affected Sigmund Freud’s early theory of hysteria and the notion of psychical trauma.

Sigmund Freud and Traumatic Neurosis
Sigmund Freud used the term traumatic neurosis,” to describe the condition that resembles the present-day PTSD. The term designates a psychopathological state characterized by various disturbances arising after an intense emotional shock, either immediately or even sometimes long after the event occurred. Freud specifically wrote about effects of traumatic memories and traumatic shock.

In Freud’s words, The symptomatic picture presented by traumatic neurosis approaches that of hysteria in the wealth of its similar motor symptoms, but surpasses it as a rule in its strongly marked signs of subjective ailment . . . as well as in the evidence it gives of a far more general enfeeblement and disturbance of the mental capacities.”  Freud’s understanding of trauma was well represented in his works, mainly in Mourning & Melancholia (1917), Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), and Symptoms, Inhibitions & Anxiety (1926).

Freud assumed that the negative emotional energy associated with traumatic memories unconsciously converted into the somatic manifestations of hysteria. Freud’s lectures in 1917– 1918 eloquently described the broad clinical picture of what we know today as PTSD. In one of his famous lectures, Traumatic Fixation – The Unconscious, which he gave in America.

Freud states: The closest analogy to this behavior in our nervous patients is provided by the forms of illness recently made so common by the war – the so-called traumatic neurosis. Of course, similar cases have occurred before the war, after railway accidents and other terrifying experiences involving danger to life. The traumatic neuroses are not fundamentally the same as those which occur spontaneously…. The traumatic neurosis demonstrates very clearly that a fixation to the moment of the traumatic occurrence lies at their root. These patients regularly produce the traumatic situation in their dreams, in case showing attacks of a hysterical type in which analysis is possible; it appears that the attack constitutes a complete reproduction of this situation. It is as though these persons had not yet been able to deal adequately with the situation, as if this task were still actually before them unaccomplished.

In 1910 Freud stated that hysterical patients suffer from intrusive reminiscences. There is much evidence to suggest that Sigmund Freud knew the spacious clinical picture of PTSD.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 
1952 DSM 1 – The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 1) was published in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association and provided new diagnostic criteria for neurotic reaction (stress response syndrome).

1968 DSM 2 : Transient Situational Disturbance Transient situational disturbance is defined as a form of maladaptive reactions to identifiable psychosocial stressors occurring within a short time after the onset of the stressor. They are manifested by either impairment in social or occupational functioning or by symptoms (depression, anxiety, etc.) that are in excess of a normal and expected reaction to the stressor.

1980 DSM 3 PTSD In 1980 the American Psychiatric Association added PTSD to the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) nosologic classification scheme. In its initial DSM-III formulation, a traumatic event was conceptualized as a catastrophic stressor that was outside the range of usual human experience.

In 1993 World Health Organization (WHO) Recognizes PTSD The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) is a coding of diseases, signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, complaints, social circumstances and external causes of injury or diseases, as classified by the World Health Organization (WHO). ICD-10 was endorsed by the Forty-Third World Health Assembly in May 1990 and came into use in WHO member states. The ICD is the international standard diagnostic classification for all general epidemiology, and is used for many health management purposes and clinical use. In 1993 it recognized PTSD as a separate diagnostic entity.

1994 DSM 4 The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Fourth Edition (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) defines PTSD as a constellation of symptoms and behaviors that includes three core clusters: re-experience of the trauma in the form of intrusive thoughts, dreams and images; avoidance of thoughts or reminders of the trauma, together with emotional numbing and withdrawal; and signs of increased central and autonomic arousal. In 2000 the American Psychiatric Association revised the PTSD diagnostic criteria in the fourth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR).

DSM 5: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) is the 2013 update to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) classification and diagnostic tool. It is the product of more than 10 years of effort by hundreds of international experts in all aspects of mental health. Compared to DSM-4, the diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 draw a clearer line when detailing what constitutes a traumatic event. DSM-5 introduced a preschool subtype of PTSD for children ages six years and younger.

PTSD in the Soviet Union
Since the October Revolution and the Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991 USSR faced a number of internal and external socio- political calamities that generated immense stresses among its population. Unsurprisingly these manmade and natural disasters had caused waves of traumatic stress among the people. But little is known to the outside world about the psychological trauma experienced by the Soviet People. The state governed Medical and Psychological establishments imposed heavy restrictions to study and publish psycho trauma that prevailed among the people of the Soviet Union. The state media constantly promoted the Soviet Socialist way of life as an idealist society and highlighted the maladies of the Western Capitalist World.

The accurate statistics of the psychological ailments such as PTSD that existed within the Soviet Society are still not known. The term PTSD or Traumatic Neurosis were not profusely used by the Soviet researchers. To denote psycho trauma the terms such as Dushevnaya Bolezen”  Stresavaya Situatsia , Pshicheskaya Rastroisthva were often used. However by the end of the Soviet era the Russian clinicians assertively used the term   Posttrumaticheskaya Stresovaya Rastroistva (PTSD) to diagnose anxiety based traumatic stress using DSM or ICD -10 classifications.

US Focus on PTSD
The US military’s historic concern with PTSD was revived during combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, as over two million personnel have served in these theaters since 2001. Of that total, 1,353, 627 have since left the military and 711,986 have used Veterans Administration (VA) health care between fiscal year 2002 and the third-quarter fiscal year 2011.19

The National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Survey (NVVRS) report provided the following information about PTSD among Vietnam War veterans: the estimated lifetime prevalence of PTSD among American Vietnam theater veterans is 30.9% for men and 26.9% for women. An additional 22.5% of male Vietnam veterans and 21.2% of female Vietnam veterans have had partial PTSD at some point in their lives. Thus, more than half of all male Vietnam veterans and almost half of all female Vietnam veterans – about 1,700,000 Vietnam veterans in all – have experienced clinically serious stress reaction symptoms.” 15.2% of all male Vietnam theater veterans (479,000 out of 3,140,000 men who served in Vietnam) and 8.1% of all female Vietnam theater veterans (610 out of 7,200 women who served in Vietnam) were diagnosed with PTSD at the time the survey was conducted (1986-1988).

There is not a consensus on the PTSD rates for the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts. Science magazine reports that of the total American military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, 4.3% of troops developed PTSD. This is a composite of the deployed combatants, (7.6% of whom developed PTSD) and the deployed noncombatants (1.4% of whom developed PTSD).21 A fact sheet from the RAND Center for Military Health Policy Research concludes the true rates of PTSD are not known and that studies existing as of 2010 vary too widely to be helpful.22 The United States Department of Veteran Affairs asserts that 11-20% of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have PTSD.23 The VA estimate could point to 20,000 to 40,000 current cases of PTSD.

Americanization of Mental Illness
There is a growing critique of the conventional Western psychological approaches to trauma and PTSD. Voices from academia, clinical practice, and victims themselves are joining to proclaim the widespread variations across ethno-cultural boundaries.”

Author Ethan Watters examined trauma and cultural factors in depth. He states that the Western conception of mental health and illness might be shaping the expression of illnesses in other cultures, and that this is rarely discussed in the professional literature. Many modern mental health practitioners and researchers believe that the scientific standing of Western drugs, Western illness categories and Western theories of the mind have put the field beyond the influence of endlessly shifting cultural trends and beliefs. Others still seek to understand the cultural context as a diagnostic factor.

Dr. Sing Lee a psychiatrist and researcher at the Chinese University of Hong Kong watched the Westernization of a mental illness firsthand. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, he was busy documenting a rare and culturally specific form of anorexia nervosa in Hong Kong. Unlike American anorexics, most of his patients did not intentionally diet nor did they express a fear of becoming fat. The complaints of Lee’s patients were typically somatic — they complained most frequently of having bloated stomachs. Lee was trying to understand this indigenous form of anorexia and, at the same time, figure out why the disease remained so rare.

PTSD: Universal Experience and Cultural Treatment
War is institutionalized violence that has intrinsically unique elements. It is a multidimensional manmade disaster. War can be an individual as well as a collective form of trauma.26 Wars represent a mental health emergency. Mental health is the springboard of thinking and communication skills, learning, emotional growth, resilience, and self-esteem. War trauma can shift the parameters of mental health towards the negative side. The circumstances of the armed conflict can produce a range of emotional and behavioral stress reactions among soldiers and civilians alike. In a war situation combat stress is an inevitable factor.

Combat stress is a specific stress factor that can affect both mental and physical health. It is a form of psychological pathology that results from traumatic exposure to battle events. Combat in most cases involves fear, despair, shock and anxiety. Combat stress is the result of internal and external stresses. Combat stress does not come from the enemy action alone. Some stress is generated from the soldiers’ own unit leaders and mission demands. Combat stress symptoms and reactions interfere with mission performance. Battle stress affects both combatants and civilians, especially those living in the war zone. War disrupts the existing social structure. The major impact of war includes disintegration of psychological well being; creating a specific calamity subculture that often generates vicious cycles that echo even after the war.

Sri Lankan Experience: 
Sri Lanka experienced a prolonged armed conflict that changed the psychological landscape of the islanders. From 1983 until 2009 a large number of government combatants, civilians and members of the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) underwent the detrimental repercussions of combat trauma.

The concept of trauma in general was not new to the Sri Lankans. Throughout history Sri Lankans have experienced natural and manmade disasters. The religion and culture have provided great resilience to cope with trauma. Culture consists of traditions, values, customs, folklore, rituals and artifacts that help give meaning to the physical world. It is transmitted primarily through language and everyday interactions. These cultural factors sometimes act as buffers to trauma and assist in coming to terms with psychological trauma.

Combat Trauma in Sri Lanka
Combat trauma, a notion that is not new to Sri Lankans, has been of profound historical, cultural, social, and religious significance to them. The written history of Sri Lanka dates back to 600-500 BC.29 According to the Mahavamsa , the great chronicle history of Sri Lanka and one of the oldest chronologies in the world, the great Battle of Vijithapura that occurred in 205 B.C. was hard fought, with great carnage and death. The triumphant King Dutthagamani experienced severe depression soon after the battle.

Throughout the Sri Lankan history there were foreign invasions and internal conflicts in which the islanders had to fight fearsome battles. Western nations arrived in 1505 AD, and until 1815 AD the Sri Lankans fought against three of them: Portuguese, Dutch   and English.  Some of the local warriors who fought against the foreign invaders later became the victims of combat trauma.

The Portuguese came to Sri Lanka in 1505 and launched a massive armed campaign against the islanders. King Seethawaka Rajasinghe (1544 A.D – 1593 A.D) was a great warrior who came to the battlefield at the age of 16. He fought against the Portuguese invaders and witnessed many deaths and much destruction. He was a fearless fighter who used proficient war tactics and overpowered the fully equipped and fully trained Portuguese Army, considered a superpower in the 16th-century world. He defeated the Portuguese in a number of decisive battles. His military campaigns prevented Sri Lanka from becoming a Portuguese colony.

Following long years of combat King Seethawaka Rajasinghe was exhausted and unquestionably suffered from battle fatigue. In later years he displayed outbursts of anger, irritability, deep mistrust, alienation, emotional numbing and various other PTSD-related symptoms. King Seethawaka Rajasinghe probably suffered from combat-related PTSD. The king’s abnormal behavior pattern was described by the Portuguese historian Fernão de Queyroz in his multivolume work, Temporal and Spiritual Conquest of Ceylon.

The culture and history of Sri Lanka reveals that PTSD types of illnesses were common in the ancient days, and the recognition of this malady was not unique to the West. Ancient and modern narratives tell of the posttraumatic symptomatology of the trauma victims.

The Eelam War in Sri Lanka and PTSD Denial
Over 200,000 members of the Sri Lankan armed forces and police had been directly or indirectly exposed to combat situations during the recent 30-year conflict. Traumatic experiences include seeing fellow soldiers being killed or wounded, seeing unburied decomposing bodies,   hearing screams for help from the wounded, and helplessly watching the wounded die without the possibility of being rescued.

Following the Eelam War in Sri Lanka, a significant number of combatants suffered from PTSD, but remained undiagnosed. For a number of years the Sri Lankan authorities denied the fact that combat-related PTSD was emerging in the military. PTSD was regarded as an American illness and there was an unofficial taboo to use the term PTSD.

The tension of combat trauma was mounting in the Sri Lankan military over the years, and there had been suicides and incidents of self-harming reported from the battlefield. The soldiers affected by war trauma had behavioral problems and their productivity was plummeting. Many soldiers who had symptoms of combat-related PTSD, but without any physical disabilities, were compelled to continue to serve in the operational areas and engage in active combat. Some were charged with malingering when they sought medical attention. Many traumatized veterans deserted the army and even joined underworld criminal gangs.

Until 2005 the Sri Lankan Army did not medically discharge any combatant on psychological grounds. The monumental work of Dr. Neil J Fernando, the former consultant psychiatrist of the Sri Lanka Army, eventually provided insight to the authorities, resulting in having war trauma and PTSD thought of more seriously. The first soldier who was able to get a medical discharge with PTSD was a lance corporal with malignant PTSD. He was a POW who had been held by the LTTE for nearly five years.

Combat Trauma and Cultural Factors
Psychological trauma is a very complex and damaging factor to the human psyche. It is a unique individual experience and the individual’s interpretation is mostly based on his subjective experience. Individual differences in posttraumatic response have been known to the mental health clinician for many decades. Numerous psychologists indicate the close association between trauma and the cultural factors. Some argue that the impact of trauma and trauma recovery sometimes depends on cultural factors as well. Therefore the victims of trauma should be treated in a culturally appropriate manner. Batista & Wiese argue that trauma must be considered within a culture, because it is the cultural context that shapes life experiences, including the ones that are considered traumatic.

No culture is immune to the pain and suffering caused by catastrophic or life-threatening events, but there are important cultural differences in how these events are interpreted and dealt with.  The cultural impact of combat trauma in Sri Lanka can be followed from the earliest beginnings of the Tamil insurgency in the north. Combatants and civilians experienced the aftermath of combat trauma. It is significant that their religious beliefs played a key role in trauma management. Many Sri Lankan combatants believe in reincarnation and the effects of Karma. The victims believe that their physical and psychological symptoms are due to karmic actions in past lives. Often these concepts help them to come to terms with their trauma by providing an explanation and cultural context for the traumatic events.

During World War I conversion reactions (characterized by the presence of bodily symptoms having no discernible physical cause) were commonplace. Even Freud wrote about these war hysteria reactions, which he termed as traumatic neurosis.”

Although in Europe and North America the number of conversion reaction cases was minimal in WWII, the Vietnam War and the Iraq War, the Eelam War in Sri Lanka has generated a large number of such cases.  This could be due to several factors.

In the Sri Lankan conflict soldiers had no psychological debriefing or similar trauma management soon after the traumatic combat events. The combatants were not informed about possible combat trauma reactions. Although the Sri Lankan Army had top surgeons and physicians throughout the war, for the last 30 years it did not have even a single combat psychologist. The field military doctors had little knowledge about traumatic combat reactions and the effects of PTSD. The psychological victims were often charged with malingering. In addition, the soldiers were reluctant to admit to emotional problems, which would have been considered cowardice. Therefore, many combat reactions were expressed through dissociative channels.

Dissociative reactions have a special cultural significance in Sri Lanka, especially in rural areas. Some combat-related dissociative reactions are often interpreted as disturbances created by bad spirits.” In many rural parts of Sri Lanka psychogenic paralysis is considered an act of black magic, and traditional healers use a ritual called Thovilaya (this ancient ritual is a form of psycho drama) to treat the sufferers. The possession state, which is categorized as a dissociative disorder, could be observed among soldiers with combat trauma.
In possession the person enters an altered state of conscious and feels taken over by a spirit, power, deity, or other person who assumes control over his or her mind and body. In many rural areas the possession state is often regarded as mediation with the gods and goddesses. Some ex-soldiers with possession state have become so-called spiritual mediators.

On most occasions cultural factors and religious beliefs have helped the victims of combat trauma to integrate their traumatic experience into a meaningful context, and have worked as a buffer to prevent further traumatization. After exposure to combat trauma many people have embraced their cultural and religious practices more holistically and completely. These individuals interpret their posttraumatic symptoms in spiritual terms. Somehow these traumatic experiences have been transformed into a meaningful attitude and non-self-destructive manner.

Sri Lankan combatants have more somatic ailments when they manifest anxiety and depression. Many combat trauma victims with depression get treatment for migraine or joint pains before seeking medical assistance for the psychological trauma that underlies the symptoms and ailments.

The relationship between trauma and culture is an important one because traumatic experiences are part of the life cycle, universal in manifestation and occurrence, and typically demand a response from culture in terms of healing, treatment, interventions, counseling, and medical care… The concept of traumatic stress and the multidimensional nature of cultures require a conceptual framework by which to address core issues that have direct relevance to understanding the nature of trauma as embedded within a culture and its assumptive systems of belief and patterns of behavioral regulation.  Summerfield argues that when it comes to the issue of cultural differences and posttraumatic syndromes (e.g., PTSD) it cannot automatically be assumed that advances in Western psychotherapeutic techniques can be exported and applied to non-Western cultures.

Treating Combat Trauma in Sri Lanka
Combat trauma can be identified soon after a traumatic combat operation or exposure to a violent combat-related event. Some combat reactions manifest themselves as immediate acute stress reactions and some take months, even years to develop. Many victims have clinical features, as well as behavioral issues, after facing traumatic combat events. Some go in to negative stress-coping methods, such as alcoholism, drug abuse, and social violence or self-harm. Traumatic post-combat reactions can cause significant distress to the victim and to his family, and in the long run it could negatively affect society.

In Sri Lanka the psychological victims of war trauma are treated with allopathic medicine (mainstream Western medical practice), traditional Ayurvedic medicine, psychotherapy and spiritual therapies. Psychiatrists treat war trauma victims with depression and PTSD and other anxiety-related disorders by using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and sometimes combine antipsychotics when there are signs of severe disturbed behavior with psychotic manifestations. Ayurvedic specialists use various types of traditional remedies to ease the anxiety.

Psychologists and psychotherapists often use cognitive behavior therapy, which is an effective form of insight therapy. Exposure therapy is one form of cognitive behavior therapy unique to trauma. It is a treatment which uses careful repeated, detailed imaging of the trauma (exposure) in a safe controlled context. This is meant to help the survivor face and gain control of the fear and distress that were overwhelming in the trauma.

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is one of the effective modes of psychotherapy that has been used to treat Sri Lankan combatants. In a white paper published by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs the authors conclude that …Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing is considered a first-line treatment for PTSD and has a strong evidence base. The United States VA/ DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Post-Traumatic Stress states that, Results of clinical trials, meta-analytic studies, review articles, and extant practice guidelines suggest that EMDR successfully treats symptoms of PTSD when compared to no treatment or delayed treatment conditions. When compared to other treatment modalities, most studies reviewed indicated that EMDR possessed comparable efficacy to other well-accepted cognitive behavioral treatments to include stress inoculation training (SIT) and exposure therapies.

Spiritual therapy frequently helps war victims to reduce their depression and anxiety- related symptoms. Many Sri Lankan clinicians have observed that spiritual therapy diminishes the suicidal ideation in combat trauma victims. Many combatants and civilians with war trauma are encouraged to practice meditation and yoga. Meditation methods such as metta meditation (meditation of loving-kindness) and vipassanna meditation (mindfulness mediation) are widely used in rehabilitation centers.

Conclusions
Every culture is unique and has distinctive ways of interpreting psychological trauma. The client’s religious and cultural beliefs play an important role in the treatment process. Using these innate factors in trauma management obviously gives more effective results. Since psychological traumas are a universal human experience, every nation and culture would do well to learn from one another the successful means to treat PTSD.

Acknowledgements

  • Ivan Welch- The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas USA
  • Professor Daya Somasundaram -Clinical Associate Professor: University of Adelaide –Australia
  • Roger Brooke -Professor of Psychology at Duquesne University USA
  • Dr Sarath Panduwawala – Consultant Psychiatrist Sri Lnakna

Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), Prof. G.L. Peiris doubtful of impartial justice over bond scam

January 10th, 2018

By Yusuf Ariff Courtesy Adaderana

Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), Prof. G.L. Peiris, says that the public is unable to place their trust on punishment being carried out in an impartial manner against the wrongdoers identified by the report of the Bond Commission.

He claimed that a paragraph in the special statement made by President Maithripala Sirisena, after the commission’s report was handed over to him, has been omitted before it was uploaded to the internet.

He alleged that a paragraph with reference to former finance minister Ravi Karunanayake and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had been edited out in this manner and that it had been included again later.

Under such circumstances, there is a doubt as to whether the onward action will proceed in an impartial manner, the former foreign minister said, addressing a press briefing in Colombo today (9).

Prof. Peiris charged that the government is doing many things in order to cover up the bond scam and stressed that although the Bond Commission’s report is to be taken up for debate in Parliament tomorrow, the MPs have almost no understanding regarding the report.

He added that if the President is to keep true to his word and met out punishment using the sword” he is wielding over the bond scam irrespective of positions, then the first person that should come under the sword is the Prime Minister.

Can Mahinda be ejected from SLFP?

January 10th, 2018

By Faizer Shaheid Courtesy Ceylon Today

There is nothing new in seeing dirty politics at play. The tactical ploys of those in power are somewhat a musical comedy to some and a rather frustrating melodrama to others, yet it continues. The latest saga once again concerns Mahinda Rajapaksa, the deposed President of Sri Lanka, who continues to be the face of the SLFP, no matter which party he contests from. Ever since Rajapaksa was defeated three years ago, the political bigwigs have been tailing his every move, pointing fingers at him no matter which direction they turn.

The negative publicity was always negated by the disappointment of the people that the Government had to resort to the blame game instead of manning up and owning their blunders. While the bond scam and corruption charges continue to be flung at the Rajapaksas, three years since his defeat, no charges have yet been proved. Either the due process must be incredibly slow, or the Government is merely going to repeat the same dialogues until the next elections.

The Local Government Elections are now approaching and once again, it appears that Mahinda Rajapaksa is the man of the hour.

On one hand, the United National Party (UNP) appears to be taunting and tainting Rajapaksa with corruption allegations at the turn of the bond scam report, while on the other hand Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) appears to be having problems with Rajapaksa for supporting the Joint People’s Front (JPF) and not the SLFP.

Ethical factor

The UNP on one hand cannot seem to come out of their election victory mood from three years ago. It sometimes feels like they are stuck in a time loop that keeps taking them back to their election victory days. No amount of nudging appears enough to wake them back to reality.

On the other hand, SLFP have made it abundantly clear that they are contemplating action against Rajapaksa for openly advocating a different political party. True enough, Rajapaksa had contested and won from the SLFP and has indeed been a staunch member of the SLFP for over 40 years. The jealousy stems from the fact that, when Western Province Chief Minister Isura Devapriya had proposed to use the image of Mahinda Rajapaksa in SLFP posters, Mahinda had objected to the Commissioner of Elections. Yet, he had permitted those contesting under the Pohottuwa (Flower Bud) symbol of JPF to use his image.

The SLFP have threatened action against Mahinda Rajapaksa and his supporting politicians with expulsion from the party since the very first day, yet no action has since commenced. Neither is it likely to commence at any point in the near future.

No matter what some SLFP politicos may claim, Rajapaksa is simply following the precedent set by his presidential successor and incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena. Sirisena had set a swing in motion when he crossed over and contested his own party member at the presidential election in 2008. He not only supported a different party by the name of the New Democratic Front (NDF), he became its candidate and contested against the SLFP candidate.

With his election victory, he also returned to take over the reins of SLFP and dictate terms to those in the party. Sirisena had completely gone off the books of ethical politics in order to pull off this blinder, but it worked. Being so, it is completely unethical for the same man and his supporters to once again point fingers at Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Expulsion plans will fail

Very recently, Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara had claimed that the Central Committee of the SLFP were currently evaluating the case of Mahinda Rajapaksa and his support for the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP). Apparently, he had claimed that the process will take time, and that stern action will be taken against party members who attend the rallies of other parties.

The problem is, nothing at all will matter to Mahinda Rajapaksa and his supporters except for expulsion from the SLFP. The reason being, an expulsion from a political party will automatically result in expulsion from Parliament. This is noted in Article 99 (13) of the Constitution.

However, the law comes with a proviso that if the expulsion is challenged in the Supreme Court within a month of expulsion, then the expulsion will not be valid unless Supreme Court upholds its validity. Herein lays the problem.

The very first expulsion happened in 1991, when Gamini Dissanayake, Lalith Athulathmudali and seven other Parliamentarians were expelled from the UNP for attempting to impeach then President Ranasinghe Premadasa. The Supreme Court upheld the expulsion and the Parliamentarians lost their seats in Parliament.

However, since that date, no party -based expulsion has ever been upheld in the Supreme Court. The wisdom is gathered from the dictum of Justice Kulatunge in the same case (referred to as Gamini Dissanayake vs. M. C. M. Kaleel and others):

“The right of a member of Parliament under Article 99(13)(a) is a legal right and forms part of his constitutional rights as a Member of Parliament. If his complaint is that he has been expelled from the membership of his party in breach of the rules of natural justice he will be ordinarily entitled to relief and this Court may not determine such expulsion to be valid unless there are overwhelming reasons warranting such a decision.”

This dictum was given very wide effect in all forthcoming cases, and no case in respect of expulsions was ever satisfied well enough to warrant an approval from the Supreme Court. For over 25 years, there has been no expulsion that has been validated by the Supreme Court, and this is highly unlikely to change in the near future. In many cases before the court, where the intentions of the expelled members have appeared to be fairly clear, and where the party has conducted a proper investigation into the matter, the matter has still not won the approval of the court.

This is the prime reason why, despite the straightforward violation of party principles and outright challenge of the party itself, incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena, was able to contest and win the election without being expelled from the SLFP.

Furthermore, Mahinda Rajapaksa contested from the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA). Therefore, regardless of circumstances, even if he is expelled from the SLFP, he will not automatically be stripped out of his position as a Parliamentarian.

Other party action

The SLFP may attempt to cause trouble one way or another to the former President. Perhaps, his actions may result in a suspension from the SLFP, or perhaps, he may be stripped out from other party positions such as that of an organizer or from being a Central Committee member. However, any move of such nature will only embolden him further and make him even more popular among his followers.

Besides, whether or not he is penalised from the SLFP, Rajapaksa has not washed his hands off SLFP and embarked on a renewed journey. No matter what the consequences are within the SLFP, the effect on him will be only minimal.

Conclusion

Mahinda Rajapaksa and the members of his party have been acting fearlessly against the threats of the present Leader of SLFP, Maithripala Sirisena. They refused to sit with Government and refused to vote in favour of the Bills presented by their fellow SLFP members in Parliament. They have no care for any repercussions as they already know the limits to the possible actions. Each of the Rajapaksa members already knows that no expulsion has mandated a vacation of Parliamentary seats since 1991. They are also very well informed of the expansion of the definition of the proviso by former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva in the 2006 case of Ameer Ali vs SLMC, where it was determined that no expulsion will be valid unless overwhelming reasons warranted it.

They are also aware that they are protected as far as they were elected from the UPFA and not the SLFP. The SLFPers are aware of this, just as much as the Mahinda Rajapaksa faction, yet it appears that the drama will continue until the opportune moment.

Only when Mahinda Rajapaksa proves to be a direct threat to Sirisena we will get to see what all of these stacked up chargesresult in.

(The writer is a political analyst and an independent researcher of laws. He holds a Postgraduate Degree in the field of Human Rights and Democratization from the University of Colombo and an Undergraduate Degree in Law from the University of Northumbria, United Kingdom)

(faizer@Live.com)

Scandal, Emil Savundra. The Prince of Con Men

January 10th, 2018

Courtesy ITV

“Scandal” was a series of five episodes broadcast weekly on ITV at 10:30pm in July & August 1989.

The episodes were 1. Tasaday: The Lost Tribe. 2. Bhagwhan Shree Rajneesh: The Man Who Was God. 3. Delorean: The Fast Lane 4. Emil Savundra: The Prince of Con Men. 5. Hollywood Confidential.

Here we have Episode 4 about the notorious con man “Dr Emil Savundra” Michael Marion Emil Anacletus Pierre Savundranayagam, usually known as Emil Savundra (6 July 1923 – 21 December 1976), was a Ceylonese swindler, most notable for the collapse of his Fire, Auto and Marine Insurance Company, which left about 400,000 UK motorists without cover. As a post-war black marketer, Savundra conducted bribery and fraud on an international scale, before settling in the UK, to sell low-cost insurance to the fast-growing car market. By defaulting on mandatory securities, he was able to fund a lavish lifestyle, mixing in fashionable circles. But this drew the attention of the press, who uncovered evidence of major fraud. In a dramatic TV interview with David Frost, he showed contempt for his defrauded customers, some of whom were in the studio audience, and shocked the nation by denying any moral responsibility. As the police had also been investigating him, he was soon arrested and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment, but released after six, and died two years later, in an advanced state of drug addiction.

Citizens must oppose Political solutions: They do not solve People’s Problems – They solve Politicians Problems

January 9th, 2018

Shenali D Waduge

We can all agree that democracy has become a farce in practice. Political parties will go down on their knees and beg for people’s vote promising to deliver the sun & the moon but after elections voters will see only a convoy of cars, bodyguards, advisors & be greeted with ‘Minister is too busy, come later’. The same can be said of the UN that was formed to stop another world war but only 10 countries in the world don’t suffer a conflict. However, every official is globetrotting, holding peace talks, ceasefires but conflicts continue, arms manufacture and sales continue & citizens end up having to foot every bill. Political solutions in reality are designed to share and distribute powers among politicians & other stake holders so that they can remain in power with a subtle understanding that they do not mind taking turns to be in power!

When the first JVP insurrection started in the 1970s the ‘solution’ was to kill and many thousands of Sinhala Buddhist youth perished. The same insurrection was planned to kill another set of Sinhala Buddhist youth plus people who were earmarked as future leaders. The ‘solution’ was to put to eternal rest these talented people and curb nationalist tendencies against the warped system of governance. Do you see the larger picture?

When with foreign assisted training and funding armed Tamil militancy was hijacked and turned into a mega global project with multiple agendas which began another wave of murders again wiped out not only promising Sinhalese leaders, armed forces personnel, civilians but also Tamil moderate leaders leaving only the remaining racist lot. The choice of targets, provide clues to the one’s kept alive to carry out the next phase of a larger plan in a scheme of logic that equates ‘you can remain in power so long as you politically agree to our conditions’. Do you now see the larger picture of things?

What good was the Indo-Lanka Accord when India did not fulfill the obligations of the clauses that held the mutual contract together? LTTE was never disarmed & India never closed its territory to LTTE cadres. So this agreement served no purpose to the citizens who were subject to LTTE terror.

However, the Indo-Lanka Accord did pave way to legitimize falsehoods & myths of a ‘traditional homeland’ combining both North & East, it even gave official language status to Tamil without the consent of the people. Clearly it was inserted for India’s advantage as Trincomalee Harbour was located in the East however other vultures were using India to advance their own designs. Why did the then UNP Government agree to sign and accept falsehoods? Who was the supposed Tamil king that ruled an ‘independent’ East Sri Lanka if such an independent state existed? The then Government & officials did not think of the damage caused by agreeing to sign against lies simply because they wanted to remain in power.

Every political solution has been arrived to address not the citizens wants or needs but to satisfy the political goals & objectives of politicians & their henchmen. None of these political proposals are what citizens have demanded. All of the political proposals are demands that cater to what politicians want and not what ordinary citizens want or need.

Therefore, the international community & the UN the supposed guardians of world peace are making a major error in thinking that political proposals are designed for the benefit of the People and are clauses demanded by the People.

These political proposals are most certainly not what the ordinary Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims want & these people comprise over 95% of the total population of a country.

By agreeing to sign the Indo-Lanka Accord, the then government made another faux pas by introducing the 13th amendment and with it the provincial council system dividing Sri Lanka into 9 provinces. The tax payer ends up footing Rs.600billion to run these 9 provinces – how have they benefitted except helping create political clans with PCs functioning as grooming schools to recruit favorites and families of politicians.

There were other agreements that brewed more trouble. Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam pact, Dudley-Chelvanayagam pact were to address the whims and fancies of the politicians making & advancing the deals to advance their racism and agendas. Devolution and similar proposals have no value to the citizens in practice. They are just fancy words thrown into proposals and quoted by political pundits and promoted by entities who need proposals for their job survival.

Thimpu demands by LTTE, Oslo Declaration, Regional Council proposals, Draft 2000 constitution were all framed not to fulfill what the people wanted but what a handful wanted falsely claiming it was what the people wanted.

No citizen would ever ask to cut a country to pieces when it would mean they would have to take permission to enter each newly created state. No citizen would want to divide an island. Clearly all these divisions and devolutions and decentralizing proposals were not what people wanted or asked for but what a handful of people devised so that they could redistribute power among themselves and turn citizens into modern day slaves.

Notice how these politicians are tweaking laws & regulations to curtail our freedoms but give themselves immunity & impunity.

The people didn’t ask for a ceasefire fire agreement in 2002 and the people certainly did not ask to include detrimental clauses that included placing a terrorist organization on par with the national army and giving legitimacy to a terrorist movement. No citizen asked that the army be kept in barracks but allow LTTE to roam all over the country armed! Ranil’s Govt gave LTTE 95% of their Eelaam and the rest the LTTE planned to secure through the ISGA/PTOMS with the former President playing Santa with Sri Lanka.

The ISGA proposals forwarded by LTTE in 2003 came with a USD5billion aid package. Elements of these ISGA proposals are now inserted into the new constitution. This is what R. Sampanthan, leader of the TNA and present Opposition Leader, said then “The ISGA proposal bears historical importance in the political history of Tamils in the island. The ISGA provides a base to find a permanent political solution to the Tamil national question”. This is what NGO maestro Jehan Perera commented “With its proposals for an Interim Self Governing Authority, the LTTE has given concrete form to its expectations in a manner that is essentially compatible with peaceful coexistence in a united Sri Lanka.” (2003)

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2013/04/06/agreements-that-betrayed-sri-lanka-interim-self-governing-authority-isga/

Main elements of the present constitution were initially drafted by British solicitors in 1994 tasked Sri Lanka Peace Support Group formed within the Centre for Policy Alternatives. The names of those who sought the proposal and their current positions in the present government should shock all.

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2017/11/05/main-elements-of-new-constitution-drafted-by-british-solicitors-in-1994/

The PTOMs was promoted by the Sri Lankan leaders at the time because it came with a USD3billion carrot. Both agreements were advanced when Chandrika Bandaranaike & Ranil Wickremasinghe held powers in the period 2002-2004. Nationalist organizations protested vehemently against the signing of the PTOMS “”…all warnings were ignored.

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2013/04/08/agreements-that-betrayed-sri-lankapost-tsunami-operational-management-structure-p-toms/comment-page-1/

Leaving aside the political solutions/agreements the trade agreements have been no better. The officials and advisors seem to be as clueless as the subject Minister and prepared to sign against any dotted line if commissions and personal perks are promised.

Some of the trade agreements have reaped no advantage to Sri Lanka and have left Sri Lanka giving tax holidays, concessions, opening the country to foreign labor without restrictions & regulations etc simply for a one-time investment cheque and monthly profits going to the foreigners with nothing much remaining for the country-Indo-Lanka FTA (ILFTA), CEPA, ETCA to name a few.

Leaders and officials have no qualms about compromising national assets, environmental impact, issues resulting from approving ventures in close proximity to sacred and heritage sites so long as some figures with lots of zeroes are shown to them!

How many of our national assets have we privatized and given to foreign or private hands with no checks and balances or controls by the government! A small island such as ours we are now even allowing foreigners to purchase land and even own condominiums from ground level & above.

As a result the ordinary people are facing adverse effects from being pushed into rural undeveloped areas, increase in taxes and hike in essential commodities, spirally gas and other essential items which should have been kept in government hands and turned into profitable ventures. Had transport not been privatized all benefits would have come to the government. The Colombo Municipality has given parking fees to an Indian company which charges Rs.50 even for 2minute parking – why couldn’t the municipality have done this and taken the profits directly without opting for a commission and giving all profits to the private company? Many more ventures wherein the state should have turned into profitable ventures the easy option of getting a lump sum and passing the entity to foreign hands was opted. These are detrimental and leading the country to rely on an import-economy with zero manufacturing income.

How many pacts have politicians signed over the years? How many of these have proved beneficial to the general public & the nation? We have nothing much to quote. It’s a tragedy that people who come as our representatives, enjoying luxurious living from our money end up wasting the country’s revenue, destroying the little island that has an over 2600year history & heritage and ruining the lives of the people as well while inviting all the enemies to set up shop and hasten and worsen the chaos brewing in Sri Lanka.

When will sanity prevail?

Shenali D Waduge

Debacles suffered by our forces under Chandrika’s reign – Part I

January 9th, 2018

By: A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA.

Victor Ivan’s notorious Bandit Queen Chandrika in her dementia keeps on telling the blatant lie that it is she who completed ¾ of the 30 year’ of war.  Although this claim is not even believed by her trusted friends and acolytes this article is to disprove her malicious claim with some detailed accounts of facts outlining the misery and setbacks suffered by our armed forces during her reign.

Ron Gluckman an American reporter who has been covering Asian Affairs since 1990 in a cover feature for Asiaweek in  August 1996 said that Chandrika Kumaratunga has survived as a politician, scraping by with a series of risky maneuvers, but piece continues to elude Sri Lanka as the killings continue. He says that several people interviewed for this article have, in fact, been assassinated, including Lakshman Kadiragamer.  The writer says that at the time of his writing the army was advancing toward the northern Tiger-held town of Kilinochchi and fighting has left over 200 people dead and forced out some 155,000 from their homes

Ron Gluckman says although Kumaratunga returned the favour, making her mother prime minister for an unprecedented, but largely ceremonial, third term in 1994, it is an uneven alliance. Mother and daughter are polar opposites. Kumaratunga speaks her mind in spontaneous outbursts. Her lively, mischievous manner contrasts starkly with her quiet, calculating mother. A shrewd strategist, Bandaranaike, 80, is a fervent nationalist.  In contrast no matter how many saris Kumaratunga wraps around her stocky frame, and despite her public expression of the Buddhist faith, few see her as anything but a Western outsider next to Mrs. B., as her mother is known. The current rumour sweeping Colombo, in fact, is that Kumaratunga is a wild swinger who parties late.

The article states that Kumaratunga was criticized recently for being overseas when the LTTE set off bombs in a Colombo train station and wiped out the entire northeastern army base of Mullaittivu, leaving at least 1,200 dead. Though the president was supposedly on an official trip to London, she was later reported in Egypt with her children and had to cut short her holiday. Ron Gluckman says that Mrs. Bandaranaike herself has disagreed often with her daughter, conveying the opinion that Kumaratunga is sometimes reckless in her presidential judgment.

The writer says that her tendency to tardiness has become a national complaint and on a state visit to India last year, she kept President Shankar Dayal Sharma waiting for 40 minutes — even though she had no appointments beforehand and this subject is a topic in the presidential palace too. “She’ll be coming soon,” a member of her 700-man security team advised him one day. An hour later, all he can offer was, “Soon.” Still later, he strolled by chuckling: “Very soon, I think. He comments that some say her tardiness is a sign of inexperience and inefficiency.

The writer points out with the power and water problems, the war has come home to everyone and the country’s infrastructure is falling apart, and critics contend that the president has no viable plan to rebuild the economy and her regime is gripped by a terrible inertia, quoting a veteran journalist in Colombo he says that no decisions are being made, no motion is going on and the country is actually found to be moving backward.

The writer Ron Gluckman says that this is the mood on the street too, where residents have watched Sri Lanka’s annual economic growth of 10% to 15% dwindle to official rates of about 5% while independent analysts say the real figure will likely be under 4% in that year, prices are rising faster than wages, and the war in the north rages on with mounting casualties and no end in sight. Quoting a government worker he says that Kumaratunga has promised to end the war and hold elections within a year but she has not fulfilled both promises.

The writer points out that even her ambitious plan to grant greater autonomy to the Tamils may fail to yield much goodwill as Kumaratunga has not even secured the backing of moderate Tamil leaders and members of the influential Buddhist clergy continue to stir simmering racial tension with complaints about the erosion of the island’s territorial integrity.

He states that he got a glimpse of how much this regime’s appeal was slipping at the president’s own home. Kumaratunga hosted a party for 150 of Sri Lanka’s most influential lawyers — and one visiting reporter. The lawyers were among her biggest supporters in elections two years ago, yet I was soon surrounded by a hissing mob. “The lady has lost her grip,” says one visitor. Adds his friend: “The president is ineffective. She has become our biggest problem.”

Surely this was not what the president had in mind earlier in the day, when she told me: “These are my most loyal supporters. It will be good for you to hear what they say.”

The writer explains that it is just one more case of bad judgment for Sri Lanka’s bad-luck president. For all her energy, idealism and dedication to human rights, Kumaratunga comes off most like Asia’s version of former U.S. president Jimmy Carter. Her goals are impeccable, but her execution, thus far, seems faulty.

Kumaratunga is stubbornly self-righteous like Carter and, to her immense credit, just as high-minded about human rights and justice. But unless she learns to be a better politician, she seems set to follow Carter’s lead and be remembered not as the crisis-solver that Sri Lanka cries out for but as one of the finest leaders Asia never had.

To see the full article pls. visit https://www.gluckman.com/ChandrikaKumaratunga.html

A report published in the Frontline weekly magazine of the Indian  newspaper The Hindu said that under the second phase of Operation Oyatha Alaigal (Unceasing Waves) of the LTTE  in September 1998, the LTTE captured Kilinochchi, thereafter creeped into Paranthan, south of Elephant Pass, in a series of short, swift campaigns that went unreported in the Colombo media, the camps at Karadipokku, Paranthan Junction, the Paranthan Chemical Corporation complex and the camp that was at Umaialpuram, between Paranthan and Elephant Pass, were taken. Umaialpuram and Iyakachchi were the two points where the troops at Elephant Pass could get drinking water as the water within the Elephant Pass base was too brackish for consumption.)

The first stage of the LTTE campaign to take control of the peninsula had been launched on December 11, 1999 .The camps at Vettilaikerny and Kattaikadu on the east coast and Pullaveli to the north of E lephant Pass were taken in a land-sea joint campaign. With the fall of Vettilaikerny, Kattaikadu and Pullaveli, the land-sea supply routes to Elephant Pass were cut off, and the only way through was along the A-9 Highway from Chavakachcheri. Under these conditions the Army brought in the elite 53rd Division trained by the United States and Pakistan to relieve the pressure on the 54th Division deployed in the Elephant Pass sector; it was stationed at the Pachilaippalli and Vadamaratchy East Pradeshiya division camps.

Under the second stage of the LTTE campaign, a multi-pronged assault, unfolded on March 26, 2000 . A joint operation led by Vasanthan of the Charles Anthony Infantry division and Veerendran of the Sea Tigers took control of the Chembiyanpattru-Maruthankerny-Thalaiady complex that housed the 3rd operational headquarters on the Vadamaratchy east coast.

These were on the land strip between the Bay of Bengal and the Jaffna Lagoon. The army then vacated the camps at Maamunai and Amban; the soldiers relocated to positions to the west of the lagoon.

Simultaneously, a squad from the LTTE Siruthai” (Leopard) Commando brigade raided Pallai, the largest junction to the north of Iyakachchi on the A-9 Highway, and decommissioned at least 11 pieces of artillery.

A contingent led by the LTTE’s deputy military chief Balraj then took a swathe of the Jaffna-Kandy road between Pallai and Eluthumattuvaal. These included the areas around Arasakerni, Ithavil, Indrapuram. Muhamaalai and Kovil Kadu. With this, the LTTE effectively cut off the main road link between the Elephant Pass/Iyakachchi camps and Jaffna.

Among Brigadier” Balraj’s many military feats the crowning achievement was the fight he put up in 2000 at Ithaavil on the A-9 Highway that interdicted transport between the Elephant Pass garrison and the supply lines along the Kilaly – Ezhuthumadduvaal-Nagar Kovil axis for 24 days at a stretch. It was this manoeuvre that contributed crucially in the subsequent fall of Elephant pass on April 22nd 2000

On March 26, 2000 the LTTE’s Kilinochchi commander Theepan led a team of men across the dried-up Chundikulam lagoon on the southeast of the peninsula and established positions in the Mullian and Vannankulam region. But the team ran into the Forward Defence Lines and was prevented from advancing towards Elephant Pass in the Vathirayan area.

The third and decisive stage of the LTTE campaign was played out around noon on Tuesday, April 18, 2000. A Leopard commando raid saw the LTTE take control of the Maruthankerny causeway, which enabled it to proceed westwards on the Maruthankerny-Puthukadu Junction road, which links the east coast and the A-9 Highway. The Puthukadu Junction is between Iyakachchi and Pallai. The LTTE proceeded along the southern areas of Muhavil, Soranpattru and Maasaar, after demolishing a 40-foot bund put up by the army as a d efence measure. The Tigers headed south on the A-9 Highway and reached the northern sector of the Iyakachchi camp. In effect, Elephant Pass and Iyakachchi were marooned.

Thereafter, the LTTE mounted a fierce attack on the Iyakachchi camp from Kovil Vayal and Sangathaar Vayal. As the fighting intensified, the Tiger cadres to the southeast of Elephant Pass broke through and began assailing the camp. The armoured and artillery units led by Bhanu pounded the base and moveded forward. The telecommunication tower in the Elephant Pass base was damaged severing all telephone lines to the north.

At a critical juncture the bulk of LTTE cadres led by Balraj abandoned the A-9 Highway and joined the fighting around Iyakachchi after setting up two cut out” posts to the north of Pallai and south of Eluthumattuvaal to prevent an army advancement. Heavy fighting in and around Iyakachchi began on April 20,2000. The Tigers positioned themselves to the south of the camp and cut it off from Elephant Pass.

Iyakachchi cap fell on April 21 2000. The LTTE entered the camp and destroyed ammunition dumps and buildings. Thereafter, the theatre of war shifted to Elephant Pass. The LTTE advanced on Elephant Pass from the north, northeast and southeast. There was heavy exchange of fire all through that long night, and even as the fighting was on, the army began to move out. By 11-30 a.m. on April 22, the large garrison at Elephant Pass vacated” it. The LTTE marched in at 2-30 p.m. the same day. The flag was hoisted on Apr il 23 2000.

The security forces vacated Elephant Pass only after they received orders to that effect from the defence establishment. Army commander Srilal Weerasooriya instructed Chief of Staff Lionel Balagalle to issue the order, which was sent by personal courier to Elephant Pass. Commanding Officer Brigadier Egodawela received it at 10 p.m. on April 21 2000.

Just see the humiliation underwent by our troops forced from Elephant Pass.  The retreating troops initially started moving out to Pallai, 14 km away, along the A-9 Highway, but when the LTTE thwarted them, they took to a disused rail track and a sandtrack to its west. From Pallai, the soldiers headed west for the relative safety of Kilali. But when Tiger mortars pounded this route, the army used another circuitous route – a dirt track going northwest from Elephant Pass to Kilali through Kurinchatheevu, Oorvanikanpattru and Thanmankerny. On this longer route, however, many soldiers succumbed to heat and dehydration, apart from the unceasing LTTE shells.

Nevertheless a good number of the troops moved out from Elephant Pass, mostly on foot. Before leaving, they spiked some artillery pieces, but even so the LTTE seized some powerful guns, including 152-mm artillery guns, and a number of tanks and armoured cars, besides other arms and ammunition. A preliminary list released by the LTTE revealed a mind-boggling armoury. Elephant Pass was in many ways a military debacle for Colombo then.

Although there were more than 15,000 troops in the Elephant Pass base and there were fewer than 5,000 LTTE cadres in the peninsula, the army was defeated because it was a demoralised force at that time. The defence establishment’s decision to move the troops out of the Elephant Pass base was, however, forced on it primarily by a shortage of drinking water. The camp was equipped with machinery for desalination of water, but it had broken down and not bee n repaired.

The Elephant Base base also had ample quantities of canned food and dry rations; and after taking over the camp, the LTTE distributed these to civilians in the Wanni area.

Defence Ministry sources estimated that over 1,000 LTTE cadres were killed in the three phases of fighting from December 11, 1999. The LTTE claimed that only 303 of its cadres were killed during the campaign, including 35 casualties in the final battle for Elephant Pass. The Tigers further claimed that over 1,000 soldiers were killed; the Army, however, said that only 80 of its men were killed and over 100 were missing in action. Subsequently the Tigers returned through the Red Cross the bodies of 126 soldiers, of which 28 were identified. Among the top Army officers who were killed were Brig. Percy Fernando, Col. Bhatiya Jayatilleke, Col. Neil Akmeemana and Lt. Col. Hewage Hewawasam. All of them were promoted posthumously.On the Tigers’ side, the women’s brigade chief, ‘Lt. Col.’ Lakshiya, was reported killed.

The Elephant Pass debacle shocked people across the country. And the government sought to put a brave face on the defeat saying that the setback” at Elephant Pass ought to be seen as a natural phenomenon in wars of this nature and we have to accept both victories and setbacks in the same manner.

Although the LTTE victory at elephant pass was hailed as a turning point in the war at that time the situation changed gradually with the passage of time. All areas under LTTE control were wrested back in stages by the Sri Lankan Armed forces during the 2006 -2009 period under the reign of Mr. Mahinda Raujapqksa.  Elephant Pass itself was re-taken in the first week of January 2009. The war itself ended in May 2009 with the LTTE military debacle at Mullivaaikkaal.

Thus the LTTE’s famous victories, Elephant Pass, Pooneryin.Kilinochchi, Mullaitivu, Pallai ans Paranthan etc and the euphoria surrounding it proved to be ephemeral, ultimately.

(To be continued)

President seeking to circumvent 19A? … asks SC if he can complete six-year term

January 9th, 2018

by Chitra Weerarathne Courtesy The Island

President Maithripala Sirisena, who publicly proclaimed several times, that he had voluntarily agreed to get his term of office reduced from six years to five through the 19th Amendment passed in April 2015, making it a world record by a sitting leader, has now asked the Supreme Court whether he can complete the original six year term.

A source close to the President yesterday confirmed that the Head of State had, in fact, asked the highest court for its opinion on the matter.

President Sirisena has asked the Supreme Court “Whether, in terms of Provisions of the Constitution, I, as the person elected and succeeding to the office of President and having assumed such office in terms of Article 32(1) of the Constitution on 9th January 2015, have any impediment to continue in the office of President for a period of six years from 9th

January 2015, the date on which the result of my election to the office of President was declared”.

Consequently, Supreme Court Registrar Mrs M.M. Jayasekera has written to the President/Secretary of the Bar Association yesterday stating “I have been directed by His Lordship the Hon Chief Justice to inform you that His Excellency the President, in terms of Article 129(1) of the Constitution, has referred to this court (regarding the above) for its consideration and for an opinion to be submitted to His Excellency on or before 14th January 2018.

“I shall be pleased, if you could inform to the membership that the above mentioned reference will be listed on 11th January 2016 at 11:00 am in the Supreme Court.”

The Bar Association Secretary in turn yesterday sent notices to its membership to make their observations to the court tomorrow as requested by it as per ‘Supreme Court Reference 01/2018’.

The Island learns that the SC Registrar has made a similar request to the Attorney General.

President seeks Supreme Court’s opinion for six-year term

January 9th, 2018

Courtesy adaderana

President Maithripala Sirisena has sought the Supreme Court’s opinion if he could be the president for six years, a request which contradicts the amendment he introduced to reduce the presidential term to five years.

He spearheaded the 19th amendment (19A) to the Constitution in 2015 to prune the presidential term from six to five years.

The president’s term should end in 2020, but has sought the Supreme Court’s opinion if he could continue until 2021.

The Registrar of the Supreme Court yesterday informed the members of legal fraternity that the consideration by the apex Court has been listed for January 11, officials said.

It said the President had requested an opinion which read, whether in terms of provisions of the Constitution, I as the person elected and succeeding to the office of President and having assumed such office in terms of Article 32 (1) of the Constitution on January 9, 2015, have any impediment to continue in the office of President for a period of 6 years from January 9, 2015”.

The request stands in direct contrast to President Sirisena’s action of backing the civil society’s demand to abolish the presidency when he offered to be the Opposition’s common candidate in 2015.

Instead of abolishing it, Sirisena introduced the 19A amendment which reduced the presidential term to five years while taking away the absolute control over the dissolution of parliament.

-PTI

-Agencies

Rajagiriya flyover, Moragahakanda planned by my Govt: MR

January 9th, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

In a statement on the third anniversary of the yahapalana government, former president Mahinda Rajapaksa said the Moragahakanda project was planned, funds allocated and construction work launched under his government in 2007 under the 2005 Mahinda Chintana programme.

He said even the Rajagiriya flyover was planned and money allocated for its construction by his government and pointed out that Cabinet approval was granted to select contractors for the construction of the flyovers in Rajagiriya, Polgahawela and Ganemulla at the cabinet meeting held on December 4, 2014.

Mr. Rajapaksa also held the yahapalana government responsible for the current debt crisis.

In his statement he said, “During the short period of 36 months that this government has been in power, they have borrowed over USD14.6 billion in foreign currency loans alone, the breakdown of which would be as follows – USD7.2 billion through the issue of Sri Lanka Development Bonds from January 2015 onward, USD3.6 billion from sovereign bonds issued in 2015 and 2017, USD2.2 billion through currency swap arrangements with India in 2015 and 2016, USD 1.7 billion through syndicated loans arranged through several international banks in 2016 and 2017 and USD1.5 billion from the IMF Extended Fund Facility in 2016. No previous government has borrowed so much money by way of foreign currency loans in such a short time.

https://youtu.be/q1xgGvNNgiw

I will gladly go before a bond commission: Cabraal

January 9th, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Central Bank’s former governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal said yesterday he would gladly go before a presidential commission if such a commission was set up to probe alleged bond irregularities from 2008 to 2014.

If there is commission that the Prime Minister wants to set up, please tell me I will go before it. I will be at my home, the address of which is known. I’m not from Singapore but from Colombo,” he said.

Mr. Cabraal said he hoped there would be commissions to probe the ‘Australian issue’, the alleged central expressway frauds and the fertilizer crisis.

He told a news briefing said if there was a single fraud during the time he was the CB governor, the Prime Minister would have taken action.

If there were such issues during my time, I should have been in jail now. The issue is who should take responsibility for this bond scam? Can anyone find Arjuna Mahendran today? Is he even in Sri Lanka,” he asked.

Mr. Cabraal rejected allegations that large scale frauds relating to Bond transactions had taken place during his tenure saying the allegations were baseless.

On August 19, 2016 the then finance minister Ravi Karunanayake requested the President for a report of Bond transactions from 2008 to 2014. The report was given on January 16, 2017. The report clearly states there was nothing wrong. I request the President to go through this document,” he said.

Remove PM for a fair bond trial: JO

January 9th, 2018

Lahiru Pothmulla Courtesy Adaderana

The joint opposition (JO) today requested President Maithripala Sirisena to remove Prime Minister Ranil Wikcremesinghe so as to ensure a free and fair trial on the Central Bank bond scam.

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) Chairman G.L. Peiris told a media conference that the President was unable to take any practical measures as long as Mr. Wickremesinghe continued to function as Premier.

The Prime Minister’s name was also mentioned in the bond report. He said he will take the responsibility for appointing Arjuna Mahendran as the Central Bank Governor. It is the Premier who is behind this. President Sirisena says he will use the ‘sword’ irrespective of the status of the wrongdoers. He should first use it against the Prime Minister,” Prof. Peiris said.

He said the ‘sword’ should be next used on the COPE members who are alleged to have had links with PTL owner Arjun Aloysius.

Meanwhile, he said the convening of Parliament without publishing the Bond report was a useless exercise.

If it is published at the last minute, there will be no time for anyone to study the report. There is no point in talking about something unknown,” he said.  ()

ඉසුරුමත් නිවහනක් නිවාස ආධාර මුදල අයකර ගැනීම

January 9th, 2018

ජනමාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයයි. Samurdhi Development Officers Union

ඉසුරුමත් නිවහනක් නිවාස ආධාර මුදල අයකර ගැනීම වහා අත්හිටුවන බව ජනාධිපති විසින් ගත් තීරණය මැතිවරණ වාසි ගැනීම සදහා කරන ලද ජනතාව රවටන හුදු ප‍්‍රකාශයට අපගේ විරෝධය.
2015 ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ මැතිවරණ වාසි ලබා ගැනීම වෙනුවෙන් හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා විසින් ඉසුරුමත් නිවහනක් යටතේ නිවාස අලූත් වැඩියා කර ගැනීම සදහා සෑම සමෘද්ධිලාභී පවුලක් වෙත ලබා දුන් රු. 2500.00 බැගින් වු සමෘද්ධිලාභීන්ගෙන් නැවත අය කර ගත් නිවාස ආධාර මුදල අය කර ගැනීම අත්හිටුවන බව ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් දෙන ලද නියෝගය හුදෙක් පළාත් පාලන මැතිවරණයේ දේශපාලන වාසි ලබා ගැනීම සදහා සිදු කරන ලද හුදු ප‍්‍රකාශයක් පමණක් බව අප මෙයින් අවධාරණය කරන්නෙමු.
2014.11.30 දිනැති සමෘද්ධි අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල්ගේ හදිසි තීරණයකට අනුව සමෘද්ධි සහනාධාර ලබන පවුල් 1,197,111 දෙනෙකු වෙත නැවත ප‍්‍රතිපුරණය කිරීමේ පදනම මත සමෘද්ධි බැංකුව සතු මුදලින් රු.2,992,777,500.00 මුදලක් ගෙවීම් කර තිබුනි. එහෙත් මෙම මුදල් වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ප‍්‍රතිපුර්ණය කර ලබා දෙනවා වෙනුවට සමෘද්ධි ලාභීන් හට ලබා දෙන සමෘද්ධි සහනාධාරයෙන් අය කර ගන්නා මෙන් සමෘද්ධි අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල් නීල් හපුහින්න මහතාගේ අත්සනින් යුතු 2016.11.30 දිනැති ලිපිය මගීන් සියලූම සමෘද්ධි කළමණාකරුවන් වෙත උපදෙස් ලබා දී තිබුනි.
සමෘද්ධිලාභීන් හට ලබා දෙන සමෘද්ධි සහනාධාරයෙන් කිසිදු මුදලක් කිසිදු කාරණයකට හිලව් කිරීමට අනුමැතියක් නොමැති බව පැහැදිලිව චක‍්‍රලේඛ උපදෙස් තිබියදී රු.500.00 බැගින් වාරික 05 කින් මේ වන විටත් අයකර ගෙන අවසන් වී ඇත. ඒසේ තිබියදී 2018 ජනවාරි මස 07 වන දින ජනාධිපතිවරයාගෙන් ලද නියෝගයක් මත මෙම මුදල් අය කර ගැනීම අත්හිටවු බවට නිවේදනයක් ජනමාධ්‍ය ඔස්සේ දැකීම අප පුදුමයට පත් කරවන පුවතක් මෙන්ම ජනතාව නොමග යවන දේශපාලන වාසි ලබා ගැනීම වෙනුවෙන් සිදු කරන ලද හුදු ප‍්‍රකාශයක් බව මෙයින් පෙන්නා දෙන්නෙමු.
මෙම මුදල් අයකර ගැනීම අත්හිටුවන ලෙස අප සංගමය විෂයභාර අමාත්‍යවරයාගෙන් ඇතුලූ බලධාරීන්ගෙන් ලිඛිත ඉල්ලීම සිදු කර ඇති අතර මෙම මුදල් අයකර ගැනීමට වාරණයක් ඉල්ලා අප සංගමය විසින් මානව හිමිකම් කොමිෂන් සභාවේ ගොණු කරන ලද පැමිණිල්ලක් පවා මේ වන විටත් විභාග වෙමින් පවතින බව මෙයින් දැනුම් දෙන්නෙමු.
තවද සමෘද්ධිලාභීන්ගෙන් මෙම අය කර ගැනීම තුල සමෘද්ධි සහනාධාරලාභීන් මහත් පීඩාවට පත්ව සිටි අතර ජනාධිපතිවරයාට සැබෑ උවමනාවක් අත්නම් අයකරගත් මුදල් නැවත සමෘද්ධිලාභීන් හට ලබා දෙන මෙන් නියෝගය ලබා දිය යුතු බවත් එම නියෝගය කඩිනමින් නිකුත් කිරීමට පියවර ගන්නා මෙන් අප සංගමය මෙයින් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නෙමු.
ස්තූතියි. 
 
චාමර මද්දුම කලූගේ.
ප‍්‍ර‍්‍රධාන ලේකම්,Samurdhi Development Officers Union

ජනපති සිරිසේන මොරගහකන්ද ගැන කියපු පට්ට පල් බොරු මාට්ටු වෙයි. මෙන්න සාක්ෂි!

January 9th, 2018

 www.mahinda.info

මොරගහකන්ද ජලාශයේ නිදන් වස්තු තැන්පත් කිරීමේ උත්සවයේදී විධායක ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා පැවැත්වූ කථාව පහත දැක්වේ.

එම කථාවේදී හිටපු විධායක ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමන් ගැනද සඳහන් කරමින් වත්මන් විධායක ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් බොරු ගණනාවක් ප්‍රකාශ කර තිබේ. එනිසා ජනතාව නොමග යැවීම වැළැක්වීමට ඒ ගැන අන්තර්ජාලය භාවිතා කරන ජනතාව වෙත මූලාශ්‍ර සහිතව පැහැදිළි කිරීමක් ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නෙමු. ඔහු දැක්වූ බොරු සහ ඒ ගැන ඇත්ත මූලාශ්‍ර සහිතව පහතින්.

[1]. බොරුව: 2005 දී අපි අලුත් ආණ්ඩුවක් හදලා ඒ ආණ්ඩුව තුළ මම අවුරුදු 2 ක් බලාගෙන හිටිය මේ කාර්යය ඉෂ්ට වෙනකම්, ඉටු වුණේ නැහැ.”

ඇත්ත: ඉහත බොරුවේ තරම පහත කරුණු වලින් පැහැදිළි වෙයි.

(i). මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමන් 2005 දී බලයට ඒමේදී ජනතාවට දුන් මූලිකම පොරොන්දුව වන්නේ රට කොටියාගෙන් බේරා ගැනීමයි. එනිසා බලයට ආ සැනින් වැව් අමුණු හැදීමට වඩා ප්‍රමුඛස්ථානයක් රට බේරාගැනීමට දීමට සිදුවිය.

(ii). 2005 සිට 2007 දක්වා තිබුණේ අපායේ ඉන්ටවල් එක” වැනි තත්ත්වයකි. යුද්දය ඇරඹුනොත් රටට අත්වෙන ඉරණම ගැන කිසිවෙකුට අදහසක් තිබුණේ නැත. එනිසා රජයේ බහුතර ප්‍රාග්ධන වියදම් වෙන් කෙරුණේ ජාතික ආරක්ෂාව වෙනුවෙනි.

(iii). අනික් අතට රජරට ප්‍රදේශය ආරක්ෂාව අතින් තිබුණේ දැඩි අවදානමක යි. එවැනි අවිනිශ්චිත තත්ත්වයකදී කිසිදු ආයෝජකයෙක් එම ප්‍රදේශ වල ආයෝජනය කිරීමට නොපැමිණෙනු ඇත.

(iv). මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතාගේ කථාවේ මුල් භාගය තුළදී ඔහු මෙසේ පැවසුවේය. 1930 කාලෙ ඉඳන් මොරගහකන්ද ගැන කතා කළේ… 1973 දී පළවෙන සක්‍යතා අධ්‍යයනය… චන්ද්‍රිකාගේ කාලෙදි කරන්නත් බැරි වුණා…. එතකොට කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍ය මෛත්‍රීපාලයි… පහුගිය අවුරුදු 50 ක කාලයේම දේශපාලන වේදිකාවල මොරගහකන්ද කළුගඟ ගැන කතා කළා.” එසේ අවුරුදු 50 ක් කල් ගත වූ මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා බලයට පැමිණ මහා යුද්දයක් තිබියදීත් වසරකින් ඇරඹීම ගැන කෘතවේදී විය යුතුය. ඒ වෙනුවට මොහු කරන්නේ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට අපහාස කිරීමයි.

(v). මහින්ද ආණ්ඩුව පැමිණ අවුරුදු 2 ක් යනකම් මේ කාර්යය ඉටු වුනේ නැහැ කීම පට්ට පල් බොරුවකි. ඇත්තනම් මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය සඳහා ඉඩම් අත් පත් කරගැනීම ඇරඹෙන්නේ 2006 දීය. (2007 දී පැවැතුණේ නිල වශයෙන් මුල් ගල් තැබීමයි). එනම් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා බලයට පැමිණ හරියටම අවුරුද්දෙන් මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඇරඹීය. මූලාශ්‍රය: 2006 වර්ෂයේ මුදල් අමත්‍යාංශයේ වාර්ෂික වාර්තාව , 65 පිටුව

පහත දැක්වෙන්නේ 2006 වර්ෂයේ මුදල් අමාත්‍යංශයේ වාර්ෂික වාර්තාවේ මුල් පිටුවේ මොරගහකන්ද ඉදිකිරීම් ගැන පළවූ පින්තූරයයි.

 

[2]. බොරුව: අවසානයේදී මගේ බේරිල්ලට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයා කිව්වා එහෙනම් පටන් ගන්න වෙන්නේ සල්ලි නැතිවයි” කියලා. මම කිව්වා කමක් නැහැ සර් සල්ලි නැතිව පටන් ගමු, පටන් ගත්තට පස්සෙ සල්ලි හොයාගමු” කියලා.

ඇත්ත: 2006 දී ලබාගත් ඉහත පින්තූරය බලන්න. මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා පවසන පරිදි සල්ලි නැතිව මොරගහකන්ද ඇරඹුනානම්, ඉහත දැක්වෙන ආකාරයට මොරගහකන්ද වේල්ල ගොඩ නගන්නේ පිනට විය යුතුය. ඩෝඩර් කරුවන්, බැකෝ කරුවන්, ඉංජිනේරුවන්, කම්කරු සහෝදරවරුන්, ඇතුළු කාර්ය මණ්ඩලය අතින් වියදම් කරගෙන ඉහත ඉදිකිරීම් ඇරඹුවා විය යුතුය. මුදල් නැතිව ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඇරඹුවා කියපු බොරුවේ තරම පැහැදිළියි නේද?

 

[3]. බොරුව: අවුරුදු 5 ක් යනකම් සල්ලි දුන්නෙ නෑ මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය කරන්න.

ඇත්ත: 2006 වර්ෂයේ මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශ වාර්ෂික වාර්තාවේ 169 පිටුවේ මෙසේ දැක්වෙයි.

ඉහත දැක්වෙන අයුරින් මොරගහකන්ද ජලාශය සඳහා ඉඩම් අත් පත් කරගෙන ජනතාව නැවත පදිංචි කිරීම සිදුකළේ 2006 දී ය. එම ව්‍යාපෘතීන් සඳහා මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා රු මිලියන 4600 ක් වෙන් කරන්නේ යුද්දයක් ඇරඹෙන්න ඔන්න මෙන්න තිබියදී ය. එතනින්ම සල්ලි දුන්නේ නැහැ කියන බොරුව මාට්ටු වෙයි.

 

[4]. බොරුව: 2007 ජනවාරි 25 වැට පටන් ගත්ත මේ ව්‍යාපෘතියේ වැඩ අවසන් වෙන්න තිබුණේ 2012 අවුරුද්දෙයි කියන එක මම මතක් කරන්න ඕන.

ඇත්ත: එම බොරුවට පිළිතුරු 2010 වර්ෂයේ මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශ වාර්ෂික වාර්තාවේ 75 පිටුවේ දැක්වෙයි.

ඒ අනුව මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය අවසන් වී එය විවෘත කරමින් රජරට ගොවීන්ට ජලය ලබා දීමට තිබුණේ 2016 වර්ෂයේදී ය. (පසුගිය දා සිදුවූයේ විවෘත කිරීම නොව නිදන් වස්තු තැන්පත් කිරීමයි).

 

[5]. බොරුව: 2012 අවසන් කරන්න තිබුණ වැඩේ දැන් 2018 ට කල් ගියේ අවුරුදු 5 කට වැඩි කාලයක් මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය කරන්න මුදල් නොලැබිච්ච හින්දයි, මුදල් නොදුන්න හින්දයි.

ඇත්ත:  මුදල් ලැබුණේ නෑ කීම බොරුවක් බවට අප මීට පෙර පෙන්වා දුන්නෙමු. එසේම 2010 වර්ෂයේ මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශ වාර්ෂික වාර්තාවේ 75 පිටුවේ දැක්වෙන පරිදි මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය අවසන් වීමට තිබුණේ 2016 වර්ෂයේ දී ය. 2015 දී බලයට පැමිණි යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාගෙන් පළි ගැනීම සඳහා එතුමා සිදුකරගෙන ගිය සියලුම සංවර්ධන ව්‍යාපෘතීන් නවතා දැමීය. මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය 2018 ට කල් යන්නේ එහි ප්‍රතිඵලයක් වශයෙනි. මොරගහකන්ද 2018 ට කල් යාමට යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව වග කිව යුතු වෙයි.

 

[7]. ගල් පැලෙන බොරු” යන වැකිය ඔබ අසා තිබෙනවා ඇත. පැරැන්නන් එය පැවසූයේ කට කහනවාට නොවේ. මොරගහකන්ද වේල්ලේ නිදන් ගලේ නිදන් වස්තු තැන්පත් කිරීමේ උත්සවයේදී ඉහත පට්ට පල් බොරු සියල්ල මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා පැවසූ අතර, පසුව බැකෝවක් වැදී නිදන් ගල ඉරි තලා ගොස් ඇත. මූලාශ්‍රය: දිවයින පුවත්පත /2016/08/07

 

[7]. මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට එරෙහිව මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා 2016 දී එසේ පැවසුවත්, 2014 දී පැවසුවේ මෙලෙසයි.

ඔබතුමා ආරම්භ කරපු මහා යෝධ සංවර්ධනය තුළ තව වසර 100 කට අවශ්‍ය වරායන් 5 ක් ඔබතුමා ඉදිකරලා තියෙනවා. ඒ වගේම නොරොච්චෝලේ කොත්මලේ කෙරවලපිටිය වැනි විදුලි බලාගාර ඉදි කරල තියෙනවා. ඔබතුමා මහා ජාතික වාරි පද්ධතියක් ඇති කරලා තියෙනවා. මොරගහකන්ද කළු ගඟ වැනි මහා යෝජනා, ඒ වගේම උමා ඔය දැදුරු ඔය වැනි යෝජනා ඔබතුමා ක්‍රියාත්මක කරලා තියෙනවා….” – සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන පවසයි

මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිතුමා ගැන තාමත් හරියට නොදන්නා අයට ඉහත වීඩියෝව නැරඹීමෙන් සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය සිරිසේනගේ හඬින්ම අසාගැනීමට හැකියාව ලැබේ.

තවත් අයටත් බලන්නට SHARE කරන්න.
  • 695

රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම බොරුවත් මාට්‍ටු. මුදල් වෙන් කළේ මහින්දගේ කාලයේදී බව රජයේ වෙබ් අඩවි වල දැක්වෙයි.

January 9th, 2018

www.mahinda.info

[1]. රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම හැදුවේ වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුවෙන් බවට ආණ්ඩුවේම දේශපාලඥයින් සහ ආණ්ඩුවට සහය දෙන ජනමාධ්‍ය වලින් නිතර පවසන්නකි. එහෙත් රජයේ නිල වෙබ් අඩවි වලින් රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම ආරම්භ කළේ සහ ඊට මුදල් වෙන් කළේ කුමන වකවානුවේදීදැයි නිශ්චිතව සොයා ගැනීමට මහින්ද ඉන්ෆො මාධ්‍ය අංශයට හැකි විය.

සැයු: පහත දැක්වෙන රජයේ වෙබ් අඩවි කිසිදු දේශපාලන පක්ෂයක වෙබ් අඩවි නොව මේ රටේ මහජනතාවට අයත් පොදු දේපලකි. රජයේ දේශපාලඥයින්ගෙන් කොතෙක් බලපෑම් ආවත්, මැතිවරණ කාලය තුලදී ජනතාවට දෙන තොරතුරු විකෘති කිරීම හෝ වසං කිරීම බරපතල වරදක් වන බැවින් ඒවායේ සිටින අපක්ෂපාතී නිලධාරීන් අදාල ලිපි ඉවත් නොකරන බව අප විශ්වාස කරමු. මේ වන විටත් එම ලිපි අන්තර්ජාලයේ ආකයිව් වෙබ් අඩවි ගණනාවක සංරක්ෂණය කර ඇත. එසේම රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලමේ ආරම්භය ගැන වාර්තා කරන සහෝදර ජනමාධ්‍ය ආයතන වලින් ආණ්ඩුවේ දේශපාලඥයින් කියන දේවල් වලට අමතරව පහත මූලාශ්‍ර වලින් පෙන්වා ඇති සත්‍යය ජනතාවට හෙළි කරනු ඇතැයි අප බලාපොරොත්තු වෙමු.

[2]. පහත දැක්වෙන්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩල කාර්යාල නිල වෙබ් අඩවියේ 2014-12-04 දින පළ වූ වාර්තාවකි. මෙම රජයේ වෙබ් අඩවියේ දැක්වෙන පරිදි අදාල රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම සෑදීමට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපති තුමා විසින්ම කැබිනට් යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කර කැබිනට් අනුමතිය ලබාගෙන ඇත. [ආකයිව් කළ මූලාශ්‍රය]

[3].පහත දැක්වෙන්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ විදේශ සම්පත් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිල වෙබ් අඩවියේ 2014 වර්ෂාවසාන කාර්යඵල වාර්තාවේ 42 පි‍ටුවේ උදෘතයකි. මෙහි දැක්වෙන පරිදි ස්පාඤ්ඤ රජය සහ ස්පාඤ්ඤයේ BBVA බැංකුව සංවර්ධන හවුල්කරුවන් වශයෙන් ගෙන රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම සෑදීමට යන සමස්ත පිරිවැය වන ඩොලර් මිලියන 49 ක් වෙන් කර ඇත.  [ආකයිව් කළ මූලාශ්‍රය]

ඒ අනුව වත්මන් යමපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ තවත් මෙගා බොරුවක් ඌරාගේ මාලු ඌරාගේ පිටේම තියලා කපන” න්‍යාය අනුව රජයේම නිල වෙබ් අඩවි වලින් මහින්ද ඉන්ෆො වෙතින් හෙළි කර තිබේ.

[4]. මුල් ගල් ගලවා දමා මහ මුහුදේ ගිල්ලුවද, අන්තර්ජාලයේ ඇති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ” නම සඳහන් සියලුම වාර්තා පීරමින් ඒවා ඉවත් කිරීමට කටයුතු කළද, මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපති තුමා ශ්‍රී ලංකාව වෙනුවෙන් කළ සේවය ජනතාවගේ හදවත් තුළින් වසන් කිරීමට ආණ්ඩුවට නොහැකි වී ඇත.

[5].මාවිල් ආරු වලින් පටන් ගත් මානුෂික මෙහෙයුම මගින් ලොව බිහිසුනුම ත්‍රස්තවාදය පරාජය කිරීමට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ රජයට ගතවූයේ දවස් 1027 පමණි. බලයට එනවිටත් සල්ලිත් වෙන් කර තිබූ රාජගිරිය ගුවන් පාලම ඉවර කරන්න යහපාලනයට දින 1095 ක් ගත වීමත්, එහි මුල් ගල් ගලවා දමා උප්පැන්නය වෙනස් කිරීමත් ගැන තීරණය කිරීම ඔබට බාරයි.

තවත් අයටත් බලන්නට SHARE කරන්න.

මහින්ද නිසා රට ණය වුණා ද? මෙන්න ආණ්ඩුවේම වාර්තා වලින් ඇත්ත.

January 9th, 2018

[1]. මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ කාලයේ රට ණය වුණ බවත් එනිසා එජාපයට සිදුවුණේ ණය ගෙවීම බවත් ආණ්ඩුවෙන් නිතර පවසන දෙයකි. මෙහි ඇත්ත නැත්ත පිළිබඳව ආණ්ඩුවේම මූලාශ්‍ර වලින් එනම් ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකු වාර්තාව ඇසුරෙන් සහ එජාප අමාත්‍ය රුවන් විජයවර්ධන පවුලට අයත් Financial Times” වෙතින් බලමු.


[මූලාශ්‍රය: Central Bank Annual Report – Special Statistical Appendix – 3.Fiscal Sector – Government Debt]


[මූලාශ්‍රය: Daily FT – 2017/10/11]

(i). ඉහත දැක්වෙන ආණ්ඩුවේම දත්ත අනුව,
2014 දෙසැම්බර් වෙද්දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ සම්පූර්ණ රාජ්‍ය ණය ප්‍රමාණය රුපියල් බිලියන 7391 කි.
2015 දෙසැම්බර් වෙද්දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ සම්පූර්ණ රාජ්‍ය ණය ප්‍රමාණය රුපියල් බිලියන 8503 කි.
2016 දෙසැම්බර් වෙද්දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ සම්පූර්ණ රාජ්‍ය ණය ප්‍රමාණය රුපියල් බිලියන 9387 කි.
2017 ජූලි වෙද්දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයේ සම්පූර්ණ රාජ්‍ය ණය ප්‍රමාණය රුපියල් බිලියන 10163 කි.

(ii). එනම් 2014 සිට 2017 ජූලි දක්වා එජාප ආණ්ඩු කාලයේදී රාජ්‍ය ණය රුපියල් බිලියන 2772 කින් වැඩි වී තිබේ.

(iii). මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපති තුමාගේ කාලයේදී ගත්ත ණය වත්මන් එජාප ආණ්ඩුවෙන් බේරුවානම් රටේ රාජ්‍ය ණය ප්‍රමාණය අඩු විය යුතුය. නමුත් සිදුවී ඇත්තේ වැඩි වීමකි. ඒ අනුව ආණ්ඩුවේ ණය බේරීම ගැන තීරණය කිරීම ඔබට බාරයි.

[2]. ආණ්ඩුවට තාමත් සහය දෙන අයෙකුගේ හෘද සාක්ෂිය දැන් මෙසේ කියනු ඇත. හරි අපි පිළිගන්නවා අපේ ඡන්ද ගන්න යහපාලකයින් පොරොන්දු වුණ විදිහට මේ ආණ්ඩුවෙන් ණය බේරලා නෑ. තව තවත් ණය ගත්ත එකයි වුණේ. ඒත් මහින්දගෙ කාලෙදිත් ණය වැඩි වුණා නේද? ඒ ගැන මොකද කියන්නේ?”

(i). ඕනෑම රජයකින් ලබා ගන්නා ණය වලින් රටට මොකද වුණේ කියල බැලීමේ ලොව පිළිගත් අන්තර්ජාතික ක්‍රමය වන්නේ රටේ ණය ප්‍රමාණය එරට දළ දේශීය නිශ්පාදිතයේ ප්‍රතිශතයක් ලෙස බැලීමයි. (debt-to-GDP ratio). එය උදාහරණයකින් කිවහොත් මිනිහෙක් රුපියල් 30,000ක් පඩි ගන්න කාලෙ ලක්ෂ 5 ක ණයක් ගැනීම සහ රුපියල් ලක්ෂ 2 ක් පඩි ගන්න කාලෙ ලක්ෂ 6 ක ණයක් ගැනීම වගේ. බැලූ බැල්මට ලක්ෂ 6 වැඩි උනාට ඒක ආපසු ගෙවීමේ හැකියාව වැඩියි තිස්දාහෙ පඩි ගන්න කාලෙ ගත්ත ලක්ෂ 5 වඩා. ඒ නිසා රටක් විදිහට ගත්තමත් ණය ආපසු ගෙවීමේ හැකියාවට සංසන්දනය වෙන්නෙ දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතට.

(ii). මේ ගැන ඔබට මහ බැංකු වාර්තාවෙන් ගණනය කළ හැකි වුවත් ඊටත් වඩා පහසුවෙන් ලොව පිළිගත් අන්තර්ජාතික ආර්ථික ප්‍රකාශන වෙබ් අඩවියක් වන tradingeconomics.com හි ඇති Sri Lanka Government Debt to GDP” වගුව බලමු.

(iii). එහි 2009 වසරේ රාජ්‍ය ණය දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයේ ප්‍රතිශතයක් ලෙස ඉහළ ගොස් ඇත්තේ විදේශ වලින් ලබා ගන්නා ණය වැඩි ප්‍රමාණයක් වැය වූයේ යුද්ධයට නිසයි. එනමුත් මානුෂික මෙහෙයුමෙන් පසුව මහින්ද යුගයේදී ණය ගත්ත ද රාජ්‍ය ණය දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයේ ප්‍රතිශතයක් ලෙස අඩු වූ ආකාරය ඔබට දැක ගත හැකි ය. එය වඩාත් හොඳින් බැලීමට එහි සම්පූර්ණ දත්ත අඩංගු වගුව බලමු.

(iv). හොඳින් බලන්න, එජාප සාම ගිවිසුම තිබුණ කාලයටත් වඩා මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා ලොව දරුණුතම ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානය සමග සටන් කරමින් රටේ ණය බර අඩු කර ගත්ත ආකාරය. එහෙත් 2015 සිට රටේ ණය බර නැවතත් ඉහළ යයි.

(v). මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපති තුමාගේ රජයෙන් ලබා ගත් ණය වලින් අධිවේගී මාර්ග, පරිගණක විද්‍යාගාර, වරාය, ගුවන්තො‍ටුපොළ, ජලාශ, විදුලි බලාගාර, නිවාස ආදිය ඉදි කරමින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට ආර්ථික වටිනාකමක් එකතු විය. නමුත් වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව මහ බැංකු නිකුත් කරමින් ගිණි පොළියට ගන්නා ණය වලින් ඔවුන්ට මිස රටට කරන දෙයක් නොමැත. ඉතින් ණය ප්‍රමාණය ඉහළ යනවාටත් අමතරව, රටේ දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදිතයේ ප්‍රතිශතයක් ලෙසත් ණය ඉහළ යයි.

මහින්ද නිසා රට ණය වුණා කියන අයට ඇත්තටම රට ණය වුණේ කුමන කාලවලදීදැයි මේ ලිපියේ අති මූලාශ්‍ර පෙන්වා පැහැදිළි කර දෙන්න.

Third anniversary of the incompetent government responsible for the worst debt crisis in Sri Lankan history

January 9th, 2018

Mahinda Rajapaksa Former President of Sri Lanka

On 9 January 2018, the so-called yahapalana government completes three years in office. During this short period they have created numerous crises running through virtually every sector in Sri Lanka. The main subject of public discussion today is the bond scam and the attempts being made by the yahapalana leaders to sweep it under the carpet. We are awaiting the release of the full report of the Bond Commission. The bond scam is only one of the many disasters brought upon this country by the yahapalana government. As this government marks its third anniversary, I wish to draw the attention of the public to another danger they have brought upon this country.

During the short period of 36 months that this government has been in power, they have borrowed over USD 14.6 billion in foreign currency loans alone, the breakdown of which would be as follows – USD 7.2 billion through the issue of Sri Lanka Development Bonds from January 2015 onwards, USD 3.6 billion from sovereign bonds issued in 2015 and 2017, USD 2.2 billion through currency swap arrangements with India in 2015 and 2016, USD 1.7 billion through syndicated loans arranged through several international banks in 2016 and 2017 and USD 1.5 billion from the IMF Extended Fund Facility in 2016. No previous government has borrowed so much money through foreign currency loans in such a short period of time.

Even though 14.6 billion USD would suffice to build five Norochcholai power plants, five Hambantota harbours with enough money being left over to build two more Southern Expressways, the yahapalana government has not built even a culvert with that money. I have made reference so far only to foreign currency loans. From January 2015 to date, the yahapalana government has borrowed well over Rs. 5.7 trillion in Rupee loans as well, through the issue of treasury bills and treasury bonds. The government commissioned the Moragahakanda project and opened the Rajagriya flyover to coincide with its third anniversary so as to answer the critics who say that the yahapalana government has not built anything tangible despite massive foreign borrowings. However, the Moragahakanda project was planned, financial allocations were made and construction commended under my government way back in 2007 in accordance with the 2005 Mahinda Chintana programme.  Likewise the Rajagiriya flyover was planned and money was allocated for its construction by my government. Cabinet approval was granted to call for bids to select contractors for the construction of the flyovers in Rajagiriya, Polgahawela and Ganemulla at the cabinet meeting held on 4 December 2014.

The yahapalana government has marked its third anniversary by claiming credit for projects for which money was allocated and started by the previous government. They came into power in 2015 claiming that there was a debt crisis in the country due to the loans taken by my government to build power plants, harbours, airports, expressways etcetera.  However the total cost of these major development projects were as follows: USD 1,350 million for all three phases of the Norochcholai power plant; USD 740 million for the Southern Expressway from Kottawa to Matara; USD 1,300 for phases I and II of the Hambantota harbour and its bunkering facility; USD 292 million for the Colombo-Katunayake expressway and USD 209 for the Mattala airport.

All these development projects put together cost less than USD 3.9 billion. The claim that the present government has been forced to borrow heavily to repay the project loans taken by my government is a complete lie. With the 14.6 billion USD in foreign currency loans that this government has borrowed up to now, the loans taken for all the above mentioned development projects could have been repaid four times over. The debt now being incurred is used to meet the day to day expenses of the yahapalana government and not to repay the project loans taken by my government. From January 2015, there was a massive and unplanned increase in government expenditure as a result of state funds being utilized to meet political objectives. The present debt crisis came about due to the yahapalana government borrowing heavily in Rupees and in foreign currency in order to meet this increased expenditure.

Foreign currency loans should always be taken with the utmost care. Since it is necessary to purchase foreign currency to repay such loans, even a slight change in the exchange rate can give rise to a massive increase in a country’s indebtedness. According to the 2015 and 2016 Central Bank reports, due to the depreciation in the value of the Rupee as a result of the economic downturn that took place after the yahapalana government took office, an extra Rs. 478 billion has been added to the national debt. It should be noted that the increase in the interest rate by about 50% due to the bond scam, has also added to the debt burden.

My government was always very careful in taking foreign currency loans. According to the Finance Ministry, the repayment of foreign loan installments plus interest during the period 2008-2014 was as follows:

2008 – USD 881 million

2009 – USD 1,041 million

2010 – USD 826 million

2011 – USD 971 million

2012 – USD 1,620 million

2013 – USD 1,160 million

2014 – USD 1,306 million

Since these are not unmanageable amounts, my government never had a problem with foreign loan repayments. The present crisis is entirely a creation of the yahapalana government. The foreign loan instalments and interest thereon that have to be paid after 2015 is as follows:

2015 –  USD 1,828 million

2016 – USD 1,604 million

2017 –  USD 2,132 million

2018 –  USD 2,891 million

2019 –  USD 4,217 million

2020 –  USD 3,699 million

2021 –  USD 3,344 million

2022 –  USD 3,743 million

2023 –  USD 2,120 million

2024 –  USD 2,067 million

2025 – USD 4,155 million

2026 – USD 2,758 million

2027 – USD 3,448 million

These figures amply explain the difference before and after the change of government in 2015. The immediate increase in repayments from 2015 onwards is due to the huge short term commercial loans taken by the yahapalana government to be repaid in a few months or one or two years. What Sri Lanka experienced in 2015 was a borrowing frenzy. Central Bank records indicate that before the yahapalana government came into power, Sri Lanka Development Bonds were issued only twice a year with the amount borrowed per year not averaging even USD 350 million between 2010 and 2014. It should be borne in mind that this was at the height of the biggest infrastructure building programme in recent history. But in the year 2015 without a single new infrastructure project being initiated, the yahapalana government issued Sri Lanka Development Bonds on no less than nine occasions. The number of SLDB issues made in 2016 were six, with four being made in 2017.

The government has now obtained cabinet approval to borrow a further USD 5 billion in foreign currency commercial loans in 2018 as well. In order to repay these loans taken for consumption purposes, the government has increased the tax burden on the people to an unbearable level by increasing the VAT, vehicle import duties, commodity import taxes, various levies and fines and stamp duties etcetera. From April 2018 onwards, the government will commence a programme to bring virtually every adult in the country into the income tax net.

Since the massive loans taken by the yahapalana government cannot be repaid simply by increasing taxes, they have now started selling off all available national assets ranging from government owned hotels to harbours, expressways to power plants. Though the government claims that the Hambantota port was sold off because the loan taken to build it could not be repaid, the proceeds of the sale have not been used to repay the project loan but is to be sent instead to the Treasury to be spent on consumption – which reveals the actual motive in selling off these assets. Since the Hambantota harbour was built with long term loans at concessionary rates of interest, the government is in no hurry to repay the loan taken to build it.

However there is an urgent need to repay the short term foreign currency commercial loans taken by this government for consumption purposes even if the payment has to be made with the money realised through the sale of national assets. If such commitments are not met on time, Sri Lanka will get locked out of the international financial markets. I request all voters to use the opportunity that will come their way on 10 February to register their protest at the disaster brought upon the financial system of this country by this corrupt, incompetent government.

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Former President of Sri Lanka

ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ දරුණුම ණය අර්බුදය ඇතිකළ වැඩබැරි  ආණ්ඩුවේ තුන්වෙනි සංවත්සරය

January 9th, 2018

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හිටපු ජනාධිපති

2018 ජනවාරි 9 වෙනිදා, ඊනියා යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව බලයට පත්වී අවුරුදු තුනක් සම්පූර්ණ වේ. මේ කෙටි කාලය තුළ මොවුන් ලංකාවේ සෑම ක්‍ෂේත්‍රයක් පුරාම දිවයන දැවැන්ත අර්බුද ගණනාවක්ම නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. මේ මොහොතේ සාකච්ඡා වෙන ප්‍රධානම මාතෘකාව වන්නේ මහ බැංකු මංකොල්ලය හා එය යට ගැසීමට ආණ්ඩුවේ නායකයන් ගන්නා උත්සාහයයි. බැඳුම්කර කොමිසමේ සම්පූර්ණ වාර්තාව එළි දක්වන තුරු අපි බලා සිටිමු. මහ බැංකු මංකොල්ලය මේ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් කරන ලද එක් විනාශයක් පමණි. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ තුන්වෙනි සංවත්සරය නිමිත්තෙන් ඔවුන් මේ රටට කර ඇති තවත්  භයානක වින්නැහියක් ගැන ජනතාවගේ අවධානය යොමු කිරීමට කැමැත්තෙමි.

මේ ආණ්ඩුව බලය හොබවා ඇති මාස 36 ක කෙටි කාලය  ඇතුළත ඔවුන් ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් බිලියන 14.6 ක් විදෙස් විනිමය ණය වලින් පමණක් ලබාගෙන ඇත. මෙය, ගත වූ අවුරුදු තුන පුරාම නිකුත් කරන ලද ශ්‍රී ලංකා සංවර්ධන බැඳුම්කර වලින් ලබාගත් ඇ.ඩො.බිලියන 7.2 ක මුදල,  2015 හා 2017 නිකුත් කරන ලද සවරින් බොන්ඩ් වලින් ලබාගත්  ඇ.ඩො.බිලියන 3.6 ක මුදල, 2016 හා 2017 ජාත්‍යන්තර බැංකු ගණනාවක මැදිහත් වීමෙන් ලබාගත් ඇ.ඩො. බිලියන 1.7 ක සින්ඩිකේටඩ් ලෝන් මුදල, 2015 හා 2016 ඉන්දියාවෙන් ලබාගත් ඇ.ඩො.බිලියන 2.2 ක කරන්සි ස්වප් ණය, හා ජාත්‍යන්තර මූල්‍ය අරමුදලෙන් 2016 දී ලබාගත් ඇ.ඩො.බිලියන 1.5 ක ණය වශයෙන් වෙන්කොට පෙන්විය හැක. මෙවැනි කෙටි කාලයක් තුළ වෙනත් කිසිම ආණ්ඩුවක් මේ තරම් විශාල විදෙස් විනිමය ණය ප්‍රමාණයක් ලබාගෙන නැත.

ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් බිලියන 14.6 ක් වැනි මුදල් කණ්දරාවකින් නොරොච්චෝලේ ගල් අඟුරු බලාගාර පහක් හා හම්බන්තොට වරායවල් පහක් ඉදිකොට තවත් දක්‍ෂිණ අධිවේගී මාර්ග දෙකක් ඉදි කිරීමට මුදල් ඉතුරු කරගත හැකි වුවත්, යහපාලකයන් එම මුදලෙන් බෝක්කුවක්වත් ඉදිකර නැත. මා ඉහත සඳහන් කලේ, විදෙස් විනිමයෙන් ලබාගත් ණය පමණි. 2015 ජනවාරියේ සිට මේ දක්වා ආණ්ඩුව භාණ්ඩාගාර බිල්පත් හා භාණ්ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර නිකුත් කිරීමෙන් රුපියල් ණය බිලියන 5,706 ක්ද  ලබාගෙන ඇත.

මහා පරිමානයෙන් විදෙස් ණය ලබාගත්තද එයින් බෝක්කුවක්වත් ඉදිකර නැතැයි යන චෝදනාවෙන් බේරීමට, යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ තුන්වෙනි සංවත්සරයට සමගාමීව  මොරගහකන්ද ජලාශයත්, රාජගිරියේ ගුවන් පාලමත් විවෘත කිරීමට යොදාගත්තද, 2005 මහින්ද චින්තන වැඩ පිළිවෙලට අනුව යමින් මොරගහකන්ද ජලාශය ඉදිකිරීමට පටන්ගත්තේ මගේ ආණ්ඩුව සමයේය. එහි සැලසුම්, මුදල් වෙන් කිරීම, යනාදිය නිමකොට ඉදිකිරීම් ආරම්භ කරනු ලැබුවේ 2007 වසර සිටය. රාජගිරියේ ගුවන් පාලම සඳහාද සැලසුම් හා මුදල් වෙන් කිරීම සිදුකරනු ලැබුවේ මගේ ආණ්ඩුව කාලයේය. රාජගිරියේ ගුවන් පාලමත්, පොල්ගහවෙල හා ගනේමුල්ල ගුවන් පාලම් දෙකත්, ඉඳිකිරීමට ලන්සු කැඳවා කොන්ත්‍රාත්කරුවන් තේරීම ආරම්භ කිරීමට කැබිනට් අනුමැතිය ලැබුණේ 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 4 වෙනිදා කැබිනට් රැස්වීමේදීය. මේ ආණ්ඩුව තම තුන්වෙනි සංවත්සරය සමරන්නේද අනුන්ගේ ව්‍යාපෘති වලට තමන්ගේ නම දාගැනීමෙන් බව මෙහිදී කිව යුතුය.

යහපාලකයන් බලයට පැමිණියේ, මගේ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ඉඳි කරන ලද විදුලි බලාගාර, වරායවල්, ගුවන් තොටුපොලවල්, අධිවේගී මාර්ග යනාදිය සඳහා ගන්නා ලද ණය නිසා රටේ ණය අර්බුදයක් පවතින බව කියමිනි. නමුත් මේ විශාල ව්‍යාපෘති සඳහා සැබවින්ම වැය වූ මුලු මුදල වූයේ නොරොච්චෝලේ විදුලි බලාගාරයේ සියලුම අදියර සඳහා – ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 1,350; කොට්ටාව සිට මාතර දක්වා දක්‍ෂිණ අධිවේගී මාර්ගය සඳහා – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 740; හම්බන්තොට වරායේ අදියර දෙක හා තෙල් ටැංකි සංකීර්ණයද සඳහා – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,300; කොළඹ – කටුණායක අධිවේගී මාර්ගය සඳහා – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 292; හා මත්තල ගුවන් තොටුපොල සඳහා – ඇ.ඩො මිලියන 209 වශයෙනි.

ඉහත සඳහන් සියලුම මහාපරිමාන ව්‍යාපෘති සදහා වැයවූ සමස්ත වියදම ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 3,900 කටත් අඩුය. මගේ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ලබාගත් ව්‍යාපෘති ණය ගෙවීම සඳහා යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව ණය ගනිමින් සිටින බව කීම අමූලික බොරුවකි. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව මෙතෙක් ලබාගෙන ඇති ඩොලර් බිලියන 14.6 න්, මම ඉහත නම් කරන ලද සියලුම ව්‍යාපෘති සඳහා ගිය මුලු වියදම සිවු වතාවක් ගෙවා නිම කල හැක. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව ගන්නා ණය වලින් කරන්නේ මගේ ආණ්ඩුවේ ව්‍යාපෘති ණය ගෙවීම නොව ආණ්ඩුවේ එදිනෙදා වියදම් පියවා ගැනීමයි. 2015 ජනවාරියේ සිට, රජයේ මුදල් දේශපාලන අරමුණු ඉටු කර ගැනීමට පාවිච්චි කිරීම නිසා  කිසිඳු සැලසුම් කිරීමකින් තොරව එක්වරම රජයේ වියදම් විශාල වශයෙන් වැඩිවිය. මේ අමතර වියදම පියවා ගැනීම සඳහා යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව රුපියල් වලින් මෙන්ම විදෙස් විනිමයෙන්ද දිගට හරහට වානිජ ණය ලබාගැනීම නිසා වර්තමාන ණය අර්බුදය නිර්මාණය විය.

විදෙස් ණය ලබාගත යුත්තේ ඉතාමත්ම ප්‍රවේසමෙනි. මේ ණය ගෙවීම සඳහා විදෙස් විනිමය මිලදී ගැනීමට සිදුවන නිසා විනිමය අනුපාතයේ සුලු වෙනසකින්වුවද ණය බර විශාල වශයෙන් වෙනස් විය හැක. 2015 හා 2016 මහබැංකු වාර්තාවලට අනුව යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව බලය ගැනීමෙන් පසු ඇති වූ ආර්ථික බිඳවැටීම නිසා රුපියල බාල්දු වීම හේතුවෙන් පමණක් ලංකාවේ ණය බරට තවත් රුපියල් බිලියන 478 ක් එකතු  වී ඇත. බැඳුම්කර මඟඩිය හේතුවෙන් 2015 මුල සිට ලංකාවේ පොළී අනුපාතය 50% කින් පමණ වැඩිවීම නිසාද ආණ්ඩුවේ ණයබර තවත් වැඩි වූ බවද මෙහිදී අප මතක තබාගත යුතුය. මගේ ආණ්ඩුව විදෙස්  ණය ලබා ගත්තේ ඉතාමත්ම ප්‍රවේසමෙනි. මුදල් අමාත්‍යංශයේ වාර්ථා වලට අනුව 2008 සිට 2014 දක්වා විදෙස් ණය වාරික හා පොලී ආපසු ගෙවීම් පහත සඳහන් ආකාරයට විය.

2008 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන  881

2009 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,041

2010 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 826

2011 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 971

2012 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,620

2013 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,160

2014 – ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,306

මේවා ගෙවා ගැනීමට නොහැකි තරම් විශාල ගණන් නොවන නිසා ආපසු ගෙවීම් පිළිබඳ කිසිඳු ප්‍රශ්ණයක් මගේ ආණ්ඩුවට තිබුණේ නැත. වර්ථමාන ණය අර්බුදය සහමුලින්ම යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ නිර්මාණයකි. 2015 සිට ඉදිරියට අපට ගෙවීමට සිදුවන විදෙස් ණය හා පොළිය පහත දැක්වෙන ආකාරයට වෙයි.

2015 –  ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 1,828

2016 – ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 1,604

2017 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 2,132

2018 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 2,891

2019 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 4,217

2020 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 3,699

2021 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 3,344

2022 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 3,743

2023 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 2,120

2024 –  ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 2,067

2025 – ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 4,155

2026 – ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 2,758

2027 – ඇ.ඩො.මිලියන 3,448

ආණ්ඩු වෙනසට පෙර තිබූ තත්වයත් ඊට පසුව ඇති වූ තත්වයත් ඉහත දක්වන ලද සංඛ්‍යා දත්ත වලින් පැහැදිලි වනු ඇත. 2015 සිටම ණය ගෙවීම් වැඩිවන්නේ මාස කිහිපයකින් මෙන්ම අවුරුද්දකින් දෙකකින් ආපසු ගෙවීමට සිදුවෙන කෙටි කාලීන විදෙස් විනිමය වානිජ ණය විශාල වශයෙන් ලබාගැනීම නිසාය.

2015 දී ශ්‍රී ලංකාව අත්දුටුවේ ණය ගැනීමේ වියරුවකි. මහ බැංකුවේ නිල වාර්තා වලින් පෙන්වා දෙන පිරිදි යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව බලයට පැමිණීමට පෙර ශ්‍රී ලංකා සංවර්ධන බැඳුම්කර නිකුත් කරනු ලැබුවේ වසරකට දෙවතාවක් පමණි. එලෙස සිදුකරන ලද නිකුත් කිරීම් වලින්ද 2010 – 2014 යන කාලපරිච්ඡේදය ඇතුලත වසරකට ඩොලර් මිලියන 350 ක් වත් මගේ ආණ්ඩුව ලබාගෙන නැත. ඒ මෑත ඉතිහාසයේ ආණ්ඩුවක් විසින් සිදුකරන ලද දැවැන්තම ඉදිකිරීම් වැඩසටහනක් ක්‍රියාත්මකව  තිබියදී බවත් මතක තබා ගත යුතුය.

නමුත් 2015 වසරේදී කිසිඳු නව ඉදිකිරීම් ව්‍යාපෘතියක් ආරම්භ නොකර වුවද යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව අවස්ථා 9 කදී ශ්‍රී ලංකා සංවර්ධන බැඳුම්කර නිකුත්කොට ඇත. 2016 දී 6 වතාවකදීද 2017 දී සිව් වතාවකදී ද ශ්‍රී ලංකා සංවර්ධන බැඳුම්කර නිකුත්කොට ඇත.   තත්වය මෙසේ තිබියදී 2018 වසර සඳහාද වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව තවත් ඩොලර් මිලියන 5,000 ක විදෙස් විනිමය වානිජ ණය ගැනීමට කැබිනට් අනුමැතිය ලබාගෙන  ඇත. පරිභෝජනයට පමණක් ලබාගෙන තිබෙන මේ ණය ගෙවීමට ආණ්ඩුව  ජනතාවට දරාගත නොහැකි ආකාරයට වැට් බදු, වාහන බදු, භාණ්ඩ ආනයන බදු, දඩ මුදල්, රජයේ මුද්දර ගාස්තු යනාදිය වැඩි කර තිබෙන අතර, 2018 අප්‍රේල් මාසයේ සිට, මුලු ජනගහනයම ආදායම් බදු දැළ තුළට ගැනීමටද සැලසුම් කර ඇත.    

රටේ ජනතාව මත බදු අය කිරීමෙන් පමණක් යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව ලබාගෙන තිබෙන ණය කන්දරාව ගෙවීමට නොහැකි නිසා ඔවුන් රජයට අයත් හෝටල් ව්‍යාපෘති වල සිට, වරායවල්, අධිවේගී මාර්ග, විදුලි බලාගාර ඇතුලු සියලුම ජාතික සම්පත් විකුණා දැමීමේ ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයකට අවතීර්ණ වී ඇත. හම්බන්තොට වරාය විකුණා දැමුවේ එය තැනීමට ගත් ණය ගෙවීමට නොහැකි නිසා යැයි ආණ්ඩුව කීවද, වරාය විකිණීමෙන් ලැබුණු මුදල් අදාල ණය ගෙවීමට නොව පරිභෝජනය සඳහා වැය කිරීමට මහා භාණ්ඩාගාරයට යොමු කර තිබීමෙන් ආණ්ඩුවේ සැබෑ අරමුණ පැහැදිලි වේ. හම්බන්තොට වරාය ඉදිකිරීමට ගනු ලැබුවේ සහනදායි පොළියට දිගුකාලීන ණය නිසා එය ගෙවා දැමීමට ආණ්ඩුවට කිසිදු හදිස්සියක් නැත.

නමුත් වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව ගිනි පොළියට ගත් කෙටි කාලීන වානිජ  ණය ජනතා දේපොල විකුණා ලබාගන්නා මුදල් වලින් හෝ ගෙවීමට පැහැදිලි හදිසියක් ඇත. ඒවා නොගෙව්වොත් සිදුවන්නේ ලංකාවට ලෝක මූල්‍ය වෙළඳපොලේ දොර වැසී යාමයි.   අන්ත දූෂිත, වැඩබැරි ආණ්ඩුව රටේ මූල්‍ය කළමණාකරනයට කළ මේ විනාශයට විරෝධය පෑමට පෙබරවාරි 10 වෙනිදා ලැබෙන අවස්ථාව උපයෝගී කර ගන්නා මෙන් මම සියලුම ඡන්ද දායකයන්ගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමි.

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හිටපු ජනාධිපති


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress